WEBVTT - 19. New District Attorney Todd Spitzer Dethrones Twenty Year Incumbent. His Mission, To Clean Up Corruption in the Orange County Justice System. Welcome Back A Timely Roundtable With Guests, Scott Sanders, Paul Wilson and Scott Moxley.

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Please be advised this story contains adult content and graphic language.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not justice at all to know that the respect

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that I had for these guys and what I thought

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they would produce for me and do for me, they

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>did the complete opposite, and they they made my pain worse.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And they continued to do that by not admitting what

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they did and not just holding themselves accountable. Welcome to Sleuth.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Linda Sawyer. We hope you recognize our effort throughout

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>this podcast to shine a light on just how justice

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is dispensed and determined in Orange County, California. With the

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>checks and balances a platform like Sleuth has brought to

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>bear on this subject, there is now a new day

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in town. On November six, the people of Orange County

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke and voted in new d A Todd Spitzer, who

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>dethroned a twenty year incumbent in Tony Rococcus, Mr Spitzer one,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 1>on a platform of cleaning up corruption in the Orange

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>County d A's office. With that, we have invited a

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>timely roundtable discussion welcoming back our trio of guests, which

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>include Wosniak defense counsel Scott Sanders, victim advocate Paul Wilson,

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>who lost his wife of twenty six years to Mr Sanders,

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>clients Got to Cry, and a thirty year award winning

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>veteran journalist Scott Moxley. Mr Moxley, through his weekly Moxley Confidential,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>informs the public by consistently keeping an eye on the

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>political and legal maneuvering taking place in the Orange County

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>justice system. Welcome to Sleuth again, gentlemen, and thank you

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for being here today. For this past season of Sleuth,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the focus has been on the Dan Wozniak case because

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe Dan was not alone in committing the murders

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of Sam Hair and Julie Kibuishi, and I've shared with

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>listeners my work in support of this theory. There are

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>others involved in these murders who should have been charged

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as accomplices, but we're not due to perhaps political expediency,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with the d a's office seemingly consumed by a win

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at all costs mentality, So the narratives seem to be

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>get the death penalty for Dan Wozniak, and the others

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>will simply be summed up as collateral damage. Therefore, I

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to invite all three of you, gentlemen, back to

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the program today, so each of you can discuss some

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of your concerning issues that your work has revealed regarding

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the shortcomings of the Orange County justice system, not only

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you covering them, Mr Moxley, but you experiencing them from

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a personal standpoint as of the MS family member, and

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of course Mr Sanders experiencing it as a as a

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>public defender in the county for over twenty six years.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So with that, let's talk about the election. We just

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>had an election and an incumbent of twenty years was

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>basically ousted. The people spoke and uh, I know that

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot to say about it in your coverage,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we start with you, Mr Moxley. Sure,

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as we film this or record this, it looks like

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Spitzer, the challenger, is up by forty votes and

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a trouncing and particularly given the history of

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the office. Racoccus one in June the first time and

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>has been openly seeking a six four year term and

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I think entered into the year believing he would be

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the next district attorney and was stunned that the voters

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in the June primary wanted someone other than him, And

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you could look at what the office did

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the following weeks leading up to the election and

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether decisions were made in the interests of justice

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>or attempted to be made to an influence an election.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know, Mr Sanders. I know that I've

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>heard that in fact, Mr Spitzer really was running on

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>it clean up the d a's office platform. Do you

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>feel like all your work and the informant scandal had

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the results that you were looking for in this election? Well,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we weren't doing it for the election, first of all,

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so it really wasn't part of the analysis. Never was

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I ever doing work and going out there and LiTi

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>getting these issues thinking that Mr ra Caucus would would

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>be replaced. It's happened, and now we'll look forward to

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>see if Mr Spitzer brings in a new thinking about

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>how to deal with issues of misconduct, both within the

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>office and outside of it. So it's really in his

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ball field. Now he can he can assuring a whole

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>new era that looks nothing like the one we've seen

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>for the last couple of decades. But on the campaign,

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>he was touting all your work and he was giving

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you credit for what you uncovered. I don't know how

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>much he was directly recognizing our work, but I think

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he was speaking to at least what the work had

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>done to show that there were problems that he believed

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>needed to be changed or responded to. So he's talked

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot about it. It's been a big issue for him.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it was an issue that did move people, unquestionably.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just you know, and and the writing

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>people like Scott Mr Moxley covered it. How many articles

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>would be he wrote over a hundred, He's written over

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty. I know on the that's a

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of articles on the informant. How many words is that?

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever figured it out? I don't want to

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>really know, it's a lot. Mr Wilson, I know you

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>had firsthand experience and got involved with Mr Spitzer's campaign

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you just spoke about your firsthand experience.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you tell my listeners about sure? Well, I'm

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>at Todd six years ago. Seven years ago. Todd gave

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>me a platform to speak. He was a lot of

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>victims rallies and it was instrumental in helping me heal.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>At that time. I give thought a lot of credit

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for that, and he was very kind to me, and

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said, he gave me that that platform that

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I very much needed at that time. And in context,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.679
<v Speaker 1>how how long ago was that? It's uh spent seven years?

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So Todd reached out to me, and my first victims

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>rally would have been probably six months after Christie was

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>shot and killed in Seal Beach. I Scott to Cry

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>who was one of Mr Sander's clients. Correct, So Todd

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is he ran on victims rights and and cleaning up

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that office and everything I know about Todd, he's been

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>true to his words. So he's got a large clean up.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And so was there a commercial that you did with

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>him or what I did? I did do a commercial

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for Todd. I wanted the voters to know the corre

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>option and the scandal that I experienced with Tony Rococcus

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in that current District Attorney's office, and that's basically what

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the commercial was about. Did you want to share with

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>listeners your experience when you did actually meet with Tony directly?

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's time with that When you said that you sat

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>down with Mr Roccoccus and you could tell that it

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was his choice. Yeah, well, I had numerous meetings with

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Tony over the course of six and a half years,

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>so many of those were face to face, and um,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they were very heated. What were they heated about? Well,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because I was contesting his decisions and what he was

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>doing and didn't agree with them, and we basically just

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>decided we didn't like each other. So definitely a different

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>experience than you had with Mr Spitzer. Completely different. But

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but again, I mean, Toodd's giving me a platform to

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>speak on it as a victim, and Tony Roccoccus is

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>out there cheating and lying to me and doing things

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that I don't agree with. So I held Tony accountable

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and I knew he was lying and he was cheating,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't like that very much. Do you have

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense, Mr Moxley, of your readers how they feel

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about perhaps this new administration? Was it just time? I mean,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me, what, if anything, you're getting any feedback. The

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Weekly's readership is twenty to forty market essentially, so it's

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>younger people, and they're always suspicious of law enforcement, particularly

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>political law enforcement. Let me go back to something about

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how he won or how he ended up losing this contest,

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to start the very beginning is

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>that Tony Corococcus abandoned his public oath. And without him

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>doing that repeatedly, nothing else would have fallen into play.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have written certain articles, uh Todd would have

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>been struggling in a way, but just repeatedly abandoning his oath.

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>And then give us an example of that, well, I

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think in the in the in the Ry case, where

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it was very evident by two thousand fourteen, and let

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>me just say for listeners, Scott to Cry was the

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>largest mass shooter in Orange County history, and one of

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>his victims was your wife, Mr Wilson. That's so the

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>key was in a place like Orange County, where there's

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>largely suburban juries who are not hesitant to vote for

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the death penalty. This was considered a slam dunk death

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>penalty case. And yet they violated the defendants constitutional rights constantly.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>They had records covered it up in light about it right,

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they committed perjury. And in the process of that,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Tony could have gone the high road and ended the

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>cheating and fired the people on his staff who were

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>cheating and go after the deputies a committed perjury in

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a death penalty case. He did none of that. So

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that's the basic right there. In fact, even said they

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't agree with Judge Goethe's ruling. Right. I mean, I

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>remember the sheriff saying that she bloody overstepped himself. You

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>had a speaking engagement, I believe it was at a

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>competing tabloid, and you spoke with and she was there sheriff,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and they've they've she and Mr ra Caucus have repeatedly

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about their frustration with what happened. I don't know

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that people listening understand that we had a debate that

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>got spurred by an informant that was both on the

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Wasnia case and the Decry case. And in the Decry

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>case we ended up writing a lengthy motion of five

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>page motion analyzing what we believed was a hidden informant program.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>That's how it all came to pass because you had

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>both clients, so you all of a sudden saw things

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>happening in both cases that ultimately drew you into the

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>informant scandals. So the line of the Sheriff's department, District

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office is that this informant ended up in these

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>locations next to high profile defendants by accident. It was

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just a coincident. You represented two of those high profiles

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and that then Wosnia and Scott to Cry and Judge

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Gouldals in the Decry case did some miraculous, really incredible things.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>First of all, he told the D's office to turn

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>over materials they didn't want to turn over, and then

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he allowed us to have hearings over three years in

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>which more and more evidence poured into the courtroom. Prosecutors

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>took the stand, which was very different in Judge Connolly's

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>courtroom because he wrote similar motions, but there was no hearings. Well,

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they were just a decision was made, that's right, and

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Judge Goltals moved over time. He first denied our recusal,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>then looked at more evidence and granted it, then dismissed

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the death penalty. Judge kindly didn't allow any hearing. And

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, what's kind of important is the Wosnia

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>case actually led to some of the most important evidence

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Decry case. So, for example, when we lost

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and Decry, we went and got records in the Wosniak case,

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and those records with Judge Statler as a matter of fact.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>He then ordered some records. I don't think he knew

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what they were, but they were devastating to what witnesses

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>had said in the Decry case. He saw a similar

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>name coming up, Is that right? Similar names, informant names,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>informant names, and evidence we had never seen before. An

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence had contradicted what witnesses had said on the standover months,

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and Mr Moxley was covering it like incredible, Yeah, yeah, incredible,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>award winning incredible. And not to speak for Paul, but Paul,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>who started as someone who couldn't have been more opposed

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to what we were doing, I would say, was watching

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you would had not a happy relationship, nothing, no cooperation.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It was very contankerous. First, he was rightfully angry. Right,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you were representing his wife's killer. This is the guy

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's defending the guy that part of your life away.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Changed my life. I was married for twenty six years,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>three children, it's a sky changed the course of my life.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And here's the guy defending him. And how could you

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>not how could you not feel the way you felt?

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to talk about the conversation stion

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you had with the prosecutor. I think it was Dan Wagner.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>You told me that you went right up to him

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and and said, is are the things that Mr Sanders

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>saying in court about this informant scandal? Are they true?

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>What was that correct? I mean, when all of this

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>started coming out and we noticed that Judge Goethe's was

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>allowing this to go on and happen in the courtroom,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we would ask the public appropriate questions, and the Wagner's

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>answer was, that's just the public defender throwing up smoking

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>mirrors and trying to dance around this thing, and extended

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>out that's none of that's true. They're all lies, nothing

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you need to worry about. So no ownership. No, he's

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting there lying to families that are all murder victims

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's lying to us. Was that the inciting incident

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for you was that when it all turned was already

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to turn. I think there was about about years two,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>about two thousand fifth, maybe about two thousand fifteen, that

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I started to see this thing unhinging and asking why

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>why is you know, this is a very simple case.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is the judge allowing all this? Common sense has

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that there's a reason why. I mean,

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a very good judge, and he's allowing it.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So something's not something's not sitting something legitimate about what

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Mr Sanders is discussing. Your listeners should know that in

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the early years of the case, the prosecutor's office went

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>out on a pr mission to blame Mr Sanders for

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>all the delays in the case, as they did in

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Lasniak and as as it turned out, as which judge

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>was determined, it was actually the Sheriff's department and the

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors that had delayed the whole time because they were

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hiding stuff that should have come in along a lot earlier.

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So they weren't they weren't submitting what the court was

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>asking for, coming up with all kinds of excuse. You've

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>can understand. I mean that when I talked about this,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes on the defense side it can be difficult. This

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is a case were ultimately, when we had marshaled all

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the evidence and gone through everything and spending year study,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we owned the facts. When we walked into the courtroom,

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we had documents that showed the movements of informants and

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the concealment of it and how it wasn't coming forward

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in cases, So you would be asking witnesses questions and

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>their answers would be ridiculous. And I remember at some

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>point Paul and I have talked about this. I would

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>look back at him, can you believe it? Kind of

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like this is this is absurd and

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of wanted to see his reaction. And I did

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>see the reaction. Again, that's before we were friendly. I mean,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we were still but it's starting to unravel. And he

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>notices that I'm noticing that it's unraveling, and he's like

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>watching an Abbot and Costello show. Absolutely and something that

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>two days after the shooting happened, we were all summoned

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>down to the d a's office and it brought us

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all upstairs and Tony's up there telling us what he's

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>going to do and how he's going to do it,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and the news media is assembling downstairs. It's a it's

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge news comp of course, UM, and he says

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to us, I don't want you guys exposed to the

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>media at this time. This is something that I'm going

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to carry and I've I've got your backs and I'm

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>going to take care of you guys. And he did

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>anything but take care of us, and UM did you

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like, right, then there was something funny that No. No,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is two days. This is my first

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the system. Right, the system is gonna work

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>because we all wanted to labor, all Americans, and it's

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the best system in the world. Never been in court,

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>never had any exposure to it. Here's the top law enforcement.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Certainly not to be there, you didn't want to be there.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a hundred percent convinced that they're going to protect

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to protect me, and they're gonna do what's right,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and the system is going to work exactly how it's

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work for me. Did complete the complete opposite.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think get people don't realize sometimes as they think, well,

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>if you uncover misconduct, it only helps defendants, like yeah,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but but all of this it's for society well and

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>also for victims. So the problem is if you're in

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a death penalty case and twenty years later evidence that

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>comes forward that could have been available twenty years earlier,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's when victims lives get unraveled again. So cheating doesn't

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>help on any side. And in reality, here, if they

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>would have played it straight from the beginning, they would

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have gotten the death penalty. They would have had a

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty good shot, not that I would have ever wanted it.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I would have always been opposed to it, but they

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but they could have done it clean from the beginning.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And one of the great and terrible examples is that

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we are years into this litigation, we are the D's

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Office has been recused, and we discover a whole series

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of records called a special Handling Log that basically said

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that everything we had said way back in two thousand

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in fourteen when we first filed the brief was accurate.

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>If they had turned that over when they were supposed to,

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and they were required to, because in two thousand and

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen they had in order to turn over all of

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>these types of materials they refused. If they had done that,

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Paul wouldn't have gone through this, none of it. It

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would have all right there been out What would have

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>happened happened to tell us? I would have dealt with

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>all the informant issues right there. We would have understood

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>what was the scope of the litigation. We would have

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>realized it all there wouldn't have been But what would

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have been the downside for the d A's Office to

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>admit all of that well, and let's let's say, you know,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>some stuff D's office sometimes Sheriff's office. If the Sheriff's

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>office had admitted, why do you think they were afraid

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to say, Okay, this happened. Let's move on. Because it's

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>devastating because because behind all this, unfortunately is years of concealment.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the Scott Decry case. So other cases

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>would have. Is that what you think, Mr Moxley? A

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of Absolutely. In January two fourteen, when Matt

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Murphy and Dan Waggoner in the homicide unit received Scott's

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>motion and to cry, I was with them and they

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>huddled around, and they looked through it and they told

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>me and they trusted me at this point. I trusted

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>them at that point. This is nothing. This is just

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>wild stuff. But I could see the look on some

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of their faces of cringet, trepidation, and and so I

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a five page motion And I remember

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on a Saturday going to a coffee shop thinking I'm

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna speed read this puppy, and I get

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>like forty pages in. It's been like four hours because

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so dense. That's how much hard work went into

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that to that brief, and I'm talking about Mr Sanders,

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the original brief, and I knew that I was. I

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just it's not the first document that revealed the informant scandal,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and I knew this is gonna take me forever to

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>digest because there's so many and you didn't have any

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>real professional relationship with Mr Sanders at that point. I

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>watched him in him. I knew of him. I had

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>watched him in court um and in fact, some of

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the people in the homicide unit had previously told me

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>good things. They thought he was a really good lawyer.

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It's true. And so eventually, when I felt I got

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more into it, I realized the issues

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>are way beyond me that he's discussing in terms of

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>all the informant games and the Sheriff's Department, the d

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>A that I requested a meeting, and we were hesitative

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>at each other because he'd read my coverage of the

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Orange County District Office and a favorable that I've written

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>favorable stories about their homicide cases. So when we sat down,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know exactly where we were going to go.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>All I wanted out of the meeting was one thing,

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that that he would open up a channel that I

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>could ask him questions. That was it to start with

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that he was worried whether he could trust a reporter

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>who was so close to everybody in the homicide unit.

0:20:53.720 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank goodness, you went first. I was second after that.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the article where he came with the cowboy hat

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and the think oxide on his nose and you were

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>afraid of the sunshine at that. I never really had

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>any um communications with reporters. Maybe once in a while

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody would ask me something, but this is really my

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>first time I've ever media, and you know, and it's

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the most media don't say very nice things about your clients,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so I could understand you not. One of the one

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of the remarkable things for me in terms of signals

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was in the after maybe a week or two where

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the d a's office had time to digest more about

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>what was in the in the brief, there was a

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hearing in in No wazni At case with Murphy and

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Matt was walking behind him at the pacing and standing

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>right behind him, and and I was sitting in there.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You hadn't seen that kind of behavior before. I hadn't

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>seen that from him that I could remember. But what

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the difference was Scott swiveled around in the divince here

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and just stared up at him. It wasn't frown or

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>just just he was digesting, like you could see he's

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>just take but he spun around. He wasn't afraid. He

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>wasn't afraid. And that was the signals, Like because one

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of my pet peeve covering court for for so long

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>is I hate lazy lawyers, you know. And I was like, oh,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this guy's this guy is ready to fight, and he

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't over the top. It was just you hate lazy journalists.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I do, but I've seen so many. Matt is an

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>impressive courtroom figure, and I've seen many defense lawyers just

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>crumble around him. And for for Scott Sanders to spin

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>around and follow him like it's sick. I'm not afraid

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of you. I'm not afraid of you on this and

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a turning point for me that

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to pay attention, I have to learn more,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and thankfully my company allowed me to drop covering other

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>things to spend more time kind of digesting this and

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>learning the issues. And they were tough at first. The

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Messiah rules and when you can when the cops can

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>talk to you or not, and that sort of thing.

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was a learning experience. It took years

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to kind of feel like I understood it appropriately. But

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it all began there with them telling me I couldn't

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>trust Scott, but me seeing a signal of him ready

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to fight. And then he he slowly opened up and

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>helped me understand what was in his motion and why

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he put it in. Do you feel satisfaction? Anybody could

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>answer this with the election results, Well, my friends joked

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with me that as an investigative journalist it's better to

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have Tony Rococcus in there because he's just a scandal machine. So, UM,

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I laugh at that. I think I've told you that before.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I mean I've I've known Todd Spitzer and

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Tony Rococcus since the late nineties. Maybe we have no

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Todd since my listeners about a little bit about Todd

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Spitzer's background. Well, Todd has been on a school board,

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been a county supervisor twice, he's been termed out

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>at the state Assembly. Um, he's a radio show and

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>KFI many years ago, or at least he was a

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>producer or something like that. He's been a reserve a

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Police Department officer and um, you know, so

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he has served the public over the years. Yeah, he's

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a he's a He's unlike Ricoccus, Tony a touch bitzer,

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is much more of a policy wonk. He gets into

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the nitty gritty of why you have to do something right.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Rococcus is more, Uh, my friends calling on the phone

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that needs help, maybe a case doesn't get filed for example. Uh.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the first indicators for me about Tony Ricoccus

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was his office filed a complaint against George Arduous, who

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was a billionaire Newport Beach real estate developer. He has

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>an apartment complex massive, and he was refusing to give

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>refunds to all these poor people, just systematically. That was

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the complaint. Within like forty five minutes of it

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>being filed officially in court with the time stamp, he

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>had it yanked. Arduous was one of his campaign contributors,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and that cleared the way for George Arduous to pass

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Senate confirmation to become a US ambassador to Spain. That's

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the type of thing that Todd has campaigned a bit,

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>not just recently, but kind of fought against or argued

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>against that. You can't have a system operating like that.

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you that the prosecutors on that

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>case were horrified that they had They had worked on

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it for years and years, and for him to yank

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it for what they believe our political concerns was unacceptable.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that with a new administration, the cleanup

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that Todd Spitzer promised to his constituents will indeed take place?

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I just am taking the perspective that it's a possibility

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that he will, he'll bring that in. I want to

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be positive about that, but this is what I would say.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be enough to just look forward

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that it doesn't happen in the future.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There's issues to address here that are not going to

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>just go away. And like what, well, right now we

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>have a phone call scandal. We have issues with regard

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to and to say what that is. There's been calls

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that recorded from inmates to their lawyers improperly. Unquestionably those

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>numbers have grown as really well, you're not allowed to

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>record calls from inmates to their lawyers. It's strictly prohibited

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and has lots of legal implications and they have been recorded.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>They have and you know this for fact. Yes, this

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>has been admitted. This has been admitted by the telephone

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>provider and by the Sheriff's department. There's no question. Yeah,

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not a disputed issue. It's been admitted

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>by both entities. The numbers that the sheriff Department admitted, Yes,

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're at this reluctantly. Reluctantly. They took a long time,

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and I would say they absolutely concealed it for three

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half years. So now they come forward and

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they have admissions of a very small number of calls.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>How did you come to realize this is And it

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't me. It was another lawyer by the name of

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Joel Garson who covered it in a case. Our office

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>then has been leading an effort to bring it out

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in other cases. I have one of the cases that's involved.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But they admitted a thousand calls on Friday, we're talking

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>here on the Tuesday and Friday. They've admitted now that

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the calls maybe vastly greater. We think the numbers are

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>more like an excess of two thousand calls, and we

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's lots of logic supporting that and lots of

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>cover up on it. So that's not going to go away,

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and he has to handle issues like that. There's also

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the issue of the people that were involved in the

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>informant scandal have moved to the streets. So if you

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>were a deputy working in the jail and you then

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>were part of what we're part of it, that's supposed

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to follow you your whole career. If you made the

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>decision to engage in governmental misconduct and concealment of that,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and that should follow you. So when you take the

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>witness stand, you get to be questioned about that. It

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>does not look like there's been any disclosures of that

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>in cases, and so that's another issue we've raised. But

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's gonna be the issue you for Mr Spitzer.

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a really good chance he's going to

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>say I don't want cheating to take place. I'm hoping

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. Well if he, I mean, you said

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he ran on that, but that campaign promise. But that's

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, But that's just not enough.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>He has to remedy what's going on to date. He's

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>got to make sure that cases from the past get

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>handled correctly. Well, we'll have Mr Moxley watching out for that,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>right sure. Let me just add something on the phone

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>call for your listeners. The importance is that your pre

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>trial inmate, the the Shares Department controls every aspect of

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.959
<v Speaker 1>your day and night in there, and you're supposed to

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>constitutionally have the ability to communicate with your defense lawyer.

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And those communications are important because you're talking about strategy

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>or your feelings or whatever, where a piece of evidence

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>might be and that sort of thing. And they just

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>can't violate that. And we know they've come in and

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>tried to downplay the numbers so far, the number the

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>system records the calls, that's a violation. But then the

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Shares deputies and key cases were going in and monitoring,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>downloading the calls for themselves and not telling anyone. And

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in the particular case of Josh Wearing that's ongoing right now,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>uh my belief that he had said some things only

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. And then Coasta Mesa police department eventually

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>had the prosecutor had to admit that she she had

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>been given a rundown of the what was said in

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the phone call. That's how they were aware of and

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote things in certain motions, and was the prosecutor using

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that information? They yes, they did. That's what started the

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>whole ball rolling on us. That's the first indication of

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>these calls. And the other thing that's really fascinating is

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the group in the jail that kind of it was

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront of the informant scandal was a group

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>called Special Handling. And so in March of two fifteen,

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Judge Goltel's removes them from the District Attorney's office. One

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>day later, that same entity, Special Handling, stops another log

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were keeping, and that log had all sorts

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of information about their monitoring a phone calls. So you

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that at that point, we didn't know. We

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>had no idea that we didn't have the evidence yet

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that they were that they were actually listening to calls

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that hadn't come out until a couple of months ago.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But way back they end their log. This is the

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>second log that they ended in a very strangely time decision.

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>One just within days of Judge Golde's ordering evidence in

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the decry case, and then second within days of Judge

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Goltell's throwing them off the case. And here comes the

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General's office, they've been listening to all these calls

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly they just they decided to stop their log

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for a second time. So that's just one piece. You know,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they turned over documents that are ridiculous where you're you've

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>got a hundred law offices you're calling, and there's five

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>week periods where they claiming there's not a single call

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>made to a lawyer's office. It's absurd stuff. And so

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>when you engage in that kind of conduct repeatedly, and

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through this through our litigation and through this litigation,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you do with the sheriff's department that keeps

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>behaving like this? Well, here comes Mr Spitzer and have

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to hope it's to the rescue. But that's a that's

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a tall order. And how do you feel because for

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so long you said your relationship with the d A's

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>office was a positive one, right where you never saw

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>any of this. I had no idea. I'd watched certain

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>battles litigate out and I wasn't aware. I knew that

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there were trouble with certain prosecutors. I mean, one, for example,

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was tipping off the organized crime about raids that were

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on the way. Wait, wait, what does that mean you

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you tipped off? I'm aware of a prosecutor doing that.

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Orange County was working in league with the organized crime

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to tip them when they were going to be police raids. Um,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he lost his license, but now he's back in practicing.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>When did that? By the way, he contributed to he

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was yes, So couldn't we say his name? Brian Kazarian? Right?

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And how long ago? When was he a prosecutor? Was

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the rococcus term? Right back? And he was.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was a prosecutor starting when I did.

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We were in the almost the same class six years

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ago almost. But the key here is that if they

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>every time you go into court, the judge will say,

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>or the lawyers are said, during when they're doing jury selection,

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>when this officer or an officer comes in, our deputy

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>comes in, you're not going to give them any more

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>weight than any other witness because that would be wrong.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And they all absolutely not. Now they come in and

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they're wearing their weapons, they're wearing their outfit with their

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>ranks and whatever else, and that carries weight in ours county.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's an authority figure. I mean that's right.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So that so that the way the system, if the

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>system is working, you have to rely on the credibility

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of those officers to tell the truth. Once that system

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is broken down, which it has here, how can you

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>trust any decision? Then I was just gonna say, it's

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a trust based system. And in the in the in

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the Informant jail House Informant scandal, they knew the loophole.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutors and deputies knew the loophole to site. So for example,

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you once a pre trial defendant has been arraigned and

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>has a lawyer, the government and their agents like informants,

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are not allowed to question them about the case. So

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an exemption that if an inmate wink wink that's

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not working for the government accidentally overhears the guy confessing. Right,

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So they would parade the guy into court and go,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>did we make any deal with you? No, No, you're

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get any sweetheart deal at all. So you're

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>just out of the goodness of your heart. You listened

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in and you heard this guy confess, and you get

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing in return. Right, And so what we've learned in

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the snitch scandal is the routine was they had meetings.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They wink wink, and they would move, they would shuffle

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the informants around, and the informants were writing notes going

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I love my little job I have. And the two

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of them that Scott exposed, both of them who that

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the d a's office said, oh, we have no deal

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>with them. There was no prior deal for them. They

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>did out of the good. These are gang murderous gang members,

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, who were facing life in prison unless

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they cut unless they cut a deal in some way,

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were being paraded into court. Oh, no deal

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. There was nothing there. And we later on,

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Um saw the paperwork in the process that worked out

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>how they were using that loophole to cheat. How did

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you how did you confront your sources in the d

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a's office when you were seeing this unfold? How did

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that change or did it change your relationship or your

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>feelings towards these people that you had been covering for years? Well, Um,

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Susan King Schroeder. She is Tony Roccoccus is right hand person,

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and she was the head of Public Aration's office. She

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>made herself chief of staff. She was the head of

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what office at public Relations office? And as I was

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>writing as I was learning and I watched the developments

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in the nich snitch scandal, she repeatedly, routinely said, I'm

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna cut you off from our agency if you keep

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>writing these stories. And I just kept well, then you're

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to cut me off because I'm going to

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>write what I see in court. And quite frankly, she

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't even keep up because she wasn't paying attention or

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever whoever the sources were who were telling her about

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what was happening, they were ill advised, or they weren't

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>telling a story, or she just was down with spin spin.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So I've lost her as a source and she's the

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>main d a flack or was and so yeah, there's

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a ramification for telling the truth in a story about

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>what you what you see sounds familiar. Well, I mean,

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what's so incredible about having someone like Paul

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>involved in another person by the name of Bethany Webb

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>also who had who lost a loved one. There's it

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>never happens. You don't have victims who are so stunned

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>by what they're seeing. I mean that they rise above

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>their natural feelings would be towards you representing their loved

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one's killer, right that they rise above that. That's right,

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>first of all. Most human beings can't do that. Regardless

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like that we would be sitting here today and that

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 1>we've sat together many times. It's Marathos, But it's not.

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not me, that's Paul, because I can do it

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>as a defense lawyer, you know, I can. I'm trained

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to see everybody in in all sorts of shades. But

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to have lost your loved one the way he did

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and still to say, look, I can't see how horrible

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that is and how much it's it's devastated my life,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but I still can't tolerate the cheating that's going on

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom and that no one's being held accountable.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's the key. And I think I don't want

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to speak for Paul, but I think that's what's so

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 1>motivating to him and why he keeps pushing me, is

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's the tenants of our system, right, but there's

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>no there's been zero accountability, right, And that's the problem.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's the zero accountability. And does that frighten you?

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course it frightens me absolutely. I Mean, like I said,

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a guy that went into this believing in this

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>system and this system that's in place for exactly guys

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like me. Right, That's that's what you think as we

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sit here today. I'm still very pro police, pro law enforcement,

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that there's more good being done than

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>than there is is bad. Unfortunately, I got put in

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>with the bad and I had to experience and through

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that experience, Yeah, I mean it look at these guys

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>took almost seven years of my life of and like

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott said earlier, the only reason I was going back

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>to court is because they got caught cheating. They got

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>caught breaking the law, and that extended the time I

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>had to go to court. And so you no longer

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at it as Scott Sanders fault. You looked at

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it as the d and obviously, and I mean, can't

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>tell you what it's like sitting ten feet away from

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the guy that has changed the course of your life.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It drains, It takes everything out of your soul. I

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>would leave court that day and just have to go

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>home and close up my house and just sit there

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and and and be alone, because it just takes everything

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>out of you. It's hard to understand unless you're there

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>actually had a very similar conversation with me about that

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>with Dan wisn Yankee says, you just can't imagine. It's

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>mentally and physically excruciating and draining. And the fact that

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I only had to do that because these guys got

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>caught cheating. They need to be held accountable, and they're there.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They as far as I'm concerned, Scott and it we're

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna work to get these guys there are going to

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable. So you're angry, of course, I'm angry.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these guys lied to me. It's difficult. I

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>had a son in high school going through his senior

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>year when this all happened. He was he was getting

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>looked at it by colleges, and there was so much

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>to juggle in the fact that these guys we're just

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>using me as a pawn and playing with me and

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>lying to me, and they knew exactly what they were doing.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 1>It's unacceptable to me, and I'm not going to allow

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it to happen. And it's at some point somewhere along

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the line, those bad guys are going to have to

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable. I mean, you could understand Paul's gone

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and spoken to the attorney General's office himself and asked

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>for answers because in two thousand and fifteen they announced

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do an investigation of what the Sheriff's

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>department did. It was obvious cover up. Judge Golds called

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>out the perjury in written rulings and it's undebatable perjury

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's plenty of evidence. We're three and a half

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>years later, not a peep from them, not a word.

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what's going on with the Department of Justice

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Attorney general investigations. I think as Scott's was

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.879
<v Speaker 1>saying earlier, the delay, the three and a half year

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>delay with nothing to show for it in it may

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe the California Attorney General, who supposedly independently investigating

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>corruption in the Arrange County shriffs Department, held a campaign

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>stunt press conference with the candidate that's trying to replace

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and did replace us shriff functions, So to pose in

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>front of the media right before an election. You're not

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that if you're going to hold these accountable. Plus,

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>standing right behind him is one of the lead investigators

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in this who's also one of the very prominent figures

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the whole snitch scandal. Yeah, who is that? William

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Baker was one of the people who's been investigating and

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>supposedly on the inside level trying to determine who's responsible.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But that investigation that Basara came to speak at and

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>speak about with Don Barnes, the newly elected sheriff, was

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>an investigation that's led by one of the primary people

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>from the snitch scandal, So a fellow by the name

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of Jonathan Larson, all through the snitch scandal, in the

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>heart of it, in the heart of not turning over records,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they chose him, of all people to be their lead

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>investigator in this very important Mexican mafia investigation. So if

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you're us looking at this, you think, but did he

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>take the standard stand? He testified, he told tests, covered up,

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he gave to testimony in two different cases. He never

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>revealed for years that there was an informant program. So

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that you would think, well, we just

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>moved him to the side. Would they put him in

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>charge of investigating Why? Because they're not afraid at all.

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>They have no fear of the attorney generals, nobody that's

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>holding anybody accountable. This is one of the things when

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I met with the d o J, and I made

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>very clear to them that what's happening in Orange County,

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>they're laughing at you, guys. They don't they operate as

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they want to, when they want to, how they want to.

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>They're laughing at you. They don't care what you have

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to say about it. They don't care what you think

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 1>or what you'll do. They're laughing at you. And what

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>was their response. Number of people at the d o J,

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the California Department of Justice. So there's the response. Um.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Their response was, we're not here to give you responses.

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We're here to listen to you. Mr Wilson, Wow, how

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about that? Mr? Mat doesn't make me

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.959
<v Speaker 1>happy because the system is not working. And it goes

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>back to it's been obvious perjury. There's been the destruction

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of records. Even their own records show that they've destroyed evidence,

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and nothing's happened so well, And just just to draw

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it back to WASNAC for a second, So in the

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Waznia case, we actually went further back. The cry is

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>really limited to about a six year examination of informant

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>records in the WASNIAC case, even though we never were

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>permitted a hearing. In our argument in the Waznia case

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>was that the system is so corrupted right now that

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not a reliable one for imposing the death penalty,

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that you can't reliably count on evidence being turned over.

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But when we looked at in Wozniak was looking back

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:39.479
<v Speaker 1>at thirty five years of deception, because it's been going

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on forever, the same techniques, the same tactics. And if

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you looked at case after case since the early nineteen

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>eighties where informants were involved, they always coincidentally landed in

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the same place. They were using the same what we

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>call snitch tanks or informant tanks, same techniques, no disclosure.

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So and then did those snitches get some kind of

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a sweetheart They all us do. They always do. They

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>come in and their line is, I'm doing it out

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of a moral obligation. That's what Fernando Perez said in

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the in the Wosniac and Decry cases. That's what Oscar

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Morial did in every case. Now, Matt did give you

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the letter from Fernando. There's no there's no disclosure issue

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Matt Murphy failing to turn over discovery

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and We never argued that he failed to turn over

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>discovery on that level. We did argue that the Sheriff's

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 1>department didn't turn over materials, and they didn't. In fact,

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>after we lost in the Wosniac case was when we

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>got this special Handling log that included details about the

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>contacts with Special Handling and Fernando Perez to get statements

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's almost undeniable. And also wasn't the mail order requests

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>from Detective Morales discovered at that point, right? That was

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>discovered afterwards as well, after the trial was complete. That

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the trial was completed, So after Wosniak was completed, was

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>when we got in a in subsequent litigation, this key

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>document that has so much about what everyone had been

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.240
<v Speaker 1>denying up to that. So, really you weren't given everything

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in discovery. We weren't giving everything. And I've always said this.

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll put it aside and say we don't blame Matt

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Murphy for not giving us a special handling lung wool.

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Assume that he didn't know about that. But what about

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the Morales mail I don't request. Well, why Morales wasn't

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>turned over I don't know, but I will just say

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get that, and that mail order request from

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Detective Morales to the Orange County Sheriff's Department had it

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a letter that spoke about the Coast of Mesa's belief

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that there was a co conspirator in the case of

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the murders of Sam and Julie, and so they wanted

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the mail from Dan Wozniak in case there was mail

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>between Dan and Rachel Buffett, which shows the mindset of

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the Coast of Masa police at the time that they

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>really did consider Rachel Buffett an accomplice. But again, this

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is we're talking about decades of concealment and it would

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>take an army to dig it all through, and people

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 1>are doing it. There's a lot of cases that have

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>been turned around by our numbers. There's eighteen cases where

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the defendant received a new trial, this case was dismissed,

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some very positive outcome for defendants related to informant related misconduct.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is the arguably the largest scandal in the

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>nation's history, and it's still growing and it should be

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>growing even more. But when do you think there's going

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to be some form of actionable response from an authority

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 1>that as something that they can claim that Okay, we're

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>going after these people and they're going to pay their

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>going there's going to be consequences to their actions. Where

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do you see the end of this odyssey that you're

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:53.879
<v Speaker 1>all on. Probably never, I mean realistically, I mean, I'm

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 1>not hoping for the U. S. Department of Justice or

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the California Department of Justice to save this. This This

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 1>work is just work that you just have to kind

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of keep going on until someone cries uncle. Do you

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's ultimately going to be the public that makes it?

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here, we do have an election after twenty years,

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a new administration. I would imagine that gives

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you some form of hope, cautiously optimistic. But is it

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the public in the end, Mr Moxley, that you think

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>has the power to make changes? They just showed it

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and Todd Spitzer's election. Absolutely. And what one of the

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous or not ridiculous, but more arrogant things that

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Shriff Huchins and Racoccus we're bragging about and when they

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>were doing private dinners and wealthy communities, was that nobody's

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to niche candle because it's made up. It's

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we all know around here that it's not made up,

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it's real. And one of the real um facts that

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>people should know is they were sending in informants illegally,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were the informants were doing great intelligent intelligence works,

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about that. Some of the notes that

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>they were making cleared defendants that were in jail, and

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>they held those notes because they didn't want to change.

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They wanted that defendant. One of them was a fourteen

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:13.479
<v Speaker 1>year old boy who had been charged in Santa Anna

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>with a murder. The notes that they had in their

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>possession said, everybody knows this guy wasn't had nothing to

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do with it. He's a punk. We would never let

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>him in our game. They kept him in and they

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dragged it out. They dragged it out for how long

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>was that two years? Fourteen year old boy. So they're

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>selective and when they want to use the information, and

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>then they pretend that even though this is one of

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest informants in history modern history around here, they

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't really read all of his notes, but they used

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>them in the cases where they wanted to use them well,

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and that would add So when that district attorney took

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the stand, do you remember what happened. He said that

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they had lost their file. The District Attorney's office had

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>lost their file. His name is Stephen Shriver, he testified,

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and James is here as a prosecutor in that case.

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>He said they couldn't find their file. The sant Ana

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Police Department officers said, oh, it is all in the

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>hands of the District Attorney's office. The District Attorney's office said,

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we can't find our file. But just as Scott Moxley

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just said, those notes are a great indication of the mentality.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And I've sometimes when I talk about this case, compare it.

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The guy who was making these comments to the informant

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 1>named Oscar Maurreal was not is not a great guy,

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but he at least had the moral decency to know

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that some kid who didn't do a crime shouldn't go

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>down for it. The folks who got the notes decided

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the better route was to keep it to themselves because

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:38.399
<v Speaker 1>they had a better sense of justice. And so when

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>people are playing on those levels and that type of mindset,

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you imagine the damage they're doing in this context and

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>so many other contexts. Again, I always say this, if

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you're cheating with informants who are the most dangerous witness

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the system. Everybody knows this, right. They're super motivated,

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll say anything. They're half bounced away from being a

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>car salesman. They're incredibly skilled. They can I had a

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>difficult time questioning them because they're really talented. Often. But

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're a district attorney's office and you're willing to

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>play with evidence of the sheriff's department or hold back things,

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>what will you do on other cases? Right? Because that

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>those are easy. You just turn over everything on an informant,

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You put it out in front of the jury and

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>let them make a call it. But for years, here, decades,

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I would say that hasn't happened, So it's not. And

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>this is why the argument I made on the Wisnia case.

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 1>In a culture that allows that you don't get to

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 1>have the death penalty, that's my argument. And that's one

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know didn't work. But we'll see what happens

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>down the road. But it's frightening to me to think

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.720
<v Speaker 1>about what else is out there that we won't ever touch.

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>When you see this type of kind of because I

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>never saw I I've spent most of my last five

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 1>years of my life studying these issues, and I never

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>found something that was helpful to a defendant from an

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>informant that was disclosed. I never found it. And in

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the case of Oscar or Moreal, this is a guy

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 1>who walked down the street with his buddies shooting at

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>people on their porches and didn't care. So he's technically

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer. And I think he admitted how many

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on the witness stand five He admitted five, But he

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>can't know because he's shooting as he's walking down the

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 1>street at night with his buddies. He's doing this all

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the time. This is who Tony Prococcus in the Sheriffs

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Department put their faith in UM as he's facing a

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>life sentence. And as far as in the Scotty case

0:50:29.719 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, well when well he testified, He testified

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in three cases with nine defendants looking at life. He

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:39.879
<v Speaker 1>ended up testifying in the Scott Decry case and having

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to answer some of those questions, and this is one

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of them. You're saying they used him as a credible witness. Yeah,

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 1>they oh yeah, they pretended they didn't have a deal

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>with him, but he got a sweetheart deal. Recently, as

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Scott and Scott wrote a number of stories about Oscar

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Morel and the lunacy of this right, true serial killer.

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:01.359
<v Speaker 1>If you go out five times to do shootings, isn't

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:03.439
<v Speaker 1>that the very definition of a serial killer? You don't

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 1>become less of one because you're a gang member. Right.

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Then he goes up and I don't know if you've

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>ever heard the recordings that were concealed and which he said,

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I can make my memories better if you give me

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a better deal. Didn't make it into any of his cases,

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and those things can be found online, just terrible things,

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and he gets rewarded because you did a deal with

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the devil and you can't get out, okay. I think

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that the prosecutors loved using someone

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like Oscar Moreal grew up in a high crime area

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>as a serial killer you wouldn't want to be around him,

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is that this is actually a remarkable person. I wrote

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this a couple of times after watching him for hours

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in court. He is brilliant, he is He outraces me

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:48.320
<v Speaker 1>by a trillion percent by his brain function. The federal

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>government used him in a Mexican mafia case and he

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was answering questions before they came out of the federal

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor's mouth. Repeatedly, he knew what the questions should have been,

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and he actually, actually, don't you want to ask me this?

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>That's how smart and slick this guy is. He could

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have been the best auto dealer salesperson at at Fletcher Jones, whatever,

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But this guy would sales. This guy could sell you anything.

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:18.720
<v Speaker 1>In the battle he gave with Scott at one point

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he was able to defend off for hours, but eventually

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Scott got him because it was hours and hours of

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>grilling him. But the few people can hold up to that.

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But a person like Oscar Morial everything is he doesn't.

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll tell you what you want to hear. In other words,

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>he's a great salesman. But and this is what's the problem.

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's so good. I had all the tools in

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the end because of this crazy situation in a death

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.879
<v Speaker 1>penalty case where Judge Goulds made a miraculous ruling, we

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>learned all these things about him. But when he was

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in trial with those defendants with their lives on the line,

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have those tools. They didn't have the evidence

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to show he was lying. I had it in some

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 1>crazy litigation that nobody could have guessed in a hundred years.

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But how's that fairness when people are in trial for

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>their lives and the prosecutor's office turns over four pages

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of his two hundred pages of notes, which they did

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in cases, or don't disclose his relationship so you can't

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>take him apart. Hey, Mr Mariel, here's this and this

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and this. That's what you need. That's why I always

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>say it wasn't that my litigation in the Decry case

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was particularly good. I had it all. It didn't take

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it didn't take the headiest guy to do this. In

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the end, we had we had accumulated all the materials

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and we could play things for him that made him

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately given. As Scott said, it took a long time

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and finally he relented, and then he started to talk

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:39.279
<v Speaker 1>proudly about his shootings in the neighborhood and how he

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>how he walked in. But it was hard, and those

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>other people didn't have it. And that's the key. The

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>key to the fairness is you've got to have the

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence that you're entitled to have so you can question

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>witnesses effectively. I mean, that's the foundation of our system. Yeah,

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's and and you know that's again I come back

0:53:55.160 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to Paul that Paul, Paul sees these things in way

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that few victims can see it. And I'm still mesmerized

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>by it. I truly am them. Yeah, you know what,

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's just incredible that with the pain that he

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and his family has suffered, he can see that. You

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>still don't want this to be the case. This isn't

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just it's just not the way to do justice. And

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately victims pay too, because what happened on the Oscar

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Morial's cases, well one of them, the victims think the

0:54:23.400 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>defendants doing life without possibility of parole. He's out in

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a year or two. You know, for whatever you think

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 1>of this, that's a disaster, right, that's a disaster. Now,

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe he should have he deserved to be acquitted, but

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the victims, they would have said, why don't you just

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>give him the evidence the first time and we'll litigate

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it the right way, or don't use him because he's unreliable.

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's never good for victims either if ten years

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>down the road or fifteen down years down the road,

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you're learning of evidence that should have been given over earlier.

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It turns your life upside down a second time. Well,

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I've been saying, and I think I've shared

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, Mr Moxley, like I don't understand in the

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>case of Wozniak, he had it all right, he had

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a confession, he had the murder weapon, he had the

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:08.880
<v Speaker 1>treasure trove of evidence, as he likes to say, he

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:12.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to frame Rachel the way he did. And

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to me like there there's a sense and

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.080
<v Speaker 1>correct me if you think I'm wrong, but I feel

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like in the case of the Orange County District Attorney's office,

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense of that they cherry pick justice, who

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>gets justice and who doesn't. I'd love to hear your

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>reaction to that, But that's someone who has come into

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>town and covered this trial for in this case for

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>three years. I don't know the history the way Mr

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Moxley does, or certainly you, Mr Sanders, and I can't

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>speak on behalf of how you feel, Paul, but that's

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.839
<v Speaker 1>my impression. It might be cherry picking. But I think

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I learned about, particularly after

0:55:55.760 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>these Wozniak and cry cases, is that they weren't focused

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on them to target them for cheating. They were just

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>cheating against everybody anytime they wanted. They were doing because

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 1>they called him capers all the time, against inmates. Um.

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is what they just routinely do. Nobody was.

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They were operating in secret, They had no management accountability,

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>they were coming into court, they were committing perjury. They

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>they're above the law. And it just through Scott's work here,

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.799
<v Speaker 1>it just got exposed that they took the easiest slam

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 1>dunk definitely case and botched it. That's the embarrassment that

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Tony Roccoccus and Sheriff Hutchins have to live with. And

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I keep asking, how is that justice for the victims families?

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you could speak best. It's not

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>justice at all, it um right, It's just it's heartbreaking.

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know, to know that the respect that I

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>had for these guys and what I thought they would

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 1>produce for me and do for me, they did the

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>complete opposite, and they they made my pain worse. And

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they continued to do that by not admitting what they

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>did and not just holding themselves accountable. I mean, right,

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm just so sorry for what you are experiencing.

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a travesty. I want to thank

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you all today for being here. It means so much

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to have listeners hear the truth and know the real

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>story behind all this, and you all three have contributed

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to that in such a powerful, honorable way, and I

0:57:50.200 --> 0:58:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just thank you all, Thank you, thank you. On our

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 1>remaining episodes of Sleuth, you can expect to hear from

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sources who will identify the full extent of others who

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 1>helped Daniel Wazniak in the murders of Sam Hair and

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Julie Kibuishi. We'll learn about when and where Tim Wazniak

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>showed up on the scene to help aid his brother

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan in the murders. And then there is Rachel's brother

0:58:26.960 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Noah Buffett. What and how much did no one know

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time of the murders. Finally, you will hear

0:58:33.320 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 1>from a couple of explosive surprise guests which will round

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>out our season, ending with a live call in finale

0:58:40.280 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 1>episode a finale where all our Sleuth listeners have a

0:58:44.520 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk to me directly with any questions, criticisms,

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>or suggestions for our team. As we head into the

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>new year with an all new season, two. Stay with

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>us as we share all that's left of our work

0:58:58.840 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for this season of Youth and No. You can find

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>us with the latest sleuth news at Facebook dot com,

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Forward Slash Sleuth podcast. If you enjoyed this episode of Sleuth,

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 1>share it with a friend and be sure to leave

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a rating or review. Follow Sleuth on I Heart Radio,

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:23.240
<v Speaker 1>or subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts so that you

0:59:23.320 --> 0:59:24.600
<v Speaker 1>never miss an episode.