WEBVTT - Flares from Infinity: Sagittarius A* Part 1

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Further out in the dark, we found alien life. There

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>were mats of corn colored slime glowing in the deep

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>as they fed on jets of sulfur bubbling up from

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the mud at the bottom of a flooded crater. White

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>ticks that tunneled through the ice, growing in spindles above

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the salt flats, the ruins of empty cities covered in

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>mosslike growth on quiet planets. But as we journeyed further

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in into the hub, into the permanent light, everything was dead.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>What could live here? The stars hurtled past one another,

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>dragging their doomed clouds of matter with them to collide

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like weather fronts. The radiation is a hot bath, the

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>killer surf rocking in from all around. The night swarms

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with starlight. But our journey goes on because the Center calls,

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>We're going to the bottom of the galaxy. Welcome stuff

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. A production of I Heart Radios

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey you, welcome to Stuff to blow

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>In Today we're coming back with some space themed I

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>was about to say the word content. I'm not going

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to say the word content. I'm gonna say space themed stuff.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>That's an old favorite how stuff works fans. How about

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a space material. There's a lot of discussion of material

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and particles this episode in the one that follows it,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.639
<v Speaker 1>because of course we're going to be talking about black

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>holes once again. Yeah. Now, we did I think a

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>three part series on black holes. It was sometime last year,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe a year and a half ago, but we wanted

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to revisit the topic to talk about a specific case

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of very interesting black hole that we didn't get deep

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>into in our last four That's right, So I do

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>want to just so so really you can go about

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this two ways. Uh, you could treat this is part

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>four and part five. Uh, and you know, go listen

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to the three previous black Hole episodes again. But I

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's entirely necessary. I think you can. You

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>can come in and listen to these is just simply

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>part one in part two of a look at a

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>very particular type of black hole, a super massive black hole, right,

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and we'll do refreshers on the basics. So it's not

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like you've you've got to have done your homework here, right,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to have seen either event Horizon or Disney's

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The black Hole. Otherwise you have no frame of reference.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the starting homework. That's like the summer reading before

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you start our podcast in the ball well, you know,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean the weird thing is that, you know, those

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are two films that I think are in some cases

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>people's first introduction to the concept of a black hole.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And granted, those are two films that, each in their

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>own way are loaded with errors and problems and misinformation.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And yet Fantasy black Hole and the Fantasy black Holes.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, a fantasy black hole is I think

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a good starting place in many respects. You know, it

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>gives you a fantastic notion, sometimes an you know, an

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>action pack very uh you know, terrestrial model of what

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a black hole is. And it's not a bad place

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to then begin and then build scientifically on the concept.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>There is a kernel of truth in the suggestion of

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy black hole, which is that while we know

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>more about black holes than we ever have before, and

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, for the very first time, we think we

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got you know, basically a direct image of a black

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>hole to whatever extent that's possible. And talk more about

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of that later on, But but yeah, while

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we still, while we know more than we ever have,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>black holes still contain a lot of mysteries. They contain

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>some edge cases for our theories of physics where what

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we know ceases to make sense. And so there's still

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lingering questions, a lot of tantalizing mysteries.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to the tantalizing mysteries and the

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>lingering questions, I want to talk about a a nerdy

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>engineer born in Oklahoma whose middle name is Gooth. I mean,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's an excellent nerd middle name. Okay, So

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about Carl Gooth Jansky. He was

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>born in Norman, Oklahoma, in nineteen o five, one of

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>six children, and his family and Jansky's dad, Cyril, was

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>an electrical engineering professor. It's a little Carl Jansky. When

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>he grew up, he followed in his father's trajectory to

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>study physics and engineering as well. So as a young man,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Karl Jansky earned a degree in physics from the University

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin. I think he got his undergraduate degree but

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>then failed to complete his masters. But then anyway, he

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>went on to get hired by a company he was

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>hired for a position as a radio engineer with Bell

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Telephone Laboratories in ninety eight, and this would have been

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>when radio engineering was something fairly new, So at this

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>time in the late nineteen twenties, Bell Labs was interested

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in creating a system for a wireless radio based telephone

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>service that would allow ins atlantic phone calls and let's

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just say you needed to call across the Atlantic Ocean

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to order a bagat or something. These radio based phone

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>calls that Bell Labs wanted to do would have been

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>in the short wave frequency range, meaning wavelengths of about

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty meters, and Jansky was given the job

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of hunting down any potential sources of radio interference that

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>would cause static on the calls. So Jansky built a

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>giant receiver antenna to detect signals at a wavelength of

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point five meters. And this was a directional antenna,

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that it could be moved around to

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>identify the origin vector of any particular signal. Right, so

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not receiving signals from every direction the same you

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>aim it in the direction that you want to pick

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up the signal from. And it was mounted on a

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>giant rotating platform outfitted with motorized wheels. Actually there were

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the wheels from a model T and it could be

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>aimed in any direction to root out the sources of

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>attic or other interference that they were looking for. Some

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>people called this Jantski's Merry go Round. I've got a

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>photo of it here for you, Robert. Yeah, at first glance,

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks not unlike a giant biplane of some kind,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. Oh yeah, with the struts on the wings,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the world's most dangerous gymnastics equipment. It's

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>just broken shins all around. Yeah, it looks a little

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>bit like scaffolding or uh, the system of goals and

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort of Susian sport. But in the middle, of course,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's got wheels, and it's got a little track that

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the wheels roll around on so that you can aim

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it to to calibrate where the source of the interference

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is coming from. So, first of all, he discovered the

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 1>main source of terrestrial interference on this radio frequency range,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>which was electrical storms. So if there's a thunderstorm nearby

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that could generate static. You can even get some static

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>from distant thunderstorms. But Jansky also discovered a source of

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>noise in this frequency range that seemed unrelated to thunderstorms,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>quote a steady hiss type static of unknown origin. This

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>signal would go through a cycle once a day, peaking

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in intensity and then fading roughly every twenty four hours,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but not exactly every twenty four hours, just slightly, just

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>slightly less than twenty four hours. Now, at first, you know,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what would you conclude if something was emitting radiation powerful

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>enough to cause terrestrial radio interference in a cycle that

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lasted about one day? What would you think it probably was?

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But that that brings one's attention to just like the

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>immediate neighborhood of the Solar system, something to do with

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's position relative to the Sun. Yeah, exactly. You

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably the Sun, right, But Jansky chased the

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>signal and it turned out it wasn't the Sun because

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he kept following it for several months, and while the

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>signal at some point, I think when he was originally

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>chasing it was kind of near the Sun, it shifted

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>over time and moved away. And so after months of

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>using his radio source finding techniques and teen thirty two

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he discovered or I think it was thirty one or

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. He discovered that the origin of this anomalous

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>static hiss was coming from deep space, and he narrowed

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it down to an origin point roughly in the constellation Sagittarius.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Now Sagittarius is named after a a centaur archer. In

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Greek mythology, it's associated with the centaur uh An. Ancient

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Mesopotamian astrology, the constellation Sagittarius was associated with the deity

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>near gal a creature of fire and the desert and

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>war and disease, kind of a a creepy demon type figure.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>In Greek and Roman astrology, the constellation was most often

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>associated with the image of a centaur drawing a bow.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's like this super accurate centaur archer who always

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>hits his mark. Yeah, that centaur's that name is Chion,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>mentor of the Greek hero Achilles. Alright, I'd rather like

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea of of Achilles is the sort of mythical

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>killing machine having been you know, the student of of

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of Well, I don't want to spoil it, but some

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of cosmic anomaly, like he was getting messages into

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>his brain from space. Yeah, this was the static kiss

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>talking to Achilles. Yeah, I mean, well, what is it

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, to hear the voice of the gods,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but to be, you know, an antenna receiving signals from beyond,

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or to get your brain hit by a cosmic ray.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, like any constellation, Sagittarius, Sagittarius is not a

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>thing up there. This is something that I often fall

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>into the trap of thinking of constellations as like objects

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that exist in themselves. But of course a constellation is

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a number of stars that appear in a certain arrangement

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>from our perspective here on Earth. It's not like those

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>stars have a natural association with each other, right, It's

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just a yeah, it all has to do with our perspective.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And then it just is a shorthand way of identifying

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>different different portions of the night sky. They're not objects

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in the sky anymore than like the figure of a

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>shadowy goblin hand cast on your window at night by

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>a tree limb against the moonlight is an object. It's

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>feature of your perspective where the lights coming from, where

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you're looking from. But an important thing about Sagittarius from

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>our perspective is that this constellation just happens to be

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>generally the direction of the center of the Milky Way galaxy,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>our galaxy, the one we live in. And this was

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what Jansky had discovered, an extraterrestrial radio source coming not

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just from space, but from the core of the Milky Way.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Then they get you're prickling a little bit, Yeah, like

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>something something major is happening there, something that we can detect. Right.

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So Jansky authored a handful of scientific papers on this finding,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>including a paper called Electrical Disturbances Apparently of Extraterrestrial origin,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which he presented in nineteen thirty three to a conference

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in Washington of the International Scientific Radio Union. And this

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>led to media coverage, including an article in The New

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>York Times from nineteen thirty three, which you can still

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>read online if you got a log in with your subscription.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I looked it up and I read it. Can you

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>guess what the reporters asked to Jansky? Can you just guess? Um?

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You probably asked, are their little green men? Of course,

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the concluding paragraph of the article is there is no

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>indication of any kind. Mr Jansky replied to a question

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that these galactic radio waves constitute some kind of interstellar signaling,

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or that they are the result of some form of

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>intelligence striving for intragalactic communication. I'm glad they cleared that

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>up because they specify in the article that was a

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>steady hiss of random radio static, which seems like a

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>really bad type of radio signal to use for interstellar

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>communication would be like trying to communicate with somebody by

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>handing them blank pieces of paper. Plus ninety three not

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a great time period to be visited by some sort

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of extraterrestrial civilization. I mean, not that today is you

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>know that we've necessarily got things in working order, so

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that so that some distant civilization can judge us and

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>decide if we should uh, you know, be left to

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>function on our own or not. But thirty three was

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>not a great year, no, not not one of the

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>best periods. So so he's not saying it's aliens. He's

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely not saying it's aliens. He's saying it's pretty much

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly physical, not organic. But what was it? Well? Jansky

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to continue research on this deep radio source at

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the Milky Way, but Bell Labs was

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of course not interested in funding this kind of thing.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>In the nineteen thirties, early nineteen thirties. You know, this

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is the depression. They're they're they're not just looking to

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to profligately spend money on astronomy. It was enough for

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>them to have the radio telephone interference issues solved, But

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the following decades many astronomers actually picked up where

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Jansky had left off, and Jansky is now remembered as

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the pioneers of radio astronomy. I've seen it

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>speculated somewhere that if he hadn't died early he died

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty young, that he may have received the Nobel Prize

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point later. But he he hasn't forgotten. In fact,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I almost forgot this. The massive radio telescope array in

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico known as the Very Large Array, which I

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>visited in person last year and have talked about on

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the show before. It's actually named in his honor. It

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>almost gets forgotten because it's the v l A. But

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the Carl G. Jansky v l A. Oh okay, cool, Yeah,

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that either. And there's also a metric

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>named after him. And there's a unit in radiophysics known

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as the Jansky I can't remember exactly what it is.

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>It denotes something. But now astronomers have since then has

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time and energy trying to understand

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what is happening at the galactic center, at the core

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of our galaxy. And this is really difficult because we

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can't leave our galaxy to look down on it from above. Right.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever seen an image of the Milky Way

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>depicted in like a circular shape, this is just a guess,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>a guess of an illustrator. We can't look at our

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>galaxy from outside it. We're in it. It would be

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like trying to look at a storm from above while

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>the storm you're standing on the ground. The storm is

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>going on all around you. The center of the Milky

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Way is especially hard for us to see into because

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this region at the center of the galaxy that the

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the galaxy orbits around, is shrouded by dust,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these thick clouds of dust that obscure its millions of

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>stars from our point of view. I've seen numbers that

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>suggests there are like twenty five magnitudes of optical extinction

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>from this region due to dust. And that's why, even

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>though the core of our galaxy is by far the

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>brightest part of the galaxy, it's lit up with tons

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of stars. There's all this dust there that blots out

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the light and mutes that brightness from our point of view.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But modern telescopes and equipment have given us other ways

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to peer through the dust into the center of the galaxy.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>For example, through infrared and other radio frequency detections, we

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>can see what's shining from within. And today astronomers believe

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we have extremely compelling evidence that this radio source at

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the center of the galaxy uh Is is a regions

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>surrounding a gigantic supermassive black hole. This compact radio source

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>together is known as Sagittarius a star. And if you

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>see this printed or you know, type, it is a

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Sagittarius a asterix. The asterix stands for star, right, Yeah,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pronounced star. But it always, for the longest time,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>whenever I saw it, it it would confuse me because I'd

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>see it then it looked like, Okay, I'm looking for

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the note and there's not one. Because in astronomy that

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that asterix denote star. And we'll get to the you know,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the details on that in a bit. Yeah, it was

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>named that way for a cheeky reason by an astronomer

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventies. But maybe we should take a

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>break and then when we come back, we can sort

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of do a refresher on black holes and get into

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the details of this supermassive black hole. Thank alright, we're back,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>all right. So, as we said before, we did a

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>whole series on black holes about a year and a

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>half ago. You can go listen to those if you want.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>They get way into the history of the discovery of

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>black holes and all that, but we'll do a brief

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>refresher here. One quote I really like comes from the

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>physicist Supermanion Chandra Shekar, who is very important in the

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>history of black hole research. Uh. And he wrote a

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>book called The Mathematical Theory of black Holes, and in

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the prologue there's a part where he writes, quote, the

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>black holes of nature are the most perfect macroscopic objects

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there are in the universe. The only elements in their

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>construction are concepts of space and time. And this gets

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to some of the history we discussed in those previous episodes,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>being that, like, the black hole was the thing that

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that we saw in the math before we even began

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to like, you know, to to see through uh. You know,

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>other astronomical means. Yeah, it existed in theory long before

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it had ever been detected directly. In fact, you could

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>only argue probably that that you could well, I don't know.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on what evidence people count. But

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there is evidence now that seems to be direct indications

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of black holes, but it's hard for reasons that we'll

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a minute, I guess, yeah, for for

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the longest black holes. So certainly if you pull out

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>an older textbook, they're going to refer to black holes

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as theoretical objects, right, Yeah, So a black hole is

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a region of space time that is so dense that nothing,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>not even light, can escape, And this of course means

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can't see a black hole. There's nothing to

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.719
<v Speaker 1>see because the only way we see things is if

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they emit or reflect light, and a black hole does neither.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>No light comes out of it. If light goes toward it,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't bounce off and come back in your direction.

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It just gets absorbed and never escapes. Yeah, you know this,

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this reminds me a lot of how we're recently talking

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>about casually about quantum mechanics. In a new book that

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you've read, about quantum mechanics and and and uh, and

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of that's kind of like the the

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>micro quest and then the black holes are the macro

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>quest and the macro into the spectrum. And you know,

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>both of these are extremes that are just so far

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond our ability to you know, certainly our evolved ability

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to perceive and and to some extent even contemplate, you know,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and and and and so we you know, we talk

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>about like how we would perceive them vigitally, and even

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that is like when you really start turning that over

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in your head, um, it's it just gets ridiculous really quickly,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know. Well, it forces you to think about the

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nature of physical information. Yeah, the fact that you know,

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a black hole highlights the fact that when you see

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a thing, you never really see the thing. You're seeing

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>light reflecting off of it, which is, you know, that's

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>our most common way of sampling the world. So it

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to just think about that as a short cut. Yes,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>when I see the light bouncing off of a coffee cup,

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I see the coffee cup, but you're not, you know,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the coffee cup within you from that,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just light. Yeah, with our site, with with certainly

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>healthy human side. We kind of have this illusion that

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that we that we are cited, that we can perceive.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But the more we look at things like the microscopic world,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the macroscopic world, the inner space and and outer space,

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you really begin to feel that we are not cited

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. We are just so incredibly blind. And the

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>only way that we are really really have been able

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand h nature has been through scientific inquiry that

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could you could relate to the like

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the blind pawing of of the blind men and the elephant,

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, And astronomy is a great way to

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>highlight that. Astronomy and well you pointed to both ends

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of the scale, you know, physical scale, the quantum mechanics

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>world and astronomy what's out there in the dark beyond Earth.

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>They both really highlight ways in which the universe is

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>full of hugely powerful, consequential phenomena that we not only

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>don't regularly see, but we can't even understand when we

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>when we detect it with other means right and in

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>both totally violates our intuitions and in both directions, both

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>towards the small and the large. You know, we can

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>optically enhance the telescope or the microscope, but in both

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>directions there reaches a point where optical enhancement uh doesn't

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>get you anywhere, and we have to rely on other

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>means of of pawing at the uh you know, at

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the the the the the Titanic forces on an either

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the spectrum. And that's something that, of course,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>we get to with Jansky's discovery, right, this idea that

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there are these powerful sources of information coming into the Earth,

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's not information that anybody would be able to

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>see with their eyes coming in radio frequencies and then uh,

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, other frequencies of light. But I guess to

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>get back to black holes, we should ask the question,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, how is it possible for an object to

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be so dense that it neither reflects nor amidst light?

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Like what what happens to the light when it goes in?

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Why that be the case? Uh? So, the basic principle

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is the greater the mass of an object, the more

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult it is for an object that is moving away

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from it to escape its gravity. Well, now, all sources

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of gravity have their own particular escape velocity and If

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm standing on the surface of the Earth and I

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>throw a cantalope straight up in the air at a

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred kilometers an hour, it's of course going to fall

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>back down to the ground. If I throw the cantle

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ope at two hundred kilometers per hour, it's going to

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>go up farther, but of course it will eventually slow down,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>reverse course and fall back to the Earth. But if

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I keep throwing it up in the air greater and

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>greater velocities each time, eventually you will reach some velocity

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>where the cantalope doesn't fall straight back down to the ground,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but it goes up and up and up, and it

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>breaks free of Earth's gravity, and then it just keeps

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 1>on flying out into space. It maintains its momentum and

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>goes in the other direction. Now at the surface of

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Earth, this velocity for objects that don't keep propelling

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>themselves as they travel, is about eleven point twokilometers per second,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's very fast. Humans have never made a terrestrial

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that goes even close to this fast with humans

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in it. Certainly, our our launch vehicles that put things

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>into orbit or send them into outer space don't go

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that fast. At first. Heavy launch vehicles like the you know,

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Saturn five rocket and things of that ilk are able

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to put things into orbit or beyond by applying continuous

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>thrust as they achieve higher and higher altitude. So the

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>rocket keeps on pushing and pushing by ejecting more exhaust

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>until it gets up through the atmosphere. And then, of course,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>inside the atmosphere, air resistance and frictional heating would be

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge issue if you try to have a spacecraft

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>achieve escape velocity too early, right, your spacecraft would probably

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get too hot and burn up. But once outside the atmosphere,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>rocket can keep accelerating. In the vehicle can get up

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to the ultimate speed that it needs to go into

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>orbit or leave Earth's gravity overall, and it turns out

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this escape velocity logic even applies to light. At a

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>certain point, an object becomes so dense, there's so much

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>mass inside such a small space that the escape velocity

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>for an object exceeds the speed of light. So no

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>light comes out of the black hole, No light is

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>emitted from within, no light is reflected from without. It's

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a perfect vortex. It swallows everything that comes within a

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>certain radius, and of course if this applies to light,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't just apply to light, right, because since nothing

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with mass can travel faster than the speed of light,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>speed of light could also be thought of as a

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of speed of information or a speed of causality

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. If light can't escape the black hole,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing can escape. Now. Something I think a couple of

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>listeners were asking about after our last black Hole series

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was trying better to picture exactly what's going on there, Like,

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>what is it that nothing can escape? In some ways?

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Could a black hole be kind of like a solid

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>black bowl, like a black ball that you get stuck

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to the outside of like paper, you just get flattened

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>against it. I think the answer to that is no.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>A black hole is matter that has collapsed on itself

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to what looks to us, at least through the math,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>like a point of zero volume and infinite density, and

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this is sometimes called the singularity. Now, is it actually

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>physically possible to have a point of infinite density that

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>may be not something that we're supposed to literally picture.

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Is what's there? But an indication that we don't have

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a correct theory of quantum gravity yet, and you know,

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we just don't understand exactly what's happening there. That's where

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>general relativity breaks down. But I think what it does

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>make sense to say is that there is some kind

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of point of extremely tiny collapse at the core of

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the black hole too. That doesn't really make any kind

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of intuitive sense to the physics, you know, engine in

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>our brains. And then of course there is that that

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that point of no return as well. That plays into

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>our very perception of the black hole, right that point

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>of no return and is often what we think of

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as the black hole. But that's not necessarily stuff. That

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is a region of space around this point where all

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the all the original matter that made up the thing

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that became the black hole is collapsing into. So that

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is the event horizon. Yes, exactly, it's the sphere shaped

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>region of space that's a kind of gravitational exclusion zone.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>The size of this zone, of course, depends on the

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.719
<v Speaker 1>mass of the black hole core. So a more massive

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>black hole will black out a larger region of space

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in the sphere around it. I think we uses we

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>might have used this very um analogy before. But if

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if the black hole is the killer inside the haunted house,

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the event horizon is the haunted house. Okay, So like, uh,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can say that the black hole is

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>leather Face, but the event horizon is the leather Face

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>family home. Can you see people walking towards and never

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>emerging from. Oh, but Marilyn Burns does escape, Well, I'm

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier the film. You're okay, Okay, Obviously, I'm sorry.

