WEBVTT - The Real Reason So Many Musicians Are Frustrated By Spotify

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. Unfortunately, my colleague Tracy Elloway is out today.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of disappointed, actually a little bit, because even though,

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like Tracy and I have been doing the podcast for

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>several years now, there are some things I still don't

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>know about Tracy. Like I don't really know what kind

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of music she's in two for example, I've gone to

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>karaoke with her a couple of times, so I know

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what she likes to sing, I think,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of what she listens to, I actually

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I was going to ask her. As for myself,

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I'm a forty one years old, so

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I have very cliche tastes. I would suppose I like

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of old indie rock, and I hardly I'm

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not very good on keeping up with new music. By

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and large. Pretty much, if I discover new music, it's

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>often courtesy of the algorithm that Spotify serves up to me.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't really know about how it all works

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and how the industry works and who benefits from this

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>current system, and I've always wanted to learn more. It's

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly interesting now because of course we've had a number

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of artists take their music off Spotify, notionally sort of

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in defiance of Joe Rogan's We're All There. But also

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been a lot of musician frustration with

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and other streaming platforms, the new economics of music

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that long precede any of the current drama. So in

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>light of all that, I want to learn more. And

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about our guest because he writes a

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>lot about the economics of the music business and how

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it all works and where the money is and so forth.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But also beyond that, he was a member of one

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite bands, and so this is personally very

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>enthusist estek I'm gonna be speaking with Damon Krakowski. He

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is was the drummer of the indie rock band Galaxy

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and currently part of the duo Damon and Naomi. Damon,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on odd lot, Thank

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. You know, with musicians don't get

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>asked about business very often. I'm really grateful for the opportunity.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Will you write a lot about business? And I guess

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's why we could have this sort of music

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>slash your business conversation. Why do you write about business?

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Why is it? You know, there are a lot of

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>musicians who probably are frustrated with the economics of the

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>music industry, but you were. You write quite a bit,

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You've written books, you have a sub stack, a newsletter

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>about it. Why is it important for you to uh

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to write about music? Yeah, it's a really it's a

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>question I asked myself pretty often. So, yeah, I started

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a sub stack. It's called Dotta Drummer Almanac, and my

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handles dot a Drummer That's where that came from.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I started writing about the business of

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>music very accidentally. It's the same way that I had

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to the business of music accidentally, which

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is from being a musician. And you just end up

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at the other end of so many contracts and so

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>many deals and so many accounting reports that you know,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you either I guess at a certain but for quickly

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>early on, decide I'm never going to pay any attention

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to any of this and turn it over to someone

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who convinces you that they are, or you start reading

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. And there actually are a surprising percentage

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of us that do read all that stuff. Um, some

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>some just out of necessity, because if you don't have

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a manager, or you elect not to, or you don't

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>trust your manager, or your manager cheats you. I mean,

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's so many ways that musicians end up

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>having to look finally at, even if they didn't want to,

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at what the hell is going on? And once you

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>take a look, well, it's a big business and so

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got a lot to learn. Takes a time for

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you to learn how this came to be because musicians

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to be they come in very young, many are

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not in the business very long, and the business is

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>oriented toward the next set of musicians that are coming.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, not you, um, you're always you're just a

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>temporary talent for an industry that has set itself up

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to deal with a revolving door of talent. And so

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, things are not explained to you. It's kind

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of like who can bother who? You know, why bother

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>explaining something to a band. They're only gonna be around

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at best, you know, a few years, a few albums, whatever,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make our money and move on. So just

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>get what you can. So you know, there's a lot

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of that, but then we learned, you know, so what

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>happened to me was our first band, Galaxy. You know,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>we were young. We signed the classic contract that handed

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>over all our rights and uh, and then the record

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>label declared bankruptcy and our contracts were thrown into Banks

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Co in Manhattan. I spent over a year dealing with that,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to extricate our contracts and an ownership of our

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>records in perpetuity throughout the universe, known and unknown. These

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>are boilerplate things that are typical of music contracts, UM

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and all formats uh, you know, as yet undiscovered and

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>all you know, blah blah blah, every contingency. Um. They

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were just thrown into this Banks record and and and

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>put up for auction. So I spent a long time.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You know. We called our music business lawyer who we

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>had a very fine firm, grew Upment and Turskey Schindler

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>representing us at the time. They were Madonna's lawyer and whatever,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and they said, I'll forget it. You know, you have

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>no you have no rights to have no chance. I mean,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you signed that deal and we're like, you told us

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to sign that deal. They're like, well that spoilerplate. The

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>company goes bankrupt, you know, it goes into bankruptcy court.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's and that your contracts are an asset. It's like,

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>no way, you know, what do you mean? It's it's

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 1>just an asset gone into into bankruptcy court, our own contracts.

