WEBVTT - CA Is On The Wrong Track (10/23)

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>KFI AM 640. You're listening to the John Kobelt Podcast

0:00:04.300 --> 0:00:13.850
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app. KFI AM 640. More stimulating talk radio.

0:00:13.910 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello there. It's the John Kobelt Show. How are you?

0:00:17.190 --> 0:00:20.470
<v Speaker 1>We are on up until 6 o'clock. After 6 o'clock,

0:00:20.530 --> 0:00:23.909
<v Speaker 1>John Kobelt Show on demand. That's the podcast. Same as

0:00:23.930 --> 0:00:26.349
<v Speaker 1>the radio show. It's for what you missed. And, of course,

0:00:26.530 --> 0:00:28.410
<v Speaker 1>you can still listen to the Karen Bass interview today.

0:00:28.850 --> 0:00:31.670
<v Speaker 1>a standalone podcast hour on the iHeart app, also a

0:00:31.710 --> 0:00:37.250
<v Speaker 1>standalone video hour on YouTube. We have been telling you

0:00:37.330 --> 0:00:42.809
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration has taken aim at the California government,

0:00:43.850 --> 0:00:49.170
<v Speaker 1>saying that there are tens of thousands of ineligible voters

0:00:49.229 --> 0:00:53.470
<v Speaker 1>on the voter rolls. Immigrants who may be here legally,

0:00:54.270 --> 0:00:58.130
<v Speaker 1>but they have no right to vote. But they've registered anyway,

0:00:58.350 --> 0:01:00.709
<v Speaker 1>and some of them have been voting. Now, the other

0:01:00.750 --> 0:01:05.530
<v Speaker 1>day there was a roundup, and they tried to arrest 25.

0:01:05.530 --> 0:01:08.740
<v Speaker 1>I don't know ultimately how many they were able to

0:01:08.780 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>put into custody for being registered or for actually voting.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>And there's more coming. Now, we're going to talk with

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.770
<v Speaker 1>Royal Oaks from ABC News, the legal analyst, about that first. Royal,

0:01:22.810 --> 0:01:23.190
<v Speaker 1>how are you?

0:01:24.350 --> 0:01:25.369
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great, John. How are you?

0:01:26.220 --> 0:01:32.820
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. So the Trump administration wants any ballots filled

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>out by somebody on this list, wants those ballots to

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>be set aside and investigated, I guess. How is this

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.700
<v Speaker 1>going to work? What's the likelihood that the Trump administration

0:01:47.740 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>can follow through and win a case in court?

0:01:52.750 --> 0:01:54.570
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's going to be tough because you first have

0:01:54.610 --> 0:01:58.250
<v Speaker 2>to convince a trial court judge, federal level, that this

0:01:58.330 --> 0:02:00.890
<v Speaker 2>is a good idea. And, you know, Trump doesn't have

0:02:00.930 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>a great track record when it comes to that. He's

0:02:02.750 --> 0:02:06.380
<v Speaker 2>already been shut down in related suits a bunch of times.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.899
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the essence of what he's saying, of course,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>makes sense. How could you object to the idea of

0:02:12.020 --> 0:02:15.149
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out if somebody who is voting really

0:02:15.190 --> 0:02:18.150
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be voting because they're not citizens? You can't be

0:02:18.290 --> 0:02:21.130
<v Speaker 2>a registered voter. Now, if you believe the Trump administration figures,

0:02:21.350 --> 0:02:24.180
<v Speaker 2>there are X thousand people in California and other states

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>who fall into that bucket. But good luck with, you know,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.490
<v Speaker 2>time pressure, getting a federal judge to say yes. And then,

0:02:31.500 --> 0:02:32.830
<v Speaker 2>of course, if you lose and you go to the

0:02:32.850 --> 0:02:35.209
<v Speaker 2>Court of Appeals. And boom, now you're up against a

0:02:35.230 --> 0:02:37.610
<v Speaker 2>glass ceiling with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which

0:02:37.669 --> 0:02:40.650
<v Speaker 2>also has ruled against Trump a whole lot. Obviously, the U.S.

0:02:40.669 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, 5-4, 6-3 majority, a lot of conservative decisions.

0:02:46.070 --> 0:02:49.660
<v Speaker 2>They could reach down and get involved, but they're pretty busy.

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.060
<v Speaker 2>You can't count them in doing that.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Because the way it works, the states have control over

0:02:56.460 --> 0:03:02.380
<v Speaker 1>their own state elections, right? But what the Trump people

0:03:02.410 --> 0:03:07.889
<v Speaker 1>are saying, there is congressional races on the ballot. So

0:03:08.110 --> 0:03:10.850
<v Speaker 1>this makes it within the purview of the federal government

0:03:12.090 --> 0:03:14.830
<v Speaker 1>to try to regulate what's going on here. Now, is

0:03:15.590 --> 0:03:18.500
<v Speaker 1>that true? Do they have a say because of the

0:03:18.580 --> 0:03:20.220
<v Speaker 1>congressional races on the ballot?

0:03:21.330 --> 0:03:25.389
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's murky. The states control their elections, even the

0:03:25.490 --> 0:03:28.750
<v Speaker 2>federal ones, like for House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.

