WEBVTT - How Does the UK Pension Drawdown Work?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, Merin Talks Money listeners,

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I have exciting news. I have launched a weekly Merin

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Talks Money newsletter. The first edition came out last Saturday.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Are very in depth, well, maybe not as in depth

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>as some of you might like. Look at the Bitcoin

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>melt up, all the great insights in even better humor

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>than you get here on the podcast. Hard to believe,

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, but it is true. The newsletter is for

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg subscribers only, so be sure to sign up at

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bloomberg dot com slash Newsletters or check out the link

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. Welcome to Merin Talks Your Money,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Pirsonal Finance edition of Merin Talks Money and these

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>bonus podcasts and they are a bonus. We talk about

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the best strategies for making the most of your money.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Merrin Somesetweb and with me Senior Border and Money

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Just Still author John's Depic.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Hello John, Hi'm.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Signing times Bitcoin Up Down, Up down. I guess everyone's

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>reading our newsletters. Everyone's reading money to Still too right

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>because you talk about it.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Too absolutely can't get enough of it.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, do you know what it gets me? A lot

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of engagement on Twitter. People keep saying to me, you

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>only post about bitcoin, so you get engagement, and you

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know what, it's true because it's kind of fun. Anyway,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this week we're not going to be talking about bitcoin, well,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>not on this bit of the pod anyway. We are

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>answering another question about pensions, and I don't say another

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with exhaustion. I know it's very important and it's something

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>that John and I get questions about all the time,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and we want to make absolutely sure that when it

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to your time to dealing with your pension, you

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what to do. So this is the question

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that John and I get asked, possibly the most apart

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from should I buy bitcoin? But we're not touching that today.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Here it is how does pension draw down actually work?

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, we hear a lot about pension draw down

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>about how are we going to take care of our

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>own money and our run up for a time, and

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that's our accumulation phase. Then we get to our decumulation phase.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>How on earth does that actually work? And how best

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can we manage it? Now? John and I of course

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>are brilliant and all sorts of things, hugely knowledgeable, but

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on this we have had to pull in an expert,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so here we have Stuart Trousse Stewart. Thank you so

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Stuart is the co host of Money, Money,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Money on Switch Radio and author of the Bluffer's Guide

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to Economics. Although of course he had not a bluffer,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>he is an expert. He was previously a strategist at

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. He's also e

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>columnist for Bloomberg Opinions to do It. Welcome and thank you. Right, okay,

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>so let's just get right in there. How does pension

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>draw down actually work?

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 3>The difficulty with pension draw down from an ordinary retire

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>or prospective retires perspective is that basically all the risk

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>is down to you, so you, you know, unlike having

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>a final salary pension where the money just turns up

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>in your out every month, so nice. You've kind of

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>got to engineer how the money is withdrawn from your

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>pot and ideally that you don't outlast your pot. That

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>means you take on a lot of risks. So you

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>take on the longevity risks simply that you last longer

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 3>than your money does. The inflation risk. You've got to

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 3>have a strategy for investing the money you don't need immediately.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, the bottom line is you've got to decide

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>on an appropriate level of draw down from your fund.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>So the way you can handle it is the classic

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>thing is people some people take their twenty five percent

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>of their pot tax free as a lumps arm to

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 3>go and buy a yacht or a Lamborghini or holiday

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 3>of a lifetime or more sort of more boringly, to

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of pay off mortgages than anything outstanding they've got

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>prior to retirement, and then they put the rest of

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>their pot into what's called draw down, and they decide

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>on a sustainable rate of draw down, ideally with the

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>help of a financial advisor. But a lot of people

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>don't take that route. Some rules of thumb perhaps we

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>can discuss later to as a guide of what's a

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 3>sustainable rate. But there is one other strategy that combines

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the tax free cash and drawing down a regular income,

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>because you can, instead of taking your twenty five percent

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>tax free cash all in one go, you can take

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent of each monthly draw down free of tax,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and that allows you to take a much bigger income

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>without running into sort of making yourself a forty percent

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>tax payer and retierance stuff like that. And you know,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>obviously that's a big challenge in the way of the

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>budget as well. You know, given the inheritance tax now

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 3>applies to pensions, you want to be able to draw

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 3>as much as you can from your pension if you've

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 3>been fortunate enough to build up a big pot without

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 3>paying forty forty five percent to withdraw it.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but the challenge, there's jud so so many places

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to go here. But let's star. Yeah, let's start with

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that inheritance tax point and whether you should take out

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenty five percent. It's not always twenty five percent

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>any more, is it as capped? But that large tax

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>free amount that you can take out immediately. Now, let's say,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that you hit whatever it is you

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>can start withdrawing from your pension. It's fifty five for

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>some and then going up to fifty six, right, and

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>then is it going to fifty seven like that? Yes,

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>So it depends on which age you can take it.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But you get to that age and you do not

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>take out the twenty five percent, you decide to take

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of every income payment going forward as

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>your tax free amount. If you get hit by a

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>bus tomorrow, everything in your pension now becomes IHT liable,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you took the whole twenty five percent out

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at once and gave it to your children, then you

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>would have avoided that bit of inheritance tax.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think you've you've just hit the nail

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 3>on the head there actually, because if you simply take

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 3>the twenty five percent tax free cash and leave it

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 3>in your bank account, you know, economically, that doesn't change anything.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 3>But if you gift it, then yes, absolutely that's a

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>game check. So you know, say you're talking about a

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>million pound pot. You can take two hundred and fifty

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>thousand pound out of that and gifted away, and your

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>inheritance taxes is calculated on the remaining seven hundred and

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is subject I just want to say

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>quickly before I'm just saying that that is subject to

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the seven year uld. Did you get run over by

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a bus tomorrow, you're still subject to problem. Get away

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from buses, stay away.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, no, yeah, you're absolutely right. That at least

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 3>starts the process rolling. And you know, and to some extent,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 3>the tax free cash is is kind of more complicated

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 3>as well, because that's not inheritable, do you know what

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean? A lot of tax allowances, especially between husband

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>and wife, are inheritable, but your spouse or whoever you

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>leave it to doesn't inherit your right to tax free cash.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>So that's what slightly changes the dynamic a bit, you know,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 3>And in some ways it's better to inherit a million

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 3>pound in ices from somebody, although you lose the tax wrapper.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>You have to take that in cash unless you're a spouse,

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>so you know, you could see you're already it gets

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 3>really complicated because you've got a whole load of choices

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>that most people just don't want to have. You know,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the sort of pension freedoms ten years or so ago

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>gave people a lot of freedom that they didn't really

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 3>want to want to have.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's sad, okay, right, Let's assume here we've decided

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we've decided not to take the twenty five percent up front.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We've decided to leave it in the account, and we've

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.559
<v Speaker 1>decided that every month when we draw our income, twenty

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>five percent of it will be the tax free part.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Or I'm saying twenty five percent is shorthand by the way,

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we do know it's capped. We're just saying twenty five percent. Yes,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people, it will remain twenty five percent.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like admin. Hell, how do you do that?

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You simply say your provider do this for me? Or

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is there some kind of admin that you're required to

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>do to make this happen?

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there is that been required to make that happen.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 3>But actually most pension providers will be able to set

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>you up. So say, for example, you decide to take

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent of each monthly payment free of tax,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 3>you can you can arrange for that to be paid

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 3>regularly into your bank account with minimal interference. A problem

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>comes when they have to decide what to sell from

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 3>within your pension pot to provide you with a liquidity,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>so you can't completely get away from the problem. But

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 3>most people can set it up so that they receive

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a regular amount into their bank account. The question is

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 3>is whether that's too much now run out of money

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>or too little and now pot will build up and

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 3>up and up and now get hit with inheritance tax

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>when they eventually die.

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But when you say they, you're referring to the provider.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's say, for example, that you hold your SIP

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on a DIY platform, so maybe you all language landsown

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>or I or something like that. How does it work.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Then when you say they have to decide what to

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sell to create the liquidity and these circumstances, you have

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to do that yourself. So it's hard work.

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 3>You're exactly right, and you know, I mean, this is

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 3>a conversation I have with a lot of people, is

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>that we may all, you know today, we may all

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 3>feel on top of our powers, and you know, on

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 3>top of our game and stuff like that, our appetite

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 3>for complexity, you know, in our late seventies and eighties

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 3>is going to be significantly diminished, even if we've got

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 3>mental capacity. So you know, this is one of the

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.599
<v Speaker 3>problems with things like draw down. There's a lot of flexibility,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of freedoms to do stuff, but most people

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>don't want those freedoms. So you can have it set

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 3>up so you get the regular income. You can do

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the regular income even if you've taken all your tax

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 3>free cash. It's just you can have a bigger income

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 3>without paying a huge amount of tax. If you take

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>a quarter of each monthly.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Payment so it might make sense then, I mean in

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the accumulation phase obviously, you know, if you're diying in

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the accumulation is complicated. You've given eyels all the time,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be careful of your investments, et cetera, but you don't

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have the same type of maths to do so. For

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>most people, is it fair to say that it would

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>make sense, if you've diyed through accumul perhaps to hand

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it over to a platform that will do the money

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>management for you in the decumulation phase.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, no, I think there's a case to be

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 3>made for doing that. Another way people handle the complexity

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 3>as well, is that the early years of retirement tend

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>to be pretty expensive. In fact, spending in retirement tend

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to be a bit of a u shape. But you,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, You still might have children on the

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet, and you might want to sort of buy

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 3>yourself a little present for a lifetime working or something

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 3>like that, or the holiday and what have it, whatever,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 3>whatever the cause, you spend quite a bit in the

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>early years of retirement, and then you get to the

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 3>stage where hopefully you're sort of still fairly fit, but

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>your appetite for sort of trekking in the Himalayas or

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>what have you, is not quite what it was when

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>you were in your twenties, so you're spending goes down

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>a bit. And then obviously the final years it's a

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>bit of a lottery. You've got care and stuff like that.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So what some people do is that they spend sort

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of in a more discretionary manner in the early part

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>of retirement, and then when they start to get a

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 3>clear idea of what their fixed expenses are, then some

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>people buy an annuity to cover just those fixed expenses

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>and then and you know, the rest of the pot

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>is available to be drawn down if they need more

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>money than that. But that's kind of a nice way

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 3>giving yourself some certainty at a time when you're you're

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 3>you're craving a lack of complexity in your life.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that makes it. That makes a lot of sense.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a really useful thought. The idea that your retirement,

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>your retirement spending is is you shaped. So let's say,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say, John, this is the last question I'm going

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask, and I'm handing over to you at the

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>long list of questions I know you have about this.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't, of course, you do, of course you. So

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about how we actually invest. So let's say

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that I am going to stay DIY at least maybe

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for the first ten years of my retirement. Maybe I'm

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>only in my late thefties, and I'm pretty sure that

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I can do this my out for the next fifteen

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>years or so. Do I just go out and buy

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a pile of equity income funds or equity income investment

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>trusts or is that the wrong approach and I should

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>just go straight into bonds and hold a pall of

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>boring bonds forever. Not the bonds are always boring.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>There's so much to unpicking that, you know. It's a

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>basic principle of investment. The amounts of risk you take

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 3>is proportionate to your time horizon. So you know, if

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you're setting you know, if you're saving a lump some

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, to pay off for mortgage by a

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>flat something like that in the next few months, you

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>obviously don't want to take the risk of the market

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 3>crashes and halves your capital, so you take zero risk

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 3>your cash or short dated bonds. But as your time

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 3>horizon lengthens, and especially once it gets past five years,

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 3>which at least some of your pension pot will be

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 3>designed to last for then it's appropriate to take more risk.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 3>And the question is how you take the risk with

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 3>a pension Because you don't have to pay capital gains

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 3>tax and stuff like that, you don't actually need to

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>have income generating sets in that you can draw down

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>on the capital gain. So you know, it's the old

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 3>thing between being indifferent between an income and a capital gain.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, if your wealth is risen by ten percent,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter whether you've got ten percent of dividends

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 3>or your the value of your assets gone up by

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>ten percent. So to that extent, you don't necessarily have

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>to restrict yourself to equity income funds on the one hand,

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 3>And then you talked about bonds, and the natural thing

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 3>is that as people get older, they de risk their portfolios.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 3>They have bigger holdings of bonds. But there's a massive

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>difference between holding a bond, an individual bond, and holding

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a bond fund because the only way you get the

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 3>good bits of bonds, you know, the fact that you

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 3>know what you're going to get when they mature, and

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the regular income along the way is if you hold

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 3>individual bonds to maturity if you buy a bond fund,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're just as subject to the arbitrary movements

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>and markets as an equity fund would be, you know,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and people found that to their huge cost in say

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two, when inflation took off, interest rates took off,

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 3>and bond funds got absolutely crucified. And so it really

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>depends what you're going for. If you've still got an

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 3>appetite for complexity, then you organize your bonds. You've got

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>them running off at a regular period, creating a stream

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 3>of coupon income and final redemption, so you can actually

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>plan what's going on. You can't do the same with

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 3>a bond fund. It's simply just another asset class that's

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 3>subject to market movements.

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so going into bonds by yourself it's also very

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>hard work.

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No, it's very labor intensive. You're doing what a

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 3>defined benefit pension fund manager would be doing, matching their

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 3>assets and liabilities, and you having a nice ladder of

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>bonds maturing at regular intervals, and you can have a

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 3>spreadsheet or I'm sure there's more sort of exotic software,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 3>but from an individual investors' perspective, they can see where

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 3>their incomes coming in each month, and they can engineer

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 3>it so they get exactly what they want. And you know,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 3>they can even do fancy things by outside pension wrappers,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 3>by sort of buying low coupon bonds. So some of

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the return is in the form of capital gains. But

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 3>do you know what I mean, you know, yeah, exactly,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 3>you're optimizing all the tools you've got at your disposal.

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Is it is mind blowing.

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So that there's a reason why people do this professionally, right.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh, definitely, very much so, you know, but the

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>issue between the difference between bonds and bond funds is

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>a crucial one that you know, even a lot of

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>financial advisors don't seem to grasp.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really interesting point that Manas kind

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>of brought up. Is there difference between the accumulation and

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the decumulation fees. I mean, ultimately, accumulation can be quite

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 2>easy if you really wanted to, then you can just

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>stick your money monthly basis, save every month, stick and

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>track your funds whatever. But you know, you start in

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 2>your twenties, you get forty fifty years before you're retired,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you can keep your portfolio being virtually the same kind

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of you know, between eighty and one hundred percent equities,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 2>probably for at least the first twenty years, probably for

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the first thirty if you want, and then you don't

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 2>have to worry too much. But is this becoming very

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>obvious from the conversation. The bit after that is actually

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 2>really complicated because suddenly your time horizon completely narrows. You're

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 2>suddenly trying to balance. It's not about saving as much

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>as you possibly can. It's about trying to make sure

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 2>that you use up as much of the port as

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>you can before you die. Yeah, and you just don't

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>know obviously, you don't know when you're going to die.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 2>You don't know what your rate of return is going

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.479
<v Speaker 2>to be on the stuff that's still in your portfolio.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>You only have a I mean, you barely know what

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>your spending is going to be. And one thing I've

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>noticed whenever I talk to the retired people is they

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 2>are astonished by how much they spend, even though I mean, yeah,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>it's the U shaped thing, definitely, but it's also it's

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 2>a bit like, you know, they're always complaining about how

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>they don't have any time now that they've retired. And

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>then also you know, they don't have any money either,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>or rather they spend more than they expect. I mean,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>so from that point of view, do you think there's

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>a good case for even if you've been an independent investor,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you're for your accumulation phase of opening an advisor, And

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>if so, what other kinds of things you should look

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 2>for in a wealth manager and maybe how much should

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 2>you be expecting they pay for that? I know those

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>are all those are both pretty tricky questions, but I mean,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 2>if you've got a rough view on your thinking there.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 3>You're exactly right, because you know, accumulation is completely different

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>from decumulation, and there are all sorts of issues. You know,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>it's you've got pound cost averaging on the way in

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 3>for accumulation that works in your favorite you know, very briefly,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 3>that's basically, the weaker the market is, the more your

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 3>regular monthly contributions buy, the more units in funds. The

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 3>mirror image of that is there when markets are really strong,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 3>you're buying fewer units, so on average, you're buying each

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 3>unit at a lower price than you might otherwise have done.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 3>It's smooth things out and protects you against falls. And

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 3>in fact, if you're really young as big stock market

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>form might actually be a really good thing because you're

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 3>going to put more in in future than you've done today.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 3>So that's the accumulation phage, and that's pound cost averaging.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 3>What we've just been talking about, what you've been asking about,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 3>is pound cost ravaging. And this is probably where you

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>need the help because because basically, if the stock market,

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 3>if the stock market falls sharply and you're just about

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 3>to sort of you know, if you're say taking your

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 3>annual income in one go, you know, just to sort

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>of make the for the purpose of illustration, you're going

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 3>to have to sell a lot more units in your

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>pension fund to make however much you want to draw

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 3>down from your fund. And that's where the professional advice

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 3>can really help, because if you can take some of

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the pressure off your pension fund when stock markets are

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>really weak, give them time to recover as they usually do,

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that will give you your fund a lot more resilience,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's worth paying extra for that. The problem is

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 3>is that basically, rather than simply giving you the advice

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 3>setting you up with a sustainable plan and letting you

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>get on with it, that financial advisors will want it

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>to bring all your assets under management and charge you

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a fee appropriately, And that's a large part of the

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>reason why, you know, people who haven't got enough assets

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 3>don't interest financial advisors because two percent of nothing is

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>still nothing, whereas people who've got very substantial assets, perhaps

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 3>people who've used pensions of as wealth management in estate

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>management tools, might have many millions in there, and two

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>percent of that is a very substantial amount of mine,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and probably considerably more than the advice they get is worth.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 3>So you do get caught in that situation. But if

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you derive quite a bit of consumer sort of joy,

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 3>if you like, from having all this worry taken away

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>from you, you know, it's difficult to put a price

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 3>on that, especially if you're buying peace of mind by

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 3>getting advice. You can also get free advice as well,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, pension wise, there are you know that the

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>take up of these services has been extremely disappointing from

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a government's perspective, and financial advisors are always quick to

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 3>point out that the take up is quite low. But

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, you can have a free conversation about precisely

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 3>these sort of issues with somebody who knows how everything works,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and conhaps sort of sanity check what your plans are

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and make a few useful comments on that.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>The all the other thing I was going to ask

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 2>about boys annuities and their rule and all this, and

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 2>know that it can have briefly meant. But again, one

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons the pensions freedom came along in the

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 2>first place is because people got annoyed about having to

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 2>annuitize and obviously buy an annuity portshole down, et cetera,

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And then they were so partly irritated not just by

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the annuities themselves, but by being ripped off by the

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>annuity providers because they were obliged to buy annuity. So

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it was partly the system and partly the fact because

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they were obliged to do it and they almost always

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>brought them from the same the provider that they'd been previously,

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>they were almost inevitably ripped off. So that was a

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>big part of the problem. Sorry to interrupt, No, I

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't you get that?

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, because I remember we always used to write

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a shop.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Up around, shop around, but nobody did. They got these

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>letters and and you know it said take care. They

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ticked there and that was that maddening.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, no, I mean, obviously, then annuities became extremely poor,

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of how you because of the low interest rate environment,

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>but that has changed now, so in terms of the

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>role of an annuity and checking that you're getting a

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 2>good value innuity, if you get any thoughts or kind

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of rules of thumb for going about doing.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 3>That, right, Yeah, No, no, definitely, because I mean, obviously,

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, annuities tend not to, even in good times,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>tend not to pass on a huge amount because you know,

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>basically you lose your entire pension pot and you get

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>an income that's only slightly better than you might do

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 3>from fixed income products as well. But you know, setting

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 3>that aside, the change is inheritance in inheritance tax will

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>definitely cause more people to err towards inuities now, because

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you're going to lose forty percent of

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 3>your pot, you might as well sort of get yourself

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>a guaranteed income and get away from a lot of

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the problems. We've just been talking about about complexity in

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 3>older age, and you can get around that to an extent.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, we talked about hybrid anuities where you arenuitized

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 3>enough of your pot to guarantee your fixed expenditure and

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. There are also medical conditions as well.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is shopping around not just to get

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 3>a better standard rate, but a lot of people will

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>be able to get if they've got slightly high blood pressure,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're taking medication for that that. You know,

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't have to be sort of a death store

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that. They'll be able to get a

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 3>better annuity rate for that as well. So it's well

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>worth shopping around there. And then going forward, you know,

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the whole change in the environment whereby pensions aren't wealth

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>planning instruments will change the sort of the way in

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 3>which people look at drawing incomes down from pensions, and

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that's a huge new area where where work has been

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 3>done but little progress may whereas now this is heavily

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 3>incentivized progress because for example, you know, if you lose

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 3>a big part of your pot on death, there is

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 3>an argument for collectivizing death risk a little bit like

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 3>life insurance in reverse. So that if for sort of

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 3>an actuary or something like that, or you know, a

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 3>pensions administrator looked at the whole fund for say particular yes,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>say for Bloomberg for example, and decide right in retirement.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>We can pay this rate largely because some people will

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 3>die early, some people will dilate, and you collectivize that

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>risk especially Yes, yeah, no, I mean you know, I mean,

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 3>obviously there are details to to sort out there, and

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 3>you'd want to improve confidence in pensions and administration, which

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 3>is pretty low at the moment. But I would imagine

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that that is a way things are going to go,

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 3>because it's you know, people want will want better incomes

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that than are available from annuities. Yet they are attracted

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 3>to the certainty and sort of you know, maybe there's

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 3>a trade off between certainty and sort of higher incomes there.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think we better, we better come to

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a closer everyone might as you get bored of pensions,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which occasionally does happen. I had one, not for us,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not for us, But I gathered there are other people

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>who lose interest minutes. Final question. There are we gather,

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>or I gather from reading the newspapers at the weekend,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of people who took their twenty five

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>percent or not twenty five percent. But when you know

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>what you can get a short hand for out of

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>their pension in advance of the budget. Yes, and now

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>regret it and would like to put it back, and

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>several of the newspaper Q and A Money things I

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>read over the weekend suggested that that is possible because

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty day cooling off period. If you only

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>took it out just before the budget, you can go, actually,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I've changed my mind and you can put it back.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct?

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely correct. Basically, whether you should regret in inverted

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 3>commas taking your tax free cash largely depends on what

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 3>you do with it. So if it's just sitting in

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>your bank account, you've lost the tax wrapper for it,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the ability for those funds to grow

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 3>capital gains, so you'd probably be better off putting it

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 3>back using the cooling off period. But again, you know,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 3>if you're sort of trying to do this as part

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 3>of your estate planning, drawing the tax free cash and

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>gifting it and taking your seven year rule chances, it's

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>probably still the main strategy. So it depends what your

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>motivation for taking the money out in the first place was,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 3>what the best strategy is for now. You know, if

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 3>you were just taking it out and parking it in

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 3>a bank account, you might as well put it.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Back and of course, the other thing say is that

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, just because you didn't change the rules in

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that budget doesn't mean she isn't going to change the rules.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, no, I think sort of going forward, it

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 3>is perhaps a little less likely because she's kind of

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>acknowledged the tax free cash thing as a thing. But

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 3>you're absolutely right, you know. I mean, basically, if you

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>take forty billion out of the economy, growth isn't going

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to exceed expectations. Wandering out of my lane here, that's

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Just in case there is anybody out there who did

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>take the money out and is thinking about putting it back,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>do be very very careful because you don't want to

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>full foul of any of the rules. We're not allowed

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to put much in after you've taken some out, because

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you could end up with a really nasty tax charge

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>if you get that wrong. So if you're going to

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do it, take advice, make sure you get it right,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think stats it. Unless anyone has anything else

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>super interesting today about pensions, Nope, we good guests.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Maren Talk to Your Money.

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>If you like us, show rate review and subscribe wherever

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your podcasts. Also, be sure to follow

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>me and John on x or Twitter at marinas w

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and John Underscores Defict Stewart. If you've got a Twitter

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>handle you would like to add in at.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 3>This point, Yes, it's a pension Man UK.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, follow at pension Man UK as well I do

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and John does. This episode was produced by some Asadi,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>production support and sound designed by Moses and Questions and

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>comments on this show and all our shows are always welcome.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Our show email is Merin Money at Bloomberg dot Net.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You've just heard us answer one question or many questions

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in one Actually, if you have a question, do send

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it to us and we will try and answer it

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>on this show. If you want to listen to it

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of Merin Talks Money ad free. Become a Bloomberg dot

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>com subscriber today. Check out our special intro offer right

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>now at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast offer or click

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the link in the show notes. You'll also un deep

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reporting data and analysis from reporters around the world, to

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>say nothing of my newsletter and John's newsletter. If you're

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>ready a Bloomberg dot com subscriber, connect your account with

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts listen to this episode ad free