WEBVTT - Legally Brunette: Sherri Papini

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi, guys, welcome to another episode of Legally Brunette. I'll

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>be your host Emily Simpson and my co host Shane.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to say, just Shane, Shane, just Shane. All right.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Our last episode we did we went through a little

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of the Karen Reid trial, but we also got

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to the closing arguments and the verdict. However, I thought

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it was important at the top of this episode just

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about the Alberts and mccabes

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because they decided to give interviews right after the verdict

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>came out. So let's talk about who was interviewed now.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Brian Albert, who was the one who owned the home

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and he was a Boston police officer where John O'Keeffe

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was found dead outside of his home, His wife Nicole,

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>his brother Chris, as well as his sister in law,

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>who we all know is Jen McCabe, the one who

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>testified in court, and her husband Matt All spoke to

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>ABC News in an interview which was released on Friday,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>June twentieth. This was two days after Karen Reid was acquitted.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>All five were witnesses at Reed's first trial. However, when

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they did the reach trial. Jennifer McCabe was the only

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>one who testified at the retrial. Now, I was thinking

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about this, and I assume the prosecution puts on their

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>on their case and they were like, Okay, we don't

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>need any of you to testify again because that did

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>not work the first time around. So Jen McCabe was

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the only one who actually testified for the prosecution.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>You mean you think that they had her testify and

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 2>then after it was a bad testimony for them, then

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>they decided not to have anyone else.

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>No, I think all of these people that were all

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>within the house all testified in the first trial, and

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>then when the retrial came along.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so even before the second trial, they realized like,

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 2>this is not a good idea.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they were like, none of they're not credible,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're just not going to put them on. So

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Jen McCabe, who is the who is the sister in

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>law of Brian Albert who owns the home, is the

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>only one who testified at the retrial. All right, So

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>let's just go over a little bit of what they did.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The families have been accused by Reid and her defense

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lawyers to be the ones who were responsible for John

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>O'Keeffe's death. That was the That was their defense was

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that there was a conspiracy and that these police officers

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>all conspired together that something happened to John within the home,

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and then that they put the body out on the lawn.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They blame Karen Read for it. But in the interview,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Brian Albert describes the theory as quote preposterous and silly.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You do realize for this conspiracy to be true, it

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>would take thirty to fifty people to be in on it.

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>This is what Albert told Matt Gutman, who is the interviewer.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how people buy this.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna price speak to it, but I don't know

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>if I agree with it takes thirty to whatever people

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to be in on it.

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So I had the same question. I remember when this

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>trial was going on, initially thinking if this is a

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy and that's the defense's play, it really is astonishing

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to me that someone has not come forward or spoken

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>out or broke this pack that they have.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not surprising to me. It happens a lot. If

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 2>there's like a drug party and someone dies, there's all

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>these people at the party house and people are like,

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying out of it, walking away.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it makes me not like.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Their hands are dirty per se, they're just staying away

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>from it.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it makes me also think about pity. Yeah

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and his freak offs. I mean, these have been going on.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>For years, years, and those are people that don't even

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>benefit from the freak cops. They're just like security guard, janitors,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, pairman, Yeah, others delivering the baby celebrities.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that no one was talking about these

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>freak offs and there were so many people involved and

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>it went on for years and years and years, goes to.

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Show you that you can have It's like you see

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>an accident, does everyone pull over and try to say,

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm a waitness, I can help out. No, A lot

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>of people just think I gotta go to work and

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>these drive.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Off, all right. So, Brian Albert also addressed one of

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the major criticisms Reid's defense had on his conduct of

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the morning of January twenty ninth, twenty twenty two. Despite

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>being a fellow Boston Police officer and a trained first responder,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Albert never left his home, which is one of the

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>things that we talked about when we did earlier episodes,

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was how bizarre it is that he is a police officer.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He's inside this home, there's a body found dead on

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>his lawn. He's a first responder. It's a fellow police officer,

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and he never leaves his home to find out what happened,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask to inquire, and police never went inside his I'm.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Sure when he pulls someone over for a moving violation,

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>he's very detail oriented, takes notes, yeah, checks all the paperwork,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>completes the form for the ticket. But then with this

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>dead body on his lawn, and he's.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Like, he doesn't want it, he's not interested.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>No, he's got to get his floor as repaired.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So during this interview, Brian Albert says, what am I

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do? Run out front in my underwear and

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>start running yellow tape around the fire hydrant. Yes, I'm

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not a Canton police officer. I'm a Boston police officer.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just woken up out of a cold sleep

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>from hanging out the night before. By the time I

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>came downstairs, the police were already in my house. John

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was already gone, and there was nobody to save. First

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of all, he says in the interview, the police were

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>already in my house.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, there's police. No, but please live in that house.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>He is the police, isn't he.

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but he's referring to the police that we're investigating,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and that's not true. I feel like this is just.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, if it is true, then it's what information did

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>they gather by being inside the house?

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's confirmed that there were no No

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>one went in the house.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Is saying that because he's.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>A liar, because I don't, because I think he's making

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>up what happened that day, because there's in my opinion,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>allegedly there was something nefarious that went on in that house,

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and that there's a cover up.

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's opinion this right, So now that.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>He's giving first of all, it probably wasn't a great

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>idea for them to give an interview.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>They probably would you give an interview, I think.

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Because people think they're going to change people's minds that

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're if they speak to it, and they and they

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're convincing enough in their own head that they're

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>going to convince other people. I think all it did

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 1>was make them look more guilty. He says, I would

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>have taken a bullet for John O'Keeffe because he was

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a fellow cop.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I'm not going to go out there. But

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to go out there my body and

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>see if he's alive or dead.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Or I'll take a bullet. But I'm not going to

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>go out there with manderwear and run yellow tail.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>And I won't testify and I won't admit for any wrongdoing,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 2>but I'll take a bullet.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>And I would take a bullet Matt McCabe.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Because it's sorry. That's because it's easy to say that.

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 2>People say that all the time that they'll they'll do anything.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's easy to say that or say I'll

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>lay down my life or I'll give my life. But

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>but when you're actually in the position, will he take

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a bullet?

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>No, doubt it, No, absolutely not.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't I take a bullet from my friends?

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah no, probably not. No, you probably would take a

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>bullet for me. Like what are you talking about?

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Son, who's firing? And what you did.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Matt McCabe said the group stayed silent because they wanted

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to let the court do its job. We took what

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>we thought was the high road, he said. Brian Albert

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>adds the criminal justice system has led us down at

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>every turn. Yesterday when Karen was acquitted, was the final letdown.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>No one protects you, and it's very very sad. Think

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>long and hard before you're a witness in a case,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>added his wife Nicole. She said she was just sad

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for John's family. Yeah, and I mean we've talked about that.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We're all sad for John O'Keefe's family. The real travesty

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is that there's no closure in this case, and they

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>still have the civil lawsuit going on. But yep, we'll

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>see what happens with that. The Oke family has not issued.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>A public A civil lawsuit might reveal more information, right,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>because some things might be more admissible in a civil case.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we need to dive into that. I have heard

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if this is true, but it

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do also with Karen's behavior that night in

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the house when she couldn't find John because his daughter

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was in the house and she was fourteen, and there's

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.559
<v Speaker 1>something about her possibly being traumatized by the way Karen

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>acted or so I think I.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Think they'll be more to learn. Yeah, maybe still some

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>more questions to be answered, but there'll be more to

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>learn as a result of the civil case.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So the Okey family has not issued to public statements

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>since the verdict and did not speak to the press

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>outside the courthouse. They are still suing read for John

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>O'Keefe's death in a civil lawsuit. All right, let's move

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on to Sherry Peppini. I'm so excited to do this

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>case because it is nuts and I love talking about

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>nutty women because I like there's I am always intrigued

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>by Shane's reaction.

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know much about this case.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't Cherry Peppini. First of all, there

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was a documentary I'm going to tell you if you

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>guys drink, I would like sh First of all, let

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>me tell you the order you need to go about

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>watching this, because I feel like too many people who

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are now interested in the Sherry Peppini case are only

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>watching the four part documentary that came out on Identity

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>What is It ID Identification Discovery, which is the the

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>most newly released interview that she did after serving time

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in prison. If you only watch that, I feel like

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you might be a little biased and a little jaded.

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So I would suggest that if you're interested in a

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>full account of what happened, go and watch the Hulu

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>documentary It's called a Perfect Wife, that is about what

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>happened with this kidnapping and everything. It gives you a

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>very deep background into her life and her husband and

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>her kids and this whole kidnapping. Then watch the new

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>four part interview that she does recently, because I feel

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like you have to put those two together to really

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have a full concept of everything.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Perfect Wife, Well, I mean, I get why is it

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>called perfect Wife?

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I think because that's the way she portrayed herself as

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like this perfect wife and mom and really in reality,

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>she's insane. All right, Let's get into Sherry. Let's get

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>into Sherry pep Beanie.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Sharry is a California mother of two who's twenty sixteen

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>disappearance and dramatic or sparked national attention, only to unravel

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>years later as one of the most notorious kidnapping hoaxes

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in modern times. So this happened back in November two

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of twoenty and sixteen. Peppini is believed to have been

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>kidnapped during an eleven AM jog. Her husband, Keith Peppini,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>says he last received a text from Sherry at ten

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven am asking if he planned to return home

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for lunch, but he claims he didn't see the text

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>right away and responded back around one thirty pm. Keith

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>reports her missing that evening after he comes home to

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>find she isn't there and had not picked up the

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>kids from daycare. He does find my iPhone and that

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>led Keith to Sherry's phone and earbuds, which were found

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on the ground with strands of hair appearing as though

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>there had been some type of struggle. Authorities and family

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>members launch an intensive search and public awareness campaign. Now

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he starts doing a lot of interviews. Of course, what

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>does everyone say when a wife disappears? They clearly please.

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Come home, please go.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I watched his interviews, it kind of it

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of Scott Peterson when Lacey was missing and

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>he did all the interviews about you know, like Marie,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>come back, please come back, bring my wife back. Although

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott Peterson is dead in the face, at least Keith

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Peppinie has I find him somewhat more believable. When I

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was watching his interviews, I felt as if I didn't think, like, Okay,

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the one.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 2>What state is this in?

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is in northern California and reading. So Sherry Peppini

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>disappears from November third to November twenty third, She's gone

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>around twenty two days. Local, state, and federal law enforcement

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are involved in the missing person's case. I do know

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that Keith also requested that the FBI be involved. Someone

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>told him that he should do that, and there is

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>video of him during his interviews asking for the FBI

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to be involved. Social media and go fund me campaigns

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>draw national attention. There was a GoFundMe that raised more

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>than forty two thousand towards search efforts, and the Peppini

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>family also offered a fifty thousand dollars reward for Sherry's

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>safe return. He also made. Keith also made many emotional

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>appearances on Good Morning America, ABC News, et cetera, describing

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>his wife as a supermom and pleading for her safe return.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 2>That's that's sign of guilt right there.

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>What the supermom? Yeah, well, he's not guilty. November twenty

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>fourth is Thanksgiving Day. At four thirty am, Sherry is

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>found in the middle of country Road seventeen and I

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>five in Yolo County, Yolo. You only live once.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not the last one in apathetic order, though it's

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 2>not Yuma County, Yuma, it's a close one. It's a

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 2>close second.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 1>It was near the Woodland area, about one hundred and

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty miles south of where she first disappeared. She has

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>found bruised and emaciated, with bindings and a brand on

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>her shoulder that says Exodus. Her hair has also been cut.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Was Exodus, Well, it's a Bible.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Verse, I know, but like I don't know, Yeah, what

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>was the significance of that?

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, not really anything, I don't think.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Was it like a certain font or was it a

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>certain like style that means some type of cult?

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 2>We would have to ask Sherry that did tattoo. I'd

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>be like, okay, whatever, But you said branded, it's different.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It's branded. It was burned onto her.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's Sherry's story.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>She claims that she was captured by two Hispanic women

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and a dark suv while on her run. They took

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>her to an unknown location, which she claims to have

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>been drugged during the car ride, so she didn't know

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>where she was. She said she was physically restrained, with

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>her wrists and ankles chained and a bag over her

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>head for the majority of the time. She said she

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was beaten repeatedly, often just for fun, by one of

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the women, who she referred to as the mean one.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>She claims she was starved, losing a significant amount of weight,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>reportedly fifteen to twenty pounds within a twenty two day

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>period that she was gone. She said her two captors

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>branded her on the right shoulder with a heated tool,

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>though she didn't know what the word act that is meant,

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Apparently it is a reference to the Bible. She was

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>forced to use a small bucket as a latrine, and

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>she reported that one of the women appeared more sympathetic

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and that her release was likely negotiated by her I

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>watched her interview when she was telling the police, and

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>she calls the two Hispanic women that she claims abducted her.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>She says there was a big one and there was

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a small one, and she said the big one was

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the mean one, and the small one was more sympathetic

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>towards her recorded police interviews was Sherry Peppini, and the

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hours after her return showed she was reluctant to speak

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with investigators, claiming that her abductors told her she was

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be trafficked to someone in law enforcement. Sheery

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>avoided doing media interviews after she had escaped. She even

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>avoided large.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Crad Did she escape or negotiate her release?

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, what happened was they she was found dropped on

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the side of the room.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I vaguely remember this in the news.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm starting, and someone picks her up and he

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>calls nine one one, and you can hear his nine

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one one recording, and he calls her first, he calls

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>her Sherry Panini and then she says Peppini. So a

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bystander on the highway finds her and calls police, and

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>she's like, has a chain wrapped around her waist and she.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Has She's not very good negotiator.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>She has u ties. What are those zip ties?

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Cable ties?

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Cable ties? Right, So she avoids doing me to interviews

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>after she's caught. There are several interviews that I watch

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the documentary where the police are recording her. They're

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>asking her questions about what happened, and I find her

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so disingenuine and so unlikable. She talks about things that

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>don't make sense, Like she talks about how she texts

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>her husband to come home for lunch, but lunch really

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>means come home to have sex. I thought that was

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>just odd that these are things that she's telling investigators

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>when supposedly she's, you know, been kidnapped for twenty two

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>days and has been beaten, and she's just making jokes

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about like sexual references with her husband. She says that

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>she needs to close her eyes when she talks. She

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>can't remember a lot of things anyway. I find her

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult to believe. There was also a skinheads dot com

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>article amidst all of this, it was discovered that Sherry

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>had written a racist post against the Hispanic community on

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a skinhead website under her maiden name Sherry Graf.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Prior to or after.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Prior to, the blog entry claims Peppini was persecuted by

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Latinos at her high school for being of German descent

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and that she was white and proud of her blood

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and heritage. The post read, I totally agree with skinheads

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that girls should not fight, they should stand by their men.

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Being white is my family, my roots, my way of life.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's always there. There's no denying it. It's nobility, its strength,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it will be there. To lift me up when I

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>really need my pride, when I need to keep walking.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>When asked about this post, Sherry denies writing it and

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>claims someone impersonated her.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Why would someone in personate her and go on a

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>skinhead website? That's so random?

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It is random, But this is what happens when someone

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is the type of person who repeatedly lies about everything.

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>On October twenty fifth, twenty seventeen.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>So you find these cases that are very that just

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>leave lots of questions.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's lots of questions. I think that.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to be confusing. In this case, it

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 2>sounds like it's going to be very confusing because you

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 2>just said she's a liar. She's a liar, so well

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>is Shelsey.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So Sherry Peppini asks the FBI, can you do a

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>sketch of the two women who abducted me? So she

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>describes them, and they do a sketch and they release

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>it to the media, and it's two Hispanic women, a

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger one and a smaller one, and they both have

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>masks on because she claims that they covered their face

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>for the majority of the time.

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 2>She's just like so she asked for criminal sketch artists. Yes,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and then she's like, oh, they wore masks, Yes, I

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 2>could have drawn that.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So basically they do the sketches of these two Hispanic women.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>They were basically just their eyes, their eyes and eyebrows.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>They release it. The media releases it like this is

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there's new developments in the Sherry Peppina case. The sketch

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>artist has, you know, made these sketches based upon, you know,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>her detailed account of these two women that abducted her.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The day that the sketch artist releases the sketches to

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the media is the same day that the FBI gets

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>back DNA testing from her clothing from when she was abducted,

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's male DNA found in her underwear.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 2>And is it has it been excluded that it's not

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 2>her husband's or boyfriends or whoever it is.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not it's not her that out Yeah, okay.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So in the years following Sherry's return, local investigators as

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>well as the FBI are very skeptical of her claims,

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>so they continue their search and investigation and to her

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>because if.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 2>She got beaten, there'd be some female DNA, you'd assume.

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they don't find any female DNA. They only

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>find male DNA, not her husband, multiple males or no

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>one male?

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The DNA evidence did not match her story. Investigators found

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>male DNA on her clothing and belongings, despite her claim

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that she was abducted by two women. The DNA did

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not match her husband or any suspect until it was

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>later matched to her ex boyfriend James Rays.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Wait, how did they make that connection?

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Though they did, I don't know. They ran it through

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>COTIS or whatever.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>It took a while in the system.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Well no or no, Maybe it wasn't codis. I don't know,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it says Familia familial dale.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the voluntarily.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>DNA. Well he, I'm sure he gave up his DNA, so.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>The lack of forensic evidence supporting the abduction. There were

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>no tire tracks, fingerprints of surveillance footage, or physical signs

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of an abduction were found where she allegedly disappeared. And also,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I know the FBI investigator also made the claim that

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they were very suspicious of her from the very beginning

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>because when they found the cell phone and the headphones

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>apparently like her ear plugs or whatever, they were were

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up neatly and like laying on top of the

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>cell phone, and the cell phone was lying on the ground.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>And then there were some blonde hairs that were kind

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of stuck into the earbuds.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Like someone pulls up to kidnapp her, and she's like,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 2>hold on one second, she rolls up her earbuds. Yes,

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 2>that's what I'm saying.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So he finds her phone. He actually before he

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>picked up her phone, he took a picture of it.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>That's even weirder.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is that weirder?

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Took a picture of your phone when I found it?

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I guess because it was evidence and

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to pick it up unless he took

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a photo of how it was sitting there.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 2>So he takes photos and he might be in it.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll find out he's gone.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>He's not in it. Unusual branding. The forensic experts suggests

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>that exodus branding looked deliberate and controlled, not consistent with

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the panicked act of violence. I guess, you know, I

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>understand that too. If they're trying to brand her and

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>she's like captive and all these things, wouldn't you be

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>moving around? I think it just was very neatly done.

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 2>It looked like she just I don't know, being wrapped up.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so they found on her penterress page that the

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>same wooden tools that were used to brand her back

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>were part of her pinteress page.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Did they check her Amazon account and she purchased like

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a brand?

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>She didn't purchase them. James ray As purchased them. Oh

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.239
<v Speaker 1>really yes, and he had the receipt for it.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so why are we bothered at? Okay, so she

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 2>wanted to go away and get branded by her ex

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend or whatever. What's the what's the issue?

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Because she said to she said to Hispanic women abducted her.

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>The theory is or what what it comes down to

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is that ray As is her ex boyfriend and she

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>was having and she calls an emotional affair with him.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>They got burner phones and they were communicating. Then he

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>comes from he lives in Coasta, Mesa. He drives from

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Coasta Mesa to reading anything emotion. She's trying to say

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have sex with them.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, so was it emotional DNA they found on

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>her underwear?

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was an emotional DNA on her underwear.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Very well, keep gone.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>So they finally figure out because they don't believe her story.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>The two masks, the getting picked up on Thanksgiving?

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Where city they find her in the same city.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>No, they found her one hundred and fifty miles away.

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought, wasn't it down here in Coasta Mesa

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>No, she was James Ray's lived in Coasta Mesa and

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where she spent the twenty two days in Coasta Mesa.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Then he drove her, I don't know, one hundred like

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>towards Redding and then dropped her off on the side.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Of the enough emotions for the weekend.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>When they on and zip ties she gets out of

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the car. I think there's actually surveillance of her running

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>without the zip ties. And then when they and then

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>when the police come then find her, she's zip tied,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>cable ties whatever they're called. And so basically what happens

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was what they didn't believe her story from the beginning.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So they're investigating her the whole time, even though they're

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>not telling her they're investigating her. They just keep interviewing

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>her and interviewing the husband.

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And so she just divulges all this information while the.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Whole time the FBI is like, this is a bunch

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of crap and they're investigating her without telling her. So

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they find the DNA, they link it to James Ray

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>As the police go to Costa Mesa and they interview

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>him and you can see they don't show him on camera.

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>He clearly did not agree to show his imass or something. Yeah,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they show body cams and they show audio, I mean

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>not show, but you can hear audio, but they don't

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>show his face on camera.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Because he's just a witness at this point.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, and what he says is that she asked him

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to come and pick her up because her husband's abusive

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and she wants to get out of the marriage. So

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in his eyes or the way he explains it is

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he's just helping this girl out. So he comes and

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>he picks her Upie takes her to Coast to Mesa.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Then she stays for twenty two days in his house.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 2>He probably can't stand her.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but he claims that all the physical things,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>all the harm, the bruises, everything, it was self inflicted,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that she did it to herself, or that she directed

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>him to do it. I guess he was a hockey

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>player and she told him to hit her with a

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>hockey puck and he broke her.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Notes like she liked it or like to set up her.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>To set up her story. I guess that's how that's

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>how much.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Then he's a psycho too, because it's like, oh, let

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 2>me go help this woman. What do you need? Do

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 2>you need me to smack you in the face with

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 2>that hockey puck?

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I don't understand for one second why this

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>James Rays guy goes along with this, Probably because.

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>He initially tried to save her and help her, and

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>then you know, get emotional with her, and then they

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 2>come down to coast to Mesa, and then he realized

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 2>she's psycho. And then she says, well, let me let

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 2>me like complete the story and you have I have

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 2>been a so hit me in the face. And he's

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>like gladly because she's psycho. And then he tied her

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 2>up and dumped her off and he wants nothing to

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 2>do with her anymore.

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I would say that, I would say

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much in a nutshell.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And if she was nice and pleasant, I don't

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 2>think he would hit her in the face with the

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 2>hockey puck.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>One he goes along with this story two. When they

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>interview him, he does not seem to be highly intelligent

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at all. He seems very like.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't there receipts for a hotel too? Did they stay

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 2>in a hotel or his place?

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>No, they stayed at his home. There was a receipt

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>for him buying the wood burning tools he had that.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like, look, here's a receipt told me to buy it.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think that they don't. The FBI doesn't give

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of information in these interviews that they do.

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They're very careful about their tools and tactics and behind

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the scenes.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, that way, then she could say something that might

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 2>conflict with what they found, and then that would be

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>more suspicious.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Right. But I'm just saying, even when they talk about

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>it after the fact, even giving interviews after the fact,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>they don't give away a lot of information about how

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they knew James was manipulated by her. I know he passed,

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lie detector test, but we'll talk later

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 1>about her because she takes one later. But I just

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't I feel like he's almost so simple, like

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not highly intelligent, that he just went along with

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this crazy scheme, because who in their right mind, has

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>someone stayed with them for twenty two days when they

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>have a wife, when they have a husband and young children,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and then goes along with physically abusing them, and then

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>goes along with dumping them on the side of the road,

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't think that that looks bad for them.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 2>It really makes my life feel very boring. Yeah, you're like, yeah,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>like you know, and he's probably less stressed than I

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 2>am in.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>His life, probably so. After they found James's DNA, this

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was in August of twenty twenty, the FBI contacted and

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>questioned James Reyes at his home in Coasta, Mesa, And

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>let's just talk about what he told the investigators. He

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>says that Peppini had reached out to him. He confirmed

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that he and Peppini had previously dated in the early

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousands. They were in constant communication via burner phones.

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Months before her disappearance, she'd tell him she needed to

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>escape her abusive marriage and start over. He agreed to

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>help her and picked her up in Reading, driving her

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>six hundred miles south to his apartment in Costa Mesa.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>He claims she was never kidnapped. Rey said that Peppini

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>stayed willingly in his apartment for the entire twenty two

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>days that she was missing. He described her as staying

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly inside doing household chores, watching TV, and exercising. He

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>claims she even watched the news coverage of her own disappearance.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Injuries were self inflicted or assisted by him. Reyes admitted

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to helping her create some of the injuries, including holding

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a hockey stick so she could run into it and

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>purposefully causing bruising. Branding her shoulder using a wood burning

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>tool was at her request, she says later in an interview,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to kind of to I don't know, get past the

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>wood burning thing, because you know, I told you this.

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Wood burning tools were on her own pinterant page. The

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>way she explains it after the fact is she says, oh, well,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>when he kidnapped me, we were having a conversation and

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I was telling him about how I was making these

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>handcrafted Christmas cards with wood burning tools, and he was

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so interested in it that he went out and bought

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>someone branded my you know, my shoulder. I mean, do

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you really think she's in Costa Mesa with James Ray's

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about how she makes Christmas cards for her kids.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>No, she's watching the coverage of her own.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Right. Security cameras show Peppini running through an empty parking

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>lot towards the highway on Thanksgiving morning. In the footage,

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>her hands are not tied together. She is running normally. However,

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>when a driver found her on the side of the road,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they were zip tied and she was wearing a chain

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>around her waist. She's like, don't forget to bring the

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>zip ties and chain. I'll just put him in a

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll just I'll hang on to him and then right

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>before the police come, I'll just put them on myself.

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I've always said ziptized. Are they not ziptized?

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Sable?

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, reyas cooperated fully with the FBI. He consented to

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA collection, provided text messages, and allowed investigators to search

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>his apartment. He passed the polygraph test, and authorities confirmed

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>no chargers were filed against him as he had no

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>criminal intent and was considered a cooperating witness. All right,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so his account directly contradicted everything Peppini had told law

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>enforcement and investigators now had a motive, a means, and

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the evidence, which was the DNA, the phone records, and

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the injury creation and that she'd faked her own abduction.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The DOJ said Rey's cooperation was truthful, consistent, and corroborated

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>by physical evidence. So the FBI is slowly building their case.

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>From twenty twenty to twenty twenty two, investigators kept the

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>case quiet for nearly two years. We talked about that.

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>How they continue to talk to Pappinie, have interviews with her,

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but obviously they don't give away any information that they're

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>investigating this as they kidnapping hoax.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>No let her say anything she wants.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, They confirm and consistency in her interviews. They track

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>how she spent one hundred thousand plus dollars of victim funds,

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>disability payments, and go fundme donations.

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Some of those gounfund me things are people are way

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 2>too quick to just set them up and give people money,

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's like there's probably a lot of scammers on there.

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, she got disability because so she's taking disability. She

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>also received money from like a California victims fund. And

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>then also clearly the state or the city or whoever

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>pays for it, taxpayers pay for her for the search efforts.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So they build a case against her for mail fraud

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which are the benefits that she received, and false statement,

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>which is lying to federal agents. On March third of

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Sherry Peppini is arrested while tending her

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>children's music lessons. The charges against her are mail fraud

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and making false statements to federal officers. The FBI released

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a forty four page data outlining all her planning with

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ray As, her false statements about the two Hispanic women,

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and her misuse of victim compensation funds. On April eighteenth

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty two, Sherry Peppini pleaded guilty to one

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>count of mail fraud and one count of making false statements.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I know they do an interview with her attorney

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and she makes it like and when she talks about

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the allegations against her, and when they arrest her, she

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>does this very woe is me. I don't even understand

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. I don't even understand why I'm in jail.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand anything against me. And she talks about

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>how like someone else and jail with her had to

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>explain the charges to her because she didn't even understand

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. I just felt like when she talks,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>she does a very good job of doing this like

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>victim role. She's very good at that. Here's just something

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>else I want to talk about, because if you watch

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a Perfect Wife or maybe even in the in her

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 1>recent interview, after she was married to Keith, I'm not

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sure how long after, but she got caught texting other

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>men and she has a little history, well, she has

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a history of what she calls always having these emotional affairs.

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And I like how she calls them emotional affairs so

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that she's never actually admitting that she has sex with

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>any of these other men. It's basically like Keith was

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>so terrible to her, and he was so awful, and

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't even talk to her, and he was controlling

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and abusive and all these things that she claims that

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>she always had to have these emotional affairs with other men,

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and she would save you know, these other guy's numbers

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>with like a female name, so she probably had like

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Jane and you know, Laurie and all these people that

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>she was texting with, but they were men. Anyway, Keith

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>finds out that she's been having these you know, emotional

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>affairs as she calls them, with other men, and he

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.719
<v Speaker 1>makes her sign a post nuptial agreement after they've been

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>married for a while.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>This is prior pre kidnapping.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>This is pre kidnapping. So I didn't read. I tried

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to find the post nuptial agreement. They actually show it

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on the four part series where she

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>does an interview.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>But do you have money or something?

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they have a lot of money. They

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>seem just very middle class to me. He's like an

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>audio visual specialist for Best Buy and she's a stay

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>at home mom. So basically, after he finds out that

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>she's having, you know, these emotional affairs and she's texting

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>other men, he makes her sign a post nuptial agreement.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Why does he just make her agree not to have

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>these emotional affairs like.

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>A post non emotional affair agreement, So she signs this

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>post nuptial agreement. It's completely one sided. It's basically says

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if she's caught, well.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>It's probably not even valid. I bet he just drafted

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 2>himself and said, here's sign this right, which you can't do.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Both sides need to have an attorney. Even if she

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 2>says I don't want an attorney, she kind of has

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 2>to have an attorney to make it valid.

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I actually read in a pre nuptial agreement both

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>people have to have representation, but for some reason, in

0:33:58.040 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a post nuptial it doesn't say that you have to

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have representation. It says that it can't be one sided

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and it can't be unconscionable, but it recommends that you.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so he should have made sure she had an

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 2>attorney so she can't later say what, I didn't know

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 2>what was going on.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, the thing that is interesting to me is that

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they make a big deal about this post nuptial agreement,

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 1>about how one sided it was, and in my mind,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking it wouldn't even be enforceable. Everybody's making it

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>like he forced her to sign it.

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Whole scheme of things anyway.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, to me, I think the post nuptial agreement is

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>very important because I feel as if she wanted to

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have an affair with James ray As, but the only

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 1>way she could have an affair is to make it

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>look like a kidnapping hoax so that the post nuptial

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>agreement wouldn't come into effect because basically he made her

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>sign a very one did.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 2>The post agreement steps then they do.

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>With an affair, Yes, he made her sign it.

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Basically, you can't do that stuff anyway. Sorry, you can't

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 2>do that stuff anyway. You can't be like, if you

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 2>cheat on me, you don't get this money.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm saying this nuptial agreement that he made

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>her sign was basically, if you cheat on me, if

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you talk to other men, if you have affairs, you

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>get nothing, you get no money, you.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Leave, or if you stage a kidnapping.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he forgot to add that part to.

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>The emotional affairs. If there's any male DNA found on you.

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>In your underwear, yes, so to me, I feel as

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if the post nuptial agreement is very interesting because I

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>feel as if she created this whole kidnapping hoax in

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>order to have an affair with her ex boyfriend, and

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>if she did get caught, then she just blames it

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on a kidnapping hoax so that she's not actually having

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.479
<v Speaker 1>an affair with her ex boyfriend, so that the post

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>nuptial agreement doesn't come into effect and he gets to

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>take the kids and all the money and everything, even though,

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, this post nuptial agreement wouldn't be valid anyway, passable.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 2>It's one sided her it's valid.

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, but she clearly thinks it's valid.

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 2>But you're just guessing all this.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just putting.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm just putting your theory.

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>My theory is that she she.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Signed the agreement and then she tried to abide.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>By it, and then she tried to abide by it

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>by thinking, I want to have an affair with my

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>ex emotion my boyfriend, an emotional affair, and I'm going

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it. However, I can't get caught having an affair,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>so I have to make it look like a kidnapping.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. That's just my my thoughts on.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 2>That her commitment to having affairs is right.

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is right.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember when they do the four part interview where

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>she speaks up and she now claims that it was

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a kidnapping. So that's where we're at now, current like

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>present day.

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, so she still admits it's that or she still

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 2>sticks to the story that's a kidnapping.

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>No, So she was arrested and for the kidnapping, she

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>signs a plea agreement with very specific language basically saying

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that she planned a hoax, that it was a fake kidnapping.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>She signs it, and then she's sentenced to I believe,

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>two years in prison. She's released from prison. Now that

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>she's released from prison, here we are in present day

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and now she's doing interviews and she's saying, you know what,

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a kidnapping hoax. I was abducted. So that's

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>where we're at today. She's now recanting, well, what's the matter.

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>You already served your time, lady. I don't know, but

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>she claims she's married to this guy.

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Still.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>No, he filed for divorce after she was the I

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. They don't they They do an interview with

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>her family law attorney, which is entertaining. She's very entertaining.

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Does she have access to those kids? I wouldn't want

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 2>her to have accesses?

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>No, currently she does.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Without supervised visitation.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>So she's fighting for that's a saying because that's where

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we're at currently is she's now recanting the kidnapping hoax

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and saying that she was abducted by James. She's claiming

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that she lied about it because I guess because she

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was scared of him, or she didn't want her husband

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to know she was having an affair so she made

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>up the two Hispanic women. She doesn't want her husband

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>or anyone to know that she was with James, so

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>she claims she was abducted by two Hispanic women. Then

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>when they found when the FBI says we know it

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was James because his DNA is in your underwear and

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.439
<v Speaker 1>we've interviewed him, then she says, oh, well, I said

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it was James's mom, and I described James's mom, so

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it would lead you to James without me actually saying

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it was James. And now that she's out of prison,

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>she's saying it wasn't a kidnapping hoax, it really was James.

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But then I found the FBI investigator said, which I

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>found funny. He goes, he said, well, James Ray's his

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 1>mom was Irish or something like that, Like she wasn't

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic anyway. Yeah, she wasn't Hispanic anyway. And she wasn't

0:38:58.760 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and she wasn't Hispanic.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Why are they even entertaining whatever she has is saying anyway?

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, yeah, you know that's maybe.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 2>The public because she's speaking about it and it's interesting,

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>but like, why is law enforcement bothering with her? They

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be, Well, they're not.

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Now she's been released from prison and they're not. But

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Now she's doing all these interviews. So

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>now she did this interview with Investigation Discovery. They made

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a four part series about her. She went on Nick Vile,

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Vile Files, and she's doubling down on them. Believe

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>her story that it was a real abduction.

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 2>So let's we get her on here and we call

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>her out.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You want to get Sherry Pepina. Can we make that happen.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's make Scherry call her out. I would love for

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you to do an interview with Shane Simpson.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh so many holes in her story. It's ridiculous.

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So Sherry pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud,

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one count of making false statements, and she was sentenced

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen okay, it was eighteen months in prison and

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>agreed to pay three hundred and nine thousand, six hundred

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and eighty six dollars and thirty three cents in a restitution.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>This was the breakdown. She took thirty thousand, six hundred

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety four dollars from the California Victim Compensation Board. She

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>took one hundred and twenty seven thousand, seven hundred and

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty three dollars from the Social Security Administration for benefits,

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty eight thousand to the Shasta County

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Sheriff's office for the cost of investigating the case, and

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hundred and fifty eight dollars to the FBI

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for the government sentencing or to the FBI for their

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>role in it doesn't seem like a lot. Twenty five

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars to the FBI, I don't know, but anyway,

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where they got the breakdown of what her restitution was,

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 1>which was a total.

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Sharyot money like that without I mean, she was able

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to bamboozle them and get all that money. Well, she got.

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Money from the California Victim Compensation, then she got money

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Social Security Administration offices for benefits because she

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>said she.

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Was disabled, just to hand out six figures like that.

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>So Sherry Peppini is released from prison after serving about

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven months in a federal facility. She was released to

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a residential re entry center then placed on supervised probation.

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So what has she been doing from twenty twenty three

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to currently? She lost custody of her two children and

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>who now live with her ex husband Keith. She began

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>telling a revised version of the story, claiming Reya psychologically

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>manipulated her and that she was trapped in twenty twenty

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>four to twenty twenty five. Her new claims were featured

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in Perfect Wife, which I told you guys to watch,

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and Caught in the Lie which is the new one

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 1>on HBO, which is her most recent interview. And then

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess she has a self published memoir Sherry Peppini

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist. And then she did the Vile Files podcast,

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's where she's out speaking now. Also, this was

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>another thing that was in this new documentary is she

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>takes a polygraph and I thought for sure that she

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to fail this polygraph.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Because clearly asked her.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So Sharry and James both took polygraphs and both passed,

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>despite their stories contradicting one another.

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Enough for me, what did they ask or know?

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I do? I do know the questions that she passed.

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you first of all, she failed some of

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the questions, and she passed some of the questions. The

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>ones that she passed, though, were the ones that were

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the most important because they go to the heart of

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this story that she's now telling. So among the questions

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>she was asked while at james house in twenty sixteen,

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>were you free to leave at any time without fear

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of violence? And did you ask James to brand you?

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>She answered no to both of those questions and she

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>passed them. Also, I don't know, maybe that's a too

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>too much compound in sent Yeah, that's.

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying. It matters what they asked.

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Were you free to leave at any time without fear

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of violence? I don't know, I mean maybe that's just

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>too convoluted instead of just asking were you free to leave? Right?

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, Like, I think they made the questions too complicated. Also,

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I was also thinking that maybe she passed because there's

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>been a long period of time since the kidnapping to

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>when she took this lie detector test.

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 2>And who administered light test? Like who who was it

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 2>that set it up? Did she just do it on

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 2>her own?

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>She did it through this new interview, this interview that

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>she did, so I don't know because she did it

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on camera.

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 2>What was the second question you referenced, did you ask.

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>James to brand you? Which is very straightforward? She said

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 1>no and she passed that maybe she didn't ask him,

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she just gave him the branding tools.

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying how they asked her, there should be follow

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 2>up questions. There may very well have been.

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there were other questions that she was asked that

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>she did not pass.

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Do polygraph questions are they only? Are they mostly yes?

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 2>Questions? Well I don't or like factual like a date

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 2>or something, or can it be how did you get

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the branding?

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you're supposed to make the questions as simplistic

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>as possible with with yes no answers, because what the

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what what it's reading is a physical response. But my

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thought was this kidnapping happened in twenty sixteen. Here she

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is in twenty twenty five taking a lie detector test.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Does the passage of time make a difference on a

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>physical response? Maybe she's told this story so many times

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, even if she's even those questions

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>are accurately answered, it doesn't It doesn't help with anything.

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a mess. Was she wasn't she under what her?

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it doesn't make any sense. Right, It's still

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a mess. Right, doesn't solve the case.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any solving it. I think what

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to is I think she's a known

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>liar and narcissist and sociopath. I think that she she

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they had burner phones and they were

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 1>communicating she and James, Well, it's.

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Anyone that says they're having any emotional fair right there,

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 2>they're lying.

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that she's returned on Thanksgiving Day, she

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick her kids up from daycare that day. I mean,

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. To me, it just seems like it

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was concocted by her. It was her way of having

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>an affair without her husband knowing that she was having

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>an affair. It was an elaborate scheme. I think she

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>lies a lot. I think she's a master at lying.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Her interview, there were several parts of her interview that

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.439
<v Speaker 1>really bothered me. In this newest interview that she did,

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there was one part where she looks directly at the

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.240
<v Speaker 1>camera when she's talking to the producer, because the producer

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 1>says something like why did you lie? And she looks

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>right at the camera and she goes, haven't you lied?

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Haven't you lied? Have you ever in your life lied?

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And I remember sitting there looking at her and thinking, yeah,

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure all of us a little bit, like I'll

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>tell Annabel that, you know, we don't have any cookies left.

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember telling the boys that McDonald's was closed, Like.

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 2>You come home and I say where were you? And

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh, I was kidnapped. This guy was having

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the emotional affair with right.

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I thought, Wow, the nerve of this woman

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 1>to look directly in the camera at us out here,

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at the audience and say, haven't you ever lied?

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.280
<v Speaker 2>The answer is yes, she did. That's what she's saying.

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, exactly, Well she's saying she lied about the kidnapping.

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, so, you know, of all things, what

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 2>gets to me is I wake up worried, stressed about

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 2>my day. Bill's getting paid this net and these people

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:23.280
<v Speaker 2>live just one day at a time.

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>They live one one kidnapping hopes at a time. Yeah,

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>one whe detector test.

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 2>That got, I know, yeah, she got. She probably has

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 2>way less stress than I do.

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably. Scherry claims that James passed the lie detector test

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's a sociopath, not her.

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not her.

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:46.399
<v Speaker 1>She's not the sociopath. It's James. He's a sociopath. Keith

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Peppini claims that his daughter Violet and said Sherry would

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>force her children to inhale cotton swabs drenched and rubbing

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>alcohol when they were sick to make them even more sick.

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Sherry denies this, claiming she gave her children essential oils

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>when they were sick because they were allergic to vis

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That was one of the things he said in the documentary.

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>If you watch The Perfect Wife, at the very end,

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>he talks about how his children said that she would

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>so like cotton balls and alcohol and then tie it

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>around their neck. I don't know if there's any truth

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to that. I have no idea. It doesn't make any

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sense that you would tie anything around a child's neck.

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it's essential oils or if it's alcohol.

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It all seems very odd to me. Sherry's therapist, family lawyer,

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and sister in law whose name is Suzanne, that's Key's

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>biological sister, all believe her story. First of all, when

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you talk about let me just say this, if you

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>guys watch the four part documentary of her recent interview,

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 1>they do interview her therapist. Her therapist annoys me. He

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>believes everything this woman says.

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 2>He it's a male and you're willing. No, I don't

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 2>like him. Why did you just call him entertaining?

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't like him. I don't like him at all,

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>because this is what I think. I think so many

0:47:55.080 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>people find a therapist that they yes therapist, someone that

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they can manipulate, that they can just tell all their

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>their side of the story, and then the therapist is like,

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>those people are wrong, They shouldn't treat you like that.

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You're right. Do you really get anything out of therapy

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>if you just find someone that just goes along with

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:18.879
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're saying and they can't discern between delusion

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and fact and lies. And I don't know, I just

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the therapist. I felt that like the therapist

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>just enabled her by saying that, you know, he believes

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>everything she said. And the reason she lies is because

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>she has trauma. And when you have a lot of trauma,

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you just lie about things because you can't really remember

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened anyway, because there was trauma. I don't know.

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>In Sheery's HBO docuseries, this is the most recent one,

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>her mother, who was supposedly on her side, explicitly said

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the incident was not a kidnapping. Sherry writes this off

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.760
<v Speaker 1>as her mother being confused, and also the editing twisting

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>things around. I love when people blame the editing. That

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:55.240
<v Speaker 1>happens on Housewives too. Everyone for their bad behavior always

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>likes to blame the editing. I like when people like

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>after an episode comes out and everyone's liked, it was me,

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it was that iting. Keith Peppini still retains custody of

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>their two children. Sherry has allowed one supervised visit per month,

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 1>lasting about one hour. She's allowed weekly calls with the

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>children at Keith's discretion. However, Sherry claims she's only seen

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>her children three times since being out of prison. Also,

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there's another thing in her this most recent docuseries, she

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>records herself having a phone call with her children. I

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>guess she gets to talk to them on Sundays. So

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:31.359
<v Speaker 1>she sets up the camera and she records herself having

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with her kids. She's so dramatic. She she's

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>overly like, oh baby, tell me more. Oh my gosh,

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I tell me so much. Yes. Then she hangs up

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with her children, and then she screams and is like

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>grabbing her head and she's all dramatic, and she's sobbing

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and sobbing well right that she gets the one weekly

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>phone call with them, And I'm just so I am

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so turned off by people who set up a phone

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to record themselves and then record themselves having this over

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the top, dramatic, ridiculous, you know response. And then they

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:17.839
<v Speaker 1>give it to the producers and they're like, here, here, here,

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>here's what happens here, Please show this. This is what happens.

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You know when I only get a weekly call with

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>my children, you know, I cry and scream and I

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>act dramatic.

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 2>I know there's people to do that. It's ridiculous.

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also another scene where I guess Keith

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>comes over to where she's living and he wants her

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to sign custody of the children over, and she secretly

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.399
<v Speaker 1>records him. So she has the phone, she like puts

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it under the bed, she records him, and then they

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>play this audio and I'm thinking, if you're trying to

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>make this guy look bad, I actually agree with him.

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He goes over and he's like, let's just do this

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the easy way without having to pay attorneys and things

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>like why don't you just sign the kids over to me,

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this is when she's going to prison. She signed a

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>plea deal. She's going to prison, and she records it

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:04.360
<v Speaker 1>as if she's catching him, you know, being mean and

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>being abusive to her. But let's be honest, she knows

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that she's recording the conversation, so she's very calm and

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:12.359
<v Speaker 1>she says everything correctly, and all it does is catch

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 1>him saying that that she can do this the easy

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>way or the hard way. She can either sign over

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>custody of the kids or they can fight for custody,

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and she's going to federal prison. So again, I felt

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like that was a manipulation tactic of her trying to

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>make this guy look bad and controlling and abusive and

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all these things. But anyway, I just found her behavior

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>to be the manipulative behavior. But anyway, all right, are

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>we gonna talk about her more?

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Is she like, well, I don't.

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know. It depends on if she

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>has any she has more docuseries explain in trying to

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>say that she it now was a kidnapping hoax. I

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, who knows. This woman's all over

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the place. I don't trust anything that she says, and

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I do believe the kids are safer with their father.

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>At least I feel like they have some stability with him.

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And I do know that she has a current family

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 1>law case where she is trying to get more custody.

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can see what happens with that.

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 2>But she'll get some visitation and then they'll be aged

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 2>out and then they'll be into that.

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, we did our best to try to fit that

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.359
<v Speaker 1>story into an hour. It's very complex. There's a lot

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of other things that happen. I would suggest if you

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.879
<v Speaker 1>find Cherry Peppini's case interesting, to go back and watch

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>A Perfect Wife on Hulu and then watch her four

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>part recent series it's on Max. So thank you for

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to our Sherry Peppini case.

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you, Sherry Peppinia to get for giving us

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 2>something to talk about. And you are a nut. Just

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 2>good luck with your life like it is, Shane.

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys,