Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom huch. BLM calls looting reparations,
Speaker 1: Russia claims vaccine victory, Cuomo nursing home depth toll even
Speaker 1: higher than thought, and Trump says Democrats are the real
Speaker 1: election meddlers. Buck Sexton coding the news and disseminating information
Speaker 1: with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake Americans great, You're a
Speaker 1: great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show. Homeless
Speaker 1: CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without a
Speaker 1: phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No, Welcome everybody to
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show, the Freedom Hut, to one place
Speaker 1: where we can all speak the truth, where it all
Speaker 1: makes sense, where we get to hang out and the
Speaker 1: world feels just a little bit. Or thank you so
Speaker 1: much for being here. Make sure that you send us
Speaker 1: your thoughts throughout the week. Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com
Speaker 1: if you want to email, Facebook dot com, Slash buck
Speaker 1: Sexton if you want to send us that way, or
Speaker 1: on Instagram, just send a message to Buck Sexton. Producer
Speaker 1: Mark Love's getting all the messages. Let's get right to it.
Speaker 1: There was a series of looting over the weekend, and
Speaker 1: here's a big problem at the LIB that the left had.
Speaker 1: Usually they will say that the looting has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with the real and respectable and important movement of BLM.
Speaker 1: All right, this is what we're often told. This is
Speaker 1: the storyline that is shared with us. There's a problem
Speaker 1: with that, because often what happens is that there has
Speaker 1: been this is for the last few months at BLM protest,
Speaker 1: and then that protest, at least a portion of it
Speaker 1: is either cover for the looting, or some group of
Speaker 1: individuals within that protest engages in looting. But the one
Speaker 1: goes with the other starts to feel a little bit
Speaker 1: like one two punch, a symbiotic relationship of sorts. You
Speaker 1: get the protest, then you get the looting. Now, it
Speaker 1: doesn't happen always, obviously, but it happens with some frequency.
Speaker 1: And over the weekend we saw this again in Chicago.
Speaker 1: You had a protest over the illegal police shooting the
Speaker 1: murder of a teenage black male, and turned out it
Speaker 1: wasn't what they said it was. The guy was twenty,
Speaker 1: he shot at cops, he was shot, he was not killed.
Speaker 1: He's taken to the hospital. And it is yet to
Speaker 1: be the case that democrats want police officers or demand
Speaker 1: that police officers get fired at and not return fire. Right,
Speaker 1: Democrats have not yet taken that position with taser's. Yes,
Speaker 1: with actual firearms, maybe they think that way, but they
Speaker 1: haven't yet been willing to come out and say, no, cops,
Speaker 1: you should get shot at him and you can't actually
Speaker 1: return fire. So it was a hoax. It was a hoax.
Speaker 1: Murder by cop didn't actually happen, and yet it led
Speaker 1: to a protest. No one of the protest it seemed,
Speaker 1: cared very much that what they were protesting didn't even happen,
Speaker 1: and then there was looting. So yet BLM Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter protests for a thing that doesn't happen, and then
Speaker 1: that leads to looting. What is the lesson that we're
Speaker 1: supposed to take from all of this? Oh, it reminds
Speaker 1: me of the lesson we take from Joe Biden over
Speaker 1: the weekend, pandering to the African American community in this
Speaker 1: country by saying that Michael Brown's life was taken from
Speaker 1: him and we need to remember about systemic racism. Michael
Speaker 1: Brown attacked a police officer and was killed by that
Speaker 1: police officer in the defense of himself. Every human being,
Speaker 1: I don't care. I don't care what people say about
Speaker 1: historic wrongs, or historical pressure or historic anything. Every person
Speaker 1: alive today, of every race, creed, color, has the right
Speaker 1: to defend himself or herself against violent assault, every person
Speaker 1: on planet Earth. It is rooted in natural law. Doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what the state says, doesn't matter what the politics are,
Speaker 1: You always have a right to defend yourself. And law
Speaker 1: enforcement obviously also needs that right, as they are supposed
Speaker 1: to be the front line of the use of force
Speaker 1: by the state against those who would break the state's laws.
Speaker 1: What happened the days after the looting in Chicago, which
Speaker 1: which is an embarrassment to the city. It should be
Speaker 1: the city of Chicago, the people that run it, the
Speaker 1: police force, the mayor, They should feel as though they
Speaker 1: failed because they have they have. The police Superintendent for Chicago,
Speaker 1: Dave David Brown, here's what he said play clip ten.
Speaker 1: CPD became aware of old social media post encouraging looting downtown.
Speaker 1: Officers were dispatched to our downtown area once we got
Speaker 1: word of the social media post. Four hundred officers who
Speaker 1: were dispatched to our downtown. As the officers arrived to
Speaker 1: our downtown, the first incident happened at a store near
Speaker 1: the eighty seventh and the Dan Ryan Expressway. Soon car
Speaker 1: caravans were headed into the loop. This was not an
Speaker 1: organized protest. Rather, this was an incident of pure criminality.
Speaker 1: This was an act of violence against our police officers
Speaker 1: and against our city. This was also coordinated, right. The
Speaker 1: looting was a coordinated response. You may have seen the
Speaker 1: vehicle being used to smash into the window of a store.
Speaker 1: This was thought through. They planned, the looters planned to
Speaker 1: do this. I'm sure if law enforcement was willing to
Speaker 1: look into it, they would see that social media in
Speaker 1: different communication apps or a part of it. But this
Speaker 1: was not the frenzy of the moment. This was not
Speaker 1: people overtaken by feelings of rage because of the story
Speaker 1: of another young black man killed, illegally, killed, murdered, shot
Speaker 1: down the street by police. That didn't happen, at least
Speaker 1: not in a way. Look, I don't get sad when
Speaker 1: someone shoots the cops and that person is shot. I
Speaker 1: don't feel any outrage. I don't feel any I have
Speaker 1: no problem with the state. I have no problem law
Speaker 1: enforcement for that. In fact, it's something that we should
Speaker 1: all say is what needs to happen. It is the
Speaker 1: just outcome. If a criminal fires a gun at police
Speaker 1: officers and the police shoot that criminal in response, that
Speaker 1: is justice. Ah, Now we have to start getting to
Speaker 1: the heart of the matter. That is a just outcome.
Speaker 1: It's regrettable, right. We don't want anyone to have to
Speaker 1: be to have to suffer the use force at the
Speaker 1: hands of the state. It would be preferable if we
Speaker 1: never had any such incident, of course, but when someone
Speaker 1: makes that decision, it is in fact the just outcome
Speaker 1: for police to respond with lethal force in that way.
Speaker 1: We need to understand that. Okay, there's no license for
Speaker 1: people because they're upset because they feel like there's systemic
Speaker 1: racism or oppression or whatever else it may be. And
Speaker 1: who gets to hold up that manchel who gets to
Speaker 1: white liberals, for example, on behalf of oppress. African Americans
Speaker 1: get to engage in violence against cops and think that
Speaker 1: they're acting in a way that is justified. Clearly in
Speaker 1: Portland they do think that. So we have to push
Speaker 1: back on this. We have to shove this narrative out
Speaker 1: of the public square. We have to defeat it, and
Speaker 1: we can't dance around it. We can't pretend that it's
Speaker 1: not there. They told people that this was the result
Speaker 1: of a police shooting. It did not happen. This was
Speaker 1: rooted in ignorance and exploitation of the moment, for thievery,
Speaker 1: for stealing. People who were involved in this were stealing. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's be very clear. This is a criminal act. Now.
Speaker 1: They will also tell you that this has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with BLM, that there was a BLM protest and
Speaker 1: then there was coordinated rioting and looting. Right, these are
Speaker 1: really two of the same thing. There are two things
Speaker 1: that go together, coordinated looting and rioting. You had BLM
Speaker 1: with all of this there, and then the police have
Speaker 1: to come out in full force, and it's it's a
Speaker 1: total nightmare for the city of Chicago because other businesses
Speaker 1: will think, do I really want to set up down there?
Speaker 1: There were small businesses, there were independent operations, not that
Speaker 1: we should. There's this attitude as well, oh well they
Speaker 1: have you know, it's it's a CDC, it's a major
Speaker 1: national drug chain, it's a big designer clothing store. Who
Speaker 1: cares because it'll all be okay, they've got enough money. No,
Speaker 1: there are big stores closing all over the place, and
Speaker 1: those stores represent jobs. There are people that feed their
Speaker 1: families because of the paycheck they get from these stores
Speaker 1: that they never reopen again. And these looters are doing
Speaker 1: this to Chicago when this city has already been kicked
Speaker 1: in the stomach by COVID nineteen, the lockdowns, the lunacy
Speaker 1: of the libs that if we just keep pretending like
Speaker 1: we can wait this thing out, everything will get better.
Speaker 1: But while the city is in this fragile state, they're
Speaker 1: seizing that moment, seizing that opportunity. And that's why I
Speaker 1: think it's so important that we really speak honestly about
Speaker 1: the mentality here. Black Lives Matter members in Chicago, according
Speaker 1: to Fox, held a rally. This is after all this
Speaker 1: stuff happened, right after sixty million in property damage, thirteen
Speaker 1: police officers injured, over a hundred arrested. BLM holds a rally.
Speaker 1: Official organizers of BLM now they'll say, oh, there's no
Speaker 1: such thing. No, there are people that are tied into
Speaker 1: the movement. The movement is getting money, lots of it.
Speaker 1: It has corporate America bowing to it. Now. It is
Speaker 1: responsible the same way the Republican Party is responsible for
Speaker 1: whatever some you know, state assemblyman says, and who knows
Speaker 1: what state? And at all? It's true of all, No, no,
Speaker 1: if you're part of if you're part of the group,
Speaker 1: we get to criticize the group for what somebody who's
Speaker 1: a part of it says or does. That's the way
Speaker 1: this works. A BLM organizer, not just a protest or
Speaker 1: a person there, said about the massive theft and destruction
Speaker 1: quote that is reparations. Anything they wanted to take, they
Speaker 1: can take it because these businesses have insurance. Oh you
Speaker 1: mean exactly what I've told you is the mentality that
Speaker 1: some members of the BLM movement are willing to say
Speaker 1: out loud that historical oppression and injustice inequity, not inequality.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about that inequity in society justifies this kind
Speaker 1: of behavior. The organizer went on. Quote, I don't care
Speaker 1: if someone decides to loot a Gucci or a Macy's
Speaker 1: or a Nike store, because that makes sure that person eats,
Speaker 1: said Ariel Atkins. A BLM organizer. That makes sure that
Speaker 1: person has clothes. So are we still going to hear
Speaker 1: Oh no, the media will pretend that this didn't happen.
Speaker 1: They'll try to move on to something else as fast
Speaker 1: as possible, because what they don't want the American people
Speaker 1: to see is that the BLM movement, which I have
Speaker 1: been telling you has made everything worse for everyone, has
Speaker 1: rotten principles at its core. Right, it's not just that
Speaker 1: the slogan black Lives matter, as we know that's intended
Speaker 1: to put people on defense. Every person who is moral, decent,
Speaker 1: ethical agrees that black lives matter. In fact, it's it's
Speaker 1: offensive to think that it has to that anyone has
Speaker 1: to be reminded of this or has to say it
Speaker 1: in order to believe it. Of course we believe it.
Speaker 1: I do, you do. The movement is entirely separate from
Speaker 1: that very basic belief. The movement is a bunch of
Speaker 1: Marxists who want to destroy the nuclear family. The movement
Speaker 1: is concerned with the acquisition and utilization of power under
Speaker 1: a radical Marxist umbrella that uses as the tip of
Speaker 1: its spear racial separation, racial identity politics, and likes to
Speaker 1: pull us apart at the seams. BLM increasingly, if you
Speaker 1: pay attention what the movement does and how its members
Speaker 1: speak about it, BLM increasingly, who wants there to be
Speaker 1: a different set of laws for an application of justice
Speaker 1: depending on what your skin color is. In this country,
Speaker 1: this is already occurring with things like affirmative action, which
Speaker 1: are clearly legal mandates legal changes based upon skin color.
Speaker 1: We know this already happens. This exists with diversity training
Speaker 1: and corporate hiring. But now they want to expand that
Speaker 1: even further. Now it has to be a redistribution of
Speaker 1: the goods of society, a redistribution of the wealth. And remember,
Speaker 1: wealth comes from labor, laborers, time and effort. When people
Speaker 1: are taking property from you, it's like they are seizing
Speaker 1: hours of your life from you. It's like they are
Speaker 1: taking away time from your life. There's a reason why
Speaker 1: it's immoral. You often hear well, property destruction is not violence. Really,
Speaker 1: Any lib who says that in the media should should
Speaker 1: run an experiment. How would they feel if someone came
Speaker 1: by their home while they were inside it and people
Speaker 1: just smat all their windows with baseball bats and destroyed
Speaker 1: everything in their home. Would they feel violated or would
Speaker 1: they say it's just property. It's just property, my friends.
Speaker 1: They are kicking at the load bearing walls of our
Speaker 1: civilization and laughing as they do it. And the cowards
Speaker 1: the abject cowards in our own media go along with
Speaker 1: it at every step of the way. They excuse it,
Speaker 1: they encourage it, they lie to you about it. Looting
Speaker 1: in Chicago, according to BLM, is like a form of reparations. Gee,
Speaker 1: if we're going to go down that pathway, what else
Speaker 1: is acceptable? What other double standards in law in society
Speaker 1: should exist based upon skin color to advantage some at
Speaker 1: the expense of others as a matter of law. Oh,
Speaker 1: BLM doesn't want to answer that one. And you know
Speaker 1: who else doesn't Joe Biden and the Democrats who are
Speaker 1: just now realizing they don't really have control of this
Speaker 1: movement and it has become a liability for them, So
Speaker 1: they're going to have to lie about it, suppress it,
Speaker 1: push it aside, distance themselves. The media is going to
Speaker 1: be working so hard to pretend that the excesses of
Speaker 1: this movement that are very apparent to all of us
Speaker 1: don't bring down Biden's hopes this fall, because the whole
Speaker 1: game here all along has been to pretend the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party isn't the party of BLM and Antifa and defund
Speaker 1: the police and abolish ice, but really we all know
Speaker 1: they are, and They can try to run from it,
Speaker 1: they can try to hide from it, they can try
Speaker 1: to lie about it, but we are onto them. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom und This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. We are waking up in shock this morning,
Speaker 1: early morning hours today, dozens of individuals came to our
Speaker 1: Loom Magmile River, North and Gold Close neighborhoods, as well
Speaker 1: as our commercial district around North and Clymorne. These individuals
Speaker 1: engagement it can only be described as brazen and extensive
Speaker 1: criminal looting and destruction. And to be clear, this had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with legitimate, protected First Amendment expression. You know,
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be brave, right, It's supposed to be all.
Speaker 1: Here's the mayor of Chicago saying that this has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with First Amendment. Yeah, we know that. Does
Speaker 1: anyone really think it does? But notice that the way
Speaker 1: that the movement BLM will be criticized is always saying
Speaker 1: the most obvious and whatever they can say, that's not
Speaker 1: really going to go after the core of the movement.
Speaker 1: He hears. The problem with BLM. It is built upon lies.
Speaker 1: It is built upon lies. Okay, it is built upon
Speaker 1: the lie of Michael Brown's martyrdom. It is built upon
Speaker 1: the lie that young black men are killed illegally and
Speaker 1: without consequence by police on a regular basis systematically in
Speaker 1: this country, that people don't care when that happens, that
Speaker 1: there's no outcry when that happens. These are lies. So
Speaker 1: it's very hard for anybody to take a movement for
Speaker 1: justice seriously when the movement is initially started by the
Speaker 1: injustice inherent in telling the public untruths to get them
Speaker 1: to their side. No one's going to say that in
Speaker 1: a position of democrat authority. Though, No, we still have
Speaker 1: to do this thing where despite now we're months into it,
Speaker 1: we see what does this movement too? Does this movement
Speaker 1: bring people together? Do they bring people together in peaceful protest?
Speaker 1: And do you see an effort to persuade and effort
Speaker 1: toward toward dignity for all people, for justice for all
Speaker 1: people in this country. No, it's divisive. It's full of
Speaker 1: virulent anti cop hatred. Time and again, it often devolves
Speaker 1: into violence. It often devolves into looting and destruction. Sixty
Speaker 1: million dollars of property destruction and one night in Chicago,
Speaker 1: sixty million folks. Why do we have to pretend like
Speaker 1: this movement is a good thing at all. I keep
Speaker 1: saying it. It has made everything worse for everyone. Nothing
Speaker 1: is better because of BLM nothing. It is an expression
Speaker 1: of rage. It is an expression of excuses by Marxists
Speaker 1: who seek to divide and conquer the United States, and
Speaker 1: to do so they rely upon reflecting whatever anger that
Speaker 1: exists in the community on specific people, on specific targets,
Speaker 1: without without ever actually addressing why do the problems in
Speaker 1: certain communities exist as they do no effort to It's
Speaker 1: all the cops fault, you see. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the bus Essen Show podcast us. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. It almost sounds as though you were saying,
Speaker 1: this is the reason we happened is because the courts
Speaker 1: and the prosecutors were not doing their job, that they
Speaker 1: were going too easy on the looters from the last time.
Speaker 1: They don't take it from me. Just go by what's
Speaker 1: been done. I don't want to do a job for you,
Speaker 1: but just go by what's been done. There was there
Speaker 1: were no consequences for the people arrested. Let's be clear,
Speaker 1: I mean, don't bad us. Okay, this is no, no,
Speaker 1: do not bid us. Don't do not bid us. This
Speaker 1: is a serious situation. People are concerned about their safety.
Speaker 1: Officers are concerned about their safety, So don't bade us.
Speaker 1: What we're saying is, as a result of what happened
Speaker 1: last night, there have to be consequences. We've got teams
Speaker 1: of people that aggressively out there identify the people responsible,
Speaker 1: looking at the plates, and we're going to bring them
Speaker 1: to justice. But when we do, and we do make
Speaker 1: those arrests, our expectation is that this is going to
Speaker 1: be treated with the level of seriousness that it should be. Period.
Speaker 1: Don't try to bait us, mischaracterize, pick one against the other.
Speaker 1: We're not playing that. We are in a serious situation
Speaker 1: here and we need a serious response. That's what we're saying, perious,
Speaker 1: Mayor of Chicago's and don't bait us. This is so serious.
Speaker 1: This is not a time for games. The reporter's questions
Speaker 1: seem very legitimate to me, is asking about prosecutors and judges.
Speaker 1: We keep hearing this in New York too. I know
Speaker 1: this is one of the democrats favorite talking points now
Speaker 1: as their cities smolder in ruin, right, they say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: it's because the courts aren't operating because of COVID. Really,
Speaker 1: the courts are preventing police from being able to do
Speaker 1: their jobs effectively in these cities. No, what prevents police
Speaker 1: from doing their jobs in New York, in Chicago, in
Speaker 1: name a city going through a crime wave in Minneapolis,
Speaker 1: is that Democrat politicians have promised the mob that the
Speaker 1: cops are on a short lease. Now the cops are
Speaker 1: on notice that even a good faith error in trying
Speaker 1: to deal with violent, resisting arrest suspects, even a good
Speaker 1: faith error could result not just an loss of job,
Speaker 1: a loss of freedom in the case of Atlanta, perhaps
Speaker 1: even the threat that the state will put a needle
Speaker 1: in the arm of a law enforcement officer defending himself.
Speaker 1: That has a real effect, that has real ramifications all
Speaker 1: across the country, ramifications that the BLM movement wanted, demanded
Speaker 1: defund police. We have gotten to a place where we
Speaker 1: see what happens when people turn on law enforcement and
Speaker 1: don't get any of these lib morons out there. They
Speaker 1: love the commitment. They haven't defunded decamped yet. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: whole point isn't just that they're saying they want to
Speaker 1: defund them, and they have actually defund of them in
Speaker 1: some places. It is the messaging of defund police. It
Speaker 1: is the messaging of de Blasio and Lightfoot and name
Speaker 1: another mayor of a major city of Wheeler in Portland,
Speaker 1: taking every opportunity to pander to the angry mob, to
Speaker 1: pander to the Democrat Biden voters who think the rules
Speaker 1: don't apply to them because they're so upset. I'm so
Speaker 1: upset right now. You know else is upset. The people
Speaker 1: who showed up to stores that they worked in, that
Speaker 1: they called places of business, that allowed them to pay
Speaker 1: their bills, that allowed them to feel pride when they
Speaker 1: returned home to see their wife or husband and kids.
Speaker 1: Another day doing the right thing, another day bringing home
Speaker 1: a paycheck, making sure that you all have food on
Speaker 1: the table, rent is paid, healthcare. The pride, the dignity
Speaker 1: of that that's being stolen from people by these looters
Speaker 1: who destroy businesses that won't open now for weeks perhaps ever. Again,
Speaker 1: it's not just the theft of the property, it's the
Speaker 1: theft of peace of mind. It's the theft of dignity,
Speaker 1: of decency that occurs. That's why the state has to
Speaker 1: enforce these laws. That's why there must be punishment for
Speaker 1: these things. And now we're told by Mayor Lightfoot, Oh,
Speaker 1: we have teams working on this. We're going to hold
Speaker 1: people to account. This is where the progressive prosecutor project
Speaker 1: that I've told you about also comes into play. Do
Speaker 1: you think that the Kim Fox prosecutors Kim Fox like
Speaker 1: prosecutors across the country. She was the one in the
Speaker 1: Jose Smallt case. Do you think that they're really willing
Speaker 1: to drop the hammer down, so to speak, You think
Speaker 1: they're really willing to put away a looter at this
Speaker 1: point in time. No, not in Chicago. Not if you
Speaker 1: want to keep your prosecutor job. Not if you want
Speaker 1: to be district attorney, maybe become mayor yourself. You're gonna
Speaker 1: find rationales for letting people off easy. Look at what
Speaker 1: has been happening in this and these are all Democrat ideas.
Speaker 1: And this, unfortunately has been one of the places where
Speaker 1: the Trump administration was infiltrated with some very faulty LIB thinking. Okay,
Speaker 1: the Lib thinking is, if we only do more criminal
Speaker 1: justice reform, if we try to meet them halfway, we
Speaker 1: will we will have safer communities, will have better outreached
Speaker 1: the minority community, and they'll be more justice. What has
Speaker 1: ended up happening is you get rid of bail you have,
Speaker 1: so you have people who are released who go out
Speaker 1: and commit more crimes. Somebody recently killed the woman he
Speaker 1: raped who was a suspect against him in a rape trial.
Speaker 1: He was let out of prison because of COVID fears,
Speaker 1: So they used the fear of COVID to let people
Speaker 1: out who shouldn't have been let out. They get rid
Speaker 1: of bail so that judges have a much harder time
Speaker 1: holding anyone. They tell cops, you better find a way
Speaker 1: to wrestle lunatic suspects to the ground, emotionally disturbed persons
Speaker 1: to the ground, and not make it look like you're
Speaker 1: using any violence against them, or else you'll lose your
Speaker 1: job and maybe go to prison and have your life ruined,
Speaker 1: your family's life ruin. All these things coming together result
Speaker 1: in what we're seeing right now, the doubling of shootings
Speaker 1: year to year in the month of July in a
Speaker 1: place like New York, the doubling of shooting America's largest
Speaker 1: city eight point six eight point seven million people, Chicago
Speaker 1: is the third largest city. Look at the major cities
Speaker 1: across the country. Why is violence rising in all of them?
Speaker 1: And especially when you're talking about the statistics here the numbers.
Speaker 1: It's in a year when people have been largely confined
Speaker 1: to their homes, far less human interaction on the streets,
Speaker 1: far less opportunity you would think for criminal mischief and
Speaker 1: criminal predatory behavior. But no, the number we're breaking records
Speaker 1: in all the worst ways in many cities across the country.
Speaker 1: Why because of the lies the Democrat Party told. This
Speaker 1: is on This is squarely on them. I hope, I
Speaker 1: really mean this with my friends. I hope that it
Speaker 1: costs the Democrats the presidency and control of the House.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you that it will, but that would
Speaker 1: be justice. That would be justice for the store owners,
Speaker 1: for the employees of those stores, for the people who
Speaker 1: live in neighborhoods who have been terrorized by this, and
Speaker 1: the coddling of the media of a movement that has
Speaker 1: brought no benefit other than the social justice virtue signaling
Speaker 1: for mostly white liberals out in the streets for their
Speaker 1: Instagram and their TikTok videos. They're not helping anyone in society.
Speaker 1: They're not tackling systemic racism. They're not making racism go away.
Speaker 1: In fact, they're creating a society in their minds where
Speaker 1: race becomes a determining factor in innocence or gui, where race,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, can be used to the benefit
Speaker 1: of minorities against you know, non minorities, whites and Asians
Speaker 1: predominantly in the legal system. They believe in this, They
Speaker 1: believe in these changes to the country. All of this
Speaker 1: is negative. All this is destructive, and we're seeing the results,
Speaker 1: and they want to hide the results. They'll try, but
Speaker 1: they can't really because we see them for what they're doing.
Speaker 1: We see what's going on. Will they hold them responsible
Speaker 1: in Chicago for the looting? I don't think so. I
Speaker 1: don't think so. Will we hold the Democrat Party responsible
Speaker 1: this fall? Will the Americans listening to this in Ohio,
Speaker 1: in Florida, in Nevada, in Wisconsin? Will they recognize what
Speaker 1: the stakes are and what the Democrat Party has become
Speaker 1: and rebuke it at the ballot box? That is the
Speaker 1: question that I leave for you right now. I certainly
Speaker 1: hope the answers. Yes. You're in the Freedom und This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Russia claims to
Speaker 1: have a vaccine the pot of coronavirus. We'll see if
Speaker 1: he sees through. Look, this would be a huge breakthrough
Speaker 1: if it's If it works, it's pretty impressive if the
Speaker 1: Russians with an economy that has a fraction the size
Speaker 1: of the US economy, If the Russians are are truly
Speaker 1: able to have or I've been able to do this now.
Speaker 1: Part of this, obviously is going to be that the
Speaker 1: Russian government is more willing to tolerate risk from a
Speaker 1: thing like this. They have not done the big, the
Speaker 1: big trial of about thirty thousand people, which is going
Speaker 1: to be done, which is underway right now in the US,
Speaker 1: for large scale data sets in order to hast effectiveness
Speaker 1: and safety of this. The Russians, I guess they're deciding, Look,
Speaker 1: we're pretty sure that this is effective. It is based
Speaker 1: along similar technology. It's not like they're, you know, telling
Speaker 1: you to rub some dirt on it or something, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, they're they're basing this along similar technology or
Speaker 1: similar research and science. I should say that's being used
Speaker 1: in other places. And they are all prudent. Says that
Speaker 1: one of his daughters has already taken it. And I
Speaker 1: always tell you that there is there's a test here.
Speaker 1: You know, there's a test here where do as people
Speaker 1: do themselves when it comes to medicine, not as they
Speaker 1: tell others to do, right, I mean, you know you
Speaker 1: could trust somebody. I mean, I trust a doctor who
Speaker 1: will tell me that, you know, for X disease, he
Speaker 1: or she and his whole and you know, their whole
Speaker 1: family have taken the treatment or been vaccinated. That that
Speaker 1: always adds a little layer of Okay, I think that
Speaker 1: that's probably more it's more likely, probably more likely that
Speaker 1: you can trust that person's opinion even even more fully.
Speaker 1: At least, so we have a Russia vaccine, a Russian
Speaker 1: vaccine that's out there. I don't know how they're gonna
Speaker 1: tie this into Russia collusion, but maybe just just give
Speaker 1: it time. You'll probably see somebody on the left, a
Speaker 1: journo who comes out with some version of uh, you know,
Speaker 1: they'll they'll say something along the lines of Russia is
Speaker 1: trying to help Trump by rushing out a vaccine. You're
Speaker 1: gonna see it, all right, it's a prediction, but I
Speaker 1: think you're gonna say, oh, look at this, putin Trump's
Speaker 1: best buddy going out there, try to help Trump win
Speaker 1: election by because there is a little bit of a
Speaker 1: sense to the agonist. I can feel it in the
Speaker 1: news cycle. You can sense it that the market's gotten up.
Speaker 1: The Dow is up above I think twenty I think,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark was a twenty seven, twenty eight thousand. Today
Speaker 1: it's the tao Is is up a bunch this week,
Speaker 1: and there's a sense that, Okay, we're getting close here,
Speaker 1: almost into September, September October, we really should have a
Speaker 1: vaccine based on the trials we're seeing here in this
Speaker 1: country this year, which it means within a few months.
Speaker 1: So it's starting to feel like the end of this
Speaker 1: is near, and that's a great thing for America, for
Speaker 1: the whole world if that's true. I don't want to look.
Speaker 1: One of the most important lessons I've learned in life
Speaker 1: do not celebrate early. You don't celebrating early is psychologically catastrophic.
Speaker 1: It also forces you to make off in very bad
Speaker 1: decisions because once you've already said, oh great, look I win,
Speaker 1: you know you never want to be the guy, right,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark. You don't want to be the guy who's
Speaker 1: doing the touchdown dance before you get into the end zone.
Speaker 1: And you get tackled right that the team doesn't like
Speaker 1: that guy. Yeah, not a smart move. Yeah, that's not
Speaker 1: a good move. You don't want to be that guy.
Speaker 1: So I'm not high stepping yet on the COVID vaccine
Speaker 1: because who knows right and who knows about this rush?
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this. Would I take the Russian vaccine? No,
Speaker 1: producer Mark, would you take the Russian vaccine? No? Absolutely not. Yeah, No,
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't think so. I mean there's a
Speaker 1: part of you that that that's hoping it would like
Speaker 1: make me Ivandrago from a Rocky four. You know, I'd
Speaker 1: be like, it must break you. But I don't think. No,
Speaker 1: it's not going to do that. So I do believe.
Speaker 1: I do believe that there's a lot of twenty Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's over twenty eight dow over twenty eight thousand. Today.
Speaker 1: People are starting to feel it. They're like, I think
Speaker 1: it's going to come back. And here's what I want
Speaker 1: you to be prepared for. And you've got to get
Speaker 1: your mindset in this space now because otherwise you will,
Speaker 1: you will give the other side more credit than they
Speaker 1: deserve on this right, You've you've got to look at
Speaker 1: this as it is right now, and you've got to say, okay,
Speaker 1: they're going to be rooting against a vaccine for widespread ushers.
Speaker 1: The Libs are gonna say, no, no, no, let's hold off,
Speaker 1: let's hold off. They don't want vaccination to start and
Speaker 1: a big surge of optimism and economic activity to flourish
Speaker 1: over the next sixty days. And that's that's a hard
Speaker 1: thing to hear because you know, all we have so
Speaker 1: many libs out there wear a mask, you know, all
Speaker 1: this stuff. Oh my gosh, they're always in panic about this.
Speaker 1: You know, you're outside walking by yourself, no longer than
Speaker 1: twenty yards. Why aren't you wearing a mask? Because I'm
Speaker 1: not crazy, I don't know. But those same libs, remember,
Speaker 1: the COVID virus for them has been and I'm I'm
Speaker 1: now going deep into lib psychology for you, I know,
Speaker 1: buckle up. The the COVID pandemic for the liberal mindset
Speaker 1: in America has been the realization for them has been
Speaker 1: for them, it has proven them, It has proven them
Speaker 1: right in their minds that Trump is a disaster of
Speaker 1: unparalleled proportions, a threat to their republic. And so what
Speaker 1: they are most upset about ultimately is that Trump has
Speaker 1: been president during this and they blame him for all
Speaker 1: of it, even though it is hit the whole world,
Speaker 1: even though there are so many countries that on a
Speaker 1: per capita basis have had more fatalities than the US has,
Speaker 1: they still view this as essentially it's like a catharsis
Speaker 1: of anti trumpsm this whole process of going through this virus,
Speaker 1: it's there. They are expunging or expelling all their anti
Speaker 1: Trump rage during this virus period, and they only think
Speaker 1: the only thing that they're looking forward to with all
Speaker 1: of this right now is that Trump will lose the
Speaker 1: election because of the virus. Can you imagine psychologically where
Speaker 1: they will be if after this virus, which they blame
Speaker 1: Trump for, they say he's showed no leadership, but he's
Speaker 1: been horrible, If after all that he wins reelection, they
Speaker 1: will think that this is a president who has gotten
Speaker 1: away with you one hundred and fifty thousand murders. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's crazy. I know, that's absolutely textbook insane. But they
Speaker 1: will believe that. A lot of them believe that, and
Speaker 1: they've already convinced themselves for years the Trump is a
Speaker 1: Russian asset which was also stupid and insane. Now they're
Speaker 1: going to think that the president has gotten away with
Speaker 1: mass murder during the pandemic, and you know, he's the
Speaker 1: worst person ever. I was watching the show Succession, and
Speaker 1: the main character who's sort of like the head of
Speaker 1: Fox News ales that's kind of is based off of
Speaker 1: He's Got It. It's a fictional show, but there's rough approximate,
Speaker 1: you know, approximations with characters. And the guy's brother, who's
Speaker 1: a huge lib has this whole monologue about how the
Speaker 1: head of the conservative news network has killed more people
Speaker 1: than Hitler because of climate change denialism, and it's absurd,
Speaker 1: but that's a mentality that actually exists. People are going
Speaker 1: to think that Donald Trump, they're going into the Democrats
Speaker 1: libs think that he's responsible for the COVID death doll.
Speaker 1: He personally is responsible, and so whatever they have do
Speaker 1: to hold them responsible making sure he loses, they think
Speaker 1: is justified. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Speaking of dishonesty in service
Speaker 1: of the Democrat narrative around COVID and the fight against coronavirus,
Speaker 1: China virus, all that stuff. We have been living through
Speaker 1: one of the most epic gas lighting situations I've ever
Speaker 1: seen in my entire life. Actually a couple of them,
Speaker 1: the two great gas lightings of the COVID pandemic have
Speaker 1: been one public health experts who were willing to bow
Speaker 1: down in servians to the Black Lives Matter movement at
Speaker 1: the risk and cost of infections and lives, by their
Speaker 1: own logic, by their own expert advice, to bow down
Speaker 1: before that movement and justify, not even apologize for it,
Speaker 1: just straight up justify the mass protests across the country
Speaker 1: during lockdowns, when people still could not bury loved ones,
Speaker 1: could not go to funerals, could not have weddings, but
Speaker 1: you could get together with two thousand of your buddies
Speaker 1: walk down the street screaming, breaking stuff, yelling and spitting
Speaker 1: at cops, and people with MD next to their name
Speaker 1: on Twitter at least or on MSNBC and CNN would say, well,
Speaker 1: this is good for public health, actually, because you know
Speaker 1: this is about saving black lives. No, it's not. It's
Speaker 1: actually not what the movement's about. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: allow the continued lies about this and everything. They're seizing
Speaker 1: a moral high ground that they do not occupy. Okay,
Speaker 1: they are not coming at this from the moral high ground.
Speaker 1: It's just not true. They pretend. So that's one great
Speaker 1: gas lighting, and perhaps I should write a piece the
Speaker 1: great gas lighting of twenty twenty. But the other one,
Speaker 1: the other gas lighting, is that the Red states have
Speaker 1: done poorly against this, and the Blue states, the major
Speaker 1: blue states, right the ones where all the worst politicians
Speaker 1: come from, all the You know that the power of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party is situated, that they did a great job,
Speaker 1: that they were excellent in their handling of this, And
Speaker 1: that's not true. I do this show every day and
Speaker 1: have for every day of the pandemic from the center
Speaker 1: of New York City, right in the middle of Manhattan,
Speaker 1: in the middle of New York and this place, and
Speaker 1: I will never forget. We had, as I've told you,
Speaker 1: field hospitals set up in our parks, hospitals, I mean
Speaker 1: Navy hospital ships going past my window. The biggest convention
Speaker 1: center in New York set up as a massive excess
Speaker 1: capacity hospital. Right we were on We were in a
Speaker 1: state as a city of total panic, and while it
Speaker 1: never got as bad in the numbers as they projected,
Speaker 1: which was going to be a total overflow, and it
Speaker 1: was really bad, twenty five to let's call it, twenty
Speaker 1: five thousand dead in New York from COVID. That's without
Speaker 1: getting into dying from COVID versus dying with COVID and
Speaker 1: the incentive that does exist for hospitals to code things
Speaker 1: as a COVID death because they get more of a
Speaker 1: reimbursement from it. And I'm sure there are people that
Speaker 1: do that that are coding it a little bit more
Speaker 1: liberally to include more deaths as under the COVID umbrella,
Speaker 1: and they feel like they're also doing a service because well,
Speaker 1: at least now they're raising more awareness about COVID nineteen, right,
Speaker 1: So I know that's been happening. Governor Cuomo has become
Speaker 1: more of a household name than ever before. He had
Speaker 1: his little two man variety show on TV at night
Speaker 1: with his brother. Why haven't you quod mom? I'm gonna
Speaker 1: quot mom first? What do you mean you're a smart one?
Speaker 1: I'm the dumber. What are you talking about? You're not Fredo?
Speaker 1: I'm Fredo, right. All this stuff that they were doing
Speaker 1: while the pandemic was raging in the city, and Cuomo,
Speaker 1: without missing a beat, doesn't say a word about the
Speaker 1: protesters other than its lawful protest First Amendment rights important movement.
Speaker 1: You know, the usual bend the knee, lib pandering to BLM.
Speaker 1: A lot of that from him. But the moment that
Speaker 1: you want to open up a bar or even just
Speaker 1: serve people out on the street and open air from
Speaker 1: your bar, none of social distancing. What a poll you
Speaker 1: look a license? We're gonna pull it from you. Why
Speaker 1: will you not listen to me? I am the tyrant
Speaker 1: dictator of New York. Well, he has no problem issuing
Speaker 1: fines and shutting down businesses. And they've played this is
Speaker 1: like Lucy with the football and Charlie Brown. Uh. You know,
Speaker 1: they tell us, oh no, this time, we promised the metrics,
Speaker 1: say we can reopen, and then nope, they pull the
Speaker 1: football away. We don't get to reopen. Haven't reopened for
Speaker 1: interior dining, having reopened jims, having reopened public gatherings, none
Speaker 1: of it. Why, well, we had two or three COVID
Speaker 1: deaths a day on average for the last couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: And these are these are senior citizens who are dying
Speaker 1: of COVID. Right, senior citizens who may also have been
Speaker 1: at very high are at high risk of dying from
Speaker 1: flu and dying from other things as well. People die
Speaker 1: from things. Every day. Two or three people dying from
Speaker 1: a disease. You would think would not be enough to
Speaker 1: shut down a state of twenty million people. But here
Speaker 1: we are. Here we are. And then that brings me to,
Speaker 1: in some ways the darkest chapter of the whole COVID response,
Speaker 1: and that is the the order given. It was It
Speaker 1: was an order given by Governor Cuomo because he was
Speaker 1: so swept up in this belief that we were going
Speaker 1: to have overflowing hospitals. We weren't going to have people
Speaker 1: were going to be showing up to the hospital and told, oh,
Speaker 1: you don't have a we have Not only do we
Speaker 1: not have a ventilator for you, we have no ability
Speaker 1: to care for you. Now we also know ventilators are
Speaker 1: an absolute last resort for this virus. They want to
Speaker 1: do everything you can before putting on a ventilator. Ventilator
Speaker 1: is and we should have known this early on. Your
Speaker 1: chance of coming off a ventilator in the early stages
Speaker 1: of this of this pandemic. If you went on it
Speaker 1: were less than fifty percent, that's a terrible treatment model.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's not something to be you know, that's
Speaker 1: not successful at all. Oh, you go on a ventilator,
Speaker 1: you got a fifty fifty chance of living. Make sure
Speaker 1: we have enough ventilators for everybody. Know, there were a
Speaker 1: lot of things they need to figure out before then
Speaker 1: other steps, pre ventilator steps that might have been helpful.
Speaker 1: And I know some of your yelling how about preventative
Speaker 1: hydroxy chloroquine, but there are there are massive incentives in
Speaker 1: the media and the Democrat Party to suppress the truth
Speaker 1: about hydroxy chloroquine. We know this. I'm not saying that
Speaker 1: it works, and I'm not saying that they're even wrong
Speaker 1: in thinking it doesn't work. I am pointing out that
Speaker 1: there are enormous incentives for drug companies and enormous incentives
Speaker 1: for the Democrat Party in the media to at least delay, delay,
Speaker 1: a real reckoning over hydroxy chloroquine, not as a last
Speaker 1: ditch effort to save people in the hospital, but as
Speaker 1: an early stage intervention, which is exactly what we already
Speaker 1: have for flu with tamiflu. If you don't take it
Speaker 1: within the first three days. Doesn't have any effect. Go
Speaker 1: ask your doctor. Doesn't have any effect If you take
Speaker 1: tamiflu when you're already having your lungs fill up with
Speaker 1: fluid because you're on your body is unable to fight
Speaker 1: off the influenza infection. Tama flow is not really going
Speaker 1: to do very much for you. But we're told, oh, no,
Speaker 1: we've only tried hydroxy chlorically in these trials where it's
Speaker 1: given to people who are already hostile spital lies, already
Speaker 1: having severe symptoms, so it doesn't work. Shut up, peasant.
Speaker 1: It doesn't work, that's what they say. But let me
Speaker 1: get back and we understand why a lot of people are.
Speaker 1: They've also lied. They lied to you, The media lied
Speaker 1: you about how it was so dangerous. It's not a
Speaker 1: dangerous drug. That's a lie. Oh it does bad things
Speaker 1: to your heart. Yeah, tilent all will put a hole
Speaker 1: in your stomach if you take it. You know that's true.
Speaker 1: It can. It doesn't always, but it can create a
Speaker 1: stomach bleeding, which is basically because it erodes it creates
Speaker 1: ulceration in you in the lining of your stomach if
Speaker 1: you take it enough, and you know so on and
Speaker 1: so forth. But does I mean you're never gonna take
Speaker 1: a tileent all again, or you know, take it a
Speaker 1: seat a minute fin or an ibuprofin or no, of
Speaker 1: course not. They put a warning label on it. Everything
Speaker 1: comes with a possible risk. So they lied to you
Speaker 1: about that, but they've lied to you about something else.
Speaker 1: And we're just beginning to see this here because I
Speaker 1: don't think they're gonna be able to hide it much longer.
Speaker 1: That often happens the press. The media will suppress a
Speaker 1: story and then for political reasons, and then when it's
Speaker 1: no longer possible, then they run out and say, oh,
Speaker 1: we have the story to break for you, because they
Speaker 1: want to just beat their competitors, because they know that
Speaker 1: people are finding out and that someone's going to break
Speaker 1: the story. So then they'll come out of it, but
Speaker 1: they will have already sat on it for a long
Speaker 1: time because they don't want to hurt the narrative. They
Speaker 1: don't want to hurt the Democrat narrative. This is from
Speaker 1: the Associated Press New York's true nursing home death toll
Speaker 1: Cloaked in secrecy. Riverdale Nursing Home in the Bronx appears
Speaker 1: on Paper to have escaped the worst of the coronavirus pandemic,
Speaker 1: with an official state count of just four deaths in
Speaker 1: its one hundred and forty six bed facility. This is
Speaker 1: from this Associated Press piece. The truth, according to the
Speaker 1: home is far worse. Twenty one dead, most transported to
Speaker 1: hospitals before they succumbed. It was a cascading effect. Administrator
Speaker 1: emil fu Fusi recalled one after the other, New York's
Speaker 1: coronavirus death toll in nursing homes, already among the highest
Speaker 1: in the nation, could actually be a significant undercount. Unlike
Speaker 1: every other state with major outbreaks, New York only counts
Speaker 1: residents who died on nursing home property, and not those
Speaker 1: who were transported to hospitals and died there. End quote.
Speaker 1: My friends, this is a big deal because we know
Speaker 1: that there were about five thousand people who died in
Speaker 1: nursing homes from COVID nineteen during the pandemic surge here
Speaker 1: in New York. But what we're now finding out is
Speaker 1: that the number could be a lot higher. Here we go.
Speaker 1: The statistic could add thousands to the state's official care
Speaker 1: home death toll of just over It's over sixty six hundred.
Speaker 1: That's the official number, but so far the administration of
Speaker 1: Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo has refused to divulge the number,
Speaker 1: leading to speculation the state is manipulating the figures to
Speaker 1: make it appeared is doing better than other states, and
Speaker 1: to make a tragic situation less dire. That's a problem,
Speaker 1: bro says State Senator Gustavo Rivera, a Democrat. He told
Speaker 1: New York Health Commissioner Howard Zucker during a legislative hearing
Speaker 1: on nursing homes earlier this month, it seems, sir, that
Speaker 1: in this case, you are choosing to define it differently
Speaker 1: so that you could look better. Oh you mean they're
Speaker 1: cooking the books, folks. Cuomo already has the worst response,
Speaker 1: the worst response of any governor in the country, in
Speaker 1: the Democrat super stronghold of New York, worst response on
Speaker 1: a global scale, perhaps the worst major city to deal
Speaker 1: with this, and it may be even worse than that.
Speaker 1: Here's the Associated Press piece. How big a difference could
Speaker 1: it make? Its may Federal regulators have required nursing homes
Speaker 1: to submit data on coronavirus debts each week, whether or
Speaker 1: not residents died in the facility or at a hospital.
Speaker 1: Because the requirement came after the height of New York's outbreak,
Speaker 1: the available data is relatively small. According to the federal data,
Speaker 1: roughly a fifth of the state's homes reported resident debts
Speaker 1: from early June to mid July, a tally of three
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty three dead, sixty five percent higher than
Speaker 1: the state's count of one hundred and ninety five during
Speaker 1: that time period. Even if half that undercount has held
Speaker 1: truth from the start of the pandemic, that would translate
Speaker 1: into thousands more nursing home resident debts than the state
Speaker 1: has acknowledged. State Health Department survey show twenty one thousand
Speaker 1: nursing home beds are lying empty this year, which is
Speaker 1: thirteen thousand more than expected, an increase of almost double
Speaker 1: the official state nursing home death tally. Is This is
Speaker 1: an absolute scandal, an absolute scandal, And this wasn't just
Speaker 1: a thing that happened. Cuomo made the decision. He decided
Speaker 1: he was in a position. He's taken all this authority.
Speaker 1: He has the authority to shut down your business on
Speaker 1: a whim as long as he wants. He also had
Speaker 1: the authority to do this and he did. He said,
Speaker 1: you must take back COVID positive seniors into the nursing
Speaker 1: home as soon as the hospital is ready to release them. So,
Speaker 1: if you're a COVID positive senior and you don't have
Speaker 1: to be on a ventilator, and they're saying that they
Speaker 1: want to send you home, there's no quarantining really in
Speaker 1: a nursing home. Right, You're sending somebody into us, into
Speaker 1: a facility where they're going to be around other munocompromise
Speaker 1: people because of their age and often because of comorbid
Speaker 1: health conditions. This was if you were trying to seed
Speaker 1: the pandemic in a way that there was a maximum
Speaker 1: fatality level. This was a good policy if you were
Speaker 1: trying to make this as fatal a disease as possible
Speaker 1: for your state. As a governor, Cuomo came up with
Speaker 1: an ingenious plan. How could how could anybody have? Oh
Speaker 1: it's because he was so convinced the hospitals were going
Speaker 1: to be overrun. He was wrong, and so he made
Speaker 1: a really bad decision. Now, I don't think that Cuomo
Speaker 1: wanted this to happen. I'm not saying he's a you know,
Speaker 1: a mass murderer. I'm not saying that he's They'll say
Speaker 1: that about Trump, of course, but I'm not saying no.
Speaker 1: But he's an incompetent, he's a moron. When when the
Speaker 1: when the chips were all down, when when all of
Speaker 1: a sudden it was really important who the governor of
Speaker 1: New York was. This guy failed miserably and was way
Speaker 1: too busy worrying about the optics and doing the press conference,
Speaker 1: and people were talking about how he could run for
Speaker 1: president as a Democrat. Remember that there were Cuomo There
Speaker 1: were people calling himselves Cuomo sexuals because he was so
Speaker 1: appealing in his press conferences. He was going on CNN
Speaker 1: with his joke brother at night. People were dying. And
Speaker 1: now they have the goal to lecture others. That to
Speaker 1: lecture other people, other states, other governors. Cuomo acts like, oh,
Speaker 1: it's just a big mask wearing campaign. Would have saved
Speaker 1: us all, you know, would have saved a few thousand,
Speaker 1: maybe thousands and thousands more than that senior citizen lives
Speaker 1: in New York. Not having Andrew Cuomo as the governor
Speaker 1: of New York. That would have saved thousands and thousands
Speaker 1: of lives. Instead of panicking about the lack of ventilators
Speaker 1: that we didn't need. Instead of panicking all the people
Speaker 1: of New York, we could have had somebody like oh,
Speaker 1: I don't know, Governor Ron de Santis of Florida, who
Speaker 1: looked at the data and looked at what was happening
Speaker 1: and made sound decisions, not based upon control, fear and
Speaker 1: the politics of the left. You're in the freedom und
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. An unnerving
Speaker 1: moment yesterday. I was watching it in real time as
Speaker 1: it happened. President Trump was giving a press conference and
Speaker 1: there was a moment where a Secret Service agent came
Speaker 1: out during the press conference in the West Wig and
Speaker 1: he says, miss President needs to come with me. And
Speaker 1: there were reports early reports of gunfire outside of the
Speaker 1: White House, and there was a moment where people were
Speaker 1: understandably very concerned. And then President Trump came back finished
Speaker 1: at the press conference. But I thought this was this
Speaker 1: was one of his one of his truly Trumpian moments
Speaker 1: where he was asked if well, I'll let you hear
Speaker 1: the exchange play clip one. Do I see him rattled?
Speaker 1: It's unfortunate that this is a world, but the world's
Speaker 1: always been a dangerous place, but it's not something that's unique.
Speaker 1: The world has been. You look back over the centuries,
Speaker 1: the world has been a dangerous place, very dangerous place,
Speaker 1: and it will continue, I guess for a period of time.
Speaker 1: Differently about your personal safety inside the White House, No,
Speaker 1: I feel very safe with the Secret Service. They're fantastic people.
Speaker 1: They're the best of the best, and they're highly trained.
Speaker 1: I don't know if anybody got to walk outside, but
Speaker 1: there were a lot of terrific looking people ready to
Speaker 1: go if something was necessary. Does this make you scared, sir?
Speaker 1: Can you just say for the record that you're really
Speaker 1: scared and that you're a whim because that'll be a
Speaker 1: great sound bite for us. Can you just tell us
Speaker 1: that a Trump's like you min? What do I see him? Ronald?
Speaker 1: Come on, come on. That's that's one of those that's
Speaker 1: one of those moments though, where you were just you know,
Speaker 1: American politics has gotten so heated right now that we
Speaker 1: I hope we get through this whole election cycle without
Speaker 1: a politically motivated tragedy on all sides against any side.
Speaker 1: I really do. I'm you know, last time I told
Speaker 1: you that that there was that I had a bad
Speaker 1: feeling about something. It was in roughly November that something
Speaker 1: bad was gonna You remember this, I played if You're
Speaker 1: in the show right before we went into the pandemic.
Speaker 1: I'm like, guys, it's been great. Something bad's gonna happen
Speaker 1: were I don't think it's going to involve President Trump,
Speaker 1: and God bless him and keep him safe. But I
Speaker 1: worry that there's gonna be some act of political violence
Speaker 1: before this election that's going to really combust everything. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the past. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Election meddling. We're gonna be talking a lot about this.
Speaker 1: You know what, the the real, the real definition of
Speaker 1: election meddling is for Democrats, we lost. We lost. If
Speaker 1: they lose, there's meddling. If they win, what meddling? Come on,
Speaker 1: what meddling? I like the Trump goes on offense on
Speaker 1: this point, doesn't play the usual Republican game of no,
Speaker 1: no please. I'm a good person, I'm in I'm acting
Speaker 1: in good faith. Don't think that I'm one of the
Speaker 1: bad guys. I prefer the Trump approach, which is to say,
Speaker 1: come on, well, you know what what is you know
Speaker 1: you know who's really meddling. You're meddling play cloop two. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying the way the politicians look. The other
Speaker 1: day they said the three countries, They said China, then
Speaker 1: Russia and Iran, and some reporter got up and said,
Speaker 1: Russia is meddling. I said, well, didn't it mention China
Speaker 1: and Iran? Why didn't you mention them too? So so
Speaker 1: I don't know. You know what I'm telling you. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you who's meddling in our elections. The Democrats are
Speaker 1: meddling by wanting and insisting on sending mail in ballots,
Speaker 1: with this corruption all over the place. If you check
Speaker 1: what happened to New York, a small, relatively small race
Speaker 1: with Carolyn Maloney, and they called her the winner the
Speaker 1: other day because I was mentioning it at conferences and
Speaker 1: getting a lot of action on that statement, so they
Speaker 1: called her. They declared her the winner, and they have
Speaker 1: no idea who won, and the person her opponent is
Speaker 1: very angry. But they had mail in voting, and they
Speaker 1: had hundreds and I think even thousands of ballots set
Speaker 1: are missing that were fraudulent. Take a look at the
Speaker 1: Carol and Maloney race. Take a look at Patterson, New Jersey.
Speaker 1: Take a look now at this one in Virginia where
Speaker 1: they mailed out five hundred thousand applications and they go
Speaker 1: into people that aren't supposed to be getting an application.
Speaker 1: Democrat are the ones that want to play games at
Speaker 1: the election. You know, they just had a CDC study
Speaker 1: that came out. Remember the CDC supposed to listen to
Speaker 1: the CDC all the time, not to listen to the CDC,
Speaker 1: not not allowed to ask any questions if you listen
Speaker 1: to Democrats, and not allow to ask any questions about
Speaker 1: the CDC. Just had a study come out, No increase
Speaker 1: in cases resulting from the No increasing cases resulting in
Speaker 1: from the voting in Wisconsin. So people were able to vote.
Speaker 1: They didn't get all You don't you know why that
Speaker 1: happened because they were outside. They kept a little bit
Speaker 1: of a distance from each other. They probably were wearing
Speaker 1: masks two whatever, for whatever that's worth. And it was fine.
Speaker 1: It was fine. We've seen the data is very clear.
Speaker 1: Long close indoors exposure is the primary way this gets transmitted.
Speaker 1: Long close indoor exposure. So all you have to do
Speaker 1: with voting is have people stagger in line stagger going in,
Speaker 1: no problem, no problem, Well what are Democrats even talking about? Oh,
Speaker 1: we can't we get No. They just want they just
Speaker 1: want to find a way to change the rules to
Speaker 1: suit their needs and to set up a narrative in
Speaker 1: advance of the actual asking of votes, so that anybody
Speaker 1: who's anybody who wants to if the Democrats lose afterwards,
Speaker 1: will be in a position to say, you know what, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the Republicans cheated because we lost because we didn't have
Speaker 1: enough or we had too much mail in voting, which
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Whichever way they need to go, they'll go.
Speaker 1: But election meddling has become a talking point you'll hear
Speaker 1: from Democrats. This is hedging, it's hedging. It also goes
Speaker 1: to this this anxiety that the Libs still have because
Speaker 1: they believe that Russia gave Trump the last election. They
Speaker 1: still cling to that fiction. That fantasy is something that
Speaker 1: they have not yet given up on. They still believe that,
Speaker 1: and so they're they're very on edge about the possibility,
Speaker 1: about the prospect of that happening again, very on edge, right,
Speaker 1: They're like, oh my gosh, there's gonna be election interference. Election. Well, okay,
Speaker 1: what about election interference from China, from Iran, from and
Speaker 1: what constitutes enough election interference that the election should be
Speaker 1: considered or you know, call them into doubt in some way,
Speaker 1: You know what, what's the rule on that how much?
Speaker 1: How much interference is enough that we have to be
Speaker 1: Because in the last election it was what Russian spending
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand dollars on Facebook ads, which is a
Speaker 1: drop in the bucket a Facebook ad spending, Is that
Speaker 1: that what we're supposed to believe was enough to do well?
Speaker 1: There are libs who still believe. Remember when CNN would
Speaker 1: go and harass private citizens because they were a part
Speaker 1: of a Facebook group that was they say, organized by
Speaker 1: Russian trolls or something. They'd show up the people. You know, oh,
Speaker 1: do you realize that the Russians were convincing you of
Speaker 1: who to vote for? There were the whole fake news
Speaker 1: phenomenon started. The idea of fake news was Lib Democrat
Speaker 1: media going around saying that the only reason people wanted
Speaker 1: to vote for Trump was because they believe these Russian
Speaker 1: disinformation articles online because they were believing fake news. That's
Speaker 1: how the fake they started fake news, and then Trump
Speaker 1: in his Trumpian Jiu jitsu way flip them around flat
Speaker 1: on their backs, and was like, actually, your fake news
Speaker 1: because you're propaganda organs. The LIB media is a bunch
Speaker 1: of propaganda organs pretending to be news organizations. But you
Speaker 1: know who is weighing in now on election interference, which
Speaker 1: tells you a lot about what we should expect. Here Hillary,
Speaker 1: I'm not really as good at the Hillary voice anymore.
Speaker 1: It's gotten hard to do it. But here she is
Speaker 1: telling you all, she's oh, oh, I just want to
Speaker 1: say this. Do we think that she's ready to be VP?
Speaker 1: If Biden were to just happen to call upon her,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, she could maybe find some time
Speaker 1: in her schedule. I don't think he will do it.
Speaker 1: I don't believe it's going to happen, but I think
Speaker 1: Hillary thinks that it's still Could I really do? I
Speaker 1: think that she is so there is a hole in
Speaker 1: her soul that will only be filled by being president,
Speaker 1: and she knows now the only way she could ever
Speaker 1: become president is to be a pointed vice president. It
Speaker 1: would be quite a move. It would certainly shake things up.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine if I think the VP pick is
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about that in a minute.
Speaker 1: I think it's getting all this attention and that people.
Speaker 1: Ultimately I don't really care all that much, but it's
Speaker 1: certainly certainly could be if it were Hillary. I know,
Speaker 1: I just wanted to hello. I want her to come
Speaker 1: back and be in the mix again, just because it's
Speaker 1: so much fun for me as a commentator. Play clip
Speaker 1: twenty one though. Here she is on election interference. I
Speaker 1: hope the press covers the vulnerabilities of our election systems
Speaker 1: to interference, something that we now know more about than
Speaker 1: we did right after twenty sixteen. I hope that even
Speaker 1: Republicans will find their patriotism their conscience, try to force
Speaker 1: some of the pacified information into the public arena so
Speaker 1: that people have a better idea about what's going on.
Speaker 1: And of course, the Biden campaign and all of the
Speaker 1: allies it has have to be as vigorous as possible
Speaker 1: in refuting and rebutting all of the disinformation and flat
Speaker 1: out wise that we can expect the Russians to be
Speaker 1: part of ramping up. She's still fixated on this. The
Speaker 1: Democrats are still very deeply rooted in this delusion that
Speaker 1: Russians are able to control American political discourse on Facebook
Speaker 1: is this is sheer madness. This would be like me
Speaker 1: investing one hundred dollars in the stock market and then
Speaker 1: claiming that I'm like, I'm making markets happen, and I'm
Speaker 1: I'm shifting the stock price. I'm involved, But it's irrelevant.
Speaker 1: It's irrelevant. It is an unserious position that Russian propaganda
Speaker 1: on Facebook against the Democrats or against Hillary is shifting
Speaker 1: the election one way or the other. Un serious. And
Speaker 1: it's kind of the way that I also think about
Speaker 1: when people complain about reps in a very close game,
Speaker 1: there are some who will say, you know, look, if
Speaker 1: you were if you were good enough to beat the
Speaker 1: team without having it, without having it come down to
Speaker 1: one call, you would have won, right, you know. I
Speaker 1: mean this is now. I'm not saying that that excuses
Speaker 1: election interference, but I'm just saying, if it's really that
Speaker 1: narrow that it's gonna be ten people that read something
Speaker 1: on Facebook, maybe you shouldn't have been president, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe it didn't deserve to win that one. I don't
Speaker 1: know what to tell you, but Hillary will never ever
Speaker 1: give this one up because it's essential. It is essential
Speaker 1: to the Democrat mythology. About why Donald Trump became president
Speaker 1: in the first place. And then there's just the really
Speaker 1: deeply stupid stuff that will be said about all of this.
Speaker 1: And if you're looking for commentary under the guise of
Speaker 1: news that is shockingly dumb, you can't do a whole
Speaker 1: lot better than CNN. We all have news anchors. Im
Speaker 1: Jim Acostas perhaps the best example of this, but news
Speaker 1: anchors will come out and say things. You say, Wow,
Speaker 1: have you ever read a book from start to finish?
Speaker 1: I mean ever? But no, No, I'm up there and
Speaker 1: I've got a lot of hairsprayed, I'm very I've got
Speaker 1: a serious sounding voice, and I've got a microphone in
Speaker 1: my hand, and people should listen to me. Sure, sure
Speaker 1: they should. Yeah, my Coosto and all these other all
Speaker 1: these other jokers too. It's amazing. It's amazing that people
Speaker 1: still believe this stuff. A lot of the dumbest people
Speaker 1: I know are in the news media, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: tell you, and I know them morons, But people still say, oh,
Speaker 1: they turn it on, Oh they must be smart, they
Speaker 1: must be smart. One of the reasons I love radio
Speaker 1: so much is that this is too hard for ninety
Speaker 1: percent of the people in journalism to do maybe ninety
Speaker 1: five percent. They just can't. They could never carrying a
Speaker 1: three hour show, never mind five hours with what I do.
Speaker 1: Carrying a three hour show every day, unscripted, without someone
Speaker 1: feeding everything into your ear, without reading off of a prompter,
Speaker 1: where it's just you, your thoughts, your knowledge, your presentation,
Speaker 1: no chance they could ever do it. A lot of
Speaker 1: people can put on a suit, look pretty and say hello,
Speaker 1: I'm here and I'm reading off of a prompter. As
Speaker 1: you can tell, I have no respected off for CNN.
Speaker 1: But here's CNN's Jeremy Diamond doing a little bit of
Speaker 1: analysis on the possibility of Trump giving a speech for
Speaker 1: the acceptance of the Republican nomination at a place that
Speaker 1: Jeremy Diamond has some thoughts on the significance of play
Speaker 1: three and Pam. We've reported that President Trump is considering
Speaker 1: delivering his GOP nomination acceptance speech from the White House,
Speaker 1: but amid some criticism of that potential venue, the President
Speaker 1: is now floating another one. This time he's talking about
Speaker 1: the hallowed Civil War battlefield in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. But that
Speaker 1: could be controversial too, particularly because this is a president
Speaker 1: who has consistently positioned himself as a defender of confeder
Speaker 1: its symbols and monuments to Confederate generals Pam. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: a fair point to make. Yeah, that's a fair All, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a fair No, it's not you morons. Do you
Speaker 1: know what happened at the Battle of Gettysburg. I just
Speaker 1: you know, just somebody, I'm just anybody, anybody want to
Speaker 1: you know who? Unbelievable This should be like saying, oh,
Speaker 1: he's commemorating the successful landing and on D Day, clearly
Speaker 1: a Nazi sympathizer. No, no, we won that one Gettysburg.
Speaker 1: As you all know. I don't have to get into it, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, the Union turned back the Confederacy was a
Speaker 1: turning tide, turning the tide of the war. And so
Speaker 1: if you give a speech at Gettysburg, the hollow ground
Speaker 1: of Gettysburg, that's a problem because you because of your
Speaker 1: support for the Confederacy. That's a that's a really strange
Speaker 1: way to celebrate support for the Confederacy. But there's there's
Speaker 1: no limit to the stupid at CNN. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: because it was anti Trump, it was all. There are
Speaker 1: questions about this. You know he likes the Confederacy, and
Speaker 1: he's a bad guy, and he's a white nationalist. Whatever
Speaker 1: you have to say, they just say, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: if it's true or not. They have an agenda, my friends,
Speaker 1: and as long as they stick to that agenda, the
Speaker 1: Libs will always back them up. And they know it.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Any day now, any day now, there's gonna
Speaker 1: be a Biden VP pick. That's what we're called. Who
Speaker 1: get excited a Biden VP pick. Representative Maxine Waters waited
Speaker 1: on this one. Here's what she says, Play eight. I
Speaker 1: don't know exactly whom it's going to be. I know
Speaker 1: whom I would prefer, but I don't think that whom
Speaker 1: I would prefer has anything to do with who he's
Speaker 1: going to select. But obviously, as they have gone through
Speaker 1: all of the women, black, white, Asian, what have you,
Speaker 1: it seems to me they have gotten down to possibly
Speaker 1: just two, and that is Kamala and that is Susan,
Speaker 1: and so I believe that it will be one of them.
Speaker 1: I do have a preference. I'm not going to say
Speaker 1: who it is at this point, but I think my
Speaker 1: preference is going to be the one that will be selected.
Speaker 1: I gotta say the first time, I think in a
Speaker 1: long time, we've played a Maxium Waters clip where I
Speaker 1: don't have any problem with anything that she said, right,
Speaker 1: I think, I think I think she's right. I think
Speaker 1: that Kamala Harris and Susan Rice are the last two
Speaker 1: in the race here. And I think that I've told
Speaker 1: you on air, I've been making the prediction all along.
Speaker 1: There's a fun prediction because of the I'm wrong. Nobody
Speaker 1: cares if I'm right. I get to pat myself on
Speaker 1: the back, which none of you will care about either,
Speaker 1: because we had that kind of relationship team where you know,
Speaker 1: I when I do a victory dance, st't wory. Producer
Speaker 1: Mark tells me afterwards that my head's getting big and
Speaker 1: I can't fit through the door. And I know you
Speaker 1: all like, come on, Buck, we don't come to you
Speaker 1: for your predictions anyway. But although my prediction about the pandemic,
Speaker 1: not that I said it was a pandemic, but that's
Speaker 1: something bad was going to happen, was that was a
Speaker 1: little weird. That was a little Eriie. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it, but I think it is going to be
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris for a number of reasons. Other people I
Speaker 1: know who are very smart and very sound thinkers on
Speaker 1: issues of politics say that it might be Susan Rice
Speaker 1: because she well, she was part of the Obama foreign
Speaker 1: policy team in many ways the architect of it. Rice
Speaker 1: and Samantha Power. And Samantha Power was a disaster. So
Speaker 1: it was Susan Rice. Obama's foreign policy was one of
Speaker 1: the weakest, and there was a lot to criticize for
Speaker 1: the eight years of Obama, but his foreign policy was
Speaker 1: among the weakest least defensible parts of his presidency. Senator
Speaker 1: Tom Cotton points out what it would mean to have
Speaker 1: a Susan Rice as a VP play for well, I
Speaker 1: am Susan Rice was the typhoid Mary of the Obama
Speaker 1: administration foreign policy. Every major debacle in President Obama's tenure.
Speaker 1: Susan Rice was right in the middle of a look
Speaker 1: at China. She consistently counseled appeasement towards China. She commanded
Speaker 1: that our military leaders in the Pacific not raised China's
Speaker 1: efforts to militarize the South China Sea and create bases
Speaker 1: out of rocks in the water to extend the range
Speaker 1: of their planes and their missiles. She would right in
Speaker 1: the middle of the Iran nuclear deal. She counseled appeasement
Speaker 1: of Russia going into the twenty sixteen election, and then
Speaker 1: after the election, she was at the center of spying
Speaker 1: on the Trump campaign an unmasking American citizens who'd been
Speaker 1: caught up in that drag bad. You know, most nominees
Speaker 1: faced the jury of the American people, Susan Rice would
Speaker 1: be the first one to potentially face a grand jury
Speaker 1: as well. Now, I've got to tell you, in a sense,
Speaker 1: it would be perfect if Susan Rice teamed up with
Speaker 1: Biden here as a VP, because they both have incredibly
Speaker 1: consistent foreign policy records of being wrong all the time
Speaker 1: and of their ideas leading to disastrous outcomes. So in
Speaker 1: that way they're highly compatible. But I do, I do
Speaker 1: just believe that the think I think the media wants,
Speaker 1: they want their person. And they loved Kamala Harris. I mean,
Speaker 1: they loved Bacho as well, and because like he was
Speaker 1: just like such a an empty headed fraud that like
Speaker 1: it was hilarious to get to talk about him. But
Speaker 1: Kamala is I think still going to be the one,
Speaker 1: and then people start to ask the question, well, what's
Speaker 1: the point of what's the point exactly of voting for
Speaker 1: voting for Biden if you're really gonna get get Kamala
Speaker 1: And we didn't want Kamala when we could have voted
Speaker 1: for Kamala. So what's really going on here? Democrats? We'll
Speaker 1: figure that out. Thanks for listening to The Bus and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. The man
Speaker 1: is back after a well deserved vacation. Our buddy from
Speaker 1: National Review, David Harsani, is in the mix. Check out
Speaker 1: his latest at National review dot com. Also follow him
Speaker 1: on Twitter at David Harsanyi. What's up, David? How much
Speaker 1: haw's it going? It's all right, man. You look tanned,
Speaker 1: ready and rested, So let's let's jump right into it.
Speaker 1: I know you're writing this week about the Cuomo nursing
Speaker 1: home disaster in New York. This to me seems like
Speaker 1: one of those stories that they've suppressed it as long
Speaker 1: as they can, but now they've got a couple of
Speaker 1: AP writers who are like, look, guys, someone's you know,
Speaker 1: someone's gonna just break the narrative here because it's too
Speaker 1: it's too big of a story for them to hold
Speaker 1: off like this. So what do you think about what's
Speaker 1: happened here where it's taken months to figure out that
Speaker 1: not only did Cuomo give a disastrous order that might
Speaker 1: have led to thousands dying, but it might actually be
Speaker 1: a lot more than that, right, I mean, I think
Speaker 1: as far as the media coverage goes, you have probably
Speaker 1: I don't know it's perfect, but you're probably have hungry
Speaker 1: reporters and see pretty see story right here. I know
Speaker 1: the AP had asked for public records a few months
Speaker 1: ago and they haven't gotten them yet. And you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's a story about a lot of deaths.
Speaker 1: You know. First I was writing and it was reported
Speaker 1: that the deaths were around four thousand, and then we learned,
Speaker 1: you know, according to New York state numbers, that it
Speaker 1: was six thousand. And now the AP finds out that
Speaker 1: that those were just deaths reported of people who you know,
Speaker 1: died in the nursing home, not being transported to hospitals
Speaker 1: or elsewhere. So the number could be eleven thousand, it
Speaker 1: could even be higher. That's that's that should be a
Speaker 1: national story. But instead, of course we've had, and we've
Speaker 1: spoken about this before, the gas lighting that's going on
Speaker 1: to try to pretend that Almo did a good job
Speaker 1: and he's opening the schools because hey, you know, he
Speaker 1: did it the right way. We're talking about thirty five
Speaker 1: thousand dead in New York and it's been a huge disaster.
Speaker 1: And that's not even counting New York and Connecticut. A
Speaker 1: lot of those deaths obviously were imported from New York.
Speaker 1: So just a huge story. And to me, I see,
Speaker 1: I sit here, and how can anyone believe that we
Speaker 1: have an aggressive and honest press corps when there is
Speaker 1: very there's very obviously a real effort underway to make
Speaker 1: it seem like Cuomo isn't I mean, he goes out
Speaker 1: there lecture. I mean, there should be disdain for Cuomo
Speaker 1: lecturing other governors. There should be outrage and him acting
Speaker 1: like he knows he has the secret sauce here, he
Speaker 1: knew how to take care of this thing. It would
Speaker 1: have if Governor Cuomo had been you know, captured by
Speaker 1: Martians for the entirety of the pandemic and had no
Speaker 1: decision making authority whatsoever, more people would be alive. But
Speaker 1: the press doesn't seem to want that narrative to get out.
Speaker 1: They'd rather pretend that the Red States didn't mask enough. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, because he's a Democrat, we all know that.
Speaker 1: And you're right about that Martian theory, because we're not
Speaker 1: talking about just incompetence here. We're talking about someone who
Speaker 1: signed an executive order proactively went and pushed people back
Speaker 1: into hospitals where they died, so that that is the
Speaker 1: real scandal. I mean, there's only so much we can
Speaker 1: do about pandemics, at least that's my view of it.
Speaker 1: I mean, we can do certain things, but there's only
Speaker 1: so much. But he actually proactively did something that killed people.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry to even laugh at that. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just so absurd that it's not covered, that people aren't
Speaker 1: angry about it. That the lecture that Paul Krugman I
Speaker 1: mentioned him every time here because this is one of
Speaker 1: his big one of his big lives, is that Florida
Speaker 1: has messed up, that Texas has messed up, you know,
Speaker 1: not California, not Colorado, definitely not New York, where he
Speaker 1: literally wrote we should be following other states should be
Speaker 1: following Como's example, Well that you know that would be
Speaker 1: disastrous for the country. You have a million dead if
Speaker 1: if every state did that. Talking to David Harsani of
Speaker 1: National Review, So, David, any day now we're supposed to
Speaker 1: get a VP pick for Biden. I always feel like
Speaker 1: VP picks are are a little bit inflated in the mind,
Speaker 1: particularly in the mind of the press. It's August, we
Speaker 1: need something to talk about. Everyone's kind of like whoa
Speaker 1: VP pick? There is a real argument this time around,
Speaker 1: especially because Biden has at least said he's only gonna
Speaker 1: be a one termer. And I mean with the cognitive
Speaker 1: decline thing, I don't think it's a crazy conspiracy theory
Speaker 1: that if Biden wins two years into the presidency before
Speaker 1: the midterms, he may pass the torch on. I mean,
Speaker 1: I can't say that. I don't know if that'll happen,
Speaker 1: but that doesn't strike me as crazy. In fact, in
Speaker 1: a lot of ways, it's the best thing that Biden
Speaker 1: can do to preserve his legacy and become a kind
Speaker 1: of revered democrat for the ages and for his family
Speaker 1: and going forward. Do you have much of it? Do
Speaker 1: you think there's much of a difference based on who
Speaker 1: the VP picks may be. I mean, is this a
Speaker 1: momentous decision for the future of the country if Biden
Speaker 1: were to win, or is it kind of all the
Speaker 1: same thing? Now? It's a big decision. And why we
Speaker 1: shouldn't pretend that Biden won't be what seventy eight thirty
Speaker 1: nine years old when he's president, And we shouldn't pretend
Speaker 1: that there's not something you know, that he hasn't slowed
Speaker 1: down and that he you know, doesn't say things that
Speaker 1: the show positive to pine. I mean, David, I speak
Speaker 1: for five hours a day on radio and I've never
Speaker 1: you know, started muttering about where all the way, the
Speaker 1: people and the thing. And I guess guy does this
Speaker 1: all the time. Yeah, I mean that's it. I mean,
Speaker 1: we can't pretend that that's not happening. And you know,
Speaker 1: when when if Donald Trump accidentally says World War one
Speaker 1: two instead of World War one, and everyone makes a
Speaker 1: big deal out of it, it's very different than what
Speaker 1: we're seeing by you where he loses track of what
Speaker 1: he's talking about, where he's just aimlessly you know, but
Speaker 1: it just gibberish starts coming out, and not in the
Speaker 1: way that maybe I or you sometimes have gibbersh coming out,
Speaker 1: but in a in a way that we know that
Speaker 1: our very old uncle or grandparents might have spoken at
Speaker 1: one point. But whatever the case is, that that VP
Speaker 1: pick is important. There's a chance that that VP pick
Speaker 1: will be president, a good, a decent chance, and they're
Speaker 1: going to be someone like Susan Rice who has literally
Speaker 1: no experience really running anything, and who has a you
Speaker 1: know whatever, terrible history, at least from from my point
Speaker 1: of view. Or it matters. And if we have Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: who's you know, who's basically an authoritarian, it matters. Can
Speaker 1: you dig into it matters more than usual? Can you
Speaker 1: dig into why Kamala scares you as as as a
Speaker 1: possible president? I said, well, what is the what is
Speaker 1: the case against Kamala as you see it? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I know we could talk about this a lot,
Speaker 1: but give us the the Harsani version. But for me,
Speaker 1: she's possibly the worst candidate other than maybe Bernie was, uh,
Speaker 1: you know. She as a libertarian ish type person. Her
Speaker 1: view of the police state is concerning to me. To
Speaker 1: begin with her view that you can use force to
Speaker 1: implement policies, and I you know is very concerning um
Speaker 1: the way that she views the use of government, and
Speaker 1: also the way she'd use the Constitution as an impediment
Speaker 1: to doing whatever she wants. She you know, everyone goes
Speaker 1: bananas over the supposed authoritarianism we're seeing from Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: but she's been during the debates and on Twitter and elsewhere,
Speaker 1: she many times simply stated that as president she would
Speaker 1: do things that she did not have the power to do.
Speaker 1: I don't remember them all right now, but you know
Speaker 1: she's done it numerous times. Her entire outlook about what
Speaker 1: how miracle works for me is incredibly problematic, worse than
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. So, I mean, you know, basically, I think
Speaker 1: she's an authoritarian. I don't say that flippantly, and I
Speaker 1: don't say that as sort of throwaway insult. I mean it.
Speaker 1: I think she's an authoritarian. Do you think there's any
Speaker 1: real shot that Elizabeth Warren is kind of able to
Speaker 1: just slip in there at the last moment because people
Speaker 1: still talk about her. I think she raised more money
Speaker 1: for buying than any of the other any of the
Speaker 1: other surrogates. You know, she's media loves her. She's female,
Speaker 1: not a minority, as we've we've had to find out
Speaker 1: over many years not a minority, but she's female. Well
Speaker 1: here's I mean, I think it would it would matter
Speaker 1: if if it's not an African American woman. I think
Speaker 1: that Biden would take a hit there, right, But if
Speaker 1: polls are showing that Elizabeth Warren is, you know, the
Speaker 1: candidate he needs, he might do it. And in some
Speaker 1: weird way, obviously I dislike her tremendously as well. She
Speaker 1: might be the most confident of the people that he's
Speaker 1: thinking about as far as being a VP, so he
Speaker 1: might he might go for it. I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: know what he's thinking, but it definitely matters that she's
Speaker 1: not a minority. I think that, you know, especially because
Speaker 1: most of the focus has been on minority candidates. For
Speaker 1: that not to happen, I think we've hurt him. Joe
Speaker 1: Joe Biden ran for president in nineteen eighty eight, and
Speaker 1: it was it floundered right away, you know, lied about
Speaker 1: his record, led about marching with the civil rights movement,
Speaker 1: plagiarized the speech. I mean, there was all this stuff
Speaker 1: that you know that was nineteen eighty eight. I mean,
Speaker 1: the walkman was cool back then, right, I Mean, this
Speaker 1: is the Soviet Union still existed and Biden was running
Speaker 1: for president. He tries again in what two thousand and six,
Speaker 1: two thousand and seven, and and I think he even
Speaker 1: tried in the interim too, But I'm just trying to jump,
Speaker 1: you know, trying to give us the short and abbreviated version.
Speaker 1: He tries again in two thousand and six, two thousand
Speaker 1: and seven, and he's never able to get more than
Speaker 1: one percent of the Democrat primary vote. He was like
Speaker 1: shoulder to shoulder in the polls with Dennis Kucinich, who
Speaker 1: wanted to start a Department of Peace to offset the Pentagon. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's who Joe Biden was as a politician. And now
Speaker 1: we're like, I just speaking about gaslighting David. It's like
Speaker 1: Democrats even though this guy is a loser, but now
Speaker 1: we're supposed to forget that. They've known he's a loser
Speaker 1: all this time. It's amazing to me. I want to
Speaker 1: preface the same by saying I think he can win
Speaker 1: the presidency. I think, yes, yes, Trump and I think
Speaker 1: he can win. But the bottom line is he's been
Speaker 1: a terrible politician his whole career. I mean, he won
Speaker 1: postwater Gate by accident a little bit complicated, but he
Speaker 1: won in Delaware, which is, you know, like winning a
Speaker 1: congressional seat at the time. And he basically has tripped,
Speaker 1: you know, has has been a bad politician since rand
Speaker 1: in eighty seven. As you mentioned, it was just a
Speaker 1: complete disaster, embarrassing, and he's embarrassed himself numerous times. But
Speaker 1: he's continually treated like, you know, like he's a real
Speaker 1: man of the people, takes his amtrak home, you know,
Speaker 1: and etc. So, but he's never been popular. He's only
Speaker 1: popular with the press. He's never been popular with people.
Speaker 1: It was Barack Obama resurrected him only because he was
Speaker 1: this sort of lightweight moderate that he could, you know,
Speaker 1: enough to worry about. Basically, Busha changed what the VP
Speaker 1: was about was no longer about the person next in line.
Speaker 1: It was something else, and I think Obama followed that
Speaker 1: as well, and in his own way. But he has
Speaker 1: never been a good politician, and the idea that he
Speaker 1: is what we need now is crazy. The only reason
Speaker 1: he wont is because we had a socialist running that
Speaker 1: Democrats knew couldn't win in a bunch of other lightweight candidates.
Speaker 1: So if he wins, he'll he'll be an accident of history.
Speaker 1: At least that's how I view it. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: not Trump. You can hate him or not. He brought
Speaker 1: a new populist populism back to the United States. It
Speaker 1: was something that's time had come. Maybe he wasn't the
Speaker 1: best vessel for it. I obviously just ruth many of
Speaker 1: those populous ideas, but I think that it meant something.
Speaker 1: What is Joe Biden's candidacy about nothing? It's just about
Speaker 1: not being Trump. There's really nothing else to it. David Arson,
Speaker 1: everybody this too. He constantly tells us that his long
Speaker 1: record is the reason he should be elected, but he
Speaker 1: does not hold any position that he held even ten
Speaker 1: years ago anymore. So his record, we're not even allowed
Speaker 1: to talk about it anymore. Well, that's that to me.
Speaker 1: How was you gonna say, David? That to me is
Speaker 1: why he is the quintessential politician, and that he is
Speaker 1: the guy who it's like, you know, a low level
Speaker 1: staffer shows up with, Hey, this is the position that's
Speaker 1: popular right now, and he's like, oh, I said something
Speaker 1: else a month ago, but let's do this. And he's
Speaker 1: been doing that for forty years. It's even worse than
Speaker 1: that in a way. But yeah, I mean, you're right.
Speaker 1: But if you take all his major accomplishments, meaning bills
Speaker 1: that had his name that he wrote, there's something called
Speaker 1: the Biden Amendment that still exists. It's an anti abortion,
Speaker 1: you know, part of a bill, you know, foreign policy.
Speaker 1: But if you take the crime bill, if you take
Speaker 1: his busting positions, if you take his high Amendment vote
Speaker 1: and another and I've listed it elsewhere, but another thirty
Speaker 1: pro abortion vote, his accomplishment. He cannot point if someone
Speaker 1: I wish someone would ask him, can you point to
Speaker 1: an accomplishment a bill that you still support that you've
Speaker 1: voted for over the last thirty years. I don't know
Speaker 1: that he'd be able to name one. So it seems
Speaker 1: unlikely to me that there's going to be a lot
Speaker 1: of excitement voting from now again. There might be a
Speaker 1: lot of anger at Trump, you know, that pushes people
Speaker 1: out to vote. But I just don't think anyone's really
Speaker 1: a huge Joe Biden fan. I've never met that person
Speaker 1: in my life that I'm waiting for that too. There
Speaker 1: are Hillary super fans, I've met them, know them. There
Speaker 1: are clearly, I mean superfans are basically just called Democrats, right, So,
Speaker 1: I mean the Democrats have had people who have and
Speaker 1: even Bernie, I've never met a person in my life
Speaker 1: who is like Joe Biden is the guy we need.
Speaker 1: Never It's never happened. No, I mean, you know you have.
Speaker 1: With Bernie, you have there's an ideological reason people like
Speaker 1: that and want it. Right With Hillary the first woman,
Speaker 1: you know, everyone believes, you know, she should have been president,
Speaker 1: et cetera. And you can go down the line. But
Speaker 1: with Biden, if you ask people why, you know, why
Speaker 1: you're voting for Biden, finance looks like I guess he'll do, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's the guy, he's the most moderate guy
Speaker 1: you can win and we need to be Trump and
Speaker 1: that's what it's about. Now. That might work for an election,
Speaker 1: but honestly, I think it will be a disaster for Democrats.
Speaker 1: On the other side of this thing. I mean, they
Speaker 1: always talk about how Trump's a disaster long term for Republicans,
Speaker 1: I think the Biden thing's going to be a disaster
Speaker 1: because you're going to have a big split in that
Speaker 1: party I think between progressives and sort of more to
Speaker 1: call thith but sort of the other wing of the party.
Speaker 1: Harsani on fire. Everybody. Check out David Harsani's latest over
Speaker 1: National review dot com. Follow him on the social media stuff. David,
Speaker 1: thanks so much for making the time. Man. Good to
Speaker 1: have you back anytime. Thanks for having me Man, You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom. Hey, this is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. If we win the election, we'll have deals
Speaker 1: with a lot of countries very fast. They're just waiting
Speaker 1: to see who wins because they are hoping. They are
Speaker 1: hoping that Joe Biden wins. Sleep Echo, and if he wins,
Speaker 1: you know what's going to happen. China will own us.
Speaker 1: Our markets will crash, the four oh one case will
Speaker 1: go down to practically nothing. Stocks will go down to
Speaker 1: practically nothing. Remember stocks, these big companies, they're owned by
Speaker 1: millions of people that are carpenters and policemen and farmers
Speaker 1: and lots of other people, and they are the ones
Speaker 1: that benefit by having a good stock market, probably more
Speaker 1: than anybody else. But the four oh one case, the stocks,
Speaker 1: the economy will be in a shambles. They want to
Speaker 1: raise taxes, they want to triple taxes, they want to
Speaker 1: raise the quopiate tax, but they want to raise all taxes. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: they can't pay for what they want to do anyway.
Speaker 1: And what they're going to do is destroy your healthcare
Speaker 1: and destroy so many other things. We're gonna have a
Speaker 1: one hundred and eighty million people that are so happy
Speaker 1: with their private healthcare they're gonna lose it under this
Speaker 1: crazy plan that these people are proposing. I think that
Speaker 1: everything Trump says there is true in general. Maybe a
Speaker 1: little exaggerated, but I think it's it's you know, it's exaggerated,
Speaker 1: but it's true in general. And that's something we should
Speaker 1: all be reminded of. When I'm talking about, you know,
Speaker 1: the stock market. I don't think your four o one
Speaker 1: K is gonna go to zero of bonding gets elected.
Speaker 1: That's that's this is classic Trump salesman talk, right, But
Speaker 1: they are going to go down. It's a stock market.
Speaker 1: Remember when Trump won the election, it's oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: it's plummeting, and actually market ended up shooting up. Right,
Speaker 1: That'll actually happen if Biden wins. Stocks go down Biden wins.
Speaker 1: We got big, big problems with that, big problems with that.
Speaker 1: That's what I see. So I really believe, I really
Speaker 1: believe that the president of the United States getting reelected
Speaker 1: is going to be of enormous benefit. But you know,
Speaker 1: to all of us, even to the people who hate him.
Speaker 1: But the the Democrat point of view, if Biden is
Speaker 1: a nice man, vote for Oh you got you gottap.
Speaker 1: You know who's coming, Elizabeth Warren. If Biden is a
Speaker 1: man of empathy, a man of empathy, I tell you
Speaker 1: play nine. But during this pandemic, Donald Trump is a
Speaker 1: man who cares only about himself. He's a man who
Speaker 1: watches his poll numbers and how he looks on camera,
Speaker 1: and you know, everything measured through the lens of how
Speaker 1: it affects Donald Trump. Joe Biden is a man of
Speaker 1: genuine empathy, a man who up in a family that
Speaker 1: had its ups and downs, and you know, lived in
Speaker 1: a family when his dad lost her job and they
Speaker 1: lost their home. He understands what's happening to human beings
Speaker 1: in this country at a human level. And of all
Speaker 1: the things we need in a leader, Yeah, we need
Speaker 1: somebody who's competent and who's smart, and who will bring
Speaker 1: good people in, but we need someone has a basic
Speaker 1: empathy for other human beings and squam in this fight
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden. Just vote for Biden because even though
Speaker 1: he's a he's a senor, a little fool, he's he's
Speaker 1: an empathy guy. Yeah, he believes in and oh he feels.
Speaker 1: He feels your paymember that Joe Biden, Joe Biden, everybody,
Speaker 1: he feels your pain. As long as they're ladies nearby,
Speaker 1: he wants to. He wants to feel the ladies too.
Speaker 1: Maybe sniff him. Thanks for listening to the bus Essen
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair.
Speaker 1: Feel those funky beats. It's time for roll Call. Roll
Speaker 1: call Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton Teambuck at iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com. If you want to email us, that's how
Speaker 1: we do, That's how we roll. Let's get to it,
Speaker 1: my friends, Thomas kicking us off. The biggest lesson the
Speaker 1: Trump administration should have learned from this COVID nineteen pandemic
Speaker 1: by now is that it was a major mistake to
Speaker 1: put HHS, m n h n CDC in charge of
Speaker 1: handling a crisis of this scale. None of those agencies
Speaker 1: have any experience dealing with managing a crisis of this skill,
Speaker 1: a hard lesson learned by President Trump his staff, and
Speaker 1: a severe impact of the overall state of mind of
Speaker 1: the country. Whoever advised President Trump it was a good
Speaker 1: idea to put a bunch of technocrats in charge of
Speaker 1: this crisis should be fired. Had President Trump followed procedures
Speaker 1: and implemented the National Emergency Action Plan as it was designed,
Speaker 1: the first person he should have contacted is the director
Speaker 1: of FEMA. The only way to break this cycle of
Speaker 1: intermittent panic, get this country back to reality and salvage
Speaker 1: our economy is for the President to declare a nation
Speaker 1: the national emergency is over. Let Fauci and friends continue
Speaker 1: their bean counting until they're satisfied they have enough data,
Speaker 1: or until the public stopped listening to them. Shields High Thomas,
Speaker 1: very compelling, very compelling analysis from you on this. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for reaching out to us with it.
Speaker 1: And yeah, I think that there have been lessons learned
Speaker 1: about NAH and NIH and CDC and these other organizations
Speaker 1: and their role in all of this, and how their
Speaker 1: role was far too prominent. Michael Riot, shield Tie mayor
Speaker 1: Lightfoot is again threatening to shut down beaches and parks
Speaker 1: because of COVID, yet refuses to put a stop to
Speaker 1: other people having their fun and forbid under penalty of incarceration,
Speaker 1: put an end to the peaceful demonstration that most would
Speaker 1: call rioting. Same with New York, Michael. I know there's
Speaker 1: a huge double standard in the way that these Democrat
Speaker 1: politicians approach enforcement in the COVID pandemic era against things
Speaker 1: they don't like and things they do like. And as
Speaker 1: we know, Democrats like b LM, Democrats like the protests,
Speaker 1: and so there's a very there's a very different tone,
Speaker 1: very different action taken all of that, and that's not
Speaker 1: going to change anytime soon because there's no accountability other
Speaker 1: than the ballot box for politicians that act out and
Speaker 1: act poorly. So that's what we see happening. That's that's
Speaker 1: the reality situation by the producer, Mark, Since you did
Speaker 1: such an excellent job yesterday of explaining the situation of
Speaker 1: a football to all of us, what is the situation
Speaker 1: right now? Has anything any updates on this? No, I
Speaker 1: don't believe there's been any updates as of yesterday's show,
Speaker 1: because I was seeing some people say that the Big
Speaker 1: Ten just because the Big Ten is shutting down doesn't
Speaker 1: mean all the other leagues will now or all the
Speaker 1: other conferences, right, I mean it definitely doesn't mean that.
Speaker 1: But I mean if one shuts down, you kind of
Speaker 1: think there's gonna be a domino effect, but you never
Speaker 1: really know. Okay, And there's always the point of is
Speaker 1: it the same if the Big ten's not there and
Speaker 1: you have four other conferences playing well, you don't have
Speaker 1: the competition for the big tens? So what's the point? Yes? Fair, fair,
Speaker 1: fair point? Are you watching? Are you watching Fear City? Yet?
Speaker 1: I am not. There's hockey on. It's the middle of
Speaker 1: the playoffs. Come on, who's would tell us about the hockey?
Speaker 1: The situation? Who doing well? The best thing ever happened
Speaker 1: last night? Have you ever heard of a draft lottery?
Speaker 1: Do you understand that concept? Yeah? Of course? So I'm
Speaker 1: not a savage, all right, I don't know what I
Speaker 1: don't know what you know. But basically, the worst teams
Speaker 1: going for people who may not know go they get
Speaker 1: put in a bunch of pink bong balls with their
Speaker 1: logos on it, and they pick out the teams in
Speaker 1: the order U The Rangers ended up winning that last
Speaker 1: night after losing in the qualifying round, so they will
Speaker 1: get to draft Alexis Lafonier, who is the new phenom.
Speaker 1: That's great for me personally, but in the playoffs, the
Speaker 1: regular playoffs are starting tonight, exciting Alexis, Yes, but he's
Speaker 1: gonna be a great player for the Rangers. I I
Speaker 1: didn't know the French even did ice hockey. I thought
Speaker 1: only either only the Quash. Those kind of folks did
Speaker 1: ice hockey. A lot of countries around the world play
Speaker 1: I hockey, Huh, I was, I was unaware of it.
Speaker 1: But the Rangers best player decade has been Swedish Henrik Lundquist.
Speaker 1: I was unaware of that. All right, cool, Um, let's
Speaker 1: see here we have Josh Buck. Producer Mark is fake news. Uh,
Speaker 1: doctor bottom. The Big Ten is a much better conference
Speaker 1: than the SEC. The SEC has Alabama at LSU. They
Speaker 1: don't have the firepower of Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Wisconsin, Iowa,
Speaker 1: and Minnesota. Usually producer Mark is spot on, but he's
Speaker 1: dead wrong on this. Producer Mark, I gave you the floor.
Speaker 1: You know, I saw this email, so I'm prepared for it.
Speaker 1: I looked it up. Since the college football Playoff was instituted,
Speaker 1: the most appearances and most wins since twenty fourteen. Fifteen
Speaker 1: season is the SEC and the Big Ten has won
Speaker 1: one championship and has only had two team make it
Speaker 1: and they have a two and three record in four appearances.
Speaker 1: So you're just going with the data. Yeah, I got
Speaker 1: so shut up, That's what I'm gonna say. There we go,
Speaker 1: There we go, Josh. We appreciate your fire, my friend.
Speaker 1: Don't let the producer Mark bull you around right and
Speaker 1: again and tell him he's wrong on something else. Don't
Speaker 1: let him get away with that nonsense. Nick hey Buck,
Speaker 1: I'm a mechanic for the USPS and can attest to
Speaker 1: the fact that the mail in voting would be a
Speaker 1: complete disaster. The amount of mail that gets destroyed by
Speaker 1: mail sorting machines on a daily basis is unbelievable. USPS
Speaker 1: claims that it's less than one percent of total volume,
Speaker 1: but even one percent might be enough to affect an election.
Speaker 1: Add to that, missorts and mishandling and balance will be
Speaker 1: showing up weeks after the election. In addition to the
Speaker 1: mechanical and logistical nightmare, added to it is that all
Speaker 1: mail processing functions are now computer based and susceptible to
Speaker 1: outside interference. This is a disaster waiting to happen, and
Speaker 1: the President has to stop this if possible. PS. Love
Speaker 1: the show. Keep up the good work well, Nick. Thank you,
Speaker 1: and your points on the reality of US postal service.
Speaker 1: I think are very compelling, and I'd have to say
Speaker 1: I find them to be persuasive. And I think that
Speaker 1: mail in balloting across the board would be a very
Speaker 1: bad thing, and that's why the President's so opposed to it.
Speaker 1: So I'm with you on all that, my friend. I'm
Speaker 1: absolutely with you. Paul. Catching up on podcasts and her
Speaker 1: are your discussion about Biden's statement on undocumented workers who
Speaker 1: pay taxes being eligible for Medicare for none. How can
Speaker 1: one be an undocumented worker and pay taxes? If you
Speaker 1: pay taxes other than sales tax, you need a social
Speaker 1: Security number. If you have a legitimate social Security number,
Speaker 1: you're not undocumented. If you have a fall social Security number,
Speaker 1: you're a criminal, regardless of your immigration status. PS. Keep
Speaker 1: up the good work. Buck. Not quite Oss, but I
Speaker 1: did start following you when you had your TV show
Speaker 1: on the Blaze. He asked, producer Mark is doing a
Speaker 1: great job. Look at that, producer, Mark, you get a
Speaker 1: little high five. Good not everyone hates me? Oh please?
Speaker 1: Do you got Producer Mark fans? We gotta make the
Speaker 1: Producer Mark. What's gonna go on the Producer Mark T shirt? Though?
Speaker 1: When we start selling T shirts, maybe something I say
Speaker 1: about you? Okay, well, I think you gotta give it
Speaker 1: some thought though, you know what I mean? All right,
Speaker 1: I haven't thought about it yet. I don't know we
Speaker 1: were gonna have Producer Mark T shirts. Producer Mark, don't
Speaker 1: step into my penalty box, you know, something like that.
Speaker 1: I gotta figure. Yeah, maybe it'll just say the penalty
Speaker 1: box with Producer Mark, the penalty box with Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: There we go with like a hockey stick logo and
Speaker 1: it or some short or maybe we'll design a penalty
Speaker 1: box but you win it. Wait even better? Is there
Speaker 1: so the penalty box? Oh no, when you go yeah,
Speaker 1: when you go into the penalty box, Yeah, it's separate
Speaker 1: from where Is that the same as the bench you
Speaker 1: normally sit on? Is there actually a box? So there's
Speaker 1: a bench where all the players sit, you know, when
Speaker 1: they're whatnot, and right across from it, on the other
Speaker 1: side of the ice, they there's two literal boxes with
Speaker 1: a door that opens and when you get called up
Speaker 1: for a penalty, you go into the box. How long
Speaker 1: are you usually the box for most penalties are two
Speaker 1: minutes of game time and then you lose a player
Speaker 1: on the ice, So it's like a short term red
Speaker 1: card from soccer. Basically yes, yeah, like, but it's a
Speaker 1: two minute red card, and it's called a power play
Speaker 1: for the other team. But you can get expect you
Speaker 1: can't get kicked out of the game entirely if you
Speaker 1: oh yeah, and then that's a ten minute misconduct where
Speaker 1: usually there's no loss of manpower, but you're you're out
Speaker 1: of a game. You have you don't know, you don't
Speaker 1: go to the box, you don't have to sit there
Speaker 1: for the rest of the game. You showed a lot
Speaker 1: for them. What will usually get you a ten minute misconduct?
Speaker 1: Um you have kind of stuff. You would have to
Speaker 1: spear somebody with your stick, like use it as a weapon,
Speaker 1: which has happened before at aggressive fighting. So a regular
Speaker 1: fight is just five minutes, no loss of manpower, but
Speaker 1: something that crosses the line would do that. Just anything
Speaker 1: crosses the line basically will do that. A big hit
Speaker 1: into the boards with your elbow into somebody's heads something
Speaker 1: like that would do it. So playing real dirty, we'll
Speaker 1: get you, yes, exact. Okay, those hockey reps must be
Speaker 1: really good skaters. I just thought about that. Oh, they're fantastic.
Speaker 1: They go into many major training camps and whatnot, and
Speaker 1: they're well conditioned. They have to skate for sixty minutes straight,
Speaker 1: basically have to be in good shape. Interesting, Paul, Oh no, Paul,
Speaker 1: Sorry about about your point on undocumented workers. Yes, they're
Speaker 1: usually Democrats where you should pay this game of saying
Speaker 1: undocumented workers, also known as the legal aliens, pay taxes.
Speaker 1: But what they mean by that, what they're really saying
Speaker 1: with that is that they pay sales tax and that
Speaker 1: so when they buy stuff, when they go buy a
Speaker 1: six pack of beer or a loaf of bread or whatever,
Speaker 1: they're paying taxes and not getting the benefit of it. Now,
Speaker 1: that's not really true, because they're living in that state,
Speaker 1: and in being in that state, you're getting the benefit
Speaker 1: of fire and police and road clearing and all that stuff. Right,
Speaker 1: so you are getting benefit on the federal level, which
Speaker 1: is what you're referring to. Yeah, to pay federal taxies,
Speaker 1: you'd have to be using if you are an illegal
Speaker 1: alien a stolen Social Security number, which is an additional
Speaker 1: crime to illegal status. One of the big parts of
Speaker 1: the illegal immigration debate that gets glossed over by the
Speaker 1: media is that there are many crimes that are routinely
Speaker 1: committed by legal aliens in excess of the illegal status. Right,
Speaker 1: So being in the country when you're not supposed to,
Speaker 1: that's a crime. But then there's document fraud and forgery,
Speaker 1: and you know, all kinds of stuff, you know, different
Speaker 1: kinds of you you know, using a false Social Security card.
Speaker 1: These are all things that you add on top and
Speaker 1: there's even more criminality that comes from it. And I'll
Speaker 1: just tell you this. You know, if you if you
Speaker 1: forward signatures and you did bad stuff when you were
Speaker 1: applying for a home, let's say, and you know you
Speaker 1: cheated on your mortgage paperwork, you could be in a
Speaker 1: lot of trouble. But for illegals, cheating is what they are.
Speaker 1: That what they have to do. The Libs will say,
Speaker 1: because they have no choice because we haven't given them
Speaker 1: an mistake, which is of course flipping around the whole issue,
Speaker 1: because they don't have to do any of these things.
Speaker 1: They don't have to be in the country illegally right,
Speaker 1: but not much of a not much of a support
Speaker 1: for that among Democrats. That is for sure. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Remember if you want to call in, oh I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be out, so please do calling. We'll probably try to
Speaker 1: do us on Thursday eight four four nine hundred two
Speaker 1: eight two five. Leave us a voicemail. Please keep it short.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark does not like listening to five minute long voicemails.
Speaker 1: Please keep it short. Under a minute is acceptable. Under
Speaker 1: thirty seconds is perfect. Listen to five minute voicemails. What's up?
Speaker 1: Producer Mark doesn't listen to the five minute voicemail. I
Speaker 1: don't the leader that out. Yeah, you go past one
Speaker 1: minute and you're in the penalty box and your voicemail
Speaker 1: is going to get deleted. That's what ends up happening.
Speaker 1: So keep it to thirty seconds is key. And my
Speaker 1: recommendation is call in, say who you are, where you're
Speaker 1: calling from. Give us either a comment about their comments
Speaker 1: are fine. If you just want to say, I want
Speaker 1: to produce your mark, you know, Teddy Bear for Christmas
Speaker 1: time to give my kids, you know, that's fine. If
Speaker 1: you have a question, that's great. Too, but comment or
Speaker 1: question thirty seconds who are where you're from? Because that
Speaker 1: way we can get through a lot of the voicemails
Speaker 1: and we can bring more and more of them on
Speaker 1: the show too. So please eight four four nine hundred
Speaker 1: two eight two five eight four four nine hundred buck.
Speaker 1: Thirty seconds is a sweet spot. Make sure you know
Speaker 1: what your comment or your question is before you call.
Speaker 1: Please and see because we do this too. None of
Speaker 1: you ever have to wait on hold. You know, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of these shows that do the live calls
Speaker 1: and they put people that don't they won't tell the audiences.
Speaker 1: They put them in hold hell where you call in
Speaker 1: and they'll say, okay, yeah, we'll get to you when
Speaker 1: we get and then to sit there on hold until
Speaker 1: you realize that you're never going to get on because
Speaker 1: they'll have seven eight phone lines going at a time.
Speaker 1: They'll just put some so if you keep calling in
Speaker 1: and they don't want your call to go on air,
Speaker 1: they'll put you on hold forever. So you know, we
Speaker 1: don't do that to you. We don't waste any of
Speaker 1: your time. Call in thirty seconds, Bam done. Producer Mark
Speaker 1: loves it. It's his favorite homework assignment and maybe you
Speaker 1: have a T shirt idea for Producer Mark. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna put that out there, you know, the Producer Mark line.
Speaker 1: You know fashion were I'm just saying, what are we
Speaker 1: adding to my duties now I have to become a
Speaker 1: fashion designer. Well, no, they're gonna give you the idea
Speaker 1: for the T shirt? Okay, And then so they're the designer. Really,
Speaker 1: you're just the producer Mark. You're just the mus you know,
Speaker 1: someone has to make the T shirt, right, you're the inspiration. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: we got we got people go, oh we do I
Speaker 1: haven't met the mint. Yeah, well, well I got surprises
Speaker 1: in store for you. We're working on it. And also
Speaker 1: please go to Bucksexton dot com speaking of surprises in
Speaker 1: store for you. More and more cool stuff going on
Speaker 1: that site. Linked to all of our different social media accounts.
Speaker 1: You can listen to the podcast of the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show there. So yeah, thank you, Steve right, it's great show. Buck.
Speaker 1: I have a theory about the whole BLM and defund
Speaker 1: the police movement. The leftists want to purge the institution
Speaker 1: of the police in this country of any non leftist elements.
Speaker 1: That way they can they can do what they've done
Speaker 1: to every other institution in this country by making the
Speaker 1: job frustrating and impossible, good cops are running for the door,
Speaker 1: quitting or early retirement. The defunding just accelerates this. When
Speaker 1: the crime goes up, and it will, of course, the
Speaker 1: same politicians will start hiring police officers that pass PC
Speaker 1: litmus tests, and the Democrat Party will have the kind
Speaker 1: of people who will be happy to enforce unconstitutional laws,
Speaker 1: laws that they will then pass. What do you think,
Speaker 1: Uh see a very interesting theory. I don't know if
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, I think I think there's some
Speaker 1: truth which there's going to be more diversity training for cops,
Speaker 1: and so there's You're not wrong. I just don't know
Speaker 1: if it's as coherent a plan as that. I think
Speaker 1: that they're not even thinking that far out. But and
Speaker 1: it's also gonna be tough to get people to go
Speaker 1: into law enforcement who are true leftists. I think that's
Speaker 1: a challenge. But interesting thoughts, Steve, and I'm gonna mull
Speaker 1: it over a bit more. Gene. Gene writes, not sure
Speaker 1: why teachers are so fearful. Before this virus, they taught
Speaker 1: kids who are coming to school with all sorts of
Speaker 1: sickness because parents sent them to school sick. If they
Speaker 1: had to work now with the virus, I would think
Speaker 1: they would actually be safer because everyone is more aware. Yeah, Gene,
Speaker 1: this is certainly true of the flu, which exists every year.
Speaker 1: We go through flu season, flu cycle. It can be
Speaker 1: lethal to children and to adults, and teachers still go
Speaker 1: to school even during the flu season. And that doesn't
Speaker 1: make anybody you know a mass murderer for saying we
Speaker 1: should have schools open. So schools should be open, folks,
Speaker 1: That much should be clear at this point. Thanks for
Speaker 1: being here. Please pass the buck. Tell somebody in your life,
Speaker 1: somebody you know about the Buck Sexton Show, get them
Speaker 1: to try the podcast. Just once. I'm gonna be out
Speaker 1: on Friday. Mike later will be in for me, but
Speaker 1: I'm back tomorrow on Thursday. Shield High