0:03:29.130 --> 0:03:32.899
<v Speaker 2>But there are federal laws, like the National Voter Registration Act,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.060
<v Speaker 2>that can also come into play. So it's murky. And

0:03:36.260 --> 0:03:39.260
<v Speaker 2>a classic example of this murkiness is up in Alaska,

0:03:39.540 --> 0:03:43.630
<v Speaker 2>where you've been reading about this guy, GOP Senator Dan Sullivan.

0:03:43.890 --> 0:03:46.590
<v Speaker 2>He's running for his third term, right? A few months ago,

0:03:47.090 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Two days before the deadline for his opponents to run,

0:03:50.220 --> 0:03:53.700
<v Speaker 2>a guy who's also named Dan Sullivan announces, hey, you

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.710
<v Speaker 2>know what? I'm a Republican, even though he'd never been

0:03:56.750 --> 0:03:59.290
<v Speaker 2>a Republican before in his life. He's a retired elementary

0:03:59.330 --> 0:04:02.030
<v Speaker 2>school teacher, and he files to run for the Senate

0:04:02.150 --> 0:04:05.010
<v Speaker 2>as well against Dan Sullivan. So the Republicans up in

0:04:05.030 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Alaska say, nice try, dude. You just want to confuse

0:04:07.540 --> 0:04:10.420
<v Speaker 2>enough GOP voters. So you split their Republican vote so

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the lady who's running as a Democrat can win, which

0:04:13.500 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>virtually never happens in Alaska. Democrats don't win. So the

0:04:16.100 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Republicans sued. They lost because the Alaska Supreme Court ruled and.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:20.779
<v Speaker 1>They said, you know what?

0:04:21.060 --> 0:04:25.330
<v Speaker 2>There's no law that says. it's illegal to confuse the voters.

0:04:25.810 --> 0:04:29.150
<v Speaker 2>And the Trump administration is now saying, okay, we lost

0:04:29.210 --> 0:04:31.690
<v Speaker 2>in state court, but we're now filing in the last

0:04:31.750 --> 0:04:34.900
<v Speaker 2>day or two in federal court, hoping to find a

0:04:34.940 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>federal judge in Alaska who will say, this doesn't make

0:04:37.820 --> 0:04:42.180
<v Speaker 2>any sense. If the purpose of a guy go running

0:04:42.500 --> 0:04:45.060
<v Speaker 2>is to confuse the voters so the democratic can win

0:04:45.310 --> 0:04:47.890
<v Speaker 2>and then they are confused see what trump wants is

0:04:47.930 --> 0:04:50.950
<v Speaker 2>that if the incumbent dan sullivan loses they're going to

0:04:50.970 --> 0:04:52.530
<v Speaker 2>do a big study and figure out if people were

0:04:52.570 --> 0:04:56.070
<v Speaker 2>confused and have either a redo or say dan sullivan

0:04:56.110 --> 0:04:58.490
<v Speaker 2>wins so it's a huge mess i'm just kidding.

0:04:58.290 --> 0:05:00.010
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to prove what's going on in

0:05:00.060 --> 0:05:01.940
<v Speaker 1>the second dan sullivan's mind.

0:05:03.970 --> 0:05:07.090
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can't know for sure, but the fact that

0:05:07.170 --> 0:05:09.350
<v Speaker 2>he had never been a Republican for his whole life

0:05:09.430 --> 0:05:11.510
<v Speaker 2>and two days before, he claims he was.

0:05:11.540 --> 0:05:17.150
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's a trick, but if he shuts up,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.340
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you investigate this.

0:05:21.460 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think what they want to do is if

0:05:23.500 --> 0:05:27.060
<v Speaker 2>the incumbent loses, then they canvass thousands of people. They

0:05:27.100 --> 0:05:30.430
<v Speaker 2>come up with some fancy, sophisticated survey and conclude that

0:05:30.500 --> 0:05:32.950
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of Republicans in Alaska thought they were voting

0:05:32.990 --> 0:05:35.950
<v Speaker 2>for the incumbent, Dan Sullivan. But by mistake, they voted

0:05:36.190 --> 0:05:39.330
<v Speaker 2>for the other Dan Sullivan. Good luck with that. I mean,

0:05:39.529 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 2>I guess this is Trump's Department of Justice being aggressive,

0:05:43.660 --> 0:05:45.740
<v Speaker 2>but it does seem kind of sneaky what they were

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to do up there.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.300
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it just seems like it would be

0:05:51.320 --> 0:06:00.710
<v Speaker 1>a very long, long, arduous case. And it's really gotten dirty.

0:06:00.930 --> 0:06:03.210
<v Speaker 1>And I also have realized, like in the case here

0:06:03.230 --> 0:06:06.409
<v Speaker 1>in California, the law is murky on this stuff. Because

0:06:06.450 --> 0:06:10.230
<v Speaker 1>you would think that if there are legal voters on

0:06:10.290 --> 0:06:14.870
<v Speaker 1>the rolls, it would be automatic. to get them kicked off,

0:06:14.930 --> 0:06:17.909
<v Speaker 1>had their votes not counted. But it looks like it's not.

0:06:18.510 --> 0:06:21.130
<v Speaker 1>It's looked like states can't get away with this. Probably

0:06:21.150 --> 0:06:24.020
<v Speaker 1>California has been getting away with this for a long time.

