WEBVTT - Surveillance: Deutsche Bank Will Survive, Albertson Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Stephen Stanley,

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna push aggressively against this, Emirs Puerplant Morgan Stanley

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>with the global selling equities. Mike Wilson has been cautious

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on equities as well. Lan Zettner has been below you

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>on g d P. But you just flat out in

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a claridean way push against us. You think, if anything,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we could get neutrality out of chairman political Yeah, I think.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I haven't. I thought all along that they

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>were not going to ease in July, and I still

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>feel that way. Um, and I think it's time. You know,

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the f has been, in my view, has been very coy, uh,

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>particularly the leadership and kind of letting things play out

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and hoping that the data would kind of push the

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>market away from the aggressive easing expectations. Perhaps and we've

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten some movement, but uh, I think with three weeks

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>ago to the meeting, Uh, if if they are thinking

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>they might not move, they're gonna need to tell us that. John.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This brilliantly sets up the polarity that's out there. We've

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>got Steve Stanley on the edge of solid. Maybe you

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>diminished GDP, but not. And then what Morgan Stanley is

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>saying is jaw dropping. The chairman of the fete's uncomfortable

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with the outlook. He's communicated that too, is Steven. I

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just wonder whether the outlook and the risks around it

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have diminished somewhat sufficiently enough over the last couple of

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks to say we don't need a right cut at

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of this month. Is that your view? That's

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>my view. I mean, I think the number one risk

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously is the trade situation. And um, we were just

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>coming off of the Mexico thing at the at the

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>last FED meeting, and we were still waiting for the

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>G twenty, And while there was certainly no final solution

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to the US China talks at the G twenty, I think, um,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know we we we got probably the best we

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can hope for. And I think since then you've also

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>seen some improvement in the data. Obviously, after a week

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>may pay all number. We got a better number in June. UM,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that the Q two GDP expectations

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are probably, if anything, a little better now than they

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>were in the middle of June. UM. The inflation numbers

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>still a little below two percent, but the latest readings

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on core inflation have been a little less soft than

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that we got earlier in the year. So

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>at the margin, it seems to me that the risks

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are still there, but they're not quite as acute as

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they were, uh the last time they fed met. Being

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhat familiar with Morgan Stanley's thinking around the Federal Reserve,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a belief that because there is limited ammunition,

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there is an incentive there to get ahead of a

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>potential down term, because if you wait for it to materialize,

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the ammunition to address it. You need

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to do less with more, you need to be preensitive.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just wondering whether that's a justification to go

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>early and go big, even if the economic dates with

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the mode, but the realized states that may not warrant's

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>hit you thought on that argument statement, Yeah, I think

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if if you believe that a downturn or even a

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>significant slowing is is likely. Uh. Then I think that's

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>exactly the FED playbook is to go hard, go early. UM.

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's there's no question that the market

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>has kind of latched onto that way of thinking. But

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I guess what I would you

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>know look at is that the FED has acknowledged that

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>their base case is still pretty pretty positive at this point.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>They see downside risks, but until unless or until they

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are more confident that those risks are likely to materialize,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see them acting than this data dependency.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>What is the data that matters that gets them to

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>some form of decision, whether it's some Morgan Stanley Barkley's

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty beeps or something more optimistic like where Steve Stanley is.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think most importantly at this point is growth because interesting, Yeah,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the downside risks are around the growth, Uh, implications of

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>trade uncertainty. I think so Q two GDP I've always

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to be a really important number, which

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and then within that, is it the consumption dynamic or

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is it really business dynamic off of the President's trade war? Right? Well,

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the risk the downside risks at this point are mainly

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>related to the business sector. But if the consumer holds up,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>then we could probably afford to see a pause in

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>business investment, which is I think what we're seeing. So

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really you know, I think that's why in some

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>ways the labor report last Friday was pretty important because

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>it tells us that the underpinnings for the consumers should

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>remain solid. Stephen, It's a question for you if at

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the end of this month we don't get an interest

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>right cut, but it's priced by the market at the moment,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>if they hold, will that be the equivalent of a

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>hike for financial conditions? Well, there's there's definitely gonna have

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to be an adjustment, whether it occurs the day of

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the meeting or between now and then. I think, you know,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly some of it could have could occur today. One

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that that I encouraged by was so last Friday

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we had a pretty significant adjustment in rates and in

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>FED expectations, and the start market was down, but it

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't down that much. So I think what the

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>FED is really concerned with is a big drop in

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>stock prices, and you know, at least so far, it

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like that's necessarily in the cards, sound TRUMPI

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Stanley with us on the stock market and

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Sherman chief investment strategist Amer's Pierpont. We are thrilled in

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>our studio to talk about the future of New York

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. Robert Albertson of Sandler O'Neill, his decks of

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>investment strategy for Sandler O'Neill our legendary. But John Farrow,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned yesterday, it was a legendary day as

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Sandler O'Neil taken out by Piper, Jeffrey and Mr Dunn

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at an emotional moment, marketing back to the courage of

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>him and you. And there's to move forward off of

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>September eleventh. What did you do yesterday? Look, I wasn't there, uh.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I came after September eleventh, and I can tell you

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a firm with probably the deepest culture I've

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ever come across. UM. I always feel like an outsider. Frankly,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it is a very solid place. We didn't get taken out.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the better way to say this is we

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>recognize change has to come to and it's tough, tougher

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for us, a private firm than most and very successful

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at what we do. But it made a lot of sense.

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>You've gotta broad you gotta do two things. You gotta

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>broaden your base, uh, products and services and contacts, and

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>then you've got to make the most of them with

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>very strong push on productivity, not cutting costs, but but

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but really finding ways to cross sell. And this Piper

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is the best. It really is the best match for

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>those two things. And that's what you're going to see

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street in general. Uh, shrinky just reliance on trading, shrinky,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>John reliance some balance sheet, Um, you've already seen it.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And and then deeper deeper into the advisory with more

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>balance Robert, this is a great story that came out

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday that Jimmy went across to the local Brooks

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Brothers store and just bought all the duck ties, all

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the times with ducks that he could get his hands on.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about his significance of doing just that yesterday. Well,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>his longtime friend and head of banking, um who perished.

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>That was one of his favorite things, and that was

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in honor of him. Uh, and very touching, and it's

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>an inside thing you need to know, but it tells

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you how although we can be as a firm as

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>hard nosed anyone else on Wall Street, when it comes

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to competing and doing their own thing, there's a really

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>soft spot based on that sad blemish that happened twenty

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Let us talk about the news you and

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I have seen. We showed film of Lehman Brothers earlier

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and embarrassed turns, and you and I talked about cotton

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois. How grave is the situation at Deutsche Bank.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell because I no longer as an analyst

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>follow it anymore. I'm on an analyst UM. I think

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been there for a long time, and my simple

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>view is when they brought on bankers Trust, it was

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a big shift in their type of product. UM they

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>stayed with it too long since because you look at

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the trendlines. I'm gonna send you those log hurts you

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>go back ten fifteen years ago. Trading was the only

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thing you should ever consider doing. It was the strongest,

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>most predictable voltile but most predictable revenue source that has

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically and everyone has to adjust. I think that's

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a bigger part of their adjustment process than most UM

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would guess that they're going to survive and

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>pull it off because they're finally facing the big elephant

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the room, so to speak. And some good news

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for people affiliated with Deutsche Bank that the fixed in

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>come trides this morning, we're tell that they will be

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>keeping their jobs. This market has changed, Robert, I would

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>love you're insight on it. It is crazy what I'm

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing in European markets right now, Emerging market Europe, so

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Poland, the Eastern European nations, the runny

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in a fixed income market. Poland's note

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is very close to dropping below zero on the yield.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Just think about that, we could have negative yields in

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Poland on ten year pages easter. They're they're doing like fops,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>just real, absolutely unreal centry bonds, some of the big

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>centry bonds, some of the well known issues of them.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>They're returning almost through What do you make of this

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>massive clamoring for fixed income income wherever you can get it,

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that the bond market is providing capital

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>returns north of what the equity market is offering. Here,

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go back and look at how long we've

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>been in abnormal interest rates, whether you want to call

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>them abnormal or not, whatever, But um, there's been an obsession. Um,

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it is an addiction, and therefore nobody wants to change it.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 1>And everyone's frightened. And even the President thinks twenty the

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>basis points will make or break as economy. It's silly. Um,

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to change whether you're an industrialized or

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>an emerging market for for a while, that's for sure.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Number two. The emerging market side of the world, let's

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>call Poland and those um more like that, not that

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not industrialized, are much more focused on infrastructure, growth,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>good things that we all remember twenty fifty years ago. Uh,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna work. So they're a different world entirely, um,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>completely decoupled. Put those all into a bunch of folks

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>called Europe EU. Oh my gosh, you really are setting

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it up. In the third thing, you break this thing

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>potentially by all this nationalism hopefully dies down, but it's

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a global trend. Obviously I've got any more questions, but

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't at the time. Robert Albertson, thank you so much.

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>With Sandal O'Neil. Congratulations to all of Sandal O'Neill. Thank

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you on their announcement yesterday with UH Piper Jeffrey Pipe,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Piper Sandler is that we're going to call it per

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Sandler Companies. Very good. You have to get new business cards.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Very good coming Robert Albert, thank you so much, greatly appreciated.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Henrietta trust joins us one of our most popular guest

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>director of Economic Policy Research UH and and thrilled that

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>she could be with us. She's really got a with

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Veda and she's got a real visceral knowledge here. Henrietta

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I got is a great Washington watcher. How much does

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Washington roll up in the summer? I mean, before air conditioning,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.119
<v Speaker 1>it was a total roll up. But like, is Washington

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like half asleep in July or is it like more

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>bustling than it used to be? One of guys, July

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>tends to be pretty busy. They do start work after

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the sun goes down. In a lot of cases, a

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff happens at night. But August is

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what everybody has definitely gone. So your calendars for July,

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to say it's the last day of session,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>then they'll be out. That's what John and I are

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>doing we're booking, so we're gonna be on holidays. Okay,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to get a serious update. We haven't done

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this in a while, folks, with all the distractions. Let's

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>do it now, Henrietta, seriously, the position now of the

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>United States of America against the threat of Huawei, How

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>has it changed in the last number of days. It

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>has not changed meaningfully at all. I think in the

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in the readout of the G twenty, there were two options.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>We could either assume that President Trump had reached a

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with President she and he was no longer serious

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>about extracting systemic reformat of China, he wasn't concerned about

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the national security threat post by companies like Bawei and

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>others in the high tech space, or the read out

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the G twenty was overly optimistic to Rosie, and

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact, nothing had substantially changed in the last ten days.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of evidence for the second scenario

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and not very much for the first. So Secretary Rob

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking at an export control restrictions conference, which is basically

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the future of the U S. China trade war, he said, look,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be relaxing a little bit of the restrictions

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>mostly steered towards US sales of semi conductor chips and

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>things that go into their tangible components that Huawei produces,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but nothing that is associated with the future of Huawei,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>So their five gene networks, their ongoing efforts to expand

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>into further visual and audio UH surveillance, the cyber security component,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all that is still very much front and center um

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's actually a lot more to come,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not just focused on Huawei, but on any high text

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>sector that has business with China, so biotech, nanobiology, synthetic biology,

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>um AI, anything in the future of the communications is

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>what we're about to roll out with these export control

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>restrictions and is becoming really complex are called with the

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>National econom accoun SO Director Larry Cudlow on Friday, various

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>members of the administration for quite a while said the

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Huawei issue was a separate issue from the trade discussion,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and Henrietta Larry Caudlo said on Friday that it was

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the same story now part of the same negotiation. What

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think of that. I think it's very much

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>something we saw with the Ztevan UH this time last year, earlier,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>even earlier than this last year. Um, the qu s

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>China negotiations are so wide ranging, and the export control

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>piece the future of high tech is what it's really

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>all about. You know, we talked about tariffs a lot,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're the window dressing to the underlying trade war,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>which is not just limited to um you know you

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>don't buy enough soybeans from US, but about how you

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>see China forcing transfer for sing I p sfts and

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation where Huawei one of the main

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>instigators and one of the areas of concern. You know,

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>some other folks at the conference yesterday we're saying, look,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to be on offense against China. We need

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to be proactive unless they're going to continue to steal

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>our I P and advanced in a global fashion that

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way that leaves our high tech industry behind. Henry,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we just seem to be blowing the lines between the

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>job of the Commerce Secretary, the job of the Secretary

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of State, the job of the Treasury secretary. It seems

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to becoming one job. Absolutely. I'm so glad you mentioned that.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's the executive order if you read it closely,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't even mention Huawei but addresses the communications technology

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and systems going into the future, and has all these

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>specific date for as you mentioned, the Department of Homeland

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Security to weigh in later this month. All these agencies, CEPIST,

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, the FCC, UM, you know, anybody with an

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>axiom they're involved in this. I want to ask, can

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I ask your first or of condition? I'm the dumbest

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress and I'm asking Henry the treas an

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>important question. What is Huawei actually done? And I'm using

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>this word as an amateur criminal. I mean is it

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we worried about the future or have they actually

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>done something bad? Now, Well, it depends on who you

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to. They they have sixty eight separate entities, so

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they do a lot of things, so it's not like

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>there's just one. UM. Probably most concerning would be UM

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they provide surveillance that allows China to

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>have its human rights abuses perpetuated, specifically with Muslim minorities

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Nations human rights. So it's a human rights

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>angle on Western China, which is completely tangible. Is that

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all you have? No, certainly not. And then you have

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>UM the fact that Huawei is trying to build out

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>its future of wireless and that is something that the

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>United States and our defense agencies have a big problem with.

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>If Huawei is selling its hand sets and it's UM

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>components not just to Iran, but to other nations, and

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>then they're incorporating their potentially um sort of cyber security

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>threat components to the general public, that becomes a major Now.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm hearing there, jump in. But what I'm

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hearing their folks, is it's a future worry. It's not

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like a present tense. It's a persistent worrying, a persistent

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>worry not just for the US government, for US as

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>well and Riet. So we're creeping up to the campaign

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>has already begun, really started a while ago, and I'm

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just wondering if this a story that's just going to

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>drag on now with no real conclusion going into the

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>back end of next year. That is absolutely my thesis,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and frankly it has been since we passed the tax

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bill in December of two thousand seventeen. This administration will

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>not be passing any other major legislation. They obviously kick

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>at the U S m c A through, We're going

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to have a fight over the debt ceiling and the

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>budget in the fall. That's going to eat up the

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>last half of this year. The President won't get an

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bill, he won't get a healthcare reform bill. What

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>can he do on his own that doesn't require Congress?

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Two things, immigration and trade. They go hand in hand,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and as as a president is better served to per

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>spetuate the trade war going into he is to resolve it. Now.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Are the people of Capitol Hill engage in the census

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>citizenship question? You know? I think a lot of folks are.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely not my wheelhouse, but is an area where

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>if you are UM focused on jerrymandering, if you are

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on the election and who gets to vote, which

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of folks are, from President former

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>President Obama and Eric Holder um on down to the

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rank and file members UM and particularly the newer members

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of Congress in the House and the Democratic Caucus and

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>folks like Elizabeth Warren. This is a major issue. It's

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>about who gets to vote, and I think if you

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have time to spend on that, you definitely do. Not

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>every member is super involved. It has become harshly part

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, but it is obviously very important question. This

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is great Harriet Trust, thank you for the briefing on

0:18:53.200 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>WAWI is with Veta Partners. There was a company in

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the twenties very quiet on Fifth Avenue in New York.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the Allen brothers and particularly Herbert Allen Sr.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And then there wasn't now Herbert Allen Jr. And what

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>they have done is quietly affect transactions in communication in media.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>You can go back four years to Time Warner, Charter Communications, Verizon, Senteen,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>HealthNet and on and on our Paul Sweeney knows is

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>cold and he is with Allen and Company as Sun

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Valley Paul. Instead of the media confab today, what is

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>accomplished by Allan here? Is it a Davos for media

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>or is that off the mark? No, that's absolutely right

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on the mark. Tom. I think just this morning, sitting

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out here by the hotel where they're having the first sessions,

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>John Malone, Barry Diller, Tim Armstrong, just you know, a

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>whole host of media, telecom and UH technology executives have

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just passed biased and Uh it's really a place like

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Barry Diller's that he comes here to be stimulated

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to learn new ideas, new technology, and people speak and

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all that right. Yeah, people speak and and uh you

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>know these I think a lot of these executives come

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>here to just to just learn to think about new

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>technologies where their businesses may be going. Um and then

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, um, you know, to really talk about deals.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Should we be doing business with you, should we be

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>merging with you, should we be acquiring you? Uh so

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that takes place at this point. I mean, Lisa,

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>if I go out there, do I need to wear

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>my wool rich Men's flannel over shirt John Richard Brothers,

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to wear that tomorrow with your bow tie.

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>You need to. I will be tweeting that out big

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Red and Black check. I cannot wait. Very it's very

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene, I love it. Please, I love Mumfords. All right,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm revealing too much about myself. Paul Sweeney, I do

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit about the urgency. Have

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you ever heard a higher degree of urgency among media

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>executives than now? Yeah, it's a great question, because you

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>know what these media executives are dealing with really over

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years that they've never had to

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with, UM, is the likes of these big technology companies,

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Google or Facebook or Amazon or Apple really

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>taking a very hard look at the media communications that

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>entertainment businesses, and so you know, they've been encroaching those

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>technology companies have been encroaching upon you know, the businesses

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that have historically been Time Warner, you know, Viacom, CBS,

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and these executives here really need to figure out how

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they react, how they adapt, Uh, do they partner, do

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they acquire? Do they sell? Many of the media companies

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>like Time Warner, like twenty one century Fox, you know,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact, they're the last couple of years have decided

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to sell their businesses instead of trying to go head

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to head. So they're winners and their losers. Here. I'm

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>looking right now at Netflix bonds and they're up the most. Uh,

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they're they're at the highest levels on record because Netflix

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is a decided winner. Is it becoming clear who the losers?

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe who in the media landscape may not exist five

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>years from now? Um, well, I'm gonna utter Tom Keane's

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>favorite word as relates to the M and A and

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>not a scale. Um. You know a lot of the

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>smaller companies out there, whether it's the lions Gate or

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>uh an MGM or even a Sony Studios, you know,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the main studios in Hollywood. Um, they're all

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking about their businesses and they're saying, we're just not

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>big enough. And when we think about it relative to

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a Google or Facebook or Amazon, we're just not big enough.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think the big big deal here this year

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is CPS and viacomp. People, are you know, really taking

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at what Sherry Redstone wants to do with

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>those two companies that her family and her company control.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>What's going to happen there? At the very least, investors

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>here believe that those two come but it's need to

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>get together, need to merge. Then the question becomes what

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>does the merged company do? So it's all about if

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't have it. People are concerned what have they

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>learned in the last twelve months, particularly from the A

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>T and T follies. I mean what a debt build up?

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are these guys talking about you know, are

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they having serious discussions about being overdebted or is that

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>okay debt debt go go go? Yeah, go go go

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>is signed for the media sector right now? Um, you know,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>so the bond market, the bank credit market really is

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>supportive of the media, communications technology sectors. So there's plenty

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of capital available to these companies, and particularly these low

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>historic rates that we're at right now, so there's no

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>real concern right now for debt. But of course, if

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you were to run into recession and advertising order to

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>take a serious blow, then company that have a lot

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of that, like an A T and T, like a Comcast,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they might have What are you seeing in advertising? I

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>mean Hulu is cutting back. NBC has talked about cutbacks

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, do the advertising people show up

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and are they wearing the men's flannel over shirt genre

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Rich Brothers sons already ordered check. I like the white check.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, would you think? I think it's got to

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be more of a grizzly brown grizzly. How many brown

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bow ties do you have? I have three of those?

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I got my my. My big question right now is

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely about the tech companies and you know how significant

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>their involvement will be. In other words, when we talk

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>about the media space, will the media space be big

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>tech in five years and all of the other all

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the other standalone companies will just get rolled in

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with them. Yeah, you know, we haven't really seen it

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to date. We've seen a lot of the tech companies

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of dip their toe, um, you know, make um

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some investments in programming, um, you know, whether it's you know,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Google with with YouTube and so on and so forth,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook may maybe you know, putting some football games

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook. But we haven't seen them really jump into

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the deep end of the pool and maybe acquire a

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>big media company to say, you know, we really want

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in the content business. We haven't seen that

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in quite frankly, this conference here at Allen Company and

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stun Valley. They've been expecting that for really the last

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>four or five six years and they just haven't seen

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it yet. So to be interesting to see whether these

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tech companies really want to go and out get a

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of capital to the contents. Sonia, thank you so

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>much for reporting from all and Company and his media world.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We're looking forward to his return. There's an auspicious time

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to speak to David Rubinstein of the Carlisle Group. David,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to speak about your wonderful conversation on unicorns

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with the leadership of Uber. Of course disappeared appear, but

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, David, I'm honored to ask you about

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the resiliency of American capitalism with the print of three

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand on the SPX. I mean that long term trend

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of American capitalism has been extraordinary, hasn't it. It's hard

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to understand completely because typically we have processions every seven years.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Were now ten years into a growth cycle, and there

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be any evidence that we're going to

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>go into any recession any time in the foreseeable future.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>So the economy is really defying gravity and history. But

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that's good for American investors. We have had a number

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of conversations that corporate officers have come to a halt

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the president, because of trade war, because of

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing uncertainty. Do you see that at Carlisle. No. I

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>would say that corporate investment has slowed a little bit,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but I would say generally we see pretty good growth

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, not three and four percent, but two

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>percent or so. And I would say that I do

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>expect there will be a trade agreement before the end

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>of the year in China, and I expect the U

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>s m c A will in time get confirmed by

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Congress. And I expect, uh we'll have some rate

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>cuts sp X three thousand and four right now, where

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with David Rubinstein, of course, a peer to peer conversation,

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and this one is interesting. You went out and found

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a unicorn. David yes Um Uber Uh, the CEO of

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Uber is the person I was interviewing, and he's an

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>incredible person. He's an immigrant from Iran, came to work

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>uh in the United States at Bizarre and then ultimately

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>came to work for Barry Dealer, and then ultimately was

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 1>was running a company for Barry to Barry Dealer's company owns.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And Um was recruited away to run Uber after the

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>previous CEO stepped down. Uh. While people say the i

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>p O was not that successful in some respects, I

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>thought it was pretty successful. While there was some uh uncertainty,

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But the pricing of the first day or so it

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was below the I p O prisis back pretty much

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to where it was at the I p O. But

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the most important point. This company is probably

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>has the second highest market value of any company in

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States that when public uh some other words, Uh,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the only company has a higher market cap. He after

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>when public, I'm aware of his Facebook Google, wasn't this high.

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft wasn't as high, Amazon wasn't as high, So people

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>can say that it wasn't all as successful. If people

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted that, they wanted a hundred higher valuation, a hundred

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion or whatever it was. But still, when you

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think about this company, it's not that old, and to

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have this kind of valuation so soon after it was started,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and relatively so soon after the I p O, I

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think it is still amazing. It's a it's a fascinating conversation.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's listen to a clip of Daro Kasar Shahi, he

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is the chief executive of Ubert, speaking with David Rubinstein

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in the episode three of the new season of The

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>David Ruinstein Show Peer to Peer Conversations. What's the biggest

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge you currently see the company facing. I mean, the

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge that that we have is a is a

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>common challenge that you see with some of the large

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>technology companies out there, which is there is an increasing

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>regulatory burden UH that is coming on some of the

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tech company some of it deserved. I don't suppose I

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have some extra money and I wanted to buy into

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a company like yours. Why should I buy you? I

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think you have some extra money. Don't you never have enough.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt that there's a sentiment in Washington that

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>there should be more regulation of some of these companies,

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and some of the CEOs of these companies have said

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there should be more regulation. Congress moves slowly. I wouldn't

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>expect any epic legislation in this area quite some time.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>It's easier to get things done in the regulatory area

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>if you do them administratively, so I expect more likely

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there will be enforcement or examinations by agencies UH of

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the operations of these tech companies more than legislation. Legislation

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>could take many years um and when Microsoft was investigated,

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, years ago, it was an antitrust action that

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was taken against it, and I expect that there's probably

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to be something in the future U in terms

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of administrative action against these tech companies more than legislation.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. One thing that I find interesting is that

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these companies, including Uber, relied heavily on

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>private markets for a very long time before going public,

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people are concerned that basically that

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that the that the potential dynamism of these companies is

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of over once they get to I p O stage.

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What's your view on that. What it used to be

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that people needed capital to grow their companies. Now there's

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>so much capital that you can stay private for a

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>long time, as Facebook did and as Uber did. But

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the end, most of these tech companies, with very

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>few exceptions, want to go public to provide greater liquidity

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for the investors and the employees. I do think that

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to recognize people aren't as interested in going public.

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>There were there were companies that were publicly traded the

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now there about half that, So there's clearly

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a bias against taking your company public or not taking

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a public as rapidly as you would in the old day.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>David would final question Allen and Company, of course, as

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>their sare in Idaho and Paul Tweeney has made clear

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>everything is about scale. How does David Rubinstein define scale? Well,

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>today you want to accompany that is global um Today,

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.239
<v Speaker 1>building a nice company in the United States or in

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>China or in Europe doesn't mean as much unless it's

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna scale around the world. And scale means you've got

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the ability to uh invest large sums of money. So

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>scale means multibillion dollar UH capabilities rather than multimillion dollar

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>capabilities in this day and age. David, thank you so much,

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>greatly greatly appreciated fascinating conversation UH Tonight peer to peer

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>conversations David ruben Stein with the Uber team. Thanks for

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Winter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio