WEBVTT - The Diddy Verdict Explains EVERYTHING About Men + Power Right Now

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>No one has all the answers, but when we ask

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the right questions, we get a little closer, closer to truths,

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to each other, even closer to ourselves. I'm journalist

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Danielle Robe, and each week, my guests and I come

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>together to challenge the status quo and our own ways

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of thinking by daring to ask what if, why not?

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And who says? So? Come curious, dig deep, and join

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. It's time to question everything. Okay, I don't

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>know about you, but I have decided that my new

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>year starts February first, because this month has been a blur.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I just got back from Veil. I wanted to spend

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>my birthday on a mountain skiing. And this is going

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to sound so la, but I'm gonna just say it.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The amazing woman who I get spray tands with is

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>also in a s astrologer, and she like read my

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>chart for my birthday and she told me that one

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of my missions in life is to realize that joy

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and play are not earned. And I laughed so hard

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>when she said that to me, because what do you

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>mean They're not earned? Yes, they are, so I am

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to work on that and trying to play a

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. I don't know what that even means

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, because like, I'm a Capricorn and everything is serious.

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But I bring that all up to say I actually

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 1>do feel that when I'm skiing, I feel so free.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So I spent my birthday on a mountain. I'm back.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to get back to work properly. I'm ready

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to like get in. I think I needed to hibernate

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like a little bear for a little bit, and I've

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not been great on my visualization practices. I've been going

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in and out, and I'm ready to commit finally. So

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if you've been better than me, then I'm so proud

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of you. Congratulations. And if you are lagging a little

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>bit like me, let's just jump in together. February first, Okay, anyways,

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to to today's episode because I had so

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.559
<v Speaker 1>much fun recording it. I learned so much, and it's

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of those few that I actually

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>listened back to because I want to relearn and sort

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of rehear what our guest had to say. I know

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be stuff that I pick up this

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>time around, so let's get into it. Do you ever

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like culture is glitching. It feels like it's been happening,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>both slowly and all at once. The rise of AI,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a new era under President Trump, a total reordering of

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>how we consume media and art, and the Hollywood business

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>models are scrambling to keep up. Celebrity used to mean mystique,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and now it means a ring light and a good angle.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Something is changing, and it has been for a while,

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's hard to tell where it is

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>actually all headed. That's a question that's been circling my mind.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>But I think when things feel uncertain, there's one place

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that always tells the truth. First, pop culture. Bear with me, okay.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it shows us what we excuse, who we worship,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and what we pretend not to see long before we

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>admit it out loud. Pop Culture is a mirror. It

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>shows us where we are and where we're going. And

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>today's guest doesn't just watch culture, she reads it like

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>a receipt. Christiana back Medina is the creator of pop Syllabus,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>which is my favorite substack and now the name of

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>her new podcast as well. She's one of the sharpest

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>cultural critics and quite honestly sharpest people in the zeitgeist.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>She has this very rare talent for seeing the pattern

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>underneath the headline. For instance, she can take a ditty verdict,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a tradwife TikTok, a celebrity headline, a met Gallas sponsorship,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the death of a celebrity apology and somehow make it

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>all point to the same big question what are we

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>rewarding right now? And why who do we give power to?

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And what does it say about us? And you know

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I love to dissect culture too, so today Christiana and

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I get into it all from her views on what

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the ditty trial really mean.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>They broken and needs to be problematic men, and we

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>absolved that even when we find out about any wrongdoing

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>they've done to.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>The complete collapse of celebrity mystique.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 2>Quite ash really collapsed for celebrity. It's right because it's

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>just like, sure, you may have this celebrity you as

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a publicist and a studio system and a stylist and

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>the whole team around them, but they can't necessarily compared

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to with gal that can just do it.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Get ready with me and get median youth.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 1>We get into why we are obsessed with wealth in

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>our culture, but why we also sort of despise rich people,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>how celebrity got demystified, and what replaces that man. We

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about the tradway, fantasy and the fine print nobody posts,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and then we get into her twenty twenty six predictions,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>including who's poised for a comeback, what aesthetic is taking over,

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and what we're underestimating about AI. So I'm not gonna lie.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>We are circling a ton of questions today. But if

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I had to wrap it all into a tiny little

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>bow and say we are circling one thing, I say

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that we are circling why do we keep giving power

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>to the same kinds of people and what does that

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>say about us? Okay, it's time to question everything with

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Christiana back Medina. Christiana, welcome to question everything.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. I'm happy to be me.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited. I've been wanting to talk to you,

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think for about a year. My friend Natalie shared

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>your work with me and I've been a huge band

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>ever since.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>You know he's gonna be so jealous. She's that here.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think in a digital age, there are so

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>many voices that it's hard to cut through the noise,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and you somehow really have. What do you think it is?

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Some people call me a bit witchy. My mother pulls

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>me anointed, as I like to say. But I think

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 2>just because of my background, I occupied like a unique

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>vantage point and I think it's my place in the

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 2>world that makes me see things that others perhaps don't.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think like I'm uniquely brilliant. I just think

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 2>my identity and my experiences I see things that other

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>people maybe ignore, or I make connections other people don't,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and I think because of that it resonates with people.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. Can you share more about your background?

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, grew up in London, in South London.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Parents are Nigerian immigrants, where I spent my childhood, most

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>of my early adulthood, and then I came out to

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the States when I was about twenty seven years old.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I'm dating myself now and I've lived

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>here for a decade.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>What made you come to America?

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>That's a very lonely question, you know what it is.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I knew there was like a bigger world out there,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and I wanted to do something different that I knew

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 2>England perhaps wouldn't allow me to do, especially on like

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the writing side of my work, and I was like,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>why not. You know, it was a bit insane in hindsight,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 2>like you have to be a bit delusional, and I

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, let me just try. And then I ended

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>up being here for over a decade, getting married, having kids,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 2>have three anchor babies, so it's going to be very

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to get.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Out of here.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You have three babies, I have frekids. I do not

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>know that he is a free kid girl. You have

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>an American.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Husband, Yes, I have an American husband who grew up

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>in New York piece of Dominican descent.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of languages in my house.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Like I go between English and if my husband speaks Spanish,

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>so there's a lot happening.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about instilling certain culture in your kids?

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I just be myself. Like my parents

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>always send these care packages, are a lot of very

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>British snacks, so my kids are like pussy pigs are

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>real McCoy's and penguins, so those are their snack references.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I speak I both to my children and so they

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>use words here and there. And my husband is taken

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>care of his past. So we're just ourselves. We're very

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>intentional about being ourselves and our kids are just like

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful blend like both of us.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I like to think they're also like nuts.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you consider yourself a writer first?

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the mode I'm most comfortable expressing my idea.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you get to be a bit more reflective.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And I kind a habit of like saying the wrong thing.

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>That's like kind of my grand funny. Yeah, I just

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 2>put my mind in a way that like people don't

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 2>like women too, So like the thing about writing, I

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 2>get to be a bit more measured. Even when I'm

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>being inflammatory. I'm inflammatory and it's smart and measured. Yeah,

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm always getting kicked out of group chats. What I

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>like about writing is that I can be myself, but

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>it also forts to me to be more reflective or

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>fall And once it exists in the world, you want

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>people to receive it in the right spirit, you know.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's say write first, and then think.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like when your friends say that and

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they take you places? Is it because they don't want

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to catch you debating and ruffling feathers?

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 4>And what is it for you?

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like you.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Like the back and floor I spoke about this recently

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 2>on another podcast. I think it's my father, Like this

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>whole thing was always he'd make the statement and he

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>was curious about the posision I would take, and he

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>would always take the opposite one.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>He's like my debatable sparring partner.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 2>So when you raise by a man like that, and

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>then my mom's a big reader as well.

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 3>When you have parents like my parents, you just always.

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 2>Want to say something that's not a bit outrageous, but

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>like you like to engage with ideas, and I think

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>it comes from that. But then you go into the

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>world and you're like, oh my god, everyone's polite and

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you're not supposed to give your opinion at the dinner table.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 2>You're supposed to do small. But I wasn't prepared for that.

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>So my friends are like, hey, for meeting you. People

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>don't let them know how crazy you are.

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>When you were dating, was it important for you to

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>meet a maan that was a thinker and like led

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with conversation.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't like to speak to most men after five pm,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>let alone a stupid man.

