WEBVTT - Google, Apple, Amazon Report Earnings

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And Caroline hired up Blougs World headquarters in New York,

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and I made Lovelow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Three giants of global technology, Caroline three very disappointing earnings

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>reports and will that put an end to quite the

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>run up in tech stocks that we've been seeing. Ed,

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. The juggernaut that is Apple. It

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>reports its first revenue declines fully short, almost across the

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>board product wise, plus the rally stores. As Caroline said

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in after hours, with Alphabet feeling the slowdown in ad spend,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we speak to the CFO and Amazon projects lackluster sales

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and slower cloud unit growth shares. They're also falling after hours.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get straight back to Apple and bringing Julia Arsk,

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>principal analysts at Forrester Research. You look at the numbers,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the sort of more deep weak this in that holiday

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>quarter for Apple. Perhaps it was that some new products

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't released until the new year. What was your takeaway

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from the print? So my takeaway was is, you know,

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a financial analyst, but are certainly our expect

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Tachens is that sales would be lower. If we look

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>at our data from consumers. We have seventy one percent

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of consumers today in the United States that are concerned

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about the general state of the economy. Those numbers are

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>even higher in Europe. We have thirty eight percent of

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>consumers who are cutting back spending on non essential goods.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And while we did have a holiday forecast that was

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>up in the United States six point one one, a

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of that was still fueled by inflation. So all

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, savings rates are down. There's a lot of

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>economic concerns that consumers have today. So that's that's one

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the factors that's impacting the near term. And talk

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to us about whether really this is a focus on

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>services that will eventually bear fruit in that respect overall

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>g because we have despite some of the misses that

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing compared to analyst expectations. The CEO, Tim Cook,

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the CFO really trying to talk about the strength and resilience,

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the amount of two billion products in people's hands, the

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that services a record revenue rate. Is that something

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be optimistic about. I think it's there's act absolutely

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's something need to be optimistic about because one of

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the other long term factors we haven't talked about is

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>very intentionally Apple, like other smartphone manufacturers, right, these smartphones

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is their number one source of revenue, are intentionally building

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>devices that consumers can keep for longer. Right, There's more

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on sustainability, There's more focus on a consumer's right

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to repair the device, their supporting devices for longer periods

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of time. So as we focus on some of these

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>environmental factors, as we look into the future, consumers are

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have also slower upgrade times. So Apple will

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>have to look to building out an ecosystem and products

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and being more focused on their services revenue, which granted

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is a smaller proportion of their overall revenue, but certainly

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>their highest margin business. Julie, I want to go back

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to this idea of new products and timing. Right, we

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>write in our Bloomberg News story that it's a tough

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>comparison because in the holiday quarter of one, Apple would

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>come out with a new line of MacBooks. They didn't

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>do that in two. How how dependent is Apple and

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>churning out generation off the generation of new hardware to

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>drive that sales growth, to drive the interest Absolutely they

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are we I mean, I look not only looking at

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>let's say the MacBook cycle, whether it's a tablet cycle,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly the smartphone cycle, weren't in every six

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>months of one of their largest competitors, which is Samsung,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>which had which you know, rolled out a news device yesterday.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But literally they need to have the next, latest and

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>greatest thing every year with every one of these product

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>lines because they've got really stiff competition coming from other geographies.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And Apple has a very strong focus on this profitability.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have as big of a product line as

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>some of its competitors can do, where they may be

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>able to sell devices, uh not the same profit margins

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>or any profit at all. So absolutely, you know, you

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>look at factors like R and D and bringing people

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>back to the office and innovation like all of that

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is key. Absolutely, product releases, new product releases, not only

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>keeping up but like leap frogging ahead of the competition

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with every one of these products is critical. And Urine

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and you're out, and it's critical to be able to

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>make these products. Julie, and I know you're much more

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on the consumer trends, the demand trends, rather than

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>say that my new shives supply chain over in China,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 1>but supply chain has been a real headache for Apple,

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the last quarter. We look at actually some

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of their supply chain suffering after hours Skyworks TSMC down

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and they've been down over the year and they're certainly

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>falling after hours as well. From your perspective, are you

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>hoping this is a company that can remain diversified to

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to make the product at the right run

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>rate and get it into the hands that can customer. Yeah.

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, if you read through the quarter

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of the reports and our reports, I think Apple has

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a very good hand on the risk factors that are

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in place, and I think everything to to you know,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>trusting what Tim Cook is saying. Everything he's saying is

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>about diversifying the supply chain and lowering the risk of

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>being dependent on you know, one country in one geography

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for so many critical components to go into their core devices.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think absolutely it's important. We want to thank you

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for us to research Principal analyst Julie Arsk fascinating across

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the board in terms of all things Apple, and we've

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>got to make the pivot now because there were so

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>many key names and Daniel Newman is going to join

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>us now to dig in to the world of Alphabet

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>principal analyst over it for true and Research and just

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we had a conversation this CFI let ed dig into

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that because he really spoke to with poor your initial

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>takeaway on Alphabet, the worries about perhaps cloud growth and

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really though trying to talk up their AI prows, right, Yeah,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there was mrs really across the board. And

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this is an adjusted down guided silver lining though, Caroline

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is I believe the fan wants to see things break

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and so if we like that devish talk for the market,

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to first see big companies that have been

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>running pretty successfully even through this downturn over the last

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>year or start to miss And so that's the silver lining. Um,

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the AI talk is a massive consideration right now. You

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>can absolutely tell that Google is going to have to

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>lean in to deal with what Microsoft is doing with

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>its open AI commitment. UM, the cloud business, the advertising business, UM,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>every part of the company is at risk if they

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>don't figure out a way to combat what Microsoft is doing.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is definitely gonna be part and you saw

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that they even have new reporting that they're planning to

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>start in their new uh the reports coming up around

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>AI to give more clarity to their investors about how

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that is is transpiring. So it was a tough quarter

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for all these big tech names. But like I said,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the silver lining is in the fact that

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>starting to miss is the indication that we really have

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe hit this bottoming period that people have been waiting for. Dan.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>We're grateful to have you on the program and get

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>this quick reaction. As Karenine said, I've been on the

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>phone with CFO Reef Parratt, and you know she framed

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>this pretty quick, quickly and clearly, this is a reset.

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We are committed to re engineering our cost base to

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>long term profitable growth. That was kind of her response

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to the layoffs. Are you convinced by that? Is this

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>alphabet basically saying, Okay, this is the year of discipline.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a theme across tech. I think

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>these reduction and forces in layoffs. I think it's in

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a moment where all the companies are taking to reset.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think throughout the pandemic, we hired uh, the tech

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>industry hired to aggressively. I think it was trying to

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>meet that rapid onset of demand and a lot of

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the digital transformation projects that we heard companies were doing.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We're really more bodies being thrown at growth and revenue

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and demand. The spiked UH during the pandemic. So now

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>companies are looking at some of those uh those hires

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they had to make it way over market values. They're

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to reset some of those and trying to get

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>back to a more favorable outfact situation, which as we've seen,

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as companies have announced reduction in forces and laots, the

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>markets actually favoring these decisions because these are getting back

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to the roots of running these businesses. And so I

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>see this as a moment. Is it enough? I mean,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the size of Google is still significantly larger than it

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was a year ago, even after twelve and that's the

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>case of most of these tech comes. So they are

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>reducing enforced, but there's still larger than they were a

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>year ago, as many of them did a lot of hiring.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's a start. But if the next quarter doesn't

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>look good, I would expect to see more. All right, Yeah,

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet confirming it will book a charge of one point

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>nine billions two point three billion dollars as a result

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of those layoffs. I guess the fighting talk was about AI,

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think we knew this was coming right Dan,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that executives would be quizzed on AI. What Roofport told

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>me was basically a flex. It was basically defense saying

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been working on AI for a long time. We're

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>excited about momentum as, breakthroughs coming from their research team,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like in language models, generative AI. A big emphasis on

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>research because for Alphabet it's not yet out there in

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the real world. Do you expect Alphabet to become a

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>real commercialized AI player this year? I think anything that

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was behind the curtain is going to have to start

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to become more exposed. I think the p A commitment,

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I think chat, GPTs popularity and the general concerns to

