WEBVTT - How Gunpowder & Sky Makes Movies for Millennials

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>This is Brent Line of Variety Magazine, and I'm joined

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>today in our Los Angeles studio with the co founders

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of Gunpowder and Sky, Van Tuffler and Flora's Bauer. In

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a very short period of time, gun Powder and Sky

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>has established itself as a major force in the indie space,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>releasing such films as Lords of Chaos, Hearts, Beat Loud,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and Her Smell. It's my great pleasure to have Van

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in Flora's here and we're gonna talk a little bit

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about some major industry trends and familiarize people with Gunpowder

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and Sky. I think, sort of to start, I'm really

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>interested in your take on the theatrical space right now

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's been a lot written about sort of this

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>box office apocalypse. You know, things don't seem to be working, uh,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>theatrically in the way they once did, and that's been

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of focused primarily on the major studio films. What's

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>been sort of this scene in the indie space? Are

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 1>are things um connecting theatrically? Is is there some spill

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>over from sort of the problems and the larger theatrical space.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>How's that impacting of the indie space right now? I mean,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from my perspective, the key is flexibility. Uh, and that's

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what we all talk about amongst ourselves and to filmmakers.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>So unlike the major studios, there's a lot of baggage

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>around the relationships with the theater owners and distribution UM.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think being open to how long movies stay

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in theaters, how they released, how they're marketed, UM, and

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>when they go to t VOD or SAT or other windows.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>We whenever we go into a film, whether we're making

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it or acquiring it, we talked to the filmmaker is

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, let's optimize the release. Sometimes that means bypassing

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>theatrical altogether. Sometimes that means a hastened window for theatrical,

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but uh, not being precious that it needs a certain

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>level of promotion and time in theaters. UM. Now theater

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>owners less flexible, but UM, particularly for young people, you

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have to give them a real reason to spend money

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and go to theaters because the experience isn't as wonderful

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>as it was for us as kids. It was, first

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of all, is the only time you could see movies.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But UM, technology is enabled kids to watch stuff on

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>demand how they want, when they want. At their freedom. UM,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So you really have to give them a compelling reason

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of making an event to go to theaters. And that's

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty high bar. Um So I think that uh,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>having flexibility, being a smaller independent studio, it enables you

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Um And the fact of the matter

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is the trending is just not great for movie with you.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone told me, um, and I grew up in New York,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>so that there are twenty plus percent less seats in

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly Midtown to downtown then there were a few years ago.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't bode well for theatrical revenues. Um. So when

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're talking about having flexibility, what do you

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? What sort of Gunpowder and Sky's approach?

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>When when you pick up a film, are you doing

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a traditional theatrical window? Are you doing some kind of hybrid?

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Are you going straight to um s bod's avods? How

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>do you approach a release of a film? I'll let

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you speak in a second, but all of the above. So, Uh,

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, we haven't sort of concluded this definitively, but

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we just acquired a documentary on on this wonderful young

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>rapper Little People on fortun Only Die he's a sort

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of emblematic of these young rappers who go from obscurity

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to infamy of via SoundCloud. Um. And unfortunately he overdosed,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>but he has these rabid rabbit fans, rabbid young fans,

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>and we are thinking about doing a one night only

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>release that may have exclusive music in theaters and then

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it will go to tivon spot, So literally twenty four hours. Um,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we did this, you know, when I was at MTV

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with Madonna's Truth or Dare to the second movie, we

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>had one week in theaters, and so sometimes we do

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety days, uh, and then we go to tivon spots.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we'll sell movies right to spots. So the first

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>four movies we did, we're with Jason Blum, and we

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sold two of those to Netflix, and two of those

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>two HBO and CAM. One in particular on Netflix was

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>released over the Thanksgiving holidays and probably more people saw

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that within a week than have seen a lot of

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Jason's films and theaters, which he admitted, Um, So I

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think you just have to figure out what's right for

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>each project. And are you finding that that's you know,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a more profitable model for you? Does it help you

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your marketing spend, your distribution costs. Are

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you getting more of the revenue from a film release

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>by not going, you know, a traditional sort of theatrical

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>run for some of these films. Definitely, I think, UM,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>because we don't pre set the distribution strategy and we

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>really look at it in a holistic way. How can

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>we create maximum awareness UM with efficient spending. UM. We

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>look at all the windows, including theatrical very specifically. So

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>for us, there's no point over spending theatrical if we

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think that is where most of our audiences to

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>watch the film. UM. And we always set the distribution

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>strategy after testing it and thinking about it a lot internally.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So probably our biggest windows from a revenue point of view,

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or at least a net revenue point of view, off

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the marketing s bend are our second window, so so HBO, Netflix, TVA.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And when you're having conversations with with filmmakers, I mean,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>how open are they to this? Because I feel like

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you still read in trade press, you know when there's

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a big bidding war or something like that, that you

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know that that these filmmakers still want that that traditional

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>theatrical release. Is that becoming you know, a little bit

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of an anachronism. Or are people more open to two

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>novel distribution strategies or do you still have to kind

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of have a kind of a tough conversation with people.

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It depends they're much more open than they used to be.

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I were to do uh Jack Assid

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Napoleon Dynamite, they may have bypassed theaters altogether. Right, But

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on one in particular, I acquired this movie foot fist

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Way with Will Smith and Adam McKay and Jody Hill,

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>who did He's Bounded Down, Who's just a great, wonderful

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>young director. Uh. We we felt because I think it

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>may have been the second or first worst testing movie

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in Paramounts history, right, And we tried to convince Jody

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to release it on Funnier Die and MTV dot com

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and he wanted a traditional theatrical window.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Was his first movie, so we couldn't argue with that.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But I bet if we had that conversation today, uh,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>he might feel differently because we would market it socially

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and viral e and potentially get more eyeballs than would

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>go see that movie and pay ten knowledge to see

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in the movie theaters. And just to add, I think

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the people and filmmakers were talking to

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately also want a successful release, So it's not only

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about the amount of theaters. They want the release to

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>be seen as successful and they want to get into

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the theaters where they think the audience which will most

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>likely want to see it is going to see it.

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's more quality over quantity, the same as in

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of the length of the release. Sometimes I wonder

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>when when people talk about, you know, the theatrical experience,

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and they have this sort of reverence for it. Um.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you think consumers feel the same way,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>because I know that that quite frankly, I don't always

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have a wonderful experience when I go to a movie theater.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's dirty, maybe people are talking. I mean, maybe

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I would prefer to just watch something in the home.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that something that that people aren't really

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to what consumers are telling them when they sort

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of talk about it in that and that sort of, um,

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>almost religious quasi religious way. It's hard. I mean, you

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think about the evolutionary lack of evolution of the in

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>theater experience. It hasn't changed that much, right. I mean,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got some Imax theaters, you've got theaters, your reserve

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>seats um that are are wonderful, but they're they're more

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the anomaly. Uh. And so I think you've got

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to make either the movie or the experience exceptional. Having

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a bar and a lot of the movie theaters is good.

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>So Alamo is having success with younger movie going audiences

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's a better experience, it's a night out. But

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that people are not listening enough to the

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>consumers saying, you know what, it's not worth me paying

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>all this money for that experience. I'd rather stay home

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>or wait for the movie to get into a window

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that I can enjoy at home. Yeah, and it's I

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's it's the cost of the ticket. But

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>always deals so driving there and the parking and the X,

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Y and Z, and we were talking a little bit

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about the sort of the filmmakers and and they're growing

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>flexibility with some of these distributions strategies. But there's office

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>obviously another party involved in that, and that's the theater

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>owners themselves. So what are you sort of hearing from

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that end of things? I mean, are they being flexible

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to about letting your movies in. I mean, how how

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is that kind of conversation too? You know, I think

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they've been pretty great to tell you the truth, as

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you work with them in terms of release

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>dates and and when you have the theaters, they want

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more programming, they want alternative program and clearly Disney students

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>still doing really well with four quadrant event movies, but

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they like to have the options. Now that may mean

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not in three thousand theaters. You can start in

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty and go to a few hundred. But I think

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that the theater owners like alternatives, and I also believe

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll maybe movie past and get it right. They're open

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to altern of pricing, particularly at low traffic times a day.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You mean sort of subscription service kinds of things ees

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or flexible pricing. Um, let's let's go back to kind

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of the formation of Gunpowder and Sky. Um Fan, I

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>know that you had a lot of experience. You were

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>at Vatcom, you were at MTV films, UM and uh Floriss,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you were at end them all. How did you guys

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>get together and why did you see this as a

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>space you you wanted to go into? Well, you know,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think separately Floris and I had a similar notion

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of kind of a premium content studio that was sort

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of youth oriented, forward looking, that would create content for

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>newer platforms. It just felt like there was a content renaissance.

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>There were platforms emerging UM every day, and a lot

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of the content, particularly for young people, was was amateur

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was based on you know, kids were posting videos, so

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there was an opportunity to create more premium content that

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>targeted young people. And UM also there was gonna be

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of a day of reckoning with linear TV

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>channels where they were going to have to find alternative

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sources of programming because the audiences were getting smaller. So

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>all those things lad each of us separately to uh

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>come up with this notion of creating UM a content studio,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>creating brands that could live on O T T platforms

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>targeting young people. And we got together primarily through Peter

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Turning and Honor and uh this was when when did

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys form the company story? And we were prepared

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for it hobby or something. So the market looks very

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>different at that time and what right, well, when we

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when we came up with the notion of the studio.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We were seeing that audience isn't obviously specifically younger people

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>were moving where very quickly from traditional and linear TV

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>channels to these new platforms, and on these new platforms

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you had, like what Ben was saying, from cat videos,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>make the totals, etcetera, which are very meaningful in themselves,

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's not, as we call it, kind of premium content.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>With the shift, we assumed that at some point when

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the audience moves, as a rule of media, at some

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>point um uh, advertising, subscription, etcetera, revenues will follow, and

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>because of that, you're able to spend more money on

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the content. And with more money coming into the space,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>more quality, newer creators, newer formats, um etcetera. That what

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we were betting on when we came into the market

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and set up this new studio purely focused on premium

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>content for the space. That market was not there right

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it was. Everybody was talking about the digital pennies and

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the m c ns at that stage. UM, So we

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>were taking a bet that what we thought what was

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen was gonna happen. You had some smaller digital

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>players who were uh starting to spend some money like

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the the go nineties watchables, et cetera. Um, since then,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we we we the market has actually shifted way quicker

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>than we could have hoped for. With now all these

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>new O T T platforms which are looking for differentiated

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>content as well as you focused content. So we're having

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the Warners, the Apples, the Netflix, Quimby, come const launching

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>news services, the monetization on YouTube becoming better. Um, So

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there is more and more outlets and demands uh for

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>premium content, differentiated premium content from both films, series as

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>well as brands and channels. So where do you fit

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>into all of this? Because you're absolutely right, I feel

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like in the last year and a half, I mean,

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you have such major players coming into this space. Um.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, as you mentioned, Warner just announcing yesterday just

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just you know this week, Uh, their their HBO Max service.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You have Disney Plus coming in, you have this a

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>VOD service that Comcast is launching. Apple. Where do you

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>fit into this? Are you going to be a provider

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of content for them? Are you a competitor? How does

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this work? And then you have something like Quimby, which

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is which is a little different with its sort of

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>short form content. Well, we're providing content to all those services.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>To tell you the truth, we haven't announced the series,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but to Warner streaming service with Quimby, we're doing that

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>first series, fifty States of Terror. We're doing movies for

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>these services. Um, so it's it's a great time to

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>make premium content for these different platforms, you know. In

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, though, we're not sort of randomly um uh,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of picking the categories that we play in. We

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>have specific genres that we're doubling down in, so sci fi, horror, music, unscripted, um, comedy.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And as part of that, we're also creating these sort

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of branded ecosystems that have primarily lived in the AVOD world. So, um,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a channel called Dust, which is a sci

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>fi channel, and if you think about it, the next

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Ridley Scott will come out of the digital ecosystem. And

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact, we've got over five hundred short films right

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with with name actors. We were acquired George Lucas's first film,

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Robert Semeckis and all these young filmmakers are making these

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of thirteen or less minute films that live in

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this world. They're consumed in this world. But then there's

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this i P that we can spin off and sell

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to other platforms, so they're also i P forms as well.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Um and so these genres we pick, we double down

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>on them, We create content if they belong on a

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>different platform like quimby or in theaters. Uh, you know

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a movie prospect came out of dust um, and then

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where they will live. So it's this combination of

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>branded ecosystems that aren't really competing with quib because they're

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>living on Facebook and YouTube and roku and they live

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on Apple and Samsung and other platforms. Uh. And then

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we have i P that we kind of sell to

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>different platforms and you're making money through advertising or through

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe option or how does that work too? So so

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>these these these brands, they do everything as Van mentioned,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>from short form two series, two films to bodcasts, and

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>we have around direct to consumer channels which live on

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>across a bunch of platforms. On the films and series,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we make money through books Office, ti vo, UM sales

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to Netflix, HBO. Then the channels we generate revenues through

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>programmatic advertising UM, and we will through affiliate fees and

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.719
<v Speaker 1>subscription in the coming period. So I think and and

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back to, we think the opportunity is there is

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a big opportunity for for indie studios to create and

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sell grade content, especially if you have differentiated content, targeted content,

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and then creating these larger brands where we want to

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be a trusted cuader and programmer within a specific genre.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And these brands can live on the bigger platforms like

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Amazon and Samsung and Comcast, so where instead

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of only selling one off films and series were also

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>packaging them in larger propositions. And I think as the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>next um ah he said iteration, I think you're going

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of these larger platforms which need

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to become larger and larger and attract more and more people.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's focused on originals, original content, which is extremely important,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>but in order for these platforms to ultimately become successful,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they need more existing brands on their platform to attract

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>larger amounts of audience and reduce programming and marketing calls

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and have sticky content on their platforms. So I think

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see a lot of brands existing and

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>new brands come up. Is that because it's almost like

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a sign of quality or something for for a user.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>What why do you think? I think, yeah, I think

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a lot of people who are now saying

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I think one which which is I think a mistake

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>where people say young people only want v o D content,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They want to watch it whatever they want, and they

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>want to find it themselves. I think ultimately people care

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about brands right people where the same sneakers people want

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to listen to playlists Spotify. You want to be part

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of a brand. You want to know that if you

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>go to a trusted brand, you're going to find something

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>good and you can talk about it with your friends.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Um and UM. I think that reduces the amount of

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>spend on programming and your it reduces your spend on marketing.

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of people now we've seen

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the issues with for example, Netflix, that sometimes it takes

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you fifteen or thirty minutes to find something you want,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think people are going to start focusing on

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that more and more. Um. It makes a lot of

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that that a smaller player, whose nimble could really

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>profit from from all this change, because it feels like

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>this change is just so accelerated. Things are so different

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and just a matter of months. But I've also recently

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>been just sort of going around to traditional studios and

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I see this massive infrastructure, and I wonder what your

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are, as people who have also you know, worked

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in that space to how do these companies pivot? I mean,

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is it difficult when you have all of this infrastructure,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>these jobs, these all these people who are on your payroll,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, ways of releasing content to the world

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>that are so sort of baked into your business model.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>How how hard is it for these companies to adjust

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to to this you know, new Frontier. It's, um, it's

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>really hard. I think that um, you know what was

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>his Steve Jobs expression that the people created the last

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>invention are probably the last people are going to do

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the next one, because I have to get out of

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>their own way. And there's all this sort of baggage

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that and and a lot of it is is good

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>or bad baggage. But you know, I think that, UM,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>being at Viacom, uh, it was really important that UM.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who stops listening to the consumer first, that's when

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you get into trouble. So MTV was a bit of

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a canary in a coal mine. All these young people

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were watching videos on YouTube. They were consuming content on YouTube,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but because there were traditional distribution deals where direct TV

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>or podcast would pay a billion dollars for the content

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on MTV, MTV couldn't put its content on the platform

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>where most consumers were going. And so that was it

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>was a nice baggage to have. You got a big

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>check for your content, but then you couldn't be flexible

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and put it where people wanted to consume your content.

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>When you don't have that baggage and you are small,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you can follow the consumer. The consumer wants to watch

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a movie you make on Demanding Home and will pay

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the same price, well that's where you should be. Um.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that the studios recognized the shift

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in consumer behavior. Look at the decline in linear TV ratings,

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the decline and young people going to movie theaters. It's there,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's really hard when you've got a lot of

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>partners involved to say the theater owners, oh, by the way,

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>i'm gonna short in your window from ninety days to

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty days. You're good with that, right. You've seen the

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>reactions that the theater owners have like, hey, come on now,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's gonna take a beat. It really is.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't have that baggage. We can just listen to

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the consumer and and the purity of purpose provides us

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of freedom. Yeah, I think, and I think

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of smart people at these larger places.

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think also the the having to focus on

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping your revenues and your profitability up whilst actually in

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>order to pivot to the new world, you're gonna have

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to do things which in the short to medium term

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>will actually you're focusing on lower profit initiatives and you're

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to let go of a couple of juicy,

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>juicy deals. Um. And for that you need to also

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have shareholders which kind of appreciate you going into that direction.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's that's the balance which a lot

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of people are having to con Well, it's interesting you

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>say that because I talked sometimes to analysts and I'm

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of struck by the fact that they treat a

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of these streaming services. They almost see them as

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>just additive, that it's just going to add revenues to,

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, their overall sort of pie. But they're taking

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>content away, you know, they're they're wrapping up licensing deals

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>which you're basically and at least in my estimation, pure

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 1>profit for them putting you know, pulling that back, putting

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it on their service, which comes with all kinds of

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>attendant costs. So I guess I'm just sort of what

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of if you're a publicly traded company, isn't that

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>really problematic if you have to do things when you're

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what you If you just look at it from a

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>pure number standpoint, you think this is this was a

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>terrible quarter, right, I mean, how how do you do that? Explain?

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Like this is gone of costs pix for the next

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>ten years. But the opportunity is why, and that's why

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>are you going to do it? And for a Netflix

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that's as a premium play coming from the less quote

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>unquote digital sign of it, it's an easier thing to

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>explain than for a for another big studio legacy revenue.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It isn't two sided coin because they're getting big license fees,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have a direct relationship with their audience,

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's the price they pay. And so the pot

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the rainbow is I'm going to

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get my content back and now I'm gonna know who's

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 1>watching it and so when I release a movie or

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I release something with that actor in it, I can

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to them directly. Why do you think, um, that

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that legacy media companies have other than Disney sort of

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And actually I would argue MTV at least at one

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>point have that kind of direct relationship with its consumers.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it because they use sort of third party to

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>get their content out of the world. Why do they

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have Why have they why have they sort of failed

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to establish that kind of connection. Oh, because there were

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>middlemen for the most part, there were cable operators and

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so and there was a really imperfect system Nielsen that

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>took a very small sample of the country that only

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>took their live viewing for a long time. So the

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>way we got information was through emails and phone calls.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>When when they didn't like something, we heard it from

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>an email. But it wasn't as if we had this

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>direct conversation we knew who was watching it in the

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Midwest or who liked what record or video. Where we

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just had to to beg and borrow and so it

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>was just there were middlemen involved. So if you're somebody

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 1>who's sort of entering this space, I mean, where do

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you see sort of the opportunities without giving away uh,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, competitive advantages. You know, a lot of people

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that I talked to seem very anxious about this, this

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>new frontier. They're frankly, they're almost depressed about sort of

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>how things are changing. You both seem to feel that

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of opportunity. What what sort of it's

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>exciting to you right now? Well, I think this this

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is part of the show for both of us at

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>big companies who did things a certain way, you know,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and them all make great content, they make great formats.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They sold it to traditional television networks around the world. Um,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>what's changed is the consumer is in control and that

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is really exciting. They tell you how they want to

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>see things. And as a content maker, if you're again,

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're not precious about your windowing, then that is

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge opportunity. So if you make your movie, maybe

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>HBO will buy it, or maybe the new Warner streaming service,

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>or maybe Hulu will take your channel and distribute it

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for you, or Roku you know this great a vod

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>system will take your channel and they'll sell ads against

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it and they don't charge five dollars a month to

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a consumer. Um, I think as long as you're open

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to the noise of culture and consumption, then that's a

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>huge opportunity. But as we talked about, if you're married

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to an old system that pays you a lot of

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>money and you have to keep your profit margin a

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>certain way, it's tough to pivot and embrace that as

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>quickly as new companies can. Yeah, and we we don't

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>need the traditional gatekeepers to build our I P and

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>our brands, right, so we because we're building these brands

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that if we can go with a series to a

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>buyer and see if anyone is interested, or if we

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's actually better, or we can do we can

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>tell it in a shorter amount of time, we can

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.239
<v Speaker 1>put things on our own channels, and as long as

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>an audience agrees with us that it's interesting and they

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>love our brands, we're going to continue to grow. It's

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting that you were talking about launching in because there

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>were a number of other indie studios that launched at

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>about the same time. And you know, I'm thinking of

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>um Open Road in one of its sort of iterations,

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and and broad Green and Relativity have been there for

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a little while. But st X really high mortality rate.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>When you when you look at those names, where did

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>where did they go wrong in your estimation? Because we've

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about sort of big traditional media, why

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>did some of the smaller players also sort of failed

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to thrive? Well, I mean, I know it's a bit

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of a buzz kill, but but I think they went

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>into it relying on traditional windowing. To tell you the truth,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and and and so um, if you don't keep your

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>costs in check, both in the negative costs of making

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a movie and your overhead, then you're gonna get burned

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>if the traditional windows don't pay off for you, and

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>so one or two failed movies costs you tens of

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars. And we, uh, we didn't sort of

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>go fall into that trap. Really, and particularly if you're

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>targeting young people, you don't have to spend hundreds of

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>millions of negative costs. You can just make it fun

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and innovative and novel and they'll try to find it.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, if you open the studio and relied on

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>traditional windowing and traditional models, then there would be a

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>high mortality rate unless you just keep banging out hits. Um.

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We're also about to go into the Toronto Film Festival,

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>which I assume you you will both be at this

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>year's Sundance. The prices for a lot of content made

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>big headlines in a huge sales for things like The

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Report and Runs a marathon and Late Night, which which

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>did not do well. Uh do you expect those prices

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to be as high at future festivals? I mean, I

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's like a a boom and bus cycle

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>or something. You know, you have one here where it's

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>four was a bit of a bus. So what what

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was it that happened that that goost prices at the

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>last Sundance? Will there be a kind of a hangover

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>effect at future film festivals? But what's your sort of

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>take on that? I mean, I don't know what Flores

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>feels about. I think you're right, it is it is

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>our peaks and valleys. I think that the last year,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>streamers in particular and particularly Amazon came in with checkbook

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to say, we're going to buy these sort

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of broader movies. I didn't personally think that Late Night

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>belonged in theaters. I thought it was and is a

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly great movie for Amazon. It's a good, really good

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>family movie. It's funny, Um, and then who knows, next

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>year they may not show up where maybe Netflix comes

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in and pays a lot of money, but the year

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>before they kind of sat out right for us. It's

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the great thing about our studio is that's why we

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't consider ourselves to be in the studio because

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we do more things. Is that if there are more

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>aggressive buyers, it's harder for us to acquire titles. On

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, it's it's a better market for us

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to develop and sell our our films and series. So

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's great if if if if there's an again aggressive

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>buyers coming into Toronto, it's a good sign for us

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of our business and on the acquisition side.

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We we don't need to fill pipeline of let's say,

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>its films a year because we have output deals or

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because we have an overhead to to to to support.

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're very fine to release fifteen films a year.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We're also very good to release two to five films

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a year because you're not saying I have to hit

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain number each year or something like that. Are

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>some contractual obligations, right, And also we don't have contractual obligations,

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>which is another kind of issue. As you know with

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>with with some other studios, you have contractual obligations to

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be in a certain amount of theaters, and then that

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>starts hitting your p and a whilst actually you might

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not believe that it should actually be in that many theaters,

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but people are putting them out regardless because they have

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>these obligations. It doesn't help anyone. That's a great point

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 1>because when you look at these sales prices, you think, oh,

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>it's sport two million dollars, but you don't realize, oh, well,

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a twenty million dollar acomm that's right. That's right.

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Because the year before we had a movie we produced

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>called Summer of eighty four and we were kind of

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like people didn't buy for theatrical release, like oh, and

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 1>then we sold the two shutter and and it was

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one of, if not their most viewed movie at the time,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and so we sold it around the world. So in

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>some ways, the market speaks for itself and and the

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>project finds the right home eventually, but being married to

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>having to spend all that money to release it theatrically

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and not knowing what the outcome will be, that gets

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to be dangerous at times. So could you tell me

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what what's behind the name? What gunpatern skuy what? What

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Absolutely nothing? It is uh, it's I

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>don't sleep and it it came to me in a dream.

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>That was because when I was developing my own plan,

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I called the studio below the Radar, only to find

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>out there were fifteen studios named below the Radar. But um,

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it was and I, uh, this lyric kept coming to me.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I do not like guns at all, just just to

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be clear, but it it had this infinite possibility. And

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's from an amy Man song and it is actually

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>meant to be ironic because it's the song fourth of

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>July gunpowder Sky, what a waste of wait yeah, yeah whatever,

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it's ironic and and but it felt like it had

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this sort of infinite possibility and uh, and I called

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>amy Man and she I didn't. I didn't really have to,

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but I called her it just comically it felt like

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to. And She's like, as long as you

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 1>treat artists fairly, then I will bless it. So we've

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>we've tried to live up to that mantra. Well, Van

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and Force, thank you so much for joining us, and

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it great. Thanks travelings. This has been another

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of Strictly Business. Tune in next week for another

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>helping of scintillating conversation with media movers and shakers, and

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>please make sure you subscribe to the podcast to hear

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>future episodes. Also, leave a review in Apple Podcast let

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>us know how we're doing.