WEBVTT - Beating the Book: 2022 Week 12 NFL MegaPod Betting Preview

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Check it in Man Now down Man Wednesday morning, but

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>two and is the Beating the Book podcast for week

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve in the National Football League. Day earlier this week

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because of Thanksgiving. So we want to get it in,

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>as they say, and do only they say get it

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in for that context. You different context, but you know

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean with me Skill Alexander by the way,

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>with me, Jeff Pearls in studio, Jeff Parlay, how you

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>doing man? It's interesting interesting few days, I would say,

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the holidays. The World Cup is underway. Mike Michael White

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is starting for the New York Jets on Sunday. Now,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike go White. One of the best Chris Andrew stories ever.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's a it's good to be here, as always,

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>good to have you. Jeff is a hostedt Visa of course,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and Todd Wishnett from his mom's cork addict in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>who was actively bet in college basketball while this happens,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're betting the World Cup as well. How you don't

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Toddy you good? Hey, Hey, hey, I'm betting the American

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgetown Gilly Memorial. The ornament it's uh, it's based on

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Gilly ICE's Washington, d C. Boyhood home. So they are

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>they bringing him out at halftime, so we might have

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to lose him for bringing me out at halftime. It's

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the battle at Northwest d C. And ladies and gentlemen,

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>big treat this week is what has become an annual

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>appearance on this show. This show, Um, how can I

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>how can I say it? Properly? Upon whose shoulders it

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>has been built? Ladies and gentlemen. You know him as Ace,

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know him as VR, you know as Vegas Runner.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It's Ace Vegas Runner. How you do it? Man? Never better? Brother?

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And thank you. It is to thank you for using

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>my proper pronouns before we start exciting. That's really excited. Great,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect time to have me on with Thanksgiving weekend because

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a couple of days. People are all from work.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at drop some bombs. We got nothing but

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>prime time, so perfect timing. Man, I'm excited and I've

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>already unloaded, so we got some good, good gold to

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>share with the I missed that about you. I like

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>everything on this card. Thank you for using my proper pronouns.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That's so awesome. By the way, I just we we

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>try not to get political on this show. But you know,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know how your phone gets pushed articles. I was

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>pushed an article about It's about some actress and some actor.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I got pushed the article. I

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know why I read it, but I started reading it.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And I consider myself a fairly intelligent human being. Um,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong about that, but I started reading

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it and I couldn't understand what I was reading, and

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>so I had to double back and read it again.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Why Because the guy that they were referring to in

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the article, they didn't refer to him as he and him.

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>They referred to him as they. So it required two

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>readings for me to understand what I was reading. No,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I ask you, are we gonna really do this? These

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are like a major publication, We're really going to do

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that with the pronounced in publication. I think if you're

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred pounds, you should be allowed to be there,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because that's you're calling me over three hundred pounds what

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I used to be over three hundred pounds. So I

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>feel like I want to continue to have the right

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to call myself they because you were more than one person. Yeah,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the fact that you know a lot of

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>times you say, oh, well we have this team in

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the first half, so you know you want to be

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a week as opposed to h an. I not not

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>really what I think they were going for in the

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>R hole, but I understand what I was just I

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was just joking. But over three hundred. By the way,

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, in the over three hundred division,

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I was in the top ten worldwide in tennis over

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>three hundred, and I've lost that designation now that thin

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>as I've told as you've told us before, what is

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>your current weight to wish? What is your current right

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>around two oh three two o four? All right? Good

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for you, good for him? Is right? All right, let's

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>do this Thanksgiving three days, three games on Thanksgiving, of course,

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>leading into a full slate of week twelve games. We start, though,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of things we are that we sort

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of added to the show since you've been here with us,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>which is and I think I already know the answer

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to this, the dumbbell of the week. Itimous. I'd like

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to believe you you want you want to handle it time,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think this this hacket has got to go.

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I've had enough for from the you can't get to

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>play in on time. Okay, your own tea, your own

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fans were counting down the play clock earlier in the season,

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and now, okay, first of all, before we get into

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the one that's just gonna drive me crazy, there was

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a point, and I believe in the first half of

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it was holding. It was either first in twenty or

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>second and seventeen. He took first in twenty. That's not

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a good option, folks, I forgot about seventeen is better

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>than first in twenty. What are you doing? That is

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not that hard to figure out. You should know that

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>by watching any football game that first in twenty is

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not as good as second and seventh. Okay, that's whatever.

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Even the announcer, even the ouncer figured that out at

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the time, which they're usually not present to do so,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>but he did. I'll let that go now. The second

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is Melvin Gordon pretty much fumbles every time he

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>touches the ball. Is certainly around large men on the

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>interior of an offensive or defensive line. Maybe let's not

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>give him the ball every time and inside the five

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>yard lights so he can give you a heart attack.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And somehow his own team gets hold on hold on,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>hold on, let's just give context. You are referring to

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first half, Denver was up ten

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to seven. They actually had its second and goal at

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the excuse me, was second and two at the four

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>second and I believe it was second and two at

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the four. No, second and goal at the four something

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. Anyway, they were in a very favorable position

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and on the third down play Melvin Gordon fubble, Denver

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was lucky enough to recover it, and then they got

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>their field goal blocks. So, yes, that was that unbelievable.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, he then he then he then

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>was cut, we should finish. He then was cut right after,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next day. So that's part of the

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>story too. Okay, whatever, It's just another time they were

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line and they don't score, which

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is maybe put you know, that's only happened eight hundred

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>times this year. Now. The worst is at the end

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the game. It's third down with like a minute

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty five. We've seen this a thousand times, no time

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>outs left for the Raiders. The minutes exactly, run the ball,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>take the sack, do whatever you have to do, and

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders get the ball. Back with one fifteen no

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>time outs, very deep in their own end, and they've

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>got to get a field go to tight. Now, I'm

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not saying that they're not going to get a field goal.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they will, maybe they won't, but you certainly want

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you get rid of the forty five seconds,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course they Russell Wilson rolls out throws the

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>incomplete passed. Now the Raiders have all kinds of time,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course you know, they go down and they

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>almost got the touchdown to win the game right there.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course they end up losing the game. But anyways,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the point is Mr Nathaniel Hackett must be a very

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>nice guy. I don't know. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is he's not ready to be a

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>head coach in the national football You forgot one, Todd,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you forgot another one. So on that on that Raiders

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>dry after after Russell Wilson threw the incomplete pass. So

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders quickly matriculate downfield like three passes, right, they

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>end up first in goal at the seven and and

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so so i I'm taking notes right for guessing lines,

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking notes. So I turned my head away and

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming, God forbid, I assume with Hackett. I'm assuming

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Raiders spiked the ball to to to set

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>up a second in goal. No, the Broncos called the

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>fucking time out. Time to remember, the Raiders didn't have

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>any time outs, which means there was going to be

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at least another five ten ten second runof Plus they're

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose it down because they're gonna have to spec

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball just like you said. So that's increditable, incredible management.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>He's got to go. You're right, he's got to go.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I'm sure that maybe he's a good coach,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's a smart guy. I don't know. But he's

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>not ready yet. He's he's so bad though, And this

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>will getting to the betting that legitimately, when you're handicapping

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a Broncos game, you have to for a moment consider

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>his impact. You really do. You're like, this guy might

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>be worth negative two points. You really will When when

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>when I took him, I said I don't want to

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>take him. I don't want to take him. I don't

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>want to take him. Fifty times I said I don't

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>want to take and then of course I took him

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to and of course you know I deserved everything I get,

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. You know, no, not to bet

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on Nathaniel Hackett. It's really not that hard, folks, It's

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>really not that hard. He's been swept by Josh McDaniels.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders have sixty six PERCENTATOR wins this year against

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. It's all you need to know. Don't short

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>change it at sixty six points. Excuse me that I

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>forgot the obvious points, the the decimal they're we're gonna get.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get sixty six fast off the math people again. Sorry, yes,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you keep doing that, all right? And then, um, what

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>do we do after that? Oh? Yeah, and just take

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it quick. I just have I have a quick end

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>game that I want to talk about. We talked about

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>this on text a little bit. The the Chiefs Charger game. Uh,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>there was ten thirty four to go in the second quarter.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers are down third team ten, they're getting the ball.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They're also getting the ball to start the second half

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. At that moment, I got plus four and

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a half on the Chargers. I loved it because of

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact I saw the Chargers are moving the ball.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>It's hard in the NFL to beat a team by

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>four and a half if the other team can move

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball. It certainly looked like the Charges were gonna

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to move the ball. Plus I had all

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the favorability of them getting the ball right then also

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball to start the second half. I just

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>thought four and a half was too much. Took the

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, ended up getting home. But I

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think a bigger issue, and it was something you talked

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>about that you had Tennessee on Saturday again, I mean

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>had South Carolina against Tennessee. Because remember, folks, the algorithms

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>are all based on the pregame number. So in the

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina Tennessee game, or even in this football game

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>that I was just talking about with the Chiefs, it

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was plus twenty two before the game South Carolina. If

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina can move the ball at will, which they could,

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not covering twenty two, you're not covering eleven, you're

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not covering twelve. You may not even win the game.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>They didn't win the game. And and plus ten plus

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>eleven plus five plus seven, all those pluses were available,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and you were you were pounding him. So you know,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing you need to know about in game.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I did a whole rant on that yesterday on the

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Numbers Game, which is exactly what you said. At one

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to seven, I go in there and I'm like, well,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>let me suspend my thought for a second about the

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>pre flop number, the twenty two and a half. What

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ought South Carolina be right? What should they be right now?

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And you go in and because as you said, it's formula,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it's derivative the algorithms derivative of the pre flop. They

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>were plus five and a half, and they were still

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>plus two thirteen or plus two twenty on the money line.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I grabbed the money line when they're up twenty one

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to seven. I grabbed it again when Tennessee had a

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>had a fourth and goal down seven. Tennessee ended up

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>converting that, by the way. But then when South Carolina

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>went back up to fourteen, bet him again at north

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of two dollars. Then it was twenty eight to seventeen,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, fourteen, Bet them at plus one sixty two.

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Then when it was seventeen, bet him on the on

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the on the spread at plus three and a half.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Any to your point, those are the opportunities in betting

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>because so because of the nature of a podcast, we

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about everything pre flop. But the reason

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we bring up in game is because when you look

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at your betting pie at the end, what you actually

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>win on pre flop is just a portion of that pie.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be present for those in game opportunities.

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>There was never a better example than that South Carolina

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee game. And the more you can recognize that and

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the more you can be aggressive and pounds. Now, by

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, it might not have worked right got closed dogs.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Dogs fade sometimes, but sometimes they the more you if

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I could just finish, the more you put yourself in

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>those positions, right, the better off you're gonna be. Right.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>That's especially especially if you get to keep some points

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>still for them to fade late, you know what I mean,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes these dogs do fade. But you could pretty

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>much tell in that game this is gonna be a

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>close game because South Carolina is not getting stopped the

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>whole time. So anyways, it's just something interesting. And I

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that the Chargers, uh you know, Chargers Chiefs game

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was a perfect example of that, that the Chiefs weren't

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>going to dominate that game if they're not going to

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>stop the charges every time. So I started out this

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL season on fire. Through nine weeks on this show,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I was twenty and seven, and I have just screeched

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to a halt. I lost to fourteen point leads two

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and then this past week one, you didn't

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>deserve one loss. One loss you in, Jeffrey, I have

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>to give you both, and then this is not deserve

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And then and then this week we lost on the

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Jets and the Broncos, or I did on both of

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>those teams. So I just feel like the PLCO chip

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>has just aggressively gone against me. Another oh and three

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for me? What else for everybody? Gilly moves to twenty

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen with his oh and three didn't deserve much

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>better in the Patriots game. Jeffrey moves to nineteen and fourteen,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just a game back, and I am eight. I got

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it right, Jeffrey. I wanted two last week at one

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and two, and I am at eighteen and fifteen, just

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>two games back. Um, the guests seat had a terrible

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>week as well, seventeen and sixteen. Now for the guest

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so en eighteen seventeen, that's where we are now, yeah, exactly.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And the teasers, you guys each have four after the

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Vikings decided not to show up in Dallas. Four wins,

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>seven losses. I'm to eight and one on the teaser

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and the guest seat is still seven and four and

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the teasers, the guest chair on the teaser has been awesome.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ace, We we apologize for the preamble there,

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's uh, that's how we start each show. Now,

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's get just be in Canada plus one as

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>we speak. Wait, wait, say again again. We're just setting

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in Canada in the World Cup at plus one as

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we speak. But it's that time of day where things

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are coming in so early. So no, I'm listening to

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>everything you're saying, but also to move a little bit

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>as we're getting through. I have the draw in that

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>game after this, i got plus one plus one minus

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one oh five. I'm actually on the same thing aces

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>even though this podcast will be out of right as

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the game starting, I was gonna say, all right, um, okay,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's usually we say hey, any thoughts on the

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game, because we do this Thursday morning. Let's

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>just sort of throw in the three Thanksgiving games and

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really one of them. Yeah, so maybe we should just

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>get into the best bets and see if any of

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Thanksgiving games qualify. ACE, we start with you. You

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>know the format better than anybody. What's your first place there? Hey, listen.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I bet all three games on Thursday, I really did,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and two of them I really liked the sides. I'll

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you. First off, I bet the Buffalo bills immediately

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at minus nine. I bet him again at minus nine

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Um. I know a lot of betters

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking to use them in a teaser. I if

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a long teaser, I just don't do it.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>As badly as I want to tease them down. Maybe

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you six and a half points or seven points, I

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just don't do it. Um. I try to keep things

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>simple and stick to certain rules that that at least

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I know historically had been profitable. Unless there's some data

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>resent with a big enough sample size to change my mind,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't do it. I I try to keep

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it simple. Um. So for me, I wanted to use

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo obviously and a teaser. Wanted to use Dallas in

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a teaser, but the smart books that move them up,

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they just don't qualify for me. For other betters that

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are a little more out on the risk curve. I

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's an obvious move to use Buffalo. Listen,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they're a number one power rated team in the NFL.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I maybe what some of you guys made disagree, but

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think their favor over anyone over a neutral field.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they win the Super Bowl. In fact,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I bet a future on Kansas City and the future

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Dallas Cowboys about a week and a half

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>back because in football, again, it's not a subven game

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>by game series where a higher probability of the cream

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>rising to the cup the top and in one game

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sample size, and there's a lot of randomness in Bob.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So again, Buffalo maybe the best team power rating wise,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they'll be able to get it done.

0:15:56.080 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>They just have shown that even with all that coality

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on paper, they just lose games they shouldn't. You shouldn't

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have lost against Minnesota, you shouldn't have lost at the Jets,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't have lost that Miami. Like, if you're a

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>dominant team, you win those games. You don't lose close

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>games to bad teams. And that's why you're still getting

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>some value on anotherwise team that would be so um

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the value. Like for value betters, you would't

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>even consider them um because they're going to be bet

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on weekend and week out. There's the premium attached. Obviously,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it's something everyone talks about, UM. And that's why I

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do think you get value still on the Buffalo Bills.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And also again the team with the highest point best

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>point differential in the NFL also reflects that high power rating. UM.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think you fade them here against the

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Detroit team where it's the perfect storm. They've outperformed the

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>betting market of late, and why shouldn't they. They went

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>over a stretch of five or six weeks where they

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>underperformed it so badly. I mean they underperformed by twenty

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>four points against New England, eleven points against Dallas, six

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>points against Seattle. So in those three weeks they underperformed

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the betting market by forty three points. Of course, it's

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>going to come back the other way towards the mean,

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they covered three straight games. But as

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you can see, two of those were coin flips. It's Thanksgiving.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Detroit will gets some loved I think it's the wrong side.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Bet Buffalo. They win this one easily, double digits, turns

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>into a blowout in the second half. Alright, Ace goes

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Buffalo Billiards. What what are you giving him?

