WEBVTT - Drilled Presents...Spill: Mary Annaise Heglar & Amy Westervelt on climate in this week's debate, Project 2025, and a whole lot more

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Hadred listeners. We're back from a short summer break.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Today we are.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Bringing you an episode from our sister podcast, Spill. That

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is where we break down climate news, general trends, talk

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to other writers, journalists, researchers about what they're doing, and

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>generally keep up to date on the climate story. Once

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>a month I bring on my former Hot Take co

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>host there Mary and a se Hegler, and we talk

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about something that is coming up in a lot of

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>climate conversations.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>This week we talked.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>About Project twenty twenty five. You've probably heard of it.

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to avoid. We thought it was worth talking

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about that and climate policy in general in the lead

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>up to this week's debate. Check it out. Hope you

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like it and subscribe if you do wherever you get

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Mary, how's it going, Hey, Amy, how are you?

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm good? I'm good. Yeah. Enjoying this election season? Oh

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>my god. No.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I keep waffling between like being glad I'm not

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in the US during the election and then kind of

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be there following everything more closely, like, but yeah, man,

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 3>It's just, you know, I'm in such a weird place

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>with it because on the one hand, I don't feel

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 3>and maybe this is just because something has broken deep

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 3>down inside of me. I don't feel the intense sense

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 3>of dred that I felt in twenty sixteen. It doesn't

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>feel like Donald Trump is eminent, and it felt that

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 3>way in twenty sixteen and in twenty twenty, so as

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 3>that demonstrates I have been wrong before in my life.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean that I'm like super crunk and excited

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 3>about Kamala Harris. No, but I don't know if I'm

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 3>capable of getting like that with any politician ever again.

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, Donald Trump feels like I'm gonna be sent to.

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 2>A gulag, you know what I mean.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 3>I've said enough shit publicly, and he's crazy enough that

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>feels like eventually he would get around to rounding up

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>people like me in bulogs or whatever. So yeah, it

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>doesn't feel like his victory is imminent. It also doesn't

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>feel like Kamala Harris is eminent or that she's going

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>to be fantastic either, Like I need this chick to

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 3>say she's gonna stop arming Israel.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you know what I mean.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>It's just she's definitely not She's saying the offices.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not happy about that. I'm not happy about

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 3>that at all.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you something someone asked me recently, and

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of like, oh, I think that's true. Actually,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they were saying that it seems like climate is just

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>not being discussed as much at all now as it was.

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, actually the last election cycle it was

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty from the center. But it's really, like I sent

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from the conversation right now.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>It's absent from the conversation. You barely heard about it

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 3>at all at the DNC, and even folks who I

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>know who are in the climate space are still just like, well,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>this is not the time to push the administration. And

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>it's just like, see, this is why y'all are not

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 3>serious as a movement, and largely why I don't think

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I see myself as part of the climate movement anymore.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Between this and just like utter spinelessness and the silence

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>on GAZA, lets me know that we don't want the

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>same things. And if that's the world that you want

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>to preserve, I don't want to be in that world.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So yeah, I.

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Just don't see myself as part of the broader movement anymore.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Damn, Mary, that's a big public announcement. I think you've

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>been saying it though.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I think I've town that through my action.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, like do I want a Liverpool future, Sure,

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think they do.

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Well. That's the thing is.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, again, have heard people make this argument, and

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it actually with people criticizing Greta Tunberg for

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>protesting in favor of Palestine, saying, you know, you're muddying

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the waters. It's the same argument that's been made over

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and over again. Right, don't muddy the waters on climate

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with labor rights or civil rights, or reproductive justice.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Or with climates or you know what I mean. It's

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>just like, well, climates, these are the name people will

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>say in the immediate aftermath of a disaster, now it's

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>not the time to talk about climate change because we

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>don't want to insert politics. These are the same people

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 3>who will say during an election like this, it's not

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the time to push the Democrats to talk about climate

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>because we don't want.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 2>To muddy the election.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 3>Just say, you don't want to do shit, you want

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 3>to go hide in your low closet.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It just it reminds me every time of the conversation

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that we had with rev Yer would probably like two

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>three years ago now where he was talking about the

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>origins of the environmental movement and how it was all

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the people that didn't want to be part of.

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 4>Any of the other social justice that history is alive

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 4>well or went away and having worked, you know, in

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 4>environmental nonprofits, the quote unquote big Greens.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 3>I knew plenty of folks who were in those positions

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>because they wanted to go somewhere where they felt like

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>they could be unproblematic. Right, They felt like science was

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 3>just inherently unproblematic, and it's like, okay, girl, but you know,

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>once upon a time for anology with science.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, we have a lot to talk

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>about today because we're going to talk about Project twenty

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and all of the many different layers of

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>including some of the specific plans and are laid out,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>but also how people are talking about it, how people

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are and aren't understanding it, how the media is covering

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. So we're going to take a

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>quick at break, and then we're going to get back

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>to that conversation.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Spill. I'm Amy Westervelt, I'm Marianna east Heckler.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this bitch is long as hell. Project twenty

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 3>five is like nine hundred pages.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I have the pdf open right now and it is

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>nine and twenty two pages long exactly.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, like so many of our listeners, likely we

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 3>have shit to do.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 2>So I have not read this entire thing.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I have read some of the parts that are relevant

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 3>for climate, in particular the EPA chapter, so I feel

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 3>like that's where we should start. And as I was

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 3>reading it, I have written down some questions for you,

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 3>starting with before we even get to the thing, that

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 3>the author is someone named Mandy m Gana Sakara. I

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>think that's how you say it, and I wrote down here,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>who the fuck is this bitch?

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Many many has like a very interesting background.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>She is.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't have a science background that's important to know,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that's important, No environmental science background, no science background period.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>She has like a polyscide degree and a law degree,

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and she immediately went to work on Capitol Hill as

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>an aid for various senators. She is the person on

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Senator Einhove's team who handed him the infamous snowball on

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the floor of the Senate. So I don't know if

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>people remember this almost ten years ago now, where Senator

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Einhove held up a snowball in the Senate and was.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's snowing outside. Global warming be happening?

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>What snowing outside that day? Or did they just happen

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to have a snowball in the pre was.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Knowing it was knowing.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And there's this hilarious picture where like he's doing that

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and Mandy is very smugly smiling behind him. She's so

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>pleased with herself. So yeah, she's been kind of in

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of climate denier network for a long time.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>She went to work for an organization called the CO

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>two Coalition, which is this organization that basically argues the

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>more CO two is actually good for the planet because

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to grow more plants and that you know, yeah, okay,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>sure some places won't farewell well, but other places will

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and then it'll all balance out in the end. And

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>people are like being unnecessarily freaked out about CO two.

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So like, just vibes, vibes, totally vibes. She worked for them.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I remember her.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>She actually was the Republican witness who testified during the

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>first hearing that Congress had on climate disinformation, which was

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen, Jamie Raskin held this committee hearing about

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>disinformation and the oil companies, and she was the Republican witness,

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and she gave this whole testimony, yeah, about how actually

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we need fossil fuels for poor people in Africa and

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>all of this kind of stuff. So she's she's just

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like been awork, right. And then she also

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was in the Trump administration and working at the EPA

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>under Trump, so she was the chief of staff for

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>EPA Administer Andrew Wheeler. So I would not be surprised

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at all to see her put forth as a potential

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>ep administrator. She's a director the Independent Women's Forum Center

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on Energy and Conservation. The Independent Women's Forum is this

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>organization that was kind of set up to do all

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that Phyllis Schlaffley did. Phillip Schlaffley was the

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>conservative woman who fought against women's rights in the eighties.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what the Independent Women's Forum is. It's like,

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to put conservative ideas in the mouths of women,

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>and these are the women who do that.

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Mm hm.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, that's who Mandy is, yes, and she's definitely

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>not someone who remotely has the sort of scientific background

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people think should be guiding the

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Environmental Protection Agency. She has no scientific back.

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Do anyone help her with us with any sort of

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 2>scientific background?

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>There's not a lot of science in it, that's the thing. No,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of science political out of it. So yeah,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that.

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>So one thing I see over and over again is

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 3>basically removing scientists and science from decision making processes and

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>replacing them with political appointees. And they're doing this amy

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 3>because the EPA is already too political.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Because it's so crazy, right, It's like, it's like, the

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 5>EPA is too.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Political, so make it more political.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>What you fight politics with politics? What are we doing?

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It's also strange because it's like, well, I guess that

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>works for you in a Trump administration, but then as

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>soon as anyone else is in power, isn't it a

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>problem for you? Again, I don't really understand the logic here.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just this sentence.

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>The challenge of creating a conservative EPA will be to

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>balance justified skepticism toward an agency that has long been

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.239
<v Speaker 3>amenable to being co opted by the left for political

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 3>ends against the need to implement the agency's true function

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 3>protecting public health and environment and cooperation with the States.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So there's a.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Lot here about anything related to climate change, especially if

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>that thing related to climate change is related to climate justice.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 3>That is leftist ideal ideology, politics or whatever. That is

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 3>not science, that's not proven, even though it is like

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 3>bulletproof science. At this point, they are characterizing it as

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 3>automatic politics exactly.

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And the interesting thing too is that so there's there's

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a real problem on the right when they talk about

0:12:55.160 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>environmental policy, because most conservative voters do actually care about

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>clean air and clean water, right, you kind of need

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you always have to straddle this line of being anti

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>climate but pro clean air and clean water. But when

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you read into the details of what she's suggesting in

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>this chapter, it's walking back a bunch of the science

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>based regulations on air pollution and a bunch of the

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>science based regulations on clean water that actually don't have

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with climate and are.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Not political at all.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, there's a leaf blower in the background of my audio.

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>You guys are going to hear it.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>It's so yeah.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, So it's this very strange piece of writing where

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>she's talking constantly about the importance of clean air and

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>clean water and public health while also suggesting eliminating the

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>things that provide clean air and clean water.

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I saw that in the clean water section, and one

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>of the things they want they said they want to

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 3>exclude speculative analysis regarding future potential harm, which would mean

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>they wait for the disaster to happen. So if I

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 3>come to you and bring you evidence that running this

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>pipeline underneath this body of water is really dangerous and

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 3>has a ninety percent chance of that oil getting into

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the water and contaminating it, You're going to call that

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>speculative analysis, as opposed to everything will be done basically

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>after the fact, correct.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And then actually, we have a really good example of

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>why that's a bad idea in Standing Rock. So the

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Dakode Access Pipeline was built despite the fact that the

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact assessment was very much still up for debate.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Pipeline got built in the meantime. Now finally, like the

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact assessment was only finalized earlier this year, and

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the analysis says, oh, this is actually potentially dangerous. They've

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>now done an analysis on what could happen if they

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>remove the pipes, and they're like, oh, it could cause

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>all of this environmental disaster, so like we don't want

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that, but it's like, yeah, the same exact

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>thing was possible when you put the pipeline in.

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 3>So one thing I've been thinking about a lot lately

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 3>is what the fuck happened to QAnon? And right is

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 3>this big book conspiracy and it kind of just seemed

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>like it dissipated. But I was reading an article about

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 3>it last night and they were talking about how basically

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 3>QAnon doesn't need to exist anymore because so much of

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>that ideology and just like even the language has been

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 3>adopted by the actual mainstream Republican party.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>And I got to say rest. So reading through this.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I felt like I heard a lot of a lot

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>of echoes of the q Andon sort of ideology.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 2>So just take you through that.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 3>There's a part where they're saying they want the EPA

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 3>to take a more supportive role toward local and state efforts,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 3>building them up so they may lead in a meaningful fashion,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and that to me sounds like states' rights, but for

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the environments there, they're demeaning the EPA's pursuit of a

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>globally focused agenda by participating in the Paris Agreement, by

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 3>giving globally to developing countries.

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's just America first and globalism.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 3>And then there's another part where they're talking about the

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 3>EPA should make public and take comment on all scientific

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 3>studies and analyzes that support regulatory decision making. And they're

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 3>talking about take comment from regular ass people like people

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>like Mandy who have no scientific background whatsoever, And that

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to me sounds.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Like do your own real arch, which is a huge,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>big part of Q and I. So this is a

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>q Andon agenda. Yeah.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the whole like taking public common thing is part

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of a proposal that's been floated for a long time.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 2>It's the transparency in.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Science or getting rid of secret science at the EKKA,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's how it's like referred to.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>That is a Steve molloy joint. Oh wow, that was

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 2>so smooth.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Ami sooo, he was a facult lobbyist for a long time.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>He worked on all of these organizations that helped to

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>suppress the science on secondhand smoke, and then he went

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to work for coal companies and he has had a

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>b in his bonnet about air pollution forever, and he's

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>been warning the right that if environmentalists and or the

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>left ever really get it together to do their messaging,

0:17:57.960 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>air pollution.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Over for a.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Bunch of fossil fuels anyway, because combustion of fossil fuels

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is what generates most particulate matter, right, So he's been

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that for a long time. And he came up

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with this proposal in the nineties and then like basically

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>dusted it off and included it in the Transition plan

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 1>for Trump for the EPA, and they almost got it

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>passed at the end of the Trump administration, it didn't

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>quite land, so they are bringing.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>It back again.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, yes, scientific research should be as

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>transparent and open and like open to me and all

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff as possible, right, But he tries to

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of be like, oh, like they're doing a human

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>testing that they're keeping secret, and like because of that,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>people are dying. There's this one woman who took part

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in an air pollution study who did end up dying,

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and the circumstances of her death are very shady, and

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there probably is some liability for the people

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>who did that study or whatever, But he kind of

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>points to that as being indicative that there's a bunch

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of shady and mysterious science happening at the EPA, and

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 1>he wants to institute rules that would basically make it

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>impossible for needs scientific study to be used for regulation.

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>It would have to meet such a high bar that

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it would just make it impossible for the EPA to

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>regulate anything.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 6>Which, by the way, the EPA already struggles to regulate

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 6>things that they fully know cause cancer. So I'm working

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 6>on a story right now about an herbicide.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>That everyone knows causes Parkinson's and yet the USPA cannot

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ban it because are.

