1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jay Ley, we bring 3 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:17,159 Speaker 1: you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and 4 00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:23,280 Speaker 1: international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple, podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg 5 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 1: dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Let's 6 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:32,519 Speaker 1: bring an entry, Schaps and welcol standing the chief process 7 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 1: at Strategist, Andrew. Let's start with your quotes. Quote, investors 8 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 1: face early cycle timing, increasing the mid cycle conditions and 9 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 1: late cycle valuations. Andrew, what does that mean? Yeah, thanks, 10 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 1: good morning, It's nice to be here. So, you know, 11 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 1: if you think about where we are just a little 12 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:50,240 Speaker 1: over the year, a year from the lows of activity 13 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:52,879 Speaker 1: belows of markets, you know, usually that would be a 14 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 1: pretty safely early cycle position. If we think about the 15 00:00:56,320 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: last three or four cycles, they've been you know, seven, eight, 16 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 1: nine year events, and so being one year out is 17 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:07,280 Speaker 1: still create still safely early in that process. But if 18 00:01:07,319 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 1: you think about the conditions that we have that that 19 00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:14,600 Speaker 1: very strong recovery and consumer spending, rising inflation, our economists 20 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 1: think you'll see a lot more capex spending start to 21 00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:20,319 Speaker 1: come through the system. Those are much more mid cycle dynamics. 22 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 1: Um you could throw in a peek and p M 23 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: I s to that as well. And then valuations on 24 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:29,040 Speaker 1: many asset classes look more late cycle. There they're they're 25 00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:32,240 Speaker 1: relatively expensive. That obviously varies. So this is a pretty 26 00:01:32,240 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: complex picture for investors, and and kind of deviates from 27 00:01:36,120 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 1: maybe a year ago or six months ago when those 28 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:42,720 Speaker 1: early cycle signals were much more consistent. I gotta congratulate 29 00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:45,720 Speaker 1: Andrew and having a midyear review published on May sixteenth. 30 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 1: I just think that's that's the way they do it 31 00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:51,120 Speaker 1: at Morgan Stanley. Andrew, you've got a grid showing a 32 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 1: real biased to international bias to European equities as well. 33 00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: Is pricing power and international concept or is that really 34 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:03,200 Speaker 1: be a concept for the American market? Well, like, I 35 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 1: think it matters, you know, I think it matters everywhere. 36 00:02:05,640 --> 00:02:07,360 Speaker 1: I think it will matter more in the US. I 37 00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:09,360 Speaker 1: think it's a you know, that quality theme is a 38 00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 1: more important theme for for Mike Wilson in our US 39 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:15,080 Speaker 1: equity call. I think where Europe and some of the 40 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 1: international developed markets have an advantages, you know, I think 41 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:22,079 Speaker 1: we know that the next six to twelve months are 42 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 1: going to be a real debate between good data, but 43 00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 1: this question of is that good data too good? Is 44 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 1: it going to lead to higher inflation? Is it gonna 45 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 1: lead to a central bank policy response? I think that 46 00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 1: is going to drive a lot of the market debate 47 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:38,760 Speaker 1: over the next six months. And in Europe and to 48 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:40,960 Speaker 1: a lesser extent, Japan are just in a very different 49 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:43,079 Speaker 1: part of that debate. You know they are. They are 50 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:46,799 Speaker 1: not as expensive, their inflationary pressures are not as significant. 51 00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:49,760 Speaker 1: I think their central banks will be much slower to 52 00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:52,600 Speaker 1: respond to any rise in inflationary data. So I think 53 00:02:52,639 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 1: that gives them a big advantage. And you you just 54 00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:57,280 Speaker 1: mentioned on your program, Secretary Yelling will be talking about 55 00:02:57,280 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 1: tax increases again, that's that's a story that that might 56 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: impact the US market, but isn't currently on the table 57 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: in Europe or Japan. And one thing that you're talking 58 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:10,079 Speaker 1: about is higher inflation and why that leads to your 59 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:14,000 Speaker 1: call to downgrade credit to neutral from overweight. And I'm 60 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 1: trying to understand what the bigger risk is to markets 61 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:21,560 Speaker 1: based on valuations currently higher than expected inflation or lower 62 00:03:21,560 --> 00:03:24,520 Speaker 1: than expected growth, right, I mean, these are two concerns, 63 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: and this is basically is what people are pitting themselves 64 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 1: against when they talk about the FED and being perhaps 65 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:32,679 Speaker 1: countered to their view. Where do you stand on that, well, 66 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:36,000 Speaker 1: I think for markets broadly, I think weaker growth would 67 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:38,280 Speaker 1: be the bigger risk. I think we saw that, you know, 68 00:03:38,320 --> 00:03:40,800 Speaker 1: throughout the last and I think that was a defining 69 00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 1: feature of the last cycle, the post GFC period. It 70 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 1: was all about risk to the downside. Now, you know, 71 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:48,800 Speaker 1: as much as we're all talking about inflation, I think 72 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:52,200 Speaker 1: we all need to acknowledge that, you know, growth improving, 73 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 1: inflation picking up in central banks eventually raising rates is 74 00:03:56,000 --> 00:04:00,360 Speaker 1: a incredibly normal pattern of behavior. That's that's happened time 75 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: and time and time again. So that's a very normal 76 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:05,839 Speaker 1: thing to happen as things improve, and it doesn't I think, 77 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 1: preempt the idea that we're still in a bull market 78 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:11,640 Speaker 1: things will still be better. Where I think credit starts 79 00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 1: to get into a challenge though, is that if we're 80 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,480 Speaker 1: talking about a hotter cycle, if we're talking about central 81 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:21,480 Speaker 1: banks having greater willingness to to run a higher pressure economy, 82 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 1: as our economists say, then you know that's an environment 83 00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 1: where credit investors they don't benefit. If if growth is better, 84 00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:32,279 Speaker 1: but they are still exposed. If that kind of hotter 85 00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 1: growth means that the next downturn is closer than it 86 00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:38,640 Speaker 1: would otherwise be, Andrews got to leave it there on that. 87 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 1: I'm pulled a note in the credit market. Morgan Stanley, 88 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 1: chief cross assets strategist right now on foreign exchange, we 89 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:52,320 Speaker 1: have anticipated this because he has been more brilliant than 90 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:56,479 Speaker 1: anyone I know. I'm saying week dollar, week dollar, when's 91 00:04:56,520 --> 00:04:59,280 Speaker 1: it gonna happen? We're not sure. Martin McCormick is with 92 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,799 Speaker 1: t d S Curities Mark. The dollar finally breaks down, 93 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:05,160 Speaker 1: is it enough of a break for you to switch 94 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 1: to a bit of a week dollar? Well, yeah, I 95 00:05:08,839 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 1: think we still like the medium term dollar down story. 96 00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:14,120 Speaker 1: I think there's an interesting element where the global economy 97 00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:16,920 Speaker 1: is doing pretty good. It's catching up with the United States. 98 00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:19,480 Speaker 1: We do see absolute growth levels that are favoring the US, 99 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,039 Speaker 1: but the delta of growth, which matters for currencies, is 100 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:25,039 Speaker 1: moving in a week or dollar direction. The most important 101 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:28,719 Speaker 1: factor is really again, the FED is allowing the weakness 102 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:30,720 Speaker 1: in the dollar essentially because what they're trying to do 103 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 1: is run the economy hot let inforlation run higher, and 104 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 1: they're experimenting with what feels like an MMT type narrative. 105 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:39,400 Speaker 1: So you add those things together and a dollar still 106 00:05:39,440 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 1: overvalued and we're still seeing again the global story is 107 00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:45,159 Speaker 1: is moving the right direction. So those are ingredients for 108 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:47,640 Speaker 1: a medium term dollar move lower. But I think the 109 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:49,680 Speaker 1: more interesting action is really on the kind of the 110 00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:52,440 Speaker 1: month to month, the three month, the quarterly basis, which 111 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 1: is really giving us really interesting pivot points to make 112 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 1: tactical decisions whether or not you want to overweight or 113 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,600 Speaker 1: underway currencies against the dollar in that time line. So, Monk, 114 00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:02,480 Speaker 1: we're trying to resolve a tug of wall at tension, 115 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 1: as you've pointed out, between global reflation, a global synchronized recovery, 116 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 1: US exceptionalism between that tug of wall. Right now, Mam, 117 00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:13,040 Speaker 1: what you think wins out? Yeah? I think right now 118 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:15,920 Speaker 1: we kind of have to downgrade global reflation a little bit. 119 00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:18,320 Speaker 1: It's not really about US exceptionalism. But I think what 120 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:21,080 Speaker 1: we had is obviously week n FP print and really 121 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,359 Speaker 1: strong inflation numbers. I think what we've learned from a 122 00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:27,239 Speaker 1: lot of conversations with clients is people are completely mixed. 123 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 1: It's one or the other, it's binary. Either the FED 124 00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:32,040 Speaker 1: is making a huge mistake and they're gonna have to 125 00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 1: you know, they're gonna have to really work to make 126 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:36,960 Speaker 1: things better or they fall on our side, which is basically, 127 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:39,320 Speaker 1: they're not gonna taper anytime soon and they're not gonna 128 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:43,400 Speaker 1: hike rates until about But there's definitely a debate that 129 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:46,440 Speaker 1: is very lively that the Fed could taper or start 130 00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: talking about tapering in June, July, or even at Jackson 131 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,840 Speaker 1: Hole in August. So that's live and I think in 132 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:55,520 Speaker 1: that environment, what we're seeing is reflation is starting to 133 00:06:55,560 --> 00:06:57,840 Speaker 1: move a little bit lower. Based on the mobility that 134 00:06:57,880 --> 00:07:01,000 Speaker 1: we track on a daily basis, volatier it should be higher, 135 00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:03,280 Speaker 1: inflation break even should be a little bit lower, and 136 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:05,320 Speaker 1: real rate should be a little bit higher. So in 137 00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:08,039 Speaker 1: that backdrop, that's a little bit more positive for the 138 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 1: dollar um at least on a tactical basis versus kind 139 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:13,640 Speaker 1: of the medium term outlook we just outline. So let's 140 00:07:13,640 --> 00:07:15,840 Speaker 1: push this through euro dollar right now hi the year 141 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,520 Speaker 1: on euro dollar nine in to day high back on 142 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:20,960 Speaker 1: January six, What are you looking to push this through? 