WEBVTT - Listener Mail Roundup #1

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says, wait a minute,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Mr Post, ma'am. I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi there, Lauren, Hi, Joe, Hi, Jonathan, Hi, Joe, Hi, Lauren, Hi, Jonathan, Hi, Noel.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, good, we got everybody. Now, Hi, how are

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you doing today? Really well, well, today, I'm very excited

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna be talking about some listener requested topics.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But we've really had a lot of listener requests piling

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>up lately. Yeah, which is fantastic. Guy, We really appreciate it.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So we love it. We're not complaining, but they're they're

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>only piling because you're so fabulous. Yes, and we can

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>only record and published two episodes a week. But so

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>today we thought, you know what we should do, We

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>should do a listener mail roundup episode. Now. Unfortunately, even

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, we're not going to be able to

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>get to every one of the things you all have

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>sent us that we want to talk about, but we

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pick some of the topics that could be

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>addressed in a slightly shorter form and uh and take

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>them on all at once, and some of these may

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>eventually become part of an episode where we take a

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>deeper dive into these, but a lot of the questions

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>seem like they would have a fairly quick answer that

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't justify a full length episode, which is why we

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of grouped them together. They're they're not grouped by

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>any sort of theme either, because you'll see as we

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>go on, it's kind of all over the place, which

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is cool. Yeah. Yeah, So our first listener suggestion that

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to get to today actually came to us

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on our Facebook while it was our listener Ed who

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>asked us about the future of media delivery, and Ed

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>said podcast idea, I want my MP three or LP

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>or v O D. I think that's and I want

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>my MTV joke for the kids who don't remember dire

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Straits or just MTV. Right. Ed goes on, how will

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we be listening to or getting our music, watching movies,

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reading books and magazines and newspapers in the future. Well,

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a great question. It is it's

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic question, and it's one that I mean, if

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I were. If I were being snarky, I would just

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>say streaming and move on, because I think that that's

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>really the the answer to a lot of this, and

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's an answer that's being pushed partly by consumer behavior

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and partly because it's a very attractive model for companies. Sure, well,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got the resources in place, don't we. I mean

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>now that now that high speed internet is becoming the norm,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>at least in some parts of the world, and more

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and more of the world long term, it's kind of

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue against the power of streaming. Well, you

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have so much access and it takes up so little space,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>right that. I mean, it wasn't that long ago that

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>WiFi was really the speed you would need in order

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to get decent streaming experience, right otherwise it was going

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a very low quality stream or you're gonna buffer.

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I remember the days of trying to

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>listen to something on streaming and get twenty seconds in

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly the song stops, and you wait another

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds, then another twenty seconds of music plays. But

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>now now we've gotten too speeds of WiFi, we've gotten

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>better speeds of of cellular service, and we've gotten better

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>compression uh models for streaming media to allow that to

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>happen where we don't have as frequent an issue with

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>buffering still happens once in a blue moon. It happens

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on my my connection at home, which is pretty fast.

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But well, I mean, you know, you've got to have

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that trifecta of a device that can handle it, right,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>connection that can handle it, and the actual service. Yeah,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you don't have if one of those

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>three things is deficient, you're gonna have a poor experience.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're we've reached the point where the norm is

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can have this pretty seamlessly. Like my my phone.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Now I can use my phone, uh pretty much anywhere

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, uh streaming a podcast, so I don't have

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to download an episode anymore. I can just stream it

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and it cash is enough of the podcast in local

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>memory so that if I do pass through an area

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that has uh, you know, weak service, Like you know,

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I often take the train. In the train here in Atlanta,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there's above ground sections and below ground, so sometimes when

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you go below ground, you lose that connection, but the

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>CASH corrects for that, right, it has enough in the

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>buffer so that I can keep listening without having that interruption.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that because the technology has reached this point,

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>streaming is really where a lot of this is going.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It also means that we can listen or watch stuff

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>when we feel like it. You know, we we we can.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of those UH services also allow us

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to stop at one point and pick up at that

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>same point even as we switch devices. So if we

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>go from TV to phone or tablet or whatever. Yeah,

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree that digital playback is going to pretty much dominate.

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be king. I can't really see that

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>changing for any good reason except for the sort of

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>small scale collector aspect. I personally, I listen to records

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at my house sometimes, and I don't know why. I

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>guess it's just fun. It can be fun to go

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>record shopping, to put a record on the turntable. There's

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>something aesthetically pleasing about it. It's a fun activity. But

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I'd say most of my listening I do digitally, whether

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that's podcasts or I mean obviously for podcasts, but h

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or music. Most of the movies I see now, I

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think come to me in a digital form. And I

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know do you'll think there's any reason that we'd

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>see a major comeback of physical media for say music playback. Nope,

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>m hm m m. I mean yeah, yeah, there's that

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that nest Alga factor and and that esthetic pleasure that

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you get from I mean, cassette tapes are a thing again?

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Are they really a thing again? Are they? I mean,

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean I know that I know that there was

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the the marketing gimmick of the Guardians of the Galaxy

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>soundtrack coming back out on cassette? Are cassettes really coming back? Bands, like,

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 1>like smaller local bands are releasing some of their albums

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on cassette tape? You have to there's still there's still

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>still electronics companies selling cassette tape players. You've got some

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>blood running down your force. Well, I mean, I'm just like,

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I'm like, look, guys, we're better than that now.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I've left those days behind. Cassettes are not great media formats, yeah,

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're fun. Come on stick and a lot of

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of older cars do still have cassette decks.

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess, so yeah, I can understand. I do agree

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>that it's a lot easier to form kind of that

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>emotional attached meant to uh to something when there's a

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>physical representation of that thing, Right, Like I have a

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>vinyl record collection, and there is a particular feeling I

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>get when I pull an album out of that collection,

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>put it on a turntable and listen to it. The

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>ritual of it is kind of lovely, exactly. Yeah, there

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is a ritual that's associated with it that's very comforting,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's all part of the experience which you can't

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can't really place a quantitative value on,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly. Yeah, I never get that warm fuzzy

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>when I like open iTunes, yeah, exactly. Yeah, when I

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>when I open up my my Google radio playlist that's

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>based off the album that I really love. Yeah, I mean,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same thing. So I don't want to

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to dismiss the the value of physical media,

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think that because there is the incentive on

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the part of the media company, these two maximize profits,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>which you certainly can do if you don't have to

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>have a physical presence anywhere. You know, you don't have

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to create inventory, you don't have to have a place

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to move that inventory, you don't have to worry about

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>inventory loss. If someone steals your physical stuff and you

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>can no longer sell it. I can see a lot

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of reasons why companies would shy away from it, and

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this could become something that we see more on a

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>special case by case basis, as UH entities, whether it's

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>an author or a band or whatever, are catering to

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>their audience. One way I do see this changing though,

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is that I think laser discs are going to come

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>back in a big way. I think capacity and electronic

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>discs are going to come back in a big way

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the future. When you want to watch Terminator two,

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get out that laser disc and you're gonna

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>flip it halfway through the movie. Yeah, I agree with

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ancestors exactly. No. Actually, one thing I do want to

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>say that I feel pretty strongly about out the future

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of audio playback is actually about the devices we use themselves.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to continue to see a decoupling

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of the audio reading device from the actual device that

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>produces the sound. So, for example, this this exists today.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You can get pretty good Bluetooth speakers or Bluetooth headphones,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>so you stream audio from the Internet on your phone

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or your laptop or your TV, and then you listen

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to that audio through whichever speaker system phone connects to

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a speaker system, and yeah, you seek to your player,

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the headphones, the whole speaker system, and you know, that's

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>bye bye to the earbuds with the chords. I think

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to become pretty universal. Sure. I mean, I

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>have a I have a pair of I have a

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Bluetooth headset that's meant for music and podcasts, that sort

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing that uses bone conduction as well, so it's

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>not even over the ear, but it also doesn't have

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to doesn't have a chord or anything. I definitely see

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that trend continuing. Oh sure, sure. Uh you know, I

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think as the technology improves, probably your big clunky headset

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>or small, sexy, slim headset will be the device that

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is streaming the media directly. Uh yeah, And I just

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>see generally more ease of interconnectivity. So like as we

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have the Internet of Things entering our homes, more devices

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>will be the sort of the digital basis of playback,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you can sink them to whatever kind of

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>thing it is that's making the actual noise. Well yeah, again,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this this kind of comes back to the idea of

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's use Netflix as an example, where if I'm

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>watching I'm logged into my Netflix account, and I'm watching

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Netflix on my phone, and then I go into my

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>house and I want to turn on that same movie

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>using a set top boxes connected there that's logged into

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>my account as well. So when I started, it picks

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>up where I left off on my phone. This uninterrupted

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>experience is also something I see continuing in to the future. Uh.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing to me is that if you had

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>asked me, maybe I don't know, five or six years ago,

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought that the standalone MP three player

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>would still remain king because back back then streaming was

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>not really the method you would download, and so you

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>would keep everything on the memory of the device itself

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of it being cloud based. And I would have said,

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this is how it's going to continue for the foreseeable future.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, for the longest time I carried an

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>MP three player and a phone because I didn't want

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to clog up my phone's memory with media. I still

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do have an MP three player in a phone. I've graduated.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I only go phone now because I use this streaming method,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not filling up my memory, the cash fills

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>up so that if I do lose that connectivity, I

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>can continue enjoying whatever it is I'm I'm listening to her,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>watching or reading. But it's not it's not that I

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>need to have a phone with practically end less amounts

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of storage because that storage isn't needed anymore. Yeah, yeah,

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think that in general across media or going

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue to see like you know, mid sized portable devices,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a tablet or a mini tablet or um tablet. Yeah,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that's what. I have very large buttons on your coat

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that that can play movies back to you. I don't know,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>um that that are right, that that are capable of

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>handling both music and video and and books and etcetera,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, doing the streaming thing. I don't know. Like,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like I wonder, I wonder whether at a certain point

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>when if like memory will become cheap enough that people

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>will return to I mean, it depends if the if

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the service ends up being so seamless that it's not necessary.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be a thing, but

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they're always going to be times at least that I

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can see where you are going to want to have

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>things stored directly on the advice itself. For example, if

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you take a flight somewhere and you don't want to

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>spring for WiFi on the flight. Plus, WiFi on flights

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is never at the speed that here, and I think

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that that's a that that's a point like like right now, um,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cellular service isn't available everywhere, WiFi can be spotty, you

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for them in in many contexts, and

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>so therefore streaming isn't quite ready. It's not to go

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>not supers totally seamless. It all depends on where you look.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're in a city like Atlanta or San

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Francisco or New York, it's probably pretty good, but that's

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not universal. Yeah. I would also add to that access

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>anxiety if you're interested in something that is perhaps obscure,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>something you're not sure is going to continue to be

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>provided by Netflix or whatever. You know, that's a good point,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, you know, I don't know if this

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>movie is still going to be on Netflix in a

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>year when I want to watch it again, I'd rather

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just own the Blu Ray, right. I mean, if Tammy

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and the t Rex goes away, I don't know what

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do me there, and uh, what about what

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about books? Right? Right? So, I think that more reading

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be done digitally as prices on reading

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>devices electronic reading devices drop, and I I suspect that

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in parallel, print prices are going to rise as printing

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>runs get smaller as a result. I see, so you're

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking of because the the market is moving more digital,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the the potential market for actual physical books is getting smaller.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That drives the prices up because you can no longer

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>print in the volumes that you would before and expect

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a decent return on that investment. Right. The other way

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of looking at that is that they just keep the

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>prices the same by cutting costs, and there will be

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>more typos in your print books now editor free. I'm sorry,

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we only hired a copy editor for the digital version

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of Lauren. I liked your book, but the main character's

0:14:55.800 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>name changed like six times. That was part of the point. John, Uh,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>these modern novels. I'm actually I'm in thinking about this.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I got the sudden moment of of worry that, um,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>some people might start to get priced out of easy

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>access to print media due to the fact that, um,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, from an entry standpoint, a paperback is a

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lot cheaper than a kindle and probably will continue to be.

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Um even though you know, obviously getting a kindle at

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>having basically unlimited access to a lot of books for

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>very cheap or even free in the case of classics. UM. Well,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and I love I love the move to electronic media

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for another reason. It also gives us access to books

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that otherwise have passed out of print. They're not in

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the public domain. You still have to buy them. But

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm the son of an author. My dad has a

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>horror novel that came out in the eighties and it's

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>my favorite book that my dad ever wrote. I love it.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's not available in physical format anymore. But you

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>can get it electronically, and that's something that I love.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It means that people can have access to works that

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason from the publishers standpoint to produce more. Yeah,

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough, there's not a large enough market to justify.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But electronically you can have anything out there. Yes, yes,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that is truly wonderful. Um And I wonder,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder whether for like the generation being born right now,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>literally right now, I salute you, um when when you're

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all about to listen to this, you'll appreciate that. Yeah,

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what weather for them? Paper books and like paper printed

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>magazines and newspapers are going to become a nostalgic, uh nostalgic.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say fetish, but but but but

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like a nostalgic uh like like like like an anachronism

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like tape or a vinyl record. Yeah. Yeah,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>if reading something on paper is going to be like, oh,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I just love the ritual of opening a book. You know,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is I'm just far too technophobic, I guess

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about technology all the time. I do

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>admit I have a perhaps old and preference for paper books.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a tablet, but I don't think I

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>would really like to read a book length literary work

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on one. I can. I'll read articles on the internet

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and stuff I I I gotta. I got one of

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the touchscreen kindles at some point, and I actually really

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>like it. I but but I also did get the

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of case for it. It's like made of wood

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and leather, and so you open it and you kind

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of feel like you're opening a book. Um, well, maybe

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I just need to get with the times. I will

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>say that the move to digital formats for books also

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>means that we'll have fewer head scratching lee odd moments

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 1>in movies like have you guys heard about the scene

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the j LO film Boy next Door where the

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>boy next Door hands her a quote first edition of

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Iliad end quote? Well, hey, there have been lots

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of first editions of the Iliad. That's the problem is

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>that just like they're joking that it's this it's this

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>valuable thing, or it should have been a blind poet,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it should have been exactly just starts reciting in Greek.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>The first edition is the first time it's fixed intangible medium. Well,

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we go back into the brain waves

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thing anyway, that's that's neither here nor there. But I

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>think I think it was great question. It was It

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. Um. I do think that streaming, for at

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>least the foreseeable feature is going to be the way

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to go. Maybe we'll eventually get to a point where

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>things will get beamed directly into our brains and we

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>will experience them instantaneously in their entirety. I hope. So

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be such a time, It would really I

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>could get through all of those books that are on

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>my list in like no time flat. Yeah. Well, thanks

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for your question, ed. I think now we're going to

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>move on to an email we got from our listener

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Jude about geothermal energy and space coordinates. So Jude says, hi, there, hey, Jude, Hey,

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>oh no, I see what you did there. Go ahead,

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Jude says, hi there, I've been listening to your audio podcast.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>You guys are doing a great job. Thanks to that

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>warms my my cold heart. Yes, uh, part is very

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>warm Jack. Well, okay, sorry, back to the email. Can

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you please cover the following topics. We all know Earth's

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>core is molten rock and must be a source of

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>massive untapped energy. Has anyone attempted to harness Earth's geo

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>thermal energy? And how do astronomers navigating the cosmos or

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>refer to a star object in space? Is their GPS

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>equivalent in space? Thanks a lot from Jude in Bangalore.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to take these in turn. We'll start

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>with geo thermal So, first of all, geo thermal energy

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is a thing, obviously something that we we harness. It

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't involve tapping into the Earth's core directly, although as

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>you'll see, there's kind of an indirect long tail version

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of tapping into the Earth's core. Geothermal heat means thermal

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>energy or heat from the Earth. So that heat is

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>generated primarily from two sore says. One is that is

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the radioactive decay of materials that are in the Earth's crust.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>That accounts for about actually of geothermal energy. Really I

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>did not at all. The other comes from the geothermal gradient,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the difference between the cores temperature and the

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>planet's surface temperature. So you probably know heat conducts from

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>high concentration to low concentration, right, and that means that

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>heat is moving from the core out into the crust.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh So if you dig down far enough, the temperature

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>starts to go up. You know, I knew that, but

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea how to do with this radioactive decay.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I assumed that it was because of the pressure of

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the rock above it. Well, radioactive decay is again just

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's part of what's generating heat, because as we've

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about before, radioactive decay that is one of the byproducts.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But the actual heat from the core that has nothing

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to do the radio activity. That's that's just basic physics

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of conduct auction. So as you drill down, that temperature

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>goes up, and the average is twenty five to thirty

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>degrees celsius per kilometer or fifteen degrees fahrenheit per thousand feet.

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the average, because there are some areas where that

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>gradient is much different. For example, if you're drilling near volcano,

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you might notice that temperature goes way up way faster.

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Macma will do that to you. Uh So it's thought

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that this gradient actually decreases dramatically as you get through

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the crust and into the upper mantle. And the basis

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for that hypothesis is that if it were steady, if

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact you continue to see that that rise in

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>temperature every kilometer, then you would eventually within the lithosphere.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the area of the upper cross, not the upper acrust,

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the crust, the upper mantle uppercrust is a great band

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>um that if if that remains steady, it would eventually

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hit the temperature where rock would melt before you got

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to a point where it's no longer solid. Like we

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>know that the crust and upper mantle are solid and brittle,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's below that when you start hitting liquid and

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>then you get to the solid core, when you get

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to the very center of the earth. Uh. And because

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we know that, we know that this gradient has to

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>level off at some point. It can't continue at that pace,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or else the temperature would be too high for there

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a solid surface there or solid material there.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It have to be liquid. So this is still just

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a hypothesis. However, we don't really know what the actual

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>conditions under the surface of the Earth are because we

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>haven't had direct observation of it. Yes, spoiler alert, Jules

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Verne wrote fiction. Yes, did not really go to the

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>center of the Earth. The deepest hole that humans have

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>ever drilled is the Cola Super Deep Bore Hole in Russia.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's one of my favorite things. It is. That's a

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>great name for a thing. Anyway, go ahead. There's a

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>great video that shows exactly where it Isn't It just

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like a little metal plate pipe sticking out of

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the ground. It's it's now, it's a metal plate on

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>top of that pipe that is welded and bolted onto it.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>So you know, but it looks like you could otherwise

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just throw pennies down there. No, yeah, you can't. Like wait,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see let's listen for the drop. So this thing

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is super deep, as the name implies, well if thou

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>actually doesn't imply it as the name states, it is

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand, two hundred sixty two or two hundred thirty

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>ft deep. I remember I wrote a video about this.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I did the video, and I did I did some

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>math and found out I can't oh, man, now that

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>i'm now that I'm sitting here, I don't remember the number.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>But I calculated how long it would take you to

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>hit the bottom. If you could fall down this tiny

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>narrow shaft, it would take you a long time, right,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know that is very deep, obviously, but

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it's not deep enough to even come close to breaching

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the crust and going into the upper mantle. It's the

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>crust is, on average underneath the continents anyway, two kilometers

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thick or twenty five miles. This thing went twelve point

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>two kilometers down, so not even halfway. Now, if we

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>were to dig a similar hole in the ocean floor,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we might actually break through to the mantel, because the

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>crust along the ocean floor is around eight kilometers thick

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on average. But then you'd have to get down to

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the ocean floor. Yeah, so you'd have to deal with that.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, we haven't even breached the crust

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to get to the mantle, so we haven't gotten close

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to the core. Uh, to get back to the to

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Jude's question, we haven't gotten close enough so that we

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>could tap into the core's energy directly. Okay, so the

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>core is pretty much a no go, and I would

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>guess even in the future, we're not going to get

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>direct access to the core just because of like the

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the heat and pressure involved once you get even a

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 1>tiny fraction of the way down there would kind of

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>make access ridiculous. Well, yeah, exactly. You know they I've

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>heard that when the the Super Deep hole was being uh,

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when the borehole was being drilled, that by the time

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they ended the project, they described the the rocks as

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>behaving more like plastic than rock. That it was. It

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>was it was deforming with the drill bit, which was

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>making it harder to actually drill. So uh. And also

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you got to the mantle that's two thousand nine kilometers thick.

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That's before you hit the core. So we're talking peanuts here,

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Like we are nowhere close to the core yet. But

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>One cool thing I think about this is that if

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if in fact we haven't drilled down and we haven't

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>had any direct observation, how do we know that the

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>mantle is the way it is or that the core

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is the way it is? And the answer is we

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>look from other sources, for example, and indirect sources, so

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>meteorites for example. By looking at the composition of the

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>material and meteorites, we start to draw conclusions about what

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>our own planet is like. So, for example, we have

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of meteorites that have rock in them

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and fewer that have iron in them, which starts to

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>have us draw the conclusion that iron, at least in

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>certain forms, is probably going to be at the core

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of a plant. It's going to make up a smaller

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>portion it's going to be at the center, and that

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>rock is going to make up a lot much larger

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>proportion of that. Right, we can also guess at the

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>iron content of the Earth's core due to the way

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that the magneto sphere is set up. That's also true,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and we can we can observe volcanic eruptions and see

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the material that is spewed out because the volcanic volcanoes

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>extend down the the the magma can extend down all

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the way down into the mantle, so that gives us

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>when it starts spewing forth, a closer picture of what's

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>inside underneath. There also studying seismic waves earthquakes by looking

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at how they propagate. So let's say a seismic wave

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>occurs in uh San Francisco, and you look on the

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>other side of the world, and you detect how those

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>those vibrations go through when they eventually passed through there.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Because we're talking about super sensitive equipment looking at this,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by measuring the amount of time and the direction that

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it came from and the frequency of the waves, we

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>can learn more about the medium or media that its. Yeah,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty awesome. That's I keep thinking like, this is

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>amazing that we've learned so much through indirect observation. So

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>cool question. Yeah, definitely. The one more thing about this

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>question is that despite the fact that we're not getting

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it from the core of the Earth, geothermal energy is

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>totally real. That's a power source. It's a renewable, clean

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>power source. I've heard that. I think some people do

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have certain concerns about it because you the main version

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I know about is steam powered basically, like you're injecting

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>water into hot places and then using the rising steam

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to power a turbine. There might be other ways of

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>doing it, but I know they're I've read and some

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people being concerned like, oh, is this safe to do?

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to cause earthquakes or something? But as

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>far as we know, it seems like it's a pretty

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>good power source. That's definitely the main way that we

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>generate electricity, right, I mean, like, we've talked about a

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of different methods to generate electricity, and they almost

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>always come down to I almost and boiled down to

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you come down to steam turning a turbine. That that

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much is the way that we we generate electricity

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. And now Jude's second question was

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about celestial coordinates really, or typically it was about how

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask for not to navigate their space. How do

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>astronomers say where a star is located? And here's the thing, guys.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The main way that astronomers describe the location of stars

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is based largely off a similar way that we describe

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>where something is on the surface of the Earth. It's

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like looking at the sky as if it were an

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>enormous sphere that completely encircled our globe. So it's like

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>our hebe is inside an even bigger globe which has

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>little pinpoints in it, and what people literally thought a

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>few thousand years. Yeah, and what's interesting is that that

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that that remains the basis the main way that astronomers

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>end up giving coordinates two stars. Now, there are a

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of others that we could talk about besides the

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>one I'm going to focus on, Like there's the galactic

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>method of coordinates and super galactic method, which is looking

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at stars from the perspective of say our Sun or

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the center of the Milky Way. But for the most part,

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in astronomical circles, both in the amateur and professional world,

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at celestial coordinates, which are much more Earth based.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And that makes sense because that's where we're looking at

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>them from. Yeah, well, I can see how this would

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>actually matter in the future, like if we encounter an

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>alien species and we're trying to communicate with them about

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>where something is. All right, So if you're standing in

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>times Square, it's totally it's like right there. Yeah, it

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't doesn't help. So on Earth we have the human

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>defined imaginary lines of longitude and latitude. UH. That's part

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of our geographic coordinate system. So the vertical lines are longitude,

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the meridians, and then the horizontal lines the ones that

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 1>are in parallel with the equator, that's latitude. And your

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>coordinates are determined by where you are in relation to

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>those lines, and the values are represented in units of degrees, minutes,

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and seconds or and this is becoming more and more

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>common with GPS devices UH decimal degrees. So the equator

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is at zero degrees latitude, and if you travel north

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>or south UH, you increase that latitude the north latitude

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or south latitude from zero to ninety degrees, so north

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>poles ninety degrees north, south poles ninety degrees south. UH.

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>The Greenwich meridian represents zero degrees longitude, and longitude extends

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred degrees to the east and hundred hundred eighty

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 1>degrees sorry hundred eighty degrees to the east and hundred

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty degrees to the west, So one eight east and

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>one a U west are the same. It's the same

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>line that's on the opposite side of the world from

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Greenwich meridian. Do you happen to know what that

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>line is somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. You're correct on that.

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what specifically? It is? The International date line.

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why if you go to Australia from here you

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>lose a day. It's like a day never existed, which

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one of our co workers just got to experience. Uh,

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>he's in Australian Now, Hi, Josh, how you doing anyway?

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So why do we describe it in minutes and seconds

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>with degrees? What's the deal with that? So along the equator,

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one hour of the rotation of the Earth is equivalent

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen degrees of rotation. Now, if you look at

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a circle and you divide up the circle into fifteen,

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, increments of fifteen degrees, you get twenty four

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours in a day, thus the fifteen degrees

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of rotation. So if you look at lines of longitude,

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that their fifteen degree increments normally between these

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>um So one second of time is equal more or

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>less to about a quarter of a mile of rotation

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>at the equator. Uh. And the degrees can be subdivided

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>into minutes and seconds this way, sixty minutes to a

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>degree three thousand six hundred seconds to a degree. And

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>now we take that same system, the latitude and longitude,

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and we blow up that globe. So it's this celestial

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>sphere that encompasses our planet, and we just create a

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>celestial equator. We take, we take where our equator is

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on our Earth, extend that outward as if it just continues.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>This imaginary line continues out into space, and now we

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have a larger imaginary line that's uh, that's linked to

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>our equator. That's the celestial equator. But at that point

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't call it a latitude and longitude anymore. No,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we do not, because I mean, you know, we need

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to make things confusing, right, So instead of lady, we

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have lines of declinetion. Uh, in lines of longity become

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>right ascension. So uh, the zero for for longitude or

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>right ascension really is the first point of aries. So

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>right ascension is described in hours, minutes, and seconds instead

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of degrees. Because the passing of stars was a means

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of measuring time back in the olden days, and it's stuck.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So uh, if you use this equatorial coordinate system, you

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>would refer to a star's position relative to the celestial equator.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the lines of declination and where it is relative

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to zero right ascension, which is the point on the

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>celestial equator where the sun would cross the celestial equator

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>during the vernal equinox. Is it simple enough for you yet? Alright,

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so Polaris would be at two hours thirty one minutes

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>right ascension eighty nine degrees fifteen arcamnuts declination, which is

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, easiest pie. But what happens now, No, this

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is a fixed system because it's based up on this

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>imaginary equator. Right, that's that's going to be the same

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for anyone anywhere on Earth. I have to stress on Earth. Obviously,

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were on some other planet, then this system

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>would totally not make any sense to you. But what

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>if you, Joe, wanted to tell somebody where to find

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>a particular celestial body, and you know, referring to the

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>celestial equator is not really convenient because it's not like

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a bright line across the sky that says, hey,

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>here's the celestial equator. You would describe the altitude of

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the star, which is how many degrees above the horizon

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. By the way, a degree is essentially if

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you hold out your thumb the thickness. The width of

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>your thumb is essentially one degree, and if you hold

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>out your hand, I think that's like more like fifteen.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of interesting. Yeah, so your degrees may vary,

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>but but your arm is longer. So so the perspective

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>makes it all work out. But if you have short

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>arms and thick thumb, you're in a pickle. You're you're

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad, bad astronomer. You have no business looking at

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the sky looked to your feet at any rate. How

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>many degrees above the horizon is the altitude, and then

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to describe the asimuth of the star asimuth

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that's how many degrees along the horizon with respect to

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>them to a compass direction. So you start from north

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>north is zero degrees, and then you go clockwise, so

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>east would be ninety degrees because that's a right angle.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>From north south is one degrees, West is two d

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy degrees. And this method of describing as stars position

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is completely dependent upon the point of reference of the observer. Right,

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be able to say, oh, hey, my friend

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska, right, look at this star. It's right there,

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>per five hands exactly. That wouldn't work. Now if you

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>were to use the other method I mentioned before with

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the celestial equator. First of all, you both have access

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to math and abilities that I don't know about because

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't figure this stuff out on my own. But

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that would work because that's a fixed system. But the

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the one that requires the the point of view of

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the observer obviously that would not work in that instance.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You're exactly right. So um. Also, this means that this

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>system is not terribly useful once you get significantly far

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>enough away from Earth. Now, most of our manned missions

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have been really close to Earth, I mean low Earth orbit.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Even going out to the Moon is not that far

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in celestial terms. Yeah. Yeah, you're still in orbit of

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. Yeah, so uh we. The big problem is

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>that if you're talking about interstellar travel, this system is

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>not useful. For one thing, it has nothing to do

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with the distance of stars. This is just their relative

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>position within the view of the night sky from Earth.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So two stars that look close together because they seem

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to be close together, and that that imaginary sphere could

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be incredibly far apart in distance. One could be deeper

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>than another, right, so it would be much further away.

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It's so the constellations are very um, very deceptive in

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that sense. You know, the stars that appear to be

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>close together might be very far away from one another. Um. Now,

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping that in mind, how do we help spacecraft that

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>go beyond this? Because we have had unmanned spacecraft that

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>went beyond Earth orbit. And one of the tools we

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>use is called the Deep Space Network or DSN. It's

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>network of three powerful radio antenna their a position around

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the world in such a way that together they have

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>total coverage of the sky. So those three points mean

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that we can send and receive messages from any angle

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>off the Earth. Sun never sets on the Deep Space Network,

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, Yes, and up during I believe the late

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Yeah, the sexually ended up becoming uh came into

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>effect just before the Apollo missions, and in fact, it

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up making another navigation system that was originally going

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the primary navigation system aboard the Apollo, the

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>secondary or backup system, because now they could do all

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the calculations from Earth. Yeah. So obviously, if you're making

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>calculations from Earth, it doesn't matter if it's an Earth

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>centric thing, as long as it still applies to whatever

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>body happens to be out there in space. And in fact,

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>these radio antenna what they do is they send out

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a signal and then they wait to get a return

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>signal from the spacecraft. And based on the time it

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>takes from the moment of transmission to the moment of

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>receiving that that return signal, as well as the shift

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in frequencies, the the the eggheads who crunch the numbers

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can figure out how quickly that spacecraft is moving where

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it is, like to an incredible degree of precisions. So,

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like judask, it kind of is like GPS in space

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of, but only for spacecraft, right, It's only for

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>something that can radio back to us that. Yeah, it's

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like GPS for your car. Yeah, it doesn't apply to stars,

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but it applies to spacecraft. So it's something like the accuracy.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>We can figure out the velocity two point zero five

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>meters per second, and we can figure out the location

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>within three ms, so it's even more accurate than some

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>GPS devices. Are just pretty phenomenal when you think of

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a tiny, relatively tiny item in space that is passing

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>possibly outside of the Solar System, because this is how

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>we contact things like the voyager probes um so it's

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. Uh. Now, if we ever reach a time

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>when interstellar travel is common, we'll have to create something

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>called star maps or star charts that are accurate representations

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of the relationships of various stars, how far away they

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are in in in three dimensions, not just in two. Yeah.

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine it being very difficult because when you

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think about maps of the Earth's surface that we're used to,

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>these are basically two dimensional. I mean, they might have

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>topographical information on them, but they're they're two dimensional planes.

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We've never had to think about space in three dimensions before.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's all been like Star Trek where all the ships

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to Yeah, yeah, exactly. And even in say like video

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>games where you're supposed to navigate a galaxy I'm thinking

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of like, uh, in the mass effect games or something

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, you typically get like a top down view

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy that's still a two dimensional map. You know,

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking down on it and everything's arranged on the

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>same two dimensional x y axis plane. But if you

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>were actually navigating, you'd have to be you'd be moving

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to like too and past and through your points of

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>reference for where you were well, and not only that,

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but the place you're leaving from and the place you're

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>going to are also in motion, right, They're not, They're

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>not standing still. So you wouldn't just be planning where

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you're headed. You have to plan where is your destination

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be by the time you get to where

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to go. So this is this is a

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>grand scale of the kind of calculations astronauts have to

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>make and ground control has to make when launching something

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to say Mars, where you know, we talked about how

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to get to Mars, it takes between like six and

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>eight months to get there because you're not launching to

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>where Mars is. You have to launch to where Mars

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. Same sort of thing here, but

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>now on an interstellar level, which makes it even more complicated,

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>really really complex. And in fact, the references I was

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>looking at said, you know, we just don't have the

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>information yet to create something that would be good for

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>navigational purposes. A lot of this would be stuff that

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>would have to be done in exploratory missions, where it

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.919
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of like the early explorers who had

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>set off in ships across the ocean, not knowing where

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they were going or when they would get there, and

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>then having to map every thing out similar in that respect,

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but on an even grander scale obviously, so pretty interesting.

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's also something cool I wanted to mention, Lauren,

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>you discovered this actually, I remember Joe was telling me

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>about astronauts using sextance on board spacecraft. Yeah. Sextance, of

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>course being the if you're unaware of them, the old

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>nautical tool where you it looks a little bit like

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 1>a pro tractor, except you site along it and yeah,

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to take you take the horizon as a

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 1>reference and another body like the sun as a reference,

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and you do some calculations to determine where in relation

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the planet you happen to be.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The astronauts did the same thing. They had a tool

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that well, well, they didn't have a protractor looking thing.

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>There was like a pair of telescopes that were connected

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to a very sophisticated at the time device. Uh there

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was in a exposition by the way, so they couldn't

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>move it. You had to move the spacecraft to look

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at the star you wanted to look at um. And

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the reason they had it was to correct for drift, right.

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>They would plan their trajectory and they would check to

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they were still on the trajectory that

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they had planned. So what they would do is they

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would cite two different celestial bodies, or they would use

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's horizon or the Moon's horizon as one of

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the reference points, and then a star, and then they

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>would make sure that it lined up properly. And if

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it lined up properly, they knew that they were on

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the right trajectory. If it was out of alignment, they

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>knew that they were drifting, and they had to do

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a course correction to get that fixed. And one of

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the descriptions I read of how the system ultimately worked

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 1>was really cool. So they would pick a star. The'd

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>say all right, we want star whatever, and they put

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that into the computer saying, this is the star we're

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>going to use as our reference point. The spacecraft would

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>orient itself to turn toward that star. Then they would

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 1>look through the sextant and the sexton has a little

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>crosshairs on it, and it's star is not in the

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>center of the crosshairs. They knew that they had drifted.

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>They used controls on the sextant to move the cross

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>hairs over the star, push a button that sends a

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>command to the navigation system to do a course correction

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>so that the thrusters then do the necessary thrusting to

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:21.720
<v Speaker 1>put them back on the correct course and correct for drift.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.919
<v Speaker 1>And I read this and I thought that's amazing. Yeah, yeah,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And and this was actually in use in several of

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Apollo missions. I think, I think as late as

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Apollo eight they had a big mission. That's the one

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that went around the back side of the dark Dark Side,

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>which is really really quite bright the far the far

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>side of the movie. But yes, yeah, and and I

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 1>think that the astronaut who specifically was using it was

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>it was an ex naval officer. That's kind of appropriate.

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably had his little Bosn's whistle there too, and everything.

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But obviously you're if you're talking about spacecraft that goes

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>outside the view of the Earth, then you want to

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>have this backup system clearly, because you aren't certain yet.

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't be absolutely sure that the Earth based navigational

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>systems will stay in constant contact because once you get

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>behind the Moon, that's a pretty big obstacle to block

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>your radio communication. So it is clear why they needed

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>to have a secondary navigational tool aboard to make sure

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they could correct for things like drift. Okay, well, those

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are the only three questions we have time for in

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but rest assured we will be getting back

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to more of your questions and suggestions in a subsequent

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>listener mail round up episode. Yeah, this has been so

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 1>much fun. Yeah, but one last message I wanted to

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>end with, just because it's very brief and we can

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>squeeze it in. It was some wonderful feedback on our

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Future episodes, and this came from Stephen

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on email. He said, I think you missed one important

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>detail in your two Back to the Future podcast, the

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>reason why we don't have all the new technologies. I'm

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 1>sure he was talking about the things we were all

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>disappointed not to have yet, like hoverboards and telescoping baseball bats.

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He says, the reason we don't have those things is

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that lawyers were never outlawed. That is why Marty's kids

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>were convicted so quickly. Than Yeah, thanks than Steve, I

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 1>forgot that salient point Back to the Future book too.

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Lawyers have been outlawed, and therefore the the court systems

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>moved much more quickly. But wait a minute, what does

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that have to do with the technologies. Well, I feel

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like I'm faintly grasping Steven's point, but I'm not quite saying.

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Is that because this one element of the future has

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not come true, the other elements can't come true. And

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.879
<v Speaker 1>also without lawyers everything would move more quickly. Yeah, first

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, you wouldn't sorry lawyers, it's just true. Oh well,

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we did just talk about intellectual property and

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the chilling effect of patent law and stuff. That's so yeah,

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>any you this was This was so much fun. Thank

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys so much. We're very much looking forward to

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>doing this again. We do have other questions, some of

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>which we have already started to research and talk about offline,

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>So keep those coming in because we're having a great time.

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of these are going to be full episodes. Some

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:18.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to be like this one, where we collect

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the various questions that don't quite make up

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.879
<v Speaker 1>a full episode. And uh, it's it's fantastic and lets

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>us know what you guys are interested in and we're

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so excited to cover that. In order to let us

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>know what you would like us to talk about, you

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.320
<v Speaker 1>should send us an email that addresses f w thinking

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot Com, or drop us a

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>line on Twitter, Google Plus, or Facebook. At Twitter and

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus, we are f W thinking over on Facebook.

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Just search f W thinking will pop right up, Leave

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>us a message, tell us what you think, and we'll

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>topic in the future of technology, visit Forward Thinking dot

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Com Problems, brought to you by Toyota Let's Go Places,