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.719
<v Speaker 2>They able to ban pfos? I mean, has that been

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a big word. But now part of this Project twenty twenty.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Five thing, they want to roll back any restrictions on pithos.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But that took what twenty thirty years worth of litigation

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds to thousands of people with cancer and all

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>sorts of other things.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>To get that done.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>The EPA is not good at regulating things that harm

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the public.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Now we should talk just really fast about what pifos is,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:21.239
<v Speaker 3>in case anybody doesn't know. It's polychlora acol substances, and

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 3>it's in mad shit like maga's.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Like the stuff that makes your clothes waterproof or your

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>cookware nonstick. It's a coating that's used for a bunch

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of different fabrics and products and stuff, and you know,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>do Pullen and three m there again absolutely knew what

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the potential in the stuff were. And in those cases,

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that people are getting exposed through consumer products,

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which they are, but also that the manufacturers that we're

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>making it were dumping shit in local waterways, So people's

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>water is contaminated.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we're running around with plastic all in our goods.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 2>So there's that. Yeah.

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>So another thing that the Project twenty twenty five folks

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 3>want to do is they want to get any get

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 3>rid of anything dealing with environmental justice, like a fucking

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>heat seeking.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>They really do. They're just like get rid of yeah. Yeah.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 3>So the Biden administration had created in Environmental Justice and

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Civil Rights office off the bat, they want to get

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 3>rid of that. They feel like that should be in

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 3>the office of the administrator and under the guide of a.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Political appointee because right go wrong.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 3>And then they want to get rid of any funding

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 3>going to work that they deem superfluous or not really

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>related to the environment. We all know what that means.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 3>That's environmental justice. And one of the main tools it

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 3>seems like they want to use is pause and review.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 3>So Amy, can you talk about what pause and review is.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like a way to kill things without killing them.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, we're just going to pause this program

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and review what kind of a return on investment we've

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>been getting, what the impact is, and then we'll come

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>back to it and decide if it should still have

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the same budget or maybe it should be folded into

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>another agency or whatever. It's a very like diplomatic way

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of something without saying that you're getting

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>It, right, You just stall install install right. It's like

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>when you're trying to make plans with your friends and

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 3>they don't want to just outright and say I don't

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 3>want to go, so they just.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Spot I don't know what you're talking about. Mary, all

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 5>your friends to you immediately. Okay, No, this is a

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 5>problem with being a millennial. I think I have a

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of friends who get like overwhelmed by the thought

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 5>of making plans anyway, So yeah, it's it's a very

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 5>clear way of saying no without saying no. And so

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 5>this is gonna sounding my friends like me, I swear

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 5>that's totally ding.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely had those conversations.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Yea, right, does so just like, yeah, so that's what

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they're planning to do with environmental justice. And then there's

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 3>also all these parts where they just explicitly want to

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 3>get the fuck rid of it.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>They feel like it's reverse racism.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They actually mentioned that, And that's interesting too, because that

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is a whole thing that's underway as well.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I keep meaning to write.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>About this because I feel like a lot of people

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>are not seeing how much that is a continuation of

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>an effort that started in the eighties and nineties.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 2>With some of the same people.

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason I know that is because I

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>worked on this show, This Land with Rebecca and Nagel,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and we were looking into these constitutional challenges to the

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Indian Child Welfare Act, and they were being brought by

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a group of different attorneys, and there were all of

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>these organizations that were filing briefs and it was all

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same people that are involved in

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Project twenty twenty five. Actually, it was like Heritage and

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Cato and all of these like right wing think tanks,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and the more we dug into it, the more we realized, like,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>oh okay, these guys have been trying to do this

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time. And it's interesting because in

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and nineties it was actually Clarence Thomas helped

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>them develop a better strategy because he was like, you

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>guys need to stop with the reverse racism thing. You

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>sound like whiny white boys.

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Was he on Supreme Court at this point.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>No, he was working for the Equal Opportunity Commission, gotcha right, right?

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>This is before Anita Hill and before Anita Hill where

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>he worked with a Neda Hill.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh okay, this is during Anita Hill.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So he was like, you guys need to you

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>need you need a better strategy. He basically was like,

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>make it about equal opportunity on a reverse racism because

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that's never play well. And they did, and it was

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a very successful strategy. That is how they rolled back

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of civil rights games.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And now they've kind of gone back.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>To the old school this is racist against white people things.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>In all these cases, this guy Stephen Miller, who was

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump's chief of staff has a new legal organization,

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're going after things like there was a venture

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fund that had a contest for black women founders and

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they've gone after them.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmmm for being discribed. It doesn't surprise me at all.

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't surprise me at all. I could see them, you know,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 3>really going after anybody who's ever worked in DEI. Yes,

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and in their next or any organization that's ever had

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 3>a d they offer.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>They want they want to get rid of DEI entirely.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>They want to get rid of any kind of any

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of straightforward attempts to address racial inequality, that's it.

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Or any kind of inequality, right, yeah, exactly exactly so,

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and you see that in this EPA chapter too, where

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 3>it's just like, oh, why should these communities get special

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 3>treatment whatever. Yeah, And the other thing that they really

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 3>want to get rid of or newter is the Inflation

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Reduction Act.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so can always you talk about that.

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>They're basically like, well, it's a spending bill, so you

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't actually have to spend. That's their strategy is they're like,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you could just not.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Which, yeah, if they're going on there, right exactly, that

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 2>is a flaw in the IRA.

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That's been pointed out time and time again, is that

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it's all spend no regulation, there's no there's

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing that requires that money.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>To be spent. Mm hmmm.

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they will struggle with some of those programs,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to have a real interesting juggling act

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to do because the fossil fuel industry loves the IRA

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>because they have figured out a way to fund carbon capture.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all these bullshit hydrogen hubs. It's a real bonanza

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for them.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmmm.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like very sy Yeah, so they're kind of struggle

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to I don't know, like they're going to have to

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>find ways to shut down all the parts they don't

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like and keep the ones they do like going.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 3>But you know, yeah, I mean, obviously I would give

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 3>this chapter an F is bad.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't want we could talk about it forever.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 3>But there's also other ways that the environment shows up

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>through projects twenty twenty five in particular, we run to

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about NOAH, the National Oceanica Atmospheric Administrative Administration Administration.

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the thing that gives us our weather reports.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>NOA is the other one that, just like the environmental

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>justice stuff, they're very explicit about just getting rid of it.

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>They're like, there's a couple things in there, those can

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be folded into other agencies and other on.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 2>This shouldn't exist.

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>So Noah is the reason why I know whether or

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>not there's a tropical wave that could turn into a

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 3>hurricane and can start planning my evacuation without Noah, as

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 3>I understand it, like they could privatize weather reports, so

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 3>creating right now we can all see the weather for free,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 3>as in as much details we want to. That actually

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 3>is a space where like the science is open and

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 3>transparent and open for public comment. Like Noah is a

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 3>perfect example of what they're saying they want at the EPA.

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 3>And then it doesn't but they want to kill Noah

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>and get rid of the exactly that function.

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah they're talking about.

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>They actually make this argument that weather forecasts from private

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>companies are more reliable than the ones from Noah, which

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is weird because I'm reasonably certain that a lot of

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the private services use Noah data.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Those private services would have to pay for Noah's data,

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 3>or they would have to inducted themselves.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, exactly, like take over those satellites themselves, or

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, anyway, then they also talk about they

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>actually specifically talk about the hurricane monitoring, so the National

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane Centers. They say that it provides an important service.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But this is what they say in this chapter, data

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>collected by the Department should be presented neutrally without adjustments

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>intended to support anyone's side in the climate debate. What

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact are they taught about this idea is not

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:43.239
<v Speaker 1>at all subtle insinuation that they're manipulating the data to

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>make it look like there's something to be said about

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the link between hurricanes and climate, and it's like, oh

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>my god, Okay. So really, basically, what they're saying is

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the only way that any of Noah's current activities can

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can to you or should continue is if they're not

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to attach any of it to climate. And then

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they're also saying to fold a bunch of it into

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the US Coast Guard, the US Geological Survey, the entire

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, you want to get

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>rid of because they say it's the source of much

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of Noah's quote climate alarmism.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 3>My goodness, they're alarmists about climate alarmism.

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Data collection is very important and necessary, but that can

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>just be collected and then like made available to companies.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of all we need.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>To do their general approach.

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Am I correct?

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 3>And assuming this could create a world where there is

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 3>a hurricane coming and we don't.

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Know absolutely, I think it could certainly lead to that.

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Even though they're saying like this that this public service

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>component is important and that they would they would basically

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>want like the Coast Guard to take that over. But like,

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but then there's nothing in here about like okay, but

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>there's already a system in place. There's a whole system

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in place and it works pretty well. Like yeah, what's

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the plan for the Coastguard taking that over without the

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>step that runs that system?

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Or you know what I mean.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just sort of like, I just I don't know

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>why you would want to up and in an emergency

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>alert service in the right And.

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I.

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I shudder to think what they want to do with

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 3>FEMA and with disaster response because you know, and we

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about this one on one before, but Project

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five is alive and well in places like Florida, Louisiana, Texas, right,

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm thinking specifically of Texas and Houston and what

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 3>happened during Hurricane Beryl, which came aground as a Category

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 3>one and shut a major city day and flooded a

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>major city for days at a time, and it barely

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 3>made any sort of news because you know, there's so

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 3>much chaos going on. But also like, you don't see

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 3>this governor who's a media hog. You don't see him

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 3>out there talking about it. You don't see him really

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>even caring about what happens in Houston. And so to me,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 3>that feels like, you know, a portal to what we

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 3>could expect for a disaster response.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm just like just like briefly scanning for FEMA

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>mentions here. So two things that I'm just like, oh

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>my god.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Why.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>One is that they want to basically bring the private

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sector in to the post disaster loan.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's a bad idea, but the insurance companies are already

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 3>like fuck New Orleans.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly. I'm just like, uh what.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And then they also are talking about moving FEMA into

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the Apartment of the Interior or possibly the Department of Transportation,

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>possibly like combining it with another agency, So that that

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to me sounds like downsizing FEMA. Which yeah, I'm like,

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at a time when disasters are increasing, you know, right,

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so downsized FEMA and disasters are increasing, they want to

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:27.239
<v Speaker 1>take the loan governance thing away from the SBA and

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>put it in the hands of private sector.

