WEBVTT - Robinhood Credit Card, Boeing Shuffle

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 4>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 3>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 5>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 4>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 3>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>business stories Impactnew Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 4>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Today, we'll discuss why Apple's iPhone shipments are falling in China.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Plaus we'll look at Boeing's leadership overhaul, with CEO Did

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Calhoun stepping down at the end of twenty twenty four.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 3>But first, Robinhood Market's best known for offering commission Free

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Trading is rolling out a credit card to US consumers

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>as it looks to become a broader financial services company.

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 4>The Robinhood Gold Card will be offered exclusively to members

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 4>of the firm subscription based Gold program.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 3>For more, guest host Bailey Lipshaltz and I were joined

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>by Robinhood, co founder and CEO of vladit Tenev. We

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 3>first asked him for more context on the company's latest news.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 6>We were really excited to announce this. We've been working

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 6>on it for quite a while and we didn't just

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 6>want to launch another me too credit card. We really

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 6>wanted to come in and do something special and really

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 6>lead the industry. So it's really the best cash back

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 6>rewards that we found in any credit card on the market,

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 6>the best digital experience, and really the best design. We

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.919
<v Speaker 6>have a solid gold card that's basically a hunk of metal.

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 6>It's extremely iconic, very simple, like, very well designed. We're

0:01:58.840 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 6>really proud of the product.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 7>How does the credit card fit into the business, because

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 7>I know early last year you guys announced a retirement products,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 7>so it feels like you're trying to expand away from

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 7>the core trading platform.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so as a business Holistically, we're focused on three things.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 6>The first is being the number one platform for active traders.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Right now, we're number two, but we have a path

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 6>to being number one in some number of years, and

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 6>that's really through user experience improvements, product innovations like twenty

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 6>four hour market, adding new asset classes like futures, new

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 6>platform launches like our web Pro platform, which we've announced.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 6>But we don't want to just be an active trader platform.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 6>We also want to grow wallet share with our customers

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 6>and help them build wealth. That's where Robinhood Gold comes in.

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 6>That's where our innovations and the retirement program with three

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 6>percent match come in. And of course, now the credit

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 6>card is sort of another pillar of us growing wallet

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 6>share with customers and helping them do all of their

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 6>financial activities one place via Robinhood.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>So are you competing with this card with the bank

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 3>issued Visa master cards? Is that the market you're now

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>going into.

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 6>I think that we're trying to do something really interesting

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 6>with this card. So if you think about premium credit cards,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 6>the best ones out there, accept less than half of

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 6>the people that apply.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Is that right? Is that half of that Chase Sephi

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>or is that an platinum or whatever.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 6>Those classes of credit cards really like the typical sort

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 6>of like super prime premium rewards cards, and they have

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 6>high annual fees. So what we wanted to do is,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 6>in the same way that Robinhood democratized stock trading and

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 6>made it accessible to a wider group of people, we

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 6>want to open up the private client experience. I don't

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 6>know if you've been to a Chase branch, but you

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 6>can see there's two doors, one for the private clients

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 6>and one for everyone else. And the whole idea behind

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 6>Robinhood Gold is giving that private client experience for as

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 6>little as five dollars a month, opening it to everyone.

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 6>And it starts with the premium credit card. Of course,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 6>the retirement benefits where you get a three percent match,

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 6>the first and biggest in the industry, the five percent

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 6>apy on our cash, which is just an institutional grade,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 6>high yield offering that you have to have, you know,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 6>millions of dollars to match at other brokers. So yeah,

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 6>we're putting all this together and we're seeing Robinhood Gold

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 6>customers actually depositing the lion's share of their money into

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Robinhood and really growing with us. And I think we

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 6>have an opportunity to offer them services for all their

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 6>financial needs in BLAD.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 7>The perks are pretty sweet, as you mentioned, three percent

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 7>cash back on all purchases. Do you make money off

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 7>of this? How is this going to be kind of

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.679
<v Speaker 7>another peg for the profitability and the growth of the company.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Two things there. One is we do obviously any

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 6>business line we enter, we intend to be profitable over

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 6>the long run on a standalone basis, so not just

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 6>a creative but we anticipate this being a profitable business

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 6>line just within the card portfolio, and that's through not

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 6>just the interchange transaction revenue, but also the lending business

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 6>through the card. We anticipate this would actually be a

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 6>very attractive card for people building credit over time, and

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 6>not just folks that pay off their balance in full.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 6>The other side of it is we see that when

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 6>customers adopt Robinhood Gold, their rate of deposit growth and

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 6>account balance growth is much higher than non gold customers.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 6>They also adopt our products at a much higher rate,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 6>and so even though they're getting so much more value

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 6>with all these industry leading rates and value props, the

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 6>revenue that accrues to the business from the gold relationship

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 6>is also multiples higher than non gold customers. And we

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 6>think the credit card since it's so core to people's

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 6>financial needs. Typically all of their the line share of

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 6>spending goes through credit and if you're using a credit card,

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 6>much easier to grab the paycheck deposit. We need to

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 6>carry his cash around.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 7>Now, this is the guy who walks around with hundreds

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 7>of dollars in his pocket.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why I asked myself to say, when

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 3>you walk into a bar, the jersey short good cash

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>on the bar there?

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 8>All right?

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>So who is the typical Robinhood customer these days? Client?

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 8>These days?

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 6>A typical Robinhood customer, I would say, is someone in

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 6>their thirties. They tend to be an early adopter of technology.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 6>They have. You know, more, half of our customers make

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 6>over one hundred thousand dollars in annual income. So it's

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 6>not sort of like the paycheck to paycheck customer as

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 6>maybe some people think.

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 6>And we also have much larger customers with big accounts.

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 6>We recently have been introducing matches. In fact, we rolled

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 6>out another initiative one percent unlimited pose and Match into

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 6>Robinhood for all dollars deposited for our Gold members. So basically,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 6>most financial firms charge you a percentage to keep your

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 6>money there as a management fee. We're paying you a

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 6>percentage to move your money with us. And these types

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 6>of offers have really attracted people with much bigger accounts.

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 6>We've had customers with tens of millions of dollars moving

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 6>those accounts to Robinhood and they've been very happy with

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 6>the experience. So we have been adding capabilities to serve

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 6>customers across the entire market, not just sort of in

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 6>that middle tier, but also people with more money and

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 6>people with less who are just getting started. We also

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 6>would like to serve them and have been focusing on

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 6>that demographic since day one and vlat.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 7>When I talk to skeptics, they point out that you

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 7>guys are heavily reliant on options, trading crypto volumes, and

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 7>that driving the business. Paul mentioned their huge run up

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 7>over the last twelve months.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 4>It's still down.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 7>Forty eight percent from the IPO price. What is the

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 7>kind of mission in the next coming months and years

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 7>for the company to get back to that IPO price

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 7>and trade higher.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think we've been doing really well focusing on

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 6>the inputs of the business. I can't really control the

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 6>stock price directly, but if we're growing revenues, if we're

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 6>diversifying revenues, if we're launching innovative new products for our customers,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 6>I think we can kind of grow through market headwinds

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 6>and high interest rate environment and be sort of like

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 6>a company that thrives in all conditions. And you mentioned

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 6>the revenues and options trading and all these things. But

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 6>what's happened in the past couple of years is the

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 6>revenue profile of the business has diversified as we've rolled

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 6>out all these products. As of the last earnings report

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 6>several earnings calls, more than half of the revenues actually

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 6>net interest margin, not even transaction base. So as we

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 6>add more of these products, like the five percent yield

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 6>on your cash, the profile of the business has also changed.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Robinhood, co founder and Ceenev, we.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Moved out of politics. President Joe Biden has gained ground

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 4>against Republican Donald Trump and six of the seven key

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 4>swinging states, and significantly so and at least two of them.

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>The results make for the Democrats the strongest position yet.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 4>In a monthly Bloomberg News Morning Console Poll.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 3>For more on this poll, we were joined by Mark Niquett,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Real Economy Team reporter. We first asked Mark to

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>break down some of the poll's findings.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 8>The poll shows it's a monthly tracking poll that we've

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 8>been doing since October, and it shows that Trump's still

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 8>doing pretty well in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada are the most

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 8>significant findings is that Biden has improved his standing in Michigan, Wisconsin,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 8>and Pennsylvania, sort of the blue Wall. I think these

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 8>states are going to decide the election, and he needs

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 8>to to win these states if he's going to get

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 8>a second term. In Wisconsin, Biden now holds one point

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.599
<v Speaker 8>lead over Trump after trailing and by four points in February.

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 8>In Pennsylvania, the candidates are tied after Trump had a

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 8>six point lead in February, and they're also tied in Michigan.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Any common denominator here, Marcus to what might be driving

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>of these poll numbers.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 8>The timing of the poll was interesting. It was conducted

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 8>March eighth through the fifteenth in the swing states, and

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 8>March eighth is a day after Biden's State of the

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Union address, which was pretty fiery, and I think, you know,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 8>alleviated some Democratic concerns about the president's age and his

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 8>fitness to take on Trump a second time in a rematch.

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 8>And it's also midway about March twelfth is Super Tuesday,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 8>when both Biden and Trump sort of clinch the respective nominations.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 8>They got enough delegates to clinch, so it kind of

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 8>really made it a binary choice. You know, we knew

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 8>this was going to be the outcome, but I think

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 8>the Democrats in particular, we're thinking that until it was

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 8>really clear in voters' minds that this was going to

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 8>be a rematch and it was Trump or Biden, that's

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 8>their choices, that you know, Biden was not going to

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 8>do as well in the polls. So this is sort

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 8>of the first poll that you know, we have clearly

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 8>established that it's going to be a Trump Biden real match.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Are voters voting because they like the candidates or because

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 4>they don't like the other one?

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, Interestingly, our polls showed that in the case of Trump,

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 8>most of the support is coming from people who like Trump.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 8>Only three and ten Trump supporters said they were voting

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 8>for Trump because they didn't like Biden. They're essentially voting

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 8>against Biden. But the case was different for Biden. About

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 8>half the supporters of Biden so and they were voting

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 8>for the president essentially as a vote against Trump. They

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 8>didn't want to see Trump get back into the White House.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 8>There was even more pronounced in Wisconsin, were like six

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 8>and ten of the supporters of Biden were voting for

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 8>him because they were voting against Trump.

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 4>To that point, are those voters more sticky or not? Like,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 4>is the anti vote stickier than the pro vote?

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 8>Is what we're going to find out is what's more motivating, right,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 8>support for your candidate or desire not to see the

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.359
<v Speaker 8>other candidate win. You know, I think Trump has benefited

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 8>over time from enthusiastic support from his base and base

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 8>turning out board for him, but the negative feeling can

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 8>also be a very strong motivating factor, could drive folks

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 8>to the polls specifically to vote against Donald Trump because

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 8>they don't want to see him back in the lighthouse.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 8>But we're going to find out what's more motivating, you know,

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 8>voting for your guy or voting against the other guy.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 4>All right, great stuff, really appreciate it, Thank you very much.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>We look forward to the next poll as well Mark Nkatt,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 4>He's Bloomberg Real Economy reporter, joining us in the latest

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Morning Console poll.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, we'll discuss why Apple's iPhone

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 3>shipments are falling in China. You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Radio, providing in that research and data on

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>two thousand companies in one hundred and thirty industries. You

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 3>can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I go in the terminal.

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Paul Sweeney and I'm Alex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo card playing Android

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand where

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 4>We look next at the aerospace industry in Boeing. Earlier

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 4>this week, we got news that Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 4>is stepping down at the end of this year. It's

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 4>all part of a leadership overhaul.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>This comes as a planemaker has been dealing with the

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>aftermath of a near catastrophic fuselage failure on a seven

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven Max nine aircraft early this year.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Boeing also said the chairman, Larry Kellner, will not stand

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 4>for reelection and stand deal. Chief of Boeing's commercial airplane

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 4>division is departing. He'll be replaced by Chief operating Officer

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Stephanie Pope.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>For more, we're joined by George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence, senior

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>aerospace analysts. We first asked George for his reaction to

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the news.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 9>My reaction was, you know, we thought Dave Calhoun probably

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 9>would be going. I hate to sort of wish that

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 9>in anybody, but it seemed that, you know, the problems

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 9>in the manufacturing business just there were just too many

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 9>of them over too long a period of time to

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 9>say that he was as effectual, if that's a right words,

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 9>as he should have been at bringing everything, you know,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 9>back into order. It does seem weird that it's going

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 9>to take them till the end of twenty twenty four

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 9>to find his replacement. There's a lot of things that

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 9>have to happen between now and then that the company

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 9>just can't wait for. They've got to serve to the

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 9>FAA their view and how they're going to stabilize their

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 9>production process, and at the same time, right they've got

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 9>to start to increase build rates so they can improve

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 9>profits and cash flow. They can't wait a year on

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 9>that either. So there's a lot of super important things

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 9>that are happening this year to wait till the end

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 9>of the year to replace the CEO that doesn't seem

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 9>to have been able to get that job done well.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 9>It seems like a lengthy timeline to me, But it

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 9>may just be that the board was flat footed and

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 9>realizing that the CEO had to go and as nowhere

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 9>in a search and so they've got to start from

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 9>scratch here and figure out who the next person is.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>What can you tell us about Stephanie Pope. She's going

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>to be stepping up and taking a big role with

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the aircraft business.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so she's been around for a while and she's

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 9>been CFO of that aircraft business. So it seems like

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 9>a logical in side choice. But I think when you

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 9>have a you know, ahead of that department stand deal

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 9>who's leaving after thirty plus years of the company, they're

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 9>hard shoes to fill. You look around internally for who could.

