WEBVTT - It's a (Crypto) Ponzi Scheme!

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and a love all things tech, and very recently I

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>did some episodes about earth Link, the Internet service provider,

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about how there was a connection to

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>an investor who was later arrested and charged on counts

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of fraud having run a Ponzi scheme, and I very

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>briefly covered what a Ponzi scheme is, But today I

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>thought we would explore this a bit further because the

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi scheme is alive and well many decades after it

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>first appeared, and often these days we see it used

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in combination with a technology that grabs a lot of attention,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that being cryptocurrency. So in this episode, we're going to

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>explore where of the Ponzi scheme comes from and how

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it works in general, and we'll learn about cryptocurrencies and

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what makes them tick from a

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>very high level, and then we'll learn how these two

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>things came together, kind of like a Reese's Peanut buttercup

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and just as evil. Now, fans of stuff you should

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>know might be aware that way back in two thousand nine,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which was, you know, one year into us doing podcasts

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>at all, they did how Ponzi schemes work. It gave

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>birth to the phrase it's a Ponzi scheme. And so

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to those longtime fans who also listened to

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>my show, because there's gotta be some overlap between those two,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>right anyway. I know I won't be as entertaining as

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh and Chuck, but then there are two of them

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's only one of me. However, I will give

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it the old college try. Now. The term Ponzi scheme

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>gets its name from a specific man, Charles Scheme. Wait, no,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I read that wrong, Charles Ponzi. He would

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>be investigated and charged for fraud in the nineteen twenties,

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>but the actual method pre dates Chuck Aino by several decades,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and earlier example of the scheme that Ponzi used was

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the method of choice for one Sarah how in Boston

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen seventy nine. Even this was not the first instance.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>There were at least two other cases of very similar schemes,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>one in Madrid, Spain, and another in Berlin, Germany, both

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>perpetrated by women, and the general idea is much much older.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's explore the story of Sarah How. I'd love

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell you all about Sarah How, but historical records

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of her are scant. There are no known photographs of her,

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there are no sketches. Few details are about her past.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>At least a few verifiable details will get to that.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>We do know that in eighteen seventy seven she was

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>working in Boston as a fortune teller, so we can

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>assume a few things. Now. Pardon me, because I am

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a skeptic. So if you believe in stuff like astrology

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or fortune telling, you're likely going to find what I

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have to say pretty irritating. But people who are really

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>good at doing stuff like reading fortunes or doing astrology

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>readings tend to be very good at making quick judgments

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about people. And they also tend to know what sort

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of things are part of the commonly shared human condition.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a practice that's called cold reading, and here's how

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it works. You've got your fortune teller or your mentalist

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and they spout out a bunch of general

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>information towards their mark. Often they are actually addressing a

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>group of people, because that increases the odds of getting

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a hit if you're talking to more than one person.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But the whole goal is to cast a wide net

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so that something that the person ends up saying ends

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>up being perceived as relevant, and you make the mark

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>do most of the wreck for you. You don't have

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to know anything about that person. As long as you

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>get close enough to something that is relevant to that

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>person's life, they're likely to do the rest of the

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>work for you. So here's kind of an example, you know,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>just as hypothetical. Uh, let's say that the mentalist or

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>fortune teller says, I, since you have experienced great happiness

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but also suffered great loss, and I'm picking up on

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a name. It might start with the letter J or

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe are. The vision is hazy, and meanwhile you're waiting

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for your mark to fill in the gaps. And people

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>tend to be people pleasers, and they want to believe

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in these sort of things, and so they become willing participants.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So you might have a mark, say I had an

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>uncle named Jason, or my sister's name is Rachel or whatever,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and to the market seems as though you as the

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>fortune teller have divined something you couldn't possibly have known,

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>but in fact they're the ones who are providing you

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with all the information, and you just go from there.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And on a similar note, astrological readings tend to follow

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a similar approach by giving out a very general message

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>that can apply to nearly anyone. A fun test to

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>do is to take a horoscope for a day and

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>see if you can figure out which of the horoscopes

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>belongs to which sign. That you mix them all up

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>so that way you can't see the sign matched with

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the horoscope. You're just getting the messages, and then you

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have somebody else who has an undoctored version of the

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>document to see if you can actually match it up.

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you do it as a double blind, really

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>like if the person who is recording your answers does

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not have access to those answers right away, you're probably

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>going to find out that your success rate is about

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>what chance would suggest. Double blind tests that try to

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>match people with horoscopes show that there's not really any

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>correlation there, but hey, what do I know? I'm a cancer.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>There are also warm readings. This is where you start

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>already knowing something about the mark perhaps through the help

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of an accomplice. But the reason I even bring this

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up is that Miss How must have had a decent

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>knack at reading people, which would come in very handy

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>when it came time to fleece them. Later, in eighteen

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight, How launched the Ladies Deposit Company, which was

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ostensibly a bank. How recognized an opportunity. Unmarried women who

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>had no guardian had difficulty establishing an account at traditional

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>banks because it was a pretty darn patriarchal society and

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>unmarried women were second class citizens. And I should also

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>mention that at this time, if you weren't white, you

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>had an even more difficult time accessing the basic functions

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of society. Even How, when she was making the Ladies

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Deposit Company was only catering to white unmarried women. Essentially,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>white men had access to everything, and everyone else was

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an enormous amount of opposition. So How opened

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>up a bank that would accept deposits from unmarried women

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and and them alone. And honestly, if How had the means,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>she might have been able to have a successful business

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>without the need for trickery. But How was making an

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>outlandish promise to her clients, She claimed that deposits would

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>see an eight percent interest rate, meaning that depositing money

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>with HOW would see an eight percent return on that

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>money over time, and she said that if you were

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to deposit on in her bank by years ind you

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>would have an additional nineties six dollars earned through interest,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and she promised that early investors would get the first

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>three months of that interest paid in advance. Now that

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rate was significantly higher than what banks in the

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>general industry were able to offer, and when pressed on

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>how she could offer such high interest rates to her clientele,

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>she claimed that her bank had the fine anential backing

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of Quakers who were supporting it as a charity for women,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and her spiel worked, and she advertised all around the Northeast,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>gathering clients all along the way, and a lot of

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the women, when they received their advance would immediately put

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that money into their account with HOW in order to reinvest.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Historians estimate that she managed to get between two hundred

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand and five hundred thousand bucks in eighteen seventy

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>nine that would be worth millions of dollars in today's money. Eventually,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>investigators uncovered what was really going on. But it was

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty tricky to do because How was strict on our

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>policy of only serving unmarried women, which cloaked her from

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>most investigations. As this was a male dominated world, reporters

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>were nearly always men, and they weren't allowed inside house establishments.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>How claimed this was to protect her customers, these delicate

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>unmarried women, which society perpetually viewed as being helpless and

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just a potential victim, perpetually a potential victim. And that

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>really showed how clever How was. She had identified a

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>target population right for exploitation and at the same time

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to exclude people determined to investigate her.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But here's what was really going on. How would bring

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in a round of investors who would give her money

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to deposit into accounts. She then would seek out a

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>second round of investors, and using money from that second round,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>she would pay out the advanced interest to her first

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>round of investors. Then she would seek out a third

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>round and use that money to help pay out the

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>second round, and so on. The scheme required How to

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>constantly seek out more investors to pay out dividends to

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>her earlier investors, and meanwhile, the clock was ticking. She

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was helped out considerably by the fact that many women

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would reinvest their money into the scheme. They were doing

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so because to them it seemed as though they were

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>getting an incredible interest eight so more money in the

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>account would mean more money and interest down the road.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Their money would be making more of itself. But in reality,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this cash was largely going to fund How's new lavish lifestyle,

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>while she kept reaching for more investors to keep the

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>whole show going strong. She was also helped by the

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that the banking industry at the time was largely

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>free of regulation, making it something of the Wild West.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But for money schemes, it was an environment that allowed

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>for exploitation with less risk of oversight, and so there

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>was opportunity for the enterprising scammer. But How's scheme eventually

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was laid bare, and the press absolutely tore her to shreds.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And by tore her to shreds, I mean they didn't

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>just point out the fraud, but they disparaged How beyond

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what the facts could support. They claimed she was illiterate,

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>They said she was uneducated, They said that she was

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>hideous to look upon. In fact, How was clearly very

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.359
<v Speaker 1>well educated and witty, and the fact that earlier accounts

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of How never brought into account her looks tells us

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that she was probably, you know, pretty ordinary looking. Not

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>only that, but the reports on How began to fabricate

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an entire history of this mysterious woman, complete with salacious

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and frankly racist overtones. So we don't know much about

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>How's history. The history that was published was fabricated. I

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>won't go into the whole thing here, but to call

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it a smear campaign would be going lightly. Yes, How

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>had pulled a fast one, but it seems to me

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that the media was more upset that a woman would

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>find such success in what was generally considered to be

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a man's domain than the fact that she did so

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>through underhanded methods. In other words, the misogyny was thick here, folks.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>How stood trial for accepting money under false pretenses because

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>she had claimed that this was an extension of the Quakers.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>She served three years of a prison sentence, she got out,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>then she did the whole thing all over again. And

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>while I don't condone crime at all, part of me

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>admires the hell out of a woman who, when faced

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with a society that actively resisted the efforts of women

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to play a part beyond just being surviled two men.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>She rejected that notion and decided to go her own way.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that she was targeting other women certainly

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>takes the romance out of it, doesn't it. I mean,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if she were targeting like fat cat businessmen who were

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>accustomed to putting the screws to the little guy, this

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>would be almost a robin Hood like story. But with

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>how it was more like I rubbed from the poor

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and give to myself. She was caught a second time

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and decided to give up the practice, and she went

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>back to fortune telling. She lived out the remainder of

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>her days in relative obscurity and modest living, still fooling

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>people into believing she had some sort of mystical insight

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>into their fortunes. It's more like she had a pretty

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>regular insight into their wallets. But the heart of this

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>scheme is the idea that you get people to pour

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>money into what you're claiming is an investment, but in

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fact there's nothing there, and then you use the money

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>from subsequent rounds of investors to pay out the dividends

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>to the first round of keeping most of the money

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for yourself and to convince people to back something without

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking too much about it, you gotta do a few

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>fairly simple things. First, you need to promise a lucrative

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>return on your investment, and it has to be high,

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but not so high as to be completely unbelievable, but

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you can definitely stretch believability quite a bit. This taps

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>into a particularly common human trait. It's called greed, you know,

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the desire for more. Second, you just need to be

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>really picky about your clients. Now, this is helpful for

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of reasons. For one thing, by limiting who

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can participate can reduce the chance that someone's skeptical is

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going to catch onto you. For another, by restricting who

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>can participate, you create a sense of exclusivity. And people

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>love to feel like they are special. They want to

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be part of that exclusive club. There's this rush of

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sarahtonin when you get the sense of acceptance as you're

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>brought into the fold of an otherwise exclusive group. You

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>made it, you merited inclusion. And then there's the old

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>fomo or fear of missing out. People also really hate

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea that they were unable to pounce on an opportunity,

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and I feel this one a lot. I can't tell

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you how many times I felt low because I discovered

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>too late something that I could have participated in but

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I missed out on. So Hey, if you're trying to

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>manipulate me playing upon my fomo works, I'm just kidding.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't manipulate me. I'm onto you. So using these psychological

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tactics and leveraging aspects that most of us share, hucksters

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>can gather or an entire population of marks, and through

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>careful management in selection, the fraud fiend can keep things

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>going for quite a while, at least until the scheme

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>grows too large to support it and the whole thing

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>crashes down. Because ultimately that's what happens with these schemes.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>They can't work perpetually. You will eventually hit a point

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of saturation where it is impossible to maintain the scheme

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any longer. So you might live high on the hog

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for a while, but eventually you will need an exit strategy,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a literal one, if you plan to escape prosecution.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Sarah how clearly had at least a feel for all

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of this, as her version of the scheme took advantage

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of some of the very limitations that otherwise held her

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and other unmarried women down. She prayed upon affinity, meaning

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>she was targeting a group of people who had something

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in common. If you remember my episode about earth Link,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that investor, or, that scam artist was largely targeting b

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>who belonged to the Church of Scientology. Again, affinity. So

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>she took the restrictions of society and then turned those

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to her advantage, at least temporarily. But again, it's not

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>called a how scheme. It's called a Ponzi scheme. So

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who was Ponzi? Well, despite my habit of mixing up

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>people who share similar names, Ponzi was not the guy

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in Happy Days who wore a leather jacket, kicked jukeboxes

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or jump sharks. He was a different person, and I'll