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>So you're gonna end.

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Up with totally predatory post disaster.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 3>CATO exactly and by design. Yeah, but by intricate design,

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 3>not an accident. They absolutely are doing it on purpose.

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 3>This isn't a case of we couldn't have anticipated that

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 3>these things would happen. We know what climate change is

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 3>going to look like. Hurricane Katrina is in the rear

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 3>view mirror. We know what happens when you don't prepare

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 3>for a disaster. We know what happens when you leave people,

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, to fin for themselves with no sort of

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 3>order whatsoever.

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>So they're doing it on purpose.

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 3>They looked at Hurricane Katrina's response and saw inspiration and

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 3>not horror.

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>No, they refer to FEMA's preparedness grants in this project

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty trive document.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 2>As quote pork First states, I'm surprised they didn't call

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>it soy.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I just you know, and it reminds me of I know,

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 3>I said earlier I don't know if I'm.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.959
<v Speaker 2>Part of the climate movement anymore, but like the whole reason.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I got involved in the first place

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 3>was you see those images from Katrina. You see that

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 3>those people look like you, and that is what is

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 3>waiting on me and climate change.

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and lo and behold here we are.

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 3>And we have folks in the climate space being like,

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 3>now it's not the time to push on climate change.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 3>So enserious, So I'm serious.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Another component to this which was really like you

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of see hints of it throughout this document, but

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>then in the undercover reporting that the Center for Climate

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Reporting did where they had someone sort of pose as

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>a prospective donor to Project twenty twenty five and get

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>more detail on their plans, definitely a huge erosion in

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>civil rights and a militarized approach to dealing with protests.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So they in that in that right the right up

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of like their meeting with the Project tween twenty five people,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Climate Reporting wrote. Later, a reporter asked

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what will happen if there are left wing protests in

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>response to deportations, which is this is another there's a

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean every I mean, they're very I want to

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>deportes pro full like anti immigration thing as well, and

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of people being deported.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about reporting deporting pro Palestine protesters, and it's like,

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 3>where would.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 2>They deport me to? Yeah, yeah, it's just Africa in general.

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Wiperpol Yeah, I guess this is the kind of thinking

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that that is happening here. So they asked them, okay,

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but what if there were protests and response to the deportations,

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and they said the plan would be to bring in

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the military. And the person who's like speaking to them

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>from Project twenty twenty five says, I think they would

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>attempt a color revolution.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 2>What is a color revolution? Do I mean a race war?

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I think they mean a race war. Yeah.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>He goes off to say, where they have riots, where

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they have everything you've seen in other countries. George Floyd

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously was not about race. It was about destabilizing the

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Off.

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Our view is that the president has the ability, both

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.919
<v Speaker 1>along the border and elsewhere to maintain law and order

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>with the military.

0:36:58.400 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 3>So that is disturbing, and that is the point where, like,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, when Joe Biden was still the nominee and

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 3>just incredibly hawkish for Israel. Books were saying that Trump

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 3>and Biden are like what and what when it comes

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 3>to Palestine, And I get it, I really really get it.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden like heartbreaking when it comes to Gaza. But

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 3>also I do think Trump would be worse in the

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 3>sense that he would criminalize the protest again protests, right,

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 3>not just even criminalize it. I think it would like

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>make it a death sentence, you know, like shoot on

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 3>site type of situation, because he wanted to do that

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 3>several times during his prey and the military wouldn't do it.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And now I think, you know, he's learned fine. Lackey's

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 3>so fine, yes, men, And there are plenty of them.

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 3>There are plenty of them out there. So I don't know.

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just like like I was saying at the beginning,

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 3>like I'm not you know, google Gaga over Kamala Harris.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I definitely see the problems, but I have to admit

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that Trump is just untenable, Yeah, just untimable. And I

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 3>don't I also don't think that means that we have

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 3>to that Kamala Harris is above criticism.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>No. I find that whole idea that you cannot criticize

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats at all, because that's basically giving the election

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to Trump.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>To see that at all. Yeah, just am like a

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of people think that.

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know in fact, actually it's because I

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see another Trump presidency that I want

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats to improve, because I know that that will

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>bring in more voters.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, right. And I think where I'm at is

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>I can bring myself to vote for Kamala Harris, but

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 3>I cannot bring myself to campaign. I definitely can't bring

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 3>myself to like chastise anyone else who's like, yeah, she's

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 3>got too much blood on her hands for me. What

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 3>am I supposed to say to that? Yeah, you know,

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 3>like I don't see the blood too, you.