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>what this can mean for search for instance, or workspaces

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to force Google and Alphabet to start to

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>reveal all of the research it's done. Now. To be clear,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:17.479
<v Speaker 1>as you know, technology industry analysts, we are continuously impressed

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>by what Google is capable of in the AI space.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They've been inventive, they've been innovative, but they haven't necessarily

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>done a great job of coming out in front recently

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and explaining how they plan to combat what others are doing,

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and in the case of the open Ai came on

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, Microsoft's large commitment and investment, and now Google

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>is in a situation where they have to be able

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to show the market, yes, we have a plan, we

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have technology. We are not going to let a chat

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>bot or what open eye is doing significantly disrupt our

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>advertising business. Uh. And that's that's what the market's gonna

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>want to hear, is that there isn't a big risk

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to that part of the business that's so critical to

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>its long term success. But down what is the risk

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to that part of the business from regulation rather than

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps competition. Yeah, I'm really glad you asked that question.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the regulators across the board continue to look

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>at Google and of course the disproportionate amount of ads spending.

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think it's the biggest challenge that regulators

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>actually have. I still find a lot of of what

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Apple does with its uh you know, it's captive app ecosystem,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>for instance, is a bigger issue. I mean, you see

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon coming out with growth and its advertising business right now.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, you see what chat GPT could potentially

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>due to the everyday search that feeds so much of

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>our ads that isn't really commerce demanded search, and you

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>suddenly say, you know, does Google's long term um, you know,

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>market strength? I don't dominance is the right word prevail

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>with all this new AI and technology that's coming into

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. Look, regulators are going to continue to regulate.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe will always, for instance, continue to be very tough

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on big technology, and of course in the US we've

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>got leadership in the FTC that's constantly looking to regulate.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, I don't think Google is its biggest focus,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>nor should it be, and I don't think regulators will

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be doing any favors to the market by harming Google

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because I also think with all the Apple I D

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the I D f A Apples and other

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>scary you know, entrent to have a really dominant opportunity

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in advertising as it controls so much of the flow.

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Is what we saw with Meta. Well, many say Amazon

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>is also competitive in advertising, and Amazon of course the

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>juggnal when it comes to cloud services AWS, so some slowdown.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that in a minute with our next guest,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But talk to us about Alphabet and it's cloud offering.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, should it be committing this much, there's another loss. Yeah,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>well the losses are narrowed. And I do believe that

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Google has the opportunity with its customer base. It's uh,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's BROADUS user base, and it's a lot

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of its technologies around data that it's become part of

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise's larger cloud ecosystem. So in what we talk

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>called the multi cloud ecosystem. Google has been a consistent

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>growth engine. You saw they grew up this quarter, which

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was right in part with with Azure and you know,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>faster than AWS. And I know you're gonna kick over

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to a w S, but you gotta look at a

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>w S as an over eighty billion dollar business, and yes,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>slowing to is significant, but the business is so much

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>larger than you know, some of the other cloud providers

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that I still think it WUS is in a really

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>good position. Going back to Google, Google needs to continue

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to grow. It's going to have to hit an economy

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of scale right get profitable. I don't sense that making

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>money is its biggest focus, but I think in this

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>time of austerity, they're gonna have to get there quicker

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>than they maybe wanted to. Future and research analyst d

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and human digesting breaking down a big nings report from

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>out Bed, Thank you very much. Now coming out, we've

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>got to state with earnings, and we're going to dive

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 1>into Amazon's lackluster results. I just want to get a

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>quick check on Qualcom ches and how they're looking in

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>after hours training. We're actually down to and a half

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>well four percent. Now that's Amazon, but I'm talking about

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Qualcolm the largest theory two and a half percent lower,

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty weak forecast. At first, it was not that

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>much of a decline because we saw this coming a

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in the smartphone market. But again the market listening

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to what executives are having to say on the call,

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and those losses accelerating in post market. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>All the earnings come thick and fast on Thursday, and

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon was among them of course as well. Earnings well

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>showing some lack luster forecasts coming through. We're down three

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>point immediately after hours, Slower cloud unit growth as well

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a w S, which is the profit center in many ways.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to Minissa Verdict, because she's not only co

