WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball, predicting Paxton's value, Goldschmidt in St. Louis, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess d Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do? Did it too? Yeah?

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever here in the

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Bringing In Network alongside Frankie standfll. I am Greg. Hey,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Greggy? What's up? Tuesday? January? Like? Something

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that I like to do while you were gone was

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I would ask Jim how did he sleep the night before?

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'll not ask you how did you sleep last night? Greg?

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I slept well. I slept well. It was very comfortable,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>little spoon, Greg, I was not a little. I was

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable. But this morning I have a massive headache.

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>To be honestly hungover, big Monday night for zero drinking.

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Just the headache developed this morning. Is it the is

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it the flu hangover? Maybe? Nope, I know the voice

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is still little raspy. While editing the NBA recap, it

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was better than it was better than yesterday. It was

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you're trending in the right direction, trending up. But I

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>was really excited to come in the day. I was

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really excited for our topics today on the program. But

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been a rough morning. Man. It's there's a lot

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>going on or anything I missed. I don't never get married.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the advice, Greg, You got it. Man. It's unbelievable.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like the dumbest arguments are just there, and I'm

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>happy to do. I was looking forward to this and

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a lot of baseball stuff on the show,

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>which I'm really excited about. Like literally midway through yesterday,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>frank'sly working downstairs, I'm reading random fan graph stats like that.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm in, I am in, So I'm not

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>letting this one about. What are you arguing about? Marriage wise?

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Like what? Like, I'm there anything I need to know about.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I certainly have not dove as deep as you have

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>yet obviously you're getting married this year. No time to wait.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Greg's years old. He's gotta get married this year for

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>everything stops Worth shut up? Um, well, like what's in

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>your mind? I actually had something to do with me,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that's ridiculous. I had a dream last night that I

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was trying to we were trying to figure out our

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>color scheme for the wedding. That was my dream. Of course,

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>nothing came to me like I still don't have something

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not a me thing with me? You have like

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a color scheme yet is Yeah, she's doing like mostly

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>like silver black white, like non colors like silver white,

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>black gray shades. Sure. Right, So they're talking about like

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>dresses now, like bridesmaid dress stuff like that. The thing

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>why I am involved with? Why would you be involved

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in that? I'm gonna try my best not to be correct.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I never thought I would be at all. So that's

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where we are, Frank, That's all I got for you.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Bud. Yeah, well, I'll try to cheer you up.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Talk a little baseball today, and they'll be Hall of

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Fame induction ceremony today as well. We also have I

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>believe the f s t a fantasy baseball draft tonight

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we do, so we'll have and something else to talk

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>about as well starting tomorrow, you want to talk about

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that draft. I also saw Leonardo Dafino that Paul Charchi,

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the head of the f c A, is changing

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the name of the fc A to the f s

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>g A grad Fantasy Sports. I saw that as well,

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy towards Gaming Association, which makes sense with gambling and

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>gaming becoming so popular. Training association never really made sense

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. Gaming. I like, I like what they're doing there.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a good job, I pul charch Ch. I mean,

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>everything is kind of being fused together anyway, because if

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you're into making projections for fantasy, it's very easily translatable

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to gaming and betting and player props and you know,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>picking a side in a game, so on and so forth.

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So there, you know, there's a lot of parallels. It

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So on the program today, we decided that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with all football still to come a k a. The

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, so we have a lot to come there,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but we also have baseball right around the corner. And

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I was looking, as I said yesterday, looking at old tweets,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>old like my time hop old stuff that we were

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>putting out and we were kind of because Florio is around,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't need deep in this stuff. Last year we

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>already had uh one of our drafts going on my

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>our first draft of the year. I think Frank has

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>several best balls done at this point and instead this

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>year a little bit later on, maybe because we were

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>so in a football which is fine, But this year

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank's first draft started. First best ball draft started yesterday.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>I literally pulled up fan graphs for the first time yesterday.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna start it now, and we're gonna start off.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's because the big shoes haven't fallen yet.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Machado hasn't signed, Harper hasn't signed. But we wanted to

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do a show as we like to do always, to

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>start off really any season, baseball, football, basketball, What have

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you in saying, Hey, this happened. Did you know that?

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Because a lot of thanks fall through the cracks when

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you're preparing for football season. You're looking into free agents

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in football every single week, you're trying to set your

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>line up or answering start sit questions. You missed stuff

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and we can't talk about it because somebody cares. Now

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>people care, and I think that's why we're gonna do

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.559
<v Speaker 1>that today. Here's a few things you missed from baseball season. Cool, Frank,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely all right, So let's get right into that, and

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with someone near dear heart, Frank. Let's begin

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with new Yankee starting pitcher James Paxton. It wouldn't be

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the fantasy baseball season without Greg wanting

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a Yankee. By the way, don't draft

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with your heart and fantasy baseball, So there might be

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>things that, like you have to take a grain of

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 1>salt with when it comes to Greg Susman, because yesterday

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he was legitimately upset at me for not drafting Aaron

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Judge in the second round of Baseball Fan, to which

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he says, what kind of Yankee fan are you? Yeah,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like what I agree? It was. It was the second

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball player you it was the second round. It

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>was great value. It's twelve team league, Greg, and it's

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>best ball. You just don't think the best center in baseball.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me do um. Anyway, So we'll start with James Paxton,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>who was traded to the Yankees. Ultimately, we'll just call

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it what it was. The Yankee top prospect and Justice Sheffield,

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>who I do want to talk about a second um

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for James Paxton, the Big Maple is not as young

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as you were led to believe, the guy that is

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>known for being really really good but also kind of

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really really hurt. He's a left hander that has a

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of success against right handed hitters. A couple of

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>things I didn't like doing my little bit of a

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>deep dive here last year. A lot of more flyballs

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>than ever that that doesn't play well into Yankee Stadium.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously home run. The flyball ratio slightly up again for

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>James Paxton, again not something great for Yankee Stadium, and

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>number you think will probably go up because you're gonna

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>play half your games in Yankee Stadium. What Altar surprised

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>me is that the pitches the Paxson throws or fastballs,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Yankees have what many believe is a anti

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>fastball philosophy that they are going to focus on pictures

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that don't really throw fastballs all that often. Now it

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always hold true. They they Jay hap is another

0:07:58.680 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys that throws a lot of fast

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>bold when you do really and Lance Lynn through a

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of fastballs, so maybe it's gone a wave enough

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>philosophy in the last year or so, but James Paxson

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really fit this philosophy that they've been working through

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>with their signings and their free and their minor league

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>starters as well. Paxton goes away from that. So those

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are the things that I really noticed on first glass

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>rank you mentioned the the injury pro nature I think

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is is where to start With James Packson. He's pitched

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and seventeen and one third endings over the

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>past three years. It's been trending up the past couple

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of seasons, but it's still last year career high on

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty point one endings pitched six and the one you mentioned.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of the things that just kind of jump off

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the page right away with the battle ball profile when

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to James Packson, the fact that normally forty

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>six point seven percent groundball rate for his career GREG

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that was down um quite a bit last year the

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>groundball rate at thirty nine point six percent, So at

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>first glance, it is something that's going to play into

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>your mind in Yankee Stadium. The fact that he gives

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>up more fly balls and typically in his career has

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>been better against right handed batters um than lefties. So

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what I really liked about James Paxson going into last

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>year was that in seventeen he had corrected that. Like

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he was awesome against lefties, he was basically him and

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale who were just the best pitchers starting pitchers

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>against left handed batters in baseball UM in batting average

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>against or sixty three ops pitching against left handed batters right,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>those numbers in three thirty batting average eights against left

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>handed battersen. So again it was a small sample size.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something like a hundred or a hundred

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty plate appearances. So obviously not a lot of teams

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>play their lefties against him. But for whatever reason, he

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>was getting hit harder by lefties last year than we're

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.719
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing. Alex if you have that um that

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>that full screen that you could throw up now for

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>people watching at home. I looked into this a little bit.

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>These these are via fan graphs, right, so we have

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>heat maps here. This is from the pitching perspective greg Um.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>You can see on the left is where he kind

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of pitched to the lower third the outside quadrant where

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of painting that outside corner away from

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>left hand batters, whereas in a lot of his pictures,

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>pitches to lefties were, you know, in the middle. They

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>were on the outer third of the plate, but he

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>was still in the middle much more than he was

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in So I think that's something that has to be

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>corrected this year, and I have faith that the Yankees

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>will will be able to do that. The problem here,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg is if you want James Paxson, you you still

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to draft him as your SP two. I don't

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>know how comfortable I feel with that. It's just that's me.

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And currently his a DP is like in the in

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the fourth, fourth round of there you go. It's fifty six,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so fourth round of a fifteen team league. He's in

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the fifth round of twelve team league. Typically he's going

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to be your SP two. I think I would feel

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>much more confident, obviously with him as my SP three,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not gonna happen. Obviously. We haven't done right

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher off the board. Right now, we're in an

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>NFBC a DP being drafted as an SP two, solid

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>SP two, but he hasn't gone more than a hundred

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and sixty and he's pitched ever in his career. He

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>did have that career high last year. Um, but yeah,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there are some morning signs. Fly ball rate you mentioned

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>one point to nine home runs per nine also a

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>career wors thirty percent hard hit rates, so allowed more

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>hard contact last year. That was a career worst. On

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the home runs specifically, great, I mentioned what they were

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>per nine. He allowed nine home runs in seen that

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>number one up to twenty three. So just at first glance,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like what he's doing is going to

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>play well into Yankee Stadium. And I think the fact

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that his ADP is basically the same world was last

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>year Greg, even with the move to Yankee Stadium, tells

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>me that other people don't really know what to do

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with James Paxson either. I agree with that. I think

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>what was interesting, smilar some other things that I looked

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>up that we're kind of similar in the past. Right,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So his caper nine went up pretty significant, Lady from

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>tem eleven point six, eight walks for nine went down

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit. His babbit basically the same. Let

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the base percentage basically the same K minus walk rate

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is always great, always great. I was reading an article

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>via Paul Sporer on fan graphs and it was basically,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>over the past three years his home his K minus

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>walk percentage is sixth best on starting pictures. And he's

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>very consistent with that, very consistent, and you could buy that,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>um the big number. And Frank and I really keep

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>harping on it. He's the home runs and the flyball

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and and the flyballs in general, which you just see

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of. And I think we're just scared

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of when it comes to Yankee Stadium, like that home

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>run of fly ball ration. I'm gonna say it again

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>seven you could basically double it last year. Bad luck, sure,

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but going in a Yankee stadium, that bad luck is

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get worse. And I think that's what a

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>real reason to be very very nervous. Now. I Frank

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>gave you the chart about left handers. I think most teams,

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>in all honesty are too dumb to realize that. And

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I know they use analytics, but like, you're never going

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to see lineups that are stacked with lefties against James Paxton,

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>even though he's better in the reverse flitt You're never

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna see that. These managers are too old school when

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to that, even though so many hused analytics,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you're never gonna see it. So that doesn't scare me

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as what we're seeing about the launch angle,

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the flyballs and going the Yankee Stadium. That's what scares

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>me the most. You said, he's around the sevente pitcher

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>off the board. Do you have some of the guys

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that are going around him? And this is via NFBC ADP.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Ational Fantasy Baseball Championship. If you if you listen

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>to h if you listen to Mattmodica, our friend Mettmodica

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at all last year, you have heard of the NFBC.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Matt Moodica has probably done twenty of these drafts.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is via This is from the beginning of January,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so January one through January one. Um, let's see acton

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen pitcher off the board. It's picture overall, So Edwin

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Diaz is actually going ahead of him, So he's sixteenth

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher. Just ahead of him are Patrick Corbin, Noah

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>synder Guard and Clayton Kershaw and Walker Bueller's just ahead

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of him. Those are four ahead of him behind him,

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to be a hype guy this year.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Jameson Tye On, Steven Strasburg, Clevinger, another hype guy, Zach Granky,

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack Flaherty, I mean Flaherty, Clevinger, Tyne or met to

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>me are guys that kind of stand out like in

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a similar tier, like their young starting pitchers and everyone's

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>expecting to like take another step for sure. Yeah, so

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestly, it is also behind him, you all honesty,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably right. Guy's probably where he should go. Like

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you don't want to take that plunge. Maybe you

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>want to get the guy earlier than that. That's fine,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but that's probably where he should go. If you play

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve team league, you could get him in

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the fifth round as your SP three. I believe that's

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>if you start the Great Fantasy base you start with

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if you start with three, I got Paxton if you

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have if you have three starting pitchers in the first

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>five rounds. The Great Fantasy Baseball Invitation with which I

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was in last year, I won my individual league. I

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>got Paxson as my SP three in that and it

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was a Rhodo draft. I believe my first two pitchers

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>were Aaron Nolah and you Darvish Harvish was obviously terrible,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I got Paxson as my SP three in

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the fifth round. I agree with you, it's kind of

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like where he should go in terms of like

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the other names that he's around, and just kind of

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at it right now, and it's worth mentioning. Just

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>like on the surface, he's been much better in his

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>career at safe Co and he has been on the

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>road at safe Co in his career um three point

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>three five e r A, and I think it's just

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. This might be just but three point three

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>five year A last year in his career at home

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at safe Co, it is two point nine eight in

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty starts two ninety six and a third endings pitched

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>two r A at home three point eight seven e

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>r A on the road. So there are things that

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>he needs to fix from last year in terms of,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, pitching lower in the zone, trying to induce

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>more groundballs. It seemed like he might have been selling

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit to try and get more strikeouts

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>last year that you see like in the Cape or nine,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he had some monster performance, has had the no hitter.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he had like a seventeen strikeout game, like

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>something massive like that. We know what his upside can be,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair, his fit and x fit were

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>both much lower than his three point seven six e

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>r A. Steamer soundly alarmed for Steamer as him for

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a three point four six e r A this season

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy two innings pitched. Both of those

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers seem a little ambitious to he was traded away

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>for Justice Sheffield as I mentioned any interest in draft

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>in Sheffield this year in one of these like fifty

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>team drafting holes, Definitely, I think he uh. He has

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously a much better opportunity to correct the starting rotation

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Marriner thingy thing with the game all right,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when we come back on all the things happened this offseason,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>including one of the top first basement off board is

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>now playing for a new team. Goldschmidt's up next, the

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Best Friend's Red Daily Roado dot Com learned from

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily roado dot Com Optimizer in minutes

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line for cash games and attorneys learned

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined daily roado dot com.

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The following ad contain shocking material. Listener discretion is advised.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Is someone in your family playing a dangerous game of

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die a year

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>from drug overdose. A hundred and twenty people a day,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes. Eighty

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse. Over

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes. Somebody you know. Maybe next

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it. Call now and learn

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>how we can help you. Eight six six four eight

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one eight six six four eight

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one. That's eight six six four

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>eight four ninety six one. Here is Area's calling the shots.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're gonna just hand the ball straight up to God.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>If Casey mill is gonna be running around, I'd rather

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball in Drew Brees hand and let him do

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>his thing. We sometimes crushed coaches for running, running, running,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and just taking the airt of the ball. But if

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sean Payton, I would have ran the ball three times,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>kick a field goal, rams, get the ball with like

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds left, and I'll bank on my defense there

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>week days a pm to eleven pm Eastern on the

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast Providers, Frankie Us.

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Today is terrible day because this is Dave Mann Steve

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Matthews Ben tour announcement that Greig, don't tell me you're

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>going on another one of these. So you were disappointed

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>last time. It was very disappoted. Last disappointed because, as

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm doing my bachelor party in Florida, and

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I was going to this. I was going to do

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it around you mean July. It's baseball game. Originally was

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do in Tampa and potentially see the Yankees in Tampa.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees whenever you want, Greg, that's the other thing Kees,

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever I want. Um. I'm not sure you and your

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Baskett party are dying to go to Tropic Canada exactly.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think we're gonna the Yanks me the

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Marlins is here like the Sting Rays, right or something.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably not one of the things we were gonna do.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We should see Dave Matthews band in West Palm Beach,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>just different location. Like it's kind of cool, but like

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the dates isn't exactly they were what I thought they were,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which is not the dates I wanted. Um, So I

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know I'm gonna be able to make it this year.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, what are we ever gonna do? I'm probably

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>just going somewhere else. I'm gonna be able to see

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Dave just not just not during my bachelor party week. Really,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>you could do anything except see Dave Matthews, Ben, How

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>long are you gonna be there? Um? Think Thursday through Sunday,

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>all the older almost almost the round. I would never

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>do the rap around to you, Frank, can't do the

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>old rap around. What are you? What's going on with you?

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you? What are you taking off? I feel like,

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, I feel like it's brewing. Probably I feel

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like he's brewing. Are you gonna drop it at some

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>point soon? I had I wanted to go visit our

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>guy Florida. He's in the chat right now, he's listening

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's watching. I wanted to go visit Florio in

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles in the month of February. It's kind of

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like a dry month super Bowl, and that's when you're

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>going away. I'm going for that exact reason, like in

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>between it's like the NBA All Star Break. It's like

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that, like that's what I'm doing, That's

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>why I'm doing it. I wanted to do that, right

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.239
<v Speaker 1>he told me you were going. Doesn't seem like it's

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. You told me you were going to. Now

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there might be plants like go to Poland later on

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the year. You visited that one. Yes, that's cool

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Inga's grandparents have like a fiftieth anniversary. When is that. Unfortunately,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, it's like it's in the middle of August,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which is prime fantasy football. So I don't know, I

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I'm gonna go on vacation. Hey, you

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta do, you gotta do. You gotta go on vacation.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's better to clear your mind, you know, honestly, Yeah,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. Man. It's the biggest fantasy sport

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's like the biggest draft time of the year.

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's gonna do the white board series? If I'm not

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>around in the middle of your recording recorded in earlier,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's all I just want you to remember, have fun first.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's disingenuous not to. You know, live your life and

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be happy your life. You knew what's going. If you

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like to wage your on sports, you never have you

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>want to try. I don't know what to bet d

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>s I. They were waiting. They have wagering options for

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>almost any sport you can think of, including sides, totals,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and player props who you can utilize your daily fantasy

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>skills without salary cap constraints. You can even wage your

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on e sports, politics, and reality TV. Get an edge

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>with live betting at bet d s I, where you

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can wage virtually any time during a contest, capitalizing on

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in game circumstances. There are so many ways that you

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>can make money. Use the promo code f f T

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>S y one on one when you sign up and

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you get bonus deposit match head on over and over

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>your account at bet d s I. That promo code

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is f F T S y one oh one to

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>get your bonus depositive match my heady is kind of dissipating.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Now we're talking baseball. Feel better. I'm happy that it's

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>cheering you up. Great, you know it's cheering me up.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>What effect that everyone in the chat is crapping all

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>over d NB right now? So why are they gonna

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>do that to me? I don't think says bachelor party

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of dudes going to a Dave Matthews

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>band cuts agree, and that's what a bachelor party is. Probably.

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I like to have your back on matters like this,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you love you specifically, never have my back on on

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>matters like well, someone's got to defend you, Greg. You know,

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>normally I'm there. Normally I'm there to defend you. I'm like, uh,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for those people, we're gonna get back to baseball. But

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>for those people who saw the videos Sunday Night Football

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on NBC, you could see the video of the get

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Back Coach with Sean McVeigh, which is awesome. It's basically

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a coach that's just there to physically move Sean McVeigh

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because it gets too animated and they don't want him

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to run into rest and get a penalty. It's great.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I'm here, Greg, I'm here to guide

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>making sure that yeah, you're not getting you're not gonna

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>crush out there by I'm I'm always crushed. I would

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>rather go to David Busters than a d NBC loved

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Busters er. Hey man, I love the Busters to see

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>after dB concert. Uh, I can't read the rest of it.

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna read those huh. All right? Well, nevertheless, so

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the other what are the other big trades we wanted

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to today? We do a little basketball a

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>little later on as well, But what are the other

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>trades that we wanted to talk about? Was Paul gold

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Schmiant headed over to St. Louis. You might have missed

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that as well, Like who is even traded for Frank? Yeah,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he was traded for Carson Kelly, Shelby Miller and another

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>lower name pop value in a couple of years. Shelly Miller.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not right, I missed that up. That's not That's

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>not Miller. It was the other gentleman that was on

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals last year that everyone was hyping up. It

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>was Luke Weaver. Weaver, the guy who only throws a

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>change up. Yes, I didn't draft him an So the

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>new Shell basically all right, see if he could get

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>it right with a human door in Chase Field. So

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you about all those guys in a moment,

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But I need to get to Paul gold Ris and

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kelly someone starting catcher for the Dimebads, Weavers and Dreams, Pible.

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't dread by Luke weaver Man. Yeah, I don't know.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Cardinals were gonna get more than this.

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were going to get one of these,

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>one of these outfield prospect guys like the Dia did

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>more than this. I thought the Dimebacks were gonna get

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>more than this, like a Harrison Bader or a Tyler O'Neill.

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Like what they got. Listen they got, they got to

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>post type Sleepers's wrong with that? Carson Kelly was the

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>catcher of the future. Luke, Yeah, I thought this. I

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>thought there's a good goodbye Carson Kelly. It's like, just

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>based on his minor league profile, there's nothing that stands out.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>He was an alright hitter. We've seen guys get better

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level. It's not impossible to happen.

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. This doesn't excite me all that much.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I int be the starting catcher. So in that sense,

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing the two catcher league, he's already on

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>your radar, absolutely, very very much. So now Paul Goldschman

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and I want to talk about Luke Weaver also in

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment. But like Paul Goldschman, here's the numbers. Home

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>runs down three, not significantly, but they're down a bit,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the runs down, r v I s down, We get it.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>He was a bad team. Here's a big number for you.

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>That always made Paul gold Schwartz still um stand out

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>where than a lot of other players that were taking

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in that top five stolen basis, which we always thought

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>was flukey, right, eighteen even if getting eighteen steals that's crazy,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. Last year seven seven stolen bases, the

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>average down to to nine ov P slightly down to

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>three nine again still really really good, and his bad

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was actually up from the previous season, not really off,

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not really too far away um from his career mark. Remember,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gold Smrit was in that miserable slump early on, so

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that second half of the year really much better as

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he got back to those standard numbers. Strike Outs were

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>along the same line, the sorry walk percentage along the

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>same lines, strikeout percentage slightly higher than it has been

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the past. What I'm worried about, um Paul gold

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt here is certainly the the new environment UM with

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, No, you were dor obviously is better. But

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what I'm worried about when it comes um to Paul

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>gold Schmidt, was that at home in a fly ball

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>ratio slightly awful, little bit hard hit percentage was actually, uh,

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the more I look at this, Frank More, I'm just

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like not all that excited about gold Schmidt. I can't

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really explain why I had it before, and I don't

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>remember why. But I'm not overly in love of gold

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Smight like I used to be. Yea Goldschman now going

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the second round. Not used to that normally a

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that is consensus, you know, top five, pick top ten.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at his ADP right there, NFBC ADP right

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>around pick nineteen twenty. He is the first first basement

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>off the board as of right now, him and Freddie

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Freeman seemingly going back to back. The one worry for me, Greg,

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of worries here, but I'll start

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>off with the strikeouts. That's something that was hurting him

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>early on in the season. He was striping out more

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. And Paul gold Schmidt is not a

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>spring chicken by any means. He's thirty one years old.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll turn thirty two in September. So this is age,

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty one season for for most of the

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>year um and the striking out more He's getting up

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>there a little bit. Age was chasing pitches more than usual,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>which I think helped um that that slump that he

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was in early on in the season. I think the

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts were really a big part of that. And you

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned what he did in the second half. You don't

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>even have to look to the second half. Greg from

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>June one on three thirty batting average four twenty O

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>b P six O two o ps, thirteen percent, walk

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>crate percent, strikeout rate, forty eight percent, hard hit rate

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>six percent, line drives twenty four point five percent home

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>run to fly ball ratio. But normally typically a guy

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>who has played much better at home in his career,

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the human or affected him last year to

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>start the season, the human or the strikeouts, chasing pitches

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>UH to thirty eight, batting average seven eight two o

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>p s at home last year. It's not like Paul Goldschmidt,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>He's normally much much better at Chase Field. But this

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is a negative park shift factor. Even with the human door.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>The human door, Chase Field produced more runs last year

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on a per game basis, more home runs last year,

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>UM than St. Louis. So I think it's a negative

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>park change here. The stolen bases have declined, and stolen

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>bases really comes down to organizational philosophy, right, And you

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>look at last year the Cardinals had sixty three stolen

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bases as a team. They were twenty six in Old Baseball,

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Diamondbacks had seventy nine they were fourteenth. So

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, is it organizational? Is it? Is it

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>personnel that you have? It's like what came first a

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>chicken or the egg. Um, I don't know that he's

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get back to like twenty stolen basis, He's probably

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like in this ten range, will say, I think the

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>batting average is pretty safe at least two eighty six

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>batting average in six straight years, greg Um. But I

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>do I do worry about the change. Like it's not

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>always you know, a guy in a new place automatically.

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've like sating. Look look at Marcello Zuna

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, like and he it's not like

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he he was going to typically what we would expect

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a better hears Ballpark from Miami to to to Bush

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Stadium in St. Louis, and he performed a lot worse.

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's it's a guy of his career

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona for sure. Now it's not like Zuna had

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the level of consistency that we've seen from Paul Goldman

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>year had broken out the year before, definitely, but I

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>understand that. But like, was that huge landown without question,

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I like to Marcello Zuna last year, but it was

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>one almost a one year breakout. We didn't see him

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>do it again. Paul Golden, we've seen do it again

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and again and again and again and again. I don't

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>know that you're gonna get the bottom falling out of

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul Goldschmandt here like he's going in the second he's

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>going in the second round, which you said we're not

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing from him, and it's true, and he's

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not a spring chicken and that true, But at that

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>second round a DP would you take him. That's where

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I struggle because I mean, as of right now, like

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't love it. I just think I

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like in Rhodo, i'd want to go in a

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>different direction, like I got like Stanton for example, right

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>if you play in Rhodo, you need five outfit you

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta fill five outfield spots. I think first base typically

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is a deeper position. It is this year as well.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I would just go in like an

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>outfield direction or a starting picture like Ultman's going just

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of guys like Standing, he's going ahead of Kluber, Verlander,

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Blackman. I feel like I would take one of

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>those starting pictures or outfielders. I think it's a fair value.

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Like if would it surprise me one bit if he

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ends up hitting you know, to five five home runs

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and steals ten bases again and you know he's close

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to a hunder robbe Eyes and a hunter runs. No,

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me at all. And if he does that

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and he returns first round value in the second round,

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>he's also a guy that wouldn't surprise me. But if

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you're I think I would just take an outfielder or

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>starting picture just based on like positional depth round, if

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you're buying into that contract, your narrative, he isn't a

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>contract year and this is the one they are. But

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tough, right and the Cardinals have had some

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 1>success doing that obviously with guys like Utt Holiday come

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to mind. But he's in the last yeervice contract and

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.479
<v Speaker 1>this is the last big contract that he's going to get.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So if you're buying into the narrative, he's there, right,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that's potentially a thing. Just saying now, out of

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the names you mentioned, just to give my quick opinion

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>here the starting pitchers, I get it right, like I'm

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>someone's gonna want to grab a hitter in the first

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>round of the storting pitcher in the second round, So

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for that, I'm with you. But Paul gold Schmidt and

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Blackman the exact same age, right there were. Blackman's

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty there by two years old. Black was actually slightly older.

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have gold Schmitt than Blackman. I think gold

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt will have the higher O b P. I think

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the averages will be similar. Strike out rate is a

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit better for black Men than is gold Schmidt.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Walk rates a little bit better for gold than it

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is black men. I think the stolen based numbers at

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this point in their careers pretty similar. Runs score will

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely be higher for black men. I think RB I

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is theoretically should be higher for gold Schmidt. I think

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the home runs are kind of close. I'm gonna I'd

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rather have Golds for than black men. I haven't dove

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>deep into black men yet like I have for gold

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt UM, but just on the surface, it's because of

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>positional depth. That's like the only reason why I'm saying, like,

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what you know, if you're you're trying to find

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>uh five Outfielers versus you know, you're trying to you're

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to find the like you know, slight differences between

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys at this point already early on UM And

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just like a hundred and at least a hundred

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven runs scored for years in a row for Charlie

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>bit like run scored that's so hard to come by, definitely,

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and it gives you a fair batting average every single year.

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The course field factor, great line up year and a

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>year out does a guy changing teams it were? It

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>worries me a little bit who would rather drop between

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>him and Freddie Freeman. I still think Freddie Freeman has

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>untapped Tex. The Freddy Freeman guy. If he put together

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>his seventeen and eighteen what he was doing in teen, uh,

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the year that he got hurt, if he put that

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of power production together with what he did in

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like he has this three hundred batting average,

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>forty homer like twenty rb I season and I feel

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like he has that. I feel like he has that

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.439
<v Speaker 1>potential home runs in a hundred and seventeen games last year. Yeah,

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but then sixty two games last year and that was

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what was his whole run of flyball ratio last day?

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Like this up the thing? The thing with Freddy free

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>ratio is down five percent. It was it was very low.

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>It was fourteen point nine percent, which is kind of

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>by his career. Dude, It's so it's he's not an

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>extreme flyball. He reverted back to being a line drive

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hitter last year, which at his core is what he is. Like,

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>he's a natural spray to all fields, line drive hitter,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>doubles guy. Actually more lines drives last year and he

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>hit every before US, but the two years before seventeen.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>He was buying into the launch angle like he was.

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>He was actively trying to hit more flyballs and hit

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more home runs, and it was coming to fruition. Like, seriously,

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that's home runs in a hundred and seventeen games overall,

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a hundred and fifty game pace. That's

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like I would rather have still feel like he has untapped.

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have gold Goldman has done for longer. He's

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.919
<v Speaker 1>also also changing places. I understand that's not enough for me. Okay,

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the trade before we move on,

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I know UH was the NBA next. We also wanted

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to get into the UH trade. But before we do,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to talk about Luke Weaver, which

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>is the other side of the trade. Luke Weaver, as

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, basically only through change ups. Last year, he

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>was going very similarly only but he's just like a

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>two pitch picture like fastball change He was going in

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the very similar bought James Paxton and honestly, right like

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of the the not even behind James

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>past on the top twenty starting pitcher. Luke Weaver was

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>going that same range as Louise Castio. He was like

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a next one. He was like SP to thirty because

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>like that, it was like an SP three that you

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to take the next step. Okay. Paxton

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit higher than excuse me, Um, he

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was more. Paxton was more in the Aaron Nola ranges.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That is that faris say yes, okay. So then these guys,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>these guys were a little bit later on the Louise

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Castillo's um and the Luke Weavers. But they expected major

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>breakouts from guys like this, and it didn't happen with

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver. I think people waited and they waited and

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they waited, and it ultimately never came. How come, well,

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>partially what I said with he's kind of predictably. He

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>threw his curveball. He tried to throw his curveball more.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Last year, this is Luke Weaver, but predominantly fastball change up.

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't getting nearly the same amount of strikeouts that he

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>was uh the year before. But if you remember last

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>year when we were talking about this in he had

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a ten point seven four case per nine, it's because

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't going deep into games. Luke Weaver was getting

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of strikeouts. But if you look at the

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike rate. It was nine point. Swinging strike er

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't change all that much last year, but the strikeouts

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>dropped tremendously, So he's gotta incorporate that herball more. He

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>needs a third pitch. The fastball change up is is

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too predictable. I think people had too

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>high expectations for Luke Weaver last Looke. We were also

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 1>walked over three and a half pree game last year.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Back after this, If you're someone that needs fantasy sports

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>When you download the n T s Y Sports Radio

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice every single day,

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>right through the weekend. Be sure to listen to our

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>weekend warriors like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Today Weekend Fantasy Update. The fantasy Jesus in this league

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is never short of exciting at I T L and

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>GAP in the iTunes and Google play Store now and

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 1>keep the best fantasy experts right in your pocket all

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>day long and all week long. From the NFL to

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Daily Rodo dot com is the place to

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>win millions in Daily Fantasy. You can get the best

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>DFS NFL coverage all season long for a price of

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>one nine, or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports round

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Elite package at month. If you use the

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n t s Y, you get ten

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package, enter promo code

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>f n T s Y, and you'll be on your

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. Maurice Allen

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen, two thousand and sixteen European Long

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Drive Tour Champion, two thousand seventeen, World number one. Me personally,

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I keep my game face on me all the time,

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>especially coming out with the bucker, leaving the range or

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.919
<v Speaker 1>even leaving the poors. What's your story? Go to game

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>face grooping dot com. From all your athletic facial wipes

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and body cleansing, kneed springs, make it rain. I do

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Purists are fading away and ultimately Bonds and

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Clemens will get it. Nothing would make me happier than

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for that to happen. Paul of Fames are supposed to

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>tell the story so when we take our kids and

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>our grandkids and you should tell the story about the

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>steroid era, you should talk about how Major League Baseball

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>completely turned a blind eye. If they are not in

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that hall, then the hall, to me is a complete joke.

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Weekdays six to nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>networking on your popular podcast providers back with you, Fantasy

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Networks and Frankie Standford

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>here all on eight Tuesday, hanging out with you, and

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to remind you that the Daily Roador dot

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Com partnership with Data Golf is back for all new

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>premium fantasy golf betting tools. Check out the all new

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>line of Optimizer of customs today is an advanced group

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>customizable projections from Fandel and DraftKings o a ship projection,

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>its PGA finished probabilities to simulator outright into twenty market

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>betting tools, head to head and three wall betting tools,

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>PGA pro Tips, subscribe to chats and more. I don't

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know what the Daily Rotor dot Com click on go premium,

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>choose golf and entered the promo code Golf nineteen for

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a tem percent discount. That's a daily Rotor dot Com.

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Good on go Premium, click on golf and enter the

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>promo code golf nineteen for a ten percent discount anything

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>else on Luke, we were Frankie now you mentioned it

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as we were going to break, just touching on the

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lack of control that was last year, you know, over

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>three and a half walks Bryant. Look, this is a

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a reclamation project for the Arizona Diamondbacks. If

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they could find a way to turn them around, get

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>him closer to where he was last year, uh the

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 1>year before, work on that curveball a little bit. I

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just think he was. He was a little bit over

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>hyped last year, you know, being drafted inside the top

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty starting pitchers around that range with like Luis Castio,

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>um Zach Godley as well. So what we'll see what

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they can do. I will say this, I believe his

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a DP is like not exa e stint right now

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in NFBC. It is so I don't know, you're the math,

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but he's going around guys like Drew Steck and rider

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like Minor Nico like he's going super late. So if

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you play in these you know, draft and hold leagues

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>or fourty round fifty round drafts. He's going super late.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>If you have faith that the Diamondbacks can figure him out,

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>then you get him out of great value right now,

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>probably the rest of draft. See, I don't I can't

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine people um anything with Carson Kelly before we want

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Reds. Look, it's just we play in two catcher leagues.

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I know there's been some debate in like Fantasy Baseball

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Twitter one catcher versus two catcher leagues, Like all right, well,

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like the old guard just saying, like,

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been two catchers forever, why are we

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>going to change it to one now just because catcher suck.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the same debate about tight ends, right like should

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we just take away the tight end position and fantasy

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>football because there's only three really good ones? No, you

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>need to learn how to be better and you you

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta find those middle round tight ends that break The

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing goes for catchers. I mean, yes, it's harder

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to find the late round catchers that break out. Is

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it impossible to find a guy that you know gives

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you positive value? I don't think it's impossible, but it's

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning a guy like Carson Kelly in two catcher leagues.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the top catching prospects for a

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>few years now. The Cardinals expected him to be the uh,

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the successor to YadA yr Molina. It seems like Yadia

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Maline is never gonna go away, and you have to

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>give something up to get something. So you want to

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>get Paul golchmant, you have to trade bad Carson Kelly.

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, he's just kind of like a two sixty

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>two seventy home runs. I guess maybe he grows into

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit more like experience wise, um, but

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where he's at right now. I see Carson Kelly, Frankie,

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys that like you pick up when

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>he gets hot and you plug him in and then

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you drop him. And I mean, in one catcher league

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you might do that, but like in catual league, he's

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>probably second catcher exactly, and there's nothing wrong with that. Okay,

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to the last day we're gonna talk

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about on today's program, and that is Yaw and Alex

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>would headed over to Cincinnati. What was that trade, frank

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It was ya Cel Pweague, Matt Kemp and Alex would too,

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>since four basically a salary dump. They did get prospects

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Jeter Downs and Josiah Gray and Homer Bailey, who was

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>also released. Um So, I'm not sure if Homer Bailey

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is gonna land somewhere else. Former favorite of Adam Rownas.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Remember when you guys used to do the show every

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>single year, Adam Rynas was all over Homer Bailey. Probably

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not on him as much anymore admittedly, but Yassi l Peag,

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Matt Kemp and Alex would too since Cincinnatti sneakily having

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these like SP two SP three guys

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in their rotation now, guys like Tanner, row Ark, Alex Wood,

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they trade for Sonny Gray, they still have Louise Castile. Like,

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some upside with these guys. It's interesting what they're doing, Like,

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they haven't had pitching for years, so it's good to

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>see them trying to address it. Their outfield is also,

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have a bunch of guys. They have Pweague,

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they have Kemp, they have Scott Schebler, they have Jesse Winker,

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of guys. Really Wilton now Gondo,

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's with the Kansas City Royals. Are celer names. Scott

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Chadler can play centerfields, Okay, alright, it's a lot of yeah,

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>well a lot. Matt Kemp, we know he's not a

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>good fielder. An ideal fit for him would have been

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the American League, so he could be a designated hitter.

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's not gonna be the case here. And since

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he and obviously you can't play him at first base

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because Joey Vado is there. Um, it just kind of

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sucks for Jesse Winker because Jesse Winker, to me, is

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like this guy who's like on the precipice, like he's there.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 1>He's like mini Joey Vado, like great plate discipline, doesn't

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>strike out, walks a lot. It kind of saw him,

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like a couple of years ago, taking that step into power,

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:39.879
<v Speaker 1>like the final month of the season, the second half,

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, I like maybe him and Kemp

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>were gonna like tune. It's just frustrate so for me,

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the to Kemp, I don't know. For me, there's a

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of names. There's a lot of names there and

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:56.439
<v Speaker 1>get the headliner and everyone's gonna be so excited about

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>pre this year, and I think rightfully, so, really, how

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>come because it's finally going to be in position to

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have regular bats. Greg and look at what he's done

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years with in l A with them,

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of jerking him around, to be honest,

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of brought some of it makes sense, Yeah,

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it does make sense. But the talent, if you can

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>get his head on right and maximize his talent, like

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely there. The talent is there. For hundred and

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty two games, twenty eight home runs, fifteen stolen bases.

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of players do that nowadays, Like you're

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to find stolen bases as much as you can

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>while not completely depleting your home run output. YAsO Page

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>is one of those guys. And the last year home

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>runs and fifteen stolen bases only five games. The Dodgers

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>has had too many mouths to feed, you know, from there,

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to find ways to get maximums in the lineup.

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And Cody Bellinger and they have all these outfielders and

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not playing every day, and he misses some time

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>with injury and then there you go, he only plays

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 1>five games. It's not gonna be the case in Cincinnati.

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:01.879
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna go to Cincinnati. He's gonna play. He's gonna

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>play every single day, and it's a great hitters ballpark.

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you are we sure he's going to play every

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>single day? Are you sure? In my opinion, I'm sure

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play. Why wouldn't he. Scott Cheveler better than him?

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Is Matt Kemp better than him? It is Jesse Winker

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>better than him? To me? Is going to play every

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>single day. And if you look at the bat the

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>batter ball profile last year from week it was one

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of his best thirty eight percent hard hit rate, so

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.399
<v Speaker 1>he was hitting the ball more. I also looked into

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>his launch angle, which was a little bit higher than

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it has been in years past, so lifting the ball

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. You see that with the line

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>drive rate was by far a career high. UM. The

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>home run fly ball ratio was as highest since that

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>breakout season when he first burst onto the scene in

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>UM And I just think, you know, he's he's in

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>a great hits ballpark now, you know, you look at

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>park shift factors here moving from Los Angeles to to

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the great American small park here. Not to mention in

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a preedom good lineup, Greg with Joey Vado and all

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>those outfielders that I mentioned, and Scow, Jeannette who played

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>very well last year, and Ajo Henio Suarez. This is

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a good line up, Greg we He's in position here

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and you see it in the a DP already he's

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 1>going pick in that range in a fifteen team league.

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>He's going on like that round six seven turn. I

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's warranted. I think could be an outfield I

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>think he's being drafted as like an outfield three right now.

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But he has outfield to upside. He could legitimately be

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>top twenty. And I think I'm bullish, and I think

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are going to be great. I

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think he has he has top fifteen outfielder upside. It's interesting.

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I he wented out what he did in that five games,

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're right and and to be rightfully excited about

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what he could do over eighty one games in Cincinnati,

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I get it, Docinetti. Not a team that's not a

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>team that's afraid to run either. They'll let him run,

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 1>yes they will, But he's never run more than he

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 1>did last year. Sure, but that was a career high

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen ever surpassed that number. I means he to me,

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he's safe for at least twelve to fifteen. Here's what

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know of. This is an analysis. This is just

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>how I'm feeling. Ye preas a dude that has the

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>ability to piss a lot of people off, right, Like

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he's the way he plays the game as a people

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>as a the ability to piss a lot of people off,

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and much of him being benched over the last few years.

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>He said, the Dodgers jerking him around like the Dodgers,

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.879
<v Speaker 1>like the Reds of jerked around Scottie Cheveler. It's he's

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>on doing in a way. And Peek being a year

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>away from free agency, I could see Pui being a

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>me guy. And that's just that's another reason to write.

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Ye Peak strike you as the guy who's like to

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>take a gonna take a crapload of stairs. I didn't

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>say that, but I did, like, he strikes me as

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy I want to get paid, right, Like he's

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out there and he was in a bib.

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>The narrative. He's a guy that narrative couldn't speak for.

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know he's had a safe you know, for

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth. The batting average in his career to

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine. He's been a safe too sixty three, two sixties,

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>seven to three years. He's just playing every single day

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that you're showing up to the stadium and

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be in the lineup, and you don't have

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to worry about when you're playing, and and all these

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>other factors that come into play with the Dodgers trying

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to trying to limit him or whatever it is. He's

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna play every day, and it's in a contract year.

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he has to seventy thirty home run, fifteen

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to twenty stolen base upside this year. Yes, Also, you

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta remember it's the only twenty eight years old, Like

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>he's been around for a very long time at this point. Um,

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but he's still just twenty eight years old, and everyone's

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on. And I'm telling you, Greg, that guy

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:08.439
<v Speaker 1>who the outfiels, he's going around Frankie Hold for you, Pui,

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, going pick ninety eight eight right now,

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>he's going just behind Eddie Rosario, Mitch Hanneger, Nicholas Castellanos,

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going just ahead of Nelson Cruiz. But that's because he's utility.

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Only the outfield guys are Justin Upton, Hellick Smith. Interesting,

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that's just stolen basis right there. Um, and that's a

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>great interesting group of Eddie Rosario, Mitch Haniger, Upton in

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 1>fourd ooh. I think that. I think that's a good group.

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>There's still like some untapped potential with some of those guys,

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>like can fourd oh could still get there. Definitely, it's

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:58.399
<v Speaker 1>still and we kind of saw in the second half

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>lest year Upton pretty safe to fifty home runs I hate,

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's great for Rhodoy be a week production is

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>very inconsistent, but he's he's he's great for Rhodo. Eddie

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Rosario a guy who's also you know, coming around as well,

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>stepping into his own you know, home runs, solid, batting average,

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna sink you. Mitch Haniger kind of broke out

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>last year. Does he have another level he could get to?

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You gotta worry about protection in the lineup now. The

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Mariners shipped out a lot of pieces. They still do

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have Edwin and Karnacion, but I'd be surprised if he's

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the team. Um, you know, Spring Karna, I'm

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there, really, you know, yeah, ship him out

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for something I don't I don't think. So with that,

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna sign off on YouTube for now and do

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:41.839
<v Speaker 1>some basketball off YouTube, So make sure you subscribe, watch,

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>listen Fantasy Full Friendies up Nextext to Cory Parson, Jim Day,

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and Chris ben trump Um tomorrow on the show. Frankie, Well,

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to start off kind of finishing up this trade.

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of pieces here, Um in particular,

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Unless you want to do that now and not do

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the NBA stuff's up to you. Alex Wooden, Mattcamp mm hm,

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we can do that now. Sorry, let's just keep it

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 1>all baseball. Fine, maybe we'll work in some basketball tomorrow.

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Trying to listen to you the people I know, there

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was a few people last week that asked us to

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about basketball, so we can

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>touch on season long things, you know, guys who are

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>over performing in DFS, so on and so okay. So

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>then wrapping up this trade, Alex would and Matt Kemp

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:20.799
<v Speaker 1>also go over to Cincinnati. But when it comes I'm

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>wanna start with Kemp and then get to wood We'll

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Kemp see enough playing time to warrant drafting your guests

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is as good as mine right now your favorite website

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>roster resource already using the roster resource as Matt Kemp

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>hitting fifth in the lineup as of right now, playing

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>left field, being the starting left fielder for this so

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Winker the outfielder on the bench. That was my question,

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>who can kind of mix in give a day off

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>here to to Schvler, give a day off here to Kemp.

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I said, uh, Plea's gonna play every day

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. I do think he'll play every day,

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but they'll probably give him, you know, a day here

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and there. That's how Jesse Winker is gonna get hit

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at pass And you know it's not like Matt Kemp

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is like the model of health. Yeah, so you know,

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and you get enough at bats in this ballpark. I mean,

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>does he does he need to does he need to

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 1>play every day? And it's kind of baked into his ADP,

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Like people don't have high expectations for Matt Kemp already,

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and he's going over under three twelve an ADP for

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt Kemp right now over I guess then would over

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be like him over You're going pick three three with

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt camp That's fantastic value. You get him for nothing,

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of plug him in. Don't really interesting, like

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, like he's a dude. That's not a great dude.

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>He's had some personality issues really everywhere he's game. When

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>he played last year, though, I'm pretty damn good. Last

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>year August he was an m VP, he carried the

0:53:55.120 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers man made the All Star Team. UM Homer's last

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>year eighty five rubies batted two nineties. There's a guy

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you could draft in your reserve rounds in these deeper leagues.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have to draft him as your fifth

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>outfielder because frankly, you get them later than that to

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety last year, twenty one home runs, and you're putting

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy in Cincinnati. But your original question is the

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one that matters most. How much is he gonna play?

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But for nothing? I don't care. So yeah, at that point,

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you're buying all upside. There's no risk back into a

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>three forty three a DP because you know if if

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you draft him and it turns out you drafted the

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks, like the only place he could go

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is up correct. So if you draft him an he

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:43.759
<v Speaker 1>plays one time in the first two weeks. You'll drops, Yeah,

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I love that as a DP Frank big fan of that.

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, last piece of this was Alex Would going

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 1>over now. Alex Would also not the picture, uh, the

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.759
<v Speaker 1>model of consistency when it comes to health. He was

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a guy that was fantastic two years ago. A lot

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of people were on him. Last year didn't work nearly

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. He said he should be had him on

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>his team together. We certainly did. He said he's going

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back to so the things that he does

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:09.359
<v Speaker 1>well this year, what does that mean? Well, you said

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>he's not the model of health in terms of consistency,

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, but he has consistently pitched a hundred

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifty when endings two years in a row. So

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that's basically where he's like, he'll take that. I think

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that he'll take that. Depending on him

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and fifty and he's pitched. The problem

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that I have with Alex Wood is every single year

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he starts off well in terms of like fastball velocity

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and then just tanks like as a sea. That's why

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you can argue is he better as a bullpen arm?

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Because you know a guy that whenever he tries to

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>stretch out throughout a season, remember, and got off to

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that phenomenal start. He was great. First half of the

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>year was like a sub two e r A. He

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.879
<v Speaker 1>was awesome the first month of the season. He's throwing.

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:54.280
<v Speaker 1>By his last start of the season, his average fastball felocy.

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's just that's a yearly occurrence with Alex Wood

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>about last year, it wasn't even there to start the year.

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>His first start average fastball velocity nine point three, next

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.920
<v Speaker 1>start eighty nine point six. By the end of the season,

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the season, he was actually throwing harder.

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, these were games where he was

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:17.839
<v Speaker 1>actually in the bullpen eighty eight point nine miles per

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 1>hour in his last start of the year. Um, that

0:56:21.960 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 1>came on September. So and then they kind of transitioned.

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you can argue that Alex would based

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on his herkey jerky delivery on he loses fastball velocity,

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>can you still have some value, Yes, I think so.

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's a guy who's also going super late

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>right now in drafts, Alex would going to a D

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, one of your end of the end

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of your fantasy rotation arms here, but he still pitches

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:58.399
<v Speaker 1>to a below four ear a like proto. He's fine,

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and fifty innings of a sub three seven five e

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>R a decent whip one point two. It's all right.

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just he's never gonna get Frenzy's up next, Corey,

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Jim and Chris or Frank Stantheon and Greg Sausenday. So

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>much for watching the Fantasy best Friends Forever. We'll do

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it all again tomorrow. We