WEBVTT - Broadcasting from Bloomberg Government NEXT 2018

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>news from the world of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Bloomberg Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists, analysts, and more than a

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You can also

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to our radio show weekdays at two pm Eastern

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>only on Bloomberg Radio. Mentally, he's the CEO at city

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Link dot AI. He's here with me here at the

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Government next event in Washington. This concept of a

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>smart city, you know, that's that's very much top of mind.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to say, but what is it? Tell us

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>what it is? You know, our version is a digital city,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and it's all about the citizen, you know, creating a

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>frictionalists commerce and improving the quality of life. So everything

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the future is going to be digital, everything from

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>your calendars to your activities, to actually having artificial intelligence

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to predict and support your intent and more importantly, you

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>start to get a network of machine learning artificial intelligence bots,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>if you will, to optimize the supply chain to support

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>those intents within a digital city. So city link ai

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is a technology company that linked the data around people, places, activities,

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and things, and it's an operating system to make that

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>data more accessible and more useful using our we call

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>our EVE your Virtual Enterprise Artificial Intelligence platform. So it's

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>all about the citizen engagement. And you kind of stick

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a step back and think about Disney. Everything about Disney

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is about the guests experience. So what we're doing is

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>taking that approach and bringing it to many cities, many

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>university towns and create that environ seven to create. Basically,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we call it simple, convenient, and fun. All right, So

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>convenience comes at a cost to some extent, both in

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>actual costs and also you talk about transparency. We've talked

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot at this conference about access, access to information,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and access to data. How do you ensure that it's safe, secure,

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and that everyone's privacy is taken into account. Yeah, that's

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a very very big topic. You can imagine all the

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>large company like Amazon that you mentioned in Google and

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all tackling this the same issue. We are actually building

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a privacy model first, So the idea of having the

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>ability to opt in once will happen and own your

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>own data, have your own private personal assistant, your private

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>clouds that follow you using our platform EVE, your virtual enterprise,

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to actually archive and delete the data

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and manage your own data is where we're moving towards.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that is, how do we level the

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>playing field and push the information, the ownership and responsibility

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the citizens, back to the local environment versus

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a one place where everybody is going to know one

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>or two very large corporation. So we call that hyperlocalization.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want to ask you too though about development, uh,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of building these cities much easier to kind

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of build a connected city from the ground up, And

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious about the obstacles that need to be

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>overcome to kind of take our old cities and bring

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>them and make them new and make them much more

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>connected than they have been. That's a great question. In fact,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we we face that every day, and I think you

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have to take a step back and take a holistic

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>approach to this. So think about it from a consortium

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and a partnership perspective. Who's going to pay for all

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of this. So that's how we think about it. So

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>when we come in, we bring the capital. We have

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a practical, who market driven environment that has a real

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>return on impact investing. At the same time, because we

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are also a commercial real estate investor and developer, we

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>understand the hurdle to build, finance, operate an environment. In fact,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>we're building a smart district out in Grammacy District outside

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Washington d C. Coincidentally only eleven miles from

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>where National Landing will be right on the silver line

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>out in Loudon County. But more importantly, you actually have

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring in everybody. In this case, we bring the

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>tool set, we bring the capital, we bring all partners.

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Wave Capital Partners is one of our capital providers. So

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that holistic approach is the only way you can actually

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>move the ball because you have to optimize the resources

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>available in the local environment. We can call it for

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, I just a quick question. I'm just curious

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>geographically global ating. Is there someone, some country, some area

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to lead in the development of these types

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of city you know, in the United States. I think

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it has to be capital driven, in commercial driven, with

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a partnership with university and governments. So unlike you know

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>other countries, we actually have to have return on investments

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have to think about an economically viable solution.

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It is great to think you can go green, but

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you cannot underwrite it and finance it and attract the

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>impact investors to dry feasible and sustainable business model. It

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't go. So we're focusing on the US. There's

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>three point five trillion dollars in commercial real estate market

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the US. All model is simple. We're actually zero

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and asset. But we want to digitize the people, the places,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the things and activities in a hyper localized environment. UM

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and will actually give the power back to the citizen.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>That's that's only available now because the ubiquity of technology.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, ten years ago you wouldn't be able to

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>do this because it cost you tens of millions up

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars to achieve what we're able to do today in

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a small UM seven investment. Yeah, that's great, Manly CEO

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>at City Link AI here with me in Washington at

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Government next eighteen event. Because when you where

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>your fist will from, that will bring everybody down all right, Carol,

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So I know you're not worried about anything. You're always happy.