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>As I understood that the stock from the warehouse went in,

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I understood that maybe the Master Tapes head ownership, but

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean our contracts were that. That was insane to me.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, I was like no, So I read all

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the stuff and did my own negotiations, you know, and

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>called up the bankruptcy court appointed lawyer and taught myself

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the business. Uh and we won. We got our rights.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I love that. So so I'm I'm a Galaxy fan.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I discovered it. I discovered the band Luna first three

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>year old band mate Dean were them, and then of

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>course I went backwards and discovered Galaxy for for listeners

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>who maybe aren't from the layer, can you describe like,

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a pretty influential band, but a little

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>bit sort of like how big you guys were, however

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to measure it and what kind of contract

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>gets offered to a sort of highly influential, but I

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think like a Billboard chart topping band in the

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>late eighties, right, No, we weren't a pop band by

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>any by any measure, and nobody nobody saw us that way,

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>most importantly ourselves, and so we had no pop ambitions

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and there was no question of trying to be world

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>conquering multi millionaires would have. So anyway, we were a

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>niche band. Uh an in indie band when we started

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was called college rock because it was college radio stations

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that played on our music, not commercial stations, and that

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 1>divide was very um significant at the time. It meant

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the major labels produced music that they tried to get

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on commercial radio and into the chain store record stores,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and that that was their world and we really had

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>no part of that world. But but a lot of

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>people in the music industry were not part of the

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>world yet were in the music industry and built a

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>fully functioning, very very efficient and good system of distribution

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and sales outside of that. So we had independent stores

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in every town. We had uh college radio stations which

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>are mostly nonprofit but or community stations also but played

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>our records, and you know, the potential on the air,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the same as a commercial station, so you still

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>can reach people. And we had venues that we played

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that the major label bands didn't go near, and so

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we had a fully functioning network. That network was hard one.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It had been built by a generation or two of

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>bands before hours. It was really mostly the hardcore scene.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually from from our from my point of view of

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of white college indie rock more or less was

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more was pretty much forged by the hardcore bands who

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>went out and slept on people's floors and and found

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>alternative spaces to play and built this system. We came

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of a more diverse musically, a little

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>bit less male, unfortunately, still pretty close to white, which

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that really wasn't discussed or acknowledged nearly enough

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time. But we came and sort of stepped

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>into that world and opened it up musically, I think

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than it had been and so

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of types of bands went through those channels

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to the point where the major labels turned around and

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>realized that there was a market there that our world

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>had developed and was communicating with and selling product too,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and they were not. And that's the expression would happened

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties. So the major labels kind of realized

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that they had missed the boat on a whole lot

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of music that was potentially more salable than they thought.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So they looked at our scene and they, you know,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they sent their and our scout, they hired in our

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>scouts out of our scene, sent them back in to

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of evaluate who could take it to another level commercially.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And then there was this really pretty ugly moment in

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the late eighties early nineties where our scene that had

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>existed was destroyed more or less by the major labels

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>coming in and investing in it. So what they did

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>was they he picked from bands. They broke up Galaxy

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>five hundred by well Gas Bars being offered a major

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>label contract of its own, and in its place, Dean

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>was offered a solo deal by an A and our

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who had worked for our record label, Rough Trade

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and independent label, had been fired by Rough Trade, had

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>told his colleagues a Rough Trade that he was going

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to break up our band in retaliation, got a job

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>with Electra, which is owned by Warner Brothers, and offered

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Diana solo deal. At the same moment that Galaxy of

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Hunter was being offered a band deal by Columbia. So

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Dean double cross to us he signed the deal on

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>his own with a different label instead of signing the

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>deal that we had already negotiated with our mutual lawyer

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>with Columbia. Besides old arguments which are long since, I mean,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a long time later. But what

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>illustrates is what happened to the scene as a whole.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>The deal that we had negotiated with our lawyer as

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a band with Columbia was going to have complete artistic control.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>We were going to choose our producer for our records,

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we were going to choose our singles for our records.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We were going to control our videos. Our lawyer said

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 1>to us, and this gives you a hint of how

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this all goes down. Our lawyer said to us in

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>our band meeting with him in street conference room, if

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you insist on that you will get less money. You

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that. And we all said yes. But of course

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I realized in retrospect that Dean didn't necessarily say yes.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>He just was sitting there not saying no. So so

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then um, the deal that Dean signed

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>with Electra Solo, where he had no negotiating power as

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a band because we had built our brand and we

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>had built our audience. That deal was without any artistic control,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and so he signed as a solo artist to be

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>shaped by the label, and the band that he then

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>put together was his were his employees. The label chose

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>his producers, the label chose his singles. The labels ran

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>him a million dollars in at as we all now

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>know because he has spoken about it in interviews and such,

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately dropped the band. Of course, that's that's that's

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened, kind of largely to the scene as a whole,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>because how do the major labels work. Well, It's like

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a bunch of hits that fund everything else

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>is not a hit, and everything else is not a

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>hit eventually just drops off their radar altogether. They're not

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>really in it for anything else, and only the hits

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>fund the business. That's how entertainment generally works as an

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>economic model. It sounds like the venture capital industry to

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>where you you sort of aim for one massive winner

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that the returns a hundred extra on your investment, and

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>then everything gets sort of tossed by the wayside before

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>we sort of move on from like this moment, Like,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can you just talk a little bit more about the

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>economics of a Galaxy five album in terms of like

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the income that you were able to generate both from

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>how much is from album sales versus how much was

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>from the touring that you did, Like what is the

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>what does that look like? Obviously? Um, yeah, on the

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on the indie labels of the time, right, Well, it

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>all speaks to the same two differing models really, right,

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so that we just talked about the major label model

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>classic entertainment business. And it's interesting to hear you compare

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>to venture capital. I'm sure it's the same idea. You're

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>basically gambling, but you the odds are are pretty good

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, if you have like a thousand pieces

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of product, you know one one is going to become huge,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and you stack the deck by making sure you control

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the distribution channels and the promotion channels that all those

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>hits go through. So whatever it's gonna hit is going

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the ones that you have. It's

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be somebody else's, right. That's that's crucial, and

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that's crucial to looking to what's happened now with streaming

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the other model is an independent model, a niche model,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which is what the independent world that I was a

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>part of and still am operates on. And that is,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like I've always said, it's like running a lemonade stand.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It was like we didn't need any more economic know

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>how than a kid opening a lemonade stand on the sidewalk.

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>It was like, we had a product, we had to

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sell it for a couple little bit more than we

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>caused us to make, and we had to know who,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>how many too, how much to make. I mean, that

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was all it was. It was like it was just

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like basic capitals and any like American five year old understands,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's all we were doing, and that's all any

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of the bands in our scene were doing. We were

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>pressing records, in selling them for more than they were

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>cast us to make, and making a small profit. And

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there was no model that would take that much bigger.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But you, as you well know, on that model or

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much like every small business traditional small business ever.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So it was like having like a small grocery store

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or harbor store or anything that serves the neighborhood of

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>community and survives by pays the bills plus then some

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have a p business model. It is not

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a business model that attracts capital, right, So this is

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, and I guess it gets to the heart

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of the tension here, which is that we all sort

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of understand that I mentioned VC, but I think Hollywood

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is the same. And I guess currently sort of mainstream music,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>which is it's really about the hits, and you aim

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for one hit out of I don't know, a hundred

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>or a thousand, and it's just so big and so

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>massive that you could have numerous flops and it doesn't matter.

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And this sort of the tail is very, very skewed

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>towards these mega stars. And today you know obviously Taylor

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Swift and Adele and a handful of artists that just

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>sell an absurd amount. And so I guess the question,

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this sort of leads into where we are now,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is like, is the lemonade stand model effectively dead? At

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this point? There's just no other route to music other

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>than or sort of Yeah, there's the lemonade stand model

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dead in a world of streaming only, Yes, that's the

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. Yeah, recorded music, yes, because what

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>happened was they were there were parallel methods of distribution

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and sales and reaching your audience before and the majors,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So the majors when they broke up for example, My

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've done this time and again, but my

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>particular moment, it wasn't like indie rock was like the

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>only time this ever happens, happened over and over and

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>over and over again in many many different genres to

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the independent jazz world that you know, all these things

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>have gone through similar cycles. My particular world, you can

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>see it very clearly again to stick with with references

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to your generation and my generation of artists. Um, you

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can see it in Nirvana. So at that moment the

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>gas have found broke up was also the moment that

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Nirvana was signed by Geffen and we all knew. We

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>were all all told because Nirvana was on another independent label, Subpop.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>They were on our scene. We were playing the same

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>venues that they where. We were at all the mutual friends.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knew before the public knew that Nirvana was going

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a huge hit and this was going to

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>change everything. And that's also why that's when Dean got

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>signed to a solo contract, everybody was already in gear

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for more Kirk cobains, because it was like, Okay,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they can take something from our scene and turn it

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>into this other model, which is you have one hit

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and a thousand failures, and that's just part of the model, right,

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And so what what I witnessed in on my own

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>little scene in the late eighties early nineties was the

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>way that that all shook out. The difference to now

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is that even though that happened, the rest of us

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>could continue our non major label model of distribution and

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sales and of lemonade stand style business. And we did,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Naomi and I formed to do. We signed

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with sub Pop, which had been Nirvana's previous navel, and

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>continue making records and touring at the same kind of

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>scale budget that we always had, reaching the same sort

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of curtailed subset of of a music audience that we

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>always had been a part of, and being played on

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>college radio, non on commercial radio, and not making videos

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>for MTV, etcetera. So that continued. And so what's changed

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>now is that there's no parallel network for distribution and sales.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So what digital did was, as in all our businesses

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and all our communications, it uh scaled everything up through

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fewer channels, and you don't really have another way now

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of distributing music. There's no indie channel for um sales

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and distribution online. We have to go through the same

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>channels that everybody does. It's Spotify, it's Apple, it's Amazon.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>These are the biggest corporation. Well, Spotify is one of

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest corporations, but in music they're enormous. I mean,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>their valuation on the stock market is bigger than the

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>major labels, and Apple and Amazon are literally among the

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest corporations in the world. So we're talking about like

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>little me and also not just middle aged me, but

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>young versions of this of the pattern that I followed,

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>who really have no choices and no already established audience,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and no ways of navigating this outside the way that

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody does. So everybody just has to put their music

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the same platform. It's as if back then

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties and nineties, we all had to put

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>our compete for this for the sales space in Kmart

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and Walmart and and and eventually Target, instead of being

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>able to go to the independent record stores. If you

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>see what I mean, there's no other channel, and that's

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the problem with with the model that's going on now

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>because there I mean, there are many problems that I'm

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>happy to go into, but the basic, basic one from

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>music music business point of view or a band's point

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of view, is that there's no choice. And the other

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>thing is that these platforms treat us just like they

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>do consumers, where we're kind of just like another It's

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>just like Facebook, you know, we're just like users. We

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't get some special status because we're producing the content.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>They treat us just like all social media. There's no

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>distinction really between content producers and consumers. So I just

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>have an account. Basically, I can't get anyone on the phone.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't ask a question can you update? Like can

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you write your band bio or anything like that. They're

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>very limited ways in which you can interact with these platforms,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>just like there are on any platform. Like yeah, you

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>can change your profile picture, you know, it's it's it

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go much beyond that. On Spotify, you can't just

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>upload your music Spotify. They're a handful of distributors that

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>have access to that obvious. The three major levels are

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the main ones they hold. I forget the exact percentage,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it's over the copyrights that are on there. The Indians

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>go through consolidators that are approved and have an account

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with them. It's already limited in that way. It does

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>make room for independent artists and all kinds of ours,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>everything can be up there. Theoretically that's important to their

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>business model, but that doesn't give us any status beyond

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>really essentially just another user on the account. They create

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>websites that we can interact with in this extremely limited,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>condescending manner and change, you know, tiny little bits of

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the of the individual page, but really so limited that

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous, but limited enough that I've gone on Spotify

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and our one artist official playlists that we're allowed to

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>create is called I forgot exactly jording. I said, Damon,

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you have me official downloads available on band camp. That's

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the name of the playlist, so that if you click

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on it, if you look for the artist official playlists,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it will be called go to band camp. And of

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>course Spotify doesn't notice that and take it down because

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not looking at my account. So I mean, Galaxy

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is there's probably a lot of listeners on Spotify still

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I presume I don't know. I mean it comes up

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on my playlist a lot but I guess that's because

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I listened to it, But I presume that on sort

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of related artists it's probably I don't know, above it

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for people who are fans of a certain style of

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.239
<v Speaker 1>indie pop comes up decently. What do you get from that? Like?

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>What are the benefits to you? And you know, obviously

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that people talk about all the

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>time is like, Okay, yeah, you're not gonna people musicians

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't make that much recording, but other things live concerts

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, Like what does that look like as

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a not huge but also not irrelevant indie band? Now

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the ongoing listenership of Spotify, I think

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you said there have been something like sixty two million

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>users or sixty two million streams of your song, Like,

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the benefit to you from there's only really one

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>for a band like Cars, which is no longer performing.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>We haven't played a show as God's Fence, so um,

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's not irrelevant because the bulk of streaming on

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Spotify is catalog, because the platform is actually oriented toward

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>non working bands or anyway old records catalog. So it's

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>no surprise. Why is that? How sorry? How is like

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in what sends. Does Spotify oriented itself towards non working well,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is it? Really? It's a great question. I mean, one

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>of the things that that Spotify is not is transparent.

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know how those algorithms work, and they

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>won't share that information. So why my band, my old

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>band might pop up on your feed, will never know.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you this, if we pay Spotify to

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>boost our work in their algorithm, they tell us, they

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>brag about it, that it will it will come up

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>more often. I didn't even know that. I didn't even

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>know there was a thing paying to be well, it

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't even be legal, is what you was. The other

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thing you might say, I didn't even know that was legal,

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because if it was radio or analog distribution, it would

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>not be legal. That is payola. Those these were fights

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that were fought in the nineties, fifties and sixties about

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>radio broadcast because radio becomes so powerful and corrupt and famous.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>DJ got caught and there was congressional action about it.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So paola wasn't illegal before Congress got involved. Spotify is

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>in a digital space. They claim they're not governed by

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>radio broadcast rules, and so they say they're not covered

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>by payola rules, so they have an official marketing. It's

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>two sided marketplace. They bragg a better in their investment

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>call and their investor calls. It's the discovery mode. They

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>call it Capital D and it's a program where this

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is This is the small way. They say it's not payola.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>They say they're not taking cash. They're taking a lower

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>royalty on selected tracks. But for all we know, there

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are other ways that they are taking cash because their

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>contracts with the major labels, for example, are privately held

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and never disclosed. So we've always believed in the industry,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>those of us who watched this, that the playlists were

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for sale. How could they not be Radio always was

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>radio continued to be after payal the laws, just in

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>third party arrangements so called radio promoters who handled the

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>cash in between. I mean, this is in my experience

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and my direct understanding knowledge, So how could it not

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>be on Spotify, which is even so powerful these playlists,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so in any case, but then loan behol while we're

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>busy accusing them of that. But officially, just but just officially,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't. There's no evidence as such, other than the

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>part about how you can an artist can agree to

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>take a lower royalty and theoretic right, but taking here,

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but here's the evidence. I mean, for one, taking Lottle

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>royalty is paying Spotify obviously say currently they say they're

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>algorithms are based on the consumer's interest, right, Like so

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if you if you're wondering why this gaspel fund to

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>come up in your playlist, you'd be thinking, what is

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it about my taste? That's the first thing you said

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as you introduced it. But if that's the case, how

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>could it change by if you give them a lower

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>royalty on a given track? Is not editorial placement on

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>They have two types of placement on playlists. One is editorial,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>one is algorithmic. They distinguish them even on their reports

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to us. They give gasp Funder, for example, next to

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>no editorial placement. I don't know if that's because I've

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>been so vocal, but I will tell you that Damon

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and Naomi, my own personal band, gets zero editorial placement.

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>They give us a percentage of our plays based on playlists,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and the percentage for editorial placement is zero percent. And

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>other artists who are very active and critiquing Spotify have

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a similar issue. Now I'm not saying I know that

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why, but I will put it out there that

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we know what for For what is the breakdown of

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic streams versus editorial I think editorial streams for Galaxy

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is something like five of our total stream so that's

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>next to nothing. In others we have not been given

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of their is they're officially declared editorial interventions,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which is they create a playlist that's like, this is

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the music you should listen to if you like. Now,

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>then there's the other type, which is algorithmic. Now, the

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic playlists, which both both of my bands get to

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>various degrees and it swerves around with time, are totally opaque.

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>We have no way of knowing what what is doing this.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But they have now admitted by bragging for their own

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>marketing program making this available from manipulation, that if you

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>cut them a deal, they will boost it so that

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that's the algorithm that's not the editorial side. So this

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>is the side that's supposedly based on nothing. But you

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>know all this data that they're collecting, so obviously the

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>data is manipulatable, that the algorithm is manipulatable. I mean

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of course it is theoretically anyway, because human beings create

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>those algorithms and make choices. But this is officially saying

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it is manipulatable for business purposes. Now, once you get

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that understanding of how Spotify is working, then it starts

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to open up a whole lot of other explanations of

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>how their entire business model is working. Because let's not forget,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>since we're on a business podcast, Spotify declares a loss

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>nearly every quarter on music. Music is a losing proposition

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for Spotify, according to them. And yet I'm sure a

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are listening to this have invested in

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and are not thinking they're losing punk cop proposition,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>because of course they aren't. But music is a loss

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>leader for them. That's what they That's what they claim.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So where is their profit coming from? And that's what

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you really got to start to look at with Spotify.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously coming from like other tech platforms that give

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>away their product for free, their content for free, It's

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>coming from data. Uh, It's coming from two sided marketplace

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>deals like Paola. It's coming from the stock market, from

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>capital investment, from growth, it's coming from market share that

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they leverage in all kinds of other ways that have

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with music, So they move further and

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>further from the lemonade stand version of music. It's not

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>my product or galaxy of hundreds product that makes Spotify

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>any money anyway, and that's crucial to seeing what what

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with the with the industry? Well, let me,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean the whole reason Spotify is back in the news,

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned this in the intro, of course, Neil

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Young saying he's going to take his music off of Spotify,

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>ostensibly out of his anger about their contract with Joe Rogan.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But how much is that as sort of in your view,

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess a, I don't know, an excuse, but as

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of like trigger point of there's already a number

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of musicians large and small, frustrated with Spotify. Spotify, in

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>your view, doesn't care that much about musicians. It may

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>view podcasts as more profitable and a potentially more durable

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>business model. So how much is the recent kerfuffle like

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a bunch of people who didn't like

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the model anyway suddenly like this is a good uh

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>rallying point to voice their displeasure with the platform. There

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was certainly no no organization taking advantage of this current moment.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Neil Young did that as he's always done things in

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>his career completely on his own, without announcement and without

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>contacting groups like my group Union of Musicians and Allied

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Workers that's been organizing very diligently for for over a

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>year about UM the financial model of Spotify UM. But

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the flashpoint is telling for so many reasons. It's actually,

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in pursuing a musician's version of what's

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>going on with Rogan, I would look to India Ari,

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>who was very very articulate about putting together all these

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>various issues that are going on with Spotify, Joe Rogan's

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>racism being paramount because it speaks to a model of

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>discriminatory practices that are tied to the type of capitalized

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>businesses Spotify is. And that I mean, I don't think

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to be a Marxist like I probably would

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be identified by by some of your listeners to to

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that these issues are tied together. On that how

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you treat your labor force is tied to how you

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>reward your labor force and also how you you know

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>how you set up your business in terms of capital

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and labor. Spotify is set up capital. They have no

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>connection to music. We are the labor that provides the

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>content on that platform, or that has built it to

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>at least in its first stage of development as a corporation,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they're on the New York Stock Exchange.

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>They are a music company, and they do not negotiate

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with us. They do not extend us even the common

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of having a relationship with us UH and they

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't reward us in any kind of way that

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we consider most of us consider fair. And yet we

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have no way of organizing and demanding anything from them.

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>We were not even at the table. They only cut

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the deal with the three major labels, not their artists,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but just the labels themselves. And the way they cut

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the deal, the way they entered the US market, was

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they gave the three major labels ownership shares in Spotify

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>before they went public. Now this is how then the

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>labels cut them a deal that screwed their artists. They

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>cut them a deal of minuscule royalties because the royalties

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>from the major labels point of view passed through the

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>major label to the artist accounts. Ownership was held by

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the corporation and was pure profit for the corporation, so

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they traded ownership for decent royalty deals. So the artists

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on the major labels were not any better represented than

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I was without any seat at that table at all.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>They were sold out by the majors. So the major

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>label artists are no happier with this than the rest

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of us. Now. The one difference, though, is that there

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are certain artists on the major labels who've been making

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>money hand over fists from streaming because what the model

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>does is consolidate it's more of the money in the

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>music industry into the top of the pyramid. It's it's

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's designed that way. The way they calculate royalties, they

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>put everything into one pot. It's called a pro roder

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>system that they capitalized on. The majors have proved this,

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So my streams go into the same pot as Taylor

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Swift streams, and then we each get paid back out

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>according to the percentage of all the total streaming that

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we each hold. Mine is of zero to to disappearing

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>infinity compared to what the few people at the top hold.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Now we get back to the whole question of the

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>playlists and the algorithm where Spotify is steering consumers to listen.

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they're steering them towards a handful of places,

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because the whole thing is designed to consolidate as much

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>all the money in the industry into the top. Then

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we get to the podcast because here's the magic for podcasts.

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>From Spotify's point view, you might have been wondering, why

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are they spending so much money on podcasting. Podcasting doesn't

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 1>seem that lucrative. I mean, in present company, I'm sorry,

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>podcasting as is not that lucrative in it for a

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons. But of course he has a lot

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of listenerships, so you know, can you turn that into

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>money somehow? Here's the thing for Spotify. There's no royalties

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on podcasts, so Joe Rogan streams have no royalties to

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pay right, Taylor Swifts do Adele's do. It may be

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>from my point of view, too little the Spotify sharing

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for the royalties, but from Spotify review, it is a

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>serious expense, and the more they stream music, the more

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that expense goes up. It's one to one. They can't

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>get around it except by pulling cacamam schemes like reduce

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>your royalty and will boost your algorithm. Right that what

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they're after is reducing their overhead. I mean again, it's

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>just back to the that's lemonade stand I understand they're

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to reduce their royalty exposure. They only have two

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ways to do it, pay musicians even less or get

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to stuff that doesn't have royalties. So they're doing it

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in multiple ways. One is podcasting. There's no royalties on podcasts,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>as you know. Second, they're commissioning music and owning content. Now,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>there's another long standing scandal in the music world that

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't get out to the general media, but did enough

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in the music press that is commonly accepted now of

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the so called fake artists. This is because Spotify at

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the at the top of some of Spotify's most popular

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>playlist So that means all the money and Spotify is

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>in the play lists, okay, because you go on the site,

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they push you to a playlist that then they control

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>what you what you're going to stream, and it's not

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just on the popular place at the top of the playlist.

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Because of course, how many songs you listen from the

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning and how how deep do you get into playlist, well,

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>most listeners just get a few songs in, so all

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the money is caused. It's the same pyramid thing. All

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the money is concentrated in the top of the top playlists.

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>That's where the bulk of the streaming is happening. That's

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>why payola is so crucial here, because of course, getting

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on the top of the playlist will make you a living.

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>What is Spotify do to to reduce their royalty exposure? Well,

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they started inserting tracks in those playlists and those popular

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>playlists that they own. How did they do that without

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>consumers noticing? They created fake bios for fake artists, That's

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what That's why it's called fake artists with you know,

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>photos that they pulled off of the internet, fake bios

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and a song title and they slip it in to

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a playlist. I mean, is this just on like you

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>instrumental sort of ambiance? No? No, no, no, no no, no,

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>it's anything, it's anything. So there other fake country musician, Well,

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know specifically country, but there are fake well

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so called fake there are fake tracks scattered throughout Spotify.

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>The only way we know about them is that journalists,

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>investigative journalists figured it out. They figured it out by

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>not recognizing a name at the top of the playlist

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and googling it, finding a bio page and then finding

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>no other links. It didn't have any existence. These artists

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>have no other existence anywhere in the world except at

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the very very top tier of one of the top

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tier playlists. So it's clear that it's Spotify owned and

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>not just someone who used like one of the aggregators

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to upload because I found that, because you can trust

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the copyright. And where did this music come from? There

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 1>all come from Swedish recording studios Spotify. The Swedish company

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Spotify said well, these aren't fake artists. These were created

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>by these producers in Sweden that that we paid to

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>produce this music got it. So their argument is what

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do you mean fake? This is as real music as

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>anything else. And now you get into another set of

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>investments to Spotify has been making, which is into AI.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>What is AI going to do for them or is

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>already doing for them? You can create sound like music

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that people can't distinguish in terms of style or you know,

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>so you feed in, take the take whatever is at

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the top of the charts at the moment, feed it

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all into AI and have it spit out a track

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's enough like it that a listener on a playlist,

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as passive listener on a Spotify playlist, will not stop

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the playlist and move away from the from it, letting

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>go continue when they hear it is maybe not an

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>artist they recognize, but they accept it going past them.

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>It sound I'm just looking. I'm reading a I pulled

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 1>up a Variety article from and it sort of gets

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>at this, and they deny that fake artists exists, although

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Variety article sites insiders who say that it is about,

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>as you say, reducing the streaming royalties that they owe,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the leverage that they have against the record labels. So yeah,

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think if you look at the language of

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>their denial, all they're saying is that these are real people.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they own those tracks is the

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>crucial part here. I mean, whether it's an artist that

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they signed to their own label like Rogan, that they

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>own a percent. So the key with the difference would

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>be essentially in your view, that they are real people,

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but have Spotify commissioned the songs and therefore the royalties

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not leaving, They're not They're not going as far

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not well, they're not going anywhere they own. The

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>problem is Spotify cannot be and this is the Rogan

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>controversy has brought this to the fore, and I've been

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>really happy to see this terminology surface in the mainstream

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 1>press about it. Spotify cannot be a platform if they're

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>also a producer, right there, a producer of music tracks.

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We have known this for years in the music business.

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>We have been screaming about this. Nobody cared, of course

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>outside the music industry, and those who are running the

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>show don't care because they're making money hand over fist.

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the estimates are that the major levels are

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>making a million dollars a minute from streaming. So obviously,

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we started this conversation and you know, as

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you point out the beginning, Galaxy never aspired to be

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>like a true like pop band that was going to

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 1>have like a megahad. Wasn't your seeing the lemonade stand

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>business model. Nonetheless, the pop scene has always existed the

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>hits driven record you know, whether it's radio stations, record

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>store CDs, etcetera. That's always existed just within the realm

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of pop setting. Aside, the end of the lemonade stand model.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Has it gotten even more skewed? Is streaming royalties to

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the handful of artists that make a killing on it,

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Taylor Swift, like the Adeles? Is it even

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>more skewed than it used to be if we went

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>back to say, record sales and radio plays in the

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>era of say Madonna, Well, here there's some squish nous

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's very hard to compare one to one because

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there has been a sea change from analog to digital

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how the business is structured and how

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the royalties are calculated, etcetera. I think everybody feels that

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:24.959
<v Speaker 1>it has gotten more concentrated. I don't know of any

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>good studies that I can point to two that make

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the case with numbers. I hope they're out there. If

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not, I hope somebody's working on it. But it

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of a difficult thing to compare. And

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot of the discussions around what's wrong

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>with streaming sometimes quickly revert to, well, how many hours

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>we're making a living in right versus today. It's just

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not the type of calculation that's that that exists because again,

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>because the business was decentralized so much more. And I

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think that even framing the question those terms is an

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>indication of how centralized it is now. We do have

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the figures for right now and here they are, according

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to Spotify themselves. Because so my my scrappy group of

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>independent arts, self employed artists that got together during COVID

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and are forming a new union called the Union of

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Musicians and Allied Workers Union of Musicians dot org. We

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>launched our own punk rock campaign to alert people to

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with Spotify and streaming in general. But

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we used Spotify as our target because they're they're running

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the show, they have the largest market share, and they're

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they're such a good enemy because they put the foot

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in their mouth all the time. So we chose them well,

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, as this podcast proves. And you know, we

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>launched a campaign called Justices Spotify, and we've got all

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>close to thirty thou musicians have signed onto it. It's

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's really it's made ripples in the music world,

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and it certainly has called Spotify's attention, because then they

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>launched a website to answer our accusations called Loud and Clear,

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was a website just directed to it's like

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a giant f a Q with their talking points counted

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to our arguments for what's wrong with Spotify on that website.

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is on Spotify's own pr designed to counter

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>musicians complaints. They say, wait, look how many people are

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>making a living from from Spotify and they say it's

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>thirteen thousand, four hundred globally are grossing fifty thou dollars

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a year or more? Okay, so this is their claim

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to the success of this model. It's very hard numbers

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so well as they're just like lift a little corner. Now,

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the only reason they said that was they thought it

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>sounded so good. First of all, their mission statement was

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to make a million artists a living. Four hundred is

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not a million. They're off by nine eight, seven thousand whatever. Right,

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>they're wildly off. And now let's consider what fifty thou

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>grows is for a musician, typically for a band, or

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for any artist, there is a label involved. We talked

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 1>before about how Spotify doesn't even platform unless you go

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>through at least a distributor, but mostly the lion share

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of stuff on there is from the majors over and

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>then you've got all the independent labels on top of that,

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>So most people on Spotify are on a record label.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Labels have various deals. Of course as a private contracts

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>privately negotiated, but as a rule of thumb, you can

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>assume the labels taking at least fifty of that income. Okay,

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>so now we're talking thousand dollars a year for thirteen

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half thousand artists globally. Now, so you get

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars in for a year. Now that's gross.

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Say you're in a band, say you're in Galaxy off

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I foundred that has three members that split the money evenly. Well,

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>now you're earning a third of dollars gross. That's without

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>any percentage that goes to management, distribution, all the other

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>overhead that any artist has producing product that gets itself

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify. So you're talking about below minimum wage. And

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 1>this is the figure that they're bragging about as their

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>big model of success. They have drained the music industry.

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Streaming is now eight of all revenue in the US

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for recorded music, all revenue from all sources, and of

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that Spotify as alliance share. So yes, it's a little

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more from the other platform. So if you're making

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>k from Spotify. Yeah, you're probably making I don't know, SEV,

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but you're not really making that. You're making less than

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage. So what have we traded for this global

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>model for most of us, for almost all of us, nothing,

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>We get nothing out of it. I could make that

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>money back with with two tho LPs or less, but

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they're making it impossible for me to do that. I

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>have to go through Spotify, and that's the problem. So

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>before we wrap up, but we just have a couple

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of minutes left, I want to ask a couple of

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>quick questions about this, because this is where I was

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>about to go. I mean, first of all, you know

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about okay, just modified but versus say the

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>late n A band can raise their profile in all

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of ways, and there's Twitter, and there's Instagram,

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's Facebook, and so sure, maybe the record stores

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>that network maybe is uh diminished, although there are still

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>our record stores and some independent music stores. But what

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>if someone says, like, you know, look, it's two Yes,

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there are obviously things that have gotten more skewed. On

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, the ability of a musician or a

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>band to become a name to promote themselves. They don't

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have to go through a record label anymore. There are

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other things that have countervailed that that allows someone to

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>get awareness and build fans on the internet and monetize

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>their music in some different ways. Why why does that

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not work? Why why does it not counteract by the

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's all these new platforms for an artist

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to promote themselves, well, because none of them are are monetizing.

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you stick monetizing monetizing in there, but but

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the platforms you mentioned are not. Don't pay. Twitter hasn't

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>pay your Facebook doesn't pay you. So the only modernization

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that has been open to artists in the streaming era

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is live performance. And it is absolutely true that you

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>can leverage your exposure. I mean it's basically, we're all

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>interns through our recorded music to the music industry, and

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>then we're supposed to make our living live. I mean,

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the truth is only some type of bands can make

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a living live. I mean, live music doesn't fit all

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the models of the type of music that you might

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>want to listen to and recorded music, and there are

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>entire genres of music that can't really turn a profit live,

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like jazz, for example. I mean there's a whole. There's

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole, there's a whole, vast amounts of recorded music

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that cannot translate into will go hit the road and

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just live that way. Then there are a whole lot

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of personalities and lifestyles that don't fit that way. Then

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a whole lot of people who fall to

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>pieces on the road because you know, actually going on

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the road is is a tall order, okay from And

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason why we have all these stories, and

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason why the end of Kirk Evans story

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. But here's what happened in the

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 1>last two years, which is COVID, so all of live

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:11.240
<v Speaker 1>music shut down. That's why my group got together Union

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>musicians and allied workers because we were all unemployed because

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>our only employment in the streaming era has been live performance.

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>That is only monetization available to us. All the modernization

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>channels of recorded music have been swallowed by streaming. That's

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that pie chart that the r i A, the Record

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Labels Association takes note of every year that's now up

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to from streaming. What's left in that seventeen is everything

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>else you can think of. It includes soundtracks for films,

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>uh selling to commercials. It includes radio performance, it includes

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>satellite radio, it includes everything else you can think of

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that monetizes recorded music. Streaming has taken it all. It's

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>done it by going into all the other markets and

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:00.720
<v Speaker 1>swallowing them. For example, back when we had coffee shops

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and bars, they play music, and they're supposed to play

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and we pick up a small license from that music.

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But what are they doing If you ever ask your barista,

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're playing their own personal Spotify account when on a

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>phone plugged into the onto the machine. They're not supposed

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And if you dig and dig and

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>dig on Spotify's website, you will come up with a

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 1>page that says, do not use this for commercial situations.

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>But boy, they don't work very hard to let people

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>know that do that. In fact, Starbucks as a deal

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>with Spotify where they give free premium accounts to every employee.

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can see what that does, right, So

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we lose that. Satellite radio it was a good income

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.399
<v Speaker 1>stream that was coming up because of they were being

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 1>installed in all the new cars. And there's a different

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 1>royalty model for salar radio that's very secure for musicians

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that was set up by Congress in the nineties that

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 1>was really booming. I mean, it wasn't a lot of money,

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but it was going up straight line up. And now

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going straight down because of course, what is everyone

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>playing in their cars? They stream instead of playing salid

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 1>raid because you don't have to play, you don't have

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay the subscription Sali radio or maybe already have

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 1>one subscription to streaming service. You just use that. So

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all these other channels branding, To take a great example,

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>people think, oh, you build your your thing. Brands put

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>on playlists on Spotify. They put our music on. They

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to negotiate with us. They don't have to

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>pay us anything for that because it's just another playlist

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, Nike presents whatever the hell they want to

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>label it. It used to be a brand wants student

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to associate themselves with your music. That was a

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>big payday. The biggest payday Galax five hundred ever got

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 1>was from Honda who used thirty seconds of instrumental track

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of ours in a television commercial. That was a huge

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>pay day for us, more than our record royalties that

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>we ever managed to collect from our labels. Um that

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:49.879
<v Speaker 1>we were assigned to before we took made our own label.

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's much better. But in any case, that doesn't exist anymore.

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Honda wants to have a playlist on Spotify, they just

0:50:56.080 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>build it. Do they pay Spotify? Probably to Spotify report

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that back as music income? No, right, you see how

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this goes, so that that's what's going on. Spotify has

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a model. It's unregulated. There are no set royalties from

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 1>anything except the three major label contracts that they did.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very winning model for destroying the music industry.

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>But here's the kicker that I really want to emphasize

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for your listeners in particular, it's not a winning profit model.

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>They still say they don't make money on music, and

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe them because look where they're putting their money.

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They're putting their money in Joe Rogan. And that gets

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>back to why Neil Young calling out Joe Rogan, which

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he had every reason to do, was explosive because it

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>actually speaks to the whole problem and in the ari

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 1>put it all together, even putting it together with racial

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>issues in the music industry, I mean, the music industry

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>has a long, ugly history of making money from black

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>artists that go to white executives, and you've got to

0:51:56.480 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>look at this tie to that too. Well, Damon, this

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was a fascinating conversation, and I'm sure there's plenty of

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>more roads and other aspects of all of this that

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we could go down, but I think that's a good,

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>uh place to stop it. Really really appreciate you coming

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.320
<v Speaker 1>out odd Life. Thank you for having me, really appreciate it.

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Take care of them. Well, that was for me. I

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>loved having that conversation. Like I said at the beginning,

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of Damon's music and a galaxy,

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but that really did actually put some pieces together for

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>me about the frustration because in my view or the

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>way I thought about it before, it was like the music,

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the music industry is always brutal. Very few people actually

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>get to become superstar musicians or make a living at

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who ever has made a living at recorded music

0:52:57.719 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>has of course been very lucky. But this sort of

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:03.800
<v Speaker 1>comparison that he made between the the the hits driven

0:53:03.880 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>pop model, which has always been hits driven, versus what

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he called the lemonade stand model, where you can not

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 1>expect to make a gigantic hit, but maybe between record

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>sales and touring taken a bit more income than the

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>cost to put it all on. That really clicked for me,

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was really strike against. So this

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>idea that with the loss of most record stores, the

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>loss of the CD business, and recently, of course the

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 1>loss of live music, that really everyone is shuffled into

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the hits business. That clicked to me. So I really

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that conversation, and uh big thanks to Damon for

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>coming on. So this has been another episode of the

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at The Stalwart. Follow my co host Tracy Alloway.

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:55.880
<v Speaker 1>She's at Tracy Alloway. Follow our guest Damon Kurkowski. His

0:53:56.000 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>handle is at Data Underscore Drummer. Follow our producer Laura

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Carlson at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg head of

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>podcast Francesco Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts.

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.