WEBVTT - Not So Fast Episode 21

0:00:01.230 --> 0:00:05.189
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Patz,

0:00:05.410 --> 0:00:08.690
<v Speaker 1>where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.730 --> 0:00:09.870
<v Speaker 1>sports stories.

0:00:09.570 --> 0:00:12.610
<v Speaker 2>Of the day. Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Patz.

0:00:13.470 --> 0:00:14.590
<v Speaker 1>Not so fast, my friends.

0:00:19.870 --> 0:00:22.850
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He's Paul Paps.

0:00:23.150 --> 0:00:25.810
<v Speaker 2>We're in the DP Show Man Cave in the baseball

0:00:25.870 --> 0:00:28.270
<v Speaker 2>corner because it is wild card time.

0:00:28.370 --> 0:00:29.890
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a great day today. We've got a lot

0:00:29.930 --> 0:00:32.580
<v Speaker 3>coming up on the show. Hit all the games, yesterday's games,

0:00:32.620 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>today's games on NBC and Peacock. Bonus coverage, Florida Gators

0:00:36.060 --> 0:00:38.420
<v Speaker 3>running back Jaden Ball. What a month he's had for

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.460
<v Speaker 3>the Gators at 4-0. He'll join us in 20 minutes.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Awesome. All right, what do we got on tap today?

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>The MLB postseason continues on NBC and Peacock. First up,

0:00:46.740 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Phillies and the Braves, followed by the White Sox and Astros.

0:00:49.820 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I know you're tuned into that. Then, of course, in primetime,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.780
<v Speaker 2>Game 2, Red Sox at the Yankees. Then, to tap

0:00:55.820 --> 0:00:59.230
<v Speaker 2>it off, Cubs face the Padres. MLB Wild Card presented

0:00:59.270 --> 0:01:04.310
<v Speaker 2>by Abbey begins this afternoon. NBC and Peacock. Paul, yesterday

0:01:04.370 --> 0:01:05.090
<v Speaker 2>was awesome.

0:01:05.130 --> 0:01:07.150
<v Speaker 3>It was a fun day here. All the bros got

0:01:07.190 --> 0:01:08.730
<v Speaker 3>over there on the couches, and we were watching the

0:01:08.770 --> 0:01:11.010
<v Speaker 3>games right off the jump. And what really stands out

0:01:11.030 --> 0:01:13.030
<v Speaker 3>about the Wild Card now, since they changed it about

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.779
<v Speaker 3>five years ago, three games on the road. Best of three.

0:01:17.100 --> 0:01:19.580
<v Speaker 3>The urgency right off the bat. We were watching Philadelphia.

0:01:19.660 --> 0:01:22.220
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia got to Chris Sale early. And when they did that,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.060
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to talk about the Yankees in a second,

0:01:24.100 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>but when they got to that game and they get

0:01:27.300 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a couple runs early, it's like, we're there. And vice versa.

0:01:30.459 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>If your team's losing even in the first couple of

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.300
<v Speaker 3>innings of the first game, it doesn't look good.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.500
<v Speaker 2>It was a little embarrassing for me. I'm a Phillies fan.

0:01:36.660 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>And the whole crew, the whole Dan Patrick show crew,

0:01:39.060 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the Not So Fast crew, was sitting around on the

0:01:40.660 --> 0:01:43.179
<v Speaker 2>couch watching the game. And I was pacing. You know

0:01:43.220 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>how you get during a game.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.580
<v Speaker 3>Baseball pacing. You're like Leo Mazzoni going like this.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.020
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everyone's like relaxed. It's only game one. But that's

0:01:49.060 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>not the way the wild card works. They kept flashing

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the stat that winners of game one have won 15

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.970
<v Speaker 2>of 16 wild card series since they changed the format.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.410
<v Speaker 2>I find the wild card round brutal. One of the

0:01:59.450 --> 0:02:01.970
<v Speaker 2>most brutal things in sports. Because you work so hard

0:02:01.990 --> 0:02:03.450
<v Speaker 2>to get there, then it's over like that.

0:02:03.550 --> 0:02:06.150
<v Speaker 3>It's fair but brutal. It's like the NCAA tournaments. You're

0:02:06.210 --> 0:02:07.850
<v Speaker 3>one and done. This is three and done. So at

0:02:07.870 --> 0:02:09.329
<v Speaker 3>least you have a chance to kind of work with

0:02:09.370 --> 0:02:11.410
<v Speaker 3>your pitching staff. Let's get right to the first game.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.980
<v Speaker 3>Yankees over the Red Sox 9-0. Now, when you see 9-0,

0:02:15.020 --> 0:02:16.860
<v Speaker 3>if you didn't watch that game, the first few innings

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.540
<v Speaker 3>felt like a great game. Peyton Tolley was playing well,

0:02:20.020 --> 0:02:21.730
<v Speaker 3>and then he got away from them. And Ben Rice

0:02:21.790 --> 0:02:24.710
<v Speaker 3>took over. Cam Schlittler took over. And those two guys,

0:02:24.750 --> 0:02:27.329
<v Speaker 3>when you have two hammers, it's like having a great

0:02:27.370 --> 0:02:29.730
<v Speaker 3>goaltender in hockey, but you also have a great scorer.

0:02:30.350 --> 0:02:32.050
<v Speaker 3>They were able to shut down the Red Sox, and

0:02:32.070 --> 0:02:34.169
<v Speaker 3>the Red Sox don't have an answer, not a bat

0:02:34.230 --> 0:02:35.630
<v Speaker 3>that can keep up with, like, Ben Rice.

0:02:35.850 --> 0:02:37.910
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah. I mean, listen, you say they have two hammers.

0:02:37.940 --> 0:02:40.060
<v Speaker 2>You would think one of those hammers would be Aaron Judge.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone saw Ben Rice having a record-breaking

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 2>game one, let alone the rest of the Yankees lineup,

0:02:44.980 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 2>which hasn't done anything in a long time. All of

0:02:47.100 --> 0:02:47.940
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, they all showed up.

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>But if you go back to the Red Sox, they

0:02:49.660 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>have a very good pitcher, a very good pitching staff.

0:02:51.780 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>They were 12-12 down the stretch. They feel like a

0:02:54.460 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 3>team that kind of eased into the playoffs. Roman Anthony's

0:02:57.380 --> 0:03:01.060
<v Speaker 3>a good player. He's not available. He's hurt. The days

0:03:01.100 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>of Mookie Betts are over. The days of David Ortiz

0:03:04.139 --> 0:03:06.370
<v Speaker 3>are over. They don't have that guy in the lineup

0:03:06.410 --> 0:03:09.550
<v Speaker 3>that you fear, and that really limits them. And Ben Rice,

0:03:09.570 --> 0:03:11.990
<v Speaker 3>like you said, he's not a superstar, but he is

0:03:12.030 --> 0:03:13.250
<v Speaker 3>a guy who could have a game like that, and

0:03:13.270 --> 0:03:13.490
<v Speaker 3>he did.

0:03:13.710 --> 0:03:15.750
<v Speaker 2>Wow, the Red Sox, the narrative was going to hammer

0:03:15.770 --> 0:03:18.070
<v Speaker 2>them with left-handed pitching, all the left-handed batters, and the

0:03:18.110 --> 0:03:20.870
<v Speaker 2>left-handed batters just got to them. It's not what you expect,

0:03:21.210 --> 0:03:23.649
<v Speaker 2>but again, that's my problem with the wild card. It feels,

0:03:24.090 --> 0:03:25.990
<v Speaker 2>and this is me, it feels done in a way.

0:03:26.230 --> 0:03:28.850
<v Speaker 2>You watch that game, you watch how dominant Slater was

0:03:28.889 --> 0:03:31.630
<v Speaker 2>against the The Red Sox, can the Red Sox come

0:03:31.669 --> 0:03:33.870
<v Speaker 2>back from that? I find that it's a very tough assignment.

0:03:33.889 --> 0:03:36.470
<v Speaker 3>Well, I find that fans, especially of a team on

0:03:36.490 --> 0:03:38.309
<v Speaker 3>the downside, like if you're a Red Sox fan, we've

0:03:38.330 --> 0:03:39.950
<v Speaker 3>got a couple of Red Sox fans in the building,

0:03:40.330 --> 0:03:41.570
<v Speaker 3>and they are demoralized.

0:03:41.650 --> 0:03:41.870
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:03:41.950 --> 0:03:43.710
<v Speaker 3>And it's the runs that do it. If you lost

0:03:43.750 --> 0:03:46.150
<v Speaker 3>that game 2-1, it's the same result. But if you

0:03:46.190 --> 0:03:49.110
<v Speaker 3>lose 9-0, you feel inept. And it kind of puts

0:03:49.150 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>like a big eraser on the entire season. Like, let's

0:03:52.290 --> 0:03:54.180
<v Speaker 3>go to the Cubs. Let's go to the Padres over

0:03:54.220 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>the Cubs, 8-0. I watched that game, and the Padres

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.900
<v Speaker 3>fans were in it right off the jump. Tatis gets

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the home run in the bottom of the first. Machado

0:04:02.220 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>gets a home run in the bottom of the first.

0:04:03.620 --> 0:04:05.540
<v Speaker 3>It felt like that game was over before it started

0:04:05.580 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 3>because the Cubs were getting eaten alive on Michael King,

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.270
<v Speaker 3>the Padres starter. And they they felt like they had said, well,

0:04:11.410 --> 0:04:12.930
<v Speaker 3>this is not going to work out for us today.

0:04:12.970 --> 0:04:16.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. If you're somebody who believes stars win in the postseason,

0:04:16.610 --> 0:04:18.650
<v Speaker 2>the Padres are your team. I mean, that that team

0:04:18.690 --> 0:04:21.810
<v Speaker 2>has legit star power. And these guys, all of them

0:04:21.830 --> 0:04:23.529
<v Speaker 2>have been in the playoffs for a while. I feel

0:04:23.550 --> 0:04:25.950
<v Speaker 2>like I've been watching Tatis and Machado in the playoffs

0:04:25.990 --> 0:04:26.590
<v Speaker 2>for a long time.

0:04:26.710 --> 0:04:28.450
<v Speaker 3>And if you watch that play, I know one play

0:04:28.470 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make a ball game, but going back to that

0:04:30.070 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Tatis home run, PCA almost got it. He almost robbed that.

0:04:33.980 --> 0:04:36.820
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine if that inning ends 0-0 off a

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Pete Crow Armstrong robbery of a home run? It wasn't.

0:04:39.940 --> 0:04:42.890
<v Speaker 3>Machado goes yard there. The fans were already into it,

0:04:43.180 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and it was galactic after that.

0:04:44.740 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 2>No, you could tell that was out of the four games.

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.020
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there were some attendance problems at two of

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the games. Yep. That was the game that was most bananas.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:53.460
<v Speaker 2>Yankee Stadium was also a little bit nuts.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.780
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at Tatis and Machado, those guys

0:04:55.820 --> 0:04:58.620
<v Speaker 3>were superstars and have had their issues. They've cooled off

0:04:58.660 --> 0:05:00.900
<v Speaker 3>in their careers. Tatis had the season where he was

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>hurt and was suspended, no offense. But they did it

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:05.900
<v Speaker 3>last night. The other thing that really stood out to

0:05:05.940 --> 0:05:08.180
<v Speaker 3>that game, going back to the Cubs kind of mailing

0:05:08.220 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>it in at the end, seventh inning, Tatis goes to

0:05:11.020 --> 0:05:13.860
<v Speaker 3>steal second base, right? And the ball goes off his foot,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>careens into the outfield. The outfielders were lackadaisical. Tatis gets

0:05:17.460 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>right back on his horse. starts hustling towards home plate,

0:05:20.620 --> 0:05:24.180
<v Speaker 3>and gets another insurance run. And watch this play here. Bango,

0:05:24.860 --> 0:05:27.669
<v Speaker 3>watch the outfield. Hey, guys, there's a loose ball here.

0:05:27.750 --> 0:05:30.089
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we grab it before Tatis cruises into home plate?

0:05:30.470 --> 0:05:32.690
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the play wasn't even close. I think this

0:05:32.770 --> 0:05:35.210
<v Speaker 2>is the iconic moment right there of the entire series.

0:05:35.570 --> 0:05:37.469
<v Speaker 2>It could be one of those moments for the whole playoffs.

0:05:37.490 --> 0:05:39.550
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to say it's Derek Jeter diving into

0:05:39.589 --> 0:05:40.690
<v Speaker 2>the crowd, but that was cool.

0:05:40.750 --> 0:05:42.750
<v Speaker 3>It did set the tone, and it set the tone that, like,

0:05:42.910 --> 0:05:45.330
<v Speaker 3>we can score seven runs. And the Cubs are known

0:05:45.390 --> 0:05:47.790
<v Speaker 3>for scoring runs and for winning in late innings. It

0:05:47.830 --> 0:05:49.710
<v Speaker 3>felt like they didn't even engage that that could be

0:05:49.730 --> 0:05:51.070
<v Speaker 3>a possibility at the end of the game.

0:05:51.270 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it felt like a moral victory. Meanwhile, my Phils

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 2>had it, Paul. And this is a story of the

0:05:57.020 --> 0:06:00.460
<v Speaker 2>Philadelphia Phillies for this era. I don't think Bryce Harper

0:06:00.580 --> 0:06:02.180
<v Speaker 2>and Kyle Schwarber are ever going to win a World Series.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you exactly why. Any Phillies fans know this.

0:06:04.900 --> 0:06:07.810
<v Speaker 2>The bullpen in the playoffs have been terrible. They have

0:06:07.870 --> 0:06:12.609
<v Speaker 2>a 12.19 ERA when leading after the sixth inning loss.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:19.060
<v Speaker 2>since 2024. So yesterday, they got to Atlanta early. The

0:06:19.260 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>one pitcher that was going to beat them, Chris Sale

0:06:21.260 --> 0:06:23.669
<v Speaker 2>of the Braves, they had a lead. He left, and

0:06:23.690 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they still could not come away with a W.

0:06:25.650 --> 0:06:27.330
<v Speaker 3>It's, again, one of those games where you see that

0:06:27.390 --> 0:06:29.489
<v Speaker 3>Chris Sale had a four-hitter. You're like, wow, he was dealing.

0:06:29.570 --> 0:06:31.250
<v Speaker 3>They did get to him earlier. They had a chance

0:06:31.270 --> 0:06:33.130
<v Speaker 3>to knock him out of the box, and they didn't

0:06:33.170 --> 0:06:35.310
<v Speaker 3>do so. I don't think the Phillies are done. They

0:06:35.330 --> 0:06:37.670
<v Speaker 3>have too much bat power to say done Like, they

0:06:37.710 --> 0:06:39.190
<v Speaker 3>have those... Look at your face.

0:06:39.630 --> 0:06:41.289
<v Speaker 2>They're done. Not only are they done.

0:06:41.450 --> 0:06:42.290
<v Speaker 3>We don't do that on this show.

0:06:42.310 --> 0:06:44.810
<v Speaker 2>We don't say done. They're done. I'll do it right now.

0:06:44.870 --> 0:06:47.310
<v Speaker 2>Not only are they done, this era's done. Like, Bryce

0:06:47.350 --> 0:06:50.070
<v Speaker 2>Harper in Philadelphia, I think the fans are going to

0:06:50.089 --> 0:06:52.530
<v Speaker 2>be so upset after they lose this series. I mean,

0:06:52.570 --> 0:06:55.110
<v Speaker 2>the stat, 15 out of 16 series, Paul, why would

0:06:55.130 --> 0:06:57.610
<v Speaker 2>this series be any different? I know that Phillies have

0:06:57.650 --> 0:07:00.370
<v Speaker 2>that strong starting pitching, but they unfortunately, because they were

0:07:00.390 --> 0:07:01.940
<v Speaker 2>so bad at the end of last season, they screwed

0:07:01.950 --> 0:07:03.650
<v Speaker 2>up their rotation. I'm saying done.

0:07:03.900 --> 0:07:06.490
<v Speaker 3>So you're saying this is a team that is technically

0:07:06.500 --> 0:07:07.990
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs, but not a playoff contender.

0:07:08.770 --> 0:07:11.140
<v Speaker 2>You know what? I have no faith. And this is,

0:07:11.170 --> 0:07:14.790
<v Speaker 2>of course, a Philly thing. I might sound extreme. Listen

0:07:14.810 --> 0:07:17.250
<v Speaker 2>to WIP in Philadelphia. Everybody's saying the same thing.

0:07:17.270 --> 0:07:18.910
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to listen to WIP in Philadelphia. I'm

0:07:18.930 --> 0:07:20.570
<v Speaker 3>going to have to do it through you. I listen

0:07:20.610 --> 0:07:23.870
<v Speaker 3>to Chicago radio sometimes. And Chicago radio was very split

0:07:23.910 --> 0:07:26.950
<v Speaker 3>today because of the White Sox winning, even though nobody

0:07:26.990 --> 0:07:29.730
<v Speaker 3>believes the White Sox are contenders. And the Cubs, which

0:07:29.770 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 3>have this great offense, terrible bullpen. I think there's There

0:07:33.380 --> 0:07:36.420
<v Speaker 3>was some resentment with Cubs fans yesterday, last night, and

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.030
<v Speaker 3>this morning because it felt like a no-show game. Not

0:07:40.050 --> 0:07:42.750
<v Speaker 3>just a game that you lost, but Michael King owned you.

0:07:43.030 --> 0:07:45.740
<v Speaker 3>He completely owned you. Now, the Cubs, with their offense,

0:07:45.770 --> 0:07:47.420
<v Speaker 3>can come back and do this. You're saying no with

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the Phillies.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.780
<v Speaker 2>No, I think the Phillies, the defeat on their faces

0:07:51.820 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>in the ninth inning... Yesterday, I really think the way

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.660
<v Speaker 2>wild card works, that's the thing about wild card. It's

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>just over like that, Paul. And I think it's over.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I got to keep your morale up. All right, let's

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>get about, we give out helmet stickers during the NFL season.

0:08:02.380 --> 0:08:04.780
<v Speaker 3>We're giving out Jersey patches. Very exciting. I will go

0:08:04.860 --> 0:08:07.460
<v Speaker 3>first while you regroup and get your head together. Michael

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>King of the Padres. This guy is not a household name,

0:08:09.700 --> 0:08:11.300
<v Speaker 3>but he is a great pitcher. When he was on

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.180
<v Speaker 3>the mound yesterday, they were talking about him and they

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.290
<v Speaker 3>were comparing him to Tom Brady in his preparation. This

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.970
<v Speaker 3>guy is a maniac with the iPad and all that stuff.

0:08:19.370 --> 0:08:21.060
<v Speaker 3>And he was just dealing. He kind of has a

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a Greg Maddux vibe to him where

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.500
<v Speaker 3>he's just doing it without being a physically imposing person.

0:08:26.860 --> 0:08:29.420
<v Speaker 3>Michael King is a great pitcher. Owned the Cubs yesterday.

0:08:29.820 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>He had a no-hitter going into the seventh inning. You

0:08:32.100 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>don't do that in a postseason against one of the best,

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 3>if not the best, offense in baseball. He shut them

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 3>down like a goaltender pitching a shutout. It was fantastic.

0:08:39.750 --> 0:08:41.810
<v Speaker 3>Really great game. Michael King gets the jersey patch.

0:08:42.030 --> 0:08:44.309
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm going to the Yankees and my guy Ben Rice.

0:08:44.750 --> 0:08:47.820
<v Speaker 2>You know where he went to college? Dartmouth. Dartmouth College,

0:08:47.860 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 2>my alma mater. Here's the stat on him. He became

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.860
<v Speaker 2>the first player ever to have multiple homers, including a

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.420
<v Speaker 2>grand slam. All of his team's extra base hits and

0:08:56.540 --> 0:09:00.180
<v Speaker 2>out hit the entire opposing team in a single game.

0:09:00.540 --> 0:09:02.690
<v Speaker 2>That's unbelievable. I mean, you can't do any more than

0:09:02.710 --> 0:09:03.290
<v Speaker 2>he did yesterday.

0:09:03.309 --> 0:09:05.970
<v Speaker 3>Bonus coverage on Ben Rice. Grew up in Massachusetts. Grew

0:09:06.010 --> 0:09:08.710
<v Speaker 3>up a Yankees fan, a Jeter fan. So everyone thought, well,

0:09:08.850 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 3>clearly he's from Mass. He went to Dartmouth. You know,

0:09:11.390 --> 0:09:13.660
<v Speaker 3>he's definitely a Red Sox fan. No go. Schlittler is.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.059
<v Speaker 3>Nailed that name. Ben Rice, not so much.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. One thing, just people were curious. Ben Rice went

0:09:18.860 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 2>there after. We were not there at the same time. Right.

0:09:21.220 --> 0:09:24.180
<v Speaker 2>But I was there with Brad Alsmus, longtime manager and catcher.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.140
<v Speaker 3>You guys both played sports at Dartmouth. You, JV, basketball.

0:09:28.179 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Ben Rice.

0:09:28.500 --> 0:09:31.469
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're a little different. But I'll be honest, Ben Rice...

0:09:31.730 --> 0:09:34.290
<v Speaker 2>You would have thought coming into this season, Ben Rice,

0:09:34.330 --> 0:09:36.370
<v Speaker 2>a nice story. This is going to be Aaron Judge

0:09:36.410 --> 0:09:38.229
<v Speaker 2>or Giancarlo Stanton. And now all of a sudden we

0:09:38.250 --> 0:09:39.750
<v Speaker 2>have a new slugger. Very interesting.

0:09:39.790 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, if they can keep that, if they could advance

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 3>on and give some rest to Judge, it could be

0:09:43.980 --> 0:09:44.860
<v Speaker 3>a whole different series.

0:09:45.100 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I felt actually coming out of yesterday, the one team

0:09:47.340 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 2>that I really felt good about was the Yankees. I

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.330
<v Speaker 2>know Slitler owns the Red Sox in particular, but if

0:09:52.350 --> 0:09:54.589
<v Speaker 2>he could pitch like that throughout the postseason, they're a

0:09:54.590 --> 0:09:55.250
<v Speaker 2>very dangerous team.

0:09:55.270 --> 0:09:56.829
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say the same about the Padres. If

0:09:56.850 --> 0:09:58.750
<v Speaker 3>they have a couple more home games, they're in great shape.

0:09:59.050 --> 0:10:00.260
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go to it. It's time for a

0:10:00.250 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>little NFL week three in the books completely, wherever those

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>books are. That's in them. We're going to do our

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.540
<v Speaker 3>September VP. We do this every month, and this is

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the first month doing it, so we've never done it before.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.970
<v Speaker 3>This is the best player of the month in professional football.

0:10:14.030 --> 0:10:14.770
<v Speaker 3>You're going first, Pearl.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.270
<v Speaker 2>Okay, since you put VP most valuable player, it has

0:10:19.290 --> 0:10:21.250
<v Speaker 2>to be Josh Allen, who you see number one in

0:10:21.270 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the actual MVP odds. Because without Josh Allen, the Bills

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.589
<v Speaker 2>are one and two. You could see it on Sunday

0:10:26.630 --> 0:10:28.710
<v Speaker 2>against the Chargers. They are not playing well in any

0:10:28.809 --> 0:10:31.809
<v Speaker 2>aspect of the game. And then Josh Allen absolutely puts

0:10:31.850 --> 0:10:35.630
<v Speaker 2>him on his shoulder with his legs. He's the most

0:10:35.830 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>one-person team in the NFL. It's like basketball. You know

0:10:38.340 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>how LeBron can carry a team? Josh Allen is doing

0:10:41.020 --> 0:10:42.860
<v Speaker 2>that with the Bills. Usually you don't see that in football,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:44.700
<v Speaker 2>but to me he's the easy choice.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm going to go off the board just a

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 3>little bit because I can't believe he's not on the board.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.089
<v Speaker 3>Running back Kenneth Walker for the Chiefs, he's had a

0:10:52.130 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>great season. 360 yards, 5.5 yards to carry, 11 catches

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.179
<v Speaker 3>as a bonus. And the bigger picture with Kenneth Walker

0:10:59.260 --> 0:11:01.910
<v Speaker 3>is what he does to the Chiefs offense. You can't

0:11:01.950 --> 0:11:04.490
<v Speaker 3>focus on Mahomes. You can't just blitz all day. This

0:11:04.530 --> 0:11:06.610
<v Speaker 3>guy is a power running back who has some sizzle,

0:11:06.710 --> 0:11:09.459
<v Speaker 3>has some wiggle. He can do everything. He's in his prime.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>He's got a contract. He's on a team where he's

0:11:11.980 --> 0:11:14.230
<v Speaker 3>probably going to go back deep into the playoffs. This

0:11:14.290 --> 0:11:15.969
<v Speaker 3>is the best edition of the year, and he is

0:11:16.010 --> 0:11:17.750
<v Speaker 3>my September VP, Ken Walker.

0:11:17.830 --> 0:11:21.189
<v Speaker 2>Let's play this out. Imagine that Ken Walker keeps doing

0:11:21.210 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 2>this all year long. Do you think there's any chance

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.580
<v Speaker 2>with Mahomes on your team that you could get some

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 2>MVP noise? Because you will always be overshadowed by your quarterback.

0:11:28.860 --> 0:11:29.239
<v Speaker 5>You're right.

0:11:29.340 --> 0:11:31.380
<v Speaker 3>He's not even on the top five odds of MVP.

0:11:31.420 --> 0:11:34.740
<v Speaker 3>But Ken Walker right now is on pace for 1,900 yards. Now,

0:11:34.900 --> 0:11:36.329
<v Speaker 3>there's a long way to go. But let's say he

0:11:36.350 --> 0:11:39.929
<v Speaker 3>gets into that 1,800-yard marker. I think he should. There's

0:11:39.970 --> 0:11:41.970
<v Speaker 3>that thing in the NFL that really bothers me. This

0:11:42.250 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>really bothers me. Running backs and wide receivers get, oh, boy,

0:11:46.020 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 3>they get the offensive player of the year because we

0:11:47.740 --> 0:11:50.459
<v Speaker 3>can't put them at MVP. You ask Mahomes. I know

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes is more valuable day to day, but who's his MVP?

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:55.300
<v Speaker 3>I bet his vote is for Ken Walker.

0:11:55.420 --> 0:11:58.020
<v Speaker 2>Oh, two years ago, Saquon Barkley should have won the MVP.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>And then he went into the playoffs and tore it up.

0:12:00.740 --> 0:12:02.780
<v Speaker 2>I think that Lamar won it that year. Lamar's already

0:12:02.830 --> 0:12:05.350
<v Speaker 2>got an MVP. He doesn't need more. Okay, coming up next,

0:12:06.210 --> 0:12:08.730
<v Speaker 2>I have the most disappointing team in the NFL this

0:12:08.770 --> 0:12:12.750
<v Speaker 2>year and maybe in many, many years. That's next. Not

0:12:12.770 --> 0:12:13.170
<v Speaker 2>so fast.

0:12:15.300 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Pearl, this is the midday pick-me-up, Pabst and Perloff.

0:12:17.860 --> 0:12:19.380
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's going to have that effect

0:12:19.460 --> 0:12:20.300
<v Speaker 3>on you today.

0:12:21.110 --> 0:12:21.660
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on.

0:12:22.570 --> 0:12:26.510
<v Speaker 3>That is Austin Riley of the Braves, three-run homer to

0:12:26.590 --> 0:12:30.310
<v Speaker 3>take down your Phillies. It's not the midday pick-me-up for you.

0:12:30.450 --> 0:12:32.290
<v Speaker 3>For Braves fans, yes. You, not so much.

0:12:32.990 --> 0:12:36.010
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man. So, manager Don Mattingly is in trouble for

0:12:36.030 --> 0:12:38.530
<v Speaker 2>his decision to go to the closer early. That was

0:12:38.570 --> 0:12:40.410
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a meatball right there to Austin Riley,

0:12:40.429 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>who hasn't been hitting at all. That was a terrible

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:44.900
<v Speaker 2>way to lose this game for my Phillies.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.300
<v Speaker 3>Did you want to watch it again? Because they have

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 3>it ready. You can call for it any time.

0:12:48.090 --> 0:12:50.010
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm good. For the rest of my life, I'm good.

0:12:50.030 --> 0:12:52.090
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not Joe Carter bad, but it's not good.

0:12:52.210 --> 0:12:54.330
<v Speaker 3>I like the celebration. He had like two scepters in

0:12:54.350 --> 0:12:56.490
<v Speaker 3>the dugout. I don't know what that was. It was

0:12:56.510 --> 0:12:56.950
<v Speaker 3>like a king.

0:12:57.150 --> 0:13:00.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I love home run celebrations. Like a jacket. We

0:13:00.429 --> 0:13:01.980
<v Speaker 2>should figure out something like that for Not So Fast.

0:13:02.020 --> 0:13:02.339
<v Speaker 2>We should.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:03.740
<v Speaker 3>If we ever hit a home run on this show,

0:13:03.780 --> 0:13:05.860
<v Speaker 3>we will celebrate that way. All right, it's time for,

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:07.820
<v Speaker 3>let's get back to it. Let's regroup Pearl. Let's get

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 3>our heads together. We're not losers, technically. It's time for

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:10.820
<v Speaker 3>Warm Takes.

0:13:10.900 --> 0:13:11.250
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:13:11.690 --> 0:13:12.189
<v Speaker 3>Warm takes.

0:13:12.390 --> 0:13:12.830
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:13:12.890 --> 0:13:15.870
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go first. The White Sox. If you've

0:13:15.910 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 3>ever been in a city that has two teams, Jets

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and Giants, Lakers and Clippers, one team soaks it all

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>up and one team is the little brother. Like Lakers

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and Clippers, Clippers will never get the coverage. And when

0:13:27.860 --> 0:13:29.700
<v Speaker 3>they get coverage, it's usually for some type of scandal.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.060
<v Speaker 3>The White Sox know all about this. In Chicago, the

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Chicago Cubs soak up most of the coverage in that town.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 3>They're America's team. They're a national team. They're on WGN

0:13:38.940 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>for years.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:40.380
<v Speaker 2>The Cubs.

0:13:41.179 --> 0:13:43.370
<v Speaker 3>The stadium is the star. I mean, Wrigley Field is

0:13:43.390 --> 0:13:45.809
<v Speaker 3>the star. People come in, and the Cubs, it's a

0:13:45.830 --> 0:13:47.610
<v Speaker 3>tourist attraction. You want to go to a Cubs game.

0:13:48.270 --> 0:13:50.850
<v Speaker 3>And it's always an uphill battle for the White Sox. Well,

0:13:51.210 --> 0:13:53.309
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox have had a really interesting year. Two

0:13:53.350 --> 0:13:56.980
<v Speaker 3>years ago, 121 losses. Everyone talked about that. Then it changed.

0:13:57.429 --> 0:13:58.980
<v Speaker 3>The Pope is from the South Side, and they got

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>a little buzz for the Pope being a South Sider

0:14:00.820 --> 0:14:02.740
<v Speaker 3>and being a White Sox fan. And then the White

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Sox kind of inched up. Cute story. Beyond a cute story, too,

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 3>making the playoffs. Yeah. Are they a 100-win team?

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.370
<v Speaker 3>They're more like an 80-ish win team. Murakami is a

0:14:12.380 --> 0:14:14.350
<v Speaker 3>good guy. He's a very interesting guy. People are jumping

0:14:14.390 --> 0:14:17.310
<v Speaker 3>on that bandwagon. The White Sox can force the issue.

0:14:17.870 --> 0:14:19.510
<v Speaker 3>All you have to do is win. You win one

0:14:19.550 --> 0:14:21.850
<v Speaker 3>more game, and then it's almost like you're like one

0:14:21.870 --> 0:14:23.970
<v Speaker 3>of those teams like George Mason in the NCAA tournament

0:14:23.990 --> 0:14:25.830
<v Speaker 3>where if you win a game or two, you get

0:14:25.870 --> 0:14:27.750
<v Speaker 3>a lot of coverage for two weeks. If you enter

0:14:27.770 --> 0:14:30.500
<v Speaker 3>the Sweet 16 and you're St. Peter's, you get a

0:14:30.500 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of coverage. The White Sox have the opportunity to

0:14:33.180 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 3>change the narrative. If the Cubs lose tonight, they're out,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 3>and they'll talk about that in Chicago. But I'd rather

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.590
<v Speaker 3>be talked about being a winner. If you could just

0:14:40.630 --> 0:14:43.550
<v Speaker 3>get to the next round, you get all the coverage nationally, locally,

0:14:44.250 --> 0:14:44.530
<v Speaker 3>all good.

0:14:44.980 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's kind of funny. You compare them to

0:14:46.780 --> 0:14:50.100
<v Speaker 2>the NCAA tournament. Yeah. You know, you like those small

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>teams in the beginning, but then CBS or Turner want

0:14:53.980 --> 0:14:56.490
<v Speaker 2>them out by the Final Four. What is the deal

0:14:56.500 --> 0:14:58.570
<v Speaker 2>with the White Sox? Do you think MLB wants to

0:14:58.590 --> 0:14:59.990
<v Speaker 2>see a Chicago World Series?

0:15:00.170 --> 0:15:03.850
<v Speaker 3>No, if you ask MLB, they always want Yankees-Dodgers. There's

0:15:03.890 --> 0:15:05.730
<v Speaker 3>other teams you'd want. You'd want the Cubs because that's

0:15:05.770 --> 0:15:06.070
<v Speaker 3>a big.

0:15:06.170 --> 0:15:08.070
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it funny? Well, the Cubs are a Chicago team.

0:15:08.090 --> 0:15:10.770
<v Speaker 2>They would want that team, but they definitely don't want

0:15:10.810 --> 0:15:11.290
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox.

0:15:11.430 --> 0:15:13.870
<v Speaker 3>No, the White Sox were in an 0-5 versus the Astros,

0:15:13.910 --> 0:15:16.290
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know how much ratings that got. Again,

0:15:16.350 --> 0:15:18.270
<v Speaker 3>the Cubs are national, and they're like this.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:18.980
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.700
<v Speaker 3>They're a lovable team, but it's not the 2016 Cubs

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.830
<v Speaker 3>that never won before. The White Sox are now in

0:15:23.850 --> 0:15:26.550
<v Speaker 3>position to be the lovable team that has always struggled.

0:15:26.570 --> 0:15:29.420
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's a, B-level story. I don't know

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:30.620
<v Speaker 3>if Major League Baseball has signed him.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.460
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's funny because I grew up with WGN and

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.980
<v Speaker 2>the Cubs. I knew the Cubs and everyone knows Wrigley.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.100
<v Speaker 2>You said it very well. Nobody knows whatever Comiskey's called

0:15:39.140 --> 0:15:39.620
<v Speaker 2>these days.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:40.980
<v Speaker 3>We call it Sox Park here.

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'll try to get into it. You've got

0:15:42.710 --> 0:15:45.190
<v Speaker 2>me a little bit into the White Sox. There we go. Okay,

0:15:45.250 --> 0:15:46.550
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go to the other end of the spectrum,

0:15:46.590 --> 0:15:50.070
<v Speaker 2>a team that everybody knows, the Los Angeles Rams. Remember

0:15:50.110 --> 0:15:52.550
<v Speaker 2>the Dream Team talk from this summer? Seems like a

0:15:52.670 --> 0:15:56.970
<v Speaker 2>distant memory. I am issuing a warning, Paul. I call

0:15:57.010 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>it The Ramspocalypse. Okay, the Rams have two tough games

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.380
<v Speaker 2>coming up. At Philly at 1 p.m. Eastern. I'm not

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.620
<v Speaker 2>sure why that game is at 1 p.m. Eastern, but

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.270
<v Speaker 2>it definitely is. And then they go, no, sorry, they

0:16:12.290 --> 0:16:15.270
<v Speaker 2>host Buffalo on Monday night the following week. So they're

0:16:15.290 --> 0:16:18.970
<v Speaker 2>1-2 already. There's a real chance they're 1-4. They're favored

0:16:19.010 --> 0:16:21.870
<v Speaker 2>against the Eagles, but the Eagles, if Jalen Hurts decides

0:16:21.910 --> 0:16:24.620
<v Speaker 2>to run the ball for once, then the Eagles could

0:16:24.700 --> 0:16:26.500
<v Speaker 2>be pretty good in this game coming off a Monday

0:16:26.540 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 2>night loss. If the Rams go to 1-4, very, very

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 2>real possibility, Paul. 1-4 is not good. I looked up

0:16:33.580 --> 0:16:36.540
<v Speaker 2>the numbers of the 1-4 teams that made it to

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. Only 6% the last whatever years. Actually, yeah,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.550
<v Speaker 2>I did look it up. I'm not even making that up.

0:16:42.570 --> 0:16:43.190
<v Speaker 2>It's very slim.

0:16:43.450 --> 0:16:45.970
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I think it's a really good point because everyone

0:16:45.990 --> 0:16:47.690
<v Speaker 3>thought that they would be the super team. And when

0:16:47.730 --> 0:16:49.970
<v Speaker 3>was the last time a super team, a dubbed super

0:16:50.010 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 3>team worked out? And their schedule at the end gets tougher.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't get easier.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 2>They have an easy run with a lot of Commanders

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.770
<v Speaker 2>and Cardinals in there. But a couple things that worry me.

0:16:57.830 --> 0:17:00.230
<v Speaker 2>Puka Nakua might come back this week. He's not going

0:17:00.310 --> 0:17:02.790
<v Speaker 2>to be 100%. Myles Garrett's out a month. And then

0:17:03.190 --> 0:17:05.470
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Stafford does not look like last year's MVP. He

0:17:05.570 --> 0:17:07.450
<v Speaker 2>already has four picks on the year. That's a lot

0:17:07.490 --> 0:17:10.810
<v Speaker 2>for him. He looks frustrated. You saw in the Denver

0:17:10.830 --> 0:17:13.230
<v Speaker 2>game especially, he just looked angry in the second half.

0:17:13.730 --> 0:17:15.210
<v Speaker 2>I think he really misses Puka Nikua.

0:17:15.330 --> 0:17:16.730
<v Speaker 3>Are you ready to call it that they're going to

0:17:16.750 --> 0:17:17.950
<v Speaker 3>make the playoffs or are you going to let another

0:17:17.990 --> 0:17:18.649
<v Speaker 3>two weeks play out?

0:17:18.950 --> 0:17:20.820
<v Speaker 2>I think they make the playoffs, but they're definitely going

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:22.739
<v Speaker 2>to have to go on the road. I don't think

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to host it all the way through

0:17:24.340 --> 0:17:26.860
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl as some people expected, and I think

0:17:26.900 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 2>it's really wide open. The problem being the Niners and

0:17:29.940 --> 0:17:32.220
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks sitting there in the NFC West. I'm not

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:33.940
<v Speaker 2>going to call it out of the playoffs, but there's

0:17:33.980 --> 0:17:35.510
<v Speaker 2>some danger because there are a lot of teams with

0:17:35.530 --> 0:17:36.790
<v Speaker 2>an easier schedule than the Rams.

0:17:36.850 --> 0:17:38.690
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if this is a situation where the Rams,

0:17:38.869 --> 0:17:40.149
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I wouldn't say they bought their own

0:17:40.190 --> 0:17:42.210
<v Speaker 3>hype because that's not fair to them. It's the injuries

0:17:42.250 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that's really playing. But when you're expected to be great,

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 3>There's not urgency in September.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.980
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what I want to ask about, the mental

0:17:49.180 --> 0:17:52.290
<v Speaker 2>aspect of this. You know, they thought they were one thing.

0:17:52.750 --> 0:17:55.369
<v Speaker 2>After three games, they're a completely other thing. Do you

0:17:55.390 --> 0:17:57.629
<v Speaker 2>think that inspires them or do you think they're feeling pressure?

0:17:57.650 --> 0:17:59.869
<v Speaker 2>Because if they go to one and four, there might

0:17:59.910 --> 0:18:00.949
<v Speaker 2>be some panic in LA.

0:18:00.990 --> 0:18:02.570
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a wake-up call. I go back to

0:18:02.590 --> 0:18:04.830
<v Speaker 3>thinking they probably thought to themselves, we're the best team

0:18:04.850 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>in football. Don't worry about a loss here or a

0:18:07.060 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 3>loss there. And I think they're probably still that way.

0:18:09.220 --> 0:18:10.899
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Stafford doesn't seem like a panic guy.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, but is he playing well? It doesn't look

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>like the same offense as last year. Some teams may

0:18:16.900 --> 0:18:19.369
<v Speaker 2>have figured out the run game of Sean McVay. I

0:18:19.430 --> 0:18:21.210
<v Speaker 2>hope you're right for Rams fans' sake that it is

0:18:21.250 --> 0:18:23.750
<v Speaker 2>a wake-up call because I see some really disturbing trends.

0:18:23.770 --> 0:18:26.050
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go back to baseball. My next warm take,

0:18:26.090 --> 0:18:27.250
<v Speaker 3>here it is. I'm going to go down the coast

0:18:27.290 --> 0:18:29.730
<v Speaker 3>to San Diego. You know, I'm not that big on

0:18:29.770 --> 0:18:32.550
<v Speaker 3>home field advantage. I think it's sometimes overrated. I know

0:18:32.570 --> 0:18:34.470
<v Speaker 3>there's stats that bear it out here and there, but

0:18:34.490 --> 0:18:36.510
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to give credit where credit is due. Those

0:18:36.570 --> 0:18:38.950
<v Speaker 3>San Diego Padres fans last night were electric. If you

0:18:38.970 --> 0:18:41.830
<v Speaker 3>tuned into NBC and Peacock and saw the game right

0:18:41.850 --> 0:18:44.449
<v Speaker 3>before the first pitch, it was out of hand. They

0:18:44.470 --> 0:18:46.290
<v Speaker 3>were standing like it was the ninth inning. It was

0:18:46.430 --> 0:18:49.260
<v Speaker 3>absolutely fantastic. And they never stopped. They got the home

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 3>run from Tatis. They get the home from Machado. And

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.020
<v Speaker 3>that emboldened them. They were up the whole game. And

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>there's an interesting thing about San Diego. They have this

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.699
<v Speaker 3>reputation about being a laid-back, chill place. That's not the

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>case with their baseball team. And that is their team.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.629
<v Speaker 3>When the Chargers leave, There's not a lot of options

0:19:05.670 --> 0:19:06.830
<v Speaker 3>in that town for sports.

0:19:06.930 --> 0:19:07.290
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:19:07.470 --> 0:19:10.609
<v Speaker 3>It's Padres or bust. And they have a great stadium downtown.

0:19:11.050 --> 0:19:13.410
<v Speaker 3>But that's where I really believe that the fans stepped

0:19:13.470 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 3>on the gas. Pete Cromstone was getting flustered. People were

0:19:16.820 --> 0:19:20.340
<v Speaker 3>giving him crap. He thought he had a check swing,

0:19:20.380 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>his argument with the ump, and they were just riding PCA.

0:19:22.900 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 3>They were invested in it. So that's one of those

0:19:24.700 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 3>situations where a three-game series, the Padres fans are electric.

0:19:28.220 --> 0:19:29.660
<v Speaker 3>Give it up for them. They were great last night.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Home field advantage in a true sense.

0:19:31.700 --> 0:19:34.450
<v Speaker 2>Pressure on PCA had a bad postseason last year. It

0:19:34.490 --> 0:19:37.290
<v Speaker 2>could be over early this year. Does he respond?

0:19:38.030 --> 0:19:39.790
<v Speaker 3>He has to, and he has to get a couple

0:19:39.810 --> 0:19:41.830
<v Speaker 3>people on base in front of him. But it's a

0:19:41.950 --> 0:19:45.590
<v Speaker 3>fascinating situation that it makes it worse the better you

0:19:45.609 --> 0:19:47.810
<v Speaker 3>play in the regular season. If you're the MVP and

0:19:47.830 --> 0:19:49.330
<v Speaker 3>you're going to get that award in two weeks, you

0:19:49.350 --> 0:19:52.129
<v Speaker 3>can be out of the playoffs in a disappointing fashion

0:19:52.150 --> 0:19:53.969
<v Speaker 3>and get the MVP. That's the worst MVP.

0:19:54.050 --> 0:19:56.450
<v Speaker 2>That's like Dirk Nowitzki did that one year. He won

0:19:56.470 --> 0:19:59.430
<v Speaker 2>the MVP, then had a disappointing early first round exit.

0:19:59.490 --> 0:20:01.230
<v Speaker 2>Then he didn't win the MVP and got to the finals.

0:20:01.260 --> 0:20:03.540
<v Speaker 3>And the Padres, that home field isn't just the playoffs.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 3>They're not just showing up now.

0:20:04.910 --> 0:20:05.379
<v Speaker 2>I looked it up.

0:20:05.380 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 3>41,003 a game. That's a fantastic number.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.950
<v Speaker 2>For Oh, and it is so gorgeous there. I know

0:20:10.990 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of reporters are rooting for the Padres. They

0:20:13.580 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 2>get to go out and spend a week in San Diego. Okay,

0:20:17.140 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go back to the NFL. And the

0:20:18.619 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>other end of the spectrum from the Rams is a

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 2>team that is playing, I think, above their head. The

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:27.710
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota Vikings are 3-0, and they host the Dolphins this week.

0:20:28.070 --> 0:20:30.410
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving them a 4-0. Now, Paul, you said that

0:20:30.430 --> 0:20:31.830
<v Speaker 2>we're not allowed to say when things are over. I

0:20:32.170 --> 0:20:36.409
<v Speaker 2>am giving Minnesota this victory today. Is that fair? Brian

0:20:36.450 --> 0:20:38.230
<v Speaker 2>Flores is going to have this team so fired up

0:20:38.250 --> 0:20:40.510
<v Speaker 2>to face the Dolphins, the former team. They're going to

0:20:40.710 --> 0:20:41.169
<v Speaker 2>maul them.

0:20:41.270 --> 0:20:43.429
<v Speaker 3>And the Dolphins are right on cue. They're doing everything

0:20:43.490 --> 0:20:44.330
<v Speaker 3>right by being wrong.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Right. But the problem is, the Vikings are going to

0:20:46.980 --> 0:20:48.820
<v Speaker 2>be one of the worst 4-0 teams we've ever seen.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.180
<v Speaker 2>I have a stat. Since 2016, there have been 50

0:20:51.180 --> 0:20:56.450
<v Speaker 2>4-0 teams. Guess where the Vikings rank offensively in EPA

0:20:56.470 --> 0:21:00.379
<v Speaker 2>per play and analytic about how you do basically an offense? Last?

0:21:00.820 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 2>They're last. And know where they stand in the team

0:21:03.980 --> 0:21:05.820
<v Speaker 2>rankings of offense in the NFL this year?

0:21:05.940 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go last?

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.100
<v Speaker 2>They're last. So apparently the Vikings cannot move the ball.

0:21:10.140 --> 0:21:12.979
<v Speaker 2>They rank last with 238 yards per game. They've been

0:21:13.020 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>outgamed by 244 yards on the season. I know you're

0:21:16.020 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a big season cumulative guy. Nothing is working for them offensively,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and they're still 3-0.

0:21:21.660 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 3>So you're saying they're a... Paper mache 4-0.

0:21:25.300 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. It reminds you, remember when Kirk Cousins got them

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 2>12 or 13 wins a few years ago? Then they

0:21:30.420 --> 0:21:31.830
<v Speaker 2>lost to the Giants in the playoffs.

0:21:31.869 --> 0:21:34.230
<v Speaker 3>Sam Darnold did the same thing. Got them into the playoffs, though.

0:21:35.070 --> 0:21:36.869
<v Speaker 2>They got them into the playoffs, but that's what I'm

0:21:36.910 --> 0:21:39.889
<v Speaker 2>saying about this team. They could be 4-0. They could

0:21:39.910 --> 0:21:43.090
<v Speaker 2>be 8-0. They could end up being 13-4. I just

0:21:43.109 --> 0:21:45.170
<v Speaker 2>do not trust them as a team. They just happen

0:21:45.190 --> 0:21:46.669
<v Speaker 2>to get the right schedule at the right time, and

0:21:46.690 --> 0:21:47.730
<v Speaker 2>they do have an awesome defense.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to call a 20 here because I'm

0:21:49.180 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 3>going to let this play out. If somehow the Vikings

0:21:51.980 --> 0:21:55.260
<v Speaker 3>make it into the playoffs, Under Kyler Murray, and he

0:21:55.300 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 3>plays okay. They're back in quarterback no-man land because are

0:21:59.260 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 3>they going to let Kyler Murray go? Are they going

0:22:00.940 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 3>to sign him for two more years? Are they going

0:22:02.859 --> 0:22:04.859
<v Speaker 3>to test the waters? This is the same thing that

0:22:04.900 --> 0:22:06.270
<v Speaker 3>happened with Sam Darnold.

0:22:06.510 --> 0:22:07.460
<v Speaker 2>And Kirk Cousins, too.

0:22:07.550 --> 0:22:10.310
<v Speaker 3>Sam Darnold was awesome in the regular season. He has

0:22:10.430 --> 0:22:12.430
<v Speaker 3>a no-show in the playoffs, and they let him go.

0:22:12.830 --> 0:22:13.930
<v Speaker 3>They didn't trust the regular season.

0:22:14.030 --> 0:22:16.689
<v Speaker 2>This is a Vikings thing now. They win double-digit games,

0:22:16.930 --> 0:22:20.450
<v Speaker 2>and then they are totally... They're harmless in the playoffs.

0:22:20.530 --> 0:22:23.290
<v Speaker 2>Nobody doesn't want to see Kyler Murray in the wildcard round, Paul.

0:22:23.310 --> 0:22:26.540
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you that right now. I'm jumping ahead to January.

0:22:26.820 --> 0:22:29.100
<v Speaker 2>I think the Vikings are going to make the playoffs,

0:22:29.220 --> 0:22:31.980
<v Speaker 2>and they're probably going to go out early like they

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>did under Kirk Cousins.

0:22:33.220 --> 0:22:36.340
<v Speaker 3>Okay, which bothers Vikings fans more, watching Sam Darnold win

0:22:36.580 --> 0:22:38.340
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs and win a Super Bowl? We're watching

0:22:38.380 --> 0:22:41.220
<v Speaker 3>Case Keenum on Monday night recover his career.

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with the Bears. With the Bears. Well, I mean,

0:22:43.580 --> 0:22:45.850
<v Speaker 2>you could go back. I feel like every former Viking

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.470
<v Speaker 2>quarterback looks good somewhere. You know what? I think they're

0:22:49.490 --> 0:22:51.750
<v Speaker 2>pretty good now. They're 3-0. They did beat the Bears,

0:22:51.810 --> 0:22:54.409
<v Speaker 2>although it was 9-3. So they feel good now. The

0:22:54.430 --> 0:22:57.669
<v Speaker 2>defense has been legit. There's no doubt about that. But

0:22:57.690 --> 0:22:59.790
<v Speaker 2>I do worry long term. Do they have the quarterback

0:23:00.170 --> 0:23:02.950
<v Speaker 2>situation solved? I do not think Kyler Murray played well

0:23:03.010 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday. I don't think Carson Wentz has played well.

0:23:05.580 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that this is a paper mache 4-0, just

0:23:07.900 --> 0:23:10.740
<v Speaker 2>as you said. And I am saying, yes, 4-0. Sorry, Dolphins.

0:23:10.770 --> 0:23:12.669
<v Speaker 3>You're salty moving on from the Phillies to the Vikings.

0:23:12.690 --> 0:23:13.710
<v Speaker 3>How about that, Vikings fans?

0:23:13.730 --> 0:23:16.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know that sounds mean, but we've seen it before,

0:23:16.990 --> 0:23:19.350
<v Speaker 2>and it's incredible. They might be the only 4-0 team

0:23:19.390 --> 0:23:21.070
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, and they're not playing like it.

0:23:21.230 --> 0:23:22.750
<v Speaker 3>Yep. Coming up next, we're going to get to some

0:23:22.820 --> 0:23:25.980
<v Speaker 3>college football with our guy, Jaden Ball, the star running

0:23:26.020 --> 0:23:28.700
<v Speaker 3>back of the Florida Gators, the 4-0 Florida Gators, plus

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.100
<v Speaker 3>our Sept Heisman. Find out next. This is Not So Fast.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Stick around.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.700
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He's

0:23:35.740 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Paul Papps, NBC Sports Now, Peacock. Paul, one of the

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.260
<v Speaker 2>great stories of college football this year. The Florida Gators

0:23:42.300 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>are back. We love it. 4-0, 2-0 in the SEC,

0:23:45.780 --> 0:23:48.590
<v Speaker 2>and of course they are led by Jaden Baugh, star

0:23:48.650 --> 0:23:52.510
<v Speaker 2>running back. Jaden, you're having an incredible season. What's Gainesville

0:23:52.530 --> 0:23:54.750
<v Speaker 2>like on Monday after you beat a team like Ole Miss?

0:23:55.770 --> 0:23:59.910
<v Speaker 6>Very exciting. In the facility, everybody's ready, trying to get

0:23:59.950 --> 0:24:04.229
<v Speaker 6>back to work. And It's just a little different. You

0:24:04.290 --> 0:24:06.510
<v Speaker 6>feel the atmosphere. You're just ready to do it again

0:24:06.550 --> 0:24:06.830
<v Speaker 6>for them.

0:24:07.369 --> 0:24:09.830
<v Speaker 3>You know, your head coach, John Summerall, he's a character.

0:24:09.869 --> 0:24:11.950
<v Speaker 3>We see him in these press conferences. Jayden, I don't

0:24:12.230 --> 0:24:14.230
<v Speaker 3>ever think he blinks when he's talking to the media.

0:24:14.890 --> 0:24:17.470
<v Speaker 3>Is he super intense during practice, or is he more

0:24:17.530 --> 0:24:18.930
<v Speaker 3>laid back? I've heard mixed reports.

0:24:19.650 --> 0:24:23.150
<v Speaker 6>I mean, yeah, he's intense, but he's somewhat laid back

0:24:23.210 --> 0:24:26.169
<v Speaker 6>as well. He'll always come around and, you know, come

0:24:26.230 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 6>up to me and be like, what's up, Coach? I'm like,

0:24:28.340 --> 0:24:31.420
<v Speaker 6>what's up, Coach? I look at him a little weird because,

0:24:31.460 --> 0:24:35.300
<v Speaker 6>you know, that's not normal. But other than that, yeah,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 6>he cool.

0:24:36.500 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>I heard you say something about a Bloody Tuesday practice

0:24:39.380 --> 0:24:41.540
<v Speaker 2>or a Grin Tuesday. What's that about?

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.859
<v Speaker 6>Bloody Tuesday is just like everybody knows what's coming. Everybody's

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 6>going to be physical. You know, we're hitting. Because it's

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 6>not going to be too much hitting during the week,

0:24:52.100 --> 0:24:54.899
<v Speaker 6>but that's one day where Coach, they want us to

0:24:54.940 --> 0:25:00.020
<v Speaker 6>go Full out. They want us to hit top speeds.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 6>They just want to hear pads hitting each other. That's

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.190
<v Speaker 6>a day you've got to get your body ready for.

0:25:07.990 --> 0:25:09.650
<v Speaker 6>Be very mentally ready for it, too.

0:25:09.970 --> 0:25:11.109
<v Speaker 3>Coach is not going to listen to us, but I

0:25:11.150 --> 0:25:12.909
<v Speaker 3>would give you those days off because they need you

0:25:12.950 --> 0:25:13.609
<v Speaker 3>on Saturday.

0:25:13.990 --> 0:25:15.470
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you something. You've been in.

0:25:15.430 --> 0:25:17.889
<v Speaker 3>Gainesville for a while. When the new coach comes there,

0:25:18.350 --> 0:25:21.190
<v Speaker 3>people have been off on Florida football the past couple years,

0:25:21.230 --> 0:25:23.689
<v Speaker 3>but it feels like everybody's back in. When did you

0:25:23.730 --> 0:25:25.409
<v Speaker 3>notice something was changing here with this program?

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.379
<v Speaker 6>As soon as he walked in, honestly, he just had

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.770
<v Speaker 6>that look in his eye, and he was just more

0:25:31.850 --> 0:25:36.250
<v Speaker 6>welcoming to any, you know, thoughts or, you know, ideas

0:25:36.790 --> 0:25:40.169
<v Speaker 6>of things we should keep. Like, he came in, the

0:25:40.210 --> 0:25:41.790
<v Speaker 6>first thing he asked, he's like, what should we keep

0:25:41.830 --> 0:25:44.210
<v Speaker 6>around here? And we told him the nutrition to staff

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.380
<v Speaker 6>just because, like, they're great, and they've been doing so

0:25:47.420 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 6>much for us to get our bodies back right. So

0:25:50.700 --> 0:25:53.899
<v Speaker 6>I just seen so much of, you know, improvement, improvement,

0:25:54.740 --> 0:25:57.620
<v Speaker 6>and how he came in, we were just ready to go.

0:25:57.700 --> 0:25:59.030
<v Speaker 5>And I was like, yeah, I got to play for him.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Jaden, actually take us back to that process. You know,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.900
<v Speaker 2>your decision to stay at Florida got a lot of news.

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you meet the coach and make the decision after that?

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:09.370
<v Speaker 2>Or what happened exactly?

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:15.340
<v Speaker 6>Well, I met, well, I met coach right after the season. And,

0:26:17.030 --> 0:26:19.350
<v Speaker 6>you know, then when I break, as when I break,

0:26:19.369 --> 0:26:21.590
<v Speaker 6>it was just a little rumors and stuff going around,

0:26:21.630 --> 0:26:25.410
<v Speaker 6>like the transfer portal and, me going somewhere else, but

0:26:25.890 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 6>Coach Jim ended up coming to my grandmother's house for Christmas,

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 6>and it was like his dad had passed, I think,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.179
<v Speaker 6>a week or so ago, and he came, and he

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 6>was like, my dad want me here, and that just

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.540
<v Speaker 6>showed me so much character, and it gave me so

0:26:42.580 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 6>much respect for him and his father as well, and

0:26:46.210 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 6>my grandmother, damn, they loved it, the The first hour

0:26:50.460 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 6>or so, we didn't even talk about football. We were

0:26:51.980 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 6>just talking about life and eating food, chilling, because he

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:56.609
<v Speaker 6>brought his family.

0:26:56.630 --> 0:26:59.470
<v Speaker 5>He brought the dog, his mother, the kids, and the wife.

0:26:59.630 --> 0:27:01.929
<v Speaker 6>It was just a good experience for all of us.

0:27:02.090 --> 0:27:04.050
<v Speaker 3>Coaches are smart. If I'm recruiting you or trying to

0:27:04.090 --> 0:27:06.490
<v Speaker 3>keep you at Florida, I'm eating second helpings from Grandma.

0:27:07.730 --> 0:27:09.970
<v Speaker 3>Did Grandma have the three hats and put the hat on,

0:27:10.010 --> 0:27:11.570
<v Speaker 3>like keeping the Florida hat on right there?

0:27:11.810 --> 0:27:16.929
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Grandma, she loved it. She was just smiling the

0:27:16.950 --> 0:27:17.830
<v Speaker 6>whole time, honestly.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:19.900
<v Speaker 2>All right, Jayden, we're going to do you a favor. Now,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 2>you might not know this, but many years ago, we

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>helped Derrick Henry with his Heisman pose. He was having

0:27:25.100 --> 0:27:27.180
<v Speaker 2>some issues, and Paul wanted to show you his take

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>on the pose.

0:27:28.100 --> 0:27:30.900
<v Speaker 3>Well, before we start, have you practiced the Heisman pose

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.730
<v Speaker 3>at home? And I know you might be saving it

0:27:32.750 --> 0:27:34.750
<v Speaker 3>for maybe the Texas game or one of the upcoming games.

0:27:34.990 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Have you practiced it?

0:27:36.710 --> 0:27:37.710
<v Speaker 5>No, no, I just do it.

0:27:37.710 --> 0:27:39.909
<v Speaker 3>Oh, so you got it down. You don't need any help.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.850
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it would be best to see it from you, though,

0:27:42.869 --> 0:27:43.130
<v Speaker 5>you know?

0:27:43.290 --> 0:27:45.150
<v Speaker 3>Well, see, now, I never played football. Just remember, the

0:27:45.190 --> 0:27:46.930
<v Speaker 3>hand's got to be out and the eye's got to

0:27:46.970 --> 0:27:50.370
<v Speaker 3>be back. You've got to really sell it, Jayden. You're physical.

0:27:50.450 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I can't do it. But when you get that run

0:27:52.700 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 3>against a big-time opponent in October, don't drop the ball.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.970
<v Speaker 3>Keep the ball tucked in tight and just go, Make

0:27:59.010 --> 0:27:59.310
<v Speaker 3>it happen.

0:27:59.369 --> 0:27:59.740
<v Speaker 5>I got you.

0:28:00.250 --> 0:28:02.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't do that, Jaden. You don't want to look

0:28:02.510 --> 0:28:05.490
<v Speaker 2>like him. Okay, we have a couple of gratuitous questions

0:28:05.510 --> 0:28:08.090
<v Speaker 2>here at the end. So we're two middle-aged guys. I

0:28:08.109 --> 0:28:11.330
<v Speaker 2>weigh about 196. Paul's at about 170. Do you think

0:28:11.350 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the two of us could tackle you in an elevator?

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:15.140
<v Speaker 2>Could we get you down?

0:28:16.820 --> 0:28:18.020
<v Speaker 5>Probably not.

0:28:18.540 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the right answer.

0:28:21.780 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, fair.

0:28:22.420 --> 0:28:24.580
<v Speaker 3>But we seem like nice guys, so you'd probably take

0:28:24.619 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 3>it easy on us.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.060
<v Speaker 5>I mean, taking it easy won't help y'all get any better.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It worked out well.

0:28:31.180 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, we do a thing here called no such

0:28:33.980 --> 0:28:35.899
<v Speaker 3>thing as a dumb question. It's called such thing as

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.820
<v Speaker 3>a dumb question. Quarterbacks like to look off the defenders.

0:28:38.940 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I was wondering, as a running back, you've been doing

0:28:40.860 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>this a long time, when you get back in the formation,

0:28:43.500 --> 0:28:46.830
<v Speaker 3>do you sometimes look one way and the play is

0:28:46.870 --> 0:28:48.130
<v Speaker 3>for you to carry the ball the other way to

0:28:48.170 --> 0:28:49.350
<v Speaker 3>try to sell the defenders?

0:28:50.270 --> 0:28:53.270
<v Speaker 6>Well, honestly, I somewhat try to just look everywhere so

0:28:53.330 --> 0:28:55.930
<v Speaker 6>it won't give it like a telltale sign. Just because,

0:28:55.990 --> 0:28:59.770
<v Speaker 6>you know, I feel like as football gets more advanced,

0:28:59.810 --> 0:29:04.930
<v Speaker 6>they look for more, like, little details. And, like, I

0:29:04.970 --> 0:29:07.810
<v Speaker 6>feel like linebackers, me actually playing linebacker when I was younger,

0:29:08.370 --> 0:29:10.670
<v Speaker 6>I would look for, like, telltale signs from a running

0:29:10.690 --> 0:29:13.550
<v Speaker 6>back or quarterbacks or anything just to get the little edge.

0:29:13.590 --> 0:29:16.630
<v Speaker 5>So I try to look everywhere, honestly.

0:29:16.650 --> 0:29:17.230
<v Speaker 3>That's smart.

0:29:17.450 --> 0:29:19.990
<v Speaker 2>Awesome. Thank you, Jaden. Good luck the rest of the season.

0:29:20.250 --> 0:29:23.030
<v Speaker 2>Huge games coming up. We can't wait to watch. Thank

0:29:23.050 --> 0:29:23.590
<v Speaker 2>you very much.

0:29:24.530 --> 0:29:24.870
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:29:25.630 --> 0:29:26.210
<v Speaker 2>That was great.

0:29:26.470 --> 0:29:28.180
<v Speaker 3>That was good stuff. He was very nice because he

0:29:28.220 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 3>could kill both of us in an elevator, no problem.

0:29:30.180 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I mean, listen, I think he was impressed

0:29:32.300 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>with the physicality of your Heisman. Right.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.350
<v Speaker 3>I look like I could sell the Heisman. I don't

0:29:36.370 --> 0:29:37.310
<v Speaker 3>look like I played football.

0:29:37.330 --> 0:29:39.969
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're good in a still when you're just standing still.

0:29:40.300 --> 0:29:41.940
<v Speaker 2>when you actually start to move, you can tell it's

0:29:41.980 --> 0:29:42.380
<v Speaker 2>not all working.

0:29:42.420 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>And I have trouble getting out of that Heisman pose.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:44.860
<v Speaker 3>Once I go low, it gets.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>You can hear the creak. I don't know if Jaden

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:47.820
<v Speaker 2>picked that up over the air.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 3>It's great to have Jaden on Not So Fast. Pabst

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.020
<v Speaker 3>and Perloff here. Let's stay with this topic. We do

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.140
<v Speaker 3>a thing here called Decept Heisman. Who would have won

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.580
<v Speaker 3>the Heisman trophy just for this month of college football? Perloff,

0:29:58.670 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go first here, and I'm going to

0:30:00.060 --> 0:30:02.260
<v Speaker 3>go really, really obvious because you shouldn't overthink this one.

0:30:02.820 --> 0:30:06.020
<v Speaker 3>Jeremiah Smith, the OSU wide receiver, he's everything we thought

0:30:06.060 --> 0:30:07.580
<v Speaker 3>he was going to be and more. If you watched

0:30:07.620 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 3>him against Illinois, it looked like your athletic uncle playing

0:30:11.020 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 3>with a bunch of little cousins in the backyard. He

0:30:13.260 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 3>looked like he was toying with them. He was going

0:30:14.900 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>past people as if they were wearing sponges on their feet.

0:30:17.500 --> 0:30:20.380
<v Speaker 3>Jeremiah Smith feels like the biggest sure thing at the

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver position in a long time, and he's not

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.460
<v Speaker 3>easing into the season. He's just wiping people off the floor.

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.490
<v Speaker 3>It's fantastic. He's your septizement winner. And I have almost

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.420
<v Speaker 3>no doubt as these games get bigger, he's going to

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:31.740
<v Speaker 3>get better.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know. He's got some tough games coming up.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.620
<v Speaker 2>First of all, you never win the Heisman in September.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.660
<v Speaker 2>So you don't want to do this. But I feel

0:30:39.700 --> 0:30:42.310
<v Speaker 2>like he's going to have some Iowa to start with.

0:30:43.050 --> 0:30:45.010
<v Speaker 2>Don't you just double or triple team Jeremiah Smith?

0:30:45.130 --> 0:30:46.690
<v Speaker 3>I think at some point you're going to do so.

0:30:46.730 --> 0:30:48.470
<v Speaker 3>But he's one of those guys in a tight game.

0:30:48.550 --> 0:30:50.730
<v Speaker 3>He needs a tight game. He needs a tight game

0:30:50.770 --> 0:30:54.660
<v Speaker 3>against Iowa this weekend where... not just 200 yards at halftime,

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:56.060
<v Speaker 3>the play to win the game.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.250
<v Speaker 2>So if you're just doing September, remember, the Heisman's a

0:30:59.290 --> 0:31:02.450
<v Speaker 2>narrative award, and who's been the narrative star? Of this season,

0:31:02.490 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Mississippi State quarterback Kamario Taylor.

0:31:04.220 --> 0:31:04.540
<v Speaker 5>Good call.

0:31:04.620 --> 0:31:08.460
<v Speaker 2>The numbers are insane, too. Fourteen touchdowns, two picks. Came

0:31:08.500 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 2>in with not that much hype, some hype, but he

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.860
<v Speaker 2>has exceeded it. I think if you were going to

0:31:12.900 --> 0:31:14.540
<v Speaker 2>give out the trophy today, it would be a hard

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.979
<v Speaker 2>vote because Kamario Taylor has been the story of the year.

0:31:17.060 --> 0:31:19.340
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you. Kamario Taylor is really making people

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 3>look at that team. The next month is going to

0:31:21.260 --> 0:31:24.239
<v Speaker 3>decide it. Will he be a September guy who we go,

0:31:24.260 --> 0:31:27.030
<v Speaker 3>remember him? Remember when they were 3-0, 4-0? But if

0:31:27.070 --> 0:31:29.010
<v Speaker 3>he's like 7-1, then he's got something.

0:31:29.270 --> 0:31:30.870
<v Speaker 2>Well, we can do this in September. It's going to

0:31:30.890 --> 0:31:34.030
<v Speaker 2>be two people. Then October, usually someone different in the

0:31:34.070 --> 0:31:34.910
<v Speaker 2>way college football goes.

0:31:34.930 --> 0:31:37.350
<v Speaker 3>And everybody loves the October Heisman.

0:31:38.410 --> 0:31:41.650
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sick of Heisman poses instead of Heisman sayings. All right,

0:31:41.930 --> 0:31:44.170
<v Speaker 2>coming up next, Dan Patrick talked to one of the

0:31:44.270 --> 0:31:47.780
<v Speaker 2>best players in the playoffs. Exciting news, maybe the best

0:31:47.860 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 2>pitcher in baseball. That's next. Not so fast.

0:31:54.790 --> 0:31:56.990
<v Speaker 1>Do you apologize to batters if you hit them?

0:31:58.610 --> 0:32:03.530
<v Speaker 4>Um, it depends, you know, obviously if you accidentally ride

0:32:03.590 --> 0:32:06.470
<v Speaker 4>one up and in and it catches a guy pretty high.

0:32:06.790 --> 0:32:07.050
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:32:07.250 --> 0:32:09.690
<v Speaker 4>I'll apologize for that. You know, send over a nice

0:32:09.710 --> 0:32:13.030
<v Speaker 4>bottle of bourbon or do something to apologize.

0:32:13.110 --> 0:32:16.670
<v Speaker 1>But wait, wait, wait, you'll buy somebody a bottle of

0:32:16.730 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>liquor if you accidentally hit them.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:19.780 --> 0:32:21.300
<v Speaker 4>And like, if I, if I hit a guy in

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.940
<v Speaker 4>like the head or something, yeah, that's, That's like, hey,

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.940
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry. This is on me. I hope we don't

0:32:27.980 --> 0:32:30.850
<v Speaker 4>have no hard feelings. It wasn't on purpose.

0:32:32.090 --> 0:32:34.350
<v Speaker 3>Back on the clip joint, Paxton Perloff here. That was

0:32:34.370 --> 0:32:37.030
<v Speaker 3>6-7 Jacob Mizorowski of the Brewers. The Brewers are in

0:32:37.070 --> 0:32:39.270
<v Speaker 3>great shape. They're not even in the playoffs yet because

0:32:39.290 --> 0:32:41.300
<v Speaker 3>they can let him rest a little bit. Next week,

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.860
<v Speaker 3>it's all them. Fascinating here because baseball has a lot

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 3>of etiquette. And if you notice, usually when a pitcher

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 3>hits a batter, there's very little like, I'm sorry. They

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>rarely go shake a hand. This isn't Little League baseball.

0:32:52.900 --> 0:32:54.890
<v Speaker 3>Once in a while, you'll get one of those My bads.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.580
<v Speaker 3>Almost like when you're merging traffic and you cut someone off,

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.620
<v Speaker 3>you give them the my bad. But the fact that

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.620
<v Speaker 3>Mizorowski sends over some booze, some hooch.

0:33:01.780 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Amazing. First of all, I'm amazed that he's old enough

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.420
<v Speaker 2>to buy booze. I guess I've never seen him without

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 2>his hat on. Was that Mizorowski or was that his

0:33:08.780 --> 0:33:10.980
<v Speaker 2>12-year-old brother? He's a young-looking man.

0:33:11.060 --> 0:33:13.220
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he does not have a shaving deal because he

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't shave.

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.140
<v Speaker 2>He looks so nice. I'm not surprised that he's apologizing

0:33:17.180 --> 0:33:19.620
<v Speaker 2>a little bit for hitting guys. I want my ace

0:33:19.660 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to be a little more gnarly, a little more manly man.

0:33:22.380 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I find this interesting because it's pure baseball etiquette.

0:33:25.100 --> 0:33:27.350
<v Speaker 3>You don't apologize during the game because you don't do

0:33:27.390 --> 0:33:29.450
<v Speaker 3>that in front of the crowd. But you may send

0:33:29.490 --> 0:33:31.830
<v Speaker 3>over to his hotel with the three-game stretch in Milwaukee.

0:33:32.350 --> 0:33:34.050
<v Speaker 3>I'll call the local booze place and send him over

0:33:34.090 --> 0:33:34.570
<v Speaker 3>some good stuff.

0:33:34.630 --> 0:33:37.550
<v Speaker 2>But did Nolan Ryan do that? Did Roger Clemens do that?

0:33:37.790 --> 0:33:39.870
<v Speaker 2>Because it's a long, you know, especially in baseball, it's

0:33:39.910 --> 0:33:41.570
<v Speaker 2>a long series. You're going to face that guy again.

0:33:41.870 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I would throw it at his head and then I'm

0:33:43.780 --> 0:33:44.620
<v Speaker 2>not going to send a gift.

0:33:44.700 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 3>No, I could, not like a muffin basket, but if

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.300
<v Speaker 3>you accidentally go toward someone's head and you say like,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>hey man, nothing personal. It does feel like a different era.

0:33:53.300 --> 0:33:55.530
<v Speaker 3>And Nolan Ryan would send over like a bill for something.

0:33:55.810 --> 0:33:58.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I don't like it, Paul. I want my

0:33:58.750 --> 0:34:00.810
<v Speaker 2>guy to have, first of all, a mustache, a little

0:34:00.850 --> 0:34:03.470
<v Speaker 2>more facial hair. Right. That was way too clean cut

0:34:03.490 --> 0:34:03.990
<v Speaker 2>for my taste.

0:34:04.010 --> 0:34:06.170
<v Speaker 3>So Mizorowski can throw 105, but he's got to be

0:34:06.190 --> 0:34:06.770
<v Speaker 3>more intimidating.

0:34:06.970 --> 0:34:10.270
<v Speaker 2>His throwing is so nasty, but his persona is so

0:34:10.790 --> 0:34:13.650
<v Speaker 2>boy next door. I didn't get all that together, and

0:34:13.690 --> 0:34:14.870
<v Speaker 2>the apology, I don't like it, Paul.

0:34:14.950 --> 0:34:17.049
<v Speaker 3>Nobody chops up baseball like that so fast. All right,

0:34:17.070 --> 0:34:18.930
<v Speaker 3>let's get to it. Earlier on the Dan Patrick Show,

0:34:19.489 --> 0:34:22.529
<v Speaker 3>Devin McCourty, former defensive back for the Patriots, joined the show,

0:34:22.570 --> 0:34:24.810
<v Speaker 3>and he talked about playing for Belichick and He played

0:34:24.890 --> 0:34:27.690
<v Speaker 3>for Belichick with his twin brother, Jason McCourty. And how

0:34:27.730 --> 0:34:28.509
<v Speaker 3>did Bill deal with that?

0:34:30.510 --> 0:34:33.069
<v Speaker 1>Could you have gotten into his uniform and he got

0:34:33.110 --> 0:34:35.470
<v Speaker 1>into your uniform and nobody would have known the difference?

0:34:36.650 --> 0:34:39.650
<v Speaker 3>Especially Belichick. He would not have known at all until

0:34:39.670 --> 0:34:40.490
<v Speaker 3>the play started.

0:34:40.610 --> 0:34:41.969
<v Speaker 5>And then he would be like, what the hell is

0:34:41.989 --> 0:34:44.700
<v Speaker 5>going on? Then he would have known the difference right away.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 3>That's fantastic. They were very good players. They weren't like

0:34:47.580 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 3>a novelty act. These are both very good players.

0:34:49.420 --> 0:34:49.620
<v Speaker 2>Very good.

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.219
<v Speaker 3>Long NFL careers, the both of them. But the fact

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.529
<v Speaker 3>that Bill Belichick He seems like a guy who doesn't

0:34:54.570 --> 0:34:56.589
<v Speaker 3>learn your name really early in training camp. He calls

0:34:56.610 --> 0:34:58.930
<v Speaker 3>you 47 until you have a couple starts.

0:34:59.090 --> 0:35:00.950
<v Speaker 2>Right. I think Tom Brady had to win a Super

0:35:00.969 --> 0:35:03.219
<v Speaker 2>Bowl for him to realize who that was. One of

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 2>the most anxiety-provoking things for the media, especially during Super

0:35:06.300 --> 0:35:09.060
<v Speaker 2>Bowl week, is telling which McCourty brother you're talking to.

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.900
<v Speaker 2>It's happened to me many times on Radio Row. They

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 2>are really identical. I mean, that is not a joke.

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.540
<v Speaker 2>Even way more so than Rondé and Tiki, who are

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:18.140
<v Speaker 2>also identical.

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.180
<v Speaker 3>We've also worked with Rondé and Tiki, and they don't

0:35:20.219 --> 0:35:21.580
<v Speaker 3>really look that much alike, like.

0:35:21.820 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't know about that.

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 3>If you get to know them a little bit, they

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.460
<v Speaker 3>look completely different. But the McCourty's, I got nothing.

0:35:29.340 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Even Belichick does different. Although I did see Devin

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.609
<v Speaker 2>was talking a lot of trash about his brother's game.

0:35:35.630 --> 0:35:37.029
<v Speaker 2>He's like, I'm the good one. You can tell by

0:35:37.070 --> 0:35:37.730
<v Speaker 2>the quality of play.

0:35:37.750 --> 0:35:40.650
<v Speaker 3>Should the McCourty's have to wear socially their football jerseys?

0:35:41.150 --> 0:35:41.930
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's not going to help.

0:35:42.050 --> 0:35:43.709
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because you put D. McCourty, J.

0:35:43.750 --> 0:35:44.170
<v Speaker 5>McCourty.

0:35:44.190 --> 0:35:44.450
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay.

0:35:44.489 --> 0:35:45.710
<v Speaker 3>And then you can help us out.

0:35:45.630 --> 0:35:47.709
<v Speaker 2>A little bit. Socially, or what if they're wearing a suit,

0:35:47.750 --> 0:35:50.260
<v Speaker 2>which they often do on TV? Can they still have

0:35:50.300 --> 0:35:53.339
<v Speaker 2>the nameplate? Yeah, I don't think they're going to do that.

0:35:53.380 --> 0:35:55.140
<v Speaker 2>They seem to enjoy this, and I think they have

0:35:55.180 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 2>done switcheroos before.

0:35:56.260 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 3>You know what's great about these guys? They were both

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 3>very good players. Sometimes you have brothers who play in

0:36:00.739 --> 0:36:03.140
<v Speaker 3>the league, and one's fantastic, and the other is just

0:36:03.180 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of a borderline guy. It's like you want your

0:36:06.060 --> 0:36:08.780
<v Speaker 3>brother to be equal to you, and they're pretty equal careers.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.779
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know Tiki a little bit. I worked with

0:36:11.820 --> 0:36:14.350
<v Speaker 2>him in I do do the joke all the time

0:36:14.450 --> 0:36:16.150
<v Speaker 2>that he's Rondé. He doesn't find it funny, though.

0:36:16.210 --> 0:36:18.190
<v Speaker 3>No, he doesn't. The seventh time he didn't find it funny?

0:36:18.270 --> 0:36:18.730
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no.

0:36:18.750 --> 0:36:20.370
<v Speaker 2>But I do always tell him that you are a

0:36:20.410 --> 0:36:22.330
<v Speaker 2>huge Tiki Barber should be in the Hall of Fame guy.

0:36:22.530 --> 0:36:23.469
<v Speaker 2>Rondé is in the Hall of Fame.

0:36:23.489 --> 0:36:25.009
<v Speaker 3>I could do an hour on Tiki Barber in the

0:36:25.030 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Fame, but nobody is. No one's picking up

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:28.660
<v Speaker 3>that traction with my bit there.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.140
<v Speaker 2>No, not at all. All right, let's go back to

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:35.259
<v Speaker 2>baseball for our next clip. John Fanta is on the sideline. Padres,

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.930
<v Speaker 2>Cubs doing yeoman's work. He talked to Fernando Tatis and

0:36:37.989 --> 0:36:40.390
<v Speaker 2>asked him, what was better, the home run or scoring

0:36:40.489 --> 0:36:41.350
<v Speaker 2>on a stolen base?

0:36:43.170 --> 0:36:44.250
<v Speaker 3>That's a tough question, man.

0:36:44.330 --> 0:36:47.430
<v Speaker 7>I go probably running around the bases. You know, you

0:36:47.469 --> 0:36:49.620
<v Speaker 7>feel the stadium, also the home run was going crazy.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.180
<v Speaker 7>Everybody was going crazy. The atmosphere here was amazing and

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 7>all credit to the fans, man. They gave us that

0:36:56.380 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 7>extra push and wow, it was amazing to be out here.

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.570
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's great to see him on national TV

0:37:01.610 --> 0:37:02.470
<v Speaker 3>making plays like that.

0:37:02.610 --> 0:37:03.070
<v Speaker 2>John Fanta?

0:37:03.290 --> 0:37:06.410
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, John Fanta, of course. But Tatis Jr., he was

0:37:06.450 --> 0:37:08.610
<v Speaker 3>a superstar four or five years ago. He had the

0:37:08.690 --> 0:37:11.230
<v Speaker 3>injuries and the suspension and he just kind of came

0:37:11.270 --> 0:37:13.540
<v Speaker 3>back to earth. Still a very good player. But what

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.020
<v Speaker 3>you saw last night is pure star power.

0:37:15.540 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh, no. I don't like to root for non-Phillies that much.

0:37:18.300 --> 0:37:21.089
<v Speaker 2>Fernando Tatis is one of my guys. Transpixing. Yeah, he's

0:37:21.130 --> 0:37:23.410
<v Speaker 2>one of those baseball players. Just his style and even

0:37:23.430 --> 0:37:25.430
<v Speaker 2>this play last night. I don't think there are a

0:37:25.430 --> 0:37:27.630
<v Speaker 2>lot of players who have the same level of excitement.

0:37:27.790 --> 0:37:27.950
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:28.190 --> 0:37:31.170
<v Speaker 2>And he's another guy you kind of root for even

0:37:31.230 --> 0:37:33.700
<v Speaker 2>if you don't like the Padres. Now, Machado is the opposite.

0:37:34.100 --> 0:37:36.060
<v Speaker 2>He's a guy I do not root for even though

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.620
<v Speaker 2>he's an excellent player. Yeah, I mean, he's had sort

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 2>of a career that's been up and down the way

0:37:40.500 --> 0:37:44.259
<v Speaker 2>he's left teams. But Tatis has almost universal praise. And

0:37:44.300 --> 0:37:45.779
<v Speaker 2>you're a Cubs fan, and he kind of beat you.

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Does he bother you?

0:37:46.860 --> 0:37:48.620
<v Speaker 3>No, I think, like you said, there are certain players

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.090
<v Speaker 3>you almost give respect for. If you want to go

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.770
<v Speaker 3>a generation ago, remember Eric Davis from the Reds.

0:37:52.830 --> 0:37:53.969
<v Speaker 2>He could do everything. Oh, he was awesome.

0:37:53.989 --> 0:37:55.850
<v Speaker 3>And you just like those guys, and you hate seeing

0:37:55.870 --> 0:37:58.150
<v Speaker 3>them get hurt because their career is just peak. And

0:37:58.170 --> 0:37:59.910
<v Speaker 3>if you want to go back even further, back in

0:37:59.930 --> 0:38:02.649
<v Speaker 3>the day, Mike Schmidt used to destroy the Cubs.

0:38:02.850 --> 0:38:03.109
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

0:38:03.270 --> 0:38:05.489
<v Speaker 3>He went four for five every single game. But you

0:38:05.530 --> 0:38:07.750
<v Speaker 3>have to respect and say, hey, that's a great ball player.

0:38:07.790 --> 0:38:08.810
<v Speaker 3>I wish we had him, but we don't.

0:38:09.690 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Shohei Ohtani's that guy. Totally. I think everybody

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.540
<v Speaker 2>roots for Shohei, even if you hate the Dodgers and

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.950
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing for baseball. Is it quite the level

0:38:16.969 --> 0:38:18.410
<v Speaker 2>of Michael Jordan? Because I'll tell you one thing. In

0:38:18.450 --> 0:38:20.850
<v Speaker 2>the 80s and 90s, I was a Michael Jordan fan.

0:38:20.930 --> 0:38:22.770
<v Speaker 2>You had to. And everyone I knew was. And that

0:38:22.790 --> 0:38:24.549
<v Speaker 2>didn't mean I liked the Bulls, but I liked Michael Jordan.

0:38:24.570 --> 0:38:26.150
<v Speaker 3>Well, it means you know the game of basketball. That's

0:38:26.170 --> 0:38:28.210
<v Speaker 3>what it really means. I mean, it does. If you

0:38:28.230 --> 0:38:29.950
<v Speaker 3>appreciate the sport, you appreciate greatness.

0:38:29.969 --> 0:38:31.510
<v Speaker 2>But there are other great players. I hated Larry Bird,

0:38:31.780 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>but Michael Jordan was so dominant. Yeah, of course. I

0:38:35.020 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>was a Sixer fan. I hated Larry Bird. But I

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 2>think Tatis, guys who are really athletic and really demonstrative,

0:38:40.620 --> 0:38:40.980
<v Speaker 2>that helps.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:41.299
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:38:41.380 --> 0:38:42.980
<v Speaker 3>It's time for the rando. This is one of our

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.339
<v Speaker 3>favorite clips of the week. It's taken over social media.

0:38:45.750 --> 0:38:49.589
<v Speaker 3>Northwestern Football built a new stadium. They spent $ 875 million

0:38:49.690 --> 0:38:52.250
<v Speaker 3>on their new stadium. Here's their locker room. Guess why

0:38:52.270 --> 0:38:54.770
<v Speaker 3>they didn't spend $ 900 million? Because take a look at

0:38:54.810 --> 0:38:58.390
<v Speaker 3>the opposing locker room. Look at that.

0:38:58.570 --> 0:38:59.950
<v Speaker 2>It's so narrow.

0:39:00.010 --> 0:39:02.549
<v Speaker 3>That looks like an OSHA violation. There's wires hanging down.

0:39:02.710 --> 0:39:03.450
<v Speaker 3>That's brand new.

0:39:03.650 --> 0:39:05.790
<v Speaker 2>How's a football team going to even fit into that thing?

0:39:05.870 --> 0:39:08.430
<v Speaker 3>Now, some people are trying to shame Northwestern Football by

0:39:08.469 --> 0:39:11.549
<v Speaker 3>not spending on the opposing locker room. I commend them.

0:39:11.810 --> 0:39:13.830
<v Speaker 3>You want to make it as comfortable as possible for

0:39:13.870 --> 0:39:14.450
<v Speaker 3>the opposition.

0:39:14.770 --> 0:39:14.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:15.150 --> 0:39:16.890
<v Speaker 3>These seats, are you going to catch your leg on

0:39:16.930 --> 0:39:17.430
<v Speaker 3>a sharp thing?

0:39:17.510 --> 0:39:17.690
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:17.969 --> 0:39:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Is this carpet new?

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:19.700
<v Speaker 2>New-ish?

0:39:20.300 --> 0:39:21.380
<v Speaker 3>You know, what does it smell like in there?

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I've kind of made fun of Northwestern

0:39:23.580 --> 0:39:24.980
<v Speaker 2>football on the show a little bit. Why are they

0:39:25.020 --> 0:39:27.690
<v Speaker 2>building such a nice home locker room? For what? For football?

0:39:27.870 --> 0:39:29.970
<v Speaker 2>Or is that where the journalists work? I don't understand.

0:39:30.830 --> 0:39:32.989
<v Speaker 2>Do they want to be Indiana? Is that what's happening here?

0:39:33.150 --> 0:39:35.069
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know. I think we're in an era

0:39:35.090 --> 0:39:36.850
<v Speaker 3>where they could be Indiana. If you find one or

0:39:36.890 --> 0:39:39.330
<v Speaker 3>two benefactors, they have a lot of money you could spend. Now,

0:39:39.390 --> 0:39:41.670
<v Speaker 3>Northwestern is going to have trouble getting in all the

0:39:41.770 --> 0:39:42.660
<v Speaker 3>athletes they want to get in.

0:39:42.770 --> 0:39:43.569
<v Speaker 2>Oh, like Notre Dame?

0:39:43.590 --> 0:39:44.330
<v Speaker 3>With academics.

0:39:44.469 --> 0:39:44.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:44.930 --> 0:39:48.230
<v Speaker 3>But, you know. Northwestern football just wants to be above average.

0:39:48.350 --> 0:39:50.569
<v Speaker 3>They just want to be seven, eight wins a year

0:39:50.910 --> 0:39:52.410
<v Speaker 3>and then maybe have one of those years where you

0:39:52.430 --> 0:39:54.109
<v Speaker 3>go to a Rose Bowl every once in a while.

0:39:54.450 --> 0:39:57.530
<v Speaker 2>I think that stadium says at least college football playoff.

0:39:57.630 --> 0:39:59.530
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, the locker room says college football playoff.

0:39:59.670 --> 0:40:02.530
<v Speaker 3>But the stadium is under 45,000 people. That means college

0:40:02.550 --> 0:40:03.660
<v Speaker 3>football playoff appearance.

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at best.

0:40:05.010 --> 0:40:07.940
<v Speaker 3>At best. All right, coming up next, new segment. A

0:40:07.980 --> 0:40:10.259
<v Speaker 3>lot of people here love sports. We were watching sports

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.299
<v Speaker 3>with them yesterday. Questions from the back room. We have

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 3>no idea what's coming. It's going to be questionable. Stick around.

0:40:15.910 --> 0:40:16.470
<v Speaker 3>Not so fast.

0:40:18.210 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back. Not so fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He's Paul Pabst,

0:40:21.430 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 2>NBC Sports Now, Peacock. We're going to talk more baseball

0:40:25.060 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in a minute. But first, Paul, I understand there's a

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:27.420
<v Speaker 2>new segment.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.180
<v Speaker 3>Hot new segment, Perloff. It's called Questions from the Back Room.

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:36.129
<v Speaker 3>Very exciting. Hosted by Dan Patrick Show editor... not-so-fast correspondent

0:40:36.230 --> 0:40:39.290
<v Speaker 3>and popular host of The Cutoff, the baseball podcast.

0:40:39.310 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Love it.

0:40:39.690 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 3>That is sweeping the country. Dan Gardella joining us. Great

0:40:42.020 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 3>to have you, Dan.

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks for having me, guys.

0:40:43.780 --> 0:40:45.500
<v Speaker 3>A lot of energy in the back room. I was

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 3>back there minutes ago, and I heard not just debate

0:40:49.060 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 3>but arguments going on. Is that your first question, or

0:40:51.219 --> 0:40:52.009
<v Speaker 3>are you saving that one?

0:40:52.110 --> 0:40:53.609
<v Speaker 8>We're going to save that. We call that a tease

0:40:53.650 --> 0:40:55.750
<v Speaker 8>in the business. We have a couple questions from the

0:40:55.790 --> 0:40:57.509
<v Speaker 8>back room here. We have a lot of thoughts as well,

0:40:57.530 --> 0:40:59.590
<v Speaker 8>so we figured we'd throw some at you guys and

0:40:59.610 --> 0:41:00.069
<v Speaker 8>see what you think.

0:41:00.110 --> 0:41:00.290
<v Speaker 1>Great.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.220
<v Speaker 8>All right, let's start with the first one. So in November,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.420
<v Speaker 8>a John Madden movie coming out. A little bit of speculation,

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.459
<v Speaker 8>a lot of talk. Nick Cage is the main actor

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 8>in that. So I ask you guys, what is the

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 8>most accurate sports movie you've seen? It could be from

0:41:14.540 --> 0:41:17.300
<v Speaker 8>the plot, the actors looking like the athletes themselves.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 2>What do you guys think?

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.420
<v Speaker 3>I'll go first. I think it's Hoosiers. It's based on

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the Milan Miracle in 1954, high school, the movie Hoosiers.

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.900
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Plump was the actual guy who hit the shot

0:41:28.020 --> 0:41:30.460
<v Speaker 3>to win the title. And he held the ball for

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.380
<v Speaker 3>like four minutes. And if you watch the end of

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the game, Jimmy Chitwood holds the ball for like 20 seconds.

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.970
<v Speaker 3>So it's similar-ish. And they definitely look like 50s basketball players.

0:41:38.130 --> 0:41:40.290
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know, Paul. I feel like you want

0:41:40.350 --> 0:41:42.290
<v Speaker 2>Hoosiers to be a real-life story. I thought that was

0:41:42.310 --> 0:41:45.549
<v Speaker 2>pretty dramatized. How about when Will Smith played Ali? I

0:41:45.570 --> 0:41:47.930
<v Speaker 2>thought Will Smith did a good Ali. And we actually

0:41:48.010 --> 0:41:50.670
<v Speaker 2>know that happened exactly like it happened in real life.

0:41:50.690 --> 0:41:52.489
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a good call. The boxing scenes in

0:41:52.510 --> 0:41:54.089
<v Speaker 3>that were not over-the-top. They were very true.

0:41:54.570 --> 0:41:57.420
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Chadwick Boseman, 42. I'm a baseball guy. That's the

0:41:57.460 --> 0:41:58.419
<v Speaker 8>one I always defer to.

0:41:58.940 --> 0:41:59.980
<v Speaker 2>Let's stick with baseball.

0:42:00.140 --> 0:42:03.939
<v Speaker 8>The MLB playoffs started yesterday. Four games, another four games today.

0:42:04.180 --> 0:42:05.739
<v Speaker 8>This one was actually asked by Jack, one of my

0:42:05.780 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 8>fellow editors sitting right here.

0:42:07.100 --> 0:42:07.819
<v Speaker 3>So he's giving a wave.

0:42:07.860 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 5>Shout outs.

0:42:09.100 --> 0:42:11.779
<v Speaker 8>What are your most memorable MLB moments? I think I

0:42:11.780 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 8>know Paul's, but I figure I asked both of you.

0:42:13.620 --> 0:42:15.660
<v Speaker 3>Well, mine's kind of weird because I went to games

0:42:15.820 --> 0:42:18.779
<v Speaker 3>three and four of the Cubs World Series in 2016.

0:42:18.780 --> 0:42:21.170
<v Speaker 3>They lost both those games. So it started as a

0:42:21.370 --> 0:42:24.870
<v Speaker 3>great day became a painful mass of drunkenness and walking

0:42:24.910 --> 0:42:27.390
<v Speaker 3>home from Wrigley Field two nights in a row. They

0:42:27.410 --> 0:42:29.570
<v Speaker 3>ended up winning the World Series, but those two days were...

0:42:30.010 --> 0:42:31.150
<v Speaker 3>a mixed bag of emotions.

0:42:31.690 --> 0:42:34.290
<v Speaker 2>You know, I actually have a thought. When I first

0:42:34.310 --> 0:42:36.750
<v Speaker 2>started a Dan Patrick show, the Phillies won the World Series.

0:42:36.790 --> 0:42:39.350
<v Speaker 2>They beat the Rays. And I went down to Philadelphia

0:42:39.430 --> 0:42:42.350
<v Speaker 2>for the parade and called into the Dan Patrick show.

0:42:42.630 --> 0:42:45.069
<v Speaker 2>And I remember Paul and Dan and everybody was having

0:42:45.110 --> 0:42:47.660
<v Speaker 2>so much fun because I think I got lost. And

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I was on some random Philadelphia street about three blocks

0:42:50.300 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 2>away from the parade. And I said, Dan, I I

0:42:53.460 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 2>think there's something wrong with the parade. I just saw

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.250
<v Speaker 2>basically a guy drive by in a van. Is that

0:42:58.290 --> 0:42:58.650
<v Speaker 2>the parade?

0:42:58.670 --> 0:43:00.330
<v Speaker 3>It was the parade's fault, not Perloff's fault.

0:43:00.870 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 8>No bedlam at the bank, Perloff?

0:43:03.380 --> 0:43:05.259
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, that was pretty cool. But listen, I go

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 2>way back. You know, I remember Mike Schmidt there. So,

0:43:08.620 --> 0:43:11.260
<v Speaker 2>you know, for me, like my core memories are the vet,

0:43:11.300 --> 0:43:12.970
<v Speaker 2>which you probably don't have never even heard of.

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:15.180
<v Speaker 8>See, I wouldn't know what it was, except I was

0:43:15.219 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 8>born and raised in Phillies baseball. My dad was a

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 8>Philly fan. So, you know, I got my education. I'm young,

0:43:21.020 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 8>but I'm wise, as they say.

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 8>Let's go to the last one. Now, this was the

0:43:25.100 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 8>one that had a lot of arguments back here. We

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.060
<v Speaker 8>actually had to pause it when Paul walked in because

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 8>we wanted to save it. If there was one sport

0:43:32.860 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 8>that you could be better at than everybody else in

0:43:35.620 --> 0:43:38.370
<v Speaker 8>the world, which sport would it be and why?

0:43:39.410 --> 0:43:41.790
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm purposely going to take off the high-paying

0:43:41.850 --> 0:43:44.210
<v Speaker 3>sports because I think that's too easy. I think it'd

0:43:44.230 --> 0:43:46.029
<v Speaker 3>be surfing. I think I'd like to be the best

0:43:46.070 --> 0:43:48.950
<v Speaker 3>surfer in the world. Seems like lifestyle-wise, that's about as

0:43:48.989 --> 0:43:50.820
<v Speaker 3>good as it gets. You get up, you go to

0:43:50.860 --> 0:43:53.299
<v Speaker 3>the beach, you go to the surfing competitions. And then

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.250
<v Speaker 3>you eat fish tacos and take naps. I mean, I

0:43:55.270 --> 0:43:56.730
<v Speaker 3>think I'd like to be the best surfer in the world.

0:43:57.489 --> 0:43:59.730
<v Speaker 2>That's a terrible idea. Sharks.

0:44:00.310 --> 0:44:02.410
<v Speaker 3>But not from the best. The second best guy is

0:44:02.450 --> 0:44:03.229
<v Speaker 3>getting eaten by sharks.

0:44:03.290 --> 0:44:05.399
<v Speaker 2>A shark doesn't know if it's Kelly Slater up there.

0:44:05.420 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I would never. I'm hanging with Pam Anderson.

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:08.980
<v Speaker 3>He's shark meat.

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 2>So I was thinking about something like pool like that,

0:44:12.340 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>but you could go anywhere. I think golf would be

0:44:15.180 --> 0:44:19.930
<v Speaker 2>the best because unlike basketball, baseball, football, You can play

0:44:19.950 --> 0:44:23.870
<v Speaker 2>until you're 70. Obviously, Tom Watson almost won the British

0:44:23.950 --> 0:44:27.150
<v Speaker 2>Open at 59. So I think being the best golfer

0:44:27.310 --> 0:44:30.250
<v Speaker 2>ever would be. Except, Paul, you always have a question.

0:44:30.310 --> 0:44:31.610
<v Speaker 2>What does a golfer do when he retires?

0:44:31.650 --> 0:44:33.390
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you retire as a golfer, you go get

0:44:33.410 --> 0:44:34.250
<v Speaker 3>a desk job somewhere.

0:44:34.530 --> 0:44:36.370
<v Speaker 2>No, but to be great at golf, can you imagine

0:44:36.410 --> 0:44:38.310
<v Speaker 2>how cool that would be? Just walk up on any

0:44:38.370 --> 0:44:41.189
<v Speaker 2>foursome and drive the green, and you're all set.

0:44:41.270 --> 0:44:43.469
<v Speaker 8>And I'm very bad at golf, so I think that's

0:44:43.489 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 8>part of the reason. Yeah, the arguments here were golf.

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:49.460
<v Speaker 8>It was basketball. It was a little bit back and forth.

0:44:49.580 --> 0:44:50.380
<v Speaker 3>I went basketball.

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.580
<v Speaker 8>If I have the chance to make $ 60 million a year,

0:44:52.700 --> 0:44:54.529
<v Speaker 8>I'm taking that. And then I can go golf later. Like,

0:44:54.550 --> 0:44:56.489
<v Speaker 8>that's always there, like you guys just said. So a

0:44:56.550 --> 0:44:57.969
<v Speaker 8>lot of argument back here, but some good stuff.

0:44:58.070 --> 0:45:00.470
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great argument. Like that. Good to hear you, Dan.

0:45:00.650 --> 0:45:01.950
<v Speaker 3>Great to have you on the show. Can't wait to

0:45:01.969 --> 0:45:03.810
<v Speaker 3>hear the next podcast about the MLB playoffs.

0:45:03.989 --> 0:45:04.469
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks, guys.

0:45:04.489 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 4>See ya.

0:45:04.950 --> 0:45:12.460
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, that was fun. Yeah. Dan Gardella. We'll see. OK,

0:45:12.980 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 2>let's look at the matchups for later today. Philly at

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:19.509
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta at 2 p.m. Eastern. White Sox Astros. Then tonight

0:45:19.550 --> 0:45:21.870
<v Speaker 2>we got the Red Sox, the Yankees and the Cubs

0:45:22.290 --> 0:45:25.910
<v Speaker 2>at the Padres. So, Paul, we're one game in, but

0:45:25.969 --> 0:45:28.250
<v Speaker 2>teams can be eliminated. What's the name of the game

0:45:28.270 --> 0:45:28.710
<v Speaker 2>we're playing?

0:45:29.390 --> 0:45:31.529
<v Speaker 3>Clinch or clench. Will they clinch a spot in the

0:45:31.570 --> 0:45:33.890
<v Speaker 3>playoffs or will they clench up? And bow out. I'm

0:45:33.910 --> 0:45:35.390
<v Speaker 3>really worried about the graphic for this segment.

0:45:35.770 --> 0:45:38.350
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. Okay, why don't you start? Who is bowing

0:45:38.450 --> 0:45:39.450
<v Speaker 2>out after today?

0:45:39.630 --> 0:45:41.910
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Red Sox don't have the bats. And,

0:45:42.070 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Yankees don't look fantastic without Judge out long-term.

0:45:46.060 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 3>But short-term, they look great. And Schlittler was awesome. Ben

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:51.180
<v Speaker 3>Rice was awesome. Not enough bats for the Red Sox.

0:45:51.219 --> 0:45:54.100
<v Speaker 3>I think they're done. And the Astros seem uninspired. I

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 3>don't know how they got to the playoffs in the

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:58.930
<v Speaker 3>first place. They were outscored this season, which should be

0:45:59.010 --> 0:46:01.330
<v Speaker 3>wrong to be in the playoffs. So the Astros seem uninspired.

0:46:01.710 --> 0:46:03.029
<v Speaker 3>Not a lot of juice in the building. I think

0:46:03.050 --> 0:46:03.890
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox take him down.

0:46:04.219 --> 0:46:09.219
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm actually keeping the Red Sox alive. I think

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:12.259
<v Speaker 2>they win Game 2 and lose Game 3. And I'm

0:46:12.340 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 2>actually keeping the Phillies alive, even though I said they're done.

0:46:15.700 --> 0:46:16.250
<v Speaker 2>They are done.

0:46:16.810 --> 0:46:18.420
<v Speaker 3>You called them done a half an hour ago.

0:46:18.969 --> 0:46:21.610
<v Speaker 2>Because of the Phillies. They're absolutely going to lose Game 3.

0:46:21.590 --> 0:46:24.270
<v Speaker 2>They don't want to put Andrew Perloff out of his

0:46:24.310 --> 0:46:26.609
<v Speaker 2>misery in two games. They want to make as much

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:29.739
<v Speaker 2>baseball pain... as possible, and Christopher Sanchez is going today,

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:30.380
<v Speaker 2>and he's awesome.

0:46:30.460 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Big picture done, small picture, they're winning tonight, so it

0:46:32.980 --> 0:46:33.439
<v Speaker 3>really hurts.

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:37.739
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. There's nothing more painful than losing in baseball, especially

0:46:37.820 --> 0:46:40.339
<v Speaker 2>with a slow ninth inning. The Phillies are going to

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:43.529
<v Speaker 2>lead in game three and blow it, because that's what

0:46:43.570 --> 0:46:46.290
<v Speaker 2>they always do. I'm calling it right now, and Paul,

0:46:46.310 --> 0:46:49.290
<v Speaker 2>you do say, not so fast, we don't call anything

0:46:49.410 --> 0:46:51.859
<v Speaker 2>over until it's over. This is over. It's over.

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:53.379
<v Speaker 3>Not tonight, but it's over bigger.

0:46:53.820 --> 0:46:54.540
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly.

0:46:54.620 --> 0:46:57.459
<v Speaker 3>So constructive criticism time. What we're doing, what you think,

0:46:57.540 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 3>send it in on Twitter. We'll get to it. We'll

0:46:59.060 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 3>put you up on the big board.

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:00.620
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:47:00.940 --> 0:47:05.299
<v Speaker 3>First one, Pearl. What's the over-under on how many games

0:47:05.340 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 3>LeBron and Embiid play together this season? Well, you have

0:47:07.700 --> 0:47:08.660
<v Speaker 3>to start with Embiid.

0:47:08.860 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, this is an under. Give me any number.

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.140
<v Speaker 3>I'll go 49 and a half.

0:47:14.140 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 2>49 and a half?

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.450
<v Speaker 3>I think the goal is to get Embiid every other start.

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:19.049
<v Speaker 3>So you're looking maybe 44 and a half, 43 and

0:47:19.070 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:47:20.450 --> 0:47:24.170
<v Speaker 2>But what about LeBron's March groin injury? Every February, March,

0:47:24.210 --> 0:47:26.010
<v Speaker 2>he has a groin injury. Is that scheduled already? Yeah,

0:47:26.030 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 2>it's scheduled. He's going to be in Barbados. LeBron always

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 2>takes an injury vacation toward the end of the season.

0:47:31.140 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 2>No way do they play 49.5. I'd say an accurate

0:47:34.700 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 2>number is 32.

0:47:35.540 --> 0:47:38.739
<v Speaker 3>All right, next one, constructive criticism. Let's go to it.

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Here we go. Just maybe J.J. McCarthy is the next

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:44.270
<v Speaker 3>Sam Darnold. Wouldn't that be a great story? Yeah, it'd

0:47:44.290 --> 0:47:47.010
<v Speaker 3>be a great story. Are you betting on that, David D.?

0:47:47.070 --> 0:47:48.969
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. It feels like we're a long way

0:47:49.030 --> 0:47:51.110
<v Speaker 3>from there. And remember, Darnold had a few stops.

0:47:51.860 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I don't think J.J. McCarthy is as good

0:47:53.780 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 2>as Sam Darnold. Sam Darnold was a New York Jet

0:47:55.860 --> 0:47:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and actually played okay. So I'd say that's way, way

0:47:59.380 --> 0:47:59.839
<v Speaker 2>out of the question.

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Time for the feel-good. Put you in a good mood

0:48:01.580 --> 0:48:03.390
<v Speaker 3>before we wrap up here and watch some baseball. Keep

0:48:03.410 --> 0:48:06.890
<v Speaker 3>your head up, Pearl. This is Patrick Mahomes. You know him.

0:48:06.910 --> 0:48:09.989
<v Speaker 3>He plays football. That's with his son. It's T-ball time.

0:48:10.650 --> 0:48:13.970
<v Speaker 3>His son's name, I'm checking my notes here, is Bronze.

0:48:14.210 --> 0:48:14.450
<v Speaker 5>Huh.

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:16.500
<v Speaker 3>And he has another son named Golden.

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's not fair.

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:20.910
<v Speaker 3>That's like naming your son third place Mahomes. Why would

0:48:20.930 --> 0:48:21.629
<v Speaker 3>you name your son Brown?

0:48:21.770 --> 0:48:23.540
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea. I don't get it.

0:48:23.710 --> 0:48:24.410
<v Speaker 3>Is it a nickname?

0:48:24.489 --> 0:48:26.150
<v Speaker 2>I think one of them might be a nickname because

0:48:26.170 --> 0:48:27.850
<v Speaker 2>he does have a kid named Patrick Mahomes.

0:48:27.870 --> 0:48:30.390
<v Speaker 3>Because I like Browns Mahomes. That sounds like a quarterback.

0:48:30.469 --> 0:48:30.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:48:30.870 --> 0:48:31.190
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:48:31.690 --> 0:48:34.630
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that kid is probably a future MLB

0:48:34.670 --> 0:48:38.110
<v Speaker 2>starting pitcher. Patrick Mahomes, of course, is from a baseball family,

0:48:38.150 --> 0:48:38.969
<v Speaker 2>played baseball himself.

0:48:39.090 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to work out well for that youngster.

0:48:40.660 --> 0:48:41.700
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how, but it's going to.

0:48:41.860 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 2>But he's still named Browns.

0:48:43.210 --> 0:48:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Coming up tomorrow, J.J. Watt on the Dan Patrick Show.

0:48:45.900 --> 0:48:48.029
<v Speaker 3>Then come hang with us on Not So Fast right after.

0:48:48.050 --> 0:48:49.150
<v Speaker 3>That's it. Enjoy the baseball.