WEBVTT - The Election and the Courts 

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:23.116
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:23.156 --> 0:00:26.276
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.716 --> 0:00:31.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. I'm speaking to you today November fourth,

0:00:31.316 --> 0:00:35.676
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, the day after election day in the United States.

0:00:36.676 --> 0:00:39.636
<v Speaker 1>Now I knew all along that the person I wanted

0:00:39.676 --> 0:00:42.556
<v Speaker 1>to speak to the day after the election was Professor

0:00:42.716 --> 0:00:46.316
<v Speaker 1>Richard Pildas. Rick is a professor of constitutional law at

0:00:46.396 --> 0:00:49.396
<v Speaker 1>New York University School of Law. He's one of the

0:00:49.476 --> 0:00:53.396
<v Speaker 1>key figures in the entire country focusing on how legal

0:00:53.436 --> 0:00:59.356
<v Speaker 1>issues and democracy interact. He's also an election analyst for CNN,

0:00:59.676 --> 0:01:02.716
<v Speaker 1>and when I was a baby professor at NYU, he

0:01:02.796 --> 0:01:07.476
<v Speaker 1>was an extraordinary mentor to me. Despite what is an

0:01:07.516 --> 0:01:11.356
<v Speaker 1>incredibly busy today for Rick, his true busy season, he

0:01:11.476 --> 0:01:14.996
<v Speaker 1>made time to speak to us, and we're really grateful

0:01:15.036 --> 0:01:26.276
<v Speaker 1>for that. Rick, thank you so much for joining me.

0:01:26.516 --> 0:01:30.156
<v Speaker 1>It's your busy season every four years as you try

0:01:30.196 --> 0:01:34.716
<v Speaker 1>to explain election law to you're adoring and terrified public.

0:01:35.396 --> 0:01:38.636
<v Speaker 1>So let's just start with the current state of play

0:01:39.196 --> 0:01:44.076
<v Speaker 1>as of Wednesday at around twelve thirty pm Eastern Standard time.

0:01:45.236 --> 0:01:50.356
<v Speaker 1>What litigation options does Donald Trump have after his two

0:01:50.396 --> 0:01:52.996
<v Speaker 1>thirty am rambling speech where he said he was quote

0:01:53.036 --> 0:01:55.356
<v Speaker 1>going to the Supreme Court, but didn't exactly explain what

0:01:55.356 --> 0:01:57.436
<v Speaker 1>he was going to ask for there. Well, the first

0:01:57.516 --> 0:01:59.956
<v Speaker 1>question is going to be, of course, you know, how

0:01:59.996 --> 0:02:03.396
<v Speaker 1>small are the margins in particular states, and then are

0:02:03.436 --> 0:02:06.876
<v Speaker 1>the potential legal issues you know, within that margin to

0:02:06.956 --> 0:02:11.156
<v Speaker 1>make it possibly worthwhile. So the one issue that stands

0:02:11.156 --> 0:02:16.676
<v Speaker 1>out most clearly is that in Pennsylvania, the state court

0:02:16.716 --> 0:02:20.316
<v Speaker 1>there extended the receipt deadline for absentee ballots until three

0:02:20.396 --> 0:02:24.396
<v Speaker 1>days after the election. The Republican Party has been litigating

0:02:24.396 --> 0:02:26.956
<v Speaker 1>that issue, trying to take it to the Supreme Court

0:02:27.036 --> 0:02:32.316
<v Speaker 1>already in earlier rounds. The Supreme Court issued a four

0:02:32.356 --> 0:02:36.756
<v Speaker 1>to four decision declining to stay that order. Then the

0:02:36.796 --> 0:02:38.876
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party went back to the Supreme Court and asked

0:02:38.876 --> 0:02:41.796
<v Speaker 1>for an expedited CIRT petition grant so the case could

0:02:41.836 --> 0:02:44.316
<v Speaker 1>be argued before the elections. Supreme Court said no to that.

0:02:44.916 --> 0:02:48.636
<v Speaker 1>But you can bet that this would be issue number

0:02:48.676 --> 0:02:51.116
<v Speaker 1>one that they would go right back to the Supreme

0:02:51.156 --> 0:02:52.756
<v Speaker 1>Court on or try to get back to the Supreme

0:02:52.756 --> 0:02:55.916
<v Speaker 1>Court very fast on if it turns out that Pennsylvania

0:02:55.996 --> 0:02:59.516
<v Speaker 1>could be decisive and the margin is affected by the

0:02:59.596 --> 0:03:01.716
<v Speaker 1>number of ballots that coming in this three day window.

0:03:01.836 --> 0:03:05.316
<v Speaker 1>Now my own guests, by the way, without even knowing

0:03:05.356 --> 0:03:07.276
<v Speaker 1>what the margin in Pennsylvania is going to be and

0:03:07.316 --> 0:03:10.436
<v Speaker 1>who's going to win or lose, I'm inclined to think

0:03:10.436 --> 0:03:13.276
<v Speaker 1>there aren't going to turn out to be that many

0:03:13.316 --> 0:03:17.076
<v Speaker 1>ballots to come in in this three day window. So

0:03:17.116 --> 0:03:19.796
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see if you know, there's enough volume

0:03:19.836 --> 0:03:24.756
<v Speaker 1>there to make it worth the worth the candle. You know,

0:03:24.836 --> 0:03:29.596
<v Speaker 1>after that, it's not clear where there are big batches

0:03:29.596 --> 0:03:33.596
<v Speaker 1>of votes that might be affected by a legal challenge

0:03:33.676 --> 0:03:37.356
<v Speaker 1>of one sort or another. And part of the problem

0:03:37.356 --> 0:03:40.276
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration has at this point, the campaign, i

0:03:40.356 --> 0:03:44.596
<v Speaker 1>should say has, is that once voters have cast ballots,

0:03:45.316 --> 0:03:47.356
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot harder for courts to

0:03:47.436 --> 0:03:50.596
<v Speaker 1>say those ballots we decided we're illegal, and therefore we're

0:03:50.596 --> 0:03:53.156
<v Speaker 1>going to throw them out. So if you you know,

0:03:53.196 --> 0:03:57.836
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get courts to intervene x amte, it becomes a

0:03:57.956 --> 0:04:04.476
<v Speaker 1>much tougher and much less appropriate action for courts if

0:04:04.556 --> 0:04:07.556
<v Speaker 1>voters have relied on the state of the law, including

0:04:07.596 --> 0:04:10.476
<v Speaker 1>when the Supreme Court has it's self not intervened in

0:04:10.516 --> 0:04:14.556
<v Speaker 1>advance when it had the opportunity to do so, you know,

0:04:14.636 --> 0:04:17.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that they will seek recounts if states are

0:04:17.676 --> 0:04:20.436
<v Speaker 1>close enough to warrant it. And then when you as

0:04:20.436 --> 0:04:22.916
<v Speaker 1>we learned in Florida in two thousand, when you go

0:04:22.956 --> 0:04:25.476
<v Speaker 1>through recounts and you start looking at each individual ballot,

0:04:25.876 --> 0:04:29.356
<v Speaker 1>issues can come up. There's an issue that could be

0:04:29.436 --> 0:04:31.916
<v Speaker 1>the hanging chat of this election if it really came

0:04:31.956 --> 0:04:35.036
<v Speaker 1>down to a small number of ballots, which is ongoing

0:04:35.076 --> 0:04:39.996
<v Speaker 1>fights about ballots that are not clearly postmarked by election

0:04:40.116 --> 0:04:46.036
<v Speaker 1>day even though they arrive within the deadline for that

0:04:46.076 --> 0:04:51.356
<v Speaker 1>particular state. And a lot of state courts have sort

0:04:51.356 --> 0:04:55.916
<v Speaker 1>of created presumptions that if there's not a clear postmark,

0:04:55.956 --> 0:04:58.996
<v Speaker 1>but it arise within a certain amount of time, that

0:04:59.076 --> 0:05:02.276
<v Speaker 1>should be treated as having been postmarked by election day.

0:05:02.316 --> 0:05:06.356
<v Speaker 1>I can see fights going on about that. I think

0:05:06.396 --> 0:05:09.596
<v Speaker 1>that there could easily be fights were sort of in

0:05:09.716 --> 0:05:13.956
<v Speaker 1>one like this already in Pennsylvania, where you have state

0:05:14.036 --> 0:05:17.676
<v Speaker 1>election officials not applying the same policies across the state.

0:05:18.516 --> 0:05:21.036
<v Speaker 1>So this is a minor problem that's opened up in

0:05:21.036 --> 0:05:25.516
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania in the last couple of days. So one of

0:05:25.516 --> 0:05:28.396
<v Speaker 1>the issues is you probably know with absentee ballots, is

0:05:28.436 --> 0:05:32.356
<v Speaker 1>if you make a mistake on the ballot envelope, do

0:05:32.396 --> 0:05:34.876
<v Speaker 1>you have a chance to get notified of that mistake

0:05:34.916 --> 0:05:39.836
<v Speaker 1>and fix it if there's time. And Pennsylvania law does

0:05:39.876 --> 0:05:42.396
<v Speaker 1>not provide that you have that opportunity. It doesn't say

0:05:42.436 --> 0:05:45.636
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that opportunity. The state Supreme Court issued

0:05:45.636 --> 0:05:48.036
<v Speaker 1>an opinion on this. It basically said the same thing.

0:05:48.076 --> 0:05:50.876
<v Speaker 1>The law doesn't prohibit it prohibit it, but it doesn't

0:05:50.916 --> 0:05:55.236
<v Speaker 1>say voters have a right to this. And then kind

0:05:55.236 --> 0:05:58.356
<v Speaker 1>of late in the day, one county started giving voters

0:05:58.356 --> 0:06:03.636
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity to fix their defective ballots. Then the Secretary

0:06:03.676 --> 0:06:07.356
<v Speaker 1>of State came in on Monday and kind of suggested.

0:06:07.516 --> 0:06:10.436
<v Speaker 1>She didn't say you must give this opportunity across the

0:06:10.436 --> 0:06:13.556
<v Speaker 1>state or you're prohibited. She sort of left it to

0:06:13.596 --> 0:06:19.436
<v Speaker 1>the counties. And this is just drives you crazy that

0:06:19.516 --> 0:06:22.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the fundamental policy issue. How can

0:06:22.876 --> 0:06:25.596
<v Speaker 1>it be that the day before the election in a

0:06:25.676 --> 0:06:30.156
<v Speaker 1>state like Pennsylvania, it doesn't occur to any state policymaker

0:06:30.316 --> 0:06:32.076
<v Speaker 1>that they have to have a clear policy one way

0:06:32.156 --> 0:06:34.356
<v Speaker 1>or the other on this. But don't get me started

0:06:34.396 --> 0:06:37.716
<v Speaker 1>with Pennsylvania, because they have been in my crosshairs since

0:06:38.676 --> 0:06:45.236
<v Speaker 1>literally late March, and I actually just really did my

0:06:45.356 --> 0:06:49.076
<v Speaker 1>best to hold them accountable, let's say, on CNN recently today,

0:06:50.196 --> 0:06:52.916
<v Speaker 1>because I think the governor and the legislature there have

0:06:53.036 --> 0:06:57.956
<v Speaker 1>just acted unconscionably and they are the reason they've thrown

0:06:57.996 --> 0:07:01.036
<v Speaker 1>the country into this period where we have to wait

0:07:01.076 --> 0:07:05.836
<v Speaker 1>for Pennsylvania and maybe another day, another two days. You know,

0:07:05.876 --> 0:07:09.356
<v Speaker 1>if it's a decisive state or the decisive state, this

0:07:09.436 --> 0:07:15.676
<v Speaker 1>is just a recipe for conflict and endless challenges to

0:07:15.876 --> 0:07:18.956
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy the election. And there's just simply no reason it

0:07:19.076 --> 0:07:21.636
<v Speaker 1>had to be this way. This is just a total

0:07:21.716 --> 0:07:25.516
<v Speaker 1>failure of state policy. Is it a failure, Rick, or

0:07:25.556 --> 0:07:29.436
<v Speaker 1>was it an intentional policy driven by the state legislature's

0:07:29.476 --> 0:07:33.196
<v Speaker 1>desire for the votes that were mailed in not to

0:07:33.236 --> 0:07:37.436
<v Speaker 1>be counted in advance when there was time to do so. Well,

0:07:37.516 --> 0:07:42.596
<v Speaker 1>the story in Pennsylvania is that the Republican legislature was

0:07:42.676 --> 0:07:47.396
<v Speaker 1>willing to allow election officials to start processing three days

0:07:47.396 --> 0:07:50.556
<v Speaker 1>at advance of election day. They actually passed a bill

0:07:50.796 --> 0:07:55.276
<v Speaker 1>in the state House to do that. But like everything

0:07:55.276 --> 0:07:58.996
<v Speaker 1>else in American politics, you know, everybody has to sort

0:07:59.036 --> 0:08:00.916
<v Speaker 1>of try to figure out what else they can get,

0:08:01.836 --> 0:08:07.596
<v Speaker 1>and so they attached to that various policies that the

0:08:07.636 --> 0:08:10.836
<v Speaker 1>governor Democratic governor didn't want to accept. They were policies

0:08:10.876 --> 0:08:17.996
<v Speaker 1>about drop boxes and the like, and so election administrators

0:08:18.036 --> 0:08:21.916
<v Speaker 1>throughout the state, Republican and Democrat, were pleading with the

0:08:21.956 --> 0:08:24.996
<v Speaker 1>political leaders of the state to give them more time.

0:08:25.276 --> 0:08:27.676
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not only do they have this massive volume

0:08:27.996 --> 0:08:30.556
<v Speaker 1>you maybe close to three million of absentee ballots that

0:08:30.676 --> 0:08:34.076
<v Speaker 1>come in and just sit there idly until election day,

0:08:34.516 --> 0:08:37.116
<v Speaker 1>but on election day when they can start processing them,

0:08:37.276 --> 0:08:39.636
<v Speaker 1>they've got to run the election on top of everything else.

0:08:40.396 --> 0:08:46.716
<v Speaker 1>So it's just an enormous undertaking. And the governor put

0:08:46.716 --> 0:08:50.916
<v Speaker 1>on the table a demand that they be given twenty

0:08:50.916 --> 0:08:54.036
<v Speaker 1>one days in advance to start the processing. So that

0:08:54.156 --> 0:08:56.196
<v Speaker 1>was a position way out there. I don't know if

0:08:56.196 --> 0:09:00.076
<v Speaker 1>that was meant to be a negotiating position, but basically

0:09:01.116 --> 0:09:02.956
<v Speaker 1>what they needed to do was to find a way

0:09:02.996 --> 0:09:05.516
<v Speaker 1>to get this issue out from the other issues and

0:09:05.596 --> 0:09:08.956
<v Speaker 1>just resolve this issue. Give the election officials even three

0:09:09.196 --> 0:09:13.396
<v Speaker 1>days to get going, and I think it's a plague

0:09:13.436 --> 0:09:17.276
<v Speaker 1>on both of their houses and really a plague on

0:09:17.316 --> 0:09:20.356
<v Speaker 1>the country as a result. So our best case scenario

0:09:20.636 --> 0:09:24.076
<v Speaker 1>then of avoiding a meltdown associated with Pennsylvania is for

0:09:24.116 --> 0:09:27.716
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania not to be the decisive state. Oh, We've been

0:09:27.756 --> 0:09:31.756
<v Speaker 1>saying for months and months and months that Pennsylvania is

0:09:31.756 --> 0:09:35.716
<v Speaker 1>a decisive state. For additional reasons beyond the ones I've described.

0:09:36.396 --> 0:09:40.196
<v Speaker 1>We're in for a very bad, very bad time. There

0:09:40.196 --> 0:09:43.516
<v Speaker 1>are many things that are incredibly badly done as a

0:09:43.556 --> 0:09:46.956
<v Speaker 1>matter of policy. Let's talk in real time about the

0:09:46.996 --> 0:09:50.396
<v Speaker 1>scenarios where Pennsylvania could maybe appear not to be the

0:09:50.436 --> 0:09:53.876
<v Speaker 1>decisive state, but where Trump goes to court to try

0:09:53.876 --> 0:09:58.036
<v Speaker 1>to make Pennsylvania the decisive state. So one of those

0:09:58.036 --> 0:10:03.796
<v Speaker 1>examples would be that Biden needs to win Nevada, which

0:10:03.836 --> 0:10:08.596
<v Speaker 1>is quite close. Is there any legal action available to Trump?

0:10:09.196 --> 0:10:14.876
<v Speaker 1>There similar question for Georgia, which Biden doesn't need to win,

0:10:15.036 --> 0:10:18.516
<v Speaker 1>but which Biden has a shot of winning, where at

0:10:18.556 --> 0:10:21.036
<v Speaker 1>least as we're speaking now, the votes that have been

0:10:21.036 --> 0:10:25.356
<v Speaker 1>counted still have Trump ahead, but Biden is gaining fast

0:10:26.076 --> 0:10:29.476
<v Speaker 1>as they count ballots from primarily Democratic districts in and

0:10:29.516 --> 0:10:32.996
<v Speaker 1>around Atlanta. Yeah, so there was an effort already. Actually,

0:10:32.996 --> 0:10:35.956
<v Speaker 1>there were a couple of efforts with respect to Nevada.

0:10:36.036 --> 0:10:39.716
<v Speaker 1>One was the big effort to try to get the

0:10:39.756 --> 0:10:42.956
<v Speaker 1>courts to do something they clearly weren't going to do,

0:10:42.996 --> 0:10:45.396
<v Speaker 1>which is to stop Nevada from having an all vote

0:10:45.436 --> 0:10:49.276
<v Speaker 1>by mail system. So that failed. That was obviously going

0:10:49.316 --> 0:10:55.876
<v Speaker 1>to fail. But more recently, the major county in Nevada,

0:10:55.916 --> 0:10:59.116
<v Speaker 1>which is Clark County has the largest population share of

0:10:59.116 --> 0:11:04.556
<v Speaker 1>the state, has allegedly been doing signature verification, which is

0:11:04.556 --> 0:11:09.956
<v Speaker 1>how they validate absentee ballots within a machine reading device

0:11:10.036 --> 0:11:13.556
<v Speaker 1>that does the signature matching, compared to other parts of

0:11:13.556 --> 0:11:16.196
<v Speaker 1>the state that do it differently. And the Republicans claim

0:11:16.836 --> 0:11:20.356
<v Speaker 1>in Clark County, which is a Democratic county, they're validating

0:11:20.436 --> 0:11:22.676
<v Speaker 1>signatures at a higher rate than in other parts of

0:11:22.716 --> 0:11:25.036
<v Speaker 1>the state. Now, they already tried to take that through

0:11:25.076 --> 0:11:29.156
<v Speaker 1>the Nevada court system on Monday night, the Nevada courts

0:11:29.196 --> 0:11:33.756
<v Speaker 1>rejected that, And I think that's probably not likely to

0:11:33.796 --> 0:11:36.436
<v Speaker 1>be a very strong claim, even if they make some

0:11:36.476 --> 0:11:41.436
<v Speaker 1>effort to try to repackage it as a federal constitutional claim.

