WEBVTT - Chiefs/Bills preview, Warriors Culture Damaged & Wright-Ins

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know to check

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with all States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode eighty one. What's Right, Nick Right? The

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>YouTube show, the podcast. We are live on YouTube right now.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're already watching, we appreciate you. Today's gonna be

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>our most interactive show we've ever done. There's gonna be polls,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be a bunch of questions. We're not even

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're saving it all for the end

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of the shows. We have in the past a ton

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to do today over the next forty minutes or so,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>as we always do. By the way, I'm Nick, He's Demanse.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Demanse's a little under the weather, so he sounds a

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>little clogged up today. Our apologies. He's powering through it.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought, you know, post pandemic and not supposed to

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>come to work if you're sick. Demanse, on the other hand,

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 2>is breathing all over me in these ghost spaces. No problem.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>We'll get before we get to the actual show, as

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>we always do. However, what missed the cut for today's show.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's what's not on today's show. Tonight's Thursday night football game,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>which one of the worst nationally televised games ever with

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the Bears and Washington. The most exciting new basketball documentary

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>has not made the show. Greadem Team or the Jeremy

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Lynn Dock You might say, Nick, why not? What do

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>you think of him? I haven't watched him. Why haven't

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you watched the docs? Nick? Because I read books? Like

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone's like, oh, make this documentary. My friend Dan Levittard

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>he's the and We're gonna make thirty new sports documentaries.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just because people won't read anymore. How about that?

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Does it take that documentary? The popularity of documentaries is

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 2>directly correlated to people's People just won't read books. Just

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>pop open a book. America turn off Netflix when you're like, oh,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to learn something, You know how I'm gonna

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>learn something laying in bed and watching it be told

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>to be read a god Dog book once in a while.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Also not on the Today's Show, Ben Simmons air ball

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>at that outdoor nets practice one of the worst shots

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 2>anyone's ever seen. Ben is now talked about it. He's like,

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I did an airball every shot. If you're watching on YouTube,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 2>there's the video of it. There was not a single

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>unique or interesting take on this, except for the one

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>demand's head before we get to the actual show. What

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>was your take on that horrifying Ben Simmons shot that.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 2>My television co host Kevin Wilde said he could shoot

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>with better form with a fifty pound medicine ball than

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Ben Simmons shot that. What's your take?

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>My take is was calculated.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like a not a marketing strategy, but

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it's to get the people talking. You know,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 4>everybody's already awesome. Yeah, oh you think I can't shoot exactly?

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 4>And then how slow the wind up was For it

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 4>to be that far off, It just seems like he's

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 4>got to be doing that on purpose.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Man, Okay, real quick before we get to our main topic,

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 2>which is of course chiefs bills. That is a great take.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>If that's not what it was, and that was in

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 2>that was his best attempt at the shot. How how

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>bad is that? In your opinion?

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty bad. I mean that was like it was

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>like a ten foo.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gotten I think a shot has gotten worse.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Kevin O'Connor, who's a great writer and podcaster from the

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Wringer five years ago, five years ago, made the argument

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Ben Simmons shoots with the wrong hand because he's one

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 2>of these lefty righty guys and he shoots with his

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>left hand and he used to shoot with his right hand.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Kevin O'Connor was correct.

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Does Kevin o'connory books, Oh.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, reads books, rights books. Listen. I'm from a generation

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>that likes to crack open a book every once in

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a while learn some things. There ain't nothing wrong with that. Now,

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>while you're watching this on YouTube, I appreciation. However, here's

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>here's what I would recommend. You know what, BUTMANI does

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>this on his podcast. I might steal it from him

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>because Bomani's a friend. What if we did a what's right,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Book of the Month Club? Oh, you know what, we're

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>doing it. We're doing it starting on Thursday shows, starting

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>next Thursday. Book of the Month Club, and we can

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>keep you updated on it, do a little minor segment

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.679
<v Speaker 2>on it, and you're gonna read it too. That's gonna

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 2>be part of the job. Part of the job for Demansey.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I already know what the first book's gonna be.

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>All I'm excited, but I hope doesn't drop an autobiography.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, No, they're not gonna be sports books. We're gonna

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>be no sports books part of de Monsey. How are

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>we starting today's show?

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 4>We're starting with Chiefs Bills. Oh yeah, the Bill's shoveled

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 4>a casey to take on your Chiefs. Underdogs at home,

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 4>underdogs at home. Yep, I mean I kind of understand it.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 4>They barely snug one out against the Raiders the other day.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Last year the Bills beat them in the Week five matchup,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 4>but obviously Kansas City won when they.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Faced them in the playoffs.

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 4>I know you're gonna say, Mahomes shouldn't be a home

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 4>fair I mean home underdog or underdog at all. Yeah,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>but given the way the season's kind of panned out.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, the Bills have done a lot of great things,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 4>and like I said, the Chiefs just played the Raiders

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 4>and barely won. Yeah, but would you be willing to

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 4>put your your money where your mouth is if you're

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna say the Mahome shouldn't be a underdog.

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm definitely betting the Chiefs. This is not a game.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 2>Listen what I I want to talk about the game,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and I want to talk about the ideas surrounding Coulby.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Could the Bills win? Of course they could win. So

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>but do I think there's value on the Chiefs plus

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>two and a half? Yeah? I mean Mahomes there is

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>his forty second career home game. He's never been an

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>underdog prior to this. He's only been an underdog eight

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>games in his higher career. Ever, by the way, he's

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 2>won six of those outright, and he's seven zero to

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>one against the spread. In the eight games where he's

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>an underdog. He was underdog. He was a favorite in

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight consecutive starts, and he was underdog two weeks ago.

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Now he's underdog again. Okay, So do I think that's

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 2>out of line?

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's out of line. And by the way,

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 2>I haven't looked at the look ahead lines. But next

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>week they're at San Francisco. I wonder if they're gonna

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 2>make him an underdog there. We'll see how this week goes.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>But here is my frustration on this conversation surrounding Patrick Mahomes,

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen, the Can't See Chiefs and the Buffalo Bills.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Everybody loves talking about that Chiefs Bill's playoff game, and

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>it was an epic playoff game, there is no doubt

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 2>about that. But they talk about it as if Josh

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Allen outplayed Patrick Mahomes. In fact, I think that is

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the general sentiment that Josh Allen was the best player

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>on the field. It is flatly not accurate. In that

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 2>football game, Josh Allen threw for three hundred and thirty yards.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes threw for three hundred and eighty yards. Oh,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>but Josh Allen on the ground, Josh Allen ran the

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>ball eleven times for sixty eight yards and no touchdowns.

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes ran the ball seven times for sixty nine

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>yards and one touchdown. So he threw for more yards.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>He ran for more yards in that football game. They

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 2>both had pass the ratings of one to twenty five

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 2>plus and Patrick Mahomes, it in the spot of adversity,

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 2>down three with thirteen seconds left, found a way to

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>get a seamen field goal range. This is not a

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>situation where Allen was unbelievable, Mahomes was mediocre and they

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>won because of a blocked field goal or a kick

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 2>return touchdown. If Allan was an a plus, then Mahomes

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a plus. So what? And then the other massive

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>frustration I have is people are saying this is Brady

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Manning and maybe one day it will be. But the

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>virtue of Brady Manning Demonsey, you were too young. But

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady won all the championships. Peyton Manning had all

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the stats, so it wasn't until two thousand and six

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that Manning eventually beat Brady in the playoffs for the

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>first time. Prior to that game, Peyton Manning had two MVPs,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Brady had zero. Peyton Manning had six first or second

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>team All pros, Brady had zero. Peyton Manning had all

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 2>the regular season numbers, but Brady was two to zero

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>against him in the playoffs and had won had been

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to three Super Bowls and won three Super Bowls. Manning

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>been to zero Super Bowls. They're like, oh, it's Brady Manning.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is Brady Allen's Manning, except Mahomes is two and

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>zero against Allen the playoffs and he's the only one

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>with an MVP, he has moral pros, he is, he's

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>both of them. Mahomes is the better numbers and the

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>playoff resume. Why does Josh Allen get to be Tom

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Brady or Peyton Manner? Josh Allen, if we're being honest,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 2>if we're comparing him to someone of Tom Brady's era

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>early in his career. Is Ben Roethlisberger a really talented, big,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>strong quarterback who up to this moment hasn't won sh

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and a pardon me, sorry forgot we're on YouTube live,

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>and is not a and doesn't have the stats that

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes has. So the Bills have built their entire team

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Chiefs. They've said they're obsessed about being

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs. The addition, so we want to break down

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>this actual game. Here is what I'm concerned about. Von

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Miller speed rushing on Orlando Brown concerns me. Now, Vaughn

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>likes to line up against the right tackle that Andrew Wiley.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.479
<v Speaker 2>But Von Miller could wreck this game the chief secondary

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>DeVante like could the Bills throw a bunch of bombs

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and get past interference penalties like the Raiders should have

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>done more of that concerns me. The Chiefs inability to

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>deal with mobile quarterbacks Josh Allen's killed him on quarterback runs.

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>That concerns me. The Chiefs number one draft pick Trent

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>McDuffie is back this week, off ir. I'm glad he's back.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>First game against Stefan Diggs, Gabe Davis. That's tough. Now

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>what is good is Harrison Buker is back this week,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>So finally the Chiefs kicking situation is going to be settled.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The Bills absolutely could win this game, but I am

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>going to but the Bills won this game in the

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>regular season last year and then spit up enough regular

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>season games that they lost the home field advantage to

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs. Here's my final Bills Chiefs take. This is

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a must win game for the Buffalo Bills because they

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>absolutely cannot in a year where they went out and

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>got von Miller and the Chiefs went out and traded

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>away their best receiver, where they have allegedly the number

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 2>one defensive football the Chiefs defense mediocre where Allan is

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>playing as well as he's ever played. They cannot squander

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>their best opportunity to have if they play in the

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>playoffs again, that game be in Buffalo. They have one

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 2>thing that Bills fans that like should hold on to

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>is Yeah, Mahomes is two and zero, but both those

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 2>games have been in Arrowhead. Well, if you don't want

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the next one to be an Arrowhead, you've got to win.

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 3>This game, right.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs would like to win this game. They don't

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>have to win this game, and so I think they do.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>You think the Chiefs have to win it or they

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>do win it?

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think they have to.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 2>How come?

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I just think if they don't, if they don't win,

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 3>people are gonna be talking. Man.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I know people will be talking. I know people

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 2>will be talking.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 4>I feel like this is going to it's whoever wins

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 4>this game. I feel like it's gonna it's gonna serve

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 4>their ego in the right way.

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 2>So this is why I'm saying it's a must win

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>for Buffalo. If the Bills don't win this game, then

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 2>it starts to be a real question, can we beat

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>this team? Mahomes would then be four and one against Allen,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>including the two playoff wins. The reason I don't think

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs have to win is because this game last year,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the exact same point of the season, the Bills didn't

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 2>only come to Era and win, They kicked the Chiefs

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 2>ass and the Chiefs struggled for the next few weeks

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 2>and it didn't matter.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, next game, all right, The four to one

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 4>Cowboys are looking to set off.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, by the way, on the poll, sixty one percent

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of the audience thinks the Chiefs are gonna win. With

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 2>that said, our YouTube stream probably skews a little Kansas

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>City heavy, but that's fine, But go ahead, right, Uh.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 4>The four to one Cowboys are looking to face the

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 4>undefeated Eagles. Dak is throwing passes left handed in practice,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 4>which I guess is kind of hopeful. Mike McCarthy said

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>that the Cowboys are preparing Cooper Rush to start. Yeah,

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 4>so the Cowboys hope that Cooper Rush does badly so

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 4>the decisions easier or is just like a Tom Brady

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Drew Bledsoe situation.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, Dak Prescott's obviously the better quarterback, despite the

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>fact they're four and zero with Rush, and Rush played

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>really poorly this past week and they won despite him.

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Great but that defense.

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Troy Aikman literally twenty minutes ago re live on YouTube

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>right now and again comments question stuff. We're gonna get

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 2>to him later in the show if you're in the chat.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Troy Aikman twenty minutes ago in the radio in Dallas

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>said that if Cooper Rush wins, you've got to ask

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the real question, do you stick with I think that's crazy.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it is a crazy idea to stick with

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Rush when Dak is clearly the better player and

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>there is not a single one of these games you

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>look at you're like, oh, won that because of Cooper?

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>That the competition's been mediocre and the defense has been unbelievable.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>Running game has been really good. Now, should they take

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>some things that they've learned from this time with Cooper

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to incorporate with Dak, Meaning, yeah, we know we have

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>a forty million dollar quarterback, but we maybe shouldn't call

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>an offenses if we do unless we have to because

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the defense is so good. Do I think yes? I

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>think that should be the case, but Dak obviously has

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>more talent all I don't think the Cowboys want to

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>lose this game, but I think because there's so much

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>noise surrounding.

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Dallas makes things a lot easier.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>The the is for the long term, like mental health

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of the franchise. It's not only best. What's best is

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 2>win or lose. That Cooper plays a talent, right, I

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>guess the ideal, the the thread the needle would be

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 2>somehow the Cowboys win because their defense is so unbelievable,

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>but Rush has three turnovers. They er the fact that,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>you know what helped Dak a lot, the fact that

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>they won that Rams game, but they did it despite

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Rush only throwing for one hundred yards. I actually think

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys this is gonna work out just perfectly for

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 2>them because they got four straight wins with Cooper, but

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>he's played worse each week. I think he's gonna be

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>bad this week. I think they're gonna lose. Dak then

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 2>takes takes over and they have the Lions and the Bears,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and Dak's gonna hit the ground running. And the question is,

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>because what you don't want is for Dak to take

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>back over with Cooper having never had a terrible game

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>that they lost, and so right, and so I think

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that this week Cooper's gonna have the bad game. I

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>think the Eagles are gonna win. I think Dak gets

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the job back.

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>All right? Next?

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, so we have another poll, sorry forget to

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 4>be the starting quarterback for the Cowboys.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>It's almost split Dak and Cooper fifty five to forty

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 2>five Dack. That's kind of what I'm saying. The fans

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>in the media love quarterback wins. That's why they love

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy g.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 4>I feel like they should get split custody of the

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 4>team that never works once that comes back, they just

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 4>one plays the first half.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 2>That never they teams have tried stuff like that that

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>never ever works.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Next, Oh, Jymon Green was not suspended for punching Jordan

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Poole in the face. Steve Kerr said that this is

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the biggest crisis that we've had since I've been the

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 4>coach here. Curs said, it's really serious stuff and our

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>culture has been damaged. You said on TV, you don't

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 4>think that Draymond will finish with the Warriors is yet,

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 4>But why would anybody trade for Draymond the basketball player

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>and Draymond on the teammate.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, so this is complicated. So I don't think Draymond's

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna finish the year with the Warriors. Yeah, I think

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna trade him. I know that's a somewhat controversial take,

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>but you got to keep in mind that Draymond gave

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>them an out because they don't want to give him

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 2>a long term extension. And after this year he is

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>a player option. He could opt out be a free agent,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>want the long term extension, right. I also think that

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you know they have to pay Wiggins. They're definitely paying Pool.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're gonna pay Draymond as well. And

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>so now Draymond, with his behavior, gave him a reason

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>for it, right, So why would someone trade for him?

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's two types of trades involving Draymond Green that

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I think could be interesting. One is a team that

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>is trading for the guys you would include along with Draymond,

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>So Draymond plus the young guys being to pardon me

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and Moody for a star player. So if a team

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>star asks out and what they want is young, you know, prospects.

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors have that, but you would have to include Draymond.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>So the salaries match. You follow me like this is

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a this trade's not gonna happen. I'm just making total

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is not my proposed trade. But like

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>let's say Zach Levine's like I want out of here

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 2>and the words like ah, that'd be interesting. Levine, along

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 2>with Clay and will play Wiseman Center.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 3>In order.

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 2>You can't just trade Kaminga and Moody for Levine. The

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 2>salaries aren't they don't bake enough. You're throwing Draymond now

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 2>the salaries were So there's one type of trade, the

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>word war. Here's another one team that needs to learn

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 2>how to win. So let's say, as a for instance,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Zion and Brandon Ingram don't work as a one two,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'm skeptical of it. I Repelicans could be really good,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think their defense is gonna be that

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>good despite herb Jones and Alvarado, and I don't know

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>that Ingram thinks he should be the number two to Zion.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 2>So for the Pelicans team like that, that's gonna that

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have anybody on the team with respect to CJ

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 2>that knows how to win at a high level. Need

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a glue guy, I need some defense. Could ingram for Draymond,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Kaminga and Moody. It's a conversation. The other type of

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>trade is a three teamer. So the three teamer is

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 2>as a for instance, the one involving the Lakers, because

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers, Draymond's a clutch guy. Draymond could play the

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 2>front line alongside Anthony Davis.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Everybody thinks that Draymond wants to go to the Lakers, and.

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot of smoke there. So the Warriors

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 2>obviously would not be taking Russ. But the way it

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 2>would work is Russ goes to for instance, let's use

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the team everybody's talking about the Pacers, Miles Turner and

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Buddy Healed. I don't know that the Warriors would want them,

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>but again they go to the Warriors. Draymond comes down

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to the Lakers and the Warriors kicking in draft picks

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to Indian the Pacers. You know, the Lakers kicking a

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 2>draft pick and the Warriors kicking a draft pick. So

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the Pacers get the two picks for taking on Russ.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Draymond goes to the Lakers and the Warriors get a

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 2>couple of rotations. Those so those are the different trades

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 2>that could work now as and again those are off

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the top of my head. My point is some star

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>is going to become available, and because of Big Vic,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>because of Victor Winn Binyama, there are going to be

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 2>more teams this year that are mediocre that then just

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 2>decide we want to tear this whole thing down and

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 2>try to tank for a draft pick than ever before

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 2>because of the thirst for Victor. So I think there's

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna be more guys available all right now. On the

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 2>the I think the Warriors botched this. You can't call

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>it the biggest crisis of your career and then not.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>And he got suspended one game yelling at Durant and

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>hurting Durant's feelings. He cold cocked Jordan Poole. I don't

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 2>know how Pool's gonna deal with it.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 4>You can tell that pools a little off. No, I

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 4>saw it when they played the Lakers.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 3>He was like, very like. You can tell that he was.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Just like, It's a jarring moment. And so much of

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Draymond's value comes from being leader adult all that stuff.

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 2>He's lost all authority there. Yeah, he's lost so I

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 2>just I don't think it's tenable long term for the Lake,

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>for the Warriors. All right, last one, there's our time,

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>but we're gonna be quick on this one so we

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 2>can get to your guys stuff soon.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Next, you know that former rich quarterback was caught stealing

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 4>from the poor alle Yeah, yep, he's denying everything completely. Now,

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Brett farm says that he's been unjustly smeared in the

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 4>media and said that he never knew where the money

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 4>was going to or coming from.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, you got his feet to the fire throughout this process.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you buy this?

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Of course not. I mean we've seen the text messages.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Text messages are are as crystal clear guilt as anything

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen. I'm not buying it. Also, while at

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 2>one point I thought the media was not covering this enough,

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the media has done a much better job of it.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 2>And I have now that I saw with respect. RG

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>three tweet out, Uh, yeah, what Davante Adams and Draymond

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Green did was bad. But let's not forget that Brett

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>favres soul from the poor guys. We can do multiple things, okay,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Like we have the ability to hold multiple thoughts in

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>our head at the same time, and I I what

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Brett Farv did, what I believe he did, was awful,

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and I believe he's going to end up in legal trouble.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Just that does not give every other athlete as for

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 2>other bad actions. But that is the that's like that

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>to tweet written by a Twitter algorithm. It's like all

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>this will get engagement. You'll be like preach, pre shut off,

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>like stupid that we can we can talk about all

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 2>of these things simultaneously.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 3>Kiss barbs.

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, Farve's denial was so audacious, like I've

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 2>done nothing wrong when we have seen the text messages.

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead way, So I want to ask you a question,

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 3>how long is it? When when did word get out there?

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 4>Brett Farr was denying this because like I just feel

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 4>like I'm just down here.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Ago.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so three days ago.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 4>These allegations came what like two or three weeks ago,

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 4>months ago.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 3>So him and his team like strategized like.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen, and by the way, it's that it's not

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 2>a the flat shaggy it wasn't me defense is not

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a terrible strategy. But anybody that's been paying attention to

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>this that the text messages are like the smoking gun here.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's it's an audacious defense, but I don't

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>buy it at all. All right, Uh, here's what we're

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna do again. Keep the questions coming to the sea block.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 2>We have a new game coming up after a very

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>short break, and I'm going to rant about the most

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 2>frustrating part about watching NFL football in twenty twenty two.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>That's all next about a sixty second break. We'll be

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 2>right back live on YouTube, and if you're listening on

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>a podcast, we appreciate that as well.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 5>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tania, and

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in What's Right? Nick Right? Live on YouTube,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, since we are live on YouTube, my apologies,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I am going to tweet out the link one quick

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>right now, still going live on YouTube, so that way

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 2>more people can join us because we're gonna answer your

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>questions in the chat at the end of the show.

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 2>We also have h on what's the right show? Sorry

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 2>about this, I should have done this starting our commercial break. Uh,

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>there we go, there's the link for that. Uh sent

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 2>out that the We're gonna answer questions in the chat

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and we've got a new game coming. But first I'll

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 2>look at that photoshop. Look demonse, Yeah I saw it. Yeah,

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I do read books. Stop see you calm down over

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 2>there dropping stuff.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I got just fidgeted with this phone for the first

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 4>thirty seconds of.

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Those I wasn't fidgeting, I was I was trying to

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 2>increase I was trying to amplify our reach. I didn't

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 2>drop my phone, by the way. Uh okay, I want

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to talk about something quickly before we get to our

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 2>new game. So like eight years ago, five years or

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 2>something like that, the NFL broadcast decided. Man, there's so

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>much controversy surrounding replay reviews. What is a catch? What

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 2>isn't a catch. Let's have on standby for all these

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 2>games a ref, a retired ref, so he can come

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in and be like, hey, this is a foul, this

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't a foul. He's not gonna be a part of

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the broadcast play in play out, but when we need

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 2>an expert, let's go to ONEm. I am calling on

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 2>NFL broadcasts to do the same thing for quote analytics unquote,

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>because it is so maddening listening to every decision a

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>coach makes that the broadcast crew disagrees with. There's like, oh,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 2>some nerd with a calculator told him to do it.

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>It's the all analytics. So I'm watching Monday night football

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs Raiders. The Raiders go for two to go up one,

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and Joe and Troy, who were great, they're like analytics.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>That was not analytics. The analytical models were actually very

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 2>split on if that was even a good or a

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 2>bad decision. That was Josh McDaniel Flatley saying, I think

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>we can get too and I don't think they trust

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 2>their kicker. I want to try and take the lead.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what it was. But here's my real frustration. First

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of all, there's so many things here, so give me

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 2>a few minutes. First of all, analytics is simply making

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 2>It needs a rebranding. It is making a decision based

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 2>on historical and contemporaneous evidence on what will lead to

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the best result. That's all it is. We all use

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 2>analytics all day long, whether we recognize it or not.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just calculated in our own head. It's like, well,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm running late, will I get there? Should I speed?

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Am I more or less likely to get their earlier?

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>If I speed? Well? How often is there a cop here?

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:05.959
<v Speaker 2>How often do I get pulled over? That is? That

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 2>is that decision tree is the same thing as analytics.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 2>If and so, there are certain NFL decisions that never

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>happened in the past that now sometimes do happen that

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 2>are purely analytics. Let me give you an example. A

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 2>team is down fourteen points and scores a touchdown. All

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 2>the analytical models agree in that spot you should go

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 2>for two. The reason you should do that that is

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 2>a pure analytical you know, red line down fourteen late,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>score a touchdown? Why do you go for two? Well,

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>if you get it now, a touchdown and an extra

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>point win you the game. If you don't get it,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you then have another opportunity to go for two. You

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 2>have to fail on two two point conversions for it

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>to hurt you. That is a clear Let me give

0:28:55.360 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you another example of a clear analytical redline, no doubt

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 2>about it. If you are and this is one a

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of teams don't do, but I argue, I would

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 2>argue they should. If you are down fifteen points and

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you need two touchdowns, one of them with a two

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 2>point conversion, right should and you score a touchdown, you

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>should go for two on the first touchdown. People are like, well,

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 2>but then if you don't get it, you're down two scores.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>The reason that is another analytical red line is you

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 2>want to know as early as possible if you are

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>or are not converting the two point conversion that way.

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 2>If you go, if you down fifteen, score touchdown, kick

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the X point down eight, and then get the ball

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>back down eight, go score another touchdown, fail the two

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>point conversion. With ten seconds left, you're like, oh, well,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I've lost games over. If you are down fifteen, score

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 2>touchdown and go for two and don't get it with

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>four minutes left, now you know, oh, down two scores.

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 2>We didn't get it. Now we are inn on side

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>kick situation. Those are analytical, pure analytics. A lot of

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 2>this other stuff that the announcers are blaming on analytics

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 2>is judgment calls in the finest of margins. And the

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 2>most frustrating part for me is we only play the

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>result on bad or not even bad on analytical decisions

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>that failed. So, for instance, what is the biggest surprise

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL this year? I would argue it's the Giants,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you know what, set their tone of their entire season.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Going for two with forty five seconds left in Game one,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>down one against the Titans and Saquon got in set

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the tone for their whole season. That would never have

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>happened a decade ago. It would have been thought of

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 2>as insane yea, and nobody's like, oh, analytics wright to

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>help the Giants there. The Raider game, people are killing

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Josh McDaniels for going for two to take the lead,

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 2>which again most of the analytical models actually disagreed with

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>because there was so much timeline. What nobody acknowledged was

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>on the first possession of the game in their own

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 2>territory and fourth and one, they went for it. That

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 2>is a pure analytical decision. They scored a touchdown. Everyone

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 2>kills John Harbaugh for last year for his goal line

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and two point conversion decisions, failing to acknowledge that last

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>year early in the year against the Chiefs, he went

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>for a fourth down it won them the game. The

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Chargers two weeks ago or last week, they went for

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 2>a fourth and short near midfield with the lead. Seemed

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>even by my standards, very aggressive. They ended up winning. Anyway,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>People kill the coach there Staley totally ignoring the week

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 2>before exact same situation. Up up against the Texans late

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth quarter, they went for a fourth down

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 2>in their own territory and got it and then ended

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>up winning the game because of it. Nobody ever talks

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>about these decisions when they work. It is maddening. And

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>nobody ever kills a coach for going against analytics, going

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 2>with the old school way when they lose, because you know,

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the major mistakes the Raiders made something that

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>went totally in the face of analytics. Up fourteen to

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>nothing on Kansas City, they had a fourth and one

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 2>at the thirty five, the Chiefs thirty five, and they

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>kicked the field goal. All the analytical models screamed go,

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 2>go go. They didn't. They got a field goal. A

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of good that did them. We never so old

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 2>school football. What coaches and the media are is complicit

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>in this. They coached to delay losing as opposed to

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to win the game outright. The Chiefs made a

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 2>grievous analytical error in that Raider game. They had fourth

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and two right outside of the two minute warning around midfield.

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 2>If they get a first down, they win the game.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 2>They punted away up one, and you know what happened.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 2>The Raiders sliced down the field and if DeVante Adams

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't bobble that football, they're in field goal range. No,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders bobbled it on the sideline and they're the

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>That was a mistake by the Chiefs. They got away

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>with the Ravens. Last week against the Bengals, they'll give

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>you another example. Everyone killed Hardball for not kicking the

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>field goal against the Bills, blamed analytics. So this weekend

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 2>against the Bengals, up three, he went against the analytics

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and kicked the field goal. Trusted his defense. You know

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 2>what the Bengals did, drove a right eight down the field,

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>score a touchdown to go up one. Now, the Ravens

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 2>ended up getting away with it because they had a

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 2>great final two minute drive. But it's just it is

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 2>so maddening that we are NFL fans and even the

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>language of it is biased. Take the points. Why don't

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 2>you take the points?

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Guys?

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>When teams don't kick field goals, it's not because they

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 2>don't like points. It's because they want more of it.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to take more points. So that's my little

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 2>rant one day, mark it down the folks that kill

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 2>every area and that's the one last point. You would

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 2>think it'd be more popular because it's the obvious, more

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 2>aggressive way to play, going for it, leaving your offense

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 2>on the field, but fans have been tricked and the

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 2>thinking it's dumb. The folks that are out here being

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>anti analytics are going to sound like the NBA commentators

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of a decade ago saying jump shooting teams don't win championships.

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna look like Caveman. What are you amazed by

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 2>how long this has gone?

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I'm amazed at the plot right now? Yeah?

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, well let's get to our game. I told

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 2>you this is gonna be a good analytics train. So

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>how does this game work, what does it?

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 3>What happens? It's called right ends pretty straightforward. I will

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 3>make a statement at this stupid kick. Oh yeah, I

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 3>love it. I don't love it to stricken my head

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 3>just a little bit.

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I will make a statement and then we will

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 4>fill in the blanks with our answers. Our live viewers

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 4>can also respond in the chat, and we'll read some

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 4>of the best answers. Okay, our first one we've got.

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 4>After losing to the Jeams, Davante Adams pushed a cameraman

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 4>over who got in his way. DeVante Adams punishment should

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 4>be okay, so.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Writing these down, yes, all right, I'm going to all right,

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to say, oh geez, what can you

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 2>not write?

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Buddy?

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 2>This is what I'm writing. Suspension with an asterisk. Okay,

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the reason I say, and ask here's why I say suspension,

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>but with an asterisk. I do not believe you should

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>be suspended. However, I believe that what he did is

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 2>far worse than what Mike Evans did. Mike Evans pushed

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 2>another player, and Mike the NFL suspended Mike Evans, and

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 2>so because of that, I think they have set the

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 2>precedent that you the If the punishment for shoving Marshawn

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Lattimore is a game, the punishment for shoving a civilian

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>has to be a game. I also am really annoyed

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 2>by the members of the media that are blaming this

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 2>camera guy. Now, they're like, oh, you should have looked

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 2>where he was going. Oh, he was in DeVante adams workspace.

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That's that guy's workspace. Now. Do I think the camera

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 2>guy filing a police report is part of a pending lawsuit? Yes?

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Do I think it's a bit of a money grab. Yes.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Do I think what DeVante Adams did rises to the

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>level of criminality, No, I don't, even though I mean

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it's it's technically simple assault caught on tape, So yeah,

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>he's probably gonna have to plead to something if the

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>guy continues to press charges. But all these folks are like,

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, can you believe this guy is going forward? Folks,

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 2>if you're just at work and something happens to neither

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:24.240
<v Speaker 2>of your markers work, okay, if you're just at work

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 2>and you'll walk by somewhere and it's like, hey, if

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you pick that up, if you pick that bag up,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Pete strangers on the internet will make fun of you,

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 2>but you get to keep the fifty thousand dollars inside.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 2>I think most people would be picking it up. It's

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 2>free money for him. He's gonna get some money. I

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 2>don't begrutin.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Like man.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 4>You know, Okay, well, I can either go forward with

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 4>this or you can just give me some money.

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Which, yeah, but the if you got to quickly file

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 2>the police report, it helps you a lot. I think

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 2>you'll end up dropping the charges again. It if Mike

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Evans hadn't been suspended, I would say the punishment should

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 2>just be a fine. But he was suspended, so I

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 2>think he should be suspended. All right, what's the next one?

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 2>The lext?

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 3>What we got?

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 4>The Chiefs were saved Monday night when the Raiders went

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 4>for two instead of kicking the game tying extra point.

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 4>The coaching decisions this year have been horrific. The NFL

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 4>head coach most likely to hit on a twenty in

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 4>blackjack k is okay?

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Are you having a straight a stroke? Are you okay?

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Demonte's got to go?

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Demonte just got up, So I'm gonna surprise

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 2>people with my answer here.

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, gosh.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Demonse is a little under the weather. He's also

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 2>having trouble with his whiteboard that he also, by the way,

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 2>left at home, and I had to go back and

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 2>get are you gonna sit back down? What are you doing?

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think everyone, what do you think? My

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 2>answer to this is gonna be the coach that Daniel Hackett.

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 2>That is not my even the Daniel Hackett knows not.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 3>They don't Andy Reid Jack.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 2>No, here's my answer. My answer is Kingsbury. And you

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 2>might be like, Nick, why, I know you don't like Cliff.

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 2>My answer is Kingsbury because nobody would hit on twenty

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 2>in Blackjack.

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Ever.

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the casino will actually try to stop you

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 2>from doing It'll be like are you sure? So why

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 2>would Kingsbury do it? Because I think Kingsbury's flirting with

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the cocktail waitress and not paying attention. It's like hit me.

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 2>He's like no, they're like sir, He's like hit me.

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, the if it were the coach most likely

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to stay on sixteen against a ten, that would be Hacket,

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 2>but hit on a twenty, it's Kingsbury because I think

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 2>he's distracted. You're out of the whiteboard game. By the way,

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 2>you're not writing anything. Your marker's not working. You're out.

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 2>You just asked me, and all I answer the questions?

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 2>What's next?

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 3>All right? New York sports are thriving.

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 4>The Jets, the Giants are somehow over five hundred for

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 4>the first time since twenty fifteen. The Nicks and Nets

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 4>tip off this week. The best New York team after

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 4>baseball season will.

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Be, Oh, that's easy. The team that I have seasoned

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 2>tickets for the best New York team once the Yankees

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>are done is going to be the Nets that the

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 2>and so okay, can I just all right, everybody real quick?

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Before I even give my answer, Demonse holds yours up

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.760
<v Speaker 2>again because I so, Demonse, hold it up to the camera.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 2>You do, fist, hold it up to the camera. Okay,

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that there you go. See how it says? Bills? Okay,

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the Bills are not a New York team.

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 3>You mean they're not a New York team.

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 2>They are talking New York City, which is why they

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 2>said the Jets and the Giants and the question they're

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 2>on New York City teams. They're not talking about the

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo Bills in upstate New York I told you you're

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 2>out of the game, and instead you wrote bills twice

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 2>in terrible handwriting because small. Yeah, it's all the first

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 2>time you're out. You can regroup next week. Just ask

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the questions. My answer is the Nets. I don't think

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the Nets can win the title, and I don't think

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 2>they'll be great in the playoffs, but they'll be quite

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 2>good in the regular season. I don't think. Listen, the

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Giants and Jets are good stories, but between the two

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of them, they're gonna win zero combined playoff games. The

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Knicks are not gonna be very good. Best player on

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that team can't be Jail and Brunson. The answer is

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 2>obviously the Nets. It's no question the Nets. Do you know,

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 2>by the way, next Wednesday, you're going by the way?

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 2>You you me, your mom and one of your sisters,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 2>next third, next a week from or not a week

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 2>from Wednesday? Wednesday? Nets Pelicans to open the season.

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, that's great, answers the Nets.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, Oh Joe Schmoe by the way. And the

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 2>chant says the Nets, and Cameron says, fly Jets Fly.

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Let me say one thing about the Jets. Zach Wilson's

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>look good. In his two games back, and that is

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that matters for the Jets is that

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson progresses and he looks good.

