WEBVTT - PGA Masters w/ Guest Pat Mayo (Ep. 82) 0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:01.280 Who will be the Master. 0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:15.200 Let's talk to the pros. 0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.720 Welcome in everybody to betting Pros. It's me Joey p Joe, 0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.520 Pi's Apia and we got a great show for you today. 0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.840 It's a little bit of golf talk, that's right, because 0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.200 the Masters is coming at you really quick, and we 0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.280 wanted to bring in, in my opinion, the best when 0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.519 it comes to golf, whether it be DFS, whether it 0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.320 be wagering. He is the host of the Pat and 0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.000 Mayo Experience podcast, and he is an experience unto his own. 0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.040 I have known Pat now for I don't know, close 0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.280 to a decade. I feel like it's getting like closer 0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.360 and closer to that. It's definitely seven eight years, I'm 0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.680 just gonna say in a decade. But Pat Mayo, I 0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.199 am so excited to have you on here. I know 0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.120 you do so much with DraftKings, I know you do 0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.280 stuff with FTN. Now you're everywhere as you should be, 0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.560 and we're just lucky to talk to you today. Pat's 0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.360 gonna help us break down the golf slate looking forward 0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.680 to the wagering opportunities that lay ahead of us here 0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.240 at Betting pro So, Pat, welcome to the program is 0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:09.400 so great to have you, my friend. 0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.680 Thank you very much. Yeah, almost like you. I'm everywhere 0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.760 like Fantasy National Golf Club, the biggest stats database and 0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.920 tools on the planet, everyone can get in a Mayo 0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.120 media network on YouTube. But he said, a decade's a 0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.520 really long time. I'm so old now it freaks me 0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:26.200 out a little bit. 0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.640 Yeah, and you're catching up to me and kids. You've 0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.920 got two. Now I've got two. I'm done. So I 0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.039 don't know it's to your limit. Have you finally said 0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.039 you know what? This is good? Two is good? I 0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.120 think we're good. Or are you pushing the envelope? I know, 0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:38.600 I know you got a lot of things in the works. 0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.480 You're moving, you're always doing stuff. But how's the second 0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.320 kid affecting the Mayo household? 0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.520 Well, two is good enough for me. My wife wants more, 0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.680 so we have to kind of figure this out at 0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.800 this point. Having two within the span of eighteen months 0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.520 kind of push push back the timeline a little bit. 0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.680 All right, all right, So let's let's talk a little 0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.000 golf here and we'll leave Pat Mayo's private life private. 0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.400 He's very wonderful for sharing a little taste of it 0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.600 with us here on the program today. Let's talk about 0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.280 the course first, in your opinion, what kind of player 0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.840 does this course favor and what is that you know? 0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.320 First attention we should pay because obviously you know last 0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.400 year when you look back at the Masters, Dustin Johnson 0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.240 is going to return to defend his crown. But it 0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.040 was a record breaking Master's win for him. But who 0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.120 else out there in your opinion in terms of style 0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.040 of play really kind of fits this course. 0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:30.000 Generally speaking, you're looking for players that have great ball flights, 0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.600 can get it up and down around the greens just 0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.600 in case you ever end up missing, because these runoff 0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.400 areas are so slick that if you don't hit the 0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.800 right quadrant of the green, you're no longer going to 0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.440 be on the green. Lag putting judging the speed of 0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.440 the green. So experience really goes hand in hand with 0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.400 playing well at Augustin. You mentioned Dustin Johnson in that 0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.639 record breaking performance in November. I think that's the key 0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.880 though November. The course is not going to be quite 0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.720 as receptive this time around. My guys on the grounds 0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.880 at Augusta National right now are telling me firm and fast, 0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.639 it's going to play a bit more challenging. Then they 0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.520 just had no idea how to control the course because 0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.720 they just have never seen a try set up in 0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.560 November before. So expect it to be harder, expected to 0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.520 be fast and firm, more difficult. So you're looking for 0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.240 second shot players who are the best approach players on 0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.079 the planet. That's generally the starting point where you want 0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.160 to go. And if anyone has a bit of extra distance, 0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.280 that only helps to mitigate some of the long distance 0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.480 of the second shots. So someone like Bryson or Dustin 0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.320 or even John Rahm are they're going to have like 0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.400 one hundred and seventy five one hundred and sixty yards 0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.200 into some of these part fives to set up eagle 0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.080 opportunities where a lot of the players in the field 0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.320 are going to be two hundred to twenty five way. 0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.480 And that's not to say that those players can't compete, 0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.200 it's just their path to getting there is so much 0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:44.840 more difficult. 0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.600 All right, Let's let's talk about some of those favors 0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.120 that you kind of mentioned there at the very top. 0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.000 So if you're looking for odds and go to betting 0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:52.440 pros dot com and you can pull up all the 0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.040 consensus odds from everywhere and see which book that you 0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.160 like the most. But let's kind of go with general 0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.280 speaking here, because if you're looking right now at the 0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.320 top dust and Johnson is at plus nine to fifty, 0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.280 then you have Bryson de Chambeau at plus eleven fifty 0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.920 and Jordan Speith at plus eleven fifty as well. So 0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:08.680 these are the three guys at the top of the board. 0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.440 We'll get into that next grouping after that. But are 0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.640 you somebody that attacks the favorites always in these kind 0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.520 of tournaments or are you somebody that's looking for that 0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.680 outside long shot kind of play? Because these are two 0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.600 very three i should say, very formidable guys at the top. 0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.240 So how do you kind of break them down and 0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:25.320 disseminate between them? 0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.760 You really can't, is the thing, especially with the odds 0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.679 being so close. And then you can even throw Rom 0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.599 Rory and Justin Thomas into that favorite mix as well. 0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.000 There are six of them this week. How do you 0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.800 discern between all of them? Well, I mean, if one 0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.520 of them shows up and plays to ninety seventh percentile, 0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.760 they are going to win this tournament. It's just it's golf, 0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.599 and that's incredibly difficult to predict So I'm not someone 0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.719 who generally bets the favorites ever during a tournament. I 0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.800 just don't think that golf odds actually lend itself to that. 0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.360 Because when we're thinking about someone like Dustin Johnson, for example, 0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:57.880 in a field with all of the best players in 0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.800 the world, and of course he just won, what is 0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.640 his actual win equity versus the rest of this field? 0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.400 He's nine and a half to one. I mean, do 0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.120 the odds actually reflect his win equity? Probably not. He's 0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.120 probably he is the favorite to win, no matter what 0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.599 sort of model that you run, but it's gonna spit 0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.000 out like five and a half percent, six percent, six 0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.760 and a half percent. So those odds just don't match up. 0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.240 And I just think that casting a wider net at 0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.640 something like the Masters and golf betting in general, is 0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.360 really the way to go. So let's just call him 0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.120 ten to one for the sake of this argument. So 0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.880 you can have one Dustin Johnson at ten to one, 0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.800 or you can still have four top twenty players in 0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.320 the world at forty to one for exactly the same 0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.760 price if you bet ten dollars, or let's say you've 0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.320 got one hundred dollars ten to one on Dustin Johnson 0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.680 to win, you would get your thousand dollars back. Now 0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.520 you could bet twenty five dollars on each of those 0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.400 forty to one guys and you would get the same 0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.360 net payout, except you have four guys. You can avoid 0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.440 a disaster from one of them. That's fine. One of 0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.840 them goes away, then you have three more runners to 0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:58.240 try to get into the race. So that's the way 0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.480 that I like to approach golf. Betting a little bit 0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.279 more does become tricky at a tournament like the Masters, 0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.720 because going back to twenty twelve was the last time, 0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.200 I mean that's when Bubba Watson won his first Masters 0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.479 and he was the eighteenth ranked player in the world 0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.400 that year. That is the worst player in the world 0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.640 to win the Masters since So you're looking at someone 0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.520 inside the top twenty if you really want to find 0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:20.480 a winner this week. 0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:22.479 All right, So who are some of these guys that 0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.560 you're going to target in these clusters, Because I mean, 0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.440 Pat broke it down for you in about as good 0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:27.880 of a way as you possibly can. I think it's 0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.880 very tempting to see those big names at the top. 0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.000 But what Pat's saying basically is look, you know, you 0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:33.360 kind of spread it out a little bit over a 0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.000 few different guys and the next thing, you know, you've 0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.200 got better odds. It's like more outs and poker basically 0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.440 when you got more cards on the table. So here's 0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.919 a question for you with the course, with some of 0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.159 these things that you're putting out there, how would you 0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.080 go and attack Which certain guys do you think are 0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.039 worth the wager in terms of the odds that you 0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.680 like where they're at and the style of play that 0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.080 you're talking about is going to be needed to be 0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.400 successful on this course at Augusta this weekend. 0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.200 I think you're looking at Brooks Koepko. He had knee 0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.240 surgery about three weeks ago, he hasn't played, and it's 0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.960 the last week of February when he came second at 0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.680 the WGC against all of the best players in the world. 0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.600 He lost to Kaala Morikawa concession that week. He won 0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.040 in Phoenix three weeks before that, and you're looking at 0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.280 good lead in for him too. That's always really important. 0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:14.840 If you go back and look at the past seven 0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.880 winners of the Masters, they had at least two top 0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.960 fifteen finishes in their lead up over the three starts 0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.000 coming into the Masters, So Brooks does have that. The 0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.679 biggest concern about him is his need. Is it gonna 0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.120 hold up? In my answer, I have no idea. But 0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.480 what I'm getting is we talked about the six favorites. 0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.680 Now normally there are. I mean, Speth has played his 0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.160 way into this conversation, obviously with a win last week, 0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.200 in his history at the Masters, and just his overall popularity. 0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.960 It'd be like if Tiger had made a cut coming in, 0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:42.520 he all of a sudden he be the favorite. Just 0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.760 because he's Tiger, people want to bet on him. Speith 0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.640 is in that category. People want to bet on him. 0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.080 Brooks people don't really know, and it's affected his odds 0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.360 to the point where I think he is a value bet. 0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.800 If you talk about like daily fantasy, I mean he 0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:57.680 might withdraw, who knows, But when you're talking about the 0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.520 betting market, there's no difference between last and second. You 0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.040 need to become first. That's how you win these bets. 0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.640 And Brook's going off at twenty eight to one right now. 0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.880 If he was healthy in coming in, he would be 0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.760 eleven to one to win. So essentially you inherit the 0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.840 risk of you don't know where his game is at, 0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.480 you don't know what his health status is at, but 0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.200 he's playing and my reports from the course said he 0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.840 looks pretty good. He's not limping around or anything like that, 0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.440 so he could be playing powesome here. So you're getting 0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.880 brooks Kopka at over double the odds of all of 0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.360 the other favorites where he would normally be. So when 0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.520 I mean, we call this gambling for a reason, you're 0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.000 gambling on you, and I think you're getting really good 0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.000 odds on a guy who's one of the favorites to win. 0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.080 And how much stock do you typically put into somebody 0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.079 who's hot coming into a tournament. I mean that you 0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.320 sort of alluded to the fact that that's usually a 0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.559 good sign. And it seems like in all sports too, 0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.200 when a player, individual, or team or whatever it might be, 0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.240 When somebody's in a groove, they're in a groove and 0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.920 it tends to carry over. Is there anybody else who 0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.760 kind of fits that bill for you, that's been playing 0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.040 well so far that you feel like, is you know, 0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.440 maybe kind of set up for possible success suprising success 0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:01.080 in this tournament? 0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.600 Yeah? I think Matthew Fitzpatrick is that guy. You can 0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.760 find him as deep as fifty five to one in 0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.319 some places. Since since coming state side at the Genesis, 0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.160 which Riviera CC in La is probably the biggest crossover 0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.360 leader board to Augusta. A lot of former Masters champions 0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.559 have won at Riviera, which would make Quail Hollow the 0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.600 Wells Fargo Championship another crossover course as well, So those 0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.320 two would be the ones that I'm looking for. Fitzpatrick 0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.559 started out there and he's not I mean, he's added 0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.360 distance to his game is off. The team has been 0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.880 really good so far this year, which is surprising because 0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:34.880 he's he's sort of like in the Speed Camp in 0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.360 the way that he plays like generally he's shoulder off 0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.120 the tee, good long irons, great potter, great chipping, but 0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.880 he's added this like extra twenty yards of distance and 0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.760 it's really propelled him up the leader boards. He hasn't 0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.439 quite closed out anything so far, but he came fifth 0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.920 at Riviera. He has no finish worse than t eleven, 0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.800 a tie for eleventh than any of his four starts 0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.720 so far in America this season, and he's come top 0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.480 ten at the Masters before if that was his best 0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.360 finish the ye that Danny Willett won in twenty sixteen, 0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.560 and ever since then he makes the cut every single year, 0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.800 but no real high end performances. But he seems like 0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.160 a different player, and he's playing great coming in. If 0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.320 the conditions do play firm and fast, that's to his advantage. 0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.760 He plays hard courses really well. And one of the 0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.080 great things about some of these Brits if you do 0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.640 want to target them, just looking at the weather forecast 0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.559 right now, it seems like Friday. I mean, it could 0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.720 get rained out based on the forecast that we're seeing 0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.559 at the moment, but if they do get out there, 0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.160 it's going to be soggy. It looks like it's going 0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.360 to be super windy. Fitzpatrick is one of the few 0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.720 players in the world who the worse the elements get, 0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.160 the more to his advantage. That actually plays so in 0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.600 ideal conditions, he's pretty good. In bad conditions, he's better 0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.480 than most of the other players in the field. So 0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.000 bring on the wind if you have Matthew Patrick. But 0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:45.800 he's just been playing so well and he's fifty five 0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.760 to one, so I think that's and he's the number 0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.040 sixteen ranked player in the world like. He's a very 0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.440 good player. I think people are sleeping on him a 0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.959 little bit and those odds are massive. So there's him 0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:57.760 and then there's web Simpson that you can get at 0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.679 forty to one or forty five to one, depending on 0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.400 where he look. His form not so great coming in. 0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.880 He does have two top six onages so far this season, 0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.000 another one at that WGC the first week they actually 0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.199 had Deflorida this season. But he has top twenties at 0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.319 the Masters each of the past three years, top tens 0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.679 each of the past two years. And once again, if 0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.360 this comes down to in irons, chipping and putting competition, 0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.320 you just need web Simpson to be okay off the team. 0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.360 It doesn't need to be Brooks. He doesn't need to 0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.920 be Bryson or rom or Bubble Watson off the tee 0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:28.920 because that is not his game. What he needs to 0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.200 do is have the exact same path that Speith does 0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.360 to win it. He needs to not bleed strokes off 0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.680 the tea. He needs to be around field average, maybe 0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.760 slightly better than the field, but not much, and then 0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:40.760 light it up with the irons, which he can do, 0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:42.800 put the lights out, which he can do, and have 0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.560 one of the best short games in the world, which 0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.280 he does have so forty to forty five to one. 0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.440 That way he can go Brooks, web Fitzpatrick and Thore's 0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.360 are three guys right away at pretty deep odds. 0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.480 That's pretty good. Sounds good to me. Actually, I feel 0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.840 so much more empowered now now. I actually, you know, 0:11:57.880 --> 0:11:59.960 I'm somebody who doesn't always, you know, look for the golf. 0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.480 I enjoy watching golf. I miss playing golf, but I 0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.560 have zero time to do it, which is really sad 0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.880 and pathetic. But as my kids are getting older, I 0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.440 feel like now I have a little bit more time 0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.719 where maybe I can get out there again and you know, 0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.760 dust off the old clubs. I used to be okay, 0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.560 I know you're good, but I used to be all 0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.360 right back, and yeah, that is fake news. 0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.800 I have played one round of golf in the past 0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:20.480 three years. 0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.800 Really I would see that happen. You have kids and 0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.120 all of a sudden, the golf game goes away. It's terrible. 0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.200 It's the worst thing ever. I mean, if any time 0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.080 you need to go out there and get some time 0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.400 to yourself on the golf courses when you have little kids, 0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.840 for God's sake, here's a question for you, going back 0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:36.840 to the Keopka injury. Is there any concern with some 0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.040 of the elements when you have a surgery, we're coming 0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.000 off an injury or things like that that that could 0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.280 have a negative effect even though we like the player 0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.600 going into it, if there is damp conditions and things 0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.160 like that. You know, like it's just kind of putting 0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.200 that out there. Is that any sort of pause for 0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.479 you when it comes to Koepka because of the elements? 0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.000 No, there's no pause for me. But I completely think 0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:58.880 that there's probably gonna be something that pups are like, 0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.679 oh no, he doesn't look great right here. But that's 0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:02.800 part of that. That's the reason that you're getting the 0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.200 odds that you're getting on Brooks, right Like, that is 0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.680 baked in to the risk that comes along with his 0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.440 twenty eight to one. So you know, like I said, 0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.320 if he withdraws, that sucks, but if he comes second, 0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.280 that also sucks. So I'm trying to find guys that 0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.200 can win, and I know Brooks can. 0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.719 Win, all right, So take me through for those who 0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.240 may be new to DFS golf and whatnot, take me 0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.320 through your approach here, Like let's say we're on DK 0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.959 and we're trying to, you know, put something together here, 0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.160 and you want to be able to watch the tournament 0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.319 and kind of have some pieces of it. What's the 0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.360 best practice for you to say go out there? I mean, 0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:36.920 I know you've mentioned some of the names, but what's 0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.000 the approach when you're looking at the pricing of the 0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.920 guys you're trying to squeeze people in and say, Okay, 0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.000 this is this is how I want to approach the 0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.600 slate here for the Masters from a DFS standpoint, because 0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.680 I think a lot of people like Waydering standpoint, but 0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.520 then if you know they want a little bit more action, 0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.360 there's always the DFS side of things too. So how 0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:54.280 would you go through that? 0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.080 Well, I would go over to Mayo Media Network and 0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.760 watch my walk through videos as I carved through this 0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.360 ST's on Fantasy National dot Com and build as. 0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.800 You should, by the way, because that has incredible work 0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.000 like this that does coach you through. And I've been 0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.240 on your show so many times and I think what's 0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.480 so great is that you always have content there for 0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.000 people who are, you know, new to things that walk 0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.320 them through the process. But you've also got the hardcore 0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.280 people audience too, that are you know doing this all 0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.600 the time. So do the two minute walkthrough for everybody, 0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.440 and then everybody go watch the real walkthrough please of 0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.600 Patmeo's website, because exactly what you need to kind of 0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.200 getch up and speed on the how of doing this. 0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.640 Yeah, I mean when you do four hundred jows ere 0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.560 you can cater to do at all. 0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.560 I mean that seems like a low number for you. 0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:37.720 Actually is the point with four hundred. 0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.720 Four hundred Patmeo experiences a year. There's also other content 0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.720 that comes out in between with them, the short videos 0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.080 and such. But what you want to be doing here 0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.040 is trying to jam in as much win equity into 0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.680 your six players on draftings as possible. Do not get 0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.720 lured in by Fred Couples or Bernhard Langer. These like 0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.240 super old dudes who have no shot at winning. Could 0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.760 they make the cut? Sure? Why not? 0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:57.160 Yeah? 0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.560 Great they can come fortieth that theys do nothing for 0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.480 your draft. Afkins are froster this week, So just avoid 0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.640 that temptation because if you put them in, you can 0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.000 start jamming in all of the top end guys. You're like, 0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.160 my team looks awesome, Oh I need Oh I need 0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:10.920 is Fred Couples to come in ninth. Yeah, well he's 0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.800 not coming in ninth, so just get mind right away. 0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.480 There are our guys at the bottomless. Then you can 0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.560 play a balanced approach. You can play a top heavy approach. 0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.720 The pricing is so soft for the masters that you 0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.720 can build almost any lineup you want. I would say, 0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.000 leave one hundred bucks at least on the table to 0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.000 make sure that you don't get duped, because you don't 0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.160 want to be splitting that million dollar top prize with anyone. 0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.400 Come on now and just if you're gonna play, let's 0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.560 say one lineup. You know, just pick whatever six guys 0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.280 that you want that you feel comfortable with. I could 0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.160 say that you could go as low as Matt Wallace 0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.480 at sixty four hundred dollars. There's a group of guys 0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.200 down there. So there's Matt Wallace, Ryan Palmer, Kevin nah 0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.840 and Robert McIntyre, Bobby Mack, the Scottish lefty bomber. He 0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.680 is a debut tomp, which is not great, but he's 0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.560 a lefty and he hits it a mile, which usually 0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.680 goes a really long way to success at Augusta. So 0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.120 you can use those guys at the bottom. If you 0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.040 want to jam in all of the guys at the top, 0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.840 you're probably better off looking at setting a cap somewhere 0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.520 around like sixty seven hundred dollars for your last man in. 0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.600 I have a couple of lineups with Max Homa, who's 0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.480 one at both of the correlation courses that I talked about, 0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.720 Riviera and Quail Hollow. He won Riviera this year. It's 0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.000 a second Masters. That's not great, but he's seventy one 0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.840 hundred dollars. He is the perfect game for Augusta. If 0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:20.480 you want to be your last man in, you have 0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.520 a really balanced lineup with win equity in it, no 0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.560 matter who else you took. But if you really want 0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.760 to go crazy at sixty seven hundred dollars, there is 0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.160 Seeoo Kim just sitting there waiting for you to say. 0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:32.720 That one more time because it was just so fun. 0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.920 That would be see Whoo Kim. 0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:36.440