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Nine and a half, nine and a half, nine and

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>a Thanksgiving early Thanksgiving warning. The Bills nine and a

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites on the road against the Lions, who

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>have the longest winning streak in the NFC currently at

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>three games to Detroit. Jeez, what do you got? I'm

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna go under forty five and a half. Is that

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what you have in the Dallas game? Let me check

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>how he's back on the Dallas unders again. I got

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half for the thought, I got

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half. Yeah, okay, give me under

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half in the Dallas Giants game.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, as I've said all season, I think the

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>most dominant portion of any football team this year is

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas front four and pass rush. It's been unbelievable.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>I was worried that they were going to get to Cousins,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why I didn't like the Vikings last week

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because of Cousins statuesque ability and you know, that that

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what happened to Dallas Cowboys. Pass rush might

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>wreak havoc on Mr Daniel Jones as well. I don't

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>see the Giants being a huge offensive team, and this

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of team that Dallas just kind of,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, just eats up and spits out. It is

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a divisional game, so I'm hoping on the Giants being

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>able to keep the score down. Dallas just had a

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>big scoring game, you know, winning whatever what was the

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>final thirty seven three, forty three, whatever the final store was,

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm hoping that they can. You know, typically you

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>don't see teams, you know, scoring thirty seven forty points

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>two weeks in a row. So I'm thinking Dallas might

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>slow down a bit here on offense, and I think

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be great on defense. I think that's the one,

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the one side of the ball you can really count

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on with the Cowboys. So you know, I think the

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Giant's gonna get more than fourteen points here. I don't

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>see it. Thirty four teen still gets you under give

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>me under forty five and a half with the Dallas

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>cow Girls. Jeffrey Parlay, This card is brutal this week

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know my things. I'm like a this this of

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all the weeks to have a so on I never

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like a lot guessing lines. I was like, I like, wait,

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm the complete opposite this week because everything with Jeff,

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>everything came within a point of what I what I

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>would have made it this week for the most part,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and the biggest differential that I had was and I'm

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I won't regret this. I'm taking four and

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a half with the Atlanta Falcons against you. It's four

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, by the way, isn't it I see four

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half's all over? Yeah? Four and a half? Now, Yeah,

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I got hit this morning. Yeah hit, they got hit

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I'm I'm looking at my screen. It's fours everywhere.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this is the reason that I'm being

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>adamant about the spread is because I'm OPO you here.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you I have? I have

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of four, I have five four and a half. Yeah,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>So do you want to how about this? Do you

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>want to how about this compromise? Do you want to

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>take forward Washington? You give me four and a half

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of Atlanta? Is that allowed? Can we allow that? It's

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>really it's really not the rules. But hold on, it's

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty evenly space Like I'm seeing just as many fours

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>as four and a half on my screen. Article three

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve dollar shut the hell up, time States shut off.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>A game cannot have two different lines for two different hosts.

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you guys want to do it, I'm okay, Well,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a hollid, it's Thanksgiving. Why the hell? No? All right?

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's legit. I think it's legit

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because it is pretty well split. Look, I know, I

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I know the Commanders have been winning. I know with

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Heideki have been winning games. They have players, Chase Young's

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>coming back this week. But this really feels everyone was

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>going after the Giants for smoking mirrors earlier in the year,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and seems like seems like that was correct for going

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>after that. It's the smoking mirrors with Washington, They're still

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not really moving the ball. Last week. Davis Mills wasn't

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the preseason Hall of Famer that I called him. He

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was shipped in that game against the kid Commanders and

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that game was over immediately. So look, not that I

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 1>like Atlanta. I think the Falcons have done as well

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>as they could with the roster they have. This is

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a field goal game to me. So that's why I'm

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>taking the four and a half. With the Falcons on

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the road. I'm sure I will regret it early, but

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>what happens, I'm sneaking. We'll start with Washington. I'm I'm

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>laying the four with Washington widely available. Atlanta really benefited

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from the court Daryl Patterson kickoff return for a touchdown

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Bears. They were minus two in

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>turnovers in that first half and somehow we're tied, and

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>somehow was because largely of that Patterson kick off return

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown. They were outgained by the Bears to

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>eight eight to two eighty. They were out time of

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>possession thirty five ten to twenty four fifty. They were

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>only two of nine on third downs. Washington, meanwhile, crush

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. I don't know how much of that is

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, how much of that is Washington. I'll concede that,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but they destroyed him and Taylor Hanekey now as the

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington starter, and he is the permanent starter now. Per

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Ron Rivera four and one versus Carson Wentz to and four.

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So I am taking Washington I'm laying the four. I

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>actually think this team is headed to the playoffs, and

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to surpass the Giants. Their schedule

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>lends itself to that. I think Washington is a sneaky

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>team to sneak in to the playoffs, which brings me,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>because we're snaking here to my number two pick, which

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>is the Dallas Cowboys. Much like Aces laying the wood

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Bills, I'm laying the wood with the Cowboys

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving nine and a half, nine and a half everywhere,

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Bill Barnwell. Now we all know that that the Giants

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have been smoking mirrors this year. Bill Barnwell actually quantified

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it in an article that he wrote for ESPN dot com.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Much of it has to do with and we'll just

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>go through a few things. John's are five and one

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in games decided by seven points are fewer. The biggest

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>one has come by eight points. They've been outscored. This

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is heading into last week. They were outscored one thirty

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>one the first three quarters, but then they were magically

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty two in the fourth quarter of the game

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of games, which ranks fifth in the league. Um, you know,

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't really plan on that their defense actually ranked

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and ep A per play outside the red zone,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but somehow in the red zone inside the twenty they've

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>allowed teams to you know, they' they've allowed teams to

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>make it to the red zone the third highest rate

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on a per game basis, but they're only allowing those

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>offenses to convert thirty eight point two percent of the

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>time heading into last week of mark, topped only by

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. So really, just by the way first and

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>second down, they're the league's fourth worst defense by e

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>PA por play. Then magically on third and fourth down

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they morph into the third best defense, you know, despite

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that opposing offenses have the fifth fewest yards

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to go to pick up third downs. Against the Giants,

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>they've been third best defensive avoiding conversions. So anyway you

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>slice it, they've just magically come up big. And that

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is the bottom line of that is is unsustainable. All

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of that's unsustainable. I think about our our old pet

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>megapod co host Marco Ace, who always used to say

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a team is not as good as they were last

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>week or as bad as they were. The Cowboys certainly qualified, right,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna be every team forty two three. Let

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>alone a team the caliber of the Minnesota Vikings. But

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that defense is epic and I think they covered the

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half on Thanksgiving Day. Those are my

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>first two, Jeffrey. Just so you know, American is only

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>down four thirty six. Let's American. I don't even have

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a response to that. Spain has just scored their fifth

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>goal to make it five nil in the seventy seventy

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.239
<v Speaker 1>fifth minute. Let me just explain why I'm bringing this up.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Our buddy, Drew Dinsi, who has been a Megapod guest,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is in a side pool of a Calcutta where Costa Rica.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Where what he has is it's a side pool of

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a team, you pick a team and in

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>any one game we're talking about a one game opponent,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the most goals scored against that team is the object.

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>So he has Iran. So Iran had six goals scored

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>against them, and so he is sweating this big time

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>right now that Espana has five goals. Yeah, that's tough

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for him. He already tweeted team total Spain right now.

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>He already tweeted me r I p me. I don't

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>blame him. I'm thinking Jacksonville plus two four is my

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>second pick against Baltimore. You know, the Ravens are weird

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>because they've been up double digits in every single game.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>They have an elite quarterback, and yet every time I

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>watch him, I come away saying this is a team

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna win a division probably going away. Last week

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was another example of that, where Carolina was legitimately dreadful

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>on offense. By the way, Sam Donald starting instead of

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield this week the right move for Carolina, and

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the lie didn't move at all. Granted,

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they're playing Denver. Hackett could do Hackett things, but you

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>know what, Denver is a too and a half point

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite makes no sense either. Though it totals also thirty six,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so we're in the Iowa range as well. But if

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with Jacksonville, though, look, the analytics community loves Jacksonville. That

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>been in the top ten most of the year. I

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's mostly skewed because of what we saw week two,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>where they decimated Indian and followed it up by destroying

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert in the Chargers when Herbert was clearly not

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ready to play yet. But coming off of by Lawrence

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>has gotten a little bit better as the year's got along.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>And this is more just the fate of Baltimore. I

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know what it is, and it could

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>torpedo me yet again, but they just don't look like

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the team that everyone claims they are. And they look

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like a solid football team, but not quite. Hey, this

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>team could represent the a f C in the Super Bowl.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it. So I'll take four with Jacksonville

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at home against Baltio. I hear what you're saying about

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore too, and it makes you know. What's amazing about

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that is I still have the power ranked is like

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the sixth or seventh best team seven, which tells you

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>how bad this league is that they're six or seventh. Um.

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>By the way, about Jacksonville. Jacksonville is three and seven

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and they have a plus eleven point differential. Contrast that

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with Minnesota, who is eight and two and they have

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a minus two point differential. God number two, I'm in

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that same football game with the Jags and the Baltimore's.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to go over forty three and a half.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's the numbers that the number you guys

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have for it. It's evenly split with forty three and

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a half for me. Okay, so I can take the

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>forty three and a half, then officially over forty three

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. You tell me Gilly three and a

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>half almost every Yeah, so there you go, you're good. Okay,

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So I have Baltimore over forty three and a half

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Jags. Uh. To me, the Jags have been

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>an over team all year. Uh. They have three in

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a row unders, one against Denver. Throw that out. Denver

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>goes under against everyone. And if you watched that game,

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that was that London game and should have gone way

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>over and somehow didn't. The Vegas game twenty and it

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>went under forty eight, which is a big number. And

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>then the Kansas City game. Those are the last three.

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, prior to that they were playing they

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>played the colt to thirty four seventeen game. Uh. They

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>played the Eagles one earlier in the year. I just

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like Baltimore, after that terrible performance offensively against Carolina,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.479
<v Speaker 1>is going to figure things out. They usually get up

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the twenties. They got you know, on the road,

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they got twenty seven in New Orleans, they got twenty

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>seven at Tampa Bay uh, So, I don't see why

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to get, you know, up into

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenties against Jacksonville. And I do like Jacksonville at

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>home with their offense to you know, to give me

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>some points to I just feel like it feels too

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>low for a Jags game. Over forty three and a

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>half I'll take. Also, I just feel like the Ravens

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have been in you know, they weren't great early in

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the year offensively and I mean defensively. Remember the game

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>against Miami where they gave up a million um. They

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>blew that Buffalo game when they were ahead by a

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>zillion in the second half. I just feel like they're

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They're a team that is not great on defense. And

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just because they held the Saints in Carolina at a

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and three doesn't mean anything to me. So I'm

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna go over forty three and a half in Baltimore, Jags.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ace, you get your second and third here

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we snake. By the way, why you were in the

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys had Is there a reason for that? Just a

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>little future, a little free future to the viewers out there,

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they may want to jump the Cowboys, little value their

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>long term just giving it out there somehow me we're

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>just the opposite on the totals. Either I'm gonna have

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a big day or my man's gonna have a big day.

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna go back to Thanksgiving and for my

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>second bed. And I absolutely love the Patriots at two

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It's a money line play. That's why

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not concerned that it's off that key three, because

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I was simply looking to bet them on the money

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>line and also tie them up into teasers. They make

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful teaser up the plus eight and a half,

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>tie them up with some things on Sunday. I think

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a great spot because it's a defense that's going

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep the game close at the very least. I mean,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we know the mean absolute error and nfls ten plus points,

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so you don't want to tease a lot um, But

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some spots where I do think it does

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>make sense. And I think when you have a New

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>England defense that's playing like they've been playing, uh, the

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>teaser just makes a lot of sense to me. Um.

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Bottom line with with Minnesota, Tony is a three dollar bill.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you've heard me say that before. This is

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that big example of the team that's just phony. Um.

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the time of the year where you start to

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>look at that Pythagorean wins, um, and you look at

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>their point differential. This is not a nine eight excuse me,

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>NAT and two football team. They got a minus two

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>point differential. And I get it they got blown out

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>last week, but prior to last week, going into last week,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>their point differential was awful for an eight and one

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>football team. UM. Bottom line, Uh, it doesn't get any

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>more simpler than that. It's a fade against Minnesota coupled

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with the perfect storm of New England coming off a

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>win like they did against the Jets. I was on

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrong side of that. In fact, I had the

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Jets and watched that point return trush my plus three

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half them plus four that I had on

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the game. Um. But still you get a win like

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that off of the revision opponent when it matters, not

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Jets of yesteryear, and it's great momentum rolling

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>into this week, where on the flip side with Minnesota

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the opposite. You just got blown out. But I

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>think that late game on Sunday, I mean on Thursday,

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is why this line is still on the Minnesota side favorite.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean this should be a pick them. I really

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>do think on a neutral field records aside, New England's

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the better football team, especially that defensive side of the football,

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be able to shut them down. Uh, And

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they easily win this game. You don't need

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the points, but it's always nice to have a cushion,

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and why not take the eight and a half on

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a teaser. But yeah, I'll use the Patriots as my

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>second pick. I really like New England. On Thursday, Christian

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>darrisaw out again Piers once, so you I was just

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna I was just gonna ask him if he's concerned

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>about going against a team that lost forty three because

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.719
<v Speaker 1>typically we see in the NFL. Yes, I wanted if

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a Minnesota Vikings team that was rolling, like

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if they had outperformed the betting market for a number

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. So it's not as if like I expect

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>them all of a sudden to be looked down on,

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like they're not being faded by the betting public. I

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that, Like they came out as a three

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>point favorite against New England. Um, I don't think there's

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that rush the judgment as far as all this team, like,

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they're phony. I thought they were phony going

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>into that game. I had Dallas irrelevant. Um. But I'm

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>not afraid of that where it's a great point because

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>usually I'm a huge mean reversionist I looked for in

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all sports because we all revert back to the mean.

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just just fact of life. Every thing does, every market, equities,

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto sports. It doesn't matter you go too far one way,

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna come back the other way. It always does.

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's why when you underperformed the betting market by

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns, usually you expect the bounce back. But I

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>think that it's a perfect situation. You're on Thanksgiving, you're

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that primetime night game, you're at home, you're giving less

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 1>than a field goal, and on top of it, you're

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight win football team. God. I don't think

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they they got enough of correction off of that loss.

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been felt yet, Jeffrey. The thing

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious with New England is because I was close

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to taking New England are not gonna make my top

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>three today? How much of what we've seen the last

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>three games with New England. Is the fact that they've

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>went played against Zach Wilson, Sam Ellinger, Zach Wilson. How

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>much of that is that this defense which has been

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>great in those three games, How much of that is

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that the defense really is that good? And how much

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of it is that those quarterbacks are just dreadful, dreadful, dreadful.

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>And look, it's a pretty good case study because you're

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>getting Kirk Cousins in a prime pop game right out

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the shoot. So we're gonna we're gonna learn a

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>lot this week about Look, Minnesota is what they are.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.479
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna win the NFC North because everyone else sucks

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in that division. I I agree with Ace. I think

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>they're fraudulent as well. But we're gonna learn a lot

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>about the Patriots on on Thanksgiving Night because if they

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>are legitimately good, they do go to Minnesota win that

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>game real quickly. The a f C East, like we

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>give it no respect, but it's the only team every

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>single team is positive point differential, Like they may not

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>be the most you know, the nine and one football team,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so the eight that everyone's talking about or putting up

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of points, but every single one of those

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>teams has a winning record and every one of them

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>has a positive point differential. It's a competitive division. And

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at a team like New England, who's um, you know,

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>five and two in conference to and one in that

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>division and just sitting there at six and four and

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>not getting much attention, I think there's a lot about

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you on a team like New England again, where they've

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>lost that historical luster that they've had for decades, you know,

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the last fifteen plus years. For those wondering in the

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>NFC East, where everybody has a winning record, the Giants

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are plus one in point differential in Washington is minus

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and nine ACE. I was gonna say this for the

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, but this is a tweet from A. J.

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Caldera twenty three because I've been promoting on a numbers

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>game that you'd be on the megapod this week, and

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>he said. Some of the bingo cards elections for VRS

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:42.479
<v Speaker 1>return include one, I love this board, They're great, to God,

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>bless America. What a country? Three? What a country that's three? Fake?

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Is a three dollar bill? Did you say that earlier?

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>FACS three? That wouldn't that's a bingo? And four he

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>said prose, but not referring to athletes. You refer to

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pros all the time. Y's right, are afraid to athletes

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at all? He beats the Vegas Lifestyle Show. I think

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>on that one. All right, your number three sir, All right,

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take you into uh you know what, I'm

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick to prime time. I was gonna give you

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll share it anyway because I love to give out.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I tell you I did. I bet the Buccaneers already

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and I also bet the first half under in that

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>game sharing it out there, But instead I'm gonna take

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it a prime time Monday Night? Is that okay? If

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we go to Monday Night? Of course, because I bet

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. I love Pittsburgh. And this is as simple

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as this. Let's not get into the deep boundingly. There's

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys that are so much smarter than

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>me out there that could come on and tell you

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>all kind of data and stats and regurgitate all kind

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that isn't proprietarry, but what have you um? Anyway?

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's as simple as this. Who are the Colts

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to be favorite over anybody? It doesn't matter who it is, like,

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>what in what world, should the Colts be coming in

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as a favorite. They've done nothing but underperformed. Let's not

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>forget coming into the season, this team was expected to

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 1>win ten football games, and that's the only reason there's

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>still that. Maybe they're just unlucky, or maybe no, they're

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>just terrible. They're a bad football team and they have

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>no business being favor That to me is as simple

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>as it gets, and I get it. Pittsburgh is who

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>we thought they were. I love that go because they are.

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>There are three and seven football team. They're one game

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>under five hundred against the spread, kind of what you

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>expect um, but they're in that underdog role. And I

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>love that fact because there's just so much randomness in

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a sixty minute football game. We see it each and

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>every week. And when you have a bad football team

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>like the Indianapolis Colts in the favorites role, like in

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what world would I ever want to trade my money

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for that bet ticket? Like maybe if they're in an

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>underdogar that could make that argument, But other than being home,

0:38:56.080 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>which they're below five hundred at home, Like, what is

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there really to make them a favorite? To me, it's

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>just that simple. It's just a fade against a bad

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>football team that's favored because someone has to be I guess,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's on Monday night football and they're at home.

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think again, the Steelers are in a great spot.

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a reason for them to show up. It's a

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>prime time game. You're a young, hungry football team. You

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>know you're not going to the playoffs. But it is

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a nice, nationalized, televised game that matters for them, and

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna get their A game, and their

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>A game, which for a three and seven team is

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>good enough to beat a four and six team on

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>any afternoon Like. It's not as if it's out the

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>realm of possibility that a three and seven team beats

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a four and six team. So for me, it's as

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>simple as that. Again, not to make it any harder

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>than it needs to be. Indianapolis has no business being favored,

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>even against the three and seven Pittsburgh Steelers. Give me

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. I'll take them on the money line. Points

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are puts, it drops down, um, But yeah, I give

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>me the Steelers. It's fine time, Monday night on the

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>money line, they win this game in Indianapolis. What do

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about Well, I'll tell you. It is the

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>American Eagles take the lead against the Nathaniel Hacket of

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the college basketball coaching realm. That's Patrick Ewing. It's fifty

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>three fifty two in the games memorial. My American Eagles

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>are making it up all game plus Spain Spain. Just

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Spain just scored their sixth dying. As far as I will,

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say one thing about my boy

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Canny pick It. I haven't been real optimistic about Mr

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Pickett up until now. He did show some green shoots

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of optimism last week when he did play pretty well

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in the freezing cold tundra here in Pittsburgh. I did

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have a free parking at the River's. Most people did not,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, game day they charged sixty bucks. Anyway, Uh,

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I will say that I like that. I like ass

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 1>call air. It looks like a tomlinesque kind of ball

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>game where he just grinds it done. He grinds it

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>done until halftime, and he just keeps grinding and grinding.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Tel Maddie Ice on third and eight at seventeen sixteen

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from the thirty four plus thirty four takes a sack

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Steelers have a chance to win. This guy, oh,

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>my god. Did you did you happen to hear the

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>ESPN promo for this game? No where it's it's Buck

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on the voiceover where it's Tomlin and the Steelers, big pause,

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like bigger than usual Saturday in the Colts, where it

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds like Buck is trying with all his might, even

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>in the promo not to laugh at the fact that

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Saturday is coaching this game. Ryan pick it, catch

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the fever? What's your todd, I don't you know what

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I have. I'm just I keep looking at these games

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't like anything. But I'm gonna do this.

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And here's what I'm gonna do. If in doubt go

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to the song Miami Dolphins go over Ford to seven

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. They love to score. Two is in a

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer, but he throws the Hall of Famers.

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>We're going over forty seven with the Hall of Famer

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Davis melt Okay, do you see what happened after you left?

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>You see what happened to this thing? Yeah? You go

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>back to over Miami against Houston. Miami is your over

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>team extraordinaire in the National Football League. You cannot stop them.

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Those receivers are just absolutely ridiculous. Uh you know, if

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you put almost any quarterback with these guys with this,

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with Hill and then and Waddle, I mean, this is ridiculous.

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>The weapons at Miami have. They score into the thirties

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>every single game. Houston just had a terrible performance offensively.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We have seen them show signs of life. Remember the

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>game against the Giants two games ago where they were

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>inside the tent about a thousand times and only ended

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up with sixteen points against Miami's defense, which is not

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that great. Why can't we get a thirty seven to

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, fourteen ballgame thirty seven to you know,

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty fourteen. That gets me over forty seven, So give

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 1>me over forty seven. There you go. You've got your song,

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>your Miami Dolphins song that everyone loves. You, got your

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>yen's you're talking at So you got everything you need.

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And up and Spain scores their seventh I said on

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a on a numbers game this morning they might win

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>by a touchdown. And then there it is, and there's

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>still six there's still five, six minutes of stoppage time.

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I have costa Rica under a half. It was part

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of a parlay. So please keep no goals Costa Rica. Um, well,

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to score. This is please don't say that.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Please take that back. I won't. They won't and has

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the lead and the gilly Ice Memorial. By the way, Patrick,

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>did I die? Why did I die? Your soul is

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>dying every day. Parents. I want to give you a

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>little pro tip. You know how they have pro tips

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on visa. I'm not aware of those. Patrick Ewing ever,

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>look maybe a very nice man, but it does not

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have the chops for college basketball coaching. This is just

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a sloppy basketball team. They've been sloppy for years. They're

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>sloppier than than you've ever seen him. This year, Oh

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>my god, Patrick, didn't Patrick, you have one year where

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they went winless in the Big East. Yes, but then

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the following year they won the Big East Tournament. And

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>they because they got that lucky, They got that like

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>lucky little run. But they're terrible. They really are terrible,

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and they will just drive you crazy with the ridiculous start.

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They should be winning this game by a hundred when

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>they were Okay, okay, when people listen to this, the

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>game's gonna be over. What do you have, Todd just

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>getting out the American Plus twelve. I said it before

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I have American plus twelve. I was down seventeen in

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time. I was nervous, but Patrick Ewing brought

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>me back. This is on Twitter. This is from Seawn Underscore.

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Gaff said best ace quote was when you were talking

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>about a suspended Jamis Winston for his uber incident and

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a saying quote, you can't do that since when That's

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>why I take lift hashtag sprinkle. There you go, that's awesome,

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that's so true. The tip, I thought, who's gonna say,

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>because I'd always like to share a couple of pro TiO.

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Never pay all the money up front, never more than

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 1>half the service is going to be absolutely terrible. It's

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna can't wait to get out the door. If you

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>never want to pay off front. What are we referring

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to specifically? Wait again, he's I think he said pro tips.

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's talking about transactions between those people. I

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>believe those tips a literal pro tip. Yes, Jeff, Jeff,

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeff's too young to hear this stuff go ahead apparently

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, so I totally lost my train of thought.

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what, he had the money all of well,

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he's about to get married. He's about to he's about

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>to stop the ol cart ordering here. That would have

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>never happened. I don't only front. It would have been

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the best hour of low meanwhile, so I'll take ace

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:29.399
<v Speaker 1>plus two points in any transaction to Yeah, I think

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that's three for three on that. All right, So this

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>line just moved moved on me while we while Todd

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was talking. But I really don't care. We're gonna it's

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the same game Todd is on. We're gonna lay the

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.720
<v Speaker 1>damn lumber with the Miami Dolphins against those Houston Texans.

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's thirteen and a half now, and legitimately just got

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 1>bed in the last five minutes, so but I really

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Um, the Dolphins can't be covered by anyone.

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>The only games they've been able to be covered Hill

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and Waddle are the games that Skylar Thompson had to

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:04.959
<v Speaker 1>play and and Teddi Bridgewater had to play, and where

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jets with great corners were able to shut those

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>guys down with bad quarterback play and the Vikings gave

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>up a zillion yards they just kept him out of

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the end zone. But other than those two games, no

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 1>one can cover these dudes. These dudes are so fast.

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill is the offensive player of the year. I

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>don't care what anyone else says. If you can get

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>anything north of plus two fifty, that's a good bet. Still,

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Wattle is awesome, and the Houston Texans have given up,

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>completely given up. He's totally worthless, totally worthless. And Miami, look,

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they're in a They're in a big time race in

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the AFC East. As A said earlier, all four of

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>those teams, if all four of those teams that competent

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play, I would say all four of them would

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to actually make make a big run

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. Two of those teams don't have competent

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play. That's why New England and the Jets are

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly behind Miami and Buffalo in that division right now.

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But if Miami wants to play even three and a

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>half quarters here, they're scoring thirty five points in this game.

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason I'm not following Todd and taking

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 1>me over is Houston. Despite the fact that Miami's defense stinks,

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Houston could very easily put up a ten in this game.

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'd rather just lay the lumber. I'll take my Yeah, yeah,

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.839
<v Speaker 1>but David Smith, this is an outdoor game for Davis Mills, he's,

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>as we know, horrible outdoors, now mediocre at home. Jeff

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>has to rejigger Davis Mills thing. He's not mediocre at home.

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He's really good Gil when they play in white uniforms

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and um. By the way, the thing about Wattle and

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh and Hill, but you think about how people people

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>revere Duper and Clayton. That was all Dan Marino, and

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you just think about, like, what are the two best

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what are the best duos in NFL history. It's gotta

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 1>be it's gonna be Rice and Taylor, right, Swan and

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you in stalk in a bath? Swan and Stalworth.

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But like I really think like Hill and Wattle have

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the potential to be in that group. By the way,

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>best trio of all time, Monk Clark Sanders, best quartet

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of all time, Let's see how good you are? No, No,

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:18.359
<v Speaker 1>best quartet a white house. I know I was kidding. Gibbons, Hill,

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Jefferies and Curtis Duncan with the oilers better. Oh yeah,

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.879
<v Speaker 1>they were. They were very good. Up thirty two three.

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe in games being up. I believe that Uh

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>yea their own actually won that game. I had the

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Bills minus the two and a half. Frank Reich came

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 1>back beauty. Thank god they didn't have replay because DeAndre

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>read Touchdow wouldn't accounted forty one thirty eight. Then the

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>greatest comeback of all time. Do you know who else

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>played that same day in the playoffs? Um, Washington did not.

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a Hall of Famer who died early, who

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Reggie White? And that the Eagles was the game right

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.399
<v Speaker 1>after that ball game. It was a great game. Well,

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>first we had Indiana, Kentucky and college back Okay, okay, okay.

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Who did Who did Philadelphia play that day in the playoffs? Uh? Philadelphia,

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. I just remember they were really good

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that year. That it was the Eagles of Reggie White

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and you couldn't block them. And uh that was a

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>game right after that amazing. It was very simple. I'll

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>make a quick here, Gil, so we're not continuing. Philadelphia

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>beat New Orleans thirty six. Philly scored twenty six points

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter in that game to come from behind.

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't remember that game at all. I was

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not alive yet, Jeff was not alive. You the greatest

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>comeback in National Football League history three in the second half.

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We all remember where we were for that game. It

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>was really impressive. Where were you remember? For sure? Not

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>watching it. I don't remember Rent, so not definitely not watching.

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:04.919
<v Speaker 1>But I try to make that a happen. Honestly, that's

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the one thing. And in a lot of the people

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>don't believe me, but I really try not to watch

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>any of this stuff just because it makes you so biased,

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and after like doing it for as long as I have,

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I've won a game and lost the game every possible way.

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>And because I met Vonume like it, thought like one

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>game really doesn't matter. So I'd be sitting there like

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a crack addict looking at scores like eight like back

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in the day, picking up the score phone the call

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear him over and over again. Seriosely now I

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:36.800
<v Speaker 1>do kind of like just any other market. It's like

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I I buy suck. I don't cheer it in, like

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sitting there going yeah, tesla, yeah, go tesla.

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Right it goes, you sell it like I'm not cheering

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in Like, yes, I shorted you know who did like

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>short last week? I shorted um JP Morgan, I shorted

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan and next on mobile, like because I think

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna drop. But I'm not sitting there like cheering

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>against them, like reading every day looking at the thing.

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just if you do something for

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so long, or you get past the why you're doing it,

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like I now do it for profit, So it's just

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a it's a little bit different, like you get past

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>all the nonsense. You remember me and we've been doing

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this now for so long, Gilt. I was just thinking

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>real quickly in the time of your podcast, like how

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>how things have changed sported. It's like gam sports betting

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 1>was almost was illegal everywhere. No one like no one

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the least wouldn't want to talk about it, and yet

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>here we are now it's like they're just every commercial

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:47.879
<v Speaker 1>is about Parlay's and bet here, bet there, bet here,

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>bet there draw. When we were growing up, it was

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>like putting warning labels on cd s because it was

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like n w A. Now it's like weeks or on

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>every corner like that. Everything just like change so quickly,

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm getting I just don't take it all

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 1>so seriously. And that's why I try not to dive

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:15.400
<v Speaker 1>into watching this stuff as well, because I bet it seriously,

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you're doing it for entertainment, it's different, Like

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>then have at it, have fun that it's different, But

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:23.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing it for profit, it's just not fun

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>watching it. I don't know. Maybe I'm just different. I

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>watch everything. I feel like you can learn, you can

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>learn so much by watching. I'm just not wired that way.

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bobb used to say all the time he used

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to wear it. He used to wear it like as

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a badge of honor. He goes, gil, I don't. I

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>don't watch any of it like I used to say too,

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I just disagree because what I see is this,

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've learned from M M A that, Like we've

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 1>even know from the courts, like the legal system, the

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 1>justice system has told us that the least reliable testimony

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is I witness, Like what we see and what's that

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>really happening? It could be two completely different things. Our

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:08.240
<v Speaker 1>perception plays such a huge role where unlike with data

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and numbers, where it's irrelevant, like how you're feeling that

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>second that you're watching it, Like it's a good debate,

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a good debate argue that Golosh. I argue for Goolosh,

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got to see and you've got to agree with

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 1>agree with it's a Goolosh model because if you're just

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on the stats, you miss little certain things. For example,

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a team can be moving the ball two yards per

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>play and then hit an eight one yard play and

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.399
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden the stats look normal, and vice versa.

0:54:38.760 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you don't watch this American Georgetown game,

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't realize how that Patrick Ewing is as a coach. Also, no,

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding about that, but but but seriously, I

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 1>do believe that. And also for in game and and

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I take your point that you can be biased, but

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>if you've watched enough ball games, if you've watched enough

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.959
<v Speaker 1>ball game, I'm not talking about if you you watch recreationally.

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about if you watch hundreds and hundreds and

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:07.240
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of games, and then you can put the stats

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of a game to the what it looks like in

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in in reality you can really pick stuff out. Is

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because you can see things. But how do you do that? Seriously,

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a great conversation for the listeners. Like

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is, give you example you want me

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to give you an example. Even if I'm learning vou

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm only going to bet five sides today basketball,

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bet five sides. So realistically, I should go

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>back and watch the last three or four or five

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>games or each five of those teams, right, and they're

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I bet you, I bet you if you had, if

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you had the time to do it, it would be

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:45.959
<v Speaker 1>very worth who does? But we don't, So then what's

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the point of watching any of it? Is? What?

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I will give you an example, give you an example.

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example of where I think it is.

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's an example of where I think it is, Gilly,

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:58.760
<v Speaker 1>if we have like a minute just to do this, Okay,

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, college football games, you're gonna see a lot

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of teams averaging upwards of nine yards of play. Okay,

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're watching those games and you're seeing the stats,

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're at like the twelve minutes left in the

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, and you see a team's averaging over nine

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>yards to play, and you're watching the game, and you

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:20.879
<v Speaker 1>see why they're averaging nine and a half yards to play,

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you can bet their team total over and win at

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculously alarming rate. And I'm just giving you that

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as one example. But if you know what it looks

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>like when a team is averaging nine yards to play,

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not fictional because you've seen it so many times,

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you can take advantage of that. Gilly, do you would

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you would agree? I would agree with Todd, And I

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:43.800
<v Speaker 1>think it is I think it is a tried and

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>true debate. I think it's a great one to have

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 1>through the years. And what I was saying before Dr Bob,

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who's you know, pioneer and using analytics to predict sports.

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>He used to wear it as a badge of honor.

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably still does. He said, Oh good, I don't watch.

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't watch nearly nearly as much as

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you do. I had the hint, I had the hint

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that he probably watched more than he was letting on.

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But he thought it was like sort of a badge

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of honor. And I always used to say to my go,

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Bob, I'm not wired that way, and

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe the more that I watch it can only

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>help me. Um, that's in games, the best market there is.

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's I mean, where are you

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>going to find a game? No? No, No, in games

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a different animal. That's a different that's what, that's why,

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why, why. That's like day trading. That's a completely

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:31.360
<v Speaker 1>different animal. You have betting. You're betting time, like specific

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>moments in time, so you have to be in the moment.

0:57:35.360 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 1>That's completely different. When we're betting a game on Tuesday

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that goes Sunday your swing trading. You're not day trading.

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be right there on top of it.

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:47.919
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm saying. It's completely different. It's you either

0:57:48.080 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have an edge with your approach or you don't. It's

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an advantaged blackjack player. I could sit

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there and watch the dealer for eighteen hours. It's not

0:57:56.840 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna make me a winning blackjack player. I either haven't

0:57:59.880 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 1>approach that beats the game, or I don't like you know,

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I understand your point. I understand your going to help

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>me what I'm saying, that's mine. I think there's still

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>new ones I'm trying to learn, but I want to

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like I'm a student of betting, and that's why I

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:19.480
<v Speaker 1>asked these because I respect you all your opinions so much.

0:58:19.880 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I like to learn and that I just think there's

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 1>nuance even even even if you're not in game betting.

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I still think there are nuances there that if you

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't watch the game, like especially in the NFL where

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>everything is so tight, and you you start to pick

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.439
<v Speaker 1>up why Rabele can win games that you don't think

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:40.919
<v Speaker 1>he would otherwise win. You start to pick up why

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin can somehow find a way too with smoking mirrors

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be in the ballgame at the end of the game.

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You start picking up these little subtle clues. And that's

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a wise watch the people are not going

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to get it. I agree with you on that. It's

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>also like again like for like for Denver, for the

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Denver game, like packet thing is a perfectly the thing

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is the perfect example of this where if you're not

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:04.479
<v Speaker 1>watching the game and you look at the box score,

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like it was a coin flip game. Five things, Yeah,

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 1>five things had to happen for Denver to lose, and

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 1>six things ended up happening because quickly. So we don't

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 1>keep going on. I'm just saying if you're if you're

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just following one or team five teams, I think it

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I think if you're betting multiple markets, multiple

0:59:28.000 --> 0:59:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sports and volume. It's just too big of a task

0:59:31.520 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to follow twenty different teams in five different betting markets

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and actually study the game while you're watching it, and

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 1>then have the time to also analyze handicap the data

0:59:44.320 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you gather from that to then find an edge the

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>next time they play. Well, I think if you just

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>pick one team and religiously follow them, I think it

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:56.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But again, if you're betting five different sports

0:59:56.280 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>betting markets and betting twenty games, I just think it's

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>too typical to grasp actionable information from all of them.

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Let me step in and end this. And this is

1:00:06.640 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what makes this sports betting such a fascinating canvas which

1:00:10.200 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to argue about. Um, there's many ways to skin the

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>cat and and and one should do what works for them.

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>See what you're doing. If you're winning, God bless you,

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you nailed it. That's so true. By the way, I'm

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not even I understand Ace's point. And it was over time,

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, we gotta move on. Last pick. Speaking of

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>your comment about the Broncos, I'm fading the Raiders. I'm

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>taking the Seahawks. I've been on them all year. I

1:00:37.720 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>see no reason to uh go off that right here.

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So the Seahawks are laying three in the hook at

1:00:43.240 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>home against the Raiders. I think Geno Smith and that

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Raider and that Seahawks running game just has its way

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Raiders. Um, they're not gonna be able to

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, not gonna be able to stop the Seahawks.

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that they're able to stop the

1:00:57.160 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Raiders on the other side of the ball. I'll make

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it quick because we gotta go. We have a harder out,

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but Seahawks minus three and a half my number three pick.

1:01:04.840 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the teasers. Teasers have have just absolutely

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sucked for for all of us Ace though we are

1:01:12.080 --> 1:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we are required to come up with a two team

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>six point teaser of the week. What would be it

1:01:17.120 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for you? Yeah? The one hasn't been good this year.

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just how it goes, man, That's why everybody's been

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>getting killed that's been doing it. But I'm gonna go

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead and not long to get betters of a little

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>more action. Let's go with the Eagles on Sunday night

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Green Bay. I know it's square to square

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>as they come, but I think you get this Eagle

1:01:35.400 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>team that does bounce back and gets the win at home.

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Bottom line, it's it's again square, but I think it

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Uh. And then let's go ahead and tie

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>them up with another and also low total. You want

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to look for a low total Carolina at Denver. Yeah,

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>low total there thirty six and a half. We take

1:01:52.840 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Carolina at home all the way up the eight eight

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So let's go Carolina, let the touchdown

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and take the bird a little prime time action at home,

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>just to get it done by the game out. I

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going to take New England because you

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>loved him so much, but I wanted to give a

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>little more stuff, all right, I was I was gonna

1:02:09.280 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>say New England. Uh fits that parameter. Also New England

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh. Also, you want to say something, Jeffrey, Okay,

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were waiting, all right, Dotty, I didn't.

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I didn't realize we had a hard at,

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and that if you would have told me that had

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a hard at, I went to continue with the conversation,

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it was an interesting conversation. I liked

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to apologize it was, but we can't go twenty minutes

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on it. No, I know, I'm apologizing. I'm saying I'm

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>sorry for for for going too long. Had I known

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't hard out, I went too long anyways. Eagles

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>minus one, I'm with Ace on that. I'm take my

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Enser's plus eight and a half. I think Tomlin's gonna

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do you know, you know what he does? You know

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what he does? You know what he does? Uh say,

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is there a Mike Tomlin stat any of us know? Oh? Yeah,

1:02:55.240 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they never had a losing record. That's right, Jeffrey, because

1:02:59.080 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's as Stiller's up to eight and a half. I'm

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>with everyone there, and then against my better judgment, I'm

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna push the Titans up the seven and a half.

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm doing against the Cincinnati Bank. Why do

1:03:12.200 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you think that's against your better judge? Because the one

1:03:14.280 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that has happened this year and part of the

1:03:16.280 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>reason that I think long teasers have blown up like

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they have good offenses have blown up teaser uh those

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>teaser legs this year. So I'm a little bit concerned.

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Chase is gonna come back for Cincinnati,

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but Vybel blows up everything the other way because he

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just continues to win games with this mediocre roster he

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>has in that I'm doing the Titans because I don't

1:03:36.920 --> 1:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>think they should have been the dogs. I think they

1:03:38.920 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>should have been the one and a half point favorites instead.

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm definitely taking the Titans up through the three

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and the seven, and I'm gonna take the Panthers just

1:03:46.320 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>because i don't think the Broncos can blow them off

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the field. Sam Donald, right, So I'm going Titans Panthers.

1:03:57.000 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the Broncos stat replaces the Matt

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Rulestat as the best stat of the year. Remember the

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt Rulestat when he was the coach of the Panthers

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that if if the other team scored seventeen or more points,

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they were like one in twenty six or one in

1:04:10.160 --> 1:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, and the Matt rule administration. The Broncos now,

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>if they had scored eighteen points in regulation and all

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of their games this year, they would be nine and one.

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, God, is that bad? Instead they are they

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are they are just also ran team in the National

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Football League. And instead of being, uh, nine and one,

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>what are they three and seven? The Broncos, Yeah, three

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and seven instead, God, I just want to throw something

1:04:39.600 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>out here. Real quick. Then this now makes sense why

1:04:42.360 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the number moved into Miami. Game. Kyle Allen's gonna start

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for Houston this week. Kyle Allen started for Houston. There

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it is the Hall of Famers. The road He's getting

1:04:55.000 --> 1:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>text like, I'm starting to think Spain is better than

1:04:57.400 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Costa Rica. Um, let's see if there's any more. Oh man,

1:05:04.000 --> 1:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the tweets are coming in all this stuff. Uh that

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Pepsi guy so freaking pump to have Johnny back been

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>too damn long, if you ask me, I can't wait.

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And I hope somebody and I hope some of the

1:05:17.800 --> 1:05:22.439
<v Speaker 1>conversations go sideways already has that's for sure. Uh, Let's

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>see what else we got here? Do we learned? If

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we learned one thing, we learned about transactional, being transactional

1:05:29.160 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and never paying up front. That's the that's the you

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>don't understand. That's the hall of fame of this show

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is the Vegas lifestyle show. That's how that's how ace

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I know about the history of the Let's see here

1:05:45.440 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>do do do do do? Trying to see if there's

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>any more here a whole bunch of people chiming in

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on the old Twitter machine. Oh Christy Anders said, Mike

1:05:53.000 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>go white as the proper pronunciation, no matter how it's spelled.

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>For your boy, all right. Final two questions of every

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>megapod from the show's inception. Which of the big favorites

1:06:03.120 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely to lose? Outright? It's the first

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of the final two, and there are a lot of choices.

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo nine and a half point favorites on Thanksgiving at Detroit,

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys nine and a half point favorites at home against

1:06:15.360 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. These are massive favorites. Dolphins thirteen point favorites

1:06:20.040 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at home against the Texans, the Kansas City Omaha Chiefs

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and a half point favorites at home against the Rams.

1:06:27.800 --> 1:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Niners nine and a half point favorites at home against

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. Should I keep the Eagles in the still

1:06:33.760 --> 1:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown? Say the Eagles seven point favorites at home

1:06:36.560 --> 1:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Packers. Which ace of those is most likely lose? Outright?

1:06:41.560 --> 1:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, Sam Francisco, Yeah, Saints hadn't won a road

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>game yet here, hear me out. I mean they're born

1:06:51.760 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>one road game excuse me so far this season. But

1:06:55.760 --> 1:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>they're the type of team that has the ability to

1:07:00.720 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like come back or even keep it close, like you've

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>seen some of those games that they've lost. They put

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>up points like you saw against even Cincinnati who put

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>up thirty against them, they put up twenty six. Arizona

1:07:14.400 --> 1:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>put up forty two, they put up thirty four. Like

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they put points up and when the teams they were

1:07:18.760 --> 1:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to put up points in a sixty minute game, they

1:07:21.560 --> 1:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>could beat an opponent, and especially a team like San

1:07:25.520 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Francisco who is coming off a couple of weeks where

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they've definitely outperformed the betting market at least two of

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the last three where they've covered the spread by more

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>than two touchdowns. So you're looking a little overvalued as well.

1:07:39.960 --> 1:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good spot for a letdown for

1:07:42.240 --> 1:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. I'd like the Saints to uh, they beat

1:07:46.160 --> 1:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams last week, should roll here again. Not not likely,

1:07:50.680 --> 1:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but probable, all right, San Francisco team most likely lose

1:07:55.960 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that right to the Saints. Todd, I am the same

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thing because with Jimmy G, every time he goes back

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to past, you're just terrified. You're just you're just terrified

1:08:04.800 --> 1:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with the guy. If you bet on the forty niners

1:08:06.680 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy G goes back. I just want them to

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>hand the ball off. When I take the Niners, I

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>turn around Jimmy and give it to the guy behind you.

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't care who it is. Just

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>run the football because every time that guy goes back

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to past, I am terrified. When I have the Niners,

1:08:21.240 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, despite their record, Cousins still is more terrifying

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:27.519
<v Speaker 1>for me because there's some about his ball that he

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>throws that I'm like, that is never getting to the

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver and somehow it has gotten there. But but Jimmy

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>g throws the ball and it bounces around and it

1:08:39.680 --> 1:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>tips off this guy's hand and it tips off that

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>gud like at least telling wise, I think this team

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is the Jets of Jimmy Garoppolo to beat Aden two

1:08:51.360 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. But that's a different argument for a different day. Um,

1:08:54.880 --> 1:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I am going to just stay on brand here and

1:08:57.360 --> 1:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>do like I do every single week with this question,

1:08:59.600 --> 1:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'll the Bills to Detroit even though I don't

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>really buy that. This week, yeah, I'm gonna say Bills

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to Detroit even though I don't really buy it either.

1:09:07.479 --> 1:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But since someone asked the question, I mean, you have

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to give an answer. I Dallas was number four this

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>week for me guild. I think Dallas is just gonna

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. I do too. By the way, if I

1:09:17.920 --> 1:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>had not picked the Bills, I would have taken the Eagles.

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Not because I think Green Bay is any good, but

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know. The Eagles man look awfully

1:09:25.280 --> 1:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>shaking at me right now. All right, then the final question.

1:09:27.920 --> 1:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We live in a bizarro world. Ace. We have to

1:09:30.640 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bet every single one of these games on the side,

1:09:33.880 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but we're allowed one free pass. What is the game

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you want no part of, sir, Bears Jets sticking out

1:09:41.000 --> 1:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to me Jets because I got the way they burned

1:09:44.320 --> 1:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>me last week. So it's a little taste in my mouth. Also,

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 1>um probably again, I try to keep my bias out

1:09:52.520 --> 1:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of it, but obviously it's poked its head here. And uh,

1:09:57.120 --> 1:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you have a three in a Chicago team on the road.

1:09:59.800 --> 1:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Not thing it gets me excited about this game. I

1:10:02.439 --> 1:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if it's uh the totals off. I

1:10:04.920 --> 1:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>see some places it was all just a game. I'm

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>not uh interested in at all Jets Chicago especially do

1:10:12.479 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we know about justin field yet in this game? Eberfoosh

1:10:17.320 --> 1:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>claims he's back at practice today. Claims claims the total

1:10:21.000 --> 1:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>dropped four points, the lines moved, went up then down.

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just one of those ugly games. You forgot the

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:32.759
<v Speaker 1>most important question. What's the score? In the Vegas Memorial volume,

1:10:32.760 --> 1:10:36.519
<v Speaker 1>it's the American Eagles sixty six to Georgetown. How sixty four?

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>With just I'm int ask to know. You gotta turn

1:10:38.600 --> 1:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it on. Folks. Really can't help yourself that I don't

1:10:43.760 --> 1:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>want any part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers Cleve Brownie's. I

1:10:48.000 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what I'm getting with this Buccaneer team.

1:10:50.600 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it tom Brady good? Is Tom Brady bad?

1:10:53.560 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Is Can the Buccaneers move the ball? Can they not?

1:10:55.800 --> 1:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Are the Browns good? Sometimes they look amazing, sometimes they

1:10:58.640 --> 1:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>look terrible? Get out of game. That's my choice too.

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:04.599
<v Speaker 1>I have no clue about that game. By the way,

1:11:04.680 --> 1:11:06.879
<v Speaker 1>it's also Jacoby should be pointed out, it's also Jacoby

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Brissett's flast game as quarterback. So literally, this could be

1:11:11.640 --> 1:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>the Jacoby Brissett I don't give a fuck game where

1:11:14.600 --> 1:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he just like I'm throwing the ball like down, feel

1:11:18.439 --> 1:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like he could do whatever he wants because he knows

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun is right, is coming in no matter what, so

1:11:22.800 --> 1:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>like he could just hit Kelly called the Kelly Bidland

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from a Numbers game called the Jacoby Brissett's Yolo Game.

1:11:29.880 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, I don't know what you know

1:11:32.479 --> 1:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. By the way, the Todd wishing

1:11:34.479 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of updates for an audience of one, my good friend

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Ben Florence, an American university grant will will love the updates, Yes,

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>but we'll Ben like them in retroactively, will you like?

1:11:44.400 --> 1:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>It'll be fun? Tod met my my friend Ben in

1:11:49.520 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the past uh and introduced him to the popcorn upstairs

1:11:53.240 --> 1:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Bowling Altum, the old popcorn Hack, the old

1:11:55.720 --> 1:11:59.519
<v Speaker 1>popcorn Hack. But my my pick for this one is

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to charge is in the Cardinals because I don't know what.

1:12:03.320 --> 1:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if what the Chargers still are, I

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think they're good, but why we will Ken all and

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to stay on the field. Mike Williams going

1:12:11.200 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to even make it through the game on against the

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs and then the Cardinals just enough of Kingsbury already

1:12:18.040 --> 1:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but with no Kylie. If Kyler Murray doesn't play, uh,

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be shocked if this is a little bit tighter.

1:12:25.479 --> 1:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>But I also wouldn't be shocked if the Chargers win

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>by a billion, So no nothing for me. Dr Bob

1:12:29.520 --> 1:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>just said to his teaser of the week, New England

1:12:31.439 --> 1:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and Pittsburgh, and wrong with that? All right, gentlemen, we've

1:12:37.400 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>done all we can do. For Todd Wish from his

1:12:40.360 --> 1:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>mom's cork addict, nice job out of you today, Todd.

1:12:43.560 --> 1:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>By nice, I mean nice. Jeff Porla, so here on

1:12:47.960 --> 1:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the side, I don't hear you're saying anything to Ace.

1:12:50.600 --> 1:12:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I thought Ace was fantastic. Casts persons, excuse me, we're

1:12:54.560 --> 1:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>crescendoing to Ace. What about like the finishing of a thought?

1:12:59.320 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't you get like, why did you move? Because you

1:13:01.240 --> 1:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>cast dispersions at me and Ace? Johnny Vegas runner, who

1:13:06.520 --> 1:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>upon whose shoulders? This show was built for so many years,

1:13:09.400 --> 1:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>eight years together on this show with Marco Um. Good

1:13:13.439 --> 1:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for you, man, congratulations on all your success. Wager Talk UFC?

1:13:17.439 --> 1:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing with UFC these days? I got

1:13:20.120 --> 1:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>two shows on Fight Pass, I got podcasts and a

1:13:22.760 --> 1:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>show we're starting our fifth season. But that show actually

1:13:26.160 --> 1:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>uh Ine and uh signed a deal for a podcast

1:13:30.479 --> 1:13:33.479
<v Speaker 1>last year, so that's now about six seven months in.

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Enjoyed doing that, and the goal for twot twenty three

1:13:37.520 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is honestly more content. I haven't done enough the last

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>year or two and there's just so much nonsense out there.

1:13:45.680 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Someone has to put a stop to it. I almost

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>feel responsibility. There you go and produce a little more content.

1:13:53.520 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 1>So that's the goal for I love a great seeing

1:13:56.560 --> 1:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you man at Greek Underscore Gambler, and happy Thanksgiving into

1:14:00.320 --> 1:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you and yours. Happy Thanksgiving to everybody who's listening. We

1:14:03.320 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you being so loyal to the pot throughout these years.

1:14:06.439 --> 1:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thanksgiving, good luck with all your bets Thanksgiving, and

1:14:09.320 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday and Monday, NFL Week twelve, appreciate you listening.