143 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,560 Speaker 1: And when three right now twenty three, what are you 144 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 1: looking for on euro dollar? I think these are good 145 00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 1: fade levels. So if you're to take our right, yeah, 146 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 1: I think yeah, if you're to take our year head forecast, 147 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:35,520 Speaker 1: we're in a one eight team camp. So even at 148 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 1: the end of the year, I think we're gonna see 149 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:39,240 Speaker 1: a little bit more of a stronger dollar verse the Euro. Again, 150 00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:41,360 Speaker 1: I think most of the action effects is really gonna 151 00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:43,880 Speaker 1: come down to factors that aren't really related or big 152 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,000 Speaker 1: driver of the Euro, which is really commodity exposure, value, 153 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:51,320 Speaker 1: relative economic growth, and even the equity store. I think 154 00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:54,720 Speaker 1: the upside for the Euro that people aren't expecting isn't 155 00:07:54,720 --> 00:07:56,200 Speaker 1: going to be a central bank trade. It's going to 156 00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:58,800 Speaker 1: be an equity story. So if European equity start to 157 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 1: outperform like they have in or at least on the 158 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,480 Speaker 1: daily tracking of bt F flows, that's where I think 159 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:06,200 Speaker 1: people can be surprised by the euro. But based on 160 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:09,440 Speaker 1: the growth to carry, the value and the relative central 161 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:12,000 Speaker 1: bank policy. To me, Euro still a sell at two 162 00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:15,400 Speaker 1: and you buy it back around seventeen. So what could 163 00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:17,320 Speaker 1: be the trigger for what you're saying for for for 164 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 1: the money flooding into European equities and driving euro higher? 165 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:25,520 Speaker 1: What data points are you looking at? I think it 166 00:08:25,560 --> 00:08:27,880 Speaker 1: comes down to the growth in the vaccine catch up story. 167 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:30,680 Speaker 1: That is a big narrative now that I think is important. 168 00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:33,280 Speaker 1: But I think the problem is that there isn't enough 169 00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:35,800 Speaker 1: on the other side to say there's a bunch of 170 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:37,640 Speaker 1: factors we want to buy the Euro one. But if 171 00:08:37,800 --> 00:08:41,080 Speaker 1: the vaccine story and the growth delta are important, but 172 00:08:41,160 --> 00:08:43,360 Speaker 1: we don't see the valuation story there. We don't see 173 00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:46,480 Speaker 1: the carry argument, we don't see the yield curves deepness um. 174 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:49,280 Speaker 1: So there's a couple of elements there, and obviously commodities 175 00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:51,200 Speaker 1: is not a big driver of the Euro, and that's 176 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,559 Speaker 1: why you kind of want to look elsewhere. You're again 177 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:55,840 Speaker 1: like the Norwegian crone, you've got a hawker central bank, 178 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:59,199 Speaker 1: you've got commodity, you've got global connections. So I think 179 00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 1: with the Euro, what you would kind of need to 180 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 1: see it is it's already there in the price. Most 181 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:06,080 Speaker 1: of our models say the Euro is a little bit overdone, 182 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:08,480 Speaker 1: and that's why I'm little wary of chasing it, because 183 00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:10,760 Speaker 1: you don't have a value story along with a very 184 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:13,880 Speaker 1: stellar growth story. You have a pickup story, which is 185 00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:16,640 Speaker 1: is interesting, but it's really well known by the market. 186 00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:19,000 Speaker 1: So again I think for the equity story to work 187 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:20,880 Speaker 1: out is we really need to see what happens with 188 00:09:20,880 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 1: the German elections later this year if we do get 189 00:09:23,400 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 1: a pivot to a green lead movement kind of center left. 190 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:29,880 Speaker 1: I think MMT narrative is much better for Europe because 191 00:09:29,880 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 1: it brings capital back into Europe, no more recycling in 192 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:35,080 Speaker 1: the current account surplus, and that would be beneficial for 193 00:09:35,120 --> 00:09:38,319 Speaker 1: the Europe for the euro versus the MMT narrative is 194 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:40,320 Speaker 1: not as great for the U S because you're taxing. 195 00:09:40,760 --> 00:09:43,559 Speaker 1: You know where the marginal driver of innovation comes in 196 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:45,480 Speaker 1: the U S, which is the equity market, which is 197 00:09:45,480 --> 00:09:47,760 Speaker 1: what the dollar needs. This site, Okay, just to pass 198 00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:49,200 Speaker 1: through some from this and dig into a lot of 199 00:09:49,240 --> 00:09:50,880 Speaker 1: what you're saying, and this is going back to the 200 00:09:50,960 --> 00:09:54,840 Speaker 1: question of is fiscal spending good or bad for a currency, 201 00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:58,000 Speaker 1: And you're saying that fiscal spending in Europe could be good, 202 00:09:58,160 --> 00:10:00,960 Speaker 1: whereas fiscal spending in the U S could be bad 203 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 1: for the dollar with respect to its strength because of 204 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:07,160 Speaker 1: the taxation, it's likely to accompany it. Am I getting 205 00:10:07,160 --> 00:10:10,599 Speaker 1: that correctly? Absolutely? I think it's very critical. One of 206 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:13,040 Speaker 1: the things that is most heavily missed and I'd say that, 207 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:16,920 Speaker 1: even especially the last five years, the relative equity story 208 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:19,880 Speaker 1: is absolutely critical. If you think about why the dollar 209 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:22,520 Speaker 1: was able to rally during the Trump years, a lot 210 00:10:22,520 --> 00:10:24,920 Speaker 1: of it had to do as US equities outperformed the 211 00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:26,920 Speaker 1: rest of the world, and the US yield curve was 212 00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:29,440 Speaker 1: steepening while the rest of the yield the rest of 213 00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:32,040 Speaker 1: the world yield curve was flattening. For the dollar to 214 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:34,400 Speaker 1: really kind of make up what is I think a 215 00:10:34,440 --> 00:10:37,080 Speaker 1: weak dollar policy from the Fed, it is going to 216 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 1: need equity flows. So in a broad balance of payments context, 217 00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:43,520 Speaker 1: you're gonna have a twin deficit. What does need an offset? 