WEBVTT - P&L: AT&T-Time Warner Will Merge, But Will Be Dwarfed by Rivals

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg pm L podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. You know,

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Pim Fox. We hear a lot about the A, T

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and T and Time Warner merger, and we've heard Donald Trump,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>president elect, talk about it and say that he opposes it.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Are we at least heard that according to sources, as

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>reported by Bloomberg, that he has told people he still

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>opposes it. So can this deal still get done? I

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Porter bib managing partner at Media

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech Capital Partners in New York. Porter, what do you

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>think is going on here? I mean, Ken Ken, President

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump even way in on this deal in any practical way.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually he can't, but that's not going to stop him.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And the one thing we have learned about President elect

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump is that whatever he says is always reversible, uh,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in a millisecond, because he's been doing it every day.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>He's he's got a very interesting meeting in an hour

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half with the senior US intelligent the community leaders.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And my guess is he's going to reverse his uh

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>love affair that he's had with Julian Ensage when not

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>meeting is over. But regarding Time Warner, A T and T,

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the two new UH Trump appointees to the SEC have

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>both come out very strongly in favor of proving the deal.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.919
<v Speaker 1>There's been no problem, uh surface that that the Obama

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department, UM, and I don't that that Trump's team

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to see this as anything but a very

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>positive Jeff says Zebuscus UH and Randall Stevens. And when

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they came to Congress and UM testified about this deal,

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>really pointed out the the fact that most people in

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington hadn't yet realized that the competition is not are

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the cable or telecom companies, It's the Frightful five, It's

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Google's, the Amazon's, the Microsoft's. Uh. Those companies are

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook. They're going to rule the media market going forward,

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and A T and T and Time Warner are going

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to be rather rather small competitors compared to the tech companies.

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Porter if anyone doubts that this merger is going to happen.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, don't doubt it. It will happen, at least

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not because of government interference. That's what I'm saying. And

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Mucas came out last week and chief executive Time Warner. Yes,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 1>then there he said, there is no Plan B. Plan

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>A is what we're planning to do, and uh, um,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go through and if it doesn't, uh,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's it. We're going to stay standalone. But that that

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>had a hollow ring to it because he's as vulnerable

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>as the other linear media content providers. They have to

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>expand they have to go digital, and the huge consumer

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>facing aspect of a T and T UM is going

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to elevate Time Warner into a very significant competitive position

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>against the tech giants, where you know, there are going

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of changes on in the media

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>landscape next year. This year. Uh, two of the biggest

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>moves that if it in the news recently are making

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and credit on suster and moving to and B

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>see from Fox. Do you think that Fox is going

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to suffer from this? And conversely, do you think the

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>NBC really will benefit well? The loss of Roger Ales

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>has really put the pressure on James and Rockland Murdoch,

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>who are who are essentially running the company right now

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with with Rupert taking a much less dominant role, and

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>they have been both very adamant, but James and Laughlin

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>saying they want to keep Fox the way it is

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>positioned as a partisan network, partisan leading network, but emphasize

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the hard news and what they call the fair and

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>balanced aspect. And I think having having lost Megan Kelly,

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>especially because she was really a departure from the heavily

0:04:55.720 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>partisan prime time lineup that Fox has, that that is

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very interesting situation to see whether

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Fox continues down the road that they have traveled for

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>for the last twenty years. And the most important thing, however,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that Fox is facing is the the very serious demographic situation.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Almost sixty percent of their audience is over sixty years old,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're very very weak and the key demographic eighteen

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 1>to forty nine, which advertisers want. And despite the fact

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that they are the market leader in cable news right now,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the demographics are very poor. And if you start looking

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at the ads that are running on Fox, there's more

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical and reverse mortgage advertising. Uh than anything else. You

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>don't see the cars and the soft drinks and the

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 1>other major advertising categories that the other networks are caring.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think Fox has to do a lot of

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what kind of image and format they want

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to go with going forward. And losing Megan Kelly was

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a very serious loss to them. She is going to

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be replaced by we Gotta we gotta leave it there.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much, Porter bib He

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is managing partner Media Tech Capital Partners. Well more than

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand people are at the Consumer Electronics Show

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas, and one of them is our guest,

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Dr Alex Leedo. He is the chief executive and the

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Efficient Power Conversion. Dr Leado, thank you

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us. Thank you. You know,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't figure out whether we should start with you

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>telling us what it's like to be at c e

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>S with all of the new things and great televisions

0:06:55.960 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything, where maybe start with something totally complicated light

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>light detection and ranging systems. The show you want to shake,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's the coolest thing that what's the coolest

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that you've seen at the show did well. You know, look,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that the coolest things all revolve around autonomous

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>cars and augmented reality. There's all sorts of displays on

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that right now, and uh, it's just amazing. You know,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>our lives are going to change quite a bit from

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>both of those, uh, those developments. So how do you

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>envision our life being changed by some of these developments? Well,

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the autonomous vehicle really takes away

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the need for individual car ownership. So you know, that

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>redefines how cities will be defined, how we'll get around.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>And really, there hasn't been a major change in transportation

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>since the jet engine was developed sixty seventy years ago.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is really going to be a revolution. But

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it'll take time. It'll take you five years, and everybody's

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna expect it tomorrow. So um, dr Leader, this brings

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>us back to, uh, the substances that Pim was trying

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to it out. Um, your company produces a substance that

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you're hoping will be instrumental in this revolution in the

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>way that we transu we we get around, correct, that's correct. Yeah,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we we make products out of the gallium nitride. Uh,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh, these products are really the successor to silicon,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the foundation of all of our computer chips

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and semiconductors. And it's it's a whole lot faster and

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>its lower cost, so it enables things like these light

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>detection and ranging systems and augmented reality systems. And in

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the next few years you'll start seeing power chords disappearing.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know about you, but I don't know

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 1>anybody who likes power chords. I think you've just you

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just made it made a convert here. I mean honestly,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you said power chords are going away, and I almost

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>jumped up and down in my seat. I see how

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>easy it is to make people happy, you know, we were.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I want you to just describe the actual thing, because

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>right now it kind of looks like a hockey puck

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that sits on top of an automobile and it spins

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>around to get that three hundred and sixty degree image.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a hockey puck type, it's a lighter, it's a

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a lighter technology, and it spins around and it

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>creates uh almost instantaneous map of whatever it is that

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you're around, and it's done with lasers. Now you've partnered

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>with Veladine to do something else and it's much much smaller.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about it. So you know, these lighter systems

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have been around since the Google mapping cars several years ago.

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>They were one of the first users of it, and

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they really paint an immediate picture of the you know,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all the objects and three dimensions around you in in

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in and they give you three dimensions. The problem has

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.119
<v Speaker 1>been they've been very expensive, so getting them less expensive

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so that they can get on cars that are driven

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>by you and me has been the goal. So we

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>partnered with Veladine and we developed some uh some more

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>advanced integrated circuits with our gallium nitride devices that are

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are allowing shrink and make these things smaller so you

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can't see them, and also make them a whole lot

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>cheaper so we can put them on everyday cars. Dr

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>leto Do you expect that in the future when we're

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>all sort of just being driven around by our computers.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that we're going to have to update

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the programs, the systems and we go to bring our

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>cars to sort of techys to to get them fixed.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Me I'm just trying to think about the realities of

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>having one of these. So first of all, you probably

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>won't own the car, you know somebody. It will be

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 1>a you know, transportation as a service kind of thing.

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>A car will arrive with no driver, you'll get in it,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll arrive at your destination, kind of like an Uber

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>without a driver, which is why Uber's experimenting with these things.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Um So in terms of service and all that, you know,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the software updates will be over the air. I think

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has already pioneered that very successfully. And in terms

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of service, electric vehicles are are fundamentally simpler than than

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gasoline and diesel vehicle. So I think that the amount

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of service has been proved to be a lot less

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on an electric car. Thank you so much. Really really

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to hear what you're seeing and what you're doing

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>over there. Dr Alex LIEDO CEO and co founder of

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Efficient Power Conversion talking about the future of our lives

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in cars that drive us around that we don't own,

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that have all sorts of cool little gadget you know,

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>next week with no power courts, with no power courts,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I am converted, and to get smarter on China,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to focus right now on trade we have

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Dan Moss. He is executive editor on Global Economics for

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News and he can be followed on Twitter at

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>moss underscore Eco. Seems appropriate, Dan, thanks for being with us.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Tell us the what's going on now with China and

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>President elected Don Trump and the back and forth of

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>words him. The two sides are really figuring out how

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to dance with each other after January. The

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are probably wondering which Donald Trump walks into the

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Oval Office that afternoon after the ceremony. Is it Donald

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump the deal maker advised by Rex Tillison and Gary Cohn,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>or is it Donald Trump the populist hitting all the

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>bases for the white working class in the manufacturing hard land.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>While the Chinese appear to be unsure of that, they're thinking,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>let's take out some insurance while we're at it and

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>say look. Earlier in the week, there was the line

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's a great lot of flowers outside key government

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>ministries in Beijing, but inside there are also sticks. Now

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we're learning, we'll look. American companies have a lot invested

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in China. We all knew that the China his government

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is reminding the incoming administration of that saying, by the way,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there are some things that we can do. We hope

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>it won't come to that. We don't expect it will

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>come to that. But hey, we're here and we're watching,

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and we're waiting, and we're not necessarily going to allow

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>ourselves to be mulanova. You know, I was struck by

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this story that was on the terminal this morning, and

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I was struck in particular was talking about how China

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>is preparing to step up the scrutiny of its US companies,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of what you were exactly talking about, dan

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh in a sort of way to retaliate. But there

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>was a quote here, Um that was really crucial to me.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>When you have a country with a large trade deficit

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that retaliates against a country with a large trade surplus

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with it, it's the country with the trade deficit, i e.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>The US that wins. The country with the surplus loses

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>every time. And America has had this trade deficit um

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with China has been narrowing somewhat um and yet you know,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there is this feeling, you know, who has more to

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>lose here? They both do. And let's just take a

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>step back. This didn't get any scrutiny at all during

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the course of the campaign. But the nature of the

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy and what's driving it is changing significantly, and

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the US as economic relationship with China

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as a result is changing as well. This image we

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>all have of people going to Guangdong to set up

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>T shirt factories, no one does that anymore because it's

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>simply too expensive. That's gone elsewhere. When people think about

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>trade with China, they think of that sort of thing

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>which is completely out murdered, or they think of stuff

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>being loaded onto a ship and brought to Mexico for

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>assembly and end of the US. The Chinese economy is

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>increasingly driven by services. When people talk about the trade

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>surplus and the trade deficit, they're talking about merchandise, goods,

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>services exports from the United States to China growing significantly.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese current account surplus will basically disappear by twenty

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>According to the IMF, The most interesting US company in

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>China right now arguably is Starbucks. It's a services economy.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese population is getting richer. Low cost manufacturing doesn't

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>make sense there anymore. Services and consumption now account for

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more than half of GDP. You know. So Earlier this week,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>President elect Trump tweeted, China has been taking out massive

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>amounts of money and wealth from the US in totally

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>one sided trade, but won't help with North Korea. Nice

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>exclamation point. Um. You know, with a tweet like this,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>there you have a lot of people saying, look, we

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all have a lot to lose. Uh. International trade has

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>really helped the economy. You know, is there something to

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what President elect Trump is saying? Well, look, leaving aside

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the North Korea question, I don't want to get into. Um,

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of FDI going on there. Look, but

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they both have a lot to lose. So yeah, China

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>has become wealthy from the opening the economy that began

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>under Dung Shooping in the late seventies. By the way,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not just US corporations that have gone in their

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Japanese corporations, European corporations. US corporations have also done well

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>out of China. I mean, GM makes a huge amount

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of money out of China. Starbucks again, services economy, big

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>expansion plans within China. Hello, last time I checked, these

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>were US companies. So it really is a two way thing.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you could argue that they aren't really the

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>first and second largest economies on the planet, they are

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actually one economy. Well, then I was just gonna try

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to get in. Can you do fifteen seconds on them

0:16:54.360 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>buying US treasuries in the currency? Well, they buy US treasuries,

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>as do many governments. The question is really whether they're

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>going to keep selling them at a pretty fast clip

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>in order to support the u n UM And I

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's sort of the jury is still out whether

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to do that um and whether

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue and whether they've they've even put

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in certain capital controls and they've made it more difficult

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for people to take money out of the country and

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to even have foreign investors in the country. But it

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like some of those measures are starting to stick

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and the economy is is solidified to some degree. Dams. Unfortunately,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to leave it there. We can talk

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>about this for the rest of the show, and I

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>would love to, actually, because I feel like this is

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the big backdrop for a lot of what happens next.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Dan Moss, executive editor for Global Economics for Bloomer. Well,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>when we want to learn more about the world economy

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>one place to look as the shipping industry. And here

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to help us his urs dir. He is the chief

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>financial officer of t b S Ocean Logistics. Or maybe

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 1>just give a quick recap of your breadth of experience

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and tell us what's going on in the shipping industry

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>right now that we can take away and use in

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of the world economy. Hey Pimm, and good

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>morning Lisa, and thanks for having me on UM and

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>happy New Year. I think that this is a good

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>subject matter to start the year off and looking a

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit macro and global shipping. My background just very briefly,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I was on the street for eight years as an

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>equity analyst prior to this role. But also I love

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that people here say on the street and it doesn't

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>mean you know, on a corner. I was in Canon

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>waving my hands, hanging by the stocks all the stock

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>no no, working at de Lazard and Clarkson's uh and UM,

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of that. I was a lender and a

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>banker and working another shipping companies UM. Right now in

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the in the dry bak shipping markets where we compete,

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>we have twenty six ships under our control we have

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>no debt, a good balance sheet, but the industry itself

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is very much oversupplied, so there's too many ships. Overall,

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>demand was fairly weak in sixteen, but didn't prove in

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the year significantly as a dollar stabilized,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>UH and UM. They outlook for next year on the

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>demand side is for demand to slightly exceed fleet growth,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 1>So we do expect freight rates to stabilize four ships, UM.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But we have high iron ore inventories I think you

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in one of the breaks, UM. We also have

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>prices coming up. We have UM coking coal inventories in

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>China moving up again but also prices coming high. And

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>then we also have Chinese New York coming So I

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>expect the first quarter of this year freight weight rate

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>wise to be weak. I would also expect commodity prices

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize and possibly soften, and the rest of the

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>year actually to be much better than which was a

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>historic worst. Gil I wanted to talk about that. I mean,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I was last year a lot of people were talking

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Baltic Dry and how it was plunging and

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the problem behind that and how it sort of indicate

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>did that the global economy was slowing. This is what

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were looking at for edification about

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>their slow growth or no growth forever type of theces.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden you are seeing a little bit

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of pickup, but not really that gangbusters growth that backs

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up with a lot of people are talking about now,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>which is sudden global reflation. I mean, where is the

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>optimism coming from suddenly? Now? At the beginning of last year,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a couple of things that are going on

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>a ship against great question um there were far too

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>many ships. There are a lot of ships being delivered

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter as well, but you also had

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a weakening dollar, and you had again a first quarter

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>that is typically saw for commodity demand growth. So you

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have the freight rates really coming off into a deep

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>historic low as a dollar stabilized. Everyone noticed the particularly

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, particularly in China, which is of the dry

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>boat demand market seaborn demand that their inventories were low

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and the price was extremely attractive, much cheaper than their

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>domestic sources of iron ore and coal. UH imports then

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>improved very significantly, so year on year, Chinese iron or

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>import import demands seaboard imports were up nine percent. Domestic

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>production was off seven UM. Steel production is moving up.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>There's been good stimulus in China. China has also been

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>rationalizing it's coal mines. Um. Part of that is clean air.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is that many of the coal mines

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were losing money at those prices and they don't want

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to subsidize them any longer. And there's cheap coal available,

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly from Australia coming in, so that demand has been good.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>There's been good stimulus in China. Second half of the

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>year was rather strong or as I just want to

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>put some numbers to all of this, because in the

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>dry bulk sector you've got maybe four groups. Right, You've

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>got your cape size, Panamax, super Max, handy size. I

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the year to the comparisons. You're in

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>your comparisons a cape size twelve thousand, three hundred today, right,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That's that's how much it will cost me per day,

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>right all Right? Last year, same time thirty eight hundred bucks.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So from thirty eight hundred over twelve thousand, what do

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to take away from that? Overall demand has

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>improved in the second half of the year. There was

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>very good dust scrapping of ships. Also in the early

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>part of last year. There has been no ordering of

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>dry bull ships now for two years. A year ago

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was one year, right, so there's there has been a rebalancing.

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But also then this is very very macro. But if

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you look at the commodity prices coming off as the

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar was collapsing, dollar stabilizing and strengthening. Um typically we

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>think of the dollar strengthens, then it would be the

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>commodities are cheaper. They are, yes for the United States,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're not for everyone else who buying, and they

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have to buy the dollars to buy the commodities. Then

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you end up having pricing in contango. People build inventories.

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Now inventories are high, looks like the dollar not the dollar.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me that that's about as high as they're going

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>to get due to their physical constraint. Uh, they're probably

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be some inventory eating over the course of

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, so rays come down. But year on year,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the overall conditions of the dry bull markets are are better.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Or in two thousand fifteen, I believe hedge funds that

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>had piled into the shipping industry in various ways got

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>yeah you you laugh. I mean it was like a

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>blood bath, right, and when they got hammered, it was, uh,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the source of a lot of pain both at hedge

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>funds as well as at some banks that had a

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of shipping investments globally. Um, from an investment standpoint,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing investors coming back? Well, I don't necessarily

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>want to comment on other competing companies, but I think

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that the interest level now in shipping remains as um

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>as strong as it was back then. Is that what

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you basically mainly do is just make a shipping investment. No, No,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>we were We own and control ships, so we're shipping company,

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>but we do have investors who are part of that

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>group that you mentioned. Um and uh, there was some

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>time ago, back in some time ago, but in there

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>was a very strong story about eco ships. So there

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>was a technological advantage of the new ships being built

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and this was going to be a boom and make

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>other ships obsolete, So there was quite a bit of

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ship ordering. Now their ships are delivering and is keeping

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the market down right now, the interest is fundamental. The

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>banks are worn out from this industry that's been in

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a bad shape for a solid almost decade, but it's

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>call it eight years. Banks are worn out traditional sources

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of funding a worn out Even the public markets seem

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>rather weary and worn out. Uh So it's going to

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>take some rather creative and smart investors that come in

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and buy assets at a price that that makes sense

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and put them into commercial managers such as ourselves, um

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that can beat the market for them. And so I

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think the interest today fundamentally makes more sense than it

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>did even two years ago. Thank you so much. This

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a fascinating sector and really important one to watch.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Often used as a bell weather for global growth. Generally,

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the Baltic Dry is a classic index that a lot

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of people keep an eye on. Or Sdr CFO of

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>BBS Ocean Logistics talking about the global bulk and shipping

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>industry of this year. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio