WEBVTT - The Lesser of Two Crab Claws, Part 3

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Can

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we're back with part three in our series on a

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>symmetry in animals when the left and the right side

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>do not match. If you have not listened to parts

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>one and two yet, why not go back and do

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that first, then you'll be all caught up. But in

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the last episode of this series, we were talking about

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>asymmetrical development in the clause of the American lobster or

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Homarus americanus, and how during larval development, the lobsters previously

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>symmetrical clause differentiate into one real thick boy. It's a

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>crusher claw, it's gigantic, it's got like moler like teeth

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on it, and it's got slow muscle fiber. And then

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the other one turns into a sharper cutter, pincher claw

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 1>that can close very fast because of its fast muscle fiber.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about attempts to pin down exactly why

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and how this happens at this these early stages in

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>lobster development. But there are other crustaceans where the mismatch

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>between left and right is much more extreme than it

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is even in the American lobster. And I think we

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>should begin this episode by considering the male of the

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>many species of fiddler crabs. So fiddler crabs comprise it's

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>not just one species of animal, its many species within

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a family of crustaceans known as O. C. Pot to

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 1>day And uh. Once again, I think we keep saying

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it during the series, but this is one you should

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go and look up pictures of because you need to

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have it in your head. In some species, male fiddler

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>crabs have one claw that grows not just bigger than

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the other one, not not even just significantly bigger than

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the other one, but hilariously bigger than the other one. Yeah. Like,

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like going back to lobsters for a second, you'd be

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>forgiven if you were just not aware of the fact

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that lobster has had this different this this difference between

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>one claw and the next. Uh. You know, certainly many

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>illustrations I'm thinking, like restaurant logos and whatnot, may not

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>even bother to make one claw look different from the other.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But with the fiddler crab, it is very pronounced. It

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is it is absurdly different one side from the other. Yeah.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And for a bit of experts summary on what life

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>is like for your average fiddler crab, I wanted to

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>quote from a New York Times interview I was reading

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>with a researcher named Sophie L. Moles, who is a

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>scientist at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge and has done

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>some research on fiddler crabs, including the use of a

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 1>robotic fiddler crab claw that I want to come back

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to later in this episode, but just in summarizing fiddler

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>crab life, she says, they live in burrows and you

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>only see them at low tide. At high tide, they

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>go back into the burrow and they seal it up.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>They feed on mud flats by sifting the sediment through

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>their mouth parts and eating micro organisms. That's the buffet

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of life. You just sift the mud in your mouth

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and get the microbes out. But Moles goes on. The

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>female has two little claws to normal size claws for

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>her which she uses to help that feeding, to help

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>pass the sediment up to her mouth. The male has

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one that it uses for feeding, and the other is huge.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It's greatly enlarged to the point that it can be

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>approximately half of his body weight. It's often really brightly

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>colored as well. Now, what the males do is they

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>wave this claw in a species specific pattern. So each

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>species of fiddler crab has its own kind of wave,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and they do this to maintain a territory but also

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to attract a female. Uh So, for for a rough

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>analogy on the size and appearance of a fiddler crab claw,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>uh just imagine an adult human that had one normal

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>sized right hand, but then a left hand with a

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>digit span of about four ft in that hand washs

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>eighty pounds. Yeah. One uh. One example of this is

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that is Brobabing, a book I'm going to reference in

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit Um Animal Weapons by Douglas j Emlyn. Uh.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He says, if you're if you're basically if you're at

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>the store, go pick up the largest bag of dry

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 1>dog food that you can find and start carrying it around,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and that will give you approximately what we might think

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of is the male fiddler crab experience. So yeah, so

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine the largest sized bag of dog food. Not just

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you're carrying it around, but that is one of your hands,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and again the other one is regular sized. So what

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with having a crab claw that big. Well,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that the main theory explaining this asymmetric

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>size difference in fiddler crab claws is much like the

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>main theory for explaining the narwhal tusk, that this hugely

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>asymmetrically exaggerated feature found in males is probably primarily a

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sexually selected trait, meaning it's more important for maximizing reproductive

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>success than it is for direct survival value, though it

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>may be in part reproductively attractive attractive to mates because

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of some value it has in helping maximize like burrowing. So,

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, things that have been cited are that a

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>male that has a very big claw can also probably

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>dig a very big burrow, which is better for a

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>female to go into to incubate her eggs. And also,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like crustaceans, tend to just keep getting bigger as they

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.679
<v Speaker 1>as they grow as they grow older, So a bigger

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>crab with a bigger asymmetric claw is also probably an

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>older male, which is good in crab mating terms because

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that probably means he has served I have more seasons

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of life, and is just generally fitter, better able to

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>survive and has good genes. Yeah, yeah, And I mean

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the obvious display here too is like, look

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at this thing I have grown. It is so big,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet I am still alive. I am able to

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sustain myself. Plus this massive claw, it's like the sports

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>car of the crab anatomy. Yeah. That that's another thing

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that has often been put up. There's sort of a

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>theory in some sexually selected traits in biology that says, well,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they may operate on the basis of essentially advertising a handicap.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They offer a good faith display that even by working

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>at a disadvantage, you're still fit enough to to do

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>well within your environment by having this ridiculous thing attached

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to you. So a male fiddler crab is running around

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>also basically advertising. I mean, this would be true of

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>all the males with the big the big claw, and

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that they have basically have to their capacity to eat,

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. So these crabs eat by shoving mud and

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to bring into their mouths, and that's true for males

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and females, but of course you can't do that with

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that gigantic claw. So essentially the male fiddler crabs they

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>got them one good eating hand. Whereas females have to. Yes, absolutely,

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know this is something that that that Emelyn

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>gets into an animal weapons um, basically getting into just

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the energy costs of having this gigantic claw. Uh So

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>some of this is gonna be repeated what we just said,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but it all kind of builds together. So, first of all,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>male fiddlers, he says, burn a lot of energy just

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to have these, just to you know, develop them and

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>carry them around resting. Metabolic rates of males with big

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>claws are almost twenty percent higher than females due to

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the cost of the claw. And then, of course, on

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>top of this, you're gonna have to scamper around. We

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>see everyone out there. I think it's probably seen crabs

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about doing their business on the beach. You've got to

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>scamper around, You've got to run with that giant claw,

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and so this is going to be energetically demanding as well.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I can how fast can you run holding that

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>dog food bag? Exactly? Yeah, this is this is where

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he originally brought up the dog food bag. But um,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he also cites a study This one was really fun.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>This is two thousand seven study that was published in

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Functional Ecology by Alan and Levinton, and they were testing

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this out by putting male fiddler crabs on treadmills, little

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>treadmills inside of air tight boxes. Now, sadly I could

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not find photos of this that I brought up the

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>original paper and there were no photos or illustrations, so

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I only have my imagination to go on. Here. This

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is the shrimp shrimp on a treadmill paper that you

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>promised in previous parts, right right, Yeah, shrimp on a

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>treadmill for anyone not familiar, That frequently brought up as

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there was an actual shrimp on a treadmill study, and

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it was used as an outrageous example of like, look

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at what the scientists are doing. They won't cure cancer,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>but they'll put a shrimp on a treadmill. And as

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed in the show before, that's that's kind of ridiculous.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are not the scientists that would be

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>developing the cure for cancer. These are the ones that

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>would be studying, say, the metabolic rates of shrimp or

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in this case crabs, right there, not mutually exclusive pursuits

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to begin with. But then also sometimes you don't even

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>know what benefits that new knowledge about animal life could

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>lead to down the road. Yeah. Absolutely, And so the

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>study put the crabs on the treadmills inside of the

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>air tight boxes. And you might be one of will,

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>why the air tight box It sounds like something from

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a Saw movie. Uh No, it's because as the crabs

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>exert themselves, uh, they burn through oxygen and they produce

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>c O two. And so the researchers are then able

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to measure the gas concentrations inside of the little boxes,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and they use these readings to calculate the exact metabolic

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>costs of running. As one might expect, the males with

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>big claws burned more energy to run compared to smaller males,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>males with the smaller claw or females and of course

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just have two regularly sized claws, and these big males

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with the big claws also tired out more quickly. And

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>then there's the impact on feeding, which we've already alluded to.

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we've all seen a crab eat. I know,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about it on the show. Crabs disassemble their food.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Their claws and mouth bits work very hard to break

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>everything down, or in the case of Fiddler, crabs are

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>often just sifting through and finding those little tiny pieces

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to eat. Anyway, it's what Inland describes as quote delicate

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and tedious, and with the females it means it often

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>means the feeding claws are just working incessantly. Yeah, you

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>can see video of this. So there's just like a

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>conveyor belt. They're just machines kind of shoveling the sediment

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>into the mouth. But the male, on the other hand,

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like we said, only has the one claw that's suitable

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to eat with anymore. He's got that big claw just

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>setting there, and then the other claud the normal size claws,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is the one that he's using to eat. So, uh,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this cuts their energy intake in half, just as lugging

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the giant claw around increases their energy output. So they

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>generally have to feed faster and or more often in

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>order to make up the difference. Right again, because you've

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>got to they've they've divided their body into eating hand

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and and handsome hand. Right, And this is this complicates

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>things for the crabs even more because remember, uh, this

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is not an apex predator we're talking about here. The

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>crab and the fiddler crab especially, they have to concern

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves with predators especially of the avian variety. Send So

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of the of this crab with this big claw that's

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>having to do extra feeding, that means extra exposure to

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>potential predation. In fact, studies have proven out that these

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>males are picked off by birds at an enhanced rate. Right,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying because it eats slower, because it can

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>only eat with one of its claws, it has to

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>spend more time outside the burrow, and that's got a

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>target on its back. Exact. Yeah, it's more time out

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the open, more time exposed to predators, and the

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>predators in many cases they they have advanced tactics for

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>dealing with these. Um, these these either tired or distracted

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or essentially one claude crab at this point when it

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to the feeding process. Uh Inland points to a

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>study from Christy Blackwell and Cooga regarding fiddler crabs in

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Panama getting basically taken out by grackles fed on by

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>grackles who as the type of bird that have devised

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a diagonal faint attack um where they kind of they

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>come in, they kind of fake the crab out and

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently this is even more effective on the male crabs.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Now you might think, well, but wait a minute, Um,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>having a bigger claw surely also means that that crab

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>can pinch with greater force, which you would think could

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>make it able to defend itself better. Right, Yeah, I

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>mean you you might you might think that, but but

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then you know, as we'll into like these claws, uh,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this big claw anyway, it doesn't seem to be that

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>useful when you're dealing with something like a hungry grackle

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping in at you. Uh So, like the end

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>result is that the big claude males, they're easier to find,

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they're easier to pick off, they're potentially more tired, and

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>also they're a better uh they're they're a better kill

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for the predator because that big old claw has big

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>old meat in it. So there's every reason in the

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>world to kill them and eat them if you were

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a grackle or some other hungry bird. Now, from what

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I've read about fiddler crab claws, it seems like what

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they are most of the time used for is is

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is probably visual signaling, but they are on occasion actually

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>used for fighting or actually used as a weapon. Yeah. Yeah.

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Emlin gets into this in the book as well. Highlighting

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly the work of John Christie. I believe he was

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>in the second study that that was cited there that

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we decided. Uh So basically, yeah, they wave them around

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to communicate their reproductive fitness. They do fight other male

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>fiddler crabs with them, so they do serve as actual

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>weapons in contests for those burrows that we were talking about.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But inland rights that quote, for every few minutes of

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>outright fighting, mail spend dozens of hours waving, in other words, communicating,

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>showing off that claw, saying look, you know, look at

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this mighty claw. I imagine what I can do with it.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>That happened. That's that's what's going on. Most of the time,

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a very small amount of the time they're actually using it.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's ultimately more of a deterrence than anything. And

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>this is evolutionarily sound because fighting is dangerous. The battle

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>itself is dangerous and can certainly be fatal to an organism,

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but fights can also just wound you, making you more

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>susceptible pupredation. It may distract you and allow the grackle

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or some other creature to come in and take you out.

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So even though there are hard disadvantages to developing such

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a deterrence, and he compares this to other animals as well,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like anytime you see something that you might label an

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>elaborate weapon. Uh in some sort of an animals anatomy,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge payoff there. Nothing is free, nothing is cheap.

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the development of these things, there's

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>an energy cost involved. Uh So even though they're there

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>are all these disadvantages to growing, say a giant crab claw,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there are also strong benefits in not having to actually

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>fight all of the time. Yeah. I mean I think

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this this goes against our intuition because we think of

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>fighting in terms of winning and losing. So like fight

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it fight as a winner who wins and thus they

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>come out good the effect for them is positive, and

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a loser who loses, and of course the effect for

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>them is negative. But in fact, in nature, I would

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>argue that most fighting is probably actually lose lose because

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>even the winner is probably blee, somewhat injured or tired

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>out by the fight, putting them at a later disadvantage

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for survival, even if they come out on top in

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that particular struggle. Yeah. Yeah, And all of this makes

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>even more sense when you we start looking at the

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>closer to the scenario of these of of fighting and

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>protecting these burrows and trying to to move females. Again,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the male set up shop in front of key burrows

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that are offered as brooding burrows to prospective females, and

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this is where they make their show and this is

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>where they fight if it comes to that. And the

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers here are apparently great. They're just tons of crabs

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>out there and they're they're just face off after face off. Uh.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And again, most of these face offs are not going

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to result in a big, drag out fight. A lot

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of them are just going to be uh displays. But

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>still uh. Lifting that that crab claw in the air

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and to signal with it, that's going to have an

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>energy cost and so this is ultimately exhausting too many crabs.

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Crabs will eventually they have to bow out and work

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 1>their way back up to good burrows. So there's like

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this whole system of communication. Uh. Most of the these

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>faceoffs don't rise to the level of full intensity battle,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and the display of the claw allows the male crabs

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to easily determine who they have a chance against, so

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>they're able to size each other up like Okay, this

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>is a battle, um that I definitely can win, and

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>he knows I can win it, so we're done. This

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is a display only situation. Okay, he's a crab that

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can definitely beat me, so I'm not gonna mess with him. Uh,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>We're just gonna carry on our ways. This one, however,

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to communicate a little bit and we

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>might have to fight because we seem to be evenly matched. Yeah.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>That's actually the most dangerous situation is when it's not

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>clear which one is stronger than. All right, Well, I

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come back to something which was earlier. I

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that New York Times interview with the researchers Sophie Moles,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the authors of a paper published

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in ten in Biology Letters UH called Robotic Crabs, revealed

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>that female fiddler crabs are sensitive to changes in male

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>display rate. The other authors here were Michael D. Jenions

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Patricia are Why Backwell, yes, I might have referred

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to her earlier as Blackwell, my apologies. Oh I didn't

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>catch that. You should apologize. Well, I just want to

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure I get the names right. I think I

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>had a type in my notes there, so but from

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the crabs perspective, I think it is important to realize

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that this really is a study that involved creating crab

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>sex robots like this is creating that it was an

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>attempt to create the hunkiest male robot crab clause that

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>have ever been put together with the explicit purpose of

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>attracting female fiddler crabs. So I'm just gonna read directly

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>from their abstract. Uh they write quote. Males often produced dynamic,

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.239
<v Speaker 1>repetitive courtship displays that can be demanding to perform and

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>might advertise male quality to females. A key feature of

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>demanding displays is that they can change in intensity, escalating

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>as a male increases his signaling effort, but de escalating

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as a signal or becomes fatigued. Here we investigated whether

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>female fiddler crabs of the species Uka mio Bergi are

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to changes in male courtship wave rate how fast

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the arm is waving. We performed playback experiments using robotic

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>male crabs that had the same mean wave rate but

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>either escalated, de escalated, or remained constant. Females demonstrated a

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>strong preference for escalating robots, but showed mixed responses to

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>robots that de escalated fast too slow compared to those

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>that waved at a constant medium rate. These findings demonstrate

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that females can discern changes in male display rate and

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>prefer males that escalate, but that females are also sensitive

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to pass display rates indicative prior vigor. So if you

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>are a male fiddler crab, it's not just important to

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>have a big claw, but it apparently, at least with

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this species, is more attractive to females if you start

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>waving it faster and faster as the female comes close

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to you. And from this New York Times interview with

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the lead author of their moles, uh it was there

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>was the question where the female is terribly disappointed when

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they realized they'd been tricked. You know what happened once

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>they finally got up to the waving robot arm that

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>they were so interested in, Well, Mole says quote, once

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 1>they got to the robot, they would touch the baseplate

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of it and realize there's something wrong here, it's not real,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and they would usually at that point stop moving or runaway.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of them actually responded as if he were a

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>real male crab, which is by tickling him. What the

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>females do is go up to the mail and use

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>their legs on one side of their body to tickle him.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>This communicates to him that she's interested in him as

