WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Lousy Smarch Weather

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Listener Mail. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's Monday, the day of the week that we

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>read back some of the messages that you've sent in recently, Rob,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if you don't mind today, I think I'm going to

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>start off with a response. Wow, this was a quick turnaround.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a response. We already got to part one

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of our series on The Seven Day Week, which ran

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday. Rob, you cool if I do this one alright?

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>This is from Kennedy. Kennedy says, Hi, I just finished

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to the part one episode of The Seven Day Week.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I was intrigued because I have time space synesthesia, so

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I see time in the space around me, including weeks, months,

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and years. If it hasn't already been done, this would

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>make an interesting podcast topic. I don't know. I don't

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>know much about this. This sounds fascinating now. Also, while listening,

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I kept hoping you would bring up menstruation as a

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>biological or natural cause. For weeks or months, I saw

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a post awhile ago hypothesizing that women may have been

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the first to track time in a month like pattern.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Because of twenty eight day minstrel cycles, a period is

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>also often five to seven days. Just wondering if you

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 1>looked into the influence of this on our current system

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of months and weeks. Thank you for the fantastic episode. Sincerely, Kennedy. Well,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks Kennedy. Yes, I think these are both really interesting ideas.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>In part, when we talked about one of the main

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>functions of the week being as an organizing principle for

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what the historian that we cited in that episode, David

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Hankin calls stocktaking, but we were also referring to as

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>time conceptualization or mental time travel. Basically, the week plays

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a role in helping us mentally organize events in the

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>recent past in near future. And I think on this front, yeah,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's totally worth remembering that as much as we

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>all do some extent visualized time, some people really visualized time,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or really have even no choice but to visualize time,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and in a very concrete and vivid way. I remember

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a while back having a conversation with with a family

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>member who was if I recall correctly, I think the

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>way she was describing things was talking about having a

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>form of something like time space synaesthesia, where they would

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they would vividly perceive time as a type of ribbon

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that rotates in a circle around them, and there was

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of visual cue making parts of that ribbon. Um,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like marking them off in terms of

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>days or weeks or months. Interesting. Yeah, I mean this

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>instantly makes me think, like, whatever is going on with

0:02:54.520 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that that person's individual um uh, you know, synesthesia experience,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Like how would it differ if they had grown up

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>with a different perception of time, a different calendar system. Yeah,

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>But on the second question you raise about the origins

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the week, and I guess this would not necessarily

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be a strict seven day week, but some kind of

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>time organization unit on the order of like five to

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>seven days or so on. The origins of that possibly

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>being linked to the human minstrel cycle. I don't know

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>if anybody has any direct evidence of that, and I

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that would be. Maybe like I don't know,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>written records from the ancient world from you know, Mesopotamia

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or anywhere making this connection themselves to tying the earliest

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>concepts of weeks to the minstrel cycle. But it seems

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like inherently a very plausible biological basis for that kind

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of organizing principle. Um. Kind of on the same level

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as like the the agricultural market cycle hypothesis. Right. You know,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there are some fairly universal human experiences that are going

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to be happening in cycles on the order of you know,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>some group of days that subdivides the lunar month. Yeah. Yeah,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And and of course we do know that in different

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>cultures there would be rituals and practices associated with with

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Instrell cycles. So uh yeah, I initially thought the same thing.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, there have to be some papers out

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there that discussed this um that that at least consider

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this connection, uh, if not presents some sort of evidence

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like we're discussing here. But I I really couldn't find

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>much out there. Uh. Not to say that my research

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>skills are are perfect and above reproach, but if there was,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>if there was something good out there, I missed it. Uh.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And I would love to be corrected if if anyone

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>out there has a paper or or in fact this

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>post that has mentioned I would love to read more. Well, yeah,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess anything you came across that was like a

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>biological reasoning that you were hypothesizing to underlie the week. Um,

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it would be hard to establish a clear link. I

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that was also true when you were

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at that paper paper in the journal uh Chronobiology International,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that was trying to find some kind of biological origin

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for um, for the seven day week. I mean, whatever

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it is, you'd have a hard time showing like, yes,

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely the reason. But I think some things

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>seem at least prima facy plausible and yeah, I would

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely say menstruation as one of them. Yeah, it's actually

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>briefly mentioned. It's mentioned only once in that Rheinberg at

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>All paper and Chronobiology. Uh. They write, quote, we wish

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to point out the endogenous roughly thirty day minstrel rhythm

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of women, which also converts survival rate, is integrated into

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the complex multiple period biological time structure. This raises the

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>question of whether the roughly seven day rhythms are in

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>any way of survival value for the human or other species.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're thinking about it, but that's really all there

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>is about minstrel cycles in this particular paper. But again,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if someone knows of some some more research writing contemplation

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>out there about this possible connection. Shoot it our way.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to read about it. But either way, Yeah,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>strong idea, great email, Kennedy. Oh Rob, there was one

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>other h do you mind if I read this next

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>message about lava boats is pretty short? Yeah, go for it.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is in response to the episode we did,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess a couple of weeks ago now about lava

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>boats in In sort of both ways, you could interpret that.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked for a long time about pumice rafts, you know,

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>these volcanic rocks that you know, floating on the surface

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of the ocean and make these vast, undulating parking lots

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the Pacific. But then we also

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about the idea of, well, could you sail a

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>boat on a on a flowing river of lava like

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you might see it one of the volcanoes in Hawaii.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And Zach had some a great point about the latter

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>idea about trying to actually sail a boat on on

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a river of lava. So Zack says, Hey, Robert and Joe,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about the idea of riding a superheated

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>steel boat from lava into water. One thing that came

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to mind was the Leaden frost effect. Depending on your

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>momentum when entering the water uh and style of boat

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>flat bottom or keeled, you could potentially be in for

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a wild ride. Love the show. It sure helps keep

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this trucker entertained. Thanks for all you guys and your

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>team do Zach, Zach. This is a This is a

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>great point. The leaden frost effect, for anybody out there

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>who's not familiar is a is a really interesting physics

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>principle that essentially has a counterintuitive effect. So like, if

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you heat up a pan and you dribble some water

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>into it. Uh, you know, the water the heat the

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>heat from the bottom of the metal panel transfer into

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the water and will start to boil. But if you

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>get the pan really hot, like ripping hot before you

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>dribble the water in, something totally different happens. Instead of

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it pooling on the bottom of the pan and then

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>boiling and then boiling off into steam, the droplets of

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>water will instead appear to float over the surface of

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the pan and kind of skitter around madly. Uh. And

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they actually, in this form take a longer time to

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>boil off than they do if the pan is at

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a lower temperature. And the reason for that is this

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>principle known as the leading frost effect. It's where when

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge temperature difference, the h the steam that

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>comes off of that you know, piece of that, that

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>little droplet of water creates an insulating layer. It's sort

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of like a cushion of water vapor that's instantly vaporized.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>That makes it take longer for the heat to transfer

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>into that droplet of water and essentially makes it float

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>over the surface of the pan. And you can imagine

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a similar thing going on with any kind of superheated

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>piece of metal coming into contact with water, maybe sort

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of like dancing around on a on a cushion of steam.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, Yeah, I didn't really think about this in

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our initial discussion. Yeah that this this, this might make

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a really wild ride for sure. Yeah. All right. We

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>have a response to a Vault episode here from Jim

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. Uh, specifically our ketchup episode of Invention,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>which we recently re aired. Uh. Jim says, Robert and Joe,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a Hines processing plant in my hometown of

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>south central Pennsylvania. A family friend worked there. He refused

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to eat Hinz Ketchup based on what he witnessed in

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the processing. Figuratively, he saw how the sausage was made,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but literally he saw how the Ketchup was made. But

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he would eat other brands of Ketchup. His family would

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>tease him and ask, do you think they make Ketchup

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>any differently? I didn't think about this. Is is Hins

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna come after us with their lawyers for reading this

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever? I like Hines Ketchup. There you go, unpaid endorsement. Yeah, anyway,

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>he continues. You ended your invention of of the Ketchup

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>episode by asking if you had any listeners who had

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>never eaten ketch Up. I can't be that listener, but

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I know one person whom I can guarantee never tasted

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>catch Up. My father. My dad was an extremely picky eater.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't eat any foods to contain tomatoes in any form.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>No catch up, spaghetti and sauce, pizza, sliced tomatoes, etcetera.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>He would eat spaghetti with melted butter on it. Tomatoes

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was only one of his forbidden foods, but it was

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the one that cast the widest net. Unfortunately, Dad

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>died years ago, so I can't follow up with him

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>about this due to his tomato aversion. I never tasted

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>pizza until age fifteen, when on the way home from

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a Saturday school trip, the bus stopped at Pizza Hut

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for dinner. After one taste, I practically moaned, what is

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>this food of the gods? Jim and New Jersey? Oh wow, Jim. Well,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>so I can sort of relate because I never went

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that far. Like, I always liked pizza and stuff, but um,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>unless it was in a highly sort of processed and

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of hidden form, actually did not much like tomatoes

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when I was a little kid. Uh. There there were

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>weird exceptions though, I mean I did like some things

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with tomatoes in them, but like most of the time,

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>if if there were visible chunks of tomato and something

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I did not like it, did not want it. And

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what changed. I mean, now tomatoes are

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite foods. But but yeah, as a kid,

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I remember being grossed out. Yeah, I don't remember being

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>super into just like raw tomatoes when I was a

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>little kid. My son, however, as always eating them. He's

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a He's a much better eater than I was at

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>his green up growing up, Um, like a pretty early

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>age you would pick up a tomato and just eat

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like an apple. So yeah, no problem there. But you know,

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're not in you know, even if you're not

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>into tomato based substances or for some reason you can't

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>have tomato based foods, you can certainly still have pizza.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You can get a white pizza, you can have like

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a pesto based pizza. Um. And I would agree that

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the pizza not a controversial opinion here is pretty great. Uh.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And I would expand that to to when I say

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 1>pizza did not just mean like literal pizza, and also

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the sort of turf wars between like one

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.359
<v Speaker 1>pizza tradition in another. But if you just take in

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>into account like all flat bread based foods, um, it's

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect formula. You know. Actually thinking about food

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>versions of this type though it's making me wonder, like

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what is the psychological basis of food aversion? Like how

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is a food you don't like represented in the brain?

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Because it just remembering my childhood, so there were so

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>many things I didn't want to eat because I thought

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like tomatoes, but like I loved tomato salsa,

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and I would eat pizza that had tomato sauce on.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It was like tomato worked as a sauce or something

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like if it was in liquid form, But I didn't

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>want chunks of tomato. I think I don't know why

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be, like what's happening in my little kid

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>brain to cause me to feel like that. I mean,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty complex issue. I know there've been some

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>some papers written on this. I know some of it

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>comes down to two textures and uh, and I'm not

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sure in all cases what the exact principle is there.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sometimes it's something to do with the path

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual like physical palate of the mouth. I've also

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>read that, of course, when you're getting into things like

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>spices and more complex flavors. Uh. You know, part of that,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of course is it's literally a developed taste. But in

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>other cases, I think there's a strong argument that like

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a smile child could not survive a dose of a

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of a poison that might otherwise be okay in an

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>adults body, and therefore there they have to be more

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>selective in what they will actually tolerate. Oh interesting, Yeah,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>lower lower body mass means that you you have to

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself more with your mouth. Yeah. Now, I haven't

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>actually looked at at the research on that, so I

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's a popular opinion right now or

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, popular hypothesis, or if they're uh, you know,

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>it's the kind of thing that we have to perhaps

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>come back and discuss in greater detail, but very I mean,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you do have kids, little kids that are all in

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on spice, but a lot of kids seem to be,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of you have to ease into it.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to develop that spice taste over time. All right.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>This next message was in response to the Moses effect.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>This is from Shannon. If you didn't catch that recent

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Vault episode. The Moses effect, again, is a phenomenon that

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>falls under the category of knowledge neglect, where if you

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ask somebody how many of each type of animal did

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Moses take onto the arc, most people will say too

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>even though they know that it was in the story,

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it was Noah and not Moses. So you just like

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ignore that part of the question. It just like doesn't

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>even register in your mind. Um so, so Shannon says, Hi, guys,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you explicitly mentioned it, but it

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that the Moses effect is dramatically lowered

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>when a foreign language is involved. I speak German, and

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>if I were to translate a question to or from English,

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that I would detect the trickery much more

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly than if I simply answered when I was more

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fluent in German, I might have been more prone to

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fall for the deception. I assume the same is true

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for any non native English speaker, that they would notice

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that Moses is the incorrect actor in the question. I

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think the implication of this is that the trickery in

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the Moses illusion relies on fluency, and the trickster quote

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>surfs the wave of that fluency to get past our

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>usual breakers. Thanks for all you do, Shannon, Uh yeah,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd say on his face that that totally makes sense

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. In fact, it's been a while since we

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>did that episode, so I don't remember for sure. But

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the studies that looked at the

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Moses effect looked into whether altering processing fluency, like doing

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>something to make it harder to understand the question or

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>make it go slower as you absorb it, would increase

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>people's chance of noticing it. But again, I don't remember.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It's been a bit alright. As some of you know,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a discord, uh message board? Is that what

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you call it? Discord? We have a discord. I guess

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe the way of saying it. I've still never

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>been there. Yeah, I I poke around in there, and

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a a number of users in there. It's it's

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>very chill. If you were interested in joining the discord,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>just shoot us an email. You doing the email address

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this episode, and I'll shoot you

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>back the invite code UM, because I don't think there's

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a way to just automatically point you to it. But anyway,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we heard from a listener by the name of ev

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>EVI writes in and says the following. From the episode

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Music and Memory, Rob mentions a song in the beginning

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>uh m nine. This is by Boards of Canada from

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a Few Old Tunes, Volume one. They include a link

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to both the discogs page about it discogs dot com

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, tremendous resource anytime you're you're researching albums and

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>artists and in particular releases and so forth. And they

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>also include um YouTube clip uh and they say this

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>song reminded me of music featured in the computer animated

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>movie The Mind's I. The similarities in the music were

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not as close as I originally thought, but I figured

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you all might enjoy this classic and maybe someone will

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>hear the song M nine and spark a memory of

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>something else that gets closer. And for your auditory and

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>visual pleasure, here's the sequel, Beyond the Mind's Eye, and

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they include a link to that as well. Um, Joe,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>do you remember The Mind's I? Uh, not by title alone.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe if I watched it. So this

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was especially the first one i've I've kind of finally remember,

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>because there were a lot of TV ads for it

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you could you could send off to get a copy

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of this. It was a like a VHS of all

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of this just cutting edge computer animation stuff that I

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I haven't I haven't rewatched all of it,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but some of it would probably come off a bit

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>rough by today's standards for sure, But you know, it's

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>very like dreamy and kind of new a G and

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>futuristic and I had to look it up one. James

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds did the music for the first one. I think

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>some different artists were involved in music for the subsequent releases,

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, this one, this one was advertised all over

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the place, and I think I may be rented it

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>from a VHS store at some point. So this was

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like a mail order computer animation clip show. Yeah. Yeah,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there's like an eight hundred number you could call and

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you could order your own copy of The Mind's Eye.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh. I remember at the time it was like

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you would you would see these commercials and you're like, wow,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the future is here. Look at this. It's like pure

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>moods for the eyes. Oh yeah, I mean I would.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I would very much classify in the same category. Have

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>pure moods is another one of those that is the

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Your Moods was a purely a musical release, of course,

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>but there were a lot of TV ads for it,

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and it had had some great tracks on it. I

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>still think about Pyramids at least once a month. Wait,

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>my memory can't be right because I'm remembering. It had

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like the Exorcist theme and the theme from the X Files,

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but also India and stuff. It was pretty great. Great.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I definitely had a copy together. Yeah, and it I

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think it actually it introduced me to a number of

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>these artists. Yeah, you had Enigma, Anya um uh. A

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>number of big evangelist is on there, Micah um oldfield In,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Neil Morriconi, the Orb, Brian Eno. You also got a

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>little Kinny g in there. But yeah, a lot of

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>big names and sort of the like the New Age

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and electronic uh uh, you know world U Tubular Bells

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>part one being the Exorcist theme song. See now I

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>want to listen to it. Can practically I can hear

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that Enigma song returned to Innocence. I just pounding through

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>my head. Now, wow, what a strange idea, But like,

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I just it was one of those

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>things you see it on TV as a kid, You're

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>just like, Okay, this is what culture is. Yeah, this

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the world I was born into. Let's see, Rob,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking a look at some of these other messages

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you brought in from the discord, since I haven't seen

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>these before. Oh we have one from Robin tying back

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to Jim's message about the about the Ketchup Vault episode.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Robin says, with regards to the Ketchup episode, if you

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>folks have not yet tried kim chi on your hot

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>dog type food of choice, I will highly recommend it. Uh, well,

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Robin would go right along with that, because obviously, you know,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a cabbage type vegetable, especially in some sort of fermented

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>or dressed form, works well on a hot dog, and

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>some people put cole slaw on there or Sauer kraut. Yeah,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>kimchi works great as well. But then Robin goes on

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to say, um may I also recommend squigging some q

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>P Japanese style mayo on there, in keeping with Joe's

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>recommended go chu jong and mayo dipping sauce. Um. I

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've ever tried exactly that QP spelled k

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>e w P i e in in English is a

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how exactly it's different than just regular

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>American mayonnaise, but but there there's something different about it,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>has a different kind of richness or something. The bottle

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>looks very cute too, like I wanted to squeeze it.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But but I don't think I've ever actually had it myself.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I always end up using um mayo or vegan mayo

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>just from the grocery store. Um, but I want to

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>try it. I'm actually having kim chi with mayo on

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>veggie dogs for dinner. Tonight. Wow, I'm excited. Well, what

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. So I don't think I would normally, under

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>regular circumstances just go with a type of mayonnaise on

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a hot dog, but yeah, I can go well when

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>paired with other types of condiments like sharper condiments or

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>something that secidic, like like kim chi or something. Um.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember many many years ago when I went to Iceland.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>There they have a special way of dressing their pilcer

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the hot dogs there, like you would get it basically

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 1>any any gas station there. That's like, uh, there's like

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember, like four or five condiments that go

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on everything. It includes like some onions and some kind

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of sharper kind of sweet and sour sauce, and then

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think also some type of mayonnaisy creamy sauce. It

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds good. It sounds very good. Anyway, Thank you, Robin.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, it looks like we're at a time

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we had we had some weird house listener man we

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to read. We're gonna save that for next time. Uh,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and when is next time? Well, it's gonna be next Monday.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's when we do listener mail and the stuff to

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind podcast feed We do our core episodes

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on two season Thursdays, we do a short form artifact

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>or monster fact on Wednesdays, and then on Friday, that

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is time for Weird House Cinema. That's when we set

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>aside most serious matters and we just discuss a strange film.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>say hello, you can email us at contact at stuff

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Mind is a production of I Heart Radio. For more

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>podcasts my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.