218 00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 1: The twin deficit during the Trump years was offset by 219 00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:48,560 Speaker 1: equity inflows and the growth story. So I think a 220 00:10:48,600 --> 00:10:50,560 Speaker 1: big side of it here is if the Europe If 221 00:10:50,600 --> 00:10:55,600 Speaker 1: European policymakers deliver more positive growth shocks, especially again with 222 00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 1: the German elections, maybe leading to more fiscal stimulus, that's 223 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 1: an important to elopment because that gives people a reason 224 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 1: to bring capital floats back into Europe where they've been 225 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:07,040 Speaker 1: recycling them out of Europe for the past ten years. 226 00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 1: So that's where I do think it's critical. And if 227 00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:13,360 Speaker 1: the us were to tax equity markets and tax the 228 00:11:13,400 --> 00:11:16,080 Speaker 1: wealth and innovation that comes from the equity markets, that's 229 00:11:16,080 --> 00:11:18,320 Speaker 1: a that's a negative for the dollar in the context 230 00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:20,240 Speaker 1: of where the Fed's going and the global economy is. 231 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:22,800 Speaker 1: That's why again we like it lower over the medium term. 232 00:11:22,920 --> 00:11:25,320 Speaker 1: Malco smile gonna say and Mot mcoll made the have 233 00:11:25,320 --> 00:11:33,679 Speaker 1: tat Cecity is the global head of strategy. We're thrilled 234 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:37,880 Speaker 1: to bring you truly the great synergy here. Synergy, I 235 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:42,280 Speaker 1: say Craig and Michael Nathanson as we look at so 236 00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:47,520 Speaker 1: much of the distribution and content creation of our media business. Gentlemen, 237 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:50,120 Speaker 1: thank you so much for being with us this morning. 238 00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:53,400 Speaker 1: Michael Nathans and very simple hearing Craig dive in on 239 00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:58,200 Speaker 1: this as well. Get and here is adamant that the 240 00:11:58,320 --> 00:12:02,360 Speaker 1: Roberts family in Philadelphia. You must respond, what would you 241 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 1: suggest Comcast will do after we see Amazon MGM, after 242 00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:12,600 Speaker 1: we see Warner Discovery. Michael, Well, well, Tom, you're gonna 243 00:12:12,640 --> 00:12:14,640 Speaker 1: like this. I'm gonna have heard to Craig today because 244 00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 1: you always say I take his question, So let me 245 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:19,760 Speaker 1: go to Craig first. That okay, because I don't want 246 00:12:19,800 --> 00:12:26,080 Speaker 1: to s Yeah, thanks for having US back um. UM. 247 00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 1: You know, look, my guess is that while everybody wants 248 00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:33,360 Speaker 1: Comcast to do something right away, uh and and they 249 00:12:33,400 --> 00:12:38,559 Speaker 1: are clearly subscale in the streaming wars with Peacock today. UM, 250 00:12:39,040 --> 00:12:41,440 Speaker 1: I don't really think there's anything for them to do 251 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:45,080 Speaker 1: right now. I think they missed an opportunity with with 252 00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:48,240 Speaker 1: Warner Media, that the fit with Warmer Warner Media would 253 00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:52,880 Speaker 1: have been frankly, probably better than than between Warner Media 254 00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 1: Discovery and UM and and better than anything else. Why 255 00:12:56,400 --> 00:12:59,080 Speaker 1: can't they top tick that even with a seven hundred 256 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:02,920 Speaker 1: million dollar break. Let's see, because because there really are 257 00:13:03,960 --> 00:13:08,640 Speaker 1: any trust concerns number one um uh and and also 258 00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:12,800 Speaker 1: um the challenges. You know, there are some overlap issues 259 00:13:12,840 --> 00:13:16,880 Speaker 1: like CNN and MSNBC that that clearly couldn't be together. 260 00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 1: Um and then you have this problem of they probably 261 00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:24,160 Speaker 1: don't want the cable networks UM, T, n T and TBS, 262 00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 1: so you start to sort of piece part the thing 263 00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:29,560 Speaker 1: into the pieces that you that you really want, especially HBO, 264 00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:32,079 Speaker 1: Max and and frankly, I don't think that's going to 265 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:34,480 Speaker 1: appeal to the A T and T board and A 266 00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:38,560 Speaker 1: T and T. So my guess is they probably let 267 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:43,480 Speaker 1: this pitch go by with some frustration of having missed it, UM, 268 00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:45,720 Speaker 1: and that they sort of bide their time because as 269 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 1: much as everybody would like to say the last dance 270 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:50,840 Speaker 1: partners have been chosen in the game is almost over, 271 00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:53,720 Speaker 1: the reality is Peacock is not even relevant yet. And 272 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 1: if they can build Peacock into at least a relevant service, 273 00:13:57,679 --> 00:13:59,520 Speaker 1: and they've got the Olympics to help them do that, 274 00:14:00,160 --> 00:14:02,199 Speaker 1: down the road, it may be that the right dance 275 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:07,600 Speaker 1: partner is actually Amazon UM and that Amazon uh prime 276 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:11,520 Speaker 1: if whether they do MGM or not, UM could end 277 00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:15,679 Speaker 1: up being a potential suitor for for Comcast Media Business 278 00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:19,600 Speaker 1: or or somebody else. I don't think this burning urgency 279 00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:22,400 Speaker 1: to say we've got to do something today or tomorrow 280 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:26,800 Speaker 1: is actually right, all right? Michael concerned, Michael, It kind 281 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:30,040 Speaker 1: of feels like here we're getting into those really last 282 00:14:30,040 --> 00:14:32,640 Speaker 1: innings where people are really trying to make sure they're 283 00:14:32,680 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 1: not the last one standing. So Amazon MGM, that goes 284 00:14:37,320 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 1: to one of the kin of the subscale content players 285 00:14:40,360 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 1: out there and MGM and make a lot of sense 286 00:14:42,680 --> 00:14:45,600 Speaker 1: for Amazon or for some others. But how about VICOM, 287 00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:49,640 Speaker 1: CBS as well. UM, What do they do? UM? Because 288 00:14:49,680 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 1: It just makes a question that even emerged Viacom CBS, Uh, 289 00:14:53,240 --> 00:14:56,560 Speaker 1: it doesn't have quite the scale. No, it doesn't, Paul, 290 00:14:56,920 --> 00:15:00,840 Speaker 1: they can't do very much. Right, what's left are you know, 291 00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:03,880 Speaker 1: ponds on the chessboard? Right? You can go after lions 292 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:06,480 Speaker 1: Gate and can go after an AMC networks. They're not big, 293 00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 1: they're not scaled internationally. You know, this was so Creig's right. 294 00:15:11,960 --> 00:15:14,320 Speaker 1: Comcast can take your time, but this was the last 295 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 1: big global play to be had, right and after this 296 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 1: they're mostly domestic stories. So I think Vacom CBS is 297 00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:26,480 Speaker 1: really stuck, and I think for the time being, you know, 298 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:28,480 Speaker 1: Comcast will sit on their hands. As Crect said, but 299 00:15:28,520 --> 00:15:30,920 Speaker 1: there's really not a lot you can do with what 300 00:15:31,040 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 1: with the pieces on the board. It just isn't enough 301 00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:35,280 Speaker 1: scale out there. Do you with all the work you 302 00:15:35,280 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 1: guys have done, if you're just joining US worldwide? Craig 303 00:15:37,520 --> 00:15:42,000 Speaker 1: mofat Michael Nathanson with us Nathanson and this historic week 304 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:44,840 Speaker 1: for media to the two of you, and I go 305 00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 1: to Michael Mobison's classic essay at credit Suites a good 306 00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 1: twelve thirteen years ago that there's only one or two 307 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:56,320 Speaker 1: in each category. Do we need a number three streaming 308 00:15:56,480 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 1: person or number four streaming person or is can it 309 00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:05,080 Speaker 1: be just Netflix and Disney win? Well, Tom, you know 310 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:07,760 Speaker 1: we've talked too this for wire. I don't even know 311 00:16:07,800 --> 00:16:10,280 Speaker 1: if streaming is a great business, right, Like, we haven't 312 00:16:10,280 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 1: seen the proof points that streaming is a great business. 313 00:16:13,920 --> 00:16:16,800 Speaker 1: It requires tons of capital, constant refresh as you know, 314 00:16:17,480 --> 00:16:21,080 Speaker 1: it's not Google, it's not Microsoft, is on Apple. Um, yeah, 315 00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:23,320 Speaker 1: this may be a category when it's all said and 316 00:16:23,360 --> 00:16:28,440 Speaker 1: done that you know, you know, the winners get get majority, 317 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 1: but the majority is not enough to make this a 318 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:33,480 Speaker 1: category of high R o I C. Right, And we 319 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:36,200 Speaker 1: don't know how it ends up, but I think Craig 320 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 1: and I both feel that we were coming from the media, 321 00:16:39,680 --> 00:16:43,040 Speaker 1: it's going to be a worse R o I C trade. 322 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:46,560 Speaker 1: That's what we're moving towards. Fascinating And you know, Paul Swey, 323 00:16:46,600 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 1: what's so important here? And acts had a great bar chart. 324 00:16:49,280 --> 00:16:51,720 Speaker 1: I'm sure they still from Craig Moffatt and Michael Nason, 325 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:56,880 Speaker 1: but it's amazing Netflix is essentially one tenth the market cap. 326 00:16:57,560 --> 00:17:01,080 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, forget scaling here. That kind of brace me 327 00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:03,200 Speaker 1: to My question for for for both of you, is 328 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:05,520 Speaker 1: is we see the news today of Apple taking a 329 00:17:05,520 --> 00:17:08,119 Speaker 1: look at MGM okay nine billion dollars, But why is 330 00:17:08,200 --> 00:17:11,439 Speaker 1: Amazon not looking at Viacom CBS. Why are they not 331 00:17:11,520 --> 00:17:18,640 Speaker 1: looking at a much, much bigger asset out there because Netflix? Uh? 332 00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:20,320 Speaker 1: And I hate when I do it, because you're gonna say, 333 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:24,640 Speaker 1: Craig need more time. So, Craig, I was gonna say, 334 00:17:24,840 --> 00:17:29,480 Speaker 1: because Netflix has proven you don't need to own traditional 335 00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 1: assets to build a global company, right, you don't need 336 00:17:32,359 --> 00:17:38,560 Speaker 1: to buy other people's problems to scale this business. I 337 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:41,000 Speaker 1: gotta have one more question, and it's got to go 338 00:17:41,040 --> 00:17:44,000 Speaker 1: to Craig Moffatt because he's been silent. Why Nathans and 339 00:17:44,080 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 1: blathers on Craig, you you have been I went back 340 00:17:47,880 --> 00:17:50,679 Speaker 1: and looked at Mr Stevenson the day of the dreable 341 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:54,920 Speaker 1: TV speech. I mean, what does a T and T 342 00:17:55,320 --> 00:17:58,080 Speaker 1: actually do? What do they say to their employees, what 343 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:01,040 Speaker 1: do they say to the board? What's what's the ninety 344 00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:04,639 Speaker 1: day prescription for a T and T? After this mother 345 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:09,679 Speaker 1: of all failures? You know, I may surprise you with 346 00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:13,040 Speaker 1: this because I've been, as you say, very critical of 347 00:18:13,040 --> 00:18:18,399 Speaker 1: of this strategy. And I actually give some credit to 348 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 1: John Stanky Um for for being able to acknowledge that 349 00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:26,520 Speaker 1: this was a mistake. You know, you rarely see businesses 350 00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:29,359 Speaker 1: particularly this quickly. This is only a couple of years 351 00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:32,440 Speaker 1: after they bought it. Um. You rarely see businesses where 352 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: the management team that put a deal together is willing 353 00:18:36,560 --> 00:18:39,200 Speaker 1: to acknowledge that it was a mistake and unwinded. Now 354 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:41,480 Speaker 1: they to be fair, they didn't have a choice. They 355 00:18:41,480 --> 00:18:43,520 Speaker 1: were trying to fight three wars and they didn't have 356 00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:49,040 Speaker 1: the money. But what did they do just because how 357 00:18:49,119 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 1: do they compete with a juggernaut known as T Mobile. Look, 358 00:18:54,320 --> 00:18:57,320 Speaker 1: it's a real problem. There's what This deal was the 359 00:18:57,400 --> 00:18:59,719 Speaker 1: right thing for the company to do, But it doesn't 360 00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:01,760 Speaker 1: make a T and T and attractive asset because it 361 00:19:01,800 --> 00:19:05,919 Speaker 1: doesn't fix the problem. The problem was that or what 362 00:19:06,119 --> 00:19:08,639 Speaker 1: The problem they're left with is that by virtue of 363 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:11,520 Speaker 1: having spent all the money on media and and burdened 364 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,600 Speaker 1: their balance sheet, they've underspent in the wireless business. And 365 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:17,399 Speaker 1: now I don't see any future where they aren't a 366 00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:20,840 Speaker 1: third place out of three wireless work. And so they've 367 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:23,119 Speaker 1: still got a ton of wid job. You guys have 368 00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:24,960 Speaker 1: been wonderful the last couple of days. They do want 369 00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:27,959 Speaker 1: to mention, folks, We've had tons of inquiries. We protect 370 00:19:27,960 --> 00:19:31,240 Speaker 1: the copyright of all of our guests, including Craig Moffatt. 371 00:19:31,280 --> 00:19:34,040 Speaker 1: We don't protect the copyright of Michael Nathanson because he's 372 00:19:34,040 --> 00:19:37,280 Speaker 1: a content guy. But gentlemen, thank you, thank you so much. 373 00:19:42,880 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 1: Right now, in exceptionally important conversation with one of the 374 00:19:46,359 --> 00:19:50,480 Speaker 1: candidates for that June twenty two primary in New York City, 375 00:19:50,600 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 1: Eric Adams joins us with just an absolutely remarkable biography. Eric, 376 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:59,000 Speaker 1: you're lining up the indorsements, you are on a dash 377 00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:02,960 Speaker 1: to June twenty second. What is the endorsement? What does 378 00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:08,800 Speaker 1: the support you most covet right now? Really everyday people, 379 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:12,119 Speaker 1: I like to say, those blue collar rookies, not only 380 00:20:12,280 --> 00:20:17,359 Speaker 1: those employees, employees who are doing uh the construction and 381 00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:20,959 Speaker 1: other jobs, but even on my accountants, my doctors. Uh. 382 00:20:21,080 --> 00:20:24,359 Speaker 1: It's the symbol of blue collar collarism. I like to say, 383 00:20:24,920 --> 00:20:27,360 Speaker 1: heart working people in the city of New York. And 384 00:20:27,440 --> 00:20:31,119 Speaker 1: they really have endorsed my campaign because they know I 385 00:20:31,240 --> 00:20:34,679 Speaker 1: protected the city for twenty two years um and public 386 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 1: safeties to prerequisite the prosperity. And that's the symbol I'm 387 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:40,359 Speaker 1: going to brain and it's the way you got to 388 00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 1: that twenty two year career. We're not gonna go into 389 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 1: it right now because of time, but you add a 390 00:20:45,520 --> 00:20:50,040 Speaker 1: most original path to serving with the nyp D. Tell 391 00:20:50,160 --> 00:20:55,520 Speaker 1: us right now how the NYPD can change with Mayor Adams, 392 00:20:56,440 --> 00:20:59,720 Speaker 1: It's about rebuilding trust. I state I would state this 393 00:21:00,000 --> 00:21:02,239 Speaker 1: we over again, and many of my colleagues that are 394 00:21:02,280 --> 00:21:04,840 Speaker 1: running for office don't want to talk about this. We 395 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:08,920 Speaker 1: have to rebuild the trust, change the ecosystem of public safety, 396 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:12,680 Speaker 1: define the role of police, but most importantly, we need 397 00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:15,000 Speaker 1: each other. Let me tell you something. The streets of 398 00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:18,800 Speaker 1: our country in general, but specifically in New York, those 399 00:21:18,800 --> 00:21:21,119 Speaker 1: streets are going to be controlled by the good guys 400 00:21:21,240 --> 00:21:23,480 Speaker 1: or the bad guys. And I'll be done if I'm 401 00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:25,520 Speaker 1: going to let the bad guys take us back to 402 00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:28,320 Speaker 1: the days when we were having two thousand homicides a year. 403 00:21:28,560 --> 00:21:31,960 Speaker 1: I'm going to rebuild trust with law enforcement and communities 404 00:21:32,080 --> 00:21:34,879 Speaker 1: in this city. Eric. This is an incredibly important message 405 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:36,800 Speaker 1: at a time when shootings we're up a hundred and 406 00:21:36,800 --> 00:21:39,280 Speaker 1: sixty six percent year over year in April and New 407 00:21:39,359 --> 00:21:42,520 Speaker 1: York City, when people are wondering, how do you accomplish 408 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:45,639 Speaker 1: what you're looking for? Which is safer streets and preventing 409 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:48,520 Speaker 1: some of these shootings and other violent crimes from getting 410 00:21:48,560 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 1: out of control. What's your recommendation As a twenty two 411 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:53,359 Speaker 1: year veteran of the New York Police Department, do you 412 00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:57,440 Speaker 1: recommend putting plain clothes police officers in subways? What measures 413 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:00,800 Speaker 1: specifically are needed? Well, they are number of things we 414 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,199 Speaker 1: must look at, and dealing with this crime problem is 415 00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:10,159 Speaker 1: both prevention and intervention. Prevention that consists of the long 416 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:13,160 Speaker 1: term things we must do, but intervention is right now. 417 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:17,239 Speaker 1: We have three year old shot at Times Square. We 418 00:22:17,280 --> 00:22:20,200 Speaker 1: had a number of homicides and shootings in the last 419 00:22:20,240 --> 00:22:25,359 Speaker 1: few days. So it's about reinstituting a anti gun unit 420 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:28,960 Speaker 1: that is better trained, will have officers that are using 421 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:32,600 Speaker 1: their cameras properly, and we'll do what's called precision policing. 422 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:37,080 Speaker 1: We must go after the gangs and the over proliferation 423 00:22:37,119 --> 00:22:39,719 Speaker 1: of guns in our city. If we don't, we are 424 00:22:39,800 --> 00:22:42,479 Speaker 1: not going to have the economic recovery. We won't have 425 00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 1: the tourism, the business travelers, or get our offices back 426 00:22:47,119 --> 00:22:48,960 Speaker 1: up in operating. Eric, this is what a lot of 427 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:51,040 Speaker 1: people are saying. But if you don't have safe streets, 428 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:53,600 Speaker 1: you can't get businesses that already are thinking of leaving 429 00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:56,600 Speaker 1: to stay in this city. What other measures are you 430 00:22:56,640 --> 00:22:59,199 Speaker 1: going to take to keep them here, especially given the 431 00:22:59,240 --> 00:23:01,520 Speaker 1: fact that the bill for all of these services and 432 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:04,280 Speaker 1: all of these measures are racking up. And there's a 433 00:23:04,320 --> 00:23:07,080 Speaker 1: deficit that we need to address as well. Yes, and 434 00:23:07,080 --> 00:23:11,400 Speaker 1: there's also a great opportunity. Number one, thanks to our 435 00:23:11,600 --> 00:23:16,200 Speaker 1: Senate and congressional delegation, we're going to have over ten 436 00:23:16,320 --> 00:23:19,760 Speaker 1: billion dollars and similars come into our city. But the 437 00:23:19,800 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 1: real question is are we going to squander this opportunity. 438 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:26,959 Speaker 1: We have to end the inequalities that we see in 439 00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:29,760 Speaker 1: this city. And it's it's really because all of our 440 00:23:29,800 --> 00:23:33,560 Speaker 1: cities in America are just really dysfunctional. Cities are made 441 00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:36,800 Speaker 1: up of agencies. If those agencies are not aligned, you're 442 00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:39,399 Speaker 1: not going to get the results that you're looking for. 443 00:23:39,680 --> 00:23:43,119 Speaker 1: So we must attract new businesses here, become the center 444 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:47,640 Speaker 1: of cybersecurity, of technology or self driving cars. We are 445 00:23:47,680 --> 00:23:50,679 Speaker 1: too expensive to buire, acractic, and too difficult to do 446 00:23:50,760 --> 00:23:53,119 Speaker 1: business in this city. And I'm going to turn that around. 447 00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:56,439 Speaker 1: Air Canadas. I am really upset about your endorsement from 448 00:23:56,560 --> 00:23:58,639 Speaker 1: Doc Gooden. I don't know how I can do that. 449 00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:01,080 Speaker 1: I need you to get in a horseman from Ellis 450 00:24:01,119 --> 00:24:04,920 Speaker 1: Burke's the Boston Red Sox. Let's get on that today. 451 00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:08,520 Speaker 1: How are you gonna bring together in New York? Everybody's polarized. 452 00:24:09,040 --> 00:24:12,160 Speaker 1: There's like, well, I think there's foreigner candidates, Lisa, But 453 00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:16,400 Speaker 1: but Mayor Adams? How are you gonna bring New York together? 454 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:20,199 Speaker 1: The fancy people the less fancy people? How do you 455 00:24:20,280 --> 00:24:23,800 Speaker 1: do that? Day one? Well, first of all, we're going 456 00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:26,760 Speaker 1: to send out the right message. And listen, sixty five 457 00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:31,680 Speaker 1: thousand New Yorkers are paying fifty one of our income taxes. 458 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:34,040 Speaker 1: They are they are only two percent of our income 459 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:37,760 Speaker 1: tax filers. I don't join the chorus that states, so 460 00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:40,879 Speaker 1: what do they leave? No? We need them here. How 461 00:24:40,920 --> 00:24:42,920 Speaker 1: are you gonna keep them here? How are you? What's 462 00:24:42,960 --> 00:24:45,840 Speaker 1: your policy going to be to keep the upper one 463 00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:48,640 Speaker 1: percent happy in New York City so they don't move 464 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:51,800 Speaker 1: down to watch the Florida Marlins. Well, one thing is 465 00:24:51,840 --> 00:24:53,600 Speaker 1: for sure, let me tell you, I hear from them 466 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:56,720 Speaker 1: all the time. Eric. We don't feel safe every We 467 00:24:56,800 --> 00:24:59,920 Speaker 1: don't believe we can walk our streets and our community. 468 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:03,080 Speaker 1: We can't use our transit system in a safe way. 469 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 1: All New York is no matter if you are a 470 00:25:07,040 --> 00:25:09,439 Speaker 1: cab driver or a person that's in the back of 471 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:11,919 Speaker 1: a limousine. You want a safe city. And that is 472 00:25:11,960 --> 00:25:15,280 Speaker 1: something I know far too well of what an unsafe 473 00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:19,480 Speaker 1: city can do to the economic, economic environment and the 474 00:25:19,560 --> 00:25:22,080 Speaker 1: stability of the city. And I'm going to make this 475 00:25:22,119 --> 00:25:25,160 Speaker 1: city a safe place to raise healthy children and families. Erica. 476 00:25:25,400 --> 00:25:27,760 Speaker 1: Just before we let you go, this is a delicate issue. 477 00:25:27,760 --> 00:25:30,000 Speaker 1: The New York Times had a story that I want 478 00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:32,159 Speaker 1: to give you a chance to address where they were 479 00:25:32,200 --> 00:25:35,960 Speaker 1: talking about some contributions that you've taken from businesses, uh 480 00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:38,720 Speaker 1: that the city has influence on, and you have influence 481 00:25:38,760 --> 00:25:42,199 Speaker 1: on as borough president. You've called money the enemy of 482 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:46,480 Speaker 1: politics before. Do you have a response to the story. Yes, 483 00:25:46,600 --> 00:25:49,360 Speaker 1: And it's not a delicate issue for me, No delicate, 484 00:25:49,359 --> 00:25:52,800 Speaker 1: No issues delicate for me because I am extremely transplant parent. 485 00:25:53,119 --> 00:25:56,920 Speaker 1: I'm wanted a few elected officials in the country that 486 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:02,400 Speaker 1: has a for pyramid, or i should say, a compliance 487 00:26:02,480 --> 00:26:05,840 Speaker 1: officer that's on board with me. This story has been 488 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:08,359 Speaker 1: vetted so many times. I was surprised to see The 489 00:26:08,400 --> 00:26:11,399 Speaker 1: New York Times placed this on their first page above 490 00:26:11,480 --> 00:26:16,800 Speaker 1: the foe to give the appearance that any UH improprieties 491 00:26:16,840 --> 00:26:20,720 Speaker 1: took place. This has been vetted. We are clear compliance 492 00:26:20,800 --> 00:26:24,040 Speaker 1: with all the rules, and I was really disappointed by 493 00:26:24,040 --> 00:26:28,320 Speaker 1: the headline that gave the appearance of any any wrongdoings. 494 00:26:28,640 --> 00:26:33,040 Speaker 1: We have not received any type of infractions based on 495 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:36,280 Speaker 1: how we handle our procedures at Borrow Hall. I am 496 00:26:36,320 --> 00:26:39,960 Speaker 1: not impacted by money and politics. I'm impacted by what's 497 00:26:40,119 --> 00:26:43,080 Speaker 1: needed for everyday New Yorkers in Brooklyn Knights, and I 498 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:46,359 Speaker 1: have done that for over thirty five years. Eric Adams, 499 00:26:46,400 --> 00:26:49,119 Speaker 1: thank you so much. She's a mayoral candidate the June 500 00:26:50,520 --> 00:26:59,359 Speaker 1: primary vote here in New York City. Right now, Well, 501 00:26:59,400 --> 00:27:01,400 Speaker 1: it is in that say that gets your attention. Let's 502 00:27:01,400 --> 00:27:04,160 Speaker 1: get right to it. He has been our most direct 503 00:27:04,280 --> 00:27:07,879 Speaker 1: and assertive guests here on the pandemic. I'm Asha Dolge 504 00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:10,320 Speaker 1: are writing in the Hill, and I'll tell you, folks, 505 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:15,640 Speaker 1: it's real, straightforward and it gives pause as UH as well. 506 00:27:15,720 --> 00:27:19,000 Speaker 1: Let me bring that up right now. I have characterized 507 00:27:19,040 --> 00:27:22,440 Speaker 1: testing as the original sin of COVID pandemic. There are 508 00:27:22,640 --> 00:27:28,080 Speaker 1: very few reasons to test asymptomatic individuals beyond facilitating the 509 00:27:28,119 --> 00:27:34,920 Speaker 1: COVID exposed unvaccinated ending quarantine early, or the unvaccinated international 510 00:27:35,000 --> 00:27:39,240 Speaker 1: travel fully vaccinated persons as the CDC guidance state should 511 00:27:39,240 --> 00:27:44,720 Speaker 1: not be tested unless symptomatic. Dr Adlga joins us. Right now, 512 00:27:44,760 --> 00:27:47,840 Speaker 1: what's the next step? Dr Adlga, that's quite a statement here, 513 00:27:48,200 --> 00:27:52,639 Speaker 1: So then what is the best policy for America? The 514 00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:56,840 Speaker 1: best policy is to really focus on testing symptomatic individuals 515 00:27:56,920 --> 00:27:59,520 Speaker 1: and people who are exposed and unvaccinated who need to 516 00:27:59,600 --> 00:28:01,879 Speaker 1: end Corny Team early, because right now we're in a 517 00:28:01,880 --> 00:28:04,680 Speaker 1: position where we are getting false positives, because the prevalence 518 00:28:04,680 --> 00:28:07,240 Speaker 1: of infection is falling in. We're in a place in 519 00:28:07,280 --> 00:28:11,280 Speaker 1: this pandemic that we haven't been over. People above the 520 00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:14,159 Speaker 1: age of sixty five have been fully vaccinated. Those were 521 00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:16,600 Speaker 1: the people that gave us this public health emergency. Those 522 00:28:16,640 --> 00:28:19,920 Speaker 1: are the ones that we're getting hospitalized. We've increasingly removed 523 00:28:19,920 --> 00:28:22,280 Speaker 1: the ability of this virus to threaten our hospitals, So 524 00:28:22,320 --> 00:28:23,959 Speaker 1: now we've kind of gotten to a point where this 525 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:26,520 Speaker 1: is like other respiratory viruses and we have to start 526 00:28:26,520 --> 00:28:29,680 Speaker 1: thinking about it. Like other respiratory viruses, we don't test 527 00:28:29,720 --> 00:28:32,720 Speaker 1: people asymptomatically for influenza. So I think we probably need 528 00:28:32,760 --> 00:28:35,959 Speaker 1: to start ratcheting back a lot on this asymptomatic testing 529 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:40,640 Speaker 1: and focus on vaccinating people and testing people who are symptomatic, uh, 530 00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:43,280 Speaker 1: either if they vaccinated or not vaccinated. Because I think 531 00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:47,440 Speaker 1: we're in a good point, in a good trajectory. Speak 532 00:28:47,480 --> 00:28:50,800 Speaker 1: to schools right now, it's May. We got to get 533 00:28:50,840 --> 00:28:54,240 Speaker 1: to August and ramp up to September school start. Are 534 00:28:54,280 --> 00:28:58,000 Speaker 1: you saying COVID and influenza that there's little distinction, that 535 00:28:58,120 --> 00:29:03,200 Speaker 1: there's little difference when it comes to younger children. What 536 00:29:03,600 --> 00:29:06,239 Speaker 1: we find is that COVID nineteen and influenza probably are 537 00:29:06,400 --> 00:29:10,320 Speaker 1: about comparable risks. They are both, they both they both 538 00:29:10,320 --> 00:29:13,320 Speaker 1: have the same burden of illness in children. Actually, arguably 539 00:29:13,320 --> 00:29:15,320 Speaker 1: you could say influenza as a higher burden in children. 540 00:29:15,600 --> 00:29:17,920 Speaker 1: So what schools do for influenza, that should be what 541 00:29:17,960 --> 00:29:20,520 Speaker 1: they're doing for COVID nineteen. And I think it's even 542 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:23,720 Speaker 1: it's even more the case because the vaccine for COVID nineteen, 543 00:29:23,760 --> 00:29:26,600 Speaker 1: which is which students twelve years and up are eligible before, 544 00:29:26,680 --> 00:29:29,360 Speaker 1: is much more effective than the flu the flu vaccine. 545 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:31,360 Speaker 1: So I think we're in an okay place when it 546 00:29:31,360 --> 00:29:33,360 Speaker 1: comes to schooling. I don't think the pool testing or 547 00:29:33,360 --> 00:29:36,120 Speaker 1: asymptomatic testing is something that we should do in schools 548 00:29:36,120 --> 00:29:37,880 Speaker 1: because you're going to get a lot of false positives, 549 00:29:37,920 --> 00:29:39,840 Speaker 1: You're going to have a lot of disruption. I think 550 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,440 Speaker 1: that we can continue the other mitigation measures of masks, 551 00:29:42,720 --> 00:29:46,000 Speaker 1: trying to vaccinate the population, social distancing, but school should 552 00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:47,920 Speaker 1: be open now, and I don't think testing should be 553 00:29:47,920 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 1: a barrier uh for for opening for opening school? Dr Delta, 554 00:29:51,560 --> 00:29:54,760 Speaker 1: can you square the discrepancy between what you're saying, which 555 00:29:54,760 --> 00:29:56,800 Speaker 1: is essentially we're moving into a new phase of the 556 00:29:56,840 --> 00:29:59,280 Speaker 1: pandemic where it's no longer the pandemic, but it's just 557 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:00,960 Speaker 1: another illness us that we need to deal with on 558 00:30:00,960 --> 00:30:04,400 Speaker 1: a regular basis. Whereas we have Singapore locking down after 559 00:30:04,440 --> 00:30:08,000 Speaker 1: a handful of cases that have been detected in the community. 560 00:30:08,040 --> 00:30:10,760 Speaker 1: What is the potential approach that you see as the 561 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:14,280 Speaker 1: correct one internationally, especially as we see the cases surge 562 00:30:14,520 --> 00:30:18,720 Speaker 1: in places like India. So I think if you've got 563 00:30:18,800 --> 00:30:21,600 Speaker 1: a highly vaccinated population, you have a whole different menu 564 00:30:21,640 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 1: of options that are there. If you're a country that's 565 00:30:24,480 --> 00:30:27,720 Speaker 1: not highly vaccinated, like India, then your only options are 566 00:30:27,720 --> 00:30:30,280 Speaker 1: those same what we call non pharmaceutical interventions. Where you 567 00:30:30,360 --> 00:30:33,080 Speaker 1: have social distancing and you have advising people to stay 568 00:30:33,120 --> 00:30:35,320 Speaker 1: at home. All of that is something that you don't 569 00:30:35,320 --> 00:30:38,040 Speaker 1: have to do if your population is highly protected with 570 00:30:38,080 --> 00:30:40,600 Speaker 1: the vaccine, especially those high risk individuals. So I don't 571 00:30:40,640 --> 00:30:43,120 Speaker 1: think what Singapore is doing is correct. I think right 572 00:30:43,120 --> 00:30:45,160 Speaker 1: now the US is on the right policy for the 573 00:30:45,160 --> 00:30:47,560 Speaker 1: first time, probably during the pandemic, the US actually has 574 00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:51,880 Speaker 1: the correct policy where we've decoupled cases from severe severe disease, 575 00:30:51,920 --> 00:30:54,360 Speaker 1: hospitalizations and death, which is exactly what the vaccine was 576 00:30:54,400 --> 00:30:57,239 Speaker 1: designed to do. So I think that that's the policy now, 577 00:30:57,320 --> 00:30:59,760 Speaker 1: is to vaccinate your population as much as possible. In 578 00:30:59,800 --> 00:31:01,680 Speaker 1: the only reason that you should be pushing these non 579 00:31:01,680 --> 00:31:04,920 Speaker 1: pharmaceutical interventions is if you have not vaccinated enough of 580 00:31:04,920 --> 00:31:07,280 Speaker 1: your high risk populations and you're worried about your hospitals 581 00:31:07,320 --> 00:31:10,360 Speaker 1: going into crisis. We've removed that ability in the United 582 00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:13,560 Speaker 1: States by vaccinating those high risk individuals. Dr. Dodger. We 583 00:31:13,560 --> 00:31:16,200 Speaker 1: also are looking at strains and other variants, and people 584 00:31:16,240 --> 00:31:18,400 Speaker 1: sometimes point to that to say, look, we need to 585 00:31:18,400 --> 00:31:22,040 Speaker 1: still remain vigilant and still remain cautious with respect to 586 00:31:22,120 --> 00:31:24,920 Speaker 1: tracking the virus and making sure that you take social 587 00:31:24,920 --> 00:31:28,400 Speaker 1: distancings precautions, and do you think that's fearmongering. Do you 588 00:31:28,400 --> 00:31:30,520 Speaker 1: think that that's sort of unnecessary given the fact that 589 00:31:30,560 --> 00:31:33,080 Speaker 1: a lot of the the vaccines have shown to be 590 00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:38,280 Speaker 1: proved effective against some of these strains. Definitely, when when 591 00:31:38,280 --> 00:31:40,880 Speaker 1: you have a fully vaccinated population, a high percentage of 592 00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:44,080 Speaker 1: your population fully vaccinated, those variants, even the more problematic 593 00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:46,600 Speaker 1: variants like one three one from South Africa, they are 594 00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:50,240 Speaker 1: still unable to cause serious disease, hospitalization in debt. Certainly, 595 00:31:50,280 --> 00:31:52,840 Speaker 1: if you're an unvaccinated person, those variants do pose a 596 00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:55,000 Speaker 1: risk to you, and if you're a unvaccinated country, it 597 00:31:55,040 --> 00:31:56,880 Speaker 1: can be a real problem, as we've seen in places 598 00:31:56,960 --> 00:31:59,480 Speaker 1: like India. But I think that the variants are something 599 00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:01,920 Speaker 1: that are vack scenes are very robust against. So the 600 00:32:02,000 --> 00:32:04,680 Speaker 1: solution to the variants is to get vaccinated into vaccinate 601 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 1: as much of your of your population as possible. Door down. 602 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:10,600 Speaker 1: You always gonna hate from me, sir as, always come 603 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:12,920 Speaker 1: back soon, dtr MESSI down to Dow Jones, Health consense 604 00:32:13,320 --> 00:32:17,440 Speaker 1: to house security, Sania Scalta. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. 605 00:32:17,680 --> 00:32:21,080 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to 606 00:32:21,160 --> 00:32:25,200 Speaker 1: ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television 607 00:32:25,560 --> 00:32:29,560 Speaker 1: each day from six to nine am for insight from 608 00:32:29,600 --> 00:32:34,120 Speaker 1: the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And 609 00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:39,400 Speaker 1: subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg 610 00:32:39,440 --> 00:32:43,160 Speaker 1: dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, 611 00:32:43,160 --> 00:32:45,200 Speaker 1: and this is Bloomberg