WEBVTT - Unionization Threatens US Restaurant Profits

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Chopping It Up, Episode six. I'm your host,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael halens In, your restaurant and food service analyst at

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Today I'm joined by Riley Logison and Jonathan Sack. Uh.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>This is part two of of last week's discussion about

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the fast Act and unionization of the restaurant industry. Um. So,

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned last week, Riley as a shareholder and

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Global Restaurant Industry Group at Greenberg Greenberg

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>tro rig tongue twister there, and Jonathan is also a

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shareholder at the firm. Uh. You know, thanks for your time, gentlemen.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you make great to be here. Alright. So, uh,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>with the US approval of labor unions now it's seventy one.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just reading that it was the highest point

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen sixty five. We have a very union friendly administration. Uh,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing unions unionization efforts increase across the country. You know,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>restaurants are low margin, uh, and their employe these have

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>historically fought back against unionization. They have not been a

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>very easy group to organize. So why are they targeting

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>targeting this industry so aggressively? Aggressively and and why are

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they targeting Starbucks and Chipotle, two companies you know that

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we cover that have a long history of treating their

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>employees better than most of their peers. Well, there is

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a there is a very um significant uptick in n

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>l RB union election filings across the country and across industries,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that includes restaurants. The in a in a

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>well reported statistic, the n l r B M reported

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year that union election filings are up fifty

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seven percent over a six month period relative to the

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>year prior. UM that statistic came out in March or

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe April around then. I would think that I would

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think that that number is it has gone up a

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lot um and driven driven largely by restaurant industry UM

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in l RB elections that UM that that uptick, it's

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's much more acute as in areas of the country

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like the South and the Rocky Mountain states and industries

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like restaurants that that historically have been more resistant to

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>UH to unionization. UM. We think there's a number of

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>factors that are driving this, that are driving this trend.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>One UM the social justice demonstrations over over the past

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>past two years around me Too and blm UM made

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>more popular the notions of protests and challenging the status quo,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly among among younger segments of the population UM that

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>historically have comprised the bulk of UM restaurant the restaurant

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>industry workforce. President biden Um campaigned in part on strengthening

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>organized labor. He has delivered on that promise UM in

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>one way by appointing former former union officials to the

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>top posts that run that run the n l R

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>b UM. Yeah, and then there's then there's a lot

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is driven by the pandemic UM

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and as we and as we emerged in where to

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.839
<v Speaker 1>have a post pandemic nation, So frontline workers who had

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to who had to had to show up to the

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>workplace every day, feel feel undervalued. That's what they're That's

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what they're reporting. At least as UM as they're higher

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>paid office employees worked from home and and earned a

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more money while while working from the safety of

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>their home during the pandemic. A lot of the frontline workers,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>including in restaurants, report that they that they have not

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>benefited or shared in need in the country's economic economic

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>success and growth over the past several years. UM and

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this is all all culminated in an effort that to

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to make union organizing cool. UM their Time magazine recently

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>named the Amazon labor union leaders Chris Smalls and and

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Derek Palmer to their one hundred most Influential People list

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of Also on that list are are our household name

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>celebrities Mary J. Blige, Pete Davidson, UM Sarah Sarah, Jessica Parker,

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>well known popular politicians. UM and it quoted the quoted

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Mr Smalls as UM as saying as saying making

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it cool to organize as as one of as one

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of his goals. UM And So that's so there's a

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>number of social factors probably others too, that are contributing

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to the contributing to this uptick in in union organizing.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And then economically there's very high inflation, labor shortage, supply

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>chain issues that have that have been UM that have

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>affected restaurants significantly. Those are all causing UM employee employees

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to to do more with us. Yeah, and Mike, you know,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been really hard to be a restaurant employee during

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic across the entire country with staffing shortages. UM

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been hard to be a restaurant owner and operator

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>as well, and everybody has been required to adjust. But

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the staff being shortages at restaurants, and especially why are

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these businesses being targeted. They are the better employers.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>They are those that have been known for for treating

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>employees better. And these are in place I want to stay.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>They want to work there, They don't want to go

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. But as as Jonathan said, you know, they

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>feel that they should be treated better. And the organizers

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>behind this, as we talked about, you know, the last

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>week's episode with with the Fast Act, they've been very

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>smart and savvy. So they're they're hitting the right notes

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at the right time with the right audience under the

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>right circumstances. And you know that's why we're seeing this

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this very unique and significant change from what we had

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>ever experienced previously. Yeah, that's an interesting point, right, Like

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks and Chipotle are almost the victims of their own

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>success in that way that that you know that they

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>have employed, they have had, you know, an employee base

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that has stuck around that they've treated well, and they

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>um you know, contribute to college tuition and give better

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>benefits than their peers, and so employees do stick around

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in an industry where employees tend to be very very transitory,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>and they don't want to pay dues historically because they figure,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is just a very short term gig

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, right, and my John can touch on this,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's a precise reason why they're targeting these employers

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to who you might think franchise fast too,

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because you know, on how you unionize a location, you know,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it requires John will tell you an employee vote, and

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>if employees aren't around, they're not gonna be their vote.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But for those employers what people have been there for

0:06:54.560 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a long time and want to stay they are. Yeah,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting and another point to uh, you know the

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that the left um you know, you mentioned this

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>last week, Riley, that that um, you know, some of

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>these groups have been playing the long game, right, and

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>so part of it is the left UM has done

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a good job of controlling the culture, right, so you know,

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>putting union organizers on Time magazine, right, and like by

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>by controlling a lot of the um messaging out of

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>these media outlet's, it's definitely become an advantage for them

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're weaponizing it absolutely. UM. So what do

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you too think about the Starbucks? About Starbucks efforts so

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>far to head off unionization at that chain, well, UM,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know they're they're not working particularly well as the

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as the numbers suggests. There's my account is about two

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks locations have voted to unionize. And that's that's in

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>addition to the approximately three and forty more locations where

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the where the union. UM it's mostly Workers United, which

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is a Service Employees International c i U affiliate UM

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>has filed for has voled for more votes at other stores. UM.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know that that's all since since about late

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>so UM a very remarkable play, a very remarkable pace

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for UM. For for this to have happened just just

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>at one employer alone. UM. You know it's it is

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to stem the tide of labor organizing once it

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is underway. And UM, as as Riley alluded to, UM,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, there's there's a couple of reasons why

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why that's difficult. One is the UM the under

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the n l RB's election process, UM, the union first

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to gather gather authorization cards from thirty at least

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of the employees it's trying to trying to organize,

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>and then it files it files a petition for election

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and based on those cards, and then once that petition

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is filed, the the election happens. Happens pretty quickly with

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>then within a matter of weeks weeks or maybe a

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer than in some cases, but but usually

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>usually pretty quickly. So once that once that petition is filed,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of time for for the employer

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to change employees hearts and minds um And then legally,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the the n l r A significantly limits employer's ability

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to change wages, benefits, scheduling practices, and and other and

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>other working conditions that may have caused employees to organize

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Once the employer is aware of

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the is aware of the union campaign, the law generally

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>makes of them awful um for employers to try to

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>improve or worsen um wages as an effort to influence

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>how employees might feel about a union or my or

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>my vote in an election, which all underscores that that

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it is important for employers to act um promptly and

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to act now before before they haven't acted organizing drive underway.

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>And it was interesting because Starbucks, you know, they raised

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>their wages for their employees in non unionized stores, and uh,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess if you want to have any

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>comments about that strategy, I mean, the union kind of

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>countered pretty quickly. I was like, oh, we agree to

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that as well, So you know, why can't you, um,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, issue raises across the system, you know. Um,

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a curious, uh, a curious way

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of combat it. And and I thought, you know, um,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the unions had a good answer to it. Yeah,

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean at Starbucks and at other other employers, both

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>within and outside of the restaurant sector. It's you know,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there's there's the standard standard age, old issues that that

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>employees and union site as reasons why why union is necessary.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Better pay, more predictable scheduling, better benefits. But it's UM

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and that this ties into what I was what I

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was discussing earlier about the UM about the rise of

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>about how social justice movements plated into the the current

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing currently. Uh, it's an employee. Employees site

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that they want a seat at the table, and um,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, once once collective bargaining with the employers underway. UM,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the unions have no ability to require require the employer

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to agree to the union's proposals. But one thing that

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a union can do under the under the n l

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>r A as as it's set up currently is UM

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is that they can provide a seat of the table

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because the law does require the employer and the union

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>UM to sit down, to sit down and negotiate in

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>good faith. So it does it and give employees a

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>mechanism to voice their concerns to management directly. Thanks for

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that and Starbucks brought up but election tampering recently? Is

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this a real concern for restaurant chains? And uh? If so,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>what can be done to fight it? Well? So the NLRB,

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it is supposed to be neutral when it is administering

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>elections and when investigating unfair labor practice or ULP charges,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>which are which are allegations that the n l r

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>A has been violated. The problem is that the same

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>agency that investigates alleged misconduct UM also acts as the

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor and its judges are also within the NLRB. And

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the n lrb's top positions are our political appointees. So

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>under Trump, the board members were UM majority majority um

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at majority management side backgrounds. And under under President bide In,

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the n l RB's top positions are are predominantly held

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>by individuals who had significant union side experience. So you know,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>this is the this is the structure that Congress set

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>up when it enacted the n l RB um um

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>about ninety years ago. But that structure makes the agency

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>highly prone to allegations of favoritism um and and in fact,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it does make it hard for the agency to be

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to be in fact neutral, much less maintained that maintained

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that position credibly to the public. You mentioned, um, the

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>allegations in the in the in Starbucks recent letter, So

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks alleges that n l RB agents in certain of

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the agency's regional offices engaged in in quote, highly improper

0:13:54.760 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and systemic conduct that that, according to Starbucks, tipped tip

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the scales in favor of unions when the agency was

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>administering mail ballot elections. So and we can get to

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>discuss what the implication of the mail ballot election in

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But the allegations more specifically included u n

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>LRB agents coordinating with with unions to arrange for voting

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen in n LRB offices, giving the union but

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not the employer, confidential information UM in real time as

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to as to how the votes were coming in. So

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were they were they were they for the union or

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for the employer, um, which which then then allows the

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>allows the union to UH to target it's it's its

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>campaign efforts while while voting is underway. So those are

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>those are They're just allegations at this point. But um,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if true, it would, um, you know

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it would it would really seriously undermine the n l

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>RB's ability to claim that that it is in fact control,

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly in in is voted, one of the most highly

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>publicized union union efforts in recent history. So, um, you know,

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in a mail ballot election, Um, well, so the mail

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ball elections are not the are not the presumptive election.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>The presumptively appropriate form of n RB election is an

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in person election. UM. In an in person election, there

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>are a number of safeguards that the that the n

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>LRB has in place. It's a pretty pretty sterile voting conditions.

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>There are the n LRB sets up sets up voting

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>boosts UM that look a lot like how we how

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we all vote in state and federal elections come November.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Both sides have a few observers there to monitor the process. UH,

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and the employers and union representatives have to steer clear

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the voting area. There's no electioneering, and campaigning near

0:15:55.640 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the voting area is not allowed in a mail ballot election. UM.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, there is no there's no voting area. UM.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Many of those many of those of the safeguards that

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>existed in personal election don't don't apply in an n

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>l RB UM mailbell election. So that that means that

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there's more opportunities for for both for unions and employers

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>as well as other employees to pressure employees to vote

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. It's interesting. I think most

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>people were hoping that that we've heard the end of

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballots, but apparently that that's not the case here. UM.

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've written a bit that automation and refranchising

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are are two ways that restaurant chains can kind of

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>head off unionization efforts. Is UM, can you maybe talk

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about these two a little bit and maybe UM tell

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>us what else they can do to to um limit

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>unionization in their chains. Well, UM, automation is a is

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a good point, and we talked a bit about how

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>last week, how the fast Act could lead to an

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>increase in into automation. UM. You know, McDonald's has done

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot on automation historically, it might be ahead ahead

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of some of the other fast food industries and in

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>adopting that that form of production UM, but you know,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>automation hasn't hasn't really caught on that much throughout the

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>throughout the restaurant sector, particularly particularly in middle and higher

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>end and higher end restaurants. So there's there there is

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a good likelihood that that automation will will increase as

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a result of what we're what we're seeing now, both

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of increased unionization UM, rising labor costs related

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to related to the Fast Act and and just to

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>just rising labor costs in general as a result of

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation and and and other labor shortage and other factors UM.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So that there are a number of things that that restaurants,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>UM and and other employers can do to try to

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to reduce the likelihood that their employees will

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>turn to a union because, as I mentioned, UM employees

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>site in addition to better wanting better pay and benefits.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>They cite UM wanting to have a seat at the

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>table UM as as a reason for unionization. So one

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that employers, including restaurants can do is to ensure

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that upper management has mechanisms in place to learn of

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>employees concerns UM in real time. And you know, those

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>concerns could be interesting interest in unions, or it could

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be just complaints about wages, scheduling or or other practice

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>or other practices. Uh. You know, it's important for decision

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>makers to have to know what's going on in the

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>ground uh in order to be able to address address

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>those issues before before they before they metastasize UM in

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a similar of make make employees feel heard UM. You know,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>employers don't need a union to h to give employees

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a voice. So communicate with employees and and ensure that

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that employees employees feel comfortable communicating with you. Communication communication

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>really does need to be a two way street, UM,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that, a lot of that has

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to do with a lot of responsibility falls on on

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>frontline managers. So ensuring that front line frontline managers in

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the restaurants are comfortable talking with employees about sensitive workplace

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>issues like pay for instance, So that so that when

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>other sensitive workplace topics come up, like unions, there there's

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>already a strong relationship in place. Employees feel comfortable talking

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to talking to their manager about about sensitive topics, and

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>managers feel comfortable, um, talking with employees about about unions. Um.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's important to have that muscle memory already built

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>before there's before there's an active organizing campaign because you know,

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned once, um, once an election, once an

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>election is scheduled, um, the ability to try to change

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hearts and minds becomes becomes rather limited. I would say

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for refranchising, Mike, Uh, that's an option, but it's essentially

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>putting the problem in somebody else's pocket. So uh, some

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>brands are looking at that as a strategy. Uh, not

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a bad one, because we're not seeing as much

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>activity at franchise locations. Most of it, at least for now,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>has been focused on company on locations. So it can shift,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>uh the issue to a franchise, but it doesn't necessarily

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>solve the able all issue. Yeah, and potentially you know,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you might get less for a refranchise store at that

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>point if if the purchaser has the factor in the

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>potential for unionization. UM. And the point you made John

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>about McDonald's it was a great one. I mean, they've

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of money over the last few years

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>implementing kiosks, UM, implementing back of the house technology that

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>reduces the amount of steps so an intern it reduces

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the amount of employees you need in the kitchen. And

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see these things become more

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>ubiquitous U in California and UM. You know what we

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>saw with server handhelds, which now have been rolled out

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>across the country. UM. You know they allow at a

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>full service restaurant, they allow a server to handle five

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tables instead of three, so it reduces flate labor on

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the floor. And you know, five, six, seven years ago,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>these things were very expensive and when uh you were

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>paying a server just a few dollars in a tipped wage,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it didn't make sense. But in Seattle and a l A,

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in places that had you know, twelve plus minimum wages

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago, that that's where UM, that's where they were

0:21:55.520 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>implemented first. But over time the technology gets cheaper UM

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>as wages rise. UM. In all the cities that the

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>r O I starts to make more sense. So, um,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it just it just makes sense that automation is going

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to be probably the most used tool to to kind

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of um pushing themselves against unionization. Yeah, and Mike a

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>real life example. I live in the city of Portland, Oregon,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the most challenging markets in the

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>country in which to operate a restaurant one or more expensive,

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and automation has really taken hold at a number of

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>locations where you'll see you know, toast for example, uh,

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ordering everything from your phone through a toast system with

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a very limited staff, no actual table service, just uh,

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, bringing and buzzing um. And you know, all

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>these efforts to reduce labor uh and utilized technology to

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>maintain profitability. So uh, I think there's the business is

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>going to evolve to to serve live. I think what

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we lose from that, though, you know, is the hospitality

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>aspects and jobs and the other things that are so

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>important because the jobs that are being lost here the

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>restaurant industries employee for some of the most important people

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>in the country, those at the bottom of the income

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>levels who really need the jobs more than anyone, and

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>It's an industry that provides a pathway for opportunity to

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone and has for decades, and to see that being

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>reduced or eliminated by these policies is really hard hard

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to take. And the team uh, and young adult unemployment

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>rates in the state of California, you know, in Brooking

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>says to study there are significantly higher than anywhere else

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in the country. You see the same in every state

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that has implemented these policies. With increasing wages

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and unionization efforts, the doors to opportunity are being closed

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people. And that's we see the

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>consequence of that. We see people not working, we see

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, more crime, we see more other other issues

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that all these cities are dealing with. So hopefully come

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>since prevails and you get to a place, you know

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where restaurants continue to be a path for opportunity for everyone. Yeah,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>it's it's uh, it definitely is is uh unfortunate in

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>some ways, and there's there's always unintended consequences right to

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>any um policy pushes, policy changes and things of that nature. Uh.

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Riley, last time we spoke, you suggested that

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>unions could come for Chipotle next. So don't get a

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>big head, but it was a very prescient call. So

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is it safe for me to assume that unions are

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to prefer to organize that companies that own a

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>majority of the restaurants. We kind of touched on that already.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, I guess what else? What else are they

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for? Uh? In the target? Well, I think it's

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's uh Jonathan mentioned earlier. Uh, you know, the ability

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to unionize uh, a location they don't want to Unions

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to spend their time or effort and trying

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to unionize a location where the emloyees are not going

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to be there through the voting process. Uh. It makes

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>much more sense to focus on locations where uh, you know,

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>with a good employer, where employees have been there, where

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they want to stay there, and get them to rally

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>around the sales pitch that the unions are making to

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>them and those not to say that franchise locations camp

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of terrific franchised restaurants out there,

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but focusing on you know, the big names like they

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>have been Starbucks, ri Pteley, and and we'll be seeing

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>others as well. You know, those are the more likely candidates.

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And so if they can achieve that, like we talked

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>about in the last episode, there's a two prom approach

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>unionization efforts hitting these company owned locations, the fast act

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>hitting you know, these other aspects of the industry. And

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>then the overall purpose of the union is to have

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a unionized workforce, you know, throughout the entire country of

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>all restaurants. And that's not something they've hidden. And so

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>their their approaches strategy is is very smart. Uh. They're

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>very well corded, they're very well funded, and they're they're

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>executing very well right now. And uh, you know, the industry,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, needs to take steps to really you know,

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>see what's going on here and respond accordingly in our

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in our opinion, that's good stuff. And I think that's

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>a good place to wrap it up. I know I

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot, so I'm sure our our listeners have

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>as well. Thank you both so much for your time.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh and before we go, what's the best way for

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>our listeners to contact you? Oh? This Riley loguson uh

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Riley dot loguson at green at g T law dot com.

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the Greenberg Charge website and they wants to

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>reach out, and Jonathan Sack else also in Greenberg. Charg

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I can be reached at Sack, J. S A c

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>k J at g T law dot com. Stuff. Thanks,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Mike,