1 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio. 2 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:13,160 Speaker 2: Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. Listener mail, 3 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 2: This is Robert Lamb. 4 00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 3: And this is Joe McCormick. And it's Monday, the day 5 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:21,120 Speaker 3: of each week that we read back messages from our mailbox. 6 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:23,799 Speaker 3: If you have never gotten in touch before, why not 7 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 3: email us. You can reach us at contact at stuff 8 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,720 Speaker 3: to Blow your Mind dot com. We like messages of 9 00:00:29,760 --> 00:00:32,879 Speaker 3: any sort, especially feedback to recent episodes, and especially if 10 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:35,879 Speaker 3: you've got something interesting to add to a topic we 11 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:38,880 Speaker 3: recently talked about on the show. But whatever else you 12 00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 3: want to write about, that's fine too. Send it on 13 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:44,600 Speaker 3: in contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. 14 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 3: What you got going on right now, Rob. 15 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:49,880 Speaker 2: Well, nobody asked about this, but I'm going no. No 16 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:53,159 Speaker 2: listeners asked about it, obviously, but I do want to 17 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:56,160 Speaker 2: throw in that. In our Weird House Cinema episode about 18 00:00:56,160 --> 00:01:00,000 Speaker 2: the viewing, the topic of lopsong Soushong tea came up, 19 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:04,039 Speaker 2: and at the time none of us had any experience 20 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,000 Speaker 2: drinking it before. So after we talked about it a 21 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:10,520 Speaker 2: little bit, I ordered some up. I've now brewed up 22 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,280 Speaker 2: a few different cups of it, and I have attempted 23 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:16,480 Speaker 2: to add the perfect amount of honey so that I 24 00:01:16,480 --> 00:01:19,679 Speaker 2: can have the proper viewing experience. And I have to say, 25 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:23,280 Speaker 2: it's a very interesting tea. I was a little frightened 26 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,800 Speaker 2: at first when I smelled just the pure smokiness of 27 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:30,800 Speaker 2: the dried tea, but the taste is a lot more subtle, 28 00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:33,759 Speaker 2: and yeah, I think I'm growing to like it. 29 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:36,319 Speaker 3: Taste like tea smells like a big old barbecue brisket. 30 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:40,119 Speaker 2: Well, at first, that was kind of what the sense 31 00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 2: I got when I opened the pouch of tea for 32 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:46,880 Speaker 2: the first time, you know, like the whole house immediately 33 00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:50,440 Speaker 2: smelled like this, kind of like smoked, you know, deeply smoked, 34 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:54,480 Speaker 2: almost liquid smoke, kind of a scent, but that dissipated, 35 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:58,280 Speaker 2: and then once it's brewed up, you know, it's I 36 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 2: find that the aroma is not as intense and it 37 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 2: is not like core to the flavor. 38 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:04,560 Speaker 1: You know. 39 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 3: It's interesting. I find that I really enjoy smoky flavors 40 00:02:08,960 --> 00:02:13,360 Speaker 3: in food, and so I like some smoky ingredients, but 41 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 3: smelling the smoky ingredients on their own I often find 42 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 3: kind of unpleasant. Like one example is smoked paprika. If 43 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:25,160 Speaker 3: you ever want a like vegetarian alternative to adding bacon 44 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 3: to a dish. Smoke paprika gets you part of the 45 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:29,640 Speaker 3: way there. I mean, it doesn't have pork fat in it, 46 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 3: but it it brings a lot of that great smoky 47 00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:34,600 Speaker 3: aroma that you get from like a smoked meat product 48 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:37,160 Speaker 3: and some of that complexity. But I find when I 49 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:41,799 Speaker 3: just smell smoked paprika by itself, it is an overpowering 50 00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:45,560 Speaker 3: and unpleasant aroma. It's only good once it goes into 51 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:47,040 Speaker 3: the mix with other things. 52 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,560 Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, I feel the same way about honestly, about 53 00:02:50,600 --> 00:02:54,520 Speaker 2: like scotch and alcohol of that nature. You know, It's 54 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:57,280 Speaker 2: like I just straight scotch I never had a real 55 00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:01,160 Speaker 2: passion for, but I did like some cocktails that had 56 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 2: scotch in them. 57 00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:05,040 Speaker 3: Well, I guess there are smoky scotches and non smoky scotches. 58 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:07,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, some really some really go. 59 00:03:07,919 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 3: For the peat trolls that. 60 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:15,639 Speaker 2: Yeah. Anyway, enough enough about my beverages. I'll be back 61 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:17,960 Speaker 2: in a future Listener Mail episode to talk about the 62 00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 2: perfect screen driver. 63 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:25,640 Speaker 3: That's right, Okay, let's go on to our first messages. 64 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 3: We're going to kick things off today with a two 65 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 3: part response to our series on anomalous imagery. This is 66 00:03:33,440 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 3: two different emails from our listener Ian. Let's see, Rob, 67 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 3: Do you want to read the first one? Here? 68 00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:46,960 Speaker 2: All? Right? Here we go? Uh. Dear Robin Joe, I 69 00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 2: was listening to your recent episode about the dindera light 70 00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:54,040 Speaker 2: and you your brief discussion of palam ses. That made 71 00:03:54,040 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 2: me realize that there is a form of palamses that 72 00:03:57,320 --> 00:04:00,360 Speaker 2: most of your listeners will be familiar with, though they've 73 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:04,000 Speaker 2: probably never thought about it in those terms. I certainly hadn't. 74 00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 2: It is the computer hard drive. There is, of course, 75 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 2: the surface level comparison, wherein hard drives are erased and 76 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 2: overwritten repeatedly as you use your computer, but the similarities 77 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 2: go deeper than that. For instance, when you delete a 78 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:19,839 Speaker 2: file on your computer, the actual data is not a 79 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:22,559 Speaker 2: raise from the drive, only the reference to that data 80 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:25,279 Speaker 2: that tells your computer operating system where on the drive 81 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:28,520 Speaker 2: the file is located in order to access it. On 82 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:31,239 Speaker 2: a mechanical hard drive or HDD, I am not sure 83 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 2: how applicable this information may be to newer solid state 84 00:04:34,640 --> 00:04:38,440 Speaker 2: drives or SSDs. The actual data comprising the file remains 85 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:40,640 Speaker 2: on the drive until the computer needs that space for 86 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 2: another file and only then is actually overwritten. Even then, 87 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:47,440 Speaker 2: the overwriting is not perfect, and it is sometimes possible 88 00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:50,400 Speaker 2: to use special software to recover old data that is 89 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,080 Speaker 2: underneath newer data. At least partially for this reason, there 90 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:58,040 Speaker 2: is even security software available for computers which use sensitive data, 91 00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:02,080 Speaker 2: which constantly overwrite the empty portions of the drive with 92 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:05,440 Speaker 2: junk data to ensure that any deleted files are truly 93 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:09,359 Speaker 2: obliterated and not recoverable. It is somewhat akin to scribbling 94 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,359 Speaker 2: on and then erasing a chalkboard over and over to 95 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 2: ensure that everything that was once written on it can't 96 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:18,640 Speaker 2: still be read. Finally, your discussion of what I'm going 97 00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:23,279 Speaker 2: to call open minded skepticism involving being highly skeptical of 98 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 2: any claims that such and such has done by aliens, 99 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:29,200 Speaker 2: while still being open to the possibility that one day 100 00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:32,479 Speaker 2: evidence of alien intelligence may be discovered, reminded me of 101 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 2: a saying often used on the PBS Spacetime YouTube channel 102 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:41,040 Speaker 2: when discussing new and strange observations in astronomy. The saying goes, 103 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 2: remember it's never aliens until it's aliens. Thank you for 104 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 2: doing more than your fair share of encouraging curiosity and 105 00:05:48,279 --> 00:05:51,160 Speaker 2: reminding us all of the importance of open minded skepticism. 106 00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 3: Ian, Well, thank you for the kind words, Ian, And yeah, 107 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:57,960 Speaker 3: I appreciate the shout out to the PBS Spacetime show. 108 00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:00,360 Speaker 3: I'm not a regular viewer, but I think I watched 109 00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:02,640 Speaker 3: a few episodes of that and thought they were quite good. 110 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:08,160 Speaker 3: As for the idea of a palimpsest being sort of reproduced, 111 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 3: at least metaphorically or I don't know, maybe you could 112 00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:14,120 Speaker 3: say literally in a computer hard drive, Yeah, that's interesting. 113 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:18,560 Speaker 3: So palimpsests came up in our discussion because we were 114 00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:24,400 Speaker 3: talking about how, like, so an ancient Egyptian inscription, you know, 115 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:26,840 Speaker 3: there might be one set of hieroglyphics on it at 116 00:06:26,880 --> 00:06:29,479 Speaker 3: one point, and then there would be you know, that 117 00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:31,560 Speaker 3: would decay over time, and then there would be a 118 00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:35,320 Speaker 3: process of maybe partially plastering over that and then putting 119 00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:39,440 Speaker 3: new inscription, like new information in it, maybe new hieroglyphics 120 00:06:39,520 --> 00:06:42,720 Speaker 3: or illustrations of things on top of the old one. 121 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 3: And this would happen on maybe the walls of a 122 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:48,360 Speaker 3: temple or like a monument or something like that, and 123 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 3: the result was that you could get these sort of 124 00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:56,400 Speaker 3: illusory emergent mixtures of the two different inscriptions, so you 125 00:06:56,400 --> 00:07:00,320 Speaker 3: could have the part on top decaying, and then heart 126 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:04,360 Speaker 3: of the hieroglyphics represented there would sort of bleed into 127 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 3: where the hieroglyphics below were revealed, creating these symbols that 128 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:10,880 Speaker 3: aren't actually part of the language. They're just sort of like, 129 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 3: you know, these random emergent bleed through kind of creations, 130 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,320 Speaker 3: and some of them look like weird stuff, like a 131 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:21,880 Speaker 3: helicopter or something like that. Anyway, So I wonder if 132 00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 3: by way of this analogy with a computer hard drive 133 00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:27,840 Speaker 3: being like a palimpsest, you could get similar things like 134 00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:30,840 Speaker 3: in the future, will there be people looking back in 135 00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:33,720 Speaker 3: time at like a preserved computer hard drive, or maybe 136 00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:37,160 Speaker 3: the data image of a preserved computer hard drive and 137 00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 3: see things emerging, see illusory like sentences or something emerging 138 00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:48,080 Speaker 3: because of splicing together of data from different points of overwriting. 139 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:49,960 Speaker 3: I don't know if it actually works like that, or 140 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:51,480 Speaker 3: works in a way that would give rise to that 141 00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:53,560 Speaker 3: sort of thing, But I don't know that's interesting. 142 00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 2: It's far less romantic. Yeah, to may anyway, but you know, 143 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:01,160 Speaker 2: future societies. I feel differently about the matter. 144 00:08:01,760 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 3: Will bits of work emails appear to run straight through 145 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 3: into snippets of text from your discarded draft of your 146 00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:11,000 Speaker 3: erotic vampire novel. 147 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:15,320 Speaker 2: Well, all vampire novels are erotic, Joe. 148 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 3: Okay, we got a second email from Ian. Ian says 149 00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 3: Dear Robin, Joe. Last week, I wrote in about open 150 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:26,320 Speaker 3: minded skepticism and PBS spacetimes approach that it's never aliens 151 00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 3: until it's aliens. As of the time of writing this, 152 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:32,960 Speaker 3: I've not yet listened to the Listener Mail episode that 153 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 3: previous message would have appeared on. Well, you certainly have not, 154 00:08:36,760 --> 00:08:40,120 Speaker 3: because it's this one today, Ian says, so I don't 155 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:41,720 Speaker 3: know yet if you read it on the air. In 156 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:45,040 Speaker 3: the interim, I have now listened to your previous listener 157 00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:48,320 Speaker 3: mail and the discussion about the difficulty of traveling between 158 00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 3: stars making visitation by aliens unlikely. I share Joe's view 159 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:57,600 Speaker 3: that I don't find any supposed difficulty particularly convincing when 160 00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:02,400 Speaker 3: we're presumably talking about beings with more advanced technology than 161 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 3: we have. By the way, for people who don't remember 162 00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 3: that previous discussion or didn't hear it, my point was 163 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:12,640 Speaker 3: that I wouldn't rule out the possibility of alien visitation 164 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 3: on Earth based on saying, Oh, it's just too difficult 165 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:19,000 Speaker 3: to travel between stars, because my view now is just 166 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:21,240 Speaker 3: that I don't think we know enough to say whether 167 00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:24,640 Speaker 3: that's too difficult or whether it's possible or not. That's 168 00:09:24,679 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 3: just an open question. But that doesn't mean I think 169 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:29,679 Speaker 3: aliens have been visiting the Earth. I just think that 170 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:32,680 Speaker 3: that is not a particular reason I would rule it out. Instead, 171 00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:36,319 Speaker 3: I would just say, where's the evidence. But Ian comes 172 00:09:36,360 --> 00:09:41,080 Speaker 3: back to say, once again, PBS space time has become relevant. Specifically, 173 00:09:41,080 --> 00:09:45,760 Speaker 3: the episode is Interstellar Travel Possible? That episode discusses the 174 00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:49,000 Speaker 3: dangers and difficulties posed by traveling to another star and 175 00:09:49,120 --> 00:09:53,160 Speaker 3: investigates whether they are solvable. The oversimplified version is that 176 00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 3: traveling from one star to the next should be doable, 177 00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 3: if not exactly with our current technology, then with technology 178 00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:03,240 Speaker 3: only a little more advanced than we currently possess Essentially, 179 00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:06,479 Speaker 3: from a physics standpoint, we know the problem is solvable, 180 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 3: and achieving it is what I like to call an 181 00:10:08,960 --> 00:10:13,080 Speaker 3: engineering problem. Granted, actually solving that problem would be a 182 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:16,679 Speaker 3: massive undertaking for our current civilization, and it certainly wouldn't 183 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 3: be easy, but there's no reason to think it couldn't 184 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 3: be done. As Matt. I guess that's the host of 185 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,480 Speaker 3: PBS Space Time. As Matt sums up in the episode, 186 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:27,920 Speaker 3: the universe may be trying to kill us, but it's 187 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:33,040 Speaker 3: not trying quite hard enough. That's good. So, given that 188 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:36,160 Speaker 3: traveling from one star to another is conceivably achievable in 189 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:40,360 Speaker 3: the not too distant future technologically at least, resource allocation 190 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:43,040 Speaker 3: being an entirely different matter, just like how no one 191 00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 3: has gone back to the Moon since the seventies despite 192 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:49,760 Speaker 3: us clearly having the technology, A civilization, even a few 193 00:10:49,880 --> 00:10:52,440 Speaker 3: hundred or thousand years more advanced than ours, should be 194 00:10:52,480 --> 00:10:55,439 Speaker 3: able to do it without too much trouble. Certainly not 195 00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:58,040 Speaker 3: so much trouble that it serves as an explanation for 196 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:02,600 Speaker 3: why UAPs can't be aliens or as a satisfactory answer 197 00:11:02,640 --> 00:11:06,160 Speaker 3: to the Fermi paradox. Personally, I find Akham's razor a 198 00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 3: far more convincing argument against aaian visitation than any specific 199 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:14,960 Speaker 3: practical objection as to why it's impossible. As always, thank 200 00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:18,280 Speaker 3: you for your wonderful and enlightening podcast. Ian, Well, thank 201 00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 3: you for both emails. Ian, and I would say regarding 202 00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:23,760 Speaker 3: the second one, Yeah, I think you're right on the money. 203 00:11:23,960 --> 00:11:26,320 Speaker 3: I would agree with you here. I don't see any 204 00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:29,920 Speaker 3: particular reason to rule out the possibility of alien visitation. 205 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:34,839 Speaker 3: The stuff about the difficulty of traveling that doesn't seem 206 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 3: like a prohibitive consideration to me, though it is something 207 00:11:37,840 --> 00:11:40,200 Speaker 3: I guess we should consider, you know, arguments of that sort, 208 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:43,560 Speaker 3: but that's not enough to rule it out for me. Instead, 209 00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:45,840 Speaker 3: it's just the dearth of good evidence, like we've been 210 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 3: talking about in these episodes. It's just like you would 211 00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:52,080 Speaker 3: expect at some point to have good evidence that it's 212 00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:55,360 Speaker 3: actually aliens and not just one of the millions of 213 00:11:55,400 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 3: things that you know, we've seen over and over again 214 00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 3: being mistaken for aliens, like balloon and camera artifacts and 215 00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 3: airplanes and birds and natural geological formations and animals of 216 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 3: various types and all kinds of weird looking natural phenomena 217 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:12,680 Speaker 3: and pieces of human technology always being mistaken for aliens, 218 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:15,680 Speaker 3: and then when you get more information, oh, oh, actually 219 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:16,520 Speaker 3: this is what it is. 220 00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, you know. I still come back to the scale 221 00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:22,880 Speaker 2: of things though, in thinking about all this, and I 222 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:26,439 Speaker 2: was reminded of this after our initial episodes. We were 223 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 2: just where we were discussing this because I was listening 224 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:31,880 Speaker 2: to the audiobook of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, and 225 00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:35,320 Speaker 2: there's one great part in there where Douglas Adams is 226 00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:40,199 Speaker 2: talking about how the sheer size of the universe is 227 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 2: such that the human imagination cannot contain it. And I 228 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:49,280 Speaker 2: thought that was a well written little phrase there, to 229 00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:51,360 Speaker 2: sort of sum it up, like it is just so 230 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:55,280 Speaker 2: big that even when we think we are understanding the 231 00:12:55,320 --> 00:12:59,679 Speaker 2: scale we're talking about here, we're only sort of summoning 232 00:12:59,720 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 2: up a placeholder of how truly vast it is, and 233 00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:07,880 Speaker 2: how small we are, and how insignificant we are in 234 00:13:07,960 --> 00:13:20,360 Speaker 2: terms of both location and also duration. All right, shall 235 00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 2: we dive into a little stickiness? 236 00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:23,840 Speaker 3: Oh yeah, all right. 237 00:13:23,760 --> 00:13:26,400 Speaker 2: This one comes to us from Kenny. Kenny says, Hi, Rob, Joe, 238 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:29,480 Speaker 2: and JJ. I was fascinated by your discussion on the 239 00:13:29,520 --> 00:13:33,080 Speaker 2: atomic stickiness of gecko feet. I wonder what the evolutionary 240 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:36,600 Speaker 2: path for that adaptation was like. Anyway, the topic reminded 241 00:13:36,640 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 2: me of highly polished metals sticking to one another. I'm 242 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:43,600 Speaker 2: a PC gamer and enjoy building upgrading my machine every 243 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:47,720 Speaker 2: few years. The central processor in a PC is covered 244 00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:51,640 Speaker 2: by an integrated heat spreader, over which a cooling fan 245 00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:55,079 Speaker 2: or water block is placed. Since the metal surfaces aren't 246 00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:58,720 Speaker 2: perfectly smooth, a thermal paste must be applied to fill 247 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:01,920 Speaker 2: all the tiny air pockets before the cooler is screwed down. 248 00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:07,160 Speaker 2: This ensures adequate heat transfer, but better cooling means more performance, 249 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:10,560 Speaker 2: so people will take it to the extremes. I saw 250 00:14:10,640 --> 00:14:14,760 Speaker 2: an enthusiast who had lapped the integrated heat spreader on 251 00:14:14,880 --> 00:14:19,880 Speaker 2: his CPU. He employed the quote Whitworth three plate method, 252 00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 2: which involves three metal plates labeled A, B and C. 253 00:14:23,320 --> 00:14:25,640 Speaker 2: With the aid of an abrasive, they are used to 254 00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:30,160 Speaker 2: polish one another in alternating pairs A and B, then 255 00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:33,240 Speaker 2: B and C, than CNA, and so on. The plates 256 00:14:33,320 --> 00:14:35,840 Speaker 2: smooth one another out and can then be used to 257 00:14:35,880 --> 00:14:39,880 Speaker 2: polish other objects to very high degrees of smoothness. After 258 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 2: lapping both the ihs and the underside of his water block, 259 00:14:43,960 --> 00:14:47,280 Speaker 2: he achieved such high polish that they fit together perfectly 260 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:51,560 Speaker 2: enough to effectively leave zero trapped gas to act as insulation. 261 00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 2: What he discovered after the test fitting was that the 262 00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:58,800 Speaker 2: CPU adhered to the bottom of the cooling block. It 263 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 2: was sticky enough to pull the CPU from the socket 264 00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:04,560 Speaker 2: when he lifted the block. I now realize this must 265 00:15:04,560 --> 00:15:07,160 Speaker 2: have been due to the Van der Waals force, as 266 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:09,920 Speaker 2: the atoms of the two components were close enough to 267 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:12,560 Speaker 2: act as if they were in a single piece of metal. 268 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:15,640 Speaker 2: I saw the Action Lab exploring a similar phenomenon in 269 00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:19,680 Speaker 2: this video about gauge blocks, and Kenny includes a link. 270 00:15:20,160 --> 00:15:22,200 Speaker 2: I'd meant to send you a topic idea, but this 271 00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:24,720 Speaker 2: turned into a pretty lengthy email, so I'll save it 272 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 2: for next time. Thanks for everything you do, Kenny. 273 00:15:27,600 --> 00:15:30,520 Speaker 3: Thank you, Kenny. That's really interesting. So if I'm understanding correctly, 274 00:15:30,560 --> 00:15:36,120 Speaker 3: you're saying like that with enough polishing and smoothing of 275 00:15:36,160 --> 00:15:39,920 Speaker 3: a flat piece of metal, it will stick to another 276 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:44,440 Speaker 3: polished flat piece of metal. So like even without an adhesive, 277 00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 3: you just like touched them together and then they get 278 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:49,720 Speaker 3: stuck as if they are glued, And that would make 279 00:15:49,760 --> 00:15:52,280 Speaker 3: sense that I want to be clear that I don't 280 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:55,360 Speaker 3: feel confident to judge what are the operative forces here, 281 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 3: especially since like even experts in this area sometimes disagree 282 00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 3: about like what are the most operative forces in why 283 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:05,400 Speaker 3: things are sticking together? But Vanderval's force, from what I know, 284 00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:09,640 Speaker 3: does seem like a plausible explanation. So like normally things 285 00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:12,640 Speaker 3: don't stick to one another. Dude to Vanderval's forces because 286 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:15,560 Speaker 3: not enough of their atoms are actually getting close enough 287 00:16:15,560 --> 00:16:19,760 Speaker 3: together for Vanderval's forces to activate. But that's like how 288 00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:20,720 Speaker 3: the gecko feet work. 289 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 2: You know. 290 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:24,560 Speaker 3: They've got so many of these extremely tiny little hairs 291 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:27,440 Speaker 3: on them that fill in all the nooks and crannies 292 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:30,160 Speaker 3: of whatever surface they're touching and get so close to 293 00:16:30,200 --> 00:16:32,880 Speaker 3: the atoms in the surface that Vanderval's forces take over 294 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:36,400 Speaker 3: and they stick. Most normal things, even when they're touching 295 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:39,360 Speaker 3: each other, just can't get that close. And so it 296 00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:41,560 Speaker 3: sounds like that could be what's happening with these highly 297 00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:45,520 Speaker 3: polished pieces of metal, though I would wonder also if 298 00:16:45,560 --> 00:16:50,560 Speaker 3: there is if there's a suction cup thing going on here, 299 00:16:50,680 --> 00:16:54,160 Speaker 3: Like if the gas between two things is evacuated in 300 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:58,600 Speaker 3: some sense, but there is some kind of cavity between them, 301 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:01,280 Speaker 3: if it's kind of like pushing a suction cup onto 302 00:17:01,320 --> 00:17:04,080 Speaker 3: a piece of glass or something. I don't know. I 303 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:06,360 Speaker 3: don't know, maybe if the polishing wouldn't really leave enough 304 00:17:06,400 --> 00:17:10,720 Speaker 3: pockets for there to be voids with negative pressure. I 305 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:11,080 Speaker 3: don't know. 306 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:13,679 Speaker 2: Well, I mean, one thing that we learned from just 307 00:17:13,760 --> 00:17:16,480 Speaker 2: looking at the research for guarding gecko feet is that 308 00:17:16,840 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 2: you know, it's possible that there are more than one 309 00:17:19,840 --> 00:17:24,320 Speaker 2: adhesive situation going on at once with a given scenario. 310 00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:26,600 Speaker 3: Though we have to acknowledge that that's right, more than 311 00:17:26,600 --> 00:17:29,840 Speaker 3: one mechanism could be working at the same time. But yeah, 312 00:17:29,960 --> 00:17:32,919 Speaker 3: very interesting, Kenny, thank you. Okay, I think we're going 313 00:17:32,960 --> 00:17:36,400 Speaker 3: to finish things out today with a message about Weird 314 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:38,879 Speaker 3: House Cinema. We have some more good messages, but for 315 00:17:39,280 --> 00:17:40,879 Speaker 3: time reasons, I think we need to save them for 316 00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:44,200 Speaker 3: next week. So one more today. This is about Weird 317 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:54,080 Speaker 3: House Cinema. And this comes to us from Chalk. Chock says, Hi, 318 00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 3: guys on Weird House Cinema on September first, and as 319 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:00,720 Speaker 3: an aside, this would be talking about the Devil's Men 320 00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:05,240 Speaker 3: aka Land of the Minotaur. Chock continues, saying, you said 321 00:18:05,240 --> 00:18:08,760 Speaker 3: the priest and comrade went to the church to get weapons, 322 00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:13,000 Speaker 3: specifically a crucifix and some holy water. Apparently the filmmaker 323 00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 3: was also lazy about checking facts. Holy water is just 324 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 3: water blessed by a priest. He didn't have to go 325 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:22,280 Speaker 3: looking for it. He could have just made some because 326 00:18:22,280 --> 00:18:24,359 Speaker 3: he was a priest, right, Yeah, he is a priest, 327 00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:25,840 Speaker 3: so he could just get some out of the tap, 328 00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:29,679 Speaker 3: I guess, and less sure, but Chock says, well, what 329 00:18:29,840 --> 00:18:34,960 Speaker 3: doo anti climactic? Probably anyway, thanks for all your shows, Chock. 330 00:18:36,400 --> 00:18:38,520 Speaker 3: You know, this is a case where I think it 331 00:18:38,560 --> 00:18:41,440 Speaker 3: was just more important to be dramatic than to be factuals. 332 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:44,920 Speaker 3: They wanted to send him to a roadside chapel, kind 333 00:18:44,920 --> 00:18:48,560 Speaker 3: of kind of decaying scenic roadside chapel to get the 334 00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 3: holy water and get all the tools of holiness, which, 335 00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:53,960 Speaker 3: by the way, I don't even recall them using the 336 00:18:54,000 --> 00:18:56,320 Speaker 3: holy water in the movie. Did they use it? I 337 00:18:56,359 --> 00:18:59,320 Speaker 3: think dub pleas he just says some Latin and they 338 00:18:59,320 --> 00:19:00,080 Speaker 3: all blow up. 339 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:03,400 Speaker 2: But I thought that he also like splashes holy water 340 00:19:03,560 --> 00:19:06,800 Speaker 2: on them or on the minotaur. But yeah, he makes 341 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:09,320 Speaker 2: everybody blow up, and I'm not sure everybody was touched 342 00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:12,200 Speaker 2: by the holy water, so it's a little foggy. 343 00:19:12,000 --> 00:19:16,239 Speaker 3: The Latin would have done it. But I agree if 344 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 3: Rob said in the episode that it was you know, 345 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:21,959 Speaker 3: it was a nice dramatic moment, and I agree. Then 346 00:19:21,960 --> 00:19:26,040 Speaker 3: a movie that was somewhat lacking in nice dramatic moments, 347 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:27,639 Speaker 3: I felt like that one kind of worked. 348 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:31,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, some of the nicest scenes where Donald Pleasant's doing 349 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:33,879 Speaker 2: church stuff, Like there's a scene where he's praying in 350 00:19:33,960 --> 00:19:37,040 Speaker 2: that where you know, it's just establishing his character. Really, 351 00:19:37,040 --> 00:19:41,920 Speaker 2: there's nothing amazing about it, but it's a nice sequence. 352 00:19:41,920 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 2: It's well framed and all, and then we get a 353 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:45,800 Speaker 2: similar vibe. I mean these were probably shot at the 354 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:49,240 Speaker 2: same location, like the same afternoon. They were particularly inspired 355 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:50,080 Speaker 2: that day. I don't know. 356 00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:53,960 Speaker 3: I think that's probably right. Okay, does that do it 357 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:54,479 Speaker 3: for today? 358 00:19:55,119 --> 00:19:56,639 Speaker 2: Yeah? I think we're gonna go ahead and close up 359 00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:59,320 Speaker 2: the mail bag. But we'd love to hear from everyone. Yeah, 360 00:19:59,640 --> 00:20:01,719 Speaker 2: keep them coming in. If you have thoughts about current, 361 00:20:02,119 --> 00:20:04,320 Speaker 2: past and future episodes of stuff to blow your mind, 362 00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:06,840 Speaker 2: you have any thoughts about the various movies we've discussed 363 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:10,480 Speaker 2: on Weird House Cinema on Fridays, you know, also just 364 00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:13,280 Speaker 2: responses to other listener males or our short form artifact 365 00:20:13,280 --> 00:20:17,040 Speaker 2: in Monster Fact episodes, or the thoughts about where else 366 00:20:17,119 --> 00:20:20,439 Speaker 2: the monster fact artifact concept can go, like is there 367 00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:24,320 Speaker 2: something else or some other kind of fact to be born? 368 00:20:25,119 --> 00:20:27,040 Speaker 2: I was thinking like, oh, you know, crime, true crime 369 00:20:27,119 --> 00:20:29,119 Speaker 2: is all the gauge. Should I start doing the murder fact? 370 00:20:30,359 --> 00:20:34,840 Speaker 2: Probably not. I would vote against against the murder fact Okay, 371 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:37,359 Speaker 2: but your brain. We're brainstorming here, so all you know, 372 00:20:37,440 --> 00:20:39,320 Speaker 2: all ideas are valid. 373 00:20:39,880 --> 00:20:43,000 Speaker 3: What if it's the mino fact and it's just minotaur 374 00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:44,159 Speaker 3: facts every week? 375 00:20:44,680 --> 00:20:46,919 Speaker 2: Oh well, you know, we could, we could get we 376 00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:50,119 Speaker 2: could make that work for for probably a month. But 377 00:20:50,160 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 2: then again, we're just basically doing a sub show of 378 00:20:54,960 --> 00:20:56,920 Speaker 2: the monster fact. So it would be the monster fact, 379 00:20:56,920 --> 00:20:59,080 Speaker 2: mento fact or something to that effect. 380 00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:00,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, I guess. 381 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:03,640 Speaker 2: Accept when we're talking about artifacts, then it's the monster fact, 382 00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:07,200 Speaker 2: mat of fact, artifact, and then it starts getting complicated. 383 00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:09,520 Speaker 2: Then we're lost in the labyrinth. Okay, I think we 384 00:21:09,560 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 2: got to wrap it up all right, take us home, 385 00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:12,240 Speaker 2: Jeff Huge. 386 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:16,480 Speaker 3: Thanks to our regular audio producer JJ Posway and our 387 00:21:16,600 --> 00:21:20,200 Speaker 3: guest audio producer today Chandler Mays. If you would like 388 00:21:20,280 --> 00:21:22,040 Speaker 3: to get in touch with us once again, you can 389 00:21:22,119 --> 00:21:25,560 Speaker 3: reach us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind 390 00:21:25,720 --> 00:21:33,200 Speaker 3: dot com. 391 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:36,240 Speaker 1: Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For 392 00:21:36,320 --> 00:21:39,119 Speaker 1: more podcasts from My Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, 393 00:21:39,280 --> 00:21:42,040 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.