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about him more after this quick break. So Charles Ponzi.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>He was born in Italy in the early eighteen eighties,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>while Sarah Howe was serving time in the joint for

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>her first foray into financial fraud yea for alliteration. He

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>immigrated to North America in the early nineteen hundreds. He

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>worked a series of odd jobs and occasionally he got

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in trouble for petty theft, and his dreams were much

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>less petty, but still involved plenty of theft. Ponzi himself

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was reportedly a man of small stature, standing only five

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>ft two. Reportedly, he knew no English when he first

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>traveled to the United States. He learned it through immersion,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like many other immigrants. Even if he hadn't already shown

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a habit of dipping into criminal activity beforehand, he probably

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>would have found it really challenging to stay on the

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>straight and narrow because America is in fact a country

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>made up of immigrants, but the America of the early

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century had a pretty nasty xenophobic streak going through it.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Communities of immigrants, like those from Ireland or Ponzi's home

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>country of Italy, were frequently the subject of scorn and suspicion,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>which in turn would become something of a self fulfilling prophecy.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And when there are very few avenues for legitimate prosperity

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>open to you, there isn't much choice but to explore

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the illegitimate pathways. So sure, Ponzi already had a history

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of larceny, but I think even if he was as

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>innocent as can be. Before he arrived in America, he

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>would face realities that created a lot of, let's say,

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>incentives to dip into crime at any rate. That's moot speculation,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>because we know he definitely dove into some illegal activities.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>He would spend three years in prison after being caught

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>forging checks, and he spent another two years in prison

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>after being caught in an operation that was smuggling Italian

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>immigrants illegally across the Canadian border over to the US,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>but that did very little to deter him from a

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>life of crime. Rather, his determination to pull a scheme

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>was taking shape, largely influenced by his experience working for

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a crooked bank back in Montreal, Canada. The bank was

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially following the same practice Sarah Howe had made famous

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>decades earlier, paying out extravagant dividends to customers by taking

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>money from later rounds of depositors. Ponzi isn't managing that

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>particular bank, but he did work there and apparently picked

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>up some tricks along the way. In nineteen nineteen, he

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hit upon the heart of his scheme, which involved something

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>called international reply coupons or i r c s. And

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>here's how they worked. Let's say you immigrated to America

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>from Europe and you have family back on the continent.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You're struggling to attain the American dream. In the meantime,

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>your family writes to you to stay in touch, and

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because you're still getting up on your feet, your family

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>encloses an I r C in their letter to you.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>The I r C is a coupon for return postage,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>which allows you to write back to your family without

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>having to purchase your own postage, thus saving your money,

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so you can, you know, try and prosper. But there

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>was a possible disparity in the value of the I

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>r C because the cost of the I r C

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>was dependent upon the country of origin. So let's say

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>your family's in Spain, and let's say the cost to

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>send a letter from Spain to the United States is

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>five cents, and an I r C costs the same amount.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So your family spends five cents on an I r

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>C to put inside the letter, and then spends another

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>five cents to post the letter to the United States.

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>But let's say that in the US it costs ten

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>cents to send a letter back to Spain. So you

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>take this I r C, which remember, your family paid

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>five cents for back in Spain, and you redeem it

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>in the United States for postage back to Spain. But

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the I r C allows you to get ten cents

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>worth of postage. So while the I r C cost

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>five cents in Spain, you can redeem it for ten

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>cents in the United States. And that was the heart

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>of Ponzi's scheme. In a way, it was an extension

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the basic idea that you should buy commodities at

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a low price and sell them for a high price,

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which generally means you've got to find a place where

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the price of something is pretty low, usually because that

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>region produces a lot of whatever the commodity is, so

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>supply is high. Then you transport those goods to a

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>place that has a higher demand for that commodity and

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you sell it for a profit. Now, over time, this

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>can lead to changes in price at both locations. The

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>source might start raising prices and the destination might start

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>decreasing demand. But for a time there's a lot of

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>profit to be made, and this is completely legal and legitimate.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi's pitch revolved around this idea that he would be

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>able to purchase I r c s for a low

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>price in other countries and redeem them for much higher

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>returns elsewhere. It wasn't that different from people who try

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to make money in currency markets, relying on the exchange

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>rates of various currencies. Ponzi might have originally been sincere

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in his plans, hoping to leverage the market to make

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a profit, but even if you were sincere, the plan

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was never going to work at scale. The actual value

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of I r c s was very low, just a

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>matter of a few cents each, So to operate at

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a scale equivalent to the investments that Ponzi would start

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>accepting would require more I r c s than the

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>market actually had. If I give you a check for

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a thousand bucks and you have promised that you're gonna

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>give me a fifty return and interest within forty five days,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which was what Ponzi was promising people, and it's all

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>through buying up I r c s that just cost

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a penny in one place, it can be redeemed for

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>five cents somewhere else. That's going to require an awful

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of I r c s to make up that fifty,

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>And you're gonna owe me in forty five days, and

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just one investor. So this plan just could not

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>work at scale, and so Ponzi was going to follow

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in the footsteps of how and others. The premise of

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the scheme was a bit complicated, this whole idea of

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I r c S, but that worked to Ponzi's benefit.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>It helps if the flam flam you're selling to Marx

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit on the complex side, because it

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder for people to sell us out that

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a scam. If what you're selling is complicated enough

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that the average person can't really follow it, but it

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds legit enough to fool them, you've got yourself a

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>potential gold mine. You just need to sound like you

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>understand how it all works. Even if it doesn't work.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>It puts the confidence in con man. Sound assured enough,

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and folks will tend to think you really got it together.

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi was promising a pretty incredible return, that return on

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>investment within the first forty five days, with future payoffs

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>making everyone truckloads of cash. He began the old practice

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of robbing Peter to pay Paul with that old gimmick

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of taking newcomers money and paying out dividends to early

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>investors and pocketing the rest, and all of those early

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>investors reinvesting that money and then just rents and repeat,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>same scam, just different trappings. He attracted a lot of customers.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Some were poor Italian immigrants, much as Ponzi had been

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 1>when he came to America in nineteen o three, so

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>again we have that affinity going on there. Others were

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>people of high social stature and those with the respectable occupations.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And over the course of eight months, Ponzi was rolling

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>in dough, bringing in an estimated fifteen million dollars in

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty. If we adjust for inflation, that's nearly two

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in today's money. To say that Ponzi

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>lived in luxury is kind of under selling it a bit.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>He bought a very expensive mansion in Boston. He bought

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a luxury automobile. He really was living the dream. He

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>also attempted to invest in legitimate businesses in an effort

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to try and shuffle some money around to pay off

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>investors of his primary scheme, as it was becoming increasingly

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>difficult to meet the interest payments of the various rounds

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of investors. Now it helped that again a lot of

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>those investors would turn around and reinvest their interest payments

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the scheme, but it still meant he had to

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>come up with those dividend payments on a regular schedule,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was getting more challenging to do that. Ponzi

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>was also the subject of a lot of publicity. This

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was actually something that Ponzi sought out, because, after all,

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he needed more people to be aware of him in

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>order to get more investors to keep the whole thing going.

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>But it also meant that more people were paying closer

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>attention to his activities, and at least a few of

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>those people knew that if something seems too good to

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>be true, it probably is, and so the net was

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>gradually closing around Ponzi. In July of nineteen twenty, the

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Boston Post published an article revealing that the math just

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't add up to support Ponzi's story. The reporter pointed

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>out there just weren't enough I r c s in

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>circulation to support the amount of money that Ponzi was handling,

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and that the very foundation for his investment scheme was

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>literally impossible. Now that should have been the end of it. All,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but Ponzi spun a story about how he had actually

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>long since switched over to a different investment strategy that

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't involve I r C S at all, but he

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>never revealed that trade secret in order to prevent others

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>from stealing his business. In other words, he was saying, oh, yeah, no,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if I were just using I r C S, I'd

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>totally be a liar and a thief. But I'm not.

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm using this other method only I can't tell you

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>what it is, but trust me to keep things moving.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi even paid out about two million dollars worth of

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>dividends to investors, which actually helped prevent a run on

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>his company. In fact, a lot of those investors, once

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they were reassured by this payment, chose again to reinvest

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in Ponzi scheme, and so you was able to keep

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>things afloat a little bit longer. But the net cinched

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>tightly because of a decision that Ponzi himself made. He

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hired on a public relations manager who happened to be honest,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and this manager suspected that Ponzi methodology was in fact fraud,

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and he went to the press and the authorities Ponzi

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>was arrested on charges of fraud. He was tried and

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>convicted and sentenced to go back to prison for three

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half years before he was let out on parole.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>He was then arrested again. He jumped bail, headed to

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Florida and tried to run a real estate scam, but

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there he was arrested again, sent back to Massachusetts and

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to another seven years in jail, and then subsequently

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States government deported him to Italy and said

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>there you you handle this guy. The investors back in

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States and then Canada lost almost all of

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>their money. Some of them saw a return of around

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of their actual investments, but no matter why,

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a loss. As for Ponzi, well, he hooked

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.479
<v Speaker 1>up with Mussolini back in Italy and joined the Fascist movement.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>He was briefly an official in Mussolini's treasury department. However,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it became here that Ponzi's business acumen wasn't all there.

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He knew how to run a convincing scam, but not

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>how to handle, you know, real financial matters. So Mussolinian

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>decided to send Ponzi off to Rio de Janeiro in Brazil,

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>where he would manage an airline called Altalia until all

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Talia was forced to close due to World War Two.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi ultimately would live in poverty in Brazil and died

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in a charity ward. In the publicity and the overenthusiastic

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>support of Ponzi before the scheme came tumbling down are

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>likely what led people to refer to this practice as

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a Ponzi scheme. But as we've learned, Ponzi was not

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the first to do it, nor was how and honestly,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of robbing Peter to pay Paul is

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a very old one, and of course he wouldn't be

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the last person to do it either. When we come back,

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>i'll talk about one of the most recent incarnations of

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ponzi scheme and how it ties into the complicated

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>world of cryptocurrency. But first let's take another quick break

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so cryptocurrency. After even just a brief overview of this topic,

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you will see how it becomes an ideal focus for

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a Ponzi scheme. The way it works is pretty hard

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to explain to the uninitiated, which frequently can include people

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>who happen to have a lot of money, but they

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>want to have more of it investors. In other words,

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and moreover, one of cryptocurrency's most important features is that

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you're usually talking about an unregulated currency that is independent

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of any government or financial institution backing, which means that,

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like the banking industry of the late nineteenth century, it's

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>prime real estate for scam city. But we should really

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>start with defining cryptocurrency. A lot of folks think cryptocurrency

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and bit going are synonymous, but that is an oversimplification.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is a type of cryptocurrency, but not all cryptocurrencies

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are Bitcoin, just like all dogs are mammals, but not

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>all mammals are dogs. Bitcoin's identity is tied to the

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>concept of blockchain, which in itself can be used for

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>other things besides cryptocurrency. But what the heck is cryptocurrency?

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Oxford defines the term as quote a digital currency in

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which transactions are verified and records maintained by a decentralized

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>system using cryptography rather than a centralized authority end quote. So,

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in other words, instead of having a government or a

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>financial institution overseeing and verifying transactions and keeping a ledger

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of everything, there is some computational system in place to

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>perform this task, and it is dependent upon cryptography. Okay,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so what is cryptography. Well, simply put, it's encoding. It's

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>taking information and using some form of reversible transformation on

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that information. In the transformed state, it is difficult or

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:12.719
<v Speaker 1>ideally impossible to determine what the encoded information actually is.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Only by performing the reversible transformation can you get at

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the original form of that information. With Bitcoin, the system

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>has transactions that are awaiting verification, and as part of

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the verification process to update the system wide ledger that

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>keeps track of where bitcoins have been spent and how

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they have changed hands. Obviously that's important, otherwise you could,

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in theory, spend the same bitcoin more than once and

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>then the whole system cracks. Well, the system will generate

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>an equation that is missing a random number to solve it,

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and computers connected to the system try to essentially guess

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that random number, and when a computer does this, the

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>equation is solved. The winning computer selects which transactions are

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to make up the next block in the blockchain.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Those transactions are verified, and the block of verified transactions

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>joins the growing chain of transactions that trace all the

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>way back to the very beginning of bitcoin. Oh, and

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>every machine on that system receives an update on this chain,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so that this distributed ledger is up to date across

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire system. And that's how you know that all

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of these transactions are legit. In return, the computer that

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>succeeded in guessing the number is awarded a certain number

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoins. The quantity of bitcoins is fixed, meaning that

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually every bitcoin that will ever exist will be in

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>circulation and no more will be made. At the time

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm recording this, the value of bitcoins is astronomical, with

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>one bitcoin equal to nearly thirty seven thousand dollars. It

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>might be even more by the time you hear this.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And if your computer, or more accurately, your network of

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>very powerful computers, is the one that solves the equation,

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you would get six point two five bitcoins right now,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>which means you break in around two dollars per block solved.

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>This explains why there's such a rush to scoop up

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff like powerful graphics processing units or GPUs, which are

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>better suited to solving these kinds of problems. Oh and

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to compensate for that, the system can actually adjust the

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>difficulty of the next problem that spits out when it's

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>time to verify a new block. The goal is for

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the time between the problem being broadcast to the system

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and the solution coming back is around ten minutes. So

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if a computer on the system is solving the problem

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in less time than ten minutes, the system will essentially

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>make the future problems more challenging. Now, if that sounds

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a little weird to you, that's a pretty common reaction

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's what scammers bank on, figuratively speaking, because with

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that unusual approach comes a lack of understanding and familiarity.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But because of the success of Bitcoin, there's a general

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>sense that cryptocurrency is a way to make stupid amounts

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of money super fast, and it's deregulated. You couldn't ask

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>for a better set up as a confidence artist. You

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>just need to demonstrate that you know what you're talking about,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least you appear to, and you can lure

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>folks in with the promise of untold riches, and you've

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>got success stories like Bitcoin to point at as your evidence. Now,

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>according to a report titled the twenty twenty State of

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Crypto Crime published by an analytics firm called chain Analysis.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>In twenty nine, the cryptocurrency community saw four point three

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of digital money go to scammers. Now,

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that includes all types of scams, including selling customers fake

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>tokens for digital currency. But of all, the cash fleaced

0:34:55.520 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>from victims followed the old Ponzi scheme. And yeah, the

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>actual scheme is the same as it always has been.

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a promise of a means of generating a high

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and rapid return on investment, and the meteoric rise in

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>value of bitcoin in particular makes this seem plausible. I mean,

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>when bitcoins first emerged, they were peaking in value at

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about eight cents per bitcoin, eight cents in and a

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>decade later there worth nearly forty thousand dollars for one bitcoin.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>That is a fact. It is also a very difficult

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to believe fact. It does feel unbelievable, but it's true.

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And when you've got a truth that seems impossible, it's

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy to sell people on the idea of equally

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>impossible things. So convinced that the scammers are going to

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>use the weird, seemingly magical world of cryptocurrency to make

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>investments balloon, exponentially. People poured money into these schemes, and

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the scammers, like those in years past, take the money

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of new investors, use a little bit of it to

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>pay out dividends to earlier investors, and then hold on

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to the rest. And like schemes of the past, they

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>frequently will see those early investors reinvest the quote unquote earnings,

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which not really earnings. You're not earning more money, you're

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>just builking more investors. So the scammers end up getting

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep way more money than they ever pay out,

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and they keep it going for as long as they can.

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But like every other Ponzi scheme, the strategy only works

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for as long as you're able to get new people

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to sign on, and you often just need to seem

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>semi legit and appeal to people's greed in order to

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>get bites. Take the scam plus Token for example. This

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was a scam out of China that primarily targeted investors

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>or suckers if you prefer in China, Korea, and Japan.

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>The pitch was that plus token was a type of

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>digital wallet, and the scammers claim that if users purchased

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a plus token with digital currencies like bit, going or ethereum,

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they would see huge returns on that investment. The scammers

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>went big with their approach, taking out ads in supermarkets

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and using the messaging service we chat to reach potential targets. Reportedly,

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 1>more than three million people fell victim to this scam,

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>signing over their digital currency to these hucksters who are

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>really just selling fake tokens. And like all Ponzi schemes,

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the scammers used money from later investors to pay out,

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a dividend to the earlier ones. And because

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>of the nature of cryptocurrency, it's pretty darn hard to

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>track down all the perpetrators and punish them. That plus

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>scam was reportedly a monumental success, with the scammers stealing

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what amounted to around three billion dollars that's billion with

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>a B. The scam ran its course through July of

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen, when the scammers tried to high tail

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it out of there, and Chinese authorities claimed to have

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>arrested a hundred and nine people connected with a scam,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>including twenty seven believed to be chiefly responsible for it.

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>And while investors lost a huge amount of money, it's

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not exactly easy to get cryptocurrency out of the system

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and converted into other forms of currency. In other words,

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to launder and get hold of that cash,

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>especially in those amounts. It requires tons of money laundering,

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>which in turn can sometimes create enough of a digital

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>noise for authorities to take notice and then try and

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>track down who is behind the activity. The plus token

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>shenanigans were so disruptive that they affected the exchange rate

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoins, the value of bitcoins, and for a while,

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the cryptocurrencies value against the dollar took a big hit.

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it has since fully recovered and then some. There

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are other examples of cryptocurrency ponzi schemes. In the United States,

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice filed charges against five defendants alleging

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that they had defrauded investors out of seven hundred twenty

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>two million in dollars using a similar ponzi scheme called

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the bit club network. The bit club approach involved pitching

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>investors the chance to put their money into cryptocurrency mining pools.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So from what I can gather, they were claiming that

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the investment money would go toward building out computer systems

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that would solve those equations I mentioned earlier and do

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so at a rate fast enough to be a profitable investment,

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So the bitcoin's mind would end up generating value that

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 1>could be distributed to the investors. And when you're talking

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>about making a couple hundred thousand dollars potentially every ten

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>minutes or so, assuming you've actually got the computer power

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that can outclass all the other computers on the system

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to do the same thing, well it sounds like

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a no brainer. But an investigation showed that, counter to

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what the bit club network claimed, the payouts for investments

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>had little or nothing to do with the performance of

0:39:56.160 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the cryptocurrency mining pool. The scammers were using investor spent

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>rounds to help pay out high dividends early on, which

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>attracted more investors, and then they gradually began to decrease

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the amounts they were paying out. Meanwhile, the actual performance

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of the mining pool wasn't really providing much in the

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>way of revenue. It was all down to that classic

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>robbing Peter to pay Paul. According to investigators, internal communications

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>within the bit club network showed that the scammers held

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>their targets in contempt, calling them morons and sheep. So

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty safe to say that they were fully

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on board with pulling a fast one on their marks

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>until they got caught. Anyway, the use of cryptocurrency as

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the foundation for ponzi schemes is bad enough to prompt

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the u S Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC to

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>publish a brochure warning people about them. And it's a

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>good reminder that when you are faced with an opportunity,

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you should examine that opportunity critically. If the promised returns

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed too high, If they are significantly higher and you

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>would find elsewhere on the market, If the means for

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>generating revenue seem overly complicated or even convoluted, those are

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>all red flags. If the opportunity is reliant on people

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with a shared affinity, such as when Sarah How targeted

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>unmarried women, that's another big red flag. I think the

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>real lesson here is that the smoke and mirrors can

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>change over time, but in the end, these schemes all

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>rely on the same old tricks as what we saw

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that more than a century ago, and as long as

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the scam seems to work on people, there will no

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>doubt be con artists willing to use it. It can

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be extremely profitable at least in the short term. Now

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't hear many stories of people who ran that

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of scheme and then we're able to make a

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>clean getaway. A lot of these stories ultimately end with

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the con artists caught and prosecuted. So I guess crime

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>does pay, but it also demands its own high price.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up this episode of tech stuff. I

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to cover it because again, I think critical thinking

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is something we all can focus on and get better at,

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>myself included, And it's good to remember that just because

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>something might involve a cutting edge technology doesn't mean that

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>underneath there isn't a very old hoax or scam at play.

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it over and over with a lot of companies.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Saros is one that comes to mind that wasn't so

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>much a Ponzi scheme, but it did look like it

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a shell game with trying to

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>keep investors in the dark as far as how far

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>along or not far along the technology was. So again,

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it's good for you to use critical thinking when you're

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at chances to invest money. You don't want to

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get burned. You want the best chance for success, and

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to support people who are you know, doing

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>real work out there. So that's it for this episode.

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>If you would like me to cover a specific topic

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>in the future, whether it's a company, a trend in tech,

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 1>how a specific technology works, whatever, let me know send

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>me a message. The best way is on Twitter. The

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>handle is text stuff H s W and I'll talk

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an I

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio,

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.