WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: How Good Is LA's Defense?

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It is Thursday, September twenty eight to twenty seventeen, Season thirteen,

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>episode number forty six. Welcome to a new edition of

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>The Break. I'm Derek Eagleton. We're joined by our normal

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>cast here. We're in the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>How's everybody feeling this morning? Hello, Derek, good, I feel good? Good. Amber. No,

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why you say no. I'm not going

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to ever stop that. You know that we've been doing

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this for a long time. Every once in a while,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, Nick, everyone is once a year. That's

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>not true. I called you Nikki the other day and

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you actually were okay with you, Like, Hey, what's up?

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So Nikki eats Nikki? It's really Nick e right, Yeah,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's true, Nick, It's accurate. Okay, I'm doing swell. Thank

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you very good. One's fine. All right, let's jump in.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk football. How are you doing? You know, that's

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the first time anybody's ever done it? Right, We don't

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>spend it back to you. Thank you. I'm feeling fine.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't care for whatever that's worth. I really did. Yeah. Right,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that's that's new and novel and different. All right, let's talk.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the Cowboys. Let's get first into a

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit news on DeMarcus Lawrence. Yesterday we heard found

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>out that he was a named Defensive Player of the

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Week after his really good game last week versus the Cardinals.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And then today we find out nick Defensive Player of

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Month, Defensive Player of the month. They just keep

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>rolling in these awards. Don't you just see you're one

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>step away from Defensive Player of the year, are you?

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a few steps away from defensive player

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I mean weeks, months, year. Okay? You

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are you? Is that what you're thinking is going to happen? Like?

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that your hot take of the day. I mean

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he's on paced, you know, for thirty five sacks in

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the year, so the record is only twenty three twenty six.

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, twenty six. Yeah, he's on face for that. No,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know if he'll be a Defensive

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year, but we'll see. It's one of

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>those situations where like you're like, oh, he won Defensive

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Week in the month, but like you

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>had the graphic made up for it yesterday because it's

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that obvious. It's like, oh, what an honor. Of course

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I am, but yeah, in other words, it wasn't made preseason,

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Like this wasn't a graphic that was made preseason. Is

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that what you're getting. No, I'm saying he's been so

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>damn good that we I mean, you know, Taylor and

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Shannon hopefully had those graphics done way ahead of time,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because that mean it's obvious three sacks in a game

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and three tackles for lost six point five sacks on

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the season really should be seven. But whatever, either way,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not shocking to hear, is what I'm trying to say. Yeah,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>good for him, really good for him, and hopefully he

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can keep it up because the Cowboys really needed I

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>thought it was interesting yesterday when you guys made the

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>point that it's hard to find a unit on this

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>team that's better than the defensive line. And I think

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously most of that, it's not hard. Good part is

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about him. It's not hard to find it. You can't.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't objectively, with any basis of facts, say that

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a unit on this team has been better than the

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 1>defensive line. It's a good point. Yeah there, I mean,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they've been phenomenal. Well, I will say this, and as

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I did think about it a little bit last night,

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I still think you probably a part of them being

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>run on in Denver was about that defensive line as well. So,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>as you said after the Denver game, you can't just

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>pooh pooh that and just act like that didn't happen.

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a significant thing. But everybody else sucked in that

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>game too, So relatively speaking, yeah, yeah, they had a

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bad just because everyone was so bad. They've been way

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>better when they've been good, and just as bad when

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.119
<v Speaker 1>they've been bad. Yeah, so they're better. All right, let's

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>get into some injury talk. Cowboys had I thought a

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty positive injury report. Now, of course, yesterday was just

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a walk through, glorified walkthrough, But Dave catch us up

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on the injuries and who didn't practice and who did

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>practice on a limited basis it is a walkthrough, So

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I can't stress enough how I mean, if you've seen

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the video of the morning walkthroughs an ox Nard, that's

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>what it looked like. Like guys are wearing backward hats.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Guys are kind of like half jogging in position. Can't

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>stress enough? How not like a real practice this was.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>But the most encouraging thing of this entire situation is

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that Jordan Lewis isn't even on the injury report, which

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>means he's fine or that's what it should mean. Yeah,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I've got my eye on. If he's

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>not even on the injury report on Wednesday, then I

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>fully expect him to play on Sunday, which is huge.

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>It's gigantic. Chittabey Woozier was limited, as was Nolan Carroll. Right,

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>feel better about Carroll since, I mean, I know that

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>your brain is super duper important, but it's not a

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, a physical ailment that can hinder you from

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>moving around on a practice fields. And wouldn't you think

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>with concussions, you're if you're even in a walkthrough, you

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want him doing anything if they still are showing signs,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>if you've been cleared to go out and do football

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>things on a field. I assume that that's a very

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>positive sign for your moving in the right direction. Whereas cheeto.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Hamstrings are tricky, it's hard to really say, yeah, um,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee was a DNP, which is you know, take

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that for what it's worth. He said yesterday that he

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>feels optimistic that this isn't as bad as some other

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injuries that he's had, but you and that goes

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the conversation we had about Odell Beckham that

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he's one of those guys that if he can find

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a way, he's going to find a way and probably

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't bet against him. But guy with an injury history

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like Sean Lee on short week's rest because of Monday

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Night football, I me, personally, I'm leaning towards just like,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>let's try to get through a game without him and

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not risk him, you know, risk losing him for further

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks just because of one game. It's a tough game

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to do it with that running back you're facing, but

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sure is. But it's just it's just a thought that

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I had when I saw that yesterday, I'm like, yeah,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'd rather I'd rather not rush him

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and have him healthy than try to wind up in

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a situation where he's out for even more time. What

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>did they list Hitchens that he was limited? Hitchens's hitchensitive.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Hitchens ran scout team yesterday. That's positive, right, Oh yeah

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>again walk through. But he was out there doing football things.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>He was part of an eleven on eleven situation, which

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is news. So I like, after the buy for him,

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I leaned toward that. Yeah, but I mean that's only

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>two games away. That's not far and that's kind of

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>what the original thought was, that you kind of get

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>through the buy and then after that he should be back, right, Yeah,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope. So a linebacker situation looks we'll start looking

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good if if you can you know, if if

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>considering nothing would happen, I guess with Damien Wilson, I

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine the NFL doing anything with that at this point.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, with with you got Hitchings coming back,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee and then obviously Jayalen Smith, just any kind

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of rotation there, and they're starting to work Duran in

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there a little bit more too. So a couple of

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, it looks really troublesome, but now it's getting better.

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>If they can get through this game with Sean Lee

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or without him, or depending what happens. He's told a

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>few reporters in the locker room, he said, hamstrings, it's

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those things. It's like neither it fires up

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or it doesn't. I mean, it's not like it's you

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can kind of limp around on it. I mean, if

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go for you, then you can't do anything.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.679
<v Speaker 1>But he did, like Dave said, he said, I've had

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>worse ones than this. Yeah, And so I guess all

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in all, when you look at the injury report, I

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think there were a lot of positive things that the

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys can at least be hopeful about moving forward. I

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>forgot to mention Stephen Pia sat out also. That's I

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's just gonna be a thing that doesn't

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>completely go away for him. I've kind of put this

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the category of romo of you know Tyron Smith

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>last year, right. I just put this in the category

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of it's one of those things where I just expect

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to see Stephen pie on the injury list most of

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the season, and if you don't, then then maybe that

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>means it that week he just feels great, but more

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>than likely just to manage him. It sounds like that's

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a normal thing, unless they and me speculating.

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything, but I guess they could sit

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>him down and do a Nyard thing, may designate him

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to return if they wanted to, But as long as

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he can keep managing it and playing every week, I

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like they wouldn't want to do that. I guess.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't sound like this is something that's gonna go away.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like it's just thing. It's there, So I

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I are necessary. If you signed him,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you kind of it. It's like a lot of football injuries,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like it would probably go away if you sat him

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>down for a couple of months to get it better.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But if he can, it's like, but wasn't this something

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that he was struggling with in the past already? Right,

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he had struggled with it in the past. But again,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like it's like DeMarcus Lawrence's backs, Like

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's there and you could have surgery on it, or

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you could do something with it to help it get better.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you can play, you're probably gonna play. I mean,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's football really same thing. You know, you could sit

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>Tyrn Smith down for a few weeks in his back

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would probably feel a lot better thinking back to last year. Yeah,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I I guess the point of what I'm saying, and

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like what Amber's saying too, is that if

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's a recurring thing that's been happening over time,

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>even if you sit him down, you'll get temporary relief,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but as soon as you start playing again, it's probably

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna start nagging again. So just kind of manage it.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds like they're just gonna manage it by

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>giving him more rest and hopefully by Sundays every week

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's ready to go. Yeah, I guess I just go

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>back to thinking before he got here, he had a

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>whole offseason and it is still something that he's struggling with,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so and it might be a situation. We talked about

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>them needing roster spots for players, obviously for David Irving

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>next week. That's where I was trying to go with that.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But Brian Price, oh, I was thinking you could move

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Pie down if you if his injuries that bad to

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>make that spot. Well, I don't think that they would.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they would. But what I'm saying is

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is that cutting price, you know, just because you need

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the spot. It's harder to get through a practice if

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>if Pie is not going to work with you every Wednesday.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I mean, guys, I got on a

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>practice squad to play defensive tackle one Lewis Neil. I

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone would know that if they didn't go

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to the College of choice. That is offensive and not

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the practice. Lewis Neil kicked too much ascid training camp.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I know people to not know who he was, but

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but you have to admit you know every single LSU

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>play in the NFL. Honestly, I probably don't. There's so

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>many of them. Not yes, oh wow, there's so many

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of them. They led the league. You probably know, right, Yes, Okay,

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit of a passionate LSU fan. I would

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>tell it a homer. But whatever it was like that

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>number might slow down a little bit. Maybe we'll see, um,

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>things aren't going well up there. Whatever. I'm just asking

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas and Texas well, I'm asking I've never claimed that

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>things are going great in Austin. I'm just asking. You know,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the jury's out right, Okay, Um, I think I could know.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>I know, I can't name the whole practice squad because

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't learned the name of the linebacker they just signed,

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Aravon Williams him, I don't think, and um, there's an

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive there's an offensive lineman they signed recently who I

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>never bothered to learn his name either. But I think

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I got the other eight showers. Yeah, Jamil's back, Brian Brown,

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Neil. Um, I don't know the guys from camp. Well,

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that's usually what you're practice seah, That's what I'm saying, Like,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>those are guys you know, because you kind of saw

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>him play those other guys. It's kind of like hard

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to really Yeah, you're like, okay, i'la all right, let's

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>move on. Let's talk a little bit about the Cowboys

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>offense versus the Rams defense. And Dave, I know you

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>were gonna watch the game last night or watch some

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>footage of this team last night and give us a

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>scouting reports. So what do you have? I did. I

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>did watch the Rams defense on tape last night, and

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>my main impression really is I'm sick of here in

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>the phrase three four defense, because I mean that's what

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it is at the end of the day, but like,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not what it looks like when these guys play.

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I watched the whole San Francisco game, so that's

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, And it's forty one thirty nine games,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so you're talking about seventy something defensive snaps. They got

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>four or five and six guys down on the line

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>like every snap. I mean, yeah, Aaron Donald Mike Brockers

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>are really like the key components of this. Like they're

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the two guys that you can count on to be

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>down every single snap, but they move all over the place.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>They play like Donald plays three technique, he plays one technique,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he plays five technique. Brockers plays zero technique, one technique,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>three technique, and five techniques. So they're lining up everywhere

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>from the tackle to the guard to the center. You

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>got Robert Quinn who plays wide wide. It's like that

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>outside linebacker, but his hands on the ground more often

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>than not. The same thing goes for Coon Curse type. Yeah,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing goes for Connor Barwin, Like he's the outside linebacker,

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but he lines up as an end way more often

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. And then you have alec Ogletree who

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is within three feet of the ball damn near every snap,

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Like he's basically another lineman. They got a couple of

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he's basically blitzing every play. Is that what I'm gonna

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get into that. Yeah. Not if he's not blitzing,

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he's just down near the line. And honestly, from what

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I watched, again, I'm not rot us. I didn't watch

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>every game. I just watched last week, but he's a blitzer.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>He's an extra pass rusher because he's sure in't anything

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that impressed me in pass coverage, that's for sure, and

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>honestly as a run stopper for that matter. I'll get

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>more into that. The big takeaway that I came away with,

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And maybe this shouldn't be surprising for Wade Phillips's. These

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are really aggressive, super duper aggressive. Like again, this

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is a three four front. They send five and six

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>man rushes all the time like a lot. Brockers and

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Donald are awesome, and they beat their man more often

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>than not. I think if Donald doesn't beat his man

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and get into the backfield, it's because he didn't want

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to or that was not his assignment on that play.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Because he does it all the time with ease, and

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the ease with which should they do it

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>actually works against them because I swear to God so

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>many times they like overran the play to the point

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where Harlow's hide has three guys in his face right

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>here and he just kind of cuts to the left

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's green grass over here. That seemed like it

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>happened all the time. Alec Ogletree, if he wasn't blitzing,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he's down near the line. He gave up a thirty

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>four yard gain down the seam to the fullback, the

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>guy with the goofy name that I can't pronounce U.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But the forty nine Ers signed him move the offseason

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>from Baltimore. You guys, aren't you know not you're tight end?

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You said, fullback? Oh, fullback? The forty nine Ers gave

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a lucrative contract to a fullback. It's like jurishnick or

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a weird name, you're a vicious Nope, not right.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Gave up a thirty four yard gain just really, in

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, did not look super amazing in coverage. Again,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like their whole strategy is to get

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to the quarterback and if they don't. It's it's not

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pretty, and it's kind of successful honestly, because

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they got four sacks on Brian Hoyer. They forced him

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>into an intercept and on the first play of the game.

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But okay, so so here here are the stats that

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of back up what I'm trying to say. They're

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty second in the league in yards per game. They're

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>allowing one hundred and forty rushing yards per game, two

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five passing yards per game, and they're twenty

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sixth and scoring d largely off of giving up for

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine to the forty nine ers. But for all

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the talent they have, I just feel like they're aggressive

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to the point that it's not disciplined. Like they give

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they give up cut back lanes, they give up big gains.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Hoyer hit he hit Pierre Garson for fifty nine yards

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>one on one coverage against Tremaine Johnson. What else did

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they give up? They gave up They gave up two

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or three long gains, like right down the middle of

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the field, and San Francisco had four drops on top

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. Like, so the main thing I come away

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with is that, yeah, these guys are super aggressive, they

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and try to force you into a mistake. But in

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>doing so, I feel like they made a lot of mistakes.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>They were penalized. The Rams were penalized seven times in

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this game. Five of those came on defense, off sides,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>off sides, too many men on the field, roughing the passer,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive pass interference, all of which are undisciplined, not smart penalties.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Roughing and the two off sides are results of trying

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to the quarterback and trying to, you know,

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>make a statement with your pass rush. Um, going back

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to our conversation yesterday. Sorry if I'm ready, Um, there

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of talent here. Wait, Like I mean,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams have been mediocre to bad for more than

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a decade, so that's to be expected. But Rockers is

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>twelfth overall. Donald is fourteenth overall. Robert backs is that

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what you go? Picks? Okay, gotcha? Sorry? Robert Quinn is

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>eleventh overall. Ogletree is thirteenth overall. Mark Baron. Mark Baron

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is a safety who's he's their linebacker BAMA former buccaneer.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>He's traded to the Rams. Um Truemain Johnson right seventh overall.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>True that uh same draft as Mo, and he was

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>better than Mo and Brockers was and you just kind

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of remember the guy I remember about the Brockers, Yeah,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that were better than him. Truemaine Johnson, who's their big,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>feisty uh six three corner. He's starting a lot of

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>crap when they practiced together at training camp. If you

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>remember that a couple of years ago, where was he drafted.

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a third round pick. Um LaMarcus Joyner is their

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>their main safety out of Florida State. He's a second

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>round pick. So they got Yeah, they've got they got talent,

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and they they can do a lot of impressive stuff

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with it. Like I can't I can't express how impressive,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>particularly Brockers and Donald Ark, like they do whatever they

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>want most of the time. But again, I feel like

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you can take advantage of a lot of that, and

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like all I was thinking about while I was watching

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this was like, oh, Dak can kill these guys with

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>play action and stuff like that, because especially like the

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>boot actions and the waggles and stuff like that, where

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you get the whole defense going one way and bring

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it back like they weren't ready for that on any level.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>When Brian Hoyer was doing it, and that's Brian Hoyer.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That's without the talent that he has around him as well.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Exactly like you know, I thought I said last week,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Arizona was really aggressive, but they were disciplined. These guys,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like they want to hit you and

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>make a statement and worry about the rest of it later.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Like it seems like just not a very disciplined group.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Now it has turned into for them, it has turned

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>into ten sacks, which they are now sixth in the

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL in sacks. And I guess the big question from

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that is do you think the Cowboys can take this

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>aggressiveness or will take this aggressiveness and use it against him?

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>What does that ten? Or do you think that'll be

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a problem for this offense. Well, I think that it'll

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be both. I mean it'll be a problem because you know,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll catch them on times when they're not ready and

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably get a few sacks here and there. But

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>it's just like that game in twenty fourteen, if you

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>remember that they got up twenty one to nothing. I

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>mean that their aggressiveness from generas Jenkins at the time

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>got a pick six interception, but his aggressiveness also led

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to a touchdown by Dez Bryant that got him back

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the game and turn things around, So you know,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>aggressiveness will work both ways. I think what's interesting is that,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously you talk about Wade Phillips wanting to

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>come in here and probably do some great things against

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys as a former coach, But let's not forget

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that that Scott Lenahan on the other side of the ball,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>also coached the Rams as a head coach didn't work

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>out as well. Might have something to prove too, even

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>though these aren't the same Rams, same city or anything.

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But I still I guarantee it will be a nice

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>chess match between Lanahan and Wade Phillips. All Right, we're

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take our first break. When we come back, I'm

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask the question, Dave. I heard you talking about

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>how these particularly the particularly Brockers and Aaron Donald move

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>around quite a bit, and I'm gonna ask the question,

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think that this can create a problem for

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys seeing as though they can now try to

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>use those guys to exploit the weaker links of that

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. We'll talk about that when we come back.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. We the entertainment

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>loving people demand the best unlimited wireless plan ever from ATNT.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>What else do you want? Are you unicorn? Maybe? Only

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>at and T offers you unlimited data with HBO included

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and never pay overages. Get ATNT Unlimited plus our best

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>wireless deal and unlimited data plus save twenty five dollars

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>per month on direct TV. It's entertainment, You're right after

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two three gods of data use and TAM Slow

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Speeds plan includes stream saving videos, will streaming standard definition

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>unless you turn it off. Twenty five dollars DIRECTD savings

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>across a t T Unlimited plus credits start with thin

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>three bills. Service prices subject to change other usage speed fees,

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>charges and restrictions. Supplies the att dot com slash unlimited

0:21:55.800 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for details. Hey Cowboys fans, did you know that over

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the next few years more than a million service members

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>will transition from military to civilian life. Veterans face unique

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges when they get out of the military, and Bank

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of America and the Dallas Cowboys are teaming up to

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>help with financial education, career opportunities, and support of military

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>nonprofits and organizations. Locally in North Texas and across the country.

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>We're proud to support our troops and are deeply grateful

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for the dedication and sacrifice of our service members and veterans.

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Official Bank of the Dallas Cowboys invites

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you to join us in our efforts to get involved

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>by tagging game day photos on social media using hashtag

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>troop thanks. That's hashtag troop thanks, and by learning more

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>about our commitment to veterans at Bank of America dot

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>com slash Military Support. Together, we can thank our troops

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in ways that make a real difference. Copyright twenty sixteen,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation. It's bowling night with brands and

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you're hanging out together there butch of cravings of the better,

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>but they're Depensie. You don't know what to do. Pepper.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You have to believe Don Pepperer. When you crave a

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper, nothing else will do. Pick up an nice cold,

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty ounce bottle today, doctor Pepper, you crave. I hear

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>all this talk about what it takes to be a cowboy.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's got their ideas, but I just say to myself,

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it's what's up top that matters. Sure, you need men

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>with the muscle and heart to get her done. But

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>if your scouts and coaches are listening out there a

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>word of advice. Pick the man with the most well

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>worn stetson. That's the one most cut out to be

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a cowboy. Stetson hats are handmade right here in Texas

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and have been on Cowboys heads for over one hundred

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years. The rest of you can visit stetson

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash cowboy to find a retailer nearest you.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, Welcome back. It's the second segment

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of The Break live from the SWBC Mortgage studios at

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the Star, and we're talking about the Cowboys offense versus

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams defense. Dave gave us a good breakdown there,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and Dave, one of the things that you talked about

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is how they tend to move around Michael Brocker's and

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald two of their better players, right, baby, two

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of the best players they have on defense. I would

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>say definitely. And so my question is this offensive line.

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys offensive line, We've talked a lot about it.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>There are two guys that are kind of new to

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>their positions and so when I call them weaker links.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much that I think they're bad players,

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be clear about that. It's more

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that they are new to their positions

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in this offensive line and they're being compared to guys

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that are all pros in the other three positions, which

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is also called a weaker link. That's okay, I know,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, but I don't want it to be you know,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>it can be construed as you're saying, well, they're a bum,

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that. I think they've actually played

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as the rest of the guys on that

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive line for the most part, because I think that

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>game they played in Denver, you're all pros. We're having

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.479
<v Speaker 1>some right. So so all that being said, all I'm

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>saying is do you think that with those two guys

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>particularly and being as good at players as they are,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and because they can move around and play a lot

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of different positions, do you think that this creates an

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for them to exploit those weaker links more than

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>say another team that wouldn't have that flexibility across their

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive front. Yes. And if you're a fan of line play,

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I highly encourage you to get yourself a copy of

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>game Pass and watched like all twenty two of these

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>guys play, because it's really fun. Like, like I told you,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>where all they line up. But you think of defensive

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>tackles as being like basically unathletic guys who just clog

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>up the middle and try to force their way into

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. These dudes are athletic. Like you're talking about

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>your two main defensive tackles running twist stunts. They ran

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a twist stunt where they were both lined up at

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>five techniques so on the tackle, and they crossed each

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>other and rushed on the opposite tackle. Wait, they were

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on the outside, both of them on the outside on

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Donald has lined up on the inside

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>shoulder of the left tackle and Brockers has lined up

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.239
<v Speaker 1>on the inside shoulder of the right tackle. And they

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>stunt and reverse and go at the other guy. And

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>they were fast enough that they did it and it worked.

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't even fathom that. I don't think.

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think essional game I don't think they didn't

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>get a sack on the play, but like they got

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure and I saw it and I had to go

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>back and watch it, like four task because everybody was confused,

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like I thought he was on the other side. How

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>did he get over here? So saying, and then but

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they can also, you know, they'll they'll play on Frederick,

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>They'll play on Martin, They'll definitely play on Chaz Green.

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they won't be I mean, they're not afraid

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the matchup an whatsoever. I mean, everybody will have

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>their hands full with these guys. And then on top

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of that, I mean, you know Lyle Collins, you know

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>he's had his hands full on the right side throughout

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the season of this point. I don't you know, Connor

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Barwin doesn't strike fear in your heart the way that

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>von Miller does, but he's been very productive. He had

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a sack in this last game. I think a lot

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of that has to do with the attention that these

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>other guys get. I mean, Robert Quinn had an eighteen

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or nineteen sacks season not all that long ago. So

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about guys who command a lot of respect

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of attention, and I think Barwin benefits

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>from that. So I think I think Lyle is going

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>to have his hands full dealing with him as well

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>as these other guys because The point I'm trying to

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>make is that they can all line up anywhere. And

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>going back to my original point from the very beginning

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.959
<v Speaker 1>is yeah, they call it a three four, but they

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>basically play permanently in nickel because you got your down linemen,

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>then you bring in your linebackers. Mark Baron and Ogletree

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are only they're the only true linebackers that are ever

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on the field. So you're usually talking about at least four,

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if not five, guys that are trying to get to

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the passers. So offensive line is going to have its

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>work cutout. It's like a huge game for Beasley. That's

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what it seems like to me. Well, yeah, actually, I

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was actually gonna go there next because it sounds like

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the strength of this defense is the front and if

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, then it sounds like there's an opportunity

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>here in the passing game. Do you guys agree with that?

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So who is the guy you said bast for you?

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Who's that guy that you think has to show up

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>this week and make plays for them from it seems

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like if there is a lot of pressure, you know

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a situation where you know you'll see

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they'll be a nickel where they they'll play a deep

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're gonna make sure and prevent the big play.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like the middle, the underneath stuff will

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be there, and that's where Beasley and Winton and those

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>guys really do their work. So I'd like to see them,

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think cold Beasley's gonna bounce back, and

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have a bad game, but he just wasn't

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>targeted a lot. But I think that you'll see that

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this will be a game for him. I agree with that.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I also I didn't come away from this impressed with

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Trumaine Johnson. He's a big guy, he's aggressive, he's physical.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>If he gets his hands on you, he's probably gonna

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>tackle you. But he's I didn't I don't look at

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>him as like a shutdown corner. I mean, Pierre Garson

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>had a nice night in this game. He had a

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of big gainers. He had a couple of plays

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>where he was left uncovered for one reason or another.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm looking at this this will be the easiest

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>matchup that Dez Bryant has by far through four weeks.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying he's going to have one hundred

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and fifty yards or something crazy like that. But it

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>should be far easier for him to get favorable looks

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in this game than it has been. I think. Can

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I say something, No, I was I was coming to you.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask you, thank you, thank you.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I was just gonna say I'm really not impressed

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>by their defense. I'm not worried about it either. I

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know how you talked about a lot of these guys,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and I do agree that they do have a lot

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of talent, but I don't think they've done enough with it.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've been as productive. I was looking

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at all the stats and just kind of comparing with

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the guys we have on our defense, and what they've

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>done has been fairly similar to what the Cowboys have

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>done so far. And I think we can all agree

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been impressive the Cowboys, aside from the defensive line,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which they the Rams don't have or havn't done nearly

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as what our guys have done. Like DeMarcus Lawrence,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which obviously we really know he's like the top guy

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, but as well as Malie Collins, so number

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>wise and production wise, they just haven't done much to

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>where um, I mean two words. Well, the one thing

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I will point out here is that Aaron Donald missed

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>all training camp. He had a holdout, and so he's

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>having to kind of work himself into shape. And if

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you go back and look at how he performed last year,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's many people that would say that productively,

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not every bit as good, if not better than

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>any defensive tackle you probably want to point to in

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, including Malie Collins. Right, he is up there

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as one of the premier guys, so productively, I hear

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>your point, but I think it's a little bit to

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that to looking at his statistics right now, that maybe

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a little MISSI I agree, because he's having to work

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in Yeah, yeah, I definitely agree. The one thing, it's like,

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it yet, so I'm I'm good as

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of right now until I see it. And I don't

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be a problem if I mean, it'll be

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>something that they'll face and they'll have a little bit

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of struggle there, but nothing that will make them lose

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the game. I actually I agree, and I mean I

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>came in here and I still believe this, But I

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>came in here and said, you know, these aren't your

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>older brothers, Rams. They're way more talented than that. This

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't a team you can write off. I still think

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that's true. But for the talent they have here, the

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>production doesn't doesn't do it justice. And maybe you know

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald's two weeks in system and one of the

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>more complicated systems in football. If if players are to

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be believed about Wade Field's defense, so maybe that's part

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. The forty nine ers big boyed them twice.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>They went forward on fourth and goal from the one

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>twice and scored on scored touchdowns on both plays. Both

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just runs to Carlos hide where they knock them over

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and score a touchdown. It's a good sign for the Cowboys.

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So and like I said, I mean, the secondary did

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>not impress me in this game. There's a lot of

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>talent here. I did think it was interesting. So this game,

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers scored to make it forty one thirty nine.

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't get the two point conversion, they recover the

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on side kick and then they so they go into

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a possession where they're near midfield with a chance to

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>go down and win the game. Aaron Donald just destroys

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>his man, forces an incompletion right away, they send five,

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Niners run a screen that they sniff out

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>immediately zone coverage on third and long. And then the

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>last play of the game, which is like a fourth

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen after a questionable offensive pass interference call, but

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>still Aaron Donald blows his man up and sacks Brian

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Hoyer in the game. So when the chips are down,

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're in a situation where you have to

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball, that could be bad news, as it

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is with most really good defensive climate right. But I

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>do think there's plenty here that the Cowboys should be

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>able to take advantage of. And you talk about Zekiel

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Elliott being great at cutting back and moving in open space,

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think their aggressiveness should play right into him. Like,

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there are plays to be made against these guys.

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like a lot like the game last year

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals a week about the same time of

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the year, Week four, Week five, they walk. They came in.

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals were I think at the time, like the

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>best defensive line in football, yeah, and that they weren't

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>allowing anything. And I think the Cowboys oh line took

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it as a big challenge and they won obviously. And

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Zeke's running sixty yards right through the middle

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the defense, and so I just think this is

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those type of games where I'll

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be it'll be big on big, It'll be some really

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>good talented players that the Rams have drafted to change

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>their defensive line. The Cowboys drafted some really good offensive

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>linemen to try to change with their line, and then

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of what you'll get. It'll be it'll

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>be one on right there, mano Imano. Yeah, strength, I

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know who. I don't know who. They were dominating,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what's you said. That Like, in a one minute

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>span on the fourth and one when they really needed

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>to stop their offensive line, that from the Niners dominated them.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But a fourth and seventeen eighteen they couldn't. They got

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>dominated on the other end. So it sounds like speed

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and quickness, it's their strength. They can kind of get

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there when it's big on big and pushing people off

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball. That hasn't really been the Cowboys strength though,

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>knocking people back. So I would say this last year

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when they were in you know, short yard of situations,

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they were pretty good at it, So I guess that

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of fits right Leary. Huh with Leary? Okay, yeah,

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying without Leary, it's a whole different thing. That's

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>nixt guy. Yeah right. I would hate to think that

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the left guard can make that much of a difference. Sorry, Nate,

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but I just think that something there's something here. He

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't the guy in twenty fifteen. He was the

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>guy in twenty sixteen, and then now he's not in

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, and we just they haven't been as good

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>short yardage. Well, we have enough of a sample now

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>we don't know that, not yet, but we're getting there.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean two and a half years. I almost no, no, no,

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this season with with you got Chazz, and

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>now I don't know that we've had enough of a

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>samplifize in short yardists to say that they can't do

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it well this year. Were you not arguing a training

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>camp that one guy wouldn't make a difference in this

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive line? That would have been me. I was arguing me, Yeah,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you were. I think it was me. I know it

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>was me. I know, I said the Ron Leary fan club,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So it was I definitely was on that that it's

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not because to me, I look at it and I say,

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>if you got that talented, if those other guys play

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>up to the level that we expect them to, then

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a left guard should not be able to platoon this thing. Yeah,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that's And I somewhat agree with

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that as well. I mean, I do agree that one

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>position on the line's not going to change a whole lot.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But when it gets down to third and short, fourth

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and short and you really need to knock people off

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball, I'm behind him. I think, run behind him.

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>They've done okay, But I do think we clearly have

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>seen a change compared to what they We don't have

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>enough aside. It's been three games, really really good. Okay,

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>from what we've seen, we have seen a change that

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think. Schedule, huh, is there

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>any bad defenses on the schedule? I mean, Giants, Broncos, Arizona,

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a great defense. Yeah they're kind of man,

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you next week then. Yeah. It seems like

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>every team's got this great defense up front. Atlanta's not

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a great defense or whatever. It's undert we're in that

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>score a ton of points. That doesn't really matter, right.

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Dak said yesterday that he thought these first three defenses

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>were about as hard as it's gonna get, which I

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know him. I will say this, though, Battle hasn't

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>played as well as they've played in the past, Like

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>they've had some games this year where their defense has

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>given up a lot more points than your typically. I'm

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>not even doing trying to worry about Christmas Eve right now,

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>September twenty starget Christmas shopping. I have not I won't

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>be home for Christmas, so I don't even need to

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>do any Christmas good point. Oh so just because you're

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>not there, It's like I don't need to have a

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>present for my parents, Like I'm not going to be there,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so why do you need a present? You just gave

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>me life much. Yeah, it's awesome. You're so sorry Mom

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and dad. You're a great son. I'll get them something,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>all right. Let's take our final break camp, Yeah exactly,

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>let's take our final break. We'll come back. We'll get

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>some questions. You guys call us the numbers two one

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>four eight seven two twenty one O two again two

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one four eight seven two twenty one O two. You

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>can also hit us on Twitter at Cowboys Break. Wake up, Dave,

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll right back. This is the break. To work this

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>big land, you need equipment with values rooted as deep

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in Texas soil as you are, like John Deer compact

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>tractors with a six year power training warrant to him.

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Big features that help you work less so you have

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>more time to do what you love. John Deer was

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>first in the Texas fields, and we're proud to be

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the field as the official agg and turf equipment

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals at my

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>John dear Dealer dot com. Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions,

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and warranty limitations apply, so you love for details. We

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment loving people, demand the best unlimited wireless plan

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>ever from ATNT. What else do you want? Are you unicorn? Maybe?

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Only at and T offers you unlimited data with HBO

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>included and never payoverages. Get ATNT Unlimited plus our best

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>wireless deal and unlimited data plus save twenty five dollars

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>per month on Direct TV. It's entertainment. You're way after

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty two kidle bytes of data USA and TAMA Slow

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Speeds plan includes stream saving videos, will stream and standard

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>definition unless you're turning it off. Twenty five dollars during

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>TV savings across AT and T unlimited plus credit start

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>than three bills, service prices sujet to change other usage

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>speed fees, charges and restrictions applies the att dot com

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>slash unlimited for details. Star Sports Tours is the only

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 1>game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo ops

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk xs and those with Senior Director

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.959
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>truly me, Brian Broadest. You can trust the official fan

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>travel partner the Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>like a pro. Is it Cowboys travel dot com to

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>book your travel package today. Back to the break, Hey, Nick,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>What's what's one of the most important components of football?

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Um scoring points? I was thinking more about ball security. Okay,

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>speaking of ball security, Tommy John underwear, I think goes

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand. He goes hand in hand. Uh, it's

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable, it's very secure. Feels like you're wearing nothing

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at all, but really keeps everything in order. I'm actually

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>wearing the promotional pair that I got yesterday right now,

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very satisfied and very comfortable. Promotional pair. Yeah,

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you mean like they gave it to people that actually

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.439
<v Speaker 1>do reads and stuff. They well, most of us, people

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that they care about. Yeah, people that they feel like

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we're like family. Your package is in the mail, I'm sure,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and I package, I package is secure. This is so

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I love that every day. Was that better than put

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John on your end zone underwearth we hadn't talked

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about that part of it on your Yeah, don't forget

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>about the tush. Yeah, it's a fantastic product. And I'll

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>say whatever ridiculous stuff they want if they keep sending, Yeah,

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>keep sending them because they're actually very comfortable and I

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>actually enjoy wearing them. So anyway, and where you got

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>anything to chime in on that one? I see you?

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm biting my tongue. Just stop, okay, all right,

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.399
<v Speaker 1>let's let's move on. Let's get some questions. You guys

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>call us the numbers two one four eight seven two

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one O two. You can also hit us on

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>at Cowboys break. Let's get a Let's get a question

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter Amber. Has Jordan Lewis jumped Nolan Carroll on

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart because of his recent play? We know

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Carol is right now, it's looking like we're gonna know question.

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you start him right now? If both are healthy?

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Would you start Jordan Lewis over Nolan Carroll? It is

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>all sample size, but I think so. I think so too.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But now we're getting into what the cowboys would do,

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>right I don't care what the cowboys are doing. I'm

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>asking what you would do, But don't you want to

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>know what's more likely to happen? Yeah, kind of, but

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they just don't. They just don't do that because there's

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>no need for it. There's Jordan Lewis, is this young

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that that's had some injury concerns too, and you

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>know he's just just stay hungry, you know. Okay, this

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is the way it works. And Nolan Carroll comes back

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in and he got hurt and because he you know,

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a long leash, but I think

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>no one Carroll would come back to his spot if

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he had another game, Like the part of the game

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>before he got injured in Denver. Do you think at

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that point the Cowboys, I'm just gonna talking about them,

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you think they would make that move at that point,

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>They've got to make some roster moves here and and

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that just took the show with a whole different direction.

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>We don't we don't even go there. We don't need

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's really easy, huh, that really is actually just do it.

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>But again again, okay what you would do versus what

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, right, But what I'm saying is is that

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Nolan Carroll would be completely safe from

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that in my opinion, really like as in they would

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just outright cut him. I mean, Cheeto to be healthy,

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I need strides from Mark Marquez White on the practice squad,

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>just just not necessarily to bring him up. But if

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you need it, about it maybe, But does it have

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with how well benabin Wickery can play?

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Does this play? I mean, but I'm saying, I'm saying,

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're thought, if you're talking about the possibiliar Carroll

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>going away, that you kind of want that vet that's

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna be here with Orlando to be I mean, I mean,

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna cut ben A before you cut Carol, I

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>don't and I mean I see the logic, but I

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>just don't think they would cut no Carol, not in season.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>He's a veteran. May if if Jordan Lewis had played

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>all of training camp and had just whooped him and

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>totally claimed that job. Maybe, But you're in season now,

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>where anything can happen week to week. I mean, they're

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>already dealing with injuries, and the thought of cutting one

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of two guys that has really been through the grind

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of an NFL season over and over again, a veteran guy, Yeah,

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make a lot of sense to me. That's

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's not you know, he's got like

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>three million and guarantees or something like that. It's not

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>even like this is some big obnoxious contract that you

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, that you have to get off the books.

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that makes a ton of sense now

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that you're playing week to week. But you know, and

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Nick, the Cowboys are always more likely

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to lean toward the veteran in a situation like this,

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. But if he gets back in the

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>lineup and looks as bad as he did in Denver.

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, once it's hindering your ability to play a

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>good defense, they'll that's not a long leash at all.

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get a phone call from Jorge in

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Mexico City or Hey, what up guys? Hey, Well, first

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of all, want to say Amber, we gave a great

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Latino touch the Verter. We just make it even better.

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Now to get to football, I have a

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>comment in the question. The comment is you carting the

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>play calling with Scott Linehan. I know Dak's a really,

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 1>really good quarterback. I know it's gonna be great some day,

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but I just feel you still learning, still developing, And

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the play calling they're taking is like

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they want to make some a pure, pure pocket catch,

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:28.959
<v Speaker 1>which I think it's not radiot. I mean, he's gonna

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>be rady today, but it's things that should get back

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to what they did Latin in the first team, with

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the boots, the waggles, you can seat. I mean, he's

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a mobile quarterbacks and uh, I feel like the decent

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sets are are challenging us to to make some pocket tatters.

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But I mean they're they're they're getting the best of us.

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And my question is and then you guys get to

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the ton, But uh, are we still sure that we

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like called layout Collins were right tackles? Can we just

0:44:56.440 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 1>go back to what we did in twenty fifteen? Guard

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>over to the cycle decisions? All right, thanks for the call.

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>First of all, let's still go back to anything from

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. Let's let's don't do anything about twenty fifteen

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to go back to UM you know with their four

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>win season. They're already halfway there with two wins, So

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I that sounded good. But then who's your right tackle? Well,

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, kick Chaz back out. But here's deal, it's

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. Guys, that's not gonna happen this season

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna happen. That's an offseason thing. They are

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>unless there's injuries. They are set that Lyle Collins is

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be their right tackle and Chaz Green is

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be their left guard. The way that you

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 1>say that, though, is kind of like, well, they're not

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:44.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna cut Kellen Moore. Like you, you think it should happen,

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but it won't, and I disagree because you made this decision.

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>We answered this in the mailback this morning. Actually, like

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you made this decision. We all said heading into the

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>season that Lyle would probably have his growing pains and

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not be an all pro from the get right. That

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>has played out fletely to form. He hasn't been terrible,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been great. He's had his struggles, he's had

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>his wins again. But again, when you're you're into the

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>season now, where you're playing a game every sixth day,

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>why are you trying to shuffle this thing. You're only

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get better by giving these guys reps where

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they are. That's the only way this is gonna work.

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And it hasn't been as good as last year. And

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that troubles people because it's a lot of

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fun when you're dominating the way that they did last year.

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But they haven't been bad by any stretch of the imagination.

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>They just they've been okay. And just to be clear,

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't saying they should but they won't. I was okay,

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I was saying they should not and they won't. You're wording,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I believe you're wording made it sound like you were

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>saying they should, but they won't. No, no, And I

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>guess the reason why I was kind of coming off

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like that is because I was trying to express to

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>him that this is kind of a moot point. For

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>those people that are out there that believe like him,

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a moot point. They're not going to do that.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make sense and how NFL teams are run.

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it logically, that's not the

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>smart call at this point. I mean, if you get

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>through the whole season and then you decide that this

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>really probably isn't going to work long term, come talk

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to me. But I think this thing is playing out

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly how you probably thought it should or you should

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have thought it, yeah, which is that these two guys

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>are having their growing pains, but they're getting the job

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>done more often than not, and they'll get better with

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>playing time. I don't think shuffling the lineup and hoping

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's magically better is the right way to do it.

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The first part of that, I think that it was

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a good that's a good observation about Dak and what

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 1>they're doing with him in the pocket. And yes, they

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are trying to do that, and it's not just to

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>try to develop him from that standpoint to be a

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>good pocket passer. It's because that will help the offense

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>if he can stand in there and make some throws.

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's shown that he can do that.

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But in that game against the Cardinals, it was clear

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that they had to move him. He needed to move

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to make plays. He needed to run. All of the

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns or three other than the one with Dak, I

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>mean with Zeke, but the three touchdowns were a product

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of his legs. He was rolling right throwing or running

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and flipping into the end zone. I think that they

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of realized that in that game, and I think

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a little bit more of that. Something else

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I would throw in. And this isn't me trying to

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.879
<v Speaker 1>be amateur scout. This is from conversations I've had here

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with people. It's harder to do that type of stuff

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing three or four teams. You're talking about

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>outside linebackers that play like why to the title, they

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 1>played disciplined, and they're gonna be there every time. You're

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be right in your quarterback's face when he's trying

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that stuff. And you've seen it play out

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>so far this season, even and it's worked a couple

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of times. But when Dak has done those actions. He's

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>had guys in his face from the get Yeah, some

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of that it happened against Arizona too. Like I said,

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the players still worked, but it's not like it

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was really faking anybody out. So I think, you know,

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll still see it, and I think it'll

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>work better when they play some more traditional style defenses. Yeah,

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that run that he had, that

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown run, to me, that's more kind of what

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to do if you're gonna use him with

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>his legs. Is it's it's not always going to work

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on the boots, like you said, when you got a

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>team that either it's really fast or they're keeping somebody

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in to kind of spy him. I think in those

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of situations, you gotta get from point A to

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>point being the fastest way you can, which is a

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>straight line, and so you fake the run and then

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you just let him take off, take off into a

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>hole that he sees, rather than having to boot out

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to the outside where the defender can then float out

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there with him. So I think they just got to

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>mix it up and give a good mixture. And I

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think if they do that and use his legs not

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but use his legs in good situations.

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a way to make this, make

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing better and make him more effective as a quarterback.

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 1>What helps the Cowboys probably promability to She was just

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>throwing her. Is that the question that you're asking throwing

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the collar? I said something I understand Amber, Like I

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.280
<v Speaker 1>don't speak Spanish, but I know what she's the Amber whisperer.

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just because I do those videos with her after

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the games. I will say this when I'm editing those

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>videos and I'm postgame with Dave, I'll be speaking Spanish

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, he'll make facial expression. Is that it's

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>all context clues, Like you can you pick out a

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>word or like, you know, like the word Mexico is

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the same in Spanish and English, Like you pick that out?

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Shut up? Context clues. You can figure out a sentence

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in another language if you can understand like three words. Anyways,

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good. And see miss Brian brought us that

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I can work. Well, are you saying that I'm not

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>good when I'm done that? Oh? Like, like I don't

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have the experience of listening to that. It's a great point. Apparently,

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not because you have no clue what I say. Anyway,

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if you put me on camera, I'd be able to

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.040
<v Speaker 1>do it. Don't ask me to do videos with you,

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>so you're too busy like figuring out how do they

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>making sure I'm good at it? Though? Right? No? No, okay, guy?

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.359
<v Speaker 1>So what helps the Cowboys probability to win? Converting third

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>downs to keep the chains moving or red zone efficiency?

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They've been pretty bad at converting third downs, haven't they.

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about for the season. Yes, Denver game

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 1>they were horrible. Now we're focusing in this coming yet,

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm saying just as a train third and long.

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>They were two and nine. What's what's third and long

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:17.919
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL? Like a third and lungs at ten?

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought third and seven or eight six or more? Yeah,

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what? They're converting on third and long like

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the percentage wise six percent awful, six percent last than

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the league two for nine on third down against Arizona

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>two for nine and that was their best game of

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the seat. Well, I don't guess. That just means on

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>first down they're not really running the ball very well.

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>First down, second down, they're getting behind the change, does it? Yes,

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because well, but because if they get in third one,

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 1>third and two, it's more manageable. They can get these

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.239
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. They're not getting to third and one

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and third and two that's the times they get to

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 1>third down. If they're converting second downs more frequently, then

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying they're not running the ball well to start

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it off, they're they're getting themselves behind the chains early

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in the in the down and distance, and then it's

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the next thing you know, it's third and ten, third

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and eleven. It's not working. I completely agree. So, but

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to answer the question, um, it's it's more important to

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>move the chains on third down. It's more important than

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it is in red zone. I think because you can

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>always kick a field goal and you're going to make it.

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's so, if you don't get it on third and

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 1>four from midfield, then you have to punt. If you

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>don't get it on with the nineteen yard line, you

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>kick a field goal. I think that's eric you don't

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>never get to the nineteen. No, I mean, I don't

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think that that one necessarily necessitates the other. Yeah, I

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think that, yes, they both are problems for them right now.

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>First down is a problem for them right now. Third

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:50.399
<v Speaker 1>down is a problem for them right now. I don't

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:54.439
<v Speaker 1>know that first down necessarily equates to always to third

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>down success. So I don't know if I agree with

0:52:57.680 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that part of it, but I get your gist, and

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why I didn't really argue to because first to

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>get you just a first and tend to start the

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 1>game Zeke for negative one second and eleven, Zeke for one,

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 1>so you're in third and ten. Next possession, Zeke up

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle for negative three. Second and thirteen pass incomplete,

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so you're in third and thirteen. Next drive, first and

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>ten offsides brings you to first and five. Zeke runs

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on first and five for no gain incomplete. They converted

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that probably because it was second and five, first and

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ten complete, the terrence for eight, Zeke up the middle

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for one, and then that third and one Zeke busts

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a thirty yard game. They haven't been great on first down,

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with that. That's why I just said.

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I just said there's they have a problem on first down,

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they also have a problem on third down. One doesn't

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily cause the others. What I'm saying, there's not a

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>causal relationship between the two. If they don't get at

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>least like three yards on first down. I'm calling that

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a wash. Like I'm just I'm assuming something bad's going

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to happen based on what we've seen. So how does

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>first down not affect third down? Like there? No, No,

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is there

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there are times when they get the third down that

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not about first down. And there are also times

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>when they convert on second down. So even if they

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't do much on first down, they convert on second down,

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't matter, So you never factor that into

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the third down conversion rate. Yeah, I'm saying. Well, so

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 1>all I'm saying is yes, they I think we're all

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>agreeing from the standpoint. They got a problem on first down,

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>they got a problem on third down, and they got

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to fix both of them because I think they're both

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 1>an issue for them right now. Okay, what are the Cowboys?

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What is the chances that the Cowboys used Seek the

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>way Minnesota is using Cook. I haven't really watched them

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>play much other than Monday nine. I assume that means

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 1>more as a receiver, I mean, because it seems like

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Cook is I mean, I know Dalvin Cook is off

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to a good start, which you've said you kind of

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:46.319
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see the Cowboys. Yeah. I mean Zeke has

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>gotten three or four receptions, I think, or three or

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:52.399
<v Speaker 1>four chances at a reception in every game that they've

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>played so far. But I still don't think it's enough.

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't. I don't think it's creative enough. You

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know what I was encouraged by though this week that

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.400
<v Speaker 1>twice they ran the you know we were talking to

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>last week. I mentioned that angle, Yeah, where they kind

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of run, they flare him out and then he cuts

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.759
<v Speaker 1>back into the middle, And they did it twice last week.

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really thinking if they just start doing things

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like that a little more, find routes that he can

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>get open on, find routes where you isolate him in

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.760
<v Speaker 1>man coverage against a linebacker, he should win that matchup.

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you're talking about from a standpoint of creativity.

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>If they can find those kinds of things and not

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 1>just always whenever he gets a pass it's just the flair.

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:29.319
<v Speaker 1>We're only going to get two or three yards at

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the best. Then I think that's where you're going to

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 1>see more production out of the running game for ridicularly,

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I would like to and I know that they did

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>try to get him the ball on a couple of those,

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:41.799
<v Speaker 1>but I would still like to see him used more

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>creatively as a receiver. I agree it just when he

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>goes out, it seems like it's always as a decoy

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and they try to screen with him and it didn't

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>work out. But more often than not, it just seems

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like it's a dump off that isn't really designed to

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>get more than three or four yards. It seems like

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a screen ought to be able to work, like they

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 1>ought to be able to be really good this team.

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You can screen them if they're that aggressive. Yes, I

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:09.720
<v Speaker 1>man misdirection delayed any anything out of the ordinary delays

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:13.400
<v Speaker 1>misdirection play action leaf licker. It should work against these guys.

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:17.279
<v Speaker 1>These guys only care about My team tried that in

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the game the other day, and were you just jumping

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>up and down. You didn't care about the result. You

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>were just like they did. Well, here's here's a part

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. You better get it blocked, okay, if you

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can't block, and then you're only wasted more time. So

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Larkansas tried it against A and M. They didn't work

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>because they can't block. So that so did you get

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the ball knocked around? Quarterback caught it and then he

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:41.239
<v Speaker 1>had to duck and go underneath and throw it over

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Nothing happened. Now get it blocked first. A

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>fleeflicker that doesn't work is like such a It's so

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:49.799
<v Speaker 1>disappointing because like you see the quarterback get the ball,

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, oh, oh my god, fleeflicker and then it's

0:56:52.280 --> 0:56:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just you he gets backed or it doesn't go anywhere,

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, the way it works, it's like, well,

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I won't see that for a while. Try that. Not

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that again this season. All right, we appreciate

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Join us. We're back tomorrow morning, nine thirty am.

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll get you guys ready with our final predictions on

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the game. Cowboys will take on the RAM Sunday at noon.

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Until then for Nick Eatman, Dave Hellman, Ambergarci. I'm Derek Eagleton.

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>This has been the Break Live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio Award. This has been a production of Dallas

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.