WEBVTT - Bonds, Markets, and Crypto

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's bring in Noel Abert.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>He covers all things credit, fixed income. He's a co

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>director of research at Bloomberg Intelligence, one of the smarter

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>dudes out there, um that we talked to. No, let's

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just start here. I mean, you're all over the credit

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>space here. What do you expect and from the Federal Reserve?

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>I guess tomorrow and then maybe going forward. Yeah, I

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think well, at the high level, I mean, you're looking

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for maybe twenty five basis points tomorrow than another twenty

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>five basis points. But I think one of the places

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>where myself and uh, you know, my group kind of

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>disagrees with broader consensus is that after that, I think

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the the higher for longer sort of FED holding path

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>through the end of the year is sort of the

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>base case for says if you look at where the

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>rates markets are. Obviously they're looking for a little bit

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of retracement or pivots somewhere around mid year. So why

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think the market what what's the market maybe

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at? And yeah, I mean, you're right, the feder

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>reserve is pretty clear in the messaging that we're going

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to stay higher for some period of time, but as

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, the markets not necessarily buying that. What do

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you think is going on there? Well, I think it's

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>probably a decade's worth of the Fed sort of facilitating

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of the market enthusiasm combined with sort of a

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>very mixed macroeconomic picture, right. I mean, I think it's

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to you know, pull out or distinguish sort of

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the good and the bad. I mean, I think there's

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of softness that seems to be cropping up

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in parts of the manufacturing sector and some of the

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer sentiments side, uh bott the flip side. We saw

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a strong jobs data, so I think from a standpoint

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you could say, hey, listen, strong jobs, but we still

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>got this sort of elevated inflation, and so you can

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of ignore sort of the weaker consumer thing that

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>seems to be drawing the attention of the market, Well,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the inflation may turn around even more

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>quick Well, certainly on the good side, we're starting to

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>see what feels like deflation in the automotive sector in

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of non grocery retail. What about the services

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, the I guess rent component. Well

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know because I just got my E V Hummer,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But so, but now I think on the service design,

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a mixed picture. I think

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing some softness there. Um, But you know, on

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>the rent side, I think is a you know, I

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're changing the methodology a little bit later this year,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>but we're seeing some moderation, but it's still going to

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of we're still running a little bit hot on

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that side, because I mean, remember that rents aren't necessarily

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>related to home prices, where we're seeing a little bit

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>more rapid deceleration. Hey, no, I know you've had a

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>long career on Wall Street looking at this credit business

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and last year you know, it's just one for the

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>books in terms of underperformance. But you guys are bouncing

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit here in January. Talk to us

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>about the performance we're seeing in January austocratic space. Yeah.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So I mean in investment grade, you're gonna be looking

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>at probably the third best uh year going back forty years.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, in a lot of that's going

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.839
<v Speaker 1>to be rates driven, right, because an investment grade you're

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to duration, i e. You know, the more interest

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>rates moved, the more pricing moves. So with treasury yields

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>coming down, that's driven a lot of you know, our

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>performance on the investment grade side, but even high yields

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>uh seem a pretty healthy starting pretty much anything kinidi

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. Uh, you know, whether you're talking municipals or

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>mortgage bats, etcetera. You know, all sort of keying in

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on what are the better starts to the year that

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, you know, in the last couple of decades

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>at the very least. Um not surprising, I mean, given

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the prepentous year that you have for mentioned. But you know, nonetheless,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, it takes the edge off for

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>people that are still looking their wounds. What are the

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest headwinds you think? No, I mean, if we uh,

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if we see a repeat of you know, everyone talks

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about our their burns, you know, the FED kind of

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>calms down a little bit and then inflation starts, um

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>poking up a bit. Is that is that very bad

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for for the credit world? Well, I think it will

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>learn a little bit tomorrow, right, I mean I think, uh,

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, if POWE comes out and sort of tries

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to really re established that sort of hackish under the

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>spectrum and we start to reprice the curve, I think

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that's where I don't know that you'd necessarily get a

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>big sell off, but you'd certainly get a little bit

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of a pause and sort of the enthusiasm that's out there,

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because one of the things that we've seen, you know,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>early on is it's not only rates that are driving

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the returns, but people have been very aggressive in the

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>risk bit, i e. Spreads have compressed quite a bit

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>as well, despite the macro economic headwinds. So if you

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>get a FED that says no, no, no, no, you

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta believe us, right, you could start to see some

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>reprice them settling in the right side, and then some

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>repricing in the spread side that maybe you know, tempers

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the excitement out there and maybe you know it leaves

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit more with the coupon and as

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a bigger you know return picture. Well, because

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the market doesn't believe the Fed's gonna get to five percent,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>not an effective FED funds rate of five percent? Is

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>there any reason that? I mean, of course he's gonna

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>job ow. He he has to, that's his job. But

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>does anybody besides day traders like care? Uh you know, well, well,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think everybody on the rate side cares, right,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>because I just mean, no, you know, if he's he

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can talk, uh the talk, but can he walk the walk?

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five basis points is just to me it feels

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so weak and luke warm. I mean, if you're gonna

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>already do that, then I'm not going to listen to

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the speech unless you come out with

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty I don't buy it. No, I'm not. I'm not

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>unsympathetic to your view, but I'm also not the rate strategist,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's not really for me to opine. Al Right.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I was not here, Yeah, we can step. I was

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like watching a soccer soccer match somewhere, alright, So no,

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I'm an issuer here, like as a

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>former bang and put my banker had on again there.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just a few months ago, I was I

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was issuing paper like close to zero percent. Now rates

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>are a lot higher. This isn't as much fun anymore.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about kind of the new issuance market

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>year to date and kind of what you expect this year. Yeah,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So on the investment grade sign, I mean, I mean

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>both markets have gotten off to a reasonably healthy start.

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think last year for investment grade, we saw about

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one point two trillion, which is sort of in keeping

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>if you look at years outside of the media post

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>pandemic when things went crazy, that's sort of like an

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>average year. I think we're gonna come down a little

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bit from that, maybe closer to one point one trillion,

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which is one owing to the higher rates that you mentioned,

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but also you just have a kind of a weaker

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>maturity calendar this year. High yields a little bit different

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>story because last year was basically shut down. Uh, you know,

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>when we got a hundred twenty billion out of there

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>versus you know, mid twos to low threes, which is

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>more common. Uh. This year, I still think we're gonna

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not quite make it to two billion, but we're gonna

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>start pulling forward some of that talents because high yield,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, anytime you get a market opening any majority

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of within that eighteen month window, you got

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to start looking at uh and so we'll see some

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of that this year. We've actually already seen some of

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that in January. You know, we're a little over twenty

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>billion for January this year, which is down from last January,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but still other than last January would be the strongest

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>month in the last year and change. Alright, the bankers

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get paid. That makes that warms my heart.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, No, thanks so much for joining us. Noel Hibert,

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence chiefs Credit Strategists. He's co director of research

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for that. All that credit research coming out of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Intelligence was one of the few shops on

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street that still provides credit research, and they do

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it across the board. More than two thousand companies, hundred

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty industries. Lots of earnings this week, lots of eco data,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>We got the Fed tomorrow, Lots for investors to chew on.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You can call for your financial bias and say what

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>am I doing now? After the brutal let's check out

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>with somebody who does this stuff for living Gene Bolvin.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>She's a president of Bovin Wealth Management. Gina, thanks so

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>much for taking the time here. Um, boy, after what

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>was just a brutally and the old sixty portfolio, I'd

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>love to know kind of what your initial communication was

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to your clients about what to do in twenty three. Yeah,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. It's great to see you. Um.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we are having a great year so far.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 1>We have the S and P up about five point

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>four percent, the nastacks up about ten two. We've been

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>telling our clients to sit tight because if you miss

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>those great days in the market, you're really not going

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to participate in the upside. And um, we're expecting more

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the same for this year. Outlook. Our base case

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is to be up by by the year end, but

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>expect by year end, but we think it's going to

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>take all year to get there. Well good, I mean,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna find that high, you don't want to

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>do it in a month, right, Um, you want to build. Yeah,

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So we do think that it's going to be another

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>choppy year. Um. This is as you know, as you've

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>been talking about. It's a pivotal week with the FED meeting.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow's the first f o MC meeting of this year.

