WEBVTT - Expectations for a Fed Rate Cut

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube right now.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Matt Hornback joins Global ahead of macro Strategy at Morgan Stanley. Matt,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>good luck with the macro strategy. September twenty twenty five.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>When you sit at the table in a wonderfully collegially

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>argumentative Morgan Stanley, how divisive is the debate? Hi?

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Tom, Thanks for having me on. It's a pleasure

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to be back. Well, we don't have divisive debates. We

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>have collegial debates, and you know, I think in the end,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 3>we all try to come to an understanding of all

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>of the very perspectives that are informing investments taking place

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 3>in the markets every day. You know, it's it's obviously

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 3>not just one perspective that ends up dominating the investment landscape.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a collection of a multitude of perspectives, and so

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>we we like having those debates internally, but.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 2>The debates here center around an absolutely original fed meeting.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's I remember years ago talking to Richard

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Berner at a dinner former Morgan Stanley Giant about the dots.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is not a normal meeting of dots,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>is it, Matt.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Hornback, It certainly is not, and it's it's perhaps a

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>meeting of dots and dissents.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 4>If I can, if I can play on words.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 3>You know in the end that the dots are a

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 3>device that the FED doesn't like to use as a

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 3>guidance device, but unfortunately investors have become a customed to

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>using the dot plot as just that, as forward guidance,

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and so this will be an important set of dots.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>As you know, we add an additional year to the

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 3>dot plot in September, and we also focus very much

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>on what the dot for twenty twenty five implies for

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the final two meetings of the year. You know, the

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>consensus is that we will have a median dot somewhere

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 3>between two or three cuts in total for twenty twenty five,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 3>including of course the cut that everyone expects at this meeting.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 4>But there's always surprises, and.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>When the dots move, they tend to move a lot,

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 3>so that's will really be the main question I'll be

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to answer going into the meeting.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 5>Matt So as global head of macro Strategy, where's the

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 5>waiting for you guys these days, US versus rest of

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>the world, Because there was similarly a little bit of

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 5>a c change there in the beginning of this year

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 5>around the liberation today. Where are you guys right now?

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, the dominance of the US and macro

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 3>markets is something that has been around for quite some time.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 4>Of course, I think one of.

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>The main reasons for that is because the central bank

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>that most people in the world pay attention to more

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 3>than any other is the FED, of course, and so

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>when you have all of these eyes around the world

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 3>focusing on the same event, it can dominate investment perspectives

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>and actions. So we are certainly focused on the US

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. You know, the US economy is one

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>where the labor market appears to be showing the most

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>signs of strain. I don't want to use the word stress,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 3>but I think strain is an appropriate description of what

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing happen in the US labor market. And of course,

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>if the strain turns into stress, then we can expect

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the central bank to act much more expeditiously, to use

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 3>a word that Pal has used in the past. So

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I think right now we are focused on the US,

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>but we'll see, We'll see what happens in the economy

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>into the end of the year, and maybe it will

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>then be appropriate to focus on other parts of other

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 3>parts of the investment world.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Matt, we got you on YouTube video. I see outside

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 5>your office. I'm bet guessing some traders out there, and

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 5>they're probably thinking about what they should be doing, how

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 5>they should be positioned around two o'clock. How are you

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 5>guys thinking about two o'clock in the two thirty conference.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>So our baseline view is that the FED will lower

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>rates by twenty five basis points. We are expecting one

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>dissent from a board governor, in this case the newly

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 3>appointed Steven Myron, and so that's what we're expecting for

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 3>kind of the main bits of the meeting. What, of course,

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>people will be focused on quite a bit is number

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 3>one the dot plot. As I mentioned earlier, does that

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>median dot settle in at two three? How many if

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 3>any dots are circling around four rate cuts for in

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 3>total for the year, that would be one hundred basis points.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I think very few people are expecting there to be

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 3>a collection of dots showing one hundred basis points of

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>rate cuts, but there certainly could be, and that will

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 3>be a point of focus. And then, naturally, the press

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>conference is an important part of the.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 4>F MC meeting now every six to eight.