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>found in president of pack for You, which of course

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>all about making the best of your e commerce provisions

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and marketing but also a tenure Amazon veteran. You know

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this business, particularly on the e commerce side. So let's

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>start their overall, Melissa. When you're looking at what they're offering,

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomic headwind all, they navigating it. All. They focusing

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and AFL and trimming costs, sudden growing growth and the

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>way you'd like to see them. Uh, they're definitely focusing

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on that. I would say that they're focusing on profit

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Um. Amazon is famous for, you know,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>changing their knobs pretty quickly and they can go from

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>driving brow to driving profit and that's what they're doing now. UM.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Q four was a really interesting kind of quarter. There

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a slowdown in demand. UM consumers that were

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>coming in, they're actually coming in to buy deals and discounts. Uh.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And the good news is that Amazon is always known

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for having the greatest prices and so that that's something

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that was definitely going for them. But um, you know,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>unlike in years past, Amazon and Q four actually had

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>more inventory. UM consumers wanted to buy on deals, so

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they came in, they bought during Black Friday's every Monday. UM.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Amazon is really focused on cost cutting

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point, being efficient profit margin um in the

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>face of having a lot of slower demand consumer demand.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting on the cool Brander's abscie the CFOs talking

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>about the layoffs and saying this round of layoffs is

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>over and talking about the charges and impairments which they took.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But Amazon is still kind of bloated. It seems still

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a big beast. Do you expect the company to be

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more nimble in terms of how it kind of adds

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and flows in hiring and reduction going forward. Absolutely, they

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>hired half a million people and they have over one

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>five million employees, so eighteen thou employees is not a

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>huge amount. And in the face of slowing growths and

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>slowing demand, you know, it's it's something to think about,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which is they will have to look at their bottom line.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Where do they lean into at the moment? When so,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>where are they able within the focus on profit to

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>decide to allocate cash for growth? Well, the through the

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>two businesses at Amazon that are very profitable are advertising

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and AWS. Uh So those are definitely areas that they

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>plan on continue to invest in. The AWS is slowing

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what you worried by about. They're definitely both slowing um

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and absolutely. Uh. You know, AWS market share has dropped

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>from forty three percent thirty four percent. They have a

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of competition with Microsoft and Google, and right now

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all companies unit hards are looking at cutting costs, and

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the first places you go to is AWS.

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that is going to be a big

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge this year because companies are looking to cut be

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>efficient themselves, and that will impact AWS. I guess my question,

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Melissa is how long does AWS be the sort of

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>bankroller of the rest of the business, Because that's the

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>situation right where Amazon has this sort of ginormous commerce business.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>There's the prime subscription element, the video and content element,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's all kind of dependent on this cash cat.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>How you've been inside that that company, you know how

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it operates. Do you think they'll have a change, They'll

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>have a snap snap free of that business model? Um,

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean serve the services business. Amazon has become a

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>services business. It's over of their revenue across AWS, advertising

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and subscriptions, and so that will continue. And I think

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, one thing that Amazon is well known

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for is innovation. The thing that can't control is the

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>demand and the cost cutting part that other people are

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>doing and that impacts AWS. UM, I think advertising is

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a bright star. They're doing so many things there. Crime

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>video for the first time surpassed as Netflix is the

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>top streaming service. Amazon talked about a hundred million viewers

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>watching a Lord of the Rings. Um, more people watching

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>streaming means more advertising revenue to Amazon, and so that

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is a big star for them. Very briefly. We've touched

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on it with Alphabet, but the regular story overhang anything

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>that worries you with Amazon. Uh, the DJ definitely has

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon as a target. It's really hard to call them

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and monopoly with so much competition. They actually have slipping

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>market share in AWS. But that's not to say that

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be a distraction and something that

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to answer. So you know, this

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>happened before with private label UM and they had to

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>answer to that. So it'll continue to be something that

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>all these tech companies are dealing with. But I see

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>less of kind of a like to stand on pact

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>for your co founder and president, Melissa birt It, thank

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you so much for breaking down again and now they're challenging.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Earnings report from Amazon now is one of the most

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>read stories on the terminal amongst our clients, at least today,

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>because some major hedge funds they've been asked by US

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>regulators to review certain employees personal mobile phones. Why because

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all part of this big probe that continues to

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 1>mushroom of Wall Street's use of unofficial messasaging platforms, basically

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the use of WhatsApp to be able to do deals,

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>broker potentially M and A and that sort of thing.

