WEBVTT - The Working Family Has Changed. Why Hasn't the Workplace?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy, a majority of households only had one

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>working parent, so the nine five work day made a

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. One parent was always at home with

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the kids. That's not the case anymore, and yet the

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>workplace hasn't changed. This is game Plan. Hi, I'm Rebecca

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Greenfield and I'm Francesco Weevie. This week we're talking about

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>how much the working family has changed in the last

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>few decades and how little the workplace has adapted to

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>those changes. So those statistics I quoted at the top

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the show are from an interesting Pew report that

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>talked all about the changing family in America, and the

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>exact statistic is that of all families have two working parents,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's up from thirty in nineteen seventy. And then

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the share of families with a

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>stay at home mom and a working dad is on

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the decline. So it used to be that most of

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the workforce was men who worked with wives at home

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to take care of the kids, and that is not

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the case anymore. I'm actually kind of surprised that it's

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>only around a fifty split, and popular culture you see

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of representations of two working parents well, interestingly,

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>also on the increase is single parents. I mean, divorce

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>became more prominent and socially acceptable, so that's also on

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the increase. So there are all these different ways that

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the family looks. And also in that report, the parents

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>all talked about how stressed out they were all the

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>time and how they didn't feel like they had enough

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>time for their kids or their careers. So clearly there

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is some disconnect with the way that our society is

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>set up, specifically the workplace, that is leading to these

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>unhappy people in the new family structure. Yeah, let's talk

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about why the modern workplace isn't set

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>up for anything but that super traditional family structure. So

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think one big thing is just the schedule of

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like nine to five, And I mean, I think you

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>can speak to this specifically, but that, like I said,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of sense when someone was at home

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to deal with anything child related or I don't have

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>a family, but doing anything that needs to happen during

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>business hours is impossible. I've been trying to go to

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the post office all week and I just can't write.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Some might argue that if you have two working parents,

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>you've got more income that you can use to cover childcare.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But as you said, like childcare doesn't exactly solve all

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of those problems. You know, my husband and I both

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have to get up and get to work and negotiate

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>dropping our son off at daycare and picking him up,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of recks our mornings and afternoons. I mean,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we've we've we figured it out, but it would be

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>much easier and yes, much less stressful if I knew

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that I could stay a half hour later at work

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and it wouldn't blow up my whole family schedule. Yeah,

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and you and you believe at five pm exactly or

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.399
<v Speaker 1>try to and are lucky enough to work a job

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>where you can do that, and not everyone is that lucky.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, these schedules are particularly hard on women basically because,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>as the Pews Right also found, they tend to still

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>take on more of the childcare duties even if they're

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the ones working. I will plead the fifth on discussing

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>that at length, but I definitely identify. And another thing

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>besides the schedule is something that we've talked about on

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the show before, but the non existence of parental leave.

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Since there's so many more working women now, the reality

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is is that a lot of them are probably going

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to have children and need to work that into their

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>working lives, but most companies still don't offer it. And

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I wrote this story recently about how the rise of

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>parental leave policies is limited to a few high profile companies.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So you saw places like Netflix and Amazon offering really

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>generous paid leave packages, but some research showed that this

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a national trend and that most parental leave policies

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are actually getting worse. I believe that I've heard about

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people I know who are at well known,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>high profile companies that have kind of shockingly bad maternity

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>leave policies, And but we've also talked about how it's

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>not just about even for the companies that do offer

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a significant amount of paid time off, that's almost not enough,

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Like there are ways in which your career can be

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.679
<v Speaker 1>stalled just by taking that time. And reintegrating back into

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the workforce is something everyone sort of expects you to

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>be able to just do without any help or not

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>even that when you do reintegrate back into the workforce,

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there's all this judgment even though it's it's the norm.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So many people are doing it and still there's this

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>motherhood penalty that women have for having children because they're

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>judged as just not as competent workers. Yeah. I don't

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>remember if I told you this anecdote when we did

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>our episode on parental leave a while back, but a

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>colleague once talking to me about another colleague who had

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>taken maternity leave said, sort of conspiratorially, like, can you

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that she didn't call once to check in with

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>her team? Is like, yeah, I can't believe it. She

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>was really busy. Yeah, it's just the workplace still assumes

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that people don't have families at home to deal with, yeah,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and that that's not its own huge responsibility and job

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>rivaling paid work in scope. And so since there are

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.799
<v Speaker 1>these two working parent families, a lot of the child

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>care might also fall on men now, which is something

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the workplace also isn't set up for. So hopefully, if

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>two people are both working, then they're also both shouldering

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the same child care responsibilities. But obviously that doesn't happen.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And one reason also is because fraternity leave is not

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>offered or acceptable. So I was writing a story about

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>women at Adobe who took maternity leave, and multiple women

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>told me that their husbands had the option to have

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>paternity leave and just didn't take it because it's culturally

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>unacceptable because of decades of that just not being the case. Yeah,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>so even and I know we have male colleagues here

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>who didn't take their full paternity leave. And I've also

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>heard men say to me, now, there's not that much

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for the dad to do in the very beginning, and

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking, uh, yeah, there's plenty there, there's plenty

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you can do. Yeah, Okay, So if our work culture

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>is still basically organized around the idea of working dad's

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and stay at home moms, is the solution then for

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>us to return to that era for moms to just

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>be staying home, I know, you know what I mean that.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But also and that Pew study there was the note

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that families with two working parents make a lot more money, obviously,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's money that they need because life is expensive.

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And that also as more moms have entered the labor force,

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>more of them have become the primary breadwinners and their families,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>so they're actually bringing in more of the money, so

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it would make more sense for them to stay in

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the workplace. So we're not going back, We're not turning

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this back. No, okay, So the working woman is obviously

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>here to stay, and as you say, in a lot

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of cases, women are out earning their male partners. Yeah,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and our guest today is going to talk more about

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>how the world is not set up for that phenomenon.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Ford is a senior features writer at Refinery twenty nine,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>where she wrote an article about being a female breadwinner.

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>She interviewed one hundred and thirty women about how they

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>feel about making more than their partners. Thanks for coming on, Ashley,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. I'm really excited about this.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You guys look fun. Thanks. So you wrote this great

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>article about female breadwinners and for a Refinery twenty nine,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and I want to know what made you decide to

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>take an anthropological dive into that phenomenon. Um. I mean

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that makes me want to write about

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>anything myself. I am of the breadwinner in my relationship.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I am a female breadwinner, and I knew my personal

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>feelings about it. But I also knew that I kept

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>having these interactions with women, even women who like talking

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>about money, that once we got to the part where

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I talked about being the breadwinner, they would start asking

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>me these questions like, well, how does that make you feel?

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Or you know, does it bother you to be with

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>someone who's less ambitious than you are? You know, like

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>these questions that felt sort of like they were trying

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, um, what to ask to make me

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>admit that I wasn't okay with it. So then I

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>started thinking, man, like, maybe there's something to this, Maybe

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there are more women who are in this position who

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't okay with it, you know, But I didn't know,

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>because all I know is my experience, and so I

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>really just wanted to find out. I was shocked by

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the results. I thought there would be a lot more

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>women who were just like no, why who cares? Um?

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And that wasn't the case. So you you ended up

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>serving a lot of your peers. But before we get

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>into that, can you just talk about how you how

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you did feel about being the redwinner? Oh? Yeah, I've

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I felt pretty fine with it. It was

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was my decision in a lot of ways, UM,

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to not just be the breadwinner, but also to combine

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>our finances in such a way that, um, I was

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the obvious breadwinner and we shared all of the money,

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the to me, all the money is our money, UM.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of that is because when we

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>started doing this, noight, we were both broken ship, Like

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>neither of us had anything when we got together. And

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like so much of the success that I've had, um,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know my definition of success, but so much of

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what I've had, I see this direct line to my

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Kelly, with my partner. I I feel like

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so much of what I do I am able to do,

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and I feel empowered to do because I have this

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like safety net in a person, you know, and also

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because I know that if today I hated my job

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to quit, Kelly would say, all right, let's

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out how I can bring in more money so

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can do what you want to do. So

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that you were both broke and then there

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>was this moment where you became the breadwinner. What was

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that conversation? Like, UM, I don't know that we really

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>had a conversation about me being a breadwinner. I have

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>always made at least a little more money than Kelly.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>That has been true, like I've I've we've never like

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>been in a situation where he out earned me. UM.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is I'm a little older than him,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm three years older than him. Part of that is

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the sort of work that I do. When you get

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to a certain point, you can make good money from it,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and the kind of work that he does that's pretty

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>much not the case. Like he works at a bookstore.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a bookseller, he's a shift leader. He is also

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a poet. You know, we're both writers. But I don't

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>know if you know this. There's no money in poetry.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's getting like, nobody's getting paid a ton of money

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to come be the resident poet at refinery to at night.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm sorry, Like that's not gonna happen. Um. So

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I always knew that there was a lot of stuff

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he was still figuring out, and also that I just

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted him to be happy as much as he has

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>always wanted me to be happy. And I also feel

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like my breadwinner status is sort of this, Like, yes,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make more money. I wanted you know,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to have certain things available to me by

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>way of making more money. But I also don't have

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to do anything I don't want to do to be

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>able to make more money. Like I don't I'm not

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at a job I hate I'm not you know, trying

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to get a promotion so that we can you know,

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>pay off a house or so, you know what I mean. Like,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's that's not what our lives are like. It's like

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really almost like I just happen to make more

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>money and I'm proud of that, you know, and negotiate it.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I did my due diligence to get what I thought

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>i'd deserved. But at the same time, it's just I

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>guess it's just not super important to me that I

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>make more money than him. So you're touching on a

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of the feelings that people mentioned in the survey,

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and some people had that attitude, but some people didn't.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, to back up, can you tell us about

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the results of talking to all these women.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>The results were basically, um, came down to most of

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the women felt complicated about their bread winter status, and

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the complication came from not necessarily feeling like it was

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the man's job to have the job and like provide

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. Like they didn't feel that, like it didn't

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>go back to like that traditional Um, that's that's what

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I got married for, was for someone to take care

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of me. You know, it wasn't that. The complication that

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>they felt really came from things like, you know, they

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're walking a fine line between being a

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>breadwinner and also trying to make sure, you know, manage

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the emotions of the men in their lives so that

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't feel emasculated. Um, they were also in a

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases still coming home and doing the majority

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>of housework and anything that had to do with children. Uh.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's also the fact that you know, there's this

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>societal expectation like it just it still means something for

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a man to say, my wife doesn't have to work,

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and that says something about his ability to provide, and

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it is a It could be a point of pride

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for a man, even if it's not a big deal

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>to him, it can still be a point of pride,

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and society is not going to punish him in any

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>way for that being the case. However, when you're a woman,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if you walk into that, you know, my husband doesn't

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have to work. He doesn't work because he doesn't have to.

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I make enough for both of us. I'm make enough

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to support our whole family, So why should he work?

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Like people look at you like you're being duped and

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're being taken advantage of. And so these women don't

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have the societal perk. They don't have the point

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of pride that comes usually from society's reaction to being

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a breadwinner, because that perk is reserved for men. It's

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>not accessible to them. You make kind of a subtle

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>distinction between the feelings that some women have about making

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>more money than their partners and the feelings that they

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have about talking about it. Can you talk a little

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about that? Yeah, Um, I think well, from the

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>data that I got, from the comments that I saw

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>from these women, um, none of them really inherently felt

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>bad about making more money. None of them inherently felt

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like there was something wrong with the fact that they

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>were making more money. Even if that was their initial reaction,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>they would stop and sort of reflect on it and

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>be like, wait a minute, I guess this. You know,

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, it's not such a big deal. When it

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>started to feel like a big deal. Is sort of

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>like the reactions like, the world does not adjust for

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>women who are breadwinners. It just doesn't. It also doesn't

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>adjust for men who become like stay at home. Um,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>husbands or you know, like or work with the kids

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all day. It's like, we still have all these systems

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in place where these women um feel even though they

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>might feel pride and being a breadwinner, to express it

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is to invite other people's perceptions of your relationship into

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>your life. And so when you do express it and

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>people give you those perceptions, they throw them at you. Um,

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely end up taking some of that on and

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you end up it ends up becoming a thing that

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you don't want to talk about it,

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily because you're embarrassed or ashamed. Sometimes it's

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to talk about it for a lot

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of these women because you just don't want to have

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to defend it all the time. You don't want to

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.479
<v Speaker 1>have to constantly be telling people that is not my experience,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>That is not our experience of being in a relationship

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>where I'm a breadwinner for us, it is working. I

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>mean it's exhausting. It is exhausting to do something non

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>traditional and have to explain to people all the time

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're not failing because of it. It's interesting because

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think of earning money as liberation. Well, I mean

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of women think of it that way. But

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>reading your story, a lot of these women felt caged

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in and away. But can you talk about that a

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Yeah, it's the responsibility factor, to be perfectly honest,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the feeling caged in. Is not so much about

0:16:55.480 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the actual um money. It's about the idea, uh that, oh,

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I am responsible for supporting another person. In some cases,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're a sole earner and also the breadwinner, absolutely

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I am not. I am My salary is no longer

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>responsible for just taking care of me. It is also

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>responsible for taking care of another person. So shouldn't I

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>be going for that promotion that I don't even want

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because it means more money, or shouldn't I be arguing

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for a raise that, you know whatever? Like, it's this

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>idea for these women that um that they are stuck

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the position of breadwinner. And I imagine anybody who

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is the breadwinner would would have those feelings. It's just that,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, male or female, if you're the person supporting

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>your family, you're gonna maybe feel trapped by that. But

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are there different ways that women like process that feeling

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of responsibility or given different messages about it? I think

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it is that we don't really have a

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>template for the conversation. Now what this piece went up,

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of men tweeted me or emailed me or

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>messaged me, and there were a lot of men saying

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>they had been talking with their friends about the fact

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that they totally expected to have to support a family someday,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>like off and on, you know, in different ways, Like

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe they weren't talking about expectably, they were always under

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the impression that at some point in their lives they

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>were going to have to support a family. They started

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about these things that like eighteen seventeen, sixteen, you

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, Like, yeah, well one day when

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I'm gonna get married and you know,

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>my wife, and I want to make sure my wife

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>could stay home with the kids if she wants to.

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like they start thinking about those things and having

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>those conversations so early, and that expectation is put on

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>them so early that it's just sort of like in

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>their minds, this natural thing of being a man right

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>now out Women are basically raised with the expectation, the

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>expectation that they will never make more than their husbands

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>or that it'll be equitable. But not that they would

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>make significantly more than their husbands, So there's no set

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.239
<v Speaker 1>up for like, how do we talk about that? How

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>do we talk about the fact that I make more?

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>If I make more, does that mean that I need

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to make more of the financial decisions? If I make more,

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>does that mean I'm in charge of the money completely?

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, like a lot of women just don't know

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>how to have those conversations with their partners. They don't

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>know how to have those conversations with their friends, they

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to have those conversations with family members,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>because nothing in the media, nothing you know, in the

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>conversations we have as young women, set us up to

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>believe that that could even be a possibility. So I

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's just this lack of resources and this lack

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know, conversation that really contribute for these women

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that there is something off or wrong

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or shameful or embarrassing, or something that should be hidden

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>or at least you shouldn't talk about it when you

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>earn more than a male partner or spouse. I'm wondering

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>if hearing from all these women and then men afterwards,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>did that change your perspective on being a breadwinner at all.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It definitely made me stop and really think, like because

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, like I kept thinking about why I

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel the same way, and the thing that I

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>kept coming to is I must not feel as complicated

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, because I know my partner, if I didn't

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be doing what I was doing that made

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>more money, that he would step up and he would

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>help me figure out how we were gonna either downsize

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>our lifestyle so that I could do what I wanted

0:20:55.720 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to do, or he would help me figure out how

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>he was going to make more money so that we could,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep our lives up, you know, like whatever.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Like I knew that he was not more committed to

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the lifestyle than he was to me. We would figure

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>this out, and that might mean that he would be

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the breadwinner at some point or it might not, you know,

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>But I just knew that we would figure it out together.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>But when I really stopped and thought about it, I

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait, how do I know that, Like we

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't really had that conversation, Like that's not something we've

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>actually ever talked about. That's my assumption, Like I'm just assuming,

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these women are assuming that their

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>partners would not be helpful or would not want that

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to happen, or you know, or that they would be stuck.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm just assuming I wouldn't be stuck. So it definitely

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>made me go home and have that conversation with my

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend where I was like, hey, so, say I really

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>hated my job, and or maybe I wanted to take

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>some time off, or maybe I wanted to take a

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>job that you know, made less money because that would

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>make me happier. You know, how would you feel about that?

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And he was like, well, we couldn't stay in this

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>apartment probably, you know. He was like, but I mean

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I can do jobs that make more money. I could

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have two jobs, like, I could do a lot of things,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. Like he was like, like, I don't want

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you to be unhappy, you know, because my thing has

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>always been I don't want to come home to a

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>miserable man. I don't care how much money he makes

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>because miserable. Here's the thing, and y'all know this is true.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Miserable men need everybody else around them to be miserable. Yeah,

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they need that, but yeah, that that was one thing

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I really liked from your article was that you were like,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't really about money. It's about relationships. It is

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>about relationships, It's about communication. The crux of every single

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems that those women had who I

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>surveyed or spoke to was that they either had never

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>really talked about the fact that they were the breadwinner

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with a partner. Even though they had all these internal questions,

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they never asked them, Like, they never actually asked the

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>person they were with, like do you feel emasculated? Do

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you could do more around the house?

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like me making more money makes me

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>less feminine? Do you feel like They had all these

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>ideas and all these worries about how being the breadwinner

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>would and could affect their relationship, and they never actually

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>asked their partner. Well, hopefully that's conversation inspires some difficult

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>conversations about money. I'm sure all of my friends listen

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast demand we talk about money. Um, thank

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you so much for coming on this interest having me

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>so on the face of it, a lot of the

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>women that actually spoke to have kind of achieved the

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>feminist idea like not only are they working and they

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have working partners who are supportive, and yet they still

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>had all of these negative feelings about it, and we're

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of weighed down by the cultural associations or what

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they believed to be other people judging them about their choices. Yeah,

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems like even if you as an individual do

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the things that you want to do, it doesn't really

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>matter if you're still stuck in the old system. And

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it reminded me of the story that I wrote recently

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>about Adobe and how they had offered flexible schedules for

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all their employees, but nobody was really taking them, and

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that was because they didn't really make it explicit. And

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so they have this new mandatory program where if you

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>come back from eternity leave or paternity leave or any

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>long leave, you have to meet with your manager and

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about that these flexible schedules exist. So it's it's

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like we need to explicitly say this system

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>has changed and we are going to let people do it,

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or else the cultural norms will just stick around. Right.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>If something is what's expected of you, you can't expect

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to do all of the work of seeking out these

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>resources or putting themselves on the line to try and

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do something differently than all their peers. Are doing it. Yeah,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and now it's time for half big takes, half baked takes.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You can call in with your own half bag take,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever else you want to tell us at two

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on two six seven zero one six six. This week's

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>listener half bag take comes from Marissa Homer, who tweeted

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at me my half bag take is that non coffee

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>drinkers deserves some sort of equivalent drink option in the

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>office hashtag soda, hashtag crystal life. My response to her

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was that at Bloomberg we have at least thirty five

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>other drink options and we're spoiled. I feel like I

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>need a little bit more information about this half big take,

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>because I want to know if she means other caffeinated beverages,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you're if you're someone who still needs a

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>caffeine kick, but you just coffee is not your thing,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>or if she works in an office where there's only

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>coffee and like water and gets that that's a drag

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you should have fresca or something. Yeah, agreed, good, hapt

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>big take. All right, Francesca, what is your not fully

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>formed idea that you'd like to share with the world.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I would like to talk about the vexing office etiquette

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>around free office food. It feels like we just came

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>to the end of girl Scout cookie season, which was

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like roughly eight months long. I don't know what happened

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>where Girl Scout cookies are now available constantly, um, but

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there were within mints everywhere. And our office is very

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>big and spread out, and there's a lot of parts

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of the office where like you might not know anybody

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that works in those few rows, but you'd be walking

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>by those rows. There'd be a little bit, you know,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>some cookies, some whatever, saltwater taffy somebody brought back from

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>like Virginia Beach, and it's sitting out there, and you

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>want to take it because free food is more delicious,

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>But then you have to you have to slow down

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and kind of fiddle with the rapper and get it

0:26:58.040 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>out and eat it, and you start to feel really

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>conscious that you don't know who put the food there. Anyway,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have a solution for this. I think

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that whoever provides the food should be sure to add

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a sign that says please take maybe please take comma anyone,

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>or plut the cookies out on a plate so you

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like a thief. I think that's your problem.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You feel like you're doing something wrong when that food

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is make them more accessible, and as the taker, to

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>be fair, I do think that you should hold yourself

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to a standard where you should at least know the

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>name of the person or the occasion for which, like

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you should know it was someone's birthday, and maybe the

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>name of the person's birthday. You don't know, wish them

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>happy birthday, but at least know whose birthday was. Definitely

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>take from an area of the office. I don't even

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>know what they do over there. I try to sort

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of say, like, oh, whose birthday is it? And if

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>nobody answers, I just describe it anyway, Becca, what is

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>your heath day? Take this week minus so underdone but

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not really related at all. But it just happened recently

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and really got me going. Was that do not feed

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the pigeons. Pigeons anywhere anywhere, maybe like a pigeon. Don't

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>feed birds at all. But you're okay the pigeons. You're

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>feeding them. You're like having them come together in an army. Yeah,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't even straight face because it's so silly. I'm

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>with you. Girls, don't give those pigeons, the strength of numbers.

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's act like you're corralling them, You're giving them strength. Literally, Yeah,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they can do anything, so they can then attack you

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 1>and poo on you. Yeah. I hate pigeons and I

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's controversial. Please let us know listeners if

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you disagree. And this has been half big takes, half

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>baked takes. Thanks for listening to another episode of Game Plan.

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter. I'm at rs Greenfield

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm at Francesca Today. You can tweet at us

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>with your half bag takes or any other thoughts you

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have about the show. You can also call us at

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>two one to six one seven zero one six and

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>leave as a voicemail. We might play it on the podcast.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>If you like our show, head on over to Apple

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts and rate and

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. The last review we got really great.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It said that Rebecca was an articulate valley girl, which

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is a great label. So if you have a label

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for me, please put it in a review. We would

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>love to hear it. Another cool thing you can check

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>out as Bloomberg lens. It's this new io s app

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and Chrome extension that gives you all sorts of relevant

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>financial information alongside your news check it out. Game Plan

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Liz Smith and Magnus Henderson. Head of

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast is Alec McCain. We'll see you next week. Bye bye.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>As a child, I literally ate like I love those

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of salt as a snack