0:11:41.476 --> 0:11:47.916
<v Speaker 1>I think that I don't know in the canvassing process

0:11:48.396 --> 0:11:52.276
<v Speaker 1>in Nevada. I would assume if there are small margins,

0:11:52.676 --> 0:11:57.276
<v Speaker 1>there will be knife fights about each individual absentee ballot,

0:11:58.276 --> 0:12:01.116
<v Speaker 1>with the Republicans trying to throw out ballots that they

0:12:01.116 --> 0:12:03.196
<v Speaker 1>think are more likely to be Democratic votes, and the

0:12:03.236 --> 0:12:07.116
<v Speaker 1>Democrats trying to protect those votes, and you could sort

0:12:07.116 --> 0:12:11.916
<v Speaker 1>of imagine that, now, can you actually change the numbers

0:12:12.676 --> 0:12:17.276
<v Speaker 1>enough to turn the outcome? Seems pretty unlikely? Can I

0:12:17.316 --> 0:12:18.796
<v Speaker 1>ask about that? So one of the things that I'm

0:12:18.796 --> 0:12:21.196
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by, and it comes out very much from your distinctions,

0:12:21.636 --> 0:12:24.036
<v Speaker 1>is that you can think of there as being kind

0:12:24.076 --> 0:12:26.596
<v Speaker 1>of wholesale and retail ways for the Trump lawyers to

0:12:26.596 --> 0:12:29.036
<v Speaker 1>fight the outcome. The wholesale ways are obviously the best.

0:12:29.116 --> 0:12:31.196
<v Speaker 1>You want to get as block as many votes as possible,

0:12:31.716 --> 0:12:34.156
<v Speaker 1>and for that you need some argument that a certain

0:12:34.196 --> 0:12:37.756
<v Speaker 1>class of votes shouldn't be accepted. And that's a little

0:12:37.756 --> 0:12:40.756
<v Speaker 1>hard because every state has a basic principle that it

0:12:40.796 --> 0:12:43.396
<v Speaker 1>ought account the votes that are lawfully cast, and until

0:12:43.436 --> 0:12:46.276
<v Speaker 1>those are all accounted, it's a little challenging to get

0:12:46.636 --> 0:12:51.396
<v Speaker 1>whole classes excluded. Then there's retail, which is vote by vote,

0:12:51.396 --> 0:12:53.836
<v Speaker 1>by painful vote. Now, you mentioned earlier, and I know

0:12:53.876 --> 0:12:57.916
<v Speaker 1>this is the case. I remember from bushricorps that once

0:12:57.916 --> 0:13:01.396
<v Speaker 1>you're in a recount situation, you could have a Republican

0:13:01.436 --> 0:13:04.196
<v Speaker 1>and a Democratic lawyer sitting there or observer rather sitting

0:13:04.236 --> 0:13:07.236
<v Speaker 1>there while the ballots are being recounted and arguing about

0:13:07.276 --> 0:13:10.596
<v Speaker 1>each and every ballot. But ordinary early in most states

0:13:10.596 --> 0:13:13.196
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that before a recount. Right at the

0:13:13.276 --> 0:13:17.196
<v Speaker 1>regular count stage, you don't always have a Democrat and

0:13:17.196 --> 0:13:20.836
<v Speaker 1>a Republican sitting next to every voter whatever. I think

0:13:21.236 --> 0:13:24.996
<v Speaker 1>explain more about that. Yeah, So, I mean in what

0:13:25.076 --> 0:13:28.956
<v Speaker 1>we call the canvassing stage, where the state is actually

0:13:28.996 --> 0:13:33.436
<v Speaker 1>going through the process of officially determining what the vote was,

0:13:33.516 --> 0:13:35.756
<v Speaker 1>looking at the ballot, seeing if there are any mistakes

0:13:35.756 --> 0:13:39.236
<v Speaker 1>in the machine counts, things like that, before they officially

0:13:39.356 --> 0:13:45.476
<v Speaker 1>certify a winner. In many states you do have observers

0:13:45.476 --> 0:13:47.836
<v Speaker 1>from both parties. Actually, this is an issue with COVID

0:13:47.916 --> 0:13:51.196
<v Speaker 1>right now, and there have been actually some complaints, indeed,

0:13:51.236 --> 0:13:54.356
<v Speaker 1>some lawsuits that the Republicans have filed in certain states

0:13:54.396 --> 0:13:57.116
<v Speaker 1>saying you're not letting our observers get close enough to

0:13:57.156 --> 0:14:00.996
<v Speaker 1>this process physically, close enough, because it should be able

0:14:00.996 --> 0:14:03.236
<v Speaker 1>to see, because that's kind of what they're that's why

0:14:03.276 --> 0:14:05.636
<v Speaker 1>they want to be there, and and and you know,

0:14:05.796 --> 0:14:08.756
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of good that comes from these pole

0:14:08.796 --> 0:14:11.316
<v Speaker 1>watch processes. A lot of people have a very negative

0:14:11.356 --> 0:14:14.676
<v Speaker 1>image of them because they imagine this is what leads

0:14:14.716 --> 0:14:18.356
<v Speaker 1>to violent confrontations in the light. But assuming your poll

0:14:18.396 --> 0:14:22.396
<v Speaker 1>watchers are well trained as they typically are, and they're

0:14:22.436 --> 0:14:24.716
<v Speaker 1>election officials, that will keep them in line. If they're not,

0:14:25.756 --> 0:14:29.516
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's validating of the process that the two sides.

0:14:29.956 --> 0:14:33.276
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that happens in the dark. In fact,

0:14:33.436 --> 0:14:36.156
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. Right now, this is the first time I'm

0:14:36.196 --> 0:14:40.476
<v Speaker 1>aware of this happening. But today I was watching online

0:14:41.596 --> 0:14:46.516
<v Speaker 1>as anyone can, the signature verification process going on in

0:14:46.676 --> 0:14:49.636
<v Speaker 1>various states, and it's you know, about as boring the

0:14:49.676 --> 0:14:51.676
<v Speaker 1>thing as you'd want to watch. I mean, it's a

0:14:51.716 --> 0:14:55.396
<v Speaker 1>guy sitting and they're socially distanced in these election ministrators offices.

0:14:55.436 --> 0:14:57.636
<v Speaker 1>It's a guy sitting in front of his computer and

0:14:57.676 --> 0:15:00.156
<v Speaker 1>he has a ballot and he has a signature up

0:15:00.156 --> 0:15:03.316
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot, and he's like, you know, looking and comparing.

0:15:03.396 --> 0:15:05.956
<v Speaker 1>And they're trained, or they're supposed to be trained. They know,

0:15:06.516 --> 0:15:08.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, what to look for and all of that,

0:15:08.836 --> 0:15:11.476
<v Speaker 1>and and very few of these ballots overall end up

0:15:11.476 --> 0:15:16.916
<v Speaker 1>getting rejected for this reason. But um, were you watching

0:15:16.916 --> 0:15:18.436
<v Speaker 1>this on a live stream. Where were you watching? I

0:15:18.436 --> 0:15:21.356
<v Speaker 1>was watching it on a live stream. Yeah, I mean

0:15:21.556 --> 0:15:24.636
<v Speaker 1>watching paint dry is probably a little more dynamic, but uh,

0:15:25.076 --> 0:15:27.316
<v Speaker 1>but but it's an amazing thing that you know, obviously

0:15:27.436 --> 0:15:30.756
<v Speaker 1>create It creates a sense of you know, integrity to

0:15:31.196 --> 0:15:33.756
<v Speaker 1>trans literal transparency. You can watch it happening. I mean

0:15:33.756 --> 0:15:37.276
<v Speaker 1>they have webcams in there, you know. And uh, I

0:15:37.316 --> 0:15:40.316
<v Speaker 1>mean the frustration is really they have to be that distant.

0:15:40.316 --> 0:15:42.676
<v Speaker 1>They can't like speed this process up, you know, by

0:15:42.716 --> 0:15:46.156
<v Speaker 1>putting people a little closer together in there. But anyway,

0:15:46.156 --> 0:15:48.716
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fascinating. It's not just one state. I noticed

0:15:49.236 --> 0:15:52.076
<v Speaker 1>this in several states. But it's now possible to do this.

0:15:53.516 --> 0:15:57.036
<v Speaker 1>So um, now you have to have very small margins.

0:15:57.396 --> 0:16:01.076
<v Speaker 1>You know, in Florida in two thousand, we were in

0:16:01.116 --> 0:16:04.596
<v Speaker 1>the five hundred and thirty five vote kind of territory.

0:16:05.516 --> 0:16:08.316
<v Speaker 1>Um uh. And so you know, if the margin is

0:16:08.316 --> 0:16:10.716
<v Speaker 1>that small, then y, you know, winning enough of these

0:16:10.716 --> 0:16:15.716
<v Speaker 1>battles could make a difference. But if you're several thousand votes,

0:16:15.756 --> 0:16:18.356
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it might sound very tight, but the idea

0:16:18.396 --> 0:16:21.716
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to change a couple of thousand votes

0:16:22.036 --> 0:16:27.716
<v Speaker 1>is h that's a much bigger, much bigger hurdle. Does

0:16:27.716 --> 0:16:30.196
<v Speaker 1>the Trump legal team seem to you to be well

0:16:30.396 --> 0:16:34.196
<v Speaker 1>organized with respect to that kind of retail level, because

0:16:34.276 --> 0:16:37.076
<v Speaker 1>at the wholesale level, you know, it's sort of interesting

0:16:37.116 --> 0:16:39.396
<v Speaker 1>they despite the fact that the President, you know, said

0:16:39.556 --> 0:16:42.156
<v Speaker 1>in his speech we're going to the Supreme Court that

0:16:42.276 --> 0:16:45.676
<v Speaker 1>was now almost twelve hours ago, and so far no

0:16:45.796 --> 0:16:48.236
<v Speaker 1>filing yet. I mean, they may have to file something

0:16:48.276 --> 0:16:50.836
<v Speaker 1>at some point just to satisfy their client. So I'm

0:16:50.836 --> 0:16:53.796
<v Speaker 1>wondering how how well prepared is the Bush is sorry

0:16:53.836 --> 0:16:58.796
<v Speaker 1>to speak in an obvious way, but in any event, no, So, Look,

0:16:59.116 --> 0:17:03.636
<v Speaker 1>that's actually an interesting question because I'm sure that many

0:17:03.716 --> 0:17:06.116
<v Speaker 1>of your listeners heard all sorts of things from the

0:17:06.156 --> 0:17:08.836
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign in advance of the election. We're going to

0:17:08.916 --> 0:17:11.676
<v Speaker 1>have fifty thousand pole watchers. We're going to have an

0:17:11.796 --> 0:17:17.196
<v Speaker 1>army of pole watchers. I actually did say to people

0:17:17.196 --> 0:17:20.796
<v Speaker 1>who were incredibly anxious about this, including on task force

0:17:21.316 --> 0:17:24.916
<v Speaker 1>task forces I was on, who wanted us to write

0:17:24.996 --> 0:17:27.076
<v Speaker 1>things about this, I said, Look, in every election I've

0:17:27.116 --> 0:17:29.356
<v Speaker 1>been involved in, there's a lot of talk about that

0:17:29.436 --> 0:17:33.316
<v Speaker 1>in advance. I've never seen it material lot materialize. I

0:17:33.396 --> 0:17:35.876
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what will happen this year. But what

0:17:35.996 --> 0:17:38.836
<v Speaker 1>did happen this year is that they didn't have that.

0:17:38.396 --> 0:17:40.916
<v Speaker 1>That just didn't happen. So what's the thing that you

0:17:40.956 --> 0:17:44.036
<v Speaker 1>expect that you expected not to materialize. I expected that

0:17:44.076 --> 0:17:47.636
<v Speaker 1>there would not be lots and lots of these challenges

0:17:47.876 --> 0:17:52.796
<v Speaker 1>from Trump lawyers or Trumps, you know, volunteers at the

0:17:52.796 --> 0:17:56.276
<v Speaker 1>polling places or during the counting of these absentee ballots.

0:17:56.396 --> 0:17:59.236
<v Speaker 1>And indeed, thus far your expectation has been born out.

0:17:59.356 --> 0:18:02.316
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing it so far, yes, And I don't

0:18:02.316 --> 0:18:05.516
<v Speaker 1>know if it's a matter of disorganization. I don't know

0:18:05.556 --> 0:18:08.036
<v Speaker 1>if it was a matter of this was just bluster,

0:18:08.436 --> 0:18:12.396
<v Speaker 1>and you know, no one was really trying to implement it. Seriously,

0:18:12.916 --> 0:18:15.836
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot harder to implement these things than kind

0:18:15.836 --> 0:18:18.036
<v Speaker 1>of people realize. You've got to get a very group people.

0:18:18.196 --> 0:18:20.476
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have to be well be able to

0:18:20.556 --> 0:18:24.396
<v Speaker 1>run a well organized organization. By the way, I should say,

0:18:24.436 --> 0:18:27.956
<v Speaker 1>the Biden campaign, my understanding, did have fifty thousand poll

0:18:28.036 --> 0:18:34.676
<v Speaker 1>watchers at various places in the country. And you know,

0:18:34.756 --> 0:18:39.876
<v Speaker 1>sometimes this language is this kind of talk in advance

0:18:40.676 --> 0:18:44.116
<v Speaker 1>I think is sometimes designed to rally your own troops,

0:18:44.156 --> 0:18:47.876
<v Speaker 1>but also maybe to discourage voters from voting from the

0:18:48.196 --> 0:18:50.796
<v Speaker 1>on the other side because they get fearful there's going

0:18:50.836 --> 0:18:53.516
<v Speaker 1>to be this army of poll watchers, this gauntlet they're

0:18:53.516 --> 0:18:56.556
<v Speaker 1>going to have to run. But we saw virtually none

0:18:56.556 --> 0:18:59.436
<v Speaker 1>of that. And the other thing that helped on that

0:18:59.596 --> 0:19:02.996
<v Speaker 1>was all of the early voting, and that's both in

0:19:03.076 --> 0:19:07.596
<v Speaker 1>person and returning mail ballots early. So states like Florida

0:19:07.716 --> 0:19:11.916
<v Speaker 1>because they have good policies on this, unlike Pennsylvania. You know,

0:19:11.996 --> 0:19:14.916
<v Speaker 1>they were processing their absentee ballots starting three weeks in

0:19:14.956 --> 0:19:16.636
<v Speaker 1>advance of the election. If there were going to be

0:19:16.716 --> 0:19:19.996
<v Speaker 1>challenges to those ballots, that was the time for those

0:19:20.076 --> 0:19:23.276
<v Speaker 1>challenges to take place, and so they weren't even taking

0:19:23.276 --> 0:19:27.716
<v Speaker 1>place before. I don't know how focused the Trump team

0:19:27.916 --> 0:19:32.756
<v Speaker 1>was on pre election day challenges or whether they focused

0:19:32.756 --> 0:19:36.396
<v Speaker 1>all their efforts on post election day, but but no,

0:19:37.116 --> 0:19:40.756
<v Speaker 1>by and large, you know, we actually had a very

0:19:40.756 --> 0:19:45.036
<v Speaker 1>smooth election. They're always glitches, you know, they're all but

0:19:45.036 --> 0:19:48.916
<v Speaker 1>but I think and we saw very little presence of this.

0:19:49.996 --> 0:20:01.436
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a moment. I want to change

0:20:01.436 --> 0:20:04.676
<v Speaker 1>our chronological focus now to what you might think of

0:20:04.756 --> 0:20:08.876
<v Speaker 1>as the possibility of stage two legitimation. So we're still

0:20:08.876 --> 0:20:12.316
<v Speaker 1>in stage one. But let's imagine for the sake of argument, that, say, Philip,

0:20:12.436 --> 0:20:15.716
<v Speaker 1>that Pennsylvania does not turn out to be determinative, and

0:20:16.236 --> 0:20:19.916
<v Speaker 1>over the next day or two the networks call enough

0:20:19.956 --> 0:20:24.796
<v Speaker 1>states for Biden to determine a Biden victory, and Trump

0:20:24.836 --> 0:20:27.116
<v Speaker 1>does not concede. It seems very unlikely that he would

0:20:27.116 --> 0:20:30.876
<v Speaker 1>concede and decides in what you might call stage two

0:20:31.436 --> 0:20:34.316
<v Speaker 1>de legitimation to emphasize an argument that he already made

0:20:34.356 --> 0:20:38.756
<v Speaker 1>in his first speech, namely, if we lost that means

0:20:38.796 --> 0:20:42.796
<v Speaker 1>the election was a hoax, and without any very concrete evidence,

0:20:42.836 --> 0:20:44.116
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe he can come up with a few

0:20:44.116 --> 0:20:47.756
<v Speaker 1>cases here or there to say, I think that, you know,

0:20:47.756 --> 0:20:50.196
<v Speaker 1>the fact there were districts that heavily voted for Joe

0:20:50.236 --> 0:20:53.476
<v Speaker 1>Biden or what have you, is just a systemic proof

0:20:53.836 --> 0:20:57.116
<v Speaker 1>that I've had the election stolen from me. Now, he

0:20:57.116 --> 0:20:58.436
<v Speaker 1>could do that sort of one of two ways. He

0:20:58.476 --> 0:21:00.676
<v Speaker 1>could just keep on saying that for the next month

0:21:00.756 --> 0:21:03.396
<v Speaker 1>or so, or he could say that in conjunction with

0:21:03.436 --> 0:21:07.316
<v Speaker 1>an actual effort to try to get some state legislatures

0:21:07.956 --> 0:21:11.276
<v Speaker 1>in states that are where the vote has apparently gone

0:21:11.436 --> 0:21:15.676
<v Speaker 1>for Biden to after the fact say they're changing the

0:21:15.716 --> 0:21:18.876
<v Speaker 1>law in their state, and they the state legislatures are

0:21:18.916 --> 0:21:22.516
<v Speaker 1>now going to choose the electors rather than relying on

0:21:22.516 --> 0:21:26.036
<v Speaker 1>the vote because I'll say the vote was tainted and implausible.

0:21:26.876 --> 0:21:29.636
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering whether you think there is a real risk

0:21:29.716 --> 0:21:31.876
<v Speaker 1>first of all, of Trump's step trying out these kinds

0:21:31.876 --> 0:21:35.916
<v Speaker 1>of stage tug of the generations, and second whether if

0:21:35.916 --> 0:21:38.996
<v Speaker 1>he does try these things, if there's any chance of

0:21:39.156 --> 0:21:44.396
<v Speaker 1>any kind of any state legislature actually listening. So this,

0:21:44.636 --> 0:21:48.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, we certainly thought about these scenarios, wrote about

0:21:48.116 --> 0:21:53.316
<v Speaker 1>these scenarios in advance, so none of this is surprising

0:21:53.436 --> 0:21:57.836
<v Speaker 1>to come up in discussion. I think the chances of

0:21:57.876 --> 0:22:00.916
<v Speaker 1>that happening have already gotten smaller than they were before

0:22:00.916 --> 0:22:04.636
<v Speaker 1>the election, because I think, in part, it would take

0:22:05.156 --> 0:22:09.516
<v Speaker 1>a real sense of chaos about the process in one

0:22:09.596 --> 0:22:13.596
<v Speaker 1>or more states, and at least as of now, we

0:22:13.636 --> 0:22:16.116
<v Speaker 1>don't have that sense. I mean, it could have been

0:22:16.156 --> 0:22:20.356
<v Speaker 1>a lot of chaos on election day. Um, it could

0:22:20.396 --> 0:22:24.876
<v Speaker 1>have been much worse. It could have started the night.

0:22:25.156 --> 0:22:27.356
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think many of us thought that that

0:22:27.356 --> 0:22:30.436
<v Speaker 1>that the president would start saying these things, you know,

0:22:30.436 --> 0:22:33.076
<v Speaker 1>at eight or nine or ten pm last night. He

0:22:33.116 --> 0:22:37.156
<v Speaker 1>didn't took him a little bit longer. And so I

0:22:37.196 --> 0:22:42.836
<v Speaker 1>think for that move to have any kind of traction, UH,

0:22:43.196 --> 0:22:45.796
<v Speaker 1>there's going to have to be you know, some kind

0:22:45.916 --> 0:22:50.516
<v Speaker 1>of of basis. I mean, not necessarily a fully realistic basis,

0:22:50.556 --> 0:22:53.636
<v Speaker 1>but you know, something to attach it to. Um. And

0:22:53.676 --> 0:22:56.116
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna have to have you know, state legislatures

0:22:56.436 --> 0:23:01.236
<v Speaker 1>who would go against their constituents in the state. And uh,

0:23:01.676 --> 0:23:04.996
<v Speaker 1>you know how many states now would this play have

0:23:05.156 --> 0:23:09.916
<v Speaker 1>to be made in uh to be effective? Um. You know,

0:23:09.956 --> 0:23:11.956
<v Speaker 1>I think if we come down to the election turning

0:23:11.996 --> 0:23:15.036
<v Speaker 1>on one state, it becomes more of a possibility. But

0:23:15.036 --> 0:23:17.396
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about three or four states, you know,

0:23:17.476 --> 0:23:20.476
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to imagine three or four state legislatures

0:23:20.836 --> 0:23:22.756
<v Speaker 1>are going to kind of agree to do this in

0:23:22.756 --> 0:23:25.636
<v Speaker 1>the face of what the reaction to that would be.

0:23:26.996 --> 0:23:29.996
<v Speaker 1>My view is that it won't happen because even died

0:23:30.036 --> 0:23:32.356
<v Speaker 1>in the will, Republicans would think it looked too much

0:23:32.356 --> 0:23:36.636
<v Speaker 1>like a coup data to replace their own constituents votes

0:23:36.676 --> 0:23:39.556
<v Speaker 1>with their own with their votes after the votes had

0:23:39.556 --> 0:23:42.196
<v Speaker 1>already been cast. You know, as you say, if there

0:23:42.196 --> 0:23:44.556
<v Speaker 1>were true chaos somewhere, maybe you could conceive of it.

0:23:44.756 --> 0:23:47.076
<v Speaker 1>But there hasn't been that kind of cast that suggests

0:23:47.116 --> 0:23:49.876
<v Speaker 1>that the relatively smooth functioning of the election thus far

0:23:50.956 --> 0:23:54.156
<v Speaker 1>is actually a pretty important factor in pushing us towards

0:23:54.196 --> 0:23:56.996
<v Speaker 1>an outcome of Biden actually being not only winning, but

0:23:57.076 --> 0:23:59.956
<v Speaker 1>being treated as the winner. Yeah, I think that's that.

0:24:00.076 --> 0:24:02.556
<v Speaker 1>That's right now. You know, of course, something could blow

0:24:02.676 --> 0:24:10.556
<v Speaker 1>up in Pennsylvania, and if Pennsylvania turns out to be decisive,

0:24:11.916 --> 0:24:15.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, the things might change. But given where we

0:24:15.796 --> 0:24:21.596
<v Speaker 1>are right now, I think the risk has been diminished,

0:24:21.716 --> 0:24:24.396
<v Speaker 1>I'll put it that way. I also think they've they've

0:24:24.436 --> 0:24:28.236
<v Speaker 1>played most of their stronger potential legal cards. One of

0:24:28.236 --> 0:24:32.076
<v Speaker 1>the advantages of this massive volume of litigation we had

0:24:32.116 --> 0:24:35.396
<v Speaker 1>in advance of the election, which wasn't necessarily good in

0:24:35.516 --> 0:24:37.836
<v Speaker 1>various ways, but one of the things it did is

0:24:37.876 --> 0:24:39.876
<v Speaker 1>it brought a lot of clarity to a lot of

0:24:39.876 --> 0:24:42.596
<v Speaker 1>the issues that could have been fought over, and instead

0:24:42.596 --> 0:24:46.196
<v Speaker 1>of fighting about them after the election, you know, we

0:24:46.276 --> 0:24:49.956
<v Speaker 1>got a fair amount of that cleared up. And in fact,

0:24:50.036 --> 0:24:53.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, on this ballot extension deadline issue, for example,

0:24:55.196 --> 0:25:00.076
<v Speaker 1>the substantial majority of states ended up having their traditional

0:25:00.356 --> 0:25:03.036
<v Speaker 1>you have to get the ballot back by election night

0:25:03.316 --> 0:25:07.276
<v Speaker 1>deadline so it's only a few states where that issue

0:25:07.876 --> 0:25:10.996
<v Speaker 1>even got opened up. One is in North Carolina, which

0:25:10.996 --> 0:25:14.196
<v Speaker 1>if Trump wins, it's unlikely that anyone's going to care

0:25:14.236 --> 0:25:20.076
<v Speaker 1>about it there. Another is in Minnesota, which Biden has

0:25:20.076 --> 0:25:23.716
<v Speaker 1>easily won before those ballots to come in after election

0:25:23.796 --> 0:25:25.556
<v Speaker 1>day or count it, so it seems like a non

0:25:25.556 --> 0:25:29.116
<v Speaker 1>issue there. So, you know, Pennsylvania's is still the one

0:25:29.116 --> 0:25:31.476
<v Speaker 1>place that it could be an issue. But as I say,

0:25:32.836 --> 0:25:37.876
<v Speaker 1>I think Democrats by election day had returned eighty four

0:25:37.956 --> 0:25:42.156
<v Speaker 1>percent of the absentee ballots that they had requested. So

0:25:42.196 --> 0:25:43.996
<v Speaker 1>the media often looks at these things, oh my gosh,

0:25:44.036 --> 0:25:46.556
<v Speaker 1>there's all these outstanding absentee ballots to come in, but

0:25:46.636 --> 0:25:49.756
<v Speaker 1>they have no baseline about what a normal return rate is.

0:25:50.476 --> 0:25:53.796
<v Speaker 1>So normally about eighty percent of absentee ballots that I

0:25:53.916 --> 0:25:57.316
<v Speaker 1>requested get voted, and the rest don't come back in

0:25:58.836 --> 0:26:02.436
<v Speaker 1>people decide to show up in vote in person, they

0:26:02.476 --> 0:26:04.596
<v Speaker 1>get nervous about whether the ballot's going to come back

0:26:04.596 --> 0:26:09.836
<v Speaker 1>on time, they forget they requested the apps T ballot.

0:26:11.796 --> 0:26:15.316
<v Speaker 1>So so even before election day, we had a very

0:26:15.516 --> 0:26:18.236
<v Speaker 1>very high return rate, at least compared to you know,

0:26:18.316 --> 0:26:20.316
<v Speaker 1>what I think of as the baseline of eighty percent,

0:26:21.396 --> 0:26:24.356
<v Speaker 1>and of course put Pennsylvania has been the focus of

0:26:24.436 --> 0:26:29.436
<v Speaker 1>both campaigns. It's been tremendous mobilizing voter field operation work,

0:26:30.076 --> 0:26:34.036
<v Speaker 1>getting people to get their ballots back early. So I

0:26:34.396 --> 0:26:38.356
<v Speaker 1>just sort of suspect that what people think in terms

0:26:38.356 --> 0:26:40.236
<v Speaker 1>of how many are going to come back, by the way,

0:26:40.316 --> 0:26:41.836
<v Speaker 1>that's something I'm going to look at in terms of

0:26:41.876 --> 0:26:46.396
<v Speaker 1>the debates about these Supreme Court decisions. When the Supreme Court,

0:26:46.476 --> 0:26:51.036
<v Speaker 1>in that recent five to three decision cut off Wisconsin

0:26:51.916 --> 0:26:57.716
<v Speaker 1>from having the extended deadlines, you know, you had lower

0:26:57.756 --> 0:27:00.996
<v Speaker 1>court judges writing dissenting writing pitons saying they're gonna be

0:27:01.036 --> 0:27:03.436
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand votes that are going to be thrown out.

0:27:04.036 --> 0:27:06.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm also very skeptical that we're going to be talking

0:27:06.796 --> 0:27:09.796
<v Speaker 1>about anything like that magnitude. I want to kind of

0:27:09.836 --> 0:27:14.476
<v Speaker 1>keep track see what we learn after the fact. Rick,

0:27:14.516 --> 0:27:17.676
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking, and you've been talking extremely valuably and

0:27:17.676 --> 0:27:20.636
<v Speaker 1>helpfully about the nitty gritty, you know, we've we've been

0:27:20.676 --> 0:27:22.796
<v Speaker 1>deep in it for the conversation, and before I let

0:27:22.796 --> 0:27:24.236
<v Speaker 1>you go, I want to talk a little bit about

0:27:24.236 --> 0:27:27.476
<v Speaker 1>the other aspect of your deep interest in election law,

0:27:27.516 --> 0:27:30.956
<v Speaker 1>which is the bigger, more profound constitutional structures that are

0:27:30.956 --> 0:27:34.516
<v Speaker 1>in play here. So let's just imagine for the sake

0:27:34.556 --> 0:27:37.396
<v Speaker 1>of argument. Let's start with the scenario where Biden wins

0:27:37.436 --> 0:27:39.836
<v Speaker 1>the election and is eventually recognized as the winner of

0:27:39.876 --> 0:27:42.116
<v Speaker 1>the election, maybe not by Donald Trump, but by enough

0:27:42.156 --> 0:27:44.236
<v Speaker 1>people that he can be sworn in and actually take

0:27:44.276 --> 0:27:47.196
<v Speaker 1>office in the Secret Service, smilingly escorse Donald Trump from

0:27:47.196 --> 0:27:51.396
<v Speaker 1>the building. In that scenario, we will have avoided the

0:27:51.436 --> 0:27:54.476
<v Speaker 1>scene of an electoral college that, twice in a row

0:27:55.236 --> 0:27:58.996
<v Speaker 1>gives a victory to a president who didn't win the

0:27:59.036 --> 0:28:03.076
<v Speaker 1>popular vote. Is that going to lead to some sort

0:28:03.116 --> 0:28:08.116
<v Speaker 1>of dying down of the growing rather intensive criticism of

0:28:08.116 --> 0:28:12.116
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college as unjust that we've seen an undemocratic

0:28:12.156 --> 0:28:15.076
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen building. Do you think that it will

0:28:15.116 --> 0:28:16.596
<v Speaker 1>just put it out of our heads for the next

0:28:16.596 --> 0:28:19.316
<v Speaker 1>four years, especially given the fact that it's pretty challenging

0:28:19.716 --> 0:28:21.196
<v Speaker 1>to change it. Or do you think we'll get the

0:28:21.236 --> 0:28:23.956
<v Speaker 1>opposite of more of a focus of people saying, look

0:28:23.956 --> 0:28:27.436
<v Speaker 1>how close this was this time, This is just not okay.

0:28:27.636 --> 0:28:29.316
<v Speaker 1>We just can't take this risk in the future, and

0:28:29.316 --> 0:28:31.756
<v Speaker 1>we have to double down on our attempt to find

0:28:32.036 --> 0:28:37.236
<v Speaker 1>some structural solution. So the issue I would link that too,

0:28:38.196 --> 0:28:40.996
<v Speaker 1>because they are intimately linked together, is what happens with

0:28:41.076 --> 0:28:44.596
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and then what's the relationship between if there

0:28:44.676 --> 0:28:48.796
<v Speaker 1>is a Biden presidency and the Senate And also sort

0:28:48.836 --> 0:28:52.636
<v Speaker 1>of nationwide what percentage of votes for the Senate seats

0:28:52.956 --> 0:28:59.276
<v Speaker 1>are for Democratic candidates versus Republican ones. And there are

0:28:59.316 --> 0:29:01.796
<v Speaker 1>so many things I'd like to fix about our election system.

0:29:01.836 --> 0:29:04.156
<v Speaker 1>This is actually at a very kind of big level,

0:29:05.076 --> 0:29:07.756
<v Speaker 1>where of course it's harder to make the changes. But

0:29:08.676 --> 0:29:11.116
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, there is this growing sense

0:29:11.316 --> 0:29:17.636
<v Speaker 1>for sure that that their political minorities have more and

0:29:17.756 --> 0:29:23.076
<v Speaker 1>more ability to come up change between the Senate, the

0:29:23.116 --> 0:29:29.116
<v Speaker 1>electoral College, even you know, Jerrymander districts um and and

0:29:29.196 --> 0:29:34.036
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more awareness of these issues. I used

0:29:34.076 --> 0:29:36.476
<v Speaker 1>to say when I taught that I'm surprised there's not

0:29:36.596 --> 0:29:39.716
<v Speaker 1>much debate about the Senate and how antidemocratic the Senate

0:29:39.716 --> 0:29:43.716
<v Speaker 1>in the US is m because the population disparities had

0:29:43.756 --> 0:29:47.276
<v Speaker 1>just become so enormous, But that has become a subject

0:29:47.276 --> 0:29:52.316
<v Speaker 1>of public debate in recent years. So, uh, depending on

0:29:54.076 --> 0:29:58.196
<v Speaker 1>what Biden as president, if president gets done or gets

0:29:58.196 --> 0:30:00.756
<v Speaker 1>blocked from doing by a Senate depending on how many

0:30:00.796 --> 0:30:04.436
<v Speaker 1>Senators there are. If Senate reform, which would be I

0:30:04.436 --> 0:30:08.076
<v Speaker 1>think the more immediate focal point gets on the agenda,

0:30:08.436 --> 0:30:11.476
<v Speaker 1>I think elector while college reform would be connected to

0:30:11.556 --> 0:30:14.036
<v Speaker 1>that debate. But is there any way to get to

0:30:14.196 --> 0:30:18.516
<v Speaker 1>Senate reform? I mean there's I guess there's the old

0:30:18.516 --> 0:30:21.876
<v Speaker 1>fashioned as in pre Civil war, let's add more states,

0:30:22.356 --> 0:30:24.236
<v Speaker 1>which is not a solution to the problem. It's just

0:30:24.276 --> 0:30:26.196
<v Speaker 1>a way for the Democrats to try to gain it

0:30:26.236 --> 0:30:28.196
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. But they can obviously only do that if

0:30:28.196 --> 0:30:30.556
<v Speaker 1>they actually hold a majority in the Senate. So it's

0:30:30.596 --> 0:30:33.036
<v Speaker 1>not a form of reform that's available unless they've already

0:30:33.116 --> 0:30:35.916
<v Speaker 1>to some extent one it. But beyond that, I mean,

0:30:35.956 --> 0:30:38.956
<v Speaker 1>when the small states stage their walkout in seventeen eighty seven,

0:30:38.996 --> 0:30:43.556
<v Speaker 1>they were made sure to permanently, you know, institutionalize their

0:30:43.556 --> 0:30:45.916
<v Speaker 1>gains by making it impossible under the Constitution to take

0:30:45.916 --> 0:30:48.916
<v Speaker 1>away your Senate votes without the consent of the state.

0:30:48.996 --> 0:30:50.836
<v Speaker 1>So is there a way is there a way to

0:30:50.876 --> 0:30:54.636
<v Speaker 1>even reform the Senate? So one of the perverse consequences

0:30:54.636 --> 0:30:59.756
<v Speaker 1>of having the longest running continuous constitutional democracy is institutions

0:30:59.796 --> 0:31:03.156
<v Speaker 1>are built, they're anchored into the Constitution at a certain

0:31:03.156 --> 0:31:08.676
<v Speaker 1>moment in time. Obviously things change dramatically and unanticipated ways.

0:31:08.796 --> 0:31:13.036
<v Speaker 1>Those institutions no longer function the way they were imagined

0:31:13.076 --> 0:31:15.796
<v Speaker 1>to function, and yet they become very very difficult to change.

0:31:15.796 --> 0:31:22.996
<v Speaker 1>And the Senate, you know, is certainly an example. And yes,

0:31:23.076 --> 0:31:27.676
<v Speaker 1>of course you're right that the Democrats need unified control

0:31:27.836 --> 0:31:30.396
<v Speaker 1>of all three parts of the national political process, the House,

0:31:30.476 --> 0:31:32.876
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, in the White House to be able to

0:31:33.356 --> 0:31:39.916
<v Speaker 1>make those changes. I assume that you know, there are

0:31:39.996 --> 0:31:45.036
<v Speaker 1>ways of keeping a Senate like structure that in fact,

0:31:45.036 --> 0:31:47.156
<v Speaker 1>it could be exactly the same structure, but we could

0:31:47.236 --> 0:31:52.916
<v Speaker 1>change the proportions of you know, how many senators a

0:31:53.036 --> 0:31:57.276
<v Speaker 1>state got per one million number of people or something

0:31:57.316 --> 0:32:01.036
<v Speaker 1>like that, so that you know, you could change the formula,

0:32:01.476 --> 0:32:05.916
<v Speaker 1>but it had to be a constitutional amendment that so

0:32:05.996 --> 0:32:10.596
<v Speaker 1>that the disproportion between California and Wyoming is not seventy

0:32:10.756 --> 0:32:13.596
<v Speaker 1>something to one like it is today. But that's also

0:32:13.636 --> 0:32:18.956
<v Speaker 1>assuming Rick, that the that the constitutional provision is amendable, right,

0:32:18.996 --> 0:32:22.116
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is an arcade debate among constitutional law professors,

0:32:22.116 --> 0:32:24.196
<v Speaker 1>but it is one of the provisions at the Constitution

0:32:24.676 --> 0:32:28.116
<v Speaker 1>that has written doesn't sound like it's susceptible to Article

0:32:28.156 --> 0:32:31.116
<v Speaker 1>five amendment because it says that in the Constitution that

0:32:31.156 --> 0:32:34.076
<v Speaker 1>you can't take away a state's equal representation without its consent,

0:32:34.116 --> 0:32:36.236
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't say unless you do it by a

0:32:36.236 --> 0:32:39.036
<v Speaker 1>constitutional amendment. So isn't there a genuine question about whether

0:32:39.036 --> 0:32:40.596
<v Speaker 1>even an amendment what could do that? Well, the way

0:32:40.636 --> 0:32:42.636
<v Speaker 1>I put the question back to you is if there

0:32:42.636 --> 0:32:46.396
<v Speaker 1>were actually a large enough political movement to amend the

0:32:46.436 --> 0:32:51.356
<v Speaker 1>Constitution in that way, do you think a court or

0:32:51.356 --> 0:32:54.436
<v Speaker 1>a Supreme Court would say, well, sorry, that was an

0:32:54.516 --> 0:33:00.796
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional constitutional amendment and therefore, you know, we're pulling the

0:33:00.916 --> 0:33:02.436
<v Speaker 1>rug out of this. What would have to be a

0:33:02.476 --> 0:33:05.476
<v Speaker 1>massive popular movement, you know, to kind of get us

0:33:05.516 --> 0:33:07.636
<v Speaker 1>to this point, or would the court say it's a

0:33:07.636 --> 0:33:12.276
<v Speaker 1>political question, etcetera. Yeah, now I hear that argument. I

0:33:12.276 --> 0:33:15.516
<v Speaker 1>guess my one response is to get two thirds of

0:33:15.516 --> 0:33:18.916
<v Speaker 1>the members of Congress, including two thirds of the Senators

0:33:18.956 --> 0:33:22.156
<v Speaker 1>and three quarters of the state legislatures, to agree to

0:33:22.316 --> 0:33:25.516
<v Speaker 1>reform the Senate is to my mind, not within the

0:33:25.556 --> 0:33:28.236
<v Speaker 1>bounds of realistic possibility. I mean, I think the same

0:33:28.756 --> 0:33:32.956
<v Speaker 1>incentives would exist now as existed at the original convention

0:33:33.276 --> 0:33:37.556
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia, whereby the smaller states just basically said, you know,

0:33:37.596 --> 0:33:39.596
<v Speaker 1>we don't care if this is unfair, We're just not

0:33:39.676 --> 0:33:41.836
<v Speaker 1>backing down. And if you don't like it, like find

0:33:41.876 --> 0:33:45.716
<v Speaker 1>no constitution, and I think so, I actually, I actually

0:33:45.716 --> 0:33:47.876
<v Speaker 1>don't see Senate reform. I wish I could find a

0:33:47.916 --> 0:33:50.516
<v Speaker 1>way towards Senate reform. In the case of the electoral college,

0:33:50.516 --> 0:33:52.516
<v Speaker 1>which was the thing I was hoping to ask you about,

0:33:52.796 --> 0:33:55.876
<v Speaker 1>there is at least this idea that if enough states

0:33:55.956 --> 0:33:59.996
<v Speaker 1>agreed to engage in an interstate pact according to which

0:34:00.676 --> 0:34:04.596
<v Speaker 1>they would all cast their electoral votes according to a

0:34:04.676 --> 0:34:08.516
<v Speaker 1>majoritarian outcome, that maybe, maybe maybe you could reach some

0:34:08.556 --> 0:34:11.356
<v Speaker 1>tipping point where without amending the Constitution, we actually got

0:34:11.436 --> 0:34:13.916
<v Speaker 1>rid of the electoral college. There are definitely ways of

0:34:14.156 --> 0:34:17.756
<v Speaker 1>fixing the electoral college without a constitutional amendment. That's true.

0:34:18.036 --> 0:34:20.676
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a couple of ways to think about.

0:34:21.596 --> 0:34:24.476
<v Speaker 1>One is the one you mentioned, the National Popular Vote Compact,

0:34:24.916 --> 0:34:27.876
<v Speaker 1>where a number of states sign up and say we're

0:34:27.916 --> 0:34:30.556
<v Speaker 1>committed in advance to giving our electors to whoever wins

0:34:30.596 --> 0:34:34.556
<v Speaker 1>the national popular vote, and then if two seventy or

0:34:34.596 --> 0:34:37.236
<v Speaker 1>more states two hundred and seventy electoral votes are more

0:34:37.236 --> 0:34:40.156
<v Speaker 1>agreed to that than the popular vote winner would become

0:34:40.276 --> 0:34:45.076
<v Speaker 1>the winner. I've always been nervous about that solution because

0:34:45.156 --> 0:34:50.156
<v Speaker 1>my concern is that at the only moment in which

0:34:50.196 --> 0:34:53.556
<v Speaker 1>the compact would actually make a difference, which would be

0:34:53.636 --> 0:34:56.996
<v Speaker 1>when a state would have to support a president that

0:34:57.076 --> 0:35:03.476
<v Speaker 1>its people voted against, would the compact actually hold or

0:35:03.476 --> 0:35:09.436
<v Speaker 1>would the state legislature withdraw from the compact at that point. So,

0:35:09.476 --> 0:35:13.076
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I worry about that solution. The other solution

0:35:13.356 --> 0:35:15.756
<v Speaker 1>is if you could get all the states to agree

0:35:15.796 --> 0:35:19.196
<v Speaker 1>to award their electors, let's say, proportionately to the vote

0:35:19.196 --> 0:35:22.476
<v Speaker 1>in the state, so that if Canada got, you know,

0:35:22.676 --> 0:35:24.796
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent of the vote, they'd get fifty five

0:35:24.836 --> 0:35:27.556
<v Speaker 1>percent of the electors or whatever the you know integer

0:35:27.756 --> 0:35:30.756
<v Speaker 1>was that was instead of one hundred percent of the electors,

0:35:31.316 --> 0:35:34.996
<v Speaker 1>and that there's no constitutional barrier to doing that. The

0:35:35.036 --> 0:35:36.796
<v Speaker 1>only problem with that is you have to get all

0:35:36.796 --> 0:35:38.756
<v Speaker 1>the states to agree to do it, because no state

0:35:38.836 --> 0:35:40.076
<v Speaker 1>is going to be, you know, go out there and

0:35:40.116 --> 0:35:43.796
<v Speaker 1>do it by itself and deprive itself of power in

0:35:43.836 --> 0:35:46.476
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college process unless the other states are willing

0:35:46.476 --> 0:35:48.236
<v Speaker 1>to do it as well. It's a little bit like

0:35:48.356 --> 0:35:50.236
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is too our kine for you,

0:35:50.316 --> 0:35:52.876
<v Speaker 1>but for the conversation at this point. But you know,

0:35:52.916 --> 0:35:55.836
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit like the dynamic we had that

0:35:55.956 --> 0:35:58.716
<v Speaker 1>led us to use single member districts to elect members

0:35:58.756 --> 0:36:02.236
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, which is the Constitution allows states to decide

0:36:02.276 --> 0:36:05.516
<v Speaker 1>how to elect members of Congress. At the beginning, a

0:36:05.556 --> 0:36:08.596
<v Speaker 1>bunch of states elected them at large. You know, so

0:36:08.876 --> 0:36:13.236
<v Speaker 1>say majority statewide controlled all the members of Congress in

0:36:13.236 --> 0:36:16.676
<v Speaker 1>the big states which had more factions, infinite diverse interests

0:36:16.676 --> 0:36:19.756
<v Speaker 1>that that was alienating to significant parts of the population.

0:36:19.836 --> 0:36:22.796
<v Speaker 1>Those states decide, okay, let's have an individual districts to

0:36:22.876 --> 0:36:26.556
<v Speaker 1>elect members of Congress. And then Pennsylvania discovered it lost

0:36:26.596 --> 0:36:31.196
<v Speaker 1>power to a small state like Rhode Island because you're

0:36:31.196 --> 0:36:34.916
<v Speaker 1>divided now in your delegation. You know, you have maybe

0:36:34.956 --> 0:36:39.236
<v Speaker 1>half of the delegates our federalist and half our anti federalist,

0:36:39.716 --> 0:36:43.676
<v Speaker 1>and they sort of neutralize each other in the Pennsylvania delegation.

0:36:44.276 --> 0:36:47.476
<v Speaker 1>So what happened, So finally Congress in the eighteen forties

0:36:47.836 --> 0:36:52.156
<v Speaker 1>there was this collective action solution mechanism available. Congress passed

0:36:52.196 --> 0:36:55.876
<v Speaker 1>a law forcing all states to elect members of Congress

0:36:55.876 --> 0:36:58.876
<v Speaker 1>from single member districts and that's what we've had ever since.

0:36:59.396 --> 0:37:01.876
<v Speaker 1>So what you need for the electoral college would be

0:37:01.916 --> 0:37:05.996
<v Speaker 1>something like that, you know, Congress, an external body that

0:37:06.076 --> 0:37:09.556
<v Speaker 1>can say, okay, we will give you the rule that

0:37:09.636 --> 0:37:12.676
<v Speaker 1>you all agree you would be better off under, but

0:37:12.836 --> 0:37:16.516
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually make an agreement sort of one by

0:37:16.516 --> 0:37:20.796
<v Speaker 1>one to adopt. The problem is it's not clear if

0:37:20.836 --> 0:37:23.196
<v Speaker 1>Congress has the power to do that and to tell

0:37:23.276 --> 0:37:26.876
<v Speaker 1>states their electors shall be awarded on a proportional basis

0:37:27.116 --> 0:37:28.796
<v Speaker 1>anyway that may be more than you wanted on that,

0:37:28.956 --> 0:37:30.956
<v Speaker 1>but well we call it. We call it deep background

0:37:30.956 --> 0:37:32.476
<v Speaker 1>for a reason. We're willing to We're willing going to

0:37:32.516 --> 0:37:35.756
<v Speaker 1>go into the deep deep questions too. Last question for you, Rick,

0:37:35.876 --> 0:37:39.436
<v Speaker 1>before I let you go with lots of gratitude, what

0:37:39.556 --> 0:37:41.716
<v Speaker 1>am I failing to ask you that I should be

0:37:41.756 --> 0:37:45.276
<v Speaker 1>asking you? What is salient in your mind that no

0:37:45.316 --> 0:37:47.116
<v Speaker 1>one asked you when you were on TV, or that

0:37:47.116 --> 0:37:48.796
<v Speaker 1>I haven't asked you in this conversation that you would

0:37:48.836 --> 0:37:50.996
<v Speaker 1>like to leave listeners with. And look, I think we

0:37:52.556 --> 0:37:56.436
<v Speaker 1>are putting ourselves at enormous risk. I don't know if

0:37:56.476 --> 0:37:59.996
<v Speaker 1>we can go through a process like this again with

0:38:00.036 --> 0:38:05.196
<v Speaker 1>our election system. We have a political culture now that

0:38:05.356 --> 0:38:10.196
<v Speaker 1>makes a system that is so screwed up potentially you know,

0:38:10.476 --> 0:38:16.076
<v Speaker 1>dynamite in a really disturbing way for the for the country.

0:38:16.956 --> 0:38:22.156
<v Speaker 1>And it's if we dodge that situation this time, we

0:38:22.236 --> 0:38:26.676
<v Speaker 1>will have gotten lucky. Um, we have huge problems we

0:38:26.756 --> 0:38:28.396
<v Speaker 1>have to try to figure out a way to fix.

0:38:28.956 --> 0:38:32.916
<v Speaker 1>To come up with election processes and systems that are

0:38:33.596 --> 0:38:36.876
<v Speaker 1>broadly accepted, we'll be kind of stable. We won't be

0:38:36.916 --> 0:38:41.716
<v Speaker 1>fighting about them constantly. We will run elections within that

0:38:41.796 --> 0:38:46.276
<v Speaker 1>framework and accept the framework is a legitimate framework, because

0:38:46.276 --> 0:38:48.596
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many elections like this we can

0:38:48.636 --> 0:38:51.676
<v Speaker 1>go through without putting, you know, putting the system really

0:38:52.396 --> 0:38:56.916
<v Speaker 1>in jeopardy. I hear you, and I think you're absolutely

0:38:56.956 --> 0:38:59.836
<v Speaker 1>right that we're playing with fire. And if we are

0:38:59.916 --> 0:39:01.756
<v Speaker 1>lucky enough to get out of this election without a

0:39:01.836 --> 0:39:05.836
<v Speaker 1>huge legal fight or without a deep crisis of legitimacy,

0:39:06.436 --> 0:39:08.436
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it's just it's just the luck

0:39:08.436 --> 0:39:10.756
<v Speaker 1>of the draw. I mean, we've already had this extraordinary

0:39:10.796 --> 0:39:12.956
<v Speaker 1>thing in the middle of the night or the early

0:39:12.996 --> 0:39:16.196
<v Speaker 1>morning hours of the President of the United States, by

0:39:16.196 --> 0:39:17.876
<v Speaker 1>the way, in the East room of the White House,

0:39:17.916 --> 0:39:20.236
<v Speaker 1>not the place where we're expecting there to be a

0:39:20.236 --> 0:39:23.676
<v Speaker 1>political rally announcing that he had already won the election

0:39:23.716 --> 0:39:25.796
<v Speaker 1>when he plainly had not won the election, and we're

0:39:25.796 --> 0:39:29.276
<v Speaker 1>all sort of we're so desensitized to we accepted. We say, oh, well,

0:39:29.276 --> 0:39:30.716
<v Speaker 1>of course the president did that. We knew he was

0:39:30.716 --> 0:39:32.756
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. And you know, we point out,

0:39:32.756 --> 0:39:34.356
<v Speaker 1>as you and I have both pointed out, that he

0:39:34.356 --> 0:39:36.076
<v Speaker 1>can say that, we can't stop him from saying it,

0:39:36.116 --> 0:39:38.916
<v Speaker 1>but doing it as another matter. But we're really we

0:39:38.996 --> 0:39:42.916
<v Speaker 1>are in a high risk situation here, and it seems

0:39:42.916 --> 0:39:45.436
<v Speaker 1>to me that we probably do need some fundamental reform

0:39:46.076 --> 0:39:47.676
<v Speaker 1>or we're going to run into a problem that's going

0:39:47.716 --> 0:39:50.956
<v Speaker 1>to make bush Vigor look like like it was nothing. Yeah,

0:39:50.996 --> 0:39:53.876
<v Speaker 1>I've said, if we had a bush Vigor situation today,

0:39:54.076 --> 0:39:56.316
<v Speaker 1>it would that two thousand would look like a walk

0:39:56.356 --> 0:40:01.196
<v Speaker 1>in the park compared to what that would produce today. Rick,

0:40:01.316 --> 0:40:03.316
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your time on your busiest

0:40:03.396 --> 0:40:04.756
<v Speaker 1>day of the year, and thank you for what you

0:40:04.836 --> 0:40:06.476
<v Speaker 1>do the other three hundred and sixty four and a

0:40:06.556 --> 0:40:10.756
<v Speaker 1>quarter days explaining many aspect of constitutional electoral alarm. Really

0:40:10.756 --> 0:40:12.916
<v Speaker 1>grateful to you. It's fun to have a good excuse

0:40:12.956 --> 0:40:21.076
<v Speaker 1>to chat with you for a while. No Professor Rick

0:40:21.156 --> 0:40:25.796
<v Speaker 1>Pildus is the go to election law expert, and we're

0:40:25.836 --> 0:40:28.196
<v Speaker 1>really lucky that he was able to make time to

0:40:28.236 --> 0:40:30.836
<v Speaker 1>talk about the current election and the options with us.

0:40:31.836 --> 0:40:35.556
<v Speaker 1>Rick says that if this comes down to Pennsylvania, this

0:40:35.716 --> 0:40:39.796
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a major, major mass. At the

0:40:39.876 --> 0:40:44.396
<v Speaker 1>same time, Rick has some pieces of mild optimism for us.

0:40:44.916 --> 0:40:48.996
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, election day ran, in his view, relatively smoothly.

0:40:49.476 --> 0:40:53.636
<v Speaker 1>This smoothness takes away one of the excuses that might

0:40:53.676 --> 0:40:57.996
<v Speaker 1>have been available to a Republican state legislature to deprive

0:40:58.116 --> 0:41:01.596
<v Speaker 1>the voters of their choice of Joe Biden and instead

0:41:01.636 --> 0:41:06.236
<v Speaker 1>to substitute a slate of Trump electors, invoking the constitutional

0:41:06.356 --> 0:41:10.756
<v Speaker 1>right potentially to do so. Chaos would have been an

0:41:10.796 --> 0:41:14.556
<v Speaker 1>invitation for the Trump administration to urge state legislatures to

0:41:14.556 --> 0:41:19.316
<v Speaker 1>do this. Relative smoothness, according to Rick, makes that less likely.

0:41:20.276 --> 0:41:25.236
<v Speaker 1>Litigation is already going on, but Rick says it's relatively

0:41:25.276 --> 0:41:28.396
<v Speaker 1>difficult at this moment for the Trump administration to come

0:41:28.476 --> 0:41:33.436
<v Speaker 1>up with a systematic legal argument for disenfranchising large numbers

0:41:33.436 --> 0:41:36.836
<v Speaker 1>of voters or for blocking the count of votes on

0:41:37.036 --> 0:41:40.716
<v Speaker 1>a wholesale level. That is, by suggesting that as a

0:41:40.756 --> 0:41:44.316
<v Speaker 1>principal matter, a whole tranche of voters should be prohibited

0:41:44.316 --> 0:41:47.916
<v Speaker 1>from having their votes counted. What the Trump administration can do,

0:41:48.236 --> 0:41:50.956
<v Speaker 1>Rick points out, is to continue at the retail level

0:41:51.116 --> 0:41:55.716
<v Speaker 1>challenging individual ballots. But doing that knocks off a vote here,

0:41:55.876 --> 0:41:58.636
<v Speaker 1>a vote there, perhaps even a few hundred votes, and

0:41:58.876 --> 0:42:01.996
<v Speaker 1>will not suffice for Trump to manage to win an

0:42:02.036 --> 0:42:05.436
<v Speaker 1>election that he would not otherwise win, unless we're in

0:42:05.836 --> 0:42:09.716
<v Speaker 1>Florida in two thousand zone, where an entire our election

0:42:09.996 --> 0:42:12.076
<v Speaker 1>is going to be decided not by ten or twenty

0:42:12.076 --> 0:42:16.316
<v Speaker 1>thousand votes, but by just a few hundred votes. At

0:42:16.356 --> 0:42:20.316
<v Speaker 1>the deeper level of the structures of our democracy, Rick

0:42:20.396 --> 0:42:24.916
<v Speaker 1>Piltus's analysis is considerably darker. He points out that we

0:42:24.996 --> 0:42:28.556
<v Speaker 1>probably can't afford to have another contested election of this kind,

0:42:28.956 --> 0:42:31.316
<v Speaker 1>and he points out that the basic structure of the

0:42:31.316 --> 0:42:36.916
<v Speaker 1>electoral college is extremely difficult to change or amend and

0:42:37.076 --> 0:42:42.316
<v Speaker 1>remains a major challenge to majoritarian democratic norms in our country.

0:42:42.996 --> 0:42:47.036
<v Speaker 1>So is the United States Senate, in which nearly half

0:42:47.156 --> 0:42:49.756
<v Speaker 1>of the senators can be elected by perhaps eighteen or

0:42:49.836 --> 0:42:54.716
<v Speaker 1>nineteen percent of the population. These are long run, deep

0:42:54.836 --> 0:43:00.076
<v Speaker 1>structural problems with our constitutional democracy, and as Rick points out,

0:43:00.436 --> 0:43:03.276
<v Speaker 1>we need to think seriously about how to address them,

0:43:03.796 --> 0:43:08.356
<v Speaker 1>lest the basic legitimacy of our democracy be substantially undercut.

0:43:09.636 --> 0:43:12.476
<v Speaker 1>My takeaway from listening to Rick is that it is

0:43:12.516 --> 0:43:15.636
<v Speaker 1>possible that in the next few days we will emerge

0:43:15.916 --> 0:43:21.036
<v Speaker 1>relatively unscathed from this very close, nailbiter election, with our

0:43:21.076 --> 0:43:25.476
<v Speaker 1>institutions fully functioning. It is also still possible that it

0:43:25.516 --> 0:43:27.916
<v Speaker 1>will come down to Pennsylvania and we will have an

0:43:27.956 --> 0:43:31.556
<v Speaker 1>all out war, which Rick says would make the two

0:43:31.596 --> 0:43:36.156
<v Speaker 1>thousand Bushbegor fight seem like a small matter in comparison

0:43:37.036 --> 0:43:39.796
<v Speaker 1>at the bigger picture level. Though, even if we manage

0:43:39.836 --> 0:43:43.356
<v Speaker 1>to survive this electoral cycle, we need to think seriously

0:43:43.636 --> 0:43:46.956
<v Speaker 1>about the institutional fixes and changes that might be available

0:43:46.996 --> 0:43:51.116
<v Speaker 1>to us so as to shore up the constitutional democracy

0:43:51.316 --> 0:43:54.996
<v Speaker 1>that we all, in principle say we're committed to preserving.

0:43:55.756 --> 0:43:58.516
<v Speaker 1>Until the next time I speak to you, be careful,

0:43:58.996 --> 0:44:02.476
<v Speaker 1>be safe, and be well. Deep background is brought to

0:44:02.476 --> 0:44:06.116
<v Speaker 1>you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia Gencott, our

0:44:06.156 --> 0:44:09.316
<v Speaker 1>engineer is Martin Gonzales, and our shorerunner is so K

0:44:09.316 --> 0:44:13.076
<v Speaker 1>Crane mckibbon. Theme music by Luis Guerra at Pushkin. Thanks

0:44:13.116 --> 0:44:17.076
<v Speaker 1>to Mia Lobell, Julia Barton, Heather Fain, Carlie mcliori, Maggie Taylor,

0:44:17.236 --> 0:44:20.036
<v Speaker 1>Eric Sandler, and Jacob Weisberg. You can find me on

0:44:20.076 --> 0:44:22.716
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. I also write a column

0:44:22.756 --> 0:44:25.356
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion, which you could find at bloomberg dot

0:44:25.396 --> 0:44:29.436
<v Speaker 1>com slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts,

0:44:29.596 --> 0:44:32.876
<v Speaker 1>go to Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts, and if you

0:44:32.916 --> 0:44:35.276
<v Speaker 1>liked what you've heard today, please write a review or

0:44:35.356 --> 0:44:37.636
<v Speaker 1>tell a friend. This is deep background