1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:04,880
Speaker 1: President Trump's recent statements and tweets disparaging Attorney General Jeff

2
00:00:04,920 --> 00:00:08,840
Speaker 1: Sessions have somewhat obscured how faithfully Sessions has been implementing

3
00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:12,360
Speaker 1: many of the President's agenda items, including his Law and

4
00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:15,840
Speaker 1: Order agenda, and that includes the recently announced rollback of

5
00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:19,320
Speaker 1: obama Eric curbs on civil forfeiture, a practice by which

6
00:00:19,360 --> 00:00:22,000
Speaker 1: the government can seize the assets of people suspected of

7
00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:25,560
Speaker 1: crimes even before they are convicted of anything, and often

8
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:29,120
Speaker 1: before they're even formally charged. Here to talk with us

9
00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,680
Speaker 1: about the Justice Department and Attorney General Sessions stands on

10
00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:36,680
Speaker 1: civil forfeiture are Lewis, really, professor at the University of

11
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:40,599
Speaker 1: Print Pennsylvania School of Law, and James Jacobs, a professor

12
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:45,320
Speaker 1: at n y U Law School. Lewis, what has Attorney

13
00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:49,879
Speaker 1: General Sessions announced that's different from what the Obama administration

14
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:54,840
Speaker 1: was doing on civil forfeiture? Yes, good afternoon. Uh. In

15
00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:58,160
Speaker 1: January two thousand and fifteen, Erik Colder than the Attorney

16
00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:04,280
Speaker 1: General under the Obama administration, had suspended the Adoptive Forfeiture program,

17
00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:07,440
Speaker 1: which is a program that allows local officials to seize

18
00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:11,280
Speaker 1: property and then handed over to the federal government. Which

19
00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:15,520
Speaker 1: prosecutes the civil forfeiture action and then once getting in

20
00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:19,280
Speaker 1: a forfeiture then returns up to of the funds to

21
00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:22,520
Speaker 1: the local government. This program had been so racked with

22
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:26,560
Speaker 1: abuses UM documented in many of the media and the

23
00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:30,959
Speaker 1: Washington Post series in particular in two thousand four UM

24
00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:35,040
Speaker 1: that it UM was had to be shelved UM. And interestingly,

25
00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:39,039
Speaker 1: in March of this year, the Inspector General for the

26
00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:42,600
Speaker 1: Department of Justice issued a report UM which was highly

27
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:48,240
Speaker 1: critical of Civil Forfeiture UM and noted there that the

28
00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:52,320
Speaker 1: UM government had taken in over the last ten years

29
00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:56,640
Speaker 1: three point two billion dollars in cash from people who

30
00:01:56,640 --> 00:02:00,080
Speaker 1: were never charged with a crime. So this is a

31
00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:05,920
Speaker 1: program that is racked with abuses, and the announcement by

32
00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:09,000
Speaker 1: the Attorney General that now it will be boosted again

33
00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:13,600
Speaker 1: through bringing back the equitable sharing adoptive forfeiture program is

34
00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:17,520
Speaker 1: really a disturbing announcement and one that is at odds

35
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:20,880
Speaker 1: with where are the states are going in trying to

36
00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:25,679
Speaker 1: reform civil forfeiture JIM. This is an issue that Republicans

37
00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:31,120
Speaker 1: and Democrats seem to agree on who supports civil forfeiture

38
00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:36,080
Speaker 1: except for law enforcement to who get that stream of

39
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:40,880
Speaker 1: revenue from it. Yeah, I think that that you're quite

40
00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:43,359
Speaker 1: right in what you're saying in the question. I mean

41
00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:46,880
Speaker 1: that the biggest stituency for this is the law enforcement,

42
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:52,639
Speaker 1: especially the state and local police departments, that use this

43
00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:57,600
Speaker 1: money to to enhance their budgets, allowed them to do

44
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:00,480
Speaker 1: things that they otherwise would not have been able to do.

45
00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:04,079
Speaker 1: So it was very popular with the state and local

46
00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:08,919
Speaker 1: law enforcement. Had been subject to a lot of criticism

47
00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:14,840
Speaker 1: from libertarian Republicans. The Cato Institute was one of the

48
00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:20,560
Speaker 1: biggest critics over the years of civil forfeiture, and also

49
00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:27,440
Speaker 1: from civil liberty liberties groups on the left. Well, lewis,

50
00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:32,200
Speaker 1: what is this likely to engender congressional opposition given that

51
00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:36,040
Speaker 1: some Republicans are against civil forfeiture at least on the

52
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,040
Speaker 1: scale it's from practiced in the past. I think it

53
00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:42,960
Speaker 1: will um and I agree with the comments that there's

54
00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:46,880
Speaker 1: a lot of support on certain local law enforcement and

55
00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:51,600
Speaker 1: state agencies, particularly where they've seen a drop in revenue. Um.

56
00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:53,680
Speaker 1: What we really have to talk about in the civil

57
00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:57,400
Speaker 1: forfeiture program is that all the money that is forfeited,

58
00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:00,600
Speaker 1: and it's a huge amount of money, goes right back

59
00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:04,440
Speaker 1: directly to law enforcements UM, and so they have a

60
00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:08,720
Speaker 1: great stake in whether or not civil forfeiture continues UM.

61
00:04:08,800 --> 00:04:11,760
Speaker 1: At the same time, they've been criticized in the Inspector

62
00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:16,320
Speaker 1: General's reports for not keeping careful records, not really advancing

63
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:20,680
Speaker 1: criminal prosecutions in the way that they're seizing cash, and

64
00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,840
Speaker 1: that it looks much more alike just an attempt to

65
00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:28,200
Speaker 1: get money as opposed and posing real civilibities issues. So

66
00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:33,960
Speaker 1: we've seen bipartisan support for reforming civil forfeiture, both at

67
00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:38,039
Speaker 1: the federal level and the state level UM, certainly from

68
00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:40,760
Speaker 1: both the left and the right UM. And I would

69
00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:44,160
Speaker 1: also note that Justice Clarence Thomas issued a very interesting

70
00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:48,279
Speaker 1: statement earlier this year in connection with a case in

71
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:52,560
Speaker 1: which the Court did not grant sartiari UM reviewed on

72
00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:56,479
Speaker 1: a civil forfeiture case. But Justice Thomas took the occasion

73
00:04:56,560 --> 00:05:01,360
Speaker 1: to say the forfeiture has become widespread, highly profitable. It's

74
00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:05,760
Speaker 1: led to egregious and well chronicled abuses UM and frequently

75
00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:09,440
Speaker 1: targeting the poor and groups least able to descend. So

76
00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:14,520
Speaker 1: we are seeing will support UM for reform of civil forfeiture,

77
00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:18,839
Speaker 1: and I think that will be also showing opposition to

78
00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:22,599
Speaker 1: what the Attorney General has announced. Jim going on what

79
00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:26,600
Speaker 1: he just talked about the Supreme Court and Clarence Thomas,

80
00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:30,680
Speaker 1: is this a dangerous move by Sessions in that if

81
00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:34,159
Speaker 1: there's a challenge to the Supreme Court, it could lead

82
00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:40,839
Speaker 1: to an all or nothing decision. Um. That's possible that

83
00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:45,800
Speaker 1: they might declare certain kinds of civil forfeiture to be

84
00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:51,599
Speaker 1: unconstitutional without certain kinds of procedural protections. But I don't

85
00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:55,520
Speaker 1: think it would be the end of civil forfeiture. And

86
00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:59,760
Speaker 1: it's also important here note that that there's a lot

87
00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:06,159
Speaker 1: of federal state uh issues here. So so about half

88
00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:12,159
Speaker 1: the states have tried to to reign in the the

89
00:06:12,240 --> 00:06:19,360
Speaker 1: forfeiture aggressiveness of law enforcement, and by and by turning

90
00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:22,560
Speaker 1: the cases over to the federal government was like an

91
00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:28,880
Speaker 1: an end run around those state limitations. Um So, in

92
00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:35,279
Speaker 1: that sense, the the the rules are are in a

93
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:41,160
Speaker 1: way undermining the state's capacity to set their own policies

94
00:06:41,279 --> 00:06:45,480
Speaker 1: on forfeiture. So I think that's very important, Lewis. And

95
00:06:45,520 --> 00:06:48,400
Speaker 1: about thirty seconds that we have left, is there a

96
00:06:48,480 --> 00:06:53,560
Speaker 1: legitimate role for civil asset forfeiture? Well, I think, and

97
00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:56,120
Speaker 1: this is my own opinion on this, that we have

98
00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:00,839
Speaker 1: criminal forfeiture in this country, and that is taking away

99
00:07:00,880 --> 00:07:03,480
Speaker 1: the property that was used in connection with the crime.

100
00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:07,839
Speaker 1: Once a person has been convicted of a crime, I

101
00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:11,440
Speaker 1: don't believe that there should be a program that takes

102
00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:14,560
Speaker 1: away property from a person who is not only not

103
00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:17,800
Speaker 1: convicted of a crime, but not even charged with a crime,

104
00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:22,280
Speaker 1: not even suspected of a crime. Our thanks to Lewis

105
00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:25,480
Speaker 1: Ruley of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and James

106
00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:27,680
Speaker 1: Jacobs of n y U Law School for being here

107
00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:29,400
Speaker 1: today on Bloomberg Law