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to nitpick your analogy. Obviously, obviously people

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>have to escape the film. I have to escape the

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>house for a proper horror movie to work. But in

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a version of the leather Face movie where nobody ever

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>comes out, then like that is the event arison. Perhaps

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a there's a more fitting example from from

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>like haunted House lore out there. I guess it would

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>make the story is less interesting if you just know

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that nobody ever escaped. I think Stephen King had a

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>short story about a women's bathroom that functioned like this,

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>where like people went in but they didn't come out,

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and and like the the the point of view character

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was just trying to figure out what was happening. I

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>only have a vague memory of this. I think it

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>was like a real shorty, or maybe it was just

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>him talking about a concept he had that he had

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not written, King Fans will have to straighten me out. Then, well,

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we're we're like that person outside the bathroom trying to

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>figure about what's going on because we can't look inside

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and see. Uh So, the edge of this region of space,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, as you said, is one name for it

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is the event horizon. But the distance between the core

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, what's known as the singularity, the

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>core of the black hole, what everything, the point that

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>everything collapses down into and this event horizon is known

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>as the schwartz Shield radius, named after the twentieth century

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>German astronomer and physicist Carl schwartz Shield, who did very

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>important calculations in the early days of black hole theory,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>back when black hole theory was still ridiculed as being

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>something that, you know, couldn't possibly be found in nature.

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it was that Arthur Eddington who originally said, uh,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when Chandra Sheker and the others were

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>proposing the idea of black holes, Eddington was like, surely

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>nature would forbid such a preposterous event. That's one of

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>those great times when nature faced a scientist who thought

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>nature couldn't be that weird, and of course it is

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>always the case. Nature is far weirder than can possibly imagine,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of course. But yeah, anyways, this sphere of space from

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>which nothing returns. Anything that passes within the short shield

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>radius enters this strange world of warped space. And from

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this space it is impossible to escape. Once inside the

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>event horizon the short shield radius, there's only one direction.

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>That direction is down. No matter what you do, you're

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>headed towards the center of the black hole. And I

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>should add quickly there may be exceptions to these rules

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 1>for special types of black holes with exotic properties. You

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>find articles about these, like weird types of black holes

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>where things can change. But this is the basic I

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think you're non rotating standard stellar blast. Yeah, this is

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>your standard model. Now, we alluded to earlier the fact

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that even though a black hole neither emits nor reflects light,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>we do have pretty solid evidence now that black holes

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>do exist. Uh, They're not just something that is sort

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of hypothesized by the theory of general relativity. But like

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we we've we're pretty certain we've detected them out there

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. Now, so how can you detect them

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if they neither reflect nor a mint light. Well, I mean,

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like the hunted house scenario, Like if

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a house like this that no one ever

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>emerged from again, because there's some sort of uh, you know,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>diabolical force within it that consumes everyone that passes within

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know, past its threshold. Obviously, you could note

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>people that entered the house and didn't come back out again.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You might notice the um the effect that such a

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>house would have on the the surrounding property values, um

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have. You know, basically, it would have some

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>effect on the surrounding environment that would be observable even

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>if you never got to actually pass within its walls

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and see the dark, hideous force that is murdering people. Yeah,

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly right. You can observe a black

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>hole by looking at its effects on surrounding objects. And

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those types of effects is gravitational effects. Imagine

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you see a dis stant star orbiting some invisible point,

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and that star's orbit is it's it's on a very

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>irregular trajectory, maybe a super stretched out ellipse, and at

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>one end of that ellipse, it appears to be going

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really close to the thing it's orbiting. Around but that

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we can't see, and as it goes really close to

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that thing, it accelerates to unbelievable speeds. There would be

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a good case to be made that maybe what it's

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>orbiting is something that is incredibly tiny and incredibly massive,

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, this is exactly what we see. Especially

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>with the case of Sagittary as a star the hypothetical

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy that

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we were alluding to earlier, we have noted the passive

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the transit of stars around it that suggests that the

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thing these stars are orbiting could only be a black hole,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise there's nothing else that could be as small

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as the thing they're orbiting and accelerating them as fast. Now,

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>another way you could look at the surroundings of an

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>object and determined that it's a black hole is if

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff is basically stuff is catching on fire, not on fire,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's getting really hot. Um as matter like gas

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and dust, swirls around a black hole and eventually falls

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>over its sword shield radius. In this process of swirling

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>around and falling in, it gets accelerated to incredible speeds

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and superheated, blasting out hot radiation that that is some

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of the brightest stuff we can see in the entire universe,

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like this idea of quasars, these you know, quasi stellar

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>radio radio emitting objects out there in the universe. We

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to think that what these things are are the

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>cores of galaxies that have supermassive black holes at the

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>center of the galaxy. And as stuff is falling into

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the supermassive black hole, it gets accelerated to such a

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>way that to such an extent that it becomes unbelievably

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bright on the on the electromagnetic spectrum. So again for analogy,

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you can you can think of this like imagine there

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>were an invisible blow torch floating around in a forest.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you couldn't see the blowtorch, but you could notice

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that all the leaves in the wind swirling around a

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>certain area of space or all catching on fire for

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>some reason. And then another thing, of course, is that

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>data collected from gravitational wave of observatories has picked up

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>waves propagating through the universe that seem to be best

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>described by the collision of black holes. Now we know

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>there are a few different kinds of black holes, right,

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so we know that there, there's your standard model stellar

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>black hole, and these are created by the collapse of

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>large mature stars. Our Sun is not massive enough to

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>become a black hole. Uh. In something like four to

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>five billion years. Our Son's probably like halfway through its

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>its main sequence life. In about four or five billion years,

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to swell up into a red giant that

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>will absorb the orbits of mercury and venus and possibly Earth,

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it will go through a series of different

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>internal chemistry phases, is where it's fusing heavier and heavier

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>elements as it runs out of its lighter fuel, so

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it'll run out of hydrogen, then fuse helium, run out

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of helium, and fuse heavier and heavier elements uh. And

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>then eventually it will end up as a white dwarf,

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what it will remain for trillions of years

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>basically until it just cools off. It's interesting, we keep

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>coming and we'll keep coming back to the the idea

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of between four and five billion years old, like and

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>again stressing that the Earth is what four point five

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>billion about years old, So in a few via the

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a few different calculations, like the Earth is half done, Yeah,

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>assuming nothing else happened to it before then. Yeah, uh though, yeah,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the the habitability window for the Earth might

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be a bit shorter than that, yes, because things might

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>get worse before before the Earth is actually even potentially

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>swallowed up right, And then of course the's a whole

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>there's an additional discussion about, you know, do we reach

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a civilization level at that point where we have the

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>technology to do something about it, say, move the Earth, etcetera.

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's another podcast unto itself. Yeah, the scoutow thruster

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Oh no, wait, no, that brings the star

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with us. We don't want that, need better star. But anyway, Yeah,

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>so the Sun is not large enough to become a

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>black hole. If our Sun were a lot larger, maybe

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about ten times its current mass, you could expect that

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>when it exhausts its hydrogen fuel and begins fusing heavier

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and heavier elements, it could eventually end up trying to

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>fuse a dense core made of iron, which is the

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>chemical death ritual of a star fusing iron. Is that's like,

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's like the character in the horror movie saying, is

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>anybody there? That's just you know, there's no returning After that,

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>fusing iron leads to not enough outward pressure to hold

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the mass of the star up against its own gravity,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and it collapses inward catastrophically. It releases a giant blast

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of energy and eventually perhaps turns into a super dense

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>neutron star or even a black hole. But again this

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>depends on the density of the thing that's left there

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>after this event. If our son had the same mass

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it does now, but it was only a few kilometers wide,

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>supposedly it would collapse into a black hole. There's just

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>no reason to think that it would ever be that small.

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are other kinds of black holes that we

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>can't say are formed necessarily from the collapse of large

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>stars after they exhaust their fuel supply of lighter elements.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>There is, for example, a hypothetical type of black hole

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>called the primordial black hole, which if they did exist,

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would have formed due to the gravitational collapse around dense

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>regions in the very earliest periods of the expanding universe.

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And then there's this other class of black hole, the

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 1>one that Sagittarius a star would be if if there

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is in fact a black hole there, and we think

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>there's very good evidence there is, uh, these remain more

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of a mystery to us. This is the These are

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the black holes found at the cores of massive galaxies. Yes,

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the theories that we have for the formation

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of sort of the standard black holes, they don't quite

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>hold up when we try to use them to explain

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a supermassive black hole, like they either like one example

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is looking at was that they don't they don't create

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>these simulations do not create a supermassive black hole fast enough,

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, for them to be present in the universe. Yeah,

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that's right. There are competing hypotheses to explain the formation

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of supermassive black holes. But it seems like, at least

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>as far as I've read, there are problems with all

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of the proposed hypotheses. I was reading one article that

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>can consults a scientist and Mitch Bagelman of the University

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>of Colorado, who works on supermassive black hole formation and

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and basically he was saying that the theories fall into

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>two main categories. One is that you've got an original

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>small seed black hole that takes a long time to

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>get bigger as it absorbs more and more material, or

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>you've got a very large original seed black hole from

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the collapse of some kind of hypothetical huge star that

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, we don't usually see, and it rose

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. But there are problems with both of these

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>classes of explanations. But then there there are other more

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, more exotic theories as well. I guess yeah.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>When I was looking at is from seen from the

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Cavali Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>UM principal investigator uh nail Key Yoshida at All produced

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a paper in Science on this with an interesting take,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, a different a different proposition for how

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a supermassive black hole might form against something something different

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>from just the idea that it's the first generation of

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>stars that have turned into black holes, and something different

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>from just the idea that, you know, a massive primordial

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>gas cloud that collapses under gravity. So this is how

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they lay out an alternate formation. First of all, you

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have a massive clump of dark matter, which forms when

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the universe is just a hundred million years old. Then

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>supersonic gas streams generated by the big dayg are caught

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>by it and form a dense gas cloud, a protostar

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>forms inside um of this gas u and a protostar

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is a young star that is formed by gas cloud collapse.

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And then this protostar feeds on the gas cloud around

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>it and grows at an accelerated rate. And then the

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>protostar grows to a mass of thirty four thousand times

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that of our Sun. And all this by the ways

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in simulations they were running, uh, and then it collapses

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in on its own gravity, birthing a massive black hole

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in the early universe that only grows more massive and

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>more gravitationally dominant as time grinds on. And this would

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>explain why all or most massive galaxies appear to have

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a supermassive black hole at the center of them. Yes,

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that though, that is what they're trying to explain with this.

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But again, this is just another hypothesis for how what

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>could have occurred to bring these things into being. Step

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>one assumed dark matter. It makes sense to be uh

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>looking at all different kinds of simulations because because I

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that again comes back to the origin of our

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the black hole. It began as this this uh,

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this vacancy yeah, in the in in the mathematics of

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Yeah, well, yeah, it began as a simulation.

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It was like these people running these different hypothetical simulations,

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but then it turned out that they actually exist. So

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should take a break, and then when we

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>come back, we can look at some specific facts about

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>this compact radio source at the center of the Milky

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Way galaxy, about Sagittarius A Stark. Alright, we're back. We're

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about supermassive black holes. Uh, not the Muse song,

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>though I ended up being reminded of the Muse song

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Supermassive black Hole and and listen to it at least

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>once during a research for this. If I know that,

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, it's it's pretty good. Yeah, news has some

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>great tracks, but hasn't been I don't think they're you know,

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>astrophys sally accurate per se, but never mind, but I

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 1>guess they're more accurate than say, you know, Sam Garden's

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>black Hole Sun, which again, uh, as we already covered,

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>is not actually going to happen no matter how many

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>times we watched that music video. Growing up what was

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago, when we were doing how stuff

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>works articles, I remember us brainstorming a like false science

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>facts in song lyrics. Uh, and I remember that that

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was the one that came up. But another one that

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm made a case for and I don't think made

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it into the article was Fleetwood Mac thunder only happens

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>when it rains. Not true, Not true at all. Yeah. Yeah,

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it's still a great track though. Yeah, they can't beat

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Mac. Alright, Well, let's talk a little bit more

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>about Sagittarius a star. Um So, I just want to

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just take apart its name a little bit more of

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think helps us understand exactly what we're talking about.

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, first of all, we've been talking about it

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>being not only massive but super massive, Like what does

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Well, we're talking about roughly four point one

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>million solar masses, with one solar mass being equal to

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the mass of our own son. So a single solar

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>mass is two times ten to the thirty power kilograms

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are roughly two quintillion kilograms. The mass of of Sagittarius

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a star is roughly four point one million times that

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of our son. I was trying to find a point

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of comparison, so I was doing a little math, and

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 1>one worked out just right. I think it's roughly the

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>difference in mass between a twenty milligram house fly and

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred and eighty pounds Gean Claude van dam

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>our Son is the fly twenty milligrams. Van dam is

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the supermassive black hole at at a hundred and eighty pounds.

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>That works out just about right. All right, So we're

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>talking like um, like time cop era vandam right. I

0:41:55.800 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mean here, I don't know. I just googled hundred vander

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's pretty dense, right, I mean it would be

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a good analogy for a black hole, I guess. So, yeah,

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah. What's the thing he does in time

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>coop to kill somebody? Oh? He does all sorts of

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>things to kill somebody. I mean he he does the

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>splits on on some kitchen sinks so that somebody electrocutes himself. Uh.

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He somebody is frozen with liquid nitrogen, and then he

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>kicks their arm off. Um. I mean things get super

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>trippy when he takes ron silver of the past and

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Ron silver of the future and kicks one into the other,

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and then they merge into a cosmic Google. Oh, there's

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>got to be a black hole analogy there, right, black

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hole takes past you in future you and merges you somehow. Yeah,

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I've never quite worked out the science of that scene,

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but it has always stuck with me. Perhaps a reviewing

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of time cop Is is worthwhile in the future. Okay,

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, so our Sun is much bigger than the Earth,

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Sun is a housefly compared to his John

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>club van Dam with the supermassive black hole. As we know,

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because of the limit physics that rule them, black holes

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>don't quite take up the same amount of space as

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 1>normal objects of the same mass. So how big is it? Well, yeah, well,

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk about it's radius. Roughly it has it's

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>roughly thirty one point six solar radius, So that means

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it's radius is thirty one point six times that of

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the radius of our own son, which is, by the way,

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and ninety five thousand, seven hundred kilometers or

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>roughly four three hundred miles. Remember that the radius is

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>half of the diameter. So even though it's more than

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>four million times the mass of the Sun, because it's

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a black hole, it's still not like so wide that

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it would swallow up the entire Solar system if it

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>were in the Sun's position, right, Just talking about like

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the physical space, it takes up its circumference. The distance

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>around it is roughly forty four million kilometers or twenty

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>seven roughly twenty seven million, three hundred forty thousand, three

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty two and a half miles and a half.

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Now this is really big, But it got me wondering.

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Is Sagittarius ay started the largest black hole we know about? Nope,

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not even holose. Contemplating the biggest ones should make your

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>head implode if it hasn't already. How much bigger can

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>black holes get? Well, it's hard to be certain because

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the mass of the black hole at the center of

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>another galaxy has to be inferred right based on these

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 1>periphery clues, like the brightness of the emissions presumed to

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be from its accretion jets or accretion disk or relativistic jets.

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, we don't know for sure, but we have estimates.

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Just one example on the highest end of estimates is

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a black hole called Town six eighteen t O N

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>six eighteen and unbelievably luminous quays are and a galaxy

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>billions of light years away. One of the brightest objects

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, the presumed supermassive black hole at the

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>center of this radio source has been estimated to contain

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty six billion solar masses, and so it's thought that

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the the brightness of the stuff swirling into that supermassive

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 1>black hole, it just completely outshines everything around, outshines all

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the stars in the galaxy around it. So sixty six

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>billion solar masses with with the tonight compared to Sagittarius

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a star, which again four point one million solar masses, right,

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's incredible. I mean, we're going from like unimaginably huge

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to um to something even beyond that. It's like four

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>orders of magnitude above. But going back to Sagittarius a star.

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>How close are we to it? Yeah, I have some

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>people may be wondering that we're roughly twenty five thousand,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred light years away, give or take one thousand,

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>four hundred light years. This is going to depend on

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>orbital positioning. Okay, so this is the very center of

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Milky Way galaxy, and we're sort of in the middle.

0:45:57.160 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We're sort of like halfway out right between the center

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy and and the farthest reaches of its arms.

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Very roughly, we're basically in a stable orbit around it. Yeah, because,

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discuss the I would think probably more in

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the next episode. Things get really rough the closer than

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you get, which should not come as a surprise. Uh. Now,

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 1>we've already talked about the name itself, Sagittarius, the ninth

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>astrological sign associated with the constellation Sagittarius, it's connection to centaurs.

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's come back around to that A star business.

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, so this is this thing can be confusing

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people. We mentioned that it often

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>makes us look for a footnote at the bottom of

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the page. I was looking into where the A star

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>part comes from the asterisk, and I found a two

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand three paper by Goss, Brown and Low that explains

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the origins. So astronomer Robert L. Brown and colleague Bruce

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Ballack are credited with discovering the compact radio source of

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Sagittarius a star in nineteen seventy four, and Brown apparently

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>named this object according to a made up convention that's

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of nerd cheeky. So he writes, quote, scratching on

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a yellow pad one morning, I tried a lot of

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>possible names when I began thinking of the radio sources

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the exciting source for the cluster of HII regions seen

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in the v l A maps. The name Sagittarius a

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 1>star occurred to me by analogy brought to mind by

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>my PhD dissertation, which is in atomic physics, and where

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the nomenclature for excited state atoms is H E star

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or f E star, meaning like you know, helium star

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>or iron star. So the star there is the excited

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>state of the atom. And apparently this discovery was exciting

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in more ways than one. Now, one of the other

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 1>reasons it is can it can potentially be confusing is

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because asterix means star. I mean, it basically derives from

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Greek aster riscos, which means little star um and

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and another thing to keep in mind, I guess is

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know it's we're basically dealing with an astronomical

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:02.919
<v Speaker 1>radio source is the likely location of a supermassive black hole.

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, I guess it's more like referring to an

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>unknown serial murder as the Green River Killer before you

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ever find out that his name is actually Gary. And again,

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as as you pointed out, it's also kind of like

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 1>cheeky and uh and I think I've seen it referred

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to as being historical in nature, but there's also a

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>broader thing of just Sagittarius A without the star. The

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 1>star is this compact radio source believed to be the

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>location of the supermassive black hole or the let's see

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the radio source emitting stuff around the supermassive black hole. Yeah,

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and then there's there's more two because there's a there's

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a Sagittarius A star, but there's also Sagittarius A east.

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>This is likely the remains of a supernova explosion that

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>occurred between thirty five thousand and a hundred thousand b

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>c E, and scientists think that the ejecta of the

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>supernova was gravitationally compressed due to a close approach by

0:48:56.560 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the supermassive black hole. Then there's Sagittarius A. Well, this

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is the mini spiral. It's sometimes called because from our

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>perspective it looks like a three armed spiral, but it's

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>actually a cloud of dust and gas. It's orbiting Sagittarius

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 1>A star. And another question people might have was how

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>old is Sagittarius A star? How long has there been

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a supermassive black hole festering at the center of our galaxy. Well,

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer I guess is it's it's staggeringly old. But

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to put a real fine line on that.

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:33.240
<v Speaker 1>The Milky Way galaxy itself is what the thirteen point

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>two billion years old, and there are different formation theories

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 1>regarding galaxies, and the universe itself is believed to be

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>roughly thirteen point seven thirteen point eight billion years old.

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, I'm I think we can stand by

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>staggeringly old and is it the center of things? You know,

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>for for a reason? Yeah, And now when we think

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about that compared to say, our own solar system, our

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Solar system is just roughly four and a half billion

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 1>years old, and it's one of the reminders that our

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Solar system and everything that makes our planet possible, that

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>makes our bodies possible, it's not the first generation, right.

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We can only exist by the fact that previous generations

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of stars lived and burned and died catastrophically, creating the

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 1>heavy elements that make up things like the planets in

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:27.919
<v Speaker 1>our Solar system. All the technology you're using to listen

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to this right now, and all the stuff in your

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>bodies that's all made of gunk from Stars that went

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>horribly wrong. Now, I think one important thing to keep

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in mind, you know, whenever we discussed black holes, but

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in this episode as well, is that despite the

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>black hole being you know, a source of peril in

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 1>various science fiction treatments, despite the fact that even in

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:52.959
<v Speaker 1>this episode we've we've discussed it and often like dark

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and forbidding ways, you know, it's not coming to get you. Yeah,

0:50:57.719 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not coming to to get us in. But then

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>even more to the point, it is, um it is

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not like this negative like counterpoint. You know, it's not

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this evil thing in the universe, like the black The

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's a supermassive black hole at the center

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of our galaxy should not come as uh, you know,

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a point of fear or disappointment. You know, it's not.

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It's wonder and it is. It just shows that the

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>black hole can be a thing that holds, uh holds

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>everything together. You know, these are that's part of the

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 1>building blocks of of of the galaxy of the universe.

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, therefore we we can't think in

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, simplistic terms about it being you know, just

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 1>like some sort of venomous uh you know, has us

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 1>off like formation. No, it's not venomous, because what the

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>venomous thing would would inject you with venom? Right, this

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>sucks it out? Yeah yeah, I mean if anything is

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>injecting us with venom, right, it's the solar radiation emerging

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from a start that necessary to life. To be fair,

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess the supermassive black hole what it Emits lots

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of radiation, so you can think of that is it? Anyway,

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not venom It's just a fantastically interesting object out

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>there in space, so much so that we want to

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>do a whole other episode on it. We we wanted

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to come back next time and deal with everything you've

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to know about the supermassive black hole at

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the center of the galaxy. But we're afraid to ask, Yeah,

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>can you live on it? Um? Can you eat it?

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Questions like this? You know we will. We will get

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>into in our next episode. In the meantime, if you

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>want to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:34.800
<v Speaker 1>your Mind, you know where to find them. Stuff to

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com. That's where you'll find them all,

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>including those previous episodes on black holes. Likewise, we mentioned

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Invention If you go to invention pot dot com you'll

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>find our other podcast, Invention. That's where you'll find that, uh,

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>that episode on the telescope that came out, as well

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as episodes on the you know, the the the invention

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of the photograph, the motion picture, etcetera. It is a

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>invention by invention, an exploration of human techno history and

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>let's see what else. Yeah, If you want to support

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 1>our show, really, the best thing you can do is

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>spread the word, tell your friends about about us, tell

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your family members about us, and if you have the

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to do so, rate and review us wherever you

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Huge thanks as always to our excellent

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>audio producer Maya Cole. If you'd like to get in

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>touch with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>suggest a topic for the future, just to say hello,

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.479
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Its duty proper f