WEBVTT - Best and Final: WBD, IPO, BNPL

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello. Hi, welcome to

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly podcast where we talk

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levian and I

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>write The Money dot Com for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I like Apostle merger fight, but like, yeah, I don't

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>like a media deal because everyone pays attention to the

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>media deals, and the Warner Brothers merger fight has been

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>wall to wall coverage everywhere, including the Money Stuff newsletter,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, I don't know, I can't keep up

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with it.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was going to say, when we were talking

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>about topics and I suggested Warner Brothers, it seems like

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you were not psyched, and it's like, I don't know

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>your column that you write would suggest differently. I agree

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>with you, though I don't really get jazz talking about media,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and obviously we're covering it on Bloomberg Television as well.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>This one. The fact that it's become this bidding war

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>does make it kind of fun and interesting.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, right, Like I merge your bidding war is

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting although it's like a strange bidding war. Yeah, recruiting

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is on like Thursday afternoon, who knows. But basically the

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>deal is that on Friday, Warner announced they signed a

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>merger agreement with Netflix fair price, let's call it like

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine or thirty dollars in a mix of cash

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and two different flavors of stock, mostly cash, but a

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of the value comes from two flavors of stock.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And then on Monday, Paramot Skydance jumped in with a

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars cash tender offer. And one thing that's worried

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about the bidding war is that, like those bids are

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty close, and a Warner's board did determine that the

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Netflix bid was higher because they valued some of the

0:01:57.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>stock higher. So I think that the bid is our

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty one on our thirty two dollars to share. But

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>also like they did an auction, they head advisors, they

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>took bids, Netflix bid whatever the number, and Paramount bid

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars in cash, and Warner looked at that and

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>we're like, we're gonna take the Netflix bid because we

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's higher. And Paramount went to shareolders with the

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>same bid that got rejected. It's like kind of an

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>unusual move, Like you normally you raise your bid to

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like to be like, look at how great this bid is.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And here they're like going with the same bid and

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>arguing the value of the stub stock on the Netflix pid. It's,

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess, strange way to connect a bidding. More. They've

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>also gone on TV. I mean like this is not

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>our best and final offer, which is a crazy way

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to connect a shipping more Like, ordinarily you don't negotiate

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>against yourself, and if you do negotiate against yourself, you

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. You know, You're like like I haven't got

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise the bid, but instead they're like, we're not

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to raise the bid, but this is not our

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>best and final offer. Like how could you tender to that?

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>How could you be like, okay, you can have it

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for not your best and final offer.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Well you too that. It's also an interesting strategy since

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 2>they need this to be a friendly situation with Warner

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 2>Brothers as well.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And they don't like strictly need it, but like they

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of need it, like they've conditioned their offer on

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it becoming a friendly Yeah, it's not that weird, Like

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>people don't usually do hostile deals all the way through

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five, you know, like you do a

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>hostile deal, the pressure of the board into coming to

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the table with a friendly deal like this is you know,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of how Twitter worked out, right, It's

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like a normal playbook. Yeah, but they're not doing a

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>pure hostile deal. They're not tendering to share elders and saying,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, give us your shares and we're clothing and

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>never mind what the board says. They need the board

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on side, and so it is a negotiation where they

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>are like waging a public pressure campaign on the Warner board,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're not just like doing a pure hostile offer.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>So what happens here? I mean, does Netflix now raise

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>their bid?

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who has to move first. Yeah, right now,

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Warner has said they're sticking with the Netflix deal. Paramount

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>can close it thunder and it's all just sort of

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like a limbo and you could imagine Netflix just waiting

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it out. But I think given that Paramount has said

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>things like this is not our best and planal offer,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>probably the next move is for Paramount to raise. But

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think they're sort of seeing what

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the shaholders said, if all of the shareholders are tendering

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>into their offer and like calling up warners bored and

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>saying the Paramount deal is so much better, then maybe

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Paramount can get away with it. But it's just hard

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to imagine them paying thirty dollars a share when they

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>said they'd pay more. Yeah, so I think they have

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to raise. But then Netflix has there ra is you know,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like and forth.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>There's also the detail that Paramount is for the entirety

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>of Warner Brothers Discovery, including the cable networks, whereas the

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Netflix offer is not. It excludes the cable networks including CNN,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>So I mean it also depends on how you value

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 2>the cable networks.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is why the Netflix deal is of uncertain

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>value because like in that deal, the cable networks stay

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>with Warner shareolders, which Yeah says is worth about a

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar per share, and you know the board thinks it's

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>worth three four.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it seems like consensus would say that one dollar

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>shares low on the lower end.

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like I think if you add it up, the

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Netflix bit is worth right around thirty dollars, is like

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of market consensus and then like the board is

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a little high and Paramoun's a little low, but like

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not like vastly more, right, It's like around thirty.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>There's also the Ellison of it all because Paramount is

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a pretty small company.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's an LBO. Right, It's like it's like

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there happens to be a Paramount attached to it. But

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like basically it's like we're going to borrow a lot

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>of money against the Warner assets. Paramount does not on

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>its own have the capacity to raise like, you know,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars of debt, right, Yeah, it would raise

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars a debt against Warner, and then it

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>would have a big equity check from you know, they

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>have like commitments lined up from Jared Kushner and like

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>some Middle Eastern investors. But it seems that owner's board

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>expressed uncertainty about the quality of those commitments, and so

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they also have a backstop from Larry Ellison's personal trust

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>or like he'll pay the equity check with his PA

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if he has to.

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's been a lot of good succession flavored memes

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>on social media about this situation.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It is very weird to have your dad by several

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>companies for you, whatever it's it.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Is, I think it's cool.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>An expression like, of course my dad would.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Buy that was an editorial comment by.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt You didn't see the expression. Yeah it's weird. Yeah,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's weird to be the CEO of a public copany

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and feel like my company is going to buy this

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>prized asset with my dad's tech book. I don't know.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 2>There's also I mean, so Larry Elson's check book is

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 2>a factor here, but also Larry Ellison's relationship with the

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>White House.

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I try to write about this too much,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is like the very depressing backdrop to this

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is that like Donald Trump does not like CNM, he

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would like his friends to buy CNN and change it

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to be friendlier to him. And the way merger regulation

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States in twenty twenty five works is

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that to get a merger done, you have to commit

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to making television news friendlier to Donald Trump.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really bad.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not like, that's not how it used to be.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to find exactly what Trump said on Wednesday

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to CNN.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Trump is he doesn't like CNN.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well he said, like when it comes to a

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>potential deal here, I believe he said that CNN needs

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>to be included.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he really like has been paying attention

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to the mechanics of this merger.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you don't think he's like following along reading money

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>stuff and like watching me on Bleep.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He's watching you on gleen Berger. He's reading money's too.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean he wants changes at CNN, right, and so

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>if the Paramount deal, then Paramount will own CNN and

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll make it, you know, twenty four hour praise Donald

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump network, because like that's a small price to pay

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the deal done, right. I mean they're valuing

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They're valuing not CNN. They're valuing the entire cable package,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>including CNN, at like one dollar per share. It's like, yeah, yeah,

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>turn CNN into the propaganda channel. Who cares, it's not

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a major part of the business investment. If the Netflix

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>still gets done, then CNN will be part of Discovery Global,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which will be a much smaller, more leveried public company

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>run by you know, existing Warner Discovery Management. But is

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that going to be an acquisition target? Jared Kushner by

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's not obvious that CNN remains independent and with

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the same editorial posture that it has now even in

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix deal. Yeah, it just doesn't go to Netflix.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, like you know, a lot of

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the reporting on this is that, like Larry Ellison is

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>friendlier with Trump, and therefore we'll win, right, And by

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>will win, I mean like Trump will tell the Justice

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Department you have to find an anti trust pretext to

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>prevent the Netflix deal from closing, and therefore the only

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>way to get the deal done is to sell the

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>paramam because the Netflix deal can't close. But there's also

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>been reporting that Netflix's management have done a good job

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of closing after Trump, Like, is one possible outcome here

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that like Netflix says, fine, fine, we'll buy a CNN

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>two and make it into the Trump propaganda channel. Maybe

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>change the deal. I should say, Also, like I said,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, because like this is so much about

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump's feelings about CNN that he could tell the Justice

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Department to find a pretext, to find an antro trust

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>reason to start the deal. Separately, everyone thinks they're like

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>real assyss problems, Like yeah, it's not like you don't

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>need a pretext, like it's a real concern when like

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest streamer buys HPOE And it's also a real

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, people in the media industry have real concerns,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, about both, but especially about the idea of

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Netflix taking over like all these iconic films.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, it's fascinating, I mean relative to most media

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>news because we've been discussing the media angle on Bloomberg

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 2>TV heading up into the Netflix deal getting announced. And

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 2>for Netflix, i mean, Netflix is so dominant in streaming,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, talking to analysts about this, they were like,

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 2>this is really a nice to have for Netflix, you know,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 2>versus paramount. This is more of a need to have.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's an interesting move by Netflix to even pursue this.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>But you think about the anti trust concerns. It's also

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>built into the deal that they announced, like they accounted

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of time to work through all the.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Different time right, I'm sure you.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Know whether or not at all. And then well that's

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>part of the record breakup fee, rights fee.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like two miks of share you want a deal,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they get done.

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a nice consolation prize though, Okay.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>No, Warner Schralder is going to be like, let's take

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix deal because at least we'll get two bucks

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to share in eighteen months when the deal falls apart.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Like they want certainty, right, like Netflix, part of their

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>job here is to get on sherolders that their deal

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>will close and like that's not. Yeah, it's like some

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>amount of like you know, economic analysis and some amount

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of like photo ops with Trump.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do wonder, like just to bring it back

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to the employees, like in a situation where your company

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>is in this deal limbo for eighteen months, I have

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to imagine that the company is kind of in suspended animation.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Like things will get done obviously, but that's a lot

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 2>of uncertainty to hang over there.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about suspended animation, but yeah, it's.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Depressing, slightly dramatic.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I think if you work in media, you're work in media.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Like the time between now and eighteen months from now

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is it's a perilous time, whether or not you're at

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Warner Brothers.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>The only sure thing is podcasts. It's true, shall we

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 2>talk about SpaceX?

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, another eighteen month. Remember it's not eighteen months. It's

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like they wouldn't an ip it's.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Twenty If it's in twenty twenty six, it will be

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>six months fewer than eighteen months. I just remember, you know,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 2>we spent so much time talking about how private markets

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 2>are the new public markets. But now all these mega

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 2>companies that were the poster child of staying private forever

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>potentially coming public.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. First of all, it hasn't happened.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it hasn't happened.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's an I don't like, the private markets are

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the new public markets like thesis. I mean, look, I

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have said in my column on this podcast, Yeah you

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>can stay private forever, right, and like why not? Why not?

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But if it is the case that SpaceX, Open Air, Anthropic,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>other names go public in twenty twenty six, then that

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>might suggest that you count they private forever. But it

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:10.359
<v Speaker 1>will be like really different from previous I p honly

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ye going public at a one point five trillion dollar valuation,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which is like the number that SpaceX is banding around.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Depending on what second you're checking, it's bigger than Tesla.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but like that's not how was used to work

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>back when public markets were the public markets. Go public,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>when you were like you know, there was there was

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>growth still to come, but like going public at a

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>one point tried trillion dollar valuation is like, okay, it's

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>wild in two ways. One is that ordinarily you go

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>from zero in a garage to one hundred million or

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a billion or a ten billion dollar valuation, and then

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you go a public and then the next leg up

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to like becoming a trillion dollar company, public investors capture, right,

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So public investors can invest not early, but like you know,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>in like the growth trajectory of a company that will

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>eventually become large, right, Like that's part of the promise

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of an IPI was like, this is a fairly immature

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>company and you can get in not on the ground floor,

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but on like the third floor. You can public get

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a one point five trillion dollar valuation, so much of

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the upside has been captured already, I mean by private

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>market investors.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you're just thinking small you know, no, I know,

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I hear.

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You, right, Like then this is like every elon musk

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>com package, right, Like, well, it's really one hundred trillion

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar company, so like going probably at one point.

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Five tracking the final frontier.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing, and this is related in the

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX case, is like if SpaceX goes public next year

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at a one point five trillion dollar valuation. In one sense,

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the private markets have captured most of the upside. In

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>another sense, it is not a mature company. Blomberg reported

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're expecting twenty two to twenty four billion dollars

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in revenue in twenty twenty six, which is a lot

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of money. It's a big company to go public or whatever.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But like they can public it at what seventy times revenue? Yeah,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like that's really big. That is what has happened here

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is not they've grown into an enormous company and then

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>gone public at their enormous valuation. What happens is they've

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not grown into an enormous company and they've they're going

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>public at a huge valuation that reflects the next ten

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>years of growth, which is a crazy thing to do.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, let's talk about why they potentially need to

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>do it, Like why now do they need to do it?

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you think about some of the things that

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 2>they're going to.

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Build data centers in space, So they need thirty billion

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars to build.

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Data centers on the moon, not actually on the moon, just.

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Sustainable data centers.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's great. It's such a sign of the times.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Like one theme of the financial markets this year is

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that everyone is building data centers and they have tapped

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>every possible source of financing for data centers, and at

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>some point, selling thirty billion dollars of SpaceX stock is

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one way away to fill the whole of need for

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>building data centers. And so like space I can raise

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money staying private. And by the way,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like cash flow positive and doesn't need to raise

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to shoot rockets into space. But

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the capital expenses are required to build data centers on

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>every inch of the Earth, and also in space is

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so enormous that even space like has to go public. Yeah,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and even open eyes.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>But maybe, well that's the thing, like I feel like,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, when we really do think big and you

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>don't really put our thinking caps on in terms of

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>how ridiculous things could get, there is a limit to

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>how long you can stay private.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, right, Like one possibility is that, like I've

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>been writing about you know, private markets or the new

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>public markets for you know, a decade or whatever. And

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that was in the context of the biggest, hottest like

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>most sort of household name tech companies were kind of

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at bottom, like capital light consumer tech right, Like, it's

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Like you wouldn't have said Face had

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of CAPAX needs because it was a website.

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Facebook has a lot of CAPEX, but like

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for a long time it didn't. You know, Uber is like, yeah,

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to match drivers and writers. We don't have

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to have anything, you know. Yeah, it was a real

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>like capital light model. And now in that context it

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was fairly you know, you have capital light and very scalable.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's very easy to stay private. You need to spend

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars a year putting data centers on the moon.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to, like, the private markets are really big,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>but they're not big enough for that.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>And even before we get there, like before we get

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 2>to the moon, SpaceX has a lot of rockets to build.

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not capital light, and yet they've but they've managed

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the private markets to be large and build a lot

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of rockets. You know.

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 2>The point that has been made is the fact that

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, they have been able to raise large amounts

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of money in the private markets. We cover rocket launches

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg TV all the time. A lot of the

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 2>rockets blow up, a lot of the tests fail. If

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX is a public company, it's going to be really

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 2>interesting to have, you know, a split screen of the

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>rocket of a test launch potentially failing and also the stock.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>That's so true, right, Like you know, I write all

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the time that every bad thing that happens to a

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>public company of security is for it. But like every

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>time a rocket blows up and they it, it's really

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>awesome to think about.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 2>We didn't talk about the wrinkle of Elon Musk potentially

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 2>being the CEO of two public companies too.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you can do that. I mean whatever the

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>er companies, they're big, now, I know. I'm just like,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm curious, like what the dynamic is of

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>pricing at one point five trillion dollar IPO because on

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, it's like so big, right, and it's like,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the talk is like they'd raise thirty

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. That's the trades, like thirty billion dollars or

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>stock good day, right, Like at some level, like you

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>just suspend disbelief and you're like, this is not an IPR.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>This is just like an Elon Msk public company that

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>happened to not be public and now it's public and

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>then like you know, they work it out in a

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, Like it's not I don't know. There's

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>something like when you get to this level of bigness

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and constantly doing tender offers and price transparency, it's like

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>no one needs a deck to be introduced to SpaceX.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, it's just like yeah, yeah, the roadshow.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Owns it in like weird vehicles anyway, it's like it's SpaceX, man.

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hope it does go public because yeah, it's cool.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>That would be fun.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>There was a thing where he tried to take Tesla private,

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>right and like he complains about the public markets and

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to the Yeah, it'll be interesting to

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>see what like a public SpaceX looks like. It'd be

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting when he gets sued for the fourth time at a.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Rocket plank, I mean, to be fair, it happens.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not saying that it's actually a securities route

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to blow up a rocket, or that he should be

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sued for blowing up a rocket, and like the investors

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the current private SpaceX understand that that's part of

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the deal and they don't sue him when he blows

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>up a rocket. All that's wrong. Should talking about private

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>credits and new public credit. Yeah, there's this fascinating Wall

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal story this week about how it is harder

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to know how consumers are doing because the way you

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>traditionally look at how consumers are doing is bank data,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>credit card data, like bank reports. Banks say things like

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>people are charging a lot of money on their credit cards,

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>or like we have a lot of delinquencies on our

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>credit cards, and you get a sense of like what

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer credit looks like and consumer spending, and what is

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>happening is that some consumer spending it's like marginal bit's

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>real has moved away from credit cards and into other stuff.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Alternative consumer lending, which I think I shorthand is like

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>buy now, pay later, So it's like a firm and

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>things like this where it's like you charge something, but

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of charging it to a credit card, you charge

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it to a buy now pay letter lender. And the

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>money for that doesn't usually come from banks. It comes

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>from other people, and there are a variety of lenders,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but like a lot of it is what you'd call

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>private credit. It's like insurance companies and private credit firms

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that are providing their balance sheet to like FinTechs that

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are the front end for these loans, that like make

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the buyout pay letter credit decisions right. And so the

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that you're seeing is that instead of banks with

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>credit cards providing credit for consumer spending, you have private

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>credit providing credit for consumer spending, which is kind of

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a weird development. And also like a thing that I've

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>been writing about for a long time now is that

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>banking is getting narrow. Private credit is taking over from

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the banks. But like a lot of that has been

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>in LBO lending, business lending, data center lending, and now

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also in consumer lending. It's sort of an interesting shift.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, And you point out, as the Wall Street

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Journal did, this makes data worse, you know, in terms

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>of tracking.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 1>But I don't care that much about that.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I care a little bit, I guess.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's like I read about stuff, but I don't

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>ever write about like, oh, consumer credit as well. I

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>don't care about this data. Other people care about this

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>data Like that's bad. But like, I mean, the broader

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>point I would make is that the worsening of data

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is because bank regulators collect a lot of data from

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 1>banks and make it public in some form, and so

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you can see stuff about what banks are doing. Also,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, the big banks are largely

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded, and so we'll talk about you know, consumer

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>credit weakness on their runnings calls. Yeah, private credit is private,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and so they don't do those earnings calls. I mean,

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a publicly traded manager, so you get a little bit,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>but like it's not the same level of interest in that,

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and like they're not reporting to regulators in the same

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>way that banks to it. And the point I make

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is that, like the whole point of financial regulation in

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years is that the banking funding model

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is systemically important and risky, right, Like banks have runs.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>When there's runs on banks, credit titans, and like the

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>economy gets worse. And if you can replace a runnable

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>banking system with a long term funded, equity funded private

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>credit system, then that is structurally better. And the tradeoff

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for that is that that's less regulated, right, Like that's

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Like banks are highly regulated because their funding

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>model is risky. If you just like have a pot

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of your own money and make loans out of it,

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you're less regulated. And people get nervous about that because

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's less regulated. But it's like that's the trade off

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that like the regulator is meant to strike mostly is

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that always thinking about it, and it's like a sensible

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>trade off, and it just makes people real nervous.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, does it become more regulated?

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I have to no, man, the people keep talking about it,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're not in an environment that is like gung

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>ho and making anything more regulated. That's true, And like

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>my point is that it doesn't makes sense. I mean

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever makes it. Like there's a reason this stuff is

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 1>less regulated, which is that it is less risky, Like

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>just as a baseline funding model is less risky. And

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so when a private credit firm wants to make bad loans,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like, all right, that's your mistake, man, it's your money, right.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>When a bank wants to make bad loans is like, no, no,

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the depositors money. That's like taxpayers money, Like we

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure they don't make bad loans. So

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the regulatory pressure is less. But we'll see.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But like for now, nothing's getting more regulated. Banks are

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>getting less regulated.

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 2>This is a turn. But did you see that piece

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Ft about Apollo and it quoted an Apollo

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>executive saying we're becoming a bank. It truly sucks. It

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 2>was an unnamed person. It sounds like you didn't see

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>this piece. No, it was kind of funny. I'll send

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>it to you. Yeah, look, I mean see if you

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>were still on Twitter, you would have seen it.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's like a long running history of like banks

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>get regulated, things that are not banks move into the business,

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>they become big, they move into risky you're in risk

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of your funding models, they blow up, they get built

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>up by the fat and they become banks. Right, Like

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the story of two thousand and eight,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Like could that be the story of private credit?

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, maybe I'm excited to find out. Truly as

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a consumer of news, Yeah, I.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Don't have in my mind a picture of what it

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like to have like like the crypto crisis in

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twin tiers. It's like truly like a replay of

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, Right, I don't have a picture

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>in my mind of what that looks like in the

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>private credit version, Like I don't have a picture of

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like runs on private credit firms, but like it would

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be cool, yeah, well to write about not like for

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the world or whatever. But it would be like an

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting development. But I again I can't quite visualize it yet.

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Who will get there? And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to The Money

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>every day on the close between three and five pm.

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on the air.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamazerakis and Moses Onden.

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Amy Keen is our executive.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Producer, and Sage Falman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff