WEBVTT - No Jacket Required: Inside the World of New School Wealth Management

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Trains. I'm Howeer and I'm Eric belx Junas Eric. I

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>live a desk life, but every once in a while

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you get to go on the road, not only from

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Philly to New York, which is like a weekly occurrence

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>for you, but also to trade shows. Yeah, occasionally, I

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>think I go to like three a year maybe, but

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the first of its kind, right, normally go

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to Inside et s maybe one other one of course

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>our events, and then this one was new for me,

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>and it was done by the rit Holtz Wealth Management,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which is very on the show Josh Brown. You a

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on Bloomberg Opinion regular Yeah, a lot

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>of people know them from Twitter. They all have a

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>ton of followers. They are advisors, but they're not your

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>grandfather's advisor. They're kind of very cool about it. Their

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>fee base, they use low cost index funds, some active,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>They're on Twitter a lot, and I think they're leading

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what's a sort of move away from the traditional both

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>style and strategy of a wealth manager or a broker.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And so this conference really was to me the future

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of the wealth management industry in a nutshell. A lot

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of independent young advisors who were there really to learn

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>how to get better. A lot of it was on technology,

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>how advisors use technology, and E t F s frankly

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are a technology so a lot of them were E

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>t F users. I talked to a bunch of people there.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Um it was sold out seven people people first time. Yep,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they're already planning a second one in California next year.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Where was this one? This was in Scott's Dale, Arizona.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And some of the sessions included like tech as a

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>catalyst for growth, direct indexing, liquid alto e s G,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing your brand on social Media. I was in a

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>panel discussion called Battle the Pundits, similar to that one

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I do in Well. They didn't judge this one, but

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I felt I didn't you know that it was early

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. Was eight in the morning. So Todd rosenblooth,

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>as you know he I think he was straw stirring

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the drink this time. He took a few friendly shots

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Dave myself and he got us going. But

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>mostly I think we're pretty pretty calm up there. You know,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody was really doing anything too crazy. We were just

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to give our take on the market and ets.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>This time on Trillians Eric's dispatch from Wealth Stack. Okay, Eric,

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>so you went to Wealth Stack with a recorder. Who

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was the first big fish that you got? Josh Brown? Um, Yeah,

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I men him a bunch over the years.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He's really great, really personable, and uh he's on Twitter.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>He's amazing on Twitter, and he his handle is at

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>reform broker um and you can see his fingerprints all

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>over this conference. So I thought let's start with him

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's really the mastermind, him and his company behind this,

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>including inside ETF. So I gotta give hi a lot

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of credit. They are master conference organizers. So here's just

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Goalie event and wy Arizona. We have,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the leading technology companies that serve advisors.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, I'm just turning the game down a little there,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>go am I too loud for this? Yeah, I saw

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a little red. I didn't want to blow it out,

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so you can see it just come down an Alright.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We have most of the practitioners who are forward thinking

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and progressive advisors, and then we have most of the

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>financial technology providers that are serving this audience. So it's

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>very engaged audience, young advisors, a lot of energy, and

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the networking is really what brings the whole

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>thing together. So why Scottsdale in September. It's a hundred degrees, Like,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the logic there? We're not very bright eric um,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So Scottsdale in September. You know what, it's a beautiful hotel,

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a great venue. We really don't want people milling

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>around outdoors. There was a hike this morning led by

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Dany Egan from Betterment took a whole group of advisors

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up into Camelback Mountain. Two dead and of course we

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>pray for their families. Did people really die? No? Okay, good.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure some came close to it, but it's it

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>was again a hundred degree hike. I saw some photos

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>from there. It was kind of cool. A lot of

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>people took early morning hikes up to the mountain. The

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>idea of having it more, yeah, the idea of having

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an events somewhere where most people did not want to

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be outside, I think was sort of the rationale they

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>were giving. And by the way, you know that, um,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that one was a little loud. There's a gain on

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the mic, and so excuse the little hiccups, and I

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like get better as we go. You'll

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>see the This is why we typically have our colleagues

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do the field reports. That's right, Um, okay, So next

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one is just I thought it was cool because it

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was very casual. I did not bring slacks. I wore

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>jeans the whole time, and that was completely the right move.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobody there had a tie on, and may many people

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>were even more dressed down. I mean I thought so.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Some some people were in T shirts. I dig it.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I personally think this is where things are going. I

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it. Here's josh On on the casual attire. I

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's the sense that a previous generation of advisors

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>they were extraordinarily image conscious and they were always worried

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about saying the wrong thing and coming off too casually,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to have gone away. And I think

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this generation of advisors it's more about the substance and

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the ideas and less about who's wearing a suit. You

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>know who like we you know, none of us are

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to look and act like our fathers. We're trying

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be our own people, and I think we want

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>our clients to understand that we're real and we're authentic.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Um and We're not putting on a show for them,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>We're we're being ourselves, and I think that resonates. I

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.559
<v Speaker 1>think it works really well in this era. So having

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the conference that was slightly more laid back and fun

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and youthful and energetic, it just made perfect sense to me.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>How many flip flops? Well, on Sunday I saw a

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>lot that was the sort of half conference half like

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hanging up by the pool day but Monday not not really. Um,

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>some some people in sneakers, but mostly people had shoes.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel about it if somebody's in flip flops

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>managing your money? That one step too far on a

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Monday at the conference? Probably I think that's a little

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too far. But the common dress was

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a shirt jacket, jeans. Uh. Some people just

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>had a short on like a um dress shirt on. Um.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>There was you know, a couple of people who were

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>a little more dressed up than that, But like I said,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it was very casual, more casual than inside ets, which

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is pretty casual as it is. How do you feel

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>about it when people at Bloomberg wear shorts to work

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>like the R and D guys. Just in general, I

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>get jealous because they're so in demand they can just

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>come to work in shorts and it's fine. I saw

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>one guy once and I was just like coders, No, No,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think that's appropriate. It might be

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a summer Friday, but like, dude, you're at work. No,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.239
<v Speaker 1>there should be some level decorum, and there was. People

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>look kind of cool. I gotta say so again, this

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is all part of a package that an advisor. Advisors

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>interact with the clients, and so I think it says

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot about what the industry is going. Totally. Who

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>else did you see? So? Nate Dacy, who is the

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>host of another E t F podcast called et F Prime,

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>also a friend because I was on the one last week,

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>so um, and Nate's had me on a bunch of times.

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>His podcast is really good. They do it out of

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City and it's real, um, real easy to understand.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>They really break it down. I love it. It's called

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>et F Prime. Anyway, he was there and he talked

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about tech. Tech was a big thing here because if

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you are a client out there with a wealth manager,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>your expectations for how to interface with them are changing.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And he addresses that if you think about how clients

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or how everyday people interact with technology. Is so Amazon, Uber, Netflix,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that's their expectation when it comes to financial advice as well.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Those companies, for better or worse, And I would say

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for better, have set client expectations around what technology and

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>what what that should look like for them. So I

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>think as an advisor we have to be thinking about that.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, this one resonates with me a little bit

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because if you dabble with any sort of robo platform,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty amazing how good it is. And then

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to like a bank and you know, check

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>your bank balance and it's like, man, I can barely

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>even transfer money around here. It's amazing how how good

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten um in a very short period of time.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And and and he's right, you think about like a a UI,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like a Netflix, and it's got to be like what

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is driving financial services now? Yeah, there was a couple

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>presenters who talked a lot about this, so I think

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a big part of it. There's a guy,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Eric Clark from Oriyan who provides a lot of this

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>back office technology. What he said was interesting and I

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>tweet this out of a lot of activity. Some people agreed.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Some people didn't, which is that the advisor value proposition

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>used to be investments. You know, I can get to

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the mutual funds, I can get you this now, or

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the stocks now. It's planning, right, because investments are cheap,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and he thinks it's going to migrate to the client

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>experience in the future, as even planning gets priced down

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>by the robot. So client experience was a big one again.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>And this is where I think Ridholtz has a lot

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>going for it because you know them, they're writing a

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>lot there. They're adding value in all these different ways

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>because again, every time something is value, it tends to

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>get priced down and commoditized. So he's trying to stay

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead of that process. Okay, so we've we've talked to

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys who helps organize it. We've talked

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to you know, a peer of yours with a rival podcast.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Who else we got, uh Nicole Boyson, who is a

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>finance professor of Northeastern University. Do you know her before? Yeah?