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>The markets are expecting UM to base point hike and

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>another and you know, well, we know that we've reached

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>peak inflation, but I think the main question is have

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we have we reached peak hawkishness? Interesting, Well, we'll part

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that a little bitmorrow. We'll see a little bit tomorrow,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what kind of tone, uh, this takes. I've

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly been talking tough, So, Gina, it give us a

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of who your average client is and

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe what an average portfolio looks for your client these

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>days a two year in terms of your talk in return,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what a portfolio should look like? Yeah, yeah, just kind

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of you know, when you sit down with somebody for

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the first time, how do you think about, you know,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>constructing your portfolio, given given the year we just had

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in given that we've got so much you know, across

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>winds out there. Well, I think it's really important to

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>take a look at what your income needs are right

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>before you build a portfolio. You have to get a

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of somebody's risk tolerance, time horizon, and what income

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>needs that they have. So we would start by doing

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a financial plan and doing an intake of UM, what

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for, and aggressive or conservative mean different things

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to different people. I think that's what was so difficult

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about last year is it was one of the worst

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bond markets ever in the history, and conservative investors really

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't see any diversification that helped their portfolio. But we

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>do think that's going to change this year, and we

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do think it will be a better year for stocks

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and for bonds. So, Gina, you were named one of

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the top advisors, top female advisor and Forbes. Um, what

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think got you those accolades? Great clients, hard work,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>being honest with my clients, trying to do the best

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>things for them. I've a great research team, and really

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not making um the wrong decision at the long time.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, not panic buying, but not panic selling. So

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>here's this kind of a it sounds like, if I

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>hear correctly, it's kind of a you're kind of a

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>buy on the weakness here for this market. You think

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna move higher this year, but you know, are

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you adding capital to the market today? Are you waiting

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for pullbacks? How are you tactically getting that done? Well? Um,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>so right now, we and in the past year, we've

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>had a value kilt. So what that means we've been

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>investing in like quality blue chip stocks that paid dividends. UM.

0:11:55.240 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That would be oil stocks. In We like industrials, erro space, defense.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, we see an uptrend in defense spending. Capital

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>spending has been resilient. They are strong technicals. We like healthcare, farmer, biotech,

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>medical equipment. Because of COVID, there's been a lot of

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>pent up demand for procedures. UM, there's a good demographic

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>kale wind. We also like UM banks, big banks, and

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pokerage farms. There are some cheap evaluations. UM. We think

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>their recession resistant and UM, you know, think about what

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in two thousand and eight when they had to

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>go through Since two thousand and ate a lot of

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>stress tests, so they're in really good shape. And UM

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we think earnings growth for the banks were likely to

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>continue this year. And we also like oil oil UM stocks.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>They've volatile, but there's good valuations. UM. However, you know,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>so those are the more conservative stocks that we have

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>been tilted in. However, as we get closer to interest

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>rate hike hikes ending, UM, we are going to be

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a buy you more on some of the technology stocks.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You know they've had a fabulous year. We wouldn't chase

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that just yet. They've up about the nastacks up about

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>over ten this year, so it's one of the best

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>years since nine. But we might see a little bit

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of weakness as we get closer to the FED easing

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>or pausing even that that would be benefit tech stocks,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>but we do expect them to be volatile. Well. They've

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely done well in the first month, that is for sure,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up almost ten percent on the last trading day of January.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>S and P s up uh five. Gina, thanks so

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Pleasure having you on the program.

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Gina Bolden there from Bolden Wealth Management talking to us

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about her view on the markets. A fifteen percent gain

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>by year end would be that would be good. I

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think everybody would take that. Think back to October coming

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>off of those lows. It's been a nice move up

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in these markets. Here A lot of folks are saying

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is that it is this the beginning of another bullmark

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and another leg up in the market. Katrina Simonettie, she's

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a senior vice president private wealth advisor at Morgan Stanley,

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>joins us. How do you for you this equity market here.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, as such a brutal last year,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but if you kind of, you know, just kind of

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>got into the game in October, it's been a good

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>market here. What are you telling your clients? Well, it

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>has been a good market. And you know, you can't

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>blame the investors for wanting to be optimistic. You know,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we're just so desperately, you know, kind of just clinging

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for that little bit of a release. And you know,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact of it is is that for the entire

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two we have been focused on the FED on inflation,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and we can't really ignore the fact that, you know,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>following inflution shows the effectiveness of the FED quality. In

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>our view, though this optimism is highly premature. We think

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that there is a lot more volatility ahead. And in

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>our review, the story for twenty three is not the

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>story of the fat or installation, or even the fact

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the CPI is getting under control, which is good news.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.479
<v Speaker 1>This is the story about the earning since, specifically earnings revisions,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>because the earnings has to be properly revised and be

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>set at the realistic level in order for us to

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>pivot into the next is exactly what I was thinking.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I get in trouble a lot here at work.

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>He does with my wife legally, um, but I never

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>feel any better than when I've told everyone what I've done.

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been completely open about it, and I can start

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>making amends. Then it's off to the races, right. That's

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of why I was hoping for a kitchen Sinc.

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>What people call a kitchen Sinc. Quarter this earning season,

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't really seen that. Nonetheless, with the horrible, terrible,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>no good year we had last year and equities and bonds,

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe all the bad news is priced in, you know,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a really good point, and I think

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that that we have to separate the actual fourth quarter

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>earnings from the earnings estimates. You know. It is really

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the forward looking projections that we need to be looking

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at because the fact is that the cost of running

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the businesses are high. And the high inflation on some

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>level was really positive for many businesses because it allowed

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>those broader profit margins. It was easier to be profitable

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the environment of higher inflation. But what it is

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be going forward, and while the earnings are

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>actually coming in mixed and positive in many ways, when

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the revisions when we're looking at the

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>new levels and the profit margins that are getting tight,

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know in labor market is you know, is quite complex.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. The issue is that what is the new normal?

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>What are the levels that are going to be realistic?

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Because in order for our companies here in the US

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be able to meet and exceed the earnings, you know,

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to be um, you know, adequately pricing them.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>And therefore we think that they're going to be this

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, revisions that are going to be mostly to

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the negative and it will catch a lot of investors

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>by surprise. And we're expecting for this market to be

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>worth before it gets better, you know. And I think

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that if we go into this market with that level

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of an expectation and stay defensive and stay high quality

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and focus on dividend being stocks, you know, will be

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>good to go for the next bull market when it's

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>when it gets here. Katarina, it talked us about fixed

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>income here. I like income as much as the next person,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I look at some of these I

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can actually get a yield now in the fixed income market. Um,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about bonds? What are you telling

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>your clients about bonds. You got the year treasury at four. Well,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that's actually good news. You know, the environment last year

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was challenging because for the first time in many years,

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>both stocks and bonds were down at the same time

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Dad was raising race. That was pressure on bonds. It

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was really difficult to invest in fixed income. It's a

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>very different environment right now. Yields are actually high. You know,

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>how how many years have it been when we can

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get excited about what even the money markets are paying

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>right not to mention the treasuries and you know, high

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>quality corporates, you know, just well diversed about fixed income

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>portfolio right now is saying field in a significantly higher

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that we had seen for years to investors that are

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>looking for yield, investors that are looking for safety, you know,

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for this cushion in their portfolio. You know, this is

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the time where they're actually getting the value out of

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>their fixed income portion of their portfolio. You know. But

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the diversification is the key on the fixed income site

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>as much as it is it's on the equities. I mean,

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul is excited. He's in a genuinely good mood. He's

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>driving home every day in the BMW he switches serious

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>X time the yacht rock. You know. Uh, he's listening

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to as much Michael McDonald as he can because he's

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>got those munis. And now he gets a chance to

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>put all of his dry powder into fixed income, dividend

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>growing stocks, value stocks. This is a Paul Sweeney market

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, is this the do you think this

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is a chance to pounce? Like do we do? We

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>look at this period of higher rates as you know, uh,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>once in a decade opportunity to get in or or

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is this the new normal? Well? Absolutely, you know, investors

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for years we're saying, you know, if only rates where

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>where they were years ago, you know, I would love

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to have you know, like this, this in comportion of

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio, you know, and for in the zero rate

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>environment which we were in just recently, you know, that

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even a possibility. You know. So when you think

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about the higher rates that we can enjoy in the

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>fixed income site, higher quality that we can enjoy, you know,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and and that risk management that comes with us coupled

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>with this amazing stock picking environment, So we do believe

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that the volatility is ahead, but it's not necessarily negative

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>because in this time of volatility. This is the time

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to pick great individual positions, defensive place, improve the quality

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of the portfolio, stay within the sectors you know that

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>will be the in our view, the leading sectors going forward,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like healthcare, like consumer stables and you know, utilities energy.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it might not be the same exact things

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've experienced in the possible market, you know, So

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that rotation to quality to dividend ping stuff you know,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we think will serve the investors for many years to come.

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>What do you in your practice and Morgan Stanley in

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the private wealth business, what do you guys do to

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>attract younger investors? Um to Morgan Stanley, Well, I think

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that the question with younger investors is, you know, where

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is why are we investing? You know, where is this

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>leading to? You know? And the the the young investors

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have been dealing with so much risk and so much volatility,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they've been growing up in this market

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>being so volatile. You know. So the question here is

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>to really than the time frame, you know, and developed

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this habit of putting together the portfolio of high quality

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>place the individual positions that they can own for many

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>many years to come. You know that come with a

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>story that diversify, that that really gives them access to

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>every sector of the market, you know, but also that

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that represents their personal values. I think that what differentiates

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the young investor versus you know, some of the more

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>seasons investors is e s G in a place a

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>significantly higher role for our younger investors than for their

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>parents in many cases. All right, Katerina, great stuff, as always,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Katerina Seminetti. She's a senior vice president of the private

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wealth advisor over at Morgan Stanley. Appreciate getting her perspective here.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking a little commodities, maybe talk a little bit coin.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Met you there, I do, all right, I want to

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>just talk Let's start with gold here. I mean, you know,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's up almost six percent year today. Let's talk about that.

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about commodities, cryptos, all that kind of stuff.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>We can do that with Everett Milman, chief markets analysts

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like Gainesville Coin. Give you one guest to where he's from.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Everett, Let's start with gold here. He's in Gainesville,

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>right somewhere in Florida. I think Truman says he's calling

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in from Pennsylvania. All right, Everett, where are you Oh sorry, no,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he said, Ricket Knights, sorry, Everett, where are you right now?

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Just outside of Tampa, Florida? Actually so not Ga proper,

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>but that part of the that part of the state alright.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Talked to us about commodities. What's going on here? What's

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>your call here? Per this year? Yeah, I think the

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>recent rally and gold has been spurred by the fact

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that the dollar has softened up a little bit um

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and we have some positive seasonality with the Chinese lunar

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>New Year. I would expect some volatility surrounding the f

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>MC decision this week, as interest rates are definitely one

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 1>of the big drivers for gold, but the fundamentals, the

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>macro fundamentals for gold have not been this strong really

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>since the nineteen seventies UM, and far as I can tell,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it really doesn't matter what scenario we get from the

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Fed UM if there is a pivot towards either pausing

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes or lowering rates, as seems to be the

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>market consensus sometime out in the next six twelve months.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It's so weird every because you know, Paul was just saying, hey,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I can get you know, four and a quarter percent

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on the two year yesterday we're talking Ted Oakley, right,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I have no problem being heavily in

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>cash because I get so much from three three month bills.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, UM, when rates are this high, why

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on earth would anybody want a pet rock that yields

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing rather than you know, making generating income with with

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. It is a fair question, obviously, UM, that

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is a gold main competitor in terms of what what

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>class in misters does it appeal to? What goals are

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you trying to reach in terms of wealth preservation rather

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>than UM looking to hit a home run. But I

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>will say that even if the Fed remains hawkish and

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps keeps monetary policy too restrictive, and we do see

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>rates remain higher for longer, that's probably going to cause

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>some pain and other you know, parts of the riskier

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>parts of markets. And that's where gold safe haven characteristics

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>kick in UM. And we have seen that treasuries have

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>experienced quite a bit of volatility UM really since the pandemic.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that lends gold some added credibility

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>as as a non correlated alternative asset UM, even though obviously,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>as you say, a fixed income is going to essentially

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing the same things that investors look for from

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>goal is that why bitcoin is has rallied as well.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're back up at twenty three dollars and

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>as rates rise. UM. Well, first of all, after the

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>collapse of f t X and it's pretty embarrassing bankruptcies

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>across the crypto universe, and then with rising rates. Why

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>why I don't get it? Uh, you know, it's kind

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of tough to explain really a reasonable explanation for anything

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that goes on in the cryptocurrency market at this point,

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>given how speculative they remain. UM. But I think kind

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of strangely we've seen that as a flight to safety

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of sorts that Bitcoin and ethereum have really rebounded and

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>led the way as retail investors have largely shunned much

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the alts coin market. UM. So you could look

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>at that of a flight to safety. UM. Overall, UH

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>transaction on chain transaction volumes have been relatively stable in crypto.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So as you say, with all of these bankruptcy and scandals,

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't completely tanked UH confidence in the broader market.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But clearly, UH, some type of regulation and oversight isn't

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>necessary evil here, particularly if crypto exchanges and crypto based

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>lenders are going to continue to engage in what amounts

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to banking behaviors. UM. They really can't do that unless

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>they are registered and regular aided, and obviously that is

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>something that they have greatly resisted up to this point. Hey,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>every what's the relationship between gold and so as? Again,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>golds up about five or six percent this year and

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>all silvers down about one So historically, how do investors

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>look at those two things together? So the divergence there

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is mainly because silver has more industrial properties that kind

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of decouple it from the performance of gold. As you

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, we've seen silver lagging behind UM. Right now,

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the gold is silver ratio is about eighty to one,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>which has remained elevated for several years. That maybe perhaps

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the new normal, but I wouldn't be surprised by some

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>mean regression where that ratio of gold gold price and

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>silver price comes back closer to its longer run average

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of about six one. We do, yes, and we do

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>see that not only UM is silver demand rising in

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the East, particularly UM in Asia with China and India,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>but there are still a major tale wins for just

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>general silver demand from an industrial standpoint, um, like continued,

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>from my standpoint, it looks like one of the most

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>undervalued assets on the market. I there's nothing I love

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>more than a post apocalyptic movie with like Kevin Costner,

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, or Will Smith. There's one right now I

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>can't remember the name of on Apple TV, only the

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>first two episodes in. But all of these uh scenarios

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>involved using gold or gas or maybe bitcoin. Does any

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of that actually drive investment or is that just a

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>fun way to look at things? Ever? Because I can't

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine that, um you know, if uh, if this hugely

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>leveraged giant debt construct collapses, that will be like um,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, melting down gold bars and spending it at

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the next cave over right, right, And certainly in a

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in a scenario where the financial system is in dire streets,

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure to can duct to normal commerce would would

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be impaired in that situation, it seems unreasonable or unlikely

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that we would actually hit that scenario. But to the

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>first point in your question, Um, in my experience, it's

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>undeniable that that sentiment or narrative surrounding UM, the perceived

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>riskiness of the leveraging markets that does drive quite a

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>bit of interest in gold, precious metals and then alternatives

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like cryptocurrency. But I have to admit that UM in

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of utility or use cases, uh, in a in

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a sort of financial collapse scenario, I think you would

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be just as well off with canned foods, ammunition, those

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>types of essentials UM, just like commodity of like gold.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff. Everett Millman. He's a chief market

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>analyst at Gainesville Coins. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Twitter at Matt Miller seventy three. I'm fall Sweeney.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio