WEBVTT - Jesse Eisinger on Why White-Collar Criminals Get Off

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business is brought to you by the American

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Arbitration Association. Business disputes are inevitable, resolve faster with the

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>American Arbitration Association, the global leader in alternative dispute resolution

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for over ninety years. Learn more at a d R

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>dot org. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholtz

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on Boomberg Radio. This week on the podcast, I bring

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>an old friend into the studio. His name is Jesse Eisinger.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>He has worked pretty much everywhere in the world of

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>financial journalism. If you are at all curious as to why,

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>during the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, effectively

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody was sent to jail, at least nobody of any importance.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>A couple of Burger flippers who were hired to fabricate

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mortgage documents were threatened with prosecution. Handful of mid level

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>traders the fabulous fab got finger wagged at him and

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>paid a fine. But all of the people responsible for

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>an epic collapse in the financial markets and the credit

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>markets escaped unscathed. If you're curious as to how that

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>came about, then you need to hear Jesse Eisinger's story.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>He is a very thoughtful investigative journalist has won numerous prizes,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>including the Pulitzer. Uh I don't find a whole lot

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>to disagree with in his new book, whose title I

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>cannot say on the radio, but I can say in

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, So you get to hear me cuss there

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado. Here is my conversation with Jesse Eisener.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>My special guest this week is Jesse Eisinger. He is

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>currently a reporter for Pro Publica. He began his career

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>at the South Pacific Mail in Santiago, Chile. Spent years

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Wall Street Journal, where he helped to create

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Ahead of the Tape column and the Long and

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Short column. I originally know him from his work at

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Street dot com. He has written for The New

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>York Times, Deal Book, The New Yorker, The Atlantic. He

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was the Wall Street editor at Conde nast In He

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>won the Lobe Award and he in two thousand eleven

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>he won the Pulitzer Prize for national reporting on Questionable

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street practices. It was notable because it was the

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>first ever Pulitzer given for online journalism. He is also

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the author of a book whose name I actually can't say,

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on the air. But we'll give it a we'll give

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it a loose I'll leave one word out, and it's

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>called the Chicken Club. Why the Justice Department fails to

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>prosecute executives? Jesse Eisinger, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you so

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. I know Jesse for a long time.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan of his work. And there's so many

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating things in this book, which is written pretty much

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in the sweet spot of the world. I inhabit finance,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>legal and bad behavior. Those three then diagrams overlap, and

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the book that's the result of it. Let's

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>begin where the book pretty much starts out, uh with

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Enron and Arthur Anderson. How significant were those two companies

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to the future lack of prosecution by the SEC and

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department? They were crucial, is what my argument is.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so I started this book with this puzzle,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>why don't we prosecute top corporate executives anymore? And I

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 1>think it goes beyond just the financial crisis. Of course,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we all know that no top bankers were put in

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>prison for the financial crisis, But I think it started beforehand.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>This problem at the Justice Department, and it persists to today,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and it goes beyond the banks to industrial companies, retailers, company's,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceuticals UM. And so I was trying to figure out

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this puzzle, and I started with Enron because if you remember,

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course you do, we were talking at the

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>time UM and after the bubble burst, an Aztec bubble burst,

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>there were a wave of prosecutions, not just Enron, but

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>World Comma, Delphia, Tycho, Global Crossing. Lots of executives did

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>some time in the Great Bar, hard exactly, hard time

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in the pokey and so what changed, and really I

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>locate this is the beginning the backlash and the problem

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>started then in the kind of lobbying effort, a corporate

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and white collar defense bar lobbying effort against what they

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>saw as overly zealous prosecutions of Enron and particularly Arthur Anderson.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They were lobbying Congress, they were lobbying the Bar Association,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they were lobbying the Judges Association. They pretty much were

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>pulling every lever of power the defense bar I'm refined

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to that was possible exactly. And what they were arguing

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was that the prosecutors were overly aggressive, that they had

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>um overcharged the executives, particularly of Enron, and I focus

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on en Ron UM and then Arthur Anderson, which was

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the kind of seminal corporate prosecution. So let's talk about

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>Anderson a little bit because I find people have consistently

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>mischaracterized that period. Let me ask you what killed Arthur Anderson.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Anderson killed Arthur Anderson, UM, and we should be

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>very clear about that. And UM. One of the big

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>goals that I have in the book is to rehabilitate

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution of Arthur Anderson, because occasionally you do have

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute companies and put them out of business when

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they are rife with UH fraud, when they are serial

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>abusers of the laws, the corporate laws, as what Anderson was. UH. Now,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened with Anderson is that they they destroyed doc

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>ms in the Enron We'll back up before we get

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to that. They had gone through a series of snaffos

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>where as auditors, they did a terrible job. Companies in

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their charge got away with lots of fraud, and they

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>engaged in all these consent decrees where they said, okay,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you caught us, we promised to do better this time.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We mean it, We're really not going to do much

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>more fraud. And then as soon as Enron went down,

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they began this aggressive policy of hey, we haven't been

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>subpoenaed yet. Shread everything exactly. And as Michael Chertoff, who

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was the head of the criminal division at the time,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>says in my book, this wasn't an ice cream company

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that was destroying documents. This is a company that was

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>part of its business was legal advice for investigations. Uh.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And so arguably preserving doctor and right and that means

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not destroying documents and not destroying evidence. What um they

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>went on an orgy. You have tons and tons of

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>document destruction, but email destruction, and email multiple cities, not

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just one person. Um. So this was a kind of

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>system wide thing. But two, in the lead up to

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the crash, the NASDAT crash, there was a pandemic of

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>accounting mouthfeasance at in corporate America. And chances are all

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the all the big auditors at the time were guilty.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But chances were, if you were one of the bigger

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>accounting frauds of the era, you were being audited by

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Anderson. And and to put a little flesh on that,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>people always blame the indictment. But weeks before the indictment,

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of but post end Ron bankruptcy, lots of big

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>clients were fleeing Arthur Anderson. And then two weeks after

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the indictment, World Calm goes belly up more accounting fraud

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and guess who their auditor was, Exactly just like Enron,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Anderson was the auditor for world Com. And so

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I argue that Anderson was going down, and not only that,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I argue that the partners wanted it to go down,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted it to unwind. Now, this wasn't a corporation, it

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't publicly traded. It was a partnership. And to avoid

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the liability from all the lawsuits, they literally had dozens

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and dozens, maybe over a hundred lawsuits that they were facing,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were going to face more with Arthur with

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>World Calm. Um, you know that was it was a

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>convenient excuse to say that the indictment caused the uh

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>failure of the company. Of course it didn't help um,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but but you know what my argument is that sometimes

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors can't worry about that uh that their jobs are

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to do justice. Their jobs are not to cushion the

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>blow for failing companies. You write in the book, Today's

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department has lost the will and indeed the ability

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>to go after the highest ranking corporate wrongdoers. Discuss. So

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it has been building since the backlash to Arthur Anderson.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>And what I argue now is that after Anderson, they

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>turned to corporate settlements. Uh, and in doing corporate settlements

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>deferred prosecution agreements non prosecution agreements. Now, let me stop

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>you right there. Deferred prosecution agreement is here's the deal.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have you signed these documentations, and we're not

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going to throw the case out, but we're gonna hold

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it in a byance and if you could be good

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>little boys for a year, a year from now, we'll

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll toss this out exactly X number of years. We're

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna Uh, we we've indicted you, and we can prove

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it in a court of law, they say, but we're

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>just gonna put this aside for now, and uh, try

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not to do anything again. Now. Um, there are many

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>problems with this. One is that there's no enforcement mechanism.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really looks at it. Sometimes they install corporate monitors.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a problem. Problematic solution. Why is that problematic, Well,

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's problematic because this has become a giant racket for

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>big law. UM and big law both likes the settlements.

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>They that provides a lot of work for them to

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>investigate the corporations. The big law firms like Paul Wise, Deba, Boys, Covington,

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and Burling do these investigations for these companies for their

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate clients, um, and then they deliver the results to

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice essentially reviews

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>it without really looking at um, the conducting the investigation

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself. You're saying, the d J outsources

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the investigation to the defendants lawyers. Dirty secret of American

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>corporate jurisprudence is that we have privatized and outsourced in

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>corporate criminal investigations. That's astonished. And not only have we

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>done it, we have private privatized and outsourced it to

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the criminals themselves to conduct investigates of themselves, alleged criminal

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>alleged criminals, they hire their own attorneys. Their own attorneys

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>conduct their investigations. These private law firms then deliver the

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>results to the Department of Justice, which reviews them and

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it gets worse because the prosecutors who are reviewing them

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>are tend to be people who are job candidates for

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the very law firms that I was about. The investors

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you, didn't we see after you know,

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands, these life for prosecutors who have

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>been in d O J and sec and the second Circuit.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>They all end up going when when, to be fair,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the departments are changing and it's no longer the job

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they loved, but they set a path and they end

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>up working at these big firms are very well compensated,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and that now that path is will trod from from

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution exactly. The most prestigious offices in the Department

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of Justice, the Southern District of New York, which does

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>most of the Wall Street prosecutions and many corporate prosecutions,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and main Justice down in d c UM those are

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>now effectively like post uh juris doctoral um let me

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>each other. Those are essentially post doc um. Employment for

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>lawyers who are training to become white collar defense work

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't always They're not it is never. It has not

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>always been that way. In fact, in the nineteen sixties

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that way at all, Uh, these prosecutors did

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not go to these white shoe firms. White shoe firms

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have this big corporate criminal litigation business. They

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>looked down on criminal defense, even white collar criminal defense exactly,

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and so they some of them went into kind of

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>transactional work um, which was very different. Um. White collar

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>criminal defense was conducted by boutiques. The Department of Justice

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>focused on individuals, not on corporate non incorporations, um. And

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>so there's been a complete transformation. And what I argue

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in the book is that big Laws approach to how

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it defends corporations has developed alongside and in symbiosis with

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justices way that it approaches corporate prosecutions,

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>investigations and prosecutions, and they've all sort of influenced each other,

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's been this cross pollination. And then they go

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>back and forth from the government to the private sector

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and back to the government and back to the private

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sector again. And now it's almost like you know that

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>line at the end of Animal Farm where you could

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>no longer tell who the government people are and who

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the defense people are, who the pigs are on the

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>one side, and who the pigs are on the other side,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a deeply profoundly troubling and corrupt

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>system when it allows corporate malefactors individuals to get off.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>So you you describe in the book how the Department

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of Justice loses the ability to prosecute criminal litigation against

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>corporate wrongdoers. Explain that, So what happens is they find

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that these settlements are much easier to reach because they

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the company has to come to the table and negotiate.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The company says, well, we're just being extorted. We we

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a fine because, um, the cloud of

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a government investigation is so great, we must resolve this.

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor that works and you know there's some validity

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to that, um, And the prosecutor uh then says, well,

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna find you an enormous amount of money. What

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors don't really do anymore is and look at individuals.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And the point of the Enron investigation, at the point

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of starting the book with the Enron narrative, is that

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they put enormous amount of resources. They devoted an entire

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>team to do the that one prosecution individual the Enron

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Task Force, and they essentially lock them in a room

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and made them study the company from the bottom up

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and start indicting lower level people to get to the top,

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>just the way you do with a mob family. Um,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to roll the soldiers to get to the

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>compos um. That art has really been lost over the

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years, and the Department of Justice just does

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not do that anymore. They essentially stop at the middle

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>when they prosecuted individuals, and occasionally they do at a

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>big bank, they're essentially stopping at the trader who was responsible.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they do a low level trader, sometimes they do

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>his or her boss, but they rarely get higher to

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the executive level. You're at the journal for a long time,

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't you? Almost seven years you and in fact you

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>helped to create the Ahead of the Tape column, which

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just ended. What is that like, a fifteen year run? Yes,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I was really sad to see a daily column that

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>was You went from daily to the Long and Short

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was a weekly. I have written every column, uh known

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to man. I've written a daily, I've written a weekly

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>times a week. I've read a weekly, and you went

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to monthly a portfolio. If I do one to decade,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>then then you moved to to pro publico where it's quarterly,

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and now the book is out after a year, so

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's annual, and soon soon it will be a decile publication.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to convince my edit decade. So so I

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I often ask authors, Hey, what's the inspiration behind the book?

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But with you, I know what the inspiration is because

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the lack of prosecution has been infuriating to all of us,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>either on Wall Street, in finance, in journalism. What was

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the last straw that made you say I really have

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to write a book about this? Well, you know, Uh,

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we wrote about c d O s and the Magnetar

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>trade betting against CDOs for your own account all received series.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the series that won the Pultzer, which we were

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>really grateful and lucky for. And um, after that, my

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and I sat around expecting to see some criminal

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>investigation and nothing happened. And then we watched that nothing

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>happened with Lehman Brothers or a I G Or Bank

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of America or city you know, um, and you know,

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>countrywide and it was utterly baffling and an enormous scandal.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And and this has been plaguing me since then. And

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy and our entire body politics, I think so,

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it contributed to Trump. It's certainly contributed to

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the two most potent movements on the

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>left and the right, Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it it undergirds the anger at Trump, and

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it undermined Hillary Clinton and Obama because I think people

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>mistrusted them because they thought they were in the pocket

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street. Uh for this reason as paramount. So,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was one of the great scandals of

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>our time, and I thought it really deserved some kind

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of serious accounting that tried to get at the deep,

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamental and corrosive aspects um in society. This is not

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>an easy problem, and it's not an easy solution, and

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not It's not a conspiracy. You know, Tim Geitner

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>did not call up Eric Holder and say lay off.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 1>It's something more troubling, because it's something more pernicious and

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>more fundamental. So I have not not so much a conspiracy,

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>but I have argued that the greatest innovation of Wall

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Street has not been the A T M or securitization,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but that it's been convincing the Department of Justice in

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the sec that if you prosecute us, the entire economy

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is coming down, right, all right? So how First of all,

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I have yet to find anything that demonstrates that that's wrong.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And second you're you're really saying that it's much more

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>systemic than that moment. This is something that's taken place

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>over a long arc of time. You know, we saw

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it in the financial crisis, most prominently UM. That's when

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that this was a big problem, but

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it really was building before then. There was no prosecution

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of the backstock option backdating scandal, which was which was huge,

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>tremendous paper trail, should have been easy to process, should

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have been much easier to prosecute than it was, which

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>raises a question of whether the skill set is there,

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>whether the will is there, whether they devote enough resources

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>to it. And I don't think that the answer is

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>yes to any of those questions and the UM but

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know it wasn't It's not just the banks. That

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was a wonderful innovation that the bank said were too

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>big to jail, too big to fail, and too big

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to jail. But you're seeing this with recidivist pharmaceutical companies.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Fiser has had has um subsidiary plead guilty to one

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>problem and has ad uh A d p A as

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>an NP NBA. They'd say, on and on and on.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>You see Walmart getting away with bribery in Mexico that

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times had them dead to rights with

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>all the internal documents. UM we are seeing this across

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy and UM so this is impunity at the

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>highest level of corporate America. What they do instead is

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>prosecute CEOs of smaller companies or that head of a

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund, raj Rajer Rottenham can be prosecuted because he's

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>committed a crime that the prosecutors are comfortable prosecuting, insider trading.

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>It's an easy thing to sell to the jury. And

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>when UM Galleon goes out of business, it only puts

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>five or six or ten or twenty people out of business.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not putting the entire UH thousands, tens of thousands

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>of people out of work, and they're terrified. My special

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Jesse Eisener. He has written for such

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>August publications as The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, New York,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times, etcetera, etcetera. He is currently the

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>author of a book whose title I cannot say, but

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we can at least talk about where the title came from.

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So the actual title is the Chicken Blank Club, the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department and the failure to prosecute white collar criminal

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>blank being a word that George Carlin would appreciate as

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the seven words you can't say on TV.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the derivation of the title. Sure, my

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>children love the title, which makes my wife really not

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>like the title. Um. But and I'm so glad that

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Simon and Schuster went with it. Um. I think they

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>went with it because it is actually organic. It is

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a real statement that came from, of all people, Jim Comey,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>who you may remember from such things as the testifying

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in front of the Senate after being fired for being

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>FBI director, But fifteen years ago he was the US

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>at turn for the Southern District of New York and

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he had just replaced Mary Joe White, and Mary Joe

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>White was a legend. Um. And he comes in and

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he gathers everybody together, and uh, they're a little trepidacious

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about him. Um. And they gathers all the criminal prosecutors

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and these guys you have to understand, are the best

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of the best of the best. They've gone to the

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>best high schools, to go to the best colleges, to

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>get into the best law schools, to perform the best,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to get to the best clerkships, and then they go

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to the southern district. These are talented and brilliant people, um.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>And they all think of themselves as towns a billion

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>people um. And so he gathers them all and he says,

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>how many of you have never lost a case? And

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of hands shoot out very proudly there, you know,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>chest stuff out and he says, so, me and my

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>buddies have a name for you. You guys are the

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Chicken expletive Club. And the hands go back down and

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of sheepish, meaning there's a point here, exactly.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And the point was you aren't taking ambitious enough cases.

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>If you never lose, it means you're only taking easy cases, exactly.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>You're taking the low hanging fruit. And that's not justice.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to protect a record. But being a prosecutor

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for the government is not about protecting a record. It's

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not about going when um, you know, going under it.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>It is about doing justice and sometimes doing justice means

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that you take a hard case and present your evidence

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to a jury and then juries are unpredictable, and sometimes

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they go with you and sometimes they don't. But justice

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>has been served. That's a really insightful position from someone

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>who's the head of a department of prosecutors. Like, we

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>don't really know a lot about come me, other than

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the recent news flow, which has been insane. In other words,

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a principled guy who's telling them, hey, the hell

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with your record, you have to do justice. Me is principal.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I mean he's got um, he's imperfect. I

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>have another episode where he really blinks on a corporate

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>prosecution of the book about kpmg UM and you know,

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.959
<v Speaker 1>he is a guy who thinks a great deal of himself. Um.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>But it is very it's a very important concept. And

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't see leaders of these organizations, um without a

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fear of losing. They're terrified of losing, and they're terrified

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the humiliation of losing a trial. And you saw

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that with Pre Barrara, who has a great reputation as

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a crusader, especially as the supposed Sheriff of Wall Street.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, I think blinked on investigations and prosecutions

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street banks and didn't want to take the

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>chance he might lose and and damages. He didn't want

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to take the difficult course of doing the tough investigations

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and then didn't want to lose his pristine record and

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to take on, for instance, Stevie Cohene at S A C. Capital, didn't,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, didn't want to take him to trial because

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>he was worried he might lose, and that which was tough. Also,

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>it was a tough case. But at some point I

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>do anything, I think justice requires that you take Stevie

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Cone to trial, and the hard cases, you know, you

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>take somebody like Stevie Cone to trial, You present the

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence in public, you present the evidence of the jury,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and if the jury disagrees with you, it's not necessarily humiliation.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>You have been exonerated. And um that is that is

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a bad day at the office. But it should not

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be the overarching goal of the government should not beat

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to win the At the very least, there's a failure

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to supervise case. Although that's more civil than criminal if

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about capital or just look at what's happened now,

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is they pay a big fine and Stevie Cone continues

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to operate and then you know he's soon going to

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>be back in the hedge fund business. Called kind of

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>message does this send to him, to any of his employees,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to any other wrongdo or anybody contemplating a life of

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>crime on Wall Street of which there are way too many. Um,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it sends a terribleness. So you reference KPMG.

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about that, because I find that to be

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating judicial decision, a fascinating case. First tell us

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what was going on with KPMG

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that it led to a prosecution. So soon after this

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Anderson case, as we were talking about, uh, there's

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>an investigation at the Southern District of New York into

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>KPMG and this was another major auditor and they were

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>selling illegal tax shelters to wealthy individuals to help them

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>avoid taxes. I R S is the people who refer

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this to arrest, refers to reverse it. There's red um. Yeah,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a big Senate investigation from Carl Levin's group by

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>partisan exposing enormous amount of um deeply questionable dealings. This

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>should have been there, should have been a relatively easy prosecuted,

0:26:54.680 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>well complicated, but complicated tax stuff but um really serious

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>amount billions and billions of dollars in alleged fraud here

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>um and lots and lots of paper trail and named partners,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>named individuals, and the Southern District names over a dozen individuals,

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>mostly KPMG executives, um. And then what happens is KPMG

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>cuts off there um paying for their defense. Now that

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sue sponsor that was at the urging, Well, it's

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>incredibly controversial and um. What later happens, to cut a

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>long story short, is that the federal judge and the

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>overseeing the case determines that the prosecutors the government has

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>forced KPMG to cut off the funding for their these

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>executives defense, and he throws out the cases against all

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the individual executives. And he essentially creates out of whole

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>cloth a new constitutional right, the right to have the

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>best attorney money can buy. If you can afford it,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or rather, if your company can afford it, then you

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to have, um, the most expensive attorney in

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the land. Now, I just goes without saying that street

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>criminals and public defenders don't have this. Well, hold hold

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that thought a second. So this is Judge Kaplan in

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern district or the Southern district. Is the Southern

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>district still sitting? Yeah, still sitting, as is Raykoff and

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other judges who are referenced in the

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>book giants of of securities litigation and all sorts of Rakoff.

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Certainly right, and and Kaplan himself is well regarded a

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>democratic appointee. Um, but came from the world of corporate law.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But but here's the thing that's so fascinating. And you

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>were alleging that there is no right to a near

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>infinite set of resources to hire the most expensive attorneys

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in the land, even if you're a corporate executive, even

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>though if you've been paid millions of dollars in salary

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and stock options. Why wouldd anyone imagine that you have

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the right to the most expensive council in the world.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>In the book, you show examples that are insane, how criminals,

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>how blue collar criminals are routinely denied the right to counsel,

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>including a lawyer arrested for dee we on the way

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to trial and the court said no, he's he's fine,

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there was no ineffective assistance counsel just because he's arrested.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But that was just the most agreed just But there

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are hundreds of examples of non white collar criminals who

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are really prevented the right to UH lawyer, and the

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court seems okay with it. Yeah, this is an undercurrent.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Is just the terrible double standard here between street criminals

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and white collar criminals in in the American jurisprudence. UM.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, even if you argue you that it

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is UH, it does not sit well with us for

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>an employer to cut off the legal defense for wrongdoing,

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>especially in the course of doing your job as a journalist.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I want Pro Publica to pay for my legal defense

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>if I'm accused of libel um. Even if we think

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that that was UM questionable and debatable. And I go

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>back and forth on the the actual merits of the case.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>One thing is I don't think that the cases needed

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to be thrown out. I think the prosecutions could have

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>gone forward against the executives. The second thing is that

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it had had an enormous effect on these guys. The

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors reluctance to charge individuals So you have Anderson where

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to indict um any companies. Then you

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have KPMG where after that they're very reluctant to prosecute

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>top executives. So what are they left with its settlements

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and these companies get away with paying, writing a check

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and um wiping the slate. To be fair, you can't

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>really expect to sitting judge to understand the concept of

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>judicial precedent when decision. I mean, he would actually have

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to be oh eight, he was a sitting judge. Isn't

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that what he Isn't that what case law? He was

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>very proud. He had his wife come to that to

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>watch when he read the ruling. I mean, this is

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one of what he viewsed as one of his crowning achievements.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Jesse Eiinger. He is the

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>author of the new book The Let's Call It the

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Chicken Club, about the Justice Department's failue to prosecute white

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>collar criminals. Check out my daily column. You can find

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that on Bloomberg view dot com. Follow me on Twitter

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at rid Halts. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry rid Halts. You've been listening to Masters in

0:31:50.120 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio. If you're having a business dispute,

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the process can be slow and drawn out, especially if

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you rely on litigation in the courts. You can wait

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for years before your case is resolved, and the longer

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your case proceeds, the more your case can cost. Not

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>with the American Arbitration Association. Arbitration or mediation with the

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>American Arbitration Association is faster. In fact, nearly fifty of

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>our cases settled prior to hearings. A d r dot

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>org resolve faster. Welcome to the podcast, Jesse. Thank you

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for doing this. I've been looking forward to this,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to This has been great. Like eighty pages

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>left in the book. I was plowing through it the

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>past week and there are there are things in it

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that are just infuriating. Good. You're good. I don't know

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>if that was your Absolutely indeed, is to make people

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>outread the The assistance of council stuff is just insane.

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That it's more than a double standard. It's if you're

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>poor and probably of color or lower income, lower economic strata. Hey,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you should have thought about that. Before you committed the crime.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You know the lawyer got a plan ahead. But if

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you're wealthy, if you're a white collar criminal, well you

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>planned ahead and you worked for a big company, and

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>they could certainly pay for your your lawyer no matter

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what it costs. That's what the constitution guarantees. Not only that,

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but the courtesy afforded these lawyers. So what happens is

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you get Um, if you're the subject of an investigation,

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the target of an investigation, you never see a prosecutor.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You They bring your lawyer in for a light series

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of conversations about what their evidence is, what your defense

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>might be. Um, there's an enormous number of uh fights

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>over what you have to produce in discovery. The public

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>never sees any of this. Uh. You are treated with

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the utmost grace and respect and polly tests. UM. Suffice

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it to say, street criminals don't quite get now. Didn't

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>people like Spitzer and Giuliani start the frog march? They

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>would walk into a place, blue jackets with the windbreakers

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with FBI or d e A or whatever on the back,

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and they would grab whoever, put him in handcuffs and

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>march him out with what a coincidence. There's all the

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>media waiting with TV and and so occasionally you get

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor with UM ambitions not to go into big

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>white whoo firms UM, and so they you know, they

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>rea havoc UM and they kind of do their jobs.

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Giuliani, after before being a kind of UM

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>overly uh cruel and not particularly competent mayor was UM

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was an aggressive prosecutor, but there was an enormous backlash

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>after him. UM. The courts then, odd enough, kind of

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>take it on themselves. They see their role as to

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>correct overly zealous prosecutors. UM. Not in street criminals, where

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>they're often affirming them, but in corporate arena and white

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>college criminals they can get their backs up exactly. You know.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's you don't relate to the crackhead, you don't

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>relate to the guy stealing whatever ten bucks. If you're

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a judge who's gone to college law school and you

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>live in suburban I mean there is a lot of

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>elite affinity. I think, UM that kind of undergirds both

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutions. The prosecutors are from the same schools, and

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they when they're prosecuting these people they're either prosecuting their

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>um their peers or their parents and their peers, and

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they're the parents of their peers are being defended by

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>their boss's former boss. Um. This is just this whole

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>milieu that they're in. The judges come from it. If

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Louis Kaplan in the Southern District earlier,

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he was a Paul Weiss partner UM. And so you

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>know when he says he's looking at um the prosecutors

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>cutting off the defense funding from top law firms and

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>top lawyers, yea, he thinks, like, you guys, this is

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just not done or I don't know what he's thinking,

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know this, it's you can read into that

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this is improper. He says, we do not do this

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in this country. You use the example of Bill Bennett,

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>who was came out of was it the Bush or

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan White House? Bob Bennett, Yeah, yeah, Bob Bennett,

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the who brother William Bennett, who was the he is um. Uh.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's President Clinton's personal lawyer, UM, and he

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 1>negotiates on behalf of KPMG. They get a power lawyer

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>and he's incredibly savvage and he's not just a courtroom litigator.

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy in the holes of power in the

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.439
<v Speaker 1>White House. In Congress, he is they're mixing it up

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with oh, with the head of the Appropriations Committee who

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.959
<v Speaker 1>calls the Justice Department and says, we're having a little

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of problem funding your agents exactly. And what he

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 1>what he does Southern District. Well, when the Southern District

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is prosecuting KPMG, they keep issuing ultimatums to him, and

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he keeps saying, okay, okay. What what he's really doing

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is he's gone right to the top of the Bush

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 1>administration Department of Justice, right to the Attorney General, and

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>right to the Deputy Attorney General, who by this time

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is none other than Jim Comey. And Jim Comey calls

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>down to the calls up to the Southern District U S.

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Attorney at the time and says, you guys have to

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you can indict KPMG. You have to post try to

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>post Arthur Anderson, um, you know. And it's unsaid that

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't want this. It's unsaid that we are worried

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about what having another Anderson on our did he say

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to lay off this Russia investigation effectively what

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he says the cloud. Um, no, he's found a spine

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>uh in this administration. Exactly. When it comes to that

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, they do better than corporate press ecusions.

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, Um, well, you know, I think that

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>this elite affinity does not plague them when it comes

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to corrupt politicians. They look at somebody like look at Preparara.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>When he looks at Sheldon Silver or Dean Skelos, these

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>top New York State politicians, he sees them as scummy.

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And I weren't afraid to go and I didn't go,

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, And I think it helps that you know

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that it outrages them. I think that these people are moral. Um,

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know that they didn't go to the same schools,

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't aren't at the same law firms. You know,

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Sheldon Silver was a kind of two bit plaintiff's lawyer

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and so Um. They have a very different attitude to

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>those people than they do to a Lloyd Blankfind or

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a Jamie Diamond. Um, they treat them with much greater respect.

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And to be fair, Lad Blankfind and Jamie Diamond have

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>not been accused of any undoing, any wrongdoing. Yeah, exactly,

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that they in this kind treat get

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the kind of respectful treatment Steve Jobs got enormously respectful.

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you despite the stock option back dating, but despite

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>being dead to rights on a collusion over engineer salaries?

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember that Google things that people have gone

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to prison for UM And that's a recent development, only

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Well, so there's never been a golden

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 1>age where the rich and powerful really had to fear

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for the liberty if they stepped over the line. But

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.240
<v Speaker 1>as I say in the book, there have been silver ages.

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>There have been better period. So we had Mortgage in

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the sixties UM and Bob Fisk in the seventies DO

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>focusing on individuals taking on high level corporations UM. And

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>then we had Juliani, we had the end round world,

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>come a Delphia prosecutions. Now we are in a terrible crisis.

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you if you want to commit widespread fraud,

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>don't be a Bernie Maid. Don't open a small hedge fund,

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>run a big bank, Run a big, big corporation, and

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty much bulletproof. UM. Wann't run a big corporation.

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Surround yourself with UM compliance officers, lawyers, UM, don't ask

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>too many questions about a division that is making too

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>much money. UM, be studiously incurious, UM studiously incurious. That's

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a that's a title to the book that we can

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>actually say on the radio. There you go, studily studiously

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>incurious when you want to investigate, UM, the wrongdoing at

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>your company. Higher a firm that is also a law

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>firm that is also incurious enough not to ask questions

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of things that will lead them the investigation to the

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>c suite or the board. So you reference in the

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>book the ability of accountant firms and law firms to

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>provide cover for what's pretty obvious frauds and pretty obvious

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>UM studious in curiosity. How significant are those organizations to

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the institutionalization of fraud. Well, we talked about it earlier

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that UM. The law firms are key to this now

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>because they conduct the internal investigations and the prosecutors don't

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.919
<v Speaker 1>do it, especially if it's something like oversees wrongdoing. UM.

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>The Department of Justice thinks that it cannot prosecute UM

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Corrupt Practices Act bribery UH, because they can't what

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot that they It's not that they can't

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>prosecute it's that they can't investigate it um and so

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they outsource the investigations to companies and they say, what,

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, just think of the resources that we would

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>need to do that. And my answer is, if you

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have the resources to sufficiently prosecute something, focus on

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.919
<v Speaker 1>things that you can prosecute or get the resources. It's

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>not an excuse to just say our jobs are hard

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>or we don't have the money. We don't. I mean,

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>what do we gotta what do we gotta o J for? Right?

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. It's you know, one of the things

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that I was thinking about when I was reading the

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>book was it wasn't just the lawyers, it was the accountants.

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And one of the parallel developments over the lack of

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>accountability for corporate executives including accountants, lawyers, orders, etcetera. I

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a coincidence that as there's been less

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecutions of wrongdoing and the accounting rules have gotten squish

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>year and squish ear with who can really rely on

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>on corporate statements anymore, simultaneous to the huge rise of indexing,

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that people have kind of reached the conclusion, hey listen,

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell what earnings legitimately are. How can I

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>be a value investor if these are all nonsense? So

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I might as well just buy the whole market and

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>hope for the best. Yeah, I think that's true. And

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I UM, if you look at the ai G investigation,

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and I go through a series of A I G

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.879
<v Speaker 1>doings and investigations in the book, um, the last one

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>where they blew up on the CDs market and the

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market. Um, sort of pivots on a very arcane,

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 1>little handwritten note in the margins from the auditors at

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>p WC and the higher ups that the Department of

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Justice are so shaken by the existence of this note

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that seems to suggest that PwC partners had some knowledge

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of this, that they put the kai bosh on the

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 1>whole indictment, the whole investigation, so that it's so. In

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>other words, we found in this year that senior people

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>knew about this. We better not yeah exactly, instead of saying,

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>my god, if the PwC people knew about this, maybe uh,

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe things were worse. Maybe we need to go higher up,

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we need to prosecute more. Maybe we need to

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of pressure on the auditors what the

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>innovation in the seventies from the Southern District and from

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. UM. And I cover this in the book

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Sporkin sort of the father of an enforcement UM.

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>At the SEC they put pressure on the auditors and

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers. They put pressure on the enablers UM. He

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>calls them the gatekeepers UM. And the problem is that

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't do that anymore. We don't put pressure on

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers, and we don't put pressure on the lawyers

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and the auditors to lesser extent, but the lawyers especially UM.

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 1>One of the big problems is that these guys want

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to go become corporate lawyers and make two five eight

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year. So the revolving door is this

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>perennially corrosive um aspect of this whole thing. Before I

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get to my favorite questions, I have to at least

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>during the podcast make reference to the actual title of

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the book, and hopefully, hopefully this will make through one bleeped.

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>This is, by the way, published by Shimon Simon and

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Schuster coming out the Chicken Ship Club, the Justice Department

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and failure to prosecute white collar criminals, and the phrase

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>chicken ship club comes from the speech by Jim Comey.

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much how you managed to get Simon and

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Schuster say that. That's astonishing. What was that? What was

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I have this fantasy about The Big Short.

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a line in it from I forgot who uh

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the book says the line um, but the line

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is the poor And I just have this picture of

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis arguing, no, no, no, the Big Short is

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a subtitle. The Poor is the name of the book,

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's a quote because this guy said it. And

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously that doesn't happen. But the S word seems less

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>offensive than the F word these days, for sure. So

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>what was the pushback like? And by the way, everything

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I just said, I'm sure we'll get But what was

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the pushback like to the name? Even though there was

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I kept waiting for it and it never materialized. I

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.919
<v Speaker 1>think Simon and Schuster, you know, I think the book

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>their adults also the book business and stuff these days,

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and you gotta get people's den and somehow it's it's clickworthy.

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little buzz buzz. Yeah. So you know, my

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>wife sort of feels like it's a little crude. She's

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like something a little bit more refined. Um, I felt like, look,

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this is really encapsulates it and it also

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is you know, I couldn't come up with it on

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>my own. It came from Jim Comey. He really said it,

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and you get suddenly he's in the news and talk

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 1>about you know, I really I was worried when his

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>reputation sank in the election with the Hillary intervention of

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the campaign, and everybody thought were so, you know, on

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the left, we're so angry about Hillary. Now he's revived.

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>That's all good for the So so let's jump over

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to my favorite ten questions, and this is sort of,

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>um tell us. One important thing people don't know about

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>your background? Oh man, Um well, uh, I have no

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>education beyond college. I didn't study law, I didn't study

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>any finance. I didn't study accounting. I'm faking everything. Okay.

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason that James Glick said something very similar.

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Every time he picks up a new subject. Um, it's

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that's his education. He becomes educated enough to be able

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to ask questions. You must do something similar. Yeah, I'm

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>very curious. By the way, the best thing about this

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>show is I'd become an inveterate name dropper, not on

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>person on purpose, but it's like, well, when I was

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking to Jim Click, he said, and I love his

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 1>his If you haven't read the information, oh I should, Yeah, astonishment. UM,

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us about some of your early mentors who influenced

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>your approach to research and writing. Huh that's a good question.

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I UM, you know, I read the big books, big

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>journalism books like UM Den of Thieves and Barbarians at

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the gate Um that was Uh, those were big influential books.

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I had, UM a bunch of great uh colleagues at

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the street dot com where we really kind of learned

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>finance and investing and UM investigations. Uh. Dave Kansas was

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the editor there. My colleagues like Colin Barrows, an editor

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Wall Street Journal, and Alex Barrenson who went

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on to the New York Times. And John Edwards was

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.760
<v Speaker 1>another editor at the Wall Street Journal. UM, a bunch

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.879
<v Speaker 1>of really talented people there. Uh. So that those were

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the early influences. And then Larry and Garcia hired

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>me at the Wall Street Journal. Um, he's one of

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the best editors of our era. So those guys all

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of helped my colleague. My colleague, Josh Brown calls

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The Street dot Com the unknown Motown of financial journalism.

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad that he appreciates it, because, um, we

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really it's all been lost to history. Um, but half

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:56.240
<v Speaker 1>my columns from there are are gone. And I'm playing

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and put him on the blog, you know. Uh. And

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim Cramer, Um, to his credit, really kind of invented

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this whole kind of way vernacular of speaking about doing

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>financial journalism. But back then it was serious financial journalism.

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We did an enormous number of real investigations, deep reporting. Um.

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>It was innovative, it was online, we weren't nobody had

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>seen anything like it before. It was totally snarky. It

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>was really unique. It's a lot of fun. That's how

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I know Jesse long enough that we go back to

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that period. And full disclosure if I have to mention this,

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>because if I don't, someone's gonna send a nasty email.

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>When Bailout Nation, UM was in the fourth editling and

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing with mcgrow hill over their SMP five D division.

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry they're standard and poor credit rating division and

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not happy with the chapter that's critical of them. Um,

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Jesse wrote a delightful column for Portfolio that pretty much

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 1>set the tone for or all the other coverage on

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the book, which was um Simon and Schuster. I'm sorry

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>mcgroy Hill drops book critical of SMPH credit division and

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that really colored all of the subsequent coverage and it

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>ended up going wildly and that transition just brought more

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>attention to it. But glad to help. Well, I I

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have to say thank you, and I also I think

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I am obligated to disclose that otherwise otherwise his Trouble

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Spy magazine called this log rolling and yes, exactly by

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, Denna Thieves written by James Stewart, Who's Who's

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a legend? And then Barbarians at the Gate was was

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that co authored Brian Burrow and John Hellier yep. And

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and also to to rockstar um journalists out there for

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>doing doing God's work. UM talk about so so you

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a handful of mentors, primarily UM, LARRYN. Grassi is

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:02.720
<v Speaker 1>legendary and lots of those folks at the Street dot Com.

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I went to the Four Winds and they're all running major.

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, who is the c the head of

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>USA today? There's like a whole. You could find people everywhere. Yeah,

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Dave Callaway. Dave Callaway, No, he wasn't there, but there

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was a guy. Uh, Dave Kansas was editor. Uh he is.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>He's no longer in journalism or I don't know where David.

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. I've lost touch of them, but I'm sure

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to forget that million mentors. Of course, of

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>course when you do a list like this, but uh um,

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he was one. Um. Let's talk about investors. What investors?

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Um influenced your thinking about markets? Um? Well, uh, you

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.839
<v Speaker 1>know it was interesting. The what happened to me was

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that I was working for this obscure operation in the

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>street dot com. You know, nobody's really talking to me, um,

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and so I kind of naturally gravitated the people would

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to me. Um, the kind of desperate weirdos and quirks,

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, cranks and uh um and outsiders, and most

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of them were short sellers. Um. And so you know,

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and in context, this is the nineties, right, and the

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>big bulls they have access to the New York Times,

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal, c NBC, they have access to all

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the regular media, right, and and the business journalism was

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I would argue even worse than it is today. And

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't have a great today. If

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a selective you can find great journalism. But you know,

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>overall it's still too generous and too uh. There's too

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>much happy talk, and there's it's too addulatory. But then

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it was even worse. Sturgeons law applies to everything. Yes,

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but but so um, so you know so uh.

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And I always thought, you know, if a company is

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>making money, if a company develops this product, I was

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>doing pharmaceuticals and biotech, then you know, if the company

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>companies the science works and exact covering exactly, um, and

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the science works and the drug works and um, they

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 1>tested and they get it approved by the FDA, and

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:20.879
<v Speaker 1>they sell it and they make money on it. All

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:22.920
<v Speaker 1>those things. They're supposed to do those things, so that's

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>not news. It's only news when those things they don't

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>do it. So I gravitated to when the drug was

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:31.280
<v Speaker 1>killing people, when they were lying about the drugs results,

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>when they couldn't sell it, when they couldn't make money

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on it, and those were all stories to me. And

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the short sellers were the people I talked to, and

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>so I learned from the best short sellers in the game.

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Some examples, Well, Jim Chenos was one of them, although

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do as much biotech. Um, but there you know,

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them were, well a lot of them.

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>These guys are sort out of the game. So like

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Dave Shally, um is probably one of the best short

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>sellers ever in the And I hope that he forgives

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:04.919
<v Speaker 1>me for outing him. Um, but now he's retired. Um

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh he worked for a shop on um in California.

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh and um he's one of the guys who did

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the most work that he would have been He probably

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>would have been the best prosecutor in the Department of Justice.

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Drop him into the Department of Justice today and he

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>would see, hands down the best prosecutor. He was one

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of the most brilliant guys. No, no, he was just

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a sort of finance guy, but just a nose for frauds.

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh, um he knows Marcojodas, who was a big

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 1>short seller. You guys know, you had a partner I

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:41.840
<v Speaker 1>won't name because he's still in the business. Um. Uh.

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>These guys were, Uh, these guys were the most influential.

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 1>They taught me how to read a balance sheet, which

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I can do in a rudimentary fashion. They taught me

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how to look for frauds, um identify them and UM

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>really that was that was an incredible learning experience. And

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the only reason they were talking to me

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is no one else would talk to them. I love that.

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about books. You mentioned Danna, Thieves and Barbarians

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:10.319
<v Speaker 1>at the Gates. What are what are some of the

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:14.280
<v Speaker 1>books that are amongst your favorites or that you found

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>influential by the way, fiction, nonfiction, finance, it doesn't matter. Yeah,

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think about that earlier today. You know,

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that the UM one of the biggest influences

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that had me on a path to journalism that I

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>read in college was a Bright Shining Lie from Neil Sheen,

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>which really exposed the government's lies during Vietnam. UM and Uh,

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have any idea I wanted to be a journalist.

0:55:37.520 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's a piece of nonfiction journalism. It's brilliant and

0:55:40.640 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it really captures the Vietnam era almost better than any

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>other book, although um, there are a lot of classics

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>from there. But I was I that I liked I

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>loved Dispatches. I loved the journalism of Michael hair. I

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>love the journalism of the Vietnam era. So that was great.

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, I gravitated to the great um

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 1>uh essay s s polemicists like George Orwell and um

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>h L Menkin, those are the people that I read.

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I read Joan Didion, So I was sort of gravitating

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to this kind of nonfiction reportage. Um those were so

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so we all know Orwell wrote four an Animal Farm.

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 1>What Menkin Pieza influenced you? Oh? Well, Menkin really does

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of essays. Um. And so he's he's doing

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a critic. Really, he's doing essays, his collection of

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:30.879
<v Speaker 1>essays or there's no one sort of novel or one

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:34.839
<v Speaker 1>big book that that he writes. But he's really kind

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of brilliant and lacerating and hilarious. Um yeah, and coins

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a million words like the boom was he Um. So

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he's he's very entertaining. And Joan Didion, Joan Didion Slatching

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to Bethlehem, Um is the White album. Um, those are

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:56.280
<v Speaker 1>collections of essays. She's a beautiful writer. Lucid um Uh

0:56:56.360 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary observer of um of humanity, just the kind of UM,

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the perfect, the best, probably the best writer of in

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 1>any journalism. And you know, I liked a lot of

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>new journalisms. I read a lot of wolf Tom Wolfe

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of stuff. So but I think she's

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the best of that era. So since you've joined

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the industry, what do you think has changed? What's the

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>most significant outside of the obvious business is the biggest

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>transformation in the business is the discipline, UM and fear

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that executives have when they talked to journalists. So when

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I broke into the business in the early ninety nineties,

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I could call up a desk and talk to anybody

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street UM. And I got a great education

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and found out a lot of what was going on

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>by t I covered I p O s and I talked,

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just called all the desks and talked to all the

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>heads of the I p O operation. There was no

0:57:52.080 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>pr involved. UM. And now if you call any cell

0:57:56.920 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>side analyst which was desperate to talk UM. Now, if

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you call anyone, they understand that they could be fired

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for talking to you as a journey UM. And they're

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so fearful for their jobs and they're just they they're

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so loyal to their companies. I think it's it's fear,

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 1>but also this kind of loyalty that they um, they

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and disdain for the press. The press has really fallen

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in estimation um. And that the combination of that has

0:58:23.680 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 1>resulted in this kind of pr grip on businesses that

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>makes it so much more difficult. It's so much harder

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 1>now to report on corporate America. That that's shocking and fascinating. Um.

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>What's the next positive shift do you see common um

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in the business? Y? Um? Well, I mean well, I

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>would say two things. One is what pro Public is

0:58:47.160 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 1>proving is that the nonprofit model for investigative journalism works. Um.

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>When we started out, that was a question mark whether

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there was going to be enough or enough money and

0:58:58.200 --> 0:59:01.360
<v Speaker 1>foundations and wealthy individuals to port this nonprofit And I

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think nonprofit investigative journalism is not the solution to the

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>journalism crisis where we don't hold the powerful accountable enough,

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>but it is part of the solution. So I think

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the most powerful development that's happened over the

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>last decade. And I just point it's sort of pulled

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people to realize that investigative journalism is

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:24.480
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important, and that's central to the mission of journalism.

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Journalism is not about selling clicks. So BuzzFeed is um

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 1>invested in investigative journalism, and Washington Post has done more

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in investigative journalism in New York Times, that's in part

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 1>um because they're waking up to their reawakening to their mission.

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think pro public has contributed to that. What

0:59:43.040 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do you do outside of the office to relax? What

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:51.000
<v Speaker 1>do you do, uh, to keep mentally and or physically fit? Oh,

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do a lot my um My work

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is not particularly all consuming. Um, So I cook, I

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>hang out with my children. I um, I listened to music.

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to I don't know a lot about classical music,

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm starting to listen to it. I'd always sort

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of learning. I like teaching myself the trees now, you know,

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what they are. So I walk

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>around with a book. I'm I'm that guy in the

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>park walking around with a little tree book. I'm like,

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm the most embarrassing dad. You can imagine. That sounds

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty amusing. Um, a millennial, someone just coming out

1:00:24.520 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of college comes up to you and said, hey, I'm

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>interested in the career in journalism. What sort of advice

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>would you give them? Go abroad? Which is what I did. Um,

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to find stories, and they're more desperate for

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>copy from there. Um because there aren't aren't that many.

1:00:41.480 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So uh, and do what you like, don't do what

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you think you can make a living it. UM. Gravitate

1:00:48.320 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to something you like and really understand it and develop it,

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and the livelihood will follow. And our final question, what

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is it you know about wool Street and journalism today

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that you wish you knew twenty years ago? That is

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a good question. UM. I think I wish that I

1:01:10.880 --> 1:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>had been even more jaded about the systemic corruption. Um

1:01:18.040 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that it exists in the system and they in the

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>malign incentives. UM I would I was too. I thought

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that the corruption happened at the smaller companies or was

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>an unusual thing. I think that the system is quite

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>troubled and needs, um needs more vigilant oversight. We have

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>been speaking to author and journalist Jesse Eisinger. If you

1:01:46.440 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoy this conversation, be sure and look Up an Inch

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or Down an Inch on iTunes, SoundCloud, overcast, Bloomberg dot

1:01:54.840 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Com or the Bloomberg terminal, and you can see any

1:01:57.160 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other hundred and forty somethings. Uch uh previous podcasts.

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not think my

1:02:06.240 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>technical producer Medina Parwana, recording engineer par Excellence Taylor Riggs

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is our booker producer Michael bat Nick is my head

1:02:16.640 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of research. If you enjoy this conversation, we love your comments,

1:02:21.680 --> 1:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

1:02:26.200 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. I'm Barry Ridholtz. You've been listening

1:02:30.200 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Masters in Business

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by the American Arbitration Association. Business

1:02:45.920 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>disputes are inevitable, Resolve faster with the American Arbitration Association,

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the global leader in alternative dispute resolution for over ninety years.

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Learn more at a d R dot org. Masters in

1:02:59.480 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses brought to you by the American Arbitration Association. Business

1:03:03.320 --> 1:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>disputes are inevitable, Resolve faster with the American Arbitration Association,

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the global leader in alternative dispute resolution for over ninety years.

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Learn more at a d R dot org.