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I met her um on Twitter, but then in person

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I met her at the Democratized quant Conference which is

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>down at Villanova every year. Anyway, she's really smart, Um,

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>she was down there because of course she teaches, but

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>she also does a lot of work with writing papers

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about brokers and advisors, and some are both, Like you know,

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a Goldman could be both a broker and an advisor,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but the payment systems of these how you get paid

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is different, and that incentive has really completely changed the

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>whole apparatus. As on they moved from broker to a

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>fee based advisor, and this is that move is why

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Passive is so big. So I asked her to just

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>explain that move. And most people at this conference probably,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I wouldn't give a percentage, but a high

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage are fee based advisors not brokers. I love that

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an academic is actually studying that. So I mean, in

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the old days, you know, you're a broker and you

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>get paid by the mutual fund. And then that started

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to shift in more and more advisors became fee based advisors,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and then within that space, more and more of the

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>fee based advisor said, you know what, I'm gonna go

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.119
<v Speaker 1>out on my own. I don't want to be affiliated

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with a broker. I'm gonna start my own shop really

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>focus on holistic financial planning, getting away from the transaction

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>based way of being paid. And I think that this group,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a young group, it's a vibrant group. People are

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>really excited about serving their clients, and there's a huge

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>push I think in two ways. I mean, one is technology,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to really leverage technology so that you can focus

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on time with meeting with clients as opposed to you know,

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>running an Excel spreadshea and trying to figure out what

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>their assets look like. And then I think the other

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>piece is really really serving clients in ways that probably

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we're more lip service before. So really integrating estate planning,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>really integrating kind of college planning and big picture planning

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and looking at a client's um you know where they're going,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just here's your canned allocations see you

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in a year. She really, I think nail the whole

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>concept here. It's just aggressively, relentlessly increasing your value proposition

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>so you can stay a step ahead of all the

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's getting priced down. I mean that's why I

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting that like Barry and Co. Are actually

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the ones doing this right like there. I mean they

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>epitomized this absolutely. I mean I have this idea for

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a book called The Big Long which is sort of

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>tracking some of these fee based advisors who started this

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>early on and who have been pretty optimistic about the market.

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the big short inspired a bunch of people

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to be very nerdy and call bubbles like It's like

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just the way Gordon Getko inspired a bunch of people

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>who want to rule the world. I think the Big

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>short inspired bubble callers, and these guys have remained optimistic.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>They fought back, and it's worked just staying long, staying optimistic,

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping people on a plan, investing not to gamble, but

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from the value created by people who go

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to work every day at these big companies. So this

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>again small companies. You're right, So, uh, this is definitely

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>again a whole mindset that's different in many different categories here.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's why we're covering. I think that's

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>why I went. And I think, uh, that incentive again,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>how you get paid, is such a big reason behind

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.599
<v Speaker 1>the rise of passive because once your your fee is

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of your client's assets and you know what's up,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of like, well, I'm not gonna pay a lot.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I I just wanted a lot of broad exposure, and

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll pick and choose my battles of where I go active,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise just give me cheap beta, all right, Who's next? Um?

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Next is Tyrone Ross um. Tyrone Ross is a startup advisor,

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a crypto advisor. He advises millennials. How much crypto was there,

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, A little handful, not a ton. Surprised, No,

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, crypto really goes with the youth,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and so because it was younger, there was definitely a

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>crypto element there. But again, most of these advisors are

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>managing regular people's money and crypto isn't a huge part

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of any portfolio it anyway. He also says he's a

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>voice for the voiceless on his Twitter and I met him.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He is a great guy. We talked to him about

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>doing good because I think the idea of these advisors really,

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think have this. They really want to help, and

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 1>I think not just helping people retire with assets and

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>being able to like do the things they want, but

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>also giving back. And Tyrone recently joined with Exponential ETFs

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>to do investing classes and teaching in Detroit in inner

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>cities to try to get more people into it because,

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the income inequality gap a big part

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of it is because half the country isn't in stocks,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's driven a lot of the wedge between the

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>really rich people and those who don't have it. So

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he talks about that when you break it down into

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>those who are unbanked, underbanked, and and getting too the

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>class structure of it you have, you get into people

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>who have no access to the market at all. So

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>those that own assets over the last ten years, like

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, so now creating awareness around what an e

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>t F is, right, awareness around where when you go

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>into your Sofi account or you have an Acorns account

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're actually putting money to work. This is

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're investing in those small steps basic education. I

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think now you start to get people exposed, right, you

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>start to educate people, and you start to put them

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in a position where now they say, okay, this is

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole world. I knew nothing about what are the

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>next steps. I lived it. He's like an activist. Yeah,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's really true. I'm e t s

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>can be bought for you know, there's no minimum investment. Well,

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just just get your hooks on the market.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Good things happen. Literally, we've had multiple people on already

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about technology and how transformative, how e t s

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are technology play and you think about how easy it

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is to like do something on your phone. All you

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>need is the awareness. So if somebody like that it's

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>going to a city like Detroit and trying to make

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a difference, it's really interesting. Another thing about Tyrone is

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I find him to be bleeding edge when it comes

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to fearlessness on social media. He'll he's an extract guy,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and he will do He'll tape himself on his iPhone

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>after working out, just giving his thoughts on random things.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It takes a brave soul to do that. He talks

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about the authenticity that's needed and it is helpful and

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>social media and social media was a big part of

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this because a lot of younger clients are going to

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>look for you on social media not in traditional forms.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You're a little bit like that, especially with the Eagles. Yeah,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I tweet my thoughts sometimes, specially at sports,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but I don't. I'm just not they're whipping up my

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>phone and like you know, at my house and just

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>saying like a reaction on something. But I've seen like

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>sports anilists to it, like Stephen A. Smith will do

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it sometimes and it just seems like that's where things

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are going. And people like that because it's like unpolished,

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>fast take. Yeah, it's a difficult thing to do, right

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You You open yourself to a lot of ridicule on

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>social media period when you post anything, let alone being vulnerable.

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think what I want people to do is

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that talking about the your weaknesses, right, things that

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you've gone through your experiences. Everyone has a story. Not

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>just want people to tell their story because I think

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>if we do that, they were not so divided, right

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and and and we can understand what it means to

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be a black man versus a white woman versus to

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be someone who comes from affluence but to someone who doesn't.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a struggle in everybody's story. No one is exempt, right.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We all live life, and life will test you in

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>their certain trials. I've seen him tweet out stuff that gets,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, exponential more likes then corporate handles that tweet

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>out stuff that you can tell has been approved by

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteen lawyers, and he has a fiftieth of the followers

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>as that other handle. So he's what he's doing works,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and it again it's showing your weakness. Being honest, it's hard.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>We gotta hang with this guy. We should have mon

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Um down the road. Who's next next is

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Patrick O'Shaughnessy. He is an asset manager quant and he's

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>also got a podcast, invest Like the Best, which is

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>really great, a highly recommended. I was on it once.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>When I went on it, I got like three followers.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Like this guy is has a lot of influence out there.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>He basically unveiled something called Canvas, which is what we

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about direct indexing. It's a tool where you just

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of flip a few knobs, put your interest in

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and the advisor is able to give a customized portfolio.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Skip the E t F and just get what you want.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, you want the SMP minus one or two stocks.

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>We can do that. You want this and this and

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>then the only. The cost will be based on how

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>much active share you have, so they don't charge you

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for beta only active share beyond that. So it was

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge, very easy to follow, and I think this

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>could resonate. You know, I've been skeptical and direct indexing,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but this presentation I think made me move the needle

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for me a little bit so here he is talking

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. Canvas is an investing platform software that allows

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>advisors to design deeply customized strategies for all of their clients.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a big trend, this idea of customization. I

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>think technology has only just caught up to the point

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that we can actually do this and implement it. So

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>no matter the client's circumstances and preferences, the low basis

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>stock they own, um, the things they care about, the

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>stocks they don't like, the E s G. Considerations they

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>want in the portfolio, all of these things can now

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be tailored sort of a fingerprint portfolio to each individual,

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>so they can get something from the advisor they can

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>get elsewhere that's better wrapped around their circumstances and preferences.

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>That sounds great. Why have you been hard on this? Well,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that brings us to our next interview. I went back

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to nature a CI who is an advisor in Missouri.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's got clients. I asked them, here's why

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>A three basis point e t f to gives you

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the whole market and like another one for fixed income,

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they take care of all bunch of stuff that you

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>don't realize. I mean you outsource a ton of stuff

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for four basis points. That is a seriously good value proposition.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is trying to replace your whole portfolio. It's

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not like saying, hey, give us like a little tiny

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>piece like a like a like a fun would be

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like hey just put two percent in me. This is like, hey,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>use us instead of all your E t F. So

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>again you're going, yeah, absolutely out. I will say I

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I like I said, I'm this was a great presentation.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I heard talk to some people who said

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for certain clients this will be great, especially once the

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>one the newest stuff, or might be very picky about

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>what they like or E s G focused. But here's

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Nate talking about what why he is skeptical to use

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>it for his clients at least right now. The value

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>proposition of E T S is so compelling right now

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that I do think direct indexine is going to have

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a difficult time significantly penetrating that market. I think the

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>best use case for direct indexine is E s G.

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And one of the comments was made on the panel

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that use ad on today the Battle of the E

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>t F pundance, that direct indexinge will swamp the demand

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for E s g e t S. I agree with that. UM,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>outside of that particular use case, I just wonder direct

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>indexing to me, you're adding active management into the process.

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have tracking error even if it's minor, and

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so as an isser, do you want to bring that

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>into the cold UM? I think that's a what are

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the costs going to be? I don't think we know

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the costs are gonna look like, So you

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>have transaction costs inside of the direct in vaccine was

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an asset management fee I'm assuming layered on that.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And so going back to how compelling a value proposition

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>E t f s are right now, how how big

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of a tax advantage is direct indexing going to be

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to overcome the potential for tracking error the additional cost.

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you are adding complexity into the process because

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's something else that has to be explained to the

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>end client. These are all questions that I think need

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to be answered. And there are questions that I had, Well,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's the bearercase. Yeah, and I talked to UM the

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>O'Shaughnessy folks uh before coming on. They said they had

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>three hundred people sign up for demos on their website.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So look, we'll see I think we should do a

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>whole episode on direct indexing at some point. I think

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we even having Patrick on and just diving in would

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>be a good idea. You can tell there's a lot

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of meat here. Totally, We're doing it. Okay. Next uh,

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Next up, we have around with your recorder looking for

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>people to talk to. Would you would you fund? Next

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>we have Ben Carlson also at Ridholtz. You know this

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>last bury saying passive bubble, YadA YadA. Every quarter there's

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>somebody who says passive bubble and then somebody ends up

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>reading a rebuttal of why it's maybe not true. Ben

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was the guy this time. So I just asked Bend

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know a lot of these advisors are using

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>passive and index funds and ETFs um. Do they ever

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>get swayed by these you know, pretty famous hedge fund

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>types calling and saying passive is has problems or it

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>could cause a problem. And I just asked him about

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that because he wrote the last defense piece, which I

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend reading at at Wealth of common sense dot com.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>But here here he is talking about why he defends

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>passive right and We get questions from clients on this

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff too, like they see this, it can't ignore it obviously.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we got to look at it like any

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>time there's going to be a crash, there's gonna be

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a narrative attached to it, and so people want to

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>get like a head of that crash and attach an

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are up to it now. But there's always been crashes

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>before index one existed, So so we want to get

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead of those questions and put context around it and

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>try to tell people like, listen, you're you're basically talking

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about the entire stock market here. The stock market has

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>always been crazy. Index funds aren't gonna make that any

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>crazier than it already was. Right basically saying, look, I

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you own an X funds, you own a bunch

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of stocks. If you own to active mutual fund, you

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>almost the same stocks everybody's in these big caps. It's

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>not like the index fund is sound crazy derivative. That's

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>his point, and um, I'm with him. I think it's

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Next next we have Kean I'm going to butcher.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>His last name Salada, and he is a E. T.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Fisher or there a couple of et f fishers here.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't there be It's a room full of advisors

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>dream Um. He was there and I talked to him

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>about just being a small issue or they have a

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of niche products. Um they have maybe uh, I

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think it was a hundred and ninety million in assets.

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Just asked him about like trying to sell to these

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>advisors who were tended Lean, black Rock and Vanguard, and

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>he said he was getting some traction from the younger crowd.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>For us, it's all about differentiation. So with the limited

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>people that we do have, I mean, we every one

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of our seven strategies that we have at this point,

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>we're just we're trying to bring something unique to the

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>market or put some unique spin on it because we

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's really the only way that you're going

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to get adoption outside of you know, a two or

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.479
<v Speaker 1>three basis point index fun um And and it seems

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to resonate with some of the younger and more up

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and coming advisors more so, I would say, um, got

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the older generation is not as into that sort of thing,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but the younger guys, I think I have something to

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>prove what their clients and more of their clients are

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>also younger and wants something different. Wait, what is this

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>guy's on? So key on is reality Shares Reality Shares.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the tips you might know is that they

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have a blockchain ETF. They're one of those issuers, but

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the bigger ones. Is Divvy, which is

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the Reality Shares divs et F and it it tracks

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>dividend swaps. It's a way to play a actual divoting

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>growth exceeding expected divoting growth. So it's a really complicated product.

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But um, I think that's sort of what he's saying,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>is that you you know, you can't just put the

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>S and P in and you know, maybe a different order.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that's getting priced down severely. He's

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to innovate, UM and he's going out there and

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to find younger advisors. And it's interesting that he

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>said that, I thought, because when I think of someone

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like that out there at a conference, first of all,

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you gotta hustle. So I commend him for doing that.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I am so surprised that we're not more small issuers there,

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because these are younger, smaller advisors who might take a

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>chance from a smaller issuer that said, Um, this is

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>how you have to try to go forward, but it's

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for indiasures. So you're out there hustling, you

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with a microphone, hustling around. Who do you see that

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you hustled over to? Next? Next was the exact opposite

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a big issuer. Um I didn't see. There was one

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>guy from Vanguard there who was on a panel. I

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't see any black Rock, but there will um. Sue

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Thompson from State Street Spiders was there and I basically

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>talked to her about what we've talked about occasionally. We

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>haven't an episode on it, but the fact that some

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>et f issuers are now becoming advisors and compete with

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>their clients, State Street has come out and said we

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>will not never do this, and so I sort of

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>asked Sue about whether that would or could give them

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>an advantage or and or make makes it a little

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>easier for her to walk around the place like this,

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>knowing that she's just talking to clients and not competitors. Also,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>when you think about State Street Bank, our parents, they're

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>known for being a custodian to all of these asset managers,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and so our partnering with asset managers are our partnership

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>is part of our DNA. Competing against our clients is not.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're gonna more and more get to

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the place where advisors are going to be valuing that UM.

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking to an advisor the other day

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>who had recently lost a very significant client to an

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>e T F issuer that has a direct business and

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>was not happy about it at all. And you know,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult if you're an advisor and you're charging

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a hunder basis points and you've got a large et

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>F issue where that's charging thirty five basis points, you know,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>where's that gonna What is that going to do to

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>your business? Long terms? Do you have to think about that?

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Knives out? Knives out? And the thirty five makes me

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's either Vangard or Swab. Those are the two

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 1>big ones. And honestly, those are the e T s

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of r i as advisors love their

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>cheap beta right and but now everybody has cheap beta.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Spider's got a line of cheap Beta. Investco has a

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of cheap Beta. Goldman and JP Morgan are also

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>launching their lines of cheap beta. All these products you

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.239
<v Speaker 1>can get basically everything from the seven BIPs. So there

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>are now options and so stay Street sort of saying like,

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know you love Vanguard and Schwab, but

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we're actually not going to compete with you and make

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that difficult. I haven't seen it maybe hit the flows

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fully yet. I think Spider's cheap Beta line has taken

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in cash. Not sure if it's for that reason per

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>se or just the fact that there's cheap offerings and

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a big salesforce. But this is an interesting

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>concept because throughout this whole conference, as we talked about,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea was always working on your value proposition, getting

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>your game better, because there are these big firms that

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>can scale and they can drive that price down because

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's job and Vanguard charge thirty and that's the that's

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>when you come in cheap, Like if you have like

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's ten million dollars, Vanguard will do it

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for like five to ten BIPs. I believe it speaks

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to like where the asset management industry can go there.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's only so many places that you can go.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean you might have the scale, but like where

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna get some money? This brings us to

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a bigger issue, which is that everything's consolidating. You know,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>advisors get a little more fee, right, one percent sounds

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty good to an asset manager. They can't sell anything

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>over ten, so I get the move over there. Um.

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I think probably headed for a world where a lot

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of big asset managers are also advisors, and it's like

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the airlines, there's a couple of giant ones that do

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>almost everything for you, and then on the fringes you'll

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>have these sort of more smaller specific r A A

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>s that have more local connections or something. Same with

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>asset managers that do more boutique work, alternative work, stuff

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you can index. Um. So, I think part of what

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>these guys are doing is trying to trying to make

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that they're providing that value add and that human

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.239
<v Speaker 1>touch and that experience so they can't be victims of

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the vanguard effect. Who is your next victim? Next victim

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and final victim? Was any massa are very own? Yeah,

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>she was on a couple of weeks ago talking multi factor.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>She was there. She moderated a panel about like macro,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the macro scene. You know, what's the election gonna hold

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing that was more panel you see

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in most places. I think that was a general one.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But of course all these advisors are concerned about the

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>election and this, and I asked her about that. But

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what really struck me on the interview was had nothing

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to do with work. Annie used the opportunity to go

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona, take a few days off and go on

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like a field trip around the Grand Canyon and hiking,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, it sounded great. I was jealous,

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I asked her about her, uh, you know,

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>her trip, her trip before the conference. So I took

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days and did an Annie goes West

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>road trip around Arizona. So I went up to Sedona,

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw the Red Rocks, hiked around there. It's the

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hundredth anniversary of the Grand Canyon National Park being in

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Ation Park, so I went to celebrate the centennial. I

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>hiked a couple of trails into the canyon, and you know,

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I just saw the sunrise, staying until sunset, I watched

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the stars come out like I'm never going home. Basically,

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they had nothing to do with work. Absolutely nothing. Now

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side was my experience. Even though I

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>had fun at the conference, I got there and I

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on East Coast time, so I woke up at like

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>four in the morning, and when I finally flew back,

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't go to sleep until one o'clock in the

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>morning because I had adapted to West coast. So I'm

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>shot right now. But um, Annie, I think she did

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it right. Took a few days off. She looked fresh

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and relaxed, and I was a little more like um,

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more tired and exhausted. But I you know,

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the conference did give me a little bolt of adrenaline.

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I really ran on fumes for a while and UM,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like I said, UM, I got a lot out of it.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And what do you guys to say to Barry Ritholtz

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>see you next year. I've probably seen him before that.

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I run into Barry in the pantry sometimes, so UM,

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I would just tell him that he did a great job.

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good event. And I think

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the material. It's not just the advice world.

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the vibe. I feel like they're just tapping

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>into the modern vibe of finance. It's not like it was.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And these guys are really I think at the tip

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of that spear of this big, broader change from a

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>more stereotypical Wall Street to a new, more relaxed, um

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>collaborative world with jeans. By the way, what was the

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>highlight of the of the whole conference? You mean, like

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the parties and stuff so um. Well, the first night

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they had a Sunday night football party outside. Now mind you,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a hundred and ten degrees, so they had these

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>fans blowing water. It was wild, like water fans, that's

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>how hot it was. But everybody sat there and drank

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>beers and watched the Patriots blow out the Steelers. Then

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I went out to dinner after that with a lot

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of the E. T. F nerds who I was on

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a panel with the next day, probably had a little

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>too much to drink, although I was probably I was

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>embedded a decent hour, but again I got jolted awake

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at four five am something like that. And then Tuesday

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>night everybody went out because they got this DJ scribble

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>who I'm not up on my DJ's but Josh Brown

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>claims he's amazing, And there was a big party. I

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>did not go to that. I was shot and I

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had to get up early the next day to go home.

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was a moment in time that you

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>were up to h I mean the nineties, forget about it.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I would have been right there. I would have closed

0:31:54.200 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that place out. I would still be up. So that

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you're okay, I gotta I gotta go. Thanks for listening

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions until next time. You can find us on

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify, and

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>wherever else he likes to us, we'd love to hear

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Balcrino's. Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levi is the head of Bloomberg Podcast. Bye