WEBVTT - Former Chief of Staff for Mike Pence Marc Short Talks Epstein Files

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Here in New York City, Mack Show the film A

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>chief of staff to the foam of Vice President of

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 2>my Pench joins us now for Mo MO, good morning,

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>good morning, Thanks for having me. Thank you for big

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>kay a much more interventionist white House over the past week,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 2>and I've maybe the last number of months as well. Yeah,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>can you just weigh in how you framing things at

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the moment well on.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>This pretty quod topic. I actually think there is probably

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>broader support among a lot of small government people who say,

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you know what, the notion of a FED truly being

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>independent was a nice notion, went before it had seven

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars of assets on its books, and so you

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of unlike to people with fourteen year

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>terms have enormous influence over the economy. Having said that,

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably a desire also that if there

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was actually effort to change it, it'd be more above

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>board than coming up with sort of these fraudulent charges

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>against the board governor, because there's probably plenty of political

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>pointees administration of multiple mortgages too, said they're both their

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>primary residents, so I'm sure there's a double standard here,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and I wish there is a more intellectual appeal about

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the fed's role as a postcon with bogus chargers.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I just want to pick up on the language a

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>difference between challenges of fraud and fortullent challenges. Which one

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 2>do you think it is?

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think these are bogus charges. I mean, what makes

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you believe that, Well, I don't know how many how

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>many homes she has or if she listed both as

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>private resident, is that really a reason you're going to

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>remove somebody as a board governor? And once again, I

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>believe there's probably plenty of people in the indministration have

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>done the same on their mortgage file.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, lots of reporting over this summer about Ken Paxton,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>who's the Attorney General of Texas, who's running to be

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the senator. Point and do you think this litmus test

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 3>now for the president. He's going to decide whether or

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 3>not he's going to back Ken Paxton because he has

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>three residences listen as a primary more you know memory, he's.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Very flexible in these things. I think this is this

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is more about his effort to exert control over the

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>FED because I think they're concerned that their trade agenda

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is causing great weakness in the labor market, and they

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>want rates lower, and to be fair, this is what

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the President has always one of his lower rates. Even

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>when he had the option to appoint Jerome Powell in

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the first administration, there were three options between Kevin Warsh,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>John Taylor, and Jerome Powell, and the President asked who's

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>going to make rates lower? And that's one of the

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>ironies is that he chose the person who Steve Nuchen

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>told him is going to keep rates lower, but obviously

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>he wants even lower.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 3>They are Now, how difficult is next week going to be?

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 3>If the Senate Banking Committee begins their hearing of Steve

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 3>Myron and you look at some of the Republicans on

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>that committee. Are we going to see pushback not just

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 3>from the likes of Elizabeth Warren but also like Tom

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>tell Us.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen it yet, Henry. He said, I'm not

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>so confident that it's going to be significant pushback on

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>his appointment. And I look, again, I think this is

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about effort, exert control, want to have a majority so

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>he can lower rates faster. But again I think it's

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>reflective of a concern about where the labor market's going.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember Stephen Mall nominated for a seat on the

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Federal sev The Senate was Republican at the time, and

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>he didn't make it, and that was pushback. What's the

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>difference between that first time for the president and this second?

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, great question, because think this is much brought

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>than the Federal Reserve. I think it's about all of

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>his nominations. I think that you know, you go to

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>his cabinet, and I think it'd be hard to envision

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that RFK would have gotten confirmed in a previous Republican

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>controlled Senate. I think this is basically a reflection that

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are very worried about the president primary. He has

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>shown his ability to engage in primaries and exert that control,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's just an enormous fear factor, and he's using

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that with great leverage amongst Senate Republicans. Has the ponce

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he changed, the party's absolutely changed. I mean, I think

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the party has certainly become far more populous. I think,

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you see basically the federal government looking

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to seize means of production and the biggest cheerleaders are

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, and there's not a Republican

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking out about the government taking over ten percent of Intel.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>On the heels of saying, you know, in selling we

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>have export controls, we don't want to sell these chips

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to China. Oh, but if you allow us to take

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of the profits of a vidiot, it's okay.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And on the heels of say we're gonna take golden

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>shares of Nippon Steel, US Steel. It's like this is

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly moving a direction where the populism and the progressive merge,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's been total silence among center Republicans.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 3>And centered Republicans with their silence, you say, potentially though,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>they're interested in revamping the Federal Reserve because they're in

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 3>favor of small government. Nothing you just listed in terms

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 3>of taking shares of companies is small government, imriy.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's I think one of the shocking parts is that

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that the first Trump administration was predominantly

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>small government. It was deregulatory, it reduced taxes, and I

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like the second administration is exerted its influence in

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>all sectors of the economy and looking to exert its muscle.

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a very different agenda.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 3>To be more constructive about what they're doing in terms

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of say Intel, there's been a lot of criticism that

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>they're mirroring what China does, or this is state capitalism

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 3>like Europeans did in the nineteen sixties. What do you

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>actually think Trump is thinking? Is this about building a

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>sovereign wealth fund? What is actually the strategy?

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that he kind of rejected the sovereign wealth

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fund the other day, but I do think it's concerning

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that the projectory there is basically Saudi Arabia, China, Iran, Russia.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ones with sovereign well funds. I certainly

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>hope that's not where we're going. I do think it's

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>more for in his mind simply about leverage and where

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he can have leverage. But again, the basis of it

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>was two weeks before he more or lessens anyway the

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Intel CEOs and Chinese spy and then basically allowing that,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>basically saying Okay, well, we're not so worried about the

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>national security and more as long as we can have

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. It's like, what's the justification. I feel like

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>when you do this, you crowd out private investors. I

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think this would be good for either side. I

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think you can see intel shock. Intel stock probably declined

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because what private investor wants to engage If they feel

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like the federal government can just come in and take

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>ten percent or more.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 2>They suffering well fenced, the ships ACKed, that's the investment vehicle.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see that coming, but that's why this is

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 2>coming apparently.

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, potentially, I mean. And it's also not just

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the examples Mark Short brought up. You also had the

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 3>DoD recently take a stake in a company as well,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>and Howard Ludnik is basically saying that this might be

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 3>potentially direction or travel for other defense companies.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Mark, this was great. It's going to see you.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for breaking it down.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>The traditional Republican view of was playing out down in Washington,

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>d C.