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Know what I mean, certainly not trying to distance herself

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>from it.

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I haven't heard her much since the DNC. I did

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>not enjoy her speech where she starts talking about her

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>support for Israel. But what was very noticeable to me

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 3>is like when she talks about Gaza. First of all,

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I noticed the introduction of the passive voice. I didn't

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 3>like that, But I also noticed that those same words

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 3>coming out of the mouth of Joe Biden would have

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 3>been just like utterly shocking and like would have sent

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 3>us all into a tail span like him actually acknowledging

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.479
<v Speaker 3>the suffering of Gaza in the detail that she did

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 3>would have been very shocking. So yeah, I do think

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 3>we have to say that that is it's not nearly enough,

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 3>not even a fraction of enough, but that is a difference.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 3>So that does feel like a little bit of a

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 3>distance to me.

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 2>It's not nearly enough. I have to keep saying that.

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 3>And what I also noticed is that when she's articulating

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the suffering of the Palestinians, that is when she gets

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 3>more of a response from the crowd. And so I

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 3>just think about what would it have been like if

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 3>they had gotten a Palestinian speaker, like they would have

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 3>gotten a standing ovation, I think, And what would that

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 3>have looked like on.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>All of those cameras.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because this is not a fringe issue, and this

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 3>isn't even a divisive issue.

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I refuse to pronounce divisive as divisive. I'm so sorry.

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't do. It's divisive too.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Exactly divisive And anyway, it's not a divisive issue. The

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 3>vast majority of Democrats, the vast majority of people in

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 3>this country want to see spire.

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 2>This is not controversial. Yeah, that's right, even people kids.

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it was.

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Pretty telling when Amy Schumer was like, never said, I'm

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>not for a ceasefire. I was like, I'm sorry.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 3>We needed to do something about all of these amys.

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm sorry for all the amies.

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 3>We gotta like, until we figure out what's going on, Yeah,

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 3>pause and review on the amies.

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Some work to do. That's true, it's true.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 3>But I did want to ask about the Center for

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Climate Reporting. So they used some tactics that a lot

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of American journalists don't use. Is basically like a sting operation.

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 3>You're journalists, Yeah, famously, So what are your thoughts on that?

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I this The whole way that I met the

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>guys who run the Center for Climate Reporting was that

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I kind of the first time that they did a

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>big sting was actually back when they were working for

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Unearthed and they did the Exxon lobbyists sting. So they

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>posed as you know, someone who is hiring, and they

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>did interviews with these guys and they just like spilled

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>all the beans and yeah, at the time, all of

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>it was really good. Yeah, And at the time, a

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of campaigners oh, like, why can't our journalists do

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff like this? And I was like, well, that's you know,

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like activists can get away with that, but journalists can't

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because we would be sued this, that, and the other.

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And Lawrence Carter, who runs the Center for Timer Reporting,

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, excuse me, but like I'm a journalist and

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. So actually I had him on to

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Drill to talk about it because I was like, oh,

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>tell me more. So he kind of walked me through

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the history of using that tactic in the UK and

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that they have a pretty solid kind of checklist for

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>what warrants a situation where that kind of tactic should

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 1>be used, and then how do you do it in

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>an ethical way and all of that kind of stuff.

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 2>And I started.

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Looking into it more and I was like, actually, US

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>journalists did used to do that affair of bit and

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it was largely Herb Schmertz and mobile oil that put

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>an end.

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 2>To it, and always a roughly to Herb all roads. Yeah.

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there's like there's some archival footage of him during

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this sixty minute panel where he's ranting, oh, you know,

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unethical and journalist shouldn't do it and this

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to the other and then could it hurt and several

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>other corporations too, not Justble, but herb was definitely like,

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, the guy rallying everything around this really got

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>together and filed some lawsuits against organizations that were doing

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it and kind of kicked up enough of a fuss

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and made it clear that there would be expensive legal

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>threats to the point where it almost never.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Happens in US media anymore.

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But then you've got like the Project very toss guy

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 1>who does it on the right, and like, yeah, he

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>does it in a really unethical and very sloppy way.

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's the only reference point people today have is.

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Like that guy.

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>So they see that stick and they go like, oh,

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not you know whatever. But I think there is

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an argument to be made for and this, this is

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a good example of like how else would we get

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>someone from Project twenty twenty five to honestly lay out

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do.

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I honestly feel like maybe they should do

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 3>it for polling right, because Republicans are far less likely

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 3>to respond to a poll, which is why, like, I

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know, I've been complaining about this on Twitter and

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 3>no one's listening, But we're seeing all of this news

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 3>about like Harris is ahead in the polls and blah

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 3>blah bla blah blah, and the polls ain't been right

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 3>for the past two elections.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know how much try to pull that.

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So, like, what is anybody doing that sort of reporting

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:45.919
<v Speaker 3>where they go to Trump rallies and talk to Trump

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 3>supporters and see what they're saying, like is he Are

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 3>the crowds still packed? Are the supporters still participating? Like

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 3>what is what's the vibe at the Trump rallies? Because

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 3>that was the part that no one, no one wanted

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to seriously in twenty sixteen. His supporters were like riled

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 3>up and like, so is he Are people not showing

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 3>up for him anymore?

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I know one thing. So two things that I know

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just from like reporters that I know who live in

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>swing states or rural states or conservative states.

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 2>One is that he is not.

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>On the campaign trail like almost.

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. Apparently he has very.

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Few field offices even which is strange, which.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I think was he really took this for granted. He

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 3>thought he was running against Biden.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And it is also an old man who wasn't going

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to be getting out much and also didn't have a

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of fields.

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, Kamala.

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Harris even she's not young, but she seems like a

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:47.720
<v Speaker 1>common compared to these guys.

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 3>He's also you know she Black people don't age like that,

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean. So, like a black fifty

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 3>nine is not the same as Tim Walls can show

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 3>you they're the same age.

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Brain, you are kidding me, They're the same age. That's hilarious.

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Actually, it is hilarious. He's funny about it. He's like, yeah,

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I ran the school lunchroom for like ten years.

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 2>You don't leave that job with all your hair.

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>So well, anyway, she's showing up everywhere, you know, like

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they're doing a bunch of events and whatever whatever. So

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>with Trump, it's like he's having significantly fewer Rellys, which

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is interesting.

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And then a friend of mine who's in Pennsylvania was like, yeah, actually,

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like I drove through the part of Pennsylvania that's like

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:43.479
<v Speaker 1>most Trump trumpy trumpy, and she's like, the signs were out,

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but definitely not as much as like twenty sixteen, probably

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about half as many signs.

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 3>I am seeing online, like a lot of the all well,

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 3>we can't call him all right, but like the far

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 3>right white supremacist screws are starting to break with him,

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 3>like Nick Fuints is frustrated with him. And at first

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 3>it started with a lot of these types of people

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 3>saying that they were turning on the Trump campaign. They

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 3>still like Trump, but they felt like the people around

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 3>him they don't like doing what they wanted. And they

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 3>were like, until the Trump campaign corrects itself, we're.

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Heading for a loss.

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 3>And like Nick Klint has like declared war on the

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Trump campaign. And now I'm singing he's frustrated with Trump

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 3>the person, because Trump is saying things like he's acknowledging

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 3>now that Biden is the president, because he's saying like

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 3>there was a cup against.

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 2>An American president. Isn't that terrible?

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 3>He's saying things like I lost by a sliver in

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty, So Nickquints is like, oh, I'm sorry you

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 3>lost thought I thought it was stolen. What happened to

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 3>stop the stale where all these people like had their

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.439
<v Speaker 3>lives ruined trying to get the election back for you.

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Now people are starting to get pissed at Trump, and

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 3>then There's something about the abortion stance, right, Like he

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 3>had this vote on abortion rights in Florida and Trump

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 3>was saying he was going to vote against the Desanta's

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 3>bill or the pro life bill, and because it was

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 3>only like six weeks and he was like, I think

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 3>people need more time. So he said he was going

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 3>to vote no, and then there was this big backlash

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and he went back and said now I'm going to

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 3>vote yes. And so he changed his mind in public

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 3>due to pressure from abortion votes. So those are the

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 3>things that make me feel like this is not he's

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 3>losing support.

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to say that gives me hope because

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris is not, you know, my favorite person in

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 3>the world either, but I'm a hell of a lot

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 3>more comfortable with her in the White House than I

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 3>am with other people. And it's like the way that

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 3>we think about elections, I think maybe needs to change, right,

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Like you're not electing a friend, you're electing in aponent.

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So like who do you want to organize against? And

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:05.840
<v Speaker 3>do you want to organize against Donald Trump or do

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 3>you want to organize against Kamala Harris.

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll take Kamala Harris in a heartbeat.

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this week. I hope you liked this

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>episode of Spill Again. You can subscribe to it wherever

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. We'll be back with more Drilled

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>next week, and we are busily working away on a

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of new narrative seasons for you as well. In

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, you can also find lots of articles on

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>our website at Drilled dot media and all over the

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>place because we're partnering with lots of outlets. If you

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are an outlet that wants to up your climate coverage

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and incorporate more investigative stories, get in touch Drill dot Media.

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.399
<v Speaker 1>You can also sign up for our newsletter there. It's

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a weekly roundup of important climate news and a little

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of analysis. It's never more than ten minutes to read,

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and people tell us it helps them keep up on

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the climate story. Check that out Drilled dot Media. Thanks

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>for listening, and we'll see you next week. M