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So I knew like whoever.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I ended up with had to be like my intellectual people,

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 2>if not like smart. I always say, my husband's smarter

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>than means. That's what I needed. I needed somebody that

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I admired, the intellects and stuff like that. Yeah, out

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>end dates, but you know you say the check please,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 2>like I'm out. Yeah, that was very important to me.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>So you sit at the intersection of politics, pop culture, rates,

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and the internet. Yeah, when you analyze culture, what questions

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>are you asking yourself? What are you looking for?

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 4>And I asked that because you have such a unique

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 4>point of view.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking why, like why now?

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 2>In particular because I think Angler Metal, the formula transfer

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 2>of Germany said something very interesting, You said, Paris raising.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>He said, history doesn't repeat itself, but there are patterns,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and I think in pop culture and the kind of

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 2>zone I'm in, there are always these patterns. And I

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 2>think we can be lazy, but like, this has happened before,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>but if you look at the past, there were maybe

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>signs that this would happen. And I'm curious about why

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>is it happening now? Right, That's the thing I'm thinking about.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Why is it happening now? How can I connect it

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to a past? And what does it say about the future?

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 2>And that is like my bag in terms of pop

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>culture and.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Like my lens, and so are you always when you're

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>researching a topic, are you going back to historical references?

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Or have you been a student of history? They just

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>come to you.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone's version of a historical reference is different.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Right. I'm a pop culture girl that grew up in

0:10:55.880 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 2>England and that is the big Breakference's SMTV Lives the UK.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>It's Top of the Pops, which shows that like your

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 2>American isn't going.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>To be like what the hell is that? But people

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 3>back home are like, yeah, those are our references.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 2>We remember when Robbie Williams or the Spice Scales were

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 2>on these shows, right yeah, And it's Bliss magazine and

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 2>so it's a whole different pop culture canon in a way.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 2>And then it's of course like my Nigerian British subculture

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and take garage and all of these things that really

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 2>inform the lens at which I look at things happening

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>in maybe India or like the US. So when I

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>say history, some of it it's like my own personal nostalgia.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>But there are these very big, broader historical themes that

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we cannot ignore when look at culture. Whether

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it's like women getting the right to vote, whether it's

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>like the Civil rights era, because especially in a US context,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>that shape so much of where we are today. So like,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>there are the big tip poles that I'm always looking

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 2>at and I'm always thinking about. In a way, I

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>think twenty twenty uprisings and COVID, like what did that

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>do to pop culture? I feel like COVID created this

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of animal who doesn't go out much.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I put myself in that.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 2>I used to go out a lot more before we

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>shut down. And I think a lot of people are

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>consuming pop culture at home and they want to return home.

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Whereas before, like maybe twenty nineteen, it was like, you

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>know what, let's go and watch this movie together, but

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 2>now it's like, you know what, I'm going to wait

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the night forty five days, which it is now, until

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 2>it's on my streamer, and maybe I'm gonna watch work

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 2>it at home, like I don't need to do this

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 2>in the theater. And I think twenty twenty kind of

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>change certain behaviors, you know, zoom parties or like just

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>working from home. I think we become different animals because

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty, the racial uprisings and the event of COVID.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's something I think about a lot, Like, how

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>does the twenty twenty years of it all in this

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of mass traumatic event affects how people are creating

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 2>pop culture and how.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>We're consuming it, consuming from home is really interesting to

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>me besides the obvious, Yes, we're consuming at home. But

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I have a friend whose husband was a party promoter

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>year ago, and he said people used to come to

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>clubs to see what people were wearing. That was like

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a big drop. It was fashion, and then when the

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Internet and Instagram happened, you didn't really need the clubs.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of when clubs die.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I don't that's the club or anybody.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I hate clubs me too.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 4>I want a book club. I don't want any of

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the club I don't want.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>It's noisy, like the bottles and the door and some

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>man judging me when I'm willing to get it now

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm twelve fashion, But like, yeah, you can see the

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 2>clubs from your phone. You can see Cachella from your phone,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and the vipon section people are sharing.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 3>That, and then you can find fashion on your phone.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember the moment that I realized that pop culture

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>was more than a tabloid magazine. I grew up in

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a family that was academic, and so they would kind

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of make fun of me.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 4>They were like, you're wasting your brain. What are you

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 4>doing this garbage?

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>And I moved to LA and started working at like

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>E and Entertainment Tonight, and I realized that it is

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a mirror. It's like we are informing it, and it

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is informing us, and it's reflecting where we are as

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>a society. Do you remember the moment you realize that

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>it was a mirror, that it was bigger than just

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>these tabolic magazines.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I always knew that because my parents were

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>very strict about not letting me consume pop culture, like

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>it was always this thing I had to sneak in,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Like they didn't like me watching television. My parents are

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>deeply con togoss on. My father's like a pasta, So

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 2>there was no second of music. This was a thing

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that don't touch It's the bidden it's of the world.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>But when I go to school, people were talking about

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>what they watched, what they read, what they were listening to,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and their parents are just like normal, like you can

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>listen to the radio, right, So I was kind of

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>consuming pop culture by like kind of osmosis a lot

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>as a child. As a teenager, I had a lot

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>more three dam So I always knew it was like

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>really important and it was reflective of how people felt

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of the world, and it was performing how they felt

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>about the world too. But I can't think of a

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>specific moment where I'm like, it's pop culture. I think

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I always intuited this.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 4>That's really interesting. Yeah, when did you realize your voice?

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Most people it's a big question, But was there like

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a piece that you put out that you thought, oh,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this movie The Needle.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it was my early days on Twitter, which

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not on anymore, but I would often go viral

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 2>or it was like the fascist Healthscape. I would often

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>go yeah, just a week clear, but I go viral

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 2>for saying things that I would just say to my

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>friends and in my life, and I just tweet what

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, and I was like, Oh, I'm resonating with people.

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>That's what I felt like.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I felt like I say things that people can relate

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to and expressing ideas.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I must have felt so good. Yeah.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 3>No, I've always kept.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>A distance from it because I had this inherent mistrusted

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of people. To go viral to be liked or people

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to respond to your voice doesn't necessarily mean that you're

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>contributing anything good to the conversation. I think like typically

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 2>actually means you're probably a bit of a maniac, right,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Like the people we've platformed, especially in modern society, whether

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 2>it's politically and culture and fashion, they tend to be

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the most like outrageous people. So about imperent skill or value,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>it's just that you've made somebody feel something. It doesn't

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>mean that you've contributed something good to the world. So

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen that viral moment as being like, oh,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>this feels good. Sometimes I interrogate, like, why are they're responding?

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it because I feel like put something good at

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>into the world? And that's like kind of the litmus

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>test for me.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I think that's a really traditional journalistic lens to

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like remove yourself from the equation. I listened to a

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.119
<v Speaker 1>podcast about how back in the day, all the journalists

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>were paid thirty forty thousand dollars and so they were

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>making a living, but they were not of the upper class.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And now a lot of journalists are mixing and mingling

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with the people they're writing about and changed the stratosphere.

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah for sure, like they.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to write about their friends.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's just like that kind of access sometimes, I

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know the spoils of it can Sully your actual work.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there a recent pop culture moment that made you

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like, oh, this says everything about the moment that

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we are in right now.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that the DD verdict the sentence being a

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>lot less than what people anticipating, and just the response

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 2>to it and the spectacle of that trial.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's like the definitive story in the way

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 3>i'd say more.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think because there was the expectation that he

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 2>would be found guilty on all accounts and he would

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>never see the light of day again. I didn't think

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that speaking to me, but I was like, I topt

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 2>him to get off on everything, but I think he

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>went down on like the prostitution charges and we've got

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 2>a fifty months sentence, which is very leniar and given

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>everything happening. But I was like, we are in a

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 2>world where like powerful and rich people can get away

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 2>with things and the public is kind of on their side.

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Like people were shocked that you know, you saw the

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 2>video of him and Cassion. You watched this trial, and

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.479
<v Speaker 2>now the documentary is coming out, You've seeing the feelings

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 2>of jurors and the general public. There's a lot of

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 2>people that are like, it's not illegal to be a

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>free That's what they've taken from this trial. And I

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>think it's so emblematic about these problematic men who verge

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>on criminality.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 3>You sometimes are criminals who are still our.

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Kind of kings, are cultural kings, and we're willing to

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 2>forgive them for anything. And I think that's the story

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of like maybe the last five to ten years of

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 2>like we like our men broken, and we like them

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 2>all our criminal and we.

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Allow them to haul us. And so I think the

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Diggy trial was that in a nutshell from a culture.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Perspective, when you say five to ten years, what do

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 4>you think fifted?

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It?

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Was?

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>It part of e Weinstein.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a Harvey element to it. There's I

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>think the political scientists can do a better job of this.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>But there was a point in the Trump campaign versus

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Hillary when take came out, everyone was like, he's done.

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think he was done, but like didn't No,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think he was done because I think that

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>what a lot of people miss about Trump is that

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 2>he represents an archetype that exists in a lot of families,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 2>which is like a problematic uncle who says the wrong

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 2>thing that you find him finn so you overlook, oh

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 2>you heard that person. It's not acceptable to me, right,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not acceptable for people like us. But there's a

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of people that are like, Okay, so he said

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 2>this thing, and he may have done this thing, but

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>he's also and I think that's how a lot of

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>people read him. But like that will not feel transgressive enough,

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 2>and it kind of changed politics right in terms of

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 2>like what you can get away with it, and so

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>like maybe some people will do that tracing of like

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the trumpiness of it all.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>But I think sometimes we make it too much about Trump.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that's so overdone that I think in a

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>US context, you can be like, it's this, and then

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe in the UK are thinking more about like Brexit,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 2>because it was like Charlatan's the people that promoted Forrexit.

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 2>You're like these men, you should not be listening to them,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>and yet it happened. And so I just think that

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 2>we're just in this world where we like elevate broken,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>deeply problematic men and we absolve them even when we

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>find out about any wrongdoing they've done.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And so why would he didn't be any different?

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm so deep because it's deeply cultural. In our family system, it's.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 2>In our family systems, it's how we live, and sometimes

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it's in friendship systems. I speak to people and there's

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 2>like a career friends and a man has done something

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 2>horrific to a woman in that group. It's on that

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>verge of like unske the full timely illegal. The woman

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't necessarily report it, but she tells her friends, and

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 2>the friendship group doesn't ostracize this. Now he's still allowed around,

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 2>so she ostracizes herself, you.

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Know what I mean.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 2>So this is something that we know, like something that happens,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think we absolve ourselves as a society, who

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 2>are like, did this unique evil?

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 3>And it's so shocking.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>The jury let him off, and I'm like, okay, but

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 2>think about in your family and in your friendship groups,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>who are the people around that are maybe predators that

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>you just kind of like that or you've heard something,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 2>but you still maybe not associate with them, but you

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 2>haven't had that person off, and I just think the

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>trial is just an emblem of that thing that we do,

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 2>especially when a person is rich, because we're just at

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 2>a time where we are sex with rich people.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>That's actually the topic I want to speak to you

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>most about today is wealth and institutions and celebrity. I

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're all intertwining. You wrote that people across the class, racial,

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and political spectrums appetite for celebrities flaunting their wealth and

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>power is ween. I remember thinking that during COVID that celebrities,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not all but some were looking tone deaf. But in reality,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so many of us look to the lives of the

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>ultra wealthy as aryeers. We're interested. What do you think

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the fixation on wealth reveals about our society?

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 4>And is it the same in America as it is elsewhere?

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think that we're in a world generally where

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 2>if you are poor and in povocy, it's seen as

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a moral faith right. If you can't afford something, you

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 2>would finalize that like we will do it. Oh my god,

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could fel that bad. You know, I

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>was just making more money. You internalize that like I've

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 2>done something wrong. So when you kind of demonize quovty

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>or not being able to afford something as like a

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 2>personal faith that you have failed within the system. The

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 2>people that do have money, it becomes like they're morally superior.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 2>We don't realize they are better than us. They are

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 2>able to maneuver the world in a way that I can't,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 2>and so you admire them because of what they have, right,

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 2>because we haven't disconnected wealth from like the way we

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 2>feel about people's humanity and their value and their worthiness

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and that, and we haven't disconnected that from ourselves. Because

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 2>I know so many people at the end of the

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 2>year when they do their review, it's not about like

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>what they've accomplished as people. They're like, my god, I

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 2>just don't have as much money as I want. So

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the people that do have all this money, we just

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 2>assume that.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>They're better than us.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They figured something out.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Or they come from better families. That's why we like

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>venerate old money, or the entrepreneurial class or the tech

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 2>maget class. We're like, these people are so much brilliant,

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>they're so much better than us, and that's why we

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 2>look to them and we watched them.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you like capitalism? No, do you think there's a

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>better alternative.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Salism, But like, I think enterprise is important, right, But

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think all enterprise is necessarily need to be

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>profitable for you to live. Like struggle with the idea

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that if I'm not generating some sort of income for myself,

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not worthy. We're all going to go through phases

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>in life where we can't being a child you can't,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm being disabled being elderly. Right, So if my

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 2>moral value is attached to what I attribute to the economy,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 2>are I less valuable in capitalism and the capitalist framework?

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the case, and capitalism is about like extracting surflace value.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>That's how the system makes money. It's not actually the

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>inherent value because if it was like or how hard

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you're working, you're cleaner would be paid a lot more

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>than they are. Like the people working the hardest are

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 2>paid the least in this capitalist framework.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 3>And I deep sac that I.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Agree, And similar to you, I love history and so

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I look back and I think, was there a system

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it better? And what I struggle with is

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read about a system that did, And I'm like,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>can we make a new like is conscious capitalism even possible.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I think, like the Scandinavian countries are onto something, but

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 2>then there's also like the Gnaudic paradox, the fact that

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 2>in that part of the world, even though they have

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of like legal equality and like quality in

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of how people live, they have one of the

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 2>highest rates of interpersonal violence.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, So there's going to be no perfect system.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this version of late state capitalism that we're

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in is not sustainable and it's not producing the outcomes

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>that they want.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 3>But then there is no perfect system.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Like I think they're the dichotomy of like capitalism versus socialism,

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 2>but like I fear between being like a social I'm

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 2>probably a social democrat when it comes down to it, right,

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 2>But like everyone in for us, I'm not here to

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>necessarily argue for a particular system. I just know that

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the system we're currently in is really not working, and

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 2>even people making lots of money feel poor.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'm like, what's that about. That's not sustainable to me?

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think people have turned on celebrity. I'm thirty five

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>years old. I share that to share the time I

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>grew up and celebrity was venerated we were obsessed with celebrity.

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember being at the gym and every woman would

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>have a tabloid magazine, regardless of class or anything. And

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>when I moved to LA in twenty thirteen, the capital

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of celebrity, people were still upsets. And then something shifted.

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't point to necessarily the moment. Why do you

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think we no longer venerate celebrity.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 3>It's been demystified.

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, there was a time to see a person's baby,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>the rollout of a celebrity baby.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 3>It's a magazine exclusive and maybe a TV exclusive.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>You used to get me in a million dollars to yours,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and you had to go down the road and buy

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a magazine to see that. Like, there are very limited

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>ways of being able to access celebrity, so you could

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 2>really create this theater of like Michael Jackson, right and

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>like people collapsing it concerts tools. These people are so inaccessible.

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 2>But in the age of like Instagram, celebrities have made

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 2>themselves so accessible and like anybody can kind of mean it.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>We have influencer celebrity. There's streamers who are like huge

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that maybe we've never heard of, losing like the boundaries

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 2>of like the old culture of celebrity.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>They've been demystified.

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Now there are still a few from ID say, like

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the old God like I say, a Tom Cruise beyond

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>say our Superstars, but they came from a different era.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift again came from a different era, and they

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 2>are the last of that way. There is still some

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of mythos around them, and you're just like, how

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 2>do I get into this person?

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that you said myth those because I was

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this so much. The American dream is a mythology. Yeah,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a story, and it's the reason that so many people,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>even people who live in countries like the Nordic countries

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that have decent state of living, if not great state

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of living, still want to come here. Is that idea

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and in reality, only eight percent of people have class

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>mobility here. It is literally a mythology. It is so

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>rare that it actually happens to people, and the story

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of celebrity has domined. I didn't think about that.

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, you know, everyone talks about that Andy

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Warhol about like there's a future where everyone's going to

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 2>be famous for fifty minutes, fifteen minutes, which is remarkably

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>like him being like this kind of futurist in that sense,

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think the influencer economy like being this incredible business.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>And then also I'd say, like the Kardashians really collapsed

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>for celebrity. It's right because it's just like, sure, you

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 2>may have this celebrity who as a publicist and the

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 2>studio system and a stylist and the whole team around them,

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 2>but they can't necessarily compare to a girl that can

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 2>just do it get ready with me and get a

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 2>million youths and like stopify or whatever it is. It's

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 2>generating like one hundreds of thousand dollars a month. Like, yeah,

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the direct to consumer girl of like an Alex Earl,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>who the whole appeal to her is is like, this

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is somebody I think I'd be in the sorty bit, right,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>This is somebody I know and admire, but she probably

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be my friend because I'm not tall enough. But

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I can access her with my phone and that just

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>gets eyed. And she's on the same platform as you're on. Garge,

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 2>pristine celebrity, Like they're all occupying the safe space. They're

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>all on laptop, they're all on Instagram and so what

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is the currency of celebrity if you are on the

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>same platform as my favorite influencer who is just some

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>stay at home mom with her two kids, you know

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, like just the kind of mundanity of

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 2>it that these are just regular people living in regular lives.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 2>We make lots of money and you're alongside a celebrity.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>The only thing that actually makes a celebrity stand out now,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I will actually say is if you have obscene well

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of money, like the celebrities with money,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>then you're like, well, this is still a celebrity, even

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>though there's pertny celebrities who don't have money as we don't.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 3>You're right.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to ask you if there's any

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>celebrity that you think is celebrity.

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 3>In well, what would you say as well?

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay, tell me if you think I could add or

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 4>subtract everything.

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think instinctually they are like in the majority

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>sense or well regarded maybe it's a better word. Their

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>work feels authentic to them. They're working consistently, and maybe

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the mythology aspect, they've created some sort of mythology.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who does, because I think part of

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>what doing it well is in this era is also

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 2>managing to be somewhat neutral, you know, where everything is

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>very politicized, right, not rocking the boat.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you have.

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Created this big tent where people have like different ideologies

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>can feel like I can still be a fan of you.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I think there are brands that do that. I think

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Housewives says that.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Really well, like if the Real Housewives universe was a

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>sinking a person, because they have a very diverse audience

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.959
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how they vote, how they live racially,

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>like you see Bravo con It's all sorts of people

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>like gender and sexuality. I think Doja cats and being

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 2>an anti celebrity is very interesting.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're right now.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because she's like she.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Kind of doesn't like her fans, like I have that

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>fans and I just have to exist. But my music,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I think some of the you know, younger millennial, the

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 2>gen Z girl that kind of figuring out something a

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 2>bit different, like Olivia Rodrigo, I think is really good

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 2>at that, you know, But in terms of like millennials,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 2>no one immediately comes to mind.

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw Jennifer Lopez a few years ago. She was

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like releasing her album and came online and said something

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>about like if you vote or do X, Y and Z, like,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll send you a poster. And I was like, is

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this ninety ninety like who is right? And I love Bela,

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but who is right?

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 3>A poster?

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, there's this whole old school of

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like machine yeah, built around people like her that just

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>does not work anymore. And I think that was part

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of the backlash against her that maybe wasn't warranted.

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>But I think she's like a great in terms of

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 2>a celebrity animal. I think her ability to just endure.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm always impressed and taken by those type of celebrities

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 2>who like can be distinct era and still feel really relevant,

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 2>because not everyone can do that, and I think Jennifer

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Lopez does it really well. I think he also does

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 2>that really well. I think Mariah Carey has done that

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 2>really well. Like there's certain women really great at that,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>whereas other people like when the digital thing happened and yeah,

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously streaming destroyed fetch of your business of

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>your musician, like yeah, you're no longer sending CDs and

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the ability to like pivot, I hate that word. There's

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 2>some celebrities were.

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Better at doing that than others.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a theory on that. Okay, the three people

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you named are pop stars. There's like a pop star

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>element in each of them. And I think women and music,

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly pop stars their mindset from the beginning because of

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>people like Diana Ross and Madonna are like, I have

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to reinvent every single album, so they're used to the

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>reinvention and an actor wants to be themselves. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's true, and I think it's hard.

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think Will Smith is somebody that did it well.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't respect social media.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Whatever he does his social media with him, and I

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 2>think We'll Smith has always been someone that has been

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>able to like, you know, from rappers, serious actor obviously, yeah,

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 2>fresh princes and like he's very good at the Internet,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and not all celebrities are.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good point. You wrote that Lauren Sanchez

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>might be one of the most important pop culture figures

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty five. Yeah, so curious why. Well, I

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's.

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Because she kind of with this marriage right, lives at

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the intersection of pop culture, het and celebrity in a

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>way that most people don't recognize because they look at

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>her and it's like this trope of like they think

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>she's a bimbo because perhaps she loves so she's got

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a classic surgery. It doesn't help. Like she's wearing lingerie

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 2>at the inauguration and do you know what I mean?

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>But she's kind of become this big moments this year,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that going to space turning like Gelking and eighth arianso astronauts.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 3>That was all her.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>She kind of breaks the internet with her wedding and

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 2>then has this digital Vogue cover shortly afterwards, co chairing

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the met Bala, hosting Christiana's party, these events that like everyone.

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Watching even though they don't want to watch, and.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>She liked that enging behind it all because Jeff Bezos

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't have that image with his formal wife. And I

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 2>think she was the one that's like, I understand how

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to get you into places that you maybe wouldn't otherwise be.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm fraided with the poor people that you want to

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 2>be around. But it's shifting pop culture, Like the met

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>vala thing is major being announced as a sponsor and

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 2>her name is on it. It's like Jeff Bezos and

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Laurence Sanchius Bezos. There's rumors like firing Berg or what's

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>happening next. But I think just especially through her husband's

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 2>influence of just owning the Washington Post boundary of Amazon,

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>it's very rare that we see a woman being able

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to harness somebody else's power and make it about themselves.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>With also shift culture, and I think it does affect

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>how people realize she's Latina in this moment of like

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a real aggressive I think anti Latino sentiment in this

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 2>country because the powers associated with immigration. One of the

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 2>most visible women and the most wealthiest women in this

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 2>country by function of who she's married, is a Latin woman,

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and that that pot me something that I find is

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 2>very interesting. And I'm not into like representation in politics.

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very pollwed. So I think those types

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>of seeming contradictions, for instance, are interesting to me.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about marriage a few months ago and

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>my therapy w I heard about it and she was like, well,

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>there's still this element of because we live in a

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>petherword patriarchy, eno like, we live in a patriarchal society,

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that heterosexual marriage still represents proximity to power, and so

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the excitement around engagement and marrying is like, oh, this

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>person with power has chosen to be with me. Therefore

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I have more power, and I know marriage is about

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>more than just that.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's a good way to put it.

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought of it because you said she's one of

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the wealthiest and most powerful people by proximity of who

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 1>she married. We're in this moment of I think, deciding

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what fourth wave feminism is, and she's an interesting character

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in it.

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean she's married pretty independent of that, very

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 2>like accomplished and interesting woman.

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Like she's a plot and she.

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Owns he's a news anchor, news anchor like, so she's

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 3>on it. Like h's intelligent woman. He's an intelligent man.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>But I think as an operator, what she's been able

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to do and witnessing it is very interesting to me

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>because they're all strategic moves that have had like pop

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 2>cultural implications, and then you're looking at I think the

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Met Gala sponsorship was interesting to me because you know,

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Bezos is interested in culture with a small sea, whether

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 2>it's like ad and the movies, the secotcetera, that it's

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 2>very small sea culture. But with the Met Museum as

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>culture of the big sea, that's a completely different profile

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 2>of philanthropy and type of person and that overlapped me

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 2>with the pop and with culture, you know, with a

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 2>big scene. I'm like, this is a fascinating book.

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>You talk a lot about soft power. It's actually a

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>phrase that a bird, but I didn't know too well

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>until I started reading your substack. What's the biggest misconception

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>people have about soft power?

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 3>So, like hard power is like international relations, it's like

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>nuclear weapons, Like do I have bombs?

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Do I have nuclear weapons? Do I have like the

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>economic means to enforce those things? Like people, We're going

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 2>to go to wa tomorrow, and it's like who has

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the guns and the bombs?

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Who's winning this thing?

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Right? So it's hard towers like Russia, it's China, it

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 2>is the US. Soft power is.

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 3>A bit different, right, it's staying in a very lazy

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 3>and crude way.

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like these intangible cultural cache that can spread influence, right,

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 2>and a great arm of that is someone call it propaganda,

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 2>But like it's the film, the music, the fashion, all

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of these things change how the world sees you. You

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 2>don't have to use the group four to that, like

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to invade you and bomb you. You can

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 2>actually like launch invasion through the art you Max.

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a good example, tell me how the Armory will

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sponsor movies like Top Gun and it increases people wanting

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in the.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Arty or even like there's a real history in American

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 2>television that's intensified after nine eleven of the way you.

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Depict your enemies.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>How do you make Muslim appear on screen? Or you know,

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 2>like so you had the trope of the Brown Terroists,

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>which is something that you see again in a game.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 2>In American television and film, that's also a way of

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 2>deploying soft power. How you make through adversities, you look

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 2>through entertainment. And so when I talk about soft how

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>I talk about like us having an incredible amount of

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 2>soft power, like Hollywood being this great machine and it's

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 2>worked since I think post World War two have like

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, the Americans recre know what I mean?

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 2>The Americans make great stuff, like you know, growing up

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 2>like the boy band way all the boy band and

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the girl bands, it all came from me. And suff

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 2>was great for America's international brand because it's something to

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 2>be said where your most beloved artist is from America.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's slightly shifting now, but it's going to

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 2>take a while, but America still has an incredible amount

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of stock power influenced in terms of just like a stalcual.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Exports, who do you see making waves?

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I think Kim Kardashian and Mega Markel.

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You always say they're the same person.

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to get into that, then we get

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>in trouble. I think they are speaking to each other

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 2>in a way that I find interesting. Similar bit different,

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think that as an export, like the royal

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 2>family wanted to launder her reputation for that too, But

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>a biracial woman who's married into this institution that has

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of problems, which is great for perhaps rehabilitating

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>their image, didn't work out like that. But Mega markles

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>beloved around the world, whether people like it or not,

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and part of that is because she appears to be ambiguous,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 2>so a lot of people can map themselves onto her

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 2>in a similar way to Kim Kardashian, who can pass

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 2>as many things and has kind of passed as many

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 2>things in her career quite cynically. So my feeling is

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 2>like these are very powerful soft power America has at

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 2>his disposal, but that's kind of changing. They're coming from

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 2>different parts of all while I think, do you think.

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>There's a powerful cultural lie that women are being told

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the trad wife stuff is I mean, it's

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 2>just dumb, like, no man is going to take care

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 2>of you for that long unless you's getting something out

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of it. Men only do things that it's good for themselves,

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 2>because the things everyone should do things for their good

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 2>for themselves.

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think this idea that, in an attempt to

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of escape the horrors of capitalism, which are bad,

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 2>women do not enjoy being in the work for I

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 2>meet very few women who love their work, right, and

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 2>often when you have children, that intensifies. You're like, I'm

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 2>doing this shop, I'm stuck in the middle management, I've

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 2>hit the glass ceiling.

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be here. I want to be

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 3>at home, right, And so I.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Think what the tad wife movement is doing is kind

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 2>of speaking to that overall burnout.

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 2>And Helen Peterson, who's brilliant, she's on Patreon, she writes

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 2>about that a lot in her work and culture study,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 2>and it's just this idea that women aren't burnt out,

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>women hired and what the Tria life image does it

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.439
<v Speaker 2>sells this fantasy or is to retreat into your home,

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>which I mean, I hate to cook. I'm never gonna cook,

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 2>but I would love to be table scaping all day

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and like doing dinner parties.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 3>And there is something whim's support about that fantasy.

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>But it is a fantasy, but it feels like a

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>compelling fantasy when you're on your phone and you're like

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 2>seeing Nara Smith even though she's performing as this thing,

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, maybe this is something I can have too.

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think that is the biggest like because you

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 2>never see old tradwives, right because the man diforces to.

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You, finds a young train you, or he.

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Finds like the fun girl he always wants, like you know,

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the lie of like the Good Girls. Tadwife is just

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 2>like women should just be themselves, like all of these

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 2>tropes that they sell us just they don't ever serve us.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Just to be yourself. But I think that's a.

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Big thing that a lot of women are buying into,

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 2>especially gen Z women millennial women of my age are

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>just like, Okay, maybe if I can just find a

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 2>man to take care of me, or one woman.

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I notice said, why not does it have one boss

0:40:58.600 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 3>instead of ten.

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I think is a lie, and I think long term

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people may regret the decision if they

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 2>women who are choosing that, because very few men can

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 2>be trusted.

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Also, and tell me what you think about this. Something

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I hear a lot is that, specifically gen Z women

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>will say I am not a feminist and they don't

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be feminist because they say, like, I want

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a man to open the door for me, and I

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>want a man who will pay for dinner or help

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 1>make me a trad Wise, if I want to stay

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at home, they say, I want to be a Lululemon

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>mom or a range Rover mom. And what I'm struggling

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>with explaining maybe it's been part of that fantasy because

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>when we got access to the workforce in a real way,

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we didn't diminish any of our tasks at home statistically,

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at least in America, And so women were doing all

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the domestic labor and working outside the home, and they

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>were burnt out and are burnt out. And so I

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>understand the want to have one boss instead of ten,

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know how to explain the other aspects

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 2>And I think when young women say that an abstraction

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 2>to theory, and I think it actually really diminishes what

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 2>stay at home mothers do. It's incredibly hard work, even

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:09.919
<v Speaker 2>if you have money at resources. It makes it maybe

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 2>a bit easier if you have money and resources, but

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 2>it's still really hard. It's twenty four seven. You don't

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 2>get to retire if you assume that role of a homemaker.

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Your husband retires one day, you're still going to have

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 2>to make the home right. So these women are giving

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 2>up an incredible amount, and we glamorize it, and when

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 2>we glamorize it, we diminish how difficult it is. And

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I think you're actually disrespecting the job because I'm like,

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 2>if you really want to be a Lulu Lemon mom,

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>trust me as somebody that has three kids. You're managing schedules,

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>you'll go to titles, you're driving from one part of

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>time to another. The kid is sick, you have to

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 2>be home with it. Sure you're wearing lelu Lemon, but

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 2>you're barely at the gym. If you're trying to be

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 2>a good parent and a good homemaker, it's an incredible sacrifice.

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's kind of this fantasy that is

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 2>just like I'm going to be there with my Stanley

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Cup and then my Lulu Langman and my Aloe Yonga

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 2>and just I'm like, no, I go to bar with

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.800
<v Speaker 2>women who are stay at home mothers and it's like

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 2>they're one treat in the depth. They're like that brief

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 2>out and then they're dashing off and they're like, oh,

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I can only do this now because my youngest is

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 2>in the elementary school, because before that, I was completely

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 2>devoted to the home. So I think it's a way

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of like undermining the work that women who are working

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>within the home are doing in a way. I'm not

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>a say of a mother, but I have friends who are,

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 2>and they are incredible and it's really hard. So it's

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you're indulging in a fantasy. And secondly, you're not acknowledging

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the risks of that decision.

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 3>It is for risks.

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'm like, if you are going to do it,

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 2>make sure you have a husband that contributes to you.

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm an account has stuffing, writing, et cetera, et cetera.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>So should it go left, you're still taking care of

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 2>because you are contributing to your household and you should

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 2>have some sort of tangible benefits. It's like this world

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 2>where you do everything for a man, including raising his children,

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and you're paying for it in some way, it just

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:53.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't exist.

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting to me is I have a friend who's

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a woman who sort of had the opposite experience.

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 4>Divorced her husband. She was working the whole time.

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have a prenup and she had to pay him,

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and she was like, I can't believe I have to

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>pay this, like do nothing.

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I would to kill myself.

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I had to like think about my gender expectation.

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's happening. I know women paying aliba, they'll

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 3>be careful, I know, but.

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>We think about it differently because women are contributing at home.

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>The man usually the last.

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 2>When is like, if you are a man under the patriarchy,

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you should be making more money than me.

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 3>So what is wrong with you that I am paying you?

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 3>You can fail? Like the system is? This is so funny.

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not into you know, this lonely man epidemic like

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone's talking about like feels I'm like, the world is

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 2>set up for you succeed a baby.

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 3>You're not managing to do that? Really, what is wrong

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 3>with you?

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>But I feel bad for them?

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Why then don't feel bad for you.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I know they don't feel bad for me at all.

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Why do you feel back for that?

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think when there's such a large group of people

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that are struggling, like something is going wrong and I

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see them struggle.

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 2>But the data is showing that the group struggling most

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 2>in America right now, black women lost the most jobs.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Like if you look at the statistics, like all the

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 2>data indicates like this idea that there is like this

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 2>lost boy, struggling man in a pandemic. But when you

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 2>really dig into their data, who was pushed out of

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the workforce post COVID those mothers who became caretakers, right,

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and then a lot of those women never went back

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 2>to the workplace, whereas men are in the workplace.

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 3>So some of it is like this men.

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 2>However, there are men among us who are struggling for

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 2>different reasons. But you are struggling because of the patriarchy,

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So help us take it down, right? I think interesting

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 2>feminism has an answer to that question because feminism has

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 2>always been concerned about the liberation of all people, including men.

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Because they see the patriarchy damage is me, We're like, yeah,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the idea that you can't cry.

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 3>And you have to hide your feelings. You're supposed to

0:45:58.920 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 3>be like this.

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 2>That's not good, that's not healthy. I'm a woman, so

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 2>we have an answer to that question. We're trying to

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 2>create a world and a future, but that doesn't exist.

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, I'm raising my son. I hope he

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 2>are feminist when he grows up. I don't know if

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 2>he will be. But like, also, my son's very creative.

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 2>He likes pats, you know, he likes music. I'm allowing

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.439
<v Speaker 2>him face to do that. And I want a world

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 2>where my son and my daughters can thrive. However, I

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 2>know just by the nature and the mechanisms of this world, yeah,

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 2>it's set up in a way that it's easier for

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 2>my son to thrive. Or if my daughter makes different choices,

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.359
<v Speaker 2>she's couldn't be judged for them, Like if my daughters

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 2>grow up and decide to be child three.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I know women who feel that they're not trusted because

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 3>they don't have kids.

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:41.959
<v Speaker 2>But then if you do have kids, you take a career,

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 2>knot whereas when men's wives have children their salaries to

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 2>go up.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 3>How can we feel sorry for these men? Dan?

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, I know I agree with you. I mean in

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the workplace one hundred percent. I guess it's less about

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>men and it's more about the suffering of people. And

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, not a zero sum game. And I think

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for years you were right to your point, like feminists

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>been saying we want a quality for all, and I

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 1>see the human suffering. Maybe I got into the mythology

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Scott Galloway.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Women are suffering way more. I would say, I don't

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 2>like oppression Olympic stuff. I think suffering is valid. And

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 2>even when we speak about men, we can't treat them

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:17.280
<v Speaker 2>as a monolith.

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>The experience of a young gay boy in certain parts

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of this country, like there's a cute suffering. If you're

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in the Bible Belt and you're gay, sure you're about

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to be a man.

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 3>But if you have an intersectional lens, you know, like

0:47:30.760 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 3>even what.

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, the closer you are the femininity, the more we

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>hate you exactly.

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Well we know that like among black men and police brutality.

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 2>So I'm being flippant, but it's just like even when

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 2>we dig into men, say, wle, men have certain experiences,

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 2>You're are divergent. Men have certain experiences, So there are

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 2>men that are oppressed to So I'm like, you know,

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 2>from a completely structural perspective, I acknowledge that, and I

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 2>feel that we need to create a world, but it

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 2>makes it easier for them. However, I don't necessarily like

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 2>buy into this refrain that I think media and culture

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 2>are selling us now, like we have to be so

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 2>concerned with these lost boys and men, and I'm like,

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 2>but what about the women who haven't even solved for

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 2>that yet?

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 3>And then we're worse off. That's kind of my art.

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So Dick Cheney was famously anti LGBTQ for years until

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>his daughter came out as a lesbian and he switched

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>his position. And I think about that all the time

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because oftentimes people who like don't want to deal with

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the words of patriarchy and oppression and all the buzzwords

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in our culture right now are people who haven't had

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to have the experience of being part of any of

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>those groups. What do you say to the person listening

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.919
<v Speaker 1>who's like, I'm exhausted by the buzzwords.

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am too expletely relatable, Like these words are

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 2>accurate descriptions, but like, you know, I speak about it

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of my work about how this has been

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of this trafficking of academic language. It's very rich

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and very important, and it's made its way until I've

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 2>like general cultural lexicon in a way that like people

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 2>of resisting right. And sometimes it's because maybe the way

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 2>those ideas are expressed, no one likes to be spoken down.

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:08.720
<v Speaker 3>It's just not a nice experience.

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 2>If you hear somebody using this new term and they're

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 2>telling me you're a bad person and you don't even

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:16.439
<v Speaker 2>know the term. There's this reflexive like get that away

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:18.839
<v Speaker 2>from me, and I think we're living in the backlash

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 2>to that. But words mean things, and it's always good

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.319
<v Speaker 2>to learn new words and we use them the right way.

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 2>They can actually be like real tools of connection.

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean. I don't use the word gentrification.

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll actually explain it it.

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll be like, yeah, rental rising because people with more

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 2>money are moving into this neighborhood. Because once you say gentrification,

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 2>people go, oh, I don't want to hear it. But

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 2>if you say it like that, it's like very legible

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to people. So I'm sick of the over use of

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 2>the words. But I also think the words are really important.

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just like, how do we use these terms and

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 2>do we use them in a way that it feels

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 2>accessible to people and people could understand and people are like, okay, now.

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 3>I can use that word, right, So it's not other

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:57.319
<v Speaker 3>in some way, it's not other in someone.

0:49:57.400 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a definition.

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 3>It's just a definition. That's what all are.

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Because what often happens is then you take the word

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and you start using it as a slurp, like di

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 2>starting calling people deis, And it's just like it's been

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 2>weaponized in a way that I find really sad, right,

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 2>because if you look at like the intention behind it,

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 2>it's like I was just like making a more inclusive

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:20.720
<v Speaker 2>well where more of us can work and be happy

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and our workplaces are more comfortable for everyone, but it

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 2>went less.

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So I understand that.

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Fatigued with the words, I'm just like, okay, how can

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 2>we find a way to add cultural thinkers or pseudo

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 2>academics like myself being like less pretentious? Right, And then

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 2>people like feel like, okay, I can get into this.

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't necessarily use this word usually, but oh this

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 2>is helpful. This is helping me understand the phenomenon that

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 2>exists in everyday life.

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the best reply. I've broken that as well, said, yeah, okay,

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 1>do some twenty twenty six pop culture predictions for it years?

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we're heading into a more un hopeful

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>year or a more chaotic culturally speaking?

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:13.319
<v Speaker 2>I think people's appetite that chaos is waiting, Like people

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 2>are really fatigue. So I see people being drawn to

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 2>things that are like more kind of hopeful, upworthy. Remember

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 2>that website. I see people leaning more into that because

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 2>it's just the algorithm's version of just like AOL sort of.

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:29.919
<v Speaker 3>I do think you've got to tie it so there'll

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 3>be more.

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there a cultural conversation that we've been avoiding that

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you think will erupt this year?

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know which one it will be, but I

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 2>think humans were very weird, like we like to zoning

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 2>on one thing. I think there's going to be a

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 2>new frontier of whatever the cultural war is supposed to be.

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what it is going to be, but

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 2>it feels like something's coming.

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think we're underestimating about AI's effect on culture.

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that people don't realize that.

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe its because I have a lot of mum friends

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm in a group with three of my closest friends

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 2>in high school, and they can't stand because every time

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 2>they use AI, I'm.

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Like judging them. I'm like, girls, what is wrong with you?

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Stop it?

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 2>But I'm realizing as a tool, it's like something that

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 2>people are really integrating into their everyday life. So even me,

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 2>who's kind of like an AI skeptic, I'm like, oh,

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 2>this is like a habit that's become embedded in a

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 2>way that, like, you know, when Alexa first came into

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the homes, you were just like, oh, that's weird. You're

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 2>not going to be like, Alexa, what's the time. But

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:24.879
<v Speaker 2>now you're like, wait, Coop, You're like, Alexa, what's the time?

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Alexa? Can you play this song for me?

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think we're underestimating how much it's already becoming

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 2>part of people's daily routine. And it's beyond like cheating

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to write essays. But I think that's what everyone talks about.

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It's just like people are using it as like an

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.320
<v Speaker 2>adjunct tool to make their lives easier.

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm becoming increasingly dependent on How do.

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You think the political climate of twenty twenty six is

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going to shape pop culture?

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that for the last year there's been a

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 2>real nervousness about making art that is hostile to this administration.

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 2>The fear of life I have you show me and

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 2>taking off air, losing track, like there's real fear. I

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 2>think the death of Charlie Kirk was a really instructive

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 2>moment about like what can people say it?

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Now? Do people say it?

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 2>But I think in the coming year there's going to

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 2>be a lot of irreverence because that's where the movie

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:16.320
<v Speaker 2>is going. Because even within the camp that's favorable to

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 2>the current administration, there's a lot of fracturing, like they

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 2>don't all feel the same. Like there's a lot of

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 2>infighting now, and I think that infighting is going to

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 2>create a space. But like people like oh, I could

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 2>say what I want, I'm going to do what I

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 2>want because the people that would police me and try

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.439
<v Speaker 2>and get me canceled, you know, like the reverse cancel

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 2>culture whatever you would have caught it, they're fighting.

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I see that happening already.

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:53:35.560 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's just more irreverence and it's just

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 2>making art that is perhaps more I don't know, punk,

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's the influence of like AI because

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 2>now it needs to feel human and tangible, and it

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 2>needs to feel different, and so you're just going to

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 2>make things that are like irreverent, provocative and just feel

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 2>like real.

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:57.320
<v Speaker 1>A twenty four is like a well known production company

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and they make a lot of mainstream indie films for

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone listening who's not familiar, and they've been around for

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a while, but they're having such a moment and I

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's because of that feels human, right, feels real.

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's gritty, Yeah, pretty Okay. You write that there's a

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>popular theory among a certain type of critic that we're

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in a time of cultural stasis. Yes, what does that mean?

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, I'm going to cite W. David Mark.

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 2>He's written a book called A Blank Space, which I'm

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 2>reading right now, which is great.

0:54:23.560 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 3>And you're just talking about like how we got to

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 3>this point.

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Where all the stars, all the thing, like, nothing seemed

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to have changed for the last fifteen years. We went

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:31.320
<v Speaker 2>back fifteen years and were like, who are all the

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:34.319
<v Speaker 2>famous people? They are all the famous people today. There's

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 2>this idea that culture, particularly culture is the evolving and

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 2>growing and we're not seeing any new stars and new genres.

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 2>It's everything so derivative. I do think that's happened, like

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 2>I think it's changing. I think people want something new.

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And the way I don't see changing is like the

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 2>influence of space. They all look the same. I'm to

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the point where I can't tell my influences apart. I

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you feel that way.

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 1>All the ones I follow are wearing the same spec

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And I.

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Want to search somebody's handle because you know, sometimes you

0:54:57.239 --> 0:54:58.839
<v Speaker 2>follow someone who you like to get their names.

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 3>They want to get their name because.

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you're like, oh, i'd like this person. TikTok isn't

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 2>showing them to me anything. Yeah, I like to a

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 2>dog or whatever it is. But you're like, what's their name?

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.319
<v Speaker 2>And back in the day, I knew all the greatest things,

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:12.399
<v Speaker 2>like I knew their handles off here and I could

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 2>type it onto YouTube.

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 3>I knew where to fan.

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 2>But now like maybe it's cause also TikTok is not

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:21.360
<v Speaker 2>a chronological experience. The flow isn't there. But it's just

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 2>like I don't remember anyone's names. It's just like it's

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 2>this kind of monoculture and the influencer. So I think

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.799
<v Speaker 2>in the influencial world. It'll stay like that, yeah, because

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the algorithm kind of needs that. But I think in

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 2>music and in fashion, I see a bit, you know.

0:55:35.520 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 3>More texture and change.

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think celebrities will get more political or retreat

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>from politics in twenty twenty six?

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 2>You can be political without being ideological. For instance, homelessness,

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 2>it feels like a political foruse. I just don't think there.

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Should be people on the street like we need better housing.

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a political cause, but it's not ideological, right, And

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 2>so I think people align themselves more like political pauses

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:02.040
<v Speaker 2>like homelessness and feeding the needy and food back, you know,

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:04.319
<v Speaker 2>stuff that it is just like political causes, but can

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:07.919
<v Speaker 2>extensively to be seeing as ideological neutral. I think people

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:10.760
<v Speaker 2>are going to wear their ideology less and less because

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people don't know what to

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 2>believe and they're afraid to be identified as either left

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 2>or right, you know. But I think celebrities will continue

0:56:18.640 --> 0:56:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to embrace pauses you can't get in trouble, for like

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:22.479
<v Speaker 2>cat fostering dogs.

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:24.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, dogs like oh, dop the dog, and if I

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:26.319
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, I love that, everyone loves the dogs.

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, So I think there's going to be more of

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the cause stuff that feels vaguely political but it's not ideological.

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to be more into celebrity or less

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:37.840
<v Speaker 2>more into celebrity because I think people just have this

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 2>yearning to worship something, and we know our civic institutions

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 2>are going you know, people don't go.

0:56:44.239 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 3>To like temple cynical churches anymore. Like you need that

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 3>need to like venerate and gather still exists. I think

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 3>they'll be like more club shallamaings, but.

0:56:53.320 --> 0:56:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Making fan clubs, so that makes sense, Like the fang

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 2>crub is going to come and to have the ban crub,

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:01.360
<v Speaker 2>you need the celebrity to be a fan, you know.

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:01.680
<v Speaker 3>What I mean.

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I know this contidence my argument about the downfall of celebrity,

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 2>but I think that will return well.

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Because there's community in it. Yeah, which people are crazy.

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Or meet up around a person, you know what I mean.

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So great because I want to meet someone who has

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a similar interest.

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Interests, right, So I think that celebrities are like a

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 2>great wonduit for that being like, oh, we're all into

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:27.160
<v Speaker 2>this celebrity or all into this band, and we're like

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the fan club of that in this town, and we're

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 2>going to meet up at this coffee shop once a

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 2>month because what we're a fan of this. I think

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:36.920
<v Speaker 2>people had that need for real work connection and celebrities

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:39.240
<v Speaker 2>are a great device to do that because I've made

0:57:39.280 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 2>so many friends because of like, oh, we all have

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 2>housewives or born into Beyonce.

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 3>We're going to see that.

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Beyonce, I know you're a fan.

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm a great, big fan.

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You've said that we might be seeing the beginning of

0:57:50.720 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce's farewell to her fans lay out the other Christian.

0:57:54.840 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's just a function of she's

0:57:57.080 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 2>getting older, right, And I don't know how your parents are,

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 2>but I'm looking for my parents and aging and my

0:58:01.640 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 2>dad retired this year, and you're just like, I'm getting older, right,

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 2>And so the time you like tall Air sing, there's

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 2>that element of it. I think that she's laying out

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 2>these acts and action Free is coming, and that feels like,

0:58:13.680 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, she's very intentional. I think, so the three

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 2>of those albums are supposed to be experienced together. And

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:22.040
<v Speaker 2>then I'm just like, it feels like a Vegas residency.

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 2>It feels like a retirement tour, going to Cowboy Tater,

0:58:25.200 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 2>going to that tour and like how much archival footage

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 2>there was from her childhood. I was like it felt

0:58:31.040 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 2>like the beginning of a third Well. I think she's

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 2>always going to exist, kind of going to be like

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a Diana Ross. And the remarkable thing about Beyonce is

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 2>that she's been you know, famous for decades that she's

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 2>still not a legacy act. You're like a contemporary act

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:45.640
<v Speaker 2>that like changes culture. She's exiting state but doing it

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 2>very gracefully on her terms.

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Reality TV is not dying, it's definitely mutating. What's it

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:51.479
<v Speaker 1>mutating into?

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 2>The new frontier seems to be like the tip top blog,

0:58:55.240 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the YouTube blog, as almost people self producing their reality shirts. Yeah,

0:59:00.760 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether it's like a weight loss journey, whether

0:59:03.760 --> 0:59:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a grief journey, whether it's like moving to another

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:09.360
<v Speaker 2>part of the world. It's kind of like self produced

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 2>reality TV. That feels a bit different from a vlog

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 2>because they're kind of borrowing like reality TV, they're not

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 2>filming themselves. It's like they actually have like mini crews almost,

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:23.840
<v Speaker 2>like especially like the more professionalized family blogs that just

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:26.919
<v Speaker 2>feel like now I'm not watching a reality TV show.

0:59:27.000 --> 0:59:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Immediately, I may be like.

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Let me go on TikTok and watch this series on

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 2>like who the fuck did I marry? Or The Danish Deception,

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 2>or like you know, when people tell their true life stories,

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 2>it kind of feels like the reality TV vacation the

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 2>New Frontier of it, and you're like, Okay, I'd rather

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 2>watch that because it's so compelling rather than like another

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 2>episode of reality TV where you just know someone's gonna

0:59:48.120 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 2>throw a drink.

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>The celebrity apology. What's the new PR playbook.

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:56.360
<v Speaker 2>It's doing an interview, We're going to reference an actress

0:59:56.440 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 2>who won't mention Okay, well you kind of vaguely APOLOGI,

1:00:00.760 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 2>but you were an outright apologize. I have a friend

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 2>who's like very anti celebrity apologies. He's just like they're

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 2>just the most stupid thing, because he's like, who are

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 2>you apologizing to? Like, if you did something to a

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>person personally, you should apologize to that person. She's like

1:00:15.440 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>apologizing to the massive ever works because when she was mad.

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think celebrities are probably going to be more

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>careful to avoid being the situation where you need to

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>issue that kind of apology because they never really were.

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump changed it too, because he's anti apology. It's just

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like teft one.

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you keep going, there's something to it. And then

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>people are like, you're breaking the social norm. Okay, what

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 3>can we do? Nothing?

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Will we cancel The concept of cancel culture, you.

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Know, it was always kind of overstated.

1:00:42.320 --> 1:00:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I think like the first or instance online was like

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the Justin Saccho, like the playing feet that went out

1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and you know, she lost her job, but in the

1:00:50.480 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>end she got her job again, which I think was

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>like instructive of like what cancel culture is. Kevin Spacey

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>recently spoke at the Oxford Union. Time has always shown

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that these people that were cancer figured it out eventually.

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Those curious to see if Dinny does that, oh I.

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Think he will.

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>He will do Yeah, he's still got fanser society.

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Re enter society. I think.

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Have you watched the documentary, so you see those scenes

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>where people know he's probably going to be arrested soon

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>and they still want to take pictures with him. And

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>they've seen the Cassie video. Remember all these people asking

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the pictures with they were all men.

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They were all men because women see that video. I

1:01:26.400 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>almost didn't watch the doc because I was like, I

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>can't see but.

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 2>You talk to women offline and if you look in

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>the comments, if you look in the comments at women

1:01:34.600 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that I like he was there, like you know that

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>feeling that like, oh, there's a guy called Armon Wiggins

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>is one of the bloggers. He followed the trial and

1:01:42.960 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>he said something interesting was like people just see it

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>as luxury abuse and kind of everyone gets abuse and

1:01:48.440 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you've got the luxury, you know, Like, I think there

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is an element of that, and then you obviously the settlement.

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that there is a world where did he

1:01:56.400 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>rehabilitates himself and says he the family man does church

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>and that's forgiveness and there is going to be a

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>part of Hollywood in the mold of the world.

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>You're just like, yeah, yeah, if you're back. I mean,

1:02:06.760 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Oja was able to come back.

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, there's a rapid fire. Okay, who's the most interesting

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>person in culture right now?

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>To you?

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Sanchez Fass a celebri public figure that people underestimate.

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Sidney Sweeney, a celebrit public figure people overestimate Sydney Sweeney.

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:27.240
<v Speaker 4>What's your most controversial pop culture opinion?

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Lopez is probably one of the most masterfully delusional

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and wonderful entertainments we've ever seen.

1:02:34.520 --> 1:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The smartest decision that you've ever made, marrying something that

1:02:37.960 --> 1:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>every woman should try once.

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm so boring. I haven't tried anything.

1:02:42.360 --> 1:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to have tried it yourself.

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I have shrewths. Apparently they say I'm too scared

1:02:48.320 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>to do it, but I've been told true.

1:02:50.280 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So many people have said drugs is the answer to

1:02:52.440 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that question. What's the most radical thing you've ever done

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for your own life that has nothing to do with work?

1:02:58.080 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, choosing to have three kids that you.

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Were going to say moving to la I love your answer.

1:03:02.200 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Why is it radical?

1:03:03.320 --> 1:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Because I knew what it would perhaps do to my life,

1:03:06.320 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>like the kind of unsettling. But I did it anyway.

1:03:09.600 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I could see it wouldn't be easy. I did it anyway.

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's a radical thing because normally, yes,

1:03:15.480 --> 1:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the conservative choice is like the path of least resistance

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>versus the radical choice is like the thing it's hard

1:03:22.000 --> 1:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight.

1:03:23.520 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>What was your cost benefit analysis?

1:03:25.800 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. You have to turn out no, they're great.

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Well part of yourself? Did you have to unlearn to

1:03:31.240 --> 1:03:33.080
<v Speaker 4>become the woman that you are sitting here?

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I had to like let go of needing people to

1:03:37.200 --> 1:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>agree with me.

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:41.439
<v Speaker 2>That's where I'm and to actually let go of I'm

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a very community person and I have very progressive politics,

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and for a long time it was like those bad

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>people over there that have a different view of me.

1:03:52.000 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>And now I realize, in order to be effective and

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe get people to see a different point of view,

1:03:56.800 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I need to be able to connect with people that

1:03:58.800 --> 1:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>are different from me and that they don't actually agree with.

1:04:01.520 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>And that's very hard because that's not how I naturally operate.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 2>But once I was able to get into that mentality,

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>it's just I think mainly a person that has worked

1:04:11.120 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 2>that is actually able to bring lots of different people

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>in a way that I think is made really important.

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It is, and it's rare. You have a very diverse

1:04:18.440 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>fan base.

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they would never get on.

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I have like trumpers, I have Mormon wives, I have

1:04:23.760 --> 1:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>like queer folks, I have like black radical femis. I

1:04:26.720 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>think I have a very broad audience that in theory

1:04:29.760 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>should not get on, but they come back to my

1:04:32.080 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>work and I think we need more of that.

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even like going to com by.

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Our way that I think is unhealthy that kind of

1:04:39.320 --> 1:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Obama perpetuated, but more in a way of just like,

1:04:42.960 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>we need to figure this stuff out, right, So where

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>are the places where there are big tenants and everyone

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>can be under them and just work through the issues

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 2>of our time?

1:04:52.880 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So well said, what's a book that you read that

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>changed your life? Something you think everybody should?

1:04:57.440 --> 1:05:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Really? I always recommend the warmth of other s. Why Isabella?

1:05:02.120 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>She's one of my favorite writers, brilliant. She's British right, No,

1:05:05.640 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>not no, she just lives in London.

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if she lives in London.

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to interview her so many times, and it

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:12.439
<v Speaker 1>seems on her website that she lives.

1:05:14.560 --> 1:05:15.040
<v Speaker 3>That's funny.

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, will you grab the question everything card game and

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>pick whichever card.

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Comes to you. This is not Tara right. My mom

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't like that.

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm prompt. It's just a random question.

1:05:24.120 --> 1:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, do you can't thrive? Will die in your die?

1:05:27.080 --> 1:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I keep alive on my kids barely

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>even succulents dye in my carriage. Yeah yeah, Christiana, I

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>could talk to you for so long, and in the

1:05:35.400 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>interest of your time, I'm going to end the interview.

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But thank you for this.

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:40.479
<v Speaker 3>This has been so fun.

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you know what time it is. Today's a good

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>day to have a good day. I'll see you next

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:51.439
<v Speaker 1>week

1:06:00.680 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Shop sup.