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You always got a lot of sleep. On the way

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>back from London, I'm joined now by someone who is

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>helping us put AI into perspective. He's got a new

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>book out. He's Daniel Wagner, founder and chief executive officer

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of Country Risk Solutions. Here with me at the Bloomberg

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Government next. Some of the book is called AI Supremacy,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Winning in the Era of Machine Learning. It's got a

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>very cool uh cover care. I'm going to bring it

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>back to you people racing. They've got flags made, They've

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>got heads made of flags. It's so cool. Uh, Daniel,

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Good to be

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with you so help us feel good about AI and

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>how it's gonna make our lives better and we shouldn't

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be scared of all the robots. Well, I think what

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>AI is really going to do is help the human

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>race be all that it can be. There are pluses

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and minuses associated with this, of course, but when you

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think about unleashing human potential, this, in my mind is

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what AI is really about. You know, you have such

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating background. We were talking a little bit about

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it before we came on. Are you worked at GE,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you worked at a I G. You worked for the

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Asian Development Bank. I believe you've worked all over the world,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so you understand that this is not a US phenomenon.

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Far from it, and the Chinese especially have essentially said

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we're coming for you when it comes to AI. To

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to the US, how is it playing out globally and

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and who's got the edge at this point. First of all,

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I should say that the Chinese get it. They see

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this as the future. They're devoting up to a hundred

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars over the next decade to make this

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a reality for them and to make them the premier

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>power in the AI arena. If you look on the

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>book cover, you see that there are five countries in

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the mix, including China, the US, Japan, Germany, Russia, and

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the US is currently kind of in the lead and

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>China's nipping at its heels. There is no doubt in

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>my mind, based on the amount of resources being devoted

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>by China, that this is China's race to lose and

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that it will very quickly, uh you know, succeed the

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>US as the leader. And I think it's going to

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>stay there in big part because we're not devoting the

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>resources and spending the money to make sure that we

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>stay on top. So it's a great point, and I

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>think everybody should, you know, kind of sit down and

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to this because we don't, I think, fully acknowledge

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money and effort and time that China

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is putting on a What will be the result if

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>China is the leader when it comes to artificial intelligence? Um,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think about you know, one HND one, one

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>country dominating this world. Right, There's already been a global

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>grad for AI engineers big time, and China's aggressively pursuing them.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Dan Daniel, what does this mean potentially on

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>a geopolitical level. That's a great question, and it does

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have geopolitical implications because the country or set of countries

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that rules the AI arena is going to rule the

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>future of the global economy. And my concern is that

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not only for the US, but the other countries that

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are not sprinting ahead fall further and further behind. So

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the question becomes, if China takes the lead and they

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>stay in the lead, will they ever be caught up?

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a pretty good chance they will not.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They understand the stakes that are involved, and they're putting

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>their money where their mouth is. They're not just talking

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>about it, They're doing it and are doing it very aggressively,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>through m and A, through the acquisition of talent, through

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>making sure that their graduates understand what AI is all about, etcetera.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for us? That's a very good question.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>We're getting all excited about DARPA getting a couple of

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, Meanwhile tens of billions are being spent by

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>other countries in a single year. Well, and I do

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think about Hank Paulson has warned about this former U. S.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury secretary about an economic iron curtain, right if if

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he talks about if the U. S. And China can't

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>get along. But I mean there's a there's a lot

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of ways of um the world kind of being divided

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>up as a result of being kind of first mover

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage when it comes to technology. So my perspective is

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that this really is the Chinese century. I think people

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>who don't acknowledge that, or maybe a little bit delusional

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>or maybe having a hard time falling off of our

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>own precipice and that's okay. We have distinct comparative advantages,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and so do they. It's very easy for them to

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>do what they're doing. They simply wave a magic wand,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and being an authoritarian government, they make it happen. They

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have to have a lot of discussion, they don't

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about allocation of resources. It just happens.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>In this country, it's a much more different process. It's

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>much more complicated, it's much more um convoluted, and that

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's to our own disadvantage. It would be really nice

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>if we had successive governments which acknowledged what it is

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that is at stake and we're simply proceeding apace so

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have a strategy and that strategy is going

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be implemented on an ongoing basis. But that's not

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what we have. So let's go back to where you

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>started this conversation, which was a pretty optimistic view of

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, how AI ultimately can make us better humans.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>One thing that we've covered in Bloomberg Business Week and

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of times, and relatively provocatively, and I think importantly,

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is understanding bias in machines and machine learning and trying

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to prevent that. I know it's something you deal with

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in your book. Are we worried enough about that? And

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are the right things being done to combat that? So

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we aren't concerned enough about it? People should understand that

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>there's bias introduced in everything that we teach a robot

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or a machine to do. They inherit our biases. That

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>includes racial bias, by the way, which has all sorts

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of unfortunate undertones when AI is put into practice. Uh,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there's not much that we can do about that. The

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>only way we lose bias, I think is when the

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>computers don't need us anymore and they can teach themselves.

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But of course then they've already integrated the biases that

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we have into the process. That's part of human nature,

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that's part of who we are. It will be really

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting to watch the evolution about how bias either becomes

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>enhanced or slowly disappears as AI develops in the future.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating such big questions. Congratulations on this book. The book

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is called AI Supremacy, Winning in the Era of Machine Learning.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Co author Daniel Wagner also the CEO of Country Risk

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Solutions based in Connecticut, but here with me at the

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Government Next Event and watched to Thank you so much,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>come back and join us. I know you're working on

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a new book. I won't spoil it, but it's going

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a good one as well. Back to you, Carol. Yeah,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly gonna be a focus in twenty nineteen. Speaking

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more about artis intelligence. You are listening to Bloomberg Business Week,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Carol Master Jason Kelly right here on Bloomberg Radio. You

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>say you want a rebel little show. No, all right,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is a very very cool topic we're about

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to get into, Carol. I'm very fortunate to be joined

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>by Diana Cooper. She's the senior VP of Policy and

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Strategy at Precision Hawk. She's joining me here at the

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Government Next event in Washington. So Precision Hawk, Carol,

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about drone. It's about drones. We've been sitting here

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about drones, talking about a sort of rogue drone

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>operation I was involved in a couple of years ago.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you were there, Carol, out in San Francisco. Um, Diana,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>great to be with you. So tell us how drones

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are kind of coming into the mainstream because you're talking

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>about using them for kind of business intelligence at this point. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So drones have been around on the commercial side for

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about four or five years now. Really started to take

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>off about two years ago when d f A put

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>out the first rule for commercial operations known as Part

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>one oh seven, which kind of made it more accessible

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>than through a very um expensive and lengthy waiverard process.

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And so the first applications were we we actually saw

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>where India agriculture space, so a lot of farmers are

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>using it to monitor their crop yield, look for UM

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>bug infed stations, water damage and things like that, and

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>really understand where to do precision UH interventions like nitrogen

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>application and things like that. UM. More recently, we've seen

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>energy companies as well as insurance companies doing things like

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>roof inspections and all kinds of new applications coming out

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. I gotta jump in because so I know

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I keep taking it back to London and our blood

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>breakaway of it. Well no, well I am. But what

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>was interesting is UM. One of the sponsors was Dell,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and they talked UM a lot about They actually showed

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a video clip of two people getting in a car

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>accident and how in a connected world versus the traditional world.

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>That kind of showed the two drivers and when you know,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I had to call their insurance agent was on the

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>phone waiting the other one the smart car said Hey,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in an accident. Let me call your insured. The

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>insure gets on Da da Da da, and then all

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden said hey, we're gonna send out a drone.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna look at the damage. And the drone comes

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and checks it out. Now, it was a little bit extreme,

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but as they said, this will happen and you will

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like instantaneously be able to kind of get it all done,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>get an insurance adjustment or or assessment. Um, you know,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like I said, courtesy of a drone coming out to

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>check out the situation, look at the damage. Like we're

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're getting ready for a very different type of world,

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>are we not? Absolutely? And that's that application is already

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to happen today, not just for accidents. But you know,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, our company did a lot of work after

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane Florence in North Carolina and a lot to the

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>areas we're just devastated and fully flooded. You couldn't access

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>them by foot, So traditional adjusters couldn't actually walk up

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to those neighborhoods and see what the damage was. There

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>were t frs in place, it was difficult for manned

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>aircraft to access and gather that data. So we're able

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to fly in very quickly with drones, gather really good data,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>help people's claims get processed faster and get back into

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>their homes or get some sort of a remedy. So

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask you because you arguably have, like the

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>engineers have a tough job, but you arguably have an

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>even tougher job, which is to ensure that sort of

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory piece keeps up with where technology is going.

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about the latest there and what you're

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>hearing from, especially from the federal level you're based here

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, About how much that the government is or

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't sort of embracing where you're going. Yeah, absolutely, We're

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>We're lucky to have a very forward leaning regulator, the

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>f A that you know, had the foresight not only

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to create the first commercial rule for drones a couple

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, which is fair fairly forward meaning for

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>given that time frame, but they also had the foresight

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to actually enter into partnerships with commercial companies like ours

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to have us test things like beyondline of site operations,

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually create the data so that they can have

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>data driven rulemaking for expanded operations. Uh so we're pretty

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>lucky in that respect. We want things to stay with

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the f A. Uh. What we want to do is

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>try to keep the cities and the states from actively

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>also piling on regulations on the drone industry. And so

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you do that? I mean that that would

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>seem like a very real danger at this point. Yeah, absolutely. Uh.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Fine Stein and Lewis each had bills on the hill

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last year trying to um get the ability

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to regulate up to two feet, which we think is

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>damaging from an innovation perspective, you can't build your business

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>across city or state lines if you have to deal

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with thirty six thousand counties regulating your operations. And also

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>from a safety perspective, you know, we have a highly

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated regulator with a great aviation safety track record. Counties

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and states do not have that track record and would

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>be you know, we would be seeing all of accidents

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>take place. What are the tricky things that still have

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to Diana kind of be worked out as we move

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>into a more drone prone world. Yeah. Absolutely, Um, you

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>know the first is really remote identification and tracking. So

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been an informal hold over rulemaking for a flight

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>over people or expanded operations because the security agencies have

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>concerns today. If they see a drone flying over a

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>crowd of people, they know that operation is likely illegal,

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and so that's a threat they need to mitigate. If

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone is allowed to do it under the rules, how

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>will they know what's a good drone versus a roade drone.

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And so really getting the rule making out for remote

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>identification and tracking is the next big thing that we're

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>waiting for, and it's supposed to drop imminently. Great. Diana Cooper,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Senior vice president of Policy and Strategy at Precision Hawk.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Fun fact, Carol, original name wine Hawk because they used

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to look over vineyards. I knew you would like that,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, Little Bruce Springsteen fourth a bit of New

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Jersey here in Washington, d C. We are Carol at

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Government next event and as we've been talking

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about artificial intelligence, so top of mind here, but I

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like the conversations are getting in a good way,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>much more complex and a very special guest joining us Saska.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Moissy Levich is head of AI Foundations at IBM, and

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, Carrol, if you didn't see this

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>in our notes, has a really cool Twitter handled data Priestess.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That is amazing. How did you come up at best?

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That is I thought about the data Jong keep Yeah,

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I like data preestiss. It feels a little more. It's

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a female power right there. You go, So tell us

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>about this intersection of basically the human and the machine.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You do so much work in this area. Help us

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>understand kind of where we are and where we're going. Okay,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so um, I'm going to start where we used to be,

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>which was like in nineties fifties when the whole field started.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>There was like this whole big fascination with creating machines

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then that can think and on that journey, we've tried

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so many different things, and I think we're still very

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>very early on that journey. But right now, we we

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>came to a point where we suddenly had this huge

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>access to massive amounts of data. We know how to

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>analyze it, how to parts it, how to tease insights

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>out of it, and we're actually beginning to think about

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>how can this take us to be hopefully maybe better

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or maybe more efficient, And we are beginning to to

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of put it into some sort of decision making.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh where we're going? I think there's an enormous evolution

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of us, and I think I would like to

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think that we we should be the ones driving it.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We should be the ones responsible for saying, hey, this

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is where I want to take AI next. These are

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of things that we want to create. So,

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, rather than maybe doing movie recommendations and taking

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>us to the best restaurant, can we put into some

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>really good use to humanity, you know, helping solve issues

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I love? Well, like what I love that idea? Uh? Yeah,

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So so I can give you plenty of examples, because

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>um um, I run a program at IBM called Science

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for Social Goods. So I'll just pull a couple of examples.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So one, for example, is how can we maybe mine

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>massive amounts of prescription data or or healthcare data to

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>understand how people get addicted to opioids because different doctors

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>prescribed differently, different people behave differently, and if we can

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>tease out these patterns, we can actually come up with

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the shot at creating more more responsible UH prescription guidelines

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and and curb the epidemic. Um. Another example is, okay,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>how about teaching computers to design new drugs that can

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>um maybe help us deal with the antimicro build resistance. Like,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>designing new drugs is enormously expensive and it takes, like

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, decades and an enormous investment, and imagine being

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>able to do that faster and cheaper and with a

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of help of kind of different type

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of creativity. They will take us to a really new direction.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And So what's your biggest worry as you design these systems?

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>As you think about this interaction between humans and machines,

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>where are we most likely to kind of get it wrong?

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So so I think, um, my biggest worial something that

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we always think about as we design them is what

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are the kinds of things they can be used for?

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They can they be misused their abuse? So you always

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>want to think about, hey, what are the the bad

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>things that can happen? Even if you design for a

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>good outcome, some bad things can happen. Um. And quite frankly,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>another type of word that I always have is is

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this notion of of security and safety and cyber security,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and this this idea that these systems can be hacked

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and manipulated just like other software systems, and that is

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>these day pretty big worry right. Well, and it's interesting,

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were talking earlier about artificial intelligence and

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>UM China really leading the way right deep pockets, a

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy and effort and the government behind it

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of really advancing on something like AI. And

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we talked about some of the geopolitical concerns potentially of

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe one country in particular leading the way

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on something. How does that factor into some of your thoughts?

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Just got about forty seconds left. I think it factors

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that we have to be ahead and

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's something that there's no boundaries anymore for scientific research,

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so just by saying okay, we are not going to

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do something, and that there is no edge completely democratized

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in ways that anyone can can develop new algorithms, and

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to keep up with that and think about that, right.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating fascinating stuff. Saska mois Levich is had ahead of

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a foundations at IBM, you know, and as you mentioned

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>also the co director of IBM Science for Social Good

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and IBM Fellow just fascinating and really important research. Joining

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>us here at the Bloomberg Government next event. And Carol,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like this echoes back to a lot

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of what we've been talking about in the pages of

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the magazine, especially around things like unintended consequences, things like

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bias and whatnot. These conversations getting much more sophisticated in

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a good way about how this technology is going to

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>be used and how it's not a binary system between

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>humans and machines. Listen, it's a powerful system and you

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>can think about all the good can be done, but

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we still have to kind of really understand because it

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>can go straight, just like things like social media. Right,

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's good, but there are some concerns about it. Yeah,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, please,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to try the questioning the Drive to the

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Globe than on Bloomberg Radio. It is time for the

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the Clothes On this Wednesday, I'm called Master

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>along with Jason Kelly. Let's bring in our guest Andrews.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Simon uh Is, Managing Director, Senior portfolio manager at Morgan

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Investment Management. Excuse me on the phone from Chicago,

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Andrew is it's Did I say it right? Slimon? That's right? Okay,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>forget right, forgive me. I knew as soon as I

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>say I said, I thought it was not coming out

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>right anyway. Tell me about this market environment. We have

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about there being more volatility in the marketplace. We

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly have seen it this year. We've seen stocks under

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>pressure once again. Um, how do you explain the trade

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>right now? Yeah? I mean, well, look in terms of

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a class the reversion to meet, which

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is last year we didn't have any volatility, so we

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>said we just do for more volatility. Uh. This year

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>number two is you know, we've had pretty good returns

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>for U S stocks off those two thousand sixteen lows.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it should come as a surprise

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is kind of more of a mediocre, flattish year.

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Is a pause, uh not the end of the world.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is if you have a pause in

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a more volatile year where the markets open, you know

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around two hundred and fifty days a year, you

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>know that creates a lot of a lot of movement.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And yet when we get to the end of the year,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>probably not much headway. And that's that's that's the scary

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>thing for investors because I'm worried that a lot of

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions are made, our knee jerk reactions are made

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at the wrong time. And I think, again, we'll get

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the year. Won't be that bad

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a year. It just won't be a great year. So Andrew,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that Europe is something that you have been

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>avoiding a bit because it has, shall we say, underperformed,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's very front of mine for a lot

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of us even today. You know, we heard from Prime

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Minister May a little bit earlier. She's got to deal

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with her cabinet. At least she's going to talk to

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Parliament tomorrow. Is Brexit the thing that could, once it's resolved,

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>make Europe a little more for lack of better term,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>investible without a doubt, absolutely, I think you it's a

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>very good question. You nailed it. And the way we

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.239
<v Speaker 1>see it when we look at stocks, there's just an

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary number of stocks in Europe that are telling it,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, very very low valuation, not distressed companies, just

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>companies that you know and followed out of bed because

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of brexits. So I think that that's the type of

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 1>thing that you know, that that needs to occur to

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have some rotation or people get a little bit more

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>optimistic on these days. And I look the return differential

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>between the US market and really the rest of the

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>world this year is so extreme that these are the

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>types of thing that caused some kind of reversal still occur.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>But is it just a case of volatility, some extremes,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but the world isn't falling apart. We talked to Peter

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Peter Koir Economics edited or Bloomberg Business Week. He's got

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a story in the magazine looking at the year ahead

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and saying, you know, folks, it's not so globally when

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at growth, um So is it a case

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of it isn't so bad. We just needed to maybe

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have more interesting and better valuations, cheaper valuations to kind

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of get investors back into the market, Or do you

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>see some problems on the horizon. Maybe it's politics has

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>played more heavily on other equity markets in the US. Right.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We've certainly seen Asia in China all the all the

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>worries about teriffs have much more negarly impacted China Chinese

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>stocks than the US. Europe has been has had this

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>cloud of Brexit over its head. So I think it's

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>more politics than anything that has weighed on really rest

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world more than the US. So talk a

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about China and how you figure out

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>valuations there, and especially when we think about the internet stocks,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the tech stocks. You know, we had Singles Day from

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba earlier in the week that gives us a

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of amazing window just by by virtue of the

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>scope of how much that they sell on a relative basis.

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there a play there? Should investors be thinking about

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that as an opportunity or is it waiting seeing sure?

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Just broadly speaking, without getting into individual stocks, this group

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of stocks, Chinese interset stocks are down significantly. In fact,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>at the lows, they had underperformed the US Internet Index

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>by fifty percent year to date five hero. The result

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the ps and many of these Chinese internet

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>stocks are half the counterparts in the US and um,

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that there is slowing there's there's been

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown in growth in China this year. But what

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I find fascinating is some of these companies have just

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>recently reported numbers, they were rather lackluster, and the stocks

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>stopped going down. And so I think what's happening is,

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, the slowdown has occurred this year,

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>so the year of your comparisons are going to start

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to get easy next year, and the stock market is

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>going to pick up on that. And so in many

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ways they have easier comparisons in China than they you

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>than the US. The US counterparts Great stef Andrew Slimmon,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Managing Director, senior portfolio manager from Marigan Stanley Investment Management,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Chicago. So, Carol, so

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>many inputs. It feels like right now in this as

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you said at the top, much more volatile market. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And can I just say that one of the stories

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that has caught my attention I ran into Simone Fox

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>when I mentioned it earlier, is this Sam's l who

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is apparently increasingly looking for exits outside of his real

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>estate empire. And so he's sold or plans to sell

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>stakes and at least four companies since October. This is

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>according to our own Bloomberg data. And in the same

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>period his company has announced one new investment. So I

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just think I go back to the top of the

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.719
<v Speaker 1>real estate market, and Sam's l selling his read uh

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and just getting out before everything started to come undone.

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And I just think, you know, we've got to watch

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>these big investors for signs of what they're doing, because

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think comming indication and maybe what they're thinking is

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to come and well. And to that point, Stevie Cohen

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just a few stories down from that, saying bear market

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.479
<v Speaker 1>coming in two years, another investor that people certainly tune into.

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to a Wednesday edition Bloomberg Business Week.

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jason Kelly, Carol Masters in New York, and this

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. You can also listen to our radio

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>show every weekday at two pm Eastern only on Bloomberg

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Radio