WEBVTT - Hold The Line w/ Buck Sexton - 05-04-22

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.937
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:17.977 --> 0:00:22.777
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. The left is still in

0:00:22.897 --> 0:00:25.337
<v Speaker 1>shock today after the leak of a Supreme Court decision

0:00:25.377 --> 0:00:29.617
<v Speaker 1>that would overturn the landmark abortion case. Wrote The Weight,

0:00:30.177 --> 0:00:32.937
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a look at the left insane reaction to

0:00:33.017 --> 0:00:42.537
<v Speaker 1>Justice Alida's opinion in tonight's hold al welcome hold on

0:00:42.617 --> 0:00:44.937
<v Speaker 1>on buck Sexton. The meltdown is happening all over the

0:00:44.937 --> 0:00:49.617
<v Speaker 1>place from these libs the mere prospect of the end

0:00:50.177 --> 0:00:53.617
<v Speaker 1>of their make believe constitutional right to abortion, because even

0:00:53.617 --> 0:00:57.497
<v Speaker 1>honest leftists and liberals Democrats know that the Supreme Court

0:00:57.497 --> 0:01:00.257
<v Speaker 1>decision in nineteen seventy three Roe v. Wade was just

0:01:00.617 --> 0:01:06.297
<v Speaker 1>legal fantasy fiction. It was absolutely cobbled together using verbal

0:01:06.377 --> 0:01:10.217
<v Speaker 1>smoke screens and nonsense. So that may go away, which

0:01:10.257 --> 0:01:12.177
<v Speaker 1>means that they would have to actually explain to the

0:01:12.217 --> 0:01:16.057
<v Speaker 1>American people. They should explain to the American people what

0:01:16.057 --> 0:01:19.017
<v Speaker 1>it is they actually believe. And just to give you

0:01:19.017 --> 0:01:21.577
<v Speaker 1>a sense of it, it's gone quite a long distance

0:01:21.617 --> 0:01:26.537
<v Speaker 1>here because the Democrat Party until about the last fifteen

0:01:26.617 --> 0:01:29.737
<v Speaker 1>years or so, had been holding to this notion. They

0:01:29.777 --> 0:01:33.617
<v Speaker 1>agree that abortion is not something that is a good thing.

0:01:33.657 --> 0:01:36.697
<v Speaker 1>It's a sad thing, a life maybe even as lost

0:01:36.737 --> 0:01:40.017
<v Speaker 1>that they would say, but it was necessary for women

0:01:40.057 --> 0:01:41.817
<v Speaker 1>to be able to make this choice. Essentially, again, a

0:01:41.857 --> 0:01:44.577
<v Speaker 1>lot of euphemisms and speaking around the issue. And if

0:01:44.577 --> 0:01:47.257
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering who took those kinds of positions, I mean,

0:01:47.297 --> 0:01:50.177
<v Speaker 1>here was Joe Biden back in two thousand and six,

0:01:50.257 --> 0:01:54.617
<v Speaker 1>little over fifteen years ago saying, well, watch, I do

0:01:54.697 --> 0:01:59.137
<v Speaker 1>not view abortion as a as a choice and a right.

0:01:59.257 --> 0:02:02.137
<v Speaker 1>I think it's always a tragedy, and I think that

0:02:02.817 --> 0:02:05.457
<v Speaker 1>it should be rare and safe, and I think we

0:02:05.497 --> 0:02:08.217
<v Speaker 1>should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions,

0:02:08.577 --> 0:02:09.977
<v Speaker 1>and there ought to be able to have a common

0:02:10.137 --> 0:02:14.337
<v Speaker 1>ground and consensus as to do that. Oh, it's always

0:02:14.337 --> 0:02:18.897
<v Speaker 1>a tragedy. Remember that was Joe Biden not too long ago.

0:02:18.937 --> 0:02:23.137
<v Speaker 1>He's currently the president who acts like the possible overturning

0:02:23.137 --> 0:02:25.137
<v Speaker 1>of Rov Wade and it has not happened yet, folks.

0:02:25.137 --> 0:02:26.897
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of pressure. We gotta remember, there's

0:02:26.937 --> 0:02:29.777
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure that the left is bringing to

0:02:29.857 --> 0:02:32.737
<v Speaker 1>bear right now. The whole purpose of the leak was

0:02:32.737 --> 0:02:34.617
<v Speaker 1>to try to get a change in the decision before

0:02:34.617 --> 0:02:38.257
<v Speaker 1>the decision is official, So that has to be in

0:02:38.297 --> 0:02:42.137
<v Speaker 1>the background of this entire conversation. But Biden then was

0:02:42.177 --> 0:02:45.897
<v Speaker 1>saying it was a tragedy. Now Biden is part of

0:02:45.937 --> 0:02:49.177
<v Speaker 1>the chorus of hysteria saying that, oh my gosh, if

0:02:49.177 --> 0:02:53.617
<v Speaker 1>they overturned Row, you know, they might even ban lgbt

0:02:54.137 --> 0:02:57.537
<v Speaker 1>children from being in the same classroom as other children.

0:02:57.897 --> 0:03:02.297
<v Speaker 1>Watch this what happens if you have st chase the

0:03:02.377 --> 0:03:06.897
<v Speaker 1>law saying that that children who are LGBTQ camp being

0:03:06.977 --> 0:03:12.417
<v Speaker 1>classrooms with other children? Is that legit under the way

0:03:12.457 --> 0:03:16.257
<v Speaker 1>that the decisions written. What are the next things that

0:03:16.297 --> 0:03:19.617
<v Speaker 1>are going to be attacked? Because this MAGA crowd is

0:03:19.737 --> 0:03:24.937
<v Speaker 1>really the most extreme political organization that's existed in American history.

0:03:24.857 --> 0:03:32.057
<v Speaker 1>There's so much just intellectual dumpster fire going on in

0:03:32.097 --> 0:03:34.977
<v Speaker 1>that one clip that we played you from the current

0:03:34.977 --> 0:03:39.177
<v Speaker 1>president United States. First of all, it's not MAGA extreme

0:03:39.417 --> 0:03:45.177
<v Speaker 1>to be opposed to Row the Wade, the pro life movement, Republicans,

0:03:45.217 --> 0:03:48.897
<v Speaker 1>conservatives have been opposed to Row v. Wade for fifty years.

0:03:49.497 --> 0:03:52.937
<v Speaker 1>There's absolutely nothing in fact, one of the core one

0:03:52.937 --> 0:03:56.457
<v Speaker 1>of the core tenants, one of the primary goals of

0:03:56.497 --> 0:04:00.377
<v Speaker 1>the conservative legal movement has been to finally give an

0:04:00.457 --> 0:04:04.737
<v Speaker 1>honest assessment of the constitutionality of the right to abortion

0:04:04.857 --> 0:04:09.617
<v Speaker 1>established in Row the Wade, because it's so obviously non

0:04:09.697 --> 0:04:12.897
<v Speaker 1>exist There is no right to abortion in the Constitution

0:04:12.937 --> 0:04:16.377
<v Speaker 1>which anybody can see, and there was certainly no implied

0:04:16.497 --> 0:04:19.897
<v Speaker 1>right to abortion either. And when you ask people about

0:04:19.897 --> 0:04:23.457
<v Speaker 1>this to try to even explain why they're so adamant

0:04:23.497 --> 0:04:26.057
<v Speaker 1>that this exists, you hear all these different explanations because

0:04:26.057 --> 0:04:27.617
<v Speaker 1>they don't even know. They're just making it up as

0:04:27.657 --> 0:04:31.697
<v Speaker 1>they go along. But you know the problem with listening

0:04:31.737 --> 0:04:33.657
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Biden for it. Remember he is technically a

0:04:33.737 --> 0:04:37.337
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and has been a member of the United States

0:04:37.337 --> 0:04:40.057
<v Speaker 1>Senate for decades, then was Vice president, now as president.

0:04:40.177 --> 0:04:43.777
<v Speaker 1>Has just been just pushed ahead by a Democrat party

0:04:43.897 --> 0:04:46.137
<v Speaker 1>that loves an empty suit with a big grin, which

0:04:46.137 --> 0:04:48.577
<v Speaker 1>is what Joe Biden is, and now one in cognitive decline.

0:04:49.017 --> 0:04:51.097
<v Speaker 1>But to be fair, not only is Joe Biden in

0:04:51.137 --> 0:04:54.177
<v Speaker 1>a state of cognitive decline. Even in his moments where

0:04:54.217 --> 0:04:56.817
<v Speaker 1>he seems pretty clear, you are reminded that his legal

0:04:56.817 --> 0:05:00.857
<v Speaker 1>analysis is what you would expect from somebody who has

0:05:00.897 --> 0:05:05.657
<v Speaker 1>an IQ that is at about room temperature. Listened to

0:05:05.737 --> 0:05:12.337
<v Speaker 1>his explanation here of well, the current constitution debate over abortion.

0:05:12.417 --> 0:05:18.057
<v Speaker 1>Watch As I said, when I when this his, I

0:05:18.097 --> 0:05:22.697
<v Speaker 1>was getting on the plane to go down to Alabama.

0:05:22.937 --> 0:05:25.697
<v Speaker 1>This is about a lot more than abortion. I hadn't

0:05:25.697 --> 0:05:29.217
<v Speaker 1>read the whole opinion at that time, but this reminds

0:05:29.257 --> 0:05:33.297
<v Speaker 1>me of the debate with Robert Borke. Borke believed the

0:05:33.377 --> 0:05:36.337
<v Speaker 1>only reason you had any inherent rights is because the

0:05:36.377 --> 0:05:38.537
<v Speaker 1>government gave him to you. If you go back and

0:05:38.577 --> 0:05:41.577
<v Speaker 1>look at the opening comments. But Biden, when I was

0:05:41.777 --> 0:05:44.897
<v Speaker 1>questioned him as chairman, I said, I believe I have

0:05:45.337 --> 0:05:47.777
<v Speaker 1>the rights that I have, not because the government gave

0:05:47.857 --> 0:05:51.537
<v Speaker 1>him to me, which you believe, but because I'm just

0:05:51.617 --> 0:05:56.417
<v Speaker 1>a child of God. I exist. So there's a natural

0:05:56.697 --> 0:05:59.897
<v Speaker 1>law right to abortion? Is Joe Biden make what is

0:05:59.937 --> 0:06:03.497
<v Speaker 1>he even? What does Joe Biden think he is arguing here?

0:06:03.577 --> 0:06:06.377
<v Speaker 1>Forget about what he's actually saying. What in that mind

0:06:06.817 --> 0:06:09.177
<v Speaker 1>as well as it continues to function with all the

0:06:09.217 --> 0:06:13.977
<v Speaker 1>cobwebs and the screeching of the mechanism as it just

0:06:14.457 --> 0:06:17.617
<v Speaker 1>grows more rust over time, what does he think he's saying?

0:06:18.137 --> 0:06:20.577
<v Speaker 1>Not even clear? It doesn't even matter it's just blather

0:06:21.137 --> 0:06:23.577
<v Speaker 1>to go on the blather heap of Well, the left

0:06:23.617 --> 0:06:25.577
<v Speaker 1>wants that the Democrats want this, so they should have it.

0:06:26.257 --> 0:06:30.377
<v Speaker 1>This is legally speaking, an indefensible position they've managed to

0:06:30.417 --> 0:06:32.537
<v Speaker 1>maintain for over fifty years because they say, shut up,

0:06:32.577 --> 0:06:35.017
<v Speaker 1>we're in charge. We've got what we wanted. Now it

0:06:35.017 --> 0:06:37.097
<v Speaker 1>can never change. Well, that's actually not how the system works.

0:06:37.977 --> 0:06:40.817
<v Speaker 1>But as I said, that's what they're planning right now,

0:06:40.857 --> 0:06:43.657
<v Speaker 1>just to shout down everybody and to even pressure a

0:06:43.697 --> 0:06:46.977
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justice into changing his or her opinion on

0:06:47.017 --> 0:06:49.777
<v Speaker 1>this one. That's the whole purpose of the leak of

0:06:49.777 --> 0:06:53.537
<v Speaker 1>the draft opinion. We all see it. And then there

0:06:53.537 --> 0:06:59.897
<v Speaker 1>are true morons out there. A Congressman Swallow Welton, among

0:06:59.937 --> 0:07:02.537
<v Speaker 1>the dumbest members of Congress, which is saying a lot

0:07:02.577 --> 0:07:04.817
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of dumbasses in the Congress.

0:07:05.257 --> 0:07:08.297
<v Speaker 1>Here he is saying that Republicans won't stop with banning abortion.

0:07:08.337 --> 0:07:11.377
<v Speaker 1>They want to ban interracial marriage. Do you want to

0:07:11.457 --> 0:07:15.777
<v Speaker 1>save that, well, then you should probably vote. What is

0:07:15.817 --> 0:07:19.457
<v Speaker 1>this idiot talking about. No one wants to ban interracial

0:07:19.497 --> 0:07:24.017
<v Speaker 1>marriage in the Republican party. This is just distraction, smear

0:07:24.097 --> 0:07:28.417
<v Speaker 1>tactics and lunacy, lunacy, But what else they gonna do

0:07:28.897 --> 0:07:34.417
<v Speaker 1>argue the indefensible proposition that abortion was implied in the Constitution.

0:07:34.497 --> 0:07:40.457
<v Speaker 1>Why Well, because reasons Jamie Raskin, another member of Congress,

0:07:40.497 --> 0:07:43.737
<v Speaker 1>If Alida's majority destroys the right to privacy, states could

0:07:43.817 --> 0:07:46.937
<v Speaker 1>jail women and doctors for abortion and contraception offenses. They

0:07:46.937 --> 0:07:50.737
<v Speaker 1>could also compel women to be sterilized for unfitness to reproduce,

0:07:51.217 --> 0:07:54.817
<v Speaker 1>as Virginia sterilized thousands in last century. So their argument

0:07:54.817 --> 0:07:57.737
<v Speaker 1>now seems to be I hate this Supreme Court decision.

0:07:58.297 --> 0:08:00.977
<v Speaker 1>Therefore I'm just going to make up that they're going

0:08:01.057 --> 0:08:03.537
<v Speaker 1>to do crazy things in the Supreme Court that no

0:08:03.577 --> 0:08:08.017
<v Speaker 1>one's arguing for because it will scare people. That seems

0:08:08.097 --> 0:08:12.497
<v Speaker 1>to be. Yes, there have been poor Supreme Court decisions

0:08:12.497 --> 0:08:15.497
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and then they were overturned. And what

0:08:15.657 --> 0:08:18.137
<v Speaker 1>they can't seem to figure out is that plan is

0:08:18.177 --> 0:08:21.457
<v Speaker 1>that planned parenthood be Casey and Roe v. Wade is

0:08:21.497 --> 0:08:24.097
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong side of the Constitution. It has now

0:08:24.137 --> 0:08:27.137
<v Speaker 1>been righted. So they don't seem to get it right.

0:08:27.177 --> 0:08:29.217
<v Speaker 1>They keep saying, oh my gosh, we could just do

0:08:29.257 --> 0:08:31.377
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Them say, so, wait, are they are

0:08:31.417 --> 0:08:34.577
<v Speaker 1>they plus a versus Ferguson advocate separate versus equal, or

0:08:34.577 --> 0:08:37.937
<v Speaker 1>are they Brown v. Board of Education, Equal and due

0:08:37.937 --> 0:08:41.897
<v Speaker 1>process for all, Equal rights for all. I'm just wondering,

0:08:42.057 --> 0:08:44.097
<v Speaker 1>is that where do they come down on this issue? Oh,

0:08:44.137 --> 0:08:48.737
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter, it's just scare tactic and planned parenthood

0:08:48.777 --> 0:08:52.857
<v Speaker 1>of course, which has been running abattoirs for infants for

0:08:53.177 --> 0:08:57.257
<v Speaker 1>decades now. It's disgusting. Here they are with the CEO saying,

0:08:57.257 --> 0:08:59.497
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, We're going to get all the rage out

0:08:59.537 --> 0:09:04.217
<v Speaker 1>there from particularly from women who go home to sad

0:09:04.217 --> 0:09:08.897
<v Speaker 1>houses that they're alone in with cat watch that when

0:09:08.937 --> 0:09:11.577
<v Speaker 1>they found out what was happening in Texas, they started

0:09:11.617 --> 0:09:14.817
<v Speaker 1>filling state houses in Florida, they started filling state houses

0:09:14.817 --> 0:09:17.377
<v Speaker 1>in other places because they know that the fight right

0:09:17.417 --> 0:09:20.017
<v Speaker 1>now is on the ground and in these states. And

0:09:20.057 --> 0:09:22.297
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to continue to capture that rage, and

0:09:22.377 --> 0:09:25.257
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to make sure that they understand

0:09:25.497 --> 0:09:29.657
<v Speaker 1>who is accountable right now. The last administrative at last

0:09:29.657 --> 0:09:35.817
<v Speaker 1>administration appointed three justices who are will be responsible for

0:09:35.977 --> 0:09:39.497
<v Speaker 1>us losing a constitutional right that we have held for

0:09:39.497 --> 0:09:44.617
<v Speaker 1>forty nine years because it was a lie. That right

0:09:44.817 --> 0:09:47.457
<v Speaker 1>was a lie all along well, I'm more on the

0:09:47.497 --> 0:09:50.657
<v Speaker 1>fallout from the league decision, with author and columnist David

0:09:50.697 --> 0:09:53.017
<v Speaker 1>Marcus coming up here in a moment, let's talk about

0:09:53.017 --> 0:09:56.297
<v Speaker 1>protecting your home. I'm not somebody who gets all freaked

0:09:56.297 --> 0:09:58.057
<v Speaker 1>out about things I don't have to, but when I

0:09:58.097 --> 0:10:00.577
<v Speaker 1>heard about home title this is really worried because it's

0:10:00.617 --> 0:10:03.017
<v Speaker 1>so easy for the bad guys to do this. Some

0:10:03.177 --> 0:10:07.097
<v Speaker 1>cyber thief forges your name off the title of your

0:10:07.097 --> 0:10:09.297
<v Speaker 1>home because your home title exists online. Then they take

0:10:09.297 --> 0:10:11.537
<v Speaker 1>out loans against your home and guess what, you don't

0:10:11.577 --> 0:10:14.057
<v Speaker 1>find out until the payment demands arrive or perhaps even

0:10:14.097 --> 0:10:16.697
<v Speaker 1>the viction notice. Well, can you need to protect yourself

0:10:16.737 --> 0:10:20.497
<v Speaker 1>normal identity? That programs don't work. You need home title lock.

0:10:21.017 --> 0:10:22.497
<v Speaker 1>All you have to do right now is go to

0:10:22.577 --> 0:10:25.897
<v Speaker 1>hometitlelock dot com and you can check and see if

0:10:25.897 --> 0:10:27.537
<v Speaker 1>you're a victim of this crime and don't even know it.

0:10:27.817 --> 0:10:30.657
<v Speaker 1>Go to home titlelock dot com again. That's home title

0:10:30.697 --> 0:10:33.737
<v Speaker 1>loock dot com. Protect your home today. Protect your title

0:10:33.977 --> 0:10:42.137
<v Speaker 1>with hometitle lock dot com. David Marcus up next, those

0:10:42.217 --> 0:10:46.177
<v Speaker 1>Republican leaders who are trying to weaponize the use of

0:10:46.217 --> 0:10:52.017
<v Speaker 1>the law against women. What we say, how dare they?

0:10:53.217 --> 0:10:55.537
<v Speaker 1>How dare they tell a woman what she can do

0:10:55.617 --> 0:11:00.377
<v Speaker 1>and cannot do with her own body? How dare they?

0:11:01.777 --> 0:11:04.977
<v Speaker 1>How dare they try to stop her from determining her

0:11:05.017 --> 0:11:11.537
<v Speaker 1>own future? How dare they try to deny women they

0:11:11.577 --> 0:11:18.217
<v Speaker 1>are rights and their freedoms. Vice President Kamala Harris expressing

0:11:18.257 --> 0:11:21.977
<v Speaker 1>outrage at the prospect of Americans losing the right to

0:11:22.857 --> 0:11:26.977
<v Speaker 1>kill the unborn or as Democrats called menstruating persons rights.

0:11:27.017 --> 0:11:32.657
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Supreme Court has seemingly prepared to correctly decide

0:11:32.777 --> 0:11:36.017
<v Speaker 1>that this was never a constitutional right in the first place.

0:11:36.217 --> 0:11:39.577
<v Speaker 1>We know the left is claiming the recently leaked Supreme

0:11:39.617 --> 0:11:43.177
<v Speaker 1>Court decision or would be decision is just the latest

0:11:43.177 --> 0:11:46.577
<v Speaker 1>evidence of extremism within the Republican Party, even though Conservatives

0:11:46.617 --> 0:11:50.537
<v Speaker 1>have been openly campaigning to overturn row for over fifty years.

0:11:50.897 --> 0:11:55.337
<v Speaker 1>Email Democratic lawmakers promising to introduce legislation to codify the

0:11:55.577 --> 0:11:58.697
<v Speaker 1>right to an abortion without limitation to federal law, positions

0:11:58.737 --> 0:12:02.337
<v Speaker 1>so extreme that it's been rejected by nearly every single

0:12:02.417 --> 0:12:05.457
<v Speaker 1>Western nation on the planet. Who are really the radicals here?

0:12:05.577 --> 0:12:07.737
<v Speaker 1>What I mean now is author and columist David Marcus.

0:12:07.817 --> 0:12:12.497
<v Speaker 1>David good to have you thanks, Bud. I have to

0:12:12.497 --> 0:12:16.097
<v Speaker 1>say one of the challenges here in this now, this

0:12:16.297 --> 0:12:19.977
<v Speaker 1>this sort of frenzy, in this moment of hysteria, is

0:12:20.017 --> 0:12:22.457
<v Speaker 1>that the people that claim that they're so certain that

0:12:22.497 --> 0:12:24.977
<v Speaker 1>they have the answers here on the left about why

0:12:25.017 --> 0:12:28.057
<v Speaker 1>abortion is so important and there are even say sacred

0:12:28.097 --> 0:12:31.137
<v Speaker 1>to them, have a whole variety of different arguments that

0:12:31.177 --> 0:12:33.337
<v Speaker 1>are offered up, that are offering even in contradiction to

0:12:33.377 --> 0:12:36.057
<v Speaker 1>the other arguments from their own side, like oh, no,

0:12:36.097 --> 0:12:39.857
<v Speaker 1>one's actually saying that a third trimester abortion would be okay,

0:12:40.377 --> 0:12:42.377
<v Speaker 1>what in fact that is what a lot of Democrats

0:12:42.577 --> 0:12:48.217
<v Speaker 1>an activists say. Oh yeah, I mean there are there

0:12:48.217 --> 0:12:53.657
<v Speaker 1>are activists who think that killing a baby after they've

0:12:53.657 --> 0:12:56.577
<v Speaker 1>already been born is something that ought to be on

0:12:56.657 --> 0:13:01.457
<v Speaker 1>the table. You know, Look, there's a huge shift in

0:13:02.217 --> 0:13:05.177
<v Speaker 1>the language of the Democratic Party over the last twenty

0:13:05.177 --> 0:13:08.337
<v Speaker 1>five years in regard to abortion. We don't hear safe

0:13:08.417 --> 0:13:12.017
<v Speaker 1>legal and rare anymore right that that was the go

0:13:12.177 --> 0:13:18.737
<v Speaker 1>to and safe legal and rare acknowledged that there was

0:13:18.777 --> 0:13:22.017
<v Speaker 1>a tragic loss of a human life when an abortion

0:13:22.097 --> 0:13:26.097
<v Speaker 1>took place, but it said, look, this is a nuanced situation. Today.

0:13:26.217 --> 0:13:30.177
<v Speaker 1>We're in the age of celebrate your abortion, you know,

0:13:30.257 --> 0:13:34.377
<v Speaker 1>go to brunch with your friends, get a cake. You know. Yeah,

0:13:34.737 --> 0:13:38.537
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sad and disturbing, but it's it's not new buck,

0:13:38.617 --> 0:13:41.377
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've been I think kat Apollock wrote the

0:13:41.417 --> 0:13:44.657
<v Speaker 1>book pro in twenty fourteen. I might be off on

0:13:44.697 --> 0:13:47.337
<v Speaker 1>that it's something like that, but that really announced this

0:13:47.617 --> 0:13:50.857
<v Speaker 1>of like, this is not something that we apologize for anymore.

0:13:50.937 --> 0:13:55.097
<v Speaker 1>This is something that we think is an unreconstructed good.

0:13:56.897 --> 0:13:59.337
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Powers, who I believe is a Yeah, she's a

0:13:59.417 --> 0:14:05.577
<v Speaker 1>Democrat strategist whatever that means at CNN. Yes, same idea

0:14:05.857 --> 0:14:08.217
<v Speaker 1>I said. If you think abortion is wrong, don't get

0:14:08.217 --> 0:14:10.697
<v Speaker 1>an abortion. It's not okay to impose is your religious

0:14:10.777 --> 0:14:13.857
<v Speaker 1>views on others. Why should a Jew, a Muslim, etc.

0:14:14.497 --> 0:14:17.057
<v Speaker 1>Have to live according to your interpretation of the Bible.

0:14:17.417 --> 0:14:19.137
<v Speaker 1>If you don't get this, please don't ever use the

0:14:19.137 --> 0:14:22.497
<v Speaker 1>phrase religious freedom again. And it's amazing how many people

0:14:22.497 --> 0:14:24.857
<v Speaker 1>in public life that are supposed to understand politics and

0:14:24.897 --> 0:14:27.937
<v Speaker 1>at some level constitutional law, even if they're not actually lawyers,

0:14:28.657 --> 0:14:30.577
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what the hell they're talking about. I mean,

0:14:30.617 --> 0:14:34.017
<v Speaker 1>just just blather on. They clearly never read the draft

0:14:34.057 --> 0:14:37.737
<v Speaker 1>decision that you know, Alito was writing for the five

0:14:38.337 --> 0:14:40.937
<v Speaker 1>justices who we believe are going to be voting to

0:14:41.017 --> 0:14:44.417
<v Speaker 1>over term. This hasn't happened yet. There's so much ignorance

0:14:44.457 --> 0:14:46.577
<v Speaker 1>from people that are supposed to know, and I find

0:14:46.617 --> 0:14:52.257
<v Speaker 1>that troubling too, David. Yeah, I mean, murders illegal, you know,

0:14:52.457 --> 0:14:55.337
<v Speaker 1>and in the Ten Commandments that says thou shalt not kill.

0:14:55.497 --> 0:15:01.257
<v Speaker 1>That's not some conflict of church and state. It's absurd.

0:15:01.297 --> 0:15:04.497
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, yes, there are religious reasons why people

0:15:04.497 --> 0:15:08.417
<v Speaker 1>oppose abortion. There are also very strong scientific reasons, you know,

0:15:08.497 --> 0:15:11.937
<v Speaker 1>including the fact that these babies can feel pain is

0:15:11.977 --> 0:15:18.497
<v Speaker 1>they're being ripped apart. So yeah, it's it's I think

0:15:18.537 --> 0:15:20.897
<v Speaker 1>the response is troubling, and I think that we've reached

0:15:20.897 --> 0:15:25.457
<v Speaker 1>a point where, you know, I wrote an article two

0:15:25.497 --> 0:15:27.417
<v Speaker 1>years ago for The Federalist and I said, this is

0:15:27.457 --> 0:15:30.697
<v Speaker 1>war now. And I do think it's war. I think

0:15:30.777 --> 0:15:34.657
<v Speaker 1>either you believe that killing babies is bad or you

0:15:34.697 --> 0:15:38.097
<v Speaker 1>don't believe the killing babies is bad. I think all

0:15:38.097 --> 0:15:42.217
<v Speaker 1>the nuance has been lost out of this conversation. And

0:15:42.297 --> 0:15:46.297
<v Speaker 1>then of course you hear some of the some of

0:15:46.297 --> 0:15:49.097
<v Speaker 1>the I guess constitutional or legal analysis that's out there.

0:15:49.257 --> 0:15:52.897
<v Speaker 1>I get here. Here's an example. MSNBC's Ellie Misstall on

0:15:53.737 --> 0:15:56.817
<v Speaker 1>how the reason the Founding Fathers I don't know if

0:15:56.817 --> 0:15:58.697
<v Speaker 1>you know this, David. The reason the Founding Fathers didn't

0:15:58.737 --> 0:16:04.697
<v Speaker 1>write in an abortion constitutional rights which clearly does not exist,

0:16:04.697 --> 0:16:06.377
<v Speaker 1>but they pretended it did. But anyway, the reason they

0:16:06.377 --> 0:16:08.857
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it is because they're they're bad people. Watch

0:16:09.137 --> 0:16:11.897
<v Speaker 1>Alito's fundament. It's a legal reasoning is that abortion is

0:16:11.937 --> 0:16:14.177
<v Speaker 1>not a fundamental right because it doesn't go back to

0:16:14.217 --> 0:16:17.617
<v Speaker 1>the Founding because the Founding Fathers didn't recognize abortion as

0:16:17.617 --> 0:16:20.057
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental right. And he's right about that. The Founding

0:16:20.057 --> 0:16:23.137
<v Speaker 1>Fathers didn't recognize abortion as a fundamental right because the

0:16:23.177 --> 0:16:27.897
<v Speaker 1>Founding Fathers were racist, misogynist jerk faces who didn't believe

0:16:28.137 --> 0:16:32.297
<v Speaker 1>that women had any rights at all. I mean, there

0:16:32.417 --> 0:16:35.577
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Wait, knew, I mean, I I what

0:16:35.617 --> 0:16:39.657
<v Speaker 1>do you mean? I knew that the Founding Fathers are racist,

0:16:39.657 --> 0:16:42.657
<v Speaker 1>misogynist jerk faces. You didn't know that. We all know

0:16:42.737 --> 0:16:45.457
<v Speaker 1>that at this point, right, I mean, that's the that's

0:16:45.897 --> 0:16:49.657
<v Speaker 1>but but but that really but that speaks to the point, right, So, uh,

0:16:50.097 --> 0:16:54.497
<v Speaker 1>the Founders were racist, misogynist jerk faces. I'm sure I'm

0:16:54.737 --> 0:16:58.337
<v Speaker 1>that as well. Um, and so now we have to

0:16:58.377 --> 0:17:04.777
<v Speaker 1>abandon everything that they did. Uh, you know, David, somehow

0:17:05.777 --> 0:17:08.577
<v Speaker 1>there was the rowe created the belief that the Founding

0:17:08.617 --> 0:17:13.777
<v Speaker 1>Fathers actually did create somehow a constitutional right. It was

0:17:13.777 --> 0:17:15.897
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional right. They didn't argue it was a natural

0:17:15.977 --> 0:17:19.337
<v Speaker 1>law right. It was a constitutional right to abortion. So

0:17:19.417 --> 0:17:21.817
<v Speaker 1>it used to be the Founding Fathers were geniuses beyond

0:17:21.897 --> 0:17:23.817
<v Speaker 1>the likes of which we could have never They essentially

0:17:23.817 --> 0:17:25.457
<v Speaker 1>had a time machine. They could go in the future

0:17:25.457 --> 0:17:27.457
<v Speaker 1>and see that this procedure would happen, and they wrote

0:17:27.457 --> 0:17:29.697
<v Speaker 1>it into the Constitution. Now that they lose it though

0:17:30.577 --> 0:17:34.897
<v Speaker 1>their their jerk faces, that's what I mean. Look, look, look, look,

0:17:35.297 --> 0:17:37.337
<v Speaker 1>I don't know have you ever seen a picture of

0:17:37.377 --> 0:17:42.177
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court that decided row. Yeah, because it's not

0:17:42.297 --> 0:17:46.617
<v Speaker 1>a Banatton had my friend, you know, it's seven seven

0:17:46.617 --> 0:17:50.097
<v Speaker 1>white guys were allowed to come up with the abortion

0:17:50.617 --> 0:17:55.617
<v Speaker 1>law initially, right, that's how. Yeah, that was fine. That

0:17:55.737 --> 0:17:58.337
<v Speaker 1>was totally okay for those seven white guys to express

0:17:58.377 --> 0:18:02.737
<v Speaker 1>their opinion on rob wage. Do you think it's fair

0:18:02.777 --> 0:18:04.697
<v Speaker 1>to say now because I put this out there and

0:18:04.777 --> 0:18:06.737
<v Speaker 1>I know this really annoys people on the left. But

0:18:06.737 --> 0:18:08.617
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually true. I think that the left

0:18:08.657 --> 0:18:11.697
<v Speaker 1>is a political ideology is just turned into a lot

0:18:11.737 --> 0:18:15.697
<v Speaker 1>of verbal smoke screens and winding around. I want what

0:18:15.777 --> 0:18:19.377
<v Speaker 1>I want, and the system, politics, the law, whatever it is,

0:18:19.497 --> 0:18:22.697
<v Speaker 1>has to give me what I want or else throw

0:18:22.737 --> 0:18:25.537
<v Speaker 1>the whole system over. No, it's exactly right. You know,

0:18:25.657 --> 0:18:29.377
<v Speaker 1>I have a piece up at Fox at Fox News today,

0:18:30.217 --> 0:18:33.057
<v Speaker 1>you know where I talk about all these baseless accusations

0:18:33.097 --> 0:18:37.177
<v Speaker 1>of racism, right, Elon Musk's a racist and Tucker Carlson's

0:18:37.177 --> 0:18:41.737
<v Speaker 1>a racist. And what's most insidious about this it is

0:18:41.817 --> 0:18:44.697
<v Speaker 1>not the fact that these are baseless, ridiculous claims, even

0:18:44.737 --> 0:18:47.817
<v Speaker 1>though they are. What's most insidious is that the message

0:18:47.817 --> 0:18:51.297
<v Speaker 1>the left sends is not only does their racism allow

0:18:51.377 --> 0:18:55.177
<v Speaker 1>you to not engage with their ideas, it compels you

0:18:55.257 --> 0:18:59.977
<v Speaker 1>to do so. To engage with the ideas of you

0:19:00.337 --> 0:19:03.377
<v Speaker 1>or me or Tucker or Elon are these people, is

0:19:03.377 --> 0:19:08.497
<v Speaker 1>to legitimize systemic racism. And so you just can't do it.

0:19:08.497 --> 0:19:11.577
<v Speaker 1>It's the death of discord and it's the death of democracy.

0:19:11.937 --> 0:19:15.577
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that's what we're seeing. Eli Mistell isn't

0:19:15.617 --> 0:19:19.377
<v Speaker 1>making serious arguments. We know he's not. What I don't

0:19:19.457 --> 0:19:23.777
<v Speaker 1>know is whether this is a cynical political tactic or

0:19:23.817 --> 0:19:27.577
<v Speaker 1>whether this is something these people actually believe. But either way,

0:19:27.617 --> 0:19:30.697
<v Speaker 1>the result is the same, and it's really bad. I

0:19:30.697 --> 0:19:34.177
<v Speaker 1>always going to see you, David. Appreciate the perspective. Thanks Buck.

0:19:36.217 --> 0:19:40.177
<v Speaker 1>Conservative author jd. Vance defeated establishment candidate Josh Mandel and

0:19:40.257 --> 0:19:44.137
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's GOP Senate primary race in Ohio. The last night's

0:19:44.137 --> 0:19:46.937
<v Speaker 1>biggest winner former President Donald Trump. We'll have more on

0:19:46.977 --> 0:19:49.257
<v Speaker 1>that with the CEO of American Majority, Ned Ryan. We

0:19:49.297 --> 0:19:51.337
<v Speaker 1>come back first. I want to talk to you about

0:19:51.337 --> 0:19:53.697
<v Speaker 1>protecting your online data. A lot of companies promise your

0:19:53.697 --> 0:19:56.457
<v Speaker 1>privacy is guaranteed. We know that's not true. That's why

0:19:56.497 --> 0:19:59.377
<v Speaker 1>you need a new privacy and cybersecurity application tool called

0:19:59.417 --> 0:20:03.977
<v Speaker 1>Secure spelled SEK. You are securities using proprietary encryption and

0:20:04.057 --> 0:20:07.297
<v Speaker 1>offering secure instant messaging and email. Let's secure all of

0:20:07.297 --> 0:20:10.657
<v Speaker 1>your communications based on servers and data centers hosted Switzerland

0:20:10.777 --> 0:20:13.577
<v Speaker 1>without using any of the big tech platforms. Privacy is

0:20:13.617 --> 0:20:16.617
<v Speaker 1>a big issue now. Without real security, people can read

0:20:16.617 --> 0:20:20.097
<v Speaker 1>your emails, messages, even your bank information. Secure will never

0:20:20.137 --> 0:20:22.417
<v Speaker 1>mind your data and never ask for your phone number.

0:20:22.617 --> 0:20:24.937
<v Speaker 1>You can send emails to your doctor, banker, lawyer, or

0:20:24.977 --> 0:20:28.057
<v Speaker 1>anyone with total confidence you're not being spied on by

0:20:28.097 --> 0:20:31.137
<v Speaker 1>your internet provider or big tech. Secure is your solution

0:20:31.177 --> 0:20:33.177
<v Speaker 1>to stop the constant theft of your digital identity. It

0:20:33.177 --> 0:20:36.057
<v Speaker 1>costs only five dollars for the messenger only ten dollars

0:20:36.057 --> 0:20:38.657
<v Speaker 1>for the messenger and email combination package. Go to secure

0:20:38.737 --> 0:20:42.177
<v Speaker 1>dot com and take back your privacy today. That's sekure

0:20:42.337 --> 0:20:45.097
<v Speaker 1>dot com and use promo code buck for twenty five

0:20:45.137 --> 0:20:54.337
<v Speaker 1>percent off. Ned Ryan stops by in a moment, Big

0:20:54.457 --> 0:20:58.257
<v Speaker 1>Night and Ohio as GOP senate candidate JD. Vance won

0:20:58.417 --> 0:21:02.177
<v Speaker 1>convincingly in the state primary against the strongest opponent, Josh Mandel.

0:21:02.817 --> 0:21:06.297
<v Speaker 1>Vance vaulted to the lead in this primary after winning

0:21:06.337 --> 0:21:09.617
<v Speaker 1>former President Donald Trump's endorsement last month, which came as

0:21:09.617 --> 0:21:11.657
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to many since Vans not too long ago

0:21:12.057 --> 0:21:15.737
<v Speaker 1>was an outspoken critic of both Trump and the Trump agenda,

0:21:15.897 --> 0:21:18.337
<v Speaker 1>but last night he had nothing but praise for Trump

0:21:18.417 --> 0:21:21.577
<v Speaker 1>during his victories. Phy, I have absolutely got to think

0:21:22.337 --> 0:21:26.297
<v Speaker 1>the forty five the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump,

0:21:26.377 --> 0:21:29.337
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen. A lot of the fake news media

0:21:29.377 --> 0:21:31.937
<v Speaker 1>out there, and there are some good ones in the back.

0:21:31.977 --> 0:21:35.817
<v Speaker 1>There there's some bad ones too, Let's be honest. But

0:21:35.977 --> 0:21:39.497
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to write a story that this campaign would

0:21:39.537 --> 0:21:43.497
<v Speaker 1>be the death of Donald Trump's America First Agenda, Ladies

0:21:43.497 --> 0:21:46.737
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, it ain't the death of the America First Agenda.

0:21:49.297 --> 0:21:51.577
<v Speaker 1>Is one of the first big primary races in the books.

0:21:51.617 --> 0:21:53.097
<v Speaker 1>Here is this giving us a hint of what is

0:21:53.097 --> 0:21:55.057
<v Speaker 1>going to unfold in the months ahead and leading into

0:21:55.097 --> 0:21:57.857
<v Speaker 1>these midterms. Let's talk to the man who's got answers

0:21:57.897 --> 0:22:00.057
<v Speaker 1>on this and a lot of things. CEO of American

0:22:00.137 --> 0:22:05.297
<v Speaker 1>Majority Ned Ryan Ned. Good to see you, buddy, a book.

0:22:06.097 --> 0:22:08.737
<v Speaker 1>So big win for Jady Vans, but big win in

0:22:08.737 --> 0:22:12.697
<v Speaker 1>a sense for Donald Trump too. Tell us about it. Yeah,

0:22:12.817 --> 0:22:15.497
<v Speaker 1>last night was incredible for Trump. He went twenty two

0:22:15.537 --> 0:22:18.697
<v Speaker 1>and oh in the Indiana and Ohio primaries. Of course,

0:22:18.697 --> 0:22:20.577
<v Speaker 1>the one that was getting all the attention on the

0:22:20.657 --> 0:22:25.337
<v Speaker 1>national front was the Ohio Republican Ohio Senate primary, in

0:22:25.377 --> 0:22:28.457
<v Speaker 1>which it was JD. Vance and Josh Mandel and five

0:22:28.577 --> 0:22:32.337
<v Speaker 1>or six other candidates. Pretty interesting to see the dynamics

0:22:32.377 --> 0:22:35.457
<v Speaker 1>playout book over the last two and a half weeks

0:22:35.457 --> 0:22:38.577
<v Speaker 1>called eighteen Days, in which you know, JD got the

0:22:38.657 --> 0:22:41.977
<v Speaker 1>endorsement on April fifteenth. My only quibble was that that

0:22:42.177 --> 0:22:45.297
<v Speaker 1>I wish it had happened about thirty days earlier. JD

0:22:45.457 --> 0:22:49.337
<v Speaker 1>gets the endorsement Club for Growth doubles down on their

0:22:49.337 --> 0:22:52.017
<v Speaker 1>backing of Josh Mandel. But a lot of people don't

0:22:52.057 --> 0:22:53.857
<v Speaker 1>know is that over the last twelve days or so,

0:22:53.977 --> 0:22:56.217
<v Speaker 1>Club for Growth spent three to four million on television

0:22:56.257 --> 0:23:01.577
<v Speaker 1>ads in defiance of Trump endorsement. Trump also doubled down. Obviously,

0:23:01.657 --> 0:23:05.017
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump Junior doubled down, was in Ohio working very

0:23:05.057 --> 0:23:08.337
<v Speaker 1>hard on behalf of JD vance. I mean this shows

0:23:08.337 --> 0:23:12.897
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is still the kingmaker in Republican primaries, despite

0:23:12.937 --> 0:23:15.577
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Club for Growth spent all that money

0:23:15.617 --> 0:23:18.337
<v Speaker 1>against JD in the last call it two weeks, But

0:23:18.417 --> 0:23:20.697
<v Speaker 1>it was about thirty million that was spent on behalf

0:23:20.697 --> 0:23:23.657
<v Speaker 1>of Josh Mandel or by Josh to actually try and

0:23:23.657 --> 0:23:27.697
<v Speaker 1>win this nomination, outspending JD by best I can dell

0:23:27.817 --> 0:23:30.617
<v Speaker 1>by about a two to one margin. So pretty incredible

0:23:30.617 --> 0:23:33.337
<v Speaker 1>when you realize there was fourteen points made up over

0:23:33.377 --> 0:23:36.657
<v Speaker 1>the last eighteen days by JD from the endorsement until

0:23:36.697 --> 0:23:39.377
<v Speaker 1>his victory last night, he was down six points. Got

0:23:39.417 --> 0:23:42.457
<v Speaker 1>the endorsement wins by just over eight last night, and

0:23:42.497 --> 0:23:45.417
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty impressive what Trump is able to do in

0:23:45.457 --> 0:23:49.737
<v Speaker 1>these Republican primaries. Here is the percentage breakdown you just

0:23:49.817 --> 0:23:53.057
<v Speaker 1>kind of alluded to it there. Ned jd Vance got

0:23:53.097 --> 0:23:55.817
<v Speaker 1>thirty two percent of the Ohio Senate primary vote and

0:23:56.057 --> 0:23:59.177
<v Speaker 1>Josh Mendel twenty three percent, So not only a win,

0:23:59.297 --> 0:24:01.897
<v Speaker 1>but a pretty considerable margin. Here it is, you said,

0:24:02.097 --> 0:24:04.417
<v Speaker 1>a flip of what had seemed to be the case

0:24:04.537 --> 0:24:07.497
<v Speaker 1>not long ago based on the polling. With that in mind,

0:24:07.537 --> 0:24:10.337
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now the most important thing is obviously with

0:24:10.457 --> 0:24:12.937
<v Speaker 1>a very I mean, I think it's gonna be. And

0:24:12.977 --> 0:24:16.497
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually curious what your predictions are for how we're

0:24:16.537 --> 0:24:19.977
<v Speaker 1>looking in general for GOP control of the Senate. But

0:24:20.137 --> 0:24:23.257
<v Speaker 1>Tim Ryan on the Democrat side, he's gonna be. He

0:24:23.457 --> 0:24:26.057
<v Speaker 1>is their nominee, and he took a little shot Advance

0:24:26.177 --> 0:24:30.297
<v Speaker 1>last night. Watch this. The work is just beginning, The

0:24:30.337 --> 0:24:34.457
<v Speaker 1>fight is just beginning. We're gonna heal the country, heel

0:24:34.537 --> 0:24:38.657
<v Speaker 1>Ohio and in turn, heal the United States of America.

0:24:38.817 --> 0:24:42.977
<v Speaker 1>I will promise you victory. Let's go, let's make this happen.

0:24:43.297 --> 0:24:48.097
<v Speaker 1>Let's get this seed now. Obviously you and I are Republicans,

0:24:48.097 --> 0:24:50.897
<v Speaker 1>were conservatives, so we're rooting for Vance here. But how

0:24:50.937 --> 0:24:52.817
<v Speaker 1>do you think, I mean, if you're just giving me

0:24:52.857 --> 0:24:55.857
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the pre the pre fight highlights here

0:24:55.977 --> 0:24:59.497
<v Speaker 1>or rather prefight analysis, pardon me, not highlights, tell me

0:24:59.697 --> 0:25:03.817
<v Speaker 1>how you think he stacks up against Vance. He's gonna

0:25:03.817 --> 0:25:05.937
<v Speaker 1>get crushed. I mean, this is a state that Trump

0:25:05.977 --> 0:25:08.617
<v Speaker 1>won by eight points both times in twenty sixteen and

0:25:08.657 --> 0:25:11.737
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, and tack onto it a year like twenty

0:25:11.777 --> 0:25:15.057
<v Speaker 1>twenty two in which you have a deeply unpopular Democratic

0:25:15.137 --> 0:25:18.297
<v Speaker 1>president in the White House, in which in platitions out

0:25:18.337 --> 0:25:20.977
<v Speaker 1>of control, and you're telling me that you think Tim

0:25:21.057 --> 0:25:23.857
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's going to be competitive in a state like Ohio, Buck,

0:25:23.937 --> 0:25:25.897
<v Speaker 1>I would think is probably going to be seven eight point.

0:25:25.897 --> 0:25:29.337
<v Speaker 1>When for JD, I said publicly in an op ed

0:25:29.457 --> 0:25:31.537
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago, and which I said, first of all,

0:25:31.617 --> 0:25:34.777
<v Speaker 1>is a great endorsement by Trump or j D. Because

0:25:34.777 --> 0:25:37.497
<v Speaker 1>I believe in Road to Damascus a fifth piece, did

0:25:37.577 --> 0:25:40.777
<v Speaker 1>j D sayson some ridiculous stuff six years ago? Yeah,

0:25:40.817 --> 0:25:43.617
<v Speaker 1>and we go through it actually multiple times, and which

0:25:43.657 --> 0:25:45.497
<v Speaker 1>I said, you better double down on the America first

0:25:45.537 --> 0:25:47.297
<v Speaker 1>and go for it. That all to say in this

0:25:47.377 --> 0:25:50.137
<v Speaker 1>ot ed I said, if whoever wins the primary, Republican

0:25:50.217 --> 0:25:53.777
<v Speaker 1>primarily is on the path to almost assuredly winning the

0:25:53.857 --> 0:25:56.417
<v Speaker 1>general election because of the dynamics of Ohio, because of

0:25:56.417 --> 0:25:59.617
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics of twenty twenty two, and further that point, Buck,

0:26:00.217 --> 0:26:02.897
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got an excellent shot in picking up

0:26:02.937 --> 0:26:07.177
<v Speaker 1>seats in Arizona. In Georgia, there's breaking news that the

0:26:07.257 --> 0:26:10.017
<v Speaker 1>Nevada and Nevada the Police Order of Police have switched

0:26:10.057 --> 0:26:13.457
<v Speaker 1>their endorsement of now endorse a Republican candidate Adam Laxalt's

0:26:13.977 --> 0:26:16.377
<v Speaker 1>look at New Hampshire as well. I think we're gonna

0:26:16.417 --> 0:26:18.897
<v Speaker 1>hold with Ron Johnson in Wisconsin. So I wouldn't be

0:26:18.937 --> 0:26:22.177
<v Speaker 1>surprised if we have a called breta four seat pickup

0:26:22.497 --> 0:26:25.777
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum in the US Senate this fall. Now

0:26:25.777 --> 0:26:30.857
<v Speaker 1>we've got the PA Pennsylvania Senate primary coming up here shortly.

0:26:31.577 --> 0:26:35.577
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Oz is running. Who is the Trump endorsed candidate there,

0:26:35.617 --> 0:26:38.657
<v Speaker 1>I mean doctor Oz, people right who doctor Ozzes? And

0:26:38.737 --> 0:26:42.297
<v Speaker 1>he's running against McCormick, who was married to Dina Powell

0:26:42.337 --> 0:26:45.337
<v Speaker 1>worked in the Trump White House. He's married to Dina Powell.

0:26:45.577 --> 0:26:48.577
<v Speaker 1>He's a billionaire hedge fund guy. First of all, how

0:26:48.577 --> 0:26:51.377
<v Speaker 1>do you think this shakes out? And why did Oz

0:26:52.257 --> 0:26:57.097
<v Speaker 1>get the endorsement over McCormick in your mind from Trump? Well,

0:26:57.377 --> 0:26:59.577
<v Speaker 1>I was actually talking with Trump about a month ago

0:26:59.617 --> 0:27:01.697
<v Speaker 1>through all the Center raised endorsements, and he asked me

0:27:01.737 --> 0:27:04.777
<v Speaker 1>about Pennsylvania, and I said, very bluntly, I hate him all.

0:27:05.417 --> 0:27:07.777
<v Speaker 1>And the next week, you know, he endorses Oz and

0:27:07.817 --> 0:27:11.337
<v Speaker 1>I completely understood why he endorsed Oz over McCormick. First

0:27:11.337 --> 0:27:13.897
<v Speaker 1>of all, we actually we put a posit on Ned

0:27:13.937 --> 0:27:15.937
<v Speaker 1>for once, just because we actually have that endorsement. Want

0:27:15.977 --> 0:27:18.137
<v Speaker 1>to have you react to it for one sec. Here, play, guys,

0:27:18.657 --> 0:27:24.057
<v Speaker 1>I endorsed another person today, doctor Oz in PENNSYLVANIAA doctor Oz,

0:27:25.777 --> 0:27:30.857
<v Speaker 1>great guy, a good man's good men Harvid educated, tremendous,

0:27:30.897 --> 0:27:33.417
<v Speaker 1>tremendous career, and they liked him for a long time.

0:27:33.497 --> 0:27:35.457
<v Speaker 1>That's like a pole, you know, when you're in television

0:27:35.497 --> 0:27:38.137
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen years, that's like a pole that means people

0:27:38.217 --> 0:27:42.057
<v Speaker 1>like you. But he's a he's a great guy. Sorry, Ned,

0:27:42.097 --> 0:27:43.817
<v Speaker 1>as you were saying, we want to let everyone see

0:27:43.817 --> 0:27:47.217
<v Speaker 1>the endorsement. There, you get no just talking with Trump

0:27:47.257 --> 0:27:50.377
<v Speaker 1>about McCormick versus Os. First of all, you have political cloud.

0:27:50.377 --> 0:27:52.057
<v Speaker 1>If you're Trump, you want to use it. There's only

0:27:52.057 --> 0:27:56.137
<v Speaker 1>two legitimate candidates in that primary. It's Oza McCormick. McCormick

0:27:56.257 --> 0:27:58.617
<v Speaker 1>is in, you know, literally in bed with the Chinese

0:27:58.657 --> 0:28:01.737
<v Speaker 1>communists in a very direct way over the last thirteen

0:28:01.777 --> 0:28:05.817
<v Speaker 1>years with alls investments through his OZ has actually been

0:28:05.897 --> 0:28:09.497
<v Speaker 1>extremely helpful to Trump. Trump is very loyal to OZ

0:28:09.537 --> 0:28:12.257
<v Speaker 1>because of especially in twenty sixteen when people were questioning

0:28:12.257 --> 0:28:14.777
<v Speaker 1>Trump's health, Oz adam on his TV show and said,

0:28:14.777 --> 0:28:17.697
<v Speaker 1>You're a healthy as anybody and should absolutely run for president.

0:28:17.777 --> 0:28:20.417
<v Speaker 1>So there's been a relationship in which OZ has been helpful.

0:28:20.977 --> 0:28:24.057
<v Speaker 1>Trump has been loyal, OZ has been loyal. McCormick is

0:28:24.097 --> 0:28:26.817
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, very bad on one of the most important

0:28:26.817 --> 0:28:29.017
<v Speaker 1>issues for Trump. And tack on top of that the

0:28:29.097 --> 0:28:32.497
<v Speaker 1>person that you just mentioned, Buck Dena Powell. I told people,

0:28:32.537 --> 0:28:34.977
<v Speaker 1>if nothing else, the fact that Dave McCormick is married

0:28:34.977 --> 0:28:38.577
<v Speaker 1>to Dena Powell, that alone is disqualifying for any endorsement

0:28:38.617 --> 0:28:44.017
<v Speaker 1>from Donald Trump. Wow. Wow, why ned? I gotta why explain?

0:28:44.097 --> 0:28:45.857
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I you know more about this than I do.

0:28:47.937 --> 0:28:52.537
<v Speaker 1>When you want to talk about a globalist with really

0:28:52.657 --> 0:28:57.857
<v Speaker 1>truly antagonistic towards an America First agenda. You know, the

0:28:57.897 --> 0:29:00.377
<v Speaker 1>crap cake that is Dave McCormick. The icing on top

0:29:00.417 --> 0:29:03.017
<v Speaker 1>of that is Dena Powell. And I told Trump, I said,

0:29:03.057 --> 0:29:05.017
<v Speaker 1>you know, sir, I have to tell you is one

0:29:05.017 --> 0:29:07.137
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest question marks in my mind. How she

0:29:07.297 --> 0:29:09.977
<v Speaker 1>ever made it into your White House, because I will

0:29:10.137 --> 0:29:13.697
<v Speaker 1>leaves she's deeply antagonistic towards an America First agenda. Not

0:29:13.777 --> 0:29:17.937
<v Speaker 1>a good person married to Dave McCormick. And that alone,

0:29:17.977 --> 0:29:19.337
<v Speaker 1>to me, if you talk to a lot of the

0:29:19.337 --> 0:29:21.857
<v Speaker 1>America First types who are aware of this, Dina Pal's

0:29:21.857 --> 0:29:26.737
<v Speaker 1>relationship is disqualifying. So all of these things add up,

0:29:26.977 --> 0:29:30.417
<v Speaker 1>and the Trump endorsement to me makes sense. Again, Howard repeats,

0:29:30.737 --> 0:29:33.057
<v Speaker 1>I don't like anybody in the Pennsylvania sent it, but

0:29:33.137 --> 0:29:34.817
<v Speaker 1>I hope for Trump's sake, and I think it was.

0:29:35.017 --> 0:29:37.177
<v Speaker 1>It was a hard endorsement, but he did it, and

0:29:37.217 --> 0:29:39.977
<v Speaker 1>I hope that it success. Yeah. And Hattt by the way,

0:29:40.017 --> 0:29:42.297
<v Speaker 1>as well, to a Trump backed candidate and friend of

0:29:42.337 --> 0:29:44.937
<v Speaker 1>the show, Madison Jasiato Gilbert, who you and I both know.

0:29:45.017 --> 0:29:48.977
<v Speaker 1>She won her Parties primary in Ohio's thirteenth congressional district.

0:29:49.017 --> 0:29:52.177
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to have Madison on ned. Always appreciate

0:29:52.217 --> 0:29:53.737
<v Speaker 1>you coming down and tell us what's what man, You

0:29:53.817 --> 0:29:59.657
<v Speaker 1>come back soon. Okay, sounds good, Thanks Bucking. A frustrated

0:29:59.697 --> 0:30:02.737
<v Speaker 1>Russian military continues to face strong resistance from the Armed

0:30:02.737 --> 0:30:05.857
<v Speaker 1>forces of Ukraine, but Western officials are warning that President

0:30:05.937 --> 0:30:08.897
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin might be planning an official declaration of war

0:30:08.977 --> 0:30:11.617
<v Speaker 1>in the coming days. We'll have more on what that

0:30:11.657 --> 0:30:15.457
<v Speaker 1>could mean for the conflict. From the Foundation of Defensive

0:30:15.457 --> 0:30:17.857
<v Speaker 1>Democracy is Bill Rogeo. Right now, I want to tell

0:30:17.897 --> 0:30:19.377
<v Speaker 1>you about the newest sponsor to hold the line, this

0:30:19.457 --> 0:30:22.137
<v Speaker 1>Silencer Shop. I'm a big supporter of the Second Amendment.

0:30:22.137 --> 0:30:24.817
<v Speaker 1>For many gun owners, using a suppressor is so important.

0:30:24.817 --> 0:30:28.537
<v Speaker 1>They protect your hearing, they improve your accuracy by minimizing recoil.

0:30:28.697 --> 0:30:30.977
<v Speaker 1>Suppressors are one hundred percent legal and forty three states,

0:30:31.017 --> 0:30:33.337
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to practice safe, accurate shooting, the

0:30:33.417 --> 0:30:35.857
<v Speaker 1>best way to get your suppressor is through the Silencer Shop.

0:30:36.177 --> 0:30:38.337
<v Speaker 1>They have variety of suppressors starting just three hundred and

0:30:38.377 --> 0:30:41.377
<v Speaker 1>sixty five dollars. My friends at Silencershop are the industry

0:30:41.417 --> 0:30:44.417
<v Speaker 1>leaders in suppressors. They're a Texas based company that excel

0:30:44.497 --> 0:30:47.857
<v Speaker 1>at customer service. Each phone call, email, direct message, or

0:30:47.937 --> 0:30:50.617
<v Speaker 1>comment is answered promptly and they treat you like family.

0:30:50.897 --> 0:30:53.537
<v Speaker 1>Customer service reviews are awesome. Go check them out on

0:30:53.577 --> 0:30:56.017
<v Speaker 1>trust Pilot. Silencershop has an average or four point nine

0:30:56.057 --> 0:30:58.817
<v Speaker 1>out of five stars on over twenty five thousand reviews.

0:30:59.497 --> 0:31:02.737
<v Speaker 1>Go right now see for yourself silencershop dot com. Again.

0:31:02.777 --> 0:31:06.217
<v Speaker 1>That's silencershop dot com. We'll be right back with more.

0:31:06.337 --> 0:31:13.097
<v Speaker 1>Hold the line. Victory Day is one of the most

0:31:13.097 --> 0:31:17.057
<v Speaker 1>important national holidays in Russia. Every May nine, the Russian

0:31:17.057 --> 0:31:19.697
<v Speaker 1>people celebrate the anniversary of the Soviet Union's defeat of

0:31:19.777 --> 0:31:23.657
<v Speaker 1>Nazi Germany in nineteen forty five with a military parade

0:31:23.857 --> 0:31:26.537
<v Speaker 1>right in Moscow. But this year and the day may

0:31:26.537 --> 0:31:30.337
<v Speaker 1>take on new significance. Western officials are now speculating that

0:31:30.457 --> 0:31:34.537
<v Speaker 1>Russian President Vladimir Putin may use the annual celebration to

0:31:34.577 --> 0:31:37.857
<v Speaker 1>officially declare war on the nation of Ukraine. The Department

0:31:37.897 --> 0:31:40.737
<v Speaker 1>spokesman Ned Price gave his thoughts on the reports earlier

0:31:40.737 --> 0:31:45.057
<v Speaker 1>this week. Watch I've seen the speculation that Russia may

0:31:45.097 --> 0:31:47.937
<v Speaker 1>formally declare war. I suppose I would add that would

0:31:47.937 --> 0:31:52.577
<v Speaker 1>be a great irony if Moscow used the occasion of

0:31:52.737 --> 0:31:57.857
<v Speaker 1>Victory Day to declare war, which in itself would allow

0:31:57.897 --> 0:32:01.097
<v Speaker 1>them to surge conscripts in a way they're not able

0:32:01.097 --> 0:32:04.697
<v Speaker 1>to do now, in a way that would be tantamount

0:32:04.737 --> 0:32:08.817
<v Speaker 1>to revealing to the world that their war effort is failing,

0:32:09.457 --> 0:32:13.257
<v Speaker 1>that they are floundering in their military campaign and military objectives.

0:32:14.177 --> 0:32:17.257
<v Speaker 1>So will Putin used his famous holiday to publicly declare

0:32:17.337 --> 0:32:19.857
<v Speaker 1>a war on Ukraine? Do me now to add some

0:32:19.897 --> 0:32:22.017
<v Speaker 1>more insight into it? As senior fellow at the Foundation

0:32:22.057 --> 0:32:25.737
<v Speaker 1>for Defensive Democracies, Bill Rogier, Bill, good to see again,

0:32:26.897 --> 0:32:30.257
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again, Bud always, so just walk us through this

0:32:30.337 --> 0:32:32.537
<v Speaker 1>because I think that people see this this in the

0:32:32.537 --> 0:32:36.137
<v Speaker 1>news story and the initial thought is, Okay, isn't Russia

0:32:36.137 --> 0:32:39.297
<v Speaker 1>already at war in Ukraine? So what would an official

0:32:39.457 --> 0:32:47.377
<v Speaker 1>declaration of war do? Differently, Yeah, Russia hasn't officially declared war.

0:32:47.457 --> 0:32:51.257
<v Speaker 1>It says it's a it's a military action, a special

0:32:51.297 --> 0:32:54.737
<v Speaker 1>military operation is what it's called. It. Declaring war would

0:32:54.737 --> 0:32:59.217
<v Speaker 1>allow it to mobilize the conscripts. But that's just about it.

0:32:59.257 --> 0:33:04.097
<v Speaker 1>And look, Russia is a state where if Putin decides

0:33:04.137 --> 0:33:10.097
<v Speaker 1>to mobilize the conscripts without declaring war, he's going to

0:33:10.057 --> 0:33:12.857
<v Speaker 1>do it. He doesn't need to declare war in order

0:33:12.897 --> 0:33:16.617
<v Speaker 1>to do this. I do think the speculation about May ninth.

0:33:16.617 --> 0:33:18.817
<v Speaker 1>I've been hearing about May Night for the last month,

0:33:19.657 --> 0:33:21.737
<v Speaker 1>that the Russians are going to declare victory. Now that

0:33:21.857 --> 0:33:25.297
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing they're going to declare war, there two very

0:33:25.297 --> 0:33:29.177
<v Speaker 1>contradictory things. By the way, you had a Russian spokesman

0:33:29.337 --> 0:33:32.697
<v Speaker 1>come out today and say this is absolutely untrue. We're

0:33:32.777 --> 0:33:36.737
<v Speaker 1>not going to be declaring war on May Night. And no,

0:33:36.977 --> 0:33:39.857
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean he's not lying. But you know, there's

0:33:39.857 --> 0:33:41.817
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of information out there that has been

0:33:41.897 --> 0:33:45.177
<v Speaker 1>quite speculative about this war from the very beginning, things

0:33:45.177 --> 0:33:48.337
<v Speaker 1>like the ghost to Kiev and the incident on Snake Island.

0:33:49.137 --> 0:33:51.577
<v Speaker 1>The question really, you know, we'll find out on May ninth,

0:33:51.697 --> 0:33:54.097
<v Speaker 1>but if we're going to find out whether this is

0:33:54.137 --> 0:33:57.257
<v Speaker 1>actually one of those speculative items that didn't pan out,

0:33:57.697 --> 0:34:01.577
<v Speaker 1>or whether it was actually true. You know, Forbes is

0:34:01.577 --> 0:34:05.337
<v Speaker 1>reporting that quote Russia has scaled down there May ninth

0:34:05.417 --> 0:34:08.097
<v Speaker 1>Victory Day parade by almost thirty five percent. The cuts

0:34:08.097 --> 0:34:11.177
<v Speaker 1>are so dramatic and the plan rate so humiliating that

0:34:11.257 --> 0:34:14.177
<v Speaker 1>Russia's President Vladimir Putin will let me do almost anything

0:34:14.217 --> 0:34:17.577
<v Speaker 1>to keep the world from focusing overly much upon Russia's

0:34:17.617 --> 0:34:21.377
<v Speaker 1>dwindling military prospect What do you make of that? I mean,

0:34:21.417 --> 0:34:24.417
<v Speaker 1>I see, here's here's my concern, Bill, because at various

0:34:24.457 --> 0:34:27.857
<v Speaker 1>phases here it feels like we've been through numerous news

0:34:27.897 --> 0:34:32.497
<v Speaker 1>cycles of Russia is just about to go, you know,

0:34:32.817 --> 0:34:37.257
<v Speaker 1>put in terms of their military ability in Ukraine, and

0:34:37.337 --> 0:34:40.457
<v Speaker 1>then sure enough, there's still a lot of fighting, they're

0:34:40.457 --> 0:34:43.937
<v Speaker 1>still shelling, They're still in Ukraine. So what do you

0:34:44.017 --> 0:34:47.017
<v Speaker 1>make of this analysis of the Victory Day parade and

0:34:47.297 --> 0:34:52.137
<v Speaker 1>Russia's dwindling prospects? Yeah, it makes sense to me that

0:34:52.177 --> 0:34:54.577
<v Speaker 1>the Victory A grade is going to be smaller than

0:34:54.617 --> 0:34:58.377
<v Speaker 1>it normally would. It has a significant amount of its

0:34:58.417 --> 0:35:03.897
<v Speaker 1>combat horses engaged in Ukraine right now, So Russia doesn't

0:35:03.937 --> 0:35:07.297
<v Speaker 1>have the capacity right now to hold a massive grade,

0:35:07.337 --> 0:35:11.137
<v Speaker 1>and nor should it. I mean, the focus it's military

0:35:11.417 --> 0:35:15.417
<v Speaker 1>should be fighting and winning in Ukraine and not putting

0:35:15.417 --> 0:35:19.337
<v Speaker 1>together a massive the biggest Victory Day Day parades on

0:35:19.497 --> 0:35:22.377
<v Speaker 1>May Night that it's ever had. So you know, again,

0:35:22.537 --> 0:35:24.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, you hit a key point there, Buck, We've

0:35:24.857 --> 0:35:28.177
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot of contradictory information. This is what's made

0:35:28.657 --> 0:35:31.977
<v Speaker 1>following this war so difficult. We've heard the Russian morales love,

0:35:31.977 --> 0:35:35.217
<v Speaker 1>they're running out of gas, They're you know, all of

0:35:35.257 --> 0:35:37.977
<v Speaker 1>these things, and they've run out of gas so many

0:35:38.017 --> 0:35:41.617
<v Speaker 1>times that they remain entrenched in eastern and southern Ukraine.

0:35:42.097 --> 0:35:46.657
<v Speaker 1>They're they're making small incremental gains in these areas. Um.

0:35:46.977 --> 0:35:49.697
<v Speaker 1>We don't know whether that's going to lead to victory

0:35:49.737 --> 0:35:52.577
<v Speaker 1>of defeat for the Russians. But what I don't see

0:35:52.657 --> 0:35:56.457
<v Speaker 1>is imminent collapse like we we've continually heard for the

0:35:56.497 --> 0:35:59.417
<v Speaker 1>past almost two months now. I mean, here's a map

0:35:59.497 --> 0:36:04.017
<v Speaker 1>of territories taken over by Russia in Ukraine and in

0:36:04.097 --> 0:36:07.737
<v Speaker 1>and around that the daun Boss region here, um, so

0:36:07.817 --> 0:36:12.297
<v Speaker 1>that that's currently area that is effectively under Russian control. Right,

0:36:12.377 --> 0:36:16.217
<v Speaker 1>So is there you know what I would want to

0:36:16.257 --> 0:36:17.977
<v Speaker 1>know at this point, because it seems like we can't

0:36:17.977 --> 0:36:21.097
<v Speaker 1>get a clear answer as to what Russia would find

0:36:21.137 --> 0:36:23.937
<v Speaker 1>acceptable to end the conflict. I would want to know,

0:36:24.057 --> 0:36:28.617
<v Speaker 1>given that we just had a variety of members of

0:36:28.657 --> 0:36:31.577
<v Speaker 1>Congress and Anti Pelosi was just over there and others

0:36:32.017 --> 0:36:35.937
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Zelenski, what's an acceptable end state for the

0:36:36.057 --> 0:36:39.097
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian government right now? Considering the loss of territory that's

0:36:39.097 --> 0:36:42.617
<v Speaker 1>already occurred. That's the key question that to me, it

0:36:42.697 --> 0:36:44.537
<v Speaker 1>isn't what the Russians want to end this war. The

0:36:44.577 --> 0:36:47.657
<v Speaker 1>Russians want to take significant areas of the south and

0:36:47.777 --> 0:36:49.857
<v Speaker 1>in the east. Without a doubt, I believe the Russians

0:36:49.897 --> 0:36:52.857
<v Speaker 1>would like to take over the entirety of the Ukrainian

0:36:53.297 --> 0:36:56.937
<v Speaker 1>territory on the Black Sea. That would require them to

0:36:56.977 --> 0:36:59.777
<v Speaker 1>go to a desa. But really, what would the Ukrainians

0:36:59.777 --> 0:37:02.377
<v Speaker 1>settle for? Would they Are they going to settle for

0:37:02.657 --> 0:37:09.337
<v Speaker 1>Russia conquering territory and administering Ukrainian territory probably somewhere ever

0:37:09.377 --> 0:37:11.857
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifty percent of its territory. If that happens,

0:37:12.577 --> 0:37:15.937
<v Speaker 1>you know where does this end? My concern here is, look,

0:37:15.977 --> 0:37:18.337
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainians. I think it's a small chance that the

0:37:18.417 --> 0:37:22.337
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians can drive the Russians out completely, but that seems

0:37:22.337 --> 0:37:24.937
<v Speaker 1>to be what everyone's pushing for. There's a chance that

0:37:24.977 --> 0:37:27.657
<v Speaker 1>the small chance that the Russians going to have full

0:37:27.657 --> 0:37:32.057
<v Speaker 1>military victory again, I don't think that's possible, or there's

0:37:32.057 --> 0:37:34.817
<v Speaker 1>a good chance that the fighting continues as it is

0:37:34.897 --> 0:37:38.697
<v Speaker 1>now and that is destroying the Ukrainian society. It's not

0:37:38.737 --> 0:37:43.337
<v Speaker 1>just weakening the Russians, it's destroying Ukrainian society and it

0:37:43.377 --> 0:37:46.297
<v Speaker 1>could potentially lead to the collapse of the Ukrainian state.

0:37:46.817 --> 0:37:49.697
<v Speaker 1>There needs to be some type of solution. As dis

0:37:49.737 --> 0:37:52.297
<v Speaker 1>caseful it is to everyone, there needs to be some

0:37:52.337 --> 0:37:56.577
<v Speaker 1>type of solution. And also we do risk coming up

0:37:56.617 --> 0:37:59.857
<v Speaker 1>to the precipice of a nuclear conflict as well, so

0:38:00.497 --> 0:38:02.577
<v Speaker 1>we have to be very careful about how we're acting.

0:38:02.617 --> 0:38:05.617
<v Speaker 1>I don't see this type of thought being put in

0:38:05.657 --> 0:38:08.337
<v Speaker 1>about what our next moves. Should we be talking to

0:38:08.377 --> 0:38:10.577
<v Speaker 1>the Russians. Is there a way to get the Russians

0:38:10.577 --> 0:38:12.937
<v Speaker 1>to draw back to the pre war lines. I'm not

0:38:13.017 --> 0:38:15.857
<v Speaker 1>hearing anything like that. I'm hearing on the Ukrainian side,

0:38:15.977 --> 0:38:20.017
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine victory on the Russian side, Russian annexation of significant

0:38:20.097 --> 0:38:24.577
<v Speaker 1>territory in the Southones and what about the you know,

0:38:24.817 --> 0:38:27.617
<v Speaker 1>going back now, because we're months into this conflict, right,

0:38:27.617 --> 0:38:29.217
<v Speaker 1>and Bill, we've been having you on to talk about

0:38:29.217 --> 0:38:32.817
<v Speaker 1>this and update this from the very beginning. So in

0:38:32.857 --> 0:38:35.697
<v Speaker 1>the early days, you remember all of the news coverage

0:38:36.057 --> 0:38:41.017
<v Speaker 1>of the Biden administration financial and economic moves against Russia,

0:38:41.137 --> 0:38:43.977
<v Speaker 1>and we were told in no on certain terms that

0:38:44.017 --> 0:38:47.017
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be a crushing blow to Russia's economy,

0:38:47.457 --> 0:38:49.817
<v Speaker 1>and that if we just got the we put the

0:38:49.857 --> 0:38:53.417
<v Speaker 1>swift sanctions in place, we do all these things, Russia's

0:38:53.457 --> 0:38:55.657
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost like the Russian war machine is going

0:38:55.697 --> 0:38:57.457
<v Speaker 1>to run out of gas and bullets and so they

0:38:57.457 --> 0:38:59.817
<v Speaker 1>won't have a choice. Or maybe they'll run out of

0:38:59.817 --> 0:39:01.937
<v Speaker 1>bread and milk on the shelves and the stores in Moscow,

0:39:01.977 --> 0:39:05.537
<v Speaker 1>you know, same idea. What's the reality of the economic

0:39:05.737 --> 0:39:07.057
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we want to call it warfare,

0:39:07.097 --> 0:39:10.257
<v Speaker 1>but the economic actions that were taken by you know,

0:39:10.457 --> 0:39:15.097
<v Speaker 1>the West America against Russia up to this point, they

0:39:15.097 --> 0:39:17.737
<v Speaker 1>were well over hype that was highly skeptical of them

0:39:17.777 --> 0:39:21.777
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning. There's a very interesting map that exists

0:39:21.777 --> 0:39:24.217
<v Speaker 1>out there, and it shows the countries that oppose right

0:39:24.297 --> 0:39:27.377
<v Speaker 1>that are on board with sanctioning Russia, and it really

0:39:27.417 --> 0:39:30.297
<v Speaker 1>just winds up being Europe, Japan, and the United States

0:39:30.337 --> 0:39:34.457
<v Speaker 1>and Canada. It's there's a Russia has a lot of

0:39:34.457 --> 0:39:37.977
<v Speaker 1>ability to hit other markets without a doubt. The Russians

0:39:38.017 --> 0:39:42.417
<v Speaker 1>are feeling it, you know, they've lost money. But we

0:39:42.497 --> 0:39:47.017
<v Speaker 1>should have learned with sanctions against Iraq, sanctions against Iran

0:39:47.097 --> 0:39:50.377
<v Speaker 1>and other countries that these types of things take years,

0:39:50.377 --> 0:39:54.497
<v Speaker 1>if not decades, to really have a meaningful effect, particularly

0:39:54.817 --> 0:39:58.097
<v Speaker 1>when the country being sanctioned is committed and Russia can

0:39:58.137 --> 0:40:01.577
<v Speaker 1>do things like build its own weapons, manufactured its own ammunition,

0:40:01.817 --> 0:40:04.417
<v Speaker 1>It grows its own food, it produces its own energy.

0:40:04.857 --> 0:40:07.777
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the IT companies sanctions make those things difficult and

0:40:07.857 --> 0:40:11.737
<v Speaker 1>more passely. But if the Putin and Russia's determined to

0:40:11.777 --> 0:40:14.977
<v Speaker 1>continue this war, the sanctions will happen to only have

0:40:15.057 --> 0:40:19.017
<v Speaker 1>a marginal effect. It's a lesson. We keep learning about

0:40:19.017 --> 0:40:21.177
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy over and over again. It team is kind

0:40:21.177 --> 0:40:24.017
<v Speaker 1>of like the UN Security Council, not exactly good at

0:40:24.017 --> 0:40:29.417
<v Speaker 1>providing security. Thanks so much to thank you. Keep learning

0:40:29.417 --> 0:40:32.417
<v Speaker 1>that one. Too good to see you. The head of

0:40:32.457 --> 0:40:35.617
<v Speaker 1>the American Federation of Teachers, Randy Weingarten, is speaking out

0:40:35.657 --> 0:40:39.377
<v Speaker 1>about a growing mental health crisis among America's students. How

0:40:39.497 --> 0:40:42.857
<v Speaker 1>that happened? The whole crisis? Oh that's right, Randy Weinarten

0:40:42.937 --> 0:40:45.217
<v Speaker 1>made sure the schools shut down because she's the commissar

0:40:45.297 --> 0:40:47.577
<v Speaker 1>for the teachers unions and the Democratic Party. We'll talk

0:40:47.617 --> 0:40:55.937
<v Speaker 1>about this and quick hits stay with us. The head

0:40:55.977 --> 0:40:58.857
<v Speaker 1>of the American Federation of teachers takes gas lighting to

0:40:58.897 --> 0:41:02.657
<v Speaker 1>a new level, and doctor Deborah Burkes has spreading misinformation

0:41:02.737 --> 0:41:05.977
<v Speaker 1>of her own out there or disinformation smething got stories

0:41:05.977 --> 0:41:08.857
<v Speaker 1>on quick Hits. Let's get into it. As you know,

0:41:09.057 --> 0:41:12.537
<v Speaker 1>I call her the Education Commissar because she is a

0:41:13.977 --> 0:41:18.257
<v Speaker 1>Marxist community organizer radical, pretending to be concerned with the

0:41:18.297 --> 0:41:21.097
<v Speaker 1>interests of children, when really all she's concerned with are

0:41:21.217 --> 0:41:25.297
<v Speaker 1>the interests of the socialist Democrats who she represents, and

0:41:25.577 --> 0:41:28.057
<v Speaker 1>that she wields power in the name of for the

0:41:28.097 --> 0:41:30.577
<v Speaker 1>teachers unions. That's what this all is. Teachers unions are

0:41:30.577 --> 0:41:34.097
<v Speaker 1>a huge source of funding for the Democrat Party, and

0:41:34.177 --> 0:41:39.577
<v Speaker 1>the teachers unions, as you know, are also always always

0:41:39.617 --> 0:41:44.577
<v Speaker 1>supportive of Democrats in a just a monolithic fashion. So

0:41:44.857 --> 0:41:47.657
<v Speaker 1>it's particularly rich when you have Randy Weingarten, who is

0:41:47.657 --> 0:41:49.857
<v Speaker 1>responsible for so much of the misery our children have

0:41:49.897 --> 0:41:53.537
<v Speaker 1>gone through, telling everybody that our kids are in crisis

0:41:53.577 --> 0:41:57.977
<v Speaker 1>because of the shutdown for schooling or two years of schooling,

0:41:58.257 --> 0:42:01.497
<v Speaker 1>that she demanded on behalf of the teachers unions and

0:42:01.577 --> 0:42:05.217
<v Speaker 1>work with the White House to get watch. Our kids

0:42:05.617 --> 0:42:11.937
<v Speaker 1>are in crisis, and we had a mental health crisis

0:42:11.937 --> 0:42:16.177
<v Speaker 1>before COVID but with and doctor Ang, we'll talk about

0:42:16.217 --> 0:42:19.257
<v Speaker 1>this far better than I do. But within but for

0:42:19.337 --> 0:42:23.577
<v Speaker 1>two years of disruption, two years of looking at the screens,

0:42:24.257 --> 0:42:28.337
<v Speaker 1>two years of not having a normal kind of routine

0:42:28.417 --> 0:42:36.937
<v Speaker 1>and rhythm recovery is really tough. Yeah, she doesn't care.

0:42:38.057 --> 0:42:40.537
<v Speaker 1>He just doesn't care, not really, because she would have

0:42:40.577 --> 0:42:42.177
<v Speaker 1>cared when schools were shut down and people like me

0:42:42.217 --> 0:42:43.937
<v Speaker 1>were saying why they shut down? Kids aren't at risk.

0:42:45.457 --> 0:42:49.337
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Burke's another person who got it very very wrong

0:42:49.457 --> 0:42:53.897
<v Speaker 1>on COVID. Seems to think that the elderly are susceptible

0:42:53.897 --> 0:42:58.817
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. Yeah, that's true, as children are susceptible to COVID.

0:42:58.977 --> 0:43:03.057
<v Speaker 1>No wrong? Has she been asleep for like the last

0:43:03.097 --> 0:43:08.097
<v Speaker 1>two years? Watch? How do you judge risk? I have

0:43:08.137 --> 0:43:10.497
<v Speaker 1>to judge it every day because, like you, I have

0:43:10.617 --> 0:43:13.657
<v Speaker 1>children under five, unvaccinated grandchildren, and I have a ninety

0:43:13.657 --> 0:43:15.457
<v Speaker 1>three year old that lives is in our house. So

0:43:15.697 --> 0:43:17.977
<v Speaker 1>I have to constantly be aware of my risk. Yet

0:43:18.017 --> 0:43:20.017
<v Speaker 1>I have to work, and I think that's just what

0:43:20.057 --> 0:43:22.337
<v Speaker 1>we need to do. If you have vulnerable people in

0:43:22.417 --> 0:43:26.337
<v Speaker 1>your household, whether it's children or elderly, you have to

0:43:26.377 --> 0:43:33.337
<v Speaker 1>continually access your risk. Children are not at risk from COVID?

0:43:33.857 --> 0:43:35.977
<v Speaker 1>What is wrong? The reason there's not a vaccine for

0:43:36.017 --> 0:43:38.137
<v Speaker 1>children under five is because in the clinical trials they

0:43:38.137 --> 0:43:41.497
<v Speaker 1>couldn't actually show any material benefit worth making kids get

0:43:41.497 --> 0:43:43.217
<v Speaker 1>the shot in the first place in that age group.

0:43:45.857 --> 0:43:50.457
<v Speaker 1>And then of course there's Bill Gates jugment him yesterday,

0:43:51.617 --> 0:43:55.177
<v Speaker 1>the walking pregnant man emoji. According to Elon Musk, Bill

0:43:55.257 --> 0:44:00.057
<v Speaker 1>Gates assures us that Trevor assures us that COVID nineteen

0:44:00.097 --> 0:44:03.497
<v Speaker 1>came from bats. Watch how do we prevent something where

0:44:03.497 --> 0:44:06.017
<v Speaker 1>we don't even understand how it came to be, Like,

0:44:06.497 --> 0:44:08.057
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the labs where they need to do

0:44:08.097 --> 0:44:10.417
<v Speaker 1>better at at you know, in closing the work that

0:44:10.417 --> 0:44:11.897
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. I understand that they have to do the work.

0:44:11.937 --> 0:44:13.697
<v Speaker 1>But how do we figure that out and how do

0:44:13.737 --> 0:44:16.577
<v Speaker 1>we move forward in that realm where we should we

0:44:16.617 --> 0:44:20.297
<v Speaker 1>be careful about lab safety. It's quite clear in this

0:44:20.337 --> 0:44:23.817
<v Speaker 1>case that it came across through animals, and almost all

0:44:23.817 --> 0:44:28.417
<v Speaker 1>our diseases like hid crossed over from chimpanzees in Africa

0:44:28.857 --> 0:44:32.937
<v Speaker 1>quite some time ago, a bullet came from bats. This also,

0:44:33.897 --> 0:44:38.617
<v Speaker 1>with one step in between, came from bats. It's actually

0:44:38.617 --> 0:44:40.937
<v Speaker 1>not clear that that's the case but who cares Bill

0:44:40.977 --> 0:44:44.017
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates is full of a lot of you know what?

0:44:44.577 --> 0:44:46.537
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody that's efferent that I to hold the line.

0:44:46.537 --> 0:44:57.617
<v Speaker 1>The No Spin News with Bill o'relly is next Shills High.

0:45:05.057 --> 0:45:07.777
<v Speaker 1>Each morning, the President of the United States receives a

0:45:07.857 --> 0:45:11.337
<v Speaker 1>highly classified briefing on the most important issues facing the country.

0:45:11.657 --> 0:45:15.257
<v Speaker 1>It's called the President's Daily Brief, or PDB. It's delivered

0:45:15.257 --> 0:45:18.337
<v Speaker 1>by America's spies and analysts. Well, now you can hear

0:45:18.417 --> 0:45:21.457
<v Speaker 1>your very own PDB in the form of a podcast

0:45:21.537 --> 0:45:25.577
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me Brian Dean Wright, a former CIA operations officer.

0:45:25.937 --> 0:45:28.617
<v Speaker 1>Each morning at six am Eastern, I'll bring you fifteen

0:45:28.697 --> 0:45:31.337
<v Speaker 1>to twenty minutes of the most important issues facing the country,

0:45:31.657 --> 0:45:35.057
<v Speaker 1>giving you the critical intelligence and analysis you need to

0:45:35.097 --> 0:45:36.217
<v Speaker 1>start your morning.