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 7>Be the next person.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 9>The CFO is always in particularly decent shape because they

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 9>understand at least all the financials about the business. She's

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 9>also had, you know, had positions at Boeing Global Services,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 9>which is a super successful business inside Boeing, high teens margins.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 9>To me, the only thing I don't see in her

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 9>background is that manufacturing skill set. I think the next

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 9>CEO has to really have a manufacturing engineering mindset background,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 9>and I think that's that's what I don't quite see there.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Sort Of like Larry culp No.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 9>I mean Lowry obviously, he's pretty busy, and honestly, the

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 9>job he has now a GE could be better profits,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 9>more fun than Boeing because there's a lot of great

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 9>technology inside GE and there's a huge bow wave of

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of maintenance coming that really high margin. I

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 9>think you'd really have to work hard to get like.

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>But George, I mean, does he like fun or does

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 4>he like a challenge? I mean he was the one

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 4>that went did GE to begin with.

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 9>I do think he likes a challenge, and I think

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 9>he showed his ability to navigate it really well at GE.

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 9>But again, you know, they're just kind of getting to

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 9>the super fun part. I think there's still challenge inside GE,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 9>but he's just getting to the point where he's got

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 9>aerospace broken out and he can really make a lot

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 9>of hay here. So someone like him is absolutely what

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 9>I think Boeing needs. I don't know, maybe he's got

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 9>a you know, maybe there's a protege somewhere inside there

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 9>that they could tap or something.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Thinking about who could be the next CEO. Here is

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>the expectation, George, that it'll come from an external candidate

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>or internally And are there any early front runners? Do

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 9>So, I definitely think it's going to come external, right.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 9>I just think the fact that you've seen this purge

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 9>of the CEO, you see the purge of commercial airplane president,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 9>means that we've depleted some talent there. There was you know,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 9>former heads of boeing'smmercial airplanes that had left when Muhlenberg

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 9>came on. They could potentially be, you know, in the

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 9>running for something like this. I know a couple of

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 9>them wanted the CEO job and didn't get it, But

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 9>I'm almost positive you're talking about something that's going to

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 9>be outside. Ray Connor is the name that comes to mind.

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 9>Used to be the head of Boeing Commercial. Not sure

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 9>what he's doing now, but he might be on the list.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Similar what's the culture like at a Boeing in terms

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 4>of getting an outsider?

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think Boeing is one of those companies.

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 9>I think you get a job and you stick around

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 9>for lots and lots of years, and so, you know,

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 9>I think that bringing people in from outside is something

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 9>you do only when you have a breakdown like you've

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 9>had now. Right under normal circumstances, there would be very

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 9>clean lines of succession inside Boeing. You know, you would

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 9>move up through the ranks and expect opportunities as you rose.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 9>But there's been so much tumult in this business over

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 9>the last I don't know, you know, four years or

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 9>so that I think that it's a time in their

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 9>history where they're they're going to be going outside a

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 9>lot more to replenish some of these senior management ranks.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 9>So they've just they've turned over a bunch of it.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 3>And George, it seems like this is no quick fix here.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 3>It seems like it was years, maybe even decades in

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 3>the making in terms of maybe the deterioration of some

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 3>of their quality controls.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>When you talk to an industry folks, people at Boeing,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>is there a pathway to kind of get back to

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 3>where they were in terms of quality.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 9>I think there is, but it's a lot of attention

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 9>to detail. And like you said, it's it's slow work,

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 9>so you can't sort of wave a wand I think

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 9>and make it, you know, happen overnight. Really, you know,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 9>I think has a lot to do with people and processes, right,

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 9>And that's why I think you want someone like a

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 9>Larry Koppe who loves people in processes. You need and

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean that just takes time. You need a lot more,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 9>you need training, you need, you need, you know, in

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 9>the interim, you probably need to beef up some of

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 9>the oversight. You need to get into your supply chain.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 9>You need to give them a hug, you need to

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 9>help them out, you know, help them bring you quality products.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.239
<v Speaker 9>It's not a hey, how are you going to make

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 9>my margins work better in the next couple of years discussion, right,

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 9>It's really, like I said, it's people and processes. It's

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 9>the softer side of management. I think Boeing over the

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 9>last decade or two really was more into the how

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 9>do I squeeze you to get you know, you to

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 9>give me products at a cheaper price. So I could

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 9>build my margins recipe for success. It wasn't that wasn't

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 9>quite the term, but there was a term like that

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 9>that Boeing was using with their suppliers. It was all

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 9>about squeezing them. So the supply chain is all. You know,

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 9>they've been scarred. They're worried about when Boeing comes to

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 9>talk to them, and I think they need to get

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 9>to a world where when Boeing shows up, that they

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 9>think someone's there to help them and is looking out

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 9>for their best.

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 3>Interests our Thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Aerospace Analyst.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 4>We moved next to big tech and Apple. Earlier in

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 4>the week, we reported that Apple iPhone shipments in China

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 4>fell about thirty three percent in February from a year earlier,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 4>and that's citing data from the China Academy of Information

0:19:58.280 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 4>and Communications Technology.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>For more on this, we were joined by man Deep Sing,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Tech analysts. We first asked man Deep

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 3>why he thinks China iPhone shipments are falling.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 5>Clearly, you know they have a problem both with the

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 5>demand for iPhone as well as competition. I think one

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 5>of the things that doesn't get as much attention right

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 5>now is the fact that Huawei has a comparable phone

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 5>to iPhone, and the reason they have been able to

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 5>do it very quickly is because of the supply chains

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 5>that Apple created in the region. So a lot of

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 5>those suppliers are actually making the phone for Huawei and

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 5>they don't have to do much because Apple is at

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 5>the cutting edge when it comes to the chip, the assembly,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 5>and so all the supply chains. Guys are actually diversifying

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 5>themselves and making phones for Shami Huawei. Huawei is the

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 5>notable share gainer here, but that just goes to show that,

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, they are also diversifying.

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the answer. I can't think of an

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 3>answer for Apple, particularly on a supply chain. I can

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 3>pencil out China going too close to zero in terms

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 3>of sales. I could pencil that out, put a multiple

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 3>on it, and there we go. There is no Apple

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 3>without China. In terms of supply chain. There is no

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Apple without that supply chain.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 5>And for the longest time we thought the risk for

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 5>the suppliers is if Apple is not giving business to them,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 5>they don't have anything to manufacture. Well, guess what they have,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, a Huawei and the local guys, and so

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 5>that's how they are going about the business right now.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 4>So if I'm Tim Cook and I have seen this

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 4>for years and I want to diversify my supply chain,

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 4>what does that look like? What is that?

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's a we did a big report. It's

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 5>a multi year yes, and you know, the assembly part

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 5>is already moving to India. We've seen a big ramp

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 5>up in India. Almost twenty two percent of the phones

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 5>last year iPhones, not the highest end, but a lot

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 5>of the models were assembled in India, and gradually they

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 5>will have to diversify, you know, the assembly side. The

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 5>problem they're running into is the all the components that

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.719
<v Speaker 5>you need to manufacture an iPhone and the complex device

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 5>that it is. It's not that easy to just you know,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 5>lift and shift your supply chains into a different regions.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 5>There's so many dependencies both with TSMC and the other

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 5>suppliers that feed into the Chinese assembly. So all that

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 5>needs to be relocated, and it will happen. It's just

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 5>it's a multi year effort, and right now the focus

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 5>is also shifting towards on device AI. I feel the

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 5>reason why Chinese government is really cracking down is because

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 5>the next wave of this is AI will run on device,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 5>and they don't want a US based company probably to

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 5>be running AI you know on device in the in

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 5>the region. So that's the other aspect of THEIRS.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>A bear case could be made here, long term, multi

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 3>year bear case here. I've got supply chain issues. I've

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>already zeroed out my China revenue and.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 4>Aris's revenue is going to be changing because of all

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the new laws right in terms.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Of core cases could be Yeah, the DOJ lawsuit, it's

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 5>come at the worst time for Apple. I mean, they

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 5>should be doubling down on other markets where they can

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 5>acquire share that they may end up losing in China. Obviously,

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the dj lawsuit is not helping. And the EU regulation

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 5>they are digital markets acts, so from a regulatory perspective,

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 5>you're right. I think the bear case is really around

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 5>the revenue exposure and I'm sure the supply chains they'll

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 5>moddel through in terms of making sure they can still

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 5>make the phone. And you know, as long as the

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 5>manufacturers or they are getting the business, they don't mind

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 5>Apple continuing to you know, have the supply chains remain

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 5>intact there. But I think the hard part would be

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 5>the EPs drawdown as a result of the Chinese revenue

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 5>going down.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 4>Why can't they just build stuff in the US? Like,

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I know, it's not as easy as like here's a plant,

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 4>let's PLoP it down in the US. But like why

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 4>is India the next port of call? Like why not

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 4>the US?

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, again, it's the components. So think of the bill

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 5>of Yeah, there are certain components that can only be

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 5>sourced over there, and over time they can move things around.

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 5>But if you're talking about, you know, a twelve hundred

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 5>dollars phone, it has a certain bill of materials. Things

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 5>are done in a certain way. That's why it comes

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 5>at that cost. We're not talking about a five thousand

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 5>dollars phone.

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 4>You remember when the iPhone was coming out of a

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 4>thousand and it was like, no one's going to pay that.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 4>This is insane, this is ridiculous. Now it's like twelve

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 4>hundred whatever.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>The market adapts as we've seen here, all right, So

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 3>if you're a bull, are you simply saying there's two

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 3>billion units out there? They'll forget to way to make

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 3>money off of those things and that ecosystem.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean The bull case is still the ecosystem and

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 5>the fact that they have an install base of one

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 5>point three billion users you know who still have the

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 5>iPhone and they will refresh the phone at some point,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 5>and everyone still likes the iOS ecosystem. I think what

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 5>Huawei is doing is laying out a path where people

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 5>can move out of the iOS ecosystem, and then the

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 5>whole AI thing and the regulatory stuff, I think is

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 5>just making it worse. Word the timing of it is

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 5>just worse for Apple right now.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 3>The Developer conference in June, right the pressure is gonna

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 3>be big for.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 10>Them to reach.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 5>And remember they're looking at leveraging by do now. The

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 5>reason for leveraging by Doo for AI in Chinese region

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 5>is just to please you know that, the fact that

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 5>they're using a local AI player as opposed to deploying

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 5>their own ais our.

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Mandy, you've seeing Bloomberg Intelligence senior tech analyst.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 4>Coming up on the program a look at how Danish

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Drugmakernovo Nordist is expanding its treatment for cardiovascular disease.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing research

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and data on two thousand companies and one hundred and

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 3>thirty injuries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 3>go on the terminal.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and am Alex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty the mood.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Now to the cruise operator Carnival, the company reporting first

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 4>quarter revenue the beat analyst expectations. The company also raising

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 4>its profit forecast for the year on record bookings volume,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 4>and this includes high demand for cruise vacations combined with

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 4>cost management including debt, refinancing and repayment.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 3>For more on this, we're joined by Jody Lorie, Bloomberg

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence credit analysts. We first asked for her take on

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Carnival's first quarter earnings.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say that when you look at Carnival, it's

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>really a cash flow story. It really is a credit

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>story more than anything else. And the bookings are sort

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of confirming that. Now the booking level if you include

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>short and long term, it's actually not at the peak,

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>which was second quarter of last year, but it's right

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>near the peak, and based on what management is saying,

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like second quarter of this year my top

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>second quarter of last year. That said, I think more importantly,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the company is starting to attack some of its debt load,

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly in of its secured areas, which will help to

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of free up the balance sheet a little bit,

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>provide some flexibility, make it so that the company has

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>an ability to sort of make its way back to

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>high grade ratings as it's been targeting for twenty twenty six.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 7>H Jody, you call that out just using the FA

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 7>function on the terminal Carnival cruise almost thirty two billion

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 7>dollars in debt compared to a market cap of twenty

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 7>one billion dollars. How does that stack up to the

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 7>likes of Royal Caribbean or Norwegian and some of those

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 7>other piers in the cruise liner space.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Carnival was able to bring down their debt

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>load to about thirty billion over the past year, and

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>it's likely that it'll probably end this year around that

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>level based on what they're taking in in terms of ships.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>That said, it is significantly higher than Royal, it is

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>significantly higher than Norwegian, but on a leverage perspective, it's

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of middle of the pack at the moment as

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>compared to Royal and Norwegian. Royal is a few quarters

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Carnival in terms of its deleveraging strategy. Management

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at Royal actually bumped up their narrative around getting to

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>investment grade level metrics to do it earlier than twenty

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and Carnival stuck to that twenty twenty six number,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think is descriptive of being a little bit

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>more conservative, particularly with the backdrop of everything happening globally,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not just the Baltimore Bridge situation, but also at the

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Red Sea and everywhere else that's affecting Carnival more broadly

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>because of its more global nature.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at again, the FA function is barely called out.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 3>I still see, you know, three four billion dollars in

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 3>capex every year. Are they buying ships or what are

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>they spending that kind of money on?

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the three four billion dollars of CAPEX is primarily ship.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>There is a portion of it that is in terms

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of maintenance CAPEX right, your ships get old, you have

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to update them every few years. You have all these

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of different requirements related to it. They also have

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that celebration key that they're rolling out on, which is

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 1>on the Grand Behind and that's to rival their peers,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>which have been investing really heavily also into island presence, right.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>The Caribbean island presence is a money maker for all

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's this captive audience. They bring the people

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>who are on their ships to these islands and to

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>these sections of islands, like you know, not the whole

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Grand Bahama, but that carved out sections specifically for carnival,

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, wine and dine them get them to

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>spend extra money. That onboard spend is really where you

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>see that.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 7>Margin you mentioned wining and dining. I just want to

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 7>look at some of the other areas that you cover

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 7>talking about wind resorts, MGM, Hilton, all the funds, all

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 7>the fund stuff. Yeah, you have the best job. I

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 7>hope you take advantage of it. But when you look

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 7>at the underlying business dynamics of some of the other

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 7>areas that you cover, what are we seeing in terms

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 7>of hotel demand and hotel sales and what that means

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 7>from a credit.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Perspective, so hotel demands, hotel sales. It is a bit

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>mixed regionally, but I think overall we're pretty optimistic about

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, and that's a function of the fact that

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>business and conference is really picking up this year as

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>compared to the past few years. You know, we're at

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that point where that post pandemic narrative has sort of

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>played out and we're getting to more normalized. That said,

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there are areas of expansion and growth. We're also seeing

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that all inclusive area be a much more attractive area

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of these companies, and I think we

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>are seeing some rivalry across the board when it comes

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to hotels, casinos, cruise lines as these destination opportunities. We're

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>talking Las Vegas obviously, not the regional casinos that's a

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit different, but Las Vegas, Macau, the cruise lines,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and the hotels. There's a lot of sort of this

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>destination narrative that's going on to get people to spend

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that extra money and to sort of go on vacation, live.

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Life to the fullest.

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, we do have these partnerships that are happening between

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Marriott and MGM, but then also we have an MGM

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and carnival relationship, So there is this fluidity that's happening

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>within my industry that makes it sort.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Of interesting and you get a great view on the

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 3>consumer Jody with you know, the coverage you have again

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 3>hotels and casinos and cruise lines. Where are people kind

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 3>of spending their dollar And it seems like they're still

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 3>spending on that whole experiential thing, the experiences. What are

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the companies you cover, what are they saying is to

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the how that's likely to play out?

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So consumers are definitely spending still on experiences. We're still

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>very much seeing it now. If you compare twenty twenty

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>three twenty twenty two, it's a different sort of narrative

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>than twenty twenty three twenty twenty four because the base

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is a much greater, right, if you looked at the

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>base going back to twenty twenty one, you're dealing with nothing,

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>building on nothing. It's very significant. That said, there still

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is that narrative of growth and that consumer spending on

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>experiences where we sort of wonder is what's going to

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>happen heading into the second half. That's sort of the

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>puzzle piece that isn't quite filled out for us yet,

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>where first half into the summer season is very strong.

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>We're also seeing that for cruise lines. They're saying that

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>going into the twenty twenty five they're seeing strength, and

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a function of the fact that people book their

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>cruises so far in advance. You don't get that benefit

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in the hotel space, you don't get that benefit as

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>much in the vacation arena elsewhere. People don't book vacations

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>apart from cruises so far in advance. So I think

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as we head into second half, we'll sort of get

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a feel for how comfortable the consumer is in terms.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Of spending our Thanks to Jody Lourie Bloomberg Intelligence Credit Analysts,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 3>we turn.

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Down to the drug space.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 4>This week we heard the Danish weight loss drug maker

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Novo Nordisk has agreed to buy Cardier Pharmaceuticals for up

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 4>to one point one million dollars. This comes as soaring

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 4>demand for obesity drugs continues to drive the more deal

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 4>making for Nova Nordois.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 3>For more, we were joined by Michael Shaw, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Senior pharmat Biotech Analysts. We first asked him for some

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 3>context on this deal, but.

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 10>Deal very much in line with kind of Novo's strategic aspirations,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 10>which is to build a presence in the cordative ast

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 10>to spaced. So prior deals that they've done include a

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 10>deal with KBB for a hypertension asset, a deal with

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 10>care Video for silk investment, So this is very much

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 10>in line with that sort of play in terms of

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, the lead asset, it's a drug called CDR

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 10>one three two L, So you know, in simple terms,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 10>it's designed to block a buyermarker of heart failure. What

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 10>we see with current therapies is you know, current therapies

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 10>kind of slow disease progression, but they don't necessarily you know,

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 10>hold it or reverse it. And that's kind of what

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 10>Nova trying to do with this asset.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 4>So they're trying to stop it all together and reverse it.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Wow, Actually that's amazing. How does this also fit into

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Novo's weight loss drug in that I remember speaking to

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 4>the Nova Nordisk CEO and they're like really really really

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 4>invested in like improving people's overall health. Like the weight

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 4>loss drug isn't about losing weight, it's about relieving the

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 4>pressure that it puts on the heart, it's about relieving diabetes,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 4>it's about the broader stuff. How do these two work together.

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 10>Could potentially add to Novo's cardiovascular portfolio. So, I mean

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 10>it's still very early stage, but you know, we're seeing

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 10>Novo build this presence in the space. So we've seen

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 10>the outcome status for supplemental approval for GOVI that's also

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 10>you know, pending a approval in heart failure. We've got

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 10>these other passets which I talked about in terms of Zelkaveka, MAAB.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 10>So it's really just kind of building out that portfolio

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 10>in the space.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 8>All right.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 3>So I'm asking for a friend here, Mikey. When is

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Novo Nordisk in a ramp up its production of these

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 3>with gov and ozempic and all that kind of stuff

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 3>to meet demand because it's not even close yet.

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, so Novo Holdings obviously did the deal recently.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 10>I mean production is going to take time to ramp up,

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, three four years before you know, these sites

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 10>come online. There's also limited capacity in the market as well.

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 10>I think what's going to help kind of things you know,

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 10>longer term is you know, the potential approvals of oral

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 10>JOLP ones that should hopefully ease some of the you know,

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 10>some of the type.

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Supply and what's the what's the timing on that?

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 10>So twenty seven I would say that sort of time

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 10>frame twenty seven to twenty eight, possibly maybe a year earlier.

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 10>There's several you know, players that are developing oral jop

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 10>one drugs, so Lily being one of them. We could

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 10>see some data for Viking and amjines albeit early data

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 10>this year, but yeah, that could really be key to

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 10>kind of opening up the market.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 4>So are there also M and A opportunities or boltons

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 4>that nobody could make to help expand capacity more quickly?

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 10>Well, they've done one deal already and yeah, I mean

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 10>they're looking to invest to basically expand capacity going forward

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 10>and support their jop one portfolio. So it wouldn't surprise

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 10>me if you know, there are further deals of further

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 10>efforts and investment into expanding this supplydcraft.

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, So Mikey, what are some of the maybe

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the one or two big therapeutics or drugs or twenty

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty four event here that are you guys are waiting

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 3>on that If something hits, it's just going to be big,

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Whether it's in the world of cancer or if it's

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 3>in the world anywhere else in healthcare, what's kind of

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 3>the big next big blockbuster that you think is reasonable

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 3>to come out of the format industry.

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 10>I think twenty four is all of our weight loss

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 10>and some of the chomon viviencies. To be honest, I

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 10>mean some of the data points that we're looking out for.

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 10>It's going to be semi glue Tide's mash readouts, so

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 10>that's a liver condition. We're also expecting kind of detailed

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 10>data from Boeing and Zealand's server do Tide in the

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 10>same disease area, and then we'll also see details of

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 10>Lily's ze bound in that liver condition too. You know

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 10>BC readouts, you know, front and center again, So in

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 10>terms of you know, data upcoming data sets, it's going

0:36:56.000 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 10>to be amgines readouts for Amgine's assets, and as I

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 10>said earlier, possibly some oral data for Vikings GLP one drug.

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of the valuations for the likes

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 4>of Nova, Nordisk or any that are in the weight

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 4>loss drug Like, we have no idea how to value this.

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 4>It's sort of like the AI phenomenon. How do you

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 4>think about it.

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So when we look at you know, Lily and Nova,

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, they clearly stand out obesit GLP ones underpinning

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 10>their growth prospects. You know, both have well, Nova at

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 10>least has you know, margins up there with peers. But

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 10>we look at you know, the obesity space. You know,

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 10>in general, more than one hundred million suffers GLP one

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 10>penetration rates you know, very low at the moment. You know,

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 10>we think access is going to improve, you know, as

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 10>we see more data, as we see more benefits and comorbidities,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 10>and you know, we're looking at a or we're forecasting

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 10>ABC market size of you know, eighty billion dollars in

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 10>twenty thirty, which is looking quite conservative. And when we

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 10>look at kind of penetration rates as based on just

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 10>twelve percent of US patients being on a JLP one therapy,

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 10>So there's significant runway there, you know, to support the valuations.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 10>And then there's also other markets which we haven't necessarily

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 10>kind of fully factored in. So China, for example, could

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 10>be a massive market for these drugs.

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Right Thanks to Michael Sha Bloomberg Intelligence senior Pharma biotech analyst.

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, spoti Pie,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.280
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 2>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Ihart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal