WEBVTT - Instant Reaction: Netflix Beats on Earnings, Disappoints on Cautious Forecast 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a breaking news update from Bloomberg.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Instant reaction and analysis from our three thousand journalists and

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 3>analysts around the world looking at Netflix shares. They're continuing

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 3>to move lower this after the company reported results for

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the most recent quarter, concerns about the guidance and boosting

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 3>spending the company saying, for even though they largely beat

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street estimates, they issued a cautious forecast for the

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>months ahead, setting higher program spending, and then, of course,

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Carol the cost of closing its deal with Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Number of customers growing by almost eight percent last year,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>topping three hundred and twenty five million subscribers. Let's get

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to our team who certainly follows it, and of course

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>our own Chris Paul Mary, who's been following this company

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and the ins and out of the pursuit of Warner

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Brothers Discovery. Chris, there out there on the West coast, Chris,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>you know you've known this company, you followed it. Investors

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>not too impressed. They're worried about I guess it seems

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>like the spend that's out there. But walk us through

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>what really jumped out for you in their reporting.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, obviously, investments has been really concerned

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 4>about the Warner Brothers bid. The stock has lost a

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of money since the since the you know, in

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 4>October when it first came out the Netflix was interested

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 4>in bidding, and you still see concern here. I mean,

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 4>they said they've spent sixty million dollars already on pursuing

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers. They're anticipating another two hundred and seventy five

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 4>million in cost for that. They paused their share buybacks,

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 4>which were considerable. They had eight billion dollars left in

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>their buyback program, so they can conserve cash for the

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers bid. So if you're if you're concerned about

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 4>all this, there's certainly enough in there for that.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>You know. I'm I'm just looking at some of the

0:01:54.960 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>headlines from here, and given Chris, the re action from

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>investors over the last few months as Netflix emerged as

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 3>a bidder, it hasn't exactly been a positive one. What's

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the case for why Netflix actually needs these assets? Because

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 3>this is a lot of money to spend, especially when

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>investors are getting increasingly concerned about how much money the

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>company is spending on content.

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, they do in their Letterator shareholders sort of cite

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the broader case that they're you know, no longer just

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 4>competing against you know, HBO or Paramount Plus or whoever,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 4>that they're competing against YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and that they

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 4>really only have a still small share of overall TV

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 4>viewing about nine percent, and by acquiring this great library

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 4>and these facilities Warner Brothers, they could really increase their

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 4>production of stuff all around the world and getting into

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 4>some new business, more consumer products, more video games, and

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>so that's the that's their argument. HBO Max would would

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 4>give them the oppagility offer different pricing plans. So somebody

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 4>just wanted HBO programming, they could get that instead of Netflix.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 4>So those are the things they're talking about.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to play Netflix's accountant. I mean how much

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean the content that they do get, They're going

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to get a lot of content right in one like

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 2>if they get the deal. If they get the.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 4>Deal, yeah huge, I mean it's a massive purchase in

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 4>the seventy eighty billion range. There's numbers that came out

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 4>today with Warner Brothers projections of what their studios and

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 4>streaming business are going to doout five years, and you

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>know it's a potentially huge boost you know, Batman, Bugs, Bunny,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>everything you can imagine for Netflix to own. But you

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 4>know they've also been investing in their own licensing deals.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Huge deal just announced with Sony Universal kicked in as

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 4>well this month, and they're even licensing shows they noted

0:03:55.160 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>from Paramount twenty programs, So huge perchon is of every variety.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Does Netflix christ get these assets?

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 4>You mean, do they ultimately win Warner Brothers to think?

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Is that what you're saying?

