WEBVTT - Surveillance: Biden's Tax Plans With Hubbard

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jay Ley. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Terminal. I

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Mouf and boffinap Bombastead of FFECS

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and E. M. Mac cris stonogy MAV and you code

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in the dollar the base. It's still the base, but

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it can't get much stronger. White Well, it's already relatively

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>overvalued if they look at it on a long term

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>historical basis um. But uh, you know, we do expect

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it to continue to trade at these high levels. Not

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>actually quite unusual. You look back historically when the dollar

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>has been to its peaks, it's gone to these you know,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>peaks in the eighty five, in in uh two thousand two,

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and then it comes involved quite hard. That isn't what

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this time. And part of that is because

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of exactly what you've been talking about here, that where

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are you going to go to access growth in the world.

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really about the US, but it's also the place

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that you go to access safety, so you get the

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>best of both worlds. So people are going to maintain

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>overallocations US assets for the foreseeable future. Marvin, when do

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>deficits start to matter again? Well, I think we're getting

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they do matter, and I think

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's more a question of the debt, not so much, um,

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the deficits. Let's remember that deficits are taking place pretty

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much everywhere, um, So it's not just a US issue. Um.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>What we're confronting right now is a very different situation

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>from the past, or certainly the last decade, where countries

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>were bailed out by following real interest rates. Now you're

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to see following real interest rates. We're at

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the zero lower around or effective lower around for most

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>countries on nominal rates, and the only way to get

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>real rates to fall from there is a hyper inflation.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So Marvin, with your dollar resiliency, do you assume then

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that the real yield doesn't claw its way back to zero,

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that we stay with a persistent negative real yield, So

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we should expect that really yields will start to

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. Um. You know, we will see UM

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>treasury yields start to pick up over the course of

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the next few years. Gradually, UM markets have already priced

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>in a significant amount of the inflation that we expect.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>There's still room for that to go to get to

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's comfort zone in terms of where break evens

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>uh go. But UM, we will see a rise in

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>really yield, but it's not going to be anything um

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>like what we've seen in the path. But remember that

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>just makes UM. To Lesa's point, the debt problems more

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>pressing for countries around the world. And John, what's so

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>important here? The cadence, So Marvin Bart at Berkeleys is

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the same cadence as Chairman Powell. The real note yesterday

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>with Chairman Poue is his ex axis. Chairman Paul's timeline

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>extends well out into two thousand twenty two. And that's

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from Marvin Burd the Ft is totally

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>committed to this. Marvin totally committed to this. And Shaman

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>pound one blink. Do you think everybody gets that now? Well, look,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people will get that, and that's why we've

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>had this pause in bond market markets over the course

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of the last month month or so. Right, Remember, we

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>had a very intense sell off in the first quarter,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of altility assession, and since then bond yields

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out they've gone up a lot this week,

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're still basically trading within the same range we've

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>traded for the last month, month or so. They're not

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>really going anywhere. That is the market accepting that, And

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>now the next step is they need to see, well,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is the economy going to be stronger than share Powell

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in the committee exact, or is it going to be

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in line with theirs? Or is there going to be

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>some sort of disaster that's that's gonna take it down.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 1>And for that we're just going to have to wait

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for the data. And that's why we're range trading across

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>asset markets right now. Mom, And it's always good to

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>see you got to catch up morv and Batley's head

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of Effects and am macro strategy, David Kelly, Whether this

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is JP Morgan and David Kelly, I'm gonna go to

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of this first look at g d P.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>In the nominal GDP statistic is ten point seven percent

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>with the big prices paid statistic. Does that signal to

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you an inflation that is here or an inflation that's

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>good to come, a little bit of both. Um I

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think there is clearly inflation right now. You can see

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and things like lumber prices which don't feed through that much.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But you can also see in the difficulty that businesses

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are having and hiring workers, they're going to have to

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>pay up in terms of higher wages. I think we've

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>got some bottle legs all over the place. I think

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, light vehicle sales are pretty strong, but the

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>inventories are very low, and that's that is pushing prices up.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're seeing that right now. And in fact,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one other thing in this report when you're actually with

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that's really interesting is inventories fell at an

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty six billion dollar annual pace in the first quarter.

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you think it's hard to find stuff, you're right.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But what that's gonna do is going to cause manufacturing

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to crank up in the rest of this year. So

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see UM as inventories are

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>restored over the course this year is just going to

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>add further to this economy. We had a savings rate

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>over in the first quarter. That's more fuel. So I

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>can see this economy really geared up to boom in

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter. I think we'll get better than ten

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>percent growth annualized in the second quarter. Can these companies

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>make that demand? David? The money question, and it's still

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>racing to be bullish the sancuity market. Yes, I think so.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think you've got to got to focus on

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical sectors, the value sectors. I think they should

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>They should do very well because this economy is going

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate fast here. I don't think interest rates are

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>going to stay at this level. I think they have

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>to go up with the pace of acceleration that would

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>likely see over the next few quarters. How do you

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>look at the data, David, Given the fact that people

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to trade off of it, what data are

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you looking at to determine whether this is something more

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>than transitory, whether these price pressures have legs. Well, you

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you almost have to have a new model of inflation.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the problem is that the old rules in

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of exact you know, the Phillips curve and the

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>relationship between money supply and inflation, they don't really work

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>very well. So it is it's a complicated process, but

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to put together the pieces of it. And

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the wage part of it's very important. Um.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And also the fiscal party. You know, the present Biden

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>announced a lot of plans yesterday. If he gets that

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>through Congress, you know, usually it's spending now, taxes later, um.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think you get more physical stimulus. And

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you get that stimulus, you will I think have

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>some inflation that sticks. And the really interesting point about

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this is, you know the federal reserves as well. It's

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>probably transitory. But by the time they know whether it's

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>transitory or not, we're in the middle of next year.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So the question is how long can you wait to

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>be sure that it's transitory. That was a hatter of transitors.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>That was very good. Dr you're getting drunk, t K.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>He's going it, David Kelly. It was very transitory of

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you to come on and give us wisdom out to

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter or fourth quarter. With what we've seen

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last a week or even five days, do

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you have any clarity pest Labor Day of this year? Yeah,

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think we can see we

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can see the GDP story. I mean, this thing is

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep on accelerating. We know we've got

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the funds, and we also know that we've got people,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, anxious to get back to to doing normal things.

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think the fourth quarter this year

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is the first quarter that's going to feel in any

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>way normal, and I expected to be a very blockbuster

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>quarter in terms economic activity. I think the holiday season

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>will be huge. But you know, I think things get

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>much more murky when you get into twenty two. Just

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>David Kelly, have to go back to the office soon.

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that July? Is that July line in the sand

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>for you, David? I'm well, my second vaccine, I guess

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on May eight, two weeks later, I intend to go

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>down to New York. We go. We look forward to

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing you, so hopefully can come back into the studio

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>one day. I'd love to do that. That's the point

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the next I don't know, several years. David Kelly

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>check mugan asid Management Chief Club with Strategies. Now Henrietta

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Trades joins his Veda partners here on the soire in

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington last night, Henrietta, I want you to explain in

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the white marbled halls of Washington how politicians line up

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>their tax policy around as a president mentioned three tenths

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of one percent of taxpayers, why aren't they more representative

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the rest of America? You know, what are the

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting things I hear from senators and including the moderates, like, um,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what Joe mansion is that they want to

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>tax wealth like the tax work. So they have I

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of talking points around raising cap games,

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>around raising taxes on top marginal rates. I think the

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>real question is, you know, what can you functionally get

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the votes for with no margin for error? Where can

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>you get those fifty votes then? And you know, I

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>don't see much movement as realistic. Maybe a couple of

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>points here and there. Okay, this is really really important.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Dan Balls steam Dan Balls in the Washington Post, so

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>talks about the narrowest of majorities. When do we come

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to our senses that the president can't be bold? If

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we do, is it within hours days? Or do we

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have to drag this into July? I mean, honestly, I

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think that you probably most investors should have seen that

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>when you know, for instance, they couldn't pass the minimum

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>wage hight votes see the fifteen dollars an hour, and

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>they lost eight votes. I mean, I think July is

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>probably a good time frame for when we'll start to

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>recognize that we're going to be mostly deficit to financing

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the costs of this bill. The administration and Democrats generally

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>have been doing a great job of avoiding the conversation

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>around reconciliation and deficiting races that will have to be

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>authorized this bill, and that's because President Biden has rolled

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>out this ambitious agenda to pay for it. So July

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>seems right to me based on what we see from

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the budget committees. We know that Secret Pelosi is marshaling

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this bill through the House and they want to be

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up by the fourth of July. I think reconciliation

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>comes right after um. September is a possibility, you know,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>might be this headline risk that looms over us until September,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But July september is my thinking as well well, the

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>headline number, and most likely be in September after it

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>gets pushed through the congressional sausage. My expectation is at

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the cost of this bill, which is currently four trillion dollars,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the combo of the Infrastructure Bill and the family's plan

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>gets flashed by at least half. So to trillion is

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the maximum sticker shock spending number that goes moderates in

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Senate can stomach. So the spend alone is going

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to come down by half, and that means the revenues

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>needed to offset the cost are going to calm down

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>by at least half. And we haven't even started about

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>started talking about the deficit hike. So the real question

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be when do we see the spending level. Um,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>my expectation that that doesn't get discovered and earnest until

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.599
<v Speaker 1>the Senate starts to consider this bill, which will be

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>July late July specifically, and then um, the deficit hike

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>number again will be the other key input point to

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>see how revenue we need. So all this is gonna

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>just effectively wait till July. You can skip over the

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months. The Housel pass a big bill

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that maybe is three four trillion dollars and then we

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>can forget about that as soon as we get over

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate. Henrietta, if you look at equity trading,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you can see that a lot of people don't believe

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that corporate taxes will be raised all that much. What

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>do you think they will be looking at in September.

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Will it be higher than they expect or will there

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>be more enforcement of loopholes and just getting the actual

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>taxes that they're charging A great point, I mean that

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>enforcement mechanism. When you start hearing lawmakers talk about enforcement

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and collecting taxes that are due by beefing up the

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>funding for the I R S, that should tell you

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all you need to know, which is we're not going

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to go after new taxes. We're not going to create

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>some new tax stream. We're gonna go after the ones

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we've already collected, trying to boost you know, fraud ways

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>an abuse and and and call some earnings from that.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Um I think what investors are stuck in right now

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is this um mentality that whatever the President says goes.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>So they here, you know, at thirty nine point six

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>capital gains tax rate, and that's what they go to.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>And then you see a couple of advisors say, you know,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe twenty eight. We'll imagine if the number is. I

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's where we ultimately end up. But people are

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>using their imagination effectively enough. Yet the same with corporate rates,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be. It doesn't even have to

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>be five percent. It could easily be. And that's what

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the business community is pushing right now. You know, we

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>can handle a point or two. Don't take us all

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the way at twenty eight, and possibly don't take us

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way at twenty five, and those are options,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think the street will spawn pretty favorably based

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>off of what current expectations are, which still can be

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>really high. If you're on the phone with folks, I

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>agree the market is not pricing it in. But when

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on the phone with people talking about where tax

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>rates are going to go, they're surprised at our thesis

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that taxes will not rise that much. And then it

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>just quickly. It wouldn't be the first time that we've

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>had a week where we're drowning in fiscal news in

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>America and we missed the foreign policy story that creeps

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>up on us. What are we missing right now? At

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Sound of America? At Sound of Domestic Fiscal Policy? Man

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>John I thought the part of the speech Laborite that

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>was most compelling was the China facing component. Um The U. S.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>China relationship is one that I think is going to

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>be paramount in the back three years of the Biden administration.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to pass anymore legislation after this bill,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>most likely except for a China facing component, so U

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>S China relationships. That means everything from expert control restrictions

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>beeping up to domestic subsidization of manufacturing in the high

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>tech sectors. Um, you know, monitoring the South China, see

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with Taiwan, dealing with the EU and the UK

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to sort of combat China on a multilateral basis. That's

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the future. That's the next three years. Henrietta gotta catch

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>up and registrates there of Vata Panas thank you, the

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Caterpillos CFO saying that they may not meet the one

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>and use a demand due to a chip shortage. You

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>saw this in Apple as they knock off three or

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars a quarterly revenue because of a chip shortage,

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>holding back sales of the Mac and the iPad. You

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>saw this from forward cutting production by fift planned production

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>by in the second quarter. I want to bring it

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a man who knows this business far better than us

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>p f Ago, the New Street Research head of Technology Infrastructure.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start right there. What's happening at the moment,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and why is this hitting some companies more than others. Okay,

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so on what's happening at the moment. Let's rewind back

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to a year ago. A year ago, the world came

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to a stud everything stopped, and then you know guys

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>working in the supply chain at like in in boundaries

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at chip manufacturers, like buyers planning for orders, they all

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>went a very cautious role. And then at that point

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in time, the word split into you have you have

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>players more into tech space who we are thinking, we

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have very important turns to take, like the cloud, the

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>five jet turn, and we don't want that situation, that

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>temporary situation to stuff. So they kept ordering like there

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is more tomorrow. And then you have people who are

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>more defensive, like the auto industry, like industrial supply chains,

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that were really scared about cash burn and like getting

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>into trouble in such like a significant downturn, and they

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>became very very cautious. Then right after that what happened.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The word remained relatively slow, which is not great for

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>many people for like restaurants and things like that. But

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>people staying at home, like white collar kept getting paid.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Blue collars or like you know, like a service jobs

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>got compensated with government with simil this money and a

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of money kept flowing into demand. You look at

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the results of that early yesterday, that was a massive,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>massive bit like iphen stays up sixty five percent own here.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So demand is far outstripping the questions supply planning that

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was made. Okay, So Pierre beautifully explained you are definitive

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on this out of Bernstein years ago. What is the

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:16.359
<v Speaker 1>fairly good timeline to where the logistics mass clears. So unfortunately,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the core of the logistics mess is what we call

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>legging edge uh logic chips. So that's the chips manufactured

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>by Global Foundries, by t SMC, by UMC. And the

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lead time to put out a new fab and have

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it up and running is at best, in ideal conditions,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months and you should be more like thinking, you know,

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>um uh, like even six more months like that, like

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty four months or a bit more. So we're going

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear that chip supply for the next couple of years.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Um And in terms of getting gets impacted the most

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, it's it's going to be very

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult to call because one chip missing on the mother board.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You can't chip your iPad, one chip missing in your car.

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't manufacture your car. So it's going to be

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>very random. You know, who gets hit, who doesn't get hit.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But of course, if you are like uh an Apple,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>your better position because you've been preparing for that better

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>because you were working on your five transitions and others

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>taking way more precautions in terms of supply than to

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>can manufact You're just being focused on managing the downtown here.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly where I wanted to go execution risk.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>As John was talking about earlier, how much is this

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>something that corporate executives can get ahead of at this point?

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking forward to hear from corporate executives

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to do about it? Um, So

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know it's going to be very difficult to get

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>granular details about what they're going to to be able

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that. If the CFO Ford, you know, you know,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you cannot really have his own and on the plan

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to secure like alternative supply for a very minor chip

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in their car, So, um, it's going to be very

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult to be able to do something about it. I

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>think what you have to do is to mitigate it. Uh.

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And then another perspectives that you have to keep in

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>mind that is very important is that we are in

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>this extreme situation where people braced for a downturn and

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>actually spending increase. But as you know, the world reopened

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and you were talking about New York getting back to normal,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people getting back into the cities that never sleeps in

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>bars and restaurants. This is actually going to flush down

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money going into consumer econics and potentially

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>even going into the car industry. And so maybe the

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>saving grace in this environment is going to be when

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>demands normalize. It is apply going to have like massive

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>quarters that they reverted yesterday for the next six months

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or nine months. Maybe not. Maybe things are going to

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>cool down, and that's actually what's going to to accelerate

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a return to normal. On the supply side of things

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are really smart as always, and I look forward to

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>catching up again. I can't MANE told you about TESTA

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and then we get distracted by something else. We're gonna

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do that soon. I promised PFW to that New Street

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Research Head of Technology Infrastructure Joseph Feldban of Telsea Adviser

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to go up as a choice set. He wrote a

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>brilliant note on Amazon to maybe three days ago. The

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>ink is barely dry and he probably already has to

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>change the model. Joe Feldman, how do you approach Amazon

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon after what you witnessed from Google and Apple? Yeah,

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see some really good results

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>out of Amazon, especially fourth quarter has in the first

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter so far is proven to be quite strong for

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really all the retailers, anybody selling to the consumer, and

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is going to be a big winner of that.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're Amazon a ws business has been strong

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>even last night. They just announced a new deal with

0:19:55.880 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus. So they're continuing to be this juggernaut in

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, retail and technology and just dominating out there.

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think our our numbers are probably going to

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>go up. I think our models going to have to

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>adjust again tonight after they report. I'm expecting good results.

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>A juggernaut with a target on its back, and we

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>saw it of an Apple trying to get ahead of

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that with a plan to do infrastructure spending in the

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>United States, invest in new plants. Are we going to

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>hear something similar out of Amazon. I think they are.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You know you you. They continue to invest in the future.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>They're getting closer to the customer with more facilities. UM,

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's distribution or grocery. They're leveraging their technology and

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the stores. I think we're going to have contact with

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>shopping at a whole new level because of the technology

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has. Their distribution capabilities continue to improve. Like I said,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the AWS, they're continuing to become more dominant there, and

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>especially with more people working from home, and and you know,

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>that's likely to continue to some extent that AWS becomes

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>even more important to have things in the class. So

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to continue to to to really

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>push and lead the direction for most others, uh, in

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the in the consumer space for sure. There's also a

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>question on the employment space. Um. Amazon coming out today

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and saying that it was planning to raise wages for

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of workers. Is it enough what you've seen

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so far fifty cents to three dollars an hour for

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>most workers, this idea that Amazon has had so much pressure,

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>including that unionization push. Yeah, I think that they have

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>done a good job, better than most people expect. I

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at their average wage, it is

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong. Um. You know, and it's certainly above the

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollar mark. And I think that they've you know,

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>been very competitive. I hear a lot of retailers talk

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about needing to compete with Amazon for for talent, uh,

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>particularly in distribution UH and even at retail. So I

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, Amazon has done a good job,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people want to work at a company

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's growing fast and has a lot of strong process

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>backs ahead, Joe, I'm looking at free cash flow back

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>five years. Here's the numbers, folks, six seventeen two six again,

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and we model out to fifty two. We've gone from

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>six gazillion to fifty two gazillion. In a long cup

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of coffee, Joe Feldman, when's the dividend? Where's the ship share?

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Buy back? Where's the stock split? When did these guys

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>grow up and become a Dow component? Yeah, the stock

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>split is something that seems nearer to us than than something,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the others, the dividend or buy back. Uh.

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>You would think that they are unstable enough footing at

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this point, and they've been able to show profitability quarter

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>after quarter now for several years that they should be

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>able to start to think about redeploying that cash to

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the shareholder in some some regard um. You know, I

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>get it, you want to hold some cash and be

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>able to continue to invest and do what they're doing.

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>But we're back, We're now that new territory, a new

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>phase of growth for these this company where I do

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>agree that you're gonna have to see some of that cash, Lisa. One,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they've gone from four gazillion and like another long cup

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of coffee, which raises a question, Joe, what are they

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy? Well, they can buy whatever they want, I guess,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, they do have a lot of opportunity

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to grow. I think their footprint to get closer to

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the customer, now, whether that's going to be through distribution

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>facilities or grocery stores. I mean, a lot of our

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>contacts in the real estate community, you know, indicate that

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon has been pretty aggressive trying to build out

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>their grocery networks. You know. Now clearly they've more than

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>enough cash to do that. I don't think they want

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy a retailer, though, I think they'd rather grow

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it themselves organically. You know, maybe they could get some

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, leases or something, but it's not clear that

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that's where they would make acquisition. Well, I gotta say, Joe,

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>when you say that they could buy anyone. Sure they

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have the cash, But I do wonder the anti trust

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>push in Washington, d C. Is it just lip service

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or is that a real threat for Amazon. I mean,

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, look as big as they are, you know,

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they've got this big guy in Bentonville that quite large

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>themselves on the retail side of things anyway, you know,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and they've got quite a few competitors in the cloud.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure that they've got this monopolist of

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>power out there that that people are concerned about. Um,

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>there is pretty strong competition in the space of retail

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and technology. Joe Fellman, thank you so much. Thrilled to

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have you on here early in the years. On day

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>he is with Telsey Advisory. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.959
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the best and economics, finance and sument and international relations.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane, and this is Bloomberg