WEBVTT - Map out your time line

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>tip is to map out your timeline. By figuring out

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>all the steps in a project and when you might

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to do each step, you can have a

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>much better sense of whether something is doable and you

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>will have a much better shot at success if you

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>do give the project a whirl. We are coming toward

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year, which means I am nearing

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year's project of listening to all

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the works of Bach. I have really enjoyed doing this project.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But key to making this project work was having a plan. First,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I needed to know that there were one thousand and

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty works in the official BWV catalog. There are a

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>few more fragments and lost works and misattributed works, but

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to become esoteric scholars here. One thousand

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>and eighty sounded good enough. Then I needed to know

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>how to split the listening each day. Well, theoretically, you

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>could just do three each day. Some of Bach's works

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are much longer than others, and some of the long

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ones are right next to each other in the catalog.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Listening to the Saint Matthew's Passion in Saint John's Passion

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back to back would be more than four hours of listening,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>whereas listening to three chorals back to back might be

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>less than three minutes. So probably marching straight through wouldn't work.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I also realized that I would like some variety. Bach

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote choral works, organ works, orchestral works, but the BWV

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers put all of the world works of a kind together.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So I created a schedule assigning myself different BWV numbers

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>from different parts of the catalog each day, which totaled

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>about thirty to forty minutes of listening. How did I

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>know the listening time. I searched for each BWV number

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and saw how long the performances were. Creating this calendar

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>took a fair amount of work, but I would do

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one to two months at a time so it was

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>never overwhelming. Then I would just spot check that I

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was on track. After two months, would I have been

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to about a sixth of the catalog? In any case,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>The upside of having detailed assignments for each day was

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that after all of that, the project was pretty easy

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to stick to. On any given day, I am not

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>deciding what to listen to or how much to listen to.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I am just listening to a violin sonata and a

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>few corals today and something else tomorrow. At this point,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I've listened to almost everything. I think if you're going

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to do any sort of project like this, you need

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a detailed roadmap. I interviewed someone recently who was visiting

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>all of America's national parks. This required a detailed outline

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of how many days it takes to see each one,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>which are close, and which require lots of advanced reservations,

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and which are a little bit more accessible. But doing

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that meant that such a comprehensive project was actually doable

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>over a few summers. Likewise, folks who are participating in

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>National Novel Writing Month in November know that you need

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to crank out fifty thousand words in a month. But

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this is much more doable if you know that this

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is sixteen hundred and sixty seven words on each of

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty days, or two thousand words a day if you

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>plan to work to twenty five days taking the five

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Sundays off, or twenty five hundred words a day if

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you plan to take Saturdays and Sundays off if you

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know your expected daily word count. On the other hand,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot harder. Now, twenty five

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred words a day might sound like a lot. That

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>means you are writing twenty five hundred words on Thanksgiving.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And if that does sound like a lot, well, maybe

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you decide that you don't actually want to start this

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>project and then give up somewhere in the middle. And

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that is a rational choice. But if you see where

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you can fit twenty five hundred words a day into

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.679
<v Speaker 1>your life, and you know that this is your expected pace,

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you stand a pretty good chance of succeeding. Maps help

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>us get where we are going. We see how far

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to go and how much time it will take.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That helps us make more rational choices. Most people understand

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that you cannot drive five hundred miles and five hours

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario, that is a nine to ten hour trip.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>If you know where you will stop for lunch and

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>stop to stretch your legs along the road, you will

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>find it all more doable than if it looks like

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>just a huge number of miles. So if you are

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>contemplating any big project, map out your timeline. What do

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you need to do when? How much do you need

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to get done on each day to stay on track.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You might decide not to bite off the project, but

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if you do, your odds of success will be good

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>if you have designed the timeline well. In the meantime,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this is Laura. Thanks for listening, and here's to making

0:05:52.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the most of our time. Thanks for listening to Before Breakfast.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>If you've got questions, ideas, or feedback, you can reach

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>me at Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. Before Breakfast

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartMedia. For more podcasts from iHeartMedia,

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>please visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.