1 00:00:02,560 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:10,319 Speaker 2: So here's the likes this this morning. Tariff's casting down 3 00:00:10,360 --> 00:00:13,440 Speaker 2: on further FED easing. Bloomberg Economics predicting the levies could 4 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:17,479 Speaker 2: add about zero point seven percent to core inflation. Joining 5 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 2: us now to discuss as the former sen Lewis FED 6 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:22,480 Speaker 2: President Jim Bullard, Jim, Welcome to the program, sir. So 7 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:25,480 Speaker 2: the FED chair wants to wait to see the policies 8 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: to be articulated, and I think it's fair to say 9 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 2: they have been over the weekend. So Jim, from your 10 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:33,200 Speaker 2: perspective in your time at the FED, once they've been articulated, 11 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:35,160 Speaker 2: did you just assume that they stay? 12 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,600 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean this is one salvo in the trade war, 13 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 1: and I think there's much more to calm in various directions. 14 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:46,319 Speaker 3: This is mostly based on. 15 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,200 Speaker 1: The fanmol issue and the immigration issues. 16 00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 3: So it does seem like the three countries that are effected. 17 00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 1: Could take actions on those dimensions and this phase would 18 00:00:57,600 --> 00:01:03,600 Speaker 1: get ended. But obviously, the the president campaign on a 19 00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:06,520 Speaker 1: trade war, and I think you know, there's far more 20 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:07,760 Speaker 1: uncertainty in the future. 21 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:11,160 Speaker 4: How much of a template Jim is twenty seventeen, twenty 22 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:16,160 Speaker 4: eighteen in terms of the inflationary impact of Trump's tariffs 23 00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:19,399 Speaker 4: to now when there are more goods being tariffed, but 24 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 4: also there is a greater degree of inflation already basins 25 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 4: the system. 26 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think the last one from twenty eighteen to 27 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 5: twenty nineteen was the GDP effect, and blanket tariffs across 28 00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:35,040 Speaker 5: the board of twenty five percent, which were met by 29 00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:37,600 Speaker 5: other countries, would have. 30 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 1: A big impact on GDP, and I think that would 31 00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:46,520 Speaker 1: dominate everybody's thinking about the inflationary impacts. If they're there 32 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,760 Speaker 1: at all, would be a one time effect, it would 33 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: be relatively minor. 34 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:52,360 Speaker 3: And that's what happened in twenty nineteen. 35 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 1: The economy slowed down precipitously and the FED actually reduced rates, 36 00:01:56,960 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 1: and I advocated. 37 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 3: For that at that time as the right response. 38 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:04,200 Speaker 4: Back in twenty eighteen twenty nineteen, I knew what the 39 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 4: begl would cost me. I knew how much gas was 40 00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:09,880 Speaker 4: going to be. I had a sense of what prices were. 41 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:12,800 Speaker 4: Now people don't have as much of a sense of 42 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:15,800 Speaker 4: where prices are to that same sort of granular degree. 43 00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 4: Do you think there is that risk that companies have 44 00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:22,359 Speaker 4: the ability to pass along price increases in a much 45 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:26,079 Speaker 4: more direct and consistent way because of how conditioned people 46 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 4: are post pandemic. 47 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean tariffs at this level are you have 48 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:33,240 Speaker 1: to think about them a little bit differently. I mean, 49 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 1: you go into the bar and there's a bunch of 50 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,320 Speaker 1: beer for sale, and the Canadian beer costs three times 51 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 1: as much as all the others. 52 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:41,680 Speaker 3: I suppose you're. 53 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:43,280 Speaker 1: Going to buy one of the other ones and maybe 54 00:02:43,320 --> 00:02:44,720 Speaker 1: not buy the Canadian beer. 55 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 3: So I think. 56 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:50,280 Speaker 1: Prohibitive type tariffs just shut down train altogether. I think 57 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 1: for the cars as well, maybe it's not a good 58 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:56,000 Speaker 1: time to buy a car if it's going to cost three. 59 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 3: Thousand dollars more, six thousand dollars more. The kinds of numbers. 60 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:02,280 Speaker 1: People are taught using around here, they can delay those 61 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:05,520 Speaker 1: types of purchases. So there's all the substitution that occurs 62 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:08,840 Speaker 1: with terrorists at this level. 63 00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:12,359 Speaker 4: Trump is also talking about putting tariffs on the European Union. 64 00:03:12,760 --> 00:03:15,040 Speaker 2: So can you view this as a one off. 65 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 4: Increase in price level or because he's talking about more 66 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 4: tariffs warning other countries that tariffs are coming down the pipeline, 67 00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 4: do you see this as an ongoing inflation threat? 68 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:26,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean one way. 69 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: So, first of all, this order is about the national 70 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 1: emergency on fed meal and immigration. But if you just 71 00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:38,120 Speaker 1: want to argue the economics, let's say, with the EU, 72 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 1: then I think what's the response to the EU going 73 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 1: to be? A simple response would be for them to 74 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:47,440 Speaker 1: lower their tariff level to the average tariff level of 75 00:03:47,480 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 1: the US. That would make a lot of sense. These 76 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:53,200 Speaker 1: are both big economies. I don't see why the average 77 00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:56,080 Speaker 1: tariff level has to be all that different between the two. 78 00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 3: Places, and that's something that the President has. 79 00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:03,120 Speaker 1: Argued for, and it seems like maybe now is the 80 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 1: time to think about that. Why not have the same 81 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:07,440 Speaker 1: ariage STAREF level in the two places. 82 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:09,720 Speaker 2: Jim, is there any reason why the Federal Reserve wouldn't 83 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 2: just look through any short term inflation shock, any reason 84 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:15,480 Speaker 2: to believe they'd be nervous about second order effects in 85 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 2: this building? 86 00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:18,400 Speaker 1: Yeah? I think you know, as we've talked about many times, 87 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 1: inflation expectations are a critical thing. 88 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:22,560 Speaker 3: That happened going up a little. 89 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 1: Bit to your tips, up a little bit, So I 90 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: do think that's a little bit concerning. But as I say, 91 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: I mean, the last one from before was that the 92 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:36,720 Speaker 1: growth effects are large or can be large, and that 93 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:39,719 Speaker 1: would tend to dominate any one time increase in the 94 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:40,320 Speaker 1: place level. 95 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 2: Hey Jim, I appreciate your time as always. Jim pulled 96 00:04:42,760 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 2: out that the former Saint Lewis fed president