WEBVTT - Draft Possibilities, Remaining Free Agents & Depth Needs | Bucs Insider

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Good morning everyone. How's everyone doing. It is time for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers Insider Live, presented by Miller like Casey Phillips here

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a senior writer and editor Scott Smith, And as always,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>this is where we take your questions. If you're not

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>already watching on Facebook page, head on over there and

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you can leave your questions in the comments section of

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the live video. And of course, since we had our

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>last one of these, we signed Ryan Griffin. So it

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was kind of funny that we had questions recently about

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the backup quarterback situation and your answer had been we

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have any because technically they hadn't been resigned it.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So at least now we do know there is technically

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a backup quarterback on the rosters. So tell me about

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this resigning, what this could mean, and what we know

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about what this means overall quarterback draft, you know, roster,

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. Yeah, now we have two. We

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have Tom Brady and Ryan Griffin, and uh, I think

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably end up with four for the start training camp,

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and the way the patterns held for years now taking

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>three into the regular season, so the buck are far

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>from done there. They also still have blame Gabbert on

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>their ever dwindling list of unrestricted free agents, which at

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Super Bowl was going to be

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four players long, and now it is down to

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like six or seven, and only three or four of

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>those have gone anywhere else. So it just continues an

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing ability to keep this team intact. And Ryan Griffin,

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's only thrown four passes in the regular season.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the story. It's kind of amazing that

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's worked out that way. It's not an indictment. It

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just means when he when he was the second guy,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the first guy always stayed healthy. You know, two years

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>ago in two thousand nineteen, Blame Gabbert her his shoulder

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason, ended up on injoy reserve, and Ryan

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Griffin was your number two, and you know, Jameis Winston

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just played every snap just about. And then last year

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Gabbert was healthy. So Ryan Griffin was the three.

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And when UH we were torching the Lions at halftime

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and they pulled Tom Brady, he was blamed. That got

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to play. So Ryan obviously knows the system very well.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>He's got two years now under his belt in UH

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in Bruce arians offense, and they always talk about how

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>much they like what he does in the practice field,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and I know we don't get to see most of that,

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but they say it all the time, so we have

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to assume, especially because they resigned him again. This is

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the third new contract he's gotten with the Buccaneers since

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>arriving in two thousand fifteen. There's obviously value there. And

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh the questions that we've been at answering

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in the last however many weeks, is when you talk

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>about how dwindling the list of free agents, is Antonio

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown still one of those names on that list? What

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are the chances that he gets resigned? What would it

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>mean either way? And and maybe just overall, what the

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver room looks like with him and without him,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and the order of who would be considered maybe that

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>third fourth wide receiver on the team. Well, as as

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this goes on longer and longer, you start to get

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that maybe the you know, Antonio Brown won't

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be back, It certainly could still happen, and obviously there

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>must be some disagreement on how much it would take

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for that to happen. And I guess one side or

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the other would have to change their mind on that.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But the longer goes on, you have to come front

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the reality that he might be the one guy that

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a significant contributor to the team last

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>year that isn't back, and if you only lose one,

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to be pretty happy about that. UM. As

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for the receiving corps, obviously it starts off with one

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of the best players in the league and Mike Evans

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Godwin and Antonio Brown. When he was here, uh,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he and healthy, he was basically the number three receiver

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>most of the time. So that's what you're talking about.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>The guy that comes in Chris Godwin usually goes into

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the slot. This guy would play on the outside. UM.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Miller and Tyler Johnson are the two obvious guys

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to pick up more playing time, and you know, there's

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a reason to be excited about that. We saw that

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Willer can make big plays at big moments too.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And Tyler Johnson, you know, his catches were here and

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>there because he just didn't get a ton of playing time,

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but he made some big plays and I'm sure the

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Bucks would like to see more out of both of

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>those guys. So it's not like the cupboards bear there

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>at all, but it also does open up the possibility.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about the draft of the Bucks

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to go in any decision in any direction

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they want, that receiver maybe becomes something you think about

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Yeah, and I know that sometimes

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the wide receiver group can be used in

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the return game. And we had a couple of people

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>asking what our return situation could look like this year

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and if that would be something that the team would

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>go after in the draft, that would that be a

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>factor in you know, maybe not your first round pick,

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but one of your middle round picks of taking a

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>guy that could serve in a return role as compared

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>to a guy who couldn't. Well, I hope it would.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see that happen. You know, you

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>could take a receiver who you're not sure that he

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>can contribute right away, uh as a receiver very much

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at least, but if he can start his career by

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>being your main return man, then you definitely get value

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>out of that pick. And um, you know, Bruce arians

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and and Jason might have talked about it. How you know,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in addition to looking at players that they think will

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>be good two years down the road. They're also going

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to be looking to see if these guys can contribute

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>right away on special teams. And with some of those guys,

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like say a corner or something, they mean can they

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>be good cover guys? But that could also mean can

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they help us a return man? And I would love

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to see that happen personally, and I'd even be happy

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to see it happened with a fairly high pick, like

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a first or second round pick. So um, but that's

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>just me. I don't know for sure if Jason Lytton

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is crew and Bruce Arians are gonna be tarting that specifically,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm in favor of it. Yeah, I thought this

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. Richard asked, do you expect the Bucks to

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>simply pick the best player available in each round, regardless

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of position? So I know we've talked about this a

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lot in terms of the thirty two pick and whether

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>or not that's just a you know, best player available

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>or a certain position. But is the answer to that

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>different for different rounds in terms of positions of need

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>versus just best player available. I think absolutely it's a

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>different answer. Um, I do think the best player available

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy will be I don't ever think personally that it's

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>best player no matter how stronger depth chart is. If

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you've got two guys and one is this isn't the scale.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But if when you have grade at ninety eight, when

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you have graded at ninety seven and you could probably

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>use that second position a little bit more, you go

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that way. But I think later in the draft, for sure,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you're you're taking guys that maybe, um, you do feel

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>like you could use a little bit more at this

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the depth chart or that part of the

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>depth chart, or this guy could help us. We're looking

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at we've got two offensive tackles or something that their

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>contracts are up in a year, and so we should

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>probably start preparing for that a little bit. I definitely

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think me comes into it a little bit more as

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you go farther down the draft. And then also it's

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a little harder when you're talking about like fifth, six

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and seventh round picks to actually say with confidence who

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the best player available is because lots of times that

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>that part of the draft you're looking at guys that

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have one or two specific traits if they were good

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>at everything, that they're already proven it everything, they'd be

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a first or second round pick. But you know, like,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take Scotty Miller, I mean, sixth round pick a

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. And he was fast. I mean

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he was really really fast. He's not a big guy,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>so he's not going in the first round, and he

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was from a fairly small school and not really a

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>well known prospect. But he was fast, and the Buccaneers

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>thought and quick, you know, sharpon cuts and so on.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Buckeers thought something could come with that, and it has.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what you're looking at a lot

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of times in later rounds. All right. Richard had asked,

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>how would you feel if we keep trading back to

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>accumulate draft picks since we have a lot of players

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on one year contracts, So we talked about trading back

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to accumulate more picks this year. Um, how likely would

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it be that they could trade back for picks for

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>next year? Well, you might having a one on one

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Richard. What's funny is there's actually multiple Richard. Richard, Yeah,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we both have good ideas. I like this one a

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>lot personally, because, um, he's right. And in addition to

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea, about a lot of one year contracts, which

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>has been the case for a couple of years now. Um.

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>You also you wonder if the Buccaneers draft eight players,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is the room for eight players even with the sixty

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>practice squad. I guess with that there might be, but

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is there really room for eight guys to make this team?

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And so it makes a little bit of sense to

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>acquire picks for a year or two years down the

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>road when you might have more openings. And that's because,

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, as he said, a lot of one year contracts.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think it makes a lot of sense. Um.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would love to see us trade down.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You just have to find a team that wants to

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>do with though. I mean, it's not just you snap

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your fingers and say, okay we're trading on to in spots.

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to find a partner. Um. But I think

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be a great move. And in terms of

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Geo getting signed, you know Giovanni Bernard, we haven't really

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>got to talk a lot about him, Um since our

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>recent shows. What does that mean for not only the

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>draft and some of those you know needs versus best

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>player available? And then what do you think it means

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for that running back room and in terms of who

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>gets what reps and what kind of role he could play. Yeah, well,

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we carried four um during the season and

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>three of them are back and the one that isn't

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>back as a Lashawn McCoy. So it's pretty obvious that

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Giovanni Bernard pretty much takes Sean McCoy's spot. And if

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you look back at it, you know, we didn't we

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of trouble, I don't know if

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>trouble's the right word, but didn't really find a ton

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities for Keyshawn Vaughan, who was a promising third

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>round pick, and then Lachan McCoy after the first month

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>barely played at all. So, um, it's not as if

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of opportunities available if you just go

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>one to one, but it's never gonna from one. Of course,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's never gonna play out exactly the same, right And

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if Geoe Vernion Bernard perusing training camp or early in

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the season that he's you know, maybe our most dynamic

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>pass catching back, then I think he forces them to

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>give him a little more playing time. Um, you know,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>so maybe who who loses snaps, I don't know or

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Buccaneers have a little bit more balanced to

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>their offense. They were about twenty nine or thirtieth last

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of run play percentage, and I think

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Bruce arians would like to see that go up. But

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>then you think about the draft and if the best

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>player available and it's it's glaringly there and it's great

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>running back, you still take him. But I don't think

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you'd go into this draft really prioritizing getting another back

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>because he pretty much I don't know what you would

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>do with him with all these other guys that you have, right, Yeah,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So Matthew asked, what is one position where the depth

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is sin So we're just somehow we got all these

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>all these running backs so on. On the other side

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of things, is there a position that you if you

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:10.599
<v Speaker 1>had to pick one, because we obviously know at this

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>point when you want a Super Bowl, theoretically you got

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good roster there, especially when you brought this

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>many guys back, but it caned to pick one that

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the depth was a little bit less. What would you say, Yeah,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your second part of that was true, because you can

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>win a Super Bowl but lose three or four guys

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to free agency. That usually happens. So the two of

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>those together mean the depth chart is really solid, and

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going through them in my head. Well, I will say,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a spot where a guy could

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>play right away. But the Bucks inside linebackers inside linebacker

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>position is pretty thin, and it was really all during

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the last season. Fortunately the depth didn't become needed. But

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>you have that amazing duo of Lavonte David and Devin White,

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and then all you have otherwise right now is Kevin Minter.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>So you know they could bring back Jack said to

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>your Dawn Buchanan. But even then, I'm not sure you

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think you've got a guy for the long term. So, uh,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the depth there isn't rate. But I don't know if

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a first round pick because I don't think that

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>guy would get on the field for a few years

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're only playing two of them. Um, I guess

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>interior offensive line maybe a little bit. You know, you've

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>got Aaron Stinny now who has proven um proven a

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit after his nice running the playoffs, But you

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of depth there behind the starters.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And you do have a few guys like Ryan Jensen

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>whose contracts are up pretty soon, so I would I

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>probably pick those two spots, but they're definitely not glaring

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>needs by any by any case. Yeah. Absolutely. Okay, Well,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it for us. On this edition of

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers Inside our Live, presented by Miller Lytton. As always,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be shooting a road to the Draft after

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>this is. Stay tuned to that on Buccaneers dot com

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if you have more thoughts on the draft and what

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear in terms of meat or what

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks might do. And we are so close, We've

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>only got one more of these shows before the draft.

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>We're almost here and we'll have some answers for all

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of those questions. So we'll see you guys next week.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>M