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Matt, with all your heritage of decades in Japan, two

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>o'clock today in the press conference today, is your own

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 2>palse central banker to the world.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Is he, frankly central banker to Tokyo.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, he might be central banker to himself.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 3>In the sense that you know, we are now in

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the twilight period of his time as FED chair He has,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, just a handful of important meetings left in

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 3>his tenure. I imagine the closer that he gets to May,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the more he will start to reflect on his own

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>time as chairman of the Fed, and perhaps he will

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>start to think about the books that may or may

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 3>not be written about him after he bids farewell to

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the Federal Reserve. In that case, you know, he could

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 3>be focused on doing what is certainly right for the economy,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>but also in doing what is right for the economy,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>he ultimately is going to be helping his own reputation

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>moving forward.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Matt thank you for your time. Matthew hornbackus with Morgan Stanley.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>We thank him here on a FED day. Stay with us.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Survey on coming up after this.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Kaylie Cox joined chief market strategists Riddultswell's management. Kaylee, get

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>us into earnings, but more importantly, get us beyond earnings

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>into November and December.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 6>Is there going to be like a frenzy melt up?

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think before earnings we need to talk the

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 7>FED and the government shutdown because those are the two

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 7>most prominent Yeah, risk kind of risk catalysts that are

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 7>coming over the next few weeks. But one quick thing

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 7>about earnings. Q three earnings obviously Q two was a

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 7>low bar. Companies hurdled that bar pretty easily, although I

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 7>guess there are a few caveats because I think you

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 7>need to be looking at earnings on a sector sector basis.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 7>The bar will be higher. I think analysts are still

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 7>having trouble processing what tariffs could mean, especially with the

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 7>new change that came at the beginning of August. But

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 7>I'm really focusing on what the Fed will do as

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 7>a precursor to what we'll see through the end of

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 7>the year, and really the pushes and pulls and the

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 7>government shut down, especially as we head into October.

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but if we get past those, Paul, yep, I'm sorry,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I got solid GDP. I understand the tensions out there,

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the labor market. But Paul, where are we

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>October twenty fifth or something?

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 5>I know it's time you talk about the resiliency, the

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 5>courage to be in the market's CALLI I know you

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 5>folks over Aberdhalt's Wealth Management are really long term. You

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 5>try not to get tripped up by by the noise here.

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 5>How is your kind of outlook kind of changed, if

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 5>at all, during the course of twenty twenty five.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's funny. Our clients are long term, but we

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 7>don't pretend that the noise isn't there. Our clients are

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 7>also hearing the noise. They have legitimate questions about the

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 7>headlines that they see come across the tape where we sit,

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 7>and you know, our outlook has been around leaning toward

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 7>value for most of the year, especially because toward the

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 7>beginning of the year, you know, we had Liberation Day,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 7>we had these tariff pressures that we had to think about,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 7>and labor markets weren't looking the strongest heading into the year.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 7>And you know, we believe that the consumer drives the economy.

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 7>Consumers aren't making money then, you know, Americans aren't spending

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 7>like they usually are, So you know, we've been encouraging value.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 7>We've been encouraging you know, rebalancing your book, understanding what

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 7>you own. We still think that this is prudent heading

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 7>into the end of the year, and honestly, we think

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 7>it's prudent for most of the time for our investors

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 7>who are prioritizing stability and consistency. But it is a

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 7>tricky moment, especially with you know, economic projections pulling in

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 7>one direction and then the labor market pulling in the other.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 7>It's tough to know where to prioritize.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 6>What are people actually doing.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Forget about the theory of ridd Holt's, the theory of Kelly,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the theory of Josh. Are they still scared stiff.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 7>There's some healthy skepticism out there. It's funny. You know,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 7>the fears were high heading into April, or excuse me,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 7>you know fears were to start the beginning of the year.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 7>I'll say confidence was high, and then it's slowly tailored

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 7>off in the first few months of the year. Now

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 7>investors have those scars. They're heading into the fourth quarter.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 7>They know that the ground is shifting underneath them. We're

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 7>getting a lot of questions on how to capitalize on this.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, mortgage refis, for example, are one of the

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 7>big questions that we're getting, you know, constantly, with the

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 7>thirty year mortgage down near a three year low. And

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 7>quite honestly, it's a hard question to answer because you know,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 7>the long term end of the long end of the

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 7>curve is one of the hardest things to talk about

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 7>at the moment.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 8>There are a lot of catalysts whipping Kelly.

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 6>Cox staying with us here, when do you get the

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 6>market open? Right now? The vics sixteen point one for it,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 6>here's Lisa Mateo.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 9>You got it, and we'll start with the S and

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 9>P five hundred right now. As we get the markets open,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 9>it's little change, little movements still up about a point

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 9>at six thousand, six hundred and eight. You have to

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 9>point out the levels that now two ten percent, one

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 9>hundred and nine points at forty five thousand, eight hundred

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 9>and seventy seven. We get to the NASAC right now.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 9>Not much movement there as well, up about two points

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 9>at twenty two thousand, three hundred and thirty seven.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 8>We go to the yield space.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 9>We have the two year at three point five one percent,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 9>that's little changed. The yield on the tenure four point

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 9>zero two percent, and that is little changed as well.

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 9>We have the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index, not much movement there.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 9>We have bitcoined down about half percent at just above

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 9>one hundred and sixteen thousand. That is your Bloomberg opening

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 9>bell report all in time.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, Liza, greatly appreciate it. Kelly Cox with

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>us with Rufotes Wealth Management. I'm sure it's been a

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 2>point of discussion there in debate, and I'm certain with Barry,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and we've talked about it for years. Kelly Cox on

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 2>John Deere, which is the great CFA company to study

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>in the brutal level one accounting treatment of the CFA Institute,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Kelly Cox should John Dear Should John Dee report four

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>times a year or like sensible YEurope two times a year.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 7>It's funny so Trump brought this up a few days ago.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 7>I think this is the second time that he brought

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 7>up the possibility of cutting earnings reports down to semi annual,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 7>or at least less frequent than quarterly. I'm a big

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 7>believer in transparency. I think markets are more efficient with

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 7>greater transparency.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 8>But you have to look at this on both sides

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 8>of the equation.

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 7>It's lower compliance costs for companies, it's lower it's lower

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 7>operating costs in general, though I don't think it would

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 7>make much of a mark. Investors are on the losing

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 7>end though, and as we you know, for where we

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 7>sit in the business, we're always on the side of

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 7>the investor. The hardest person to ask is me because

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 7>I love rifling through data, so I have a natural

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 7>bias there.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 6>She's on the conference call.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 8>Great quarter, No, hey, Kelly, talk to us about it.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.599
<v Speaker 8>I wish the courage.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 5>To be in the market right now. What's it take

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 5>to get in the market today, That's the heart of

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 5>the matter.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 7>I think it takes a strong stomach, but look, you

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 7>have to do it. You can't predict where the bullmarket is,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 7>especially a bull market that's been driven by momentum and

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 7>sentiment for most of this year. You know, we keep

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 7>reminding people that things feel uncomfortable. Obviously, there are a

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 7>lot of catalysts to consider at this moment. But as

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 7>rake cuts come, you're going to be you're you will

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 7>be paid less and less on cash. So cash management

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 7>is key as we head into the end of the year.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 7>And look, nobody ultimately knows where this bull market heads.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 7>And you know, we could still be missing a lot

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 7>of You could still be missing a lot of upside here,

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 7>especially from those unloved sectors of the market that are

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 7>more value oriented that we've seen shine over the past

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 7>month or so with this rake cut rotation.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 6>Kelly, Thank you so much, Kelly Cosh for the west

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 6>to management. Stay with us.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>starting seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just Say

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 2>This is well timed, to say the least. Randy Schummer's

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>with us, who's been doing this a while, Vice chairch

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Churchill Asset Management and also chief investment strategists. Oh, chief

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>investment strategists. Should my grandmother have private credit in our

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 2>four oh one k?

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 8>Look?