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's quite a few chuckles. Yeah, yeah, Well to

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>be expected with a question like that where you know

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 3>where you can't release either yes or no.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, they look like, well, let's do the poly market

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 4>prediction exactly.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 3>But they are the favorable. They are the favorite, no

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 3>question about that. It's it's the board has said this

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 3>is a better offer.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're the favorite from Warner Brothers standpoint for sure.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 4>But there's certainly a community of people that think smart

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 4>people who think the Paramount is going to increase the offer,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 4>or that this is going to fail from a regulatory standpoint.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 4>So to pick the winner from here is a real

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 4>dicey proposition.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 2>In terms of their subscriber numbers. Where does that? I

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>mean this has been something investors have been concerned about

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 2>right now, the sustainability of their growth based on what

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>we got from the company. How does that you know,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 2>push back on that argument or does it not?

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 4>It was pretty strong growth eight percent to the past

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and twenty five million. That was a year

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 4>end that was in line with what investors were forecasting.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Stronger numbers were the you know, the sales growth, which

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 4>you know any company would kill for double digit like that. Uh,

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 4>they said, where it's coming from, it's it's new members

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>all around the world. And price increases. They said they're

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>going to increase prices again this year. They weren't specific,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 4>so it could be just in certain markets. Advertising business

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 4>is growing. We all wondered how big a deal that

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 4>was going to be. They said it was one point

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>five billion last year. That's only about three percent of

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 4>their overall revenue. But they said the number was going

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>to double this year. Is that part of it's growing.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 4>So as long as they can keep the prices climbing

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 4>and the and the subscribers growing and the ad sales coming,

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, they're going to see that revenue growth.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I just want to especially for those people who are

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>listening on radio. Netflix shares are down about four and

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 2>a half. They've been as low as a five percent

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>decline here in the aftermarket. This is after the company

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>plans to be spending on programs in twenty twenty six,

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>crimping profits at the massive streaming company.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>A Chris, before we let you go, pricing power that

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the company has, you mentioned price increases that we could

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>see how much pricing power does Netflix have in the US,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 3>Like there are there's no shortage of places to go

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 3>for content, but you know Netflix, they're kind of the og.

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, Well, I think the big story of last year

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 4>really was that everybody raised prices and we didn't see

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 4>huge defections of subscribers. And it's certainly getting to the

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 4>point where you know, it's getting very pricey. Netflix has

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of been like the video utility, that's the one

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 4>you can't cancel. It's the it's got the just about

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 4>the lowest churn rate of you know, subscriber cancelations of

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 4>any of the big ones. So you know, how long

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 4>can it continue to do that? And maybe they would say,

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 4>if we have Warner brothers. It's going to be a

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 4>long time.

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, Chris, thank you so much, really appreciate it. Chris,

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Paul Mary, Senior editor and Entertainment team leader here at

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News out there in our bureau in Los Angeles.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>We're going to stay on Netflix though.

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Let's bring in Eric Clark. He's chief investment officer

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 3>of the ra Acuvest Global Advisors, about one point two

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in assets under management, portfolio manager too of

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.559
<v Speaker 3>the Alpha Brand's logo ETF. He covers about two hundred

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>consumer stocks, including Netflix. It's the eleventh biggest holding in

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the logo ETF. Eric joins us from San Diego, which

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I understand. It's like sixty nine degrees there. It's not

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 3>like here, Eric, where the high today was twenty one degrees.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>So don't rub it in.

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I don't even know why you guys like watch

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Netflix in San Diego. You just should be playing outside

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>all the time. A decline of four percent after hours

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>right now, are you buying more Netflix? I will buy

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>more Netflix.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow, absolutely, because it's seventy five here.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Oh my bad.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks thanks very much for that. We're done with this interview.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, so why are you going to be buying tomorrow?

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, bigger picture, nothing's really changed with the business.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>It's just that people have left Netflix.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Stock because of the Warner Brothers the time that it

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>takes to get a deal done like this. So people

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.559
<v Speaker 1>just say, I just don't want to have my money

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>tied up in something that's going to be a little

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>more uncertain than maybe quote dead money. That's the opportunity.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So the stock's down over thirty percent and business is

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>still doing really well. And at this point where the

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>stock is now, I don't even think it matters what

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of the Warner Brothers deal is. You're just

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the stock at a great price here, So we

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>just have to be patient.

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 3>That's all. Are you? Are you saying that the Warner

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Brothers Discovery deal will happen, Netflix will get.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>That That one is a little tough because there are

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the unknowns of the regulatory part. I think, generally speaking,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the concept that Netflix really is competing

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with all of our time, not just you know, other

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>streamers or cable. It's YouTube and TikTok and Instagram, et cetera.

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But within the streaming within the quote, you know, kind

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of core cable TV viewing. They obviously are the dominant one.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 1>It's just there's much more than just streaming and and

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>there's room for every brand here. You know, Netflix is

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the first place that people generally start that gives them

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that pricing power. And then we bolt on the paramount

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for the landman and you know Mayor of Kingstown, et cetera.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know HBO, Max, et cetera.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 5>But you know, the.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Assets and Warner are so powerful and they are in

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the best hands with Netflix. It's impossible to know about

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory stuff.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 2>But Eric, what if Netflix doesn't get Warner Brothers, do

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you still like Netflix going forward or do you think

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>then there is this would be a big loss. We've

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>done some reporting. I think we've had some stories that say,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is going to help shape Hollywood, you know,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 2>for years to come. Whoever gets this property. So I'm

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>just curious. If they don't get it, Netflix does not

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>get it, then what well.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just going to go back to the

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>same playbook that has you know, driven seventeen percent annual

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>subscriber growth for the last decade. I mean, they're just

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody can compete with them on the content spend. So

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>they're just going to go back to doing the spending.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they do some tuck in acquisitions. It's you know,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to know, but you know, you have

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to give management the benefit of the doubt. They've done,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, a pretty amazing job building this brand, and

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>so you have to assume that they're going to continue

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>making solid decisions. And you're getting it. You know, a

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>stock that's thirty percent off the highs with strong free

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. I know they will continue to grow margins,

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they will continue to grow subscriber growth, the ad teers

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>growing like a weed. So there's just a lot to

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like here. So I love this thing on a dip.

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>You know. I'm looking at the the most the ten

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 3>most watch movies from the second half of twenty twenty

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 3>five Carol k Pop, Demon Hunter is Happy, gil Moore

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to Frankenstein, My Oxford. I did not see one of these.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 5>I was just thinking movies, Wait.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>The Woman and Cavin ten, A House of Dynamite.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Those are movies, not shows. Oh okay, okay, And even

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the top ten shows didn't see a single one of them. Wednesday,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Stranger Things five, Untamed Squid Game, Stranger Things, Eric, this

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 3>is interesting the way that people watch the different seasons

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of Stranger Things in the second half of the year

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 3>in anticipation for season five. In the second half of

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the year, Stranger with different different seasons of Stranger Things

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 3>were three of the top ten shows most watched on Netflix.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>So is that is that an issue for Netflix moving forward?

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 3>That's it for Stranger Things.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so. They will continue to bring

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>out other stuff. I mean, they're just so good at

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this concept. I mean, listen, if they get Warner that's

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>even better because there's so much more that they can

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>do to refresh.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 3>That entire library. Oh so you're saying, you're saying, like, Okay,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Happy Gillmore two was in there, so maybe like another

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 3>version of a classic each show or another version of

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 3>classic Warner Brothers movies. Is that what you're saying? I

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 3>think there.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, you get a bunch of creative

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>people in a room and they take something. Let's say,

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say Sopranos for instance, what could we do to

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>refresh Sopranos in the same theme. There's just so many,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so many things that they could potentially do hard to

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>see again, because you need the budget and nobody else

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>has the budget.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Does does Paramount Skuidance? If they get the assets, do

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 3>they have the creatives, do they have the budget to do?

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they catalogue what you think Netflix could do.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they can compete with Netflix. And

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>remember they get they're still going to have a metric

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>ton of debt to deal with. So I look at

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this like a private equity owner. If if I owned

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Warner and that was my baby, who would I love

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sell that library to that would

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>put it in the best shape for the rest of time.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 3>And that's clearly Netflix. It is not Paramount Sky.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, So top of mind on the call

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>with analysts and investors, Eric like, what is it that

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you know we need to be asking this company right now?

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Or is it just really all about their pursuit of

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just think that there's obviously just a lot

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of noise, and there's a lot of assumptions. There's a

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of assumptions and a lot of industries like AI too.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think that if you widen the lens, nothing

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>has changed. It's still an important part of people's consumption.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's still an absolute, crazy good value even at twenty

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>five bucks. I mean, I go out to dinner in

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>San Diego and you get a drink and a half

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's twenty five bucks. I can watch an unlimited

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of content on Netflix, So there's still a lot

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of value there, and you know, recurring revenue, business global

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in size and scope, you know, reaching kids as well

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>as my mom. At eighty three male female. I mean, like,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot to love about a business like this.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And I feel the same way about Spotify too. Similar

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, similar business, slightly different category, but for the

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>same reason. And Spotify is off thirty five percent too.

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting too they talk about you know,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>we've already begun to launch video podcasts from our partnerships

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>with Spotify, The Ringer, iHeartMedia and Barstool Sports, and I've

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 2>just announced two new original podcasts with Pete Davis in

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 2>The Comedian and NFL read Legend Michael Irvin. So like,

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, we talked too about just podcast taking off,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and now it's not just audio anymore, it's video. So

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>is this a big opportunity for this company or just

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a nice side business.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it's a big I think it's a

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>big opportunity. I don't know about you guys, but I

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>can consume five, ten, ten times more content when I

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>can listen to it in the car and you know,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to it on a bike rider or whatever. It's

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>not just about reading anymore. People want audiobooks, they want music,

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they want videos, they want podcasts. There's just there's there's

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so much opportunity, and both of these brands have just

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a wild opportunity, you know, long term gathering subscribers and

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bolting on new opportunities that drive operating efficiencies.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Add AI to the to the.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Mix in in more engagement, better profitability.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>There's there's just a lot of lot.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>To like, and you don't often get a compounder on

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>sale like both of these companies, so you should take

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it if you can look through some of

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the short term, you know, kind of noise.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Eric loves Netflix. Eric, always good to see you. Thanks

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 3>for great to see you. Going to come out here, yes, yeah,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 3>we will.

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Stupidly, I think the studio is about ten degrees.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 3>We were out there last year and it was actually

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 3>like kind of June gloom. When we were out in

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>San Diego? Was it? Oh? Was yeah? Netflix shares let's

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>stay on this. The company shares fell in the after

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 3>hours as much as five point one percent, this after

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 3>it for cast first quarter EPs below the average analyssessment.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>The company also plans to posits share buybacks in an

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>effort to accumulate cash to fund them pending acquisition of

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers. I want to bring in a Bloomberg Intelligence

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>senior media analyst, Geetha Ranganoth, and she joins us from Princeton,

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>New Jersey, where Bloomberg Intelligence headquarters are. Githa, just your

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 3>takeaway from this report? The outlook is a concern spending

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>on content. Got to tell you this is like an

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 3>age old story for Netflix, right, the concern about, oh,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 3>you guys are spending way too much. We could have

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>had this discussion a dozen years ago, I know.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 5>And yes, content spending, so it was up about seven

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 5>percent in twenty twenty five. They're projecting about a ten

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 5>percent increase in content spend going into twenty twenty six.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 5>And then of course you have the cost related to

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 5>the Warner Brothers deal. And I think it's not just

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 5>the cost site right, Yes, operating margin. The guidance of

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 5>tim looks a little bit light. It's below thirty two percent.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 5>I think the street was looking for something like closer

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 5>to thirty three percent. But also the ad revenue, you know,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 5>definitely not bad, but not gangbusters. So this is the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 5>very first time that they've actually reported advertising revenue. They

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>said it was about a one and a half billion

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 5>dollars in twenty twenty five. They expect to double that

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 5>in going into twenty twenty six. Again, definitely not bad

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 5>given that you know, this company made its foray into

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 5>adds just a few years ago versus all of the

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 5>other media giants, But again, not really a number to

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 5>kind of get too too thrilled about.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Was so that's not I was just going to ask,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>is that in line or below or above the expectations

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 3>that you've been making of late. I mean, a nice

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to get some new data from the company, especially yeah,

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>in recent quarters that you know they're not doing the

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 3>same same sort of disclosures they have in the past.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 5>No, absolutely, I mean, so really twenty twenty so you know,

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>as we kind of zoom out and we just take

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 5>a look at Netflix. So twenty twenty four was all

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 5>about subscriber growth, right, they had about forty two million

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 5>new subscribers. Twenty twenty five was all about pricing, right,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 5>huge price increases. Again, pretty stable subscriber growth. They obviously

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 5>did add close to almost twenty five million subscribers. But

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 5>then twenty twenty six, as we kind of looked at

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six, here was like the big head scratcher, Right,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 5>what is the big growth catalyst for this company going

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 5>into twenty twenty six. And that's really where people were wondering,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 5>whether you know, that's why they had to buy Warner.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 5>And of course one of the big things that everybody

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 5>was looking for was AD revenue. Again, it has gotten

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 5>off to I would say, an okay start, but slightly

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 5>on the lower side than I think people were expecting.

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 5>People who are probably expecting something closer to about two

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 5>to two and a half billion dollars in twenty twenty five.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 5>So definitely I think fell slightly lower than general expectations.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I always think about Giza, like what's the

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>next markets or how much more is they're out there?

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 2>And in their company release they talk about, you know,

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 2>we relish competition, work to earn more of our consumer's attention,

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 2>and they say, despite our success over the years, our

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 2>share of TV time remains below ten percent in the

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>major markets in which we operate. And then they said,

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 2>for example, to Nielsen, in December, our share of US

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 2>TV time reached an all time high nine percent point

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 2>five points year overy year, yet linear TV still comprises

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>over forty percent of US TV screen time. You know,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 2>is this just blowing smoke or is it really that

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>there is still a lot out there for either Netflix

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>or Amazon or some others to still grab when it

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 2>comes to screen time.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, there is still a lot more room for streaming

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 5>to grow, and I think it absolutely will. So I

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 5>think one of the big things that we've seen, especially

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 5>towards the end of twenty twenty five and going more

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 5>into twenty twenty six, is that, you know, most of

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 5>the Marquee sports properties are now moving to streaming. So

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 5>obviously you have the big launch of ESPN. You know,

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 5>for the very first time in the history of television,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 5>all of the Marque sports are now available for people

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 5>to watch on streaming. They don't have to subscribe to

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 5>a PATV bundle anymore, and I think that makes a

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 5>huge difference. You know, consumer behavior is changing, It's changing rapidly,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 5>and so obviously there is you know, a lot more

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 5>room for a Netflix for and Amazon as you pointed out,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 5>but also equally for a YouTube to grow. And this

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 5>is where you have this whole, this whole debate with AI,

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 5>right because as AI comes in and kind of democratizes

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 5>content creation, you have more and more user generated content.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Are people going to be spending more time on YouTube

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 5>and less time with like premiere platforms like a Netflix,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 5>like an HBO.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>I've just seen junk is obsessed with YouTube?

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but but not with the AI junk. I mean

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>social feeds. Have you seen anything good? I mean, nothing good,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 3>nothing creative. It's like the junk with the.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 2>AI you're talking, You're not talking YouTube.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 3>No, like the junkiest junk.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 5>You cannot think out there, Not yet, Tim, But I

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 5>think just give it about a year or two and

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 5>I think soon we're going to be seeing pretty high

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 5>quality stuff come out. I mean, I know, so how

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 5>the industry experts have basically projected that that, you know,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 5>another two to two and a half years you will

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 5>see the first high quoquality fully AI generated movie you know,

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 5>come out. So again, have to wait and watch, but

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 5>definitely a possibility and definitely something Netflix is preparing for.