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a mate and not just trying to steal his home.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So this this study did indeed implicate female fiddler crabs

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>tickling metal base plates because they thought it just that

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>claw is so huge, it's swinging so fast, I've got

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to believe it's it might be a real crab. This

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>sounds like something that could be factored into, I don't know,

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Battlestar Galactica sort of situation like that. The replicants, the robots,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>they look just like us, they behave just like us,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>except um tickling them will reveal their true nature. Anyway,

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>in the spirit of of our enthusiasm for the shrimp

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on the treadmill, the crab on the treadmill, I want

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>more studies with robot crab hunks. We have to build

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the most attractive male crab that has ever been that

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>has ever existed on Earth. And uh, but I guess

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to be careful with it because we don't

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>want to drive crabs to to extinction by like now

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>now the real crabs only desire the robot. It's weird

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>how this does line up with the sort of trope

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of them the muscle man on the beach attracting the

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>women and in the in the nerd that's that's also

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>inevitably on the beach as well and make get sand

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>kicked in his face or whatnotum, But it also does

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>bring to mind, like even with with humans, there's sort

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>of there's there's fitness, and there's like visible fitness, but

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>then there's also like fitness to the level where it's

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>no no longer purely functional anymore. Like there's like, for instance,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>there's the muscle that might aid in the delivery of

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a punch, and then there's like the the the muscle

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>build up that say, makes it harder to move around

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>or or makes it, you know, more difficult to say,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>touch portions of your back, the sort of thing. I

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>totally know what you're saying. Though, Also that reminds me

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I always want to caution people, you know, just don't

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>don't try to extrapolate too much from from animal sex

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and attractiveness studies to humans, because you know, crabs and

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>humans are pretty different, right right, And certainly the reasons

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that humans do things um and uh, and the way

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they react to things are generally there's a lot a

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>lot more going on. There's there's this whole level of

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>human complication. It's taking place on the surface of whatever

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>else is going on all Right, after we've talked about

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these examples of animals that broadly have bilateral

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>symmetry but then some major deviation from it, I've been

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how symmetry and asymmetry come about at the

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>cellular level, because you know, you can imagine why it

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>would be genetically efficient to have bilateral symmetry, like you

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 1>you just basically need half of a body plan and

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>then you just copy it over on the other side.

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But within that broadly symmetrical framework, you know, we get

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>these deviations major and minor. And it's not all narwhal

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>tusks and fiddler crab claws things that are like huge

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and noticeable. There are plenty of forms of a symmetry

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that are common but harder to spot, such as the

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>orientation of internal organs. You know, you're digestive tract and

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>it's associated organs and your heart and circulatory system, or

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>all asymmetrical they have different organs and pathways situated on

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the left and right of the body cavity, and there

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>are also minor more invisible variations at the cellular level

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>in within mostly symmetrical creatures like us. So how do

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>these deviations from perfect symmetry come about at the level

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of cell division, which is actually you know, actively building

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>your body's tissues. How do the cells know which side

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>is which and how to do something different on the

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>left than what they're doing on the right. Well, one

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>jumping off point here is I came across an interesting

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>article about this in Quantum Magazine from January by Tim

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Vernemon called how Life Turns a symmetric which is worth

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a read in its entirety, but I just wanted to

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>summarize and jump off from a few things I learned

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>from it. And one of the big takeaways is that

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we have some good answers about at least

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>some strong factors for like mammalian or vertebrate symmetry and

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>symmetry breaking something. We know some things about the genetic

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and cellular basis for a symmetry in the body, but

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we still don't know everything yet, And so one of

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the ideas thin gets brought up in this article is

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the nodal lefty genetic connection, and it goes like this.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Since the nine nineties, scientists have been studying a gene

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>called nodal in O d A L which appears specifically

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>on the left side of the developing embryo of At

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the time this article is written, they said every vertebrate

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>animal yet studied and associated with this gene is a

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhat confusingly named gene called lefty, which appears to work

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically to suppress the nodal genes activity on the right

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>side of the vertebrate embryo. So the purpose of lefty,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if I understand core, actually appears to be something like

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>telling the right side of the body not to do

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>left side of the body stuff. According to the Harvard

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>biologist Cliff Tabin, the nodal lefty gene combination seems to

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be the main genetic factor guiding asymmetry in animals, or

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at least invertebrates. So how does this difference get expressed? Well,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>another biologist named Nobo taka Hirokawa has offered an explanation

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with cilia. Cilia are little hair

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>like or thread like projections Technically, they're a type of

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>organelle which stick up from cell membranes within the cells

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or of eukaryotes, and they serve various functions like gathering

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sensory information for cells or facilitating the movement of cells

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>through fluid. So you might read about us silia motility.

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>These these things often moved back and forth, though actually

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they're divided into motile and nonmotile cilia. So how would

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>tiny hairs sticking up off of cell membranes have anything

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with the body of a vertebrate splitting from

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>perfect symmetry into a differentiated left and right half. Well,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>one fascinating clue came in the form of a rare

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>genetic disorder found in humans known as cartagen or syndrome. Actually,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I'm saying that right, but it's

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>spelled k A R T A G E N E

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>R cartagen Or syndrome, which presents most often in patients

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as patients with continued respiratory problems such as recurrent lung

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>infections and sinus problems, and also sometimes infertility. It turns

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>out this condition is caused by a congenital defect that

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>prevents the bodies sillia from functioning as needed. So these

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>little hair like projections on cells don't function as they

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>normally would. Now why that affect respiration? Well? Of course,

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the inside of our breathing passages are aligned with cilia,

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and the cilia need to move in synchronization for I

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think multiple purposes, but one of them is to help

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>clear breathing passages of mucus. And this disorder causes the

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>cilia to have trouble again with motility, with movement, and

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 1>so they can't really synchronize. They can't really work together

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>to get the mucus out of the lungs uh and

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>out to the throat to prevent infections. Now, strangely, this

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>disorder affecting cilia also frequently coincides with a seemingly totally

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>unrelated issue. About half of people diagnosed with cartagon or

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>syndrome also have their internal organs flipped. Their body is

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a mirror image of what a thoracic surgeon would expect

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to see if they open you up. So you know,

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the heart on the right and the liver on the

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>left and so forth. That's right. Yeah, the the if

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we're looking to spy literature, of course, if we look

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>at Ian Flemings, the doctor No. We might remember Doctor

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>No has this where his heart is on the other

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>side of his body, survives. I think he survives an

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>assassination attempt at some point because of this anatomical quirk. Oh,

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody shoots him on the wrong side. That's a good

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>twist than than than well anyway, So you have that

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>association people who have this, who have this congenital condition

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>affecting proteins that in turn effect cilia. Uh. They also

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>half of the time their organs are are flipped opposite

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of what you normally see. On top of that, there

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was a paper in Nature by Lee at All which

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Vernamon in the article points to called global Genetic Analysis

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in Mice unveil central role for cilia in congenital heart disease.

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And this paper apparently found multiple instances of genes where

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>if the gene was defective, the mouse presented with some

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of unusual issue related to symmetry and asymmetry in

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the body, some issue with that the haves left and right,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and in those instances the gene was somehow also related

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to cilia. So these clues UH indicate that somehow silia

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>may play a role in symmetry breaking during mammalian development.

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So how could this be Well, A leading explanation has

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to do with something called dorsal flow and a little

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>patch on the surface of mammalian embryos called the ventral node. So,

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at like a mammalian embryo, the ventral

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>node is a little pit or depression on the underside

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or the bottom surface, and the pit is ciliated, meaning

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's covered in cilia, these little hair like or thread

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>like projections. And the explanation goes that the waving of

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cilia in this little pit create a consisder stant direction

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of flow in the fluid around the ventral node. So

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the cilia rotate to get the fluid moving, and then

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they keep it moving in a consistent direction. The fluid

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is always moving to the left along with the with

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the way the silly are waving, and the direction of

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this flow seems to cause a chain reaction that results

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in changes in gene expression, specifically in the a symmetry

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>genes coming back to again no dole and lefty. So apparently,

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if the cilia are having trouble with motility, the unidirectional

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>left word current of fluid is not established, and the

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>symmetry breaking genes aren't expressed as they would normally be,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>which can lead to deviations from the type of mammalian

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a symmetry we would we would see in most most

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>members of that species, such as creating a condition where

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the body fifty of the time can have its internal

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>organs flipped. However, this be the only factor leading to

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>standard symmetry breaking in animal bodies. Vernemon's article also cites

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a Toughs University biologist named Michael Levin who points out

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that some animals, even some mammals, don't have that ciliated

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>dorsal node we were just talking about, and Levin believes

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there's some involvement of a factor called the cellular skeleton

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>or the cytoskeleton. Did you know that your cells have

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a skeleton of their own? I I don't know. I

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>guess I'd heard the word cytoskeleton, but I hadn't quite

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>put it together. It's not exactly like your your bigger skeleton.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not like bones. The cytoskeleton is a

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>system of protein filaments that are, at least in a

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>metaphorical sense, sort of like the bones of a cell.

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh to describe them, I want to quote from a

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>review in Nature by Fletcher and Mullins. Quote. The ability

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of a eukaryotic cell to resist deformation, to transport intrust

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>cellular cargo, and to change shape during movement depends on

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the cytoskeleton, an interconnected network of filamentous polymers and regulatory proteins.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Recent work is demonstrated that both internal and external physical

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>forces can act through the cytoskeleton to affect local mechanical

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>properties and cellular behavior. Attention is now focused on how

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>cytoskeletal networks generate, transmit, and respond to mechanical signals over

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>both short and long time scales. An important insight emerging

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>from this work is that long lived cytoskeletal structures may

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>act as epigenetic determinants of cell shape, function, and fate.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's exactly this last comment that I think is

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>most relevant here, because in the case of symmetry breaking,

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it may be that features of this cellular skeleton, this

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>system of sort of strands of of polymers and proteins

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that helped give a cell its shape and help it

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>resist deformation when it's under pressure and things like that,

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that this system may ultimately epigenetically determine the development of

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>cells and ultimately the handedness or asymmetry of the whole body.

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>This was so this next part was also a surprise

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. I don't think I knew this. Apparently sells

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves have a kind of handedness or asymmetry. Some cells

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are sort of left oriented and some are right oriented,

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can see this in their behavior when they're

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>moving through fluid and they come up against an obstacle.

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>So that you can have experiments where you show that

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>cells are flowing around along in a controlled environment and

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>then they bump up against something, a bump a surface.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>When that happens, the cell will tend to turn in

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one direction or the other, and that preference for a

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>particular way of turning tends to remain consistent for each cell.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You have sort of left turning cells and right turning cells,

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and experiments in fruit flies demonstrate that these small differences

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>at the cellular level can snowball into major morphological differences

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>at the body level. Vernamon's article mentions researchers named Leo

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Juan and Kinji Matsuno, who each identified proteins within the

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>cellular skeleton specifically the actin and myosin's as having an

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>influence on whether a cell becomes left handed or right handed.

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>And there there may also be some interplay between proteins

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the cytoskeleton and the asymmetrical expression of the nodal gene,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>each playing a role. But then there's one more thing

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that gets mentioned towards the end of this article, uh

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that the Quanta article that I thought was interesting, which

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is that other factors leading to asymmetry. Of course, there

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>might be some that haven't been discovered yet, but one

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>candidate has to do with communication between cells, for instance,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>based on the relative prevalence of proteins on a cell surface,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>which would in turn determine how cells trade electrical charges

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between each other. And the Quanta article

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>cites Michael Levin again saying quote, if we block the

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>communication channels, asymmetrical development always goes awry. And by manipulating

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this system, we've been able to guide development in surprising

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but predictable directions, creating six legged frogs, four headed worms,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or froglet's with an eye for a gut without changing

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>their genomes at all. And in a final twist, bringing

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this back to medicine. UH, it's interesting that all of

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this knowledge might one day be useful in finding treatments

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for pathological growth and development patterns and somatic cells by

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of harnessing these systems, by harnessing the bodies existing

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms for detecting and UH and directing its own shape,

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way the cells come together to to

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.720
<v Speaker 1>form larger structures that might be harnessed for for treating

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>cases where cell cell development is going wrong. Yeah, that's

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating, you know, coming back to what you said earlier,

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if prior to this, if someone had

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just stopped me on the street, like a man on

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the street reporters situation asked me if sells off a skeleton,

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if I would have been able to correctly answer regarding

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the site of skeleton. Here this is this is pretty fascinating.

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And then to get into its um sort of the

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>ramifications of that and how that ends up being reflected

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the left handedness of the of the overall system

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>or the right handeds, whichever the case may be. You know,

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I have to think back once more to the cock

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>eyed squid histeo tooth that we discussed in this was

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the first episode. One of the reasons to marvel of

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this amazing creature is that its eyes have evolved to

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>look in different directions to different realms of the ocean,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>light and dark. And this seems understandably strange and alien

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to us, but perhaps less so when we remember things

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>like left handed in right end and this whenly thing

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about neural asymmetry that defines us on the inside. Uh.

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course it's not just us. A Symmetries between

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>left and right side of the nervous system are present

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>throughout the animal kingdom, from invertebrates to mammals. And as

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one source I was looking at this is by Concha,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Bianco and Wilson in Encoding Asymmetry within Neural Circuits, published

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in in Nature Reviews Neuroscience. UH. The theoretical advantages of

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>brain asymmetry include the capacity for parallel processing, the specialization

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of left and right side for distinct computations, and the

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>restriction of information processing within local circuits with short, fast connections.

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But while there are obvious advantages to brain asymmetry, are

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>there advantages to brain symmetry. As I was looking into

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this little bit and I read some thoughts from Marco

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Data of the University of Padua who experimented with the

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>often lateralized fish species the gold belly top minnow in

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine. Basically, what this experiment consisted of

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was dividing these UH top minnows, these gold belly top minnows,

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>into groups of left lateralized, right lateralized, and non lateralized specimens.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So the seeming advantage to the non lateralized came when

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>judging stimuli to either side of the creature through either eye.

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>The experiments involved judging advantageous shoals of fish to join

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>on either side. Remember you're a small fish in the ocean. Uh,

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of survival advantage of being able to

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>determine which shoal of fish you should take refuge in. Uh,

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know their strength in numbers, and so it seems

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that in these fish having a lateral tendency, most uh,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>most often, they just joined the shoal that they saw

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with their dominant eye. So I guess, I guess the

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>take home here is that in some cases, yeah, it's

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and it may come down to your dominant side is

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>just going to be the tendency that you go in. Uh.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's maybe going to potentially get in the way

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of properly evaluating in this case, two different shows of fish.

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have evidence of this in front of me,

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>but it makes me think that surely things like this

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>must also be true even with uh, you know, brains

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>we would think of as more complex. I mean, I'm

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sure even with humans, handedness probably plays a role in

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like directional reactions to fast stint. You know, something pops

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>up and scares you, which direction do you bolton? I will.

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised if there is not some kind

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of tendency there that's not purely dictated by where the

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>stimulus is, but also has to do with like body

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>side dominance. Yeah, and body side dominance and left handedness

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and right handedness and human beings. This is something I

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think we'll have to come back to in a future episode. Uh,

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of great research out there, particularly when

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>again it comes back to what we're saying earlier about

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how you have whatever is going on on the animal

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>level and then you have the human complications involved there,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, when you start getting into the whole situations

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of okay, you have a right handed dominant society and

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 1>then you have left handed individuals within that society. Uh,

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, what what is the impact? And uh and

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a there's a lot of There have

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>been a number of interesting studies over the years that

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have looked at this, how it plays into sports, how

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it plays into conflict and combat, how it just plays

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>into thinking about the world around you. So that would

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 1>be a fun one to come back and uh and do.

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And I know that the lefties especially it will love it.

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But right e's you're most of our audience, so don't worry.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You'll like it too, You're just less special. Sorry, Okay,

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>should we wrap it up there? I suppose we should. Uh.

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So we hope, we hope that you've enjoyed this uh

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 1>partial journey through a symmetry. Like we said there, there

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of other examples of a symmetry in the

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>animal world. We we tried to focus on some of

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the examples that you know illustrated uh the

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 1>topic the best. But perhaps you're thinking of something we

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention that bears mentioning, right in, let us know, uh,

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>let us know if you're interested in an episode in

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the future about left handedness and right handedness in in

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in Humans anyway you look at it just right in

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you past episodes, future episodes,

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>present episodes. It's all fair game. We read those on

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Mondays on listener mail and the Stuff to Blow Your

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Mind podcast feed We have our core episodes on Tuesdays

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and Thursday's short form artifact or monster fact episode on Wednesdays,

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and on Fridays, we put aside most serious concerns and

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we just watch a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>say hello, you can email us at contact at stuff

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for My Heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app,

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to your favorite shows.