0:06:25.150 --> 0:06:27.330
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's no surprise. I mean, politics is a

0:06:27.370 --> 0:06:30.990
<v Speaker 2>dirty business with all the gerrymandering and so on. But

0:06:31.029 --> 0:06:33.310
<v Speaker 2>I think at the end of the day, when you

0:06:33.350 --> 0:06:36.270
<v Speaker 2>have statutes that are murky or like a federal and

0:06:36.310 --> 0:06:38.940
<v Speaker 2>a state statute that are kind of contradictory, what you

0:06:39.020 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>need is a common-sense, fair-minded judge to cut through it

0:06:42.140 --> 0:06:45.219
<v Speaker 2>and say, all right, don't talk to me about parsing

0:06:45.260 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>all the semicolons and the paragraphs. The fact of the

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 2>matter is if you are not an American citizen, you

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.410
<v Speaker 2>are not entitled to vote in an election. And as

0:06:55.450 --> 0:07:00.790
<v Speaker 2>a result, it may seem unfair that we're disenfranchising people,

0:07:00.870 --> 0:07:04.450
<v Speaker 2>but these are folks who are not entitled to be enfranchised.

0:07:04.730 --> 0:07:08.550
<v Speaker 2>And it's a very messy, murky situation trying to call

0:07:08.690 --> 0:07:11.890
<v Speaker 2>out votes. But as you know, John, we're really good

0:07:11.990 --> 0:07:14.170
<v Speaker 2>at taking a lot of time after Election Day to

0:07:14.470 --> 0:07:17.230
<v Speaker 2>figure out what the heck happened and who voted for

0:07:17.270 --> 0:07:19.230
<v Speaker 2>whom and what the numbers are. So I think that's

0:07:19.310 --> 0:07:21.990
<v Speaker 2>ultimately what the Trump administration is asking for.

0:07:22.110 --> 0:07:23.690
<v Speaker 1>Seems like this one's going to be a big mess.

0:07:24.450 --> 0:07:26.490
<v Speaker 2>Figuring out who didn't, who shouldn't have voted. Yeah.

0:07:26.570 --> 0:07:27.890
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a big mess. This one

0:07:28.310 --> 0:07:31.260
<v Speaker 1>just seems like it's heading there for a lot of reasons.

0:07:31.540 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:07:32.180 --> 0:07:32.500
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:07:32.540 --> 0:07:32.780
<v Speaker 2>Royal.

0:07:32.820 --> 0:07:37.380
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for coming on. Royal Oaks. ABC news, uh, the

0:07:37.420 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>legal analyst. When we come back, um, there was more

0:07:42.300 --> 0:07:47.370
<v Speaker 1>polling out today. Uh, two things. One is just how

0:07:47.460 --> 0:07:52.970
<v Speaker 1>unpopular Gavin Newsom is among Californians. When asked, uh, do

0:07:52.990 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you want him to be president? And secondly, you are

0:07:56.740 --> 0:08:00.220
<v Speaker 1>not going to believe who Democrats in California do want

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.060
<v Speaker 1>to be the nominee.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Really.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:09.910
<v Speaker 1>And I, I, I, I, I always think, well, I

0:08:09.950 --> 0:08:12.330
<v Speaker 1>can't get worse. And it actually gets worse.

0:08:13.290 --> 0:08:17.710
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to John Kobelt on demand from KFI AM 640.

0:08:17.710 --> 0:08:20.010
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:08:20.090 --> 0:08:26.250
<v Speaker 1>California Post and McLaughlin and Associates have, uh, collaborated on

0:08:26.310 --> 0:08:30.420
<v Speaker 1>a poll. I think McLaughlin and Associates did the poll,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Post paid for it, and now they're running

0:08:32.260 --> 0:08:37.939
<v Speaker 1>a series of stories on it. And I've got several

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of their questions to go through. But the first one is,

0:08:43.340 --> 0:08:48.790
<v Speaker 1>what California voters think, specifically Democratic voters, about the Democratic

0:08:48.830 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>presidential primary? Who do they want? Well, the number one

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.730
<v Speaker 1>choice is not Gavin Newsom, and the number two choice

0:08:57.929 --> 0:09:01.210
<v Speaker 1>is not Gavin Newsom. Who do you think the number

0:09:01.309 --> 0:09:09.850
<v Speaker 1>one choice is? It's not Kamala Harris either. It's Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

0:09:11.790 --> 0:09:16.260
<v Speaker 1>She got 18% of the respondents saying that they would

0:09:16.300 --> 0:09:22.470
<v Speaker 1>pick her to be the Democratic nominee. So that is

0:09:22.610 --> 0:09:27.610
<v Speaker 1>truly the insane wing of the California Democratic Party. In

0:09:27.630 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>case you wonder how many people are truly off their rockers,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:45.980
<v Speaker 1>she's even dumber than Kamala Harris. Have you ever heard

0:09:46.020 --> 0:09:52.090
<v Speaker 1>her try to talk at length about real issues? She

0:09:52.140 --> 0:09:55.010
<v Speaker 1>always talks herself into a cul-de-sac and eventually has to

0:09:55.090 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 1>stop dead. Very much like Kamala Harris or Nithya Raman.

0:10:02.429 --> 0:10:09.170
<v Speaker 1>Second place was Pete Buttigieg, who has some wacky views

0:10:09.210 --> 0:10:13.670
<v Speaker 1>but does not seem like a complete idiot. Newsom is third.

0:10:15.030 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>He's only got 14% of the vote. Newsom did not

0:10:17.740 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fare well in this poll at all. Again, these are

0:10:21.059 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>California voters. And his disapproval rating, 50%.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 4>50.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>41% strong disapproval. Yeah, I think he's done. He may

0:10:34.990 --> 0:10:39.900
<v Speaker 1>charm people for five minutes outside of California, but... These

0:10:39.940 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are the people who know him best. And these are

0:10:43.020 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>diehard Democratic voters who voted for him five times. In

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:54.060
<v Speaker 1>some cases, seven times. Because he won two terms as

0:10:54.100 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco mayor and turned that place into a sewer

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.070
<v Speaker 1>along with George Gascogne. Then he had two runs as

0:11:01.300 --> 0:11:04.969
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor. And then he had three times he ran

0:11:05.010 --> 0:11:06.790
<v Speaker 1>for governor because there was a recall in the midst,

0:11:07.030 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of it. So that's seven times he

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>ran and seven wins, and he's got a 50% disapproval rating, 41%

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.740
<v Speaker 1>strong disapproval. Now, listen to this. You know probably 90-plus

0:11:21.780 --> 0:11:24.460
<v Speaker 1>percent of the Republicans don't like him, right? But independent

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>voters disliked him. 62% of independent voters disliked Newsom's performance. Now,

0:11:33.700 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have over 90% of Republicans and 62% of independents, God,

0:11:41.059 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do most Democrats still like Newsom? And what is that?

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>What kind of mental disease is that? Then again, some

0:11:50.460 --> 0:11:53.210
<v Speaker 1>of them want Kamala and some of them want AOC

0:11:53.630 --> 0:12:00.069
<v Speaker 1>as president. This is an alternate universe. And unfortunately, this

0:12:00.170 --> 0:12:04.620
<v Speaker 1>crowd has been able to steer the ship here. for

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:09.170
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. The most extreme progressive whack job

0:12:09.309 --> 0:12:16.550
<v Speaker 1>elements of California society. 56% of California voters say the

0:12:16.590 --> 0:12:24.310
<v Speaker 1>state was on the wrong track. And, of course, most

0:12:24.370 --> 0:12:28.170
<v Speaker 1>of them are going to vote for Javier Baccaria. This

0:12:28.250 --> 0:12:33.380
<v Speaker 1>wrong track number is consistent in all the polling. People

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like what's going on. They don't like Newsom's policies.

0:12:37.540 --> 0:12:40.660
<v Speaker 1>I had a poll specifically on Newsom's policies the other day.

0:12:42.650 --> 0:12:46.490
<v Speaker 1>And Becerra has promised to continue all Newsom's policies. I'm

0:12:46.750 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>completely at a loss here, except for the T word, Trump. And,

0:12:54.179 --> 0:12:55.780
<v Speaker 1>you know, it makes you want to grab these people

0:12:55.820 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and sit them down and say, you really want this?

0:12:59.900 --> 0:13:05.750
<v Speaker 1>Look outside. You really want this? But Trump, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:13:06.090 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you want this, though? You're voting on what's outside

0:13:09.179 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>your window. You're not voting on him in Washington. You're

0:13:13.660 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>voting on what's outside your window. You're voting on that

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:23.420
<v Speaker 1>$ 6 gas you just paid for. Here's the issues they

0:13:23.490 --> 0:13:29.790
<v Speaker 1>care most about. Cost of living. Budget and taxes. Well,

0:13:29.850 --> 0:13:34.790
<v Speaker 1>for God's sakes, the cost of living. Well, when you

0:13:34.830 --> 0:13:39.450
<v Speaker 1>have $ 6. 50 gas, yeah, the cost of living is going

0:13:39.470 --> 0:13:45.230
<v Speaker 1>to be really high because everything, we've got like, diesel

0:13:45.290 --> 0:13:46.849
<v Speaker 1>is going for.

0:13:46.510 --> 0:13:48.370
<v Speaker 4>$ 8, $ 9.

0:13:47.750 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Everything has to get delivered. Everything that gets delivered has

0:13:51.220 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to use fuel. The original sin for a bad economy

0:13:57.980 --> 0:14:07.030
<v Speaker 1>is excessive fuel prices. That bleeds into everything. They don't

0:14:07.090 --> 0:14:15.020
<v Speaker 1>like the budget. The budget has more than tripled in

0:14:15.059 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the last 15 years. And you show me one category

0:14:20.500 --> 0:14:24.500
<v Speaker 1>of government where things are better. One aspect of government

0:14:24.540 --> 0:14:28.140
<v Speaker 1>services that is better in the last 15 years.

0:14:30.500 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 4>You can't.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.510
<v Speaker 1>Housing costs are upset with. Well, what do you think?

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:40.210
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that's about? That's about excessive government regulations.

0:14:40.950 --> 0:14:44.750
<v Speaker 1>Makes it difficult for developers to develop. So you end

0:14:44.790 --> 0:14:50.410
<v Speaker 1>up with a lot less housing. It's simple. Everybody's prattling

0:14:50.470 --> 0:14:53.910
<v Speaker 1>about affordability of housing. There's one way to fix that.

0:14:54.150 --> 0:14:58.780
<v Speaker 1>Build more homes. We've got more people than we did 20, 30,

0:14:58.780 --> 0:15:03.130
<v Speaker 1>40 years ago. People aren't dying as quickly as they

0:15:03.250 --> 0:15:05.770
<v Speaker 1>used to. You know, people used to be done like

0:15:05.790 --> 0:15:09.290
<v Speaker 1>at about 70. Now they're going to 90, many of them. Well,

0:15:09.470 --> 0:15:13.420
<v Speaker 1>every one of those people needs a house. Then you

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>got at least a million illegal aliens living in the state. Actually,

0:15:17.820 --> 0:15:22.220
<v Speaker 1>more than that, probably two, three, four million illegal aliens.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't looked it up in a while. I think

0:15:25.580 --> 0:15:27.580
<v Speaker 1>there's a million just in L.A. County, so it's probably

0:15:27.620 --> 0:15:32.250
<v Speaker 1>four million across the state. Well, they take up homes too. Like,

0:15:32.290 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if you took the million illegal aliens out of L.A. County, boy,

0:15:35.780 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that would open up a lot of real estate, wouldn't it?

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of apartments. Then the price would go down.

0:15:43.420 --> 0:15:47.300
<v Speaker 1>And they're upset with health care costs. Well, again, we're

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:55.390
<v Speaker 1>spending $ 13. 5 billion on illegal alien Medicaid. Or California. What

0:15:55.430 --> 0:16:00.230
<v Speaker 1>is it? Medi-Cal. $ 13. 5 billion. There you go. That explains

0:16:00.290 --> 0:16:05.370
<v Speaker 1>high taxes. Higher health care costs. Like, you can't get

0:16:05.410 --> 0:16:08.330
<v Speaker 1>a break. But the illegal aliens are getting it for free.

0:16:10.530 --> 0:16:12.950
<v Speaker 1>That's all Newsom. I don't know what to tell you.

0:16:13.730 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And Becerra is going to keep all those policies. KFI

0:16:26.790 --> 0:16:30.780
<v Speaker 1>AM 640, more stimulating talk radio. John Kobelt Show continues.

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>We're on until 6 after 6. John Kobelt Show on demand,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. We're live on YouTube and live on X.

0:16:38.980 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And we got the Moistline coming up tonight at 520

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:48.290
<v Speaker 1>and 550. Okay, so here is more of this California

0:16:48.330 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Post-McLaughlin Associates poll. And somehow, after all this... Karen Bass

0:16:56.900 --> 0:17:01.270
<v Speaker 1>has become the Republican candidate for mayor. I will explain.

0:17:02.570 --> 0:17:08.050
<v Speaker 1>John Fleischman wrote a really good piece in the California

0:17:08.109 --> 0:17:14.469
<v Speaker 1>Post explaining the polling. Overall, according to this, Rahman is

0:17:14.530 --> 0:17:23.210
<v Speaker 1>leading Bass 46 to 38. 13% undecided. Now, if you

0:17:23.230 --> 0:17:29.590
<v Speaker 1>break down the demographics... See, Karen Bass leads among registered

0:17:29.630 --> 0:17:35.650
<v Speaker 1>Republicans 44 to 14. She leads among Trump voters 45

0:17:35.650 --> 0:17:42.590
<v Speaker 1>to 14. Conservatives, all these groups overlap, back her 42

0:17:42.590 --> 0:17:50.750
<v Speaker 1>to 18. And the Democrats, most of them, have gone

0:17:50.810 --> 0:17:51.290
<v Speaker 1>for Rahman.

0:17:51.290 --> 0:17:53.369
<v Speaker 4>59 to 37.

0:17:55.430 --> 0:17:59.050
<v Speaker 1>So Rahman is now the Democratic nominee, in effect, and

0:17:59.109 --> 0:18:09.690
<v Speaker 1>Bass has become the Republican nominee. Because normal people in

0:18:09.730 --> 0:18:17.580
<v Speaker 1>the middle don't have a choice. And obviously, a lot

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.740
<v Speaker 1>of people are voting for Bass. They're also voting primarily

0:18:21.820 --> 0:18:28.869
<v Speaker 1>against Rahman. The whole thing is exhausting, isn't it? Now,

0:18:29.700 --> 0:18:32.369
<v Speaker 1>the Spencer Pratt voters, they've tried to identify them as

0:18:32.410 --> 0:18:41.510
<v Speaker 1>a subgroup. Let's look just at the 13.5% who claim

0:18:41.530 --> 0:18:49.970
<v Speaker 1>they're undecided. Two-thirds view Spencer Pratt favorably. They don't like

0:18:50.410 --> 0:19:01.340
<v Speaker 1>either candidate. of the undecided view Bass unfavorably. 73% view

0:19:01.420 --> 0:19:09.900
<v Speaker 1>Rahman unfavorably. And three quarters don't like the DSA. So

0:19:10.260 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this crowd is completely alienated from this election. They dislike

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>both candidates deeply. And they dislike this new party that

0:19:22.820 --> 0:19:38.930
<v Speaker 1>has produced Rahman. and they also increasingly don't trust California elections. 78%,

0:19:38.930 --> 0:19:45.310
<v Speaker 1>listen to this, 78% of the undecideds have concerns that

0:19:45.350 --> 0:19:49.970
<v Speaker 1>California elections are fair and honest. I don't know how

0:19:50.220 --> 0:19:54.970
<v Speaker 1>anybody could look at the elections in LA are fair

0:19:55.010 --> 0:20:00.449
<v Speaker 1>and honest after Rahman cheated her way into second place.

0:20:03.250 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>That was The most bogus election result I have ever

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.220
<v Speaker 1>seen in my life. And believe me, I didn't buy

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>into any of the Trump stuff from 2020. But this

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw happen with my own eyes. I saw Nithya

0:20:18.510 --> 0:20:23.810
<v Speaker 1>Raman giving a tearful concession-like speech. I saw that she

0:20:23.850 --> 0:20:27.050
<v Speaker 1>was down eight or nine points on election night in

0:20:27.090 --> 0:20:30.170
<v Speaker 1>June in the primary. And I saw where the votes

0:20:30.230 --> 0:20:33.340
<v Speaker 1>came from. A lot of them came from Skid Row.

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:38.370
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them were nonprofits who had created ballots

0:20:38.750 --> 0:20:45.109
<v Speaker 1>for the people laying on the ground, whacked out on

0:20:45.330 --> 0:20:50.609
<v Speaker 1>fentanyl or running around screaming on meth. Those people voted.

0:20:51.380 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>The nonprofits made sure they did somehow, even if they

0:20:55.020 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>had to fake the ballots. And then we were told, oh, well,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:06.469
<v Speaker 1>that's legal. That's California law. You can do that. All

0:21:06.490 --> 0:21:08.810
<v Speaker 1>those homeless people in the Skid Row area and other

0:21:08.850 --> 0:21:13.020
<v Speaker 1>areas had no addresses. They used the nonprofit office as

0:21:13.060 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>their address. And then the nonprofit people allegedly handed out

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the ballots. And if the drug-addicted mental patient couldn't fill

0:21:24.380 --> 0:21:28.740
<v Speaker 1>out the ballot, the nonprofit could have them draw an

0:21:29.100 --> 0:21:32.030
<v Speaker 1>X for their signature. You remember all this, right? We

0:21:32.050 --> 0:21:35.250
<v Speaker 1>went over through this in June. This is what happened.

0:21:36.990 --> 0:21:40.590
<v Speaker 1>Now you come back with another election in November, and

0:21:40.609 --> 0:21:43.490
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, do you trust the California election? Well, no,

0:21:43.650 --> 0:21:50.780
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Not after that. I don't scream about this

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>every time an election doesn't go by my way. I

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.940
<v Speaker 1>know what state we're living in. I also know that

0:21:57.020 --> 0:21:59.179
<v Speaker 1>the two times we tried to recall in L.A. the

0:21:59.220 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>past few years, Mike Bonin and George Gascon, that recall

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.060
<v Speaker 1>should have gone to the ballot and didn't.

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:08.820
<v Speaker 2>And I.

0:22:10.540 --> 0:22:18.050
<v Speaker 1>Think that was corruption as well. But this? So Bass

0:22:18.109 --> 0:22:20.790
<v Speaker 1>is now relying on the West side. She lost to

0:22:20.830 --> 0:22:25.170
<v Speaker 1>Caruso on the West side. And now she's winning there.

0:22:26.730 --> 0:22:30.100
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, that's all she's got. A lot

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:35.140
<v Speaker 1>of them are Republicans, independents, Pratt voters. Well, small number

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.889
<v Speaker 1>of Pratt voters. But she's lost most of the Democratic Party.

0:22:39.940 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you run in L.A. when you've

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.100
<v Speaker 1>lost most of the Democratic Party when you're a left-wing Democrat.

0:22:53.770 --> 0:22:58.910
<v Speaker 1>And I realize she looks moderate compared to Rahman, who's

0:22:59.630 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a stark raving lunatic. But Bass is still... a left-wing

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>progressive Democrat. Absolutely the strangest situation ever. There is nobody

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.450
<v Speaker 1>to represent regular, normal people. And I blame it on

0:23:18.470 --> 0:23:20.930
<v Speaker 1>the regular, normal people. I blame it on the Republican

0:23:21.250 --> 0:23:26.090
<v Speaker 1>Party out here, too. There was plenty of votes for

0:23:26.130 --> 0:23:31.350
<v Speaker 1>a Pratt, or there should have been another candidate, even

0:23:31.369 --> 0:23:35.340
<v Speaker 1>a moderate Democrat, but there wasn't. A lot of Republicans

0:23:35.390 --> 0:23:38.260
<v Speaker 1>didn't turn out, didn't vote for Pratt. They didn't vote

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:47.700
<v Speaker 1>for Caruso either. You have a situation now where in

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the space of four years, L.A. voters rejected a Rick

0:23:51.420 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Caruso and then Spencer Pratt, two wildly different people. But

0:23:58.820 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 1>they were telling the truth about what was going on

0:24:01.859 --> 0:24:08.730
<v Speaker 1>and what needed to be done. And then after the

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.409
<v Speaker 1>election happens, especially if Rahman gets in, it's going to be,

0:24:12.420 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>how did this happen? It happened because when good people

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:22.830
<v Speaker 1>ran who made sense, you found some wacky reason either

0:24:22.890 --> 0:24:26.950
<v Speaker 1>not to vote or not to vote for them. This

0:24:27.010 --> 0:24:30.250
<v Speaker 1>is utterly predictable. And let me tell you something. There's

0:24:30.310 --> 0:24:33.859
<v Speaker 1>so many people now in this nutty state, who vote

0:24:34.100 --> 0:24:48.820
<v Speaker 1>based on gender, color, and ethnicity, and not things like accomplishments, intelligence, experience,

0:24:49.060 --> 0:24:55.170
<v Speaker 1>common sense. As long as you don't factor those aspects

0:24:55.230 --> 0:24:57.530
<v Speaker 1>into your vote, you are going to get what we

0:24:57.570 --> 0:25:01.750
<v Speaker 1>have now in L.A. You have to vote on merit.

0:25:03.510 --> 0:25:08.190
<v Speaker 1>People aren't voting on merit anymore. They think somehow one's

0:25:08.369 --> 0:25:12.150
<v Speaker 1>skin color or one's genitalia gives you special powers. They

0:25:12.210 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think somehow one's ethnicity is significant when it comes to decision-making.

0:25:18.420 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's not. It's utterly irrelevant. The color of your

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:27.109
<v Speaker 1>skin is completely irrelevant. Your sex is completely irrelevant, as

0:25:27.190 --> 0:25:31.140
<v Speaker 1>is your ethnicity. You either got the goods... to make

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.540
<v Speaker 1>executive decisions and have a coherent policy and be able

0:25:34.580 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to look outside your window and say, hmm, that's bad.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.100
<v Speaker 1>Let's fix this. And then let's make the right decisions

0:25:42.140 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. If you don't have that capability, then

0:25:45.140 --> 0:25:49.220
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get more of this. But that's mostly

0:25:49.260 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>what the vote has been the last two election cycles.

0:25:56.500 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who was voting for Garcetti, but Garcetti

0:25:58.500 --> 0:26:03.570
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any opposition. If you don't have any independent candidates,

0:26:05.340 --> 0:26:09.219
<v Speaker 1>moderate Democratic candidates, Republican candidates, if you don't have any

0:26:09.260 --> 0:26:14.340
<v Speaker 1>other alternatives, we just keep sliding farther down into the abyss,

0:26:15.380 --> 0:26:20.909
<v Speaker 1>which is what's happening. More coming up.

0:26:21.850 --> 0:26:28.150
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to John Kobelt on demand from KFI AM 640.

0:26:31.780 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Can't buy AIM 640. More stimulating talk radio. John Kobelt Show.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.619
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Schrupp and Christopher Ruffo have written a piece in

0:26:39.700 --> 0:26:44.650
<v Speaker 1>City Journal about the bullet train. They looked at, believe this,

0:26:44.650 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>130,000 pages of environmental review materials. This is one of

0:26:55.780 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the many reasons that high-speed rail is which has never

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:05.490
<v Speaker 1>been built, 130,000 pages of environmental review. If you stacked

0:27:05.690 --> 0:27:09.830
<v Speaker 1>all the pages together, it's 40 feet tall, weighs 1,300 pounds.

0:27:12.090 --> 0:27:16.790
<v Speaker 1>These studies alone cost almost $ 700 million. We're going to

0:27:16.830 --> 0:27:19.620
<v Speaker 1>talk with Kenneth Shrupp, who wrote this piece, to explain more.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.619
<v Speaker 1>We've been discussing the polling that came out in the

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.690
<v Speaker 1>California Post today, done by McLaughlin and Associates. which found

0:27:28.770 --> 0:27:32.490
<v Speaker 1>Rahman is ahead of Bass 46 to 38. And Bass

0:27:32.550 --> 0:27:39.190
<v Speaker 1>is now relying on Republican, conservative, or Pratt voters. Again,

0:27:39.230 --> 0:27:43.310
<v Speaker 1>there's some overlap there. And to try to eke out

0:27:43.350 --> 0:27:49.370
<v Speaker 1>a win here. Because the Democrat voters have largely went

0:27:49.730 --> 0:27:54.250
<v Speaker 1>with Rahman. In fact, very liberal voters are going to

0:27:54.300 --> 0:27:58.899
<v Speaker 1>Rahman 80 to 18. Now, I guarantee you, very liberal voters,

0:27:59.260 --> 0:28:06.420
<v Speaker 1>when Bass ran against Caruso, I'm sure she got 90% plus. Well,

0:28:06.970 --> 0:28:11.909
<v Speaker 1>she's lost almost all of them, 80 to 18. Meantime,

0:28:12.730 --> 0:28:16.210
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's Nithya Raman quote from her appearance with Alex Michelson

0:28:16.770 --> 0:28:20.909
<v Speaker 1>was about, even though she wants Jim McDonald fired, As

0:28:20.970 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>police chief, she couldn't name a single police chief in

0:28:25.300 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all the United States of America or even foreign countries

0:28:28.380 --> 0:28:32.060
<v Speaker 1>that she admires. She just was saying, I don't know.

0:28:32.500 --> 0:28:34.060
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. In fact, do you have that? Can

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we hear that first? I'm going to start to put

0:28:36.100 --> 0:28:44.190
<v Speaker 1>together a series. This is CNN, Alex Michelson, about who

0:28:44.250 --> 0:28:46.130
<v Speaker 1>she admires as police chief.

0:28:46.490 --> 0:28:48.630
<v Speaker 4>Who's an example of a police chief that you really

0:28:48.710 --> 0:28:49.670
<v Speaker 4>respect or admire?

0:28:50.170 --> 0:28:52.030
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I don't know.

0:28:52.050 --> 0:28:54.150
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:28:54.170 --> 0:28:57.180
<v Speaker 2>All right, you.

0:28:57.170 --> 0:29:00.660
<v Speaker 1>Can stop there. Now, here's another one. Do you agree

0:29:00.700 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>with Alex asking Nithi about DSA policies? Go ahead.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.060
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with abolishing the police?

0:29:06.100 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:07.940
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with abolishing prisons?

0:29:08.180 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:29:08.820 --> 0:29:11.900
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with getting rid of the Senate? No.

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.270
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with capitalism? Are you a capitalist?

0:29:16.460 --> 0:29:19.230
<v Speaker 5>I am a capitalist and I'm also a democratic socialist.

0:29:19.310 --> 0:29:20.910
<v Speaker 4>I want the city to work.

0:29:21.990 --> 0:29:23.950
<v Speaker 5>And when the government is doing its job, it needs

0:29:23.970 --> 0:29:26.450
<v Speaker 5>to work really effectively. And we need to make sure

0:29:26.510 --> 0:29:31.370
<v Speaker 5>capitalism works without harm to workers, without worker exploitation, without

0:29:31.450 --> 0:29:34.510
<v Speaker 5>exploitation of poor people. That's what I'm going to focus on.

0:29:34.570 --> 0:29:36.730
<v Speaker 4>So you are a capitalist? I'm a capitalist and a

0:29:36.750 --> 0:29:38.670
<v Speaker 4>democratic socialist. There's a lot of people here that that

0:29:38.710 --> 0:29:39.950
<v Speaker 4>sounds confusing. I don't.

0:29:40.060 --> 0:29:44.910
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think democratic socialism is is a big tent.

0:29:45.270 --> 0:29:48.110
<v Speaker 5>The DSA is a big tent organization. And I'm in

0:29:48.470 --> 0:29:50.310
<v Speaker 5>part of that tent. And I think a lot of

0:29:50.370 --> 0:29:51.740
<v Speaker 5>Angelenos are in that tent with me.

0:29:54.330 --> 0:29:56.770
<v Speaker 1>She ought to be put in a tent. I was

0:29:56.790 --> 0:29:58.910
<v Speaker 1>going to say, is she talking about a homeless tent? Yeah,

0:29:58.930 --> 0:30:01.150
<v Speaker 1>she ought to go into a homeless tent and practice

0:30:01.170 --> 0:30:03.210
<v Speaker 1>her Democrat... I have no idea what she was talking

0:30:03.270 --> 0:30:06.050
<v Speaker 1>about there. I'd like to give you a critique here,

0:30:06.510 --> 0:30:09.590
<v Speaker 1>an analysis. I don't know what the F she's talking about.

0:30:11.650 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Capitalism and democratic socialism, not compatible. Nothing in common. In fact...

0:30:21.630 --> 0:30:24.630
<v Speaker 1>In addition to wanting to abolish the police and the

0:30:24.690 --> 0:30:29.469
<v Speaker 1>prisons and the jail and the Senate, under DSA, the

0:30:29.490 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>DSA platform says that companies should be taken over by

0:30:37.260 --> 0:30:42.180
<v Speaker 1>the government. Private companies should be taken over by the government.

0:30:43.020 --> 0:30:46.340
<v Speaker 1>That's what it says. Now, if she doesn't believe in this, this, this,

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:51.770
<v Speaker 1>and this, then why is she in this party? Why

0:30:51.790 --> 0:30:55.330
<v Speaker 1>does she identify that way? What is it, just a

0:30:55.450 --> 0:31:01.490
<v Speaker 1>fashionable label? Like her designer clothing?

0:31:02.850 --> 0:31:03.170
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:31:03.690 --> 0:31:08.300
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense. And her votes do indicate

0:31:08.340 --> 0:31:10.620
<v Speaker 1>that she believes in this DSA stuff because she voted

0:31:10.660 --> 0:31:13.620
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly to defund the police. She wrote defund the police

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly in 2020. She does give different answers on different days,

0:31:23.180 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and when she has to explain herself, she makes no sense.

0:31:28.390 --> 0:31:31.330
<v Speaker 1>She just doesn't. I can't follow it. What she's saying

0:31:31.670 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>is just incompatible with capitalism, obviously. All right, we come back.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Shrupp coming on over the article he co-wrote in

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:47.420
<v Speaker 1>City Journal. The bullet train, one of the many reasons

0:31:47.460 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not being built. They've blown $ 700 million on environmental studies.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.860
<v Speaker 1>A lot of consultants got rich. Deborah Mark is live

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the KFI 24-hour newsroom. You've been listening to the

0:31:57.940 --> 0:32:00.540
<v Speaker 1>John Kobelt Show podcast. You can always hear the show

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>live on KFI AM 640 from 3 to 6 p.m.

0:32:03.980 --> 0:32:07.260
<v Speaker 1>every Monday through Friday. And, of course, anytime on demand

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:08.540
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app.

0:32:08.780 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 3>KFI AM 640.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 4>More stimulating talk.