WEBVTT - Good Time To Sell Oil Into Rally: Cantor's Cecchini

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg PENL podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor, find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Right now, we are looking at

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>markets that are slightly down, not perhaps down as much

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>as someone expected, after oil prices surged and continue to

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>surge even higher, the most on record in the wake

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Saudi Arabian attacks on the attacks on the

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabian oil production facilities. Joining US now Peter Checchini,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Global Market try to Global Chief Market strategistic Canter Fitzgerald. Peter,

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking the time. Let's just

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>start with are you surprised that there isn't a more

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>market sell off in US equities in the wake of

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this disruption oil production in the Middle East? Yes, good morning,

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for having me. Um. You know, the reaction

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is is about right. The broader markets are

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously uh off overall. Um somewhat frankly offset by the

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>benefit to UH energy companies with the with the spike

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and oil prices. UM. The spike and oil prices itself

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really come as much of a surprise to us,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so our our target for oil this year has been

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty to fifty five dollars on w T I UM.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>But we wrote recently that we expected UH geopolitical risk

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to come into play with spikes and oil between sixty

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five, and in fact, quite frankly, I think

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>UH this would be a time to sell oil rather

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>than to buy it. I think UH around a COO

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>in particular, has an incentive to to cure this problem

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. May not be easy, but obviously

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>UH they don't want to delay their I p O

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>any longer than they have to. So market action seems

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to be about right in response to this attack. But

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for us, you know, more broadly, UM, we think, as

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been saying, we're in the red zone for US

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>equities for other reasons. So, Peter, I know last week

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you wrote a note suggesting that the credit markets might

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be getting a little bit frothy. Give us your sense

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of what you're thinking. There. Yeah, you know, we've we've

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>been careful not to overstate this because one of the

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>things that's been going on, UH is the capital flows

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>into US high yield really because there's there are very

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>few people places in the rest of the world that

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on a risk adjusted basis, you can get the kind

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of return that you can get in US high yield.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Default rates have been relatively low, about two point one

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>percent UH for trailing twelve months. And you know, with

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with seventeen trillion dollars of negative yielding dead about to

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>trillion of that being in corporates, the flows into high

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>yield in the US have been have been pretty pretty

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>strong UM and a couple that with the low default rates.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Until one sees cash flows starting to roll over UH,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to get barish of high yield. However, the

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>signs of FRA are there where we're seeing UH pictoggle

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>deals come coming out like the corn Main deal recently.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen very many of those. I think there

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are one or two last year, but that tends to

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>be a very market topy kind of event, especially when

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>they go to pay UH dividends to LBO sponsors UM.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And so we're seeing that and even just the issue

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>wance volumes of late have been gigantic, with I think

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>last week probably the third or fourth highest on record,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>depending on whose data you look at. So so I

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think the signs in terms of issue and volumes, as

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>well as the form of the deals are are sort

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of singing to that that's froth, uh, and it's just

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>really to me a question of how much longer it

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>can last. So then there is sort of a flip

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>side to this, which is when you see froth and

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>credit markets in a real robust demand, uh, that typically

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is a positive for US equities, at least to the

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>short term. So do you view this as being potentially

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>constructive even if in the longer term not great. Yeah,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that's that's an interesting point least, and I and I

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>would generally tend to agree with it. I think in

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>most cycles, when you look at the history of credit cycles,

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>credit actually tends to to to lead equities in the

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>hig yield market in particular, tends to be pretty important

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to that. I think there are some interesting differences this cycle,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.679
<v Speaker 1>one of which is the dependence of equity markets uh,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>less so on high yield and more so on the

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>levered loan market in particular in my view, and we're

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some some real signs of frosth there as well.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, for example, of the of the names in

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the levered loan index are are now demonstrating interest coverage

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>ratios below one and a half, in leverage above seven times,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which is which is really quite something. And we're starting

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to see a trend in cash flows for those same companies. Uh.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Really the growth and cash flows for those companies is

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>close to zero at this point. So so yes, I

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>would agree with you. In the near term, I would

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>say over all credit markets are still providing support, but um,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I think in particular equities are going to be very

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to a turning cash flows, especially for some of

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>those levered names. Uh. And we're starting, at least in

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the form of the second derivative of cash flow, is

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that that rate of growth slow considerably. Peter,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Peter Stini, Global Chief

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>market Strategist for Cantor Fitzgerald joining us on the phone. Well,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the United Auto Workers Union is leading its first strike

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>against General Motors in twelve years, digging in for a

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>fight over jobs and benefits that could cost the Carmaker

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>deally for an indefinite period of time to get some

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>more details. We welcome David Welch. David is a Detroit

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>bureau chief for Bloomberg News located in our Detroit bureau

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. David, thanks so much for joining us. Just

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of how far apart you think

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the union and GM are right now. There's a key

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>issue here that I think really has them apart by

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, and that is the use of temporary workers.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>GM wants more of them because they get paid less,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they have weaker benefits that they do cut their labor

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>costs overall, but you can also get rid of them

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>much more easily if there's a downturns that kind of

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>makes the workforce flexible. They want fewer are them, say

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>they want more um and the a W wants not

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>only few of them, but they want a path to

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>make those people permanent employees. So there's not a lot

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of middle ground there. Someone's going to have to give

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on that one. Uh GM had made an offer over

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the weekend that had pretty hefty raises and I signing bonus.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>They're going to hire more than five thousand new workers.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's some job security and there. It was a

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty nice offer to start with, but that that one issue,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a big sticking point

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for them. You know, I'm looking right now General Motors

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 1>share price down three per cent and I'm wondering why

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the union is doing this now. I mean, sort of

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what what what catalyzed this strike? Well, you know, the

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the labor agreement expired over the weekend, and this is

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the one shot in four years they have

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to go out on strike and get a really good deal.

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of pent up anger over the plant

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>closing is that GM announced back in November. That's for plants,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>including a very big one in Lordstown, Ohio that President

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump has taken a personal interest in. So there was

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of anger there, especially when you have GM

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>putting out near record profits three years in a row

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and actually affirming guidance that they might hit that number

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>something close to that profit number again this year's you

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 1>have a prosperous GM plant closings, and and the workers

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are already pretty angry. They want a piece of of

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the record profits, even if we are possibly headed into

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a downturn um and and this is there one chance

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to get a piece of those profits while the company

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>still has a lot of money. So that that's that's

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the weather they're pulling at this point in time. So, David,

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the sense here early days of this strike. Is

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this something that is expected to drag on for a

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>long period of time or can this be a relatively

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>quick issue? Um? Honestly, I think this will last maybe

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a week. Because GM did with their first offer that

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the union really won't talk about yet. The GM made public,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't address a lot of the issues, and those

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>issues things like pay, things like investing a lot of

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>money and plants that GM announced as part of this

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna invest seven billion dollars in their US

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>plants over the next four years. That the Lordstown plant

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>will not get a vehicle to build, but they would

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>make a battery plant. They would build a battery and

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>wint vehicle battery plant in Wordstown and that would hire

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the workers who have not transferred out of

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>there already. And the plan in Detroit that was at

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>risk of being closed is also going to get a

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>vehicle to build, so that there were a few bones

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in there for the workers who were waiting to see

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>what their fate is going to be, but the other

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>issues could take some time. And look, there's also a

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of vaudeville here. The union negotiators have to show

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the rank and file, who, by the way, they have

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to vote to ratify the deal. They got to show

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>them that they're putting up a good fight in a story,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because the way to do that. Yeah, and it's so

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought that part of the story was pretty interesting

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that the piece that you wrote. I do have to wonder,

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 1>though it's been twelve years, right, this comes up every

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>four years that they have to negotiate a new contract,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this time is different, and they're going to dig their

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>heels in. And you said that part of what the

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>backdrop here is the record profits and the fact that

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>General Motors has been closing some plants. But you also

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the story pointed to a corruption scandal plaguing the

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>U a W as part of what is sort of

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>setting this setting the stage here. Can you give us

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>more color on that? Sure, So there's been a corruption

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>scandal at the union that's gone back for well over

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the past year, and it started at theat Chrysler. On

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>both sides, Union and man manishment people have been indicted

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and convicted basically giving union leaders graft out of a

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>union training fund in exchange for giving Fiat karist or

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a more lenient contract. That investigation has moved a GM.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>It's slightly different in that the union leaders and including

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>past president Dennis Williams and current president Gary Jones, are

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>being accused of stealing money from union charity funds and

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>community activism funds and the general fund for this lavish

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle they woven in uh, Palm Springs, California, for renting

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>villas for a month or two, expensive cigars, expensive scotch.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Is kind of crazy stuff. So the union and everybody,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>even some of the was called analysts wh watched the

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>unions say that they won't really play into this, but

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it does. I think when members don't trust you,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got to drive a hard bargain uh to get

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a deal ratified, because the membership is going to be

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>looking at any deal really scrutinizing it, saying, Okay, we

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>try these people. They're they're stealing our money to buy

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>mccalen eighteen and some good cigars. Why would I trust

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>them to give me a good deal. They've got to

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>drive a really hard bargain here. David Welch, thank you

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. David Welch's Bloombergs Detroit

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>bureau chief. Talking about that GM news the first strike

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of the labor Union in twelve years. There is that

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>surge in oil prices that we're seeing today in Brent crude.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>At one point it was the most on record as

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>reaching the highest levels since May, but jumping more than

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent. The question is how long will this disruption

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>oil production out of Saudi Arabia last what will be

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the implications for the Middle East in terms of Iranian

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>relationships with the US and Saudi Arabia. To help us understand,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in John Killed, a founding partner of Again Capital.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So John, let's just first get your impression of how

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>much oil prices are rising. Do you view this as

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a temporary blip or something that has longer lasting legs

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and potentially even a higher leg up. Well, I think

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the response has been um somewhat measured, even though it

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>was the biggest jump since the invasion of Kuwait bi

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Iraq back in the day. Um, We're gonna have to

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>see how quickly the Saudis can get the situation under control.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're claiming that they can get a good

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>portion of the production back online UM, and they're also

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>claiming that they'll be able to supply everyone as needed

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>out of available inventories that are in the country. The

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 1>big thing to watch from here really is what the

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>response is going to be. It seems now that the

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>US and a few moments ago the Saudis themselves are

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>accusing Iran of having uh done this, and it's hard

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to believe that the Saddies won't respond or the US

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>won't help them respond. But if they don't, you're gonna

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>look incredibly, incredibly weak. So it seems to me that

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll be vulnerable to more attacks and that the security

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>premium and prices is only going to inflate. John. You know,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as someone who follows these markets closely, are you surprised

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>at how much this facility, again, one of the largest

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>facilities and we're not maybe the largest facility in the world.

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>How susceptible it was to attack? UM? Yes, and no,

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>uh look to the extent it was it was cruise

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>missiles coming from Iran. If that's the case, UM, you

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>would have think they should have been picked up by

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of anti missile defense that the Saddi's have

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>purchased from the US. Drones are almost impossible to stop,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and um, the Saddies are particularly bad at it. This

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is not the first drone attack I think, as most

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people know on Saudi infrastructure, UM that has occurred. It's

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>been going on for months, and the Satti's have really

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>done nothing about it, which I have found remarkable. Um.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>They tried to put more pressure on the Hoothies and

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Yemen and and do other things, but for the most part,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>as far as the direct response goes, you know, there's

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>been nothing. So this day was almost inevitable. But if

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at the satellite imagery, you can see there

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is unbelievable precision in in where these uh these round

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>tanks that they have there that store the oil got

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>penetrated almost the exact same spot in each tank that

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>are in a row together. So um, high level sophistication.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And certainly for roll of money the Sadie's spent on

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>their defense, they should have had some kind of anti

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>missile technology uh AT in place here. So it's it's

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a remarkable failing on their part. So, John, I

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to what you were saying about

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>how the response in markets has been somewhat muted, especially

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>given the backdrop you were just talking about, which is

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of a lack of protection on the part of

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia against an attack like this. I'm just trying

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand the counter argument to that that there's loss

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of production that can be increased elsewhere, and that you know,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the US can increase shell production, this will offset any

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>decline in production out of Saudi Arabia. What do you

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>say to that. I think that's partly right. I mean,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>as far as there being any kind of you know,

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>spur of the moment US shell response that, I don't

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>buy that at all. I mean, they're not built that way.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't. Our guys don't necessarily e gals don't necessarily

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>dial up and down the production in reaction to price.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>As we all know. They just plot along pump as

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>much as they can, and and and deal with the

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>prices as best they can. There is spirit capacity out there, though,

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because of what OPEC and Russia have done to try

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to um curtail the price slide. So we know Russia

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>has spirit capacity. You a some of the other countries. Also,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>two of the other levers that are out there arguing

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>against the greater price increases is certainly the existence of

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>all the strategic petroleum reserves around the world, and China

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in particular, which has almost two years worth of supply

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to cover a complete cutoff of STATI supply to China.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, we we're sort of well banked

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of oil supplies for now. The problem you

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have though, is that this turns into any kind of

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of hot war. And it's also remarkablelives if I

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>could just stay quick. Um, the fact that these prices

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't up as much much more in light of the

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have already lost I ran in Venezuela

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>oil to the global market as well, So it shows

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you just how sloppy the situation has become supply wise

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in the face of diminishing demand. As we were speaking

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about a few weeks ago. Yeah, John, that's kind of

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>where I wanted to go. It seems like when we

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about crude oil, it's obviously trying to get a

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>handle on the supplied to demand dynamics and what had

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>been driving price. It seems to have been the demand

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation, and investors concerns that the trade

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wars and other issues would be slowing down demand for crude.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But this news coming out of the Middle East brings

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the supply story right back into focus. Here, How what

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think will be the driver of oil over

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the next several weeks, the supply or the demand or

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>some combination of the two, if the situation at all

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>calms down, and we're in the situation looked like it

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be calming down, just generally with the overtures

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that were being made to the Iranians by President Trump

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of weeks, you know, we're gonna

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>slide right back down lower. There's really no no two

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>ways about that. The key economic data that we're all

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>waiting for at a China last night, for example, was

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>horrific again, seventeen year low on industrial production growth goes

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>right to the heart of the matter in terms of

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>energy demand growth. I mean, it's just continuing to slip.

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>The U. S. China trade war is really rereaking havoc

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on these manufacturing intensive economies in Asia, and and that's

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>oil demand. Uh so, um, you know, to the extent

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't break out into a war, and it looks

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>like my sense of it is that it's not going

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to It's not going to break out into a war.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>The Trump administration wants to avoid it at all costs.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna take this one too. I guess, um and um,

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>you know it'll it'll stabilize and and head lower until

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>something else more horrific happens. So, John, I just wanna

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>wrap up with the idea of gas prices in the

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>US and the bleed through effects on the economy. Do

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 1>you think that if prices were to stay where they

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are or go materially higher, that will translate into higher

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>gas prices in the United States? Yes, I mean then

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mix. Today gasoline prices are up about over ten

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>per center, up seventeen cents a gallon. Um. You'll see

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that ripped through to the to the retail

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>pump over the course the next couple of days. It'll

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>take longer for that to go through. We're still at

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a relatively low price at the pump, but to the

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>extent consumers start to get anxious and if or if

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the price goes you know, even higher, Um, you'll see

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>another You'll see a hit to consumer confidence, and you'll

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>see a hit to UH freight rates and other industries

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that rely obviously on fuel for transportation, but also with

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store, you'll see the price of veggies whether

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.239
<v Speaker 1>things that start decline. John Kildo, thank you so much

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. John is the founding partner of Again Capital,

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us to discuss what's going on in the energy market.

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Certainly an eventful day. Well. The ongoing trade dispute between

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the US and China is whips on currency markets around

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the globe, presenting hedging challenges for a whole host of companies.

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>To get a sense of how some of these companies

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are managing that currency risk as well as their cash overall,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we welcome our next guest, Wolfgang Coaster. Wolfgang is a

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>senior strategy officer at Kirrieba based in Phoenix, Arizona, but

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg Interact their broker studio.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So Wolfgang, thanks so much for joining us again. You know,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues with this the uncertainty presented by

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the U S and China trade issues is currencies. Give

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of how well you think companies are

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>managing their currencies at the currency risk. Yeah, so I

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>think that one of the things that we're seeing is

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately it's all over them what map, Right, You have

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>some companies who do a really good job, and the

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>key thing is to actually understanding your exposures, really having

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a good grasp around where are my exposures, how am

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I exposed not just on the revenue side on the

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but on the expense sides, and what's the net impact

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of that? And then what do I do to manage

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that properly? That's really the gist of it. The execution

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of that strategy then of actually putting hedges on, etcetera,

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't as hard. So as we see these companies doing

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it the once we're doing it well are the ones

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>who are ahead of the game. I want to talk

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your company because I find it

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>really interesting and it sort of builds on what we've

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>been hearing a lot. Basically, you do liquidity management for companies,

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>right um, and what that means is helping them manage

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>their cash and risk as well as just in general operations.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's the software, uh that you that you provide

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just wondering, why is this such a growth

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>area that companies are increasingly outsourcing some of the basic

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>functioning of the way they run their businesses to software

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>such as yours. Yeah, I think that it's an evolution

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>and really over time of how things are going. And

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, treasury and finance are often the later partists

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>to the stages than sales organizations and marketing organizations are.

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So you've seen this, like you said, exactly like a salesforce.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>There typically in the forefront finance more conservative and a

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit difficult and more difficult to open up to

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that because what you have to do when you help

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>companies at the very basis of it, you have to

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>help them get at their data and that's a really

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>tough thing to do. They have these enterprise systems like

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>these Earpie systems like an Oracle, or they have you know,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>an s A P. But now they have both on.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So they have tursury management systems as one of our

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>offerings that we also have that help them manage that

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in the pre trade and the post trade era, so

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>raw data to decision. Then they'll make some decision and

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>actually execute on that, and then they need to book

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 1>that and track those transactions as well, and automating that

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was not easy, and quite frankly, being able to be

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>cloud driven made that a lot easier because installing those

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>soft wars was a very difficult prospect and quite frankly

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is a very difficult business prospect. So we're purely cloud

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>driven and that's why all of a sudden, this incredible

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>growth because all you do is you hook up your

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>API as we do it for you, you implement, and

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you're ready, ready to go, and all of a sudden,

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>year impacts are major. So you mean, we see thirty

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to fifty percent risk reductions on the currency side, We're

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing much more efficient use of capitals. So the our

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes on that are pretty significant. But you know, sometimes

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it's harder for people to say, well, my my great

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Excel spreadsheets or my this process is good. But that's

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>when it kind of that's that's kind of where I

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go. Like if I think about you know

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know the world is becoming a smaller place,

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>arguably through technology global trade, despite some of the moves

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>against globe global trade. So even small and mid sized

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>companies have international exposures. Um, how do you find some

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of these mid sized companies do they know what they're

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>doing and when they're hedging. I mean, but I think

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a Microsoft, I'm sure that's got a hundred people thinking

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>about hedging in their finance department. But I think somebod

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>these small and mid sized companies, it's probably a black

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>box for them. What do you what's your experience been there?

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, And the difficulty for these mid sized companies,

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and we see there as a major growth area for

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>ourselves as well, is you really have you need? You

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>require all these different um disciplines. So from it, let's

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>say a risk management on the finance on the form

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>exchange side A, you need really understanding purely accounting. Then

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>from that you go to really financial risk management, and

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>then you need to understand the markets. You need to

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>understand how to actually execute those things. And technology facilitates

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that because typically small to mid sized company doesn't even

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>have you know, they're not going to hire three people

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this. It's not very cost effective, for example.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But we help the largest companies in the world, like

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the one you just mentioned, do the same thing because

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for them, it's we're all over the world. We may

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have two hundred and thirty currency payers. You're gonna stick

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to the currencies. They all interact and even if they

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>hired a hundred people to do it, the technology tells

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to split a second. If you have a hundred people

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>doing it, it it will still take you four or five

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>six hours to do. Now you're right at the pulse

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. So, as we do talk about the currency

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations and which companies are sort of able to better

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>weather some of the less predictable fluctuations that we see

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>emanating from tweets, which companies to sort of hone in

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on as the as the potential benefactors frankly of a

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>lack of altility in the wake of that. Yes, so

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you have a few different categories. Let's start

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with as an investor, I first of all, if I

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 1>want to stay out of this, I'm gonna look at

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>companies that are not very international, big companies like a

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 1>General Mills. You say, listen, you know I don't want

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to I don't understand this stuff, don't know how good

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they are. Why don't understay in the area where they're

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>much more focused on growth. They only have eleven percent

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of their sales are international. So that's an interesting one

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that's very stable that's that's kind of an interesting strategy

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to just stay out of it. Quite frankly, okay, But

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>then you go into companies UM like an Apple or

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a Boeing or Texas instrument, they're really struggling with this, right,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they have macroeconomic moves, they have all these sort of things,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and what they have to do they have to go

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in there and say, okay, like a like a UM

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Texas instrument of their revenues out of China, that's a

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 1>major impact, what do I do with that? So you know,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some companies like a General Motors, they've gone really good

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at figuring out what their exposures are both on the

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>revenue and their expense set, and they try to match

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it as close as possible so they're not exposed to

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the terrorists. But then what they do, they'll actually take

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>part of it, like the Apples, etcetera doing or Flextronics

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, is doing really well. They're actually looking to

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere else. They're going to Cambodia, They're going to Vietnam.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>We all know that's big. The currency therefore strength things significantly.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So what this whole trade war does, it does, whether

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>one likes it or not, disrupt the supply chain of China,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's the intention of this whole thing at the

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. And as investors do you have

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at a are they going to be impacted

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>like a General Mills, No B. If they are going

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to be impacted, how good are they manage gen that risk?

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>And quite frankly, if you read their ten cues and

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>ten caves and you can actually figure some of that

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff out. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure. Well for having me, it's really interesting. Wolfgang Coaster,

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Senior strategy officer of Cariba based in Phoenix, Arizona, for

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our BLOOMBERGUNNA active broker's studios talking

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>about what he is seeing out of companies in terms

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of how they are planning ahead for their currency risk

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>amid the trade wars. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>abram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram Woit's one

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio