WEBVTT - Ray Dalio on the Five Forces That Make This a Historical Moment

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>So Tracy, since we've been doing the podcast for ten years,

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, trying to talk to some of the big thinkers, right,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 2>some of the people who have a little bit of

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 2>a perspective on how the world's changed. We say, how

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the world's changed in ten years, but it's a little

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>bit arbitrary how the world's changed and what the next

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>ten years or fifty years are going to be.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Like big thinkers, thinking big thoughts.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Zooming out a little bit. And I think everyone sort

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of is these days. I mean, it happens to be

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that we're sort of celebrating our anniversary or birthday or

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is. But I think it's just in the air,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, like everyone. I guess people are always trying

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>to think big. But there's something in the air right

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>now where everyone is trying to grapple with pretty evident

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>change that is afoot.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, here's the thing. The big story in markets is AI, sure, right,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>and whether or not it's in a bubble, and AI

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 3>is a story that is not just about finance and markets.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Is a story that touches multiple things. So you have

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a cultural, social, and political story. So you have

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 3>people talking literally about how AI is going to change

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the world. It's going to change art, it's going to

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 3>change music, movies, people as well. Right, so some people

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>are going to lose their jobs, some people are going

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to get rich. People talk about it in this existential way,

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>both for countries and companies. To your point, and if

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>you don't win in the AI race, then you are

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 3>literally dead right.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Part of the permanent underclass or whatever people say. And

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>then I think beyond AI, even if we didn't have

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 2>this boom that really started in late twenty twenty two,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>even if that weren't going on, there'd be all these

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>other big questions related to technological competition, because we already

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>talked about that particularly.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah we were Shauna.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 2>There would be all the concerns about the size of

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the debt. There'd be all the concerns about demographics and

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 2>so forth, and the perhaps strain that changes in demographics

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 2>are going to put on the existing labor force. So yes,

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>you have all of these things going on, big picture

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>questions then layer into the AI question. And I just

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>feel like people right now is we all feel it.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>We're consumed by these like sort of forward uncertainty questions

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>about the integrity of elections and democracy and all of

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>these things. Is sort of we're at this clearing of

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the woods where we don't know which.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Direction we're going to go.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>You know who's very good at synthesizing major forces going

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>on in the world.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, we do, indeed have the perfect guest, someone who

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>many people turn to and who obviously is an incredible

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>track record of talking about things both in the big

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>picture and shorter cycles. We are going to be speaking

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>with Ray Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater. He ran it

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>for fifty years. That's kind of unbelievable.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've seen many market cycles.

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Proud of ten years of doing a podcast, fifty years

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of running what became the world's biggest hedge fund is

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 2>an orders of magnitude more impressive accomplishment. So Ray, thrilled

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that you're in here in studio with us, Thrilled that

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you're taking the time to chat with us once again,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you coming back on odd lots.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Yeah, congratulations on ten years ago starting this thing.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 5>I think of how the world has changed in those

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 5>ten years. And you want to talk macro. Listen, I

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 5>think you're.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>You've heard, you've heard a thing or two about it.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I am Global mac grobal mac and AI is

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 5>just a part of that. It's a small thing in

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 5>relationship to the whole global Macro.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I know we'll get into all this thing, but again,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>like it feels like something we're patting ourselves on the

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>back of ten years podcast, fifty years of running a

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>hedge fund. Like I say, it doesn't even seem real

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>that that could even be possible. I mean, I know

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it sounds crazy, but yeah, what a joy.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 5>Oh it's fantastic. Yeah, you know I do.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>You have any tips on longevity because we're like, well,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>we want to be doing this again in ten years

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and maybe again.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 3>No one's asking us about in forty years.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeahh So.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Meaningful work and meaningful relationships, in other words, do you

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 5>have is it your passion to make it as great

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 5>as it can be and a shared passion? And are

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 5>you doing it with people that you care about? And

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 5>you have meaningful relationships? And if you've got that, you

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 5>know you've got the energy to keep evolving and you

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 5>know that's what it's about. I think that's for me

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 5>what it's about.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 3>How would you characterize this moment, not just in markets,

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.799
<v Speaker 3>but in global macro as you point out, in terms

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>of your experience, your career, how does it stack up

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 3>to previous decades.

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 5>It's part of a long term evolution that I'd like

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 5>to take you through. I love a brief macro perspective

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 5>of that evolution, and I'd like to start, if I could,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 5>with a little story of what change me. Okay, when

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 5>I was twelve, I caddied and I earned a little

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 5>bit of money, and I put my money in the

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 5>stock market because everybody was in the stock market at

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 5>the time, and the people I caddied for would tell

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 5>me about the stock market, and I bought a company.

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 5>It's the only company I ever heard of that was

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 5>selling for less than five dollars a share.

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Did you just choose it randomly?

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 5>It was the only company that was less than five

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.799
<v Speaker 5>dollars a share that I heard of, and I figured

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 5>if I could buy more share, so if it went up,

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 5>I'd make more money. That was my logic. Okay, you

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 5>know there.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Are many people today in the market anyway, keep going.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 4>But the silliest lot. The number of people.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Out there who I believe like have come to think

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>similar logic, particularly in other areas like crypto.

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, I didn't know anything about what I was doing

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 5>on It was obviously stupid. But what happened was it

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 5>was company that was about to go bro another company

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 5>acquired it, and when tripled in value, I thought I

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 5>was smart and it is an easy game, and I

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 5>got hooked on the game. Okay, fast forward. Graduated college

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 5>in nineteen seventy one, clerking on the floor of the

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 5>New York Stock Exchange before I went to graduate school.

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 5>In the summer August fifteenth, nineteen seventy one, President Nixon

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 5>gets on the television and says, you're not going to

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 5>get the gold. Gold was money then, and you had

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 5>paper money and it depreciated in value, so you're not

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 5>going to get the gold. And I walked on the

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 5>floor of the stock Exchange the next morning, and I thought,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 5>this is a big crisis. Money as we know it is ending.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 5>We're going to have a problem. And it went up

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 5>more than it had gone up in decades. And I

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 5>didn't that's because I didn't know what a devaluation was.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 5>So I studied history, and I found the exact same

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 5>thing happened in March of nineteen thirty three with Roosevelt

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 5>getting on the radio and making the exact same move.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 5>Because they didn't have enough real money back then it

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 5>was gold was real money. They didn't have it. And

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 5>that led me to realize for the first time that

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I needed to understand things that happened before my lifetime,

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 5>not just my experiences. So I studied the thirties, and

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 5>because I studied the thirties, I was able to anticipate

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 5>the two thousand and eight financial crisis because it was

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 5>the thing that was playing over and over again. And

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 5>there are those things that are going on now. Okay,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 5>we'll get into those. But it led me study history.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 5>So about six or seven years ago, I studied last

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 5>five hundred years of history to think what causes the

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 5>rise and decline of reserve currencies in the empires? And

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I said, the last five hundred years, and that brings

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 5>me to the five big forces. Okay, the five big

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 5>forces are and they each have a mechanic to them,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 5>a dynamic. The first is how money, debt, markets, and

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 5>economics works. Okay, and we'll get into that the second.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 5>By the way, there's a big cycle there is, and

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 5>we can call it a monetary order, and there's a

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 5>monetary order that always happens and breaks down, and it's

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 5>part of an arc that has to do with limitations

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 5>on debt and money. And we'll get into that.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Like a leverage cycle.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Right, how much debt can you take on? And what

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 5>is the value of money? Money's supposed to have a

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 5>storehold of wealth? Is debt a storehold of wealth? And

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 5>what is our money? That's a question that we have

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 5>to deal with today. Right, what is the money that

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 5>you can be an effective storehold of wealth? Okay? And

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 5>are we at the end of our debt cycle? Okay?

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 5>That's number one. Number two related to this money and

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 5>who has money and wealth differences and so on. A

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 5>part of the cycle is that capitalism creates great opportunities

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 5>for inventiveness, to be productive and so on, and it

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 5>raises living standards and it raises wealth, but it raises

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 5>wealth in an unequal way, and there are big wealth

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 5>differences that naturally come as a part of the cycle,

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 5>and those wealth and then values differences get to a

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 5>point where there are irreconcilable differences So throughout history there's

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 5>the left and there's the right. There's the rich and

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 5>there's the poor, and there are those who are liberals

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and those who are conservatives, and throughout history they have

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 5>a conflict, particularly if you have an economic problem. So

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>that's the second force, right. The third force is the

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 5>changing world order, the international geopolitical order, and that has

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 5>a cycle to it too. You started last time, you

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 5>start in nineteen forty five, the end of the war.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 5>The war determines who has power. The powerful determine what

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 5>the new world order is like. And then you have

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 5>the rising power challenging the existing power, and then you

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 5>change the dynamic of the world order. The world order

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 5>always changes. The monetary order changes, the domestic political order changes,

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 5>the world order changes, and there is that arc. Number

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 5>fourth force is acts of nature. Throughout history, drought, floods,

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 5>and pandemics have killed more people and toppled more orders

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 5>than the first three that I mentioned. And number five

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 5>throughout history is man's inventiveness, particularly of new technologies. Okay,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 5>and here we are with AI, and all of those

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 5>are connected. There each relate. What happens with AI affects productivity,

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 5>effects who gets the money oh, what happens in geopolitical

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 5>You have to spend money to have a military and

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 5>the conflicts and then there are trade wars, and it

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 5>all transpires pretty much in the same way. Over those

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 5>five hundred years. You can see these cycles in that pattern.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>It is pretty incredible listening to this and thinking, you

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>know what, it's not just our imagination. We are in

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>a time of extraordinary change. We had a global pandemic

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that disrupted life for everyone on Earth in varying ways,

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 2>at least to some extent. We do have this unbelievable

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>technology that everyone is trying to wrap their heads around

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>with AI. We did have, even starting you know, arguably

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago, the emergence of serious trade tensions with China.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>We do see the emergence of their military clearly getting

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>much more strong. Like, you know, you see all these

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>things like, it's not we're I guess we're not hallucinating.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Some big stuff is going on these days.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, yes, And the thing that I would like to

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 5>focus on is the mechanics of how that happens, the

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 5>interdep relationships between where are we in the debt cycle,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 5>where are we in wealth. We'll talk about these things.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 5>I hope, what does that mean geopolitical and so on?

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 5>And if for me it's like watching the movie over

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 5>and over again. There is connections and there's a cyclicality

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 5>to this, a big cycle dynamic, so that we can

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 5>step back. I think there's too much intent. Everybody looks

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 5>at the news item of the day and they don't

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 5>step back and see the big arc and the cause

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 5>effect relationships. So that's why I'm hoping we can get

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 5>into that.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, let me try to thread the needle between

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>the news item of the day and the big arc.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 3>But when you look at something like AI, how does

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 3>that fit into your five forces framework? Draw the lines

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>for us as we well.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Next, I mean, first of all, it has tremendous effect

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 5>on the economics of it. Right, it looks to me

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 5>very very similar to all the times in history that

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 5>there was great inventions and great changes, such as the

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 5>twenties late twenties.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So a real productive show.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a change and maybe the greatest ever. But right

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 5>up there, but imagine, let me take you into the twenties.

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Imagine we need to get like a time warp soundtrack

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 3>on it, back in time.

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 5>But first time electricity is going into houses and you

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 5>can have washing machines and refrigerators. First time we have

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 5>the car. Okay, first time that we have airplanes, First

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 5>time we have movies that you can go at ten,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 5>First time you have radio. You used to have silence

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 5>in your house, and so on. The first invention of

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 5>television and so on. Can you imagine it would be

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 5>much more immediate and exciting. You see the revolutions in

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 5>those things. And so there's a mechanic to a mechanism

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 5>of which how does wealth get created? And what's the

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 5>difference of wealth, and how does a bu come and

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 5>how does a bubble go? In other words, to distinguish it.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 5>And that's, by the way, many of those bubbles. So

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 5>I can go back in history and give you many examples,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 5>but that would be a good example. So what makes

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 5>it go up? And what is the difference between wealth

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 5>and money? So you get into the mechanics. Wealth is

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 5>not money, okay. So and this becomes very relevant to

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 5>us now because what you do, what say, okay, but

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 5>let me give you an example. Yeah, okay, you come

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 5>up with a great idea, you want to create a unicorn.

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 5>You sell fifty million dollars of the sock and you

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 5>value it a billion dollars. Okay, now you're a billionaire,

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 5>and now that company is worth a billion dollars.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>But what happens is it really worth a billion?

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Child or teenagers at some point had this idea, Right,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start a company and then Tracy, I'm

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 2>going to sell her a dollar's worth of share.

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 4>But it's just this friend and suddenly, oh, I'm.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 5>A billionaires and wealth is being created.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Suddenly, Like I think everyone has this scheme at some

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>point in their life.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, But the importance thing to realize is wealth is

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 5>different from money. Okay, wealth you can't you can't spend wealth.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 5>You have to sell wealth in order to get money

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 5>to go buy things. Okay. And so how do the

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 5>bubbles happen? Okay, The bubbles happen in the way that

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 5>you create these needs for money, and then the wealth

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 5>rises and then there's a need to sell it. For example,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 5>let's imagine that we put in wealth taxes. Okay, Okay,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 5>what's going to happen? Those are going to need to

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 5>sell some of that stock to be able to get

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 5>up the cash to be able to pay taxes. Right,

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 5>whether for whatever reason, the need for cash happens, and

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 5>you want to make a conversion from wealth to money

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 5>to be able to come up with the money, and

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 5>all the bubbles it's worked this way. There's not enough cash,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 5>and there's the desire for that cash, and then you

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 5>sell it and the dynamic begins to work in reverse.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 5>So that's all I'm talking about is mechanics. So when

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 5>you ask me the question, and I look at today today,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 5>it looks like another one of those Okay, who's got

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 5>the wealth? And then where is the vulnerability that can

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Is this real wealth or is it accounting wealth? And

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 5>then and people make the mistake of thinking will it

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 5>produce an income over its time in order to justify

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 5>that valuation. That's not what make bubbles okay, because the

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 5>answer to that question did not change between nineteen twenty

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 5>eight and nineteen thirty one. It's not like they found

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 5>out the answer and then they say, Okay, that's okay.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 5>It's this dynamic between wealth and money okay. So there's

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 5>a mechanics to the way this happens, right, And if

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 5>you understand those, and it goes back a long time.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 5>If you go back to the Old Testament, the year

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>of you believe. Okay, how do you deal with debt

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 5>and you have to pay back the debt because debt

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 5>is a need for money. I have to pay deliver

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 5>money on my debt. So it's important to understand those mechanics.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that you hear a lot when

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 2>people characterize the economy today of twenty twenty five is

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of it is writing on people's wealth.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>People talk about, you know, the K shaped recovery. They

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>talk about how people in the higher income or wealth

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 2>quintiles are really driving consumption, et cetera. Then we look

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>at these large obligations that we have, whether national debt

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 2>or just the obligations to care for seniors, et cetera.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Is this sort of where it comes together that at

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>some point, maybe we don't call it a well text,

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, but where the political entity feels compelled to

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>go after the quote wealth, the wealth that exists on paper.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and it's happened over and over and over again

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 5>for basically the same reasons. Okay, if you look at

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 5>the thirties for example, or it's the same you need

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 5>the money, Okay, so just watch what's happening right there's

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 5>a small group between one and ten percent of the

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 5>population that this is going unbelievably great for right, And

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 5>then there's the bottom sixty percent. The bottom sixty percent

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 5>are having problems being productive and being affected. Sixty percent

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 5>of Americans have the lowest sixth grade reading level. Okay,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 5>the stock ownership of the top ten percent, they own

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 5>about ninety percent of the stocks. The bottom sixty percent

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 5>own about five percent of the stocks. So we're seeing

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 5>this wealth, and who are you going to get the

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 5>money from the way you used to get the money

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 5>was that you would borrow the money, would the debt

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 5>would continue to rise relative to d GDP or relative

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 5>to your incomes, and then you'd spend. Well, we're close

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 5>to not being able to have that happen for mechanical

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 5>reasons that are worth understanding. One man's that's or another

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 5>man's assets. And if you're holding a lot of bonds,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 5>a lot of government bonds, that's a lot of debt.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Is that a good storehold of wealth? And then when

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 5>you have the political or geopolitical problems that are going on, conflicts,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 5>then the foreign ownership owners of those who own about

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 5>a third of the bonds may not want to hold

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 5>those bonds because they think it may not be a

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 5>good store old of wealth, either because it's being depreciated

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 5>or because they may have sanctions. So if you go back,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 5>like into the thirties before, there's always the economic war,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 5>including the financial war, in which entities are cut off

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 5>sanction we call them now. Okay, So there is this

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 5>dynamic in which and it's not just an American dynamic,

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 5>it's a UK dynamic, it's a France dynamic, it's a

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Chinese dynamic in which we're at a point where it's

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 5>not easy to keep doing it the way we were

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 5>doing it, by selling more and more of those bonds

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 5>in that way, and so then we'll look at it.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 5>You can't raise, you can't borrow like you used to.

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 5>Number two. I went to Washington, speaking leaders on both sides.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 5>I said, we got to get the budget down to

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 5>three percent of GDP, and you can do with that

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 5>if you take it for this, a little bit of

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 5>this and that, and you can do that. The answer

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 5>I get is, and it's the same in the UK,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 5>it's the same in France, same role around the world.

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 5>You have to understand that I can't I have to

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 5>make one of two pledges or both. I will not

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 5>raise your taxes and I will not cut your benefits. Okay,

0:20:58.960 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 5>so now we talk ball.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not that much.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 5>You can't borrow, you can't keep it up as it was.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 5>You can't raise the taxes politics, okay, you can't cut

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 5>the spending. Okay. So there we are. It's different. The

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 5>world is very different from I was thinking about your

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 5>tenth year anniversary. Okay, twenty fifteen. Yeah, okay, so think

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 5>about how different the world is as a function of

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 5>these five forces. Right, that's what it looks like.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, absolutely, So can we talk about this in a

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 3>US context specifically since you brought up DC, but it

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 3>feels like US especially has changed in ten years, so

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>rising inequality, the deficit is higher than ever, and we

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>also have an administration which seems to be redefining America's

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 3>place in the world. How does that fit into again

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 3>your five forces framework? And I guess I should bring

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>up the debasement trade as well, because this was a

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 3>big theme earlier in the year, that the idea that

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, people don't want to be in the dollar

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 3>because they don't know what's going to happen with the debt,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 3>or because they're worried about sanctions and limits on currencies.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 5>It's all the same, isn't it. And it's all interrelated, right,

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, okay, and it's all understandable, right, it's all.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 5>You have a financial limitation, you have large wealth gaps,

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 5>You reach the point that you don't want to negotiate

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 5>your sick and tired. The electorate is sick and tired

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 5>of hearing these excuses. They want populism. So populism arises

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 5>from this, and populism of the left and populism of

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 5>the right. So they've greater polarity, and they say, I

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 5>don't want to compromise my things. I want it delivered.

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 5>So win for me, okay, win for me my values,

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 5>my way of operating. And therefore you have irreconcilable differences.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 5>And so if you look at history, the people who

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 5>arise or of the same character, have you produce populists

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 5>because of that set of circumstances. While the world is changing. Okay,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 5>so what is the place in the world we can't

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 5>sustain what we were doing before. Think of the relationship,

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 5>let's say between the United States and China by way

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 5>of example. Okay, the dynamic of Chinese will sell inexpensive

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 5>their goods cost effectively. Americans buy it, send them the money.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 5>The Chinese take the money and they put it into bonds.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 5>That dynamic can't exist anymore. First of all, they don't

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 5>trust each other. Everybody's worried, Okay. The United States will worry,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 5>can I can't be dependent on imports from China? The

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 5>Chinese worry that I can't be dependent that you're going

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 5>to give me. I'm a creditor. Am I going to

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 5>get my money? If you study history, maybe because of conflict,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 5>I can be a problem. You lose the middle class

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 5>because they are the manufacturers. You ship manufacturing to China,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 5>and so you don't have the man and you say

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 5>we have to bring back manufacturing. We need self sufficiency. Okay,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 5>So now self sufficiency means you cannot continue that dynamic anymore. Right,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 5>And then what do you do when there's the challenge

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 5>the wars that are not the military wars, the trade war,

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 5>the technology war, the geopolitical influence war. It's not like

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 5>you can go to what was imagined in the world

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 5>post World War two period that the United States said

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.239
<v Speaker 5>we're going to have a multilateral world order we're going

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 5>to have a United Nations and we're going to go vote,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 5>and we're going to have a World Bank, and we're

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 5>going to have all these world organ a World Trade

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 5>Organization and so on. We're going to have those types

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 5>of things. Well, that's that's naive. We're past that. So

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 5>we switch from a multilateral world order to a unilateral

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 5>world order where power matters. Right, that's what's going on. Right.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 3>So, Joe, I'm kind of laughing here because I'm thinking

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 3>back to both of us studied international relations right in college.

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking how much time I spent studying international institutions

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 3>like the World Trade Organization and then un Yeah, totally irrelevant.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Now, can I ask you a personal question? Not that personal,

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 2>but we had you on the podcast in March and

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about the scale of the US debt

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, and it was, you know, this was

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>on the eve of when the big tax cut negotiations

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>were happening. It was clear that the White House wanted

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to push a tax cut, and as you mentioned, you

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 2>went to DC and you know, you were say, fine,

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 2>there are ways to get the budget deficit within three

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 2>percent of GDP. This is not an insurmountable task. But

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, right now there does not seem to be

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 2>any meaningful change in the spending or deficit trajectory. Did

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 2>you find that personally demoralizing? You were concerned in March.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Now here we are talking on November fourteenth, you know,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the last eight months have your you got more concern earn?

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Did that experience have any effect on you.

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 5>I've been in the markets for a very very long time.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm a hyper realist. I view everything as a learning experience,

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 5>and so when I don't get demoralized, I find it

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 5>interesting and informative. So I was disappointed. I mean, it

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 5>would have been better for everybody if we could work

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 5>together and we can also find even if we couldn't

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 5>agree on how to do it, just do it proportionately

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 5>across things to make those changes to try to bring

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 5>that in order. But it was a good reminder of

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 5>where we are in the political cycle to understand the

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.239
<v Speaker 5>nature of that. And so that's what it is. You

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 5>can't be idealistic, Yeah, you have to be realistic.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>I consider myself to be someone who every new experience

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is a learning environment and that's why I love the

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>job that I have and everything is new and interesting.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 4>But occasionally things that.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>The news get to me a bit more than I

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 2>wish they would.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 5>There's a there's a feeling in the stomachyah.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's like this is not just an intellectual exercise.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>This actually stakes.

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 5>For but for me. Listen, I've been doing markets fifty years.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah okay, And a lot of motion can get in

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 5>to the to the way of how is it the meditation.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Meditation has a big effect. Oh yeh, yeah, you no, no,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 5>you're touching on something, right.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Is this like a key element of separating the emotion

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 2>from the learning.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 5>That's right. The ability this meditation, I would say, would

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 5>be maybe the single most important reason for whatever success

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 5>I've had. I mean meaning, it has given me an

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 5>equanimity to step back, to see the arc, to accept

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 5>there's a life cycle. Okay, I'm seventy six years old.

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 5>I know where it is. People. You know, there's all

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 5>sorts of things that we all go through and so on.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 5>To the ability to step back align the subliminal, the

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 5>subconscious mind, which has an effect and the intellectual mind

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 5>to be able to do that while still feeling the

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 5>emotions but being able to look down on how does

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 5>reality work and almost even things we don't wish were true.

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 5>It's like the tooth Fairy or Santa Claus. Okay, we

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 5>wish that we exist, but we can accept the fact

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 5>that they don't exist. Don't have our preconception, and just

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 5>learn here's reality and how to deal with reality. Meditation

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 5>has helped me a lot to do that, But I

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 5>think that's the right approach.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, so if you meditate and you recognize the

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 3>arc of history, what do you actually do with that information,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 3>especially if you're trading or investing, Because I think part

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 3>of the problem when we have these conversations is we

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about like, oh, the debt keeps going up, and

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>there's political polarization, and it just seems like there aren't

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 3>many solutions to those problems and there's not much we

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 3>can do with that recognition.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, I just disagree. I think that what I think

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 5>you'll ask yourself, how does it work mechanistically? What effect

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 5>can I have on how it's handled, How any difficult

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 5>situation is handled, like being in dead and having these

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 5>conflicts and so on, how do you handle it well

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 5>for the for the greater good and whatever? And then

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 5>or maybe you can't change the world. But you can

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 5>deal with it yourself and what do I do to

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 5>take care of myself, my family and so on? And

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 5>you can you can deal with that by first understanding

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 5>how does it work mechanistically. That's that's why I wrote

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 5>these books. The last book is How Countries Go Broke.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm not it's it's the mechanics of it. And so

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 5>you could see it as indicators and you can do

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 5>the calculation and you can line it up with what's happening,

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 5>and you know where you are. You know how you

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 5>can store your money, how do you what's a storehold

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 5>of wealth? So you can have a skill and you

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 5>can understand what's going on, and you can understand how

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 5>to position yourself, and you can maybe bring it to

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 5>Washington and or other places you can. You can bring

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 5>it to Washington. But it's the mechanics. The podcast, it

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 5>is not an ideology, Okay, to separate yourself from There

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 5>are different views and different preferences. And there's the left

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 5>and the right. And I can't tell you whether the

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 5>left or the right, that's a different question. But whether

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 5>you're of the left or you're of the right, they're

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 5>dealing with the same mechanics, and if you understand those mechanics,

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 5>then you as a policy maker can do it. And

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 5>now we're in a situation. Of course that policy politics

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 5>is part of that mechanics. Okay, now we have to

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 5>accept the politics, and then we have to say where

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 5>are we going and how do we best deal with that?

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 5>You can do all of that.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, Sometimes our truths that we don't want to

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>exist and maybe we try to turn our face or

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>we imagine the truth.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 5>And they think that's bad. Well yeah, right, and so

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't want no, No, it's just reality. You know.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>There's one of the phrases that the CCP has over

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 2>in China seeking truth from facts, And it sounds very obvious,

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>but it is very hard to do it. It can

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 2>be hard to just look at facts and actually observe

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the world as it is rather than.

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 5>As I think part of it is a habit. I mean,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 5>I think that if we're if we're taught the emotional

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 5>like what is real? Reality is interesting, Reality is beautiful

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 5>in a sense. If you take evolution and things die

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 5>and and and things happen, they may not. It's like

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 5>if you recognize that and you think that way and

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 5>it's all part of that evolution and you and you

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 5>can get that in your mindset. That's so much better

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 5>than being a than saying I don't know, dying is bad.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean to give that as an example, or this

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 5>thing is bad, and when we approach it that this

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 5>thing is bad and so on, then it's that fault

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 5>of that thing, rather than Okay, how does the system work?

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 5>And then how do I then deal with the system

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 5>to get the best outcome? Because we could deal with

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 5>the system, For example, the mechanics today has a lot

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 5>to do with how people deal with each other. Right.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 5>In other words, if we were collectively being able to

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 5>solve these problems and put the collective well being ahead,

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 5>we would have a lot less wars, we'd have a

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 5>lot better solving of problems, not the ideological and I

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 5>have to fight for that kind of thing. So it's

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 5>an approach. That approach could be taken on and taught.

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 3>This is the idea that you can't control the world,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 3>but you can control your reactions.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 5>You can influence the world. People together, world leaders if

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 5>they were to try to say what is the common

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 5>good and how do we work it out mechanistically so

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 5>that Okay, somebody's going to give here and somebody is

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 5>going to give there, and then we but that'll produce

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 5>a better outcome than if we go to war. You know,

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 5>there's there are better approaches that leaders of countries. Yes,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 5>there's leaders countries can do this, and also individuals can

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 5>do this in terms of what they're going to be

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 5>with others.

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Have you ever considered going into politics or policy? Is

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 3>that something that not?

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 5>Since I smart enough, because you know what, I think

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 5>it's I have great admiration, great appreciation for the people

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 5>who take on that life that we have a challenge

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 5>in terms of even how the system works because there

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 5>are so many people right now who have opinions want

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.239
<v Speaker 5>to fight for those opinions. They determine the votes, then

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 5>they create people who are acting out. It's not an

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 5>effective I do think it's very difficult to be successful.

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 2>I do think though, I am worried how often you

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 2>counterintelligent people, thoughtful people, et cetera. And when you ask

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 2>them if they ever consider elected office, immediately like it's

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it's actually a little bit. It is disturbing how quickly

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 2>basically anyone saying would have that anyone who's saying of

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 2>course I would never go into elected office or never

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 2>pursue elected office because you look around the environment's miserable.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 2>But then you think, well, what kind of filter does

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 2>that have on the actual leaders that we end up do.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Get it is a reality, no, I know. But when

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 6>you think about that filter and you think about, okay,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 6>you want quality leadership, et cetera, Well, look think about

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 6>anyone who seems like normally saying immediately says, of course

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 6>I would never go into elected.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Right, So let's just look at that for a minute

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 5>and take it through the perspective that I'm u trying

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 5>to convey. We look at that and how it's different

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 5>from ten or twenty years ago, and how the people are.

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 5>So the first thing we should do is besides saying

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 5>that's terrible, we should look at why is that? Okay?

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 5>Does that make sense? Yes? Why we can answer that

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 5>it makes sense. There's the clash that the party alignment

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 5>be analytical okay, and then say, okay, what do we do? Okay?

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 5>So maybe you're contributing it to good things in your way,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 5>and you know, but you have to be practical. If

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 5>you're going to have an effect, you have to have

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 5>an effect on the people who have their hands on

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 5>the levers of power. They affect things, not us chatting

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 5>away here, okay, and the voters maybe, But what can

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 5>you do to help to bring about it? Or what

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 5>do you need to do yourself in order to do that?

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 5>So you have to be analytical and mechanical about what

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 5>the cause effect relationships, because it comes back to the

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 5>mechanics cause effect relationship. If you understand the cause effect relationships,

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 5>like how politics works, how the populations work, you can

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 5>be analytical in doing that. But also the cause you

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 5>can get ahead of the game because the causes happened

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 5>before the effects. And if you know the cause effect

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 5>relationship and you could see the causes and imagine the effects,

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 5>you can be ahead of the game.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything in your very long career experience that

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't match up with previous examples or cycles in history?

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 5>All the time? I mean, I mean object nineteen seventy one.

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 5>In other words, I had a preconception. I walk on

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 5>the floor of the stock exchange and I realized, wow, Okay,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 5>now I go to the thirties and I learned something.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.720
<v Speaker 4>About a bridgewater. An interesting time.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I can get. But what I've learned is that whatever

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 5>success in life I've had is also more because I

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 5>know how to deal with what I don't know than

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 5>anything I know. Okay, I learned that. Okay, I know

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 5>some things, but what I don't know about what the

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 5>future is, and so it's still very large. So I

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 5>learned how to diversify. I learned how through financial engineering,

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 5>in terms of controlling I could, through diversification, improve my

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 5>return to risk ratio by a factor of five by

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 5>keeping the return the same and diversifying well, that will

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 5>reduce the risk without reducing the returns. That's mechanics that

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 5>came from my knowing that I don't know that I

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 5>can't be sure. Okay, So when you're analytical that way

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 5>and you view these things as a puzzle, then there

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 5>are all these puzzles and you have to solve the puzzles.

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 5>But if you can do it calmly and analytically and

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 5>so on, you can engineer the mechanics or how you're

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 5>dealing with it. That's what I mean by principles for

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 5>dealing with reality and.

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 3>What about it? Bridgewater was there ever, and like, oh yes.

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Allthing all the time. You know, I knew what I wanted. Okay,

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 5>that was that's an advantage if you start a company,

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 5>you can make it what you want, what the culture

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 5>should be, and you know in one sentence, I wanted

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 5>meaningful work and meaningful relationships through radical truthfulness and radical transparency. Okay,

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 5>So I really believe that if you can have meaningful work,

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 5>in other words, something you're in to the mission and

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 5>you have great relationships with people or in that mission,

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 5>maybe it's you two with odd lots Okay, I don't

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 5>know what it is. But if you're on that mission

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 5>and you have a great relationship and so on, that's magical.

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 5>But you also need to have radical truthfulness. In other words,

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 5>if you don't think he's doing a good job and

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 5>he or vice versa or something, it's like a team.

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 5>You've got to put together a team. I'm not picking

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 5>on you.

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 3>We're pretty honestly.

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 5>Let me finish answer this question, okay, because I haven't

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 5>gotten to the challenges. Okay, I want that. I believe

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 5>in that truthfulness and so on. So then there are

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 5>trade offs. Not everybody likes that, okay, not everybody. You know,

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 5>there's an aversion to looking at mistakes. There's an aversion

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 5>to looking at weaknesses. How do you get over that?

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 5>I have to face these questions and deal with it.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 5>That's what to my first book, Principles of Life and Work.

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 5>But in other words, when we recognize that knowing our

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 5>weakness is is a great thing, it's a great power.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 5>So how do you objectively get to the notion of

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 5>knowing your strengths and weaknesses? And I created personality profile

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 5>tests for your listeners. Go to it's a free test.

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 5>Principles you you can go online and learn about your

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 5>nature and what your nature is and how you deal

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 5>with things. So there's the constant encountering reality what your

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 5>goals are and what your aspirations are. And so I

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 5>encounter that. I thought, that's your question, and I encounter that,

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 5>and then you realize you encounter obstacles, and then you

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 5>view those obstacles as puzzles as you that you have

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 5>to solve in order to get better, because you have choices,

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 5>and if you make better choices, you get better outcomes.

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 5>So that I'm giving that as an example. So recognizing

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 5>that it's not the best place for some people, and

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 5>that other people couldn't possibly work anywhere else because they

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 5>can't get them meaningful work and bringing relationship or the

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 5>truthfulness you know, the truthfulness the politics, politics that goes

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 5>on in companies and so on. These people, a lot

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 5>of them could can't work anywhere else because they can't

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 5>get that truthfulness and that spirit. So yes, it's constantly

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 5>finding these things out through discovering of interacting with reality

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 5>and then solving puzzles and developing principles.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 2>It occurs to me when you're talking about this, like

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 2>it's become very popular, maybe in the last ten years,

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 2>but probably a little bit longer. People love to talk

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 2>about corporate culture. This place is a good corporate culture,

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 2>this place is a bad corporate culture. What is the

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 2>corporate culture of Silicon Valley? What is the corporate culture

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 2>of the big banks, et cetera. I mean, you clearly

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>were One thing you're clearly very ahead of the curve

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 2>is just thinking about this term corporate culture.

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's a term, and it's just like what

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 5>do you want to do? How do you want to

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 5>behave with each other? I mean, we don't have to

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 5>even use the word corporate culture in any relationship. If

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 5>you have a marriage, if you have friendships, if you

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 5>have partnerships, it's you have to face the question of

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 5>how you'd want to be with each other.

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, how do you actually shape the culture? Then?

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, two ways. I know what I believe is best whatever,

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 5>but I'm not actually sure. And then I go through

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 5>the question and answer. I believe I should have an

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 5>idea meritocracy that's a different from values. Different people can

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 5>live their lifestyles, different kinds of lifestyles, freedom of choice

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 5>to operate that way. But I kind of know what

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 5>I believe is best and what I want, and then

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 5>I have openness to debate is that right? Is that

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.399
<v Speaker 5>the best? Because if you have an idea of meritocracy

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 5>where you can have anybody debate anything, you know, anybody

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 5>at Bridgewater at any time could could challenge me on anything.

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 5>And I felt the obligation for everybody to hear that

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 5>exchange of why I think this is best and not

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 5>and then let people make decisions or enlighten me when

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 5>it comes to that trade off, because otherwise they wouldn't

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 5>be invested in it, you know.

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 2>To take it on a practical level, how do you

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 2>deal with in an environment in which people are encouraged

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 2>to be transparent and to be critical even senior people

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 2>or junior people. How do you avoid the pitfall.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Of bullying in mobs?

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I think this is actually very relevant when you

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 2>think about politics, we think about social media, et cetera.

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 2>How do you prevent an environment of openness from turning

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 2>into mob psychology?

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 5>None of them is perfect. Yeah, okay, okay, But first

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 5>of all, first you go and you paint the picture

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 5>of how it should be, okay, And you know that

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 5>not anyone's view is objective, okay, is your point of

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 5>view and your point of view may be different, and

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 5>highlight that. So if you go to ted Talks, there's

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 5>a Ted talk I gave, and it shows how we

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 5>I created a tool called a dot collector, which everybody

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 5>has put as we're having meetings, putting their thoughts in

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 5>and so on and their reactions so we feel free

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 5>to give your thoughts bring it up, including critical thoughts

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 5>and not. Then you get to what I call believability

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 5>decision waited decision making. How do you get about whether

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 5>this person is a better decision maker? What the strengths

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 5>and weaknesses of a person, of each person is so

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 5>that they can play their role well, if you if

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.320
<v Speaker 5>you set that out as your aspiration. You'll find ways

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 5>of doing that. Like there may be tests, there may

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 5>be you know, how do you pick your doctor. You

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:34.479
<v Speaker 5>know you have.

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 2>One who has an appointment open, Yeah, that's pretty much it.

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.919
<v Speaker 5>You know what to get three smart people, the three

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 5>best or the two best, get a second opinion, and

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 5>you want to make sure. So it's the same thing

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 5>in picking people there and how do you do that?

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 5>You want that and then you have to let people

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 5>know that that's good for them and it's good for

0:44:55.800 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 5>the organization, that it's fair. Okay, that the process is fair.

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not one person making a pronouncement of what another

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.799
<v Speaker 5>person is like that. You go through the cases and

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 5>you say, oh, that case happened that way, and it

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 5>happened again. What do you think and so on? You

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 5>work your way. Once you have the notion that the

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 5>system is fair and you're just trying to get at

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 5>what's true and what are people's strengths and weaknesses and

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 5>so on, you're making great leaps toward that. As this

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 5>thing from most companies in which they don't talk about

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 5>that and you know, or they're behind the scenes, Like

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 5>I had a rule if you talk behind somebody's back

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 5>three times or more critically, you're out, okay if but

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 5>you're always free to bring it up and deal with it,

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 5>because let's deal with it. Let's try to find out

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.320
<v Speaker 5>what the problem is and deal with it that way.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 5>So on the bullying, they can tell the bully, Okay,

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 5>you can tell the book why why did you do that?

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Why is that that way? But in any case, that

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 5>was my path, whether you choose it different path, I

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 5>think you have to agree that getting a truthfulness teams

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 5>sports teams have to do this right, So how do

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 5>you select I'm sorry, you're not doing a good job

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 5>at that thing. You have to deal with it and

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 5>you have to make the team great. It's like that.

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, so now I have to ask what do you

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 3>think about multi strats and the pod shops because the

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 3>culture that you're laying out where everyone is sort of

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 3>talking to each other and challenging each other, seems very

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 3>very different to the multi strat model that seems to

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 3>be much more predicated on, you know, little teams that

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 3>are sort of often doing their own thing.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 5>There's different ways to play the game. That's a totally

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 5>valid way to play the game, and maybe related maybe

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 5>it's just a totally utilitarian way. In that way, is

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 5>it effective in making the investment decision? Can be very

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 5>effective for lots of reasons. I can digress into uncorrelated

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 5>return streams, many operations blah blah blah blah blah that

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 5>could be very effective may not be effective of creating

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 5>the meaningful relationships and those types of things. Therefore, you're

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 5>going to have a continuity and a competitiveness problem. In

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 5>other words, people will go.

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 3>For, you know, which is what we've seen a little bit.

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 5>More, a little bit more money, a little bit more.

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 5>They're not in it together. They're not cheering their lives,

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 5>they're not cheering their mission together, and so on. So

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 5>maybe it's a fun, totally fine way for the investment management,

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 5>but it's not a fine way for building a fifty

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.399
<v Speaker 5>year old I did this, I built a fifty year

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 5>old organization, while others.

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 2>It has raised a question like in those environments, like

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 2>what is the franchise value? Because what happened? Right, what

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 2>seems to be this model which has produced extraordinary returns

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 2>for some investors. You do get the situation in which

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone is sort of a mercenary. I've never and then

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and everyone you know, you dangle these big paychecks and

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 2>bonuses and you're.

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 3>An independent contract basically.

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's hard to imagine that environment building a fifty

0:47:58.120 --> 0:47:58.720
<v Speaker 2>year franchise.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 5>I think I think it's I think it's not going

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 5>to last, and it's particularly in the area of an

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 5>aire sire. I think that you're going to have and

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to try to help it. AI enabled ability

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 5>to be an independent investment manager okay, like Uber. Okay,

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 5>Uber's got a technology that they take the individual, they

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 5>plug them into that that technology and whatever, and everybody

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 5>can do that. In a sense, I think we're going

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 5>to be moving more into that direction. So what is

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 5>it that's a path that we can go down and

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 5>that's a whole other path.

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you said you're going to try to help it.

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean. Are you working on something?

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, I might. I'm building my own ability and I

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 5>want to share how people can do certain things. That's it.

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 4>But you don't think this model this because it's been

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:53.879
<v Speaker 4>very hot.

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Again, talk about things that have changed ten years. Ten

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 2>years ago, we were not talking about multi strategy, talk

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 2>about fund to fund. Yeah, fund of finds much more

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 2>back then. You're it sounds that you're skeptical that this

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>model will endure much will endure?

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think in everybody. I'm just looking at mechanisms. Yah, yeah, yeah,

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 5>talk about okay, So what creates cohesiveness? You have to

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 5>have the need for cohesiveness. Okay, what is the cohesiveness?

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:22.879
<v Speaker 5>What is the commitment? Okay? I think when we help

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 5>each other. I believe in how people can help each other. Okay,

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 5>are they helping each other? Can they be better? And

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 5>that's the question, isn't it? Okay? So when we're thinking multistrap,

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 5>if everybody's there and you put it together, that that

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 5>could be done technologically very easily. Right, So is that

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 5>going to stick it together? Okay? What is a relationship like? Okay,

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:51.280
<v Speaker 5>to be on the mission together and to have relationships

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 5>and so on is invaluable not only in terms of

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 5>effectiveness in terms of doing job because different people have

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 5>different skills and you do that together, but it is

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 5>also psychologically rewarding. The greatest source of happiness Okay, this

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 5>is I think an important thing. Studies of happiness all

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.280
<v Speaker 5>around the world and so on shows that income past

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 5>a certain level does not bring a higher level of happiness.

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 5>Once you get the basics taken care of that. The

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 5>greatest source of happiness is community. Yeah, do I have

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 5>a sense of community? Okay? People who are there for

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 5>me and I can help and I work for that.

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 5>That's a powerful force and it's very rewarding. Okay, those

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 5>are my thoughts.

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I have one more question, since we're being very retrospective

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 3>here and nostalgic in some ways, do you think if

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:46.879
<v Speaker 3>you were setting out today, do you think you would

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:49.800
<v Speaker 3>have been able to create a bridgewater in the current environment?

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Yep, how would you say? I think, I think, and

0:50:54.680 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that everybody can. And that on entrepreneurship is

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 5>so clearly an example that it is the greatest power.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Money is not the greatest power. Money will seek out

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 5>the people, the entrepreneur, the person who has the talent

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 5>have enabled people, and then money will go to them

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 5>to make them. That's what investors do. We try to

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 5>find those people are going to make these new things.

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Wonderful things happen. So the talent of an individual to

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 5>attract money, to attract the resources that are necessary for success. Okay,

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:38.839
<v Speaker 5>we can do that. Now. The question is how are you?

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:42.279
<v Speaker 5>Are you the next one of those who's got the

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 5>ideas and can put that together and make the case

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 5>for your supports that I need this and the other

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 5>thing and grow and become better. Yes, I believe that

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:55.879
<v Speaker 5>we're in a period of time that that's very very good.

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 5>You need different resources than you did. You know. The

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 5>way I did it is I played. I was a kid.

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 5>I played the markets. I like the markets. Then on

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 5>one day I make a pitch to somebody. I did

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 5>my thing, and then the World Bank gave me a

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 5>five million dollar count. Okay, World Bank gives me a

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 5>five million dollar account because we were just talking about markets,

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 5>and they gave me a five million dollar count. And

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 5>that's started me in the institutional asset management business. Then

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 5>the next one gives me the account. Then I get

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 5>to build a track record. Then I get to build

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 5>the things I need. I mean right now, if you're

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 5>running an operation, it can be expensive because you need

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 5>compliance department, you have to deal with the regulatory things.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 5>You have a lot of those things expense, but you

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 5>can find your way.

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Ray Dalli on Underbridgewater, thank you so much for coming

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 2>on back on the podcast.

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 5>So good to be back in Congratulations again for your

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 5>ten years.

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Keep it up, Thank you so much. Well looking forward

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 4>to our fifty aeth year.

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 2>That'll be see if we can pull that up there, Yeah,

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll see.

0:52:56.000 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 4>That was fantastic. Thank you so much for Tracy. Fifty

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:13.919
<v Speaker 4>years is insane. I mean, that's insane, like in any field.

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Media, it actually is.

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 2>But when I like when I said that a lot

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of and when he said he ran that almost seems

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 2>too hard to wrap my head around that you could

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 2>run something for fifty a hedge fund that it could survive,

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Like that's an incredible track record.

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well he said he was seventy six years old,

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, no, he must have started it very very young. Yeah,

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty six. Yeah, I don't know, I've I'm kind of

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 3>in I'm in a strange mood now. I'm very like

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 3>introspective and retrospective and thinking about the future. But I

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 3>do think, you know, it is true he pioneered a

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of stuff like culture, and we hear a lot

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 3>of stuff about Bridgewaters very special culture in some distinct culture.

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Distinct culture.

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I'll say a couple of things is that,

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, I feel like as a as a middle

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 2>aged man, you know, you.

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Start to like change your view on the world and you're.

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Like, wait, does everything seem a little crazy objectively or

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:14.760
<v Speaker 2>is it just my state in life and.

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 3>What I am I losing touch?

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:18.759
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's important, and I actually would like

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the answer in some way to be that I'm losing touch,

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Like everything's totally fine. I'm just sort of like aging,

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of out of touch these days. And so I

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether I find it like reassuring or not.

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 2>That No, Like, these are really big things that are

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 2>going on, and all of these things, these big historical forces,

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 2>we've got a bunch of them, all sort of converging

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 2>at once.

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, they are big things going on. But I think

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:43.800
<v Speaker 3>one comforting thing, and this is why I think people

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 3>tend to read history in times of change, because you

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 3>feel very unsettled, you feel very insecure, and so you

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 3>look back at history and just start seeing these patterns

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to raise point and then you're like, oh, okay, maybe

0:54:57.040 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 3>things will be all right. But also you can read

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 3>certain history books and think, oh god, things are going

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to be terrible.

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know it's all about the books, and I

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 2>suppose it's about the time frame. I mean the other thing,

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and Ray mentioned is in terms of legacy, I do

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 2>associate Bridgewater specifically with teaching lots of people about the

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:23.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of specific ways that you can achieve great returns

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:26.839
<v Speaker 2>through leverage plus diversity care right, which is sort of

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 2>like the magic that they brought to it, which is

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 2>we're going to diversify. And you typically associate diversification with

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to sleep better at night, but I'm a

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 2>sacrifice return.

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, And that's fine.

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 2>But the idea is like, well maybe you can like

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, achieve both through leverage, and of

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 2>course it worked really well and yeah, the results speak

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:51.919
<v Speaker 2>for This is also interesting comments about Mac. I'm glad

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you as multi, Yeah, multi, because that was very interesting.

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, this idea that relationships are like personal camaraderie is

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the glue that's sort of holds the whole thing together.

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I think if you talk to people in that in

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that world, like the money can be great obviously, but

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I never ever sounds like a particularly satisfying life in

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 2>terms of, you know, everyone is aware that they're on

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:17.279
<v Speaker 2>a short leash, et cetera. There's not really much of

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a team, et cetera. It seems very mercenary and so forth.

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Someone else are leaving all the time, all the time.

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so it is interesting to think, you know,

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 2>there have been some implosions, not really blow ups per se,

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 2>but implosions. It does sort you do sort of wonder

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:37.360
<v Speaker 2>whether the balance of power or whether the how sustainable

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 2>this model is. It's been a while since we've done

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a multi stride episode, so I should revisit it because

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 2>there have been some developments.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there.

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's leave it there.

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.400
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:55.360
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand Deesh Hall

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Been at a Dashbop Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. From more Odd

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:04.919
<v Speaker 2>Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot com. Slash odd Lots

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.759
<v Speaker 2>were a daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 2>you can chat about all of these topics twenty four

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 2>to seven in our discord Discord dot gg slash od Lots.

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 3>when we look back at Ray Dalio's five decade long career,

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 3>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:57:21.560 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:57:25.280 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 3>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:57:30.960 --> 0:58:01.040
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening, Foo,