WEBVTT - Inflation, Investing, And The Latest On Omicron

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We got a FED

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>meeting on Wednesday. A lot of folks will be paying

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>very close attention to that. Let's check in with Sylvia Jablonski,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer and co founder of Defiance E t

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>F S. Sovia, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of folks are saying, boy, these guys,

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>these folks are gonna be very hawkish here come Wednesday.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>What are your expectations? Hi, good morning. Well, I think,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like everyone else, I'm very curious to see what what

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>FED share Powell will will have to stay on Wednesday.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the recent meetings have given us an indication that,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the tone is a little bit more hawkish,

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about perhaps doing you know, sort of

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>more tapering more quickly, and um, you know, perhaps there's

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a debate about rate hikes whether or not they will

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>come sooner than we expected. So you know, I'll just

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>be kind of listening in to see, um, you know,

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>what what the tone is and whatnot. But you know,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>all in all, if we take a step back from it,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, we do have this senslation issue,

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>but we also have an expanding economy. We have, you know,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>just a massive surplus of equidity in the markets, and

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the point here for the fat

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the economy is sort of strong and on

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the way off. We had this this good unemployment number

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>four point two percent. Perhaps it is appropriate to sort

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of pump the brakes because we don't need as much

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>riscal and monetary stimulus. So um, you know, there's two

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sides to that too. How much can the economy take

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of rate hikes. I mean, I don't mind, um,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>if the market is telling us with the flat yield

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>curve that inflation goes away. But I don't want growth

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to go away. Yeah, I don't want grows. I don't

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>want growth to go away either, So you know, I

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think though that if you if you look at

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the top growth companies, UM out there right

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>now and look at the amount of sort of cash

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that they have on the balance sheet, you know, and

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you sort of like think about where we've been in

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, and you know, some of

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the issues in terms of like the economy being hit

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, massive part of the economy still haven't

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>recovered supply chain issues. I just wouldn't expect the FED

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to sort of come crashing in and do aggressive rate

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>hikes really quickly. I would anticipate that they would be

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>slow and steady. And and if they are sort of

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>slow and steady, you know, in that case, the growth

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>growth firms are you know, they're they're well capitalized, are

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>well founded, they have balance sheets, so I don't think

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a huge impact for them if

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it goes in an orderly fashion. So, so you've given

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that background background for the FED for rising rates, for

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>inflation transitory maybe not. What is your kind of bag

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>eas case outlook for how are you approaching this new year? Yeah,

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>so I actually project that two is going to be

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a positive year. I think the consumer is strong. There's

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there's tillions of dollars of savings on

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines that will either come into spending or will

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>come into the market. UM. I think that we're sort

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of learning how to live with the various variants. They'll

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>probably with be with us going forward, but you know,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of adapted. I think that some of the

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues will sort of shake out, and you know,

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>companies are flesh with cash as we said, and they're

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>spending it. We have UM, you know, a record level

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of buybacks coming back in capital expenditures. UM. The you know,

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>employment numbers good. So I think that you know, you're

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot of growth, particularly in some

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of these hot new disruptive sectors. So I think that

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, quantum computing, UM and and the metaverse are

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be to sort of hot topics that people

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to invest in and investing in that means

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at things like you know, semiconductor, is cloud computing, cybersecurity,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>ai A, are you know e TPX or single stocks

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that sort of play in those different spaces. Five G

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be something that has a huge opportunity

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as as Washington continues to invest there. I think the

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>reopen trade that UM you know have has has sort

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of just like flit along is going to really start

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to grow, you know, do the delta abicon in the

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>general COVID headwinds, I think that that trade hasn't really

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>worked yet. And you know, travel is about nine trillion

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of the global economy. Half of that went away during

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID and we're nowhere near that now. So I think

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, once we sort of see full fledged travel, hotels, casinos,

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>um cruise, ships and airlines will benefit from that. So

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot there are a lot of really great

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>places to put your money. And I just think overall,

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but the market is again just flush with cash and

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll just generally be be sort of like liquid

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and the right place to be in terms of equity exposure.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Me and Paul are going on a cruise and hopefully

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't see Omega. What about healthcare? What do you

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think about healthcare? Sylvia? Yeah, so health care I think

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>is UM health care will be a good portfolio diversifier.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we we always advocate for the Barbell approach,

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>right and you want some some level of defensive exposures

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of portfolio, and I always you know, throw healthcare into

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that bucket because I think it's something that UM is

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's sort of consumed whether or not

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the market pulls back, right, and you have all of

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>these sort of advancements and um, you know, different mergers. Now.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You heard about the Deviser murder today, and I just

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that there's going to be consolidation. I think there's

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be sort of better use of cash. You know,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we've had this backdrop of like fast track at THEA

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>approvals um and you know, it's it's it's interesting. I

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have a husband who's deeply involved in research in medicine

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and has said that, you know, the COVID vaccine is

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>either going to COVID is either going to be looked

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at as the biggest disaster of our time or you know,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>an absolute modern miracle in terms of how fast research

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>trials and things came out to pump out vaccines. So

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see how how much that continues. And yeah,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so I do think it's always good to be positioned there.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So Villa, thank you so much for joining us and

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sharing your thoughts. We always appreciate getting your time. So

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Via Jablonski, chief investment officer, co founder of Defiance et

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>F S the new variant in Town. These days is

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>omikron uh and governments and cities all around the world

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>are trying to figure out and companies, for that mat

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>are trying to figure out how to respond. Let's get

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the latest from Dr Pervy Perk, pediatric allergist and immunologists

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>at Allergy and the Asthma Network. Dr P thanks so

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here amikron. We've it's been in

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 1>our midst here for several weeks. Here. What do we

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>really know and how concerned should people be about this

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>new variant? Right right? Thank you for having me so.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, when news verse broke, there was a lot

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of concern, you know, given the number of mutations that

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this variant carries compared to previous ones. But in the

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks we've actually had reassuring news, one of

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>which is that, you know, luckily, majority of the cases

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>have been mild um so we haven't been seeing increase

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in deaths, increasing severe disease or hospitalization. And the other

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>good news is that we have evidence that you know,

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>those who are vaccinated are well protected against the severe

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>disease and hospitalizations, and then those who go on to

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>receive their booster are in even better shapes. You know. Um, So,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so we have more information now and this variant maybe

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>more trans transmissible, sorry, transmissible or contagious, But the good

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>news is it doesn't appear so far to be more

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and also it appears our vaccines are still very

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>effective against it. Yeah, we were talking this morning with

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>an epidemiologist from the UK who said, um, this this

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>variant doesn't seem to care whether or not you're vaccinated.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean he wasn't talking about people who are necessarily boosted,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but who had the first two shots and assuming okay

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that was months ago. Um, does it make a difference

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you're vaccinated when it comes to the

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>severity of the disease? Right? So that we we still

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know the exact answer to right, because we want

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to see how many people unvaccinated get this variant versus

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>those who are vaccinated and if there is a difference

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and the severity and and frankly we just don't have

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that data yet. Um. But you know, whatever drop in

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>antibodies that we did see and those were fully vaccinated,

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was well compensated for with that booster dose.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, in different studies have shown difference

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>amounts that have decreased. So I know, one study showed

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>a fortyfold drop in that neutralizing antibody. Another study showed

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five fold drop. But the nice thing is

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with that booster dose that kind of compensated for that drop.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, everyone talks about these antibodies, but

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it's so much more than that. You know, our immune

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>system has t cells that help us remember and fight

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>off infections, and it looks like those cells are still

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>quite efficacious and keeping people out of the hospital even

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with this new variant and preventing death. Um, whether vaccinated

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>versus unvaccinated makes a big difference, we'll find out soon enough.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I know in South Africa they had some data showing

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that people who recovered from COVID were more likely to

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>catch this variant if they had not been vascinated versus

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>those who were. So there may be something there and

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that the vaccine is still more helpful. But we we again,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we're building the plane as we're flying it, so hopefully

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>as that data comes in, will have better answers the

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks. Doctor is I guess the new normal,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at least for the foreseeable future, is that given that

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>there's so much of the world's population that is unvaccinated

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or not fully vaccinated, that these variants are just going

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a way of life going forward. Yeah, you know,

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we should accept that covid vantine is here

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to stay, just like so many other coronaviruses. You know,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the common cold is a coronavirus, and we don't think