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 10>Look at the rest of our investors. We have five

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 10>million teachers through the TIAA retirement program, including my brother

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 10>and sister in law, who every Thanksgiving ask about private credit,

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 10>how how their portfolio is doing?

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 10>So you're in good company. Look what's interesting now, particularly

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 10>my new role, is we're focused on one of the

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 10>fastest growing channels out there, which is private wealth. What

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 10>is private wealth?

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 10>Private wealth is pretty much everyone we all have of

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 10>private wealth. We all are looking for yield and we're

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 10>looking for income. You know, I'm at a softball game

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 10>with my daughter watching your play. Somebody comes up and

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 10>he says, Hey, I think I heard you on Bloomberg

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 10>last time. With those guys, you seem pretty smart. How

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 10>do I get into this assay class? That is what

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people are thinking about, particularly when you

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 10>look at the sixty forty model, which you guys are

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 10>experts on, But what's happening is the alternative model, which

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 10>is including ten twenty thirty percent of non correlated assets

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 10>that have longer yield less correlation, is getting a lot

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 10>more action right now. And I haven't talked to you

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 10>about this during most of our programming, but half of

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 10>our committed capital is going to private equity and junior capital.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 10>Think about that. So we have probably our fastest growing

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 10>products right now in private equity because the yields are better.

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 10>And in the current environment when gps are trying to

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 10>get more liquidity because the exits are slower, they're looking

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 10>for more products that can help them get liquided, not

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 10>just for them but for their LPs as well. So

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 10>exits are a little slow, but for the best private

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 10>equity firms, actually fundraising is pretty good. So you know,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 10>I like to come every morning with you with a

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 10>fun fact. Fun fact for us, Our gps that have

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 10>been raising money this year in new funds have all

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 10>hit their hard caps. What does that mean? You have

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 10>a target cap of funds you want to raise five

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 10>hundred million billion, whatever it is, and then you have

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 10>a hard cap above which you're not going to go

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 10>because you don't want to dilute your existing investors. They've

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 10>all hit their hard caps. That's different than the news

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 10>you're hearing generally outside of Bloomberg about fundraising because people say, oh,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 10>fundraising is slow, not for the best.

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, So I'm on your distributional list. I get

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 5>notes from you guys. You're all over the world. What

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 5>are you doing when you go to Asia, when you

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 5>go to the Middle East, when you go to the Europe?

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Are you looking for capital? Are you looking for deals?

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 10>So doing these days in my new role, but even

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, when you can think of think of me as.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Likeocus on the private wealth site, private wealthments, and.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, we obviously have institutional clients. But the key

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 10>to my friend Jess larsenal give him a tip of

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 10>the hat, you know, over at Briarcliffe says that beta

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 10>for private capital is performance. Alpha is education, because you

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 10>need to explain to investors what this private credit, private

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 10>capital opportunity really is. You guys have been helping me.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 10>Are so so grateful for that over the last several years,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 10>getting the message out, getting the gospel of private capital out.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 10>But what it means is that how do I get

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 10>value out of an ill liquid asset class? What is

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 10>the benefit to me if I can't sell?

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 6>What do you think benefits.

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 10>Correct? And the answer is less correlation when markets trade down,

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 10>and more consistency and premium income when when rates go down,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 10>for example. So we're going to see some interesting turns

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 10>over the next few months and next year as rates

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 10>start to come down.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I got to get this question, and we're

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>going to have to run here on an incredible FED day.

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 2>But Randy, to me, what's a pard of the matter

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>here is the big boys are going to come in.

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Churchill can manage its story, fine, I get it, I

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>love it. But the big boys are going to show

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>up in private equity and particularly conservative private credit where

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>you can make a coupon blah blah blah. What's going

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>to happen when Blackrock and the others send a wall

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of money right into this environment?

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 10>So you know that are the way we do deals

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 10>is that we're an investor in the GPS. We're an

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 10>LP actually in four hundred roughly GP funds. So we're

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 10>getting the best assets from those investors that we've already

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 10>pre credentialed. We've already pre qualified. Portfolio quality is destiny

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 10>in asset management. If your portfolio put if your portfolio

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 10>is hied to high quality, then you are going to

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 10>be able to satisfy the needs of your investors. In

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 10>order for it to be high quality, you have to

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 10>be super selected.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 2>How is our listeners and viewers going to do a

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 2>credit analysis and quality analysis of the ginormous huge bank

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 2>either Park Avenue or Downtown West Street ETF fund in

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>their retirement.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 10>The beauty of retail investing is, if you're investing in

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 10>our funds, you're investing in the same funds that the

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 10>ginormous sovereign wealth funds, including our parent company, Trillion Dollar,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 10>TA and Euveen are investing in same deals.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you?

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 8>Are you in triple leverage?

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 5>I got to take a Chase Man, hadn't bank credit

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 5>training and going into private credit.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 8>You do that again?

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>What was it like buying your first fancy white shirt

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>and blue suit to do the folks? This is what

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Sweeney did. Was like gospel back then. It was like

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 2>going to State department. You did private.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 5>We all came out of we all came out of

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 5>NBA programs and they said, get what you've learned.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 8>Now we're going to tea. Now we're going to.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 11>Teach you how to do it.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 10>Was very good, by the way, he was very good.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, Sir Randy Schummer, thank you so much.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 2>With Paul Sweeney looking down a whole new environment with

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 2>private credit and private equity.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:56.239
<v Speaker 8>Stay with us.

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Listen live each weekdays.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Were sitting where this is, Andrew Lloyd allenhursts that was

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>City Bank, here.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 6>Circumstances at the table.

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to go back to the nineteen eighties

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and Wayne Angel and some of the fiery debates of monetorism.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 6>We've never seen this, have we end.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 8>It's going to be a big debate today.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 11>I think about not just what they should do at

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 11>this meeting, although at this meeting we could have a

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 11>couple of descents, but also where policies should be going,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 11>where the neutral rate is, with the balance of risks is,

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 11>so every everything is on the table at this meeting.

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Paul Donovan at UBS, a student of the British process, said,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 2>we're becoming like the Bank of England, are we?

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 11>It feels a little bit that way, where you have

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 11>just this big divergence between some FED officials who didn't

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 11>want to cut rates at all this year, other FED

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 11>official those who wanted to cut more aggressively and dissented.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 11>Back in July, we had Waller and Bowman with those

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 11>twenty five basis point cut VIEWA.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 2>But should we notice Paul that Andrew Hollenhorz absolutely nailed

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the higher rate environment we're talking two years ago.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 6>Yep, I mean just absolutely nailed.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 4>That, Andrew.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we had some strong retail sales yesterday. I

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 5>mean you could argue this FED could be as cautious

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 5>as it wants to be when you're thinking about twenty

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 5>five versus fifty.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, if you look at the retail sales report, I

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 11>think that's telling you this is an economy that's not

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 11>going into recession. We have had a slow down in growth,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 11>We've had to slow down in consumer spending. Retail sales

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 11>doesn't change that. And what retail sales really doesn't change

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 11>is what's going on in the job market, and ultimately

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 11>that's the Fed's mandate.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 8>You look at those payrolls numbers. We had negative job

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 8>growth in June.

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 11>I know, it was in a revision, so we don't

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 11>really feel that way. But this is a FED that

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 11>would have cut already if we had those jobs numbers

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 11>in real time.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 5>So how do you think that cadence will go here

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 5>for this better reserve? Starting this sea?

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 11>So I think Powell, to Tom's point, has to bring

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 11>together this committee, and I think he can bring them

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 11>more or less together around a twenty five basis point

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 11>rate cut today. But you do have people like Waller

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 11>who are dissenting, wanting to cut back in July. How

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.479
<v Speaker 11>do you keep Waller on board with just twenty five

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 11>basis points today? I think you have to be a

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 11>little bit dubvish in the press conference. I think we're

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 11>gonna hear Powell be a little bit dubish to kind

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 11>of indicate that this is a FED that could be

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 11>cutting at each meeting this year. I think we see

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 11>that in the dot plot, and then continuing to cut

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 11>next year.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but that's where I wanted to go to cut

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>this year. Some people are saying three this year. I

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 2>don't want to do the parlor game, Andrew, you know,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I hate it. But here's the reality. I've got nominal

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>GDPQ three off Atlanta fed of at least four and

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>a half five percent. Dare I say six percent? I

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 2>don't think I can say that. But with the consumption

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>and retail sales there there we are. Does that strengthen

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 2>the one and done feel of today's meeting or is

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 2>he really going to anticipate out a set of rate cuts.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 11>I think it's a set of ray cuts, and I

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 11>think that's where cher Paul was starting to go at

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 11>Jackson Hall. Remember back in late August we had policing.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 11>This balance of risks is starting to move more imbalance

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 11>between downside risk to employment, upside risk to inflation. Now

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 11>we have even more downside risk on the job side.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 8>You're right down.

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 11>We've run very strong nominal growth through twenty twenty four.

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 11>The first half of this year was slower nominal growth.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 11>What's your nominal growth twelve months forward? Twelve months forward

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 11>from here will probably be four to five percent nominal growth,

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 11>So not that six to seven percent.

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 6>That's terrible color graz to me. I'm sorry, I'm lost

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 6>on this, boss saying.

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, so, talk to us about this labor market. Let's

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 5>dig a little little bit deeper in there. For the

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 5>first time I saw recently, number of job openings versus

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 5>the number of people kind of looking for jobs kind

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 5>of a little bit more in balance now and it

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 5>used to be poy. There's so many more job openings

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 5>out there, and that gave you a sense of olders.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 5>This economy, the labor conmry is a lot stronger than

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 5>me we think. Is that not the case anymore?

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't seem to be the case.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 11>We obviously have big differences between which labor market series,

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 11>which job series you look at. But the payroll numbers

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 11>look very concerning now after those revisions, that probably looks

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 11>the most concerning of any series. But if you look

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.479
<v Speaker 11>at some of the survey data, if you look at

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 11>in the consumer surveys, when you ask people are jobs

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 11>hard to get? That number is going up. People are

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 11>finding this to be a more difficult market to get

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 11>a job. We're also seeing if you switch your jobs,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 11>how much is your pay going up when you switch

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 11>your jobs. That's really not normalized. You used to get

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 11>a big premium for switching your job. That would indicate

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 11>it's a labor market more imbalanced. No, that was my

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 11>game plan for twenty years of work.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Just fine.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 8>So Andrew.

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 5>If I'm the FED here, I mean, I'm looking at

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 5>the labor market. Maybe why wouldn't I be a little

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 5>bit more aggressive here with that signal? Oh there's something

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 5>else under the hood the FED season. Maybe the market

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 5>doesn't seem I think.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 11>There's nothing pushing them to be super aggressive at this meeting,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 11>when when you really have a big push to be aggressible,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 11>it's like what happened a year ago, where you had

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 11>data that was coming in softer than expected, and you

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 11>had the equity market selling off. You had risk assets

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 11>that were performing poorly, and that that's part of what

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 11>pushed the FED to deliver that fifty basis point rate

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 11>cut back in September of last year. This year, as

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 11>the FED is getting priced to cut, we're seeing equities rally.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing very high prices for risk assets and looser

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 11>financial conditions. So the FED isn't working against tightening financial

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 11>conditions here. We actually have loosening financial conditions. BET cuts

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 11>are going to feed into that. I think there's no

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 11>pressure for fifty basis points today.

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 12>The press conference today, what would be the question you

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 12>would ask, I think the key question that I would

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 12>want to know from share Powell is really what you

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 12>were asking, Tom, which is should we be thinking about

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 12>this as a adjustment.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Are we just calibrating rate slightly lower?

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 11>Or is this a real rate cut cycles at a

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 11>rate cut cycle that started a year ago pause because

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 11>we had care of uncertainty, inflation uncertainty, and now we're

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 11>picking it up again.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Lord Hollanders, thank you so much. I'm giving everyone a title.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Today, thanks for having This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday, seven to ten am Eastern on

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal