WEBVTT - Google Shares Surge on Cloud Growth, BYD Beats Tesla on Revenue

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Valley NBN.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Ed Ludlow.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 5>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:36.959
<v Speaker 5>Technology Coming up.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 6>Google's AI bet is paying.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Off shares surging on the company's cloud growth.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Plus byd beats Tesla on quarterly revenue for the first

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 4>time in the battle between the two ev giants.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 5>And super Micro, shares plunge after Ey resigns as the

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 5>auditor to the troubled server maker.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 4>But first, Ed, Yeah, straight to that top story. Super

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Micro is a server maker. It takes those high performance

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 4>GPUs from names like n Video and AMD packages them

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 4>up for data centers. Ey, its auditor, has resigned citing

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 4>concerns about the company's ethics, its integrity, and specifically management

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 4>in the audit committee. The stock is down more than

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 4>thirty percent. That puts it on track for its biggest

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 4>drop since October twenty eighteen. This is complex and there

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 4>is a backstory and a series events that went on

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 4>with super Micro. Let's bring in bloombergs brody Ford to discuss.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 4>Ey told us about this brody in a regulatory filing.

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 4>First off, what did they say.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Yes, these are some words that you never want to

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 7>hear from your auditor. Right, we only got a snippet

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 7>of the resignation Letterer, but effectively, Ey said that they

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 7>received some information that made them feel that they could

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 7>not continue with this. And in addition, they felt that

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 7>there was information they weren't getting right. So there was

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 7>something that made them feel that they were not right,

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 7>and that they said they weren't willing to put their

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 7>name behind reports that came out from this management committee.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 7>Obviously investors have to read a bit of tea leaves here,

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 7>but they're not exactly mincing words. It doesn't look great

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 7>for a company that's financials are on pause. We are

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 7>waiting to see them. Yeah, and they say that they

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 7>are not going to restate, but clearly the shares today

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 7>there's anxiety that they will right.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 6>Berdy to the point of tea leaves. This tea has

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 6>been being made for a long time.

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 5>They've had the Hindenburg research, We've had many people calling

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 5>out concerns in this way.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and I mean even going back to twenty twenty,

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 7>super Micro paid to settle claims from the SEC about

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 7>accounting issues, right, and so there has been these kind

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 7>of murmurs for a little while that super Micro had

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 7>some accounting issues that were going on. As you said that,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 7>there was a large Hindenburg report. About a month later,

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 7>the company said that, hey, we're going to you know,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 7>delay our annual filing, a very rare step of a

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 7>company of this scale. It's something you do not see

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 7>very often. When you do, often there are no issues

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 7>at the end. Not to say that there are. We're

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 7>we're still waiting to see you. But yes, this has

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 7>been kind of bubbling for a while, and this is

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 7>certainly a moment where the pot seems to be tipping'.

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I just want to do this. It's important for

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 4>our audience. Super Micro settled in accounting probe in twenty

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty with the SEC. But in April this year, a

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 4>former employee accused them through litigation of exaggerating or misstating revenue.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Then you had the Hindenburg report in August, and then

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 4>last month the stock sank because of reports that the

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 4>DOJ's investigating. That's the background, but we care about super

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:49.279
<v Speaker 4>Micro because of its role in AI infrastructure. Explain that part, Brady.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 7>Yes, very expert history there. I appreciate you giving that

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 7>in simple English. But yeah, we care about super Micro

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 7>because all of a sudden, everybody needs to run these

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 7>advanced work flows for AI and it requires much more

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 7>powerful servers. And there's really three companies that are selling

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 7>these right now. Right it's HPE, Dell and super Micro,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 7>and so super Micro this year has seen an incredible

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 7>ramp at revenue. There are debates over the margins some

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 7>of that revenue, because you know, it requires these super

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 7>expensive chips. But the server makers, which were somewhat of

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 7>a sleepier segment of the tech industry maybe two years ago,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 7>have really come into the center of the zeitgeist, which

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 7>makes this whole disruption kind of all the more. You know, cinematic.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 5>Cinema is what potentially we'll get on November the fifth,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 5>not because it's election day only, but because that is

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 5>when we will see the earnings being restated. We understood

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 5>by the company, as you mentioned before, Brody, super Micro

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 5>does not expect the issues to lead to revisions in

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 5>previously issued financials.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 6>We want to thank you, Brodie Ford.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Now we've got a lot to digest today Alphabet up

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 5>five percent. We were higher than this earlier, but we

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 5>surge on the back of of course AI paying off Alvabit. Look,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 5>they might not be buying all their chips from AMD

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 5>at the moment it would.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 6>Seem, but they are investing.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 5>They're raising their capital expenditure, but it's paying off dividends.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 5>People are really buying into the cloud, offering a thirty

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 5>five percent growth in cloud. Let's just see what the

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 5>CEO Snapitchi was particularly pleased about in terms of adoption

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 5>of AI offerings.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 6>Take a listen.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm very pleased with our growth. This business is real

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 2>momentum and the overall opportunity is increasing as customers embrace

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>jen Ai. We generated Q three revenues of eleven point

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>four billion dollars, up thirty five percent over last year,

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>with operating margins of seventeen percent.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Let's get an invest to take now, like im Asinos

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 5>with our CEO of we family offices AI paying office

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 5>some not others. Let's just hear about Alphabet's perspective.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 8>I definitely think one of the interesting things is everybody

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 8>was worried about how much money they were spending on AI,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 8>and now they're using AI, and I heard their CFO

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 8>speak yesterday talking about how they're going to be using

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 8>AI to actually become more productive and reduce expenses. So

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 8>I think they're already starting to become more productive using AI.

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Itself, using AI managing to build up in terms of

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 5>the cloud offering.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 6>We're also seeing not.

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Much competition eating in to their search offering. Are they

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 5>going to manage to keep that mote there well?

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 8>And I think with the search of offering, and as

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 8>sun Dar was talking about that yesterday, people are asking

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 8>customers are asking more questions, They're asking more important questions,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 8>more complex questions, and AI is delivering, and so I

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 8>think the opportunity is tremendous.

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, final question on Alphabet, but sort of looking ahead

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 4>as well to Microsoft and later Amazon, the calculus is

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 4>the same, right, you look at capital expenditures going forward

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and then decide if it's showing up in revenue growth

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 4>and bottom line growth in terms of do you see

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 4>that with Google?

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I do see that with Google, and I see

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 8>her with the other two as well. I think I

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 8>think we sort of underestimate just the incredible impact of

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 8>AI in terms of productivity and efficiency in these companies

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 8>as well as in revenue.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 4>World, AMD is going to do about twelve billion dollars

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 4>of data center sales this year. In video is going

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>to do one hundred and ten billion dollars. What do

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 4>you make of AMD?

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:34.119
<v Speaker 8>I think they've got a catchup extrapolate opportunities there.

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 6>Okay, let's talk about the opportunities that are there.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 5>Because is it that the market just wants too much

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 5>too quickly? From Lisa suit because she has been pointing

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 5>that twenty twenty five is where they're making inroads. She

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 5>anticipates that they're making big moves. Analysts call out the

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 5>Middle East in particular, going well, they talk about Meta

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 5>being a key well buyer of AMD.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 6>They think at least is that.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Likely to be where they need to make the inroads.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 8>I think how you manage the narrative is very important.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 8>And I think that the street tends to get ahead,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 8>whether it's about interest, whether it's about interest rates or

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 8>revenue or whatever. And I think that's a little bit

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 8>of the story here. She's been signaling what actually has happened,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 8>but the market wanted more.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a really interesting time to be a technology journalist.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 4>And I imagine an investor in the technology sector. I

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 4>note that Google said the election was a tailwind for

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 4>their search business and other parts. Try and tie that

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 4>all together for us. If you're an investor this week

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 4>looking at the sector, where's your attention focused.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm not focused on the election at all. I'm focused

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 8>on the long term tailwinds for the technology sector and

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 8>for risk assets in general. All we get is good news.

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 8>We have sunny skies out there. Look at the GDP

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 8>report this morning, up two point eight percent. Look at

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 8>the employment report this morning. Interest rates are going to

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 8>come down, maybe not as fast as the market wanted,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 8>but they're going to come down. The housing market, housing

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 8>sales are actually up. Everything that we have in the economy,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 8>all the drivers of the economy are pointing green, and

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 8>so I think it's not about the election. Actually, the

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 8>only thing that I think can mess up this sunny

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 8>outlook is mistakes that politicians might make, because when we

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 8>look at the fundamentals of economic growth, they're all there.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 8>The US economy is in a fantastic space. And from

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 8>an investor perspective, no matter whether you're going to invest

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 8>in fixed income, in real estate, in the equity market,

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 8>it's all green light ahead.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 5>All these valuations within Nvidia trading at forty.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 6>Nine times future earnings.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 5>The right level for these green skies at green the

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 5>outlook of being a positive one, Well.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 8>It depends how long your timeline is. I mean, if

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 8>I wouldn't be without Emdia in my portfolio, I wouldn't

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 8>be without any of these hyperscalers in my portfolio, because

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 8>that's that's the future, and you buy them and you

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 8>hold them.

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh, if we had more time, I would ask you,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 4>how on earth you know what's going to happen in

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 4>the world in twenty twenty seven, twenty twenty eight, But

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 4>we don't, so we'll save it for next time. Melga Messino,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 4>CEO of we Family of this, thank you, Okay. Other

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 4>earnings that we're watching Reddit in particular, it's fiscal fourth

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 4>quarter outlook. Yes, that is a stock that's up forty

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>one percent in the session. Yes, it was a stock

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 4>that post ipo in March was already up one hundred

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 4>and forty percent. And basically they're making money in different ways.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 4>The ad business is strong, but also there's the data

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 4>licensing and AI part. It's a pretty astonishing jump and

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of optimism that Reddit will continue to grow,

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 4>even though Carro points out something interesting the user base

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 4>if you compare it to like a snap very small,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 4>They're just gould at squeezeing dollars out of them.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 5>I'm with a market cap of now excess a twenty

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 5>one billion extraordinary.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 8>Ed.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, coming up another earning story BYD it's now beating

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Tesla on quarterly revenue for the first time. We'll have

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 5>all the details. As of Blueberg technology, the European Union

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 5>has imposed those higher tariffs of up to forty five

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 5>percent on electric vehicles from China, so ratcheting up trade

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 5>tensions between the world's leading export powers. The regulation was

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 5>published in the EU's official journal last night, going into

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.599
<v Speaker 5>force today after months of negotiations.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 4>ED Yeah, let's stick with EV's Chinese clean energy vehicle

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Giant BYD posted quarterly sales that eclipse Tesla's for the

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 4>first time, but the race to dominate the EV market

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 4>is very much still on Blueberg's. Danny Lee is still

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 4>awake for us in Hong Kong, and I posted on

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 4>social media about this this metric. Many would point out

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 4>this is not apples to apples right, because you need

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 4>to explain to us Danny that within those BYD sales

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 4>include plug in hybrids and the scales are completely different.

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 4>What do we learn in the court just gone.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean we learn in the quarter how BID is

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 9>continue to dominate the China market where it gets most

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 9>of its sales. But when you look at how BYD

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 9>and Tesla are both building out the electric vehicles, BID

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 9>obviously has its hybrids and so it has a greater

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 9>advantage in particularly at the time when demander is skewed

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 9>when it comes to electric vehicles and hybrids and the

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure is not necessarily always there around the world. But clearly,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 9>when you look at how BID is doing on a

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 9>per employee basis, Tesla earns six times more per employee.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 9>So as much as the figure shows a new landmark

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 9>for BID, clearly there are still other metrics to show

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 9>just how efficient Tesla is. And you know, whether you

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 9>get those who support must those who are big fans

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 9>of Tesla who point out otherwise, clearly it's still a.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 4>Good run for BYD.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 9>We had that run last year of them eclipsing pure

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 9>D sales, but this time on revenue.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Talk about that vertical integration though, that we do see

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 5>with BID in its supply chain, can it ring out

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 5>more efficiencies, can it start to produce more per capita.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 9>It's already got the efficiencies there, and what it is

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 9>doing now, particularly where it's nine hundred thousand employees, is scale, scale,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 9>and what it's doing is to try and build as

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 9>many cars as possible, not just in China but now

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 9>around the world with all the factories it's committed to.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 9>So you know, it's got the efficiency there and now

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 9>it can use it to its advantage. And that is

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 9>what is scaring the European and US automakers who are

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 9>really struggling with the EV transition. But when you look

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 9>at Tesla and BYD combined the might of them, they

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 9>can show that profitable path to get into that EV transition,

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 9>which the others out there, the legs you'll becerus, are struggling,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 9>which is why you see Tesla and BODS at one

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 9>and three. In terms of valuations, it is hard to

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 9>compare them.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I look at gross margin for example, where like BYD

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 4>in the Quarrid was near to twenty two percent and

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Tesla just under twenty percent. But again it's not apples

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to apples. Many point out well, Tesla's an AI and

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 4>robotics company and it's investing there. How is BYD different,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, what are its product lines? Where is it

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 4>moving toward?

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 9>BUID has very much focused itself on the product, the

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 9>car itself, and so it doesn't necessarily have those wildly

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 9>big evaluations that Tesla has with that you know, full

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 9>self driving that it's been pushing constantly. So BID is

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 9>starting to think about how it's looking to be more

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 9>more savvy with its digital skills because on the roads

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 9>in China it does have this level of automation which

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 9>could match Tesla frankly, and so with its scale in China,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 9>it's all its learnings perhaps that can be extrapolated into

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 9>something more meaningful in a long run.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 5>More than eight hundred billion dollar valuation for Tesla just

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 5>over one hundred billion BYD. Dannie Lee stays late for US,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 5>We thank you now. Despite more than six years of

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 5>US tariffs, expert controls, financial sanctions, China is making steady

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 5>progress in position itself to dominate the industries of the future,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 5>like the one we were just discussing.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 6>There's some new research by.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Blue Meg Economics and Blueberg Intelligence diving into thirteen key technologies,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 5>and it shows that China achieved a global leadership position

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 5>in five of them, catching up fast in seven others.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 5>We're pleased to welcome to the show that the author

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 5>of this piece, Jered Dipipio from Bloomberg Economics, who takes

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 5>part in the report in Gerard, just outline the five

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 5>where they're dominant and the areas that they're growing.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 10>Right, So we looked with our Bloomberg Intelligence and Economics

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 10>colleagues at thirteen key technologies that are part of China's

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 10>Made in China twenty five initiative from about ten years ago.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 10>The five areas where China is clearly leading as of

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 10>this year would be drones, high speed rail evs, as

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 10>you were just discussing, solar panels, and graphing. So some

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 10>advanced materials where there are competitive would be things like semiconductors, AI,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 10>machine tools, LERG carriers they have like a big ship

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 10>target and drugs like pharmaceuticals. Where they're really behind is

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 10>commercial aircraft, interesting toads.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 4>You just read out the sort of dream smallus board

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg technology stuff. I think one thing we reflect

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>on in the show is that some of those key areas, right, semiconductors,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 4>even drones. In EV it's very policy focused. In other words,

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the government in China change their minds, but they're often

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 4>willing to support those industries through finance or policy to

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 4>make them successful.

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 10>Indeed, I mean industrial policy is a big part of it.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 10>China's new energy vehicle targets and plans go back to

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 10>around two thousand and nine, so they predate Man in

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 10>China twenty five. How they do this it's hard to quantify,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 10>but there are a lot of subsidies for buyers for firms.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 10>There's state backed credit, state backed investment funds, government procurement, etc.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 10>But I think BYD is a good example. So the

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 10>EV sector clearly benefited from Chinese industrial policy, but the

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 10>industrial policy also didn't pick winners, so to speak. BYD

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 10>was the one that rose to the top, in part

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 10>because consumers were ultimately the ones sociding. And now it

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 10>is a globally competitive firm.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Let's just talk about what this means for the US

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 5>as well, because the US has been trying to prevent

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 5>great strides in certain areas of technology. AI chips comes

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 5>first to mind by limiting trade from the US, but

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 5>also from its allies.

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 6>What does this do if China gets there?

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 10>Anyway, The US measures I media tariffs are kind of

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 10>more macro in terms of hitting many things. The expert

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 10>controls are very much focused on van semic conductors and

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 10>things related to artificial intelligence. The US concern, as articulated

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 10>by Jake Sullivan recently, is basically that they're afraid that

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 10>China having advanced leading these things while having military application,

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.479
<v Speaker 10>particularly for things like artificial intelligence. But there's also an

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 10>economic side, because these are the industries of the future,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 10>and from a competitiveness perspective, especially if you think China

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 10>is benefiting from its own industrial policy. The US thinks,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, in a sense, it's quote unfair and that

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 10>they don't want to be left behind.

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Job, let's do semiconductors as one final case study, please,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 4>partly because it's also been in the news cycle. Right, Yes,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 4>US export controls, but China's responded and tried to champion

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 4>specific names. What did your research find in that space?

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 10>So, I mean China's main fab is Smick, right, and

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 10>Smick is sort of their TSMC equivalent. It receives heavy subsidies.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 10>But then there are other firms like Quawei, which is

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 10>ultimately buying the chips that they're making that are also

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 10>being state supported. So in general, I think the US

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 10>export controls have probably done less damage in many in

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 10>the US government would have hoped two years ago. China

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 10>is still making strides, but it's also clear that or

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 10>at least maybe debatable, how good THEO strides are. And

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 10>even recently Bloomberg was reporting that maybe Huawei was getting

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 10>chips from TSMC through a carve out right, So there's

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 10>still leakage in the export controls and this is something

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 10>that the Biden administration in its final days is looking

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 10>to address.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Gerard DiPippo from Bloomberg Economics, just incredible, Thank you so much,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 4>really appreciate it.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Time now for talking tech. First up, in Or Musk's startup, Xai,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 5>seeking new funding at a roughly forty billion dollar valuation,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 5>according to a person familiar with the matter, and the

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 5>company's valuation was twenty four billion, including the six billion

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 5>dollar raised during its last funding round back in May.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 5>This week, Musk said that his aim was to double

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Xai's access to compute, of course, the resource that fuels

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 5>official intelligence, plus open Ai is working with broad content

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 5>developing custom AI chip focused on running AI models. After training,

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 5>the chips will run I software that responds to user

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 5>requests and is expected to be in some high demand.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 5>You are Apple again this hour, veiling an updated MacBook

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 5>Pro lineup with new M four chips, looking to entice

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 5>shoppers with Speedia processing and of course AI capabilities. Is

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 5>part of a flurry of Mac upgrades this week. The

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 5>company also released Apple Intelligence, it's new AI platform.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 6>Earlier in the week ed what are you watching?

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Super Micro the server maker again reminder it's down significantly,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 4>biggest drop since twenty eighteen. Ey It's auditor resigned. It's

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 4>concerned about ethics and integrity of the management team and

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 4>the audit committee. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm karenine Hyde.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 4>In New York and I'm ed Lovelo in San Francisco.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to the technology earning story. Social media

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 4>kind of a focus snaps up the most in six months.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 4>User growth looks good. Sales in the cour have gone

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 4>above expectations, and it's like they've done a lot of

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 4>work on advertising to make them more relevant. They're getting

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 4>rewarded for that. Also Reddit biggest jump since IPO day

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 4>March twenty first, a strong outlook for the holiday quarter

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 4>again ad business, but of course they had the data

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 4>licensing side with AI as well. We're going to talk

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 4>about that in just a moment. And then Meta up

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 4>eight ten to one percent. I think this is going

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 4>to be a megaprint. You know, Meta, the social media company, Meta,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the AI company, Meta, the biggest runner of data centers

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 4>that no one talks about that kind of stuff, Garrett.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 6>Someone talks about all of it.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 5>We're pleased to have flue megazation accounts across a florry

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 5>of social media moves. Let's just start with snap because

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 5>they are managing to show that they can still get

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 5>growth outside of the US. It seems to mainly be

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 5>and also people subscribing.

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean the snapsom was really interesting. As you

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 11>mentioned earlier, they tend to have a lot of altility.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 11>Sometimes they're not always rewarded for the investments that they're

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 11>making in their advertising business. But they put a lot

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 11>of money, spent a lot of money on artificial intelligence

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 11>and machine learning. So it really is coming to fruition

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 11>across multiple areas. Better targeting ads, better recommending video content,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 11>and then as you mentioned, subscriptions. Subscription revenue is now

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 11>about one hundred and twenty three million dollars in the quarter,

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 11>which is eight to nine percent of the revenue. So

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 11>they're one of the few social media companies that's really

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 11>been able to benefit from subscriptions and really turn that

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 11>into a notable business.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 4>He shoul Let's talk about Reddit, I mean a bit

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 4>of a surprise in the session of forty percent gain

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 4>on the stock. You spoke to Steve Hoffman, the CEO.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 4>What do we learn about how it's going and what

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the Reddit platform is doing to be different?

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 11>I mean, of course the simple advertising story, right, they've

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 11>really been able to convince advertisers to actually buy ads.

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 11>So part of that is expanding Reddit to other languages

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 11>so they can have more users and more advertisers across

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 11>the world. Part of it is just investing in artificial intelligence,

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 11>machine learning, better targeting ads, and then educating the market.

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 11>Reddit is very different than our social media platforms. You

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 11>target based off of topics, not necessarily personal data. A

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 11>lot of users are anonymous, so they've really had to

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 11>do a lot of educating the market and that's seen

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 11>you pay off, and then of course there's the AI

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 11>story selling their data to AI companies, having partnerships with

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 11>open ai and Google that's really pushing their revenue over

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 11>the edge. And then again coming into the holiday, core

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 11>huge beat on what they're forecasting for the holiday.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 6>So all that is really led to that stock rise.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 5>It's just so interesting though, Like Eda and I were

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 5>having this back and forth earlier about when you look

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 5>at the underlying amount of users of both of these platforms.

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 5>We won't even get into meta quite yet, but Reddit's

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 5>got what just over ninety seven million users. Snap has

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 5>way more, and they also have far bigger revenue, I

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 5>mean four times that of Reddit, yet their market capitalizations

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 5>are about the same.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 6>At this level, where is.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 5>The market seeing the future potential of Reddit versus Snap?

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 11>I think it really comes down to that data licensing business.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 11>When I was talking to Steve yesterday, one of the

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 11>things he mentioned was he said every large language model

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 11>has used Reddit data to train, and so he's like,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 11>that right there, shows you the potential of the value

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 11>of the data on the site. So I think investors

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 11>are really seeing that. Some investors are projecting as much

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 11>as six hundred million dollars a year in data licensee revenue,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 11>which is huge, and so I think part of it's that.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 11>And then you know Snap has been public for a

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 11>lot longer, so the expectations may be a little bit higher.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 11>Right of course, Reddit just in March they beat expectations

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 11>every quarter, and so we'll see if they can continue

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 11>to do that.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 4>The biggest of them all in the social media context,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 4>but a lot more is meta. After the bell today,

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 4>what's going to happen.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 11>I expect revenue to beat expectations. I mean, they're definitely

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 11>going to have a higher bar. Their peers, as we

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 11>just talked about, have done really well. Google also did

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 11>really well in their earnings, and so I think the

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 11>bar is going to be high. But over the past

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 11>quarters they've achieved double digit revenue growth, oftentimes as much

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 11>as twenty percent in Quortant, So we'll expect that, and

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 11>then we'll expect to hear more about the AI story,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 11>so whether it's their AI video generator movie Gin that

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 11>they just announced they have new AI tools for creators,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 11>for advertisers. I mean, they really doubled down on finding

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 11>ways to put a in front of users and then

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 11>not even to mention their METAAI assistant, which has five

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 11>hundred million users that are chatting with AI across Facebook

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 11>and Instagram. So we'll expect to see that, expect to

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 11>hear them continue to talk about how they're getting a

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 11>return on their investments in AI. And as you mentioned,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 11>they have tons of data centers. They spend a lot

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 11>of money on infrastructure, and so part of the story

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 11>too will be will they not spook investors with how

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 11>much they're spending on infrastructure like they did a couple

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 11>of quarters ago.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Investors for sort of.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 11>Worry about how much money they were spending there. So

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 11>we'll be looking for all those things.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Stay tuned after the market closed. Blim Baxasia counts on

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 4>a trio of earnings. Thank you very much. Let's keep

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 4>talking about technology and means with Jeffrey's analyst Brent Till

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I think that if you're trying to

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 4>find the common denomination to particularly if it's like the

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 4>Hyperscala's meta, et cetera, for me, it's that the calculus

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 4>is the same as last quarter, right, capex money going in,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 4>how much money's coming out, particularly in AI. Have you

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 4>seen some good evidence that that's the case so far.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, we're early in the curve, so you know that

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 12>the revenue is not coming in because remember you know,

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 12>for Microsoft, we're on a recurring subscription model. So even

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 12>if they plowed ten dollars into AI today, you're paying

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 12>a monthly fee.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 4>So no, we haven't.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 12>But I think we're seeing proof that if you had

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 12>all the hyperscalers at their total bookings relative to their

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 12>capex and their actual booking numbers accelerated. That's not all AI,

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 12>but we are seeing that return. We're also seeing in pricing.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 12>I mean, Microsoft's double the cost of office. See, if

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 12>you're paying thirty dollars per se per office, you just

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 12>double your AI, Like it doesn't cost double that to serve.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 12>They're making a lot of money. Look at last year,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 12>amy Hood gave you a hundred basis points of margin

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 12>improvement in the in the beginning of AI, and this

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 12>year they're guying to about one hundred basis points aheadwind.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 12>But like, this isn't this isn't like they're losing money, right,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 12>they made money in your an AI like so Brenda,

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 12>I mean these are incredible numbers, So like this isn't

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 12>a wasteland and this is the number one question we're

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 12>getting whereas all this capital are going. Well, you can

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 12>see in the booky number, you can see it in

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 12>the margins, you can see it now on the incremental revenue,

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 12>you can see it in the pricing, and then you

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 12>can start to see it in the in the customer

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 12>case studies.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Brent, you're excited about Microsoft. I can tell we're all excited.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 4>That never makes I mean the thing about Microsoft, they've

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 4>always been good at selling software that you can otherwise

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 4>get for free somewhere else. Meta is a different beast, Right,

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 4>you have this bio meta and in the AI story

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 4>it's like interesting the business model, Like I've been using

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 4>the ray Baan metas for about a month now, That's

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 4>how I use meta AI. What are you ex expecting

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 4>in the earnings print and the sort of belief that

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 4>they can demonstrate this feature business model?

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think again, we're super early across the entire

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 12>industry when we think about AI in applications, right, we're

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 12>not early in AI and infrastructure. We see it in

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 12>all Nvidia, all the numbers, right, you see it. It's

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 12>going to be a delayed reaction, So I want to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 12>be careful like you're not going to solve This isn't

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 12>going to pop out of pop, pop out of the

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 12>cake and surprise everyone. Like this is going to be slow, steady,

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 12>a gradual ramp like we've said, like this is is

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 12>going to be game changing. So I'm a believer in meta.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 12>I think ultimately, over time we as users will get

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 12>a better experience because of AI. The advertisers which pay

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 12>the bill. Again, none of us pay to build. It's

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 12>a meta, right, it's all out ad driven. If you

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:58.239
<v Speaker 12>if you can create an easier ad campaign, uh, and

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 12>do it quickly and do it more cost efficiently, Like

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 12>our sizes are going to stampede because all the users

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 12>are going to stay there and more people are going

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 12>to be there because the experience is so good. So again,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 12>I think it's a phased approach. I don't think it's

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 12>going to be overnight success.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 4>But I think what.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 12>Zuck has been doing, Like he's very confident, right, you

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 12>can see it in his style, his T shirt, his necklace,

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 12>his hair.

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 6>You can just see it.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 12>He's not he's not.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 5>He's got a stylist man, he's got himself a good style.

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 6>Stand. We all love to see it. I'm a big

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 6>approver and appreciate it.

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 5>But Brent, what's also interesting is there were some news

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 5>as to whether or not Meta AI is ultimately trying

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 5>to build its own search, real time search within its

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 5>Meta AI offering, becoming less dependent on the likes of

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 5>being which is Microsoft of Google Search, which of course

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 5>his alphabets.

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 6>How much do you.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Think these frenemies will continue to use each other? Of course,

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Meta in some ways when it depends on access to

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 5>compute or just building its ownes and going to Nvidia

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 5>and the others the ecosystem.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 12>Own searches and no brain I mean, think about it,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 12>like if you buy a golf shirt or or you

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 12>buy something for your house and you want to find

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 12>something else on the platform, why can't you just go

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 12>on their platform search for it. It's it's not a

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 12>good search experience today. It should be a better search experience.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 12>So is in an area that they can improve upon.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 12>Does that mean I'm not going to Google Maps because

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 12>I'm going from San Francisco down to the valued visit

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 12>a company and I'm going to jump on on their

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 12>you know there, I'm not going to search there for

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 12>traffic and all the other things. So but I think

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 12>the experience is going to get better because it's not

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 12>great right now, and there's no question all the data

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 12>that's trapped in that platform. I mean it's really really

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 12>hard to find something that you've seen and go back

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 12>and try to find it. I'm not a the experience

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 12>is going to get better, but it's not going to

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 12>box out Google. It's not going to box up Perplexity.

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 12>It's not going to change. I think the the opportunity

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 12>for the others, and we saw that at Google's number, right.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 12>I meant digit.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 5>About talk to us about how they're managing to finding

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 5>meet the different but ins the rewards of an AI investment, Well.

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 12>I think you go back to it's not all AI driven,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 12>which is you get in your car, use ways to

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 12>get to work. You you effectively looking for a restaurant.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 12>What are the hours you don't you don't go to

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 12>other you don't go to other engines like Perplexity of

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 12>other places for that information. You may want to say,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 12>how do I stop my washer driver from blinking? I'll

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 12>go to Perplexity and do that on eve go to

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 12>Google anymore. But I'm not like, I think the thing

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.719
<v Speaker 12>is we're having a higher query volume, and then all

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 12>of us are becoming more comfortable that they're different tools,

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 12>and so we're just increasing our usage across all these platforms.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 12>And so it's like everyone wants to Hey, this vendor

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 12>is gonna gonna die, and this vendor is gonna win.

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Like I think everyone seems to be then in a

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 4>good spot or winning.

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 12>And that is again these bigger platforms, right, AI needs

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 12>three things capital, users, and data and and when you

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 12>think about all the big platforms Amazon, Google, Microsoft.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 4>They all have that matter incredible usage.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 12>Obviously to argue is the big keep getting bigger and

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 12>it's a really boring storyline, Like I wish I had

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 12>a better storyline, but like I'm sorry, but like they're

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 12>just going to keep getting bigger and better.

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Regulators might have something to say about it, but for you,

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 5>you've got to buy across the border and all those names.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Jeffrey's analyst Brent Thill, we thank you so much for

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 5>joining us today. Meanwhile, coming up and look at the

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 5>major impact of the results in the upcoming election could

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 5>have on technology and innovation.

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 6>Linden Melman's joining us.

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 5>From bl Government Strategies team.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 6>That's next.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 5>This is a BlueBag technology conspiracy theorists who believe that

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump won the twenty twenty election. I'm making plans

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 5>online to monitor and film polling places in swing states,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 5>a move that some groups argue amounts to voter suppression.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Stone has been reporting on this, joining us now.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 5>This is surrounding the messaging app Telegram, in particular, where

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 5>these conversations and views to meet the happening.

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Caroline. Telegram is an incredibly popular app, certainly globally,

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's gained a lot more attention in the United

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 3>States over the past couple of years. There's large communities,

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 3>tens of thousands of people through the country, many of

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 3>them in swing states Georgia, Wisconsin, who are making plans

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 3>and trying to coordinate to take efforts to do what

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>would they describe as stopping another stolen election.

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 4>So, Jeff, I'm not a Telegram user. It's a cloud

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 4>based messaging app basically, right. Take that explain literally what

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 4>people are doing to communicate. But why it's noteworthy, why

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 4>this is a news item in the context of this election.

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 3>This is important because the way that Facebook and formerly

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Twitter now x have you know, really removed a lot

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of conspiratorial and false election related to content over the

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 3>past few years that doesn't exist on Telegram. So Telegram

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 3>was a Russia founded app. It has nearly a billion users,

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and people communicate in large communities, so they're a lot

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 3>like large group chats, almost like WhatsApp. Without that moderation,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 3>things can get pretty extreme and pretty radical. Sometimes there's

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 3>calls for violence. And really what's happening now is that

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 3>some of these groups are circulating petitions. They are circulating

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 3>calls for volunteers, looking for people who are willing to

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 3>stand outside of ballot boxes in the middle of the night. Again,

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 3>some places that are pretty key to the election.

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 4>And it's worth pointing out that in our reporting, Telegrams

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 4>press team did not respond to requests for comment Bloomberg's

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Jeff Stone, that's really important one week out, Thank you

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 4>so much. Let's stay with the election and the technology industry.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Immigration is one of the most hotly contested topics in

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 4>the upcoming US election, but there's one area of general agreement.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 4>A recent pewpole finds the vast majority of both Harris

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 4>and Trump voters support allowing high skilled immigrants into the country.

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 4>For example, doctors engineers, but also computer scientists. Let's discuss

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 4>this with Linda melmad He's a partner at BAL and

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 4>oversees the company's government strategies group. This is interesting. It

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 4>is a policy topic at the heart of the election.

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 4>But do you have a firm understanding of either candidate's

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 4>position on this, even if the voting base agrees.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, first, thank you for having me on today, and

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you're correct that the asylum crisis on the border has

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly dominated the conversation. But behind the curtain, there is

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commonality across voters of both parties that

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>high skilled immigration is beneficial for the United States. And

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Americans understand immigration better than a lot of

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>people give them credit for. They see CEOs, foreign born

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>CEOs at companies like Google, Uber Chabani, and they know

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that they want those individuals investing and creating jobs in

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But this election will be the most

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>consequential election for immigration policy, both in terms of that

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>asylum crisis, but also for high skilled immigration because the

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>candidates will implement very different policies and that will affect

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>how companies hire and attract and build out their talent pipelines.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So I'm an employer, I want to get access

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 5>to AI talent, I need to go abroad for it.

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 6>What can I anticipate?

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 5>How do I need to align my business hiring with

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 5>either outcome from the election.

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Well let's start with that. So you know, if President

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump is elected, we all recall back in twenty sixteen

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that he put travel bans in place, and we are

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>planning for that eventuality. So if he is elected again,

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>we could see travel bands going to affect as early

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 1>as the first week. They won't necessarily target AI specifically,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 1>but there could be peripheral damage, so to speak, if

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they target nationalities China, for example, or just particular visa

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>categories that employ a number of AI professionals in it.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So really, as early as the first week, we could

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>see an impact on the ability to bring new AI

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>talent into the United States. But that's only part of

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the story. I think approximately two thirds of graduate students

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in AI fields are foreign born, and what we are

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>expecting is that there will be restrictions on the ability

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of companies to hire foreign born talent out of US universities.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's on top of a broken system that already

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>exists today. It's already very difficult to transition someone from

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a foreign student to work visa, but it could get

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>worse if Trump is elected.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 4>We're just showing this brilliant chart of the top technology

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 4>companies are the beneficiaries of H one B visas, Amazon

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 4>the most and Apple the fewest. Based on this data

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 4>from UCIS, you must know what the company's attitudes are

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 4>towards this. How active are they in this election cycle

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 4>in impressing the importance of skilled labor to either candidate

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 4>in either party.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, all the companies have been operating under a dysfunctional

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>immigration system for as long as they've been around, and

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the first election that they have to prepare

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for different scenarios, and even within any particular administration, there's

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>very competing views about how to implement immigration policy. So

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>all of them are preparing for both eventualities and putting

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>really the teams and people in place to be able

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to react. One thing to understand is that if President

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump is elected, a lot of those action plans will

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get started right away. During the lame duck period of time,

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>there might be a small window to try and get

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 1>some policies done under a Biden administration during those final

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>few weeks that might be beneficial to those companies. But

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's best to describe their activity going into

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this election as preparing for all eventualities. No one, of course,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>knows for sure how the election is going to play

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>out in a few next week, but the companies are

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>prepared from a workforce perspective. Probably the most difficult challenge

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 1>for them is the fact that a lot of their

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>foreign workers like to travel holidays like all of us do,

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and that that could be difficult for them to put

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in place quickly.

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Bender moment, thank you so much uponner at Baal, whoever

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 5>sees the company's government strategies. More big tech earnings after

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 5>the bell, Let's get to it with Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 5>and mis Manning Singh, who joins us. Now, you're just saying,

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 5>how the gargantuan beat that you saw out with Alphabet,

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 5>is that going to be a read across to the

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 5>metas to the Microsoft's.

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 13>I mean, look at industry is doing well, and that's

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 13>what we saw with Reddit's app and Alphabet all calling

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 13>that out. I think the magnitude of Google beat, you

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 13>know that two billion dollar on the top line what's

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 13>pretty impressive. You're not going to see that sort of

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 13>beat from Microsoft or Meta if I had to take

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 13>a guess, But clearly I think with Alphabet specifically their

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 13>LLLM integration across their family of apps with two billion

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 13>plus users is what's driving you know, the positive sentiment today.

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Mandie, Really quick, do you see the market share split

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 4>in cloud changing based on Google's progress?

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 13>It could simply because you know, everyone is getting the

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 13>same allocation of GPUs, So if Google is using more

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.720
<v Speaker 13>of their TPUs for training, they can have and Vidia

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 13>GPUs on their cloud that can generate revenue, whereas some

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 13>of the other cloud providers are using it for their

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 13>own training. So from that perspective, it'll be interesting to

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 13>see if Azure prints more than thirty four percent growth tonight,

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 13>But anything less than that I think will be disappointed.

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 5>We have so much still to digest when it comes

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 5>to these magnificent five for this week that are reporting

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 5>of course, just in video that we lack now for

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 5>the next weeks to come. Bloomberg Intelligence senior Alis Man

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 5>Yep saying love having him. Meanwhile, that does it for

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 5>an extremely busy addition Bloomberg Technology, it was and.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 4>It's just going to continue. It's amazing there's so much

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 4>focus on tech all the time. Recap on the podcast,

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 4>you know where to find it online on those platforms

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 4>and on the Bloomberg ones as well. Thank you team

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 4>in New York, thank you team here in San Francisco.

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 4>Get some rest because there's a lot more to come.

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.