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately we're hearing that the SEC has our Steve

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Cohen's points on only two Ken Griffin's Citadel other firms

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. But what about the liability here? What about

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>people's phones? What sort of data might we end up

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of unfolding here in terms of health, in terms

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of finance, Well, we should say those hedge funds you name,

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>no one's been accused of any wrongdoing, but they are

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>literally asking them to review the devices for any transactional stuff,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that business stuff that's being done on them inappropriately. That's

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the reality of what's playing out on Wall Street. We've

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>already seen the fines being exerted upon the brokerages and

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the actual banks. We see asset managers kind of pushed

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>back at the moment, I'll come back to Bluemo technology.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline had in New York, and let's get you

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>up to speed with some of cost cuts, some of

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the layoffs, whether they're done or not. Lumbag intelligence put

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on oil and pieces says with us Rumas Tech Executive

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>editor Tom Jailes as well, start with you and on

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Amazon because ed talking about this reset and alphabet, this

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on being more disciplined and on cost cuts, the

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>layoffs Amazon's used to be saying, look the cost cuts, Well,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly the layoffs are done. Are they right sizing in

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that the market wants to see? Well, they're

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there are laborers down for a percent and a year

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or a year basis, So they did right size a little.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you can argue that could they do more? Sure,

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but maybe they're just waiting to see how things unfold.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And remember Amazon's a business where many parts of it

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>are still in rapid growth mode, whether that's advertising a

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>WS or um even on the three P side where

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they really are growing much faster than expected, or the

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>overall retail business despite resolve all down. Sorry it interrupts

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you out, Tom, I actually want to pivot to Apple

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>because we kind of saw this coming, you know, we

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>knew that December would be really tasked. They missed estimates

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>basically across all the products, and the markets reacting as

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd expect, pretty negatively. But is that a surprise. I mean,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we thought they'd be weak. We saw the headlines out

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of China. We knew that there were going to be

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>supply chain constraints, We saw the lockdowns, and we saw

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the impact, and and Apple is absolutely feeling it. In

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>addition to supply chain concerns, Tim Cook talked about currency

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>headwinds that has to be taken into consideration. But also

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>remember back the saying when Clinton was running for pred

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it's the economy, stupid, it's the economy. The economy is

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>hurting Apple. It's hurting demand for iPhones. The economy is

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>affecting demand for ads on Alphabet, and the economy is

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>affecting demand for a WS, the cloud services at Amazon,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. That's the theme running between all

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of these three companies today. I love how you bring

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>them all together and this discipline, this focus. What's interesting

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is rule for Apple, in particular, their supply chain headaches.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Did they speak to that in any way? Have we

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>got an idea as to whether the China issues, whether

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they're now trying to broaden out of just Fox Con,

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>whether that was what was hindering some of the sales,

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly on iPhone sales. Well, a couple of things, Caroline,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>great questions. First and foremost, Obviously, things have changed dramatically

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in China since we had the lockdowns late last year.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You've seen this opening up. Uh, So you're not seeing

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the headlines of like of of people just locked in

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>their homes literally not going out, not buying um, and

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>people not even being being able to get to work

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to actually manufacture the phones. So that's changing. What isn't changing, however,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>is these questions about, you know, just how quickly is

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>demand overall globally going to come back. It's not roaring back. Um.

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>You know they've had to take they've had to slow

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>down their hiring. Um. Everybody's taking different kinds of us

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>theority measures. Um. You know, I sort of put out

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a tweet about how all these companies maybe they should

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be talking about, just like Zuckerberg did, is going to

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be the year of austerity. You're not quite hearing it

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as aggressively as you heard with with Meta, and remember

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Meta also talked about authorizing a buyback of as much

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as forty billion dollars. Another reason why you may not

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>be seeing quite the rally in the stocks that you

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>saw with Meta earlier today. Okay, let's go back to Amazon,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but also kind of links what Tom was talking about

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>about the broader economy. You're you've written about a bifurcation

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>in trends and particularly focus on that AWS drag. Right,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to know about the macroeconomic environment. You wanted

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to know about cost saving progressions. Well, what did you

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>learn so far from Amazon's commentary? Sure, I mean the

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>call starting as we speak, but what I've seen them

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>say just recently on the call is that consumers are

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>trading down. And that's obviously a concern because when you

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>start to see a trade down, you kind of get

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the first signal that the economy is softening. So there

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>are pockets of weakness that we do need to look

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>out for as we move forward into three But overall,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>when I think about Amazon, Amazon is just not a

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one P business. It's also a three P business, and

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>their third party business is very very strong. It remains

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>an attractive platform for new businesses. And existing businesses to

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>really get the eyeballs that they want. So it's it's

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a mixed story when you think about

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's total g m B, where one P may struggle

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a little, but three P is still very much on fire.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Three P third party. We love the lingo. We love

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that both of you could draw all of

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>these juggernauts together and sort of tell us the thread

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>across it all, which is, of course, efficiency, efficiency, efficiency,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>stupid Bloomberg intelligence pot and goil. Bloomg Executive editor Tom Giles,

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We thank you both so much, great expertise. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pivot a little bit. Let's get out of

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the world of earnings. Let's go back to the world

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of fts. Because we had an exclusive interview with the

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>former f t x U S president Brett Harrison. When

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong from an inside of you, that's next and this

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is Greenback. It's been less than three months since f

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>t x collapsed and a former top executive is eager

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to get it all behind him. Former f t x

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>U S President Brett Harrison insists he didn't have a

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>clue what Sam Bankman Freed was up to. He sat

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>down with Bloomberg Sinali Bassik in an exclusive interview. M H.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>There were primarily disputes that I would attribute to the

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>growing pains of any high growth company, you know, problems

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>around internal communication, around structuring the company, for providing better governance,

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>especially as we as we were growing larger, around hiring

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>enough you know, developers and other senior staff that we

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>needed to be able to accomplish many of the goals

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that we were seeking to accomplish. And when I would

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>try to bring up these kinds of criticisms internally at

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the company, UM, they were never met well. And at

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.959
<v Speaker 1>some point, you know, we truly weren't really speaking much

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to each other over the course of the last queen

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a part of the time that I was there. Now,

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you had mentioned these disputes were not just with Sam

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Big but Free you had mentioned these disputes were with

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>other members of his staff, his deputies. Who else did

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>you find those disputes with? Yeah, you know, they were

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>primarily with Sam, but you know, I think many of

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the people around Sam really agree with him on most

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of the internal decisions, especially around trying to kind of

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>grow and separate the staff. Um, there was very much

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a separation between the group of people who

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>were the executives in the Bahamas, sort of around them,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>living together, who were making those kinds of decisions, versus

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the people on the U S side, who are you know,

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess I said, we're systematically left out of many

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of those decisions. Um to the extent that you believe.

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, the number of his deputies have already come

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>up and pled guilty to some of the charges that

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing against f t X. What do you think

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about those charges and do you think that there's anybody

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>else that will be brought into them. I'm not sure

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>if there's going to be anybody else at this point. UM.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the charges are they're damning, and

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>they're truly shocking to see sort of the depths that

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>um Sam and his close associates went to to try

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to conceal this fraud from the public and the private

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>UM and you know, as as a customer of the exchange, myself,

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>as someone who had worked extremely hard to try to

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>build out this great business on the U S side,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>who had hired extremely talented individuals into the U S

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Company to be able to accomplish those goals. It was

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>really really sad to see all this come to light.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you had said fraud, but this is still an

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>alleged fraud. He has not been convicted yet, although others

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>have played guilty. I'm wondering what you think about the

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>go forward path here? I mean, do you have any evidence?

0:27:55.720 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you cooperating with authorities at this time? You know,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak to whether I am or I'm not,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, involved in the investigation. I am very happy

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate in any way that I can, But at

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>this point it's really just sort of a wait and see.

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, We're going to see if there are more

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>details that come to light, if there are anyone else

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of brought in, who ends up leading guilty

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>or not, you know, whether this case actually ends up

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>making it to trial. It's something that I'm kind of

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>watching and waiting and interested in the way that kind

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of everyone else is in the public. Have you been

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in touch with Sam since you've left? No, In fact,

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we were last in touch several

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.239
<v Speaker 1>months before I left the company. Even have you been

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in touch with any of his other deputies that you

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>had said you had disputed with and if you had

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to talk to Sam, would you want to

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and what would you say? Um? No to the first question,

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the second one. I think nothing. You know,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point it's best for me and

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, the media, the public, investors, everyone to sort

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of to move on from from Sam and find a

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>way path forward, to be able to move forward with

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with crypto in this industry. UM, I think you know

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we're time to turn the page. M Brett Harrison, their

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>former f t X US president and ED is great

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that Shannale is staying late to talk to us about

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this extraordinary conversation. And I think ultimately Shannali just give

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>us your take on the fact that he is trying

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to turn a page. People are handing him money, not

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as much money as he hoped to raise, but five

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>millions a lot from some interesting players. Do you think

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>he can move on? You know, it's interesting, as you said,

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not as much as he initially went out to raise.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>He started that process after leaving f t X, before

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it had imploded. And then you look at who he

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>raised money from, the likes of Anthony Scaramucci, who himself

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>felt wronged by f t X. Given that Anthony Scaramucci

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>had selt sold a part of his own firm to

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>f t X Ventures, can he move on? It's interesting

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to hire former employees of f t X.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He's hired about five, he said, and the road. He

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>says he wants to move on, But how long does

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that take? The questions that still remain are should he

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have known? He says he was misled. He says he's

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>kept records of how he was misled. But at the

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, this will take a long time.

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Even just the responses on Twitter, people won't feel like

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they can move on from f TX until they start

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to get their money back and they get some resolution

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to some of the answers that are so brewing about

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the situation. Snali triffic interview, Just great timing around that conversation.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>The other big headline of the day is, according to

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg sources, Silver Gates is facing d o J probes

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>over what happened with f t X and Alimta. What

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do we know? A few things? This is US prosecutors

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Justice departments fraud Unit. According to Bloomberg's Tom Schoenberg,

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a criminal investigation according to his report, and

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it is started fairly recently. Remember when you look at

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate and its relationship with Alameda, it started in

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eighteen. Silvergate was really the bank of

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>choice for a lot of crypto large crypto companies. But

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>when you take a look here at this investigation itself,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes off the heels of criticism from lawmakers as well.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>To describe more of the relationship between silver Gate, f

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>t X and Alometa and what silver Gate really knew

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>about what was going on and whether they had appropriate disclosures. Remember,

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate is a bank here, California based bank that

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is still using a depression era backstop for the way

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that it operates. It has short term funding that really

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>allows it to operate in the way it does. So

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it is one of the more clear links to the

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>traditional financial system when you're looking at how the crypto

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>industry is financed generalie. What's interesting whether or not people

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>can move on. Some people are trying to move on

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that prices are rallying again. They're not

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in anywhere near the heady heights six, but still Bitcoin

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the o G is climbing higher. We've just had some

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of micro Strategy, which was once upon a

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>time a software company and basically became a bitcoin vet.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>How are we seeing these companies still suffering from last year?

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But looking forward, one thing that's interesting is on the

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>way down, so many people lost so much money last

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>year that when you're looking at places like micro Strategy

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>or coin base, or places that are linked to the

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.719
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry, you have an instance in where people are

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at, Okay, have we bottom should we get in now?

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>As prices of bitcoin start to recover. If you're linked

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin, it's an easier way to play the industry

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>through infrastructure than it is to really bet on other

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tokens and coins if you're an institutional investor. Micro Strategy

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is still publicly traded stock. So it's interesting. You know,

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about being in Miami and seeing a lot

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of these big crypto players. I saw Scared Mucci. No

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>progress is there as well. There is still an industry

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that is severely bruised. But that balance that you're talking

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>about is giving people power to come up and say

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we're surviving basic terrific reporting, Thank you very much. I

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually want to stick with the conversation around crypto arc

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>investment managements. Kathy would spoke to Bloomberg earlier about why

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>she's sticking to her bitcoin strategy. You have a listen.

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>The confidence actually was strengthened last year. Now, last year

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was was a terrible year for everything crypto. But if

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you think about what happened, it was the centralized opaque

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>players who went bankrupt f T x Celsius three hours

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Capital Um and and what did we see from bitcoin?

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is completely decentralized and transparent. It started because of

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>oh eight oh nine, the lack of transparency in the

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>traditional financial services ecosystem. And I remember when we did

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>our research and Art Laugher I mentioned him. I mentioned him.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.719
<v Speaker 1>The first was on your show. Um. She took us

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>through what bitcoin meant to him and it was wow. Art.

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is a a rules based momentary. It's a

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>rules based digital monetary system, and it's global and and

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no human intervention. Uh, it's very disciplined. It's mathematically

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>metered to top out at twenty one million units. Well

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>in the last year. The response to the last three years,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the responses to COVID that the fiscal and monetary responses

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that you know in many countries are causing hyperinflation and

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know fiscal crises. We're seeing protests and riots all

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Um, well, where do these people go

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for an insurance policy against an implosion in their purchasing

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>power and wealth. It is in something like bitcoin. Happy

0:34:51.440 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with that Netflix password sharing? Why are we all freaking

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>out about it? Okay, let's get to the facts. Because

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>last year Netflix told us more than a hundred million

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>households currently use memberships and Netflix that don't pay for it,

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to crack down on this password sharing,

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>probably coming into effect in the end of the first quarter,

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that means by March. Now, why are we all freaking

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>out right here right now? Or they've already been trying

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>ways to curtail password sharing over in Latin America in

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>three key countries in fact, Peru, Chili, Costa Rica, and

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they put out a helpful article to tell users in

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>those countries about some of the changes. That they published

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>it in every single region, So that's why we're all

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>worrying about it. So what are we seeing being trialed

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in those three countries. Well, the users are being asked

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to set a primary location for where they use Netflix

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on their devices, and then Netflix will track a mixture

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of IP addresses or device ideas account activity to see

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if anyone outside the wholesehold is using that password. And

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be incentivized to add members to your

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>own household. If you want them to be using it,

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got to pay up now right here in the US.

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Take a deep breath. Nothing is exactly happening at this moment,

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but what's clear is Netflix is going to have to

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>use all of its storytelling skills to get you and

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I on board with these changes. Oh and the fewer

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the outrage that was across Instagram, that was across Twitter

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>as people got this the wrong way around, thought it

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was being enacted in the US immediately. And what was

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.479
<v Speaker 1>so ironic, I suppose is actually Netflix had some strong

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>news coming out on Wednesday. They wanted to talk about

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Netflix Spatial audio are better, an amount of more devices

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have the premium Netflix subscription, and instead it

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>got drowned out by this. We thought this would be

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>adds the story for Netflix right add supported tier about

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>password sharing and Greg Peters before he was promoted to

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>co CEO, that was his project. He was out there

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to crack this problem, whether he does it or not.

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was a really fascinating reaction, It really was.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>And I think now we're going to have to hear

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>from Netflix about how this might be enacted, the trials

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that were going on, and what it's actually going to

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>mean for you and me eventually in the US. Remember

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>back in they were saying it was all about passwords sharing.

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a very different matter when it comes to numbers.

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But talking in numbers, the earnings today, I mean, what's

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the afterno ours reaction looking like? Now? Yeah, I mean

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we're still lower across all of those mega caps. And

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what's so interesting is we asked our audience, did you

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>think after meata this was us turning the corner for

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tech tech stocks? Actually, everyone on Twitter at least was

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty bearish. No, this is a tad cat bounce. Well,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there's right. It would see that they're pre improved, right,

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>although we're coming off our lows, aren't we? After hours?

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And so we'll all go tune into tomorrow what exactly

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the numbers look like, how we perform in terms of

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks. But this addition of bl technology, do not

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>forget to Tune in to Twitter spaces Friday midday. That's

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve noon, right head, Yeah, I got the crew of

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>me and a special guest. This is Bloomberg.