WEBVTT - The Suits Behind the Insurrection

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peepsen. Welcome to Okay f Daily with Meet

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>your Girl Danielle Moody. Recording from the home Bunker, Folks,

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a jam packed legal show for you today

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>with our friend Glenn Kirshner, host of Justice Matters and

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC legal analyst. Breaking news came out of Georgia with

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>regard to Fannie Willis and the grand jury that she

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>had called in order to review an interview roughly seventy

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>five people, including Senator Lindsey Graham, who, if you all remember,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>tried his damnedest not to have to sit before the

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>grand jury and answer any type of questions from Fannie

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Willis and her team. Also, we heard from Offensberger, the

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State who received the call for the ken

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You find Me eleven thousand, seven hundred and some odd votes,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and Rudy Giuliani among other cast of characters in the

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump Stopped the Steal who were trying to steal orbit.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Glenn will give us the details about, you know, what

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was missed in mainstream media news, but what we need

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to actually be keeping our eyes on. He will also

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>give us some details into the latest rounds of convictions

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>in the Oathkeeper's trial, which is separate from the initial

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Oathkeeper's trial that featured the founder, Elmer Stewart Rhodes, and so, folks,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>what this episode lays out for me is that there

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is still a little bit, not a lot, but a

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of hope in the way of Donald Trump

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and the architects of the insurrection being held criminally accountable

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for their crimes. Now, folks, I believe that we are

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>going to see the scenario where Donald Trump is indicted

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>by Fannie Willis apparently the only prosecutor that has a

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>backbone in the whole of the United States that has

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>evidence on Donald Trump that if in fact she does

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>go after and indict Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani and others,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that we may see for the first time in America's history,

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. One a criminal indictment of a

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>former president of the United States, and that same former

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States, while under indictment running for

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States. If this does not spell

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>fucking Banana Republic, I don't know what the fuck does.

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Because this is some shit, some messy ass political shit

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that you would hear about in other nations and think

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to yourself, Oh, that would never happen in America. America

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>would never stand for it. Well, because Republicans don't stand

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for a fucking thing. Donald Trump was never impeached in

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, which gives him the ability to run for

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>office again. And apparently we have no rules on the

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>bucks that say that if you are currently indicted for

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a crime, that you can't run for office. Lord Jesus

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>take the wheel. So coming up next my jam packed

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation with our friend Glenn Kirshner to walk us through

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>where we are on the road to indictment for Donald Trump. Because, Folks,

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>what we have seen is that, and I love this

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>phrase that Glenn uses, is that the boots of the insurrection,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>those people that were literally on the ground in the

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Capitol building are receiving penalties. But the people and the

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>person that pointed to the Capitol Building and told them

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to go take their country back, the person that tweeted

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and got them to Washington, DC in the first fucking place,

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is still golfing in Mara Lago while they're in federal prison.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So something here just doesn't fucking seem right. So the

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>question that we continue to ask on this show and

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>everywhere is if the boots are going to be held

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the insurrection? When the fuck will the suits

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be held responsible for their strategy, plan and conspiracy to

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>thwart a free and fair election. That conversation with our

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>friend Glenn Kirshner is coming up next. Folks who know

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that whenever I have the opportunity to chat with our friend,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the host of Justice Matters and MSNBC legal analyst and

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>former federal prosecutor, Glenn Kirshner, I am always thrilled. Yet

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we never come with good news, But I'm always thrilled

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to just speak with you, Glenn, because you know you

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.119
<v Speaker 1>make me feel less crazy. A lot of news has

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>been circulating around in the legal sphere, and I want

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to start with Fannie Willis in Georgia. I think that

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that still provides I don't know,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that mustard seed of hope I talk about often is

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that Georgia, Fulton County and the find me

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the eleven thousand some odd votes call that Donald Trump

0:05:52.720 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>made to State the Secretary of State Ravensburger the fake electors.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>That gives us probably about as close as we may

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>see to an indictment of the architects around this quote

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>unquote stop this steal. So I want to give you

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to just bring us up to speed on

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the latest that has come down out of Georgia and frankly,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>how you are feeling with that breaking news, Danielle. What

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we heard Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis say an

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>open court this week is the most concrete and direct

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thing we have ever heard a prosecutor who's investigating Donald

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump say about the likelihood of charges. I viewed this

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as an eleven on the legal Richter scale. I don't

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>know that it got the play it deserves, but she

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>said so just to set it up, you got the

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>funky too grand jury system in Georgia. The regular grand

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>jury can indict people but can't issue subpoenas. The Special

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>grand Jury can issue subpoenas, but it can indict people.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So Fannie Willis ran seventy five reluctant witnesses through the

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>special grand Jury. That grand jury then authors a report. Really,

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe the prosecutors authored the report and presented to

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the Special grand Jury for its approval, talking about here's

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the evidence, here's who committed crimes. Here's you who should

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>be indicted. That report then goes back to the regular

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>grand jury. They look at it, they absorb it, the

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors make their arguments, and then the regular grand jury

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>indicts people if that's what it believes is the right

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. So the news media went into court

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and brought suit to try to get that grand jury

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>report released publicly. Fannie Willis herself, not one of her

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>assistant prosecutors, went into court and said, Judge, we strongly

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>object to the report's release at this time because if

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it was released, that would interfere with the defendants plural.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>She emphasized plural multiple times in the hearing, with the

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>defendant's right to a fair trial. Danielle, you don't become

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a defendant unless you're indicted. That was Fannie Willis communicating

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>people will be indicted. My second favorite word after defendants

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that Fannie Willis used was imminent. She said, Judge, and

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>are charging decisions are imminent. Fannie Willis is no nonsense.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>She probably has all of the vertebrae and the strongest

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>spine of all of the prosecutors who have looked at

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's crimes and when she says defendants are coming

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and the charging decisions are imminent, I take it to

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the bank. I don't know if imminent means days or weeks.

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I am. I am convinced that Fannie Willis has the

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>goods and she's not afraid to use them, and that

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see the first indictments of Trump and

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>company coming from Georgia. Okay, a couple of questions here,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just to remind people what those what would those indictments?

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What would those charges be? Glenn, because again we have

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>been in this web of potential legal charges for Donald

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump what seems to be well, frankly my whole adult

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>life because I live in New York. But then with

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>regard to the stop the steal the election, the documents cases,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>blah blasso, tell us, just remind folks if this indictment

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>were to come down, one, what would the charges be?

0:09:55.160 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And then two who do we think these defendants are?

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Because there again you said there were a parade of

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>people that came in. We know that Senator Lindsey Graham

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>had fought tooth and nail not to sit before the

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>grand jury. We know that Rudy Giuliani also fought tooth

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and nail not to sit before the grand jury. So

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tell us who the cast of potential characters and her

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>defendants plural would be, so you know the charges. Let

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>me take one as an example. Under Georgia's state law,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>it is illegal to solicit election fraud, to ask an

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>election official or a state government official to engage in

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some form of election fraud. And all she has to

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do to prove that crime beyond a reasonable doubt is

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>push playing on the audio we actually see. I worked

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>wire tap cases, Danielle, and when you caught conspirators talking

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>dirty on the phone about their drug deals, I call

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that a push play trial. You push play the jurors

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hear the crime committed on audio tape, soliciting election fraud

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>under the laws of Georgia as a felony that I

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>think will be one of the lead counts against Donald Trump.

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I urged people to read the Brookings Institute deep dive

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>into all of the laws that the publicly available evidence

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>suggests Donald Trump and others committed. They cataloged more than

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a dozen felony and misdemeanors alike that were violated, arguably

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>by what Trumpet Company did. The other big ticket crime.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see indicted as conspiracy. Remember,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgia has what I'll refer to as mini Rico laws.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>You have the federal Rico law, and then a lot

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of the states adopted their own versions of the Rico

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>laws called mini Rico laws. And Fannie Willis there are

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>some indications in the litigation and in the grand jury

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>proceedings as they unfolded, that she was perhaps using George's

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Rico laws to go after this as a Rico crew,

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>as a corrupt organization, as a group that was making

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a concerted effort to violate the Georgia's state election laws

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to get Donald Trump falsely corruptly declared the

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>winner of the presidential election in Georgia. So I think

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we might seek a conspiracy charge together with the substitutive

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>charges of election soliciting, election fraud and others. Who is

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to be indicted certainly Donald Trump, certainly, Rudy Giuliani

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jenna Ellis. I say that because there's a lot

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of reporting about how they made false statements to Georgia's

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>state legislators trying to gin up these false claims of

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>election fraud to try to undermine the elections results. I

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think they are likely defendants, and listen Lindsey Graham. One

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of the star witnesses against Lindsey Graham is Georgia's Secretary

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of State Brad Raffensberger, who has very publicly and openly

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and I believe also to the grand jury. Though we

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know precisely what he told the grand jury, he

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>very openly has said Lindsey Graham called me repeatedly, and

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>what he was saying to me I interpreted as Lindsey

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Graham urging me to toss out lawfully cast ballots. That's

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a quote from a Republican secretary of state about what

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a sitting republic senator from another state, not even from Georgia,

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was urging him to do commit election fraud, solicit election fraud. So,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>if there is a justice God, and I think that

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>remains an open question, Lindsey Graham ought to be one

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of those names on the indictment. We will have to

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>see if Fannie Willis is comfortable with the evidence she

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>has supporting including Lindsay Graham as a criminal defendant. I

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>hope she has the goods. Based on public reporting, it

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like she might and I hope she decides it's

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. Now, let me ask you this, Glenn,

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>because this is something that I have been curious about.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of what was late last year the

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump organization, by being prosecuted in New York was found

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>guilty of seventeen different charges, and one of the biggest

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>being all sorts of fraud. Right, does that type of

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>conviction play into the character of the people that we

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are talking about? Meaning, I know that Fannie Willis has

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>her own you know, slight of evidence as it pertains

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to the particular crimes that took place in Georgia. But

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has and the Trump or well, I should say,

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Trump organization with his name on it, has been

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in you know, has been charged and found guilty of fraud. Right,

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So does that play in or does that play in

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in a legal sense or just in people's minds? Yes,

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. It certainly plays in factors in

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to common sense, our commons, right, Right,

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>does the factor in, you know, in a legally exploitable way?

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>The answer is generally no, because you know, there's common

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sense and then there's legal sense, and rarely do those

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>two things meet. Unfortunately, here's where it does factor in

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of ways. First of all, any information

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or evidence developed by one prosecutor in one jurisdiction, Ken

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure will be shared with other jurisdictions that

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are investigating the same people for similar crimes, because I

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's too important for the Department of Justice and

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors in Georgia and the prosecutors in New York

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>not to be communicating with one another about the evidence

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of crime that they're finding by Trump and his criminal associates.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So it would be stupid, encounter productive if prosecutors weren't

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>coordinating with one another to use and exploit, in an

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>appropriately legal sense, evidence that the other jurisdiction has developed.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like if Donald Trump personally gets charged

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in both Georgia and New York, it's not like the

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>New York jury will be told. Oh and by the way, folks,

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he did some crimes down in Georgia too. Even if

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he had already been convicted of those crimes and was

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>now on trial in New York, that evidence probably wouldn't

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>come in into the new prosecution unless a judge ruled

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that it was relevant somehow it wasn't what we call

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>uncharged misconduct that was likely to unduly prejudice the defendant's

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>right to a fair trial. These are legal issues that

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to be litigated and sorted out. It may

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be that a judge rules, yeah, what he did in

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Georgia was so inextricably intertwined, that's a legal term. With

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the crimes he committed in New York that a judge

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>would rule they were relevant for certain purposes and therefore

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>admissible at his New York trial. The other place that

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>directly comes in is if you're convicted of a crime

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>somewhere and you go to trial after you've been convicted,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and you take the stand and testify, you can be

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>cross examined with the prior crime you committed. You can

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>be it's called impeaching the witness with a conviction, And

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the law generally says, if you take the stand in

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>your own defensive trial and you have criminal convictions in

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>your past, those you're admissible for the jury to use

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether you're telling the truth today, So they

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>go to your credibility. So those are the different ways

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that stuff does or doesn't factor in when it comes

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to multiple jurisdictions finding crimes and trying people. So to

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>close the loop just on Georgia before we move on

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to trumping companies other crimes. So give us your hypothesis

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on a timeline here. Okay, So Fannie Willis says, imminently, right,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, we don't know if that is days or weeks.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that it's it's weeks from the moment that

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>an indictment comes down. How long are we going to

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>an actual trial? Knowing that Donald Trump's main defense has

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>always been to tap dance and run out the clock.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>So there's good news and bad news. The bad news

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is criminal trials, once there's an indictment, once somebody's been

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>charged and hauled into court for the first time and

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a trial date has been set, criminal trials can take

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a while. I wouldn't expect a trial date to be

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>set after Donald Trump has been indicted for between six

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>months and a year out. That is just kind of

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a rule of thumb how long it takes to get

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a case to trial. So the bad news is we'll

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>still have to wait for a little bit. The good

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>news is when we see Donald Trump forever running out

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the clock in litigation, right, always trying to delay his

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>day of reckoning. That can be done in civil cases,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>civil lawsuits, and that up to this point is the

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>only thing we've seen Donald Trump involved in because he

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been charged criminally with anything, right, But it can't

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be done in criminal cases. Why because as judges are

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>making decisions, you know, on motions, on what evidence can

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>be admitted, and all these decisions that have to be

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>made in the run up to a criminal trial, none

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of those are appealable. So a defendant delay his trial

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>date by filing these appeals that go up and down

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and up and down the appellate court chain the way

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you can in civil cases. The only time you can

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>appeal anything, with a couple of very minor exceptions, the

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>only time a defendant can appeal anything is after you've

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten the trial, you've been convicted, you've been sentenced, your

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>case is over. Then you can file an appeal of

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>your conviction. So Donald Trump cannot weaponize the delay in

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the court system in the criminal case the way he

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>always has been able to do in a civil case.

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh that is good news, Glenn. Okay, So switching gear

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is out of Jorge Jeff and and pulling back and

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at where what has happened recently with the next

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>slate of Oathkeepers. Right a couple of weeks ago, the

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>last time that we had you on the show, we

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>had the convictions come down of seditious conspiracy for the

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>former founder of the Oath Keepers and two other people,

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they had separate trials that were set up

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for the next slate. Tell us what happened with those

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>cases and how, if at all, it is going to

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>inform this sloth like Department of Justice, an Attorney General

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that is signaling to me and anyone who I think

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>pays attention that he ain't doing not a goddamn thing

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to going after Donald Trump and the

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>architects of this crime. Because frankly, what I said the

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>other day on Twitter, Glenn is that I look at

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>who is in the House of Representatives right now and

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>realize that Merritt Garland is to blame for why these

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>people have not been indicted for their involvement in the insurrection.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Knowing that many of those House members were in fact

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>involved in the stop to Steal rally and involved in

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>given recognisance tours to who would then become insurrectionists. Yeah,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>don't let me forget to talk about the sloth like

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>pace of the Department of Justice at the end of

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>this answer. But I want to start with the Oathkeepers trial.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first Oathkeeper's trial was against five Oathkeepers, kind

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>of some of the upper echelon of the Oathkeepers organization,

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>including the president, the leader, Elmer Stuart Rhodes, the guy

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>with the eye patch because as a firearms instructor he

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>shot his own eye out. You can't make that up.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So Elmer Rhodes and his top lieutenant, Kelly Megs were

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>convicted of the lead charged seditious conspiracy, the attempted violent

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>overthrow of the government, and all five of those defendants

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>were convicted of several other charges. And that was the

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>first seditious conspiracy conviction in more than a decade in

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States. These cases aren't often brought, and when

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they are, they're not always successful. So that was actually

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a really big deal. Now then, and I attended that

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>entire seven week trial, and the evidence was powerful, it

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was overwhelming, proved beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>these five Oathkeepers. Then we went to part two of

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the oath keeper's trial four more defendants, and I didn't

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>attend that trial. Again, my fellow former colleagues and my

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>friends were the prosecutors and that one as well, and

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the jury just hands down convicted all four of those

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>oath keepers of seditious conspiracy and other charges related to

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the insurrection. And of course the Proud Boys are on

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>trial right now, and I would bet buck my betting limit.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a high roller. I would bet a buck

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that they are all about to be convicted of seditious

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy as well. It's almost becoming routine that the federal

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors are indicting the boots of the insurrection for seditious conspiracy. Now,

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, the Department of Justice hasn't managed to rise

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>above the boots of the insurrection, the people that Donald

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump told to attack the capital and start to take

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on the suits of the insurrection. The suits are out

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>there holding dinner parties and fundraisers and playing golf and

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you committing any other number of crimes because they haven't

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>been held accountable for any of their crimes. With Respected

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>DJ's sloth like pace. Here's what has me so upset.

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>What the Department of Justice is doing by waiting now

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>more than two years to hold accountable bowl the suits

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of the insurrection, the people who organized, funded, orchestrated, and

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>incited and directed the attack on the Capitol. What they

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have done is they've sent a powerful message that if

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you in the future try to overthrow our democracy, let

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>me tell you what's going to happen. We're going to

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>give you a full two years and counting to come

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>up with your next move, maybe to try to do

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it again, maybe to avoid accountability, maybe to tamper with witnesses,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>but we will give you a full two plus years

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to try to come up with your next move. That

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is law enforcement insanity, because you're not deterring crime, you're

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>encouraging crime. This is something I don't understand from a

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>department that I served for more than for nearly quarter

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of a century. This is not the way it worked

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>when I was there, right, I understand this is an

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>unusual case, But frankly, there are more reasons to hold

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>these people accountable immediately for trying to kill our democracy,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not less reasons. So the sloth like pace I think

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>every day works to the extreme detriment of the health

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and continued viability of our democracy. You know, Glenn, I

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, you know, I speak to so many

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>legal folks, and you know, the other day I spoke

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>with Ellie Mistol, who is the Justice correspondent for the nation,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and Ellie said to me, in no uncertain terms, ding,

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Llen ain't happening. He's like, I knew that when Merrick

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Garland was appointed to be Attorney General, anyone else, Doug Jones,

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Sally Yates would have been the people that had the

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>backbone and the fortitude to get this done. And we

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>kept saying, oh, Merrek Garland just needs more time, but

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>people knew, based on the cases that he has overseen,

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>based on the kind of person that he is, that

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted justice to be done, an accountability to

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>be delivered to the feet of Donald Trump and his minions,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland won the guy. And he also wouldn't have

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>been the guy apparently to sit on this type of

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>vicious Supreme Court either, right. So I'm just I wonder

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your thoughts on that assertion by

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>other friend of the show, Ellie Misstell. Yes, the first

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of all, I love Ellie and I missed the days

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>when he and I would sit around that round table

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with David up with and it was so liberating because

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about everything for the entire hour

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of just two or three minutes at a time.

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And I was not only in formed by Ellie, but

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I was always amused because the dude, he is unique

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in his ability to inject humor with deadly serious information

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and make you laugh and learn at the same time.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>My hat's off to Ellie, and I can't disagree with

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>his observations that because it hasn't happened yet, there is

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a sense that it ain't never going to happen. I

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>did agree. I still think it's going to happen. Justice

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>has been delayed, Will it be entirely denied? I don't

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think so. And here's why Merrick Garland has obviously turned

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>out to be not the right man for the moment.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Right he has not risen to meet the urgency of

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the moment, as we just discussed, because tomorrow's aspiring dictator

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>will have years to plan his next move after he

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>tries to overthrow our democracy. That's a significant failing of

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Arland's Department of Justice. However, I still don't believe it.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I know so many of the people who work there,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I worked with so many of them. I still don't

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>believe that they have reached the conclusion that we're prepared

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to give our democracy away to Donald Trump and to

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>whoever rises up in Donald Trump's image next, because they

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>will be giving it all away if they don't hold

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Jeffrey Clark and John Eastman and Rudy Giuliani

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bannon and Flynn and Stone and Jenna Ellison and

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Sidney Powell, and I could go on and on and

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on accountable for trying to unlawfully and unconstitutionally overturn our democracy,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because if they decide we're not going to charge those

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>people for those crimes, they will in fact have given

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>our democracy away. I still, in my heart of hearts,

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>can't conceive of a scenario or a reason that they

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>would reach the conclusion we're giving our democracy away. We're

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>done here. I just don't. I don't see a declination

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of charges. They've taken too long. They will come too late,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe not too late, to save our democracy for the

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>time being. Listen, maybe one of the best things that

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I would love to chat with Ellie about this, maybe

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>one of The best things that happened is these matters

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>were taken out of Merrick Garland's hands when he appointed

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack Smith. Now I am not prepared to sing Jack

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Smith's praises and call him the hero. Because we had Muller,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we had Garland, now we have Jack Smith. How many

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>times you would fool us? But I do think Jack Smith,

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>given his credentials, his bona fidays, his body of work,

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the guy goes after politicians left, right and center, brings

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the hard cases when some loses. Some has gone after

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>war criminals. I mean, if ever there was a prosecutor

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>who seems to be up to the task right and

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>he has proven that he has done things moving in

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred miles an hour that Merrick Garland never did,

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but he should have done eighteen months ago. So listen,

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>if that's a little bit of hope, because now it

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is in Jack Smith's hands. If he gets it right, great,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>If he gets it wrong, we're losing our democracy. Is

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>their last question for you, Glenn, Is there a scenario

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and I, oh my god, I don't even want to

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>say it, but I'm going to say it. Is there

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where charges are brought for Joe Biden and

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump to have this perception of, oh, we go

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>after everybody like is because again, the Justice Department, you know,

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Mulla report said we don't indict sitting presidents documents, documents,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>because the media is not making any any distinction between

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the crime that Donald Trump committed and the mistake that

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden and now Mike Pence may have committed. First

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of all, as much as I disagree with the Department

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of Justice policy, the OLC Office of Legal Counsel memo

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that says you can't indict a sitting criminal president, you know,

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what kept Donald Trump out of hot water, plus

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a corrupt Attorney General, Bill Barr. As much as I

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.959
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that memo because I think it moves us

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of being a banana Republic, Joe Biden,

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>based on that memo, can't be indicted, certainly not while

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>he's president. I don't embrace that. I don't celebrate that.

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Joe Biden committed crimes based on the

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>available evidence. You know, right, you know, Joe Biden and

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>now Mike Pence went through their stuff for whatever, prompted

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>by what we don't know precise found things that they

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have, and immediately both of them. I'm no fan

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of Mike Pence, but both of these people said, Okay,

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we found stuff that shouldn't be in our papers. Please

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>take them national Archives. DJ. We need to let you know,

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>come in and search, do what you need to do.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no criminal intent there. There may not even be

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a criminal act. But those are not prosecutable cases. And

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland, in his zeal to be perceived as fair

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and even handed to everyone, he's not gonna say, well,

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I have if we're going to charge Donald Trump, then

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to charge Mike Pence and Joe Biden too,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to give the superficial appearance of fairness. That's not fairness.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>If Mike Pence and Joe Biden didn't commit crimes, it's

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>an abuse of power. So I am less worried about that.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But Danielle, it feels like today we need to worry

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>about everything. That's what I'm saying. That's what I'm saying.

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like, while in a normal a society, that

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>would seem like something we don't need to worry about.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Nothing surprises me in America today. As always, Glenn, I

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your thorough, thorough look into where we are in

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the march to indictment, and it looks like once again

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>all eyes are on Georgia. So whenever that comes been down,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we will want to be with you immediately, so appreciate

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>me talking. That is it for me today, dear friends

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on Woke a f as always power to the people

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and to all the people. Power, get woke and stay

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>woke as fuck.