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Next, you're not a big baseball fan, but you've been

0:41:58.600 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 4>watching the playoffs a bit.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 3>You will watch what percentage of that will be playoffs?

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, I mean starting next round? Where? Well, really,

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 2>in this round when the games aren't on during the day,

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 2>eighty five percent. Let me say this about playoff baseball.

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Playoff baseball, it's like a different sport than regular season baseball.

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Regular season baseball, I have almost I have close to

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>zero interesting. Playoff baseball is exhilary, the way every pitch matters,

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the way everything matters. I'm totally into it. And I

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 2>like the new format. I like the expanded I didn't

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>think I would, but the best of three in the

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 2>wild card round, now the division round, Padre's Dodgers been

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable series. I'm totally in on the playoff baseball, So

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll watch eighty five percent.

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Last one?

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Wait, hold on, I know it says something about Roger

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 4>Goodell here, but we're not doing We're not doing that yet.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 3>So Adrick, no, because I'm on the updated document.

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's it's it's not okay. So do you have

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers question? This has not been your best performance.

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you no, no, no, man, you don't okay,

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll read the question. Demonze, take a lap. Demonte's in

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the penalty box. During the Lakers Wolves preseason game, Patrick

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>Beverly called a huddle on the court. Lebron A d

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and Lonnie Walker joined him. Russell Westbrook refused to join.

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Your relationship advice for Russ and Pat Bev is my

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 2>relationship advice. You're not on the updated document. Stop looking

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 2>so confused. It's not your fault. The internet went out

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 2>for a moment. I already had mine updated. Don't worry

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 2>about it, Pal, I got you my Here's my advice

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 2>for Russ and Patrick Beverly, and it's what I think

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Russ expected to happen.

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Divorce.

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 2>There is no saving this. And the idea Russ is

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 2>clearly and obviously coming to the realization like I am,

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 2>that he's going to start the season on this team.

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 2>He didn't want to start the season on this team.

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 2>He was trying to play good soldier. And what was

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 2>planning on starting the season on this team and this

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and Patrick Beverly. Listen, Russ, I've got your back. Patrick

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Beverly has no business trying to tell Lebron James, Anthony Davis,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and Russell Westbrook Win to huddle up. Patrick Beverly is

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the height of irritation. Whether he's not one of those

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 2>guys like, oh, you hate him when he's on your team,

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>but you love him when he or you hate him

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 2>when he's on the other team love when he's on

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 2>your team. No, Yeah, he's irritating for all people involved

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 2>in all circumstances. Unfortunately, the Lakers traded for him, so

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be around. I do not think Russ makes

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it to New Year's Day with the Lakers. I think

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Russ's on his way out. They just haven't found the

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 2>trade that works best. Okay, I gotta be honest. This

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 2>game didn't go exactly how we hoped. Demondy's market didn't work.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Demonsey's computer then crashed. He's a little onto the weather.

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna you know what, I take ownership of this.

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 2>This was my fault here. I should have saw this

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.839
<v Speaker 2>coming down the pike. Demonsey's still curious about what's going

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 2>on with the computer, just going with the computer. Don't

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 2>worry about it. We got it all to the handle.

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.959
<v Speaker 2>We're still live on YouTube. Podcast, still rolling. We answer

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 2>your questions. Next quick break, What's right? All Right? Welcome

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 2>back in episode eighty one. What's Right? Nick Right Live

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube. Also if you're just listening to us, you

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 2>can download on Spotify on Apple iTunes. But he don't

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 2>worry about it. Don't get tilted. You see what you

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 2>see him listen, we're live. Oh guys, I told him

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 2>not to worry about it. Now we're doing a new

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 2>drawing of blank. Monse's performance. Day has been outstanding. He's

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 2>under the weather. He could have called in sick. You

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 2>could have left the screwed. His computer went down for

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:39.919
<v Speaker 2>a moment and his whiteboard didn't work. I'm not worried

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 2>about it. You're doing a great job.

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Wait, I'm actually not. You're a tilted by it.

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 2>We should be a little tilted, should be a little bothered.

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:48.720
<v Speaker 3>It's not my fault.

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 5>Is that well?

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:51.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, I kind of gave you an out there

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 2>saying it wasn't your fault. I'm not sure whose fault

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 2>it was. Doesn't matter. We are now reading questions from

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the fans. Demonse, what are the questions?

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, this putting in the question. But Nathan said he

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 4>had to turn this off for you to book.

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh good for him, you know what? Nathan the good

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 2>thing about being on YouTube. In the podcast We're on

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 2>demand wherever you want. Did a nice couple chapters in Nate,

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you'll feel better about yourself.

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Next, Gave Goodwin says, what's right with Nick?

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Right? Come for the book clubs, stay for the analytic analysis,

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Gabe Goodwin is another one of our executive producers. As

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned the EPs earlier, Gabe runs Blue Duck Media

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 2>does a great job. I would love to know is

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Gabe Gabe at Oh Gabe's there? Can you guys put

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 2>in there? What's the last book Gabe read? Start to finish?

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Cause I this is there's a chance that Gabe, because

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Gabe is like a low key, real smart guy, there's

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 2>a chance that Gabe was like, oh yeah, I read

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a book really recently about you know, the French Revolution.

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I would believe that. I would also believe that he

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 2>has not read a complete book in six years. Like

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 2>I think the realm, the range of possibilities there are endless.

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 2>This is not a book guy too busy making podcast.

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh look at them? Look okay, so we can put

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 2>that in the chat, all right, to Monjay, what's next?

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Next? We have Matthew.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 4>He's asking what's the best bet you've ever won? Poker

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 4>or sports gambling. I want to know about your favorite

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 4>win ever. Love this show, have a great day, team,

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Thanks dude.

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well that's very nice of you. I mean, poker

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:33.879
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be like a bet like I've won. I think

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the biggest single poker hand I've ever won, the pot

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 2>was probably, I don't know, sixteen thousand dollars, So that's

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 2>probably the biggest poker hand I've won. My best poker

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 2>night ever would be that it was on TV the

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 2>time that I won that ten thousand dollars Sit and

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Go with Helmut and to Grandou and Mario Jo and others,

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 2>and that I mean that one I won. It was

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand to enter and it was fifty thousand, fifty year,

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 2>sixty thousand first prize. It was sixty thousand first prize,

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 2>so I won fifty thousand there. So that was So

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 2>that's my best poker night ever. But that's kind of

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:20.720
<v Speaker 2>a unique situation. That's a one off. The best bet

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I've ever won.

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Would be.

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>The oh I won I won a lot when the

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Lakers won the title on a Lakers future. That was

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 2>a really good one.

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, no.

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 2>The best the best bet I ever won, without question

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 2>was when the Clippers were up three to one on

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets. I bet the Nuggets live to win the

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 2>series at like eighty while they were trailing in Game five,

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.919
<v Speaker 2>with a butt with in this kind of gambling group

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm in, I got the Nuggets to win the series

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 2>at like seventy eight to one because they were down

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:14.959
<v Speaker 2>three to one in the series and they were down

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 2>like fifteen in the second half, and they ended up

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 2>coming all the way back. So that one, I mean,

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 2>that one was crazy. I also won a ton of

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 2>money in this same gambling group betting on the last

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 2>presidential election after Biden had been announced the winner. Because

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these guys I'm in this group with

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 2>are just just I mean, I think half of them

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>were at the Capitol in January sixth and they were

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 2>convinced that the election was gonna get overturned, and they

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 2>kept betting. They bet on Trump to win States that

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 2>had already been called ye and so that was that

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:52.280
<v Speaker 2>was the biggest That was way more. I mean that

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the election thing was just consistent. I mean it was

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 2>just people giving money away, and if I mean totally honest,

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.240
<v Speaker 2>it kind of felt like they were getting free rolled

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 2>because if I lost, it would mean that, you know,

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 2>our government fell in a coup, in which case I

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 2>think all bets are all. I think that's where they

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 2>got the phrase all bets are off. It's like, well,

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 2>if your country's in the midst of a you know,

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the government's been overthrown, I'm not sure how and when

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 2>we're paying these bets off all? Right?

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Next uh, Dylan asked if the Chiefs went in bankrupt

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 4>and had to shut shut operations down tomorrow, what NFL

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 4>team would you root for.

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting question. So I think the answers

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. Oh well, because I do believe in Trevor Lawrence,

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 2>and I wouldn't want to like bandwagon a team that

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 2>is already really good. Yea, the Ravens be fun, but

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 2>it would feel a little bandwagoning. It couldn't be any

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:02.759
<v Speaker 2>AFC West teams. I obviously wouldn't be the if let me,

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I got that's a hell of a question, like who's

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 2>my favorite team? Another way to put that is, uh,

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 2>what's my favorite team other than the Chiefs? So I

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 2>like Trevor Lawrence, so that one's interesting. There'd be no

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 2>AFC East team. I like Tomlin. But no, I didn't know.

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Houston's not the answer. Uh so the Jags or if

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 2>they got rid of Jimmy Garoppolo San Francisco. San Francisco

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:36.400
<v Speaker 2>would feel a little bandwagon.

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 3>To be honest with you, it seems like you love Cincinnati.

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I do like Cincinnati. Cincinnati beat it, but that feels

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 2>a little bandwagony too. They just went to the super Bowl.

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 2>You know what? My answer to the my answers to

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the Jags. All right, what's the next question? From the chat?

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 3>Pepa asked what is the Premier League team? Team you

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 3>rout for?

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Liverpool? Because, uh, my buddy Maverick owns a piece of it,

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So the lebron and Maverick bought a piece of Liverpool.

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And I like Premier League soccer. I like European soccer

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 2>most notably or international soccer. So I'm so excited for

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the World Cup. But I never had a team I

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 2>thought for a while that I was a Tottenham fan,

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 2>but then I realized I didn't really care. I wasn't

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 2>watching their games. But once Maverick bought a piece of Liverpool,

0:52:22.239 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 2>then I became a fan of them.

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 4>All Right, last one, yeh by the way says you

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 4>nailed it. He got through half of Obama's last book.

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what I figured. He has n't on his

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:32.720
<v Speaker 2>night stand, so it looks good but he doesn't. Actually.

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so he got Joel Penfield Pinfield lo hard? Oh?

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 3>How okay? How hard?

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Were you laughing when Carl Jeffer's voice cracked when he

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 4>had to announce that call.

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen, let me say one thing, and is oh

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 2>wrap the show. The roughing the pastor penalty on Chris

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Jones was objectively terrible. It was one of the worst

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 2>calls you'll ever see. He already possessed the ball when

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:59.879
<v Speaker 2>they called him for ruffing the passer. Despite that call

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that it might have been the ten

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 2>point swing, I think the Chiefs got the better whistle

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 2>over the course of that game because the refs were

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 2>so tilted by how bad that call was. A narrowhead's

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:17.959
<v Speaker 2>crowd that the Chiefs got every single flag the rest

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:21.720
<v Speaker 2>of the game. If I'm a Raider fan, that holding

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 2>on the kick on the missfield goal haunts me to

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 2>this day. And the poor Raiders who blew the game

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 2>against the Cardinals almost stole the game against the Titans,

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>finally got a win and then we're about to get

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 2>another win. Be fine. Two and three headed into their

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 2>box and would have beaten It would have beaten the Chiefs.

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And uh, what was their other win? Was it the

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Chargers or was it the Broncos the Raiders the Raiders

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:55.800
<v Speaker 2>other win? My apologies, No, it was it was the Broncos.

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right. They would have gotten two divisional wins and

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 2>going into their buy instead, they're one and four. With

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 2>that said, here's the Raiders' next six Houston, New Orleans, Jacksonville, Indie, Denver,

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Seattle before they play the Chargers again. The Raiders absolutely

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:15.879
<v Speaker 2>could be five and five. The reason I say five

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and five is obviously they're gonna lose to the Jaguars,

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 2>my second favorite team. That's today's show, episode eighty one.

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you guys tomorrow for the gambling show. What's

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Right