WEBVTT - Fake Meat, Real Food

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Dana, So alternative protein or fake meat? Have we

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>tried it? Yes? And how was it? It was great?

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>I've had beyond burgers, impossible burgers. I even had some

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>delightful sausages that weren't actually sausages just earlier this week.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I am what you would call a flexitarian, so somebody

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>who generally avoids meat but will still buy it and

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>eat it from time to time. I once went a

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>whole year without any red meat at all, and I

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>must say the thing that I missed the most that

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>year was a hamburger. So when I started seeing fake

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>burgers showing up on menus and at the grocery store,

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not talking about a veggie patty but something

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that actually resembles a hamburger, I was pretty excited about it. So, yeah,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I take it you like these they cut the mustard

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>no pun intended. Okay, So years ago, my then girlfriend,

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>no wife, and I would go to this vegetarian restaurant,

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a Sunflower in Vienna, Virginia. If you know it, you

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's fantastic place. But it always struck me as

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>odd the attempts at replicating meat with like things like

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>satan and like I thought it really wasn't worth the effort.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I still don't, certainly not good enough to be worth

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the effort. But I've tried the impossible burgher and all that,

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and it seems fake meat has really come a long

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>way since then. And that's what we're here to talk

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about today, This alternative to animal protein, be that poultry, fish, beef,

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>or pork, and what it means to be fake meat,

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>whether made of plants or actual animal tissues growing in

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the lab. So today we speak with Hume Bromley, who

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>looks at consumer trends here at B A E F,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to talk to us about a report

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>titled Alternative Proteins Fake It Till You Make It. The

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>full report is available on the Bloomberg terminal, at BENF

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com or on BNF's mobile app. And as always,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>BENF does not provide investment or strategy advice, and you

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>can hear a full disclaimer which will play at the

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>end of today's show. Now, let's hear about alternative proteins.

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dana Perkins and I'm Mark Taylor, and you're listening

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to Switch on the BENF podcast. Hi, Hi, thanks for

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>coming on the show today. Yeah, thanks having to be back.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So the title of the no that we're talking about today,

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about, well, we're going to call it fake meat,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but alternative proteins fake it till you make it. So

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to know how fake is it. I have

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a friend who actually refers to these, um, these alternative

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>hamburger patties that they actually have in the United States

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is frank and food. So does it resemble the real

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>food that we interact with or is it something that

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even recognize due to the processing. Look, I've

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>had to try a bunch of things through you know

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what you call market research. I guess for this this report, right,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's all it's all subjective, it's all

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be individual opinion. But I mean, I think

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the best ones I have tried that the best companies

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that faking meat and the best ones are cooking it

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>afterwards probably do the same job as really poor quality beef.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now. You know, they might get better over time,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but no, certainly, no one's doing that I've tried has

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>done a great job of replicating, you know, a great hamburger.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And and no one's anywhere clotis on on replicating a

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>steak or anything like that. But what are they actually

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>made of, Like, what's it comprised of? Most of the

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff out there on the supermarket shells, but at the

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>moment are are plant based, right, So they'll typically use

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>either a soy protein or a yellow p protein. So

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>basically you're growing that crop, you're extracting the protein from it,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you're basically running it through a big macerator and eventually

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>extruding it's mixing it with other ingredients and extruding it

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>like you would pasta or cereal into a form factor.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>We recognize, you know, something that looks like like ground beef,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or if you've turned into a paddy, it might kind

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of look like you can squint, you know, a chicken

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>fill it. I was just to get back when I

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>used to go to vegetarian restaurant and they would have

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fake meat back in the day, made out of like

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>satan and stuff like that. I don't know, it was

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just not good. My conclusion back then was, you know what,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>let's get it. Just give me the veg. I'm good. Look,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't disagree that there's new products out

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there for decades, right at least or MILLENNIU if you

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>count things like tofu. There's been an alternative as protein,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to animal meats out there for for people that

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 1>don't need it. What's different about this, what's different about

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>plant based meeting the culture, the lab growing meats that

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>are coming, is that they're not trying to offer a

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>new product of vegetarians and vegans. Really they want to

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>win over the omnivores or at least the flexitarians, but

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but ideally the omnivores or other people who eat meat.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It's got to look, taste, feel, smell just like meat

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to do that, because otherwise, you know myself and you

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>will have that response. Just give me a vegetable, give

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>me meat, don't try and trick me. I mean, this

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was fifteen years ago too, and you know, I'm sure

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>technology has approved. I've had a what beyond burger or whatever,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was good, it was great. I'm

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>really excited for this actually to happen. I would call

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>myself one of the flexitarians or I haven't even heard

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that word, but I'd say that's what I am. You

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>are at the target market, I think I am. Actually yeah, definitely,

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you and me both so This is a bit of

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a departure for benf Why did we actually choose to

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>write about alternative proteins. It's a good question, but being

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>has been involving for a long time now right where

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>we're no longer just a clean energy research firmly moved

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>into transport industry decoganization, and I guess the common narrative

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>here is that we have these century old industries and

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>supply chains that are being threatened and disrupted by by

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>new incumbents, and those new incumbents are enabled by technology,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether that be falling prices of solar panels

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>or or or electric vehicles, or whether in this case

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, the potential cost reductions of making plant

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>based or lab grown meats that will disrupt you know,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest trading commodities of the planet meat.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing that leads that's come with all

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of them is is massive emission reduction potential if this happens,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and if the company's offering plant based meat and cultured meats,

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>get it right, So you mentioned just now cultured meat,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually the very beginning of December, I saw an

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>announcement that Singapore approved the very first lab growing meat

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be sold for regular people like you and meat

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to consume it. So my question is about that, how

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is it made and what are some of the concerns

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>around the lab grown and cultured meat that have made

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it kind of lead us to the market. That hasn't

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>been on the shelves for fifteen years, it's been on

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the shelves for maybe fifteen days. It's really interesting stuff

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and exciting stuff that we finally have a product on

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the market of coming to market soon in Singapore. Lab

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>grown meats, cultured meats, clean meats are sometimes called very

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>different plant based. So you haven't tried this stuff before.

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's only been tasted in kind of experimental settings. And

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is is basically, it's it's real meats. It's

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just grown inside inside an incubator inside a machine. So

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's where you're basically extracting animal cells from a live

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>animal from from a from a placenter, growing in a

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>machine by feeding it this kind of concoction of kind

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of what you call food culture and basically exercising that

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>inside this machine to make it grow like muscle would

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>grow muscle and that tissue and then when that's you know,

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>whether that's finished growing inside this machine and you're you're

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>scraping it out and you know, and using it like

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you would ground beef. Eventually, maybe down the track you

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>could even grow up an entire fiel it inside. So

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a it's a process that they're

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>basically lifted from medical science. Not that uncommon at all,

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but clearly very costly um and clearly new for the

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>food industry. The development Singapore is a company called it

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Eat Just. They're certainly at the forefront of of the industry.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>They're working across a whole bunch of different animals. The

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>development in Singapore looks to just apply the chicken right now,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's the first step in bringing these products

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to market. So when people are talking about potentially growing organs,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a similar technology they're using to grow the

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>meat that will go on our plates. Yeah, very similar. Obviously,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got different cells, different culture every animal you grow,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and it requires a different environment, so different different temperature,

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>different culture. Obviously different cells that you're extracting, and different

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>timelines as well. But that it's it's just the same

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as what you're seeing in some of those some of

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>those therapeutic or generative medicine practices. This feels very futuristic

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to me. It does, look at it is futuristic. It

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>comes with that futuristic price tag as well. You know

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that the original burghers that were being process this way,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we're costing something like a hundred thousand dollars a burger. Supposedly,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly companies out there that's you know, you're still

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>paying kind of hundredfold of premium of what you would

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for for animal meats. But there are companies out there,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but certainly hope to bring that down to something that's

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, more more like tenfold in the next few years.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Really costly. No reason why those costs couldn't come down.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Not you know that there's many reasons to beleeve the

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>costs should come down, just like we kind of I

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>said before, you know, very similar to solar panels or

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>batteries and e v s. You know, you've got this

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>cost curve, You've got a process that's infinitely scalable. You

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>just need to make more of these incubators, you know,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>put more cells inside machines and you get more and

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>more product. A lot of the costs at the moment

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>comes from the culture. So you have specialized firms are

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>basically brewing up this culture to feed your your cell

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lines and grow the meat that would need to come down.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's got to have a learning rate behind it.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It's way too early to even put a number on

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what that learning rate might be right now, but you know,

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very scale, little repeatable process that that

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that that that should come down. And you contrast that

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to a very inefficient sector putting animals out to pasture

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for for months or or years at a time to

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>grow meat, you know, and and wasting the male metabolic

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>cycle to work to grow an animal that then butcher

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>it to then waste a decent chunk of the carcass.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There is a whole lot of old waste there that

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that can be undercut by a futuristic, mechanical, automated process.

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>How is it going to be rolled out in these

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>first adopters in Singapore? You know, is it going to

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be high end restaurants with people waiting out the door

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to get a shot at this, or is it going

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, through more I guess fast food

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>chains or places that'll sell this. Look. I imagine in

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Paul with this cultured chicken, it's got to be high end.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>There is this disconnect between costs and price. When it

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to plant based meat, yes, it's price that are premium,

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>but cost you could argue should be the same or

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>lower than animal meat. When it comes to cultured meat,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>it's costly and its pricey, and it's probably going to

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>stay that way for a while. So that there's the barrier.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of trying to find enough people willing to

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sample it at that cost, and then you know, where

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do you grow from there? Every country you go into

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>after Singapore you need to jump, you know, really strict

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and high regulatory hurdles. You know, in the US we're

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>going through that process right now. And because it's a

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>meat product but also an agricultural product, you're basically regulated

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>twice by the FDA, the Food and Drug Administration, and

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>by the U S d A, the U. S. Department

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of Agriculture, so all of which already have processes in

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>place for regulating livestock, for regulating meat and butchering, and

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 1>for regulating basically all food supply chains. And you've got

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to meet all those existing hurdles, even though your product

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>might look and behave very differently. So that's specifically in

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States. How about an other parts of the world.

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Does the FDA have the most stringent standards and therefore

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they translate over to other countries or you know, I've

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>had a beyond Burger here in London's I mean, there

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>definitely is an equivalent here in the UK. What's the

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>view on these products in other parts of the world. Well,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you see these companies kind of pushing for

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>some sort of consistency amongst different regions and how they regulators,

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But it is an entirely different process right now. If

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to go into the EU, you need to

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>go through the regulator. If you want to go the US,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you go through the USD, usd A and f d A.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>They're pushing for consistency, but at the same time, they

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>really want to protect their their secret source, protect their processes,

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>protect protect their recipes, so they can't be open book

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>with their competitors. The push for industry stands across the

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>world because they're trying to be market leaders at the

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>same time. Now, for a very short break, stay with us,

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about adoption of alternative proteins. Both kinds

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the plant based and then maybe someday the cultured meat

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>coming to a plate near you. In this research note,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you talked a lot about the United States, and my

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>question also has to do with whether or not that

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is the primary market for these products at this point

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in time and where the real growth is coming from,

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because what immediately comes to my mind is, you know,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the consumer preferences in Asia, for example, are really gravitating

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>increasingly towards animal proteins and meats with raising GDPs and well,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the maybe taste are changing as well. Can

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you give us some color on that. There's a couple

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of questions in there, right, But first of all, where

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>where's this stuff being trial today? Who's eating it? If

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at the leaders companies like Beyond Meat or

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Impossible Foods and where they're actively marketing and selling their products,

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly biased towards the Western hemisphere. They target

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>North America, US and Canada a target primary markets, certainly

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the European Union UK in the preferences are changing there,

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there's healthy decisions being made. And in some other places

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like like like Australias on their radar as well, you

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>do see a lot of announcements coming out of Asia.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's the same firms moving into Asia. A landmark

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with Starbucks recently struck in China. But you also

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of local firms as well, local startups

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>getting traction in places like Japan and career in China.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>In Singapore, we've seen these firms pop up. And these

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are countries they're the more, but I guess the more

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they're the wealthier Asian countries. It's still with changing consumer

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>preferences and servicing the greater Asia market. With with growing

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>meat appetite. The challenge there I think will be one

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the meat attachment levels and outside of China and the

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>countries Malaysia, Singapore, meat attachments or not all that high

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>meat consumption the past has not been all that great.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And what you see when you look at kind of

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>meat consumption over decades and generations as an economy comes

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with wealthier certainly the rate of meat intake, the annual

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the per capita intake of meat increases. But if you

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>start from a very low base, you don't catch up

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to the US, you don't catch up to Western Europe.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You just grow from your lower base. You start at

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a high base, you know now I'm thinking kind of

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, maybe you will catch up to the US

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on a per capita basis, but they're small, population small,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but populations with growing wealth. So really the opportunity is

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>huge my population perspective in those countries. But chances are

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they one don't have the meat attachment because they haven't

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had as much meat in their diets historically. As their

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>meat appetite grows, it's just not going to be the

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>same level as what you see in kind of in

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the West. I mean this has a lot to do

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>with cultural factors. When you say meat attachment, I mean

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with like the recipes that somebody knows, Right,

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm going to make something for dinner, I'm

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>going to go to a recipe that maybe my mom

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>taught me, and that may not necessarily involve animal protein.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Are there other things that come into play here that

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't know about. There's certainly trends happening in meat.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's put plant based on cultured meat aside for

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a moment, But just the big trends happening and meat

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>right now are consumers are making healthier decisions, They're switching

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>from bread, meat, beef and lamb, and some extent poor

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>chicken and seafood. That's a trend that's happening already, or

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the eating smaller portions in Europe for example, in some

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>case of the US. So they're making those healthy decisions

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>regardless of alternatives that are that are available to them,

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and certainly they're looking for convenience. So yeah, you're seeing

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the majority of meat I think you meant for most

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>animals being consumed in your prepackaged, preportioned individual cuts. It's

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>actually quite rare now to go and take a whole

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>chicken home in many of these countries, or bring home

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole whole cut of lamb or beef. You know,

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>people are looking for convenience, and that's great news if

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you are a supplier of alternative meat, because it means

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to make your product look like an animal.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You need to make it look like the regurgitative product

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that comes out of the end. Can you tell us

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more about who's involved in who's producing these

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>alternative proteins, and who's investing in them, so people are

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>generally familiar with the real market leaders here and possible

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>foods and beyond meat, and those firms have got enormous

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>traction off one know, I p o S and secondly

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>through announcements and partnerships with fast food chains in many

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>cases with McDonald's, with Starbucks, with Burger King. But there

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>are others out there. I mean, certainly if you're sitting

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, be familiar with corn. It's been around

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for decades now, Good Catch foods, doing seafood, you know, Primaries,

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Alpha Foods. There's lots out there. These are the brand

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>names that are selling the alternatives, but actually what's interesting

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is what's behind them right as some are still venture backed.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>The top six players here have raised about two and

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollars since eleven. A lot of that's

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>come from venture, you know, from really big name venture

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>as well, also Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezas, Jay

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>z Serena Williams. Really broad pool of venture that it's

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>backing these companies. I guess. More recently we've seen a

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>wave of acquisitions and internal business units being started by

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>massive food conlawance. You know, Kellogg's has a stake here,

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Maple Foods, Nestle, Craft, Hyn's, they're all getting in on

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this space early really, but before we see massive baptech. Okay,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so you just mentioned Serena Williams, and I can't help

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but immediately think. You know, she's a professional athlete. She

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>has got to have an extremely healthy diet, and she's

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at this and she may have had the same

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>thoughts that I originally did when I went to take

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a bite into my first beyond burger, which is, oh,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's made of plants, so therefore it must be healthier.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that the case? It's complicated right to start with.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So certainly when you asked why they would choose or

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>become interested in plant based meat, the most common reason

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they site is health. And then there's other attributes like

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>environmental you know, lower emissions or land use or water,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>animal welfare they might care about, but health is certainly

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>number one. Firstly, what's interesting is if you are concerned

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>by health, is a greater chance you just eat less

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.239
<v Speaker 1>meat than you you'll eat plant based meat. So if

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>there's complicating fact to number one. But secondly, let's talk

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>about the health of plant based meat, and it's really

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>debatable is whether it's healthier or not. You know, in

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>many cases you'll see that plant based meat has higher

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fat content necessily saturated fat content. But if the higher

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>fat content, then meat lower protein content, and depending on

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>how you look at it, you know, higher sodium. What's

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>really complicated about this stuff is when you go and

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>buy some plant based meat off the shelf at a

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>test you or your local supermarket, it's already been mixed

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>with all these other ingredients to make it kind of

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a final product, so it's already loaded with the sodium

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or arrest of it. You're going by a container of

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>mints off the shelf next to it, and it's not

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a raw ingredient. So quite often consumers are comparing

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a raw ingredient with a process ingredient, the

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>plant based. When you start comparing plant based products like

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>burger patties and sausages to meet burghers and sausages and

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>over comparing ingredients to products or comparing products to products,

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>then it starts to look a little bit better. Still,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the protein content is lower. Still, the fact content killed

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>can be higher, but suddenly the sodium would worry a

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of consumers. Tends the balance out. Okay, so

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we've spent a lot of time already today talking a

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>lot about this in terms of ground beef, and this

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>raises another point around what these alternative proteins actually are

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what they're looking to mimic. So we're talking about what

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got. You mentioned sausages, so we're talking pork, beef, chicken.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I've seen a toe fur ky in the past,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>but maybe that doesn't fall into the scope here. And

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>then also fish, if you could give us a little

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of insight into what this fish is like and

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the potential uptake is of that. Sure,

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>so if you can name and animal, chances are there

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a fake version out there. Most of the attention

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to date has been around ground beef products. I think

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one it's because there is That's where I'm most health

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>concerned lives. Secondly, it's because actually it's pretty easy to replicate.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's already highly processed, so therefore you know

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you've mashed up all your vegetables or your plant into

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this paste and arrive at something that isn't too similar

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to ground beef. And further, I guess there is that

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact as well, beef resulting a whole lot more

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 1>emissions than these other livestock animals do. That's why they

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get attention, and hype has been around beat today. But

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what's available on the shelf, and

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at kind of sales by value out there,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and it broadly alignes with meat sales. You know, about

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a third of it is beef in the US, about

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of it is fake chicken, Nearly a quarter

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of it is fake pork and fake bacon, and then

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of this mix of other stuff. And that

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>other stuff you're right, includes fish, includes turkey, includes duck,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and often nondescript kind of you know, here's some fake meat.

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Moculan animal name. Fish is a really interesting one. Actually,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>see food more broadly is really interesting. I've seeing fake shrimp,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fake prawns, fake fish out there, and it's interesting because

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from a plant based perspective, sure, you're basically doing it

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the same why you're mashing together proteins, adding some different

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>ingredients to make it seem more like like fish or

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sea food than than others. But when it comes to

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>cultured meats, it starts to get really interesting, really strange

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>because fish is a cold blood animal, and it's the

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>only cold blood animal we we we listed there in

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of animals that humans consume. It's actually much easier

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to grow in an artificial environment as much less energy intensive,

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and it can be faster, so you can incubate the

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>as so long as you have the settings right, you

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>can grow them inside these artificial artificial environments for potentially

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a lower cost than you could for for any of

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>these other farmed livestock. The complicating fact you're here is

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that fish are not growing. You know, they're caught in

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>almost every you know, basically ever in any country in

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. There's no massive supply constraint apart from over

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>fishing and which is which is huge, but there's also

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>not the same emissions consequence as you get from beef

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and from pork. Over fishing problems. Definitely, I'd love to

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>solve that. I mean, as a consumer, I am now

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you're our get market for the fish when I also

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think of diseases associated with farm grown fish as well.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Instead of farm growing fish, get me some lab grown fish.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what's amazing about fish is most people that

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>covered this stuff don't look at fish because the only

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>c D and IRONPHO stuff. When they look at meat,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they not fish and seafood they just think about red

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>meat and poultry basically and look at appetite over over time.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you do that, you see economies like you're

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>peeking out a few years ago in terms of meat

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>consumption per capita and starting to fall. Now it's only

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>once you add seafood back on top of that, but

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you realize they're not peeking in their meat consumption, they're

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just switching to seafood um. So there is growing demand there.

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And it was taking a lot of data assemble to

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>put this together so we can look at meatst land

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>based meats and seafood in one report and realize, actually

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the trends totally different. Common misconception because I definitely didn't

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>even think about fish until we got ready to prepare

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>for this show today. So I feel like the other

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>side of it, that side of the coin has to

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have something to say about this, right, So the meat

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and fish lobby, right, they've got to be having something

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to say about alternatives to their product, right. Yeah, And

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the meat lobby groups are enormous and powerful. They're certainly

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>watching this space. But you know a lot of the

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>data is coming from there. You know in the US

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that cattleman's Association saying look at look everyone, it's okay.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Only point three percent of meat consumed or substitutes, only

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>half percent of beef. It's it's it's small. You know,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing to worry about yet. But Mark, I mean

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're back there for in yours and then in

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the mid two thousands as well. Around is it's it's

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very familiar, small numbers, industry being potentially being disrupted,

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>technology changing all the time, and an enormous powerful incumbent

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>lobby groups. I think what's different this time around is

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that energy companies in an economy were big and they

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>could be disrupted, but we kind of knew that knew

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the extent of the of the scope. When you talk

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about livestock, you know where I where I'm sitting right

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>now in Australia, I think animals a year, some of

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>them are ark for our second or third biggest export.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's enormous and enormous late you know, enormous from

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a labor perspective as well, in terms of farmers and

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and and rural and agricultural community, enormous in land holdings,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>enormeless in money, enormous in trade um enormous in foreign investment.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>This actually, I think in many cases is bigger than

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>energy and has more powerful voices. Okay, so if you're

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>saying it's that big, then I think you've confirmed that

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a place for some potential huge growth. Those

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>who maybe haven't interacted with this in the past probably

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>will in the future. My question really revolves around how

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>quickly do we see this happening? Because it is consumer lead.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I know there's no science to predicting the future, but Hugh,

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is this going to be ubiquitous

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in five years, ten years, fifty years. Yeah, you've really

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>put me on the spot there. I think in the

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's there's a lot of really interestreme developments happening here.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Falling castle as ingredients and said that could lead to

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>massive disruption. If you look at what's happening today, you

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>know you've got about forty of US adults. I don't

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's that different. In Western Europe have tried the stuff.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Very few say they don't like it in anyway you

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>know that they're all okay with it. There's lots of

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>repeat sampling, repeat purchasing happening, but but very few Abanity

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>meat and if they are, they're they're not switching to substitutes.

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of mixing this into their diets. So it's

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a small proportion of their diet. Maybe that will grow

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>over time. Maybe the proportion of people that try it

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>will and eat it will grow over time. But basically

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>where we are today is that we have a number

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of market leaders who control who control the industry really essentially,

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're pricing this at a premium to everything else

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that's out there, and generally for most of these animal times,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about kind of twice the cost of animal

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>meat at the supermarkets of reach out pricing now, and

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that really doesn't lend itself to massive growth. Where we've

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of got the Tesla strategy here that it's sell

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this to people who care about these, you know, these

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>aspirational qualities of health for animal welfare, but not expect

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of growth. I think in that scenario,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've kind of said it's somewhat similar to

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of fair trade products or fair trade coffee. You know,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we might get you know, from where we are today

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>point three percent and meat to something like you know,

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, maybe maybe a cup four percent

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of meat sales over the coming decades. What would really

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>become interesting if the pitch changes that that pitch at

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the moment is justified by the way it's justified because

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>their supply constraints. There's not enough in particular p protein

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>out there to make the address or market any bigger.

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But what happens if there is What happens if these

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bottlenecks to kind of are are untied or solved, and

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes really interesting because this stuff could get

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>really cheap. We could we could be you know, grinding

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>up plant based proteins inter pace performing into into meats

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that if they can get the recipes right and make

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>it seem like meat could be the same cost or

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>less than animal meats and could have all these aspirational

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>qualities at no cost to consumers. It's free or or

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>even a discount to to meat products. And that's where

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers will really start to move. In our view.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>We started looking at parallels. There two things like genetically

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>modified corn at the far extent, you know that that

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, just a couple of decades has become the

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>dominant plant to crop across the US. And in the

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>middle of something like diet soda. I think they're really

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>strong and ourlogy here with diet soda cost the same

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>desoda when it's sugar field soda when you go to

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the store, but you're getting that aspirational quality of health

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and healthy is aspirational, by the way, it's not it's

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not universal. Um, I was going to say, diet soda healthy.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You yeah, but but it's it's something

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that you don't necessarily need. You could just not have soda.

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Same with meat, you could not have meat, or you

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>could go to the alternative if it's the same price.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you can get at that same price, you

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>diet service suggest that you get kind of twenty five

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to the market. If you can sell a product for

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the same price as the competitor, that's roughly close enough

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to the real thing to convince convince consumers to buy it.

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, were certainly on a pathway towards single

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>digit percent of meat sales. We really need the price

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to change, Maybe the technology costs to come down a bit,

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but really priced your marketing strategies to change if you're

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to see really high bunch levels and therefore the emission consequence.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So you. This was a lot of fun. Thank you

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>very much for coming on the show today. And I

0:26:58.320 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think it was a lot of fun just because I

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sudly love the shows where we get to talk about

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I'm actually going to get to see and touch.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>While I do love the electricity that is powering my

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>computer right now, and that is a compelling topic. I

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>am also really interested in what I'm having for lunch today,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So you've You've closed the loop for me, Hugh, Thanks

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thanks very much, great to be here.

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was edited by Rex Warner

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of Gray Stoak Media. Bloomberguin e F is a service

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute, nor should it be construed as investment advice,

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an investment or

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>other strategy. Bloomberguin e F should not be considered as

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Neither

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes any

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the information contained in this recording, and any liability as

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 1>a result of this recording, did expressly disclain