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>twice about you know, getting a cold in the winter

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>time or what have you. Um, So I think it

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is here to stay. But um, the good news is,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we have much better tools to deal with it. Uh,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and eventually, hopefully we can reach that concept where enough

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>people have been exposed that the virus just continues to

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>become milder and milder, similar to you know, the more

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>common coronaviruses that our bodies have become used to over

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few decades or hundreds of years. Um. But

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, I think we're in much better shape

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>than we were two years ago, or we were all

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>naive to this virus. Now we have excellent vaccines and

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>we have excellent therapeutics too. Even if you do happen

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to get sick. Um, I have been I hate wearing

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a mask. It gives me, mask me and I don't

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>breathe terribly well in them, etcetera. On silvia. But at

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the pandemic, I thought I was only

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing a master protect others. Now I hear that if

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I wear a mask, if it's an f FP two mask,

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and I wear it properly, I'm protecting myself with the mask.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you have we seen that opinion evolved? Yeah? No, definitely,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>um so much has evolved, right, but we have now

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>very good studies and data that show that it not

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>only protects others, but the user as well, you know,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>especially if it's a medical grade math So now I care. Yeah. So,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's a bandana or like a gator, you may

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>not be providing much protection to yourself, but if it's

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a surgical mask or higher some medical grade mask, you're

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>actually helping yourself too. And I think that's why we

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>virtually saw no flu cases last year too. You know,

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in years prior, flu season always crushed our healthcare system,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but last year there were almost no cases, and it's

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>because everyone was masked up. Everyone was very proactive about

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>getting their flu shot early on, you know, even before

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the COVID vaccine was available, So UM, I think you know,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the masking can only help, especially in the winter time.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you're indoors and public places outdoors, you

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be as stringent, thankfully, because those respiratory

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>viruses don't aren't as contagious outside. Dr what's the latest

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on therapeutics? Uh? If folks do in fact become sick, Um,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the latest and what should we be looking for

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of treatments? Yeah, you know, and now it's

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>exciting because um, you know, we have therapeutics both in

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>injection and pillform. So um Fiser you know, has a

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>tablet that's an anti viral that if you take it

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>within the first three to five days, it can reduce

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>your chances of being in the hospital or being very

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>very ill by over nine which is huge um. And

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>as does mrkum Astra Zeneca. They don't have a pill,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but they have UM, you know, an antibody cocktail, which

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>given early enough, can help prevent you from getting ill. Um.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course the regeneration monoclonal antibodies, which you know

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>with the musing for some time. Even our last president

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>used that when he became ill. So the key is

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>early treatment timing is everything um and recently another antibody Cocktails,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>got a pool for those people who may have had

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a severe reaction to the vaccine and can't tolerate another dose,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or can't tolerate a booster, or let's say they're immune

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>compromise where they took the shot, but they just don't

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>mount as good of a response as someone who's not

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>immune compromised. So there's there's so many options out there now,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>both preventatively as well as once you're already sick, that

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in much better shape now than we were before.

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Dr perv Peric, thank you so much for joining us.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate getting your expertise pediatric allergists and immunologist

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Allergy and Asthma Network, also on the faculty

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>as a clinical assistant professor at n y U School

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of Medicine. So we always appreciate and we can get

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>experts on the air and hope explain all the changes

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and that this pandemic leads us through. And of course

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the discussion over the last several weeks and likely coming

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>forward will be the omikron uh and the reactions to that. Right,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Tim Fury, chairman of the Institute of

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Supply Management i s M, to the insiders. Hey, Tim,

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the time of year and we'd like to

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chat with you about your forecast. For boy, there's so

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>many moving pieces here. Just give us your top line

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll dig in. Yeah, Thanksfaul very much. So yes,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>twice a year we do a forecast, do comprehensive forecast

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>here in December, we do an update in May. We

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>also look back at the prior year in December to

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>see how well we perform. And we gathered the information

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of UH percent change year over year

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and also the diffusion index that we use on the

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>p M I, meaning anything over fifty is positive, under

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty is contracting. So you know, the headline number here

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is that our manufacturing revenues for two are expected to

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>be up six point by the end of the year,

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>following a fourteen point one percent growth in one. So

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that's really strong. Indicates that things will continue on at

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good pace holloway through two. The panel said.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>On the outlook side for the next twelve months, the

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>fusion index of sixty six, which is a strong number.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, anything over sixty is really strong, so very

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>positive there. And then from the business comparison standpoint half

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>one to half two, the panel believes that half one

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>will perform at a seventy the fusion index compared to

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year, which is really strong, and

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>half two will be a sixty three percent the fusion

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>index compared to half one. So we're gonna be growing

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as a year goes on, it looks like, but the

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>growth will slow, right, I mean, when we look at

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the flattening yield curve, it shows us that investors are

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't sor that this inflation and this growth is going

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to stick around at the same kind of strength that

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it now. Well, you know at sixty two

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty three, I think for the half half two against

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>half one is still pretty strong. Remember over fifties is expanding,

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so uh, definitely better than half We're going to perform

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>better in half one of two compared to the end

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of twenty one, and then again in half two of

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. It's gonna be a pretty strong period. So

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the profit margin side, interesting, we we've forecasted at

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year we saw a contraction and

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>profits compared to the first half, but for the first

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>half of two we see an expansion of profits at

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a fusion index of fifty six. So you know a

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of ups and downs there with labor costs going up,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>rob till and puts going up, and we collect information

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on that also. Would you like to hear those numbers? Yeah,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they're right, yeah, so uh So on the labor and

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>benefits side, we we forecast that the cost of labor

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>will be up four point seven percent two uh and

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>last year in December one, we thought it would be

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>two point seven So you can see escalating and labor

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>costs and the better just go with that. So that's

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a headline obviously for in your fashion. On the employment side,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we believe that we grew our employment levels three one

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and we'll grow them a further one. So that's a

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>big question mark because the question really is is it

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>because they only need one percent more people or because

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't get any more than one percent more people?

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot of stuff you can't get right now Before Um,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you worked for I s M. You were a rioter

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>before that, I think at Tuson, so you know what

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain is like firsthand. Do you think that

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this issue is gonna work itself out by the end

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of next year. Well, the transportation has been a big disruptor.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's an enabler when it comes to speeding goods

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>to the next level of assembly. This year has been

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a disabler because there's so many variables in whole supplies,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and as you know, I've been looking very closely at

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that and the t m I, and we really don't

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>see much recovery before the second half of next year,

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and the porticians may even continue beyond that through to

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the labor management negotiations on the next contract for the

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>UH port workers on the West Coast. So it's gonna

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. I mean, transportations remaining very disruptive about half

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of my comments, and the supplier delivery section last month

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>where transportation related the highest I've ever seen, So you know,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that destruction level is going to continue. Hey, Tim,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate UH chatting

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>with you. Tim Fury, Chairman, Institute of Supply Management Business

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Survey Committee. UH. They get some really good granular data

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>from all folks in the manufacturing sector, in the services sector,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and now increasingly important in the transportation and logistics sector,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and then we love getting their survey results, and of

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>course we get the manufacturing and service data from I

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>S M on a monthly basis as well of checking

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in with Tim Fury. Now, let's get over to Michael Cogino,

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>President and portfolio manager the Permanent Portfolio family of funds,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk to us about what investors do as we

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>head into a tidal wave of central bank decisions. I

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>guess the feed is clearly UM first and foremost, or

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at least UH for US investors, the most important thing

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to watch, Michael, what do you expect from Jerome Powell? Yeah,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>good morning guys. Um. You know, because of the different

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>directions they have taken over the last few years, pivots

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you want to call them, I'm not really sure, um,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And and we've positioned our portfolio that way. I mean,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the general sense, UM that's been evolving in the last

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>month or so here has been that the FETE is

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>finally recognized that, you know, inflations not just transitory there

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>tapering interest rate hikes may come quicker than everybody expected. Um.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing going into the meeting this week, that they

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>might even be more dramatic than that, um, and quicker

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on the on the trigger. So I mean, sure, all

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that's on the table. Um. The biggest issue is is

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the to the degree that these aggressive actions

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>are taken, it just slams home the point that they

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>were wrong to begin with. And I mean, and and

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I don't know how drastic you want

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to be, because you could easily raise rates too quickly

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and throw the economy into a recession. Um, But you

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do have an inflation problem, that's real. I mean, anybody

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that saw the liquidity creation and the velocity of money

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last year and a half or so, I

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know why anybody would be surprised by what we're

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now. And and so the question for investors is, yeah,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we all know inflation, we're hearing about it constantly, But

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you do with it to protect your life

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in your portfolio? Alright? So give us you know, kind

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of your thoughts there, my as we go into what

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>are you telling your clients? Well, I mean you want

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to be reasonable. Um, you know, inflation at

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>some level is a natural byproduct of economic growth. And

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and so the question and so are arising interest rates

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really and so The question is at what point does

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>does that is? What is gradual, what is reasonable, what

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a positive from the market growing, and

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then when when does the turn negative. Our view has

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>always been that part of this inflation story was structural. UM. Yes,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>part of it is transitory. We would expect inflation to

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe settle down from where it's been going. But I

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think I still think you're looking at a three or four,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, five percent number on a longer term basis,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big difference from where we've been for

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the last you know, X number of years and decades.

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to necessitate a change in thinking. Our

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>view would be to stay diversified. UM. Markets are moving

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>around assets, money flows, assets are moving quickly. We would, obviously,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>UM want to have some hedges against the declining value

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of money UM I e s A. Gold and silver

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>assets on the bond side. Given the risk of rising

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>rates and volatility, UM, we would be very short duration

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are high quality balance sheets. UM. You know,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>despite the flattening of the curve, I think the real

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>risk would be that the FED loses credibility, market rates

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>decouple from the feds desires, and investors lose confidence and

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 1>they start selling bonds. Um. If that occurs, then you're

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to be short. And on the equity side,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's always opportunities and equities, but equities

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are richly valued as an asset class. And certainly if

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>rates go higher, um, and you're dealing with more inflation,

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>other types of companies are going to do better and

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some are gonna suffer. Inequities, we would look for companies

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that have pricing power for their goods and services, and

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>also those that have some control over input costs and

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>say tabor and materials and whatever, because those are the

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>things that are going to have some structural inflation built

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>into them. So in terms of the growth expectation, what

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>do you see going forward? We just talked to Tim

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Fiori from the I S M and he said he

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>thinks growth is still going to remain very strong in

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the first half and even in the second half, it's

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to tail tail off too much. Um. Yeah,

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't really have a prediction one way another.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a reasonable story. Um. The one thing I worry

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about with respect to growth, I do think you're gonna

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have a growth story UM, but it definitely is tempered

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>by what goes on with COVID. COVID has been a risk,

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, since it came out, and and I think

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 1>anybody that uh sort of feels like we're beyond it

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>or we know all the things that come out of

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it is really being naive. And I think we're seeing

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that with the most recent omicron and and you know,

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you're heading into the winter, people getting together vaccine means

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>not being as effective and needing boosters, and you know,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there's just all kinds of issues there that potentially have

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>risk economic growth. The other is with respect to UM,

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, cost structure, labor UM, the fact that you've

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>got millions of unfilled jobs UM, and how do you

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>get those jobs filled? Because at some point that's a

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>limit to economic growth. You you sort of limit your upside,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>you're sealing your capacity. And so I see that as

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>an emerging problem. And and the fact that you have

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>so many unfilled jobs is definitely adding to UM labor

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>costs and wage inflation, and wage inflation is going up

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>higher than income numbers based on the recent dat I've seen,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's a risk as well. UM, So that could

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>limit economic growth higher interest rates. Interest rate volatility could

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>could impact growth because you're you're lending costs, you're borrowing

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>costs go up um. So there are risks to the

0:24:56.000 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>just growth story. And I'm not predicting recessions or lower

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>growth stories, but I think you need to think about

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>those in an overall investment strategy. And you do need

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to worry about things like stagflation, you know, the misery

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>index and all those other things. Not saying they're gonna happen,

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but you do have them, all right, Michael, A lot

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to think about their Thanks very much for you taking

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the time today. We always appreciate that, Michael Caino. He's

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a president and portfolio manager, a permanent portfolio family of funds,

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>constructive for two. But there are some headwinds out there.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Need to be mindful fed. Coming up Wednesday. Thanks for

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio