WEBVTT - Have all the good ideas already been discovered?

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you welcome to Stuff You Should Know?

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>From House Stuff Works dot Com. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark with me as always as

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Charles W. Chuck Bryant. And that makes the stuff you

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>should know. That's right, Yes, it is not other imitators.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how many times I've said that that makes

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you should know. No, the just the whole spiel,

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole opening. Hey, you welcome to the podcast. Well

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you've said it about two hundred and seventy. Sometimes I think,

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>luckily we have them all saved and we could count

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we do. I don't know if it's lucky, though, Chuck,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of shows, dude, we should do something

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>special for three hundred. That's like, that's a lot of shows.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It is that makes me probably Okay, Well, do you

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think maybe we could get some cake around here or something?

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Shrimp cocktail the love of Pete. No, I'm allergic to

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>shrimp now, I remember, I know, But to let a

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>throat out there. Actually, I had a shrimp wanton the

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>other day and nothing happened. I had a wanton with

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>shrimp and nothing happened. So it was just like tiny

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>little bits of shrimp. And I don't know either that

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>or I'm getting stronger. Maybe so superhuman, you might say

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>trans human speaking of human um, chuck. There is a

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>recent study that came out in part from one of

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>our universities here in the city, Emory, right down the street,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Great School. There's been this problem that's been plaguing researchers

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time, and that is at the

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the Lower Paleolithic period, which is about two

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>points seven million years ago, we started using sharp rocks

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as bashing and cutting tools. So we figured that out. Okay,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you can take a rock, that's technology. That's not horse,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that's technology. Yes, okay, you can take this rock and

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you can use it to when a coconut or the

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>head of someone who's wrong. Do you using an implement

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to complete attack? Well, specifically sharp rocks? Okay? It took

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>two million years the end of the Lower Paleolithic period

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>before we figured out that we could actually attach handles

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to these things. And tournament how long it took? Yes,

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is baffled scientists, like, how could it possibly

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.119
<v Speaker 1>have taken two million years to go from using your

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>hand to attaching a stick. You know, this doesn't make

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>any sense. So, um, well they were dumb back then.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Well a dumb is close to it. They would literally

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>were lacking the region of the brain needed. Apparently, according

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to this new study, Um, they they basically we developed

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a region in the right hemisphere, specifically the supra marginal gyrus,

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>which allowed us to go, hey, let's put a hand

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>on this. And after we did that, we moved out

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of Africa and started colonizing the rest of the world.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's they've been pointed the region of the brain

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that is specific to innovation, too specific to um stone toolmaking. Okay,

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought you meant innovation in general. No, like that's

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>where your ideas come from. No, give me a second,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>old ramp all shoot, did every rue it? It's okay? Um.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So we go from I can't figure out how to

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>attach a handle to a sharp rocky two million years

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we figured that out, We leave Africa, and we start

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>colonizing the rest of the world, and all of a

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>sudden things start entering light speed, right, And it seems

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like over the last couple hundred years, you know, especially

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>since the Industrial Revolution, our ability to innovate, to grasp

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>new ideas, to understand the world around us has just

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>been hitting this hyper speed, and a lot of people

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder if we've reached a point where all the ideas,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all the good ones at least, have already been discovered,

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all the we under stand how everything works, and there's

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>really just figuring out how to dot the eyes and

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>cross the teas right right. There was actually a guy

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>who famously said in guy named Charles Buell. I love

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this quote. He was, He was the commissioner of the

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Patents Office. That's attributed to him, I should say, but

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>he said something like everything that can be invented has

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>already been invented. And he said this in a memo,

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>basically saying like you should go ahead and shut down

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the patent office. He clearly had never considered the Snuggie

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh or anything that's been invented since. So here's what

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say. I'm gonna go ahead and give you

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>my summation early on, Okay, is that I think people

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think at various times in history that they've plateaued, and

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>then I think things happen. People come along innovators and

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>then they reached new heights and they go, oh, well,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know that, and we there are new ideas, right.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's on most umb. It almost displays a shameful

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>lack of historic awareness to say we've reached the end

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of all of our good ideas. It's just it's just

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>asking to be made a fool of, yeah, or for

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>people to maybe people do that on purpose, to go

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the innovators and say, oh, yeah, right, using reverse psychology,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that's how innovation works. Yeah, you might as

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>well just give up. Reverse psychology drives innovation. There are

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>people though, that say that technological that real technological innovation

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>has been stalled for quite a while. Yes, after the

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>nineties computer revolution, everything else since then has kind of

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>been like, uh, packaging it and better looking cases and

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sleeker designs, and it's all like design oriented it is,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>or marketing oriented. These these guys Cedric Lagare and Eric Virdo,

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we're both with scheme of business school. Um basically say, smartphones, Yes,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they seem incredibly new and cutting in, but really they're

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>just the packaging of several already extant technologies into a

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really sharp looking handheld device, but there's still a new idea.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I would argue it is still a new idea. But

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what their point is is saying, like, but

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>before the late nineties and before the eighties, let's say,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with computers, but especially the tech boom of the telecom

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>boom of the late nineties, Like this stuff wasn't around, Like,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not true innovation rights, it's kind of repurposing and

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>what you were saying, like the cosmetic changes to a computer. Um.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons why they they believe that this

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is going on is because we've come to a point

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in the computer revolution. I think, chuck, where, Um, it's

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not you can still make tons of cash just by

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>changing the casing of a CPU. Yeah, there's like no

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>money in innovation basically, is what I got from this

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>one article is that innovation costs more than it's worth

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>when you can just repackage what you've got in a

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>sleeker design and people buy it up. Exactly. Um, these

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>two authors of this article, UM predict that we're gonna

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have two trends that will drive innovation. I guess currently right, yes,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that consolidation where basically like especially with I think they're

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>talking just about computers. Yeah, because they're saying the big

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>hardware firms are going to all consolidate all of the

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>smaller hardware firms to where they'll just basically be like

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the Big three or five, and that will leave it

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to the software firms to compete and innovate, so we'll

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>see more innovation in the software side rather than the

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>hardware side. And they're also saying that, um, the green

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>boom is going to drive innovation that makes sense, like

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up with sustainable packages or sustainable solutions. Yeah, totally.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the other things I pointed out thought was

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting was the they said they said the tes uh

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they call it the tech refresh cycle is too small

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. So what's happening is they'll say, Um, you

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like your CD, well you're gonna love the the Super

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Audio CD or Blu Ray. Do you like your DVD.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna love Blu Ray. But guess what's coming up

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>after Blu Ray. It's gonna be like Super Blue Ray.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It's happening so fast. People aren't abandoning their current systems.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>They're just like, you know what, I'm gonna hold on

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to be the guy stuck with

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the laser disc player in a couple of years, so

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the same thing happens. No one's

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>buying it, so it's not worth a much money, which

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>means that nobody's putting any effort into it and money

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>into it. So innovation sees right. And there's a guy,

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>um named Edmund Phelps who's a professor of political economy

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia University, right, and he's basically kind of saying

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. He's saying that, Um, there's not enough

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>money going toward innovation. But rather than the the onus

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>being put on consumers not buying blue rays of fear

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of looking like laser disc jerks, Um, it's actually government

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and big business that's not pouring money into small innovators. Yeah,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, that's the innovation is the only thing not

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>subsidized by the United States government, which he says is

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>actually attacks in a way because it's not being subsidized. Reach.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You could definitely, Yeah, I think a lot of these

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>guy's points are reached. But um, what he's suggesting is

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>if the government isn't pouring money into big business so

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that they can pour money into I guess small venture firms. Um,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>these people who are in their garages aren't going to

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>take you know, risks, They're not going to innovate. There's

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>no incentive. Right. I disagree with this. I dispute this

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's saying, like the people who do work in

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>their garages and you know, are the Steve Jobs and

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates in the seventies, that they were driven by

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this lust for money exactly. And I think that's wrong.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that people innovate first and foremost to get

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>this idea out of their head and birth into reality. Right.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you said this because I completely agreed. Regardless

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of what you think of the Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg didn't

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>invent Facebook to make gobs of money. He invented to

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>make real friends. Yeah, to to innovate. And that's what

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that's my point that you made is that these people

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the garage, the true innovators. They don't care if

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they have two pennies to rub together. They're still gonna

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>be trying to innovate and make a name for themselves

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and come up with something awesome. Right. And now there

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are people out there who are trying to innovate for

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the riches sure. The guy who invented the

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>snugg he wasn't in his garage and just wanted to

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of get this out or else I'm never gonna sleep. Yeah,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the people that are looking for the next get

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>rich quick thing. But I think you can also make

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a point that, um, when you introduce money to innovation,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>it leads to actual stagnation. Um, because when you introduce money,

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there's now uh something to lose, and people are less

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>willing to take risks, and risk is one of the

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>driving the willingness to take risk is one of the

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>driving forces of innovation. You know. Yeah, well, I Phelps

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>had a good idea, uh and this will never happen,

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, because it's a good idea to create the

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>first national Bank of innovation all capitalized capitalized not all caps,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but each word is capitalized. He should do it all

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in all caps with exclamation points. But basically, it would

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be a bank that you could go and partner, you know,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as a startup company and partner with his bank for

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>financing and you know, get I would guess some sort

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>of low interest loans to spur innovation. Right. That was

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a great idea, So it is. It is a good

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>idea and this does happen in the real world, and

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the government does pour money into innovation. He's not exactly

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>correct in that sense. And I also kind of resented

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that he placed big business in between you know, people

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in their garage innovating and you know, government subsidies that

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to have big business give them the money

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and then skim a little off the top and give

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it to this guy in the garage. He's drawing broad

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>strokes here. For sure. There are government programs, and we'll

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about one from the National Institutes of Health where

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the government says, hey, you have a really good idea,

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr or MS research scientists, and we're gonna give you

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>enough money to survive for three years. Yeah, because the

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>deal is you can always get grants if you know,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you put together a nice package. But this program with

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the n i H what's it called the New Innovator Award,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Director's New Innovator Award. This is uh intended for people

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>who have such a good idea, but it's so new

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that they don't have the data to write a grant

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>where people would say, like, it looks like you're onto

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>something here, So they're sort of throwing money at stuff.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That's like, you know, you're the dude in the garage

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and we believe in this idea. Go see what you

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can find out, right, and we're keeping big business out

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of the way. Yes, but now that and I h

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>owns you for the rest of your career. Yeah, So

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about UM. There's three people at U c

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>l A That got these grants recently and they're up

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to some kind of some interesting one could say innovative stuff, right.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>They have some good ideas, hugely innovative about how to

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>UM approach problems, like the professor Dino di Carlo. All

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>these I think these people are younger than us. By

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, UM Dino de Carlo is working on ways

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to basically apply heat or pressure or chemicals to very

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>specific sites in cells using nanoparticles and magnets, which is tough,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a winning idea to me. Is basically one

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of the big problems we have with UM getting cells,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>engineering cells to do specific things, like UM, I don't know,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>attack other cells for fun. Like if tell me that

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be like a big Christmas gift this year, if

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you could like make cells fight with one another under

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the microscope, UM then what you have to basically try

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to engineer the cell, you know, time after time after time,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and basically program it to do what you want it

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. What Di Carlo is coming up with is

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a way to use very tiny magnets and even tinier

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>nano particles that can basically you, my brain is so small.

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>When you move the magnet with a joystick, it attracts

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the nano particles in a certain direction or whatever, and

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you can have the nano particles apply heat or pressure

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>or a specific chemical to a specific site on a

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>cell and direct it to go attack another cell for

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>your pleasure. That's awesome, your amusement. So one point five

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mill goes to uh de Carlo and for a good reason.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And for a good reason. The other winner, one of

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the other winners, was Hugh Wang, and you came up

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with basically, I'm gonna break this down easy. Instead of saying,

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>let me come up with cure for cancer, hu Wang said,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>let me come up with a way to detect cancer

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>so early, like way earlier than we've ever detected it before,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that we can stop in his track essentially curing cancer.

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And he's doing this, actually I don't know, she's doing

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this um through uh nano material called graphine that is

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>just one atom thick. Yes, graphine is like the super

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly not of this world material. It's literally a carbon

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>atom thick. That's it. So, but it is a biological

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sensor to tell you when cells aren't doing the things

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that should be doing. So did you know a graham

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff? It's flattened covers a football field. Wow,

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's ultra light. That is thin, my friend, it's one

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>atom thin. So one point five mail to hu Wang, Right, well,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>did you explain how? Let me let me try my

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>hand at this. So basically what you do is you um,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you put a graphine conductor transistor UM in a cell

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and when these biological markers right say his stones or

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>something like that, start to accumulate, they're attracted to the graphing.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And these, by the way these biological markers are, we

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>found are correlated with the growth of cancer, the origin

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of cancer. That's where they're starting. UM. And when some

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of these markers like are attracted to the graphing, they

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>create an electrical charge that we can sense. And the

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>graphine is so thin but so highly conductive that um

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with just a couple of these molecules attaching to the graphing.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We would be able to detect it and be like,

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>oh right, we'd be like, oh crap, you have cancer

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'd cure it right then. Wow, Yeah, that's awesome. Yeah,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's a good way to approach a cure for cancer.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>If you asked me, did I explain that? Well? I

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think the last winner this year was

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Jen Hill Lee and Jin is trying to debug the

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>brain circuit using you know, we have the Wonder Machine,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which is our favorite thing in the world fm R I,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>which measures uh measures. It measures blood and oxygen levels

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the brain, so it tells you these areas light

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>up there called bold signals blood and oxygen level dependent.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>They light up to correspond a certain brain right, And

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this before, like you're seeing that there's

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>more oxygen that's going to that part of the brain.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So we've assumed this is the basis of the f

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>m R I. If it has more oxygen being delivered

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>to it, that must mean that that region of the

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>brain is active. When you show somebody a picture of

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, their kid, like being carried away into a

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>van that you know that's the fear region right there. Um.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't really say anything though, and it doesn't. It

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't also implicate well it's it's not it's showing. Okay,

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>well there's more oxygen in this region, right? What this is, um?

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>What what genuine Lee is looking at is um how

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>or what specifically on the neuronal level is being activated? Right?

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>And he's using opt to genetics, So it's going to

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be called the O F M R I. And that's

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>beyond even what we thought was the wonder machine. So

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the super duper wonder machine. Basically, he's using

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>light to allow genetically specified neurons to be activated. Right.

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you know, um, are one of our listeners that

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Emory has been harping on us doing one on opt

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to genetics for a while. We should get this person

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in here. This is probably his closest forever gonna come

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>out and it uh, well it's a great idea though

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously because Jin Young Lee won one of the Innovator

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Awards as well. Yes, and they give these out every year,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so they clearly believe that we're not out of good ideas.

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>No excellent point choke h no, and we're not out

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of good ideas. So yes, Chuck, we we you pick

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>those out. You found those guys all right, Well I

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't personally find them. You're like, these guys should get

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the UM. There are very good ideas out there, right,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But there is a debate that's raging in science UM

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>about whether these ideas like optogenetics or um, you know,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>using graphine or nanoparticles to cure detect cancer. UM, are

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>these variations on a theme? Are they applying cosmetic changes

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to a computer rather than really creating new parts to it? Right?

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And basically the question is, um, are are are there

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>any more major discoveries for us to make or are

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>these really just basically at Remember I've always said like

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>we we have the pieces on the table, now we

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just have to put it together. Is that the point

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that we're at? UM said we were, I did, and

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then we started researching this, and I'm like, I wonder,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I still do believe that. UM. But within

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that though, there's so much that it's to me a

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit like splitting hair. Well, but you're absolutely right,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when you throw in the word discovered, right, Discovery

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>indicates something that's already out there. We just figure it

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>out or stumble upon it and an idea necessarily kind

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of UM invention leads, Yeah, it leads to an invention.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It's something we we've created, like technology. So let's talk

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about discovery, right. We have a lot of UM problems

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that are still facing us and how we understand the universe,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like human consciousness. How do brain cells create our understanding

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world, like what we see as reality? How

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is that possible? And can we figure everything out? Well,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the big question. Is there there's a UM there's

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, there's a lot of debate about whether

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>or not we will ever be able to figure everything out,

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or if the human brain just simply isn't UM programmed

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand the world? Uh fully, you know, will will.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy who's a physicist. His name is um

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Russell Standard, and he's written this book called The End

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of Discovery, and basically he's saying he says that we're

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>in quote a transient age of human development, right where

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we're past the point where we figured out you can

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>put a handle on a rock and make it an ax.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're right before the point where we can no

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>longer make discoveries. Not because we've understood everything or figured

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>everything out. But because we've reached the limits of what

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is noble for the human brain. But even that, look

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>at that, that part of the the right hemisphere that

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>developed and allowed us to put the axe handle on, right,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>who's to say that our brain won't that we won't

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>reach that point where we can't know anything any longer,

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>or I can't know everything? And in uh, we evolve

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>even further and all of a sudden we're even better

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at um understanding our world. Right, But will we end

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>up eventually coming to a point where humans understand everything

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and there is no more discovery to make I say no,

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>because he he points out in here and this is

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I think very valid from the Midnight century, the nineteenth century.

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry they said that. A lot of people in

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>science said, you know, we've kind of debunked religion and

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>philosophy and all these things with scientific discovery. But he

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>points out, and I agree that even if you figure

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>out all the problems of science, which will never happen,

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there's still human life and consciousness in the subjectivity of

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what goes on inside a person's head. You're never gonna

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>solve that's not solvable, right, that's what I argue. That's subjectivism. Yeah,

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>before I think I believe in that there, well, they're

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole the I guess I I agree with you. Um,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there's this aspect of the universe that Kant called the

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>new Amenon, new amenon that was specifically tailored from my

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>thick time. But basically the new aminon is the thing

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>itself right where um it has. It's just the objective.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the objective universe, and we don't interact with that.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Everything we know and understand is subjective, and this is

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>where subjectivism is is based that basically we can never

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>fully know anything or and we certainly won't ever know

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>everything because one thing that will always be elusive is

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what you see. My reality is different than your reality exactly,

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's different. There's an extreme version of it called

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so solipsism, right, yes, and solipsism is the the um

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this extreme version of subjectivism that basically says, um, we

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.239
<v Speaker 1>everything is so subjective that I can't fully verify that

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you exist. The only thing I know that exists is

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>my reality, but all of you may be made up.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I may be totally completely out of my mind and

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>actually in a padded cell right now and none of

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you are really real Well, that's sort of touches on

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole quantum mechanics thing, right, don't you think Please? Well,

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't have a whole to say about

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it because we've covered it, but it definitely is along

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the same line. So I think, well, yeah, there's a

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>there's an interpretation of quantum mechanics that basically says, um,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>everything we know about the universe we know through observation,

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and but once you observe it, it it changes. That's part

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. And when when we observe, we we gain information, right,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but we can't observe everything at once, So all we

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>know exists in our reality for sure, is what we're observing.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>So everything else, like what's going on out there in

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the office right now, doesn't exist because we're not there

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to observe it. Mind blowing. Once again, it is mind blowing,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but it all So we say all this not just

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to you know, rock out to Floyd, but um, because

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what science is up against. This

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>isn't just jibberish. This isn't just philosophical jibberish, as much

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 1>as science would like it to be. There is a

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>true problem with the fact that subjectivity, not objectivity, is

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>how we interact with our universe, even though science is

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>based it's supposed to be based exclusively on objectivity. Right. Well, uh,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking, you might have heard of him and another

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>dude named Leonard load Loader. Now is how I'm going

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to pronounce that there's a silent m in there somewhere.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.719
<v Speaker 1>They have a new book called The Grand Design, and

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they are now saying that I think scientists used to

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>say we're gonna find the theory of everything. Now they're saying,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're probably not going to find the

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>theory of everything, but it's probably gonna be more like

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what they call, quote a family of interconnected theories which

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>describe your reality under very specific conditions. And this is

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of huge for Stephen Hawking because he's long been

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a big supporter of the theory of everything, which takes

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the standard model of physics, includes gravity, which has always

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>been elusive, and then marries it with quantum mechanics to

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>explain everything. That's the theory of everything. It's one theory

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that explains everything, right, like that surfer guy exactly, Garrett Leci.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's damn it was. And you know it's

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be years before he's shown to be correct

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>or incorrect. But Hawking saying it's probably not going to

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be the case. There's going to there's too many different

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>variables that don't fit together. But the thing that really

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>scares a physicist, that will scare any physicist, is this sports.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are those models that we've come up with. Are

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they how the universe actually works? Or how we look

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at the universe and see how it works? You see

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. There's that subjectivism again. It can't be

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>whipped well. And all the things that we've said over

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the years that we have formed to be true, are

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>those even true? Or are are the conclusions we're reaching

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just based on years of thought compiled that may not

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.239
<v Speaker 1>have been true to begin with. So I like we

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>arrive at reality by consensus. Yeah, but is that consensus?

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Was that even accurate along the way? Not necessarily. It's

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>been shown time and time again that it's it hasn't

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>been accurate through these um the five revolutions, as VM

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Ramaschandra and puts them. Arnicus Copernicus was the first one

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>who said that Earth is not the center of the universe,

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Darwinism dark very good. Chuck Darwin's says like, hey, we're

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>actually just a bunch of apes DNA Freud Freud Freud

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>saying like we we actually are driven by desires that

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we can't control and aren't really aware of DNA, which

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>is saying I think James Watson, who found DNA along

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with Francis Crick, said quote, there are only molecules, everything

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>else is sociologist. I love that quote, man, It's one

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite. And then um, the Fifth Revolution, the

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience revolution, that we're all everything, are all of our

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>understanding movements and and experiences are nothing but um neuronal transmissions,

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>electrochemical impulses. Right, so there's not even sociology that even

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is just based on firing neurons. Right, That's that's where

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we're at right now. That's why I say, I think

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>we have everything on the table, just haven't put it together.

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's entirely possible historically speaking, to say, well we

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thought that before and we didn't. And what revolution is next?

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Will that will the next revolution get us over the

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>wall of subjectivism or will that be the wall that

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we always run into? This is a good one, and well,

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I was worried about this one. It came out pretty

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>good in it. I think, so, yeah, don't you like

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it when we like pat ourselves in the back of

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the show, I think this one deserves it.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Man well, so from Blue Rays to Carons And at

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, Josh and Chuck say, we

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are not out of new ideas. Can I speak for you?

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, We're not out of new ideas. And just

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>when you think you're out of new ideas, just when

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you think of plateaued comes up you wang along to

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>say no, no, no, no, there are new ideas and

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>here's one you know not give me the cash exactly.

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more about innovation and new ideas,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we have tons of stuff all over the site. Just

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>type in innovation, type in discovery. I'm sure that'll bring

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>up a ton of stuff. Um, and type in neurons.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>That will bring up some pretty cool stuff too. Agreed. Uh,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you can type all those words into the handy search

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>bar how stuff works dot com, which means it's time

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for a listener mail. Yes, Josh, I'm gonna follow this

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>very heavy podcast with the opposite an email for him Okay,

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this is from our thirteen year old fan Payton in California. Well, hello,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sending us from my eye touch while laying in bed.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to be asleep, so anyway, I just started

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to your podcast after my friend Claire. Yes, that's

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Claire from California whose email you read on the air,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>who thinks Jerry looks like Tina f A. Uh. Claire

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is his his Peyton's friend. So she said, oh, you

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>got in the year, so i'letna starting listening to you. Um. Actually,

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying Peyton is a girl, Peten maybe a boy.

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You never know? Oh really, yeah, it's indragynus right, yeah,

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ambivalent at least. Uh. Claire posted on her Facebook page

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that I said, listen to the most recent podcast because

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys read her letter or something. I thought it

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was so cool. Claire and I are really good friends. Anyways,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I love this podcast. Gosh, I feel so boring because

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying podcast. Is there like another word for that?

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Jared laughed at that. Anyways, I definitely she does that

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thing like the kids do now where they put like

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>eight s at the end of a word. Have you

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seen that yeah, I don't get that. I don't either, original,

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So. I most definitely enjoyed the podcast on

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Octopi and stuff I thought was Octopie. I thought

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it was informational and funny. By the way, this email

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. It's because my eye touch is

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>dumb and auto correct words that have already spelled right

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ERG moving on your iPhone does that too? And mind

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>does that? What's this? An email written with one of

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>those pens that has like four different color ink you

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can select rons that it feels like. But the reason

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I brought that up is I have an idea to

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>start a website called my ipop my iPhone spelled what

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com Because you ever look at some of them

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you sinned and you're like, can you please make sure

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you take the sofa out of the oven when you

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>get them when you meant to say, um sturgeon, let's

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>say surgeon is so far I would surgeon, okay, take

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the surgeon out of the oven? Which is I think

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so much better. I wish you would have planned this anyway.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It can make for a lot of fun. So that's

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>my new idea. And that's some lots of love from Peyton,

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>aged thirteen and Cali thanks a lot of patent age

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and a boy or girl. We're not exactly sure,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but either way, we appreciate you taking the time to

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>write in. And if you have a movie that Chuck

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and I have not seen, you assume we haven't seen

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that you think we should see, best movie, best overlooked

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>movie of all time. We're always looking for good suggestions.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Wrap it up in an email and send it to

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at how stuff works dot com. For more

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. The how stuff Works dot Com i

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>phone app is coming soon. Get access to our content

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in a new way, articles, videos, and more all on

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the go. Check out the latest podcasts and blog post

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and see what we're saying on Facebook and Twitter. Coming

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>soon to iTunes. Brought to you by the reinvented two

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you